13.07.2013 Views

Assembling The Project Compendium - Computing Technical ...

Assembling The Project Compendium - Computing Technical ...

Assembling The Project Compendium - Computing Technical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Another study suggests that often PMs rely on socialisation of explicit knowledge to avoid<br />

the effort involved in extracting knowledge which is sometimes stored in a disorderly<br />

fashion, too much, too little, difficult to analyse or take in (Henry et al., 2007). <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

research was explicitly related to PMs and included a wide sample size. Sense (2008; 2007a;<br />

2007b), an author of many articles on the subject of learning within project teams shares a<br />

similar view to that advocated by Fernie et al, (2003) that is personalisation, for example<br />

project team meetings are required for effective knowledge sharing. <strong>The</strong> way in which<br />

knowledge is transferred affects how knowledge is learned by project teams. Sense‟s (2008)<br />

view about the importance of personalisation for knowledge sharing was not supported by<br />

any primary research, although it was supported by many secondary literature sources.<br />

Knowledge sharing is a heavily documented topic under the knowledge management<br />

umbrella. Knowledge sharing is defined as the activity of transferring knowledge from one<br />

person to another or to group or to an organisation according to Nonaka and Takeuchi<br />

cited in Lee (Lee, 2001). Effective knowledge transfer within projects can help projects to<br />

quickly achieve their objectives (Jackson and Klobas, 2008). Knowledge sharing highly<br />

depends on an individual‟s willingness to share knowledge (Ajmal and Koskinen, 2008; Raghu<br />

and Vinze, 2007). One study found that financial reward and status do not influence<br />

people‟s propensity to share knowledge, rather people are motivated to share knowledge if<br />

they believe it would help team success, feel that they are expected to do so and believe<br />

sharing is valued. <strong>The</strong> limitation to these finding is that the sample group was culturally<br />

mixed (Jewels, 2006). Culture is believed to have a large influence on one‟s propensity to<br />

share knowledge (Lee, 2001). Lee (2001) and Jewels (2006) do not believe that culture<br />

impacted their results however with such a small sample size such a statement is difficult to<br />

validate.<br />

Knowledge management and knowledge sharing appear to be supported by technology in<br />

most circumstances (Jackson and Klobas, 2008; Jewels, 2006; Liebowitz and Megbolugbe,<br />

2003). Despite such support, technology should not solely be relied upon for effective<br />

knowledge sharing or other knowledge management activities. According to Bobbitt cited<br />

in Rubenstein- Montano et al. (2001) and Raghu Vinze (2007) the influence of culture<br />

(sociological and anthropological) on knowledge management must be taken into account.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!