Perceived Effects of International Volunteering - Center for Social ...

working with males as colleagues instead of bosses, and handling sexual advances from staff or
community members. Examples included female volunteers participating in male-dominated sports
or working in jobs typically performed by male workers. Others said that community members
found it difficult “adjusting to Western points of view of the value of the involvement of women in
decision-making roles.” Some responses were nondescript but cited some form of gender-related
tensions including “challenges of having a foreign female on the island” or “distractions to older
students at the high school as a young female Asian teacher.” While a fair number of female
volunteers reported these difficulties, no male volunteers described their gender as a specific
challenge. Likewise, no CCS alumni reported gender-related challenges.
Labor replacement contributing to local unemployment was also a concern for some volunteers.
Whether or not this perception was accurate, volunteers sometimes felt they were “taking a job away
from qualified and unemployed teachers in the community.” Volunteers received feedback that staff
members sometimes “felt their positions were being compromised” due to labor replacement
performed by the volunteer work:
The local teaching staff sometimes received fewer classes because every volunteer was required to have 5
classes. I sometimes felt that this created a negative view —like it was stealing jobs away from the local
people.
This concern was exacerbated by other potential problems such as language barriers or the delivery
of services by non-professionals:
Many of my students spoke so little English to begin with; I could barely communicate with them, a
situation I did not have the training to handle. I thus worry that I did not contribute enough to my
school to justify taking a job from a local.
The fact that volunteers were non-professionals created concern for some staff members and
volunteers. Although the vast majority believed their services were needed and valued, a small
percentage of volunteers felt they were unprepared and therefore less effective. A recent college
graduate reported, “I was young, naive and not very good at teaching—it took more effort to have
me there than it would have if I hadn’t been there.” The fact that volunteers were novice made it
difficult for them to receive full programmatic support at a local level:
The principal of my school didn't have buy-in from the local teachers for bringing a volunteer from the
States into their school, especially one who had never taught before, so it was difficult to get support
from my colleagues [at the school].
Other volunteers felt that community members perceived them as “foreign tourists” or “random
volunteers who had no formal teaching background.” Consequently, it took a while to convince
work colleagues and host community members that they could effectively deliver services.
Power differences inherent between volunteers and local staff and community members may also
have created tension in some cases. Because of their privilege, some volunteers expressed a belief
that they were treated better than local staff or community members, which occasionally resulted in
jealousy, resentment, and hostility.
C ENTER FOR S OCIAL D EVELOPMENT
W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY IN S T . L OUIS
22