14.07.2013 Views

The complete book - Cucurbit Breeding - North Carolina State ...

The complete book - Cucurbit Breeding - North Carolina State ...

The complete book - Cucurbit Breeding - North Carolina State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORGANIZING COMMITTEE<br />

Gerald J. Holmes, Chair, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

Jonathan R. Schultheis, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

Todd C. Wehner, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE & EDITORIAL BOARD<br />

Angela Davis, USDA-ARS, Lane, Oklahoma, USA<br />

Maria Luisa Gomez-Guillamon, Experiment Station ‘La Mayora’, Malaga, SPAIN<br />

Elzbieta Kozik, Research Institute of Vegetable Crops, Skierniewice, POLAND<br />

Ales Lebeda, Palacky University, Olomouc, CZECH REPUBLIC<br />

Donald Maynard, University of Florida, Bradenton, Florida, USA<br />

James McCreight, USDA-ARS, Salinas, California, USA<br />

Ray Martyn, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA<br />

Harry Paris, Newe Ya’ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, ISRAEL<br />

Gordon Rogers, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA<br />

Michel Pitrat, INRA, Montfavet cedex, FRANCE<br />

Susan Webb, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA<br />

Xingping Zhang, Syngenta Seeds, Woodland, California, USA<br />

SPONSORS<br />

Diamond Silver<br />

Helena Chemical Bayer CropScience<br />

Seminis Vegetable Seed Cerexagri-Nissco<br />

Syngenta Chemtura Corporation<br />

Dow AgroSciences<br />

Hendrix and Dail, Inc.<br />

Hollar Seeds<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of<br />

Agriculture and Consumer Services<br />

Valent BioSciences<br />

Willhite Seed Inc.<br />

Gold Bronze<br />

Abbott & Cobb, Inc. Addis Cates Company, Inc.<br />

DuPont Clifton Seed Company<br />

Harris Moran FMC Corporation<br />

Mt. Olive Pickle Company Nat’l Watermelon Promotion Board<br />

Nunhems <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Watermelon Assoc.<br />

Sakata Seed USA <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Pickle Producers<br />

Association<br />

ORO Agri<br />

Pickle Packers International, Inc.<br />

Rupp Seeds, Inc.<br />

UAP <strong>Carolina</strong>s<br />

Xenacom


PREFACE<br />

n behalf of the organizing committee of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006, I<br />

welcome you to Asheville, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> for the 9 th O<br />

biennial<br />

gathering of cucurbitologists. This tradition began in 1989<br />

with Claude Thomas hosting the first conference in South <strong>Carolina</strong>,<br />

U.S.A. Poland hosted the meeting in 1992. Since then the conference<br />

has alternated between countries on both sides of the Atlantic in evennumbered<br />

years: Texas (1994), Spain (1996), California (1998), Israel<br />

(2000), Florida (2002), and the Czech Republic (2004). We are<br />

pleased to continue this rich tradition by hosting <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

in the mountains of western <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> at the lovely Grove Park<br />

Inn, Resort and Spa in Asheville.<br />

Many people have contributed to the planning and execution of<br />

this conference. I am especially grateful to the organizing committee<br />

for assistance in planning all aspects of the conference and to the<br />

scientific committee for their prompt and careful editing of these<br />

proceedings. <strong>The</strong>se committees are also responsible for selecting the<br />

three recipients of the Lifetime Achievement Award for outstanding<br />

contributions to the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 awardees<br />

are Harry Paris (breeding and genetics), Michel Pitrat (plant<br />

pathology) and Donald Maynard (crop production). Special thanks to<br />

Jane Dove Long of the Plant Pathology Department at NC <strong>State</strong><br />

University for her tireless efforts and attention to detail in coordinating<br />

and executing the endless tasks, big and small, that make a conference<br />

successful.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se proceedings contain 81 contributed papers from 236<br />

authors in 12 countries and 16 states within the U.S.A. and span the<br />

areas of research typical of any major horticultural crop. Special<br />

thanks go to Carolyn Currie for editing each manuscript,<br />

communicating with authors all over the world and especially for<br />

formatting the final document for printing.<br />

Lastly, I want to recognize the gracious support of our<br />

sponsors. Without their contributions, the cost of this conference<br />

would be much higher for every participant. Please take a moment to<br />

thank them for their generous support.<br />

On behalf of the Organizing Committee, we welcome you to<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 and look forward to a lively exchange of new<br />

ideas and discoveries in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae.<br />

GERALD J. HOLMES, CHAIR<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 Organizing Committee


Adkins, S. ............................. 309<br />

Akashi, Y. .................... 317, 372<br />

Alarcón, A. L. ...................... 146<br />

Álvarez, J. M. ....................... 146<br />

Ando, K. ............................... 347<br />

Andres, T. C. ................ 326, 333<br />

Aranda, M. ................... 180, 186<br />

Arús, P. .........146, 180, 186, 553<br />

Azulay, Y. .............................. 31<br />

Babadoost, M. ...................... 507<br />

Baker, C. A. ......................... 309<br />

Bar, E. .................................... 31<br />

Bascur, G. .............................. 65<br />

Becker, J. O. ......................... 395<br />

Becker, J. S. ......................... 395<br />

Bendahmane, A. ..................... 89<br />

Benyamini, Y. ........................ 31<br />

Besombes, D. ......................... 89<br />

Blanca, J. ...................... 180, 186<br />

Boualem, A. ........................... 89<br />

Bruton, B. ............................. 277<br />

Buckley, R. .......................... 539<br />

Burger, Y. .............................. 31<br />

Bustamente, R. ..................... 333<br />

Caboche, M. ........................... 89<br />

Caño, A. ............................... 180<br />

Cantliffe, D. J. ...................... 483<br />

Cavanagh, A. ........................ 232<br />

Chen, Q-J. ............................ 220<br />

Chou, T. T. ........................... 317<br />

Chung, S. M. ........................ 197<br />

Collins, J. K.<br />

...............545, 578, 585, 591, 597<br />

Colucci, S. J. ........................ 403<br />

Cortright, B. ......................... 427<br />

Cothran, A. ........................... 286<br />

Cowgill, W. .......................... 539<br />

Crosby, K. .........23, 70, 153, 165<br />

Cui, C. .................................. 133<br />

Dalmais, M. ............................ 89<br />

Dane, F. ............................ 48, 78<br />

Datnoff, L. E. ......................... 43<br />

Daunay, M.-C. ............. 235, 363<br />

Davis, A. .......125, 258, 412, 545<br />

Deleu, W. ............................. 180<br />

AUTHOR INDEX<br />

DeNicco, A. ........................... 301<br />

Dittmar, P. J. .......................... 241<br />

Dogimont, C. ............................ 89<br />

Dolan, K. ................................ 585<br />

Du, D. ..................................... 301<br />

Eduardo, I. ............................. 553<br />

Eubanks, M. D. .............. 146, 492<br />

Fergany, M. .............................. 89<br />

Fernández-Trujillo, J. P. . 146, 553<br />

Fish, W. ...................... 1, 277, 545<br />

Fujita, M. ................................. 14<br />

Fukino, N. ................................ 95<br />

Fukunaga, K. .......................... 372<br />

Gajdová, J. ................................. 9<br />

Gałecka, T. ................................515<br />

García-Mas, J. ................ 180, 186<br />

Garrido, D. ............................. 171<br />

Garza-Ortega, S. .................... 560<br />

Gasmanová, N. ......................... 51<br />

Gevens, A. J. .......................... 427<br />

Giovinazzo, N. ......................... 89<br />

Glala, A. ................................. 158<br />

Gómez, P. ............................... 171<br />

Gómez-Guillamón, M. L. 100, 108<br />

Gong, G. ......................... 133, 212<br />

González, D. .................. 180, 186<br />

González, M. .................. 180, 186<br />

González, V. .......................... 180<br />

González-Román, M. ............. 206<br />

Grajeda-García, L. F. ............. 560<br />

Grumet, R. ....................... 39, 387<br />

Guner, N. ............................... 468<br />

Guo, S. ................................... 212<br />

Haider, M. S. .......................... 527<br />

Hammar, S. .............................. 39<br />

Harp, T. L. ............................. 421<br />

Hassell, R. L. .......................... 591<br />

Hausbeck, M. K. .................... 427<br />

Hazzard, R. ............................ 232<br />

He, N. ..................................... 296<br />

Heckman, J. R. ....................... 539<br />

Henninger, M. R. ........... 116, 539<br />

Heredia, A. ............................. 108<br />

Hernandez, A. ........................ 125


Hofer, D. ...............................395<br />

Holmes, G. J. ........................403<br />

Holmstrom, K. E. ..................539<br />

Hopkins, D. L. ......................436<br />

Hossain, M. D. ........................14<br />

Huber, D. J. ...........................578<br />

Ibdah, M. ................................31<br />

Infante-Casella, M. L. ...116, 539<br />

Jamilena, M. .........................171<br />

Janick, J. .......341, 349, 358, 363<br />

Jester, B. ...............................591<br />

Jett, L. W. .............................249<br />

Jifon, J. ...................................23<br />

Jullian, E. ..............................358<br />

Kato, K. ........................317, 372<br />

Katzir, N. ........................31, 125<br />

Khaing, M. T. ...............317, 372<br />

King, S. .........................125, 258<br />

Kline, W. L. ..........................539<br />

Kołakowska, G. .......................515<br />

Korzeniewska, A. ....................515<br />

Kozik, E. U. .............................121<br />

Kuhn, P. J. ............................421<br />

Kunihisa, M. ...........................95<br />

Larkov, O. ...............................31<br />

Lebeda, A. ..........9, 51, 444, 453<br />

Leskovar, D. .....................23, 70<br />

Lester, Gene E. .......................70<br />

Levi, A. .........125, 380, 412, 468<br />

Lewinsohn, E. .........................31<br />

Li, H. .....................................133<br />

Li, Y. .....................................133<br />

Ling, K-S. .............................468<br />

Little, H. A. .............................39<br />

Liu, H-Y. ..............................139<br />

Liu, J. ......................................78<br />

López-Sesé, A. I. ..................100<br />

Loy, J. B. ..............................568<br />

Luo, F. ..................................272<br />

Maness, N. ....................578, 597<br />

Mao, A. .........................220, 225<br />

Martínez, J. A. ..............146, 553<br />

Marzec, L. ................................515<br />

Matsumoto, S. .........................95<br />

Maynard, D. N. .....................591<br />

McCreight, J. D. ...................139<br />

McGrath, M. T. ...................... 473<br />

Miller, M. ................................. 23<br />

Miranda, C. ............................ 553<br />

Mitchell, J. M. ........................... 483<br />

Monforte, A. ...........146, 180, 553<br />

Monks, D. W. ........................ 241<br />

Morton, H. V. ........................ 395<br />

Murphy, J. F. ......................... 492<br />

Napier, A. B. .......................... 153<br />

Navrátilová, B. ..................... 9, 51<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. .......... 515<br />

Nishida, H. ......................317, 372<br />

Nitzsche, P. J. ........................ 539<br />

Nuez, F. ..........................180, 186<br />

Obando, J. .......................146, 553<br />

Ohara, T. ...........................95, 193<br />

Olson, S. ................................ 591<br />

Omran, S. ............................... 158<br />

Özdemir, Z. ............................ 498<br />

Paris, H. S. ......341, 349, 358, 363<br />

Park, S. O. .......................153, 165<br />

Pavon, C. ............................... 507<br />

Payán, M. C. .......................... 171<br />

Peñaranda, A. ......................... 171<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P.<br />

.................545, 578, 585, 591, 597<br />

Picó, B. ...........................180, 186<br />

Piskurewicz, U. ......................... 515<br />

Pitrat, M. ...........................89, 412<br />

Pompan-Lotan, M. ................... 31<br />

Portnoy, V. ........................31, 135<br />

Puigdomènech, P. ............180, 186<br />

Rajab, M. ................................. 89<br />

Ravid, U. .................................. 31<br />

Robbins, M. D. ...................... 197<br />

Roberts, W. .....................277, 597<br />

Robles, A. .............................. 180<br />

Roig, C. ...........................180, 186<br />

Rosales, R. ............................. 171<br />

Sakata, Y. ..........................95, 193<br />

Samulis, R. J. ......................... 539<br />

Sánchez-Estrada, A. ............... 560<br />

Sargent, S. A. ......................... 483<br />

Sarria, E. .........................100, 108<br />

Schaffer, A. A. ......................... 31<br />

Schultheis, J. R. ......241, 265, 591


Sedláková, B. ......................... 444<br />

Si, Y. ........................................ 48<br />

Siddiq, M. .............................. 585<br />

Skálová, D. ............................... 51<br />

Śmiech, M. ................................ 515<br />

Smith, M. ............................... 301<br />

Staub, J. E. ............................. 197<br />

Stephenson, A. G. .................. 301<br />

Stoffella, P. J. ......................... 483<br />

Sugiyama, K. .......................... 158<br />

Sugiyama, M. ......................... 193<br />

Sun, X. ................................... 272<br />

Sun, Z. .................................... 197<br />

Sztangret-Wiśniewska, J. ......... 515<br />

Tadmor, Y. ............... 31, 125, 545<br />

Tahir, M. ................................ 527<br />

Tanaka, K. ...................... 317, 372<br />

Taylor, M. .............................. 277<br />

Tetteh, A. ............................... 412<br />

Thies, J. A. ............................. 380<br />

Thimmapuram, J. ................... 125<br />

Thompson, C. M. ................... 146<br />

Tietjen, W. H. ........................ 539<br />

Tirpak, S. ............................... 539<br />

Tory, D. R. ............................... 42<br />

Trebitsh, T. ............................. 125<br />

Troadec, C. ............................... 89<br />

Troncoso-Rojas, R. ................ 560<br />

Turíni, T. A. ........................... 139<br />

Tzuri, G. ................................... 31<br />

Ugás, R. ................................. 333<br />

Urban, J. ................................. 453<br />

van der Knaap, E. ................... 146<br />

Wang, Y. .......................... 20, 225<br />

Wargo, J. ................................ 286<br />

Webb, S. E. ............................ 309<br />

Webber, III, C. ....................... 545<br />

Wechter, W. P. ....................... 125<br />

Wehner, T. C. . 121, 403, 412, 468<br />

Wenge, L. ............................... 296<br />

Wessel-Beaver, L. .................. 206<br />

Whipkey, A. ........................... 348<br />

Widrlechner, M. P. ................. 453<br />

Wien, H. C. .............................. 60<br />

Winsor, J. A. .......................... 301<br />

Wyenandt, C. A. .... 116, 534, 539<br />

Xu, Y. ............................. 212, 225<br />

Yan, Z. ................................... 296<br />

Yariv, Y. .................................. 31<br />

Yi, S. S. .................................. 317<br />

Yuste-Lisbona, F. J. ............... 100<br />

Zhang, F. ........................ 220, 225<br />

Zhang, H-Y. ... 133, 212, 220, 225<br />

Zhao, S. .................................... 96<br />

Zitter, T. A. ...................... 60, 498


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Biotechnology and Physiology<br />

SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF WATERMELON<br />

LYCOPENE EXTRACTED INTO AQUEOUS SODIUM DODECYL<br />

SULFATE<br />

Wayne W. Fish and Angela R. Davis ..........................................................................1<br />

PROTOPLAST FUSION IN GENUS CUCUMIS<br />

J. Gajdová, B. Navrátilová, and A. Lebeda .................................................................9<br />

EXPRESSION PROPERTIES OF THREE TAU-TYPE PUMPKIN<br />

GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASES IN BACTERIA AND A SEARCH FOR<br />

THEIR INTRINSIC INHIBITORS<br />

M. D. Hossain and Masayuki Fujita ..........................................................................14<br />

PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAFTED MUSKMELON<br />

GROWN IN MONOSPORASCUS CANNONBALLUS-INFESTED SOIL IN<br />

SOUTH TEXAS<br />

John Jifon, Kevin Crosby, Marvin Miller, and Daniel Leskovar...............................23<br />

FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF GENES INVOLVED IN THE FORMATION<br />

OF MELON AROMA<br />

Nurit Katzir, Vitaly Portnoy, Yael Benyamini, Yoela Yariv, Galil Tzuri, Maya<br />

Pompan-Lotan, Olga Larkov, Einat Bar, Mwafaq Ibdah, Yaniv Azulay, Uzi Ravid,<br />

Yosef Burger, Arthur A. Schaffer, Yaakov Tadmor, and Efraim Lewinsohn ...........31<br />

STUDIES OF TRANSGENIC MELON EXPRESSING THE MUTANT<br />

ETHYLENE RECEPTOR, ETR1-1, INDICATE THAT ETHYLENE<br />

PERCEPTION BY STAMEN PRIMORDIA IS REQUIRED FOR CARPEL<br />

DEVELOPMENT IN MELON FLOWERS<br />

H. A. Little, S. Hammar, and R. Grumet ...................................................................39<br />

DROUGHT-INDUCED GENE EXPRESSION IN ROOTS OF CITRULLUS<br />

COLOCYNTHIS<br />

Ying Si and Fenny Dane ...........................................................................................48<br />

EMBRYO CULTURE AS A TOOL FOR INTERSPECIFIC<br />

HYBRIDIZATION OF CUCUMIS SATIVUS AND WILD CUCUMIS SPP.<br />

D. Skálová, B. Navrátilová, A. Lebeda, and N. Gasmanová .....................................51<br />

INIATIATING SUDDEN WILT DISORDER IN MUSKMELON WITH LOW-<br />

LIGHT STRESS<br />

H. C. Wien and T. A. Zitter .......................................................................................60


<strong>Breeding</strong> and Genetics<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED CULTIVARS OF ZUCCHINI SQUASH<br />

AND SWEETPOTATO SQUASH STARTING FROM CHILEAN<br />

LANDRACES<br />

Gabriel Bascur . .........................................................................................................65<br />

GENETIC VARIATION FOR BENEFICIAL PHYTOCHEMICAL LEVELS<br />

IN MELONS (CUCUMIS MELO L.)<br />

Kevin M. Crosby, Gene E. Lester, and Daniel I. Leskovar........................................70<br />

PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND EVOLUTION OF WILD AND CULTIVATED<br />

WATERMELON<br />

Fenny Dane and Jiarong Liu ......................................................................................78<br />

FINE GENETICAL AND PHYSICAL MAPPING OF THE GENES A AND G<br />

CONTROLLING SEX DETERMINATION IN MELON<br />

M. Fergany, C. Troadec, M. Rajab, A. Boualem, M. Dalmais, M. Caboche, A.<br />

Bendahmane, D. Besombes, N. Giovinazzo, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat.................89<br />

QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS ANALYSIS OF POWDERY MILDEW<br />

RESISTANCE AGAINST TWO STRAINS OF PODOSPHAERA XANTHII IN<br />

THE MELON LINE ‘PMAR NO. 5’<br />

N. Fukino, T. Ohara, Y. Sakata, M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto.............................95<br />

LINKAGE ANALYSIS AMONG RESISTANCES TO POWDERY MILDEW<br />

AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION BY APHIS GOSSYPII GLOVER IN MELON<br />

LINE ‘TGR-1551’<br />

M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, A. I. López-Sesé, E. Sarria, and F. J. Yuste-Lisbona<br />

.................................................................................................................................100<br />

EPICUTICULAR WAX MORPHOLOGY AND TRICHOME TYPES IN<br />

RELATION TO HOST PLANT SELECTION BY APHIS GOSSYPII IN<br />

MELONS<br />

M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, A. Heredia, and E. Sarria................................................108<br />

EVALUATION OF ZUCCHINI AND STRAIGHTNECK SUMMER SQUASH<br />

BREEDING LINES AND VARIETIES FOR POWDERY MILDEW AND<br />

DOWNY MILDEW TOLERANCE<br />

M. L. Infante-Casella, C. A. Wyenandt, and M. R. Henninger................................116<br />

INHERITANCE OF CHILLING RESISTANCE IN CUCUMBER SEEDLINGS<br />

Elzbieta U. Kozik and Todd C. Wehner ..................................................................121<br />

GENES EXPRESSED DURING DEVELOPMENT AND RIPENING OF<br />

WATERMELON FRUIT<br />

A. Levi, W. P. Wechter, A. Davis, A. Hernandez, J. Thimmapuram, T. Trebitsh, Y.<br />

Tadmor, N. Katzir, V. Portnoy, and S. King............................................................125


RESEARCH OF MOLECULAR MARKERS LINKED TO THE DWARF<br />

GENE IN SQUASH<br />

Haizhen Li, Haiying Zhang, Guoyi Gong, Yunlong Li, and Chongshi Cui.............133<br />

REACTION OF MELON PI 313970 TO CUCURBIT LEAF CRUMPLE VIRUS<br />

James D. McCreight, Hsing-Yeh Liu, and Thomas A. Turini .................................139<br />

THE MELON GENOMIC LIBRARY OF NEAR ISOGENIC LINES: A TOOL<br />

FOR DISSECTING COMPLEX TRAITS<br />

Antonio José Monforte, Iban Eduardo, Pere Arús, Juan Pablo Fernández-Trujillo,<br />

Javier Obando, Juan Antonio Martínez, Antonio Luís Alarcón, Esther van der Knaap,<br />

and Jose María Álvarez ...........................................................................................146<br />

MOLECULAR MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH QUANTITATIVE<br />

CONTROL OF BETA-CAROTENE SYNTHESIS IN CUCUMIS MELO L.<br />

A. B. Napier, S. O. Park, and K. M. Crosby............................................................153<br />

A NEW EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR PRODUCING SEEDLESS<br />

WATERMELON FRUITS FROM SOME DIPLOID CULTIVARS<br />

S. Omran, K. Sugiyama, A. Glala............................................................................158<br />

QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI FOR SUCROSE PERCENTAGE OF<br />

TOTAL SUGARS IN MELON CROSSES UNDER GREENHOUSE<br />

AND FIELD ENVIRONMENTS<br />

Soon O. Park and Kevin M. Crosby ........................................................................165<br />

ETHYLENE MEDIATES THE INDUCTION OF FRUITS WITH ATTACHED<br />

FLOWER IN ZUCCHINI SQUASH<br />

M. C. Payán, A. Peñaranda, R. Rosales, D. Garrido, P. Gómez, and M. Jamilena<br />

.................................................................................................................................171<br />

THE MELOGEN PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC TOOLS IN<br />

MELON<br />

Pere Puigdomènech, Ana Caño, Víctor González, Pere Arús, Wim Deleu, Jordi<br />

Garcia-Mas, Mireia González, Antonio Monforte, José Blanca, Fernando Nuez,<br />

Belén Picó, Cristina Roig, Miguel Aranda, Daniel González, and Antonio Robles<br />

................................................................................................................................180<br />

THE MELOGEN PROJECT: EST SEQUENCING, PROCESSING AND<br />

ANALYSIS<br />

Pere Puigdomènech, Pere Arús, Jordi Garcia-Mas, Mireia González, Fernando Nuez,<br />

José Blanca, Belén Picó, Cristina Roig, Miguel Aranda, and Daniel González<br />

.................................................................................................................................186<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF A POWDERY MILDEW-RESISTANT CUCUMBER<br />

Yoshiteru Sakata, Mitsuhiro Sugiyama and Takayoshi Ohara ...............................193<br />

HISTORY AND APPLICATION OF MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR<br />

CUCUMBER IMPROVEMENT<br />

J.E. Staub, M.D. Robbins, S.M. Chung, and Z. Sun ...............................................197


SILVERLEAF WHITEFLY AFFECTS LEAF MOTTLING IN CUCURBITA<br />

MOSCHATA DUCHESNE<br />

Linda Wessel-Beaver and Moisés González-Román ..............................................206<br />

QTL ANALYSIS OF SOLUBLE SOLIDS CONTENT IN WATERMELON<br />

UNDER DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS<br />

Yong Xu, Shaogui Guo, Haiying Zhang, and Guoyi Gong ....................................212<br />

MAPPING AND QTL ANALYSIS CONCERNING TOLERANCE TOWARD<br />

POOR LIGHT IN CUCUMBER<br />

(CUCUMIS SATIVUS L.)<br />

Yong-Jian Wang, Hai-Ying Zhang, Qing-Jun Chen,<br />

Feng Zhang, and Ai-Jun Mao .................................................................................220<br />

CONSTRUCTION OF A GENETIC MAP OF CUCUMBER USING RAPDS,<br />

SSRS, AFLPS AND MAPPING RESISTANCE GENES TO PAPAYA<br />

RINGSPOT, ZUCCHINI YELLOW MOSAIC, AND WATERMELON MOSAIC<br />

VIRUSES<br />

Haiying Zhang, Aijun Mao, Feng Zhang, Yong Xu and Yongjian Wang ...............225<br />

Crop Production<br />

PERIMETER TRAP CROP SYSTEMS USING BLUE HUBBARD SQUASH<br />

AS A CONTROL FOR STRIPED CUCUMBER BEETLE IN BUTTERNUT<br />

SQUASH<br />

Andrew Cavanagh and Ruth Hazzard ......................................................... 232<br />

CHARACTERIZATION OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE<br />

WATERMELON POLLENIZERS<br />

Peter J. Dittmar, Jonathan R. Schultheis, and David W. Monks..............................241<br />

GALIA MUSKMELON PRODUCTION IN HIGH TUNNELS IN THE<br />

CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS USA<br />

Lewis W. Jett ...........................................................................................................249<br />

A COMPARISON OF NOVEL GRAFTING METHODS FOR<br />

WATERMELON IN HIGH-WIND AREAS<br />

Stephen R. King and Angela R. Davis.....................................................................258<br />

CUCURBITS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN NORTH CAROLINA<br />

Jonathan Schultheis..................................................................................................265<br />

APPROACHES TO MINIMIZE THE DEFECTS OF SEEDLESS<br />

WATERMELON<br />

Xiaowu Sun and Fuqing Luo ...................................................................................272<br />

COST BENEFIT ANALYSES OF USING GRAFTED WATERMELONS FOR<br />

DISEASE CONTROL AND THE FRESH-CUT MARKET<br />

Merritt Taylor, Benny Bruton, Wayne Fish, and Warren Roberts ...........................277


NITAMIN ® LIQUID: BACKGROUND AND USE ON CUCURBITACEAE<br />

FAMILY<br />

James Wargo and Anne Cothran .............................................................................286<br />

TRIPLOID SEEDLESS WATERMELON PRODUCTION IN CHINA<br />

Liu Wenge, Yan Zhihong, Zhao Shengjie, and He Nan .........................................296<br />

Entomology<br />

HERBIVORY BY CUCUMBER BEETLES AFFECTS POLLEN<br />

PRODUCTION AND POLLEN PERFORMANCE IN A WILD GOURD<br />

Andrew G. Stephenson, James A. Winsor, Daolin Du, Andrew DeNicco, and<br />

Matthew Smith ........................................................................................................301<br />

WHITEFLY TRANSMISSION OF A NEW VIRUS INFECTING CUCURBITS<br />

IN FLORIDA<br />

Susan E. Webb, Scott Adkins, and Carlye A. Baker ...............................................309<br />

Germplasm<br />

GENETIC DIVERSITY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIP AMONG<br />

MELON ACCESSIONS FROM AFRICA AND ASIA REVEALED BY RAPD<br />

ANALYSIS<br />

Y. Akashi, K. Tanaka, H. Nishida, K. Kato, M. T. Khaing, S. S. Yi, and<br />

T. T. Chou................................................................................................................317<br />

ORIGIN, MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION, AND USES OF CUCURBITA<br />

FICIFOLIA, THE MOUNTAIN SQUASH<br />

Thomas C. Andres ...................................................................................................326<br />

LOCHE: A UNIQUE PRE-COLUMBIAN SQUASH LOCALLY GROWN IN<br />

NORTH COASTAL PERU<br />

Thomas C. Andres ...................................................................................................333<br />

OLD WORLD CUCURBITS IN PLANT ICONOGRAPHY OF THE<br />

RENAISSANCE<br />

Jules Janick and Harry S. Paris................................................................................341<br />

JONAH AND THE “GOURD” AT NINEVEH: CONSEQUENCES OF A<br />

CLASSIC MISTRANSLATION<br />

Jules Janick and Harry S. Paris ................................................................................349<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF AN IMAGE DATABASE OF CUCURBITACEAE<br />

Jules Janick, Anna Whipkey, Harry S. Paris, Marie-Christine Daunay, and E. Jullian<br />

.................................................................................................................................358<br />

FIRST IMAGES OF CUCURBITA IN EUROPE<br />

Harry S. Paris, Jules Janick, and Marie-Christine Daunay ......................................363


POLYPHYLETIC ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED MELON INFERRED FROM<br />

ANALYSIS OF ITS CHLOROPLAST GENOME<br />

K. Tanaka, K. Fukunaga, Y. Akashi, H. Nishida, K. Kato, and M. T. Khaing ........372<br />

RESISTANCE OF CITRULLUS LANATUS VAR. CITROIDES GERMPLASM<br />

TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES<br />

Judy A. Thies and Amnon Levi ..............................................................................380<br />

Phytopathology<br />

FACTORS INFLUENCING A CUCUMBER FRUIT SUSCEPTIBILITY TO<br />

INFECTION BY PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI<br />

Kaori Ando and Rebecca Grumet ............................................................................387<br />

EARLY PROTECTION AGAINST ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES THROUGH<br />

NEMATICIDAL SEED COATING PROVIDES SEASON-LONG BENEFITS<br />

FOR CUCUMBERS<br />

J. O. Becker, J. Smith Becker, H. V. Morton, and D. Hofer....................................395<br />

THE DOWNY MILDEW EPIDEMIC OF 2004 AND 2005 IN THE EASTERN<br />

UNITED STATES<br />

Susan J. Colucci, Todd C. Wehner, and Gerald J. Holmes......................................403<br />

WATERMELON RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW RACE 1 AND<br />

RACE 2<br />

Angela R. Davis, Antonia Tetteh, Todd Wehner, Amnon Levi, and Michel<br />

Pitrat.........................................................................................................................412<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUNGICIDE MANDIPROPAMID IN THE<br />

UNITED STATES FOR CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW OF CUCURBITS<br />

Tyler L. Harp, Donald R. Tory, and Paul J. Kuhn ...................................................421<br />

INTEGRATING CULTURAL AND CHEMICAL STRATEGIES TO<br />

CONTROL PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI AND LIMIT ITS SPREAD<br />

M. K. Hausbeck, A. J. Gevens, and B. Cortright .....................................................427<br />

TREATMENTS TO PREVENT SEED TRANSMISSION OF BACTERIAL<br />

FRUIT BLOTCH OF WATERMELON<br />

D. L. Hopkins and C. M. Thompson........................................................................436<br />

IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEY OF CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW<br />

RACES IN CZECH POPULATIONS<br />

A. Lebeda and B. Sedláková....................................................................................444<br />

INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION ASPECTS OF INTERACTIONS<br />

BETWEEN CUCURBITS AND PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS:<br />

PATHOTYPES AND RACES<br />

A. Lebeda, M. P. Widrlechner, and J. Urban ..........................................................453


EVALUATING ZUCCHINI YELLOW MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE IN<br />

WATERMELON<br />

Kai-Shu Ling and Amnon Levi, Nihat Guner and Todd C. Wehner ....................468<br />

OCCURRENCE OF FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE IN PODOSPHAERA<br />

XANTHII AND IMPACT ON CONTROLLING CUCURBIT POWDERY<br />

MILDEW IN NEW YORK<br />

Margaret Tuttle McGrath.........................................................................................473<br />

FRUIT YIELD, QUALITY PARAMETERS, AND POWDERY MILDEW<br />

(SPHAEROTHECA FULIGINEA) SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SPECIALTY<br />

MELON (CUCUMIS MELO L.) CULTIVARS GROWN IN A PASSIVE-<br />

VENTILATED GREENHOUSE<br />

J. M. Mitchell, D. J. Cantliffe, S. A. Sargent, L. E. Datnoff, and P. J. Stoffella......483<br />

INTEGRATION OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AND PLASTIC MULCHES<br />

TO MANAGE WATERMELON MOSAIC VIRUS IN SQUASH<br />

John F. Murphy and Micky D. Eubanks..................................................................492<br />

BACTERIAL LEAF SPOT (XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS PV.<br />

CUCURBITAE) AS A FACTOR IN CUCURBIT PRODUCTION AND<br />

EVALUATION OF SEED TREATMENTS FOR CONTROL IN NATURALLY<br />

INFESTED SEEDS<br />

Zahide Özdemir and Thomas A. Zitter....................................................................498<br />

DETERMINING DENSITY OF PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI OOSPORES IN<br />

SOIL<br />

C. Pavon and M. Babadoost ....................................................................................507<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF DOUBLE-HAPLOID CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS<br />

SATIVUS L.) LINES RESISTANT TO DOWNY MILDEW<br />

(PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS [BERK. ET CURT.] ROSTOVZEV)<br />

J. Sztangret-Wiśniewska, T. Gałecka, A. Korzeniewska, L. Marzec, G. Kołakowska, U.<br />

Piskurewicz, M. Śmiech, and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt ................................................. 515<br />

NATURALLY OCCURRING STRAINS OF BIPARTITE BEGOMOVIRUSES<br />

AFFECT SOME MEMBERS OF CUCURBITACEAE FAMILY INSIDE AND<br />

OUTSIDE THE COTTON ZONE IN PAKISTAN<br />

M. Tahir and M. S. Haider ......................................................................................527<br />

EFFECT OF FUNGICIDE CHEMISTRY AND CULTIVAR ON THE<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW ON PUMPKIN IN<br />

NEW JERSEY<br />

Christian A. Wyenandt ............................................................................................534


SURVEY FOR CUCURBIT VIRUSES IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS AND<br />

EVALUATION OF VIRUS-RESISTANT SUMMER SQUASH BREEDING<br />

LINES IN NEW JERSEY<br />

Christian A. Wyenandt, Michelle Infante-Casella, Melvin R. Henninger, Richard<br />

Buckley, Sabrina Tirpak, Kristian E. Holmstrom, Peter J. Nitzsche, William H.<br />

Tietjen, Raymond J. Samulis, Wesley L. Kline, Win Cowgill, and Joseph R.<br />

Heckman ..................................................................................................................539<br />

Postharvest<br />

A RAPID HEXANE-FREE METHOD FOR ANALYZING TOTAL<br />

CAROTENOID CONTENT IN CANARY YELLOW-FLESHED<br />

WATERMELON<br />

Angela R. Davis, Julie Collins, Wayne W. Fish, Charles Webber III, Penelope<br />

Perkins-Veazie, and Y. Tadmor...............................................................................545<br />

QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI ASSOCIATED WITH SUSCEPTIBILITY<br />

TO POSTHARVEST PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORDERS AND DECAY OF<br />

MELON FRUIT<br />

J. P. Fernández-Trujillo, J. A. Martínez, J. Obando, C. Miranda, A. J. Monforte, I.<br />

Eduardo, and P. Arús ...............................................................................................553<br />

POSTHARVEST CHARACTERIZATION OF A CUSHAW SQUASH<br />

BREEDING LINE.<br />

L. Fernando Grajeda-García, Sergio Garza-Ortega, Alberto Sánchez-Estrada, and<br />

Rosalba Troncoso-Rojas ..........................................................................................560<br />

HARVEST PERIOD AND STORAGE AFFECT BIOMASS PARTITIONING<br />

AND ATTRIBUTES OF EATING QUALITY IN ACORN SQUASH<br />

(CUCURBITA PEPO)<br />

J. Brent Loy .............................................................................................................568<br />

RIPENING CHANGES IN MINIWATERMELON FRUIT<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie and Julie K. Collins Donald J. Huber, and Niels Maness<br />

.................................................................................................................................578<br />

CHANGES IN CAROTENOID CONTENT DURING PROCESSING OF<br />

WATERMELON FOR JUICE CONCENTRATES<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie, J. K. Collins, M. Siddiq, and K. Dolan...........................585<br />

VARIATION IN CAROTENOIDS AMONG MINIWATERMELONS<br />

PRODUCED IN FOUR LOCATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S.<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie, Julie K. Collins, Richard L. Hassell, Donald N. Maynard,<br />

Jonathan Schultheis, Bill Jester, and Steve Olson....................................................591<br />

WATERMELON CAROTENOID CONTENT IN RESPONSE TO<br />

GERMPLASM, MATURITY, AND STORAGE<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie, Julie K. Collins, Angela Davis, Niels Maness, and Warren<br />

Roberts.....................................................................................................................597


SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF<br />

WATERMELON LYCOPENE EXTRACTED<br />

INTO AQUEOUS SODIUM DODECYL<br />

SULFATE<br />

Wayne W. Fish and Angela R. Davis<br />

South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural<br />

Research Service, P.O. Box 159, Lane, OK 74555.<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> absorbance properties of aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate<br />

(SDS) extracts of watermelon tissue were examined as part of an ongoing effort<br />

to develop simpler, more economical ways to quantify carotenoids in melon<br />

fruit. Levels of SDS >0.2% extracted and solubilized watermelon lycopenecontaining<br />

chromoplasts, and the absorbances at 565nm of the extracts obeyed<br />

Beer’s law. A method was developed for the detergent extraction/spectrophotometric<br />

determination of watermelon lycopene. Its application on 110<br />

watermelons representing 14 cultivars yielded results directly comparable to<br />

conventional lycopene methods (the regression coefficient for linear fit was<br />

~0.98). <strong>The</strong> methodology, its advantages, and its limitations are presented.<br />

L<br />

ycopene, a fat-soluble carotenoid, is a precursor of β-carotene<br />

(Sandmann, 1994) and has at least twice the antioxidant<br />

capacity of β-carotene (Di Mascio et al., 1989). A number of<br />

epidemiological studies suggest positive health benefits to be derived<br />

from the consumption of diets high in lycopene (Gerster, 1997),<br />

although a consensus for either its beneficial or detrimental role in the<br />

modulation of carcinogenesis remains to be established (reviewed in<br />

Bramley, 2000; Arab et al., 2001). Red-fleshed watermelon is a rich<br />

source of lycopene. Previous research has determined that watermelon<br />

cultivars vary in lycopene content depending on genotype and<br />

We wish to thank Rick Houser for his technical assistance and Julie Collins for<br />

performing the HPLC analyses. Mention of trade names or commercial products in<br />

this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not<br />

imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All<br />

programs and services of the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a<br />

nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex,<br />

age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA<br />

employee as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection under U.S.<br />

copyright law is not available for such works. Accordingly, there is no copyright to<br />

transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in which the article appears is itself<br />

copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S. Government, which can be freely<br />

reproduced by the public.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 1


environmental conditions (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2006). To aid in<br />

breeding programs, plant breeders need a safe, economical, yet reliable<br />

method to determine lycopene content in individual watermelons.<br />

Presently, there are three principal experimental methodologies for<br />

lycopene quantitation.<br />

Conventional extraction methods coupled with spectrophotometry<br />

employ organic solvents for the extraction of lycopene from the tissue<br />

into the solvent. <strong>The</strong> extracted lycopene is then quantified<br />

spectrophotometrically by its absorbance in the visible region of the<br />

spectrum (Beerh and Siddappa, 1959; Adsule and Dan, 1979; Sadler et<br />

al, 1990; Fish et al., 2002). Though relatively simple and reliable, the<br />

extraction methodology requires the use of flammable, biologically<br />

hazardous organic solvents, and thus poses personnel-safety and<br />

environmental-waste issues.<br />

HPLC offers both separation/identification and quantitation of<br />

individual carotenoids (Craft, 2001). Although the research method of<br />

choice, HPLC requires significant technical expertise, expensive<br />

instrumentation, columns, and column standards, and the use of<br />

hazardous solvents. HPLC is too slow and too expensive for the<br />

routine screening of fruit from a breeding program.<br />

A recent methodology, Xenon flash spectrophotometry (Davis, et<br />

al., 2003), allows the direct spectrophotometric determination of<br />

lycopene in a puree of watermelon flesh. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is rapid, simple,<br />

requires little sample preparation, and uses no hazardous chemicals.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two disadvantages of the method are the high cost of the<br />

instrumentation and the fact that for quantitation, the instrumental<br />

output initially must be calibrated with lycopene values determined by<br />

one of the previously mentioned methodologies.<br />

A recent investigation showed that aqueous solutions of the<br />

anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) extracted and<br />

solubilized lycopene-containing chromoplasts from watermelon fruit<br />

tissue. <strong>The</strong> findings from this study provided sufficient fundamental<br />

information to allow development of a detergent<br />

extraction/spectrophotometric method for lycopene quantitation (W.<br />

Fish, unpublished data). That methodology, its advantages, and its<br />

limitations are described below.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL AND SAMPLING. Watermelons used for the<br />

study were from the 2003 harvest and were obtained from commercial<br />

producers in California, Texas, and Oklahoma. In addition, three<br />

watermelon cultivars were grown on research plots at Lane, OK. Two<br />

2 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


to 10 watermelons were used from each of 14 cultivars for a total of<br />

110 individual watermelons. Seedless, hybrid seeded, and openpollinated<br />

seeded types of watermelon cultivars were employed. Prior<br />

to analysis, watermelon tissue was handled in one of two ways. In one<br />

method, two 100-g tissue samples were removed from the center of the<br />

watermelon heart and stored at –80 o C until assayed. When assayed,<br />

samples of frozen watermelon tissue were partially thawed and then<br />

ground to a homogeneous puree with an electric tissue grinder<br />

(Brinkman Polytron Homogenizer, Westbury, NY). In the second<br />

method, 40-g samples were removed from the heart of a fresh<br />

watermelon and immediately ground to a homogeneous puree with an<br />

electric tissue grinder. Tissue purees were kept on ice and out of light<br />

after preparation and until assayed. Purees were stirred on a magnetic<br />

stirring plate during replicate sampling. Sampling and weighing of<br />

replicates were performed in reduced room light.<br />

LYCOPENE ASSAYS BY CONVENTIONAL METHODS. <strong>The</strong> method of<br />

Fish et al. (2002) was employed for the conventional solvent<br />

extraction/analysis procedure. In a few instances, the HPLC elution<br />

profiles of watermelon carotenoids and their relative amounts<br />

extracted into SDS were compared to those obtained by direct<br />

extraction of the tissue with hexane. <strong>The</strong> method of Craft (2001) was<br />

employed for HPLC analyses, and was carried out in the laboratory of<br />

Penny Perkins-Veazie.<br />

LYCOPENE ASSAY BY SDS EXTRACTION. Approximately 2g of<br />

watermelon-tissue puree, prepared as described above, were removed<br />

from the total puree during rapid stirring. This material was weighed<br />

to the nearest 0.01g into a tared, 15-ml screw-capped plastic centrifuge<br />

tube (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ). At the same<br />

time, 0.5-g samples of puree were removed for lycopene assay by<br />

conventional organic solvent extraction/analysis. To the ~2-g weighed<br />

sample of puree were added 6ml of 0.4% SDS in H2O, and the total<br />

weight of the puree plus added solvent was recorded. <strong>The</strong> inclusion of<br />

0.02% sodium azide in the SDS solution to prevent microbial growth<br />

in solutions that stood at room temperature for long periods had no<br />

effect on the solubilizing effect of the SDS. <strong>The</strong> suspension was<br />

thoroughly mixed either by shaking or on a vortex mixer. After<br />

standing for 1 hr to allow denaturation of some of the cellular<br />

components and the solubilization of the lycopene-containing<br />

chromoplasts, the homogenate was centrifuged at room temperature<br />

for 15 min in the 15-ml plastic conical centrifuge tube at 1,500 x g<br />

(3,000rpm) in a Sorvall TC6 bench-top centrifuge (Kendro Laboratory<br />

Products, Asheville, NC). <strong>The</strong> chromoplasts were solubilized into the<br />

aqueous supernatant, and the colorless tissue residue was pelleted at<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 3


the bottom of the tube. For watermelons that were noticeably overripe<br />

(i.e., orange coloration in the locule and tissue pulled away from the<br />

seeds), part of the lycopene in SDS was pelleted when centrifuged at<br />

1,500 x g. <strong>The</strong> result was a red pellicle on top of the extracted tissue<br />

residue at the bottom of the centrifuge tube. <strong>The</strong> amount of insoluble<br />

lycopene visually appeared to be roughly proportional to the degree of<br />

overripeness. Consequently, the lycopene contents of significantly<br />

overripe watermelons could not be as accurately quantified with the<br />

SDS extraction system (see Results).<br />

For spectrophotometric determination, ~5ml of each supernatant<br />

from the centrifugation step were pipetted into a cylindrical glass<br />

cuvette of 1.0cm path length (Milton Roy, Rochester, NY). <strong>The</strong><br />

absorbance of each sample was measured at 565nm and 700nm on a<br />

Spectronic 21 spectrophotometer (Milton Roy, Rochester, NY) versus<br />

a blank composed of the SDS solvent diluted with water (6ml solvent<br />

+ 2ml H2O). <strong>The</strong> lycopene content of the watermelon was estimated<br />

from the absorbance readings by one of two relations:<br />

Not Corrected for Light Scattering:<br />

[Lycopene]<br />

(mg/kg tissue)<br />

( A565)<br />

1 { wt reagent + wt sample}<br />

=<br />

× ×<br />

0.033 ml/ μg<br />

⋅cm<br />

1.0<br />

cm (wt sample)<br />

{ wt reagent + wt sample}<br />

= (30.3) × ( A 565)<br />

×<br />

(wt sample)<br />

Corrected for Light Scattering:<br />

[Lycopene]<br />

(mg/kg tissue)<br />

= 52.9 ×<br />

Eqn. 1<br />

3<br />

A565<br />

-{A<br />

700 (700/565) } 1 { wt reagent + wt sample}<br />

=<br />

× ×<br />

0.0189 ml/ μg<br />

⋅cm<br />

1.0 cm (wt sample)<br />

( A<br />

565<br />

−<br />

( 1.<br />

902)(<br />

A<br />

700<br />

{ wt reagent + wt sample}<br />

) ) ×<br />

(wt sample)<br />

Eqn. 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> absorptivities, 0.0189ml/μg·cm with and 0.033ml/μg·cm<br />

without light-scattering correction, and the correction term for light<br />

scattering, (A565 – {A700(700/565) 3 }), were taken from earlier<br />

determinations (W. Fish, unpublished data).<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSES. Statistical analyses were performed with<br />

the aid of Statistica software, version 6 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK).<br />

4 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Results and Discussion<br />

We initially tested to see if the SDS system could fulfill two<br />

requirements. First, that all of the lycopene present in watermelontissue<br />

puree could be extracted by the medium. Second, that the<br />

absorbance of the lycopene extracted into the aqueous SDS was a<br />

linear function of the amount of lycopene in the assay system, i.e., did<br />

it obey Beer’s law under this assay protocol? To test the latter<br />

requirement, we combined, in different ratios, purees from two<br />

watermelons, one of lycopene content (by hexane extraction) of<br />

21.6mg/kg and the other of lycopene content of 96.1mg/kg, and<br />

assayed each by SDS extraction/absorbance. <strong>The</strong> lycopene contents of<br />

the combination samples were also verified by hexane<br />

extraction/absorbance. When the absorbances of the SDS extracts at<br />

565nm, either corrected or not corrected for light scattering, were<br />

plotted versus the lycopene contents of the various combined purees, a<br />

linear relation was obtained (data not shown).<br />

<strong>The</strong> first requirement was tested indirectly by comparing the total<br />

amount of lycopene extracted into SDS versus the total amount of<br />

lycopene estimated to be in the tissue by direct hexane<br />

extraction/absorbance. Aliquots of lycopene-containing SDS extracts<br />

were themselves extracted with hexane, and the lycopene in the total<br />

SDS extract calculated from these results. <strong>The</strong> average recovery by<br />

SDS extraction of ripe and slightly underripe watermelons compared<br />

to that extracted by hexane was 100.3% + 1.3% (n = 6). Practical<br />

validation of the aqueous SDS extraction method was carried out by<br />

comparing the lycopene contents determined by this method with<br />

those determined by a conventional hexane extraction method for 110<br />

individual watermelons. When lycopene values determined by the<br />

SDS extraction method were plotted versus their corresponding values<br />

determined by a conventional hexane extraction assay, a linear relation<br />

was obtained (Figure 1). This same relationship was also observed for<br />

a group of over 180 watermelon samples examined in earlier studies<br />

by more sophisticated instrumentation while evaluating the state of<br />

lycopene in aqueous SDS (W. Fish, unpublished data). This one-toone<br />

linear relation is consistent with the hypothesis that results from<br />

the SDS extraction and the hexane extraction methods are directly<br />

comparable, and thus it supports the validity of the SDS extraction<br />

method.<br />

For the 90 individual non-overripe watermelons for which<br />

lycopene was quantified, the SDS extraction/absorption methodology<br />

yielded value differences that averaged –0.09% + 6.8% (n = 90)<br />

without the light-scattering correction and –1.50% + 10.0% (n = 90)<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 5


with the light-scattering correction, as compared to those by hexane<br />

extraction/absorption. <strong>The</strong> differences from the earlier data referred to<br />

above were 0.1% + 5.2% (n = 181) without and –1.1% + 5.1% (n =<br />

181) with the light-scattering correction. All watermelon cultivars<br />

demonstrated normal scatter of data about the mean percent difference.<br />

This suggests that no individual cultivar exhibited aberrant behavior in<br />

the assay. Also, the average amount of lycopene determined for each<br />

cultivar was similar to that previously reported (Holden et al., 1999;<br />

Fish et al., 2002; Perkins-Veazie et al., 2006). <strong>The</strong> precision of the<br />

SDS extraction assay procedure appears to be comparable to that of<br />

the conventional hexane extraction assay. For 90 watermelon samples<br />

assayed by SDS extraction, the average standard error per triplicate<br />

was 1.12% + 1.07 % for determinations that employed light-scattering<br />

corrections and 1.00% + 1.26 % for the same samples not corrected for<br />

light scattering. As mentioned under Materials and Methods, part of<br />

the lycopene from noticeably overripe watermelons frequently<br />

sedimented when the extract was centrifuged. This resulted in an<br />

underestimation of the lycopene content of overripe melons. <strong>The</strong><br />

absorbance responses of overripe samples in the SDS assay are<br />

demonstrated by the filled triangles in Figure 1A and B. <strong>The</strong> average<br />

difference between the SDS method and the conventional hexane<br />

extraction method for these overripe melons was –7.4% + 9.8% (n =<br />

20) with the light- scattering correction employed and –9.4% + 6.5%<br />

(n = 20) when the light- scattering correction was not employed.<br />

HPLC analysis of lycopene solubilized from watermelon tissue<br />

with aqueous 0.3% SDS exhibited the same levels of all-trans<br />

lycopene and its cis-isomers as those of direct hexane extracts of the<br />

tissue. Furthermore, higher levels of the more water-soluble<br />

carotenoids, such as lutein, were detected by HPLC analysis of SDS<br />

extracts of watermelon than were seen in direct organic solvent<br />

extracts of the tissue (data not shown).<br />

Previous results demonstrate aqueous solutions of SDS to be a<br />

marginal solvent for certain carotenoids (Takagi et al., 1982, 1996).<br />

Furthermore, our studies found that SDS was unable to extract<br />

lycopene from some types of plant fruit cell matrices, such as<br />

processed tomato products (W. Fish, unpublished data). In spite of<br />

such limitations, for selected systems in which a safe and inexpensive<br />

method to quantify lycopene is desired, the SDS extraction/absorption<br />

methodology offers an acceptable alternative to existing<br />

methodologies. This appears to be especially true for watermelon.<br />

One can reasonably anticipate that lycopene estimates for watermelon<br />

using the SDS system will be within +10% of estimates by organic<br />

solvent extraction/absorption.<br />

6 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Because SDS is not toxic at the levels employed (it’s an ingredient<br />

in toothpaste), laboratory-personnel-safety concerns and hazardouswaste-disposal<br />

issues are eliminated. Furthermore, all of the<br />

equipment needed for the analysis, i.e., blender, tabletop centrifuge,<br />

and student lab-type spectrophotometer, can be purchased for under<br />

$3,500 at today’s prices. This methodology may thus afford the plant<br />

breeder or other investigator a means to quantify lycopene in<br />

watermelon or other fruits.<br />

A B<br />

Fig. 1. Lycopene levels determined for 110 individual watermelons by the SDS<br />

extraction/absorbance assay compared with the corresponding levels<br />

determined by conventional hexane extraction/absorbance. Open circles<br />

represent ripe or underripe melons and filled triangles represent overripe<br />

melons. A. <strong>The</strong> absorbance values of lycopene in SDS were adjusted for light<br />

scattering (see text). <strong>The</strong> equation of the linear least squares regression fit to<br />

the data is y = 0.569 + 0.976x. <strong>The</strong> regression coefficient for the linear fit of the<br />

data is r 2 = 0.969 (P < 0.05). B. <strong>The</strong> absorbance values of lycopene in SDS were<br />

not adjusted for light scattering. <strong>The</strong> equation of the linear least squares<br />

regression fit to the data is y = 3.163 + 0.929x. <strong>The</strong> regression coefficient for the<br />

linear fit of the data is r 2 = 0.981(P < 0.05).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Adsule, P. G. and A. Dan. 1979. Simplified extraction procedure in the rapid<br />

spectrophotometric method for lycopene estimation in tomato. J. Food Sci. &<br />

Tech. 16:216.<br />

Arab, L., S. Steck-Scott, and P. Bowen. 2001. Participation of lycopene and Betacarotene<br />

in carcinogenesis: defenders, aggressors, or passive bystanders?<br />

Epidem. Rev. 23:211–230.<br />

Beerh, O. P. and G. S. Siddappa. 1959. A rapid spectrophotometric method for the<br />

detection and estimation of adulterants in tomato ketchup. Food Tech. 13:414–<br />

418.<br />

Bramley, P. M. 2000. Is lycopene beneficial to human health? Phytochem. 54:233–<br />

236.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 7


Craft, N. E. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation, p. f2.3.1–<br />

2.3.15. In: R. E. Wrolstad, T. E. Acree, E. A. Decker, M. H. Penner, D. S. Reid,<br />

S. J. Schwartz, C. F. Shoemaker, and P. Sporns (eds.). Current protocols in food<br />

analytical chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.<br />

Davis, A. R., W. W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method<br />

for analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />

Di Mascio, P., S. P. Kaiser, and H. Sies. 1989. Lycopene as the most efficient<br />

biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.<br />

274:532 538.<br />

Fish, W. W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />

lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food Comp. Anal.<br />

15:309–317.<br />

Gerster, H. 1997. <strong>The</strong> potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Amer. College<br />

Nutr. 16:109–126.<br />

Holden, J. M., A. L. Eldridge, G. R. Beecher, I. M. Buzzard, S. A. Bhagwat, C. S.<br />

Davis, L. W. Douglass, S. E. Gebhardt, D. B. Haytowitz, and S. Schakel. 1999.<br />

Carotenoid content of U.S. foods: an update of the database. J. Food Comp.<br />

Anal. 12:169–196.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, A. R. Davis, and W. Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />

content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:2593–2597.<br />

Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and bcarotene<br />

from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />

Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />

Sandmann, G. 1994. Carotenoid biosynthesis in microorganisms and plants. Eur. J.<br />

Biochem. 223:7–24.<br />

Takagi, S., J. Itani, Y. Kimura, and K. Takeda. 1996. A spectroscopic behavior of<br />

zeaxanthin molecular aggregate and its form. Okayama Daigaku Nogakubu<br />

Gakujutsu Hokoku. 85:7–13.<br />

Takagi, S., K. Takeda, K. Kameyama, and T. Takagi. 1982. Visible circular<br />

dichroism of lutein acquired on dispersion in an aqueous solution in the presence<br />

of a limited amount of sodium dodecyl sulfate and a dramatic change of the cd<br />

spectrum with concentration of the surfactant. Agric. Biol. Chem. 46:2035–<br />

2040.<br />

8 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


PROTOPLAST FUSION IN GENUS CUCUMIS<br />

J. Gajdová, B. Navrátilová, and A. Lebeda<br />

Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />

Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Somatic hybridization, Cucumis sativus, cucumber,<br />

Cucumis melo, melon, polyethyleneglycol<br />

ABSTRACT. Protoplasts of Cucumis melo L. (MR-1, cv. Charentais D 132, cv.<br />

Charentais), Cucumis metuliferus ‘Meyer ex Naudin’, Cucumis sativus L. (line<br />

SM 6514, cv. Borciagovskij), and C. zeyheri ‘Sonder’ were isolated and then<br />

fused by PEG (polyethyleneglycol). Leaves were used along with growing<br />

apices, calli, and hypocotyls as sources of protoplasts. Various plant species and<br />

plant organs were combined for fusion. <strong>The</strong> most viable combinations were<br />

achieved using Cucumis sativus line SM 6514 (leaf) combined with either C.<br />

melo cv. Charentais (callus, leaf, growing apex), C. melo cv. Charentais D 132<br />

(callus), or C. metuliferus (leaf). Other successful combinations included: C.<br />

melo cv. Charentais (callus) with C. metuliferus (leaf), and C. sativus cv.<br />

Borciagovskij (leaf) with C. zeyheri (callus). <strong>The</strong>se combinations successfully<br />

regenerated calli. Hypocotyl explants were the least viable for protoplast fusion.<br />

P<br />

rotoplast fusion offers a potential plant-breeding technique<br />

where traditional hybridization is not possible. Somatic<br />

hybridization in the genus Cucumis also may serve as a tool for<br />

introducing pathogen resistance against Pseudoperonospora cubensis<br />

to Cucumis melo and Cucumis sativus (Fellner et al., 1996). Previous<br />

work with somatic hybridization resulted in no regeneration in most<br />

observed cases (Gajdová et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> regeneration of hybrid<br />

plants was achieved only in fusions of Cucumis melo with <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata × C. maxima (Yamaguchi and Shiga, 1993), and of C. melo<br />

with C. myriocarpus (Bordas et al., 1998). Yamaguchi and Shiga<br />

(1993) found that intergeneric hybrids did not retain <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

features. Bordas et al. (1998) found the resulting plants were unable to<br />

produce roots.<br />

Our previous studies (Gajdová et al., 2006) have investigated and<br />

optimized the factors involved in regeneration. <strong>The</strong> aim of our recent<br />

work was to establish a reliable method of somatic hybridization in<br />

the genus Cucumis. All possible combinations of genotypes were<br />

tested and various combinations of plant organs were also investigated.<br />

Only genotypes that previously indicated good regenerative capabilites<br />

This research was supported by the following grants: (1) MSM 6198959215<br />

(Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic); and (2) QD 1357<br />

(NAZV, Ministry of Agriculture, Czech Republic.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 9


(calli; in C. zeyheri microcalli obtained) (Gajdová et al., 2006) were<br />

selected for this study.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Seeds of Cucumis melo (line MR-1 [CZ 09-H40-0600]), cv.<br />

Charentais D 132 (CZ 09-H40-1114), cv. Charentais (CZ 09-H40-<br />

1116), Cucumis metuliferus (CZ 09-H41-0587), Cucumis sativus (line<br />

SM 6514 [CZ 09-H39-0768]), C. sativus (cv. Borciagovskij [09-H39-<br />

0056]), and C. zeyheri (CZ 09-H41-0595, CZ 09-H41-0196)<br />

originating from different germplasm collections and recently<br />

maintained by the Research Institute of Crop Production (Dept. of<br />

Gene Bank, Olomouc, Czech Republic) were surface-sterilized with<br />

8% chloramin B and germinated on a 50% MS (Murashige and Skoog,<br />

1962) medium in the dark at 25°C. After 7 days, hypocotyls were<br />

detached and seedlings planted on MS medium in plastic boxes.<br />

Hypocotyls were used either for protoplast isolation or for callus<br />

derivation. Leaves and growing apices of 2–8-week-old plants served<br />

as sources of protoplasts. Calli were derived from leaves of in vitro<br />

plants, except in the case of C. melo (MR-1 and cv. Charentais), where<br />

they were derived from hypocotyls. Explants were placed on MSC<br />

medium (MS with 30g/l sucrose, 2.5mg/l NAA, 1mg/l BAP, and 0.8%<br />

agar) to induce callus growth and the calli subcultured every 2 weeks.<br />

Various combinations of plant species and plant organs were<br />

investigated for protoplast fusions. Protoplasts were isolated using a<br />

novel protocol (Gajdová et al., 2006). After isolation and viability<br />

assessment (by FDA staining), protoplasts were fused in Petri dishes<br />

(diameter 40mm) by 33% (v/v) PEG 6000 (polyethyleneglycol)<br />

solution (Christey et al., 1991) according to the following protocol:<br />

protoplasts in M+C solution (Christey et al., 1991) mixed in a test<br />

tube; 4 small drops (ca 100µl) of protoplasts were left in a Petri dish<br />

for 20 min of sedimentation; 20 min of PEG treatment - 50µl added to<br />

each protoplast drop; PEG pipetted off; Stop solution (Christey et al.,<br />

1991) (200µl per 1 drop) treatment added for 20 min, then pipetted off.<br />

After the fusion liquid LCM1 medium (Debeaujon and Branchard,<br />

1992) was added into dishes (ca. 1.5ml per dish) and protoplasts were<br />

cultivated at 25°C in the dark. After 14 days samples were checked,<br />

liquid LCM 2 medium (Debeaujon and Branchard, 1992) was added,<br />

and dishes transferred under 16-hr light. Growing microcalli were<br />

transferred onto solid F medium (Pelletier et al., 1983) after 2–3 weeks<br />

and subcultured after 3 weeks.<br />

10 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> investigation revealed that the best materials for protoplast<br />

fusion were Cucumis sativus line SM 6514 (leaf) combined either with<br />

C. melo cv. Charentais (callus, leaf, growing apex) or C. melo cv.<br />

Charentais D 132 (callus), and/or with C. metuliferus (leaf). Other<br />

successful combinations were: C. sativus line SM 6514 (growing apex)<br />

× C. metuliferus (growing apex); C. melo cv. Charentais (callus) × C.<br />

metuliferus (leaf); C. sativus cv. Borciagovskij (leaf) × C. zeyheri 0595<br />

(callus). It is unclear how these were combined. In these cases growing<br />

calli were regenerated after fusion but did not undergo organogenesis or<br />

somatic embryogenesis. <strong>The</strong> induction of shoots on the callus and their<br />

development into whole plants has yet to be achieved. <strong>The</strong>se difficulties<br />

were also noted by some authors (Yamaguchi and Shiga, 1993).<br />

Table 1. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis melo cv. Charentais. *<br />

Cucumis melo cv. Charentais<br />

Callus Hypocotyl Leaf Growing apex<br />

C. metuliferus callus microcallus microcallus<br />

leaf<br />

C. sativus leaf callus callus callus<br />

Growing apex cell division microcallus<br />

Hypocotyl no<br />

regeneration<br />

C. melo MR-1 microcallus microcallus<br />

leaf<br />

Growing apex microcallus<br />

Hypocotyl cell division no<br />

regeneration<br />

Callus hyp. no<br />

regeneration<br />

* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />

Regeneration of calli in fusion of C. metuliferus with C. melo or with<br />

C. sativus has not been reported. Fusion of C. zeyheri has not been<br />

previously reported. In general, hypocotyls were found to be the least<br />

viable explant for successful protoplast fusion. Even in combination<br />

with leaves or growing apices they did not show regenerative capacity.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y also indicated low regeneration ability when cultivated in pure<br />

culture (Gajdová et al., 2006). In C. melo cv. Charentais (Table 1) all<br />

other explants were equally suitable for fusion experiments. In C. melo<br />

MR-1 (Tables 1 and 2) growing apex or leaf is better than callus;<br />

however, calli grew well in vitro but plants did not.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 11


Table 2. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis melo MR-1.*<br />

Cucumis melo MR-1<br />

C.<br />

metuliferus<br />

leaf microcallus<br />

C. sativus<br />

Leaf<br />

Callus hyp. Hypocotyl Leaf<br />

Growing<br />

apex callus<br />

Hypocotyl first division<br />

* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />

no<br />

regeneration<br />

Growing<br />

apex<br />

In C. sativus (Tables 3 and 4) the leaf is the best choice for<br />

protoplast fusion (calli were not investigated as they were not viable<br />

[Gajdová et al., 2006]). To date cotyledons have been the most<br />

common source of protoplasts (Fellner and Lebeda, 1998). Cotyledons<br />

were not used in this study due to cotyledon protoplast regeneration<br />

problems reported. Previous studies suggested that this is due to their<br />

tetraploidy (Kubaláková et al., 1996).<br />

Electrofusion has been the most commonly used method of<br />

somatic hybridization. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) or high pH/Ca 2+ has<br />

previously been used to induce fusion (Gajdová et al., 2004). PEGinduced<br />

fusions yielded improved results over previously reported<br />

electrofusion (Greplová et al., 2005). Future research will be focused<br />

on enhancing organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis on regenerated<br />

calli.<br />

Table 3. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis sativus line 6514.*<br />

Cucumis sativus<br />

Leaf Growing apex Hypocotyl<br />

C. melo<br />

Charentais D 132<br />

callus<br />

C. metuliferus<br />

callus<br />

leaf callus microcallus microcallus<br />

Growing apex microcallus callus<br />

* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />

12 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 4. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis sativus cv. Borciagovskij.*<br />

C. sativus<br />

Borciagovskij leaf<br />

C. metuliferus<br />

leaf<br />

C. zeyheri 595<br />

callus callus microcallus<br />

C. zeyheri 196<br />

callus microcallus<br />

* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bordas, M., L. Gonzáles-Candelas, M. Dabauza, D. Ramón, and V. Moreno. 1998.<br />

Somatic hybridization between an albino Cucumis melo L. mutant and Cucumis<br />

myriocarpus. Naud. Plant Sci. 132:179–190.<br />

Christey, M. C., C. A. Makaroff, and E. D. Earle. 1991. Atrazine-resistant<br />

cytoplasmic male-sterile-nigra broccoli obtained by protoplast fusion between<br />

cytoplasmic male-sterile Brassica oleracea atrazine-resistant Brassica<br />

campestris. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 83:201–208.<br />

Debeaujon, I. and M. Branchard. 1992. Induction of somatic embryogenesis and<br />

caulogenesis from cotyledons and leaf protoplast-derived colonies of melon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.). Plant Cell Rep. 12:37–40.<br />

Fellner, M. and A. Lebeda. 1998. Callus induction and protoplast isolation from<br />

tissues of Cucumis sativus L. and C. melo L. seedlings. Biol. Plant. 41:11–24.<br />

Fellner, M., P. Binarová, and A. Lebeda. 1996. Isolation and fusion of Cucumis sativus<br />

and Cucumis melo protoplasts, p. 202–209. In: M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, C. Soria,<br />

J. Cuartero, J. A. Torés, and R. Fernández-Muňoz (eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s towards 2000.<br />

Proc. 6 th Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Malaga, Spain.<br />

Gajdová, J., A. Lebeda, and B. Navrátilová. 2004. Protoplast cultures of Cucumis<br />

and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp., p. 441–454. In: A. Lebeda and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in<br />

cucurbit genetics and breeding research. Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8th Eucarpia<br />

Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Gajdová, J., B. Navrátilová, J. Smolná, and A. Lebeda. 2006. Effect of genotype,<br />

source of protoplasts and media composition on Cucumis and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

protoplast isolation and regeneration. Acta Hort. (In press.)<br />

Greplová, M., B. Navrátilová, M. Vyvadilová, M. Klíma, J. Gajdová, and D.<br />

Skálová. 2005. <strong>The</strong> wild species of the genus Brassica, Cucumis and Solanum in<br />

somatic hybridization, p. 647–648. In: Abstracts, XVII. International Botanical<br />

Congress, Vienna, Austria.<br />

Kubaláková, M., J. Doležel, and A. Lebeda. 1996. Ploidy instability of embryogenic<br />

cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) callus culture. Biol. Plant. 38:475–480.<br />

Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays<br />

with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol. 15:473–497.<br />

Pelletier, G., C. Primard, F. Vedel, P. Chetit, R. Remy, P. Rousselle, and M. Renard.<br />

1983. Intergeneric cytoplasmic hybridization in Cruciferae by protoplast fusion.<br />

Molec. Genet. 191:244–250.<br />

Yamaguchi, J. and T. Shiga. 1993. Characteristics of regenerated plants via<br />

protoplast electrofusion between melon (C. melo) and pumpkin (interspecific<br />

hybrid, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima × C. moschata). Jap. J. Breed. 43:173–182.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 13


EXPRESSION PROPERTIES OF THREE TAU-<br />

TYPE PUMPKIN GLUTATHIONE S-<br />

TRANSFERASES IN BACTERIA AND A<br />

SEARCH FOR THEIR INTRINSIC INHIBITORS<br />

M. D. Hossain and Masayuki Fujita<br />

Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa<br />

University, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0795, Japan<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, E. coli, IPTG, substrate,<br />

ligand<br />

ABSTRACT. Expression levels of three tau-type pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima)<br />

glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in bacteria and the presence of substances in<br />

pumpkin callus (PC) and leaf (PL) that inhibit activities of the GSTs were<br />

investigated. Bacterial expression systems based on E. coli transformed with<br />

CmGSTU1, CmGSTU2, or CmGSTU3 cDNA genes in pBluescripts [SK(-)] were<br />

used as enzyme sources. All GSTs were found to be expressed in E. coli XLI-<br />

Blue cells cultivated in the culture media with or without isopropyl-β-Dthiogalactopyranoside<br />

(IPTG). <strong>The</strong> chemical enhanced the expression of<br />

CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 but was found to suppress the CmGSTU3 expression<br />

level in bacterial cells. Inhibition studies indicated that alcoholic extracts of PC<br />

had strong inhibitory effects on CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU3 and a weak effect on<br />

CmGSTU2 activity toward 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB). <strong>The</strong> PL extract<br />

showed a small inhibitory effect on CmGSTU3 but negligible or no effects on<br />

CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2. Through diethylaminoethyl cellulose (anionexchange)<br />

column chromatography of PC and PL extracts, the highest<br />

inhibitions were obtained in 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fractions,<br />

respectively. HPLC analyses demonstrated that the fractions contain several<br />

inhibitors possessing hydrophobic or hydrophilic characteristics. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

suggest that some potent inhibitors charged negatively are present as substrates<br />

or physiological ligands of pumpkin GSTs in pumpkin callus and leaves.<br />

G<br />

lutathione S-transferases (GSTs, EC 2.5.1.18) are a family of<br />

multifunctional enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of<br />

reduced glutathione (GSH) with a wide range of hydrophobic,<br />

electrophilic, and usually cytotoxic substrates (Wilce and Parker,<br />

1994). In plants, GSTs are key enzymes in the detoxification of<br />

herbicides (Marrs, 1996). Some plant GSTs are involved in the<br />

metabolism of endogenous toxins and protect plants from oxidative<br />

damage. Furthermore, some plant GSTs act as binding proteins or<br />

ligandins. <strong>The</strong>y are capable of binding and transporting plant<br />

hormones and a variety of secondary metabolites (Edwards et al.,<br />

2000). <strong>The</strong>re is some evidence that binding to ligands often inhibits<br />

GST activity (Lyon et al., 2003). Little is known, however, about the<br />

14 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


functions of GSTs with endogenous compounds, despite the fact that<br />

plants synthesize numerous toxic secondary metabolites that are<br />

potential GST substrates.<br />

From pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duchesne) callus cultured in a<br />

medium containing 2,4-D, three forms of tau-type pumpkin GSTs,<br />

Puga (CmGSTU1), Pugb (CmGSTU2), and Pugc (CmGSTU3), have<br />

been purified (Fujita et al., 1994, 1998) and their cDNAs have been<br />

cloned (Fujita and Hossain, 2003b). It has also been reported that<br />

CmGSTU1 is expressed at high levels in fully expanded mature organs<br />

and that CmGSTU2 is expressed preferentially in leaves and petioles,<br />

whereas expression of CmGSTU3 in pumpkin organs is under<br />

detectable levels (Fujita and Hossain, 2003b). Since GSTs play a role<br />

in detoxification of endogenous toxins, organs of pumpkin plants as<br />

well as the callus might contain substances that interact with GSTs.<br />

Little progress has been made previously in identification of inhibitors<br />

of pumpkin GSTs (Fujita and Hossain, 2003a). Recently, we found<br />

that tissues of pumpkin seedlings contain some substances that inhibit<br />

activities of pumpkin GSTs (Hossain et al., 2006). In this study, we<br />

investigated the effects of pumpkin callus and leaf extracts on<br />

activities of three tau-type pumpkin GSTs. <strong>The</strong> study would be helpful<br />

in predicting the physiological roles of pumpkin GSTs.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIALS. Callus was induced from sarcocarp tissues of<br />

pumpkin fruit on Murashige and Skoog’s solid medium containing<br />

4.5µM 2,4-D and 0.5µM kinetin at 25˚C in the dark (Fujita et al.,<br />

1994). Fully expanded pumpkin leaves were harvested from mature<br />

plants at Kagawa University Farm.<br />

EXTRACTION. Extract was prepared from 25g of pumpkin callus<br />

(PC) using methanol : chloroform : water (12:5:3, v/v/v) and 70%<br />

ethanol solution following a method described in our previous study<br />

(Hossain et al., 2006). To prepare extract from the same quantity of<br />

pumpkin leaves (PL), 1.5-fold volume of each solvent was used.<br />

Finally, dried substances were dissolved in 10ml distilled water.<br />

COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY. To separate constituents into<br />

different fractions, alcoholic extracts of PC and PL were applied<br />

separately to a diethylaminoethyl cellulose (DE-52; Whatman, UK)<br />

column (5.0ml). After washing the column with a sufficient amount of<br />

distilled water, 1.9ml PC extract were applied to the column and eluted<br />

with different concentrations of NH4HCO3 (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4,<br />

0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1, and 2.0M) and finally with 100% methanol, using a<br />

constant volume of 20ml for each fraction. <strong>The</strong> solvents of the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 15


fractions were thereafter removed by evaporation, and dried<br />

substances were dissolved in 0.5ml distilled water. To fractionate PL<br />

extract, a 1.0-ml sample was applied to the column and the same<br />

procedure was performed. Finally, dried substances were dissolved in<br />

1.5ml distilled water. Inhibitory activities of all fractions of PC and PL<br />

extracts were examined for CmGSTU3 toward 1-chloro-2,4dinitrobenzene<br />

(CDNB) as a substrate.<br />

PREPARATION OF ENZYME. E. coli cells containing CmGSTU1,<br />

CmGSTU2, and CmGSTU3 cDNAs in pBluescripts [SK<br />

(-)] were cultivated separately for about 16 hours at 37˚C in Luria-<br />

Bertani liquid medium with ampicillin (50µg/ml). To investigate the<br />

expression properties of GSTs, 0, 1, and 10mM IPTG were added to<br />

the culture medium. After incubation, the cells were harvested by<br />

centrifugation (2400×g for 10 min) and homogenized in 25mM Tris-<br />

HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1mM EDTA, 1% (w/v) ascorbate, and<br />

10% (v/v) glycerol with a mortar and pestle. A small amount of sea<br />

sand was added to make grinding easier. Cellular debris was<br />

precipitated by centrifugation (10000×g at 4˚C for 10 min) and the<br />

supernatant was used as enzyme solution.<br />

ENZYME ASSAY, PROTEIN QUANTITATION, AND INHIBITION<br />

STUDY. GST activity was determined spectrophotometrically by the<br />

method of Booth et al. (1961) with some modifications. <strong>The</strong> reaction<br />

mixture contained 100mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5),<br />

1.5mM reduced glutathione, 1mM CDNB, and enzyme solution in a<br />

final volume of 0.7ml. To perform inhibition studies, various<br />

quantities of extracts were added to the reaction mixture. <strong>The</strong> enzyme<br />

reaction was initiated by the addition of CDNB, and A340 was<br />

monitored at 25˚C for 1 min. <strong>The</strong> protein concentration of each<br />

enzyme solution was determined by the method of Bradford (1976)<br />

using BSA as protein standard. Enzyme solutions of CmGSTU1 and<br />

CmGSTU2 extracted from E. coli cells with 1mM IPTG and<br />

CmGSTU3 with no IPTG in the culture media were used for inhibition<br />

studies.<br />

HPLC ANALYSIS AND ACTIVITY PROFILING. Fractions with the<br />

highest inhibitory potencies obtained from DE-52 column<br />

chromatography were analyzed on a LC-6AD Liquid Chromatograph<br />

(Shimadzu, Japan) fitted with a UV-VIS detector (SPD-6AV) and C-<br />

R6A Chromatopac. Separation was performed using a Shim Pack<br />

CLC-ODS column (4.6mm i.d. × 250mm, Shimadzu, Japan). <strong>The</strong> flow<br />

rate was 0.6ml min-1 and detection was carried out at 220nm. <strong>The</strong><br />

column was eluted with a linear gradient of 0–80% methanol for 40<br />

min and with 100% methanol for an additional 20 min.<br />

16 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Fifty µl of 0.2M NH4HCO3-eluted fraction of PC extract<br />

(corresponding to 475mg fresh callus) were injected onto the column.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effluent from the column was fractionated according to important<br />

peak areas or after some intervals (when no peak appeared). <strong>The</strong><br />

solvent was removed by evaporation and dried substances were<br />

redissolved in 250µl distilled water. For PL extract, 20µl of 0.3M<br />

NH4HCO3-eluted fraction (corresponding to 30mg fresh materials)<br />

were injected onto the column and the same procedure was carried out<br />

for fractionation. In both cases, inhibitory activity of each of the<br />

HPLC-eluted fractions was assayed for CmGSTU3, using samples of<br />

50 and 100µl.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In a previous investigation (Fujita and Hossain, 2003b), cDNAs of<br />

pumpkin GSTs, namely, CmGSTU1, CmGSTU2, and CmGSTU3,<br />

were subcloned in the multicloning site of the expression vector<br />

pBluescript [SK(-)], and the open reading frame of each clone was<br />

found to be in-frame with the α-complementation particle of the βgalactosidase<br />

gene. Each of the recombinant expression vectors was<br />

subsequently transformed into E. coli XLI-Blue cells and found to be<br />

expressed as a fusion protein in the presence of IPTG. In this study, we<br />

examined the effect of IPTG on expression levels of these GSTs as<br />

fusion proteins in bacterial cells. We cultivated bacterial cells<br />

containing cDNAs of the GSTs treated with 0, 1, and 10mM IPTG and<br />

then extracted proteins from the cells. Interestingly, all of the GSTs<br />

were found to be expressed without the addition of IPTG in the cells,<br />

and CmGSTU3 and CmGSTU2 showed the highest and the lowest<br />

activity, 6084 nmolmin- 1 mg- 1 protein and 60 nmolmin- 1 mg- 1 protein,<br />

respectively (Table 1). IPTG was found to significantly enhance the<br />

expression levels of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 and, in contrast, to<br />

suppress the expression of CmGSTU3 in bacterial cells. In all cases,<br />

IPTG reduced the quantities of total proteins (data not shown).<br />

IPTG activates the expression of the α-complementation particle of<br />

the β-galactosidase gene in pBluescript [SK(-)], thereby increasing the<br />

production of the GST fusion protein. This is the main reason for the<br />

high expression levels of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 in bacterial cells<br />

treated with IPTG. In the case of the suppression of CmGSTU3<br />

expression, IPTG might cause overexpression of the fusion protein,<br />

and the excessive quantity of the protein could be toxic to the bacterial<br />

cells, resulting in damage to the cells. In the control (no IPTG),<br />

bacterial growth appeared to be normal.<br />

To search for inhibitors of pumpkin GSTs, we examined the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 17


Table 1. Effect of IPTG on bacterial expression of pumpkin<br />

glutathione S-transferases. GSTs activities were measured with CDNB<br />

as a substrate.<br />

Specific activity (nmolmin- 1 mg- 1 protein)<br />

GSTs No IPTG 1mM IPTG 10mM IPTG<br />

CmGSTU1 944 3958 5315<br />

CmGSTU2 60 117 163<br />

CmGSTU3 6084 3473 2232<br />

effects of alcoholic extracts of PC and PL on the activities of the<br />

above-mentioned GSTs toward the model substrate CDNB. Our results<br />

showed that the PC extracts had strong inhibitory effects on<br />

CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU3 (Figure 1). In the assay system, 50%<br />

inhibition of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU3 was achieved with extracts<br />

corresponding to 226 and 173mg of fresh callus, respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />

extract showed only a small inhibitory effect on CmGSTU2. <strong>The</strong><br />

specific activities of different GSTs can vary markedly, possibly<br />

causing differences in inhibition among them. In our previous study<br />

(Hossain et al., 2006), we found that inhibitory substances were<br />

Fig. 1. Inhibition of pumpkin GST activities toward CDNB by pumpkin callus<br />

(PC) and pumpkin leaves (PL) extracts. Results were obtained from two<br />

independent experiments; bars indicate standard error. Each µl of both extracts<br />

corresponds to the substances present in 2.5mg of fresh materials.<br />

18 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


present in pumpkin seedlings and that they had various inhibitory<br />

effects on the same GSTs as those used in the present study. We also<br />

obtained evidence that the variation of inhibitory effects on GSTs was<br />

due to the specific characteristics of the enzymes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> alcoholic extract of PL showed a marginal inhibitory effect on<br />

CmGSTU3 and negligible effects on the other two GSTs. Moreover, a<br />

larger volume of the extract in the assay system appeared to increase<br />

the activity of all three GSTs, suggesting that pumpkin leaves might<br />

contain inhibitors as well as activators of pumpkin GSTs.<br />

To obtain further information, we fractionated PC and PL extracts<br />

using a DE-52 column (as described in Materials and Methods). Potent<br />

inhibitory substances of PC extracts seemed to be eluted with 0.2M<br />

NH4HCO3 followed by 0.3M and 0.1M NH4HCO3 (Figure 2). In the<br />

assay system, 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fractions caused 50%<br />

inhibition of CmGSTU3, with samples corresponding to 264 and<br />

361mg fresh callus, respectively. In the case of PL extract, the 0.3M<br />

NH4HCO3-eluted fraction was found to contain the major inhibitory<br />

substances. However, the inhibitory effect of this fraction at a larger<br />

volume was beyond the detectable level due to the much thicker<br />

concentration of the sample.<strong>The</strong> 100% methanol-eluted fractions of<br />

PC and PL extracts were found to contain both water-soluble and<br />

water-insoluble substances.<br />

Fig. 2. Inhibition of CmGSTU3 activity toward CDNB by the fractions of<br />

pumpkin callus (A) and pumpkin leaves (B) extracts obtained from DE-52<br />

column chromatography. Fractionation was done by eluted columns with<br />

different concentrations of NH4HCO3 solutions and finally with 100%<br />

methanol.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 19


Although the water-soluble portion had almost no effect on<br />

CmGSTU3 activity (Figure 2), the insoluble counterpart showed an<br />

apparent high increase of GST activity (data not shown). HPLC<br />

analyses revealed that the water-insoluble substances present in the<br />

100% methanol-eluted fraction of PL extract neither increased the<br />

production of dinitrophenyl-glutathione conjugate (DNP-GS) nor<br />

produced any other conjugates (data not shown), suggesting that the<br />

increase in the absorbance does not depend on GST activity.<br />

In order to evaluate the inhibitory properties of the 0.3M<br />

NH4HCO3-eluted fraction of the PL extracts, we examined the<br />

production of DNP-GS by HPLC after incubating samples (0, 20, and<br />

60µl) with GSH, CDNB, and enzyme solution. We detected a decrease<br />

in DNP-GS production (peak area decreased to 66% with 60µl) along<br />

with an increase in unconjugated GSH concentration (peak area<br />

increased to 159% with 60µl) (Figure 3), but formation of other<br />

conjugates was not observed, suggesting that the fraction contains true<br />

inhibitors of the enzyme.<br />

Fig. 3. Effect of 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fraction of PL extract on the production<br />

of DNP-GS by CmGSTU3. Reactions were performed by adding 0, 20, and 60µl<br />

of inhibitor sample to 1.5mM GSH, 1mM CDNB, 100mM potassium phosphate<br />

buffer (pH 6.5), and 5µl enzyme solution to a final volume of 0.7ml. After 10<br />

min of reaction, 20µl of each product was injected to an HPLC column. <strong>The</strong><br />

amounts of DNP-GS and unconjugated GSH among three reaction mixtures<br />

were compared by the peak areas (as shown by Chromatopac) detected at<br />

220nm.<br />

20 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


To gain some insight into the characteristics of the inhibitors, we<br />

analyzed 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fractions of PC and PL<br />

extracts, respectively, by HPLC. <strong>The</strong> results indicated that each sample<br />

contains at least two inhibitors that have small to almost no absorption<br />

at 220nm (Figure 4). From retention time, it was revealed that both<br />

hydrophilic and hydrophobic inhibitors are present in the sample. It<br />

was also reported earlier that inhibitors of GSTs that bind to the<br />

hydrophobic site are typically hydrophobic (Koehler et al., 1997),<br />

while mimic-substrate ligands are either hydrophobic or amphipathic<br />

(Ketley et al., 1975). <strong>The</strong> present study, as well as our previous<br />

investigation (Hossain et al., 2006), also interprets the presence of<br />

some inhibitory substances with hydrophobic as well as hydrophilic<br />

characteristics.<br />

We conclude that cDNAs of pumpkin GSTs in pBluescript are<br />

expressed in E. coli cells without IPTG. Furthermore, IPTG activates<br />

the expression of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 but suppresses the<br />

expression of CmGSTU3. Pumpkin callus and leaves contain some<br />

hydrophilic or hydrophobic inhibitory substances that might be<br />

physiological substrates or true inhibitors of pumpkin GSTs. In a<br />

future study, we will determine the structural properties of the<br />

inhibitors and investigate their mechanisms of inhibition.<br />

Fig. 4. HPLC-based activity profiling with 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted<br />

fractions of PC and PL extracts, respectively, for CmGSTU3 activity. <strong>The</strong><br />

HPLC chromatograms show the absorbance of compounds detected at 220nm;<br />

the bar graphs above each of the chromatograms show the inhibitory activity of<br />

corresponding HPLC fractions.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 21


Literature Cited<br />

Booth, J., E. Boyland, and P. Sims. 1961. An enzyme from rat liver catalyzing<br />

conjugations. Biochem. J. 79:516–524.<br />

Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of<br />

microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.<br />

Anal Biochem. 72:248–254.<br />

Edwards, R., D. P. Dixon, and V. Walbot. 2000. Plant glutathione S-transferases:<br />

enzymes with multiple functions in sickness and in health. Trends Plant Sci.<br />

5:193–198.<br />

Fujita, M. and M. Z. Hossain. 2003a. Modulation of pumpkin glutathione Stransferases<br />

by aldehydes and related compounds. Plant Cell Physiol. 44:481–<br />

490.<br />

Fujita, M. and M. Z. Hossain. 2003b. Molecular cloning of cDNAs for three tau-type<br />

glutathione S-transferases in pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima) and their expression<br />

properties. Physiol. Plant. 117:85–92.<br />

Fujita, M., Y. Adachi, and N. Sakato. 1998. Purification of pumpkin glutathione Stransferase<br />

species specially present in cultured cells treated by excessive<br />

concentrations of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid but absent in normal plants.<br />

Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 62:2431–2434.<br />

Fujita, M., Y. Adachi, and Y. Hanada. 1994. Preliminary characterization of<br />

glutathione S-transferases that accumulate in callus cells of pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

maxima Duch.). Plant Cell Physiol. 35:275–282.<br />

Hossain, M. D., T. Suzuki, and M. Fujita. 2006. Inhibitory substances to glutathione<br />

S-transferases in pumpkin seedlings. Asian J. Plant Sci. 5:346–352.<br />

Ketley, J. N., W. H. Habig, and W. B. Jakoby. 1975. Binding of nonsubstrate ligands<br />

to the glutathione S-transferases. J. Chem. 250:8670–8673.<br />

Koehler, R. T., H. O. Villar, K. E. Bauer, and D. L. Higgins. 1997. Ligand-based<br />

protein alignment and isozyme specificity of glutathione S-transferase inhibitors.<br />

Proteins. 28:202–216.<br />

Lyon, R. P., J. J. Hill, and W. M. Atkins. 2003. Novel class bivalent glutathione Stransferase<br />

inhibitors. Biochem. 42:10418–10428.<br />

Marrs, K. A. 1996. <strong>The</strong> functions and regulation of glutathione S-transferases in<br />

plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:127–158.<br />

Wilce, M. C. J. and M. W. Parker. 1994. Structure and function of glutathione Stransferases.<br />

Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1205:1–18.<br />

22 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF<br />

GRAFTED MUSKMELON GROWN IN<br />

MONOSPORASCUS CANNONBALLUS-<br />

INFESTED SOIL IN SOUTH TEXAS<br />

John Jifon, Kevin Crosby, and Marvin Miller<br />

Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />

Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Weslaco, TX 78596;<br />

Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College<br />

Station, TX 77843<br />

Daniel Leskovar<br />

Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />

Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Uvalde, TX 7; Department<br />

of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX<br />

77843<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Vine decline, water potential, cantaloupe,<br />

rootstock, root vigor, hybrid squash, physiology<br />

ABSTRACT. Two commercial muskmelon varieties (‘Caravelle’ and ‘Primo’)<br />

were grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a and Cucumis rootstocks and grown in fields with a<br />

history of vine decline disease caused by Monosporascus cannonballus to<br />

determine whether physiological responses of the scions are consistent with<br />

predictions of a high capacity for water uptake by the rootstocks. Three<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (hybrid squashes: HS 380, HS 286, and HS 1330) and six Cucumis (PI<br />

20488, PI 1207, MR1, PI 212210, PI 124104, and hybrid melon 3105) rootstocks<br />

were used. Vines of plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks were generally<br />

longer than those of nongrafted plants, but this effect was most significant only<br />

during the vegetative developmental stages. Leaf-water potentials (Ψleaf) of<br />

plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks were consistently higher than those of<br />

nongrafted plants, especially during the critical fruit- development and<br />

maturation phases. Melon plants grafted on PI 1207, PI 12404, and PI 20488<br />

also maintained relatively high Ψleaf. Grafted plants with high Ψleaf also had<br />

high leaf stomatal conductance and transpiration rates, indicating ample water<br />

supply from the root systems. Maintenance of high Ψleaf by grafted plants<br />

indicates that such plants could better tolerate root infection and damage by M.<br />

cannonballus without late-season collapse.<br />

V<br />

ine decline of melons caused by the soil-borne fungus<br />

Monosporascus cannonballus Pollack & Uecker has become a<br />

major production problem worldwide (Bruton, 1998; Martyn<br />

and Miller, 1996). Root infection and damage occur at all stages of<br />

development, but increased water demand during fruit development<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 23


and maturation can lead to vine collapse due to loss of water-uptake<br />

capacity. Conditions that promote water loss such as high<br />

temperatures, high winds, and drought can exacerbate late-season vine<br />

collapse caused by root infection and damage (Bruton, 1998). <strong>The</strong><br />

majority of commercial melon varieties lack resistance to M.<br />

cannonballus. Resistance to M. cannonballus among germplasm<br />

accessions of Cucumis melo L. has been linked to vigorous rootsystem<br />

development (Crosby et al., 2002; Crosby and Wolff, 1998). A<br />

vigorous root system presumably compensates for the reduced<br />

absorptive capacity, thus allowing infected plants to satisfy the<br />

increased water/nutrient demands during fruit maturation. Crosby et<br />

al. (2002) and Crosby et al. (2000) have reported differences in root<br />

morphology among susceptible and tolerant Cucumis cultivars and<br />

concluded that tolerance to root infection by M. cannonballus is<br />

closely linked to the integrity of the root structure. Grafting<br />

commercial melon and watermelon varieties on disease-resistant<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks is a common practice in the Mediterranean<br />

region and Southeast Asia to manage soil-borne diseases (Lee and<br />

Oda, 2003; Lee, 1994), including vine decline of melons caused by M.<br />

cannonballus (Cohen et al., 2005). Squash rootstocks have been the<br />

primary source of rootstocks for grafting melons; however, reports of<br />

poor fruit quality have reinforced the need to find compatible Cucumis<br />

rootstocks. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to characterize the<br />

physiological responses of two commercial melon varieties grafted on<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a and Cucumis rootstocks and grown in fields naturally<br />

infested with M. cannonballus. <strong>The</strong> Cucumis accessions used were<br />

selected based on their high root-vigor ratings (Crosby and Wolff,<br />

1998; Crosby et al., 2002).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Seeds of two western shipper-type muskmelon [Cucumis melo L.<br />

(Reticulatus group)] varieties (‘Primo’ and ‘Caravelle’) (scions) and<br />

nine rootstocks (including Cucumis and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species; Table 1)<br />

were sown in 72-cell (0.04L) seedling trays filled with a commercial<br />

rooting medium (Sunshine #5 Plug Mix, Sun Gro Horticulture Inc,<br />

Bellevue, WA) and germinated in a greenhouse maintained at 28/20<br />

°C (day/night temperature regimes). Due to differences in<br />

This research was funded in part by a TDA-BARD Grant #TIE04-04, a USDA<br />

Grant: 2001-34402-10543, “Designing Foods for Health” and by the South Texas<br />

Melon Committee. We also thank technicians Yolanda Luna and Alfredo Rodríguez,<br />

Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center-Weslaco, for their assistance.<br />

24 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


development rates, the squash rootstocks were sown 7 days later than<br />

the scions. At the two-leaf stage, scions were grafted on rootstocks<br />

using the cleft grafting technique (Lee and Oda, 2003). Grafted<br />

seedlings were healed in a mist chamber (28°C, >90%RH) for 7 days<br />

and hardened outdoors for 2 days before transplanting into field plots<br />

with a history of root rot/vine decline disease caused by M.<br />

cannonballus in Weslaco, Texas.<br />

Fifteen plants of each graft combination (including nongrafted<br />

scion varieties) were transplanted during fall 2005 in a randomized<br />

<strong>complete</strong> block design. Field-culture procedures were identical to the<br />

common commercial practices—namely, raised beds covered with<br />

plastic mulch, and subsurface drip irrigation. Fourteen days after<br />

transplanting (DAT), plots were evaluated for plant survival. At 30<br />

DAT, vine lengths of each graft combination were recorded. Leafwater<br />

potential (Ψleaf), stomatal conductance, and transpiration were<br />

measured before fruit set (~30 DAT) and during the fruit maturation<br />

period (~69 DAT). Leaf gas-exchange parameters were measured on<br />

at least four plants of each graft combination using a portable<br />

photosynthesis system (CIRAS-2, PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA).<br />

Leaf-water potentials (Ψleaf) of six to eight leaves from each graft<br />

combination were measured between 11:00–14:00h (local time) with a<br />

Scholander-type pressure bomb (Plant Moisture Systems, Santa<br />

Barbara, CA). Disease incidence (% wilted plants) was evaluated<br />

visually at the onset of fruit maturity. A plant was considered wilted if<br />

more than 50% of the canopy leaves had collapsed with wilt<br />

symptoms. Mature fruits were harvested at full-slip over an 8-day<br />

period and average fruit weight, size class, total soluble solids contents<br />

(TSS, an indicator of fruit quality), and yield were recorded.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Survival rates were generally high among melon plants grafted on<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks (>85%) (Table 1). Survival rates varied among<br />

plants grafted on Cucumis rootstocks (33–86%) with PI 20488, PI<br />

124104, and PI 1207 having high rates and PI 3105 and MR1<br />

consistently having the lowest rates, regardless of scion variety.<br />

Nongrafted scion seedlings also generally had high (>80%) survival<br />

rates.<br />

Main-stem vine lengths also differed between Cucumis and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks, with seedlings on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks<br />

consistently having the longest vines compared to nongrafted plants.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were no differences in vine lengths among melons grafted on<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks, regardless of scion variety. Differences in vine<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 25


Table 1. Transplant survival and vine length (four weeks after<br />

transplanting) of commercial muskmelon (‘Caravelle’ and ‘Primo’)<br />

grafted on Cucumis and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks and grown in a field<br />

naturally infested with Monosporascus cannonballus.<br />

Survival Vine length<br />

Rootstock Genus %<br />

(m)<br />

Nongrafted<br />

‘Caravelle’<br />

80.0 a 0.39 cd<br />

PI 20488 Cucumis 86.6 ab 0.43 bcd<br />

MR1 Cucumis 40.0 d 0.37 cd<br />

PI 1207 Cucumis 73.3 abc 0.45 abc<br />

PI 212210 Cucumis 53.3 cd 0.42 bcd<br />

PI 124104 Cucumis 60.0 bcd 0.46 abc<br />

PI 3105 a<br />

Cucumis 33.3 d 0.35 d<br />

HS 380 a <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 86.6 ab 0.52 a<br />

HS 286 a <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 86.6 ab 0.49 ab<br />

HS 1330 b <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 93.3 a 0.49 ab<br />

Nongrafted<br />

‘Primo’<br />

86.6 ab 0.37 de<br />

PI 20488 Cucumis 73.3 abc 0.43 bcde<br />

MR1 Cucumis 46.6 cd 0.36 de<br />

PI 1207 Cucumis 73.3 abc 0.48 ab<br />

PI 212210 Cucumis 60.0 bcd 0.38 cde<br />

PI 124104 Cucumis 80.0 ab 0.43 bcd<br />

PI 3105 Cucumis 40.0 d 0.33 e<br />

HS 380 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 93.3 a 0.47 abc<br />

HS 286 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 86.7 ab 0.54 a<br />

HS 1330 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 93.3 a 0.55 a<br />

a b<br />

Sakata Seeds; Abbot & Cobb Inc.<br />

Values for each scion variety (‘Caravelle’ or ‘Primo’) within a column followed by<br />

the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level (Duncan’s<br />

multiple range test).<br />

lengths among plants grafted on Cucumis rootstocks were similar to<br />

those for plant survival. Vines of ‘Caravelle’ grafted on Cucumis<br />

rootstocks were slightly longer than those of nongrafted plants, but this<br />

trend was not significant. ‘Primo’ grafted on PI 1207 had the longest<br />

vines compared to nongrafted ‘Primo’ plants and to ‘Primo’ grafted on<br />

other Cucumis rootstocks.<br />

Midday leaf-water potentials (Ψleaf) measured prior to fruit set (30<br />

DAT) were significantly higher than those measured during fruit<br />

maturation (69 DAT) (Table 2). For both scion varieties, plants<br />

26 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks had higher Ψleaf compared to<br />

nongrafted plants. Leaf-water potentials of ‘Caravelle’ plants grafted<br />

on Cucumis rootstocks were also generally high compared to<br />

nongrafted plants, but this trend was significant only for PI 1207 and<br />

PI 124014 during early and late development. For ‘Primo’, the trend<br />

was significant for plants grafted on PI 20488, PI 1207, and PI<br />

124014.<br />

Table 2. Leaf-water potential (Ψleaf), stomatal conductance (gs), and<br />

transpiration rates (E) of commercial muskmelon varieties (‘Caravelle’<br />

and ‘Primo’) grafted onto different rootstocks and grown in a field<br />

naturally infested with Monosporascus cannonballus. Measurements<br />

were taken before fruit set (30 days after transplanting, DAT) and<br />

during fruit maturation (69 DAT).<br />

Ψleaf Ψleaf gs gs E E<br />

30 DAT 69 DAT 30 DAT 69 DAT 30 DAT 69 DAT<br />

Rootstock MPa mmolm -2 s -1<br />

‘Caravelle’<br />

Nongrafted -1.5 c -2.1 c 650 abc 274 de 4.0 d 1.7 c<br />

PI 20488 -1.2 bc -1.7 bc 584 bc 320 bcd 4.3 cd 1.9 bc<br />

MR1 -1.4 c -1.8 c 535 c 240 e 4.5 cd 1.9 bc<br />

PI 1207 -0.9 ab -1.3 a 663 abc 375 abc 5.1 abcd 2.2 abc<br />

PI 212210 -1.0 ab -1.4 abc 622 abc 313 cd 4.7 bcd 2.1 bc<br />

PI 124104 -0.9 ab -1.3 a 667 abc 334 bcd 5.2 abcd 2.2 abc<br />

PI 3105 -1.5 c -1.9 c 564 bc 217 e 4.1 d 1.8 c<br />

HS 380 -0.7 a -1.0 a 702 ab 392 ab 5.5 abc 2.4 ab<br />

HS 286 -0.8 a -1.2 a 764 a 420 a 6.1 a 2.7 a<br />

HS 1330 -0.8 a -1.2 a 693 ab 415 a 6.0 ab 2.6 a<br />

‘Primo’<br />

Nongrafted -1.6 c -2.2 c 569 abc 321 bcd 4.5 ab 2.0 ab<br />

PI 20488 -1.0 ab -1.3 ab 666 abc 377 abc 5.2 ab 2.3 ab<br />

MR1 -1.5 c -2.1 c 546 bc 298 cd 4.9 ab 2.2 ab<br />

PI 1207 -1.1 ab -1.5 ab 754 a 355 abc 5.4 ab 2.8 a<br />

PI 212210 -1.2 b -1.6 b 604 abc 305 cd 4.5 ab 1.9 ab<br />

PI 124104 -1.2 b -1.6 b 643 abc 366 abc 4.9 ab 2.1 ab<br />

PI 3105 -1.6 c -2.0 c 525 c 241 d 3.7 b 1.6 b<br />

HS 380 -0.8 a -1.1 a 677 abc 410 a 5.9 a 2.6 ab<br />

HS 286 -0.9 a -1.2 ab 695 abc 429 a 6.4 a 2.8 a<br />

HS 1330 -1.0 ab -1.3 ab 723 ab 402 ab 5.8 a 2.2 ab<br />

Values for each scion variety (‘Caravelle’ or ‘Primo’) within a column followed by<br />

the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level (Duncan’s<br />

multiple range test).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 27


Leaf stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E) values measured<br />

during the fruit maturation period were more than 50%<br />

lower than those measured during the vegetative growth phases. Both<br />

parameters were generally higher in the plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

rootstocks than on Cucumis rootstocks but the trends were not<br />

consistent.<br />

Table 3. Average fruit weight, total soluble solids concentration<br />

(TSS), and vine decline disease incidence of commercial muskmelon<br />

varieties (‘Caravelle’ and ‘Primo’) grafted onto different rootstocks<br />

and grown in a field naturally infested with Monosporascus<br />

cannonballus.<br />

Fruit TSS Wilt<br />

Rootstock wt./kg % Incidence %<br />

‘Caravelle’<br />

Nongrafted 1.7 bc 7.9 bc 6.7 b<br />

PI 20488 2.2 ab 9.1 ab 13.3 ab<br />

MR1 1.9 abc 8.9 bc 20.0 a<br />

PI 1207 2.3 a 8.7 bc 13.3 ab<br />

PI 212210 1.6 c 7.7 c 13.3 ab<br />

PI 124104 2.4 a 8.4 bc 6.7 b<br />

PI 3105 2.0 abc 8.3 bc 20.0 a<br />

HS 380 2.4 a 9.2 ab 6.7 b<br />

HS 286 2.2 ab 10.1 a 6.7 b<br />

HS 1330 2.5 a 8.5 bc<br />

‘Primo’<br />

6.7 b<br />

Nongrafted 1.5 d 9.1 a 13.3 ab<br />

PI 20488 2.5 ab 9.5 a 13.3 ab<br />

MR1 1.8 cd 9.3 a 20.0 a<br />

PI 1207 1.7 cd 7.8 bc 13.3 ab<br />

PI 212210 2.1 bc 9.2 a 20.0 b<br />

PI 124104 2.1 bc 9.1 a 6.7 b<br />

PI 3105 1.4 d 7.4 c 26.7 a<br />

HS 380 2.7 a 8.7 ab 6.7 b<br />

HS 286 2.5 ab 8.6 ab 6.7 b<br />

HS 1330 2.8 a 9.7 a 6.7 b<br />

Values for each scion variety (‘Caravelle’ or ‘Primo’) within a column followed by<br />

the same letter are not significant different at the 0.05 probability level (Duncan’s<br />

multiple range test).<br />

28 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


<strong>The</strong> average fruit weight of nongrafted plants was significantly<br />

lower than that of plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks for both<br />

scion varieties (Table 3). For plants grafted on Cucumis rootstocks,<br />

the fruit-size differences were not consistent between the two scions<br />

varieties. <strong>The</strong> observed smaller average fruit weights for nongrafted<br />

plants was also associated with slightly higher fruit counts compared<br />

to grafted plants (data not shown). Fruit soluble solids concentrations<br />

varied among grafted and nongrafted plants for both rootstock types<br />

and scion varieties but there were no consistent trends in this<br />

parameter.<br />

Vine decline disease development was not severe due, perhaps, to<br />

generally cooler weather during the fruit maturation period. MR1 and<br />

PI 3105 had the highest incidence of plants with wilt symptoms among<br />

grafted plants. <strong>The</strong>re were no statistically significant differences in<br />

total soluble solids (TSS) among the different graft combinations and<br />

between grafted and nongrafted plants.<br />

Vine decline disease of melons caused by M. cannonballus is<br />

believed to result from reduction in the root absorptive capacity<br />

following infection and root damage by the fungus (Bruton et al.,<br />

1998). A vigorous root system presumably compensates for the root<br />

damage, thus allowing infected plants to meet the increased<br />

water/nutrient demands during fruit maturation (Dias et al., 2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> leaf-water potential responses to grafting observed in this study<br />

are consistent with expectations of the effects of a vigorous root<br />

system on leaf-water status. Plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks<br />

had the highest Ψleaf, especially during fruit maturation, when plant<br />

water demands are high. Plants grafted on the Cucumis rootstocks PI<br />

1207, 124104, and 20488 also had higher Ψleaf values compared to<br />

nongrafted plants, and consistent with their vigorous root system<br />

classification (Crosby et al., 2002). Even though transpirational water<br />

loss of grafted plants was high, the symptoms of vine decline disease<br />

(wilting) were generally low. Maintenance of high Ψleaf by plants<br />

grafted on rootstocks with vigorous root systems indicates that such<br />

plants could better tolerate infection and root damage without collapse<br />

compared to nongrafted plants.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bruton, B. D. 1998. Soilborne diseases in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae: pathogen virulence and<br />

host resistance, p. 143–166. In: J. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998. ASHS,<br />

Alexandria, VA.<br />

Bruton, B. D., V. M. Russo, J. Garcia-Jimenez, and M. E. Miller. 1998.<br />

Carbohydrate partitioning, cultural practices, and vine decline diseases of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s, p. 189–200. In: J. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998. ASHS,<br />

Alexandria, VA.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 29


Cohen, R., Y. Burger, C. Horev, A. Porat, and M. Edelstein. 2005. Performance of<br />

Galia-type melons grafted on to <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstock in Monosporascus<br />

cannonballus-infested and non-infested soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 146:381–387.<br />

Crosby, K. and D. Wolff. 1998. Effects of Monosporascus cannonballus on root<br />

traits on susceptible and tolerant melon (Cucumis melo L.), p. 253–256. In: J.<br />

McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Crosby, K., D. Wolff, and M. Miller. 2000. Comparisons of root morphology in<br />

susceptible and tolerant melon cultivars before and after infection by<br />

Monosporascus cannonballus. HortSci. 35:681–683.<br />

Crosby, K., M. Miller, and D. Wolff. 2002. Screening plant introductions of Cucumis<br />

melo L. for resistance to Monosporascus cannonballus, p. 188–191 In: D. N.<br />

Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Dias, R. C. S., B. Pico, J. Herraiz, A. Espinos, and F. Nuez. 2002. Modifying root<br />

structure of cultivated muskmelon to improve vine decline resistance. HortSci.<br />

37:1092–1097.<br />

Lee, J. M. and M. Oda. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental<br />

crops. Hort. Rev. 28:61–124.<br />

Lee, J. M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. current status, grafting methods,<br />

and benefits. HortSci. 29:235–239.<br />

Martyn, R. D. and M. E. Miller. 1996. Monosporascus root rot and vine decline: an<br />

emerging disease of melons worldwide. Plant Dis. 80:716–725.<br />

30 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF GENES<br />

INVOLVED IN THE FORMATION OF MELON<br />

AROMA<br />

Nurit Katzir, Vitaly Portnoy, Yael Benyamini, Yoela Yariv,<br />

Galil Tzuri, Maya Pompan-Lotan, Olga Larkov, Einat Bar,<br />

Mwafaq Ibdah, Yaniv Azulay, Uzi Ravid, Yosef Burger, Arthur A.<br />

Schaffer, Yaakov Tadmor, and Efraim Lewinsohn<br />

Department of Vegetable Crops, Agricultural Research Organization,<br />

Newe Ya’ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, fruit quality, functional genomics<br />

ABSTRACT. A multidisciplinary approach aimed at the identification and<br />

characterization of key genes that direct the biosynthesis of aroma compounds<br />

in melon (Cucumis melo) is described. <strong>The</strong> aromas of fruits are normally due to<br />

complex mixtures of volatile compounds. Volatile esters, mainly acetate<br />

derivatives, are prominent in aromatic melon varieties, along with lower<br />

amounts of sesquiterpenes, norisoprenes, short-chain alcohols, and aldehydes.<br />

Nonaromatic melon varieties often have much lower levels of total volatiles, and<br />

especially lack the volatile esters. EST libraries of melon fruits were developed,<br />

representing the great variability of C. melo. Altogether, 4,800 ESTs from these<br />

libraries were sequenced and a melon EST database was developed<br />

(http://melon.bti.cornell.edu/). <strong>The</strong> database has been mined to identify<br />

candidate genes affecting fruit ripening and fruit-quality traits, among them<br />

genes involved in aroma formation from three gene families: (1) alcohol acetyl<br />

transferases, (2) sesquiterpene synthases, and (3) carotenoid cleavage<br />

dioxygenases. Full-length clones of candidate genes were isolated, and their<br />

expression patterns in various melon cultivars were studied. Biochemical<br />

characterizations of heterologously expressed gene products, coupled with the<br />

systematic analysis of aroma volatiles and corresponding biosynthetic enzymes,<br />

were used to identify the roles of these genes in aroma formation during<br />

ripening.<br />

F<br />

ruit quality is determined by numerous traits that affect taste,<br />

aroma, texture, pigmentation, nutritional value, and duration of<br />

shelf life (for review see Giovannoni, 2004). Recently, genomic<br />

tools, such as EST libraries and DNA microarrays, have been applied<br />

to various fruit species and have provided vast information on the<br />

patterns of gene expression throughout fruit development and<br />

This work was partially supported by the A.R.O Center for the Improvement of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong> Fruit Quality, by an Israel Ministry of Science Grant, and by Research<br />

Grant No. IS-3333-02C from B.A.R.D, the United <strong>State</strong>s-Israel Binational<br />

Agricultural Research and Development Fund.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 31


maturation (Aharoni et al., 2000; Alba et al., 2004; Fei et al., 2004).<br />

Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is a highly polymorphic species that<br />

comprises a broad array of wild and cultivated genotypes that differ in<br />

fruit traits such as ripening physiology (climacteric and<br />

nonclimacteric), sugar and acid content, and secondary metabolites<br />

associated with taste and aroma. In aromatic melon varieties the<br />

prominent compounds responsible for aroma formation are volatile<br />

esters, mainly acetate derivatives, and lower amounts of<br />

sesquiterpenes, norisoprenes, short-chain alcohols, and aldehydes<br />

(Shalit et al., 2001). <strong>The</strong> contribution of each component to the overall<br />

unique aromas is often difficult to assess due to the differences in odor<br />

intensity and thresholds of the different components. Thus, different<br />

components impart different notes and contribute in different ways to<br />

the overall aroma of melons. Nonaromatic varieties often have much<br />

lower levels of total volatiles, and especially lack volatile esters (Shalit<br />

et al., 2001; Burger et al., 2005; El-Sharkawy et al., 2005; Benyamini<br />

et al., unpublished).<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim of our project was to identify candidate genes that affect<br />

the aroma of melon, as part of a broader program aimed at identifying<br />

key genes that control melon quality and marketability. This project<br />

has helped to establish a platform for future marker-assisted selection<br />

and genetic modifications to generate superior varieties.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL. <strong>The</strong> melon cultivars investigated in this study<br />

included: (1) ‘Dulce’, ‘Noy Yizre’el’, ‘Arava’, and ‘En Dor’ of C.<br />

melo subsp. melo Group Reticulatus, (2) ‘Tam Dew’, ‘Rochet’, ‘Noy<br />

‘Amid’, and ‘Piel De Sapo’ of subsp. melo Group Inodorus, (3)<br />

‘Védrantais’ of subsp. melo Group Cantalupensis, (4) PI 414723 of<br />

subsp. agrestis Group Momordica, (5) ‘Dudaim’ of subsp. melo Group<br />

Dudaim, and (6) ‘Faqqous’ of subsp. melo Group Flexuosus.<br />

EST LIBRARIES. EST libraries were constructed using suppression<br />

subtractive hybridization (SSH, Diatchenko et al., 1996), PCR-<br />

SelectTM kit (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA), or ZAP cDNA<br />

Synthesis Kit and ZAP Express® cDNA Gigapack ® III Gold Cloning<br />

Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to manufacturer’s<br />

recommendations. RNA was extracted using a modification of La<br />

Claire II and Herrin (1997).<br />

CLONE SELECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION. Expression of<br />

selected clones in different tissue types and developmental stages was<br />

further analyzed on <strong>North</strong>ern blots or Real-time PCR. <strong>North</strong>ern<br />

blotting (25μg of total RNA per lane, confirmed by methylene blue<br />

32 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


staining) and hybridization were performed as described by Sambrook<br />

and Russell (2001). Real-time PCR was performed as described by<br />

Ibdah et al. (2006).<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF VOLATILES: SAMPLE PREPARATION. Melon<br />

fruits were harvested at immature and mature stages. Immediately after<br />

harvest three fruits from each cultivar were picked randomly and cut<br />

into large pieces. Samples were prepared for analysis as described in<br />

Fallik et al. (2001).<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF VOLATILES: HEADSPACE-SOLID PHASE<br />

MICROEXTRACTION (HS-SPME). <strong>The</strong> volatiles were sampled by<br />

automated headspace-solid phase microextraction using an<br />

autosampler of CTC Pal system. <strong>The</strong> headspace phase was adsorbed<br />

for 30 min at ambient temperature and desorbed for 10 min into a gaschromatograph-mass<br />

spectrometer (GC-MS) injection port. <strong>The</strong><br />

volatiles were analyzed according to Ibdah et al. (2006).<br />

ENZYMATIC ASSAYS OF ALCOHOL ACETYL TRANSFERASE,<br />

SESQUITERPENE SYNTHASE, AND CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE<br />

DIOXYGENASE ACTIVITY. Fruit extractions and enzymatic activity<br />

assays were performed as described by Shalit et al. (2001), Guterman<br />

et al. (2002), and Ibdah et al. (2006) respectively.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Our project aimed at the discovery and application of important<br />

genes controlling the metabolism of fruit-quality components in<br />

Cucumis melo. EST libraries of melon fruits were developed,<br />

representing the great genetic variability of the species C. melo. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

include subtracted and nonsubtracted, nonnormalized libraries from<br />

various genotypes. Altogether, 4,800 ESTs of these libraries were<br />

sequenced and a melon EST database was developed<br />

(http://melon.bti.cornell.edu/).<br />

<strong>The</strong> EST database has been mined to identify candidate genes<br />

affecting fruit ripening and fruit-quality traits, especially genes<br />

associated with aroma formation. To better understand the<br />

biochemistry and the molecular regulation of aroma biosynthesis,<br />

functional analyses of putative genes involved in aroma biosynthesis<br />

were studied. First we determined the main compounds in the<br />

headspace of the fruits. We then established biochemical assays to<br />

measure the enzymes putatively involved in the biosynthesis of key<br />

aroma compounds. Heterologous expression of the isolated genes in E.<br />

coli combined with enzymatic activity of their products enabled us to<br />

draw conclusions concerning their role in aroma biosynthesis. Some of<br />

our results are summarized below.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 33


ALCOHOL ACETYL TRANSFERASES. <strong>The</strong> major volatiles present in<br />

the aromatic melon varieties are volatile acetates (El-Sharkawy et al.,<br />

2005; Benyamini et al., unpublished). Total volatile acetates present in<br />

mature melon varieties are shown in Figure 1A. <strong>The</strong>se compounds are<br />

absent in unripe fruits and in the nonaromatic cultivars such as<br />

‘Rochet’, whether ripe or unripe. In accordance, cell-free extracts from<br />

aromatic melons contained alcohol acetyl transferase (AAT) activity,<br />

enabling acetylation of several alcohol substrates, while nonaromatic<br />

melons did not contain significant AAT activity with any of the<br />

substrates tested (Figure 1B).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the EST database was searched for putative AAT genes,<br />

leading to the identification of several members of this family. Two of<br />

them, namely CmAAT1 and CmAAT2, have been previously identified<br />

in melons (Yahyaoui et al., 2002; El-Sharkawy et al., 2005). <strong>North</strong>ern<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

µg acetates/gr f.w<br />

Pkat/gr f.w<br />

12000<br />

9000<br />

6000<br />

3000<br />

0<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

y m y m y m y m y m y m y m y m y m<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

Fig. 1. (A) Volatile acetate content in aromatic and nonaromatic melon<br />

cultivars. (B) AAT activity in crude extract of melon cultivars. (C)<br />

<strong>North</strong>ern blot of melon genotypes using probe of CmAAT1, y, young fruit;<br />

m, mature fruit. ‘Arava’ (1), ‘Noy Yizre’el’ (2), ‘Védrantais’ (3), ‘Dulce’ (4),<br />

and ‘Dudaim’ (5) have a typical melon aroma while ‘Tam Dew’ (6) and<br />

‘Rochet’ (8) are nonaromatic. PI 414723 (9) and ‘Faqqous’ (7) have distinct<br />

strong aromas.<br />

34 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


lots demonstrated expression of AAT in mature aromatic but not in<br />

nonaromatic genotypes (Figure 1C). This expression pattern fits well<br />

the composition of volatiles and AAT activity found in these melons:<br />

the majority of the volatiles of nonaromatic and unripe melons were<br />

short- and medium-chain alcohols, while the majority of the volatiles<br />

of mature aromatic melons were acetates, mostly aliphatic.<br />

CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASES. Comparative analysis of<br />

carotenoids and volatiles revealed an interesting association between<br />

carotenoid content and aroma of melon fruit flesh. <strong>The</strong> major volatile<br />

norisoprenoid present in orange-fleshed melons is β-ionone, a<br />

compound derived from the oxidative cleavage of β-carotene.<br />

β-ionone was not detected in any of the green- or white-fleshed<br />

melons. A search for a gene putatively responsible for the<br />

cleavage of β-carotene into β-ionone was carried out in our EST<br />

database, yielding a sequence (CmCCD1) highly similar (84%) to<br />

other carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase genes. Expression patterns<br />

of the gene were compared in the orange-fleshed ‘Dulce’, the green-<br />

fleshed ‘Tam Dew’ and ‘Noy Yizre’el, and the white-green-fleshed<br />

‘Rochet’ (Figure 2) in order to observe a possible relationship between<br />

mesocarp color and volatile production (Ibdah et al., 2006). CmCCD1<br />

gene expression is upregulated upon fruit development mainly in the<br />

orange melon ‘Dulce’ but also in the green and white-green melon<br />

varieties, despite the lack of norisoprenoid volatiles in the latter. Thus,<br />

the accumulation of β-ionone in melon fruit is probably limited by the<br />

availability of carotenoid substrate.<br />

Relative expression<br />

0.1<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

0<br />

FR-1 FR-2 FR-3 FR-4<br />

Stage of development<br />

Tam Dew<br />

Dulce<br />

Noy Yizre'el<br />

Rochet<br />

Fig. 2. Expression patterns of CmCCD1 in melon fruit. Real-time PCR analysis<br />

of RNA extracted from four genotypes. Fruits at the following stages of develop-<br />

ment were sampled: FR-1, very young green fruits; FR-2, young green fruits;<br />

FR-3, full-size mature green fruits; FR-4, ripe fruits. Values are means ± SEM<br />

of 3 different evaluations carried out in duplicates with one set of cDNA.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 35


<strong>The</strong> clone was functionally active and overexpressed in E. coli<br />

strains previously engineered to produce β-carotene. <strong>The</strong> incorporated<br />

CmCCD1 gene product cleaved β-carotene, generating β-ionone.<br />

Interestingly, the gene product is able to cleave other carotenoids that<br />

normally do not accumulate in melons, such as lycopene, phytoene,<br />

and δ-carotene, into their respective breakdown products such as<br />

pseudoionone, geranylacetone, and α-ionone as determined by HPLC<br />

(carotenoids) and GC-MS (volatiles) (Ibdah et al., 2006). β-ionone is a<br />

very potent odorant and can be detected in concentrations as low as<br />

0.07ppm. Thus β-ionone accumulates to significant amounts in orange<br />

melons, and might have a profound effect on the aroma of the fruit.<br />

White-fleshed melons that lack β-carotene also lack β-ionone.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, color has an effect on aroma.<br />

SESQUITERPENE SYNTHASES. In the case of sesquiterpenes, the<br />

volatile compounds, the appropriate enzymatic activity, and relevant<br />

gene expression were found to be cultivar-specific. Two novel<br />

sesquiterpene synthase genes have been isolated from two melon<br />

cultivars: CM-SS1 (‘Dulce’) and CM-SS2 (‘Noy Yizre’el’). <strong>The</strong> two<br />

genes were functionally expressed in E. coli and shown to encode for<br />

distinct proteins that convert farnesyl diphosphate into either farnesene<br />

(CM-SS1) or cadinene (CM-SS2). <strong>The</strong> details of the sesquiterpene<br />

study will be described in Benyamini et al. (unpublished).<br />

Conclusion<br />

We have undertaken an investigation aimed at rationalizing the<br />

biochemical and molecular events that lead to the formation of aroma<br />

volatiles in melon fruits. Cell-free enzymatic assays have enabled us to<br />

measure the potential of each melon variety to produce certain volatile<br />

compounds from their respective precursors. <strong>The</strong> expression level of<br />

the relevant genes as well as their enzymatic activity increases upon<br />

maturation, concomitantly with the appearance of their respective<br />

volatile compounds in fruit.<br />

By combining EST database mining, expression analyses,<br />

enzymatic assays, and volatile determinations, we have been able to<br />

establish a platform by which many genes typical of fruit maturation<br />

were isolated. Many of these genes play major roles in various<br />

metabolic pathways and physiological processes related to aroma<br />

volatile formation. <strong>The</strong> final confirmation of the biochemical role was<br />

assessed by heterologous functional expression. This interdisciplinary<br />

study has provided a good infrastructure to address questions related to<br />

aroma formation and other ripening processes taking place in melons.<br />

36 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Literature Cited<br />

Aharoni, A., L. C. P. Keizer, H. J. Bouwmeester, Z. Sun, M. Alvarez-Huerta, H. A.<br />

Verhoeven, J. Blaas, A. M. M. L. Van Houwelingen, R. C. H. De Vos, H. Van<br />

der Voet, R. C. Jansen, M. Guis, J. Mol, R. W. Davis, M. Schena, A. J. Van<br />

Tunen, and A. P. O’Connel. 2000. Identification of the SAAT gene involved in<br />

strawberry flavor biogenesis by use of DNA microarrays. Plant Cell. 12:647–<br />

661.<br />

Alba, R., Z. J. Fei, P. Payton, Y. Liu, S. L. Moore, P. Debbie, J. Cohn, M.<br />

D'Ascenzo, J. S. Gordon, J. K. C. Rose, G. Martin, S. T. Tanksley, M.<br />

Bouzayen, M. M. Jahn, and J. J. Giovannoni. 2004. ESTs, cDNA microarrays,<br />

and gene expression profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and<br />

development. Plant J. 39:697–714.<br />

Burger, Y., U. Sa’ar, H. S. Paris, E. Lewinsohn, N. Katzir, Y. Tadmor, and A. A.<br />

Schaffer. 2006. Genetic variability as a source of new valuable fruit quality traits<br />

in Cucumis melo. Israel J. Plant Sci. (In press).<br />

Diatchenko, L., Y.-F. C. Lau, A. P. Campbell, F. Chenchik, B. Moqadam, S. Huang,<br />

K. Lukyanov, N. Lukyanov, N. Gurskaya, E. D. Sverdlov, and P.D. Siebert.<br />

1996. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating<br />

differentially regulated or tissue specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc. Natl.<br />

Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:6025–6030.<br />

El-Sharkawy, I., D. Manriquez, F. B. Flores, F. Regad, M. Bouzayen, A. Latche, and<br />

J. C. Pech. 2005. Functional characterization of melon alcohol acyl-transferase<br />

gene family involved in the biosynthesis of ester volatiles. identification of the<br />

crucial role of a threonine residue for enzyme activity. Plant Mol. Biol. 59:345–<br />

362.<br />

Fallik E., S. Alkali-Tuvia, B. Horev, A. Copel, V. Rodov, Y. Aharoni, D. Ulrich, and<br />

H. Schulz. 2001. Characterization of ‘Galia’ melon aroma by GC and mass<br />

spectrometric sensor measurements after prolonged storage. Postharv. Biol.<br />

Technol. 22:85–91.<br />

Fei, Z., X. Tang, R. Alba, J. White, C. Ronning, G. Martin, S. Tanksley, and J.<br />

Giovannoni. 2004. Comprehensive EST analysis of tomato and comparative<br />

genomics of fruit ripening. Plant J. 40:47–59.<br />

Giovannoni, J. 2004. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant<br />

Cell. 16:S170–S180.<br />

Guterman, I., M. Shalit, M. Menda, D. Piestun, M. Dafny-Yelin, G. Shalev, E. Bar,<br />

O. Davydov, M. Ovadis, M. Emanuel, J. Wang, Z. Adam, E. Pichersky, E.<br />

Lewinsohn, D. Zamir, A. Vainstein, and D. Weiss. 2002. Rose scent: genomics<br />

approach to discovering novel floral fragrance-related genes. Plant Cell.<br />

14:2325.<br />

Ibdah, M., Y. Azulay, V. Portnoy, B. Wasserman, E. Bar, A. Meir, Y. Burger, J.<br />

Hirschberg, A. A. Schaffer, N. Katzir, Y. Tadmor, and E. Lewinsohn. 2006.<br />

Functional characterization of CmCCD1, a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase<br />

from melon. Phytochem. (In press).<br />

La Claire II, J. W. and D. J. Herrin. 1997. Co-isolation of high-quality DNA and<br />

RNA from coenocytic green algae. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 15:263–272.<br />

Sambrook, J. and D. W. Russell (eds). 2001. Molecular cloning: a<br />

laboratory manual, p. 7.21–7.45. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory<br />

Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.<br />

Shalit, M., N. Katzir, Y. Tadmor, O. Larkov, Y. Burger, F. Shalekhet, E. Lastochkin,<br />

U. Ravid, O. Amar, M. Edelstein, Z. Karchi, and E. Lewinsohn. 2001. Acetyl<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 37


CoA: alcohol acetyl transferase activity and aroma formation in ripening melon<br />

fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:794–799.<br />

Yahyaoui, F., C. Wongs-Aree, A. Latche, R. Hackett, D. Grierson, and J. C. Pech.<br />

2002. Molecular and biochemical characteristics of a gene encoding an alcohol<br />

acyl-transferase involved in the generation of aroma volatile esters during melon<br />

ripening. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:2359–2366.<br />

38 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


STUDIES OF TRANSGENIC MELON<br />

EXPRESSING THE MUTANT ETHYLENE<br />

RECEPTOR, ETR1-1, INDICATE THAT<br />

ETHYLENE PERCEPTION BY STAMEN<br />

PRIMORDIA IS REQUIRED FOR CARPEL<br />

DEVELOPMENT IN MELON FLOWERS<br />

H. A. Little, S. Hammar, and R. Grumet<br />

Department of Horticulture, Michigan <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

East Lansing, MI 48824<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, sex expression, monoecious,<br />

monoecy<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> species are characterized by a range of diverse sex<br />

phenotypes that are, at least in part, regulated by the plant hormone ethylene,<br />

which promotes increased femaleness, i.e., carpel development, on typically<br />

monoecious (male and female flowers) or andromonoecious (male and bisexual<br />

flowers) cultigens. We sought to determine the role of ethylene perception in<br />

carpel development by expression of the dominant negative Arabidopsis mutant<br />

ethylene receptor, etr1-1, under control of floral-targeted promoters in<br />

transgenic melon (Cucumis melo L.). Our previous studies with constitutively<br />

expressed etr1-1 demonstrated that etr1-1 blocked ethylene perception and<br />

prevented formation of carpel-bearing flowers when introduced into the<br />

andromonoecious melon cultivar Hale’s Best Jumbo, indicating the necessity of<br />

ethylene perception for carpel development. In these studies, we hypothesized<br />

that ethylene perception by the developing carpel primordium would be<br />

necessary for production of carpel-bearing flowers. In contrast to our<br />

prediction, expression of etr1-1 driven by the carpel-directed promoter, CRC,<br />

increased production of carpel-bearing buds, while etr1-1 driven by the stamen-<br />

and petal-specific promoter, AP3, abolished production of carpel bearing buds.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that ethylene perception by the stamen primordia is<br />

required for development of carpel primordia.<br />

C<br />

ucurbit species produce varying combinations of male, female,<br />

and bisexual flowers (Perl-Treves, 1999; Roy and Saran, 1990).<br />

Sex determination of individual flowers is hormonally<br />

regulated, with ethylene playing the predominant role (Rudich, 1990;<br />

Perl-Treves, 1999). Application of ethylene-releasing compounds<br />

We thank Drs. Eric Schaller, John Bowman, and Vivian Irish for providing the etr1-<br />

1 gene and CRC and AP3 promoters, respectively. This project was in part supported<br />

by research grants IS-3139-99 and US-3735-05C from BARD, the United <strong>State</strong>s-<br />

Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, and by a USDA-<br />

NNF fellowship to HAL.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 39


increases female or bisexual flower production, while treatment with<br />

inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis or action increases maleness.<br />

In early stages of cucumber flower development, floral buds<br />

contain primordia of all four whorls (sepals, petals, stamens, and<br />

carpels) typical of a bisexual flower (Goffinet, 1990). In male flowers,<br />

arrest of carpel primordia occurs prior to differentiation of the ovary<br />

(Bai et al., 2004). In female flowers, initial differentiation of the<br />

filament and anther is followed by DNA degradation in the primordial<br />

anther (Hao et al., 2003). Response to ethylene-releasing or ethyleneinhibiting<br />

compounds indicates that the stage just preceding, or<br />

immediately following, differentiation of stamen primordia is critical<br />

for sex determination (Yamasaki et al., 2003; Bai et al., 2004; Hao et<br />

al., 2003).<br />

Our objective is to elucidate the role of ethylene perception on sex<br />

expression in melon. Melon plants are typically andromonoecious,<br />

with an initial phase of male flowers followed by a combination of<br />

bisexual and male flowers. We previously showed that melon plants<br />

transformed to constitutively express the dominant negative ethyleneperception<br />

mutant, etr1-1 from Arabidopsis, exhibited a range of<br />

phenotypes associated with reduced ethylene sensitivity, verifying that<br />

etr1-1 is able to confer ethylene insensitivity in the heterologous<br />

melon system (Papadopoulou, 2002).<br />

As predicted, the formation of carpel-bearing buds was essentially<br />

abolished in 35S::etr1-1 melons, demonstrating that ethylene<br />

perception is necessary to promote bisexual flower development in<br />

melon.<br />

In this work, we sought to identify the critical locations for<br />

ethylene perception within the developing flower bud. <strong>The</strong> etr1-1<br />

gene was introduced under the control of the Arabidopsis floral-organ<br />

specific Crab’s Claw (CRC) and Apetela3 (AP3) promoters. <strong>The</strong> CRC<br />

promoter drives expression in carpel and nectary primordia in<br />

Arabidopsis at the outset of gynoecium development (Bowman and<br />

Smyth, 1999; Lee et al., 2005). AP3 is expressed in cells destined to<br />

become petals and stamens (Irish and Yamamoto, 1995). It was<br />

predicted that blocking ethylene perception in the carpels would<br />

prevent carpel development, resulting in male flowers, but blocking<br />

ethylene perception in the stamens would not alter sex determination.<br />

In contrast to our prediction, CRC::etr1-1 plants showed increased<br />

female sex determination, while AP3::etr1-1 plants were nearly<br />

exclusively male. <strong>The</strong>se results provide insight into the molecular<br />

basis for sex determination in melon, and indicate that ethylene<br />

perception by the stamen plays a critical role in regulating carpel<br />

development in the developing melon flower.<br />

40 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Materials and Methods<br />

PLASMID CONSTRUCTION, PLANT TRANSFORMATION, AND<br />

VERIFICATION OF TRANSFORMATION. Construction of the CRC::etr1-<br />

1 and AP3::etr1-1 plasmids is described in Little (2005).<br />

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of<br />

andromonoecious melon (cv. Hale’s Best Jumbo, Hollar Seed, Rocky<br />

Ford, CO) was performed based on the methods of Fang and Grumet<br />

(1990) and Tabei et al. (1998). Regenerated plantlets (T0) were<br />

evaluated for the presence of the neomycin phosphotransferase protein<br />

by NPTII ELISA (Agia ® , Elkhart, IN) and the etr1-1 gene by<br />

polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using both etr1-1 and promoterspecific<br />

primers. PCR- and ELISA-positive T0 plants were transferred<br />

to the greenhouse and self-pollinated to produce T1 and T2 progeny.<br />

RNA was isolated from leaves, young male and female buds (3–5mm),<br />

and older male buds (10–12mm) of greenhouse-grown plants using<br />

Concert Plant RNA Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Gene<br />

expression was verified by northern analysis using standard procedures<br />

(Sambrook and Russell, 2001) and DIG-labeled probe (Roche<br />

Diagnostics, Germany).<br />

SEX EXPRESSION. <strong>The</strong> first 30 nodes of the main stem of<br />

transgenic T1 or T2 plants and nontransgenic controls were evaluated<br />

for the time of appearance of the first carpel-bearing flower bud; the<br />

total number of nodes with carpel-bearing or male buds; the number of<br />

carpel-bearing buds that reached anthesis; and, for aborted carpelbearing<br />

buds, the size reached prior to senescing. Each transgenic line<br />

was tested in at least three experiments using a randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />

block design.<br />

Results<br />

GENE INTEGRATION AND EXPRESSION. Presence of the etr1-1<br />

gene and appropriate promoter was verified in T1 progeny of<br />

AP3::etr1-1 or CRC::etr1-1 plants by PCR analysis (Little, 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong> observed segregation ratios were consistent with a single insertion<br />

site for all lines except AP3-3, which likely has two insertions (Little,<br />

2005). <strong>North</strong>ern hybridizations demonstrated that in AP3::etr1-1<br />

lines, etr-1-1 expression was absent in leaves (Figure 1A) and present<br />

in male buds (Figure 1B), as expected based on the petal and stamen<br />

specificity of AP3 in Arabidopsis (Jack et al., 1994). CRC::etr1-1<br />

lines showed hybridization in leaves, indicating leaky expression from<br />

the promoter in the heterologous melon system. etr1-1 mRNA was<br />

detected in both young male and carpel-bearing buds of CRC::etr1-1<br />

plants; higher levels were observed in the carpel-bearing buds,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 41


consistent with expected carpel expression. Detection of etr1-1<br />

message in male CRC::etr1-1 buds could be the result of expression in<br />

the nectaries (Bowman and Smyth, 1999; Lee et al., 2005) or<br />

leakiness, as is suggested by expression in the petals.<br />

SEX EXPRESSION OF TRANSGENIC ETR1-1 MELONS.<br />

CRC::ETR1-1. <strong>The</strong> typical progression of sex expression along the main<br />

stem of andromonoecious melon is several vegetative nodes, followed<br />

Fig. 1. <strong>North</strong>ern hybridization of etrl-1 gene expression. (A) Total RNA isolated<br />

from leaf tissue of nontransgenic (WT), 35s::etr1-1 (35S), CRC::etr1-1 (CRC11<br />

and CRC15), and AP3::etr1-1 (AP3-3 and AP3-8) plants. (B) Total RNA isolated<br />

from young male buds of WT, AP3-3, AP3-8, CRC5, and CRC15 plants and<br />

young female buds of WT, CRC5 and CRC15 plants. (C) Total RNA isolated<br />

from mature male buds of WT, CRC5, CRC11, and AP3-8 plants. Mature male<br />

buds were separated into petals and lower bud, which included sepals, stamens,<br />

nectary, and floral cup. <strong>The</strong> bottom band in each pair shows rRNA.<br />

by a phase of staminate buds, then a mixture of staminate and bisexual<br />

buds. ‘Hale’s Best Jumbo’ wild-type plants produced the first bisexual<br />

flowers at approximately Node 20 (Figure 2A). Examination of the<br />

CRC::etr1-1 plants did not show the predicted failure to produce<br />

carpel-bearing buds. Instead, carpel-bearing buds occurred<br />

42 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


significantly earlier (by 6–0 nodes) on the main stem of CRC::etr1-1<br />

plants than on the nontransgenic controls. CRC::etr1-1 plants also<br />

showed a significant increase in number of carpel-bearing buds on the<br />

first 30 nodes (Figure 2B). Thus, despite leaky expression from the<br />

CRC promoter, the phenotype of the CRC::etr1-1 plants was distinct<br />

from the 35S::etr1-1 plants, which failed to produce carpel-bearing<br />

buds (Papadopoulou et al., 2005; Little, 2005).<br />

Fig. 2. Sex expression of CRC::etr1-1 melon plants. (A) Node of first carpelbearing<br />

bud on main stem. (B) Total number of nodes with carpel-bearing buds<br />

on the main stem for ‘Hale’s Best Jumbo’ (WT), azygous nontransgenic plants<br />

(AZY), and CRC5, CRC11, and CRC15 lines. <strong>The</strong> experiment was repeated<br />

three times in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design. Data are means ± standard<br />

error of 16 plants/genotype.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect of failure to perceive ethylene was, however, evident in<br />

the maturation of the carpel-bearing flowers. Typically, the majority<br />

of the buds bearing carpels initiated on the main stem of melon plants<br />

abort prior to reaching anthesis (Papadopoulou et al., 2005).<br />

Measurement of the size of the immature carpel-bearing bud at the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 43


time of abortion showed that carpel-bearing buds on CRC::etr1-1<br />

plants were four times more likely than buds on control plants to reach<br />

senescence at 4mm or less; a similar decrease was observed in the<br />

proportion of buds on CRC::etr1-1 plants that mature beyond 4mm or<br />

reach anthesis relative to controls (Figure 3).<br />

Fig. 3. Size reached by carpel-bearing buds before senescing for ‘Hale’s Best<br />

Jumbo’ (WT), azygous (AZY), and CRC::etr1-1 plants (lines CRC5, CRC11,<br />

and CRC15). <strong>The</strong> experiment was repeated three times in a randomized<br />

<strong>complete</strong> block design. Data are means ± standard error of 16 plants/genotype.<br />

AP3::ETR1-1. Inhibition of ethylene perception in the stamens was not<br />

predicted to affect sex determination in melon; however, all AP3-3<br />

plants and the majority of AP3-8 plants (61%) failed to produce any<br />

carpel-bearing buds within the first 30 nodes (Figure 4A). <strong>The</strong> AP3-8<br />

plants that did produce buds bearing carpels on the main stem reverted<br />

to male buds after producing only 1–2 buds containing a carpel.<br />

Examination of both main and lateral stems showed that less than 5%<br />

of the nodes on AP3::etr1-1 plants produced carpel-bearing buds vs.<br />

more than 50% of nodes evaluated in nontransgenic plants (WT and<br />

AZY) (Figure 4B). As was observed in previous experiments,<br />

CRC::etr1-1 plants that were included for comparison had earlier and<br />

increased formation of buds containing carpels.<br />

44 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Discussion<br />

Expression of the etr1-1 gene under the direction of the<br />

Arabidopsis floral-targeted promoters CRC and AP3 conferred unique<br />

flowering phenotypes. CRC::etr1-1 plants exhibited enhanced<br />

femaleness as indicated by earlier and increased formation of buds<br />

containing carpels. This is in contrast to the expected inhibition of<br />

carpel-bearing buds, due to inhibited ethylene perception by the carpel,<br />

and the observed production of only male flowers on plants<br />

constitutively expressing etr1-1 (35S::etr1-1). <strong>The</strong> difference in the<br />

sex expression of 35S::etr1-1 and CRC::etr1-1 plants, despite leaky<br />

expression from the CRC promoter, may result from differences in<br />

timing and/or location of etr1-1 expression at key stages in sex<br />

determination, such that the CRC-driven etr1-1 expression does not<br />

prevent sex determination leading to initial carpel development.<br />

Conversely, and in contradiction to the predicted result that blocked<br />

ethylene perception in the stamen would not affect the production of<br />

bisexual buds, AP3::etr1-1 plants produced almost exclusively male<br />

flowers, suggesting that ethylene perception by stamen primordia is<br />

necessary for development of carpels. Collectively, these results with<br />

the CRC::etr1-1 and AP3::etr1-1 plants suggest that control of early<br />

carpel development resides within the stamens.<br />

Fig. 4. Carpel-bearing bud formation on AP3::etr1-1 transgenic plants. (A)<br />

Node position of first carpel-bearing bud on main stem. (B) Percentage of nodes<br />

bearing buds containing a carpel for ‘Hale’s Best Jumbo’ (WT), azygous (AZY),<br />

AP3::etr1-1 (lines 3 and 8), and CRC::etr1-1 (CRC15) plants. <strong>The</strong> experiment<br />

was repeated three times using a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design with a total<br />

of 7–21 plants/genotype.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 45


Presumably, under normal growth conditions,<br />

andromoneocious melon plants would produce a phase of male flowers<br />

until sufficient levels of ethylene are perceived by the stamen<br />

primordia to promote bisexual buds. Morphological analyses of male<br />

and female bud development suggest that divergence from a bisexual<br />

to unisexual flower begins after the initiation of carpel primordia at<br />

Stage 5 (Bai et al., 2004), and the stage of floral development at which<br />

sex determination can be modulated by ethylene treatment just<br />

precedes, or immediately follows, differentiation of stamen primordia<br />

(Yamasaki et al., 2003).<br />

Perhaps the decision to promote or inhibit carpel development<br />

occurs at a stage in development when the stamen primordia, but not<br />

the less-developed carpel primordia, are able to perceive ethylene.<br />

Analysis of CRC::etr1-1 melon plants showed that although<br />

carpel-bearing buds were initiated, virtually all aborted very early,<br />

most before reaching 4mm in length. This suggests that ethylene plays<br />

a role in sustained maturation of the carpel. <strong>The</strong>se results support our<br />

earlier observations made in transgenic melon constitutively<br />

expressing ACS (Papadopoulou et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> 35S::ACS melon<br />

plants exhibiting increased ethylene production had earlier and<br />

increased production of carpel-bearing buds, and a marked increase in<br />

the proportion of carpel-bearing buds reaching anthesis. Thus, it<br />

appears that ethylene has separable functions for sex determination<br />

and pistillate bud-maturation in melon.<br />

In summary, the CRC::etr1-1 melon plants showed increased<br />

femaleness as demonstrated by earlier and increased carpel-bearing<br />

bud production while AP3::etr1-1 melon plants showed increased<br />

maleness as demonstrated by virtual elimination of bisexual buds.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that the critical site for ethylene perception for<br />

promotion of early carpel development does not reside within the<br />

carpel, and that perception by the stamens is required to prevent carpel<br />

arrest. Further study is necessary to determine the precise timing and<br />

localization of etr1-1 expression at key stages of sex determination.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bai, S. L., Y. B. Peng, J. X. Cui, H. T. Gu, L. Y. Xu, L. Q. Li, Z. H. Xu, and S. N.<br />

Bai. 2004. Developmental analyses reveal early arrest of the spore-bearing<br />

parts of reproductive organs in unisexual flowers of cucumber (Cucumis sativus<br />

L.). Planta. 220:230–240.<br />

Bowman, J. L. and D. R. Smyth. 1999. CRABS CLAW, a gene that regulates carpel<br />

and nectary development in Arabidopsis, encodes a novel protein with zinc<br />

finger and helix-loop-helix domains. Develop. 126:2387–2396.<br />

Fang, G. and R. Grumet. 1990. Agrobacterium tumefasciens mediated transformation<br />

and regeneration of muskmelon plants. Plant Cell Rep. 9:160–164.<br />

46 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Goffinet, M. C. 1990. Comparative ontogeny of male and female flowers in<br />

Cucumis sativus, p. 288–304. In: D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey<br />

(eds.). Biology and utilization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press,<br />

Ithaca, NY.<br />

Hao, Y., D. Wang, Y. Peng, S. Bai, L. Xu, Y. Li, Z. Xu, and S. Bai. 2003. DNA<br />

damage in the early primordial anther is closely correlated with stamen arrest in<br />

the female flower of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Planta. 217:888–895.<br />

Irish, V. F. and Y. T. Yamamoto. 1995. Conservation of floral homeotic gene<br />

function between Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Plant Cell Rep. 9:160–164.<br />

Jack, T., G. L. Fox, and E. M. Meyerowitz. 1994. Arabidopsis homeotic gene<br />

APETALA3 ectopic expression: transcription and posttranscriptional regulation<br />

determine floral organ identity. Cell. 76:703–716.<br />

Lee, J. Y., S. F. Baum, J. Alvarez, A. Patel, D. H. Chitwood, and J. L. Bowman.<br />

2005. Activation of CRABSCLAW in nectaries and carpels of Arabidopsis. Plant<br />

Cell. 17:25–36.<br />

Little, H. A. 2005. Modification of sex expression in transgenic melon via altered<br />

ethylene production and perception. PhD Diss., Dept. of Horticulture, Michigan<br />

<strong>State</strong> Univ., East Lansing.<br />

Papadopoulou, E. 2002. Sex expression in cucurbits: the role of ethylene synthesis<br />

and perception and sex determination genes. PhD Diss. Dept. of Horticulture,<br />

Michigan <strong>State</strong> Univ., East Lansing.<br />

Papadopoulou, E., H. A. Little, S. A. Hammar, and R. Grumet. 2005. Effect of<br />

modified endogenous ethylene production on sex expression, bisexual flower<br />

development and fruit production in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sex. Plant<br />

Repro. 18:131–142.<br />

Perl-Treves, R. 1999. Male to female conversion along the cucumber shoot:<br />

approaches to study sex genes and floral development in Cucumis sativus,<br />

p.189–215. In: C. C. Ainsworth (ed.). Sex determination in plants. BIOS<br />

Scientific, Oxford, UK.<br />

Roy, R. P. and S. Saran. 1990. Sex expression in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, p. 251–268. In:<br />

D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey (eds.). Biology and utilization of<br />

the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.<br />

Rudich, J. 1990. Biochemical aspects of hormonal regulation of sex expression in<br />

cucurbits, p. 288–304. In: D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey (eds.).<br />

Biology and utilization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca,<br />

NY.<br />

Sambrook, J. and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3 rd<br />

ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.<br />

Tabei, Y., S. Kitade, Y. Nishizawa, N. Kikuchi, T. Kayano, T. Hibi, and K. Akustu.<br />

1998. Transgenic cucumber plants harboring a rice chitinase gene exhibit<br />

enhanced resistance to gray mold (Botrytis cinerea). Plant Cell Rep. 17:159–<br />

164.<br />

Yamasaki, S., N. Fujii, and H. Takahashi. 2003. Characterization of ethylene effects<br />

on sex determination in cucumber plants. Sex. Plant Repro. 16:103–111.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 47


DROUGHT-INDUCED GENE EXPRESSION IN<br />

ROOTS OF CITRULLUS COLOCYNTHIS<br />

Ying Si and Fenny Dane<br />

Department of Horticulture<br />

Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Drought stress, cDNA-AFLP, real-time RT-PCR,<br />

bitter apple<br />

ABSTRACT. Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad, closely related to watermelon, is a<br />

member of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family. This plant, commonly known as the bitter<br />

apple or bitter gourd, is a tender perennial vine with a rich history as an<br />

important medicinal plant and as a source of valuable oil. It is a very drought<br />

tolerant species with deep root system, widely distributed in the Sahara-<br />

Arabian deserts in Africa and the Mediterranean region. A 20% polyethylene<br />

glycol 8000 (PEG) solution was used to induce drought stress in C. colocynthis<br />

seedlings. cDNA-AFLP analysis was used to study gene expression in roots.<br />

Genes with similarity to known function genes involved in transport facilitation,<br />

metabolism and energy, stress- and defense-related proteins, cellular<br />

organization, signal transduction and expression regulation were induced. <strong>The</strong><br />

results suggest that C. colocynthis undergoes a complex adaptive process in<br />

response to drought stress.<br />

D<br />

rought is the major abiotic stress that has adverse effects on<br />

the growth of plants and productivity of crops. A combination<br />

of biochemical and physiological changes at the cellular and<br />

molecular levels, such as an increase in the plant stress hormone<br />

abscisic acid (ABA) and accumulation of various osmolytes and<br />

proteins coupled with an efficient antioxidant system, is known to<br />

result in stress tolerance. Plant cells have evolved to perceive different<br />

signals from their surroundings, to integrate them and respond by<br />

modulating the appropriate gene expression. <strong>The</strong> products of these<br />

genes are thought to function not only in stress tolerance but also in<br />

the regulation of gene expression and signal transduction (Bartels and<br />

Sunkar, 2005; Zhu, 2001).<br />

Although research has produced an enormous amount of<br />

information, we are far from understanding the <strong>complete</strong> mechanism<br />

of the stress reaction. It is proposed that our understanding of plant<br />

stress tolerance can be refined through gene isolation, characterization<br />

of individual genes and the assessment of their contribution to stress<br />

tolerance.<br />

48 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad, closely related to watermelon, is<br />

a member of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family. This plant, commonly known<br />

as bitter apple or bitter gourd, is a tender perennial vine with a rich<br />

history as an important medicinal plant and as a source of valuable oil.<br />

It is a drought-tolerant species with deep root system, widely<br />

distributed in the Sahara-Arabian region in Africa and the<br />

Mediterranean region.<br />

In an effort to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of drought<br />

tolerance in C. colocynthis, we set out to examine genes induced<br />

during drought stress in seedling roots.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Citrullus colocynthis seeds were sown in Metromix. Seedlings at<br />

5- to 6-leaf stage were cultured in 20% PEG 8000 solution for drought<br />

induction. Leaf and root samples were collected at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24 and<br />

48 h and stored at –80 o C immediately. RNA was extracted from<br />

control and 8 h treatment samples according to Spectrum Plant Total<br />

RNA Kit protocol (Ambion, Austin, TX), and purified by DNase I<br />

treatment. <strong>The</strong> concentration of RNA was measured using an<br />

Eppendorf Biophotometer (Brinkmann Instruments, NY), and quality<br />

was checked using formaldehyde/agarose gel electrophoresis.<br />

cDNA was synthesized using RETROscript (Ambion, TX)<br />

according to the manufacturer's instructions, and digested using the<br />

MseI/EcoRI enzyme combination. AFLP analysis was conducted<br />

according to the protocol of AFLP kit from Li-COR (Li-COR<br />

Biosciences, NE). Preamplified cDNA was diluted 40-fold, before<br />

amplification with selective primers. After selective PCR with E+A<br />

and M+C primers, selective PCR products were run on 6%<br />

polyacrylamide sequencing gel at 80 W for 5 h. Fragments were<br />

visualized by silver staining according to the Silver Sequence TM DNA<br />

Sequencing System Technical Manual (Promega, WI).<br />

Transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were extracted from the gel<br />

and used as a matrix for reamplification by PCR. TDFs were ligated<br />

directly into the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega), and then<br />

transformed into competent Escherichia coli (Promega). Plasmids<br />

were isolated using Plasmid Mini Kit (BIO-RAD). Fragments were<br />

sequenced with the ABI 3100 DNA sequencer (AU Genomics Lab).<br />

Analysis of nucleotide sequence of fragments was carried out using the<br />

National Center for Biotechnology Information BLASTx search tool.<br />

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using an AB 7500<br />

RealTime PCR System (AU Genomics Lab) and 7500 System<br />

software version 1.2.3 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with β–<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 49


actin gene used as reference in parallel with the target gene allowing<br />

gene expression normalization and providing quantification. PCR<br />

efficiencies of target and reference genes were determined by<br />

generating standard curves.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

cDNA-AFLP using 32 different primer combinations resulted in 42<br />

putative differentially expressed DNA fragments, which were cloned,<br />

sequenced, and analyzed. Genes with similarity to known function<br />

genes involved in transport facilitation, metabolism and energy, stress-<br />

and defense-related proteins, cellular organization, signal transduction,<br />

and expression regulation were detected. Thus far, 5 up-regulated<br />

fragments were confirmed to be differentially expressed in treated<br />

plants using quantitative relative real-time PCR. <strong>The</strong>se genes show<br />

high similarities at the amino acid level to heat shock protein (Hsp70),<br />

putative senescence-associated protein, grpE-like protein,<br />

synaptobrevin-related protein, and putative pathogenesis-related<br />

protein. <strong>The</strong> drought-stress-induced genes are known to be regulated<br />

not only by drought signals, but also by osmotic stress and defense<br />

signals in other plants (Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Zhu, 2001). More<br />

genes will be identified and confirmed in further studies and detailed<br />

characterization will be forthcoming. It is clear that C. colocynthis<br />

undergoes a complex adaptive process in response to drought. <strong>The</strong><br />

recognition of specific genes and in-depth analysis of their function in<br />

the process of stress tolerance will enable their use in improving the<br />

stress-tolerance ability of other Citrullus species.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bartels D. and R. Sunkar. 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant<br />

Sci. 24:23–58.<br />

Zhu, J. K. 2001. Cell signaling under salt, water and cold stress. Curr. Op. Plant Biol.<br />

4:401–406.<br />

50 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


EMBRYO CULTURE AS A TOOL FOR<br />

INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION OF<br />

CUCUMIS SATIVUS AND WILD CUCUMIS<br />

SPP.<br />

D. Skálová, B. Navrátilová, A. Lebeda, and N. Gasmanová<br />

Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />

Botany, Šlechtitelů 11, 783 71 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumber, muskmelon, cross-pollination, embryo<br />

rescue, colchicine application, ploidy level, disease resistance<br />

ABSTRACT. One of the possible methods for introducing resistance to disease<br />

and pests from wild Cucumis species to cucumber genotypes is interspecific<br />

hybridization. Methods of embryo-rescue and/or ovule culture are of<br />

considerable interest for overcoming crossability barriers. In the present study,<br />

selected genotypes of Cucumis species (C. sativus L., C. melo L., C. anguria L., C.<br />

zeyheri Sonder, and C. metuliferus E. Meyer ex Naudin) were used for<br />

hybridization experiments. Cross-pollination between C. sativus (as a maternal<br />

parent) and wild Cucumis species (as paternal parent) to obtain fertile hybrid<br />

plants was unsuccessful but some callus formation (hybridization of C. sativus ×<br />

C. melo) and morphological changes on the isolated embryos and seeds<br />

(hybridization of C. sativus × C. metuliferus) were observed. <strong>The</strong> most suitable<br />

medium for the culture of immature embryos and seeds was the GA medium<br />

(with the addition of gibberelic acid). <strong>The</strong> best results were obtained from<br />

hybridization between mixoploids (2n/4n) and tetraploids (4n) of C. sativus<br />

(produced by polyploidization based on colchicine application) with wild<br />

Cucumis spp. Callus formation on the isolated embryos was followed by<br />

rhizogenesis, leaf formation, and regeneration of plants (most frequently on the<br />

GA medium).<br />

T<br />

he genus Cucumis contains two economically important<br />

species, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L., 2n = 14; from the Asian<br />

group) and muskmelon (Cucumis melo L., 2n = 24; from the<br />

African group). <strong>The</strong>se two species are different in their origins and<br />

basic chromosome numbers (Jeffrey, 2001). Cucumber is among the<br />

top 10 vegetables in world production (FAO, 2004; Lebeda et al.,<br />

2006); however, it is a crop with a narrow genetic basis and is<br />

susceptible to many diseases and pests (Chen et al., 2004). Several<br />

valuable resistances have been found in wild African species of<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors thank Dr. H.S. Paris and Dr. M.P. Widrlechner for valuable comments<br />

on this manuscript. This research was supported by the following grants: (1) MSM<br />

6198959215 (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic); and (2) QD<br />

1357 (NAZV, Ministry of Agriculture, Czech Republic.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 51


Cucumis that are not known naturally in cucumber (Lebeda et al.,<br />

2006).<br />

Because of the value of these resistances for cucumber breeding, a<br />

number of attempts have been made to cross them with cucumber.<br />

However, because of crossing barriers (Ondřej et al., 2001), most of<br />

the crosses have been rather unsuccessful (Lebeda et al., 2006;<br />

Skálová et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> primary reason for these crossing barriers is<br />

thought to be related to the differing chromosome numbers of the<br />

parents. Yet, interspecific hybridization can be one of the most<br />

efficient ways to transfer useful characters from wild relatives to the<br />

cultivated species, and embryo-rescue culture can facilitate the process<br />

(Skálová et al., 2004). Embryos at the globular stage were observed in<br />

interspecific hybridization between C. sativus and C. melo<br />

(Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Wyszogrodska, 1976), and between C.<br />

sativus and C. metuliferus (Franken et al., 1988). Some successful<br />

interspecific hybridizations between cucumber and wild Cucumis spp.<br />

have been made via such unconvential techniques as embryo-rescue<br />

culture, e.g., with C. hystrix Chakr. (Chen et al., 2003) and with C.<br />

melo L. (Lebeda et al., 1996, 1999). Interspecific hybridization<br />

between C. sativus and wild Cucumis spp. is usually unsuccessful<br />

because of the different chromosome numbers of the parents. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

are some possibilities for overcoming this problem; one of them is<br />

embryo-rescue culture (Skálová et al., 2004). Embryos at the globular<br />

stage were observed in interspecific hybridization between C. sativus<br />

and C. melo (Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Wyszogrodzka, 1976), and<br />

between C. sativus and C. metuliferus (Franken et al., 1988).<br />

Some attempts to improve the success of interspecific<br />

hybridization in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae have been made by using<br />

polyploidization or haploidization of the parental lines to obtain<br />

similar chromosome numbers (Greplová et al., 2003; Yetisir and Sari,<br />

2003). Among the techniques used for chromosome manipulation,<br />

colchicine polyploidization is the most widely employed. Other<br />

doubling agents include podophyllin, oryzalin, pronamide, etc. (Rao<br />

and Suprasanna, 1996). Several methods for polyploidization by<br />

colchicine pretreatment have been used: wetted cotton-wool on the<br />

growth apex (Rao and Suprasanna, 1996); submersion of rootlets<br />

(Mathias and Röbbelen, 1991); submersion of the main stem (Yetisir<br />

and Sari, 2003); seed treatment (Kalloo, 1988); and incubation of<br />

embryos on MS-medium containing colchicine (Chen and Staub,<br />

1997).<br />

<strong>The</strong> main aim of this research was to contribute to the work of<br />

obtaining interspecific hybrids of Cucumis sativus with different wild<br />

Cucumis spp. via the embryo-rescue-culture technique, and to transfer<br />

52 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


esistance to some cucumber diseases (e.g., downy mildew). Crosses<br />

of C. sativus with wild Cucumis spp. without special pretreatment and<br />

using colchicine treatment of cucumber mother plants have been<br />

compared.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL. Selected genotypes of Cucumis species were<br />

used for hybridization experiments (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> plant material<br />

originated from the vegetable germplasm collection of the Research<br />

Institute of Crop Production (Prague), Department of Gene Bank,<br />

Workplace Olomouc, Czech Republic (, part<br />

databases, EVIGEZ) and the Plant Introduction Station, Iowa <strong>State</strong><br />

University, Ames, IA. <strong>The</strong> plants were cultivated in a glasshouse and<br />

in insect-proof isolation cages. Various wild Cucumis species were<br />

used (Table 1) as a source of pollen, and C. sativus was used as the<br />

maternal component. <strong>The</strong> fruits were harvested on the 14th day after<br />

pollination.<br />

Table 1. Plant material.<br />

Cucumis spp. Abbreviation Accession number<br />

C. sativus (SM-6514/line) CS CZ 09H3900768<br />

C. anguria var.<br />

longaculeatus CA CZ 09H4100569<br />

C. metuliferus CME CZ 09H4100185<br />

C. zeyheri CZ CZ 09H4100196<br />

C. melo CM2 PI 124112<br />

C. melo (line MR1) CM1 CZ 09H4000600<br />

EMBRYO CULTURE. Fruits were surface-sterilized with 70%<br />

ethanol and seeds or embryos were excised. Embryos or seeds were<br />

cultivated on various media (Table 2) in test tubes for six weeks in at<br />

25 o C. After germination they were transferred to a culture room<br />

(22±2 o C and 16h-day/8h-night photoperiod).<br />

POLYPLOIDIZATION METHODS. Two C. sativus sowings were<br />

cultivated without colchicine pretreatment. Four other sowings were<br />

influenced by various types of polyploidization with colchicine<br />

(wetted cotton-wool on the growth apex with 0.5 % and 5% colchicine<br />

solution; submersion of rootlets for 24 h with 0.5 % colchicine<br />

solution). <strong>The</strong> ploidy of obtained plants was determined by flow<br />

cytometry.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 53


Table 2. Composition of culture media.<br />

Culture<br />

medium<br />

Basic<br />

medium Other components<br />

OK<br />

MS 20mg/l ascorbic acid, 0.01mg/l IBA,<br />

0.01mg/l BAP, 20mg/l sucrose, 8g/l agar<br />

(control medium)<br />

ON MS 1g/l caseinhydrolysate, 0.01mg/l IBA,<br />

0.01mg/l BAP, 20g/l sucrose, 6g/l agar<br />

CW MS 5% coconut water, 200mg/l α- glutamin,<br />

0.01mg/l IBA, 0.01mg/l BAP, 60g/l<br />

sucrose, 6g/l agar<br />

GA MS 0.3mg/l giberellic acid, 0.01mg/l IBA,<br />

0.01mg/l BAP, 20g/l sucrose, 8g/l agar<br />

MSNAA MS 2.5mg/l NAA, 1mg/l BAP, 30g sucrose,<br />

8g/l agar<br />

Abbreviations: MS = Murashige and Skoog (1962); OK, ON, CW, GA, MSNAA =<br />

abbreviations for MS-media supplemented with different type of additions<br />

supporting embryogenesis; IBA = indole butyric acid; BAP = benzylaminopurin;<br />

NAA = naphthalene acetic acid.<br />

ISOLATION AND STAINING OF NUCLEI. As an internal reference<br />

standard Cucumis sativus (CS) was used. Twenty mg of plant tissue<br />

were chopped together with the standard into small pieces in a Petri<br />

dish containing 0.5 ml OTTO I (Otto, 1990) (0.1M citric acid, 0.5%<br />

Tween 20). <strong>The</strong>n the suspension of isolated nuclei was filtered through<br />

nylon (40µm) and 50µ RNAse and 50µl PI (Propidium iodide) stock<br />

solution and 1ml OTTO II (Otto, 1990) (0.4M Na2HPO4) were added.<br />

<strong>The</strong> suspension was incubated for 5 min at room temperature. After<br />

incubation, each sample was run on a flow cytometer.<br />

ESTIMATION OF PLOIDY LEVEL. Relative fluorescence of the<br />

nuclei was measured using a PAS flow cytometer (Partec GmbH,<br />

Münster, Germany) equipped with a laser. <strong>The</strong> gain was adjusted so<br />

that the fluorescence peak of the standard (diploid) was placed on<br />

channel 100 of the 512-channel scale. Ploidy level was determined by<br />

comparing a position of peak corresponding to G1 nuclei of the sample<br />

with that of a diploid plant used as a standard. At least 5,000 nuclei<br />

were analyzed in each sample.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> regeneration of embryos isolated from fruits obtained by<br />

interspecific hybridization of Cucumis spp. was efficient only in some<br />

54 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


cases. In total, the regeneration of seven embryos from interspecific<br />

crosses of C. sativus × C. melo was observed (Table 3). Five embryos<br />

developed small roots or a shoot meristem, however callus formation<br />

predominated. Two embryos developed into flowering plants and their<br />

hybrid origin was confirmed using isozyme analyses and flow<br />

cytometry, as in the previous experiments where development of<br />

hybrid embryo of C. sativus × C. melo was confirmed (Lebeda et al.,<br />

1996, 1999).<br />

Some positive results were obtained in pollination of female<br />

flowers of C. sativus with pollen grains of C. melo and C. metuliferus<br />

(Table 3). Callus formation on some embryos from the fruits obtained<br />

after pollination of C. sativus with both Cucumis species was<br />

observed. Growth of isolated embryos (from the crosses of C. sativus<br />

× C. melo) without any subsequent regeneration was observed as well.<br />

However, the growth of embryos stopped very early. Regeneration of<br />

immature seeds from fruits of crosses of C. sativus with C. melo and<br />

C. metuliferus and some morphological changes on the seed coats<br />

and/or stems occurred. <strong>The</strong> most suitable media for the<br />

regeneration of isolated embryos and seeds were GA and CW (media<br />

with gibberelic acid and coconut water added) (Tables 2 and 3).<br />

Nevertheless, no direct or indirect regeneration of plants was observed<br />

from this type of hybridization. It can be concluded that interspecific<br />

hybridization between C. sativus and wild Cucumis spp. is rather<br />

difficult without using some special strategies of embryo-rescue<br />

culture. This conclusion is also supported in a literature survey focused<br />

on embryo-rescue culture of Cucumis spp. (Skálová et al., 2004).<br />

One possible strategy for overcoming crossing barriers is to use<br />

irradiated pollen for cross-pollination (Custers and Bergervoet, 1984).<br />

Custers et al. (1981) used AVG (aminoethoxyvinylglycine) with a<br />

positive effect on the success of reciprocal crosses between C.<br />

africanus and C. metuliferus ‘Megurk’ (2n = 19), and fertile F1 hybrid<br />

plants were derived from pollination of C. sativus with mixed pollen of<br />

C. sativus and C. melo (Van der Knaap et al., 1978). Embryo rescue<br />

after in vitro pollination has also been used to obtain hybrid calli from<br />

Cucumis spp. (Ondřej et al., 2002). Polyploidization of plant genera<br />

with lower chromosome numbers can be useful for overcoming the<br />

prezygotic barriers (Greplová et al., 2003).<br />

In this experiment we used different colchicine treatments of C.<br />

sativus (2n = 14) as a maternal parent. <strong>The</strong> main purpose of this<br />

treatment was to obtain plants with chromosome numbers closer to<br />

those of wild Cucumis spp. as sources of pollen. <strong>The</strong> polyploid<br />

character was confirmed by flow cytometry. Tetraploids (4n = 28) and<br />

mixoploids (2n/4n = 14/28) were obtained after these pretreatments.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 55


Table 3. Results of interspecific hybridization of Cucumis sativus with<br />

wild Cucumis spp.<br />

Partn.<br />

Type for<br />

of CT IH 1<br />

No. No. No. No./ Suc-<br />

No. obiso- isolated type cesspollitainedlatedemregenfulnation<br />

fruits seeds bryoser. media 2<br />

CM1 27 13 260 260 8 (C, OK,<br />

MC) CW,<br />

GA<br />

None<br />

CM2<br />

CA<br />

18<br />

11<br />

8<br />

2<br />

120<br />

80<br />

160<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

-<br />

-<br />

CZ 16 7 280 0 0 -<br />

CME 8 6 240 0 4 (C, CW,<br />

MC) GA<br />

Total 80 36 980 420 12 -<br />

CM1 9 6 219 20 1 (RE) GA<br />

CM2 7 6 240 16 7 (5 RE OK,O<br />

Wetted<br />

plants!; N, CW,<br />

cotton-<br />

2C) GA,<br />

wool,<br />

MSN<br />

0.5% col. CA 4 2 60 0 0 -<br />

CZ 3 2 70 0 0 -<br />

CME 2 2 45 25 1 (C) MSN<br />

Total 25 18 634 61 9 -<br />

CM1 28 16 505 68 6 (3RE, ON,<br />

Wetted<br />

cottonwool,<br />

5%<br />

col.<br />

CM2<br />

CA<br />

CZ<br />

9<br />

3<br />

12<br />

5<br />

1<br />

11<br />

185<br />

45<br />

302<br />

20<br />

0<br />

15<br />

3C)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

CW,<br />

GA<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

CME 5 3 135 0 1 (MC) OK<br />

Total 57 36 1172 103 7 -<br />

CM1 12 7 180 80 1 (C) GA<br />

CM2 4 2 60 20 0 -<br />

Submer- CA 5 1 15 0 0 -<br />

sion of CZ 6 6 225 20 0 -<br />

rootlets, CME 2 2 90 0 4 (2C, 2 OK,<br />

0.5 %<br />

MC) ON,<br />

col.<br />

CW,<br />

GA,<br />

MSN<br />

Total 29 18 570 120 5 -<br />

Abbreviations: CT = colchicine treatment,; IH = interspecific hybridization; RE =<br />

regeneration and germination of embryos; C = callus formation; MC =<br />

morphological changes.<br />

1 2<br />

= particular genotypes of Cucumis spp. (Table 1). = different types of media<br />

(Table 2).<br />

56 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Regeneration of embryos and seeds, obtained by hybridization of<br />

wild Cucumis spp. (Table 1) with cucumber maternal plants (after<br />

colchicine treatment), was relatively successful. In addition to calli on<br />

both immature above-mentioned explants and morphological changes<br />

on the seed explants, organogenesis was also recorded on calli<br />

(formation of roots or shoots on callus mass) and direct formation of<br />

whole plants (from embryos derived by interspecific hybridization C.<br />

sativus × C. melo, CM2). <strong>The</strong>se embryos passed direct embryogenesis<br />

and germinated on all types of used media. <strong>The</strong> hybrid/nonhybrid<br />

origin of these plants will be confirmed by flow cytometry.<br />

Caseinhydrolysate (ON medium), coconut water (CW medium)<br />

and gibberelic acid (GA medium) promoted embryo germination,<br />

which was followed by callus formation (regeneration on the GA<br />

medium was the most frequent). Seed development was best on the<br />

ON and GA media, respectively (Table 3).<br />

<strong>The</strong> highest total number of successful regenerations occurred by<br />

pollination of C. sativus without colchicine treatment; however, no<br />

regenerated plants were obtained (Table 3). Only one type of<br />

colchicine treatment of C. sativus offered direct regeneration of<br />

embryos into plants (application of wetted cotton-wool on growth<br />

apex, 0.5% colchicine solution; crossing partner C. melo (CM2) (Table<br />

3). In this experiment, the most suitable partner for interspecific<br />

hybridization with C. sativus was C. melo (line MR1; CM1) (Table 1),<br />

because of the highest regeneration frequency (Table 3). Gibberelic<br />

acid (GA medium) appeared as the most efficient additive to<br />

cultivation media for embryos and seeds.<br />

It can be concluded that colchicine pretreatment of C. sativus is a<br />

possible way to improve the success and efficiency of interspecific<br />

hybridization with wild Cucumis species. <strong>The</strong> frequency of embryo<br />

and seed regeneration (organogenesis on the callus mass, direct<br />

regeneration to plants) was higher after colchicine treatment. From<br />

these experiments it is evident that the most suitable wild Cucumis<br />

partners for interspecific hybridization with C. sativus were C. melo<br />

(line MR1) and C. metuliferus (for both types of hybridization, i.e.,<br />

with and without colchicine treatment in the maternal genotype of C.<br />

sativus with wild Cucumis spp. as the paternal genotype). <strong>The</strong> most<br />

efficient medium, for isolated and potentially interspecific embryos,<br />

seems to be the GA medium (added gibberelic acid).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Chen, J. F. and J. E. Staub. 1997. Attempts at colchicine doubling of an interspecific<br />

hybrid of Cucumis sativus L. × hystrix Chakr. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genet. Coop. Rep.<br />

20:24–26.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 57


Chen, J. F., J. Staub, Ch. Qian, J. Jiang, X. Luo, and F. Zhuang. 2003. Reproduction<br />

and cytogenetic characterization of interspecific hybrids derived from Cucumis<br />

hystrix Chakr. × Cucumis sativus L. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 106:688–695.<br />

Chen, J. F., F. Y. Zhuang, X. A. Liu, and Ch. T. Ruin. 2004. Reciprocal differences<br />

of morphological and DNA characters in interspecific hybridization in Cucumis.<br />

Can. J. Bot. 82:16–21.<br />

Custers, J. B. M. and J. H. W. Bergervoet. 1984. Embryo size in Cucumis sativus ×<br />

Cucumis melo as affected by irradiation of the pollen and genotype of the female<br />

parent. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rep. 7:94–95.<br />

Custers, J. B. M., A. P. M. den Nijs, and A. W. Riepma. 1981. Reciprocal crosses<br />

between Cucumis africanus L. f. and C. metuliferus Naud. III. effects of<br />

pollination aids, physiological condition and genetic constitution of the<br />

maternal parent on crossability. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rep. 4:50–52.<br />

FAO. 2004. FAOSTAT Agricultural Database. .<br />

Franken, J., J. B. M. Custers, and R. J. Bino. 1988. Effects of temperature on pollen<br />

tube growth and fruit set in reciprocal crosses between Cucumis sativus and C.<br />

metuliferus. Plant Breed. 100:150–153.<br />

Greplová, M., J. Frček, M. Rejlková, D. Kopecký, J. Vagera, and J. Doležel. 2003.<br />

Polyploidizace planých druhů bramboru in vitro. Research Institute for Potatoes<br />

(VÚB), Havlíčkův Brod (Czech Republic), Research Reports. 14:55–63.<br />

Jeffrey, C. 2001. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, p. 1510–1557. In: P. Hanelt (ed.). Mansfeld’s<br />

encyclopedia of agricultural and horticultural crops, vol. 3. Springer-Verlag,<br />

Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.<br />

Kalloo, G. 1988. Vegetable breeding, vol. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.<br />

Lebeda, A., E. Křístková, and M. Kubaláková. 1996. Interspecific hybridization of<br />

Cucumis sativus × Cucumis melo as a potential way to transfer resistance to<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis, p. 31–37. In: M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, C. Soria, J.<br />

Cuartero, J. A. Torés, and R. Fernández-Muňoz (eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s towards 2000.<br />

Proc. 6th Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Málaga Spain.<br />

Lebeda, A., M. Kubaláková, E. Křístková, B. Navrátilová, K. Doležal, J. Doležel,<br />

and M. Lysák. 1999. Morphological and physiological characteristics of plants<br />

issued from interspecific hybridization of Cucumis sativus × Cucumis melo.<br />

Acta Hort. 492:149–155.<br />

Lebeda, A., M. P. Widrlechner, J. Staub, H. Ezura, J. Zalapa, and E. Křístková. 2006.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae; Cucumis spp., <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp., Citrullus spp.), ch. 8. In:<br />

R. J. Singh (ed.). Genetic resources, chromosome engineering, and crop<br />

improvement series, vol. 3 – vegetable crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. (In<br />

press.)<br />

Mathias, R. and G. Röbbelen. 1991. Effective diploidization of microspore-derived<br />

haploids of rape (Brassica napus L.) by in vitro colchicine treatment. Plant<br />

Breed. 106:82–84.<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. and A. Wyszogrodzka. 1976. Embryo culture and in vitro<br />

pollination of excised ovules in the family <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, p. 571–576. In:<br />

Novák, F. J. (ed.). Use of tissue cultures in plant breeding. Proc. Int. Symp.<br />

Olomouc, Czechoslovakia.<br />

Ondřej, V., B. Navrátilová, and A. Lebeda. 2001. Determination of the crossing<br />

barriers in hybridization of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis melo. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen.<br />

Coop. Rep. 24:1–5.<br />

Ondřej, V., B. Navrátilová, P. Tarkowski, K. Doležal, and A. Lebeda. 2002. In vitro<br />

pollination as a tool of overcoming crossing barriers between Cucumis sativus L.<br />

and Cucumis melo L. Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianea Bot. 41:81–88.<br />

58 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Otto, F. 1990. DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of<br />

nuclear DNA, p. 105–110. In: H. A. Crissmann and Z. Darzynkiewicz (eds.).<br />

Methods in cell biology, vol. 33. Academic Press, New York.<br />

Rao, P. S. and P. Suprasanna. 1996. Methods to double haploid chromosome<br />

numbers, p. 317–339. In: S. M. Jain, S. K. Sopory, and R. E. Velleux (eds.). In<br />

vitro haploid production in higher plants, vol.1. Kluwer Academic Publishers,<br />

Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />

Skálová D., A. Lebeda, and B. Navrátilová. 2004. Embryo and ovule cultures in<br />

Cucumis species and their utilization in interspecific hybridization, p. 415–430.<br />

In: A. Lebeda and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in cucurbit genetics and breeding<br />

research. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Van der Knaap, B. J., A. C. de Ruiter, and B. V. Deruiterzonen. 1978. An<br />

interspecific cross between cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and muskmelon<br />

(Cucumis melo). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rep. 1:8.<br />

Yetisir, H. and N. Sari. 2003. A new method for haploid muskmelon (Cucumis melo<br />

L.) dihaploidization. Sci. Hort. 98:277–283.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 59


INITIATING SUDDEN WILT DISORDER IN<br />

MUSKMELON WITH LOW-LIGHT STRESS<br />

H. C. Wien and T. A. Zitter<br />

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 15853<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cantaloupe, vine collapse, Cucumber mosaic virus,<br />

Cucumis melo<br />

ABSTRACT. Sudden wilt or collapse of melon plants at a point close to harvest of<br />

the first mature fruit is a common disorder in the <strong>North</strong>eastern U.S. Cucumber<br />

mosaic virus, Papaya ringspot virus, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis, and<br />

powdery mildew, among others, have been implicated as causal organisms,<br />

acting singly or in combination. <strong>The</strong> disorder is often triggered by unfavorable<br />

weather conditions, such as a period of cold rainy weather. To determine if the<br />

disorder could be initiated by conditions of low light that would occur during<br />

rainy weather, shading experiments were conducted in fields of ‘Athena’ melons<br />

in 2004 and 2005. In the first year, shading frames that reduced the incident<br />

radiation by 40 and 80% were placed over the crop for a week, starting either 7<br />

days before the first fruit harvest, or a week later. None of the treatments<br />

caused plant collapse nor affected yield in 2004. In 2005, the same two levels of<br />

shade were imposed on the field plots starting a week before first ripe fruit<br />

harvest for a duration of two weeks. This time, plant collapse was noticeable by<br />

one week after the start of shade treatments, and was proportional to the degree<br />

of shade. If confirmed by our 2006 experiment, the results indicate that plant<br />

collapse of Cucumis melo can result not only from direct attack from plant<br />

pathogens, but also from a carbohydrate stress. We speculate that under the<br />

latter conditions, the plants preferentially translocate assimilates to the ripening<br />

fruits rather than the root system, leading to an impairment of root function<br />

and plant collapse.<br />

T<br />

he sudden collapse of muskmelon plants close to harvest has<br />

concerned growers and frustrated researchers in the<br />

<strong>North</strong>eastern U.S. for many years, and has defied simple<br />

answers as to causes and possible cures. Zitter (1995) summarized the<br />

state of knowledge at a previous <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae meeting, and listed a<br />

number of pathogens that have been associated with the disorder.<br />

Early reports of the disorder implicated Fusarium wilt (Fusarium<br />

oxysporum f. sp. melonis) (Crozier, 1963), but resistance to this<br />

disease in most modern cultivars has reduced the likelihood of<br />

involvement of this pathogen. Evidence that Cucumber mosaic virus<br />

(CMV) could be a causal agent for the collapse of melon plants has<br />

been more compelling. MacNab (1971) induced a vine decline of<br />

flowering melon plants by inoculating with CMV, and demonstrated<br />

the progress of wilting and necrosis of the leaves from the point of<br />

inoculation. Treatments did not lead to overall collapse of these<br />

60 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


plants, however. In other experiments with fruiting plants, MacNab<br />

(1971) could not induce collapse by late inoculation with CMV. His<br />

observations of sudden wilt in growers’ fields implicated a period of<br />

cold, rainy weather as a triggering factor. Unfortunately, his attempts<br />

to cause plant death by cooling the roots to 10 C produced only a<br />

temporary wilting, duplicating the results of similar experiments by<br />

Raleigh (1941). <strong>The</strong>se cooling experiments were conducted with<br />

flowering plants without fruit load, so the question of whether cooling<br />

of roots of fruiting plants would lead to collapse has not been<br />

addressed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence of fruit on the plant can play a significant role in the<br />

health and vigor of plant root systems. Roots of greenhouse-grown<br />

tomatoes declined when fruits were actively growing (Hurd et al.,<br />

1979), and similar observations have been made with cucumber (Van<br />

der Post, 1968). Under low-light stress, fruiting greenhouse cucumber<br />

plants allocated a smaller proportion of assimilates to roots, perhaps<br />

further impairing the capacity of the roots for water uptake (Marcelis,<br />

1994). If environmental stress factors such as low light or cold soils<br />

can contribute to the loss of function of melon roots on fruiting plants,<br />

it may be possible to stress a melon plant sufficiently with heavy shade<br />

to cause it to collapse even without the added stress of pathogens. <strong>The</strong><br />

current experiments were conducted to test this premise.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Plants for the field shading experiments were started in seedling<br />

trays in a greenhouse. Seeds of Cucumis melo cv. ‘Athena’ were sown<br />

in 72-cell trays in a commercial peat-vermiculite artificial-soil mix.<br />

Four weeks later, the seedlings were transplanted to the field, into a<br />

gravelly loam soil (mixed mesic, Glossoboric hapludalf), covered with<br />

IRT green polyethylene mulch 122cm wide, in rows 183cm wide.<br />

Plants were spaced 61cm apart in the row. Supplemental irrigation<br />

was provided by a single trickle irrigation line under the mulch, and in<br />

the very dry 2005 growing season, by additional sprinkler irrigation.<br />

At specific stages of plant growth in relation to fruiting, plots were<br />

shaded by wooden shading frames measuring 244cm wide, 488cm<br />

long, and 100cm tall, covered with black polyester shade fabric. Three<br />

degrees of shade were utilized: none, 40%, and 80%. Shade duration<br />

was one week in 2004, two weeks in 2005 and 2006. In 2004, shading<br />

treatments were begun either one week before or at first ripe fruit<br />

harvest; in 2005, shade was initiated at first fruit harvest; in 2006,<br />

shading treatments were applied when first fruits reached 3cm<br />

diameter, and at first fruit harvest. Fruits were harvested at full slip,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 61


weighed, and soluble solids measured using a refractometer. <strong>The</strong><br />

degree of vine collapse was noted by counting the number of wilted<br />

plants in the harvest area at weekly intervals. <strong>The</strong> experimental design<br />

of the experiments with more than one shading time was a split plot<br />

with four replications, and shading time as main plots. Statistical<br />

analysis of the yield and soluble solids content was by analysis of<br />

variance using the Statistix software program.<br />

Results<br />

Climatic conditions in the 2004 fruiting and harvest season were<br />

cool and cloudy. Sudden wilt or late vine collapse did not occur in the<br />

experiment in 2004, regardless of the timing and degree of shade<br />

imposed. <strong>The</strong>re was also no effect of the one-week shading treatments<br />

on marketable yield, which averaged 32MT/ha, or on soluble solids<br />

(10.83%).<br />

In 2005, the weather was dry and sunny most of the season, with<br />

higher temperatures than in 2004. From Aug. 1 to the end of fruit<br />

harvest, temperatures at the experimental farm averaged 19˚C in 2004<br />

and 21˚C in 2005. Rainfall totaled 220mm and 21mm in 2004 and<br />

2005 during the same period, respectively.<br />

First signs of plant collapse were noticed at first fruit harvest<br />

(August 10), 5 days after shade treatments were begun, and became<br />

progressively more marked (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> greater the shade level<br />

imposed, the more plants collapsed. From Aug. 22 to the final fruit<br />

harvest on Aug. 29, more of the plants subjected to 40% shade had lost<br />

turgor, and there appeared to be a slight recovery of some of the<br />

heavily shaded plants. This interaction of sampling date and shade<br />

level was significant at the 5% level.<br />

Table 1. Number of plants of ‘Athena’ melon collapsed (out of 8<br />

plants per plot) at specific dates in the harvest season of 2005, in<br />

relation to shading treatments applied. Treatment effect significant at<br />

the 0.1% level; interaction of sample date and treatment significant at<br />

the 5% level.<br />

Sample date<br />

Treatment Aug. 22 Aug. 29<br />

Control 0 1.2<br />

40% shade 2 4.5<br />

80% shade 6.2 5.2<br />

62 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


In spite of the plant collapse, marketable and total yields of fruit<br />

were not significantly affected by shading treatments. Yields averaged<br />

28MT/ha in 2005. Fruit soluble solids also did not vary significantly<br />

among treatments, and averaged 11.6%.<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> lack of response to shading in 2004 could be due to the shorter<br />

duration of the shade treatment in that year (one week compared to<br />

two weeks in 2005). This may not have depleted assimilates enough<br />

to affect root growth of the fruiting plants.<br />

If the 2005 results are more representative of the effects of a severe<br />

carbohydrate deficiency on fruiting melon plants, it would indicate that<br />

even apparently healthy melon plants can be subject to sudden wilt.<br />

‘Athena’ melon is resistant to the common races of Fusarium wilt<br />

(Races 0, 1, 2), and in our plantings did not show obvious symptoms<br />

of cucumber mosaic or powdery mildew (‘Athena’ has moderate<br />

powdery mildew resistance). <strong>The</strong> shade-induced collapse without<br />

obvious signs of disease would support the theory that melon plants<br />

near the time of fruit harvest are transferring such a high percentage of<br />

their assimilates to the fruits that support of the root system may be<br />

sacrificed, especially if the plants are under an assimilate stress.<br />

While normally one would not expect to encounter two weeks of<br />

severely low light conditions close to the time of melon harvest, under<br />

field conditions one could expect a combination of environmental<br />

stress and some plant diseases. Cucumber mosaic virus was shown by<br />

Bauerle (1971) to reduce root extension and water uptake. Powdery<br />

mildew in cucumber (Podosphaera xanthii syn. Sphaerotheca<br />

fuliginea) reduces photosynthetic rate of the leaves, and thus would<br />

contribute to an assimilate stress (Yurina et al., 1993).<br />

Given the apparent susceptibility of melon to collapse close to<br />

harvest, what practical measures can be taken to decrease its<br />

susceptibility? <strong>The</strong> development of multiple disease-resistant cultivars<br />

would be one useful solution. In addition, breeding lines that have<br />

more vigorous root systems should also help. This approach has been<br />

shown to be useful, when it was noted that grafting melon onto<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a helped to lessen the incidence of sudden wilt disease caused<br />

by Monosporascus in Israel (Cohen et al, 2000). It remains to be<br />

determined if the establishment of a stronger sink in the root system of<br />

melon plants would reduce the sugar content of the fruits.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 63


Literature Cited<br />

Bauerle, W. L. 1971. Effect of the sudden wilt disease on the physiology of the<br />

muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulates). PhD thesis, Cornell University,<br />

Ithaca, N.Y.<br />

Cohen, R., S. Pivonia, Y. Burger, M. Edelstein, A. Gamliel, and J. Katan. 2000.<br />

Various approaches toward controlling sudden wilt of melons in Israel. Acta<br />

Hort. 510:143–147.<br />

Crozier, J. A., Jr. 1963. Some factors affecting the development of a sudden wilt<br />

disease of muskmelon in New York <strong>State</strong>. PhD thesis, Cornell University,<br />

Ithaca, N.Y.<br />

Hurd, R. G., A. P. Gay, and A. C. Mountifield. 1979. <strong>The</strong> effect of partial flower<br />

removal on the relation between root, shoot and fruit growth in the<br />

indeterminate tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol. 93:77–89.<br />

MacNab, A. A. 1971. Symptomatology of decline, early-collapse, and late-collapse<br />

of muskmelons (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulates) in New York <strong>State</strong> and the<br />

etiology of decline. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.<br />

Marcelis, L. F. M. 1994. Effect of fruit growth, temperature and irradiance on<br />

biomass allocation to the vegetative parts of cucumber. Neth. J. Agric. Sci.<br />

42:115–123.<br />

Raleigh, G. J. 1941. <strong>The</strong> effect of culture solution temperature on water intake and<br />

wilting of the muskmelon. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 38:487–488.<br />

Van der Post, C. J. 1968. Simultaneous observations on root and top growth. Acta<br />

Hort. 7:138–143.<br />

Yurina, T. P., V. A. Karavaev, and M. K. Solntsey. 1993. Characteristics of<br />

metabolism in two cucumber cultivars with different resistance to powdery<br />

mildew. Russian Plant Physiol. 40:197–202.<br />

Zitter, T. A. 1995. Sudden wilt of melons from a <strong>North</strong>east US perspective, p. 44–<br />

47. In: G. Lester and J. Dunlap (eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’94.<br />

64 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED CULTIVARS<br />

OF ZUCCHINI SQUASH AND SWEETPOTATO<br />

SQUASH STARTING FROM CHILEAN<br />

LANDRACES<br />

Gabriel Bascur<br />

INIA C.R.I. La Platina, Santiago, Chile<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, inbred lines,<br />

fruit traits, new cultivar<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> CRI La Platina of INIA is developing zucchini squash<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) and sweetpotato squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duch.) crops to<br />

provide cultivars with good horticultural characteristics in a market where<br />

there are few commercial cultivars available. Starting from selections made<br />

from commercial cultivars, inbred lines were evaluated in different seasons and<br />

locations. In zucchini squash, the cultivar Curital INIA was released. It is openpollinated,<br />

with a total yield 18.9% higher than ‘Black Chilean’. Its fruit are<br />

cylindrical, shiny, and dark green with clear green stripes. In sweetpotato<br />

squash, 300 inbred lines were produced and evaluated at Curacaví and La<br />

Platina locations. <strong>The</strong>re is great variability among the inbreds both in fruit<br />

shape and size. Inbreds have been selected for adaptation, yield, and quality.<br />

Cultivars will be released for use by the growers.<br />

I<br />

n Chile, zucchini squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) and sweetpotato<br />

squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duch.) have been used traditionally in<br />

the preparation of local dishes. Those dishes require that certain<br />

characteristics be present for success in the marketplace. As a result,<br />

certain cultivars that have maintained the preferences of local<br />

consumers have been grown for a long time. Those landraces have<br />

characteristics that are not present in the new cultivars available in the<br />

world market (Escaff, 2001).<br />

Since there are no suitable cultivars being developed for this<br />

market, INIA La Platina Regional Research Centre began a geneticimprovement<br />

program to produce cultivars with the characteristics and<br />

quality required by the Chilean consumer. <strong>The</strong> leading cultivar of<br />

zucchini squash is ‘Black Chilean’. It has dark green fruit with light<br />

green longitudinal stripes. This landrace has low yield and high<br />

variability for plant and fruit characteristics (Giaconi and Escaff,<br />

1997).<br />

In sweetpotato squash, a great diversity of fruit types exist that are<br />

marketed in the country. <strong>The</strong> landraces differ in fruit color, shape, size,<br />

and appearance. <strong>The</strong>y also differ in thickness and color of the pulp,<br />

which determine the quality of the mature fruit. <strong>The</strong> Chilean market<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 65


equires large fruit (over 15kg), clear grey to brown, with thick, dense,<br />

very dark orange pulp. One of our objectives is to develop a cultivar<br />

with these fruit characteristics but of smaller size. In this way, we hope<br />

to encourage the sale of this crop without having to cut the fruit for<br />

retail marketing.<br />

Zucchini squash was grown on approximately 6,000ha, and<br />

sweetpotato squash on 4,500 to 5,000ha annually during the period<br />

1995 to 2000 (ODEPA, 2006). <strong>The</strong> cultivation of these vegetables<br />

prevails at the small-farmer level of the center north zone of Chile.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

New zucchini squash cultivars were developed at CRI La Platina<br />

starting with the ‘Black Chilean’ landrace. Single-plant selections<br />

were made for fruit type. Crosses were made to combine traits from<br />

different plants, and inbreds developed through self-pollination as<br />

described by Whitaker and Robinson (1986). From this material, the<br />

best lines selected in preliminary evaluations were evaluated in trials<br />

established at La Serena (29°53'S; 71°19'W) IV Region; Curacaví<br />

(33°22S; 71°07'W); and CRI La Platina (33°34'S; 70°38'W)<br />

Metropolitan Region (RM). Trials were run in the 2002–2003 and<br />

2003–2004 seasons to evaluate phenotypic stability, horticultural<br />

characteristics, and yield based on number and weight of commercial<br />

fruit (10 to 15cm of long, immature fruit) per area. A randomized<br />

<strong>complete</strong> block design was used with four replications, where the<br />

control treatment was ‘Black Chilean’. <strong>The</strong> fruit were evaluated for<br />

shape, color, and shininess.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

ZUCCHINI SQUASH. Several inbred lines were selected for good<br />

yield, plant, and fruit characteristics, and one line (LPZI 2002-47) was<br />

released as ‘Curital INIA’ (Bascur, 2005). ‘Curital INIA’ has an erect<br />

growth habit with vigorous stems, medium-sized lobed leaves of<br />

variegated dark green and marked areas of grizzly white, with serrated<br />

borders, and the presence of trichomes. Sex expression is monoecious<br />

and flowers are an intense yellow. <strong>The</strong> fruit at the immature stage, as<br />

sold for the commercial product, are of cylindrical elongated shape, 10<br />

to 12cm long, of intermediate thickness, with an approximate weight<br />

of 200 to 250g, and no girdle. <strong>The</strong> fruit are shiny, dark green, with<br />

light reticulation, and light green stripes.<br />

‘Curital INIA’ had similar fruit yield to ‘Black Chilean’ at the La<br />

Platina and Curacaví locations (Table 1). In the 2003–2004 season,<br />

‘Curital INIA’ had significantly higher yield than ‘Black Chilean’ at<br />

66 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


the three locations. Averaged over all environments (year and<br />

location), ‘Curital INIA’ outyielded ‘Black Chilean’, with an<br />

advantage of 24,268 fruit/ha or 18.9% higher (Figure1).<br />

Upon comparing the standard deviation, a parameter that allows<br />

the estimation of the stability of the mean, it appears that ‘Curital<br />

INIA’ has a larger value than ‘Black Chilean’, which indicates that its<br />

production is more influenced by changes in environmental conditions<br />

such as year and location (Figure1). ‘Curital INIA’ has improved fruit<br />

shape and brightness relative to ‘Black Chilean’ (Table 2).<br />

SWEETPOTATO SQUASH. <strong>The</strong> breeding work carried out on<br />

sweetpotato squash resulted in the development of 300 inbred lines,<br />

which have a high uniformity of characteristics. However, there is<br />

great variability for fruit characteristics among lines, resulting in good<br />

opportunities for selection of outstanding lines for use by growers<br />

(Bascur, 2005). Preliminary data indicated that three lines excelled in<br />

number of fruit/ha and weight of fruit/ha compared to the two controls<br />

(Table 3). Line 37-1 had the largest fruit weight.<br />

Table 1. Yield (total number of fruit/ha) of ‘Curital INIA’ and the<br />

control (‘Black Chilean’) evaluated in different seasons and locations.<br />

La Platina Curacaví La Serena Curacaví La Platina<br />

Cultivar<br />

2002–2003 2002–<br />

2003<br />

2003–<br />

2004<br />

2003–<br />

2004<br />

2003–<br />

2004<br />

Curital INIA<br />

102,000 a*<br />

143,340 a<br />

177,333 a<br />

221,333 a<br />

120,667 a<br />

Black Chilean 104,000 a 142,000 a 148,667 b 164,000 b 84,667 b<br />

*Means followed by the same letter in column are not significantly different based<br />

on LSD test (P


Table 2. Fruit characteristics of Curital INIA and the control.<br />

Stripe<br />

Cultivar Width Shape Girdle Color color Brightness<br />

Curital<br />

INIA<br />

Black<br />

Chilean<br />

Medium<br />

Thick<br />

Cylindrical,<br />

elongated<br />

Conical,<br />

short<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

Dark<br />

green<br />

Dark<br />

green<br />

Light<br />

green<br />

Light<br />

green<br />

Shiny<br />

Medium<br />

In the evaluations carried out in the 2003–2004 season, lines<br />

evaluated in the Curacaví location had higher fruit production, in<br />

number as well as in weight (Table 4). Also, the fruit produced was of<br />

larger size, in comparison with La Platina. At Curacaví, line 8-1 was<br />

better than the two controls. At La Platina, line 33-2 had the highest<br />

production. <strong>The</strong>se results demonstrate that lines having better<br />

characteristics and productive potential than the ecotypes used by<br />

farmers have been generated.<br />

High fruit quality is defined by the presence of a thick pulp of dark<br />

orange. According to the evaluations, both characteristics are present<br />

in 28.8% of the total of the evaluated inbred lines. This result indicates<br />

that approximately one third of the improved germplasm combines<br />

two relevant aspects for obtaining a very good commercial fruit.<br />

We will continue testing the inbred lines to identify those of high<br />

productivity and fruit quality. In the future, we will determine<br />

combining ability and produce hybrid cultivars of sweetpotato squash<br />

for use by growers.<br />

Table 3. Number and weight of fruit per hectare, and average weight<br />

of fruit of sweetpotato squash inbred lines and controls in Curacavi,<br />

2002–2003 season.<br />

Inbred<br />

line<br />

Fruit<br />

number/ha -1<br />

Fruit weight<br />

(kg./ha -1 )<br />

Average fruit<br />

weight (kg)<br />

79-1 2,250 abc 31,925 a 14.19 ab<br />

20-2 2,000 bcd 24,150 bcde 12.08 abcd<br />

20-1 2,250 abc 20,775 def 9.23 abcdef<br />

37-1 1,250 efg 20,000 defg 16.00 a<br />

33-1 1,500 def 17,850 efgh 11.90 abcd<br />

Farmer 1,188 fg 14,405 ghi 13.34 ab<br />

San Alfonso 1,000 fgh 10,125 ijk 10.55 abcde<br />

113-1 750 gh 3,325 k 4.43 ef<br />

*Means followed by the same letter in column are not significantly different based<br />

on LSD test (P


Table 4. Number and weight of fruit per hectare, and average weight<br />

of fruit of sweetpotato squash inbred lines and the controls in different<br />

locations, season 2003–2004.<br />

Curacavi La Platina 2003–2004<br />

Fruit<br />

weight<br />

Average<br />

fruit<br />

weight<br />

Number<br />

fruit/ha -<br />

1<br />

Fruit<br />

weight<br />

Average<br />

fruit<br />

weight<br />

(kg)<br />

Inbred Number<br />

line fruit/ha -1<br />

(kg./ha -1 ) (kg)<br />

(kg./ha -1 )<br />

8-1 3,000 31,600 10.53 2,000 17,500 8.75<br />

11-2 1,750 17,250 9.86 2,000 20,600 10.30<br />

14-2 1,250 15,300 12.24 1,000 5,325 5.33<br />

20-2 2,250 20,925 9.30 2,250 14,750 6.56<br />

33-2 2,000 22,800 11.40 3,500 27,750 7.93<br />

34-1 2,000 16,300 8.15 2,250 17,075 7.59<br />

37-1 1,250 15,875 12.70 1,000 8,375 8.38<br />

Farmer 1,750 9,500 5.43 2,500 22,700 9.08<br />

San<br />

Alfonso<br />

1,000<br />

8,250 8.25<br />

1,000 9,100 9.10<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bascur, B. G. 2005. Curital INIA: Nueva variedad de zapallito italiano tipo negro<br />

chileno. Hortic. Bras. 23(2):414(Abstr.).<br />

Bascur, B. G. 2005. Desarrollo de líneas puras en zapallo de guarda para la<br />

generación de variedades comerciales. Resúmenes 56º Congreso Agronómico de<br />

Chile:5(Abstr.).<br />

Escaff, G. M. 2001. Hortalizas, p. 717–757. In: SOQUIMICH (ed.). Agenda del<br />

salitre. Cousiño Asociados, Santiago, Chile.<br />

Giaconi, M. V. and M. G. Escaff. 1997. Cultivo de hortalizas. Editorial Universitaria,<br />

Santiago, Chile.<br />

ODEPA. 2006. Estadísticas agropecuarias. .<br />

Whitaker, W. T. and R. W. Robinson. 1986. Squash breeding, p. 209–242. In: J. M.<br />

Basset (ed.). <strong>Breeding</strong> vegetable crops. AVI Publishing Co., Westport, CT.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 69


GENETIC VARIATION FOR BENEFICIAL<br />

PHYTOCHEMICAL LEVELS IN MELONS<br />

(CUCUMIS MELO L.)<br />

Kevin M. Crosby<br />

Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />

Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Weslaco, TX 78596;<br />

Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, TX 77843<br />

Gene E. Lester<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Kika<br />

de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center,<br />

Weslaco, TX 78596<br />

Daniel I. Leskovar<br />

Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />

Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Uvalde, TX 7; Department<br />

of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, TX 77843<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Vitamin C, beta-carotene, cultivars, western<br />

shipper, honeydew<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong>re is a paucity of published data on genetic variation for humanhealth-related<br />

phytochemicals in melon. Improvement of melon cultivars<br />

through traditional breeding depends on genetic variation for traits of interest.<br />

This research investigated the effects of cultivar and environment on the levels<br />

of vitamin C and beta-carotene in a diverse selection of melon cultivars and<br />

lines. Extensive variation was found for both compounds, with three- to fourfold<br />

differences between high and low entries. Several open-pollinated<br />

cultivars, including ‘TAM Uvalde’ and ‘TAM Perlita 45’, contained high levels<br />

of both these compounds, as did some older hybrid cultivars such as ‘Mission’.<br />

Many popular commercial hybrids such as ‘Cruiser’ and ‘Primo’ had lower<br />

levels of these phytochemicals, but larger fruit. Fruit grown at Uvalde were<br />

consistently higher in vitamin C than fruit grown at Weslaco. <strong>The</strong> highest levels<br />

of vitamin C recorded in this experiment (32mg·100g -1 ) were lower than the<br />

levels found in the USDA nutrition database, while the highest beta-carotene<br />

levels (62µg·g -1 ) were higher than USDA figures. <strong>The</strong>re is good potential for<br />

genetic improvement of these phytochemical levels through conventional<br />

breeding and selection.<br />

This research was funded in part by USDA Grant: 2001-34402-10543, “Designing<br />

Foods for Health.” We acknowledge financial support from the South Texas Melon<br />

Committee. We also thank technicians Alfredo Rodríguez and Hyun J. Kang, Texas<br />

Agricultural Research and Extension Center-Weslaco, for their assistance.<br />

70 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


T<br />

he melon-breeding program at the Texas Agricultural<br />

Experiment Station in Weslaco focuses on improving fruit<br />

quality to meet demands of consumers and producers. <strong>The</strong><br />

importance of melons in the human diet, coupled with their naturally<br />

high levels of vitamins, makes them ideal delivery systems for<br />

beneficial phytochemicals. Melons can provide vitamin C, betacarotene,<br />

potassium, calcium, sugars, and folate. Muskmelons are an<br />

excellent source of both vitamin C and beta-carotene (provitamin A).<br />

Among the top 10 most consumed fruits in the U.S., muskmelons are<br />

the only ones that provide the recommended daily allowance of both<br />

these vitamins (Lester, 1997). <strong>The</strong> stability of beta-carotene<br />

concentration over time is very high, which makes selection for this<br />

compound reliable (Lester and Bruton, 1986). In addition, there is a<br />

good correlation between levels of beta-carotene and desirable orange<br />

flesh color (Lester and Turley, 1990). This is both a selection and<br />

marketing advantage. Genotypic and environmental effects on betacarotene<br />

levels have been observed in field-grown fruit under<br />

commercial production practices. Lester and Eischen (1996) found<br />

that some melon varieties had higher levels of this compound than<br />

others. In addition, some varieties produced consistent beta-carotene<br />

levels across environments while others did not. Vitamin C is very<br />

susceptible to degradation over time or by exposure to high<br />

temperatures. <strong>The</strong>refore, fresh melon fruit consumption will deliver<br />

the highest concentrations of this important compound. <strong>The</strong> species<br />

Cucumis melo L. is divided into six horticultural groups based on<br />

diverse fruit and vine characteristics (Robinson and Decker-Walters,<br />

1997). <strong>The</strong> great genetic diversity within this species is valuable for<br />

screening to identify genotypes high in these beneficial compounds.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A diverse selection of melon lines and cultivars was planted in<br />

replicated field plots at Weslaco and Uvalde Texas during the spring<br />

of 2001. Seeds were sown on beds covered with black plastic mulch.<br />

Subsurface drip tape was utilized to irrigate and supply fertilizers<br />

throughout the growing season. Several applications of pesticides<br />

were applied to prevent mildew, gummy stem blight, and insect<br />

infestations. All fruit were harvested at the full-slip stage and<br />

processed within 24 hours. An effort was made to select fruit of<br />

similar size across entries when possible. Roughly 100-g flesh<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 71


Table 1. Fresh fruit Vitamin C and beta-carotene contents of 15 melon<br />

cultivars and lines grown in field plots at Weslaco, Texas.<br />

Vitamin C<br />

Cultivar/line (mg·100g -1 Beta-carotene<br />

) (µg·g -1 ) Fruit type<br />

TAM Perlita 45 21.7 a z 62.2 a z<br />

Western shipper<br />

- size 15 y<br />

Western shipper<br />

TAM Uvalde 15.2 b 57.5 ab<br />

- size 18<br />

Western shipper<br />

Explorer 12.4 bc 45.0 cde - size 15<br />

Western shipper<br />

Cruiser 12.1 bc 36.3 e<br />

- size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

Mission 11.9 bc 40.3 de<br />

- size 15<br />

Honeydew –<br />

Green Ice 11.8 bc 4.70 f<br />

size 15<br />

TAM Mayan 11.2 bcd 11.5 f Casaba - size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

Gold Mark 10.8 bcd 41.4 cde - size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

TXC 2015 10.0 bcd 49.8 bc<br />

- size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

HMX 9583 9.4 cd 46.0 cd<br />

- size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

Valley Gold 9.3 cd 48.5 bcd - size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

Mainpak 9.2 cd 43.5 cde - size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

Pronto 8.0 cd 43.0 cde - size 12<br />

Honeydew –<br />

TAM Dew Impr. 7.2 cd 4.70 f<br />

size 12<br />

Western shipper<br />

Primo 7.0 cd 56.7 ab<br />

- size 12<br />

z<br />

Mean separations by LSD, P ≤ 0.05. Values followed by the same letter are not<br />

significantly different.<br />

y<br />

Sizes based on number of fruit that fit into a standard melon packing box.<br />

samples were taken from three replications per entry. <strong>The</strong>se samples<br />

were stored in a –80 ºC freezer prior to chemical analysis.<br />

Vitamin C (total ascorbic acid) was extracted from 10g of frozen<br />

tissue by homogenizing in ice-cold meta-phosphoric acid (5% w/v) for<br />

5s in a polytron homogenizer (Brinkman Instruments, Westbury, NY).<br />

<strong>The</strong> homogenate was then centrifuged (7000gn) for 15min at 4 ºC.<br />

Detection of free and dehydro- ascorbic acid was at 525nm, and<br />

72 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


concentrations were calculated based on a standard curve (Hodges et<br />

al., 2001). Beta-carotene was extracted from lyophilized tissue using<br />

heptane under low-light conditions as described by Lester et al. (2005).<br />

HPLC was used to separate beta-carotene in a C18 column, with<br />

detection at 454nm. Total soluble solids were measured with a<br />

handheld refractometer (ATAGO USA, Inc., Bellevue, WA) at room<br />

temperature. Total ascorbic acid and beta-carotene concentration<br />

values were subjected to ANOVA and mean separations by LSD,<br />

utilizing STATGRAPHICS plus 4.1 software (Statpoint, Inc.,<br />

Herndon, VA).<br />

Several families were developed with ‘TAM Uvalde’, ‘Mission’,<br />

‘Cruiser’, and ‘TAM Dew Improved’ as parents. <strong>The</strong> F2 progeny were<br />

screened to determine the potential for selection of larger fruit with<br />

genetically high levels of vitamin C and beta-carotene. Preliminary<br />

results demonstrated potential for transgressive segregation, with some<br />

progeny having higher concentrations of the phytochemicals and larger<br />

fruit than the parents (Crosby, unpublished data). Molecular markers<br />

linked to QTL affecting vitamin C have been developed in another F2<br />

family (Sinclair et al., 2006). Ideally, these RAPD markers, and others<br />

under development for beta-carotene QTL, will be useful to expedite<br />

selection of new melon cultivars with genetically enhanced levels of<br />

these two important phytochemicals.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is very little published information on genetic variation for<br />

fruit phytochemical traits in melon (Cucumis melo L). USDA<br />

statistics suggest that cantaloupe and honeydew melons are potentially<br />

good sources of vitamin C and beta-carotene, but do not address<br />

potential variation in these compounds across cultivars or horticultural<br />

groups (Adams and Richardson, 1981). Extensive genetic variation<br />

exists for many fruit-quality traits within the species Cucumis melo L.<br />

In addition, new cultivars and horticultural types are becoming<br />

available to U.S. consumers. It does not seem realistic to assume that<br />

all cultivars and types provide the same levels of beneficial<br />

phytochemicals. Both genetic and environmental components of<br />

variation for beta-carotene and vitamin C in melons were reported by<br />

Lester and Eischen (1996) and Lester and Crosby (2002). However,<br />

these studies included only a few cultivars of western-shipper<br />

cantaloupe or honeydew types. <strong>The</strong> present investigation included a<br />

larger number of commercial cultivars, germplasm accessions, and<br />

diverse horticultural types.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 73


Table 2. Fresh fruit vitamin C and total soluble solids of 39 melon<br />

cultivars and lines grown in field plots at Uvalde, Texas.<br />

Vitamin C<br />

Cultivar/line (mg·100g -1 Total soluble<br />

) solids (ºbrix) Fruit type<br />

TAM Uvalde 32.0 a z Western<br />

12.2 shipper<br />

Western<br />

Magnum 45 29.9 ab 8.5 shipper<br />

Western<br />

Mission 25.5 bc 12.3 shipper<br />

Western<br />

A-chapparal 22.5 cd 9.2 shipper<br />

Western<br />

TXC 2015 22.3 cd 10.4 shipper<br />

Western<br />

Durango 21.5 cde 9.0 shipper<br />

Western<br />

Tesoro 21.2 cdef 6.0 shipper<br />

Western<br />

Caravelle 21.0 cdef 11.0 shipper<br />

Western<br />

TXC 1053 20.6 cdefg 11.0 shipper<br />

Guadeloupe 20.3 cdefgh 10.5 Charentais<br />

TXC 807 19.7 defghi 10.2 Charentais<br />

Western<br />

TXC 1075 19.0 defghij 8.0 shipper<br />

Charlynne 18.8 defghijk 10.1 Ananas<br />

Western<br />

Sol Real 18.7 defghijk 10.0 shipper<br />

Ames 20488 18.2 defghijk 6.0 Momordica<br />

Western<br />

TXC 2040 17.5 defghijkl 8.5 shipper<br />

Western<br />

Primo 17.5 defghijkl 10.0 shipper<br />

Western<br />

TP 45 16.5 efghijklm 10.0 shipper<br />

Western<br />

TXC 1409 16.0 efghijklm 12.5 shipper<br />

Eastern<br />

Athena 15.7 fghijklm 8.0 shipper<br />

Western<br />

Impac 15.6 fghijklm 8.0 shipper<br />

TXC 1129 15.2 ghijklmn 13.0 Honeydew<br />

Western<br />

Cruiser 15.2 ghijklmn 8.3 shipper<br />

Trooper 14.8 hijklmno 7.7 Western<br />

74 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


(Table 2,<br />

continued)<br />

Vitamin C<br />

(mg·100g -1 )<br />

Total soluble<br />

solids (ºbrix)<br />

Cultivar/line<br />

Fruit type<br />

shipper<br />

Western<br />

TXC 1143 14.6 ijklmno 10.5 shipper<br />

PI 124104 14.4 ijklmno 6.1 Honeydew<br />

Western<br />

RML 6483 14.0 ijklmnop 10.0 shipper<br />

Deltex<br />

Crème de<br />

13.4 jklmnop 9.0 Ananas<br />

Menthe 13.2 klmnop 13.3 Honeydew<br />

PI 127546 13.1 klmnopq 5.0 Momordica<br />

PI 165449 12.5 lmnopq 7.5 Casaba<br />

Western<br />

Copa de Oro 12.1 lmnopq 7.5 shipper<br />

Morning Ice 11.3 mnopq 13.0 Honeydew<br />

TAM Dew Impr. 11.3 mnopq 14.4 Honeydew<br />

TAM Mayan 10.9 mnopq 12.8 Casaba<br />

Mega Brew 9.6 nopq 14.0 Honeydew<br />

Santa Fe 9.2 opq 11.7 Honeydew<br />

Doublon 8.6 pq 11.0 Charentais<br />

Western<br />

TXC 1405 7.5 q 7.0 shipper<br />

z<br />

Mean separations by LSD, P≤0.05. Means followed by the same letters are not<br />

significantly different.<br />

Vitamin C concentrations at Weslaco demonstrated a threefold<br />

difference between highest and lowest entries (Table 1). This<br />

represents substantial genetic variation, considering that environmental<br />

parameters and growing conditions were presumably quite similar<br />

within the small field plots. <strong>The</strong> difference in vitamin C concentrations<br />

between the highest and lowest entries at Uvalde was even greater at<br />

32 vs. 7.5mg·100g -1 (Table 2). <strong>The</strong> mean vitamin C concentrations<br />

were higher at Uvalde than at Weslaco for the best cultivars, such as<br />

‘TAM Uvalde’ and ‘Mission’, and for those on the low side, such as<br />

‘TAM Dew Improved.’ In general, the trend for higher levels of<br />

vitamin C at Uvalde than Weslaco was evident. However, in neither<br />

location did the best entries produce as much vitamin C as was<br />

reported in western-shipper cantaloupe melons by the National<br />

Agricultural Library nutritional database Website (nal.usda.gov). This<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 75


suggests that despite extensive genetic variation among cantaloupe<br />

types for vitamin C content, they may be quite susceptible to genotype<br />

x environment interaction for synthesis of this key phytochemical.<br />

This was found to be true with honeydews grown at different Texas<br />

locations (Lester and Crosby, 2002).Beta-carotene concentrations were<br />

assessed only from the Weslaco fruit. In contrast to the vitamin C<br />

data, the beta-carotene concentrations for the orange-fleshed entries<br />

were generally greater than the values reported by the USDA<br />

(nal.usda.gov.). Statistically significant differences were evident<br />

among orange-fleshed entries, with 1.7-fold greater levels in ‘TAM<br />

Perlita 45’ than in ‘Cruiser’. As expected, white- and green-fleshed<br />

honeydew cultivars had much lower levels of beta-carotene than the<br />

western-shipper types. <strong>The</strong> intermediate level in the casaba cultivar<br />

‘TAM Mayan’ is likely due to its pedigree, which includes an orangefleshed<br />

ancestor. Some light-orange coloration is evident in the<br />

placental region of this cultivar. At 62.2µg·g -1 , ‘TAM Uvalde’<br />

contained roughly 1030 retinol equivalents or 100% of the RDA for<br />

provitamin A. This is better than the value of 676 retinol equivalents<br />

(3382 IU) for cantaloupe suggested by the USDA Website. This<br />

cultivar also had high total soluble solids and vitamin C, suggesting<br />

that selection for multiple fruit-quality and antioxidant traits<br />

simultaneously should be feasible.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Adams, C. F. and M. Richardson. 1981. Nutritive value of foods. USDA Home and<br />

Garden Bul. 72. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.<br />

Hodges, D. W., C. F. Forney, and W. V. Wismer. 2001. Antioxidant responses in<br />

harvested leaves of two cultivars of spinach differing in senescence rates. J.<br />

Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:611–617.<br />

Lester, G. E. 1997. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit nutritional quality and health<br />

functionality. HortTech. 7:222–227.<br />

Lester, G. E. and B. D. Bruton. 1986. Relationship of netted muskmelon fruit water<br />

loss to postharvest storage life. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:727–731.<br />

Lester, G. E. and F. Eischen. 1996. Beta-carotene content of postharvest orangefleshed<br />

muskmelon fruit: effect of cultivar, growing location and fruit size. Plant<br />

Foods for Hum. Nutr. 49:191–197.<br />

Lester, G. E., J. L. Jifon, and G. Rogers. 2005. Supplemental foliar potassium<br />

applications during muskmelon fruit development can improve fruit quality,<br />

ascorbic acid and beta-carotene contents. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130(4):649–<br />

653.<br />

Lester, G. E. and K. M. Crosby. 2002. Ascorbic acid, folic acid, and potassium<br />

content in postharvest green-flesh honeydew muskmelon fruit: influence of<br />

cultivar, fruit size, soil type and year. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127:843–847.<br />

Lester, G. E. and R. M. Turley. 1990. Chemical, physical and sensory comparisons<br />

of netted muskmelon fruit cultivars and breeding lines at harvest. J. Rio Grande<br />

Valley Hort. Soc. 43:71–77.<br />

76 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Robinson. R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />

New York.<br />

Sinclair, J. W., S. O. Park, G. E. Lester, K. S. Yoo, and K. M. Crosby. 2006.<br />

Identification and confirmation of RAPD markers and andromonoecious<br />

associated with quantitative<br />

trait loci for sugars in melon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 131(3):360–371<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 77


PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND EVOLUTION OF<br />

WILD AND CULTIVATED WATERMELON<br />

Fenny Dane and Jiarong Liu<br />

Department of Horticulture, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus, C. lanatus var.<br />

citroides, domestication, nucleotide polymorphism, cpDNA, nuclear sequence<br />

polymorphism<br />

ABSTRACT. Cultivated (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus) and wild (C. lanatus var.<br />

citroides) watermelon accessions from different geographical areas were used to<br />

study the origin and domestication history of the cultivated watermelon.<br />

Chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence analyses were conducted to infer<br />

evolutionary relationships and biogeographic patterns. Variability within C.<br />

lanatus was observed at regions of high AT content only. Distinct chlorotype<br />

lineages were identified separating the cultivated watermelon from several<br />

citroides lineages, indicating ancient splits between the cultivated and wild<br />

watermelon. While polymorphism at cpDNA regions within var. lanatus was<br />

lacking, sequence variation at glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and<br />

glutamine synthetase revealed variability, which was used to study colonization<br />

events. <strong>The</strong> egusi-type watermelon from Nigeria can be distinguished by a<br />

unique amino acid deletion at the transit peptide region of G3pdh. Variability<br />

among var. citroides accessions suggests a center of diversity in southern Africa.<br />

W<br />

ith the advent of agriculture began the process of plant<br />

domestication, which led from wild populations to plants<br />

adapted to cultivation and human use (Gepts, 2003).<br />

Human selection affected a wide array of morphological and<br />

physiological traits that distinguish cultivated crops from their wild<br />

ancestors. Research has revealed that a relatively small number of<br />

qualitative and quantitative trait loci with major effects control<br />

domestication-related traits in crops (Gepts, 2003). Understanding the<br />

process of domestication of species and colonization is fundamental to<br />

the study of evolutionary diversification. Studying the geographical<br />

distribution of plant lineages helps synthesize history and genetic<br />

exchanges and provides insights into the different factors that shape<br />

the genetic diversityof a species and the origins of crops (Avise, 2000;<br />

Gepts, 2003).<br />

Plant molecular evolution has been dominated by studies of the<br />

chloroplast (cp) genome because cpDNA is an abundant compenent of<br />

the total cellular DNA, and maternally inherited in most angiosperms.<br />

Chloroplast DNA is evolutionarily conservative in terms of genome<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors thank Rasima Bakhtiyarova for technical assitance.<br />

78 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


size, structure, gene content, and linear order of genes among plant<br />

lineages. Consequently, any change in structure or arrangement of the<br />

cp genome can have significant phylogenetic implications (Soltis et<br />

al., 1998). Both coding and noncoding sequences are used either<br />

through direct sequencing or PCR-restriction fragment length<br />

polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (Petit et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> plant<br />

mitochondrial (mt) genome has with few exceptions not yielded useful<br />

amounts of population-level variation. Because sequences of cp- and<br />

mtDNA evolve more slowly than those of the nuclear genome in<br />

plants, nuclear gene markers are needed especially for phylogenetic<br />

reconstruction at low taxonomic levels. Noncoding regions of lowcopy<br />

nuclear genes have not been extensively explored in plants,<br />

although this genome can potentially provide multiple unlinked allele<br />

genealogies at the intraspecific level. Recent studies have<br />

demonstrated that rapidly evolving introns of low-copy nuclear genes<br />

can provide information to resolve intraspecific relationships (Olsen,<br />

2002; Zhang and Hewitt, 2003).<br />

Wild and cultivated watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.]<br />

Matsum & Nakai) are native to Africa and can be divided into the<br />

botanical varieties lanatus and citroides (Jeffrey, 1990; Maynard,<br />

2001). <strong>The</strong> variety lanatus includes the cultivated watermelon, known<br />

for its large sweet red or yellow fruit, and the egusi-type, cultivated in<br />

West Africa for its oil- and protein-rich edible seeds. <strong>The</strong> variety<br />

citroides (Bailey) Mansf. includes the citron or preserving melon,<br />

which produces small spherical fruit with hard, inedible bitter flesh,<br />

and green or tan seeds.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary gene center for watermelon is not known. One theory<br />

proposes that watermelon is derived from the perennial C. colocynthis,<br />

endemic to Africa; another that watermelon was domesticated from a<br />

putatively wild form of C. lanatus var. citroides (Maynard, 2001).<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence of 5000-year-old seeds of C. lanatus in Libya implies<br />

that domestication might have occurred in <strong>North</strong>ern Africa. <strong>The</strong> oldest<br />

published records of Citrullus remains come from the tomb of<br />

Tutankhamun in Egypt (ca. 1330 BC), and it was known in Sudan as<br />

early as 1500 BC (Hepper, 1990). Records of cultivated watermelon<br />

are known around the Mediterranean from the early first millennium<br />

BC. By the Roman period, records are widespread, ranging from<br />

Libya to Europe, but only a few are known from southern Africa.<br />

Watermelons have been cultivated in the Nile Valley since before<br />

2000 BC, and many landraces varying in fruit size, shape, flesh color,<br />

rind, and seed color were developed. From Africa, watermelons were<br />

introduced to India about 800 AD and to China about 1100 AD.<br />

Cultivation spread to Southeast Asia in the 15 th century, while the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 79


Moors introduced watermelon to Europe during their conquest of<br />

Spain. Watermelon was transported and introduced to the Americas in<br />

post-Columbian times by the early European colonists, and became<br />

readily accepted and disseminated by Native Americans, especially in<br />

the Mississippi Valley and the southwestern U.S. (Zohary and Hopf,<br />

2000). But despite the economic importance of watermelon,<br />

domestication events and phylogeographic relationships have received<br />

only limited scientific attention.<br />

Initial studies using PCR-RFLP analysis in Citrullus species were<br />

conducted using different chloroplast regions (Dane, 2002).<br />

Sequencing analysis of informative regions revealed four haplotypes<br />

within C. lanatus, one associated with the cultivated watermelon (var.<br />

lanatus), and three with var. citroides (Dane et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />

chlorotypes within C. lanatus suggest ancient splits between the<br />

cultivated and wild watermelon types (Liu, 2005). This study was<br />

conducted to provide a comprehensive review of DNA-sequence<br />

diversity and divergence within this wild/domesticated complex and to<br />

make inferences about the domestication history of the species.<br />

Variable nuclear regions were compared to information gained from<br />

cpDNA sequence analysis.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Seeds from Citrullus accessions and cultivars were obtained<br />

through the Plant Introduction (PI) Station at Griffin, Georgia, the<br />

National Plant Genetic Resources Centre (NPGC) at Windhoek,<br />

Namibia, or from the Volcani Center in Israel (Table 1). Accessions<br />

were chosen based on an extensive survey of the Citrullus collection<br />

using PCR-RFLP and cpDNA sequencing analysis (Dane et al, 2004;<br />

Liu, 2005).<br />

DNA was extracted from seedlings or cotyledon tissues using the<br />

Qiagen plant DNA easy extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).<br />

Chloroplast genome sections were amplified using universal primers<br />

(Liu, 2005). Nuclear DNA sequences were amplified with primers<br />

designed from published EST information. Primers were designed in<br />

exons to amplify fragments of around 600–800bp around intronic<br />

sequences (Table 2). PCR cycling conditions for the GS and Dip<br />

sequences were 95˚C for 2 min, followed by 10 cycles of 1 min at<br />

92˚C, 20 s at 73˚C, 20 s at 72˚C, followed by 25 cycles of 20 s at 92˚C,<br />

20 s at 55˚C, 20 s at 72˚C, and finally 5 min at 72˚C. PCR cycling<br />

conditions for the G3pdh sequences were 94˚C for 4 min, followed by<br />

35 cycles of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 52.5˚C, 2 min at 72˚C, and finally<br />

10 min at 72˚C.<br />

80 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Amplified fragments were purified using the Qiaquick PCR<br />

purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and sequence analysis was<br />

performed using an ABI 3100 sequencer. Nucleotide sequences were<br />

submitted to GenBank and accession numbers are available from the<br />

senior author. Sequences were aligned using Vector NTI ® software<br />

(InforMax, Frederick, MD), followed by manual adjustments.<br />

Single base indels were crosschecked to the original chromatograms<br />

for accuracy. Indels were scored as single binary (0 vs. 1 characters<br />

appended to the main matrix. All character states were specified as<br />

unordered and equally weighted. To test for congruence of the<br />

cpDNA and different nuclear regions, partition homogeneity tests with<br />

heuristic searches were conducted in PAUP* with 100 replicates and<br />

tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch swapping (Swofford, 2002).<br />

Table 1. Investigated Citrullus lanatus plant introductions (PI) and<br />

cultivars with their geographic origin.<br />

Taxon PI number Origin<br />

C. lanatus var.<br />

lanatus<br />

PI 179881 India<br />

PI 494529 Nigeria<br />

PI 295845 S. África<br />

AU Producer USA<br />

C. lanatus var.<br />

citroides<br />

PI 189225 Zaire<br />

PI 270563 S. Africa<br />

PI 271769 Transvaal<br />

PI 296343 Cape Province<br />

PI 485583 Botswana<br />

PI 288316 India<br />

PI 532667 Swaziland<br />

Nam1569 Namibia<br />

Nam1884 Namibia<br />

TCN1126 USA<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Since cpDNA sequence analysis did not uncover much variability<br />

within C. lanatus (Dane et al., 2004; Liu, 2005, Figure 1), wild and<br />

cultivated watermelon accessions were surveyed for sequence<br />

diversity at three nuclear regions. Characteristics of the studied<br />

nuclear regions are listed in Table 3. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 81


dehydrogenase (G3pdh) catalyzes the reduction of 1,3<br />

diphosphoglycerate to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate in the cytosol or<br />

chloroplast. <strong>The</strong> N-terminal transit peptide is interrupted by three<br />

introns, two of which are conserved across gymnosperms and<br />

angiosperms. <strong>The</strong> sequenced G3pdh region in C. lanatus spans one<br />

intron (2), flanked by AG and GT motifs typical of nuclear introns,<br />

and a short section of the transit peptide region. Sequence divergence<br />

is high mainly at the intronic region, although one informative 3-bp<br />

deletion (glu) was detected at the transit peptide exon region in some<br />

var. lanatus accessions.<br />

Glutamine synthetase (GS) functions as the major assimilatory<br />

enzyme for ammonia produced from N fixation, and nitrate or<br />

ammonia nutrition. It also reassimilates ammonia released as a result<br />

of photorespiration and the breakdown of proteins and nitrogen<br />

transport compounds. GS is distributed in different subcellular<br />

locations (chloroplast and cytoplasm) and in different tissues and<br />

organs. <strong>The</strong> enzyme is the product of multiple genes with complex<br />

promoters that ensure the expression of the genes in an organ- and<br />

tissue-specific manner and in response to a number of environmental<br />

variables affecting the nutritional status of the cell (Miflin and Habash,<br />

2002). <strong>The</strong> GS primer pairs cover two intron regions of 574 and<br />

113bp, each flanked by GT-AG sequences. Variability between var.<br />

lanatus accessions was detected at one intron region, but very low<br />

between citroides accessions.<br />

Drought-induced polypeptide-1 or Dip-1 belongs to the<br />

ArgE/DapE/Acy1/Cpg2/YcsS protein family, and is strongly induced<br />

in wild watermelon leaves by drought/high-light-stress conditions<br />

(Kawasaki et al., 2000), but the catalytic property of Dip-1 remains to<br />

Table 2. Primer pairs used to sequence Citrullus lanatus nuclear<br />

regions.<br />

GenBank<br />

accession<br />

number Forward primer Reverse primer<br />

Nuclear region<br />

Glyceraldehyde-<br />

3-phosphate<br />

dehydrogenase<br />

Glutamine<br />

synthetase<br />

AI563173 CAGGCTAATGG/<br />

AAAGGGTTT<br />

AI563060 ATGTCTCTGC/<br />

TCTC<br />

Dip-1 AB036420 TGGGTTCTG/<br />

TTCCATCCATT<br />

TTGTATCCTC/<br />

CGCTCCTTCC<br />

TACCTGTCTT/<br />

CTCC<br />

TTGTGAATCT/<br />

GCTGTGTCAA<br />

82 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


e determined. <strong>The</strong> enzyme is known to be encoded by a single gene<br />

and resides within the plastid (Slocum, 2005). <strong>The</strong> Dip primer pair<br />

covers several introns (130, 111, and 529-566bp) and sequence<br />

divergence is high at both intronic and exonic regions (Table 3). One<br />

substitution at an exon results in an amino acid substitution from<br />

serine (at position 274) in var. citroides accessions (and C.<br />

colocynthis) to glycine in var. lanatus.<br />

<strong>The</strong> C. lanatus accessions are characterized by 26 substitution<br />

polymorphisms and six indels at the nuclear regions. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

polymorphisms define a total of at least eight different haplotypes,<br />

while only four haplotypes were detected using cpDNA sequence<br />

analysis (Liu, 2005). Intravarietal differences were detected at the<br />

transit peptide region of G3pdh and intron region of GS and can<br />

subsequently be used to assess colonization patterns. Most of the<br />

accessions showed one nuclear haplotype, but heterozygosity was<br />

detected in PI 532667 and 596656 at the variable sites of the GS<br />

region. Since the PI accessions originate as seed collections and are<br />

maintained and increased under limited isolation, hybridization and<br />

recombination might have occurred and led to heterozygosity at<br />

nuclear regions. Alternatively, the C. lanatus GS shows high sequence<br />

homology with cytolosic GS1 forms of several species, which are<br />

known to be members of a small multigene family and haplotypes<br />

might not be orthologous. Sequence variability at GS was very low<br />

and not very informative.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 3-bp deletion at the G3pdh transit peptide region was found to<br />

be characteristic of egusi-type watermelon. Sequence analysis of<br />

several egusi-type watermelon originating in Nigeria showed this (glu)<br />

deletion in PIs 186490, 189318, 560012, 560023, 5559997, 494527,<br />

and 494529. <strong>The</strong> deletion was also detected in cultivars ‘Au-<br />

Producer’ and ‘Lucky’, but not in watermelons from any other<br />

geographic area (Syria, Afghanistan, India, or southern Africa). It can<br />

thus be hypothesized that the watermelon cultivars were domesticated<br />

from Nigeria. More studies will be forthcoming to test this hypothesis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> citroides accessions can be characterized by unique<br />

substitutions and indels at the nuclear regions, although a low number<br />

of substitutions were common to all citroides accessions. One major<br />

37 bp deletion at the Dip-1 intron is the result of replication slippage<br />

since a 13 bp section of this indel is homologous to contiguous<br />

flanking regions. This deletion was not detected in var. citroides PI<br />

296343, 189225, 288316, and NAM 1569.<br />

Partition homogeneity tests using Paup showed incongruence of<br />

the cpDNA and nuclear sequence data (P=0.01). <strong>The</strong> genomic regions<br />

may have been shaped by different evolutionary processes. Some<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 83


Table 3. Characterization of sections of nuclear regions within C.<br />

lanatus.<br />

Glyceral-<br />

Nuclear Glutamine dehyde-3P<br />

regions synthetase dehydrogenase Dip-1<br />

aligned 620 (575bp 672 (600bp 650-687(428length(bp)<br />

intron) intron) 465 bp intron)<br />

intron AT<br />

content<br />

exon AT<br />

65.0% 64.6% 73.8%<br />

content 52.4% 51.4% 57.5%<br />

var. lanatus PI 1 2 Ts, 1 Tv, 2 ID 2 Ts, 2 Tv, 2 ID 6 Ts, 3 Tv, 1 ID<br />

var. citroides PI 1 Tv 3 Ts, 1 Tv 4 Ts, 1 Tv, 1 ID<br />

Nucleotide<br />

diversity (%)* 0.696 1.121 2.796<br />

1 PI = parsimony informative sites; Ts = transition; Tv = transversion; ID = indel<br />

*Nucleotide diversity refers to Π x 100, calculated at noncoding regions.<br />

forces such as population bottlenecks have a genome-wide effect,<br />

others like recombination and selection may have only a regional<br />

influence. Dating of indels and substitutions is difficult for nuclear<br />

data, but the presence of the large deletion at the dip intron adds<br />

phylogenetic weight to this nuclear marker. Nucleotide diversity was<br />

clearly not random along the nuclear genome (Table 3). This<br />

unevenness is associated with differences in recombination rate, gene<br />

density in the genomic region, transmission pattern, and selection<br />

strength (Zhang and Hewitt, 2003). <strong>The</strong> lowest number of nuclear<br />

polymorphic sites was observed in PI 288316 from India, possibly due<br />

to isolation and founder effect, the highest number (9) in accessions<br />

from Namibia and South Africa, probably the center of origin of<br />

watermelon. Minimum spanning trees (Figure 2) using substitutions at<br />

two nuclear regions divide the citroides accessions into two main<br />

groups. <strong>The</strong> small group of accessions from S. Africa (PI 189225,<br />

296343, and 271769) might be considered as ancestral, since they lack<br />

the large informative indel at dip. Information gained from the<br />

cpDNA analysis shows the ancestral chlorotype in PI 596656 and<br />

532667. Traditional phylogenetic analysis methods are not the most<br />

appropriate for analyzing intraspecific polymorphic data (Zhang and<br />

Hewitt, 2003) since rare polymorphisms such as singletons are treated<br />

as noninformative from a parsimony perspective. Results from cpDNA<br />

84 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Fig. 1. Minimum spanning haplotype tree representing the relationships<br />

between Citrullus lanatus accessions inferred from sequence information at the<br />

trnS-trnG, atpA-trnR, trnE-trnT regions of the chloroplast genome (Liu, 2005).<br />

Large open circles represent observed haplotypes. Lines between haplotypes<br />

indicate mutational steps. Small circles, squares, and diamond indicate type of<br />

nucleotide substitution. <strong>The</strong> size of deletions is given in bp. <strong>The</strong> order of<br />

mutations on the branches is arbitrary.<br />

and nuclear DNA analyses support the divergence of var. lanatus and<br />

var. citroides from a common ancestor and little molecular exchange<br />

between them (Figures 1 and 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> amount of genetic variation in cultivated crop plants is<br />

shaped in part by the way genetic material is passed from one<br />

cultivated generation to the next. In cucurbits, seeds from a limited<br />

number of wild plants were used to form cultivated populations. <strong>The</strong><br />

resulting founder effect, coupled with ongoing selection of seeds from<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 85


Fig. 2. Minimum spanning haplotype tree representing the relationships<br />

between Citrullus lanatus accessions inferred from sequence information of the<br />

glyceraldehyde- 3P-dehydrogenase and Dip nuclear genes. Observed haplotypes<br />

are in large open circles. Lines between haplotypes indicate mutational steps,<br />

small circles and squares indicate type of nucleotide substitution. <strong>The</strong> size of<br />

deletions is given in bp. <strong>The</strong> order of mutations on the branches is arbitrary.<br />

the initial pool of cultivated genotypes, produced a genetic bottleneck<br />

in the cultivated populations. Intense artificial selection during<br />

domestication results in a progressive narrowing of the genetic base of<br />

the cultivated populations. In recent times, the genetic base of<br />

cultivated populations most likely has been reduced further as modern<br />

crop-improvement programs have selectively bred only a small subset<br />

of the original cultivated gene pool (Gepts, 2003). This is clearly the<br />

case in watermelon, which is known for its narrow genetic base (Levi<br />

et al., 2004, 2005), indicating that bottlenecks have reduced the<br />

amount of genetic variability in the cultivated crop. <strong>The</strong> G3pdh and<br />

Dip primers used are applicable for intraspecific studies since they are<br />

evolutionarily conserved across different taxonomic groups and their<br />

target sequences are single or low-copy. At the nuclear regions<br />

substitutions in var. lanatus accessions were higher than in var.<br />

citroides accessions, indicative of the effects of selection and<br />

domestication. One major evolutionarily recent deletion at a nuclear<br />

86 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


intron points to citroides accessions from southern Africa as ancestral,<br />

supporting migration patterns from southern Africa to the U.S. and<br />

India.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Avise, J. C. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard<br />

University Press, Cambridge, MA.<br />

Dane, F. 2002. Chloroplast DNA investigations in Citrullus using PCR-RFLP<br />

analysis, p. 100–108. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS Press,<br />

Naples, FL.<br />

Dane, F. and P. Lang. 2004. Sequence variation at cpDNA regions of watermelon<br />

and related species: implications for the evolution of Citrullus haplotypes. Am.<br />

J. Bot. 91:1922–1929.<br />

Dane, F., P. Lang, and R. Bakhtiyarova. 2004. Comparative analysis of chloroplast<br />

DNA variability in wild and cultivated Citrullus species. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

108:958–966.<br />

Gepts, P. 2003. Ten thousand years of crop evolution. In: M. J. Chrispeels and D. E.<br />

Sadava (eds). Plants, genes and crop biotechnology. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury,<br />

MA.<br />

Hepper, F. N. 1990. Pharaoh’s flowers: the botanical treasures of Tutankhamun.<br />

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London.<br />

Jeffrey, C. 1990. Systematics of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae: an overview. Cornell University<br />

Press, Ithaca, NY.<br />

Kawasaki, S., C. Miyake, T. Kohchi, S. Fujii, M. Uchida, and A. Yokota. 2000.<br />

Responses of wild watermelon to drought stress: accumulation of an ArgE<br />

homologue and citrulline in leaves during water deficits. Plant Cell Physiol.<br />

41:864–873.<br />

Levi, A. and C. E. Thomas. 2005. Polymorphisms among chloroplast and<br />

mitochondrial genomes of Citrullus species and subspecies. Gen. Res. & Crop<br />

Evol. 52:609–617.<br />

Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, M. Newman, O. U. K. Reddy, and X. Zhang. 2004. ISSR<br />

and AFLP markers sufficiently differ among American watermelon cultivars<br />

with limited genetic diversity. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:553–558.<br />

Liu, J. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)<br />

Matsum & Nakai) based on chloroplast, nuclear sequence and AFLP molecular<br />

marker data. MS <strong>The</strong>sis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.<br />

Maynard, D. N. 2001. An introduction to the watermelon. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />

VA.<br />

Miflin, B. J. and D. Z. Habash, 2002. <strong>The</strong> role of glutamine synthetase and glutamate<br />

dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation and possibilities for improvement in<br />

nitrogen utilization of crops. J. Exp. Bot. 53:979–987.<br />

Olsen, K. M. 2002. Population history of Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae)<br />

inferred from nuclear DNA sequences. Molec. Ecol. 11:901–911.<br />

Petit, R. J., J. Duminil, S. Fineschi, A. Hampe, D. Salvini, and G. G. Vendramin.<br />

2005. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear<br />

diversity in plant populations. Molec. Ecol. 14:689–701.<br />

Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />

New York.<br />

Sauer, J. D. 1993. Historical geography of crop plants. CRC press, Boca Raton, FL.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 87


Slocum, R. D. 2005. Genes, enzymes and regulation of arginine biosynthesis in<br />

plants. Plant Physiol. & Biochem. 43:729–745.<br />

Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. 1998. Molecular systematics of plants II.<br />

DNA sequencing. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />

Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other<br />

methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.<br />

Zhang, D.-X. and G. M. Hewitt. 2003. Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of<br />

populations: practice, problems and prospects. Molec. Ecol. 12:563–584.<br />

Zohary, D. and M. Hopf. 2000. Domestication of plants in the old world. Oxford<br />

University Press, Oxford, UK.<br />

88 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


FINE GENETICAL AND PHYSICAL MAPPING<br />

OF THE GENES A AND G CONTROLLING SEX<br />

DETERMINATION IN MELON<br />

M. Fergany, C. Troadec, M. Rajab, A. Boualem, M. Dalmais, M.<br />

Caboche, and A. Bendahmane<br />

INRA, URGV, Evry, France<br />

D. Besombes, N. Giovinazzo, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat<br />

INRA, GAFL, Avignon-Montfavet, France<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, flower biology, monoecious,<br />

gynoecious, hermaphrodite, andromonoecious, genetic map<br />

ABSTRACT. Sex expression in melon (Cucumis melo L.) is controlled by 2 major<br />

genes: andromonoecious controls the presence (allele a) or the absence (allele a +<br />

or A) of stamens in the female flowers and gynoecious controls the absence<br />

(allele g) or the presence (allele g + or G) of male flowers on a plant. A program<br />

of positional cloning has been developed for these 2 genes. AFLPs linked to the 2<br />

loci were selected by the Bulk Segregant Analysis method. <strong>The</strong> identified AFLPs<br />

were transformed into PCR specific markers and mapped on more than 5000<br />

plants segregating for a or g loci. In this analysis, the markers M23 and M58<br />

were mapped at 0.23 cM and 3 cM from the a and g loci, respectively. A melon<br />

BAC library of more than 120,000 clones was built and screened to isolate BAC<br />

clones carrying the targeted loci.<br />

M<br />

ost of the higher plants (angiosperms) have hermaphrodite<br />

flowers but some are monoecious or dioecious, for instance<br />

in the Betulaceae, Salicineae, Fagaceae, Juglandaceae, and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae families. Understanding the genetic control and the<br />

biological processes leading to sex expression is of great interest for<br />

plant breeding and for producing hybrid seeds.<br />

Most species in the genus Cucumis are monoecious, with the<br />

exception of C. heptadactylus, C. kalahariensis, C. hirsutus, and C.<br />

baladensis, which are dioecious (Kirkbride, 1993). In cucumber (C.<br />

sativus L.), almost all traditional cultivars are monoecious. In the<br />

second part of the twentieth century, breeders have developed<br />

gynoecious cultivars. <strong>The</strong> genetic control of sex expression is based on<br />

two main genes (Rosa, 1928; Galun, 1961; Rowe, 1969): the gene<br />

Female (symbol F) controls the high frequency of pistillated flowers<br />

on a plant and the gene monoecious / andromonoecious (symbol m)<br />

controls the presence of stamens in pistillate flowers. Interaction<br />

between F and m results in four phenotypes: hermaphrodite (Fm),<br />

gynoecious (FM), monoecious (fM), and andromonoecious (fm).<br />

Another major gene (androecious, symbol a) controls the presence of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 89


mainly staminated flowers (phenotype androecious) if the recessive<br />

allele f is present. <strong>The</strong> gene F has been identified as an ACC synthase<br />

(Mibus and Tatlioglu, 2004).<br />

Wild melons (C. melo) are monoecious but about 60–70 % of<br />

cultivated melon accessions are andromonoecious. Monoecism is<br />

found mainly in the flexuosus, acidulus, chate, and mormordica<br />

groups. As in cucumber, andromonoecism is controlled by one gene<br />

(Rosa, 1928), which was first named monoecious (symbol M) and now<br />

andromonoecious (symbol a). Another phenotype, hermaphroditism,<br />

has been found in very few accessions. In 1937, Poole and Grimball<br />

identified in Charleston (SC) 5 hermaphroditic accessions from China,<br />

among 48 monoecious and 339 andromonecious ones. <strong>The</strong>y studied<br />

the genetic control in crosses of monoecious x hermaphrodite and<br />

andromonoecious x hermaphrodite and they concluded to the action of<br />

a gene named gynoecious (symbol g), independent from a (Poole and<br />

Grimball, 1939). Interaction between the two loci is as follows: AG<br />

monoecious, Ag gynoecious, aG andromonoecious, and ag<br />

hermaphrodite. Gynoecious lines including WI 998 have been<br />

developed from this material (Rowe, 1969; Peterson et al., 1983). At<br />

the same time, Kubicki in Poland was also studying the genetic control<br />

of sex expression. He used an “uncultured hermaphroditic form”<br />

received from the All-Union Institute of Plant Industry in the Soviet<br />

Union. He also concluded at two loci with major effects and modifiers<br />

(Kubicki, 1969). Genetic controls in melon and in cucumber are very<br />

similar: alleles m and F in cucumber corresponding respectively to the<br />

alleles a and g in melon. It should however be noted that F in<br />

cucumber is dominant, whereas g in melon is recessive.<br />

We have developed a program of positional cloning for both genes<br />

a and g in melon. We will present here the first results of the fine<br />

genetical and physical mapping of these genes.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIALS. Five melon accessions were used: PI 124112<br />

is a monoecious line (genotype AAGG) from India; ‘Védrantais’ is an<br />

andromonoecious cultivar (genotype aaGG) in the Charentais type<br />

released by Vilmorin seed company; PI 161375 is an<br />

andromonoecious cultivar from Korea; ‘Gynadou’ is a gynoecious line<br />

(4 th backcross followed by selfing) in the Charentais type derived at<br />

INRA in Avignon-Montfavet from a white mealy flesh line received<br />

from B. Kubicki in 1967; ‘WI 998’ is a gynoecious line (genotype<br />

AAgg) released by the Michigan <strong>State</strong> University (Peterson et al.,<br />

90 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


1983) and derived from an hermaphrodite accession from China<br />

studied by Poole and Grimball.<br />

MAPPING POPULATIONS. Population of recombinant inbred lines<br />

(RILs) ‘Védrantais’ x PI 124112 was already available (Perchepied et<br />

al., 2005). Backcross populations BCa = (‘Védrantais’ x PI 124112) x<br />

‘Védrantais’ and BCg = Gynadou x (Gynadou x PI 124112) have been<br />

developed.<br />

MOLECULAR MARKERS. AFLP analysis was carried out (Vos et<br />

al., 1995) using PstI and MseI primer combinations. Genomic DNA<br />

was extracted using standard procedures. Analysis was performed on<br />

bulked DNA samples of monoecious and andromonoecious plants for<br />

the a locus and monoecious and gynoecious plants for the g locus. To<br />

identify plants carrying recombination events linked to a and g loci,<br />

DNA samples were extracted from more than 5000 segregating plants<br />

and analyzed using the a- and g-flanking markers, respectively. Map<br />

distances are given in centimorgans, and represent the percentage of<br />

recombinant plants in the total number of plants analyzed.<br />

GENOMIC LIBRARY. A melon BAC library was prepared from<br />

nuclei extracted from line PI 124112, based on the method described<br />

in Peterson et al. (2000). <strong>The</strong> library consists of 120,000 BAC clones.<br />

To assess the insert size of the BAC clones, plasmid DNA was isolated<br />

from more than 100 randomly chosen clones, digested with NotI and<br />

analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, as described previously<br />

(Kanyuka et al., 1999). <strong>The</strong> screening of the BAC library was<br />

performed as described by Kanyuka et al. (1999).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

ALLELISM TESTS. All the plants in F1 and F2 progenies between<br />

‘Gynadou’ and ‘WI 998’ were gynoecious. Previously, a 3 gynoecious<br />

vs. 1 hermaphrodite segregation has been observed in crosses between<br />

a “Polish hermaphrodite” and gynoecious material derived from a<br />

Chinese line studied by Poole and Grimball (Rowe, 1969). Thus it is<br />

highly probable that the same locus g is involved in plants studied by<br />

Poole and Grimball (1939) and by Kubicki (1969).<br />

MAPPING OF THE LOCUS a. <strong>The</strong> locus a has previously been<br />

mapped on linkage group II (Périn et al., 2002) and is linked to the<br />

locus Zym for Zucchini Yellow Mosaic-virus resistance. One thousand<br />

twenty-four combinations of primers were used on 2 bulks of<br />

monoecious and 2 bulks of andromonoecious plants derived from the<br />

BCa population including 15 plants per bulk. <strong>The</strong> promising markers<br />

were mapped on the RIL population ‘Védrantais’ x PI 124112 and on<br />

96 plants of the BCa population. M19 and M47 are 2 markers flanking<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 91


0<br />

3<br />

3<br />

M17<br />

M47<br />

A M23<br />

M19 M64<br />

0<br />

9<br />

4<br />

5<br />

M17<br />

M47<br />

A M23<br />

M19 M64<br />

0<br />

3<br />

2<br />

Fig. 1. Genetic map around the locus a on LG II on 1 = 120 RILs Védrantais x<br />

PI 124112; 2 = 96 plants of the backcross population BCa = (Védrantais x<br />

PI 124112) x Védrantais; 3 = 5000 plants of BCa. Marker M23 cosegregates<br />

with the locus a on the first two populations and is at 0.23 cM from a on<br />

population 3; 4 = Construction of a BAC contig overlapping the a locus.<br />

Fig. 2. Genetic and physical map of the g locus: 1 = Fine genetic map around the<br />

g locus on 5000 plants of the BCg = Gynadou x (Gynadou x PI 124112) progeny;<br />

2 = Construction of a BAC contig overlapping the g locus.<br />

M47<br />

A<br />

M23<br />

M64<br />

1 2 3 4<br />

92 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


the locus a and M23 cosegregates with a (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong>se 3 AFLP<br />

markers have been transformed in PCR specific markers and used to<br />

screen 5000 plants of the BCa population. Marker M23 could be<br />

separated from the locus a with 11 recombinant plants corresponding<br />

to 0.23 cM. <strong>The</strong> closest marker from a previously described was a<br />

SCAR derived from an AFLP at 5.5cM (Noguera et al., 2005).<br />

MAPPING OF THE LOCUS g. We identified AFLP markers tightly<br />

linked to the g locus by screening 1024 AFLP primer combinations on<br />

DNAs derived from bulked monoecious or gynoecious segregant<br />

plants from the BCg population. <strong>The</strong> obtained AFLPs were mapped<br />

relative to the g locus in a population of 5000 segregants to develop a<br />

high-resolution genetic map. In this analysis the g locus was delimited<br />

to a genetic interval of 5cM (Figure 2).<br />

PHYSICAL MAPPING OF THE a AND g LOCI. To isolate DNA clones<br />

carrying the a or g loci, a BAC library was constructed from nuclear<br />

DNA derived from a line homozygous for the a and g alleles. <strong>The</strong><br />

library consists of 120,000 clones and represents the haploid melon<br />

genome at least 23 times over. Using a systematic PCR-based<br />

procedure, the library was screened with markers linked to a or g loci<br />

(Figs. 1 and 2). Positive BAC clones were isolated and aligned in 2<br />

single overlapping contigs.<br />

Conclusions<br />

As many recombinants have been identified in the vicinity of a and<br />

g the next step will include the anchoring of the BAC contigs to the<br />

genetic map. <strong>The</strong> outcome of this experiment will be the genetic<br />

delimitation of the a and g loci to single BAC clones. <strong>The</strong> identified<br />

BAC clones will be sequenced and annotated. <strong>The</strong> predicted genes will<br />

then be mapped relative to the identified recombination events.<br />

Complementation studies will be carried out in melon and<br />

Arabidopsis.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Galun, E. 1961. Study of the inheritance of sex expression in the cucumber, the<br />

interactions of major genes with modifying genetic and non-genetic factors.<br />

Genetica. 32:134f–163.<br />

Kanyuka, K., A. Bendahmane, J. N. A. M. Rouppe van der Voort, E. A. G. van der<br />

Vossen, and D. C. Baulcombe. 1999. Mapping of intra-locus duplications and<br />

introgressed DNA: aids to map-based cloning of genes from complex genomes<br />

illustrated by physical analysis of the Rx locus in tetraploid potato. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl.<br />

Genet. 98:679f–689.<br />

Kirkbride, J. H. (ed.). 1993. Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumis<br />

(cucurbitaceae). Parkway, Boone, NC.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 93


Kubicki, B. 1969. Sex determination in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Genet<br />

Polonica. 10:145f–165.<br />

Mibus, H. and T. Tatlioglu. 2004. Molecular characterization and isolation of the F/f<br />

gene for femaleness in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

109:1669f–1676.<br />

Noguera, F. J., J. Capel, J.I . Alvarez, and R. Lozano. 2005. Development and<br />

mapping of a codominant SCAR marker linked to the andromonoecious gene of<br />

melon. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 110:714f–720.<br />

Perchepied, L., M. Bardin, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat. 2005. Relationship between<br />

loci conferring downy mildew and powdery mildew resistance in melon<br />

assessed by QTL mapping. Phytopathology. 95:556f–565.<br />

Périn, C., L. S. Hagen, V. de Conto, N. Katzir, Y. Danin-Poleg, V. Portnoy, S.<br />

Baudracco-Arnas, J. Chadoeuf, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat. 2002. A reference<br />

map of Cucumis melo based on two recombinant inbred line populations. <strong>The</strong>or.<br />

Appl. Genet. 104:1017f–1034.<br />

Peterson, C. E., K. W. Owens, and P. R. Rowe. 1983. Wisconsin 998 muskmelon<br />

germplasm. HortSci. 18:116.<br />

Peterson, D. G., J. P. Tomkins, D. A. Frisch, R. A. Wing, and A. H. Paterson. 2000.<br />

Construction of plant bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries: an<br />

illustrated guide. J. Agricult. Genom. 5:1f–3.<br />

Poole, C. F. and P. C. Grimball. 1939. Inheritance of new sex forms in Cucumis melo<br />

L. J. Hered. 30:21f–25.<br />

Rosa, J. T. 1928. <strong>The</strong> inheritance of flower types in Cucumis and Citrullus.<br />

Hilgardia. 3:233f–250.<br />

Rowe, P. R. 1969. <strong>The</strong> genetics of sex expression and fruit shape, staminate flower<br />

induction, and F1 hybrid feasibility of a gynoecious muskmelon. PhD Diss.,<br />

Department of Horticulture, Michigan <strong>State</strong> University, Lansing.<br />

Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J.<br />

Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA<br />

fingerprinting. Nucleic Acid Res. 23:4407f–4414.<br />

94 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS ANALYSIS OF<br />

POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANCE AGAINST<br />

TWO STRAINS OF PODOSPHAERA XANTHII<br />

IN THE MELON LINE ‘PMAR NO. 5’<br />

N. Fukino, T. Ohara, Y. Sakata, M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto<br />

National Institute of Vegetable and Tea Science, Tsu, Mie 514-2392,<br />

Japan<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, genetic mapping, recombinant<br />

inbred lines<br />

ABSTRACT. Due to the appearance of new races of Podosphaera xanthii (syn.<br />

Sphaerotheca fuliginea), leading melon varieties in Japan that had previously<br />

been considered resistant are now frequently infected by powdery mildew. <strong>The</strong><br />

melon breeding line ‘PMAR No. 5’ (thought to be ‘AR5’) is resistant to these new<br />

races. To elucidate the relationship between resistance genes and strains, we<br />

constructed a genetic-linkage map of melon with a recombinant inbred line<br />

(RIL) population derived from a cross between ‘PMAR No. 5’ and the<br />

susceptible cultivar ‘Harukei 3’. Inoculations on leaf disks of this population<br />

were accomplished using two strains of P. xanthii (pxA and pxB). Quantitative<br />

trait locus (QTL) analysis allowed the detection of two QTLs on Linkage Groups<br />

II and XII at a significance threshold of 3.0. One QTL is responsible for<br />

resistance to both pxA and pxB at the cotyledon and the first-leaf stage, and the<br />

other QTL is responsible for pxA at both stages and pxB at the first-leaf stage.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it is more likely that the effects of the two QTLs differ depending on<br />

the strain and the stage. ‘PMAR No. 5’ will be useful as a source of resistance to<br />

powdery mildew in melon breeding in Japan.<br />

P<br />

owdery mildew caused by Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne) U.<br />

Braun & S. Takam and Erysiphe cichoracearum DC limits the<br />

production of melons (Cucumis melo L.) worldwide (Sitterly,<br />

1978), with E. cichoracearum being less important than P. xanthii as the<br />

causal agent of powdery mildew. Although many melon cultivars that<br />

are resistant to powdery mildew have been produced in Japan, they are<br />

now being severely infected with powdery mildew, and the appearance<br />

of new races of P. xanthii has been reported (Hosoya et al., 1999;<br />

Orihara et al., 2001). Accordingly, melon cultivars with resistance to the<br />

new races are needed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> melon breeding line ‘PMAR No. 5’ (Yoshida & Kohyama,<br />

1986) was introduced from the University of California in 1981 and is<br />

thought to be ‘AR5’. It shows strong resistance to powdery mildew and<br />

has been used for breeding. Fukino et al. (2004a) reported that two<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 95


genes control the resistance of ‘PMAR No. 5’ to Race 1, but no reports<br />

have discussed DNA markers or provided a quantitative trait locus<br />

(QTL) analysis of powdery mildew resistance in ‘PMAR No. 5’.<br />

Because resistance to powdery mildew is greatly susceptible to<br />

environmental factors, marker-assisted selection of this trait is in great<br />

demand. Here we report the construction of a genetic-linkage map with<br />

a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross<br />

between ‘PMAR No. 5’ and ‘Harukei 3’ (type ‘Earl’s Favorite,’ which is<br />

susceptible to powdery mildew), and QTL analysis of powdery mildew<br />

resistance using two strains differing in their degree of virulence.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIALS. <strong>The</strong> population used in this study consisted of<br />

93 RILs derived from single seed descent of a cross between ‘PMAR<br />

No. 5’ and ‘Harukei 3’. RILs, their parents, and F1 plants were used for<br />

the test. Five seeds per line were sown in 34 × 48cm flats and were<br />

grown in a phytotron (28°C [day] and 20°C [night] with a 12-h<br />

photoperiod).<br />

POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANCE TEST. Two strains (tentatively<br />

denoted pxA and pxB) of P. xanthii were used for the test. <strong>The</strong> responses<br />

of these strains to the differential genotypes of melon are shown in<br />

Table 1.<br />

Leaf disks were cut from the cotyledons and first leaves and placed<br />

face up on medium with 8g/L agar in petri dishes. Three disks were used,<br />

and two independent trials were performed for each test.<br />

Table 1. Response of two strains of Podosphaera xanthii (pxA, pxB) to<br />

differential genotypes of melon. Genotypes were evaluated at the<br />

cotyledon (C) and first-leaf (FL) stages.<br />

pxA pxB<br />

Genotype C FL C FL<br />

Harukei 3 (‘Earl’s Favorite’) S S S S<br />

PMR45 M R R R<br />

WMR29 R R R R<br />

Edito47 M R R R<br />

PI414723 S S M R<br />

PMR5 R R R R<br />

MR1 M M R R<br />

R = resistant; M = moderately resistant; S = susceptible.<br />

96 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Inoculation of powdery mildew was performed by spraying a<br />

conidial suspension (Morishita et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> petri dishes were then<br />

covered and incubated at 25°C. After 10 to 14 days, a disease index (DI)<br />

indicating the degree of sporulation was scored on a scale of 0 (no<br />

sporulation) to 5 (entire disk covered with heavy sporulation) using a<br />

visual rating system.<br />

MOLECULAR MARKERS AND DATA ANALYSIS. Genomic DNA was<br />

extracted from leaf tissue as described by Fukino et al. (2002). Random<br />

amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence<br />

repeat (SSR) analyses were performed as described by Nunome et al.<br />

(2001) and Fukino et al. (2004b), respectively. Cleavage amplified<br />

polymorphic sequence (CAPS) analysis followed the procedure of<br />

Kunihisa et al. (2003). Linkage and QTL analyses were performed<br />

using MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0 (Lander et al., 1987 and<br />

MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1 (Lincoln et al., 1993), respectively.)<br />

II XII<br />

pxA(C), pxA(FL),<br />

pxB(FL)<br />

pxA(C), pxA(FL),<br />

pxB(C), pxB(FL)<br />

Fig. 1. Map locations of QTLs involved in resistance against two strains of<br />

Podosphaera xanthii.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In each test, ‘PMAR No. 5’ showed no symptoms, whereas ‘Harukei<br />

3’ was severely infected. F1 plants were moderately resistant to pxA and<br />

resistant to pxB. Average DI values of each RI line showed a continuous<br />

segregation from susceptible to resistant, suggesting the polygenic<br />

nature of this trait.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 97


<strong>The</strong> responses of 47 Japanese commercial F1 cultivars to both<br />

strains were tested (data not shown). Most cultivars were susceptible to<br />

pxA at both the cotyledon and first-leaf stages. <strong>The</strong> response to pxB was<br />

very different depending on the stage; at the cotyledon stage, 46<br />

cultivars were susceptible, whereas at the first-leaf stage, only 11<br />

cultivars were susceptible. This result indicates that the genetic system<br />

controlling resistance to the pxB strain differs depending on the growth<br />

stage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> constructed map spans 1,024cM consisting of 183 markers,<br />

which include 169 SSRs, 10 CAPs, and 13 RAPDs segregating into 18<br />

linkage groups. <strong>The</strong> localization of the QTLs is represented in Figure 1.<br />

Two QTLs were detected on Linkage Groups II and XII at a significance<br />

threshold of 3.0. Resistance to the pxA strain is conditioned by two<br />

QTLs at both the cotyledon and first-leaf stage, and the effects of two<br />

QTLs were similar and explained about 30% of the phenotypic variation.<br />

Resistance to pxB is controlled by one major QTL on Linkage Group<br />

XII at the cotyledon stage, and by two QTLs at the first-leaf stage. <strong>The</strong><br />

effect of QTLs on Linkage Group XII was much larger than on LG II,<br />

explaining 46.7% (cotyledon) and 48.7% (first leaf) of the observed<br />

phenotypic variation. This suggests that the effects of the two QTLs<br />

differ depending on the strain and the stage. Further studies will be<br />

necessary to clarify the relationship between powdery mildew strains<br />

and resistance genes. Most Japanese cultivars were susceptible to pxA<br />

at both stages and pxB at the cotyledon stage. As ‘PMAR No. 5’ is<br />

resistant to both strains at both stages, introduction of the resistance<br />

genes of ‘PMAR No. 5’ into those cultivars will enhance the resistance<br />

of Japanese cultivars.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Fukino, N., M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto. 2004a. Characterization of recombinant<br />

inbred lines derived from crosses in melon (Cucumis melo L.), ‘PMAR No. 5’ ×<br />

‘Harukei No.3.’ Breed. Sci. 54:141–145.<br />

Fukino, N., M. Kuzuya, M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto. 2004b. Characterization of<br />

simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and development of SSR markers in melon<br />

(Cucumis melo). Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004. 503–506.<br />

Fukino, N., M. Taneishi, T. Saito, T. Nishijima, and M. Hirai. 2002. Construction of a<br />

linkage map and genetic analysis for resistance to cotton aphid and powdery<br />

mildew in melon. Acta Hort. 588:283–286.<br />

Hosoya, K., N. Narisawa, M. Pitrat, and H. Ezura. 1999. Race identification in<br />

powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea) on melon (Cucumis melo) in Jpn. Plant<br />

Breed. 118:259–262.<br />

Kunihisa, M., N. Fukino, and S. Matsumoto. 2003. Development of cleavage<br />

amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers for identification of strawberry<br />

cultivars. Euphytica. 134:209–215.<br />

98 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Lander, E. S., P. Green, J. Abrahamson, A. Barlow, M. J. Daly, S. E. Lincoln, and L.<br />

Newburg. 1987. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing<br />

primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics.<br />

1:174–181.<br />

Lincoln, S., M. Daly, and E. S. Lander. 1993. Mapping genes controlling quantitative<br />

traits with MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1. Whitehead Institute technical report.<br />

Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA.<br />

Morishita, M., K. Sugiyama, T. Saito, and Y. Sakata. 2003. Powdery mildew resistance<br />

in cucumber. Jpn. Agric. Res. Quart. 37(1):7–14.<br />

Nunome, T., K. Ishiguro, T. Yoshida, and M. Hirai. 2001. Mapping of fruit shape and<br />

color development traits in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) based on RAPD<br />

and AFLP markers. Breed. Sci. 51:19–26.<br />

Orihara, N., H. Uekusa, K. Kusano, K. Abiko, and M. Morishita 2001. Race<br />

differentiation of melon powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fuliginea) from<br />

Kanagawa Prefecture, and the relationship between races and resistance of<br />

commercial varieties. Ann. Rep. Kanto-Tosan Plant Protect. Soc. 48:45–48.<br />

Sitterly, W. R. 1978. Powdery mildew of cucurbits, p. 359–379. In: D. M. Spencer<br />

(ed.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. Academic Press, New York.<br />

Yoshida,T. and T. Kohyama 1986. Mechanisms, genetics and selection methods of<br />

aphid resistance in melons, Cucumis melo. Bull. Veg. & Orn. Crops Res. Station<br />

Series C (Kurume). 9:1–12.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 99


LINKAGE ANALYSIS AMONG RESISTANCES<br />

TO POWDERY MILDEW AND VIRUS<br />

TRANSMISSION BY APHIS GOSSYPII<br />

GLOVER IN MELON LINE ‘TGR-1551’<br />

M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, A. I. López-Sesé, E. Sarria,<br />

and F. J. Yuste-Lisbona<br />

Estación Experimental ‘La Mayora,’ CSIC, 29750 Algarrobo, Málaga,<br />

Spain<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Genetic distance, Cucumis melo, Podosphaera<br />

xanthii<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> melon accession ‘TGR-1551’ shows resistance to Races 1, 2, and<br />

5 of powdery mildew and to virus transmission by A. gossypii. Linkage<br />

relationships of these four resistances were studied in a segregation F2<br />

population obtained from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola de Oro’. A<br />

very tight linkage (a distance of 2 to 4cM) among the powdery mildewresistance<br />

genes has been found. <strong>The</strong> segregation ratios (R:S) observed allow<br />

establishing the hypothesis that powdery mildew resistance is controlled by a<br />

double dominant and recessive interaction, where there could be three<br />

dominant genes tightly linked that provide specific resistance to Races 1, 2, and<br />

5 of P. xanthii, and one recessive gene that confers horizontal resistance to the<br />

three races. <strong>The</strong> estimated distance among powdery-mildew-resistance and<br />

virus-transmission-resistance genes was approximately 17cM.<br />

P<br />

owdery mildew is an important disease of cucurbits worldwide,<br />

with the reduction of quality and crop yield the most striking<br />

aspects of loss to the disease (Sitterly, 1978). Two fungal<br />

species, Podosphaera xanthii (DC.) VP. Gelyuta and Golovinomyces<br />

cichoracearum, (Castagne) U. Braun & N. Shishkoff have been<br />

reported as the common agents of powdery mildew in melon, although<br />

P. xanthii is the species usually found in regions with a temperate<br />

climate (Bertrand and Pitrat, 1989; Kenigsbuch and Cohen, 1992;<br />

Vakalounakis et al., 1994). Several physiological races of P. xanthii<br />

have been described according to the reactions of differential melon<br />

lines. To date, many races of this species have been differentiated<br />

(McCreight, 2006). <strong>The</strong> predominating race of powdery mildew<br />

changes depending on the melon cultivar, the cultivation season, and<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors thank the great collaboration of R. Tobar in all the experiments. This<br />

work has been financed by the CICYT Research Project: AGL2005-03850-C02-01.<br />

100 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


the geographical area studied (Hosoya et al., 2000), with Races 1, 2,<br />

and 5 being the most extensive in southern European regions (Bardin<br />

et al., 1997; Bertrand, 1991; Del Pino et al., 2002; Olalla, 2001).<br />

Viral diseases are the main cause of serious yield losses in<br />

cucurbits crops worldwide. Among them, the cucumovirus Cucumber<br />

mosaic virus (CMV) and the potyviruses Watermelon mosaic virus<br />

(WMV), Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), and Papaya ringspot<br />

virus-W (PRSV-W) are some of the most widespread in melon crops<br />

(Lovisolo, 1980; Luis-Arteaga et al., 1998; Nameth et al., 1986). <strong>The</strong>se<br />

viruses are naturally transmitted by aphids in a nonpersistent manner<br />

(Pirone and Harris, 1970), with the cotton-melon aphid, Aphis gossypii<br />

Glover, being one of the most important vectors (Lecoq et al., 1979).<br />

Fungicide applications are the main means of powdery mildew<br />

control, but in spite of these measures, powdery mildew continues to<br />

impose serious limitations on cucurbit production throughout the<br />

world (Zitter et al., 1996). Control of nonpersistently transmitted<br />

viruses by means of insecticide spraying against their vectors or other<br />

crop-management practices is ineffective (Loebenstein and Raccah,<br />

1980). One of the most successful procedures for controlling plant<br />

diseases is the development of resistant cultivars. Genetic resistance<br />

to diseases is one of the main components of integrated plant<br />

protection systems (Heitefuss, 1989).<br />

Melon resistance to powdery mildew has been studied for a long<br />

time and several sources of resistance have been described for Races 1<br />

and 2 (Jagger et al., 1938; Bohn and Whitaker, 1964; Epinat et al.,<br />

1993; Kenigsbuch and Cohen, 1992; Perchepied et al., 2005).<br />

Nevertheless, the inheritance of resistance remains somewhat<br />

confusing, due mainly to environmental conditions affecting trait<br />

expression (Cohen et al., 1996, 2002). <strong>The</strong>re are not many virusresistance<br />

sources in melons, so indirect resistance to viruses could be<br />

incorporated by using genes conferring resistance to virus<br />

transmission. <strong>The</strong> Korean melon line PI 161375 was reported to show<br />

resistance to virus transmission by A. gossypii conferred by the Vat<br />

gene (Lecoq et al., 1979).<br />

<strong>The</strong> melon accession ‘TGR-1551’ from Zimbabwe shows<br />

resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of powdery mildew (Gómez-Guillamón<br />

et al., 1995, 1998). In addition, ‘TGR-1551’ presents resistance to<br />

virus transmission by A. gossypii, and this resistance seems to be<br />

controlled by a single dominant gene different from Vat (Soria et al.,<br />

2003). Linkage between resistance genes has been reported in<br />

previous works. Thus, Pitrat (1991) described that resistance to virus<br />

transmission mediated by Vat appears to be tightly linked to resistance<br />

to powdery mildew provided by Pm-W (0cM). Bardin et al. (1999),<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 101


Anagnostou et al. (2000), and Klinger et al. (2001) support the<br />

hypothesis of the existence of resistance-gene clusters in melon.<br />

Montoro et al. (2004) established that resistances to powdery<br />

mildew Race 5 and to virus transmission by aphid are linked in ‘TGR-<br />

1551’. In the current study, resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of P.<br />

xanthii and to virus transmission by A. gossypii have been evaluated in<br />

the F2 population obtained from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and<br />

the susceptible cultivar ‘Bola de Oro’. Linkage among the genes<br />

involved in the resistances to the different races of powdery mildew<br />

has been estimated, as well as the linkage to the virus-transmissionresistance<br />

gene.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Ten plants of the resistant parental ‘TGR-1551’, the susceptible<br />

parental ‘Bola de Oro’, and their F1, and 295 plants of the F2 were<br />

evaluated. Scions from each plant were taken before inoculation in<br />

order to inoculate the same genotypes with both powdery mildew and<br />

virus transmission by aphid.<br />

Artificial inoculation of powdery mildew was done by depositing a<br />

small amount of conidia on the second true leaf (Ferriere and Molot,<br />

1988). All plants were inoculated on the same leaf with Races 1<br />

(isolate 27), 2 (isolate P-15.0), and 5 (isolate C8) of P. xanthii. <strong>The</strong><br />

plants were maintained in a controlled growth chamber at 32ºC and<br />

22ºC with a 16:8h (light:dark) photoperiod. Plants were scored 12<br />

days postinoculation and classified as either resistant (R; no apparent<br />

fungal development) or susceptible (S; profuse sporulation).<br />

Virus inoculation by A. gossypii was carried out according to Soria<br />

et al. (2003) using CMV-M730 (‘Song’ pathotype). Ten days after<br />

inoculation, plants showing no symptoms were reinoculated. Presence<br />

or absence of virus symptoms was recorded 20 days after first<br />

inoculation, and plants with no or doubtful symptoms were tested by<br />

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test using CMV<br />

polyclonal antiserum (Loewe Biochemica GmbH). All plants showing<br />

clear symptoms of CMV infection, as well as plants testing positive in<br />

ELISA, were considered susceptible. <strong>The</strong> experiment was carried out<br />

in a greenhouse with temperatures that oscillated between 32ºC and<br />

20ºC under a 16:8h (light:dark) photoperiod. A. gossypii used for the<br />

experiments were taken from a nonviruliferous aphid colony<br />

maintained on plants of the susceptible accession ‘C-278’ growing at<br />

25–15ºC under a 16:8h (light:dark) photoperiod.<br />

Chi-square tests were performed to check segregation for each<br />

character in the F2 population. For linkage analysis, pairwise χ 2 tests<br />

102 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


were conducted and recombination frequency was estimated according<br />

to Fisher (1921). <strong>The</strong> Kosambi function (Kosambi, 1944) was used to<br />

convert recombination units into genetic distances.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In order to verify that the simultaneous inoculation of the three<br />

races of powdery mildew on the same leaf could modify the plant<br />

response, previous work using differential melon genotypes was<br />

carried out and no interaction among resistances was detected<br />

(unpublished data).<br />

All plants of the cultivar ‘Bola de Oro’ showed clear symptoms of<br />

Races 1, 2, and 5 of powdery mildew and clear susceptibility to CMV-<br />

M730 infection. Plants of the accession ‘TGR-1551’ showed <strong>complete</strong><br />

resistance to the three races of powdery mildew and to CMV-M730<br />

infection. <strong>The</strong> F1 plants showed a similar resistant response to the<br />

pathogens evaluated, indicating that these resistances are dominant. In<br />

the F2, segregation for these characters was observed (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Segregation of resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of P. xanthii<br />

and to CMV-M730 transmission by A. gossypii in the F2 obtained<br />

from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola de Oro’.<br />

χ 2<br />

Observed<br />

Pathogen segregation Segregation<br />

ratio Value Probability<br />

P. xanthii Race 1 243/52* 13:3 0.244 0.621<br />

P. xanthii Race 2 242/53 13:3 0.119 0.730<br />

P. xanthii Race 5 247/48 13:3 1.189 0.275<br />

CMV-M730 190/77 3:1 2.098 0.147<br />

* Resistant plants/susceptible plants.<br />

<strong>The</strong> segregation ratios (R:S) observed after inoculation with the<br />

different races of powdery mildew were identical (13:3) (Table 1).<br />

Most of the F2 plants were clearly resistant or susceptible to all races,<br />

and only nine plants were recombinants. <strong>The</strong> presence of all the<br />

possible types of recombinants in the F2 population indicates the<br />

existence of at least one dominant resistance gene for each one of the<br />

races of powdery mildew. Although this hypothesis should be<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 103


confirmed in F3 and backcross populations, it seems that powdery<br />

mildew resistance is controlled by a double dominant and recessive<br />

interaction, where there could be three dominant genes tightly linked<br />

that provide specific resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of P. xanthii, and<br />

one recessive gene that confers horizontal resistance to the three races.<br />

Segregation of resistance to powdery mildew Race 1 observed by<br />

Montoro (2005) in this material could adjust to our hypothesis;<br />

however, Montoro et al. (2004) described that resistance to Race 5 in<br />

‘TGR-1551’ is controlled by one dominant gene. In the current work,<br />

inoculations with the three races of powdery mildew have been done<br />

simultaneously, while Montoro (2005) inoculated each F2 plant with a<br />

different race. We found an excess of resistance for all the races, in<br />

comparison to the segregation observed by Montoro (2005); therefore,<br />

the possibility that simultaneous inoculation could have triggered a<br />

defensive response in the inoculation zone (Gozzo, 2003) in these F2<br />

plants cannot be discarded. <strong>The</strong> segregation ratio observed for virustransmission<br />

resistance (3:1) agrees with the observations of Soria et<br />

al. (2003), suggesting a dominant monogenic control (Table 1).<br />

In order to estimate the recombination fraction between resistance<br />

genes to different races of powdery mildew, we considered the<br />

probabilities of phenotypes according to our hypothesis of digenic<br />

inheritance with a common recessive gene. A very tight linkage (a<br />

distance of 2 to 4cM) among the powdery mildew-resistance genes<br />

present in ‘TGR-1551’ has been found (Table 2). Linkage between<br />

powdery mildew-resistance genes has been reported in previous<br />

works; genetic analysis done by Bardin et al. (1999) revealed that PI<br />

124112 possessed four genes for resistance to powdery mildew and<br />

that all these genes are linked in a cluster spanning 22cM. <strong>The</strong><br />

estimated distance between powdery mildew-resistance and virustransmission-resistance<br />

genes was approximately 17cM (Table 2). In<br />

‘TGR-1551’, Montoro et al. (2004) established that the distance<br />

between the Race 5 powdery mildew-resistance gene and the virustransmission-resistance<br />

gene was 28,3cM with F2 populations, and<br />

15,9cM with backcrosses. Our results seem to agree with those<br />

observed by Montoro et al. (2004), and support the hypothesis of the<br />

existence of resistance-gene clusters in melon (Anagnostou et al.,<br />

2000; Bardin et al., 1999; Klinger et al., 2001).<br />

<strong>The</strong> evaluation of more F2 plants could implement the number of<br />

representatives of each phenotype, including recombinants, for a more<br />

precise estimation of genetic distances. Segregation of resistance to P.<br />

xanthii and virus transmission by A. gossypii in the F3 populations and<br />

backcrosses obtained from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola<br />

de Oro’ is under study. <strong>The</strong>se results and analysis of the RILs will<br />

104 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Linkage analyses between resistance genes to Races 1, 2, and<br />

5 of P. xanthii and between powdery mildew and CMV-M730<br />

transmission by A. gossypii in the F2 obtained from the cross between<br />

‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola de Oro’.<br />

Genetic distance<br />

Observed segregation Ratio (cM)<br />

R1R2 * Race 1/Race<br />

2 240<br />

R1S2<br />

3<br />

S1R2<br />

2<br />

S1S2<br />

50<br />

43:9:9:3 2.38<br />

Race 2/Race<br />

5<br />

R2R5<br />

241<br />

R2S5<br />

1<br />

S2R5<br />

6<br />

S2S5<br />

47<br />

43:9:9:3 4.27<br />

Race 1/Race<br />

5<br />

R1R5<br />

241<br />

R1S5<br />

2<br />

S1R5<br />

6<br />

S1S5<br />

46<br />

43:9:9:3 3.94<br />

P. xanthii /<br />

CMV-M730<br />

R R<br />

180<br />

R S<br />

34<br />

S R<br />

7<br />

S S<br />

43<br />

9.3:3.1 17.27<br />

*<br />

Ri: resistant to race i; Si: susceptible to race i.<br />

allow us to clarify powdery mildew genetics and estimate more precisely<br />

the distances among the genes involved.<br />

Selection of plant material resistant to several important pathogens<br />

is hard and time-consuming labor. <strong>The</strong> tight linkage among the<br />

different powdery mildew-resistance genes could allow the<br />

simultaneous selection of resistance to all three races with high<br />

probability. Moreover, the linkage between these genes and the virustransmission-resistance<br />

gene could likely allow selection of this gene.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Anagnostou, K., M. Jahn, and R. Perl-Treves. 2000. Inheritance and linkage analysis<br />

of resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus, watermelon mosaic virus, papaya<br />

ringspot virus and powdery mildew in melon. Euphytica. 116:265–270.<br />

Bardin M., C. Dogimont, P. Nicot, and M. Pitrat.1999. Genetic analysis of resistance<br />

of melon line PI 124112 to Sphaerotheca fuliginea and Erysiphe cichoracearum<br />

studied in recombinant inbred lines. Proc. 1 st International Symposium on<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. Acta Hort. 492:163–168.<br />

Bardin, M., P. C. Nicot, P. Normand, and J. M. Lemaire. 1997. Virulence variation<br />

and DNA polymorphism in Sphaerotheca fuliginea, causal agent of powdery<br />

mildew of cucurbits. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:545–554.<br />

Bertrand, F. 1991. Les oïdiums des <strong>Cucurbit</strong>acées: maintein en culture pure, étude de<br />

leur variabilité et de la sensibilité chez le melon. PhD Diss., University of Paris<br />

XI, Orsay, France.<br />

Bertrand, F. and M. Pitrat. 1989. Screening of a muskmelon germplasm for<br />

susceptibility to 5 pathogens of powdery mildew, p. 142–149. In: C. E. Thomas<br />

(ed.). Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1989. Charleston, SC.<br />

Bohn, G. W. and T. W. Whitaker. 1964. Genetics of resistance to powdery mildew<br />

race 2 in muskmelon. Phytopath. 54:587–591.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 105


Cohen, R., Y. Burger, and S. Shraiber. 2002. Physiological races of Sphaerotheca<br />

fuliginea: factors affecting their identification and the significance of this<br />

knowledge, p. 181–187. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS<br />

Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Cohen, R., Y. Burger, S. Shraiber, Y. Elkind, and E. Levin. 1996. Influence of the<br />

genetic background and environmental conditions on powdery mildew of<br />

melons. Phytoparasitica. 24:162(Abstr.).<br />

Del Pino, D., L. Olalla, A. Pérez-García, M. E. Rivera, S. García Moreno, A. de<br />

Vicente, and J. A. Torés. 2002. Occurrence of faces and pathotypes of cucurbit<br />

powdery mildew in south-eastern Spain. Phytoparasitica. 30(5):1–8.<br />

Epinat, C. M., M. Pitrat, and F. Bertrand. 1993. Genetic analysis of resistance of five<br />

melon lines to powdery mildews. Euphytica. 65:135–144.<br />

Ferriere, H. and P. M. Molot. 1988. Effect of leaf position on the susceptibility of<br />

melon plants to artificial infection with powdery mildew, Sphaerothecafuliginea.<br />

J. Phytopath./Phytopath. Zeitschrift. 121(3): 250–254.<br />

Fisher, R. A. 1921. On the “probable error” of a coefficient of correlation deduced<br />

from a small sample. Metron. 1(4): 3–32.<br />

Gómez-Guillamón, M. L., E. Moriones, M. L. Luis-Arteaga, J. M. Alvarez, J. A.<br />

Torés, A. I. López-Sesé, I. Cánovas, F. Sánchez, and R. Camero. 1998.<br />

Morphological and disease resistance evaluation in Cucumis melo and its wild<br />

relatives, p. 53–61. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998: Evaluation<br />

and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Gómez-Guillamón, M. L., J. A. Torés, C. Soria, and A. I. L. Sesé. 1995. Screening<br />

for resistances to Sphaerotheca fuliginea and two yellowing diseases in Cucumis<br />

melo and related Cucumis species, p. 205–208. In: G. E. Lester and J. R. Dunlap<br />

(eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1994: Evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm.<br />

ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Gozzo, F. 2003. Systemic acquired resistance in crop protection: from nature to a<br />

chemical approach. J. Agric. & Food Chem. 51:4487–4503.<br />

Heitefuss, R. 1989. Crop and plant protection. Ellis Harwood Ltd., Chichester, UK.<br />

Hosoya, K., M. Kuzuya, T. Murakami, K. Kato, K. Narisawa, and H. Ezura. 2000.<br />

Impact of resistant melon cultivars on Sphaerotheca fuliginea. Plant Breed.<br />

119:286–288.<br />

Jagger, I. C., T. W. Whitaker, and D. R. Porter. 1938. A new biotic form of powdery<br />

mildew on muskmelon in the Imperial Valley of California. Plant Dis. Rep.<br />

22:275–276.<br />

Kenigsbuch, D. and Y. Cohen. 1992. Inheritance and allelism of genes for resistance<br />

to races 1 and 2 of Sphaerotheca fuliginea in muskmelon. Plant Dis. 76:626–<br />

629.<br />

Klinger, J., I. Kovalski, L. Silberstein, G. A. Thompson, and R. Perl- Treves. 2001.<br />

Mapping of cotton melon aphid resistance in melon. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

126:56–63.<br />

Kosambi, D. D. 1944. <strong>The</strong> estimation of map distances from recombination values.<br />

Ann. Eugen. 12:172–175.<br />

Lecoq, H., S. Cohen, M. Pitrat, and G. Labonne. 1979. Resistance to cucumber<br />

mosaic virus transmission by aphids in Cucumis melo. Phytopath. 69:1223–<br />

1225.<br />

Loebenstein, G. and B. Raccah. 1980. Control on non-persistently transmitted aphidborne<br />

viruses. Phytopath. 8:221–235.<br />

Lovisolo, O. 1980. Virus and viroid diseases of cucurbits. Acta Hort. 88:33–82.<br />

106 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Luis-Arteaga, M., J. M. Alvarez, J. L. Alonso-Prados, J. J. Bernal, F. García-Arenal,<br />

A. Laviña, A. Batlle, and E. Moriones. 1998. Occurrence, distribution, and<br />

relative incidence of mosaic viruses infecting field-grown melon in Spain. Plant<br />

Dis. 82:979–982.<br />

McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />

melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

131:59–65.<br />

Montoro, T. 2005. Resistencia genética a Podosphaera xanthii en melón y<br />

caracterización molecular de distintas razas del hongo. PhD Diss., Univ. de<br />

Málaga, Spain.<br />

Montoro, T., R. Camero, A. I. López-Sesé, and M. L. Gómez-Guillamón. 2004.<br />

Posible existencia de ligamiento entre la resistencia a oídio y la transmisión de<br />

virus por pulgón en “TGR-1551”. Actas de Hort. 41:203–206.<br />

Nameth, S. T., J. A. Dodds, A. O. Paulus, and F. F. Laemmlen. 1986. <strong>Cucurbit</strong><br />

viruses of California: an ever-changing problem. Plant Dis. 70:8–12.<br />

Olalla, L. 2001. Etiología, biología y epidemiología del oídio de las cucurbitáceas en<br />

cultivos bajo plástico. PhD Diss., Univ. de Málaga, Spain.<br />

Perchepied, L., M. Bardin, C, Dogimont, and M. Pitrat. 2005. Relationship between<br />

loci conferring downy mildew and powdery mildew resistance in melon<br />

assessed by quantitative trait loci mapping. Phytopath. 95(5):556–565.<br />

Pirone, T. P. and K. F. Harris. 1970. Non-persistent transmission of plant viruses by<br />

aphids. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 15:55–73.<br />

Pitrat, M. 1991. Linkage groups in Cucumis melo L. J. Hered. 82:406–411.<br />

Sitterly, W. R. 1978. Powdery mildews of cucurbits, p. 359–379. In: D. M. Spencer<br />

(ed.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. Academic Press, London.<br />

Soria, C., E. Moriones, A. Fereres, E. Garzo, and M. L. Gómez-Guillamón. 2003.<br />

New source of resistance to mosaic virus transmission by Aphis gossypii in<br />

melon. Euphytica. 133:313–318.<br />

Vakalounakis, D. L., E. Klironomou, and A. Papadakis. 1994. Species spectrum, host<br />

range and distribution of powdery mildews on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae in Crete. Plant<br />

Path. 43:813–818.<br />

Zitter, T. A., D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Compendium of cucurbits<br />

diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 107


EPICUTICULAR WAX MORPHOLOGY AND<br />

TRICHOME TYPES IN RELATION TO HOST<br />

PLANT SELECTION BY APHIS GOSSYPII IN<br />

MELONS<br />

M. L. Gómez-Guillamón 1 , A. Heredia 2 ,<br />

and E. Sarria 1<br />

1 Experimental Station ‘La Mayora’ CSIC 29750-Algarrobo,<br />

Málaga, Spain<br />

2 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry,<br />

Málaga University, Teatinos Campus, 29071-Málaga, Spain<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Antixenosis, cotton-aphid, Cucumis melo, glandular<br />

trichomes, resistance, susceptibility<br />

ABSTRACT. Morphology of epicuticular wax layers and trichomes types and<br />

density in leaves of aphid-resistant cultivars of Cucumis melo were compared<br />

with the susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’. Epicuticular wax layer characteristics are<br />

similar in both resistant and susceptible cultivars. Three types of trichomes<br />

have been identified in Cucumis melo leaves. A relationship between the density<br />

of glandular trichomes Type I and the existence of antixenosis mechanisms to<br />

Aphis gossypii has been established.<br />

T<br />

he cotton-melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, causes serious<br />

direct and indirect damage to many crops and is considered a<br />

serious pest of melon in Mediterranean countries. Growing<br />

resistant or tolerant cultivars is the most effective, environmentally<br />

compatible control strategy. Two main genetic resistance sources have<br />

been found in melons: the lines PI-161375, carrying the Vat gene,<br />

which confers resistance to A. gossypii colonization and virus<br />

transmission (Pitrat and Lecoq, 1980), and PI-414723, carrier of the<br />

Agr gene, which confers A. gossypii resistance (Kishaba et al., 1971).<br />

More recently, Garzo et al. (2002) described resistance to this aphid in<br />

the cultivar ‘TGR-1551’. Electrical Penetration Graphs (EPGs) of A.<br />

gossypii behavior in the C. melo cultivar ‘TGR-1551’ have shown the<br />

existence of phloematic specific factors disturbing the aphids feeding<br />

on resistant plants (Garzo et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong>se authors also found<br />

antixenosis mechanisms in ‘TGR-1551’.<br />

Interaction between plants and aphids is very complex (Miles,<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors thank the valuable collaboration of R. Tobar and R. Camero in all the<br />

experiments. This work has been financed by the CICYT Research Project:<br />

AGL2005-03850-C02-01.<br />

108 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


1998). <strong>The</strong> selection or avoidance of potential host plants by aphids is<br />

guided by a complex combination of physical and chemical stimuli.<br />

<strong>The</strong> choice of host plants could be affected by the presence of<br />

chemicals, acting as repellents or deterrents. Also, the presence and<br />

density of trichomes in the leaves may become a physical barrier for<br />

aphid feeding and reproduction (Renwick, 1983).<br />

In other vegetable species, the role of the leaf epicuticular lipids<br />

composition in relation to aphid infestation and resistance has been<br />

studied (Powell et al., 1999; Ni and Quisenberry, 1997; Shepherd et.<br />

al., 1999; Bahlmann et al., 2003; Duetting et al., 2003), but no<br />

information exists for melons. Morphology, types, and density of leaf<br />

trichomes have also been related to the choice of host plants by aphids<br />

in other species (Levin, 1973; Bahlmann et al., 2003; Simmons et al.,<br />

2003; Wagner et al., 2004) and a few authors have studied trichomes<br />

types in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family (Kolb and Müller, 2004).<br />

Morphology and topography of epicuticular wax layers<br />

determination together with a description of the trichomes observed in<br />

leaves of ‘TGR-1551’ and the susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’ have been<br />

examined. Moreover, the relation between the density of glandular<br />

trichomes for three different resistant cultivars (‘TGR-1551’, PI-<br />

414723, and PI-161375), and the existence of antixenosis mechanisms<br />

to A. gossypii has been investigated.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A. gossypii were reared on plants of the susceptible Spanish melon<br />

cultivar ‘ANC-57’, at 25ºC (day) and 20ºC (night) with a 16:8-hour<br />

(L:D) photoperiod. <strong>The</strong> melon cultivars used in the antixenosis<br />

experiments were the aphid-susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’ and the resistant<br />

cultivars ‘TGR-1551’, PI-414723, and PI-161375. In these cultivars,<br />

leaf trichome evaluations were also done. For the epicuticular wax<br />

observations only the cultivars ‘Bola de Oro’ and ‘TGR-1551’ were<br />

used. Plants were cultivated in a glasshouse in individual pots at 25ºC<br />

(day) and 18ºC (night) with a 14:10-hour (L:D) photoperiod. In the<br />

antixenosis experiment, 10 adult aphids (7–8 days old) were released<br />

on five plants from each melon line, at the five-full-expanded-leaf<br />

stage, following the methodology described by Martin and Fereres<br />

(2003).<br />

For the evaluation of epicuticular wax layer and trichomes, two<br />

leaf disks (5,94mm diameter) per plant were taken at three different<br />

levels in the plant, corresponding to young, medium-aged, and old<br />

leaves. Samples were fixed in glutaraldehyde (4% v/v, in phosphate<br />

buffer 0,2 M, pH 7) at 4ºC. <strong>The</strong>y were thoroughly rinsed in fresh<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 109


phosphate buffer and then dehydrated through acetone solutions series<br />

(25, 50, 75, and 100% v/v), 15 min each. Samples were mounted on<br />

scanning electron microscope tubes and coated with a thick layer of<br />

gold. A JEOL JSM-840 scanning electron microscope (SEM) operated<br />

at 15kV was used.<br />

Pubescence of the leaves was evaluated on fresh leaf disks using a<br />

stereoscopic magnifying glass. Using SEM, different types of<br />

trichomes were observed. To identify and count trichomes under a<br />

light microscope, staining of the samples was required. Leaf disks<br />

were decolorated using 100% alcohol and heating to 80ºC for three<br />

minutes. Samples were stained using an aqueous solution containing<br />

0,05% tolouidine blue O (O’Brien et al., 1964).<br />

Trichome numbers were analyzed using two-way ANOVA<br />

(p=0,05) and aphid data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p =<br />

0,05) to test for differences between antixenosis in different cultivars.<br />

Trichome density and antixenosis data were further analyzed by<br />

pairwise comparison using Student-Newman-Keuls test (p = 0,05).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In the antixenosis experiments, the number of adults feeding on the<br />

inoculated leaves of the ‘Bola de Oro’ cultivar 72 hours after the<br />

aphids were released was always higher than the number observed in<br />

plants of ‘TGR-1551’, PI-414723, and PI-161375, which also<br />

confirmed the existence of antixenosis in the resistant cultivars (Table<br />

1). Similar results were also obtained by Garzo et al. (2002) in their<br />

experiments under free-choice and no-choice conditions using the<br />

same cultivars.<br />

Host selection by aphids is not a random process; these insects<br />

employ a variety of sensory and behavioral mechanisms to locate and<br />

recognize their host plants. Epicuticular waxes, trichomes exudates,<br />

substrate texture, topology, and color may influence aphid behavior<br />

before stylet insertion (Powell et al., 2006). <strong>The</strong> results obtained<br />

Table 1. Number of aphids (mean ± SE) on each inoculated leaf 72 h<br />

after 10 adults were released in the antixenosis experiment.<br />

Cultivar Average number of aphids<br />

‘Bola de Oro’ 7,42 b* ± 1,62<br />

‘TGR-1551’ 1,53 a ± 1,23<br />

PI-414723 1,80 a ± 0,79<br />

PI-161375 3,60 c ± 2,07<br />

*Means in columns followed by a common letter do not differ at the 5% level by<br />

SNK test.<br />

110 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


could suggest the existence of one or more of those stimuli.<br />

Observations using SEM suggested that the epicuticular wax layer<br />

is very thin. In young leaves no wax images were observed. As the<br />

leaves increase in age, some very small crystalline wax deposits were<br />

visible, but these appeared in leaves of both the susceptible cultivar<br />

and the resistant ‘TGR-1551’. <strong>The</strong> observed morphology was also<br />

similar for both cultivars, which indicated a similar chemical<br />

composition (Barthlott et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that neither<br />

the presence of a wax layer in leaves nor its composition seem to have<br />

a relation with the antixenotic effect on A. gossypii observed in ‘TGR-<br />

1551’.<br />

Three types of trichomes have been observed in the leaves (Figure<br />

1). <strong>The</strong> most frequent trichomes were identified as columnar trichomes<br />

(Figure 1a), similar in both the resistant and susceptible cultivars.<br />

Density of trichomes has been described in other species as a factor<br />

that impedes aphid feeding and reproduction (Donald, 1973;<br />

Bahlmann et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> pubescence observed in the adaxial leaf<br />

surface of ‘Bola de Oro’ is lower than that in ‘TGR-1551’ at the three<br />

examined plant levels; however, the susceptible cultivar has the<br />

highest pubescence in the abaxial surface (differences were significant<br />

at the 5% level) (Table 2). Regarding these results, the pubescence<br />

does not seem to be an important factor in aphid resistance.<br />

Table 2. Number of columnar trichomes/cm² (mean ± SE) in abaxial<br />

and adaxial leaf surfaces of different melon cultivars.<br />

Cultivar Leaf surface Young leaf Medium leaf Old leaf<br />

Adaxial 377,1 a*± 70,4 225,5 a ± 40,6 106,8 a ± 14,5<br />

Bola de Oro<br />

Abaxial 2030,2 b ± 315,1 1346,4 b ± 295,6 782,3 b ± 128,6<br />

Adaxial 756,6 c ± 156,2 310,8 c ± 63,6 201,7 c ± 43,8<br />

TGR-1551<br />

Abaxial 1310,5 d ± 278,9 694,2 d ± 174,8 557,2 d ± 119,5<br />

*Means in columns followed by a common letter do not differ at the 5% level by<br />

SNK test.<br />

During SEM examination, two additional types of trichomes<br />

smaller than columnar trichomes were noticed in the leaf samples<br />

(Figure 1). <strong>The</strong>se trichomes were located mostly on leaf veins on the<br />

abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces in both cultivars. Regarding their<br />

morphology, one of them corresponded to Type I as described by Kolb<br />

and Müller (2004) in leaves of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. pepo var. styriaca<br />

and observed on blooms of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a by Uphof and Hummel (1962).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 111


This type consisted of a basal cell, a uniseriate stalk, and a four-celled<br />

head region (Figure 1b).<br />

Type I trichomes have been described as glandular trichomes, with<br />

a secretory function. Using specific stains, Kolb and Müller (2004)<br />

observed that the head area of this trichome stored lipids, terpenoids,<br />

and other flavonoids. Terpenoids have also been identified in similar<br />

trichomes on leaves of Calceolaria adscendens (Sacchetti et al., 1999)<br />

and Teucrium scorodonia (Antunes and Sevinate-Pinto, 1991). <strong>The</strong>se<br />

metabolites play a significant role in interactions between the plant and<br />

herbivorous or pathogenous organisms, respectively (Levin, 1973).<br />

<strong>The</strong> third type of trichome was identified as Type III as described<br />

by Kolb and Müller (2004) in oil pumpkin. Type III consisted of five<br />

cells in line, and a basal cell, and was observed very rarely on the<br />

abaxial surface of the leaves, in both the resistant and the susceptible<br />

cultivar (Figure 1c). Ascensao et al. (1999) have also found this type<br />

of glandular trichome in Plectranthus ornatus.<br />

Fig. 1. Different types of trichomes observed in melon leaves: (a) Columnar<br />

trichome, (b) trichome Type I, (c) trichome Type III.<br />

White scale-bar: 100µm; black scale-bar: 10µm<br />

In order to establish a correlation between the number of Type I<br />

trichomes in the leaves and antixenotic effects in the plants, density of<br />

these trichomes in the first three young leaves was evaluated. Results<br />

showed that Type I trichomes were also found in leaves of PI-414723<br />

and PI-161375 in numbers similar to those observed on plants of<br />

‘TGR-1551’. Density of Type I trichomes was similar in both leaf<br />

sides and they were in any case located on leaf veins. Number of<br />

trichomes/cm² was higher in younger leaves, as expected. But the most<br />

interesting observation was that their density was always higher in the<br />

112 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


esistant cultivars than in the susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’, and these<br />

differences were clearly significant (Table 3).<br />

When trichomes were stained with diphenylboric acid-2aminoethyl<br />

ester (DPBA) (results not shown), the presence of<br />

flavonoids inside them was observed. Flavonoids have been described<br />

as chemicals disturbing the behavior of aphids, forcing them to avoid<br />

plants in which they detect their presence (Levin, 1973; Dreyer and<br />

Jones, 1981; Mitchell et al., 1993; Francis et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> higher<br />

number of Type I trichomes found in resistant cultivars could be<br />

related to higher flavonoid content in the leaf environment, and that<br />

could force the aphid to leave the plant in the antixenosis experiment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> density of these trichomes in resistant cultivars could also explain<br />

the results obtained by Garzo et al. (2002) in their free-choice<br />

experiment. <strong>The</strong>ir experiments showed that aphids preferred the leaf<br />

disks of the susceptible cultivar for feeding.<br />

Table 3. Number of trichomes type I/cm² (mean ± SE) in the abaxial<br />

and adaxial leaf surfaces of different melon cultivars.<br />

Cultivar Surface leaf 1 st leaf 2 nd leaf 3 rd leaf<br />

‘Bola de Adaxial 44,0 a* ± 6,3 17,9 a ± 5,2 21,7 ab ± 3,5<br />

Oro’ Abaxial 17,6 a ± 3,7 14,3 a ± 7,2 1 3,6 a ± 6,7<br />

PI-161375<br />

PI-414723<br />

Adaxial 344,9 b ± 63,0 127,1 bc ± 11,9 41,4 b ± 7,5<br />

Abaxial 230,8 b ± 29,7 97,0 c ± 11,5 33,8 b ± 2,7<br />

Adaxial 311,7 b ± 130,3 116,9 b ± 44,2 55,2 b ± 17,4<br />

Abaxial 251,7 b ± 89,2 120,6 bc ± 43,4 61,1 b ± 12,0<br />

Adaxial 313,5 b ± 103,3 226,8 d ± 10,1 122,4 c ± 32,2<br />

‘TGR-1551’<br />

Abaxial 223,7 b ± 111,7 171,9 b ± 37,8 110,9 c ± 20,1<br />

*Means in columns followed by a common letter do not differ at the 5% level by<br />

SNK test.<br />

With these observations, the density of Type I trichomes could be<br />

related to antixenosis against A. gossypii in ‘TGR-1551’, PI-414723,<br />

and PI-161375. Results suggest that the number of Type I<br />

trichomes/cm² could be considered as a useful morphological marker<br />

for antixenosis selection in melon breeding.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 113


Literature Cited<br />

Antunes, T. and I. Sevinate-Pinto. 1991. Glandular trichomes of Teucrium<br />

scorodonia L.: morphology and histochemistry. Flora. 185:65–70.<br />

Ascensao, L., L. Mota, and M. de Castro. 1999. Glandular trichomes on the leaves<br />

and flowers of Plectranthus ornatus: morphology, distribution and<br />

histochemistry. Ann. Bot. 84:437–447.<br />

Bahlmann, L., P. Govender, and A-M. Botha. 2003. Leaf epicuticular wax<br />

ultrastructure and trichome presence on Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia)<br />

resistant and susceptible leaves. African Ent. 11(1):59–64.<br />

Barthlott, W., C. Neinhuis, D. Cutler, F. Ditsch, I. Meusel, I. <strong>The</strong>isen, and H.<br />

Wilhelmi. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot.<br />

J. Linnean Soc. 126:237–260.<br />

Donald, A. L. 1973. <strong>The</strong> role of trichomes in plant defense. Quart. Rev. Biol.<br />

48(1):3–15.<br />

Dreyer, D. L. and K. C. Jones. 1981. Feeding deterrency of flavonoids and related<br />

phenolics towards Schizaphis graminum ad Myzus persicae: aphid feeding<br />

deterrents in wheat. Phytochem. 20(11):2489–2493.<br />

Duetting, P. S., H. Ding, J. Neufeld, and S. D. Eigenbrode. 2003. Plant waxy bloom<br />

on peas affects infection of pea aphids by Pandora neoaphidis. J. Invert. Path.<br />

84:149–158.<br />

Francis, F., G. Lognay, and E. Haubruge. 2004. Olfatory responses to aphid and host<br />

plant volatile releases: (E)-b-farnesene an effective kairomone for the predator<br />

Adalia bipunctata. J. Chem. Ecol. 30(4):741–755.<br />

Garzo, E., C. Soria, M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, and A. Fereres. 2002. Feeding<br />

behavior of Aphis gossypii on resistant accessions of different melon genotypes<br />

(Cucumis melo). Phytoparasitica. 30(2):129–140.<br />

Kishaba, A. N., G. W. Bohn, and H. H. Toba. 1971. Resistance to Aphis gossypii in<br />

muskemelon. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101(5):557–561.<br />

Kolb, D. and M. Müller. 2004. Light, conventional and environmental scanning<br />

electron microscopy of the trichomes of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo sbsp. pepo var. styriaca<br />

and histochemistry of glandular secretory products. Ann. Bot. 94:515–526.<br />

Levin, D. A., 1973. <strong>The</strong> role of trichomes in plant disease. Quart. Rev. Biol. 48(1):3–<br />

15.<br />

Martin, B. and A. Fereres. 2003. Evaluation of a choice-test method to assess<br />

resistance of melon to Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) by<br />

comparison with conventional antibiosis and antixenosis trials. App. Entomol.<br />

Zool. 38(3):405–411.<br />

Miles, P. W. 1998. Aphid saliva. Biol. Rev. 74:41–85.<br />

Mitchell, M. J., D. P. Deogh, J. R. Crooks, and S. L. Smith. 1993. Effects of plant<br />

flavonoids and other allelochemicals on insect cytochrome P-450 dependent<br />

steroid hydroxylase activity. Insect Biochem. & Molec. Biol. 23(1):65–71.<br />

Ni, X. and S. S. Quisenberry. 1997. Effect of wheat leaf epicuticular structure on<br />

host selection and probing rhythm of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera:<br />

Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 90(5):1400–1407.<br />

O’Brien, T. P., N. Feder, and M. McCully. 1964. Polychromatic staining of plant cell<br />

walls by toluidine blue. Protoplasma. 59:367–373.<br />

Pitrat, M. and H. Lecoq. 1980. Inheritance of the resistance to cucumber mosaic<br />

virus transmission by Aphis gossypii in Cucumis melo. Phytopathology. 70:958–<br />

971.<br />

Powell, G., C. Tosh, and J. Hardie. 2006. Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral,<br />

evolutionary, and applied perspectives. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 51:309–330.<br />

114 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Powell, G., S. P. Maniar, J. A. Pickett, and J. Hardie. 1999. Aphid responses to nonhost<br />

epicuticular lipids. Ent. Exp. Appl. 91:115–123.<br />

Renwick, J. A. A. 1983. Nonpreference mechanisms: plant characteristics<br />

influencing insect behaviour, p. 199–213. In: P. E. Hedin (ed.). Plant resistance<br />

to insects. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.<br />

Sacchetti, G., C. Romagnoli, M. Nicoletti, A. Di Fabio, A. Bruni, and F. Poli. 1999.<br />

Glandular trichomes of Calceolaria adscendens Lidl. (Scrophulariaceae):<br />

histochemistry, development and ultrastructure. Ann. Bot. 83:87–92.<br />

Shepherd, T., G. W. Robertson, D. W. Griffiths, E. Nick, and A. Birch. 1999.<br />

Epicuticular wax composition in relation to aphid infestation and resistance in<br />

red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Phytochem. 52:1239–1254.<br />

Simmons, A. T., G. M. Gurr, D. McGrath, H. I. Nicol, and P. M. Martin. 2003.<br />

Trichomes of Lycopersicon spp. and their effect on Myzus persicae (Sulzer)<br />

(Hemiptera: Aphididae). Austral. J. Entomol. 42:373–378.<br />

Uphof, J. C. Th. and K. Hummel. 1962, v. 4, pt. 5, p. 1–206. Plant hairs. In: W.<br />

Zimmermann and P. G. Ozenda (eds.). Encyclopedia of plant anatomy.<br />

Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.<br />

Wagner, G. J., E. Wang, and R.W. Shepherd. 2004. New approaches for studying<br />

and exploiting an old protuberance, the plant trichome. Ann. Bot. 93:3–11.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 115


EVALUATION OF ZUCCHINI AND<br />

STRAIGHTNECK SUMMER SQUASH<br />

BREEDING LINES AND VARIETIES FOR<br />

POWDERY MILDEW AND DOWNY MILDEW<br />

TOLERANCE<br />

M. L. Infante-Casella<br />

Rutgers Cooperative Research and Extension of Gloucester County,<br />

Clayton, NJ 08312<br />

C. A. Wyenandt<br />

RCRE, Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center,<br />

Bridgeton, NJ 08302<br />

M. R. Henninger<br />

RCRE, Foran Hall, New Brunswick, NJ 08901<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, disease tolerance<br />

ABSTRACT. Field research was conducted with 22 green zucchini and yellow<br />

straightneck summer squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo) hybrids to evaluate tolerance to<br />

powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii) and downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis) infection under field conditions in 2005. Powdery mildew (PM) and<br />

downy mildew (DM) are important diseases of cucurbit crops in the mid-<br />

Atlantic region of the United <strong>State</strong>s annually during summer months. In New<br />

Jersey, PM is first observed in mid-July and DM is usually first observed in<br />

mid-August. However, during the 2004 and 2005 production seasons, DM was<br />

identified approximately two months earlier than expected. In 2005, AUDPC<br />

values for PM development were lowest in the straightnecks ‘Sunray’, ‘General<br />

Patton’, and ‘Patriot II’ and in the zucchinis ‘Wildcat’, ‘Judgment III’<br />

(formerly ‘EX04629728’, released December 2005), ‘Justice III’, and ‘Payroll’.<br />

AUDPC values for DM development were lowest in the straightnecks ‘Lioness’,<br />

‘Conqueror III’, and ‘Cougar’ and in the zucchinis ‘Judgment III’, ‘SSX6593’,<br />

‘Lynx’, and ‘Leopard’.<br />

Z<br />

ucchini and straightneck yellow squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) are<br />

important crops for many vegetable farmers in New Jersey.<br />

Over 1000 hectares of green zucchini and 360 hectares of<br />

yellow straightneck summer squash are grown annually in the state,<br />

with a farm-gate value of 12.8 million dollars, making New Jersey the<br />

fifth highest in the nation in production value (National Agricultural<br />

Statistics Service, 2000). Powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii)<br />

(PM) and downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) (DM) are two<br />

of the most important foliar diseases of summer squash in New Jersey<br />

(Infante-Casella et al., 2003). Without the use of fungicides, losses to<br />

PM and DM can be extremely high in the mid-Atlantic region.<br />

116 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Unfortunately, in recent years, PM resistance to certain fungicide<br />

chemistries has been detected in the U.S. (McGrath and Thomas,<br />

1996). Additionally, some fungicide chemistries used to control DM<br />

are also at risk for resistance development. This study was done to<br />

evaluate zucchini and straightneck summer squash hybrids for<br />

tolerance to PM and DM.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A trial was conducted in the field during the summer and fall of<br />

2005 at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center<br />

(RAREC) in Bridgeton, New Jersey, on a Sassafras sandy loam soil.<br />

All squash were seeded on 14 July by hand with 75cm spacing into<br />

black plastic mulch on high raised beds. Rows were spaced 150cm<br />

apart. In total, there were 22 hybrids with six plants per block, with<br />

four replications. Drip irrigation was used for supplying water and<br />

fertilizer. Prefar 4E (bensulide) at a rate of 11.2L/ha was applied on<br />

the soil surface just before laying plastic for preemergent weed<br />

control. For control of aphids and cucumber beetles, Admire<br />

(imidacloprid) was applied in the seed hole at a rate of 1.7L/ha after<br />

planting using a backpack sprayer. On August 26, Gavel (zoxamide)<br />

at 2.4kg/ha tank-mixed with Phostrol (phosphite salts) at 5.6L/ha was<br />

applied to slow downy mildew infection. Green zucchini hybrids<br />

planted included: ‘Tigress’, ‘Leopard’, ‘Lynx’, ‘Wildcat’, ‘SSX6560’,<br />

‘SSX6593’, ‘SSX6609’, ‘SSX6713’, ‘Payroll’, ‘Revenue’, ‘Senator’,<br />

‘Independence II’, ‘Justice III’, and ‘Judgment III’ (formerly<br />

EX04629728). Yellow straightneck hybrids planted were ‘General<br />

Patton’, ‘Sunray’, ‘XPHT1832 III’, ‘Patriot II’, ‘Liberator III’,<br />

‘Conqueror III’, ‘Cougar’, and ‘Lioness’. Disease evaluations began as<br />

soon as the plants showed visual signs of PM (1 Sep.) and DM (18<br />

Aug.) infection. <strong>The</strong>reafter, weekly evaluations were done to assess<br />

PM and DM development for each of the 22 hybrids. Leaves and<br />

stems of plants were visually rated on a scale of 0.0 (no sign of<br />

infection) to 10.0 (100% infection) at 0.5 increments for presence of<br />

PM and DM infection. Arcsine-transformed AUPDC values were<br />

calculated for PM and DM development during the late-season<br />

evaluation period for observing differences in disease development.<br />

Zucchini and straightneck squash data were analyzed separately using<br />

SAS (ANOVA, P=0.05).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were significant differences in AUDPC values for PM and<br />

DM development among both straightneck (Table 1) and zucchini<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 117


(Table 2) squash cultivars. Of the straightnecks, AUDPC values for<br />

PM development were lowest in ‘Sunray’, ‘General Patton’, and<br />

‘Patriot II’, respectively. AUDPC values for DM were lowest in<br />

‘Cougar’, ‘Lioness’, and ‘Conqueror III’. No straightneck squash had<br />

acceptable levels of both PM and DM tolerance. Zucchini squash that<br />

had the lowest AUDPC values for PM development included<br />

‘Wildcat’, ‘Judgment III’, ‘Justice III’, ‘Payroll’, and ‘SSX6560’.<br />

Zucchini squash with the lowest AUDPC values for DM development<br />

included ‘Judgment III’, ‘SSX6593’, Lynx’, and ‘Leopard’,<br />

respectively. Of all the squash evaluated, ‘Judgment III’ was the only<br />

one that had a relatively low AUDPC value for both PM and DM.<br />

Table 1. AUDPC values z for powdery mildew (PM) and downy<br />

mildew (DM) on straightneck summer squash cultivars grown at the<br />

Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center (RAREC),<br />

Bridgeton, New Jersey, in 2005.<br />

Variety Seed company PM DM<br />

Cougar Harris Moran 1164.3 1531.8<br />

Lioness Harris Moran 1085.2 1432.9<br />

Conqueror III Seminis 1078.1 1531.8<br />

XPHT 1832 III Seminis 1038.84 1861.0<br />

Liberator II Seminis 1017.2 1697.9<br />

Patriot II Seminis 897.2 1674.7<br />

General Patton Seminis 684.5 1838.4<br />

Sunray Seminis 595.6 1805.5<br />

LSD 154.5 210.6<br />

z AUDPC values arcsine transformed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> identification of PM- and DM-tolerant and -resistant squash<br />

varieties is important to the future of summer squash production in<br />

New Jersey and other production areas in the mid-Atlantic region.<br />

With the high cost of fungicides and the threat of fungicide-resistance<br />

development, summer squash growers are looking for cultivars that<br />

have tolerance to both PM and DM. Vegetable producers can reduce<br />

the need for fungicides that are at high risk for resistance development<br />

by selecting resistant varieties for production (McGrath, 2005).<br />

Breeders identify disease tolerance or resistance by continually testing<br />

new lines. Much of the breeding is aimed at developing PM-tolerant<br />

or -resistant squash lines, with less effort in finding DM tolerance or<br />

118 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


esistance (T. Pagels, personal communication). While there are<br />

fungicides available to control PM, it is still a problem for many<br />

growers (Elkner and Young, 2004). <strong>The</strong> same can be said for control<br />

fungicides available to control PM, it is still a problem for many<br />

growers (Elkner and Young, 2004). <strong>The</strong> same can be said for control<br />

of DM on susceptible cucurbits, due to the difficulty of properly<br />

timing application and the potential for fungicide-resistance<br />

development. DM resistance exists in some cucumber cultivars.<br />

However, some of these cultivars appear to be losing resistance. <strong>The</strong><br />

cucumber ‘Speedway’, thought to be DM resistant, was found to be<br />

infected with DM in southern New Jersey in 2005. <strong>The</strong>re is a need to<br />

evaluate all cucurbit varieties for DM tolerance or resistance, even<br />

though DM resistance may not be the main target of many cucurbitbreeding<br />

programs.<br />

Table 2. AUDPC values z for powdery mildew (PM) and downy<br />

mildew (DM) on zucchini squash cultivars grown at the Rutgers<br />

Agricultural Research and Extension Center (RAREC), Bridgeton,<br />

New Jersey in 2005.<br />

Variety Seed company PM DM<br />

Revenue Siegers 1355.1 1835.5<br />

Leopard Harris Moran 1181.7 1635.2<br />

Lynx Harris Moran 1145.6 1628.6<br />

Independence II Seminis 1140.2 1670.5<br />

SSX6593 Siegers 1076.9 1622.3<br />

Senator Seminis 1065.1 1722.7<br />

Tigress Harris Moran 1046.4 1732.4<br />

SSX6713 Siegers 1023.3 1863.7<br />

SSX6560 Siegers 992.3 1825.4<br />

Payroll Siegers 815.4 1698.0<br />

Justice III Seminis 757.6 1752.1<br />

Judgment III Seminis 702.1 1522.9<br />

Wildcat Harris Moran 657.1 1677.7<br />

LSD (P=0.05) 192.4 161.0<br />

z AUDPC values arcsine transformed.<br />

PM and DM have continued to be a challenge when producing<br />

summer squash in New Jersey. Identifying PM and DM diseasetolerant<br />

or -resistant cultivars is necessary to improve the economics<br />

of producing summer squash in New Jersey and the mid-Atlantic<br />

region of the U.S.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 119


Literature Cited<br />

Elkner T. E. and L. Young. 2004. Mildew tolerant pumpkin variety evaluations in<br />

Pennsylvania, p. 35–38. In: Proc. 35 th Annual Mid-Atlantic Vegetable Workers<br />

Conference.<br />

Infante-Casella, M. L., G. M. Ghidiu, and B. A. Majek. 2003. Crop profile for<br />

summer and winter squash in New Jersey.<br />

.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2005. Managing fungicide resistance is key to controlling powdery<br />

mildew, p. 63–66. 2005. Proc. New Jersey Annual Vegetable Meeting. Rutgers<br />

Cooperative Research and Extension.<br />

McGrath, M. T. and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Powdery mildew, p. 28–30. In: T. A. Zitter,<br />

D. L. Hopkins, and E. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS<br />

Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2000. 2000 National rankings, squash, fresh<br />

market and processing. .<br />

120 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


INHERITANCE OF CHILLING RESISTANCE IN<br />

CUCUMBER SEEDLINGS<br />

Elzbieta U. Kozik<br />

Department of Genetics, <strong>Breeding</strong> and Biotechnology, Research<br />

Institute of Vegetable Crops, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland<br />

Todd C. Wehner<br />

Department of Horticultural Science, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cold injury, genetics, vegetable breeding<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> inheritance of the resistance in cucumber inbred NC-76<br />

(originating from PI 246930) was studied. <strong>The</strong> results clearly confirm the<br />

presence of a high level of resistance to chilling injury in NC-76. <strong>The</strong><br />

segregation data of F2 and backcross progenies of the resistant NC-76 crossed<br />

with the susceptible ‘Chipper’ and Gy 14 demonstrated that a high level of<br />

resistance from NC-76 was conferred by a single, in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene<br />

Ch.<br />

C<br />

ucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is susceptible to chilling (low<br />

temperatures above freezing). <strong>The</strong> first symptoms of chilling<br />

injury to the leaves of cucumber plants are rapid leaf wilting<br />

and development of sunken, necrotic patches within a few hours of<br />

chilling exposure. When plants return to warm temperatures, the leaf<br />

margins and necrotic patches dry out, giving the leaf a mottled and<br />

brittle appearance. Chilling injury may occur in the spring in many<br />

geographical regions where the cucumber crop is planted before the<br />

risk of frost has ended. In order to determine whether chillingresistant<br />

cultivars can be developed, a method for testing genetic<br />

variation in chilling sensitivity was developed, and germplasm having<br />

partial chilling resistance was identified, including AR75-79<br />

(sometimes called ‘Little John’) and ‘Chipper’ (Smeets and Wehner,<br />

1997). Using this method, Chung et al. (2003) investigated<br />

inheritance of chilling injury in genetic progenies of resistant<br />

‘Chipper’ and AR75-79 in crosses with susceptible Gy 14. <strong>The</strong>ir data<br />

suggested that chilling resistance was maternally inherited. In the<br />

meantime, a high level of resistance was identified in cucumber<br />

accession PI 246930, and the genetic basis of resistance in this<br />

accession is presented here.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

<strong>The</strong> plant material used in this study consisted of reciprocal F1, F2,<br />

and backcross progenies from three groups of crosses between<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 121


esistant inbred NC-76 (P1) (selected from PI 246930) and ‘Chipper’<br />

(P2) and Gy 14 (P3) (susceptible). All crosses were made by handpollination<br />

in a greenhouse.<br />

Chilling-resistance tests were conducted under controlledenvironment<br />

conditions in the growth chambers of the Southeastern<br />

Plant Environment Laboratory at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University.<br />

Seeds were sown in peat pots (57mm 2 , 100-ml volume) filled with a<br />

standard substrate of gravel and peat in a 1:1 ratio and placed in trays.<br />

One seed was sown in each pot.<br />

After their germination, the plants were placed in growth chambers<br />

set at 26/22°C (day/night) temperatures under long days, consisting of<br />

12 hours of combined fluorescent and incandescent light (from 8 AM<br />

to 8 PM). Light intensities (PPFD) were 650 and 44mmol . m -2. s -1 ,<br />

respectively. Plants were watered with the standard phytotron nutrient<br />

solution (Thomas et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> experiment was divided into 10<br />

sets for ease of handling. Each set contained 3 plants of each parent<br />

(P1, P2, P3), 6 F1, 6 BC1P1, 6 BC1P2/BC1P3, and 30 plants of the F2<br />

generation. Data from all sets were pooled for the analysis.<br />

When the plants reached the first-true-leaf stage, they were moved<br />

from the main growth chamber to the chilling chamber for treatment at<br />

4°C under a light intensity of 500mmol . m -2. s -1 PPFD during 7 hr.<br />

After the chilling treatment, they were returned to the main growth<br />

chamber and placed under the same light and temperature regime as<br />

before. Plants were evaluated 14 days after chilling, rating the damage<br />

on the first true leaf. <strong>The</strong> scale used was 0 to 9: 0 = no damage; 1–2 =<br />

trace of damage; 3–4 = slight damage; 5–6 = moderate damage; 7–8 =<br />

advanced damage; 9 = plant dead. Data were collected as means over<br />

all true leaves (not cotyledons) for each plant within each generation.<br />

Plants from Classes 0, 1, and 2 were considered highly resistant (R),<br />

those from Classes 3, 4, 5, and 6 were considered moderately resistant<br />

(M), and those from Classes 7, 8, and 9 were considered susceptible<br />

(S). Data from these three categories of F2, BC1P2, and BC1P3<br />

populations were tested for goodness-of-fit to theoretical ratios using<br />

the chi-square tests.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Analysis of the data showed that plants of NC-76 exhibited high<br />

but nonabsolute resistance level (89% highly resistant and only 11%<br />

moderately resistant plants) in response to low temperatures. In<br />

contrast, plants of either the ‘Chipper’ or Gy 14 line showed high<br />

susceptibility (100% Class 9) (Table 1).<br />

122 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


<strong>The</strong> F1, reciprocal F1, and BC1 to the resistant parent NC-76 had<br />

highly resistant and moderately resistant plants, with some excess of<br />

highly resistant plants, which is in accordance with a dominantly<br />

Table 1. Segregation ratios for chilling-resistant leaves in cucumber<br />

seedlings of populations derived from crosses between NC-76 and ‘Chipper’,<br />

and NC-76 and Gy 14.<br />

No. of plants<br />

Parent/<br />

segregating Segregation ratio<br />

Cross R M S Total Expected Obtained Chi 2 df Prob.<br />

P1 NC-76 47 6 0 53 100% R+M 100% R+M<br />

P2 Chipper 0 1 56 57 100% S 100% S<br />

P3 Gy14 0 0 27 27 00% S 100% S<br />

F1<br />

(P1xP2/P3) 53 30 1 84 00% R+M 100% R+M<br />

F1R<br />

(P2/P3xP1) 42 41 1<br />

BC1P1<br />

84 100% R+M 100% R+M<br />

(F1xP1) 49 34 0 83 100% R+M 100% R+M<br />

BC1P2/P3<br />

(F1xP2/P3) 1 45 49 95<br />

F2<br />

(F1xself) 125 247 113 485<br />

50%R+M :<br />

50%S<br />

1R+M : 1S<br />

25%R:50%<br />

M:25%S<br />

1R : 2M : 1S<br />

48%R+M :<br />

52%S<br />

1R+M : 1S 0.100 1<br />

26%R:51%<br />

M:23%S<br />

0.752<br />

1R : 2M : 1S0.76 2 0.684<br />

inherited trait. <strong>The</strong> pooled F2 population had 125 highly resistant<br />

plants, 247 moderately resistant plants, and 113 susceptible plants.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se data fit a ratio of 1 highly resistant : 2 moderately resistant : 1<br />

susceptible with a probability of 0.684 (pooled chi square = 0.76).<br />

<strong>The</strong> pooled BC1 to resistant NC-76 parent was considered resistant<br />

(100% highly resistant and moderately resistant, with an excess of<br />

highly resistant plants).In the pooled BC1 to both susceptible parents<br />

‘Chipper’ and Gy 14, there were 1 highly resistant, 45 moderately<br />

resistant, and 49 susceptible plants. <strong>The</strong>se data fit a ratio of 1<br />

moderately resistant : 1 susceptible with a probability of 0.752 (chi<br />

square = 0.100).<br />

<strong>The</strong> segregation pattern in the F2 (1R : 2M : 1S), BC1P1 (100%<br />

resistant plants), and BC1P2/P3 (1M : 1S) populations demonstrated<br />

that a high level of resistance was conferred by a single, in<strong>complete</strong>ly<br />

dominant gene from NC-76. <strong>The</strong>se results are different from the ones<br />

obtained by Chung et al. (2003), who suggested that chilling resistance<br />

was maternally inherited. It seems that there is a different genetic<br />

system for chilling resistance in NC-76 and ‘Chipper’. Other<br />

differences in the two studies include chilling-test methods and plant<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 123


stage. In our studies, seedlings at the first fully expanded true leaf<br />

were subjected to a chilling treatment of 7 h at 4°C, while Chung et al.<br />

(2003) treated seedlings whose first true leaf was apparent but not<br />

fully expanded for 5.5 h at 4°C. Thus, the tests they ran were less<br />

severe than ours, and ‘Chipper’ showed slight resistance under those<br />

conditions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> symbol Ch is proposed to designate the in<strong>complete</strong>ly<br />

dominant gene from C. sativus NC-76 for resistance to chilling<br />

conditions in accordance with gene nomenclature rules (Wehner,<br />

1993). <strong>The</strong> results are promising, since resistance conferred by the<br />

in<strong>complete</strong> resistance gene Ch was effective under extreme chilling<br />

conditions. <strong>The</strong> gene should be useful in breeding programs for the<br />

development of new cultivars adapted to planting in the field in early<br />

spring.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Chung, S. M., J. E. Staub, and G. Fazio. 2003. Inheritance of chilling injury: A<br />

maternally inherited trait in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128(4):526–530.<br />

Smeets, L. and T. C. Wehner. 1997. Environmental effects on genetic variation of<br />

chilling resistance in cucumber. Euphytica. 97:217–225.<br />

Thomas J. F., R. J. Downs, and C. H. Saravitz. 2005. Phytotron procedural manual<br />

for controlled environment research at the southeastern plant environment<br />

laboratory. NCARS Tech. Bull. 244 (revised), 44 p.<br />

Wehner, T. C. 1993. Gene list update for cucumber. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt.<br />

16:92–97.<br />

124 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


GENES EXPRESSED DURING DEVELOPMENT<br />

AND RIPENING OF WATERMELON FRUIT<br />

A. Levi and W. P. Wechter<br />

USDA, ARS, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, 2700 Savannah Highway,<br />

Charleston, SC 29414<br />

A. Davis<br />

USDA, ARS, P.O. Box 159, Lane, Oklahoma 74555<br />

A. Hernandez and J. Thimmapuram<br />

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Roy J. Carver<br />

Biotechnology Center, W.M. Keck Center for Comparative and<br />

Functional Genomics,<br />

1201 W. Gregory Drive, Urbana, IL 61801<br />

T. Trebitsh<br />

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev,<br />

Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel<br />

Y. Tadmor, N. Katzir, and V. Portnoy<br />

Agricultural Research Organization, P.O. Box 1021,<br />

Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel<br />

S. King<br />

Department of Horticulture, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, Texas 77845<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. cDNA, gene expression, ESTs, Citrullus lanatus<br />

ABSTRACT. A cDNA library was constructed using watermelon fruit (flesh)<br />

mRNA from 3 distinct developmental time-points and was normalized and then<br />

subtracted by hybridization with leaf cDNA. Random cDNA clones of the<br />

watermelon flesh subtraction library were sequenced from the 5’ end in order<br />

to identify potentially informative genes associated with fruit setting,<br />

development, and ripening. One-thousand and forty-six 5’-end sequences<br />

(expressed sequence tags; ESTs) were assembled into 832 nonredundant<br />

sequences, designated as “EST-unigenes.” Of these 832 EST-unigenes, 254<br />

(~30%) have no significant homology to sequences of other plant species.<br />

Additionally, 168 EST-unigenes (~20%) correspond to genes with unknown<br />

function, whereas 410 EST-unigenes (~50%) correspond to genes with known<br />

function in other plant species. Microarray analysis indicated that a large<br />

number of the ESTs (about 15%) are differentially expressed during the<br />

development of watermelon fruit. This study provides new genetic information<br />

for watermelon as well as an expanded pool of genes associated with fruit<br />

development in watermelon. <strong>The</strong>se genes will be useful targets in future<br />

functional genomic studies dealing with watermelon fruit development.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 125


W<br />

atermelon fruits are diverse in shape and size, in rind and<br />

flesh color, and in flesh texture, aroma, flavor, and nutrient<br />

composition. Ripening watermelon fruits undergo changes<br />

in pigment accumulation, flavor and aromatic volatiles, conversion of<br />

starch to sugars, and in increased susceptibility to postharvest<br />

pathogens (Karakurt and Huber 2004). Significant knowledge has<br />

accumulated in a number of plant species with respect to genes<br />

associated with fruit development, including genes associated with<br />

cell-wall metabolism, ethylene biosynthesis, signal transduction, and<br />

hormones affecting fruit setting, growth, and ripening (Giovannoni<br />

2001). However, there is little information on genes controlling these<br />

processes in cucurbit fruits including watermelon. Identifying,<br />

mapping, and characterizing these genes will be useful to research and<br />

breeding efforts in this crop.<br />

In this study we report the development of 832 expressed<br />

sequenced tags (ESTs) for watermelon fruit, their classification based<br />

on their putative function in other plant species, and their differential<br />

expression during fruit development and ripening.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL AND RNA ISOLATION. Fruits at early<br />

development stage (white flesh; 12 days postpollination), at maturing<br />

stage (light pink flesh; 24 days postpollination), and ripe fruits (red<br />

flesh; 36 days postpollination) of the watermelon heirloom cultivar<br />

‘Illiniwake Red’ were used for RNA isolation. RNA was isolated from<br />

freeze-dried tissue of watermelon according to the procedure described<br />

by Callahan et al. (1989).<br />

CDNA SYNTHESIS, SIZE SELECTION, AND CLONING. cDNA<br />

synthesis and library construction was performed using Stratagene kits<br />

(Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA), as described by Soares and Bonaldo<br />

(1998). <strong>The</strong> primary cDNA library was normalized as described by<br />

Bonaldo et al. (1996). <strong>The</strong> library was first normalized in order to<br />

enrich it with the genes that have low expression levels in the fruit<br />

tissue. <strong>The</strong>n the normalized library was subtracted using leaf cDNAs<br />

in order to enrich the library with genes that are differentially<br />

expressed in the fruit tissue.<br />

SEQUENCING OF CDNA CLONES AND ASSEMBLING OF ESTS. <strong>The</strong><br />

cDNA clones were sequenced from the 5’ ends using standard T7<br />

primer and ABI BigDye terminator chemistry on ABI 3700 capillary<br />

systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). <strong>The</strong> sequenced cDNA<br />

clones were designated as expressed sequenced tags (ESTs). <strong>The</strong> EST<br />

clusters were assembled into contigs (contiguous sequence) by<br />

126 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


multiple-sequence alignment, which generates a consensus sequence<br />

for each cluster with criteria of 95% identity over 30 nt overlap. <strong>The</strong><br />

ESTs remaining in a cluster after the formation of contigs are<br />

designated as cluster singlets. <strong>The</strong> set of nonredundant sequences for<br />

the library includes the contigs, cluster-singlets, and singlets and was<br />

designated as “EST-unigenes.” <strong>The</strong>se sequences were used to query<br />

the GenBank database for homologs using the Basic Local Alignment<br />

Search Tool (BLAST) (Altschul et al. 1990), using e-value of 0.01, to<br />

ensure a high level of confidence that each sequence represents a<br />

nonredundant gene transcript.<br />

MICROARRAY ANALYSIS. Each of the 832 ESTs was represented<br />

on the microarray chip by 15 oligos (24 bp) x 3 replications.<br />

Microarray design, chip production, hybridizations, staining, and data<br />

extractions were performed by NimbleGen, Inc. (Madison, WI).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Of the 832 watermelon EST-unigenes analyzed, 254 (~30%) had<br />

no detectable homologs (E 0.1) to any other plant genomes or protein<br />

sequences reported so far in GenBank (Figure 1). Some of these ESTunigenes<br />

may represent untranslated (UTR) 3’regions (Mignone et al.<br />

2005). However, further studies are needed to determine if they are<br />

typical to watermelon and other cucurbit species. <strong>The</strong> majority of the<br />

watermelon fruit EST-unigenes reported in this study could be<br />

grouped into abundantly expressed gene families. However, a<br />

considerable number of the EST-unigenes could not be classified<br />

(Table 1; Figure 1). Extensive genome sequencing is still needed for<br />

cucurbit species to identify the genes that may be distinct to this<br />

family.<br />

A large number of the ESTs identified in this study are<br />

homologous to genes previously reported to be important in fruit<br />

growth and ripening in other plant species. <strong>The</strong> 1,046 random cDNA<br />

clones sequenced produced 832 EST-unigenes. Of these 832 ESTunigenes,<br />

747 were single ESTs (singletons; nonassembled sequencing<br />

reads), and 85 were contigs generated by computer-based assembly of<br />

sequence fragments from several clones (contigs). Of the 832 ESTunigenes,<br />

578 have significant homology to amino acid sequences<br />

from the GenBank nonredundant protein database. A large number of<br />

these homologous sequences have previously been ascribed to<br />

Arabidopsis proteins, and were successfully annotated using gene<br />

ontology (GO) analysis. <strong>The</strong> length of the ESTs ranges from 338 to<br />

699 bases, whereas contigs range from 555 to 2823 bases. <strong>The</strong><br />

individual sequences of 1046 ESTs have been submitted to NCBI<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 127


(Accession numbers: DV736965–DV738010, to be released on<br />

October 1, 2006).<br />

A functional class was assigned to each EST-unigene based on the<br />

degree of similarity (E-value) to the closest counterpart sequence<br />

found in other plant species. Of the 578 EST-unigenes that had<br />

significant homology to the nucleotide database (nt), 168 are<br />

homologous to genes with unknown nucleotide database (nt),<br />

Cell wall and<br />

division<br />

5%<br />

Membrane transport<br />

8%<br />

Amino acid<br />

synthesis<br />

7%<br />

Primary metabolism<br />

9%<br />

DNA/RNA<br />

Transcription<br />

8%<br />

No significant<br />

homology to genes<br />

in other plant<br />

species<br />

30%<br />

Signal transduction<br />

8%<br />

Defense/stress<br />

response<br />

4%<br />

Secondary<br />

metabolitesm<br />

1%<br />

Unknown function<br />

20%<br />

Fig. 1. Distribution of watermelon flesh ESTs according to their function.<br />

168 are homologous to genes with unknown function, while 410 are<br />

homologous to genes with known function. <strong>The</strong>se 410 EST-unigenes,<br />

based on GO annotation, were assigned to one of the following<br />

functional classes: (1) primary metabolism (74 EST-unigenes); (2)<br />

amino acid synthesis and processing (57 EST-unigenes); (3)<br />

membrane and transport (66 EST-unigenes); (4) cell division, cell wall<br />

and metabolism, cytoskeleton, and cellular organization (41 ESTunigenes);<br />

(5) DNA/RNA transcription and gene expression (63 ESTunigenes);<br />

(6) cellular communication/signal transduction (70 ESTunigenes);<br />

(7) defense- and stress-related proteins (31 EST-unigenes);<br />

and (8) secondary metabolism (8 EST-unigenes) (Figure 1).<br />

128 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Expression levels of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) during<br />

watermelon fruit development, including early-stage (12 days<br />

postpollination [PP]), maturing (24 days PP), and ripened fruit (36<br />

days PP). <strong>The</strong> levels shown are relative to the expression level in the<br />

leaf, which is determined as 1.0.<br />

EST Early Maturing Ripe<br />

AL01006B2C02.f1 22.09 26.07 16.16<br />

AL01005A1F10.f1 22.07 13.24 11.62<br />

AL-Contig4 18.98 21.89 13.91<br />

AL-Contig47 17.45 32.16 9.39<br />

AL-Contig60 17.34 5.27 2.78<br />

AL010001000B12 15.15 10.18 3.93<br />

AL01005B1D07.f1 14.93 27.32 22.52<br />

AL-Contig9 10.24 14.15 11.72<br />

AL01005B2A05.f1 10.16 10.28 7.81<br />

AL01006A2D05.f1 10.12 8.63 7.82<br />

AL01006A1C09.f1 9.94 8.83 7.99<br />

AL01006B1H12.f1 9.61 5.84 13.00<br />

AL-Contig71 9.37 10.36 3.97<br />

AL01003X1E03.f1 9.27 16.11 11.37<br />

AL01005A2B07.f1 9.03 16.71 16.33<br />

AL010002000G10 9.00 7.17 5.03<br />

AL01003X1E07.f1 7.60 9.15 8.81<br />

AL01003X1A05.f1 7.58 2.25 0.84<br />

AL01005B1E08.f1 7.49 12.53 4.36<br />

AL-Contig41 7.30 12.03 7.93<br />

AL-Contig66 7.04 13.59 9.87<br />

AL01005A2H08.f1 7.03 7.28 7.61<br />

AL01006B2E04.f1 5.85 4.81 0.73<br />

AL01005B2F12.f1 5.66 4.89 3.81<br />

AL01006A2G09.f1 4.92 22.20 5.32<br />

AL-Contig83 4.88 1.10 0.81<br />

AL01005B2E08.f1 4.80 3.33 2.46<br />

AL010002000E03 4.70 1.67 1.48<br />

AL-Contig78 4.70 8.01 7.95<br />

AL010001000D09 4.60 2.36 0.92<br />

AL-Contig64 4.41 2.22 5.22<br />

AL01006B2F11.f1 4.34 6.23 4.74<br />

AL01005A2F02.f1 3.64 11.18 8.66<br />

AL-Contig27 3.56 16.38 3.80<br />

AL01005B2D01.f1 3.47 5.55 6.52<br />

AL-Contig56 3.45 4.04 4.07<br />

AL-Contig79 3.42 7.21 6.39<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 129


(Table 1, continued)<br />

EST Early Maturing Ripe<br />

AL-Contig46 3.22 5.42 3.98<br />

AL01006A1H06.f1 2.80 7.01 5.01<br />

AL01006A2H11.f1 2.80 3.05 2.35<br />

AL010001000C07 2.80 2.90 2.03<br />

AL010002000A05 2.80 3.17 3.42<br />

AL010001000H02 2.74 2.70 1.80<br />

AL-Contig42 2.15 25.60 18.29<br />

AL010002000B05 2.09 2.50 2.47<br />

AL010002000B08 2.07 1.91 2.09<br />

AL01006B1A07.f1 2.06 3.58 1.55<br />

AL01006A1F01.f1 2.04 3.98 8.38<br />

AL01006B1G08.f1 1.90 2.14 2.27<br />

AL010001000E12 1.89 1.84 1.86<br />

AL-Contig15 1.81 2.30 2.03<br />

AL01005A2A11.f1 1.80 2.48 2.13<br />

AL010002000A07 1.70 1.45 1.55<br />

AL01004X1H02.f1 1.60 4.06 3.97<br />

AL-Contig73 1.56 2.06 1.94<br />

AL01005B2G04.f1 1.55 1.09 1.09<br />

AL010001000F05 1.48 3.75 2.17<br />

AL01005A1D10.f1 1.46 1.58 1.66<br />

AL01005B2G02.f1 1.43 1.70 1.67<br />

AL01005A2D06.f1 1.42 2.14 1.70<br />

AL010001000G11 1.34 2.58 2.80<br />

AL01006B2G09.f1 1.22 1.29 1.23<br />

AL01003X1C10.f1 1.22 1.79 1.49<br />

AL01005B2F05.f1 1.00 1.80 1.36<br />

AL01006B1G06.f1 1.00 1.51 1.36<br />

AL01005A2E07.f1 0.99 1.27 1.18<br />

AL01006A1C10.f1 0.99 1.64 1.56<br />

AL01004X1B12.f1 0.96 1.09 0.87<br />

AL01004X1A07.f1 0.96 1.52 1.25<br />

AL010002000H11 0.94 1.64 1.24<br />

AL01006B1B11.f1 0.93 1.48 1.50<br />

AL01005A1G08.f1 0.83 1.16 1.03<br />

AL-Contig32 0.83 3.79 1.82<br />

AL01003X1E11.f1 0.73 0.82 0.80<br />

AL01005B1G08.f1 0.60 0.84 0.62<br />

130 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


RNA from each fruit stage including early development stage<br />

(white flesh; 12 days postpollination), maturing stage (light pink flesh;<br />

24 days postpollination), ripe fruit (red flesh; 36 days postpollination),<br />

and young leaf was used for hybridization with the microarray chip<br />

containing the 832 EST oligos (15 oligos of 24 bases each; 3<br />

replications for each oligo). One-hundred and thirty-six ESTs showed<br />

high differential expression (expression level of 3–22 folds compared<br />

with the leaf RNA) during watermelon fruit development (as shown<br />

for a sample of ESTs in Table 1). All other ESTs (696) showed low<br />

expression (expression levels ranging from 0.11 to 2.9 folds compared<br />

with that in the leaf) (as shown in Table 1). <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

indicate that normalizing the cDNA library, and subtracting the fruit<br />

fleshcDNA library with a leaf cDNA, was effective in obtaining<br />

cDNA clones that are differentially expressed, and at the same time<br />

obtaining cDNA clones that have low expression (in a low-copy<br />

number). <strong>The</strong> results indicate that about 10–15% of ESTs (watermelon<br />

genes) are differentially expressed during watermelon fruit<br />

development and ripening. Watermelon may have a large number of<br />

ESTs with no significant sequence homology to gene sequences in<br />

other plant species reported an NCBI. <strong>The</strong> genes discovered in this<br />

study will be useful in future functional genomic studies dealing with<br />

watermelon fruit development and ripening.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Alba, R., Z. Fei, P. Payton, Y. Liu, S. L. Moore, P. Debbie, J. Cohn, M. D'Ascenzo,<br />

J. S. Gordon, J. K. Rose, G. Martin, S. D. Tanksley, M. Bouzayen, M. M. Jahn,<br />

and J. Giovannoni. 2004. ESTs, cDNA microarrays, and gene expression<br />

profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and development. Plant J.<br />

39:697–714.<br />

Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic<br />

local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410.<br />

Bonaldo, M. F., G. Lennon, and M. B. Soares. 1996. Normalization and subtraction:<br />

two approaches to facilitate gene discovery. Genome Res. 6:791–806.<br />

Callahan, A., P, Morgens, and E.Walton. 1989. Isolation and in vitro translation of<br />

RNAs from developing peach fruit. HortSci. 24:356–358.<br />

Giovannoni, J. 2001. Molecular regulation of fruit ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant<br />

Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52:725–749.<br />

Karakurt, Y. and D. J. Huber. 2004. Ethylene-induced gene expression, enzyme<br />

activities, and water soaking in immature and ripe watermelon (Citrullus<br />

lanatus) fruit. J. Plant Physiol. 161:381–388.<br />

Mignone, F., G. Grillo, F. Licciulli, M. Iacono, S. Liuni, P. J. Kersey, J. Duarte, C.<br />

Saccone, and G. Pesole. 2005. UTRdb and UTRsite: a collection of sequences<br />

and motifs of the untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res.<br />

33:D141–D146 (database issue).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 131


Soares, M. B. and M. F. Bonaldo. 1998. Constructing and screening normalized<br />

cDNA libraries in detecting genes. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring<br />

Harbor, NY. 2:49–157.<br />

132 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


RESEARCH OF MOLECULAR MARKERS<br />

LINKED TO THE DWARF GENE IN SQUASH<br />

Haizhen Li, Haiying Zhang, and Guoyi Gong<br />

National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />

Banjing, Haidian, Beijing 2443#, Beijing, 100089, P. R. China;<br />

Yunlong Li and Chongshi Cui<br />

Department of Horticulture, <strong>North</strong>east Agricultural University, 59<br />

Mucai Street, Gongbing Road, Xiangfang, Haerbing, Heilongjiang<br />

province, 150030, P.R. China<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Near isogenic line, dwarf gene D, RAPD, SCAR<br />

ABSTRACT. In this study, the first discovered dwarf mutant (Ai 10) of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata Duchesne was used as a donor parent and the normal C. maxima<br />

Duchesne (cv. MengRi) was used as a recurrent parent. Nine pure lines of the<br />

near isogenic lines (NILs) S1 through S9 were obtained through six backcrosses<br />

and two self-crosses.<br />

W<br />

ith the development of the world economy, rapid increase of<br />

global population, and decrease in arable land, an increase in<br />

food production per unit of land is especially important.<br />

Short-straw and half short-stalked crops with short and thickset stems<br />

that do not easily fall over can improve crop yields significantly (Liu,<br />

2005). With the development of intensive-cultivation agriculture, there<br />

is an urgent need for more dwarfing stock varieties and dwarf cultivars.<br />

Recently, many good dwarf and half-dwarf varieties have been<br />

developed, and some dwarf genes of Rht short-straw wheat and rice and<br />

a half short-straw sd-1 gene and Arabidopsis GA3 have been cloned<br />

(Peng et al., 1999; Sasaki et al., 2002; Helliwell et al., 1998). Because<br />

the mechanisms of short-straw and half-dwarf straw genes are not<br />

understood <strong>complete</strong>ly, their applications in crop improvement are<br />

limited. A search for new sources of dwarf genes revealed the dwarf<br />

China pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne). This rare resource,<br />

found in Shanxi Province in 1982, is the first dwarf mutant to be<br />

discovered in the world. Up to now, Chinese and foreign botanists have<br />

described the Chinese pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata D.) as having long<br />

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5042008 )<br />

and by the Special Foundation Support of Beijing’s Excellence person.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 133


vines. <strong>The</strong> discovery of a dwarf mutant has enriched the germplasm<br />

resources of pumpkin greatly. It may become a standard for breeding<br />

dwarf pumpkin. It has been proven that the short-vine and long-vine<br />

characteristics of Chinese pumpkin (C. moschata D.) are controlled by a<br />

pair of corresponding hereditary characters. Vinelessness (dwarfism) is<br />

a dominant gene (indicated with D), while long-vining is a recessive<br />

gene (indicated with d) (Zhou and Li, 1991). Mapping and cloning this<br />

gene may be helpful in understanding its mechanism, enriching plant<br />

genetic resources, and in developing dwarfs through genetic<br />

engineering, leading to improved varieties.<br />

Cloning and separation of genes often depends on the molecular<br />

genetic marker tightly linked to the gene. In this study, our objective<br />

was to find a marker that is tightly linked to the gene for dwarfism using<br />

near isogenic lines (NILs ) and RAPD technology (Fang et al., 2002).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIALS. Plant materials were provided from the<br />

pumpkin-breeding laboratory of the National Engineering Research<br />

Center for Vegetables (NERCV) in China. <strong>The</strong> plants used included<br />

‘MengRi’ (C. maxima Duchesne), the dwarf mutant Ai 10 (C. moschata<br />

Duchesne), nine pure NILs designated S1 through S9 (obtained through<br />

six backcrosses and two self-crosses) and 306 F2 individuals derived<br />

from the single-cross progeny of the NIL S2בMengRi’ and five<br />

long-vine C. maxima.<br />

METHODS. Genomic DNA was extracted from young expanding<br />

leaves following the CTAB protocol (Murray and Thompson, 1980).<br />

DNA concentration and quality were estimated by agarose gel<br />

electrophoresis. Final concentrations were adjusted to 30ng/ul. PCR<br />

reactions for RAPD markers were performed using standard procedures<br />

in the DNA PTC-100 (Dongsheng Chuangxin Biotechnology Co., Ltd).<br />

Products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels using a Kodak EDAS-120<br />

for imaging analysis and recording the polymorphic fragment.<br />

Data were analyzed Using JoinMap3.0 software (Van Ooijen and<br />

Vorrips, 2001) to calculate the genetic distance between the RAPD<br />

marker and the dwarf gene D. <strong>The</strong> data were denominated according to<br />

the rules of the JoinMap3.0 software. RAPD reamplification was<br />

performed using the marker linked to dwarf gene D. <strong>The</strong> product was<br />

detected on a 1% agarose gel. Bands were excised and purified by the<br />

Takara Agarose Gel DNA Purification Kit. PCR fragments were<br />

subcloned using the Promega PGEM-T easy Vector system. <strong>The</strong> DNA<br />

of the recombinant plasmid was verified by PCR after enzyme<br />

digestion.<br />

134 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Subcloned fragments were sequenced in ShangHai ShengGong<br />

Biological Engineering Services Limited and AoKe Biological<br />

Engineering Services Limited.<br />

PCR amplification was performed using SCAR primers on parents,<br />

nine pure lines of the NILs and 306 F2 generation plants, and visualized<br />

by agarose gel electrophoresis. <strong>The</strong> standard molecular weight marker<br />

is GeneRuler TM 100bp DNA Ladder Plus (MBI packing).<br />

Results<br />

ANALYSIS OF GENETIC DWARF GENE D. <strong>The</strong> experiments used a<br />

total of 306 separated F2 generation plants. Our field survey determined<br />

that 223 of the plants were dwarf and 83 were long-vine plants. We<br />

calculated X 2 =0.736< X 2 (0.05,1) =3.841, which is consistent with a 3:1<br />

separated ratio. This data suggests that the dwarf character is controlled<br />

by a single dominant gene, supporting the conclusions of Zhou et al.<br />

(1991).<br />

RAPD PRIMER SCREENING. Through screening 640 randomly<br />

primed amplifications, a total of 13 RAPD primers generated specific<br />

repeatable bands that appeared to associate with the drawf gene D<br />

phenotype. Selecting seven dwarf and seven long-vine plants randomly<br />

from the F2 progenies, we performed initial link analysis. A RAPD<br />

fragment amplified using primer S1225 (band 548bp, and named<br />

S1225-548) was present in the dwarf but not in the long-vine plants<br />

(Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> primer S1225 was used to carry out RAPD<br />

amplification and certification of 306 F2 plant progenies. Of these,<br />

seven plants had a dwarf phenotype inconsistent with the predicted<br />

RAPD band (Table 1). <strong>The</strong>se seven plants allowed us to map the<br />

distance between the RAPD marker and the dwarf gene D to 2.29 cM.<br />

<strong>The</strong> appearance of seven plants inconsistent with the predicted RAPD<br />

band may be due to an exchange between markers with dwarf gene D,<br />

which lost the linkage relationship. We further verified primer S1225s<br />

linkage to the dwarf gene D by screening the eight original NILs (Figure<br />

2) and the six C. maxima (Figure 3).<br />

LINKAGE ANALYSIS OF RAPD MARKER AND DWARF GENE D. <strong>The</strong><br />

F2 generation was analyzed with JoinMap3.0 software. <strong>The</strong> results<br />

suggest that the dwarf gene D has a genetic distance of 2.29cM to<br />

marker S1225-548. A SCAR marker (SCAR3-398) was developed from<br />

the sequencing of the S1225-548 RAPD marker using these primers:<br />

upstream primer sequence 5’-CTTGTCCATTCCTCCTCC-3’, and<br />

downstream primer sequence 5’-TCCACTCCCTCTTTTTCA-3’. <strong>The</strong><br />

amplification product fit to the RAPD expansion profile (Figure 4).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 135


Fig. 1. Patterns of ‘MengRi’ Ai10 S2 and some F2 individuals with RAPD primer<br />

S1225 (arrow indicates marker S1225-548). M = Marker; 1= ‘MengRi’; 2 = Ai10;<br />

3 = S2; 4–10 = normal plants in the F2 population; 11–17 = dwarf plants in the F2<br />

population.<br />

Fig. 2. Patterns of ‘MengRi’, Ai10, S2, and the other eight pure lines of NILs with<br />

RAPD primer S1225 (arrow indicates the marker S1225-548). M = Marker; 1=<br />

‘MengRi’; 2 = Ai10; 3 = S2; 4–11 = the other eight pure lines of the NILs (S1,<br />

S3–S9).<br />

136 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Fig. 3. Patterns of ‘MengRi’, Ai10, S2 and the cultivars of C. maxima with RAPD<br />

primer S1225 (arrow indicates the marker S1225-548). M = Marker; 1=<br />

‘MengRi’; 2 = Ai10; 3 = S2; 4–8 = the other five cultivars of C. maxima.<br />

Fig. 4. SCAR patterns of ‘MengRi’, Ai10, and some F2 individuals with primer<br />

SCAR3 (arrow indicates the marker SCAR3-398). M = Marker; 1= ‘MengRi’;<br />

2 = Ai10; 3–10 = normal plants in the F2 population; 11–14 = dwarf plants in the<br />

F2 population.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 137


Table 1: Cosegregation between S1225-548 and phenotype in the F2<br />

population from MengRi×Ai10 progenies.<br />

S1225-54<br />

Genetic<br />

Phenotype No. plant Presence Absence distance<br />

Long 83 4<br />

79<br />

Dwarf 223 220 3<br />

2.29cM<br />

Discussion<br />

Dwarf gene D is a dominant gene, though growing conditions can<br />

affect the growth habit of seedlings, sometimes making it difficult to<br />

accurately pheontype the plants for up to 35 days.<br />

Our RAPD and SCAR markers can be a useful tool to verify the D<br />

phenotype at the seedling stage. Bulked segregation analysis and NIL<br />

analysis allowed the linking of our RAPD marker to 2.29cM from the<br />

objective gene. Through theoretic calculation, the proportion of<br />

transmigration parents should be 98.438%. Currently we are screening<br />

more backcrosses to find a closer RAPD marker.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Fang, X-J. W-R. Wu, and J-L. Tang. 2002. Plant DNA molecular marker assisted<br />

breeding. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese.)<br />

Helliwell, C. A., C. C. Sheldon, M. R. Olive, A. R. Walker, J. A. D. Zeevaart, J. A. D.<br />

Peacock, and W. J. Dennis. 1998. Cloning of the Arabidopsis entkaurene oxidase<br />

gene GA3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:9019–9024<br />

Liu, J. and R-Z Li. 2005. Dwarf gene and GA signal transduction pathway in crops.<br />

Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 21(1):125–129. (In Chinese with English abstract.)<br />

Murray, M. G. and W. F. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight<br />

plant DNA. Nuc. Acids Res. 8:4321–4325<br />

Peng, J. R. et al. 1999. Green revolution genes encode mutant gibberellin response<br />

modulators. Nature. 400:256–261<br />

Sasaki, A. et al. 2002. Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin synthesis gene in rice:<br />

new insight into the rice variant that helped to avert famine over thirty years ago.<br />

Nature. 416:701–702<br />

Van Ooijen, J. W. and R. E. Voorrips. 2001. JoinMap3.0. Software for the calculation<br />

of genetic linkage maps. Plant Res. Int., Wageningen, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />

Zhao, S-Q. and W-H. Wu. 2000. DNA molecular markers and mapping. Biotech. Info.<br />

6:1–4. (In Chinese.)<br />

Zhou, X. and H. Li. 1991. A study on the heredity of cushaw (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a Moschata)<br />

vineless character and its utilization in production. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci. 1:1–6. (In<br />

Chinese.)<br />

138 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


REACTION OF MELON PI 313970 TO<br />

CUCURBIT LEAF CRUMPLE VIRUS<br />

James D. McCreight and Hsing-Yeh Liu<br />

U.S. Agricultural Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture,<br />

Agricultural Research Service, 1636 E. Alisal St.,<br />

Salinas, California 93905<br />

Thomas A. Turini<br />

University of California Cooperative Extension, Imperial County,<br />

1050 E. Holton Rd., Holtville, CA 92250-9615<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo, muskmelon, disease,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf curl virus, inheritance<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) is a recently described<br />

sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci [Gennadius]) biotype-B-transmitted<br />

begomovirus (Geminiviridae family) of cucurbits in the desert southwest U.S.A.<br />

‘Top Mark’, a standard, orange-flesh, western U.S. shipping-type melon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.) was susceptible and expressed severe symptoms in two<br />

naturally infected field tests in Imperial Valley, CA, in 2003 and 2004. PI<br />

313970, a kakri-type melon, exhibited resistance to CuLCrV in these tests; it<br />

was asymptomatic in 2003, but 20 of 30 plants evaluated in 2004 expressed<br />

symptoms. <strong>The</strong> difference in the reaction of PI 313970 could be due to seasonal<br />

differences in symptom expression, disease pressure, recovery from initial<br />

infection, and additional experience in assessing CuLCrV symptoms. Diseasesymptom<br />

data from a cross of ‘Top Mark’ and PI 313970 (F1, F2, and<br />

backcrosses to each parent) indicated recessive genetic control of the resistance<br />

reaction of PI 313970 to CuLCrV.<br />

S<br />

weetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), adversely<br />

affects yield and quality of a wide range of vegetable and<br />

agronomic crops worldwide directly through feeding damage or<br />

indirectly as a virus vector (Henneberry et al., 1998). Three new B.<br />

tabaci biotype-B-transmitted begomoviruses of cucurbits were<br />

observed in commercial cucurbit fields in the southwest U.S.A.,<br />

northern Mexico, and Guatemala beginning in 1998. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf<br />

crumple virus (CuLCrV) was observed in Imperial Valley, California,<br />

first on watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. & Nakai) in<br />

1998 (Guzman et al., 2000; Hernandez et al., 2000), and then on melon<br />

We thank Patti Fashing for assistance in the field and greenhouse tests, and Jeff Wasson and<br />

John Sears for assistance in the greenhouse and laboratory tests. Mention of a trade name,<br />

proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the<br />

USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 139


(Cucumis melo L.) in 1999 (Guzman et al., 2000). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf curl<br />

virus (CuLCV) occurred on pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.), honeydew, and<br />

muskmelon in Arizona, Texas, and Coahuilla, Mexico, in 1998<br />

(Brown et al., 2000). Melon chlorotic leaf curl virus (MCLCV)<br />

occurred on melon in Guatemala in 2000 (Brown et al., 2001).<br />

CuLCrV and CuLCV are identical based on percent nucleotide and<br />

amino acid similarities for open reading frames, and are distinct from<br />

Squash leaf curl virus (SLCV) on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. (Flock and Mayhew,<br />

1981) and MCLCV (Brown et al., 2002). CuLCrV symptoms are<br />

variable and include stunted and chlorotic tips and leaves (Figure 1A,<br />

B), crumpling (Figure 1B, C), and interveinal yellowing of leaves<br />

(Figure1D).<br />

C D<br />

Fig. 1. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) in a naturally infected field test:<br />

(A) susceptible plant showing stunted and chlorotic growing points; (B) close-up<br />

of chlorotic terminal bud and crumpled leaves; (C) crumpled leaves; and (D)<br />

interveinal yellowing.<br />

140 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Although the foliar symptoms have been widespread and severe<br />

during the fall cantaloupe season, from August to November, the<br />

presence of CuLCrV has not been associated with obvious decreases in<br />

cantaloupe yield or quality in Imperial Valley (T. A. Turini,<br />

unpublished). Severe and uniform infection of melons was observed in<br />

the fall of 2003 at the University of California, Desert Research and<br />

Education Center, Holtville (DREC), and the University of Arizona,<br />

Yuma Agricultural Research Center, Yuma. Symptoms were similar to<br />

SLCV, CuLCrV, and CuLCV, and were preceded by unusually high<br />

numbers of B. tabaci biotype B at the two research stations,<br />

documented at the Yuma site (J. C. Palumbo, unpublished data).<br />

Population density trends between Yuma and Imperial sites are similar<br />

(Yee et al., 1997).<br />

We report here data on the inheritance of the resistant reaction of<br />

PI 313970 to CuLCrV in two naturally infected field tests. PI 313970<br />

is a kakri-type melon from India that possesses resistance to B. tabaci<br />

biotype B (Boissot et al., 2000), Lettuce infectious yellows virus<br />

(LIYV) (McCreight, 2000), and powdery mildew incited by<br />

Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea) (McCreight, 2003).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

VIRUS CONFIRMATION AND IDENTIFICATION. Symptomatic melon<br />

leaf samples were taken from ‘Top Mark’ in both years. Total nucleic<br />

acids were isolated from 100mg of infected melon leaf tissue<br />

according to the method described by Li et al. (1998). <strong>The</strong> polymerase<br />

chain reaction (PCR) parameters used to amplify the CuLCrV DNA<br />

fragment were as follows: an initial denaturing step at 94°C for 5 min<br />

followed by 94°C, 40 sec for denaturing; 60°C, 40 sec for annealing;<br />

and 72°C, 1 min for extension for 35 cycles, with a final extension step<br />

of 72°C for 10 min. PCR-amplified DNA fragments were analyzed by<br />

electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels in 1X TAE buffer (40mM Trisacetate<br />

and 2mM EDTA, pH 8.0), stained with ethidium bromide and<br />

visualized with UV light. <strong>The</strong> primer pairs FA-908 (5’-<br />

ACCCCGTGTATGCGACATTG-3’), RA1-1419 (5’-CGACGAATA<br />

GACTTGGACTGCG-3’), and RA2-1601 (5’-<br />

AGGAATCCCATCAATCGTGC-3’) were designed from the<br />

sequence of CuLCrV DNA-A component (GenBank accession no.<br />

AF224760) to amplify AC2 and AC3 open reading frames. <strong>The</strong><br />

specific primer pair for CuLCrV, FB-1324 (5’-<br />

TTCTTCTGGTAAAATATGGC-3’) and RB-2370 (5’-<br />

CCGACGAGATATGTCAACG-3’), was designed from the sequence<br />

of CuLCrV DNA-B component (GenBank accession no. AF224761).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 141


<strong>The</strong> amplified products from AC2 and AC3 open reading frames were<br />

purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN Inc. Valencia,<br />

CA) and sequenced by a commercial company (MCLAB, South San<br />

Francisco, CA). Sequences were analyzed by the program MacVector<br />

7.0 (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA).<br />

INHERITANCE STUDY. Two naturally infected field tests were<br />

conducted in the fall melon seasons of 2003 and 2004. <strong>The</strong> studies were<br />

planted at DREC on 11 Sept. 2003 and 15 Sept. 2004, and irrigated, as<br />

needed, using subsurface drip. Each plot was 366cm long and consisted of<br />

three hills spaced 91cm apart with 91-cm buffers on each end; beds were<br />

203cm wide. Two seeds were planted per hill and thinned to one seedling<br />

at the first-true-leaf stage of growth. Each of the seven replications<br />

included one plot of each parent, one plot each of four reciprocal F1<br />

progenies (one TM x PI and three PI x TM), five plots of one F2 progeny,<br />

one plot of the backcross to ‘Top Mark’ (BCTM), and two plots of the<br />

backcross to PI 313970 (BCPI). Plants were inoculated by naturally<br />

occurring B. tabaci biotype B. Disease symptoms were recorded on 20<br />

Nov. 2003 and 7 Nov. 2004, and noted as present or absent.<br />

All F1, F2, and backcross progenies used in the field and greenhouse<br />

tests were produced using standard hand-pollination techniques for melon<br />

(Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997). Data were analyzed using chisquare.<br />

Yates correction was used for the analysis of the 2003 data from<br />

the F2 and BCPI families where the number of expected segregants in one<br />

class was less than 20 (Yates, 1931).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

VIRUS CONFIRMATION AND IDENTIFICATION. <strong>The</strong> CuLCrV-specific<br />

primer pair from BC1 region was amplified by PCR. A product size of<br />

about 1000bp was expected (Figure 2, lane 3). No products were found in<br />

similar preparations from healthy plants (Figure 2, lane 2). <strong>The</strong> expected<br />

product sizes from primer pairs used to amplify AC2 and AC3 open<br />

reading frames were obtained (Figure 2, lanes 4 and 5). <strong>The</strong> sequence<br />

analysis of AC2 and AC3 revealed a high degree of sequence identity with<br />

CuLCrV (100% and 99.0% for nucleotides and 100% and 97.7% for<br />

amino acids, respectively). <strong>The</strong> PCR and sequence analyses confirmed<br />

that the virus present in the inheritance studies was CuLCrV.<br />

INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE IN PI 313970. ‘Top Mark’ was<br />

highly susceptible in both years (Table 1) and exhibited pronounced<br />

CuLCrV symptoms (Figure 1). PI 313970 was asymptomatic in 2003,<br />

but 20 of the 31 plants in the test were symptomatic in 2004 (Table 1).<br />

PI 313970 was, therefore, not immune to CuLCrV. <strong>The</strong> difference in<br />

the observed reactions of PI 313970 in the two years could be due to<br />

142 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


one or more factors, including seasonal differences in symptom<br />

expression, disease pressure, recovery from initial infection, and<br />

additional experience in assessing CuLCrV symptoms.<br />

In 2003, whitefly and disease pressures were very high. CuLCrV<br />

generally occurred in isolated fields and to a very limited extent during<br />

May and June (Turini, unpublished). <strong>The</strong> planting in 2003 was subject<br />

to very high whitefly pressure and it is unlikely that PI 313970 escaped<br />

infection due to low or nonuniform insect pressure. Disease recovery<br />

may be a factor. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. were observed to recover from SLCV,<br />

Table 1. Reactions of ‘Top Mark’, PI 313970, and their F1, F2, and<br />

backcross families to natural infection by <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus<br />

in two field tests, Holtville, CA, Fall 2003 and Fall 2004 z .<br />

Entry<br />

Asympto-<br />

matic<br />

Sympto<br />

matic - Expected χ 2 P<br />

2003<br />

Top<br />

Mark<br />

(TM) 0 15 all S<br />

PI<br />

313970<br />

(PI) 18 0 all A<br />

F1 TM x PI 1 17 all S<br />

F1 PI x TM 2 52 all S<br />

F2 15 64 1 A:3 S 1.09 0.30<br />

BCTM 0 15 all S<br />

BC1PI 15 20 1 A:1 S 0.46 0.49<br />

2004<br />

Top<br />

Mark<br />

(TM) 3 17 all S<br />

PI<br />

313970<br />

(PI) 11 20 all A<br />

F1 TM x PI 6 24 all S<br />

F1 PI x TM 4 28 all S<br />

F2 38 129 1 A:3 S 0.08 0.78<br />

BCTM 2 19 all S<br />

BC1PI 23 34 1 A: 1 S 2.12 0.15<br />

z Yates correction applied to the 2003 analysis of F2 and BCPI segregation data.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 143


a related geminivirus, in field and greenhouse tests (McCreight and<br />

Kishaba, 1991). <strong>The</strong> 2003 test was evaluated 70 days after planting<br />

whereas the 2004 test was evaluated 53 days after planting. <strong>The</strong><br />

additional 17 days in 2003 may have been sufficient for PI 313970 to<br />

recover and appear asymptomatic.<br />

Regardless of the discrepancy in the reactions of PI 313970 to<br />

CuLCrV between years, the reciprocal F1 progenies were susceptible,<br />

and the F2 segregated in acceptable fits to a 3 susceptible:1 resistant<br />

(asymptomatic) ratio in both years (Table 1), clear indication of<br />

recessive control of the resistance reaction in PI 313970. <strong>The</strong><br />

backcrosses provided additional evidence for a recessive gene. <strong>The</strong><br />

backcross to ‘Top Mark’ was susceptible with only two escapes in<br />

2004 (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> backcross to PI 313970 segregated in an<br />

acceptable fit to a 1 susceptible:1 resistant (asymptomatic) in both<br />

years (Table 1).<br />

Fig. 2. A 1.0% agarose gel showing the products of polymerase chain reaction<br />

(PCR) for detection of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) in melon leaf<br />

tissue with CuLCrV-specific primer pairs. Lane 1, BRL 1kb ladder; Lane 2,<br />

from healthy melon leaf tissue; Lane 3 to Lane 5 from CuLCrV-infected melon<br />

leaf tissue. <strong>The</strong> primer pair for Lanes 2 and 3 was FB-1324 and RB-2370; Lane<br />

4 was primers FA-908 and RA1-1419; Lane 5 was primers FA-908 and RA2-<br />

1601.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Boissot, N., C. Pavis, R. Guillaume, D. Lafortune, and N. Sauvion. 2000. Insect<br />

resistance in Cucumis melo accession 90625. Proc. 7 th EUCARPIA meeting on<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>. Acta Hort. 510:297–304.<br />

Brown, J. K., A. M. Idris, C. Alteri, and D. C. Stenger. 2002. Emergence of a new<br />

cucurbit-infecting Begomovirus species capable of forming reassortants with<br />

144 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


elated viruses in the Squash leaf curl virus cluster. Phytopathology. 92:734–<br />

742.<br />

Brown, J. K., A. M. Idris, D. Rogan, M. H. Hussein, and M. Palmieri. 2001. Melon<br />

chlorotic leaf curl virus, a new begomovirus associated with Bemisia tabaci<br />

infestation in Guatemala. Plant Dis. 85:1027.<br />

Brown, J. K., A. M. Idris, M. W. Olsen, M. E. Miller, T. Isakeit, and J. Anciso. 2000.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf curl virus, a new whitefly-transmitted geminivirus in Arizona,<br />

Texas, and Mexico. Plant Dis. 84:809.<br />

Flock, R. A. and D. E. Mayhew. 1981. Squash leaf curl, a new disease of cucurbits<br />

in California. Plant Dis. 65:75–76.<br />

Guzman, P., M. R. Sudarshana, Y. S. Seo, M. R. Rojas, E. Natwick, T. Turini, K.<br />

Mayberry, and R. L. Gilbertson. 2000. A new bipartite geminivirus<br />

(Begomovirus) causing leaf curl and crumpling in cucurbits in the Imperial<br />

Valley of California. Plant Dis. 84:488.<br />

Henneberry, T. J., N. C. Toscano, and S. J. Castle. 1998. Bemisia spp. (Homoptera:<br />

Aleyrodidae) in the United <strong>State</strong>s history, pest status, and management. Recent<br />

Res. Dev. Ent. 2:151–161.<br />

Hernandez, N. A., M. R. Sudarshana, P. Guzman, and R. L. Gilbertson. 2000.<br />

Generation and characterization of infectious clones of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple<br />

virus, a new bipartite geminivirus from the Imperial Valley of California.<br />

.<br />

Li, R. H., G. C. Wisler, H. Y. Liu, and J. E. Duffus. 1998. Comparison of diagnostic<br />

techniques for detection of tomato infectious chlorosis virus. Plant Dis. 82:84–<br />

88.<br />

McCreight, J. D. 2000. Inheritance of resistance to lettuce infectious yellows virus in<br />

melon. HortSci. 35:1118–1120.<br />

McCreight, J. D. 2003. Genes for resistance to powdery mildew races 1 and 2 U.S. in<br />

melon PI 313970. HortSci. 38:591–594.<br />

McCreight, J. D.and A. N. Kishaba. 1991. Reaction of cucurbit species to squash<br />

leaf curl virus and sweetpotato whitefly. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116:137–141.<br />

Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />

NY.<br />

Yates, F. 1931. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Suppl. J.<br />

Royal Stat. Soc. 1:215–235.<br />

Yee, W. L., J. C. Palumbo, N. C. Toscano, M. J. Blua, and H. A. Yoshida. 1997.<br />

Seasonal population trends and densities of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera:<br />

Aleyrodidae) on Alfalfa in southern California and Arizona. Env. Ent. 26:241–<br />

249.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 145


THE MELON GENOMIC LIBRARY OF NEAR ISOGENIC<br />

LINES: A TOOL FOR DISSECTING COMPLEX TRAITS<br />

Antonio José Monforte, Iban Eduardo, and Pere Arús<br />

Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Cabrils, Spain<br />

Juan Pablo Fernández-Trujillo, Javier Obando,<br />

Juan Antonio Martínez, and Antonio Luís Alarcón<br />

Technical University of Cartagena (ETSIA) and Institute of Plant<br />

Biotechnology Cartagena, Spain<br />

Esther van der Knaap<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ohio <strong>State</strong> University/OARDC, Wooster, OH<br />

Jose María Álvarez<br />

Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón,<br />

Zaragoza, Spain<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, QTL, fruit quality, introgression<br />

line, marker- assisted selection<br />

ABSTRACT. A doubled haploid line (DHL) population of melon derived from a<br />

cross between the Korean accession PI 161375 (SC) and the Spanish Inodorus<br />

cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) was used to develop a collection of near isogenic<br />

lines (NILs). Selected DHLs were backcrossed to PS and further backcrossing<br />

and selfing was performed, monitoring introgressions from SC using molecular<br />

markers. A final collection of 57 NILs was obtained, containing a unique<br />

independent introgression from SC in the PS genetic background. <strong>The</strong><br />

introgressions within the collection cover at least 85% of the SC genome, with<br />

an average introgression size of 41cM, corresponding to 3.4% of the SC genome.<br />

<strong>The</strong> melon NIL genomic library was used to dissect the genetic control of melon<br />

fruit shape. A total of 15 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were detected, 8 of them<br />

producing round melons and 7 producing elongated melons. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

demonstrate that the melon NIL genomic library is a powerful tool for the study<br />

of QTLs involved in important complex traits, introduction of new genetic<br />

variability in modern cultivars from exotic sources, or the development of<br />

precompetitive breeding lines in melon-breeding projects.<br />

M<br />

elon (Cucumis melo) is the most diversified species of the<br />

genus Cucumis, and this variability is reflected at the<br />

morphological, physiological, biochemical (Kirkbride,<br />

1993; Liu et al., 2004), and molecular (Stepansky et al., 1999; Mliki et<br />

al., 2001; Akashi et al., 2002; Monforte et al., 2003) levels. A high<br />

proportion of the genetic variability can be found in African, Indian,<br />

and Oriental germplasm, which are considered exotic relative to<br />

European and <strong>North</strong> American cultivars. Exotic germplasm has been<br />

used to search for resistance genes, but its potential as a source of new<br />

major gene and quantitative trait locus (QTL) alleles with favorable<br />

146 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


effects on fruit quality has not been thoroughly investigated.<br />

Furthermore, the genetic control of fruit morphological variation is<br />

largely unknown.<br />

QTLs involved in fruit-quality traits have been detected in three<br />

different crosses involving European cultivars and exotic Asian<br />

accessions (Périn et al., 2002; Monforte et al., 2004). However, a more<br />

thorough analysis is needed to assess the suitability of incorporating<br />

new alleles from exotic germplasm into elite melon cultivars.<br />

Werhahn and Allard (1965) demonstrated that individual QTL<br />

effects can be efficiently estimated using backcross inbred lines, each<br />

having a low proportion of the donor genome. Eshed and Zamir (1994,<br />

1995) further developed the idea, constructing an introgression line<br />

(IL) population consisting of a set of lines where each contained a<br />

single homozygous chromosome segment from a donor parent, in the<br />

genetic background of an elite cultivar. A NIL population can be<br />

defined as a genomic library where inserts are chromosome fragments<br />

of the donor-parent genome and the vector is the recurrent-parent<br />

genome. QTL analysis is very efficient using NIL collections (Eshed<br />

and Zamir, 1995). Fine mapping and cloning of genes underlying the<br />

QTL is more expeditious when introgression lines are used (Frary et<br />

al., 2000).<br />

In the current report, we present the construction of a NIL<br />

collection in melon. A Spanish ‘Piel de Sapo’ cultivar (PS), belonging<br />

to the horticultural group Inodorus, was chosen as the recipient<br />

genotype. PS fruits are very sweet, oval, white-fleshed, and<br />

nonclimacteric (Monforte et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> Korean cultivar<br />

‘Songwhan Charmi’ accession PI 161375 (SC), included in the<br />

horticultural group Conomon, was chosen as the donor genotype<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors thank A. Montejo, A. Ortigosa, E. Moreno, F. García, E. Truque, M. C.<br />

García-Abellán, M. Cánovas (CIFACITA S. L.), A. B. Pérez, and N. Welty for<br />

technical assistance. This work was funded in part by grants AGL2003-09175-C02-<br />

01 and AGL2003-09175-C02-02 from the Spanish Ministry of Education and<br />

Science and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER, European Union), and<br />

the Fundación Séneca de la Región de Murcia (00620/PI/04). AJM was supported in<br />

part by a contract from Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y<br />

Alimentaria (INIA) and by a fellowship from the Departament d’Universitats,<br />

Recerca i Societat de la Informació (Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain). IE and JO<br />

were supported by fellowships from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science<br />

and the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, respectively. Field space and personnel<br />

at the WO location were provided by the Ohio Research and Development Center of<br />

Ohio <strong>State</strong> University. Thanks are due to Semillas Fitó S. A. for providing the seeds<br />

of the parental PS line.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 147


ased on phenotypic and molecular data. <strong>The</strong> genetic distance between<br />

PS and SC is one of the highest described between two cultivars within<br />

melon germplasm (Garcia-Mas et al., 2000; Monforte et al., 2003). SC<br />

presents some resistance to some diseases and pests, and its fruits are<br />

pear-shaped, green-fleshed, with low sugar content (Monforte et al.,<br />

2004). <strong>The</strong> NIL collection was used to study the genetic control of<br />

melon fruit shape.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of the melon NIL genomic library is detailed in<br />

Eduardo et al. (2005). Briefly, 30 selected doubled haploid lines<br />

derived from the cross between a ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) genotype and the<br />

accession PI 161375 (SC) were backcrossed to PS. <strong>The</strong> selected 30<br />

DHLxPS were considered as our initial BC1 (first generation of<br />

backcrossing) population. All 30 BC1 genotypes were backcrossed to<br />

PS. Next, 12 BC1 progenies were chosen to found the BC2 generation<br />

(192 plants in total). BC2 plants were backcrossed to PS and genotyped<br />

with 65 molecular markers, covering the whole genome (see below).<br />

BC3 families with candidate introgressions and a lower proportion of<br />

donor genome were selected according to BC2 genotypes. Seedlings<br />

from each BC3 family were genotyped in order to select the target<br />

regions and discard other exotic introgressions. Several rounds of<br />

marker-assisted selection (MAS), backcrossing with PS, and selfpollination<br />

were performed to obtain a set of NILs with a single<br />

introgression from the SC donor genome.<br />

DNA was extracted as described by Klimyuk et al. (1993) and<br />

Garcia-Mas et al. (2000) from cotyledons and young leaves. <strong>The</strong><br />

molecular markers included 62 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), one<br />

cleavage amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS), and two sequence<br />

characterized amplified regions (SCARs) selected from the map of<br />

Gonzalo et al. (2005). SSRs were amplified as in Gonzalo et al. (2005)<br />

and visualized using a LI-COR IR 2 sequencer (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln,<br />

NE). Bands were scored visually and the molecular weight of each<br />

band was estimated by comparing its migration on electrophoresis<br />

with the IRD-labelled STR molecular size marker (Li-Cor Inc.,<br />

Lincoln, NE). <strong>The</strong> SCAR markers were genotyped as described by<br />

Morales et al. (2004).<br />

A selected set of 27 NILs was evaluated in four locations in the<br />

summer of 2004: Cabrils, Spain (CA), Zaragoza, Spain (ZA),<br />

Cartagena, Spain (CT), and Wooster, Ohio, USA (WO). In CA, 10<br />

plants of each NIL and 100 controls (PS) were grown in a greenhouse<br />

in peat bags, drip-irrigated. In ZA, four plots of 3 plants for each NIL<br />

148 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


and 14 plots of PS were randomized in the field. In CT and WO, 10<br />

plants of each NIL and 50 plants of PS were transferred to the field in<br />

a <strong>complete</strong>ly randomized design.<br />

Fruit-shape index (FS) was calculated as the ratio between<br />

maximum fruit length and maximum fruit diameter. NIL mean values<br />

were compared with the control genotype PS using the Dunnet contrast<br />

(Dunnet, 1955) with Type-I error α ≤ 0.05 for each location.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> melon NIL genomic library includes 57 NILs, each of them<br />

containing a single homozygotic introgression from SC, with an<br />

average introgression size of 41.0cM (approximately 3.4% of the SC<br />

genome), ranging from 6.8 to 100.8cM (0.6% to 8.9% of the donor<br />

genome) in the PS genetic background (Eduardo et al., 2005). Each<br />

linkage group was represented by an average of 4.75 NILs with<br />

overlapping introgressions. <strong>The</strong> average genetic resolution to map new<br />

molecular markers or QTLs is 18.9cM, although the resolution can be<br />

increased easily by generating new recombinants from selected NILs<br />

allowing fine mapping or map-based cloning of QTLs (Fridman et al.,<br />

2000).<br />

Three NILs were already used to verify the QTLs involved in<br />

several fruit traits: fruit shape (fs1.1 and fs9.1), external color (ecol9.1),<br />

and flesh color (gf1.1) (Monforte et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> effects of these<br />

QTLs were verified using NILs with introgressions in the candidate<br />

regions (Eduardo et al., 2004). To assess further the suitability of the<br />

NIL library to dissect complex traits, the genetic control of fruit shape<br />

was studied with a selected set of NILs evaluated in four locations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of this experiment are summarized in<br />

Table 1. FS of the recurrent parent was moderately elongate. <strong>The</strong><br />

overall mean of the NIL library was similar to PS; however there was<br />

important variation among NILs, ranging from <strong>complete</strong>ly round to<br />

extremely elongate, demonstrating the high genetic variability within<br />

this population for this trait (Figure 1).<br />

Sixteen NILs were significantly different in at least one location.<br />

Eight of them had fruits that were between 11 and 52% more<br />

elongated than the control, and the other 8 produced 10–28% rounder<br />

fruits. Three showed significant effects in all locations, and 5 showed<br />

significant effects in only one location. <strong>The</strong> minimum number of<br />

QTLs estimated as affecting this trait was 15. Périn et al. (2002)<br />

detected seven QTLs for FS, as did Monforte et al. (2004). All these<br />

QTLs have been detected with the NIL genomic library in at least one<br />

location. Furthermore, the number of detected QTLs was significantly<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 149


Table 1. Fruit-shape index means and standard deviations for recurrent<br />

genotypes ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS), the overall NIL library mean, and the<br />

range among NILs among four locations.<br />

Cabrils Cartagena Wooster Zaragoza<br />

PS 1.26 ± 0.08 1.39 ± 0.10 1.42 ± 0.08 1.48 ± 0.06<br />

NIL library 1.30 ± 0.16 1.40 ± 0.16 1.45 ± 0.21 1.45 ± 0.18<br />

Range 0.98–1.72 1.00–1.74 1.11–2.03 1.09–1.86<br />

higher using the NIL genomic library, demonstrating the high<br />

efficiency of this novel population to dissect complex traits in melon.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results reported in the present article are only a first example<br />

of the possible applications of the melon NIL genomic library. This<br />

resource could also be useful for studying traits useful to consumers,<br />

such as nutrition, pharmaceutical-compound content, aroma, flavor,<br />

texture, external aspect, shelf life, and sensitivity to internal disorders,<br />

as well as for detecting new allelic variability that could also be a<br />

resource for modern breeding programs. For example, designing<br />

cultivars with appropriate fruit shape for automatic fruit processing is<br />

critical for reducing mechanical damage, and fruit shape is also an<br />

important factor in consumer preferences. In the current work, some<br />

highly heritable QTLs modifying FS have been identified that would<br />

allow the design of melons adapted for different markets by<br />

introducing these QTLs in modern cultivars, using marker-assisted<br />

selection.<br />

<strong>The</strong> allelic variability detected in this NIL population is obviously<br />

only a small portion of the melon genetic variability. New crosses<br />

between distantly related cultivars or accessions are necessary to<br />

understand globally the genetic variability in melon germplasm.<br />

Further analysis of this NIL population, including fine mapping,<br />

candidate gene analysis, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and mapbased<br />

cloning, will provide a body of data comparable to other model<br />

species.<br />

In summary, we present a study of the genetics of fruit shape in<br />

melon, using a newly available melon NIL genomic library. <strong>The</strong><br />

results presented here can provide a starting point for further<br />

characterization of the genetic factors involved in melon fruit quality.<br />

Future studies with this and other similar populations will allow<br />

150 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


efficient, systematic, and straightforward manipulation of the allelic<br />

variability present in melon germplasm.<br />

Fig. 1. Images of typical fruits from the parent genotypes PS and PI 161375 and<br />

from several NILs showing the variability in fruit shape within the NIL genomic<br />

library.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Akashi, Y., N. Fukuda, T. Wako, M. Masuda, and K. Kato. 2002. Genetic variation<br />

and phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo<br />

L., based on the analysis of five isozymes. Euphytica. 125:385–396.<br />

Dunnet, C. W. 1955. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several<br />

treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50:1096–1121.<br />

Eduardo, I., P. Arús, and A. J. Monforte. 2004. Genetics of fruit quality in melon.<br />

verification of QTLs involved in fruit shape with near-isogenic lines (NILs), p.<br />

499–502. In: A. Lebeda and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in cucurbit genetics and<br />

breeding research. Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Eduardo, I., P. Arus, and A. J. Monforte. 2005. Development of a genomic library of<br />

near isogenic lines (NILs) in melon (Cucumis melo L.) from the exotic accession<br />

PI 161375. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 112:139–148.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 151


Eshed, Y. and D. Zamir. 1994. A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L.<br />

esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica. 79:175–179.<br />

Eshed, Y. and D. Zamir. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon<br />

pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of<br />

yield-associated QTL. Genetics. 141:1147–1162.<br />

Frary, A., T. C. Nesbitt, S. Grandillo, E. van der Knaap, B. Cong, J. Liu, J. Meller, R.<br />

Elber, K. B. Alpert, and S. D. Tanksley. 2000. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus<br />

key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Sci. 289:85–88.<br />

Fridman, E., T. Pleban, and D. Zamir. 2000. A recombination hotspot delimits a<br />

wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an<br />

invertase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:4718–4723.<br />

Garcia-Mas, J., M. Oliver, H. Gómez-Paniagua, and M. C. de Vicente. 2000.<br />

Comparing AFLP, RAPD and RFLP markers for measuring genetic diversity in<br />

melon. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 101:860–864.<br />

Gonzalo, M. J., M. Oliver, J. Garcia-Mas, A. Monfort, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, N. Katzir,<br />

P. Arus, and A. J. Monforte. (2005). Simple-sequence repeat markers used in<br />

merging linkage maps of melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

110:802−811.<br />

Kirkbride, J. H. 1993. Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumis<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Parkway, Boone, NC.<br />

Klimyuk, V. I., B. J. Carroll, C. M. Thomas, and J. D. G. Jones. 1993. Alkali<br />

treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. Plant<br />

J. 3:493–494.<br />

Liu, L., F. Kakihara, and M. Kato. 2004. Characterization of six varieties of Cucumis<br />

melo L. based on morphological and physiological characters, including shelflife<br />

of fruit. Euphytica. 135:305–313.<br />

Mliki, A., J. E. Staub, Z. Y. Sun, and A. Ghorbel. 2001. Genetic diversity in melon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.): an evaluation of African germplasm. Genet. Res. Crop. Ev.<br />

48:587–597.<br />

Monforte, A. J., J. Garcia-Mas, and P. Arus. 2003. Genetic variability in melon<br />

based on microsatellite variation. Plant Breed. 122:153–157.<br />

Monforte, A. J., M. Oliver, M. J. Gonzalo, J. M. Alvarez, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, and P.<br />

Arus. 2004. Identification of quantitative trait loci involved in fruit quality traits<br />

in melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 108:750–758.<br />

Morales, M., E. Roig, A. J. Monforte, P. Arus, and J. Garcia-Mas. 2004. Singlenucleotide<br />

polymorphisms detected in expressed sequence tags of melon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.). Genome. 47:352−360.<br />

Périn, C., L. S. Hagen, N. Giovinazzo, D. Besombes, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat.<br />

2002. Genetic control of fruit shape acts prior to anthesis in melon (Cucumis<br />

melo L.). Mol. Genet. Genom. 266:933–941.<br />

Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of<br />

melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation.<br />

Plant Syst. & Evol. 217:313–332.<br />

Wehrhahn C. and R. W. Allard. 1965. <strong>The</strong> detection and measurement of the effects<br />

of individual genes involved in the inheritance of a quantitative character in<br />

wheat. Genetics. 51:109–119.<br />

152 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


MOLECULAR MARKERS ASSOCIATED<br />

WITH QUANTITATIVE CONTROL OF<br />

BETA-CAROTENE SYNTHESIS IN<br />

CUCUMIS MELO L.<br />

A. B. Napier, S. O. Park, and K. M. Crosby<br />

Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural<br />

Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843<br />

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Weslaco, Texas, 78596<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Inheritance, segregation, progeny, polymorphism<br />

ABSTRACT. Flesh color in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) is considered to be<br />

controlled by two genes, gf (green flesh) and wf (white flesh). <strong>The</strong> epistatic<br />

interactions between the genes produce orange flesh color. <strong>The</strong> intensity of<br />

orange flesh color, caused by the levels of beta-carotene, appears to be<br />

quantitatively inherited. Our study of two F2 populations, formed from the<br />

initial cross of ‘Sunrise’ (white fleshed) with ‘TAM Uvalde’ (orange fleshed),<br />

resulted in a continuous distribution of beta-carotene concentrations from high<br />

to low, which suggests quantitative inheritance for this trait. A chi-square test<br />

for our segregating F2 populations corresponded with expected segregation<br />

ratios. From an F2 population, two DNA bulks were composed of either eight<br />

high or eight low beta-carotene F2 individuals. <strong>The</strong> bulks were screened for<br />

detecting polymorphic molecular markers using 128 primer combinations with<br />

the polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />

technique (PCR-AFLP); this technique did not provide useful polymorphisms.<br />

Additional bulks were created using six high and six low beta-carotene F2<br />

individuals. <strong>The</strong>se bulks were screened using random amplified polymorphic<br />

DNA (RAPD) primers. Of 510 primers screened, 47 produced marker<br />

polymorphisms between parents and bulks.<br />

M<br />

uskmelons play an important role in the American diet.<br />

Ranked as one of the top 10 most-consumed fruits by the<br />

USDA, muskmelons have the highest amount of betacarotene<br />

among these top 10 fruits. Beta-carotene, also called provitamin<br />

A, is an essential nutrient required for eye health, and may<br />

have the potential as an antioxidant to reduce the risks associated with<br />

cancer, heart disease, and other illnesses (Lester, 1997).<br />

This material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative <strong>State</strong> Research,<br />

Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture “Designing Foods<br />

for Health” under Agreement No. 2004-34402-14768 or 2005-34402-16401. We<br />

would also like to acknowledge Dr. Monica Menz for her assistance with AFLP<br />

procedures, techniques, and supplies.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 153


<strong>Breeding</strong> melon varieties with increased levels of beta-carotene<br />

will benefit consumer health. Many phytonutrients are most<br />

bioavailable when consumed in their fresh form, rather than as vitamin<br />

supplements. <strong>The</strong> higher level of beta-carotene found in some melons<br />

has a genotypic component, which may be used to breed melons high<br />

in beta-carotene. Molecular markers and marker-assisted selection<br />

(MAS) can be used to increase the efficacy of the breeding process,<br />

while lowering breeding costs. Developed markers can also be used to<br />

easily screen existing lines for high beta-carotene content.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

An F2 population was created by self-pollinating F1 progeny of<br />

‘Sunrise’, the white-fleshed female parent, crossed with ‘TAM<br />

Uvalde’, a high beta-carotene variety. A field population consisting of<br />

117 F2 individuals and a greenhouse population containing 90 F2<br />

individuals were grown. <strong>The</strong> resulting fruit samples were subjected to<br />

hexane extraction followed by spectrophotometric analysis (Fish et al.,<br />

2002) and ranked according to beta-carotene content. Genomic DNA<br />

was extracted from young leaf tissue by the method of Skroch and<br />

Nienhuis (1995). Two eight-plant DNA bulks composed of either high<br />

or low beta-carotene F2 individuals were screened for polymorphic<br />

molecular markers (Michelmore et al., 1991). Primers based on<br />

EcoRI+3 and MseI+3 were used to create 128 combinations, which<br />

were screened using the amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />

(AFLP) technique described by Vos et al. (1995).<br />

Additional bulks were created consisting of six high and six low<br />

beta-carotene F2 individuals. Random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />

(RAPD) primers were also used to screen between bulks, using the<br />

method described by Skroch and Nienhuis (1995). A total of 510<br />

RAPD primers were screened.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> levels of beta-carotene found in the parents were as expected.<br />

‘Sunrise’ had consistently low levels while the beta-carotene quantities<br />

found in ‘TAM Uvalde’ averaged about 26µg/g. Beta-carotene levels<br />

within the F2 populations were quite variable, and in some cases much<br />

higher than ‘TAM Uvalde’ (Table 1). This indicates that the quantity<br />

of beta-carotene produced in each progeny fruit is quantitatively<br />

controlled.<br />

<strong>The</strong> segregation ratios of our F2 populations further confirm the<br />

results presented by Clayberg (1992) and Monforte et al. (2004) (Table<br />

2). If orange flesh is always dominant to white and green flesh color,<br />

154 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Beta-carotene content in fruit of field and greenhouse F2<br />

populations.<br />

Beta-<br />

Generation/<br />

Average beta- Standard carotene<br />

description<br />

carotene, μg/g deviation range, μg/g<br />

P1, Sunrise 1.41 0.41<br />

P2, TAMU 25.91 8.20<br />

F2, (P1 × P2) greenhouse 12.81 9.32 1.13-40.17<br />

F2, (P1 × P2) field 15.32 9.36 1.41-50.25<br />

Table 2. Expected and actual melon-flesh color segregation ratios<br />

Generation/<br />

Description Total Orange White Green<br />

P1, Sunrise 9 0 9 0<br />

P2, TAMU 6 6 0 0<br />

F2, (P1 × P2)<br />

green-house<br />

79 58 13 8<br />

F2, (P1 × P2)<br />

field<br />

117 92 12 13<br />

Ratios χ2<br />

Expected Actual Accept Ho Actual ά<br />

F2 g-house<br />

o:w:g 12:3:1 12:3:1 5.99 2.15 0.05<br />

o:no z F2 field<br />

3:1 3:1 3.84 0.11 0.05<br />

o:w:g 12:3:1 7:1:1 5.99 9.14 0.05<br />

o:no<br />

z<br />

no = not orange.<br />

3:1 3:1 3.84 0.82 0.05<br />

then a simple segregation of 3:1 (orange: white+green) is expected.<br />

<strong>The</strong> segregation ratios for both F2 populations match this. <strong>The</strong><br />

epistatic interaction between the genes wf and gf create the three<br />

observed flesh colors in a ratio of 12:3:1. <strong>The</strong> segregation ratio of the<br />

greenhouse F2 population corresponds to this ratio. <strong>The</strong> chi-square test<br />

indicates that the field-grown F2 population did not have the expected<br />

segregation ratio of 12:3:1. <strong>The</strong> variation found between the field and<br />

greenhouse populations could be caused by uncontrollable<br />

environmental factors or, as mentioned by Clayberg (1992), the<br />

inherent difficulties associated with differentiating white and green<br />

flesh color. <strong>The</strong> ideal ratios from the greenhouse plants are also<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 155


indicative of the previously assumed parental genotypes. To achieve<br />

the 12:3:1 ratio, the genotypes of ‘TAM Uvalde’ and ‘Sunrise’ would<br />

be wf+wf+/gf-gf- and wf-wf-/gf+gf+, respectively.<br />

After performing the initial AFLP primer screenings, no useful<br />

polymorphic data could be obtained. Of the 510 random primers<br />

screened, 47 primers have generated marker polymorphisms; an<br />

example of RAPD marker OAC09.900 is shown in Figure 1. Of those<br />

markers, 19 were derived from ‘Sunrise’ and 28 were derived from<br />

‘TAM Uvalde.’ Further screening of these primers is needed to<br />

determine their significance throughout our F2 populations, and their<br />

potential utility for marker-assisted selection within other breeding<br />

lines. <strong>The</strong> 47 RAPD primers generating clear polymorphic bands will<br />

be used to screen the entire greenhouse F2 population. RAPD markers<br />

demonstrating linkage to the high beta-carotene phenotype within the<br />

greenhouse population, will be screened within the field population to<br />

determine the extent of environmental affects on relevant genes or<br />

QTL.<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

- 1500 bp<br />

- 900 bp<br />

- 600 bp<br />

Fig. 1. RAPD marker OAC09.900 expressing polymorphism between two DNA<br />

bulks from high and low beta-carotene F2 plants. 1 = Sunrise (low parent); 2 =<br />

TAM Uvalde (high parent); 3 = DNA bulk from low beta-carotene F2 plants; 4 =<br />

DNA bulk from high beta-carotene F2 plants; and 5 = molecular size marker.<br />

Secondary evaluations of the primer combinations used in the<br />

RAPD screenings are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn<br />

156 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


egarding genetic linkage relationships. Our current findings comply<br />

with already well-known flesh-color genes, but we are still pursuing<br />

the quantitative genetic aspects of beta-carotene content.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Clayberg, C. D. 1992. Interaction and linkage tests of flesh color genes in Cucumis<br />

melo L. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. 15:53–54.<br />

Fish, W. W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative<br />

assay for lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents.<br />

J. Food Comp. Anal. 15:309–317.<br />

Lester, G. E. 1997. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit nutritional quality and health<br />

functionality. HortTech. 7:222–227.<br />

Michelmore, R. W., L. Paran, and R. V. Kesseli. 1991. Identification of markers<br />

linked to disease resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method<br />

to detect markers in specific genomic regions using segregating populations.<br />

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:9828–9832.<br />

Monforte, A. J., M. Oliver, M. J. Gonzalo, J. M Alvarez, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, and P.<br />

Arus. 2004. Identification of quantitative trait loci involved in fruit quality traits<br />

in melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.108:750–758.<br />

Skroch, P. W. and J. Nienhuis. 1995. Qualitative and quantitative characterization<br />

of RAPD variation among snap bean genotypes. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

91:1078–1085.<br />

Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters,<br />

J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique<br />

for DNA fingerprinting. Nuc. Acids Res. 23:4407–4414.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 157


A NEW EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR<br />

PRODUCING SEEDLESS WATERMELON<br />

FRUITS FROM SOME DIPLOID CULTIVARS<br />

S. Omran<br />

Horticulture Research Institute <strong>Breeding</strong> and Genetics of Vegetable<br />

Dept. Agriculture Research Center, Egypt<br />

K. Sugiyama<br />

National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region<br />

Hitsujigaoka, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo, 062-8555, Japan<br />

A. Glala<br />

Horticulture Technology Department<br />

National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Tetraploid, pollen grains, pollenizer<br />

ABSTRACT. In this paper, we present a new technique for the production of<br />

diploid seedless watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) from some diploid watermelon<br />

cultivars by using tetraploid plants as the pollen source. Diploid seedless<br />

watermelon fruits were obtained from ‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ when their<br />

female flowers were pollinated with pollen grains from tetraploid watermelon<br />

(Lines SS100 and SS200). However, this technique was not effective with those<br />

cultivars producing large seeds, such as ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’. Large, empty seed<br />

coats were obtained in their fruits when their female flowers were pollinated<br />

with pollen grains from tetraploid watermelon (Lines SS100 and SS200). Almost<br />

no difference was obtained between seeded and seedless fruits of diploid<br />

watermelon, with regard to appearance, fruit maturity, fruit weight, fruit<br />

shape, flesh color, and rind thickness. <strong>The</strong> exception was that seedless fruits<br />

recorded a slightly higher percentage of total soluble solids. No hollow heart or<br />

misshapen fruits were found when the new technique was used. This new<br />

technique has potential utility for commercial production of inexpensive<br />

seedless watermelon fruits.<br />

W<br />

hile seedless watermelon fruits have become very popular<br />

in the developed countries because they are easier to eat<br />

(Sugiyama and Morishita, 2000), seedless watermelon fruits<br />

are still very expensive for most watermelon consumers around the<br />

world due to high production costs. Moreover, the breeding of<br />

commercial triploid cultivars is more time consuming, challenging,<br />

and expensive than the breeding of diploid cultivars (Kihara 1951).<br />

Hence the diversity of triploid watermelon genetics is not as large as<br />

that of the diploid. To overcome this problem, many have investigated<br />

the potential of producing seedless watermelon fruits from diploid<br />

158 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


plants directly. Seedless watermelon fruits can be produced by using<br />

plant growth regulators such as NAA (1-naphthalene acetic acid)<br />

(Buttrose and Sedgley, 1979) and CPPU (N-[2-chloropyridyl]-Nphenylurea)<br />

(Hayata et al., 1995; Kano, 2000). However, using plant<br />

growth regulators has occasionally resulted in deformed fruits, because<br />

the female flowers (ovaries) were injured by directly spraying or<br />

rubbing growth regulators on them. This method also poses potential<br />

food-safety problems, and therefore has not been used. Producing<br />

seedless watermelon fruits on diploid plants by using pollen irradiation<br />

with soft-X-ray has been recently developed (Sugiyama and Morishita,<br />

2000; Watanabe et al 2002). This method makes it possible to produce<br />

seedless fruits from any diploid cultivars with no loss in fruit quality.<br />

One of the shortcomings of the technique lies in the occurrence of<br />

empty seed coats in the fruit (Watanabe, et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> number and<br />

size of empty seed coats varies among cultivars (Sugiyama and<br />

Marishata, 2000). Also the application of pollen irradiation with soft-<br />

X-ray can be implemented only in specialized laboratories because of<br />

safety and health considerations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> current study aims to develop a simple technique for<br />

producing seedless fruits from diploid cultivars for commercial<br />

production in the fields that can easily and safely be applied by small<br />

producers and that will eliminate the potential danger of using either<br />

growth regulators or soft X-ray-irradiation.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Seedlings of four diploid watermelons cultivars (‘Giza1’, ‘Crimson<br />

Sweet’, ‘Targi’, and ‘Aswan’ F1) and two tetraploid lines (SS100 and<br />

SS200) were transplanted in the field at a spacing of 1m in-row and<br />

2m between rows on 1 March in 2004 and 2005. Five plants of each<br />

genotype were transplanted in every treatment. Three replications in<br />

<strong>complete</strong> randomized block design were conducted. Other agriculture<br />

practices were carried out based on commercial recommendations for<br />

the growing area. At flowering stage, each male flower of the<br />

tetraploid plants and each female flower of the diploid plants was<br />

covered with a paper bag the day before anthesis. All bagged male<br />

flowers of the tetraploid plants were collected in the morning on the<br />

day of anthesis and used for hand-pollinating the bagged diploid<br />

female flowers for 40 days. In addition to the bagged flowers that were<br />

pollinated, some female flowers were artificially self-pollinated on all<br />

diploid genotypes as a comparison (control) treatment. All handpollinated<br />

female flowers were quickly re-covered with a bag for 3–5<br />

days to prevent contamination with insect-borne pollen (Sugiyama and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 159


Morishita 2000). Mature diploid fruits of ‘Giza 1’ were harvested 45<br />

days postpollination; ‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ 40 days; and<br />

‘Targi’ 35 days.<br />

Fruit weight, shape, rind thickness, sugar content (total soluble<br />

solids; TSS), and hollow heart were recorded for all treatments on the<br />

day of harvesting. All recorded data were analyzed using the Statistical<br />

Analysis System (SAS Version10.2; Cary, NC).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> response of the four diploid genotypes to the tetraploid<br />

pollenizer is shown with respect to the number of fully developed<br />

(hard) and empty (seed coats only) seeds per fruit. Note the hard seed<br />

produced with the diploid pollenizers and no seed produced with the<br />

tetraploid pollenizers in ‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’. Empty seed<br />

coats and some hard seed, however, were produced when the tetraploid<br />

was used as a pollenizer for ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’. <strong>The</strong> effect of the<br />

tetraploid pollenizer on the appearance and inner quality of fruits is<br />

shown in Figure 1. <strong>The</strong> fruits had similar rind and flesh<br />

characteristics, except for the presence of hard seeds in three of four<br />

cases.<br />

<strong>The</strong> response of maturity period and various quality characteristics<br />

of watermelon fruits to diploid and tetraploid pollenizers is provided in<br />

Table 2. <strong>The</strong>re were no observable differences in terms of fruit set<br />

between tetraploid and diploid pollenizers.<br />

All genotype entries were different at the 1% level of significance<br />

in terms of hard-seed and empty-seed-coat counts per fruit when a<br />

diploid was used (Table 1). ‘Crimson Sweet’ fruit had the highest<br />

number of hard seed and empty seed coats per fruit, while fewer were<br />

produced by (in descending order) ‘Aswan’, ‘Targi’, and ‘Giza1’. No<br />

hard seeds were found in any of the cultivars when pollen was<br />

obtained from the tetraploid. More empty seed coats per fruit were<br />

detected with ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’ when the tetraploid was used as the<br />

pollenizer. <strong>The</strong> fruits of ‘Giza1’ had the highest number of empty seed<br />

coats, followed by ‘Targi’, ‘Aswan’, and ‘Crimson Sweet’ fruits,<br />

respectively. When the tetraploid pollenizer was used, all empty seeds<br />

were white and very soft (i.e., edible) for all cultivars except ‘Targi’,<br />

which contained some colored and hard seeds.<br />

<strong>The</strong> seeds in ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’ were derived from fruit set<br />

though self-pollination. <strong>The</strong> low seed counts per fruit of these<br />

cultivars may be due to the large size of their seeds compared to<br />

‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ seeds. <strong>The</strong> same rationale may explain<br />

the high number of empty seed coats in ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’ versus<br />

160 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ cultivars when tetraploid-pollinated<br />

(Figure 2).<br />

A similar response was obtained by Henderson (1977). He<br />

reported that the triploid reciprocal cross [(2x) female x (4 x) male] in<br />

watermelon has not been successful at producing hard seeds. <strong>The</strong><br />

results we obtained also agree with those reported by Sugiyama and<br />

Morishita (1998a, b) when they used soft X-rays to produce diploid<br />

seedless watermelon fruits.<br />

While tetraploid pollen germinated on the stigma, the pollen tube<br />

didn’t elongate to reach the embryo sac, because of the wide pollentube<br />

size, compared with the diploid pollen tube. Hormones and<br />

auxins produced during the tetraploid pollen germination led to<br />

improved fruit set without any hard seeds (seedless fruit).<br />

1. A B 2. A B<br />

3. A B 4. A B<br />

Fig. 1. Exterior and interior quality of diploid watermelon in response to diploid<br />

and tetraploid pollenizers. 1 = ‘Aswan’; 2 = ‘Crimson Sweet’; 3 = ‘Giza 1’; 4=<br />

‘Targi’.<br />

A = diploid (normal fruit); B = seedless fruit by tetraploid pollenizers.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 161


350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

D.Normal<br />

seeds<br />

D.Empty<br />

seeds<br />

T.Normal<br />

seeds<br />

T.Empty<br />

seeds<br />

Fig. 2. Number of hard and empty seed coats across cultivars in response to<br />

whether the pollenizer was diploid or tetraploid. D = Diploid watermelon<br />

(control); T = diploid watermelon set by tetraploid pollen. From left to right:<br />

‘Aswan’ F1, ‘Crimson Sweet’, ‘Giza 1’, and ‘Targi’.<br />

Generally, the use of a tetraploid pollenizer is an effective method<br />

for producing diploid seedless watermelon fruits. However, some<br />

diploid genotypes respond better than others.<br />

Time to fruit maturity was not affected by pollenizers; however, it<br />

varied among genotypes. ‘Targi’ had the shortest period to maturity<br />

(35 days from pollination), followed by ‘Aswan’, ‘Giza1’, and<br />

‘Crimson Sweet’, respectively (Table 1). ‘Aswan’ produced the<br />

heaviest fruits, followed by ‘Crimson Sweet’, ‘Giza1’, and ‘Targi’,<br />

respectively (Table 2).<br />

Our results agree with those reported by Hayata et al., (1995).<br />

<strong>The</strong>y produced seedless watermelon fruits using artificial hormones,<br />

resulting in fruits that were deformed and small compared with fruit<br />

that were set with pollen. Fruits produced for each cultivar from the<br />

different pollenizer types were round and free from hollow heart.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were significant differences in TSS among all fruit cultivars.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tetraploid pollenizer increased significantly in both ‘Giza1’ and<br />

‘Crimson Sweet’. <strong>The</strong>re was no significant effect of tetraploid<br />

pollenizer on rind thickness.<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> use of tetraploid pollenizers may have potential for<br />

commercial production of high-quality diploid seedless watermelon<br />

fruits since this was successfully demonstrated with ‘Aswan’,<br />

‘Crimson Sweet’, and ‘Giza1’. In general, the application of this new<br />

technique not only reduces total costs of seedless watermelon fruits,<br />

but also increases net income compared to triploid watermelon<br />

162 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


(traditional method). <strong>The</strong> new technique seems to be a promising<br />

solution for many economic problems at different levels.<br />

Table 1. Hard-seed and empty-seed-coat counts per fruit and maturity<br />

period of diploid watermelon fruits in response to diploid and<br />

tetraploid pollenizers.<br />

Second season 2005 First season 2004<br />

Anthesis<br />

to<br />

Empty<br />

seed<br />

Anthesis<br />

to<br />

Empty<br />

seed<br />

Hard<br />

Hard<br />

harvest coats seeds harvest coats seeds Pollenizer Cultivar<br />

40.0b 21.0d 291.0b 40.0b 21.0d 293.0b Diploid Aswan<br />

40.0b 10.9e 0.0e 40.0b 10.8f 0.00e Tetraploid Aswan<br />

46.0a 27.0c 306.7a 46.0a 27.0c 310.0a Diploid Crimson<br />

Sweet<br />

46.0a 5.0g 0.0e 46.0a 5.0g 0.0e Tetraploid Crimson<br />

Sweet<br />

45.0a 15.0ef 181.0d 45.0a 15.0ef 180.3d Diploid Giza 1<br />

44.7a 120.2a 0.0e 45.0a 120.2a 0.00e Tetraploid Giza 1<br />

35.0c 17.0ed 255.0c 35.0c 17.0ed 253.0c Diploid Targi<br />

36.0c 85.4b 0.0e 36.0c 85.4b 0.00e Tetraploid Targi<br />

** ** ** ** ** ** Significance level<br />

NS= nonsignificant; * = significant at 5 %; **= significant at 1 %.<br />

Table 2. Response of maturity period and various quality parameters<br />

of diploid watermelon fruits to diploid and tetraploid pollenizers.<br />

TSS<br />

%<br />

Second season 2005 First season 2004<br />

Rind<br />

thickness<br />

cm<br />

Fruit<br />

weight<br />

kg<br />

TSS<br />

%<br />

Rind<br />

thickness<br />

cm<br />

Fruit<br />

weight<br />

kg Pollenizer Cultivar<br />

11.7cd 1.2a 7.4a 11.5 d 1.2a 7.5a Diploid Aswan<br />

12.6b 1.2a 7.4a 12.3 b 1.2a 7.4a Tetraploid Aswan<br />

11.3de 1.3a 7.0b 11.5de 1.3a 7.0b Diploid Crimson<br />

Sweet<br />

12.2c 1.3a 6.9b 12.2bc 1.3a 6.9b Tetraploid Crimson<br />

Sweet<br />

12.0d 1.3a 6.1c 12.0c 1.3a 6.1c Diploid Giza 1<br />

13.2a 1.3a 5.8c 13.0a 1.3a 5.8c Tetraploid Giza 1<br />

11.5d 0.8b 4.5d 11.5d 0.8b 4.5d Diploid Targi<br />

12.4bc 0.8b 4.8d 12.1c 0.8b 4.4d Tetraploid Targi<br />

* * ** * * ** Significance level<br />

NS= nonsignificant; * = significant at 5 %; **= significant at 1 %.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 163


Literature Cited<br />

Buttrose, M. and M. Sedgley. 1979. Anatomy of watermelon embryo sacs following<br />

pollination, non-pollination or parthenocarpic induction of fruit development.<br />

Ann. Bot. 43:141–146.<br />

Hayata,Y., Y. Niimi, and N. Iwasaki. 1995. Synthetic Cytokinin-1-(2-chloro-4pyridyl)-3-phenylurea<br />

(CPPU) - promotes fruit set and induces parthenocarpy in<br />

watermelon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort .Sci. 120:997–1000.<br />

Henderson, W. R. 1977. Effect of cultivar, polyploid and reciprocal hybridization on<br />

characters important in breeding triploid seedless watermelon hybrids. J. Amer.<br />

Soc. Hort. Sci. 102(3):293–297.<br />

Kano, Y. 2000. Effect of CPPU treatment on fruit and rind development of<br />

watermelons (Citrullus lanatus Matsum. et Nakai ). J. Hort. Sci. & Biotech.<br />

(6):651–654.<br />

Kihara, H. 1951. Triploid watermelon. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58:217–230.<br />

Sugiyama, K. and M. Morishita, 1998a. Induction of seedless watermelon by<br />

pseudogamy, p. 297–299. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98,<br />

evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHA Press, Alexandria,<br />

VA.<br />

Sugiyama, K. and M. Morishita. 1998b. Fruit set and seed characteristics of diploid<br />

seedless watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cultivars produced by soft-x-irradiation<br />

pollen. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 69(6):684–689.<br />

Sugiyama, K. and M. Morishita. 2000. Production of seedless watermelon using<br />

soft-x-irradiation pollen. Sci. Hort. 84:255–264.<br />

Watnabe, S., Y. Nakano, K. Okano, K. Sugiyama, and M. Morishita. 2002. Effect of<br />

cropping season on the formation of empty seeds in seedless watermelon fruit<br />

produced by soft-x- irradiation pollen. Acta Hort. 588:89–92.<br />

164 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI FOR SUCROSE<br />

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SUGARS IN MELON<br />

CROSSES UNDER GREENHOUSE AND FIELD<br />

ENVIRONMENTS<br />

Soon O. Park and Kevin M. Crosby<br />

Vegetable & Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />

College Station, TX 77843<br />

Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M<br />

University, Weslaco, TX 78596<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, glucose percentage of total<br />

sugars<br />

ABSTRACT. Our objectives were to identify RAPD markers associated with<br />

QTL for sucrose percentage of total sugars (SPTS) using bulked segregant<br />

analysis (BSA) in an F2 population derived from the melon (Cucumis melo L.)<br />

cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ (high SPTS) × TGR1551 (low SPTS) in a greenhouse<br />

experiment, and confirm the association of RAPD markers with QTL for the<br />

sweetness trait in an F2 population from the cross of ‘Deltex’ (high SPTS) ×<br />

TGR1551 in a field experiment. Continuous distribution for SPTS was observed<br />

in the genetic populations indicating quantitative inheritance for the trait. A<br />

significant positive correlation was found between SPTS and sucrose or soluble<br />

solids. Seven RAPD markers, 3 amplified from ‘TAM Dulce’ and 4 amplified<br />

from TGR1551, were detected to be significantly associated with QTL for SPTS<br />

in the greenhouse population. Three unlinked markers were significant in the<br />

full model, and accounted for 31% of the total phenotypic variation for SPTS.<br />

Four RAPD markers were confirmed in the field population to be consistently<br />

associated with QTL for SPTS. <strong>The</strong>se RAPD markers associated with QTL for<br />

the sweetness trait identified in the greenhouse and confirmed in the field could<br />

be useful in melon breeding for improving the mature fruit sweetness.<br />

D<br />

ue to consumer preference for sweet fruit, sugar content is a<br />

highly important quality trait of different melon classes. <strong>The</strong><br />

improvement of sugar content is one of the most significant<br />

goals in breeding programs of most melon types worldwide. Sucrose,<br />

glucose, and fructose are major factors determining mature melon fruit<br />

sweetness. <strong>The</strong> ratio of individual sugar compositions is also an<br />

important sweetness trait.<br />

This research was funded in part by USDA Grant 2001-34402-10543, “Designing<br />

Foods for Health.” We acknowledge financial support from the South Texas Melon<br />

Committee. We also thank technicians Alfredo Rodríguez and Hyun J. Kang, Texas<br />

Agricultural Research and Extension Center-Weslaco, for their assistance.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 165


Bulked segregant analysis (Michelmore et al., 1991) is an efficient<br />

method of rapidly identifying molecular markers linked to a specific<br />

gene using DNA bulks from F2 plants. Molecular markers linked to<br />

genes for sweetness traits may improve the breeder’s ability to recover<br />

sugar genotypes and aid in the development of sugar cultivars.<br />

However, markers associated with QTL affecting SPTS present in<br />

‘TAM Dulce’, a western-shipper muskmelon type, have not been<br />

reported. Our objective was to identify RAPD markers associated with<br />

QTL for SPTS by means of BSA in an F2 population derived from the<br />

melon cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ (high SPTS) × TGR1551 (low SPTS) in<br />

a greenhouse experiment. Park et al. (1999) emphasized the<br />

importance of confirming the marker-QTL associations in different<br />

populations and environments before using molecular markers for<br />

marker-assisted selection in breeding programs. Thus, our additional<br />

goal was to confirm the associations of RAPD markers with QTL for<br />

the sweetness trait in an F2 population from the cross of ‘Deltex’ (high<br />

SPTS) × TGR1551 in a field experiment.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL. For identification of QTL, 105 F2 plants<br />

derived from the cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 were planted in a<br />

greenhouse at the Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center-<br />

Weslaco, Texas A&M University, on 15 Oct. 2002. ‘TAM Dulce’ is a<br />

western-shipper muskmelon type with high fruit quality, while<br />

TGR1551, originally obtained from Zimbabwe, is a wild type with low<br />

fruit quality. For confirmation of QTL, 64 F2 plants from the cross of<br />

‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 were planted on black plastic mulch with drip<br />

irrigation on sandy clay loam soil at Weslaco, Texas on 10 March<br />

2005. <strong>The</strong> high-sugar ‘Deltex’ parent is a commercial ananas cultivar<br />

(Nunhems, Parma, ID). Data for SPTS were obtained from the two<br />

parental pairs as well as the 105 and 64 F2 plants.<br />

BULKED SEGREGANT ANALYSIS USING RAPD. Fully expanded<br />

leaves of the 105 and 64 F2 plants along with their parental pairs were<br />

collected at 21 days after planting. Total genomic DNA was extracted<br />

from the leaf tissue using the method of Skroch and Nienhuis (1995).<br />

A total of 500 random 10-mer primers (Operon Technologies,<br />

Alameda, CA) were used. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were<br />

performed on 96-well plates in an MJ Research thermalcycler (model<br />

PTC-0100; MJ Research, Waltham, MA). Protocols for PCR and the<br />

composition of the final volume of reactants were the same as those<br />

described by Skroch and Nienhuis (1995). Two low and high bulks<br />

were prepared from equal volumes of standardized DNA (10ng. L-1)<br />

166 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


from 8 selected F2 plants of the ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 cross with<br />

the highest and lowest SPTS values, respectively. <strong>The</strong> 500 primers<br />

were used to simultaneously screen between the low and high DNA<br />

bulks, and between the parents ‘TAM Dulce’ and TGR1551. Primers<br />

that generated marker polymorphisms between the low and high DNA<br />

bulks were tested in the F2 population from the cross between ‘TAM<br />

Dulce’ and TGR1551 for identifying QTL. Six primers were tested in<br />

the F2 population of the ‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 cross for confirming<br />

QTL.<br />

DETECTION OF QTL. To detect segregation distortion of markers,<br />

F2 population marker data were tested for goodness-of-fit to a 3:1 ratio<br />

using the chi-square test. Due to the dominant nature of RAPD<br />

markers, the linkage analyses of three markers obtained from ‘TAM<br />

Dulce’ and four markers obtained from TGR1551 were separately<br />

performed on the data for 105 F2 plants of the ‘TAM Dulce’ and<br />

TGR1551 cross using MAPMAKER version 3.0 (Lander et al., 1987).<br />

We also executed separately the linkage analyses of three markers<br />

from ‘Deltex’ and three markers from TGR1551 on the data for 64 F2<br />

plants of the ‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 cross. Simple linear regression<br />

(SLR) for each pairwise combination of quantitative traits and marker<br />

loci was used to analyze the greenhouse and field data for detection<br />

and confirmation of QTL for SPTS. Significant differences in trait<br />

associations were based on F-tests (P


Table 1. Pearson correlations of sucrose percentage of total sugars<br />

(SPTS) with other fruit-sweetness traits in two F2 populations derived<br />

from melon crosses of ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 (TT) and ‘Deltex’ ×<br />

TGR1551 (DT) in greenhouse and field experiments.<br />

Sweetness traits<br />

Trait Cross TSS z Sucrose Glucose Fructose GPTS x FPTS<br />

SPTS TT 0.33** 0.89** -0.03 NS 0.18 NS -0.85** -0.58**<br />

DT 0.53** 0.98** -0.77** -0.59** -0.95** -0.92**<br />

z<br />

TSS = total soluble solids.<br />

x<br />

GPTS = glucose percentage of total sugars; FPTS = fructose percentage of total<br />

sugars.<br />

**Nonsignificant or significant at P < 0.01.<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF QTL. A total of 500 primers were used for<br />

the RAPD analysis of two different bulks for SPTS along with their<br />

parents ‘TAM Dulce’ and TGR1551. Seven RAPD markers were<br />

polymorphic between the two DNA bulks. Three displayed an<br />

amplified DNA fragment in the high bulk that was absent in the low<br />

bulk. Four showed an amplified DNA fragment in the low bulk that<br />

was absent in the high bulk. <strong>The</strong>se seven marker fragments segregated<br />

in the F2 population of the ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 cross. A<br />

goodness-of-fit to a 3:1 ratio for band presence to band absence for<br />

each of the seven markers was observed in 105 F2 plants. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

markers were unlinked based on linkage analysis, suggesting that they<br />

are located on different chromosomes.<br />

Seven significant associations of RAPD marker loci with QTL<br />

influencing SPTS were identified in this greenhouse population based<br />

on SLR (Table 2). <strong>The</strong> ‘TAM Dulce’ parent contributed high SPTS<br />

alleles for these seven markers. Markers OAU13.1350, OAT03.250,<br />

and OAW06.1250 from ‘TAM Dulce’ explained 4% to 13% of the<br />

variation for this trait. Only one of the three unlinked markers<br />

accounting for 13% of the variation was noted using the SMR analysis.<br />

Markers OAW06.600, OAA09.350, OAU05.600, and OAQ13.750<br />

from TGR1551 explained 6% to 17% of the variation for this trait.<br />

Three of the four unlinked markers were significant in the full model,<br />

and accounted for 31% of the total variation for the trait. Six and two<br />

of the seven RAPD markers associated with QTL for SPTS were also<br />

found to be significantly associated with QTL for GPTS and FPTS,<br />

respectively. However, andromonoecious (a) on Linkage Group 4 of<br />

the classical melon map regulating stamen absence or stamen presence<br />

in female flowers was not associated with SPTS in the greenhouse<br />

population.<br />

168 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Simple linear regression (SLR) and stepwise multiple<br />

regression (SMR) analyses of marker and data for detection of QTL<br />

for sucrose percentage of total sugars (SPTS) in an F2 population<br />

derived from the melon cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ (high SPTS) ×<br />

TGR1551 (low SPTS) in the greenhouse experiment.<br />

Marker Source P<br />

OAU13.1350<br />

SLR Average value SMR<br />

R 2<br />

(%) Presence Absence P<br />

R 2<br />

(%)<br />

TAM<br />

Dulce 0.000 13 12.6 z 5.5 y 0.000 13<br />

OAT03.250 TAM<br />

Dulce 0.027 5 12.4 8.9<br />

OAW06.1250 TAM<br />

Dulce 0.04 4 12.4 9.1<br />

Cumulative R 2 = 13<br />

OAW06.600 TGR1551 0.000 17 9.8 16.5 0.000 17<br />

OAA09.350 TGR1551 0.000 13 10.1 17.1 0.000 9<br />

OAU05.600 TGR1551 0.007 7 10.5 14.4 0.008 5<br />

OAQ13.750 TGR1551 0.013 6 10.4 15.4<br />

Cumulative R 2 = 31<br />

z An average value of F2 plants with band presence for the marker.<br />

y An average value of F2 plants with band absence for the marker.<br />

Table 3. Confirmation of RAPD markers associated with QTL for<br />

sucrose percentage of total sugars (SPTS) in an F2 population derived<br />

from the melon cross of ‘Deltex’ (high SPTS) × TGR1551 (low SPTS)<br />

in the field experiment.<br />

Simple linear Stepwise multiple<br />

regression<br />

regression<br />

R<br />

Marker Source P<br />

2<br />

R<br />

(%) P<br />

2<br />

(%)<br />

OAW06.1250 Deltex 0.000 10 0.000 10<br />

OAU13.1350 Deltex 0.047 4 0.047 4<br />

Cumulative R 2 = 14<br />

OAA09.350 TGR1551 0.000 12 0.000 12<br />

OAU05.600 TGR1551 0.041 4 0.045 4<br />

Cumulative R 2 = 16<br />

Four RAPD markers associated with the sweetness trait in the<br />

greenhouse experiment were confirmed in the F2 population of the<br />

‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 cross in the field experiment to be consistently<br />

associated with QTL for the trait on the basis of SLR (Table 3).<br />

Marker OAA09.350 from TGR1551 associated with QTL for the trait<br />

in the greenhouse population was also found to be significantly<br />

associated with QTL for the trait in the field population, and accounted<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 169


for 12% of the phenotypic variation for the trait. A significant<br />

association of OAW06.1250 from ‘Deltex’ with QTL for the<br />

sweetness trait was consistently expressed in our populations derived<br />

from two different crosses under greenhouse and field environments.<br />

However, markers OAT03.250 and OAQ13.750, slightly associated<br />

with the sugar trait identified in the greenhouse F2 population, were<br />

not confirmed in this field F2 population. <strong>The</strong> RAPD markers linked to<br />

the SPTS QTL identified and confirmed in two populations and<br />

environments here should be more reliable for marker-assisted<br />

selection than those evaluated in a single population and environment.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Edwards, M. D., C. W. Stuber, and J. F. Wendell. 1987. Molecular marker-facilitated<br />

investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. I. numbers, genomic<br />

distribution, and types of gene action. Genetics. 116:113–125.<br />

Lander, E. S., P. Green, J. Abrahamson, A. Barlow, M. J. Daly, S. E. Lincoln, and L.<br />

Newburg. 1987. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for<br />

constructing primary genetic linkage maps with experimental and natural<br />

populations. Genomics. 1:174–181.<br />

Michelmore, R. W., I. Paran, and R. V. Kesseli. 1991. Identification of markers<br />

linked to disease resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method<br />

to detect markers in specific genomic regions using segregating populations.<br />

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:9828–9832.<br />

Park, S. O., D. P. Coyne, N. Mutlu, G. Jung, and J. R. Steadman. 1999. Confirmation<br />

of molecular markers and flower color associated with QTL for resistance to<br />

common bacterial blight in common beans. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 124:519–<br />

526.<br />

Paterson, A. H., S. Damon, J. D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H. D. Rabinowitch, S. E.<br />

Lincoln, E. S. Lander, and S. D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying<br />

quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and<br />

environments. Genetics. 127:181–197.<br />

Skroch, P. W. and J. Nienhuis. 1995. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of<br />

RAPD variation among snap bean genotypes. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:1078–<br />

1085.<br />

170 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


ETHYLENE MEDIATES THE INDUCTION OF<br />

FRUITS WITH ATTACHED FLOWER IN<br />

ZUCCHINI SQUASH<br />

M. C. Payán 1 , A.Peñaranda 1 , R. Rosales 2 , D. Garrido 2 , P. Gómez 1 ,<br />

and M. Jamilena 3<br />

1 Departamento de Biotecnología, IFAPA de Almería. Autovía del<br />

Mediterráneo, La Mojonera, Almería, Spain<br />

2 Departamento de Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias,<br />

Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain<br />

3 Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Escuela Politécnica Superior,<br />

Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, flower maturation, flower<br />

abscission, sex expression, high temperature<br />

ABSTRACT. We previously reported that high temperature during the springsummer<br />

growing season is the main factor increasing the incidence of zucchini<br />

fruits with attached flower, a trait that reduces the shelf life and commercial<br />

quality of the fruits produced in greenhouses. In this work, the increase in the<br />

number of fruits with attached flowers is caused by reduced ethylene<br />

production in female flower buds. Treatments with ethylene inhibitors such as<br />

aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) and silver thiosulphate (STS) promote the<br />

production of fruits with an attached flower in a number of cultivars. In<br />

addition, the flowers that remain attached to the harvested zucchini fruits are<br />

found to be transformed into bisexual, with a lower internal ethylene level than<br />

female ones. Alterations of the development of attached flowers, which exhibit<br />

different degrees of stamen development and are arrested in their maturation,<br />

indicate that ethylene is required for both the maintenance of stamen arrest and<br />

for completing the maturation of female flowers. Moreover, the incidence of<br />

this character is genotype-dependent, and the internal level of ethylene is<br />

reduced in cultivars that produce the highest proportion of fruits with attached<br />

flowers. This opens the possibility of direct or indirect contraselection of this<br />

trait in current breeding programs of zucchini squash.<br />

T<br />

he production of zucchini squash in greenhouses requires<br />

cultivars in which the abscission of the flower occurs in the<br />

earlier stages of fruit development and always before<br />

harvesting. <strong>The</strong> delay in abscission of zucchini flowers is now a major<br />

problem for greenhouse cultivation of zucchini squash in SE Spain.<br />

This work was supported by grants C03-180 and AGL2005-06677-CO2, awarded by<br />

the Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca de la Junta de Andalucía (Andalucía, Spain),<br />

and the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain), respectively.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 171


When the enormous flower of zucchini remains attached to the fruit<br />

after harvesting, it must be manually removed by growers, inducing<br />

wounding and making the fruit more susceptible to infection and<br />

rotting during storage and transport, thus diminishing its shelf life and<br />

its commercial quality and value.<br />

Previous results from two trials carried out under different<br />

environmental conditions in greenhouses in SE Spain indicate that<br />

high greenhouse temperature during the spring-summer growing<br />

season is the major environmental factor that induces the production of<br />

zucchini fruits with attached flowers (Gómez et al., 2004).<br />

Nevertheless, the incidence of this trait is genotype-dependent, and<br />

while some cultivars produce more than 80% of fruits with attached<br />

flowers under high temperatures, others scarcely reach 5% of such<br />

fruits (Gómez et al., 2004). Given that attached flowers are arrested in<br />

their maturation, not reaching anthesis but remaining green and closed<br />

even in harvested fruits, and are also transformed into bisexual<br />

flowers, showing different degrees of stamen development, we<br />

assumed that ethylene was involved in this flower-development<br />

alteration.<br />

Ethylene plays a key role in the sex expression of cucurbits.<br />

Treatments with ethylene or ethylene-releasing agents increase the<br />

production of female flowers, while treatments with inhibitors of<br />

ethylene biosynthesis or perception induce the production of a higher<br />

number of male flowers (Robinson et al., 1969; Rudich et al., 1969;<br />

Owens et al., 1980). Accordingly, the levels of endogenous ethylene in<br />

gynoecious cultivars of cucumber are two- to threefold higher than in<br />

monoecious and andromonoecious genotypes (Trebitsh et al., 1987;<br />

Yamasaki et al., 2001). In fact, the additional copy of the 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate<br />

(ACC) synthase (ACS) gene in<br />

cucumber, one of the key enzymes of the ethylene biosynthesis<br />

pathway, cosegregates with the F gene, conferring gynoecy in this<br />

species (Trebitsh et al., 1997; Mibus and Tatlioglu, 2004).<br />

It has recently been reported that ethylene is involved in the<br />

development and maturation of flowers in Arabidopsis (Hall and<br />

Bleecker, 2003) and melon (Papadopoulou et al., 2005; Little et al.,<br />

2005). Thus, flower organs of the double mutants for the ethylene<br />

receptors ers1 etr1 are arrested in development, remaining as<br />

immature closed flowers in which petals and stamens have not been<br />

elongated and anthers have not been dehisced (Hall and Bleecker,<br />

2003). Moreover, andromonoecious melon lines that overexpress an<br />

ACS transgene not only have altered sex-expression patterns but also<br />

an increased number of bisexual buds that reach anthesis, indicating<br />

that ethylene is necessary to maintain the development of ovary-<br />

172 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


earing flowers in species of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family (Papadopoulou<br />

et al., 2005).<br />

In this paper we study the implication of ethylene in the induction<br />

of zucchini fruits with attached flowers using two different<br />

approaches. On the one hand, we analyze the effects of ethylene<br />

inhibitors on flower development and abscission in different zucchini<br />

squash grown under winter conditions. On the other hand, we compare<br />

endogenous ethylene production in different cultivars and different<br />

environments. Data demonstrate that the delay in flower abscission<br />

occurs concomitantly with the inhibition of female flower-bud<br />

maturation, a process accompanied by conversion of the female bud<br />

into a bisexual one and reduction in the levels of ethylene production.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

<strong>The</strong> four hybrid cultivars used, ‘Cora’, ‘Cavili’, ‘Consul’, and<br />

‘Xsara’, were selected because they differ in the production of fruits<br />

with attached flowers when grown under high temperatures. For<br />

treatments with ethylene inhibitors, seeds were germinated in<br />

rockwool cubes (Grodan), and when three to four leaves had<br />

developed, they were transferred to 1-m rockwool slabs at a density of<br />

two plants/slab. Plants were grown in a greenhouse in La Mojonera<br />

(Almería, Spain) in winter 2005, following standard local practices for<br />

both plant nutrition and pest management.<br />

Treatments with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) and silver<br />

thiosulphate (STS) were carried out when the fifth leaf was 2cm long.<br />

<strong>The</strong> apical meristems of these plants were treated with 25μl of a<br />

solution containing 1mM AVG and 0.1% Tween 20, or 0.5 M STS<br />

and 0.1% Tween 20. Control plants were treated with a solution<br />

containing only the same concentration of Tween 20.<br />

<strong>The</strong> release of ethylene was measured in mature flowers at anthesis<br />

in spring-summer 2005, and winter-early spring 2006. In bisexual<br />

flowers with arrested maturation, ethylene production was measured in<br />

closed flower buds, in which fruit length and width were similar to<br />

those of mature female flowers. <strong>The</strong> ethylene produced by the flowers<br />

after incubation at room temperature for 24h in the dark was measured<br />

in a Perkin-Elmer 8600 gas chromatograph, fitted with a flame<br />

ionization detector and 2m×3.2mm column packed with 80/100 mesh<br />

porapak R. <strong>The</strong> instrument was calibrated with standard ethylene gas.<br />

At least four replicates were made for each measurement.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 173


Results and Discussion<br />

EFFECTS OF ETHYLENE INHIBITORS. <strong>The</strong> cultivars ‘Cora’,<br />

‘Consul’, ‘Cavili’, and ‘Xsara’ were used to analyze the effect of<br />

ethylene-inhibitor treatments on the incidence of fruits with attached<br />

flowers. <strong>The</strong>se cultivars were selected because they represent cultivars<br />

producing low (‘Cora’ and ‘Consul’) and high (‘Cavili’ and ‘Xsara’)<br />

proportions of fruits with attached flowers when grown under springsummer<br />

conditions. <strong>The</strong> study was carried out under winter conditions<br />

since, under such conditions, all the cultivars except ‘Cavili’ produce a<br />

very low proportion of fruits with attached flowers.<br />

Number of flowers<br />

Female flowers Male flowers Bisexual flowers<br />

12<br />

Cora Cavili<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Node number in the main stem<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 111315 1719 21 23 25 2729<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />

Control<br />

AVG<br />

Fig. 1. Effects of AVG on sexual expression in two cultivars of zucchini squash.<br />

Treatments increase the production of bisexual and male flowers in the nodes<br />

after the treatment (Node 5). Bisexual flowers remain attached to the fruits.<br />

<strong>The</strong> inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis or perceptions by means of<br />

AVG or STS, respectively, induced the production of fruits with<br />

attached flowers in all the studied cultivars. AVG altered the sexual<br />

expression of the plants, inducing a partial or <strong>complete</strong> conversion of<br />

female flowers into bisexual ones and thus increasing the maleness of<br />

the plants (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> effect of the treatment was similar in all four<br />

cultivars. In the nodes immediately above the treatment, AVG induced<br />

the development of bisexual flowers, while in the following nodes the<br />

treatment increased the production of male flowers (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong><br />

bisexual flowers, showing partial or <strong>complete</strong> development of stamens,<br />

174 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


were those that remained attached to the harvested fruits (Figure 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se bisexual flowers were all arrested in flower maturation,<br />

remaining as closed floral buds even in fruits of commercial length<br />

and width (Figure 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect of the inhibition of ethylene perception by STS was<br />

very similar, inducing the production of male and bisexual flowers in<br />

all cultivars (Figure 3). Nevertheless, STS treatments induced a higher<br />

proportion of bisexual flowers than AVG (Figure 3). Moreover,<br />

besides the partial or <strong>complete</strong> development of stamens and the arrest<br />

of flower maturation, these bisexual flowers were also altered in the<br />

development of pedicel, sepals, and carpels. <strong>The</strong> pedicel and sepals of<br />

these bisexual flowers resembled those of male flowers, being larger<br />

than those of female ones (Figure 2). Moreover, in addition to the<br />

normal inferior ovary, which may be more or less developed, some of<br />

these flowers developed superior ovary tissue (Figure 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> flower phenotypes of bisexual flowers induced by AVG and<br />

STS treatments were very similar to those found by Gomez et al.<br />

(2004) in different cultivars of zucchini grown under high<br />

temperatures. Given that these bisexual flowers appeared in the nodes<br />

just above the treatment, it is likely that they result from a reduction of<br />

ethylene in already determined female floral buds. In more immature<br />

floral buds the inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis or perception would<br />

produce a <strong>complete</strong> reversion of female into male flowers, such as was<br />

observed in higher nodes of AVG- and STS-treated plants.<br />

ETHYLENE PRODUCTION IN MALE AND FEMALE FLOWERS. <strong>The</strong><br />

production of ethylene was measured in female and male flowers of<br />

‘Cavili’ and ‘Cora’ cultivars of zucchini grown under winter or springsummer<br />

conditions. <strong>The</strong>se cultivars were selected because they<br />

produce the highest and lowest proportion of fruits with attached<br />

flowers, respectively, when grown at high temperatures. <strong>The</strong><br />

production of ethylene in all flower sex phenotypes of ‘Cavili’ was<br />

significantly lower than in those of ‘Cora’ under both environmental<br />

conditions, which may explain the higher susceptibility of ‘Cavili’<br />

plants to spring-summer environmental conditions (Gómez et al.,<br />

2004).<br />

Male flowers of both cultivars produced less ethylene than female<br />

ones (Figure 4), which is not surprising given that ethylene promotes<br />

femaleness in this species. <strong>The</strong> production of ethylene in bisexual<br />

flowers that appeared attached to the harvested fruits under very high<br />

temperatures during spring-summer conditions was intermediate<br />

between that of perfect female or male flowers. Moreover, in<br />

comparison with winter conditions, spring-summer conditions promote<br />

a reduction in internal ethylene in female flowers (Figure 4).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 175


Fig. 2. Effects of AVG (A, B, and C) and STS (D, E, and F) treatments on flower<br />

development in zucchini squash. Both treatments induced the production of<br />

fruits with attached flowers. <strong>The</strong>se flowers were arrested in their maturation,<br />

remaining green and closed even in harvested fruits (A and D). Fruits with<br />

attached flower were also bisexual, exhibiting different degrees of stamen<br />

development (B, C, E, and F). <strong>The</strong> pedicel and sepals of STS-treated plants<br />

resembled those of male flowers (D). STS also alters carpel development,<br />

inducing the growth of superior ovary tissue (E and F).<br />

<strong>The</strong> effects of ethylene inhibitors on flower development and the<br />

measurements of ethylene production in the bisexual flowers that<br />

remain attached to the fruits have indicated that the induction of fruits<br />

with attached flowers in zucchini is caused by a reduction in the<br />

internal level of ethylene in female flower buds. Differences in<br />

susceptibility to summer environmental conditions and in the<br />

incidence of fruits with attached flowers among genotypes of zucchini<br />

squash (Gómez et al., 2004) appear to be correlated with a decrease in<br />

the base level of ethylene. Indeed, we have observed that ethylene<br />

176 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


production in all the studied flowers of ‘Cavili’, a cultivar with one of<br />

the highest percentages of fruits with attached flowers in the spring-<br />

summer growing season, was significantly lower than in flowers of<br />

‘Cora’, a cultivar among those with the lowest production of fruits<br />

with attached flowers. <strong>The</strong>refore, genotypes that have a reduced level<br />

of ethylene production could be more susceptible to high temperatures,<br />

not being able to reach the threshold level necessary for normal<br />

development of female flowers.<br />

Number of flowers<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Female flowers Male flowers Bisexual flowers Bisexual flowers with<br />

Cora 10<br />

male characteristics<br />

Cavili<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />

Fig. 3. Effects of STS on sexual expression in two cultivars of zucchini squash.<br />

Treatments induce the production of bisexual flowers with male secondary<br />

characteristics immediately after the treatment (Node 5).<br />

Given that the production of ethylene in the flowers that remain<br />

attached to the harvested fruits was lower than that of female flowers,<br />

the developmental arrest of these flowers before maturation supports<br />

the idea that ethylene is required to maintain the development of<br />

ovary-bearing flowers, and for the transition from immature to mature<br />

flowers in C. pepo. This conclusion agrees with other studies on<br />

Arabidopsis and melon indicating that ethylene is involved in flower<br />

maturation (Hall and Bleecker, 2003; Papadopoulou et al., 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong> conversion of female into bisexual flowers observed in AVG-<br />

or STS-treated zucchini squash and the lower level of internal ethylene<br />

in these transformed flowers also support the conclusion that a<br />

threshold ethylene level is required to arrest stamen growth during<br />

female-flower development in C. pepo. <strong>The</strong> specificity of ethylene<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Node number in the main stem<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />

Control<br />

STS<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 177


function on stamen arrest in female flowers of C. pepo may depend on<br />

the internal levels of this hormone in specific flower sex types, as we<br />

have observed in zucchini flowers, but also on a differential sensitivity<br />

of male and female flowers to ethylene as proposed by Yamasaki et al.<br />

(2001) in cucumber.<br />

nl ethilene/g fw*d<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Females Bisexuals Males<br />

Cora Summer 13,6928 11,8959 10,3283<br />

Cavili Summer 3,686 5,127666667<br />

Cora Winter 16,2097 8,6609<br />

Cavili Winter 6,6658 9,8858<br />

Fig. 4. Ethylene production of flowers in anthesis of the zucchini<br />

cultivars ‘Cora’ and ‘Cavili’ in winter or spring-summer<br />

conditions. Data represent the mean of at least 6 measurements<br />

from 3 replicates. Vertical bars represent standard deviation of<br />

the means. Bisexual flowers appeared only in the springsummer<br />

culture. Under these conditions, some of the female<br />

flowers of ‘Cora’ and nearly all the female flowers of ‘Cavili’<br />

were transformed into bisexual ones.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Gómez, P., A. Peñaranda, D Garrido, and M. Jamilena. 2004. Evaluation of flower<br />

abscission and sex expression in different cultivars of zucchini squash<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), p. 347–352. Progress in <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong><br />

Research. Eucarpia-<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004.<br />

Hall, A. E. and B. Bleecker. 2003. Analysis of combinatorial loss-of-function<br />

mutants in the Arabidopsis ethylene receptors reveals that the ers1 etr1 double<br />

mutant has severe developmental defects that are EIN2 dependent. Plant Cell.<br />

15:2032–2041.<br />

Little, H. A., S. A. Hammar, and R. Grumet. 2005. Modified sex expression in<br />

transgenic melon expressing the dominant mutant ethylene receptor gene, Atetr1-1,<br />

under control of floral targeted promoters.<br />

.<br />

178 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Mibus, H. and T. Tatlioglu. 2004. Molecular characterization and isolation of the F/f<br />

gene for femaleness in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) <strong>The</strong>oret. & App. Gen.<br />

109:1669–1676.<br />

Owens, K. W., C. W. Peterson, and G. E. Tolla. 1980. Production of hermaphrodite<br />

flowers on gynoecious muskmelon by silver nitrate and<br />

aminoethoxyvinylglycine. Hort Sci. 15:654–655.<br />

Papadopoulou, E., H. A. Little, S. A. Hammar, and R. Grumet. 2005. Effect of<br />

modified endogenous ethylene production on sex expression, bisexual flower<br />

development and fruit production in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sex. Plant<br />

Repro. 18:131–142<br />

Robinson, R. W., S. Shanno, and M. D. La Guardia. 1969. Regulation of sex<br />

expression in the cucumber. Biosci. 19:141–142.<br />

Rudich, J., A. Halevy, and N. Kedar. 1969. Increase in femaleness of three cucurbits<br />

by treatment with ethrel, an ethylene releasing compound. Planta. 86:69–76.<br />

Trebitsh, T., J. Rudich, and J. Riov. 1987. Auxin, biosynthesis of ethylene and sex<br />

expression in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Plant Growth Reg. 5:105–113.<br />

Trebitsh, T., J. E. Staub, and S. D. O´Neill. 1997. Identification of a 1minocyclopropane-1-carboxylic<br />

acid synthase gene linked to the female (F)<br />

locus that enhances femaleness expression in cucumber. Plant Physiol. 113:987–<br />

995.<br />

Yamasaki, S., N. Fujii, S. Matsuura, H. Mizusawa, H. and Takahashi. 2001. <strong>The</strong> M<br />

locus: an ethylene–controlled sex determination in andromonoecious cucumber<br />

plants. Plant & Cell Physiol. 42:608–619.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 179


THE MELOGEN PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT<br />

OF GENOMIC TOOLS IN MELON<br />

Pere Puigdomènech, Ana Caño, and Víctor González<br />

Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Departament<br />

de Genètica Molecular, Barcelona, Spain<br />

Pere Arús, Wim Deleu, Jordi Garcia-Mas,<br />

Mireia González, and Antonio Monforte<br />

Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Departament<br />

de Genètica Vegetal, Cabrils, Spain<br />

José Blanca, Fernando Nuez, Belén Picó, and Cristina Roig<br />

COMAV-UPV, Departamento de Biotecnología,<br />

Valencia, Spain<br />

Miguel Aranda and Daniel González<br />

CEBAS-CSIC, Departamento de Biología del Estrés y Patología<br />

Vegetal, Murcia, Spain<br />

Antonio Robles<br />

UPV, Departamento de Informática de Sistemas y Computadores,<br />

Valencia, Spain<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, ESTs, TILLING, SNP, oligo chip<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> Spanish Initiative in Genomics and Proteomics started <strong>The</strong><br />

MELOGEN Project: Development of Genomic Tools in Melon (C. melo L.) in<br />

2004 for the analysis of resistance to pathogens and fruit-quality traits. This is a<br />

collaborative effort involving five different research groups. After two years,<br />

several of the project objectives have been achieved including (1) EST<br />

sequencing; (2) development of a Webpage and a database that integrates the<br />

EST and genetic map information; (3) expanding the melon genetic map<br />

resolution with EST-derived SNP markers; (4) construction of a melon physical<br />

map by anchoring BAC clones with genetic markers; (5) development of BAC<br />

contigs in regions containing clusters of disease-resistance genes; (6)<br />

development of an EMS-mutagenized melon population for TILLING; and (7)<br />

construction of an oligo-based chip containing the EST unigene set.<br />

M<br />

elon (Cucumis melo L.) is a diploid species (2n=24) that<br />

belongs to the family <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and is a vegetable crop<br />

widely distributed in temperate, subtropical, and tropical<br />

climates. It is, after the tomato, the most widely grown vegetable crop<br />

in Spain in both area and production. Spain is the fifth largest melon<br />

producer worldwide and the leader in Europe. An important aspect of<br />

the melon industry in Spain is the production and commercialization of<br />

melon hybrid seed. Melon seeds command the highest prices among<br />

all vegetable crop seeds. Melon breeding is focused mainly on the<br />

180 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


incorporation of disease resistance and fruit-quality traits into<br />

commercial cultivars.<br />

<strong>The</strong> melon genome is relatively small. Some studies have<br />

estimated its genome size to be 450–500Mb (Arumuganathan and<br />

Earle, 1991), similar to that of rice (419Mb), and three times the size<br />

of the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana (125Mb). <strong>The</strong> melon<br />

genetic map has an estimated size of 1197cM (Oliver et al., 2001),<br />

which represents approximately 375kb per cM of physical map vs.<br />

genetic map. <strong>The</strong>se data make it an attractive species to study from a<br />

genomics point of view.<br />

Our genetic map was obtained from an F2 population of the cross<br />

PI 161375 (Korean accession) x ‘Piel de sapo’ T111 cultivar (Gonzalo<br />

et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> genetic map is based mainly on Restriction Fragment<br />

Length Polymorphism (RFLP) and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR)<br />

markers. Recently, several methods for the detection of single<br />

nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been developed. SNPs are<br />

good markers for detecting polymorphism and they can be developed<br />

from genes with known function, which gives them added value. SNP<br />

markers will likely be the reference marker type in the near future and<br />

we have started to use them in melon (Morales et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />

primary objective of this project was to generate a high-resolution<br />

genetic map of melon based on SNPs that will complement an earlier<br />

map. This new map will be important for the achievement of the rest<br />

of objectives of the project.<br />

One of the main objectives in melon breeding in Spain is<br />

incorporating resistance to a number of plant diseases, both fungal<br />

(e.g., powdery mildew, soil-borne fungal diseases, and melon collapse)<br />

and viral (e.g., Cucumber mosaic virus [CMV], Watermelon mosaic<br />

virus [WMV-2], Zucchini yellow mosaic virus [ZYMV], and <strong>Cucurbit</strong><br />

aphid-borne yellows virus [CABYV] in the field and Melon necrotic<br />

spot virus [MNSV], Cucumber vein yellow virus [CVYV], and<br />

Cucumber yellow stunting disorder virus [CYSDV] in glasshouse<br />

production). It is important to develop melon varieties resistant to<br />

these pathogens (Nuez et al., 1999). <strong>The</strong>re are several known<br />

monogenic disease-resistance genes in melon. A few have been<br />

characterized by positional cloning (Joobeur et al., 2004; Nieto et al.,<br />

unpublished). Thus, it is important to have BAC libraries, such as the<br />

one obtained from a melon DHL containing 23,000 clones with an<br />

average size of 141kb (van Leeuwen et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> cloning and<br />

analysis of the genomic distribution of some disease-resistance genes<br />

in several plant species has revealed the existence of clusters of these<br />

genes in some genomic regions (Leister et al., 1996). We have<br />

detected at least three regions in melon that contain several known<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 181


disease-resistance genes and homologous sequences (Garcia-Mas et<br />

al., 2001). <strong>The</strong>se regions will be further studied during this project<br />

after building BAC contigs spanning 1-Mb regions, which will lead to<br />

a better understanding of the organization of the melon genome (van<br />

Leeuwen et al., 2003, 2005).<br />

On the other hand, the availability of large collections of ESTs in<br />

model species has facilitated the correct assembling of whole genomes<br />

after sequencing (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000). EST<br />

collections may allow the construction of microarrays with thousands<br />

of ESTs representing an organism, a very powerful tool for highthroughput<br />

genetic-expression studies (Seki et al., 2001). During this<br />

project we anticipate sequencing 30000 ESTs and developing a melon<br />

ESTs oligo chip. <strong>The</strong> analysis of the expression data obtained with the<br />

chip will be complex, so we will also establish a bioinformatics<br />

platform.<br />

<strong>The</strong> analysis of gene function requires the existence of mutant<br />

alleles for the genes analyzed. Plant breeding also needs genetic<br />

variability, which is not always available naturally. This can be<br />

important in the cucurbit family, a group of species relatively isolated<br />

among the cultivated crops. For this reason the TILLING approach has<br />

been developed (McCallum et al., 2000). Using this methodology we<br />

can search for allelic variants for a candidate gene. In this project we<br />

will also establish a melon mutant population and a TILLING<br />

platform.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

<strong>The</strong> melon genotypes used for contructing the cDNA libraries were<br />

the Korean accession PI 161375, two ‘Piel de sapo’ cultivars, the C35<br />

cantaloupe line, and the C. melo ssp. agrestis accession pat81. RNAs<br />

were extracted using the Tri-reagent kit (Sigma). cDNA libraries were<br />

normalized and constructed in the pBSK cloning vector. <strong>The</strong> EST<br />

sequences were produced in Macrogen (Seoul, Korea). EST annotation<br />

and analysis was performed and stored in .<br />

For SNP discovery, primers were designed from melon ESTs, and<br />

the amplified products in PI 161375 and T111 were sequenced and<br />

aligned. SNPs were genotyped using CAPS or the SNaPshot kit. SNPs<br />

were mapped in the PI 161375 x T111 genetic map using bin-mapping<br />

(Howad et al., 2005).<br />

cDNA clones corresponding to melon RFLP markers in Oliver et<br />

al. (2001) were sequenced. Specific primers were designed and used to<br />

screen the melon BAC library (van Leeuwen et al., 2003).<br />

182 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Melon seed from a ‘Piel de sapo’ breeding line from Semillas Fitó<br />

was treated with ethyl-methane sulfonate (EMS) using standard<br />

protocols. <strong>The</strong> M1 plants were selfed and M2 seed was stored. Ten M2<br />

individuals from each M2 family were grown and DNA was extracted<br />

(QIAGEN) and pooled for each family.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

MELON ESTS. We have constructed eight normalized cDNA<br />

libraries from five different melon genotypes (see Materials and<br />

Methods section). Two cDNA libraries corresponded to melon fruit<br />

tissue 15 and 46 days after pollination (DAP). Four cDNA libraries<br />

were obtained from healthy roots and roots inoculated with<br />

Monosporascus cannonballus in two different melon genotypes. Two<br />

cDNA libraries were prepared from healthy leaves and leaves infected<br />

with CMV. After sequencing 3,500–4,000 EST clones from each<br />

library (5’ sequencing), 30,675 high-quality ESTs were obtained.<br />

WEBPAGE AND EST DATABASE. Once clustered and annotated, the<br />

ESTs were classified in 6,023 contigs and 10,615 singletons, yielding<br />

16,637 unigenes. A Webpage that contains all of the EST information<br />

has been constructed (www.melogen.upv.es). <strong>The</strong> database is<br />

searchable in a user-friendly way to provide sequence information for<br />

the members of MELOGEN. For example, the system provides tools<br />

to easily identify ESTs containing SSR motifs or “in silico” SNPs.<br />

SNP DISCOVERY AND DETECTION. ESTs were selected either<br />

randomly or because they may be candidate genes for interesting<br />

agronomic traits. Two systems were used to discover SNPs between<br />

the melon genotypes PI 161375 and ‘Piel de sapo’: (a) specific primer<br />

design from each EST and resequencing the amplicons from PI<br />

161375 and ‘Piel de sapo’, and (b) in silico SNP discovery using the<br />

MELOGEN database. Because many EST contigs contain ESTs from<br />

different melon genotypes, it is possible to identify putative SNPs that<br />

can be validated later. For SNP detection and mapping we used 14<br />

DHL individuals from the PI 161375 x ‘Piel de sapo’ mapping<br />

population, which allows mapping the SNP in a known interval of the<br />

genetic map with lower resolution: selective mapping or “binmapping”<br />

(Howad et al., 2005). SNPs have been detected using either<br />

CAPS markers or, when there was no restriction enzyme differentially<br />

recognizing the SNP sequence, the SNaPshot kit. At this time we have<br />

discovered and mapped approximately 100 new SNPs, which are<br />

evenly distributed in the 12 melon linkage groups.<br />

PHYSICAL MAP. We have anchored to the genetic map 100 BAC<br />

clones using RFLP probes. For each cDNA producing an RFLP,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 183


specific primers were designed. <strong>The</strong>se primers were used to PCR<br />

amplify the melon BAC library (van Leeuwen et al., 2003), which is<br />

arranged in superpools and pools of DNA, making it easier to identify<br />

a positive BAC clone for each RFLP. <strong>The</strong>se BAC clones are the<br />

original skeleton of the melon physical map.<br />

MELON MUTANT POPULATION. A ‘Piel de sapo’ breeding line was<br />

chemically mutated with EMS at different concentrations to determine<br />

the optimum EMS concentration for an efficient mutation of the melon<br />

genome. From 17,000 M0 mutagenized seed, 8,000 M1 plants were<br />

grown and selfed in two different locations. We have obtained M2 seed<br />

from 3,000 M1 plants. This is the basis of our melon TILLING<br />

population. At the beginning of 2006, 10 to 20 seeds have been grown<br />

for 1,000 M2 families. DNA has been extracted and pooled for each<br />

M2 family. Experiments to identify mutants for several genes of<br />

interest using the heteroduplex digestion method based on the Cel1<br />

enzyme have been started.<br />

FUTURE PROSPECTS. <strong>The</strong> EST unigene set is ready for the design<br />

of the first melon oligo chip. For this purpose we will use Nimblegen<br />

technology. Expression experiments will be performed using the<br />

melon oligo chip with RNA samples from melon fruits in different<br />

stages of development, and leaf and root tissues infected with viruses<br />

and fungi, respectively. We will continue the discovery and mapping<br />

of SNPs in order to reach 300 new markers in the melon genetic map.<br />

At the same time, the SNP markers will be used to identify new BAC<br />

clones anchored to the genetic map. If the mutation rate in the EMStreated<br />

population is acceptable, we will continue extracting DNA<br />

from the M2 families until we reach an initial collection of 3,000.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the<br />

flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 408:796–815.<br />

Arumuganathan, K. and E. D. Earle. 1991. Nuclear DNA content of some important<br />

plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:208–218.<br />

Garcia-Mas, J., H. van Leeuwen, A. Monfort, M. C. de Vicente, P. Puigdomènech,<br />

and P. Arús. 2001. Cloning and mapping of resistance gene homologues in<br />

melon. Plant Sci. 161:165–172.<br />

Gonzalo, M. J., M. Oliver, J. Garcia-Mas, A. Monfort, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, N. Katzir,<br />

P. Arús, A. J. Monforte. 2005. Simple-sequence repeat markers used in merging<br />

linkage maps of melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 110:802–811.<br />

Howad, W., T. Yamamoto, E. Dirlewanger, R. Testolin, P. Cossont, G. Cipriani, A.<br />

J. Monforte, L. Georgi, A. G. Abbot, and P. Arús. 2005. Mapping with a few<br />

plants: using selective mapping for microsatellite saturation of the Prunus<br />

reference map. Genetics. 171:305–1309.<br />

184 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Joobeur, T., J. J. King, S. J. Nolin, C. E. Thomas, and R. A. Dean. 2004. <strong>The</strong><br />

fusarium wilt resistance locus Fom-2 of melon contains a single resistance gene<br />

with complex features. Plant J. 39:283–297.<br />

Leister, D., A. Ballvora, F. Salamini, and C. Gebhardt. 1996. A PCR-based approach<br />

for isolating pathogen resistance genes from potato with potential for wide<br />

application in plants. Nature Gen. 14:421–429.<br />

McCallum, C. M., L. Comai, E. A. Greene, and S. Henikoff. 2000. Targeted<br />

screening for induced mutations. Nat. Biotech. 18:455–457.<br />

Morales, M., E. Roig, A. J. Monforte, P. Arús, and J. Garcia-Mas. 2004. Single<br />

nucleotide polymorphisms detected in ESTs of melon (Cucumis melo L.).<br />

Genome. 47:352–360.<br />

Nuez, F., B. Picó, A. Iglesias, J. Esteva, and M. Juarez. 1999. Genetics of melon<br />

yellows virus resistance derived from Cucumis melo spp. agrestis. Eur. J. Plant<br />

Pathol. 105:453–464.<br />

Oliver, M., J. Garcia-Mas, M. Cardús, N. Pueyo, A. I. López-Sesé, M. Arroyo, H.<br />

Gómez-Paniagua, P. Arús, and M. C. de Vicente. 2001. Construction of a<br />

reference linkage map for melon. Genome. 44:836–845.<br />

Seki, M., M. Narusaka, H. Abe, M. Kasuga, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, P. Carninci,<br />

Y. Hayashizaki, and K. Shinozaki. 2001. Monitoring the expression pattern of<br />

1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length<br />

cDNA microarray. Plant Cell. 13:61–72.<br />

van Leeuwen, H., A. Monfort, H. B. Zhang, and P. Puigdomènech. 2003.<br />

Identification and characterisation of a melon genomic region containing a<br />

resistance gene cluster from a constructed BAC library. microlinearity between<br />

Cucumis melo and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. Mol. Biol. 51:703–718.<br />

van Leeuwen, H., J. Garcia-Mas, M. Coca, P. Puigdomènech, and A. Monfort. 2005.<br />

Analysis of the melon genome in regions encompassing TIR-NBS-LRR<br />

resistance genes. Mol. Gen. Genom. 273:240–251.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 185


THE MELOGEN PROJECT: EST<br />

SEQUENCING, PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS<br />

Pere Puigdomènech<br />

Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA,<br />

Departament de Genètica Molecular, Barcelona, Spain<br />

Pere Arús, Jordi García-Mas, and Mireia González<br />

Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA,<br />

Departament de Genètica Vegetal, Cabrils, Spain<br />

Fernando Nuez, José Blanca, Belén Picó, and Cristina Roig<br />

COMAV-UPV, Departamento de Biotecnología, Valencia, Spain<br />

Miguel Aranda and Daniel González<br />

CEBAS-CSIC, Departamento de Biología del Estrés y Patología<br />

Vegetal, Murcia, Spain<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, expressed sequence tabs, cDNA<br />

libraries, bioinformatics, qPCR, gene expression<br />

ABSTRACT. Thirty thousand melon (Cucumis melo) ESTs have been sequenced<br />

from eight normalized cDNA libraries corresponding to different tissues in<br />

different physiological conditions: healthy leaf and root, Monosporascus<br />

cannonballus-infected root, cotyledons inoculated with Cucumber mosaic virus<br />

(CMV), and fruits of 15 and 46 days after pollination. A database and a Web<br />

page have been created (www.melogen.upv.es), with statistical information<br />

about libraries, 16,600 unigenes, 350 putative SNPs, and 1,000 putative<br />

microsatellites. In addition, we have made gene-expression analysis by Real-<br />

Time-qPCR for 20 unigenes of the database, including genes known to respond<br />

to pathogen infection such as a 70-KDa heat shock protein (Hsp70), a WRKY<br />

transcription factor, the eukaryotic translation initiation factors 4E and (iso)4E<br />

described as susceptibility factors for some plant viruses, and several other<br />

genes involved in fruit development.<br />

S<br />

pain is fifth in the world in the production of melons (Cucumis<br />

melo L.) and is the largest producer in Europe. In Spain, melon<br />

is the second most widely grown vegetable crop after tomato<br />

(F.A.O., 2006). <strong>The</strong> agricultural importance of melon and the<br />

possibilities that plant genomics offers (e.g., Rensink and Buell, 2005)<br />

have led to the establishment of a Spanish consortium to develop<br />

genomic tools in melon, focusing on resistance to pathogens and on<br />

fruit-quality traits (Melogen). <strong>The</strong> research that we present in this<br />

paper has been performed within the framework of this consortium.<br />

Partial sequencing of cDNA inserts of expressed sequence tags<br />

(ESTs) has been used as an effective method for gene discovery,<br />

molecular-marker generation, and transcript pattern characterization. It<br />

186 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


is an efficient approach for identifying sets of plant genes expressed<br />

during different developmental stages and/or responding to<br />

environmental stimuli. Despite the importance of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae,<br />

relatively little EST information is currently available. For this reason,<br />

we have undertaken a survey of the melon transcriptome by analyzing<br />

ESTs from eight normalized cDNA libraries corresponding to different<br />

tissues in different physiological conditions: healthy leaf and root,<br />

Monosporascus cannonballus-infected root, cotyledons inoculated<br />

with Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), and fruits of 15 and 46 days after<br />

pollination. Here we present the sequencing of 30,000 melon ESTs<br />

from these libraries and also a gene-expression analysis by Real-TimeqPCR<br />

for 20 unigenes of the database.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL. <strong>The</strong> genotypes used for the construction of the<br />

libraries were the ‘Piel de Sapo’-type cv. T111 (Semillas Fitó, SL,<br />

Barcelona, Spain), the cantaloupe accession C35 (germplasm<br />

collection of “La Mayora” Experimental Station, Málaga, Spain), and<br />

C. melo ssp. agrestis accession pat81 (germplasm collection of<br />

COMAV, Valencia, Spain). Inoculations with the pathogens were<br />

carried out using standard procedures (Table 1). This plant material<br />

was used as the RNA source for the construction of libraries and for<br />

gene-expression analysis by RT-qPCR.<br />

Table 1. Description of the cDNA libraries.<br />

Name Accession Tissue Physiol. cond Kind<br />

A agrestis pat_81 root healthy normalized<br />

AI agrestis pat_81 root M cannonballus normalized<br />

PS Piel de Sapo root healthy normalized<br />

PSI Piel de Sapo root M cannonballus normalized<br />

HS c35 leaf healthy normalized<br />

CI c35 cotyledon CMV infected normalized<br />

15d t111 Piel_de_Sapo 15 days fruit healthy normalized<br />

46d t111 Piel_de_Sapo 46 days fruit healthy normalized<br />

CDNA LIBRARIES. Total RNA was prepared using TriReagent<br />

(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Poly(A) RNA from total RNA was<br />

purified with a cellulose-oligo(dT)-based method [MicroPoly(A)<br />

Purist, (Ambion, Austin, TX)]. Integrity and quality of both total and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 187


poly(A) RNA were tested by gel electrophoresis. cDNA libraries were<br />

constructed with the SMART cDNA Library Construction kit<br />

(Clontech, Mountain View, CA), with a modified primer to include an<br />

Sfi I enzyme restriction site. <strong>The</strong> normalization step was carried out<br />

with TRIMMER kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). <strong>The</strong> cDNA<br />

fractionation step was made with SizeSep 400 Spun Columns<br />

(Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England). cDNA was digested with Sfi<br />

I generating Sfi IA-Sfi IB cohesive ends for directional cloning into a<br />

modified version of BlueScript SK plasmid vector (Stratagene, La<br />

Jolla, CA). <strong>The</strong> product of ligation was transformed into E. coli<br />

electrocompetent cells DH10B (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) by<br />

electroporation. Title of libraries was evaluated plating an aliquot on<br />

LB agar plates with ampicillin at 100μg/ml. Only libraries of<br />

10 5 cfu/ml or more were accepted. In order to check the average insert<br />

size, 24 plasmid DNA minipreps from randomly picked colonies were<br />

analyzed by Eco RI-Hind III restriction analyses.<br />

SEQUENCING OF ESTS. Sequencing was carried out from the 5´end<br />

of the insert without library amplification using the universal M13<br />

reverse primer. An external custom service was contracted for this task<br />

(Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea). Approximately 6,000 clones were<br />

sequenced from the “inoculated cotyledon” (CI) library, and 3,500<br />

clones from each of the other libraries (Table 2).<br />

Table 2. cDNA libraries statistical information.<br />

Raw<br />

sequen<br />

High-<br />

quality<br />

Redundancy <br />

Libspecificuni-<br />

Libraryces<br />

ESTs<br />

SingletonsContigsUnigenes<br />

(%) genes<br />

15d 3936 3582 1064 1875 2939 18 1312 45<br />

46d 3840 3493 1070 1787 2857 18 1291 45<br />

A 3936 3666 1344 1844 3188 13 1424 45<br />

Ai 3647 3255 974 1644 2618 20 1494 57<br />

Hs 3648 3012 989 1564 2553 15 1120 44<br />

Ci 6605 5664 2177 2509 4686 17 2618 56<br />

Ps 3840 3377 1245 1702 2947 13 1408 48<br />

Psi 3840 3555 1339 1768 3107 13 2000 64<br />

Total 34417 30675 10614 6023 16637 46 12844 77<br />

Nov-<br />

elty<br />

(%)<br />

GENE-EXPRESSION ANALYSIS BY RT-QPCR. Real-time<br />

quantitative PCR was performed with an AB 7500 System (Applied<br />

Biosystems, Foster City, CA) to quantify mRNA of some transcripts of<br />

interest. Twenty ESTs representing these transcripts were chosen from<br />

the database and used to generate gene-specific primers with Primer<br />

188 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Express Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). <strong>The</strong><br />

chemistry used for PCR product detection was the Power SYBR green<br />

dye (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and ROX as passive<br />

reference. Cyclophilin served as endogenous control (sequence<br />

extracted from the database) and ΔΔCt was the method of calculation<br />

used to perform relative quantification. Melting curves analyses at the<br />

end of the process and No Template Controls (NTC) were carried out<br />

to ensure product-specific amplification and no primer-dimer<br />

quantification. A control reaction as for reverse transcription but<br />

without the enzyme was performed to evaluate genomic DNA<br />

contamination.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Almost 35,000 rough sequences were generated. After processing<br />

to eliminate vector sequences, short PCR products, and poor-quality<br />

sequences, 30,675 high-quality ESTs were identified. <strong>The</strong>se were used<br />

for clustering, resulting in 16,637 unigenes (10,614 singletons and<br />

6,023 contigs) (Table 2). This high proportion of singletons could be<br />

due to the normalization step. Traditionally, normalization protocols<br />

are based on reassociation of denatured double-stranded DNA, so that<br />

most of the abundant DNA molecules will form double-stranded (ds)<br />

molecules, whereas the single-stranded (ss) fraction results equalized<br />

to a considerable extent. <strong>The</strong> normalization protocol that we have used<br />

here consists of a novel method based on a DNase treatment that, in<br />

contrast with other methods, does not require physical separation of<br />

the two fractions for selecting the ss-molecules, increasing yield and<br />

probably efficiency. As shown by electrophoresis in agarose gels,<br />

bands corresponding to the more abundant transcripts are efficiently<br />

eliminated in normalized samples (Figure 1, arrow in lane 4).<br />

Once processed and annotated, an EST database and a Web page<br />

were created to facilitate access to information (www.melogen.<br />

upv.es). In addition to the unigenes identified, clustering and<br />

redundant sequences have served as a resource for identification of<br />

single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by comparing EST<br />

sequences pertaining to contigs from different melon genotypes. More<br />

than 1,000 putative short sequence repeats (SSRs) and 356 putative<br />

SNPs have been generated and have the potential to be used as<br />

molecular markers.<br />

Gene-expression analyses were made by RT-qPCR to quantify<br />

transcript accumulation for some genes of interest (Table 3).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 189


1 2 3 4 5<br />

Fig. 1. Construction of the healthy leaf library (HS). Lanes 1, 2, 3: cDNA after<br />

normalization. Lane 4: cDNA prior to normalization. Lane 5: molecular weight<br />

marker.<br />

Sequences were extracted from the database searching by keyword or<br />

BLAST result with an orthologue sequence from another species (e.g.,<br />

Arabidopsis thaliana). Transcripts were quantified altogether in the<br />

tissues and conditions used for generation of the libraries. Cyclophilin<br />

was used for normalization. Its expression pattern showed very little<br />

variation when tissues in different physiological conditions were<br />

compared (e.g., healthy vs. inoculated roots), though variation<br />

increased when different tissues were compared (e.g., root vs. leaf)<br />

(data not shown). <strong>The</strong>refore, it seemed reasonable to compare<br />

expression profiles for different physiological conditions but for a<br />

given tissue. For example, Figure 2 shows the effect of CMV<br />

inoculation on cotyledon gene expression. As already described for<br />

other plant-virus combinations, we identified an increase in the<br />

expression of the 70-KDa and 101-KDa heat shock proteins<br />

Table 3. Genes analyzed by RT-qPCR.<br />

Gene Description Gene Description<br />

4A Eukar.init.fact. 4A Hsp101 Heat shock prot.<br />

4E Eukar.init.fact. 4E Hsp70 Heat shock prot.<br />

4E novel Eukar.init.fact. 4E nov. Lsm Sm-like protein<br />

Aqp Aquaporine Ly e-lycopene cyclase<br />

Aux Auxine responsive MADS MADS box protein<br />

Chi Chitinase Tom1 Tobamovirus multip. 1<br />

Eth Ethylene recept ETR2 Tom2A Tobamovirus multip. 2A<br />

Ga2ox gibberellin 2-oxidase Tom3 Tobamovirus multip. 3<br />

Glu UDP-glucose epimerase WRKY WRKY DNA-binding<br />

Hyp hypersensitive response Xyl Xyloglucan endotransgl.<br />

190 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


(HSP70 and HSP101) associated with CMV infection (Aranda et al.,<br />

1996). Notably, the transcription factor WRKY also responded with an<br />

increased transcript accumulation (Park et al., 2006). We were<br />

interested in analyzing the response of genes described as factors<br />

required for viral infection, such as eukaryotic translation initiation<br />

factors (Robaglia and Caranta, 2006), Tom genes, and Lsm (Kushner<br />

et al., 2003). Except for Tom2A, no significant modification on their<br />

patterns of transcript accumulation could be detected after CMV<br />

infection (Figure 2).<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

4A<br />

4e<br />

4enovel<br />

cy<br />

hsp101B<br />

hsp70<br />

Fig. 2. Pattern of transcript accumulation for 10 selected genes in healthy (CS)<br />

and CMV-infected melon cotyledons (CI). RNA accumulation is expressed<br />

relative to that of healthy cotyledons.<br />

FUTURE PROSPECTS. <strong>The</strong> unigene set will be used to construct an<br />

oligo-based microarray to perform transcriptomic analysis in melon.<br />

An international project has been initiated to further increase the<br />

collection of melon ESTs and to create a common database to continue<br />

developing genomic tools in this species.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Aranda, M. et al. 1996. Induction of HSP70 and polyubiquitin expression associated<br />

with plant virus replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:15289–15293.<br />

F.A.O. 2006. Food And Agriculture Organization Of <strong>The</strong> United Nations. 15 May, 2006,<br />

.<br />

Kushner, D. et al. 2003. Systematic, genome-wide identification of host genes<br />

affecting replication of a positive-strand RNA virus. PNAS. 100:15764–15769.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 191<br />

lsm<br />

tom1<br />

CS<br />

CI<br />

tom2A<br />

tom3<br />

WRKY


Park, C. et al. 2006. A hot pepper gene encoding WRKY transcription factor is<br />

induced during hypersensitive response to Tobacco mosaic virus and<br />

Xanthomonas campestris. Planta. 223:168–179.<br />

Rensink, W. and R. Buell. 2005. Microarray expression profiling resources for<br />

plant–genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 10(12):603–608.<br />

Robaglia, C. and C. Caranta. 2006. Translation initation factors: a weak link in plant<br />

RNA virus infection. Trends Plant Sci. 11:40–45.<br />

192 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


DEVELOPMENT OF A POWDERY MILDEW-<br />

RESISTANT CUCUMBER<br />

Yoshiteru Sakata, Mitsuhiro Sugiyama, and Takayoshi Ohara<br />

National Institute of Vegetable and Tea Science<br />

Kusawa, Ano, Tsu, Mie. 514-2392, Japan<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis sativus, Podosphaera xanthii, temperatureindependent<br />

resistance<br />

ABSTRACT. We developed a cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.; accession CP-02)<br />

with resistance to powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii [Castaggne] U. Braun<br />

& N. Shishkoff) as potential breeding material. This cucumber is the progeny<br />

from crosses among CS-PMR1, ‘Sharp 1’ (Saitama Gensyu Ikuseikai), and<br />

‘Rira’ (Enza Zaden). CP-02 shows a high level of resistance to powdery mildew,<br />

not only at higher temperatures (above 25°C), but also at relatively cool<br />

temperatures (20°C). This resistance to powdery mildew is thought to be<br />

controlled by one major recessive gene and one in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene,<br />

which enhance the resistance.<br />

P<br />

owdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii [Castaggne] U. Braun &<br />

N. Shishkoff) limits the production of cucumber (Cucumis<br />

sativus L.) worldwide. In Japan, the damage caused by<br />

powdery mildew is severe, as most Japanese commercial greenhouse<br />

cultivars are susceptible to the disease during the winter-to-spring<br />

period (Morishita et al., 2002). In addition, tolerance to powdery<br />

mildew declined after the adoption of bloomless rootstocks for the<br />

production of bloomless fruits (Hazama et al., 1993; Sakata et al.,<br />

2006).<br />

Generally, fungicides are used to control powdery mildew in<br />

cucumber production, but as daily harvests are common in Japanese<br />

cultivation it is often difficult to time the spraying of fungicides<br />

properly. <strong>The</strong> mistiming of fungicide application can lead to a decline<br />

in yield, and the labor and cost of fungicide application is an<br />

undesirable burden for growers. In addition, the demand for food<br />

produced with fewer agrochemicals has been increasing.<br />

For production with reduced agrochemicals, the use of diseaseresistant<br />

cultivars is desirable. Although some European greenhousetype,<br />

Asian open-field, and Beit Alpha-type cucumber cultivars show<br />

resistance to powdery mildew at higher temperatures (above 25°C), no<br />

known cultivars are resistant under relatively cool conditions (20°C).<br />

Morishita et al. (2002) identified an accession, CS-PMR1 (Figure 1),<br />

that showed a temperature-independent resistance to powdery mildew.<br />

This accession was derived from PI 197088, a wild-type cucumber of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 193


Indian origin, and resistance was observed at both higher and lower<br />

temperatures. Morishita et al. (2003) have started breeding powdery<br />

mildew-resistant cucumber by using CS-PMR1, but it may require a<br />

long time to breed practical cultivars, as the resistance of CS-PMR1 is<br />

controlled by one recessive gene and one in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, we intend to release an accession, CP-02, with temperatureindependent<br />

resistance to powdery mildew, as breeding material.<br />

Fig. 1. Fruit of CS-PMR1, a resistant source material for breeding<br />

powdery mildew-resistant cucumber. <strong>The</strong> fruit was harvested 8 days<br />

after anthesis. <strong>The</strong> white bar indicates 5cm.<br />

Origin<br />

<strong>The</strong> source of the resistance to powdery mildew was CS-PMR1.<br />

Progenies from crosses among CS-PMR1, ‘Sharp 1’ (Saitama Gensyu<br />

Ikuseikai), and ‘Rira’ (Enza Zaden) were evaluated for powdery<br />

mildew resistance at 20°C, and one fixed accession, CP-02, was<br />

selected (Figure 2).<br />

1996 1997 1998 1999 2005<br />

PI 197088 CS-PMR1<br />

F1 F2 F3 Sharp 1 F1 F2 F8 F9 Rira CP-02<br />

Fig. 2. Pedigree of the powdery mildew-resistant cucumber accession CP-02<br />

194 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Powdery mildew resistance of CP02 and control cultivars at<br />

20°C and 26°C.<br />

Disease index z<br />

Temperature<br />

20°C<br />

Cultivar 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Avg.<br />

CP02 12 0.00<br />

Sharp 1<br />

Suisei-<br />

1 7 3 8.18<br />

fushinari<br />

Kurume<br />

3 2 8.40<br />

65<br />

Poinsette<br />

2 1 5 5 2 6.27<br />

76<br />

Asomidori<br />

3 5 1 6.78<br />

5<br />

Natsu-<br />

3 6 3 2 1 4.47<br />

fushinari<br />

Freedom<br />

2 3 1 1 1 4.50<br />

House 2 3 1 2 1 5.14<br />

CS-PMR1 1 11 0.92<br />

26°C CP02 12 0.00<br />

Sharp 1<br />

Suisei-<br />

1 11 5.92<br />

fushinari<br />

Kurume<br />

1 1 6 1 5.78<br />

65<br />

Poinsette<br />

12 6.00<br />

76<br />

Asomidori<br />

12 6.00<br />

5<br />

Natsu-<br />

2 8 2 2.00<br />

fushinari<br />

Freedom<br />

4 6 2 1.83<br />

House 2 1 4 4 1.33<br />

CS-PMR1 12 0.00<br />

z<br />

Disease index: 0 = no symptoms; 9 = <strong>complete</strong>ly covered with mildew.<br />

Inoculation of powdery mildew performed as in Morishita et al., 2002.<br />

Description<br />

<strong>The</strong> characteristics of CP-02 were evaluated in a greenhouse from<br />

spring to summer 2005. A single stem was trained vertically and<br />

pinched at 180cm, and all lateral branches were pinched at the first<br />

node. <strong>The</strong> Japanese standard cultivar ‘Tokiwa’ was used as a control.<br />

<strong>The</strong> plant height, length of internodes, and leaf size of CP-02 were<br />

similar to those of ‘Tokiwa’ (data not shown), but petiole length was<br />

relatively longer. <strong>The</strong> plant was monoecious. <strong>The</strong> fruit harvest began<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 195


approximately 60 days after seeding, as is characteristic of an earlyharvest<br />

type. Eighty percent of the lateral branches bore fruit, which<br />

was cylindrical and similar to those of a Beit Alpha cucumber (Figure<br />

3). Fruit was small, weighing approximately 60g. No warts or spines<br />

were found on the surface. <strong>The</strong> fruit skin was dark green and tough,<br />

the flesh relatively soft. Parthenocarpy was evident.<br />

Fig. 3. Fruit of CP-02. <strong>The</strong> fruit was harvested 8 days after anthesis. <strong>The</strong> white<br />

bar indicates 5cm.<br />

Under growth-chamber conditions, using artificial inoculation of<br />

Podosphaera xanthii derived from naturally infected melon leaves, the<br />

powdery mildew resistance of CP-02 was found to be temperatureindependent,<br />

with resistant reactions observed at both 20°C and 26°C<br />

(Table 1). We have tested with various isolates and populations; to<br />

date, no breakdown of resistance has been observed. <strong>The</strong> resistance to<br />

powdery mildew is thought to be controlled by one major recessive<br />

gene and one in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene, enhancing the resistance<br />

(data not shown).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Hazama, W., S. Morita, and T. Kato. 1993. Resistance to Corynespora target leaf<br />

spot in cucumber grafted on a bloomless rootstock. Soc. Phytopath. Soc. Jpn.<br />

59:243–248. (In Japanese with English summary.)<br />

Morishita, M., K. Sugiyama, T. Saito, and Y. Sakata. 2002. An improved evaluation<br />

method for screening and selection of powdery mildew resistant cultivars and<br />

lines of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71:94–100. (In<br />

Japanese with English summary.)<br />

Morishita, M., K. Sugiyama, T. Saito, and Y. Sakata. 2003. Powdery mildew<br />

resistance in cucumber. JARQ. 37:7–14.<br />

Sakata, Y., M. Sugiyama, T. Ohara, and M. Morishita. 2006. Influence of rootstocks<br />

on the resistance of grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) scions to powdery<br />

mildew (Podosphaera xanthii U. Braun & N. Shishkoff). J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

75:135–140.<br />

196 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


HISTORY AND APPLICATION OF<br />

MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR CUCUMBER<br />

IMPROVEMENT<br />

J. E. Staub, M. D. Robbins, S. M. Chung, and Z. Sun<br />

USDA/ARS, Vegetable Crops Unit, Department of Horticulture,<br />

University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Marker development, map construction, QTL<br />

analysis, marker-assisted selection<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> history of marker development, map construction, and the<br />

utility of marker-assisted selection (MAS) is presented. Experimental results<br />

indicate that the identification of marker-trait associations will continue to be<br />

extremely expensive and time consuming, but will likely pay large dividends for<br />

use in MAS. MAS for quantitative trait improvement will require a populationspecific<br />

evaluation of genotypic background, and an understanding of<br />

physiology (source-sink relationships), epistasis, and heritabilities.<br />

C<br />

ucumber has a narrow genetic base (3–8%) as defined by DNA<br />

assessments of genetic diversity (Dijkhuizen et al., 1996;<br />

Horejsi and Staub, 1999; Meglic et al., 1996). Nevertheless,<br />

cucumber is amenable to MAS because of its rapid life cycle (3–4<br />

months), its low chromosome number, and relatively small genome (~<br />

750cM map length). <strong>The</strong> development of genetic marker systems<br />

(Horejsi et al., 1999; Fazio et al., 2002) and unique genetic stocks<br />

(Staub et al., 1996 & 2002a) have allowed for the slow but consistent<br />

development of genetic maps for use in marker-assisted selection<br />

(MAS) (Serquen et al. 1997; Fazio et al., 2003a).<br />

<strong>The</strong> pyramiding of simply inherited genes (e.g., disease resistance)<br />

during germplasm enhancement is common, and has proven useful in<br />

the improvement of many crop species. Less well reported and<br />

understood are genetic approaches for the incorporation of<br />

quantitatively inherited traits. In cucumber, quantitative trait loci<br />

(QTL) conditioning yield components have been identified and<br />

mapped for potential use in MAS (Serquen et al. 1997; Fazio et al.,<br />

2003a). <strong>The</strong> use of MAS in cucumber improvement has been effective<br />

for increasing gain from selection for single (Fazio et al., 2003b) as<br />

well as multiple quantitatively inherited traits (Fan et al., 2006;<br />

Robbins, 2006). Because marker development and the implementation<br />

of MAS in cucumber has spanned nearly 2.5 decades, reports are often<br />

not synchronous and, therefore, a historical understanding of this<br />

process is not self-evident. This paper seeks to provide a historical<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 197


understanding of marker development, mapping, and MAS in<br />

cucumber.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

<strong>The</strong> results presented herein are a synthesis of reports on marker<br />

development (Horesji et al., 1999; Staub et al., 2002b; Robbins, 2006),<br />

map construction (Serquen et al., 1997; Bradeen et al., 2001; Fazio et<br />

al., 2003a; Sun et al., 2006), and their use in MAS (Robbins and Staub,<br />

2004; Robbins, 2006; Fazio et al., 2003b; Fan et al., 2006). While the<br />

description of marker development focuses on the difficulties<br />

encountered in marker identification and characterization, Linkage<br />

Group (LG) 1 is used to validate its importance in MAS. Previously<br />

unreported data are presented, and are used to synthesize concepts to<br />

define the use of marker systems for cucumber improvement.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> development and use of molecular markers for cucumber<br />

improvement in our laboratory is depicted in Figure 1. <strong>The</strong> process for<br />

the application of genetic markers in MAS has followed three major<br />

recurring cycles, regardless of marker type. Potentially useful markers<br />

are identified and then developed into efficient and effective systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se markers are then placed on a genetic map and associated with<br />

QTL through progeny analysis for their subsequent use in MAS.<br />

1980<br />

Isozymes,<br />

RFLP<br />

1990<br />

RAPD,<br />

AFLP,<br />

SSR<br />

2000<br />

SNP<br />

Resource<br />

allocation<br />

New Technologies New Technologies New Technologies<br />

Methods<br />

development<br />

Marker<br />

Development<br />

Methods<br />

evaluation<br />

New Technologies<br />

Methods<br />

assessment<br />

Map<br />

construction<br />

Mapping &<br />

QTL analysis<br />

QTL<br />

analysis<br />

Field<br />

evaluation<br />

Analysis of<br />

gain<br />

Markerassisted<br />

selection<br />

Experimental<br />

design<br />

Population<br />

development<br />

New Technologies New Technologies<br />

Fig. 1. Schematic of marker development and application in cucumber<br />

breeding.<br />

198 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


MARKER DEVELOPMENT. Marker development has occurred in<br />

several marker systems [isozymes, restriction fragment length<br />

polymorphisms (RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />

(RAPD), sequenced characterized amplified region (SCAR), amplified<br />

fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP), simple sequence repeats<br />

(SSR), and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)], where changes<br />

have been driven by steady advances in technology. In each case, the<br />

cost of development has been critical, since funding for markerdevelopment<br />

projects has not been abundant in U.S. public plantbreeding<br />

programs. Much-needed funding to support our laboratory<br />

was received from international seed companies between 1984 and<br />

1999 for the development of isozyme, RFLP, RAPD, and SSR<br />

technologies, with the goal of developing a moderately saturated<br />

genetic map (~150 to 200 markers to provide 90–95% coverage at 10–<br />

15-cM intervals).<br />

Between 1984 and 1995, isozyme and RFLP markers were<br />

developed and placed on unsaturated genetic maps (Knerr and Staub,<br />

1992; Meglic and Staub, 1996; Kennard et al., 1994). <strong>The</strong> use of these<br />

codominant markers was assessed, but their development was<br />

minimized because of their high utilization costs and the paucity of<br />

markers detected when compared to newly developed RAPD<br />

technologies (Figure 1). Dominant RAPD, and subsequently AFLP<br />

markers, were attractive because of their comparatively low<br />

technological costs and simple methodologies. In the case of RAPD<br />

technology, putative polymorphism declaration (i.e., number of bands)<br />

were relatively high (10–15 bands per primer), but reproducibility was<br />

low, as was their fit to 3:1 genetic ratios for many putative marker loci<br />

(recovery rate ≈ 50 markers per 1,000 evaluated) (Staub et al., 1996).<br />

This level of recovery is not unusual in other marker systems. Sun et<br />

al. (2006) found relatively few polymorphisms in RAPD, SCAR, and<br />

SSR markers between elite mapping parents in a narrow cross (Table<br />

1).<br />

Dominant markers (RAPD and AFLP) were initially useful in the<br />

development of more advanced maps (Serquen et al., 1997; Bradeeen<br />

et al.,2001), but are not preferred in breeding programs. <strong>The</strong> mapped<br />

RAPD loci were, nevertheless, strategically important (Serquen et al.,<br />

1997), and were subjected to conversion to SCAR markers by silver<br />

staining-mediated sequencing (Horejsi et al., 1999). Although 62<br />

(83%) of the 75 RAPDs were successfully cloned, only 48 (64%)<br />

RAPD markers were successfully converted to SCAR markers and 11<br />

(15%) of these reproduced the polymorphism observed in the original<br />

RAPD PCR product. <strong>The</strong> appearance of automated sequencing<br />

technologies led to the development of codominant SSR and SNP<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 199


Table 1. Marker recovery from comparative genotype screening<br />

between two elite parents (2A and Gy8) used in mapping<br />

parthenocarpy (Sun et al. 2006).<br />

Total<br />

Marker type examined<br />

No.<br />

polymorphic 1<br />

No.<br />

mapped 2<br />

RAPD 1077 77 17<br />

SCAR 3 77 2 1<br />

Melon SSR 4 89 1 0<br />

Cucumber<br />

SSR5 135 4 3<br />

1 At least one major band polymorphism between parents.<br />

2 Fitted to either 1:2:1 (codominant) or 3:1 (dominant) ratio at α = 0.01.<br />

3 SCAR according to Horejsi et al., 1999.<br />

4 Melon SSR sequences according to Danin-Poleg et al., 2000.<br />

5 Cucumber SSR sequences according to Fazio et al., 2002.<br />

technologies (Fazio et al., 2002, 2003a) and a reassessment of the<br />

conversion of RAPD to SCAR markers (Robbins, 2006; Figure 1).<br />

Two methods (sequencing and BAC library hybridization) were<br />

employed to convert RAPD to SCAR, and SCAR to SNP markers for<br />

increased efficiency (multiplexing) and effectiveness (stable and<br />

codominant) (Robbins, 2006). A total of 39 new markers (SCAR and<br />

SNP) were developed, seven of which have proven effective when<br />

multiplexed in MAS (Figure 2; Robbins, 2006).<br />

MAPPING AND QTL ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> cucumber maps of Kennard et<br />

al. (1994; wide- and narrow-based), Serquen et al. (1997), and Park et<br />

al. (2000) spanned 766 (narrow-based) and 480 (wide-based), 600, and<br />

1904<br />

1584<br />

1375<br />

947<br />

831<br />

564<br />

AW14SCAR (H)<br />

L19-2-SCAR (H)<br />

AW14SCAR (G)<br />

L18-SNP-H19 (H)<br />

Fig. 2. Example of a multiplexing reaction in a population. <strong>The</strong> far left lane is a<br />

molecular weight marker (in base pairs). <strong>The</strong> four bands (top to bottom) are:<br />

the H19 allele of AW14SCAR (a codominant marker); L19-2-SCAR (H19 allele<br />

is present, GY7 allele is absent); the GY7 allele of AW14SCAR; and L18-SNP-<br />

H19 (H19 allele is present, GY7 allele is absent).<br />

200 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


816cM, respectively. <strong>The</strong> map constructed by Serquen et al. (1997)<br />

defined 9 linkage groups with an average distance between RAPD<br />

markers of 8.4cM. Information from the Serquen et al. (1997) map<br />

was recently merged with other maps (Fanourakis and Simon, 1987;<br />

Horejsi et al. 2000; Kennard et al., 1994; Knerr and Staub, 1992;<br />

Meglic and Staub, 1996) to synthesize a consensus map spanning 10<br />

linkage groups with 255 markers, including morphological traits,<br />

disease resistance loci, isozymes, RFLPs, RAPDs, and AFLPs<br />

(Bradeen et al., 2001). <strong>The</strong> mean marker interval in this consensus<br />

map was 2.1cM with a total length of 538cM. Fazio et al. (2003a)<br />

then constructed a map containing 14 SSR, 24 SCAR, 27 AFLP, 62<br />

RAPD, 1 SNP, and 3 morphological markers (131 total markers)<br />

spanning 7 linkage groups (the theoretical number) using recombinant<br />

inbred lines (RIL). This map spanned 706cM with a mean marker<br />

interval of 5.6cM. More recently, Sun et al. (2006) constructed a map<br />

to identify the map location of parthenocarpy using an F2:3 design<br />

employing lines 2A (parthenocarpic) and Gy8 (nonparthenocarpic) as<br />

mapping parents. Linkage maps having 7 linkage groups (LG) were<br />

constructed, consisting of 47 (2A-coupling phase), 48 (Gy8-coupling<br />

phase), and 54 (coupling plus repulsion phase) DNA markers,<br />

spanning 388.6cM, 412.2cM, and 496.6cM, with an average marker<br />

interval of 8.1cM, 8.8cM, and 9.2cM, respectively. <strong>The</strong> general<br />

marker order is conserved (collinearity) in the maps of Fazio et al.<br />

(2003a), Sun et al. (2006), and Bradeen et al. (2001) (Table 2),<br />

indicating the potential utility of the consensus map of Bradeen et al.<br />

(2001). Three genomic regions conditioning parthenocarpic QTLs in<br />

Sun et al. (2006) were also mapped to the same genomic regions as<br />

QTLs detected for fruit yield at first-harvest as reported by Fazio et al.<br />

(2003a).<br />

MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION. Two experiments have been<br />

reported using marker-trait associations identified by Serquen et al.<br />

(1997) and Fazio et al., (2003a) for MAS of yield components. Five<br />

QTL for a single trait, multiple lateral branching (MLB), were linked<br />

with SNP, SSR (2), and RAPD (2) markers on different linkage<br />

groups. <strong>The</strong>se associations were used during backcrossing to increase<br />

MLB. <strong>The</strong> means of MLB after phenotypic (BC2PHE = 3.0, BC3PHE<br />

= 3.3) and marker-aided selection (BC2MAS = 3.1, BC3MAS = 3.1)<br />

were not significantly different. Thus, markers linked to MLB are<br />

effective tools in marker-assisted cucumber improvement.<br />

Multiple-trait MAS in cucumber was examined during phenotypic<br />

recurrent mass selection (population development) followed by MAS<br />

(SSR, RAPD, SCAR, and SNP) backcrossing (line extraction) (Fan et<br />

al., 2006). Similar gain from selection was detected as a result of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 201


Table 2. Common genetic markers in Linkage Group 1 across four<br />

linkage maps in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var. sativus and var.<br />

hardwickii [R.]) Alef.<br />

Sun et al., 2006<br />

(2A × Gy8) F2<br />

var. sativus ×<br />

var. sativus<br />

Linkage group 1<br />

Updated Fazio et al.<br />

2003a<br />

(Gy7 × H19)<br />

RIL var.<br />

sativus ×<br />

var. sativus<br />

Bradeen et al. 2001 Bradeen et al. 2001<br />

Narrow-<br />

based<br />

consensus<br />

F 2/BC var.<br />

sativus × var.<br />

sativus<br />

Broad-<br />

based<br />

consensus<br />

F 2/BC<br />

var. sativus<br />

× var. hardwickii<br />

F (LG1,0.0) F (LGA,0.0)<br />

CSWCT25-350 CSWCT25-350<br />

(LG1,6.5)<br />

(LG1,9.4)<br />

J5-SCAR<br />

(LG1,11.2)<br />

J5_1 (LGA,5.6)<br />

de (LG1,28.8) de (LGA,15.6)<br />

E14M62-214 E14/M62-F-214-P2 E14/M62-F-214-P2<br />

(LG1,37.2)<br />

(LGA,52.2)<br />

(LGA,77.9)<br />

E14M62-112 E14/M62-F-112-P1<br />

(LG1,43.0)<br />

(LGA,41.2)<br />

E12M62-230 E12M62-230<br />

(LG1,56.2)<br />

(LG1,49.0)<br />

E18M48-188 E18M48-188<br />

(LG1-2A,64.6) (LG1,54.7<br />

I1B-SCAR<br />

(LG1,57.5)<br />

I1_1 (LGA,54.4)<br />

OP-AJ6 (LG1,59.5) AJ6 (LGA,52.2)<br />

E12M48-107 E12/M48-F-107-P2<br />

(LG1,62.2)<br />

(LGA,53.0)<br />

BC523-SCAR<br />

(LG1,64.1)<br />

BC523 (LGA,52.2)<br />

OP-AD12-1 AD12 (LGA,49.2)<br />

(LG1,68.4)<br />

OP-W7-2<br />

(LG1,76.2)<br />

W7_2 (LGA,71.8)<br />

E14M62-224<br />

(LG1,76.9)<br />

ll (LG1,82.0)<br />

E14/M62-F-224-P2<br />

(LGA,48.2)<br />

ll (LGA,68.5)<br />

E18M48-303 (LG1-<br />

2A,68.5)<br />

E18M48-303<br />

(LG1,84.0)<br />

BC551 (LGA,69.1) BC551 (LGA,92.1)<br />

BC592-SCAR<br />

(LG1,100.1)<br />

BC592 (LGA,81.8)<br />

OP-AH14<br />

(LG1,112.7)<br />

AH14 (LGA,96.2)<br />

* Underline = single sequence repeat; italic = amplified fragment length<br />

polymorphism; bold = random amplified polymorphific DNA or sequence<br />

characterized region; and bold & underlined = restriction fragment length<br />

polymorphism. Parentheses indicate linkage group and position.<br />

202 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


phenotypic and MAS selection for MLB (~0.3 branches/cycle), and<br />

fruit length-to-diameter ratio (L:D; ~0.1 unit increase/cycle) with<br />

concomitant changes in frequency at linked marker loci. MAS<br />

operated to fix favorable alleles that were not exploited by PHE, thus<br />

MAS could be applied for altering plant architecture in cucumber to<br />

improve its yield potential.<br />

<strong>The</strong> value of MAS in population development of cucumber was<br />

examined by Robbins (2006) using the same traits and markers<br />

employed by Fan et al. (2006). Four inbred lines, complementary for<br />

the target traits, were intermated and the resulting populations<br />

underwent three cycles of MAS and PHE. Selections by PHE were<br />

visually made for all four traits at the whole-plant level and MAS was<br />

based on individuals possessing the highest number of desired marker<br />

genotypes from 20 marker loci. Both MAS and PHE provided<br />

improvements in all traits under selection in at least one population,<br />

except for earliness by MAS. Overall, PHE was most effective for<br />

gynoecious sex expression, earliness, and L:D, while MAS was most<br />

effective for MLB. <strong>The</strong> most effective selection method, however,<br />

varied by trait and between populations (Figure 3).<br />

No. of lateral branches<br />

3.50<br />

3.25<br />

3.00<br />

2.75<br />

2.50<br />

2.25<br />

2.00<br />

Population 1<br />

Multiple lateral branching<br />

C0 C1 C2 C3<br />

Cycle of selection<br />

No. of lateral branches<br />

3.50<br />

3.25<br />

3.00<br />

2.75<br />

2.50<br />

2.25<br />

2.00<br />

Population 3<br />

Multiple lateral branching<br />

C0 C1 C2 C3<br />

Cycle of selection<br />

MAS<br />

PHE<br />

RAN<br />

Linear (MAS)<br />

Linear (PHE)<br />

Linear (RAN)<br />

Fig. 3. Response to three cycles of selection (C0–C3) by marker (MAS),<br />

phenotype (PHE), and no selection (RAN) for the number of lateral branches in<br />

two populations.<br />

MAS in cucumber can be effective, but requires high resource<br />

inputs to develop markers, define valuable marker-trait associations,<br />

and conduct appropriate experiments to determine marker efficacy.<br />

Although initial marker development efforts were largely ineffective,<br />

sequencing technologies and the availability of BAC libraries (Nam et<br />

al., 2006), and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) will allow for the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 203


development of codominant SSR- and SNP-based markers that will be<br />

extremely useful in MAS in cucumber.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bradeen, J. M., J. E. Staub, C. Wyse, R. Antonise, and J. Peleman. 2001. Towards<br />

an expanded and integrated linkage map of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).<br />

Genome. 44:111–119.<br />

Danin-Poleg, Y., N. Reis, S. Baudracco-Arnas, M. Pitrat, J. E. Staub, M. Oliver, P.<br />

Arus, C. M. de Vincente, and N. Katzir. 2000. Simple sequence repeats in<br />

Cucumis mapping and map merging. Genome. 43:963–974.<br />

Dijkhuizen, A., W. C. Kennard, M. J. Havey, and J. E. Staub. 1996. RFLP<br />

variability and genetic relationships in cultivated cucumber. Euphytica. 90:79–<br />

89.<br />

Fan, Z., M. D. Robbins, and J. E. Staub. 2006. Population development by<br />

phenotypic selection with subsequent marker–assisted selection for line<br />

extraction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 112:843–<br />

855.<br />

Fanourakis, N. E. and P. W. Simon. 1987. Analysis of genetic linkage in cucumber.<br />

J. Hered. 78:238–242.<br />

Fazio, G., J. E. Staub, and M. R. Stevens. 2003a. Genetic mapping and QTL<br />

analysis of horticultural traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using<br />

recombinant inbred lines. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 107:864–874.<br />

Fazio, G., J. E. Staub, and S. M. Chung. 2002. Development and characterization of<br />

PCR markers in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

127:545–557.<br />

Fazio, G., S. M. Chung, and J. E. Staub. 2003b. Comparative analysis of response<br />

to phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for multiple lateral branching in<br />

cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 107: 875–883.<br />

Horejsi, T., J. Box, and J. E. Staub. 1999. Efficiency of RAPD to SCAR marker<br />

conversion and their comparative PCR sensitivity in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc.<br />

Hort. Sci. 124:128–135.<br />

Horejsi, T. and J. E. Staub. 1999. Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus<br />

L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet. Res. Crop Evol.<br />

46:337–350.<br />

Horejsi, T., J. Box, and J. E. Staub. 1999. Efficiency of RAPD to SCAR marker<br />

conversion and their comparative PCR sensitivity in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc.<br />

Hort. Sci. 124:128–135.<br />

Kennard, W. C., K. Poetter, A. Dijkhuizen, V. Meglic, J. E. Staub, and M. Havey.<br />

1994. Linkages among RFLP, RAPD, isozyme, disease resistance, and<br />

morphological markers in narrow and wide crosses of cucumber. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl.<br />

Genet. 89:42–48.<br />

Knerr, L. D. and J. E. Staub. 1992. Inheritance and linkage relationships of isozyme<br />

loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L .). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 84:217–224.<br />

Meglic, V. and J. E. Staub. 1996. Inheritance and linkage relationships of allozyme<br />

and morphological loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

92:865–872.<br />

Meglic, V., F. Serquen, and J. E. Staub. 1996. Genetic diversity in cucumber<br />

(Cucumis sativus L.): I. a reevaluation of the U.S. germplasm collection.<br />

Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 46:533–546.<br />

204 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Nam, Y. W., J. R. Lee, K. Song, M. K. Lee, M. D. Robbins, S. M. Chung, J. E.<br />

Staub, and H. B. Zhang. 2006. Construction of two BAC libraries from<br />

cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and identification of clones linked to yield<br />

component quantitative trait loci. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 111:150–161.<br />

Park, Y. H., S. Senory, C. Wye, R. Antonise, J. Peleman, and M. J. Havey. 2000. A<br />

genetic map of cucumber composed of RAPDs, RFLPs, AFLPs, and loci<br />

conditioning resistance to papaya ringspot and zucchini yellow mosaic viruses.<br />

Genome. 43:1003–1010.<br />

Robbins, M. D. 2006. Molecular marker development, QTL pyramiding, and<br />

comparative analysis of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection in cucumber.<br />

PhD <strong>The</strong>sis, University of Wiscosin-Madison.<br />

Robbins, M. D. and J. E. Staub. 2004. Strategies for selection of multiple<br />

quantitatively inherited yield components in cucumber, p. 401–410. Proc. 8th<br />

Eucarpia Conference, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004: progress in cucurbit genetics and<br />

breeding research. Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Serquen, F. C., J. Bacher, and J. E. Staub. 1997. Mapping and QTL analysis of a<br />

narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random amplified<br />

polymorphic DNA markers. Molec. <strong>Breeding</strong> 3:257–268.<br />

Staub, J. E., J. Bacher, and K. Poetter. 1996. Factors affecting the application of<br />

random amplified polymorphic DNAs in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).<br />

HortSci. 31:262–266.<br />

Staub, J. E., L. K. Crubaugh, and G. Fazio. 2002a. Cucumber recombinant inbred<br />

lines. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 25:1–2.<br />

Staub, J. E., M. D. Robbins, and A. I. López-Sesé. 2002b. Molecular methodologies<br />

for improved genetic diversity assessment in cucumber and melon. Proc. 26th<br />

IRC, Horticulture: art and science for life-advances in vegetable <strong>Breeding</strong>. Acta<br />

Hort. 642:41–47.<br />

Staub, J. E., V. Meglic, L. K. Crubaugh, and L. D. Knerr. 1996. Cucumber<br />

germplasm: isozyme genetic stocks W6743, W6744, W6745. HortSci.<br />

31:1243–1245.<br />

Sun Z., R. L. Lower, S.M. Chung, and J. E. Staub. 2006. Identification and<br />

comparative analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with<br />

parthenocarpy in processing cucumber. Plant Breed. (In press.)<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 205


SILVERLEAF WHITEFLY AFFECTS LEAF<br />

MOTTLING IN CUCURBITA MOSCHATA<br />

DUCHESNE<br />

Linda Wessel-Beaver and Moisés González-Román<br />

University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Bemisia argentifolii , recessive epistatis,<br />

complementary gene action<br />

ABSTRACT. In <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata, leaf mottling (silver patches in the leaf-vein<br />

axils) is reported to be controlled by a single gene M (mottle-leaf) that is<br />

dominant over m (green-leaf). In the presence of the silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia<br />

argentifolii Bellows and Perring), some green-leaf lines express a yellow-mottle<br />

(yellow patches in the leaf-vein axils), while other lines remain green-leaf,<br />

suggesting a more complex inheritance of leaf mottling. We studied the<br />

relationship between whiteflies and leaf mottling by observing segregations in<br />

populations derived from crosses of mottle-leaf, yellow-mottle, and green-leaf<br />

phenotypes. In the presence of whiteflies, an F2 population of mottle-leaf ×<br />

green-leaf segregated 9 mottle-leaf: 3 yellow-mottle: 4 green-leaf. F2 populations<br />

of mottle-leaf × yellow-mottle segregated 3 mottle-leaf: 1 yellow-mottle. F2<br />

populations of yellow-mottle × green-leaf segregated 3 yellow-mottle: 1 greenleaf.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se segregations suggest that mottling in the presence of the silverleaf<br />

whitefly is controlled by two genes, M (previously reported) and proposed M-2<br />

(mottle leaf-2), where allele m-2 changes M/M to green-leaf (recessive epistatis<br />

of m-2 to M and m). In the absence of whiteflies, locus M-2 and M exhibit a<br />

complementary gene action where both dominant alleles are needed to produce<br />

the mottle-leaf phenotype.<br />

S<br />

ilver-grey patches in leaf-vein axils are seen in many different<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a including wild species. In C. moschata, the presence<br />

of silver patches is reported to be controlled by a single gene M<br />

(mottle-leaf) dominant over m (green-leaf) (Coyne, 1970). Coyne<br />

(1970) studied this trait in two crosses using four parents: ‘Crookneck<br />

Butternut’ × ‘Golden Cushaw’ and ‘New Hampshire Butternut’ ×<br />

‘Hercules.’ All four parents are temperate types of C. moschata and<br />

likely represent a narrow genetic background. Three of the parents are<br />

butternut types. <strong>The</strong> first author, in her breeding program, noticed that<br />

some genotypes classified as green-leaf (m/m) would sometimes<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors thank Mr. Obed Roman Hernandez for his technical assistance. This<br />

research was supported in part by the USDA/CSREES Special Grant Program in<br />

Tropical/Subtropical Agriculture Research, USDA Hatch funds, and by the Puerto<br />

Rico Agricultural Experiment Station.<br />

206 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


express an unusual type of yellow leaf mottling, not described by<br />

Coyne (1970). This yellow-mottle phenotype occurred only in the<br />

presence of the silverleaf whitefly. Other m/m genotypes would remain<br />

green-leaf in the presence of the insect. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was<br />

to determine the relationship between the presence of whiteflies and<br />

the expression of leaf mottling by observing segregations in<br />

populations derived from crossing parents with various combinations<br />

of leaf-mottling phenotypes (mottle-leaf, yellow-mottle, and greenleaf).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Crosses were made among 12 cultigens that differed in leafmottling<br />

phenotype (Table 1). With the exception of ‘Waltham’ and<br />

BN111, most parents were tropical, subtropical, or mixed (tropical ×<br />

temperate) in origin. <strong>The</strong> F2 and backcross (BC) populations were<br />

evaluated at 5 weeks after planting for leaf mottling under conditions<br />

of high natural populations of whiteflies in the field in Isabela, Puerto<br />

Rico, in either June 2001 or May 2005, or in Juana Díaz, Puerto Rico,<br />

in May 1999. Whitefly populations are typically very high during the<br />

late spring/early summer in Puerto Rico. <strong>The</strong> parents and F1s were<br />

phenotyped in those plantings and several others over the past 5 years,<br />

both in the presence and absence of whiteflies. Leaf mottling was<br />

classified from 0 to 3 (0 = green-leaf; 1 = weakly mottle-leaf; 2 =<br />

intermediate mottle-leaf; 3 = strong mottle-leaf) after Coyne (1970).<br />

This classification was used only when leaf-axil patches were silvergrey.<br />

Plants with yellow-mottle (light yellow patches in the leaf-vein<br />

axils) were simply classified as Y. Observed versus expected<br />

segregations were compared using chi-square tests. Classes 1 to 3 for<br />

silver-grey mottle-leaf were combined, leaving three mottle-leaf<br />

classes: silver-grey mottle (SM), yellow-mottle (YM), and green-leaf<br />

(G). <strong>The</strong> G phenotype included plants that had silver veins but no grey<br />

patches in the leaf-vein axils.<br />

Results<br />

Four parents (‘Waltham’, BN11, 9706, and Bol-370), classified as<br />

green-leaf (m/m) in the absence of whiteflies, express a yellow-mottle<br />

phenotype when planted in fields naturally infested with whiteflies<br />

(Table 1). Two other genotypes (Col-5 and PI 162889) remain greenleaf<br />

(defined as having no leaf-vein-axil patches) even in the presence<br />

of whiteflies. Col-5 had a slight silver color that followed, but did not<br />

concentrate in, leaf-vein axils (no patches of silver). <strong>The</strong> latter<br />

phenotype was very distinct from that of the six mottle-leaf genotypes<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 207


Table 1. Leaf mottling phenotypes expressed by <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata<br />

parents in the presence and absence of the silverleaf whitefly Bemesia<br />

argentifolii<br />

Parent<br />

Type of<br />

germplasm<br />

Phenotype/<br />

whiteflies<br />

absent<br />

Phenotype/<br />

whiteflies<br />

present<br />

Coyne<br />

(1970)<br />

genotype<br />

Soler Tropical<br />

Tropical ×<br />

SM SM M/M<br />

TP411 Temperate<br />

Tropical ×<br />

SM SM M/M<br />

TP312 Temperate SM SM M/M<br />

Col-11<br />

Nigerian<br />

Tropical SM SM M/M<br />

Local Tropical SM SM M/M<br />

CG-1 Tropical SM SM M/M<br />

Waltham Temperate G YM m/m<br />

BN111 Temperate<br />

Tropical ×<br />

G YM m/m<br />

9706 Temperate G YM m/m<br />

Bol-370 Tropical G YM m/m<br />

Col-5 Tropical G G m/m<br />

New<br />

proposed<br />

genotype<br />

M-2/M-<br />

2M/M<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

M/M<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

M/M<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

M/M<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

M/M<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

M/M<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

m/m<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

m/m<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

m/m<br />

M-2/M-2<br />

m/m<br />

m-2/m-2<br />

M/M<br />

PI162889 Subtropical G G m/m<br />

m-2/m-2<br />

m/m<br />

SM = silver-grey mottle [“mottle-leaf” of Coyne (1970)]; YM = yellow mottle-leaf;<br />

G = no patches in leaf-vein axils [“green-leaf” of Coyne (1970)].<br />

that displayed large silver-grey patches in the leaf-vein axils. <strong>The</strong> Col-<br />

5 phenotype is clearly a variation of green-leaf, and not of the silvergrey<br />

mottle-leaf. <strong>The</strong> genotypes classified as M/M according to Coyne<br />

(1970) expressed the same degree of silver mottling whether whiteflies<br />

were present or not (data not presented).<br />

Segregating F2 populations produced ratios of 3:1 or 9:3:4 (Table<br />

2). Crosses of silver-grey mottle (SM) × yellow-mottle (YM)<br />

segregated 3 silver-grey mottle: 1 yellow-mottle; crosses of silver-grey<br />

mottle (SM) × green-leaf (G) segregated 9 silver-grey mottle: 3<br />

yellow-mottle: 4 green-leaf or 3 silver-grey segregated 3: yellowmottle:<br />

1 green-leaf. Backcross populations segregated either 1 silver-<br />

208 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


grey mottle: 1 yellow-mottle or 1: silver-grey mottle: 1 green-leaf,<br />

depending on the cross.<br />

Table 2. Segregation for leaf mottling in F2 and BC populations of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata in the presence of silverleaf whiteflies (Bemesia argentifolii).<br />

Observed frequency of:<br />

F2 or BC<br />

population<br />

Description of<br />

parental<br />

phenotypes<br />

Mottleleaf<br />

(SM) 1<br />

Yellow<br />

mottleleaf<br />

(YM)<br />

Greenleaf<br />

(G) 1<br />

Exp. 2<br />

Nigerian<br />

Local (NL) ×<br />

Chi-square<br />

(probability)<br />

Col-11<br />

Waltham ×<br />

SM × SM 49 0 0 all M -<br />

TP411<br />

BN111 × TP<br />

YM × SM 80 22 0 3:1 0.64 (0.42)<br />

312<br />

YM × SM 60 17 0 3:1 0.35 (0.55)<br />

9706 × Soler<br />

TP312 ×<br />

YM × SM 24 12 0 3:1 1.33 (0.25)<br />

Waltham<br />

PI162889 ×<br />

YM × SM 84 0 0 all M -<br />

Soler<br />

G × SM 34 16 14 9:3:4 1.69 (0.43)<br />

NL × Col-5<br />

CGold-1 ×<br />

SM × G 39 0 8 3:1 1.60 (0.21)<br />

Col-5<br />

Bol-370 ×<br />

SM × G 35 0 16 3:1 1.10 (0.29)<br />

PI162889 YM × G 1 38 10 3:1 0.44 (0.50) 3<br />

(9706 × (YM × SM) ×<br />

Soler) × 9706<br />

(CG-1 × Col-<br />

YM 27 15 0 1:1 2.57 (0.11)<br />

5) × Col-5<br />

(NL × Col-5)<br />

(SM × G) × G 25 0 25 1:1 0.00 (1.00)<br />

× Col-5 (SM × G) × G 22 0 28 1:1 0.72 (0.40)<br />

(CG-1 × Col- (SM × G) ×<br />

5) × CG-1 SM 50 0 0 all M -<br />

1<br />

Mottle-leaf refers to silver-grey patches and green-leaf refers to the lack of silvergrey<br />

patches in the leaf-vein axils, as described by Coyne (1970). Terminology is<br />

also that of Coyne (1970).<br />

2<br />

Expected segregation.<br />

3<br />

Because the chi-square test is inappropriate for models with expected frequencies of<br />

zero, single observations that did not fit into the 3:1 model were not included in the<br />

calculation of the statistic.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 209


Discussion<br />

Three phenotypic classes suggest that leaf mottling is controlled<br />

either by a single locus with in<strong>complete</strong> dominance or additivity<br />

(producing an “intermediate” phenotype), or by two loci with epistasis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ratio observed for the silver-grey mottle × green-leaf cross, 9:3:4<br />

rather than 1:2:1, indicates that the latter explanation is more likely.<br />

We propose that mottling in the presence of the silverleaf whitefly is<br />

controlled by two genes, a new gene M-2 (mottle-leaf-2) and the<br />

previously reported M. When silverleaf whiteflies are present, m-2/m-<br />

2 causes M/M to produce a green-leaf phenotype and causes 4/16 of<br />

the F2 progeny in a SM × G cross to be green-leaf. Fehr (1991) calls<br />

this type of between-locus interaction “recessive epistatis.” In the<br />

absence of whiteflies, locus M-2 and M exhibit a complementary gene<br />

action, where both dominant alleles are needed to produce the mottleleaf<br />

phenotype. Under this scheme, in the presence of whiteflies, the<br />

SM phenotype corresponds to M-2/M-2 M/M and the YM phenotype<br />

corresponds to M-2/M-2 m/m. <strong>The</strong> G phenotype corresponds to two<br />

possible genotypes: m-2/m-2 M/M or m-2/m-2 m/m. <strong>The</strong> segregations<br />

of crosses involving the two parents with the G phenotype (Col-5 and<br />

PI162889) indicate that Col-5 is M/M while PI162889 is m/m (Tables<br />

1 and 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> genotypes Coyne (1970) used in his study were probably<br />

homozygous for M-2/M-2. This would explain why Coyne (1970)<br />

reported leaf mottling to be controlled by a single locus. What Coyne<br />

(1970) described as M/M and m/m were likely the genotypes M-2/M-2<br />

M/M and M-2/M-2 m/m, repectively. In the experience of the first<br />

author (evaluating hundreds of PIs and other germplasm of C.<br />

moschata), the m-2/m-2 genotype is very rare. We have observed it<br />

only in tropical or subtropical germplasm from South America. Col-5<br />

and PI 162889 are landraces from Colombia and Paraguay,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong>se materials are of special interest because they often<br />

appear to be resistant to the whitefly-induced silverleaf disorder<br />

(Wessel-Beaver, 1998).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Coyne, D. P. 1970. Inheritance of mottle-leaf in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a mochata Poir. HortSci.<br />

5(4):226–227.<br />

Fehr, W. R. 1991. Principals of cultivar development, vol. I. Iowa <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

Ames, Iowa.<br />

Wessel-Beaver, L. 1998. Sources of whitefly-induced silvering resistance in<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98: evaluation and<br />

enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />

210 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Wessel-Beaver, L. 2000. Inheritance of silverleaf resistance in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata.<br />

In: N. Katzir and H. S. Paris (eds.). Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2000, Acta Hort.<br />

510:289–295.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 211


QTL ANALYSIS OF SOLUBLE SOLIDS<br />

CONTENT IN WATERMELON UNDER<br />

DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS<br />

Yong Xu, Shaogui Guo, Haiying Zhang, and Guoyi Gong<br />

National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />

Banjing, Haidian, Beijing 2443#, Beijing, 100089, P. R. China<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. C. lanatus, quantitative trait locus, genotype ×<br />

environment interaction<br />

ABSTRACT. Soluble solid content (SSC) is an important factor affecting the<br />

quality of watermelon. It is necessary to confirm the genetic stability of the<br />

quantitative trait loci (QTLs) under different environments. An F2S8 RIL<br />

population was derived from the cross of PI 296341-FR × ‘97103’ and a highdensity<br />

molecular genetic-linkage map covering 1383.8cM with an average<br />

distance 6.8cM was constructed. QTL analysis of watermelon SSC was<br />

conducted under three environments. In total, 18 QTLs were detected, located<br />

on the Linkage Groups 1, 2, 3, 5, 14, 15, and 19. Six QTLs were detected under<br />

two environments. Only 2 QTLs, qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b (explaining the 19%<br />

and 17.6% average phenotypic variation, respectively), were comparatively<br />

stable and can be detected under the three environments observed. <strong>The</strong>se two<br />

QTLs, which may be the main loci controlling the gene expression of SSC, were<br />

mapped between the markers N02_800a and Z03_250a. <strong>The</strong> results are<br />

advantageous for using MAS for SSC in watermelon.<br />

S<br />

oluble solids content (SSC) is an important factor affecting the<br />

quality of watermelon and many breeders attach importance to<br />

this trait. But SSC is a quantitative trait locus (QTL) and<br />

controlled by several genes. <strong>The</strong> stable expression of QTL under<br />

different environments is an important factor in the use of QTL as the<br />

target gene in marker-assisted selection (MAS). Twenty-nine QTLs<br />

related to SSC were detected in the F2 and F3 populations of tomato<br />

under three different environments, but only 4 QTLs had outstanding<br />

expression under three environments (Paterson et al., 1991). QTLs are<br />

sensitive to environment and are expressed with different stability.<br />

That is to say, the QTLs with high heritability are easily detected<br />

under several different environments (Huang et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> SSC<br />

genes of watermelon have been mapped using impermanent<br />

populations, and several QTLs have been detected recently (Fan et al.,<br />

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China<br />

(30471186, 30570997) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5062008,<br />

5050001).<br />

212 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


2000; Hashizume et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> SSC genes of watermelon have<br />

been mapped using the F2 population derived from a crossing between<br />

a cultivated inbred line ‘97103’ and an African wild form PI 296341-<br />

FR, and 4 related QTLs have been mapped (Fan et al., 2000). A QTL<br />

for the SSC of watermelon had been mapped using the BC1 population<br />

derived from a crossing between a cultivated inbred line (H-7; C.<br />

lanatus) and an African wild form (SA-1; C. lanatus) (Hashizume et<br />

al., 2003). QTL analysis of watermelon SSC needs to be conducted<br />

under different environments to confirm their inheritance stability.<br />

However, the report about the analysis of the SSC expression in<br />

watermelon under different environments using permanent population<br />

has not been found up to now.<br />

In the present study, a high-density genetic map has been<br />

constructed based on the permanent population derived from a<br />

crossing between a cultivated inbred line ‘97103’ and an African wild<br />

form PI 296341-FR. <strong>The</strong> SSC of watermelon under three different<br />

environments was analyzed and their respective QTLs were compared<br />

to find the QTLs with high heritability and stability.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIALS. <strong>The</strong> high-SSC cultivated inbred line ‘97103’<br />

(Citrullus lanatus [Thunb., Mansfeld] var. lanatus) was crossed with<br />

the low-SSC African wild form PI 296341-FR (Citrullus lanatus<br />

[Thunb., Mansfeld] var. citroides). One F1 plant was self-pollinated to<br />

produce 120 F2 progeny, which were then self-pollinated by the singleseed<br />

descent method to obtain 117 F2S8 recombinant inbred lines<br />

(RILs). <strong>The</strong> RILs were planted in a randomized block design under<br />

three open-air environments: (1) Daxing, Beijng in May, 2002 (E<br />

116°13′-116°43′ N 39°26′-39°51′; altitude 54.7m; warmtemperature/semihumid<br />

climate region; annual mean temperature 13°C;<br />

annual duration of sunshine 2000–2800 hours; average annual<br />

precipitation 507.7mm; frost-free period 189 days); (2) Changji,<br />

Xinjiang in May, 2003 (E 86°24’-87°37’, N 43°06’-45°20’; altitude<br />

918.7m; midtemperate continental arid climate region; annual mean<br />

temperature 6.8°C; annual duration of sunshine 2500–3550 hours;<br />

average annual precipitation 190mm; frost-free period 160 days); and<br />

(3) Changji, Xinjiang in May, 2004. Thirty plants of every line were<br />

planted in three rows with 10 individuals in each row according to<br />

standard conventional methods. <strong>The</strong> central flesh juices of the mature<br />

fruits were analyzed for SSC using a hand refractometer (ATAGO<br />

ATC-1E, Atago Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). <strong>The</strong> RILs were used in map<br />

construction and QTL analysis.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 213


MAP CONSTRUCTION AND QTL ANALYSIS. Two molecular linkage<br />

maps have been constructed in our laboratory (Zhang et al., 2004; Yi<br />

et al., 2004). In the first, a total of 87 RAPD markers, 13 ISSR markers,<br />

and 4 SCAR markers were arranged into 15 linkage groups. A total of<br />

1027.5cM in the population was covered with an average interval<br />

length of 11.7cM (Zhang et al., 2004). In the second map, 150 AFLP<br />

markers were arranged into 17 linkage groups. A total of 1240.2cM in<br />

the population was covered with an average interval length of 8.3cM<br />

(Yi et al., 2004). Combining with the 24 polymorphic SSR markers<br />

and a morphological marker screened in our laboratory, a new<br />

molecular genetic-linkage map of watermelon was constructed using<br />

JoinMap3.0 software. In this map, 79 AFLP markers, 86 RAPD<br />

markers, 24 SSR markers, 10 ISSR markers, 3 SCAR markers, and a<br />

morphological marker were arranged into 19 linkage groups. A total of<br />

1383.8cM in the population was covered with an average interval<br />

length of 6.8cM. <strong>The</strong> distribution of SSC data of watermelon in<br />

parents and the RILs was analyzed using SYSTAT 10 software and<br />

overall genome QTL screening was conducted using MapQTL 5<br />

software. <strong>The</strong> significance of each QTL interval was tested by a<br />

likelihood-ratio statistic (LOD) score of 3.0. <strong>The</strong> variation explanation<br />

and the additive effect of the QTLs were calculated simultaneously.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se QTLs were denominated following the universal rules<br />

(McCouch et al., 1997).<br />

Results<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF SSC IN TWO PARENTS AND RIL POPULATION.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SSC of ‘97103’ is higher than SSC of PI 296341-FR under the<br />

three environments, and the differences between both values in the<br />

three environments were 7.75ºBrix, 7.90ºBrix, and 7.80ºBrix,<br />

respectively. No significant differences were detected between the<br />

values of SSC under the three environments. <strong>The</strong> SSC of the RIL<br />

population distributed broadly and there was a significant difference<br />

between the two end values. A continuous distribution near to normal<br />

for SSC was observed in the RIL population (Table 1). <strong>The</strong><br />

correlations between the SSC values observed in the RILs population<br />

under the three different environments were 0.621, 0.651 and 0.773<br />

(Table 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were significant and positive correlations at the level α =<br />

0.01 between the SSC values under the three environments. <strong>The</strong> result<br />

demonstrated that the SSC of the parents and the RILs are comparative<br />

stable and fit to be used in this study and the SSC is a typical<br />

quantitative trait. However the different correlation coefficients<br />

214 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Distribution of SSC of the two parents and the RIL population<br />

in ºBrix<br />

97103<br />

Parents RIL population<br />

PI<br />

296341-<br />

FR Mean Range<br />

Mean<br />

±SD<br />

Kurtosis <br />

Skewness<br />

Beijing,<br />

2002 10.50 2.75 3.39 1.40~7.50 3.39±1.26 0.37 0.89<br />

Xinjiang,<br />

2003 10.70 2.80 3.95 2.00~8.40 3.95±1.40 0.42 1.20<br />

Xinjiang,<br />

2004 10.30 2.50 5.20 2.92~10.40<br />

5.20±1.48 0.89 0.95<br />

indicated that there was GE interaction between the SSC of<br />

watermelon and the environments.<br />

QTL ANALYSIS. Interval mapping was performed analyzing the<br />

SSC data (Figure 1). A total of 18 QTLs were detected, 14 in Beijing,<br />

2002, 6 in Xinjiang, 2003, and 8 in Xinjiang, 2004; these QTLs were<br />

located on the Linkage Groups 1, 2, 3, 5, 14, 15, and 19. Two QTLs<br />

explained 19% and 17.6% of the phenotypic variation detected under<br />

the three environments. Six QTLs were detected under two of the<br />

observed environments.<br />

Two QTLs detected under the three environments, qSSC-1a and<br />

qSSC-1b, were mapped in Linkage Group 1, and their peaks were<br />

mapped in the same location of markers N02_800a and Z03_250a,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> average additive effects of qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b<br />

were -0.6039ºBrix and -0.5764ºBrix, respectively. <strong>The</strong> corresponding<br />

positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’. <strong>The</strong> average variation<br />

explanation value of qSSC-1a is 19% and its allele, coming from<br />

‘97103’, could increase the SSC in 0.6039ºBrix. Its additive effect and<br />

the variation explanation were the highest among the detected QTLs.<br />

Two QTLs, qSSC-2a and qSSC-2b, were mapped in Linkage<br />

Group 2; their peaks were mapped in the same location of markers<br />

H08_1500 and Q05_675a, respectively. <strong>The</strong> average additive effect of<br />

qSSC-2a and qSSC-2b were -0.5759ºBrix and -0.5323ºBrix, and their<br />

average variation explanations were 12.9% and 13.7%. <strong>The</strong><br />

corresponding positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’. <strong>The</strong><br />

QTL qSSC-2a could be detected under two environments (Beijing,<br />

2002 and Xinjiang, 2004). <strong>The</strong> QTL qSSC-2b could be detected under<br />

two environments (Xinjiang, 2003 and Xinjiang, 2004).<br />

Five QTLs were mapped in Linkage Group 3. Two QTLs, qSSC-3a<br />

and qSSC-3b, could be detected under two environments (Beijing,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 215


Table 2. Correlation coefficients of watermelon SSC characters under three<br />

different environments.<br />

SSC<br />

Beijing, Xinjiang, Xinjiang,<br />

Location<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

Beijing, 2002 -<br />

Xinjiang, 2003 0.621 ** c<br />

Xinjiang, 2004 0.651 ** 0.773 ** ** Significant at α = 0.01<br />

-<br />

2002 and Xinjiang, 2004). <strong>The</strong> peak of qSSC-3a was mapped in the<br />

same location of the marker R05_750. <strong>The</strong> QTL qSSC-3b was mapped<br />

near the marker Z12_1800 with a distance of 2cM. <strong>The</strong>ir average<br />

additive effects were -0.5491ºBrix and -0.5835ºBrix, and their<br />

variation explanations were 16.7% and 18.1%. <strong>The</strong> corresponding<br />

positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’. <strong>The</strong> other three QTLs<br />

could be detected in Beijng, 2002, with obvious GE interaction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> QTL qSSC-5 was detected in the Linkage Group 5 with a<br />

distance of 2.1cM away from marker P17_1000. This QTL could be<br />

detected under two environments (Beijing, 2002 and Xinjiang, 2004).<br />

Its average additive effects were -0.5751ºBrix and the average variation<br />

explanation is 16.3%. <strong>The</strong> corresponding positive alleles of the QTLs<br />

came from ‘97103’.<br />

Three QTLs were mapped in Linkage Group 14 under two<br />

environments (Xinjiang, 2003 and Xinjiang, 2004) and the peak of<br />

qSSC-14a was mapped in the same location of marker Z01_2100. <strong>The</strong><br />

corresponding positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’ and<br />

could increase the SSC by an average of 0.5689ºBrix; their average<br />

variation explanation value is 15.6%. <strong>The</strong> other two QTLs could be<br />

detected only in Xinjiang, 2003.<br />

Two QTLs for SSC were mapped in Linkage Group 15 in Beijing,<br />

2002, with obvious GE interaction. <strong>The</strong> corresponding positive alleles<br />

of the QTLs coming from ‘97103’ could increase the SSC in 0.4864 to<br />

0.4956ºBrix, and their variation explanations were 14.9%–15.6%.<br />

Three QTLs mapped in Linkage Group 19 could be detected only<br />

in Beijing, 2002. <strong>The</strong> positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’<br />

and could increase the SSC in 0.4781 to 0.5499ºBrix; their variation<br />

explanations were 14.4%–19%.<br />

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS ON THE QTLS FOR SSC.<br />

Among the 18 QTLs detected, only 2, qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b, were<br />

detected under all three environments. <strong>The</strong> directions of these genetic<br />

effects were identical, whereas the additive effects and the variation<br />

216 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


explanation were different because of the influence of the<br />

environments. Six of the QTLs were detected under two environments<br />

and 10 QTLs under only one environment. <strong>The</strong> results demonstrated<br />

that these QTLs are easily affected by environmental conditions. It is<br />

necessary to do the experiments in different years and places to<br />

identify the stable major gene.<br />

Causal GE interactions can usually reduce general response to<br />

MAS across environments, and the reduction in the cumulative<br />

response is a function of the proportion of GE interactions involved in<br />

the improved trait. <strong>The</strong> QTL analysis of the agronomic traits in rice<br />

indicated that the results of the same traits were different when<br />

observed in different environments (Zhuang et al., 1997). Some<br />

researchers considered that the results of QTL mapping depend on<br />

many factors, such as the planting environment, the size of the<br />

population, the number of the markers in the genetic map, and the<br />

general heritability (Tanksley, 1993). Thus, new breeding strategies<br />

based on QTL evaluation among different environments will be<br />

necessary to realize the potential of MAS.<br />

In this study, the QTL for the SSC of watermelon was analyzed<br />

under three different environments. <strong>The</strong> significant climate distinction<br />

of the two locations, Beijing and Xinjiang, benefits the identification<br />

of the stable major genes. Comparing the QTL detected under three<br />

different environments, only 2 QTLs were comparatively stable and<br />

could be detected in all the environments. <strong>The</strong> two most stable QTLs,<br />

qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b, may be the major QTLs for SSC in<br />

watermelon. It is noted that these QTLs were mapped in the same<br />

range between markers N02_800a and Z03_250a. <strong>The</strong> result is<br />

advantageous for the use of MAS for SSC in watermelon. <strong>The</strong> QTL<br />

qSSC-1a was mapped near the flanking marker IX_334. <strong>The</strong> band of<br />

the marker IX_334 was present in the parent ‘97103’ and the distance<br />

between the marker and qSSC-1a is only 3cM. Considering that the<br />

positive allele of qSSC-1a came from ‘97103’ could increase the SSC<br />

in 0.6039ºBrix, the marker IX_334 can be used in the MAS of the<br />

corresponding positive allele of qSSC-1a came from ‘97103’.<br />

Due to the differences in the populations used, molecular markers,<br />

genetic maps, and planting environments, no identical QTLs were<br />

found between this study and other reports (Fan et al., 2000;<br />

Hashizume et al., 2003). Nevertheless, in the F2 population derived<br />

from the same parents used in this study, two QTLs were detected in<br />

which alleles from ‘97103’ could increase SSC (Fan et al., 2000).<br />

Follow-up studies will be performed to analyze the relation<br />

between the two QTLs detected in this F2 population and those found<br />

in the RILs using the flanking marker of the QTLs. <strong>The</strong> stability and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 217


eliability of qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b will be further validated using<br />

different analysis models and different combinations.<br />

N02_800a<br />

T13_850a<br />

IX_347 IX_334<br />

Z03_250a<br />

LG1<br />

0<br />

10<br />

AG_TT320<br />

AG_TT288<br />

AG_AT127<br />

CC_AA341<br />

AC_TT143<br />

AC_TC100<br />

X01_900a<br />

A08_1100a<br />

AG_AC350<br />

CC_AA110<br />

CC_AA244<br />

AC_TC122<br />

AG_TC157<br />

C06_1300a<br />

Z10_1900<br />

I835_210 I835_209<br />

Q05_500<br />

SCP01_570 X20_700<br />

K14_1500<br />

J11_1200<br />

LG4<br />

A05_800<br />

AI15_850a<br />

AG_TA260<br />

I835_565<br />

qSSC-1a<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

80<br />

90<br />

100<br />

110<br />

120<br />

130<br />

140<br />

150<br />

160<br />

170<br />

180<br />

190<br />

LG13<br />

qSSC-1b<br />

A10_1031a<br />

P03_600a<br />

E08_600a<br />

AC_AA79<br />

B13_1400a<br />

AH03_1031a<br />

AL11_650a<br />

C04_1300a<br />

IXX_192<br />

H08_1500 I856_300<br />

I04_1200<br />

AC_TT141<br />

AH12_2000<br />

S09_650<br />

AG_AT104<br />

CA_AC195<br />

AG_AC120<br />

H17_550a<br />

AG_AC402<br />

Q05_675a<br />

AC_AA302<br />

N02_325a<br />

AC_TT117 AC_TT116<br />

P17_1000<br />

M18_620<br />

H02_690a<br />

AC_TC139<br />

I842_1500a<br />

B12_830a<br />

AG_TC107<br />

O13_350a<br />

IX_583<br />

AG_TT117<br />

AG_TA156<br />

0 Z01_2100<br />

10 X04_450<br />

20<br />

30<br />

AG_TC128<br />

P17_2400a<br />

LG8<br />

LG14<br />

LG2<br />

LG5<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

80<br />

90<br />

100<br />

110<br />

120<br />

130<br />

140<br />

150<br />

160<br />

170<br />

180<br />

190<br />

200<br />

210<br />

220<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

qSSC-14a<br />

qSSC-5<br />

qSSC-2a qSSC-2b<br />

R05_750<br />

Z12_1800<br />

B12_1100a<br />

P17_940a<br />

AC_TT166<br />

AH13_1200a<br />

F08_2500a<br />

AC_AA347<br />

AG_AC124<br />

T17_1200a<br />

T17_800<br />

I842_525<br />

AC_AA207<br />

N02_1600<br />

CC_AA114<br />

AC_TT126<br />

A12_600<br />

H07_950<br />

XXI_283<br />

XXI_267<br />

E08_950a<br />

AG_AT122<br />

AC_AA613<br />

AC_TC92<br />

Z03_1200a<br />

AG_TA157<br />

AG_TC79<br />

CA_AC230<br />

CC_AA247<br />

AG_TA212<br />

AC_TT99<br />

AH03_1600a<br />

I856_625a<br />

CA_AC354<br />

CA_AC347<br />

C09_900a<br />

CC_AA163<br />

CC_AA162<br />

qSSC-14b<br />

qSSC-14c<br />

LG9<br />

LG6<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

80<br />

90<br />

100<br />

110<br />

120<br />

LG3<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> genetic-linkage map of watermelon and the distribution of QTLs for<br />

SSC of watermelon.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Fan, M., Y. Xu, H. Y. Zhang, H. Z. Ren, G. B. Kang, Y. J. Wang, and H. Chen. 2000.<br />

Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with fruit traits in watermelon<br />

[Citrullus lanatus (Thanb) Mansf] and analysis of their genetic effects. Yichuan<br />

Xuebao (Acta Genetica Sinica). 27(10): 902–910.<br />

Hashizume, T., I. Shimamoto, and M. Hirai. 2003, Construction of a linkage map and<br />

QTL analysis of horticultural traits for watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

80<br />

90<br />

100<br />

110<br />

120<br />

130<br />

140<br />

150<br />

160<br />

170<br />

180<br />

190<br />

qSSC-3a<br />

qSSC-3b qSSC-3c<br />

qSSC-3d<br />

AG_TC195 AG_TC194<br />

AG_TC206 AG_TC205<br />

F09_800<br />

AG_AC112<br />

IXX_298 IXX_296<br />

Z16_500a<br />

AL03_800a<br />

M05_1200a<br />

Subi<br />

LG15<br />

LG10<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

qSSC-15a<br />

AG_AT80<br />

K12_400a<br />

Z10_500a<br />

K12_900a<br />

CA_AC91<br />

CC_AA157<br />

II_147<br />

II_155<br />

AG_TA105<br />

AG_TT219<br />

qSSC-3e<br />

LG7<br />

0<br />

AG_AT207 AG_AT206<br />

A10_500<br />

qSSC-15b<br />

LG18<br />

H08_550<br />

M18_850a<br />

XII_205<br />

0<br />

AG_TA154 0<br />

10<br />

AC_AA121 10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

V_240<br />

V_228<br />

S15_1000a<br />

VI_678<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

VI_950 VI_1030<br />

H07_540a<br />

AG_TT223<br />

AC_TC80<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

80<br />

CC_AA332 80<br />

90<br />

A07_1100<br />

O05_480 Q17_1500<br />

A18_1600<br />

AG_TT79<br />

90<br />

100<br />

110<br />

V_405 V_395 120<br />

N04_600 130<br />

I835_430 140<br />

V_257<br />

IX_689 IX_678<br />

AC_TT106<br />

AC_TT208<br />

150<br />

160<br />

170<br />

AC_AT280 180<br />

O16_550a<br />

SCP219_1600<br />

AC_AT257<br />

AC_AT258<br />

190<br />

200<br />

210<br />

I835_298 220<br />

O16_475<br />

Z12_850 V03_800<br />

B20_1200<br />

230<br />

240<br />

X04_1100 250<br />

Z04_1600<br />

Z04_900a G10_850a<br />

N04_850 N04_800a<br />

I835_328<br />

260<br />

270<br />

280<br />

N02_1031a Q05_1500 290<br />

Q05_1600a<br />

X01_650a<br />

SCP01_700a<br />

300<br />

310<br />

AC_AA375 320<br />

AC_TC84<br />

AG_AT557<br />

AC_TC314<br />

AG_AT89<br />

330<br />

340<br />

350<br />

O03_480a 360<br />

Q05_1200a 370<br />

M07_400a M07_590<br />

AC_TT327 380<br />

LG11<br />

LG12<br />

LG16<br />

0<br />

0<br />

10<br />

I_268<br />

I_224 I_276<br />

AG_TT280<br />

AG_TT98<br />

AG_TA93<br />

AG_TT278<br />

CA_AC143<br />

218 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

LG17<br />

LG19<br />

0<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

qSSC-19a<br />

qSSC-19b<br />

qSSC-19c


Matsum & Nakai] using RAPD, RFLP, and ISSR markers, <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

106:779–785.<br />

Huang, N., E. R. Angeles, J. Domingo, G. Magpantay, S. Singh, G. Zhang, N.<br />

Kumaravadivel, J. Bennett, and G. S. Khush. 1997. Pyramiding of bacterial<br />

blight resistance genes in rice: marker-assisted selection using RFLP and PCR.<br />

<strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 95:313–320.<br />

McCouch, S. R., Y. G. Cho, M. Yano, E. Paul, M. Blinstrub, H. Morishima, and T.<br />

Kinosita. 1997. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet. Newslett. 14:11–13.<br />

Paterson, A. H., S. Damon, J. D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H. D. Rabinowitch, S. E. Lincoln,<br />

E. S. Lander, and S. D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying<br />

quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and<br />

environments. Genet. 127:181–197.<br />

Tanksley, S. D. 1993. Mapping polygenes. Ann. Rev. Genet. (27):205–333.<br />

Yi, K., Y. Xu, X. Y. Lu, L. T. Xiao, X. L. Xu, G. Y. Gong, and H. Y. Zhang. 2004.<br />

Construction of AFLP molecular genetic map for RIL population of watermelon.<br />

Yuanyi Xuebao (Acta Horticulturae Sinica). 31(1): 53–55.<br />

Zhang, R. B., Y. Xu, K. Yi, H. Y. Zhang, L. G. Liu, G. Y. Gong, and A. Levi. 2004. A<br />

genetic linkage map for watermelon derived from recombinant inbred lines. J.<br />

Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129(2):237–243.<br />

Zhuang, J. Y., H. X. Lin, J. Lu, H. R. Qian, S. Hittalmani, N. Huang, and K. L.<br />

Zheng. 1997. Analysis of QTL × environment interaction for yield components<br />

and plant height in rice. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 95:799–808.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 219


MAPPING AND QTL ANALYSIS CONCERNING<br />

TOLERANCE TOWARD<br />

POOR LIGHT IN CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS<br />

SATIVUS L.)<br />

Yong-Jian Wang, Hai-Ying Zhang, Qing-Jun Chen,<br />

Feng Zhang, and Ai-Jun Mao<br />

National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />

Banjing, Haidian, Beijing 2443#, Beijing, 100089, P. R. China<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. AFLP, RAPD, RIL, SSR, genetic map<br />

ABSTRACT. An AFLP and RAPD genetic map with 235 markers and an RIL<br />

(recombinant inbred lines) population from the cross of two cultivated lines were<br />

employed in mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) concerning<br />

tolerance toward poor light in cucumber using the interval mapping method.<br />

Leaf area in seedlings under low light intensity was used as phenotypic value to<br />

detect the QTL concerning tolerance. Five QTL were mapped in four linkage<br />

groups. Four loci, including La-1, La-2, La-3, and La-4, showed a negative<br />

additive effect, while La-5 showed a positive additive effect. Of the five QTL,<br />

phenotypic variation explained by La-5 was the largest, La-2 was the second.<br />

C<br />

ucumber is an important greenhouse vegetable. <strong>The</strong> main goal<br />

of breeding for greenhouse cucumber cultivars is to increase<br />

tolerance to poor light and low temperature. <strong>The</strong> impact of<br />

poor light on cucumber growth and yield is usually stronger than that<br />

of low temperature (Chen et al, 2003). Several indexes, such as<br />

photosynthetic rate, light compensation point, and photosynthetic yield,<br />

under chilling and poor light have been reported (Aoki et al., 1988; Xu<br />

et al., 1997, Wang et al., 2001). <strong>The</strong> increase in leaf area in seedlings<br />

under low light intensity was a reliable phenotypic value to evaluate<br />

tolerance to poor light, according to our study.<br />

Tolerance to poor light was believed to be conditioned by many<br />

genes. Wang et al. (1998) indicated that light compensation at 15ºC<br />

could reflect tolerance to poor light at low temperature; the inheritance<br />

agreed with an additive-dominant epistatic model. It was impossible,<br />

using classical genetic methods, to know how many genes concerning<br />

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China<br />

(30471186, 30570997) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5062008,<br />

5050001).<br />

220 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


tolerance are involved and where they are located.<br />

Recently, molecular markers and related technologies have allowed<br />

plant geneticists and breeders to devise strategies for extensive<br />

mapping of plant genomes (Staub et al., 1996). In commercial<br />

cucumber, the application of molecular-marker technologies has<br />

increased the understanding of its genome (Kennard et al., 1994;<br />

Kennard and Havey, 1995; Meglic and Staub, 1996). Serquen et al.<br />

(1997) conducted a molecular mapping with QTLs for length of the<br />

stem and number of fruits in cucumber based on a F3 population. Up to<br />

now little information has been reported on mapping QTLs of traits<br />

concerning tolerance to poor light.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to map genes concerning tolerance<br />

to poor light in cucumber using the RIL population obtained from the<br />

cross of the lines ‘European 8’ and ‘Qiu Peng’ and based on a linkage<br />

map with 235 markers (AFLP, RAPD, and SSR) that had already been<br />

constructed by our research group.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

MATERIALS. <strong>The</strong> inbred line ‘European 8’, a European<br />

greenhouse-cucumber cultivar with tolerance to poor light, was<br />

crossed with the inbred line ‘QiuPeng’, an open-field Chinese<br />

cucumber cultivar sensitive to poor light. Single F1 plants were<br />

randomly selected and self-pollinated to generate F2 families. A single<br />

F2 family was randomly chosen and individual plants were<br />

self-pollinated for four more generations to generate an F2-derived F6<br />

RIL population. Those RILs were used for all DNA isolations and<br />

evaluated for tolerance to poor light.<br />

EVALUATION OF TOLERANCE TO POOR LIGHT. Cucumber seeds<br />

were germinated for 24 hr at 28ºC and sown in plastic pots of 8cm<br />

diameter with a steamed commercial peat medium. About 8 days after<br />

sowing, 24 uniform seedlings at the cotyledon fully expanded stage<br />

were treated under low illumination (80µmol·m-2·s-1, 8 h, 25ºC/18ºC)<br />

and 3 replications were conducted. Seedling leaf area was measured 12<br />

days after treatment.<br />

LINKAGE ANALYSIS. Using SYSTAT 7.0 software, a graphic of the<br />

frequency distribution in the RIL population for leaf area was drawn.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data of the mean of leaf area were used for QTL analysis. <strong>The</strong><br />

whole genome was scanned and the QTLs for tolerance were detected<br />

by using Windows QTL Cartograph vi20 at the threshold LOD score<br />

2.0.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 221


Results and Discussion<br />

PHENOTYPIC VARIATION OF THE MATERIAL. <strong>The</strong>re were significant<br />

differences between both parental lines and significant segregation<br />

among RILs (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> average increase in leaf area of RIL was<br />

45,187cm 2 and the standard deviation was 11,348cm 2. . <strong>The</strong> graphic of<br />

the frequency distribution (Kurtosis/SEK = 1.33; Skewness/SES = 0.78)<br />

fits normal distribution (Figure 1).<br />

Variance analysis indicated that there were no significant<br />

differences among replications for the increase of leaf area, while the<br />

differences among RILs were significant and the broad heritability was<br />

77.5%. <strong>The</strong> high heritability of leaf-area increase under low<br />

illumination suggested that the above index could be used as an<br />

acceptable criterion to evaluate tolerance to poor light in cucumber as<br />

well as for QTL analysis.<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0.0<br />

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> frequency distribution in cucumber RIL population for<br />

low-light-tolerance trait.<br />

Abscissa = phenotypic value; ordinate = number of lines on the left side and<br />

the percentage on the right.<br />

QTL ANALYSIS OF TOLERANCE TO POOR LIGHT IN CUCUMBER.<br />

QTL analysis was conducted by using Windows QTL Cartograph. <strong>The</strong><br />

scanning of gene tolerance to poor light in cucumber in the whole<br />

genome (Figure 2) indicated that there were five QTLs at the threshold<br />

LOD score 2.0 concerning tolerance to poor light: La-1, La-2, and<br />

La-3 on Linkage Group 1, La-4 on Group 7, and La-5 on Group 9.<br />

222 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1


Table 1. Parent values and distribution in cucumber RIL population for<br />

low-light- tolerance trait.<br />

Parent values Distribution in RIL population<br />

Agronomic<br />

traits<br />

Leaf-area<br />

No. 8<br />

EuropeanQiupeng<br />

Mean SD Range<br />

Kurtosis/<br />

SEK<br />

Skewness/<br />

SES<br />

increase<br />

(cm 2 ) 61.00±3.6 22.00±2.9 45.19 11.348 55.94 1.33 0.785<br />

<strong>The</strong> result of the scanning showed that four putative QTLs were<br />

negative (Table 2). La-5 was a positive locus contributing in 5.54<br />

additive effects to tolerance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> expression of quantitative traits is the result of the reaction<br />

between genotype and environment. It is important to limit the<br />

influence of environment to achieve accurate QTL mapping. <strong>The</strong><br />

results derived from RILs analysis could be more accurate than those<br />

using F2 populations, since replications could be conducted to reduce<br />

environment error (Paterson et al.,1991). In classical quantitative<br />

genetics, a theoretical model assumed that genes controlling quantitative<br />

traits had the same direction and similar effects. However, many studies<br />

have indicated that the genes are diverse in effect and direction. This<br />

study showed that only one locus expressed a positive effect and that the<br />

others expressed negative effects. Yu et al. (2003) also found that the<br />

effect direction of QTLs controlling some morphological traits in<br />

Chinese cabbage were opposite.<br />

Fig. 2. LR plots and additive-effect plots on cucumber genome for low-light<br />

tolerance.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 223


Table 2. QTLs controlling low-light tolerance and its effect in cucumber.<br />

Agronomic<br />

traits QTL<br />

Leaf area La-1<br />

La-2<br />

La-3<br />

La-4<br />

La-5<br />

Linkage<br />

group<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

7<br />

9<br />

QTL<br />

position<br />

6.0<br />

10.0<br />

50.2<br />

36.0<br />

54.0<br />

LR<br />

value<br />

9.8<br />

10.8<br />

12.4<br />

13.5<br />

11.0<br />

Variance<br />

explained<br />

(%)<br />

10.6<br />

11.9<br />

7.3<br />

8.3<br />

20.2<br />

Additive<br />

effect<br />

-4.58<br />

-5.17<br />

-4.02<br />

-4.34<br />

5.47<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Aoki, S., M. Oda, and M. Naga 1988. Chilling and heat sensitivities in cucumber<br />

seedlings measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. Bull. Natl. Res. Inst. Veg.<br />

Ornam. Plants Tea. A(2):81–92.<br />

Chen, Q. J., F. M. Zhang, Y. J. Wang, and K. Kenji. 2003. Studies of physiological<br />

characteristics of the reaction of cucumber to low temperature and poor light.<br />

Sci. Agr. Sinica. 36(1):23-26.<br />

Kennard, W. C. and M. J. Havey. 1995. Quantitative trait analysis of fruit quality in<br />

cucumber: QTL detection, confirmation, and comparison with mating-design<br />

variation. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:53-61.<br />

Kennard, W. C., K. Poetter, A. Dijkhuizen, V. Meglic, J. Staub, and M. Havey. 1994.<br />

Linkages among AFLP, RAPD, isozyme, disease resistance, and morphological<br />

markers in narrow and wide crosses of cucumber. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:53–61.<br />

Meglic, V. and J. E. Staub. 1996. Inheritance and linkage relationships of isozyme<br />

and morphological loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

92(7):865–872.<br />

Paterson, A. H., S. Damon, J. D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H. D. Rabinowitch, S. E. Lincoln,<br />

E. S. Lander, and S. D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying<br />

quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and<br />

environments. Genome. 127:181–197.<br />

Serquen, F. C., J. Bacher, and J. E. Staub. 1997. Mapping and QTL analysis of a<br />

narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random amplified<br />

polymorphic DNA marker. Molec. <strong>Breeding</strong>. 3:257–268.<br />

Staub, J. E., F. C. Serquen, and M. Gupta. 1996. Genetic markers, map construction,<br />

and their application in plant breeding. Hort Sci. 31:729–741.<br />

Wang, Y. J., H. Y. Zhang, Y. W. Jiang. 2001. Effects of low temperature and low light<br />

intensity stress on photosynthesis in seedlings of different cucumber varieties.<br />

Acta Hort. Sinica. 28(3):230–234. (In Chinese.)<br />

Wang, Y. J., Y. W. Jiang, G. S. Wu, F. Zhang, and L. R. Zhang. 1998. Relationships<br />

between photosynthetic light compensation point and tolerance to low<br />

temperature and low irradiance in cucumber. Acta Hort. Sinica. 25(2):199–200.<br />

(In Chinese.)<br />

Xu, C.-H., Z.-Q. Chen, K.-B. Wang, F.-H. Zhao, S.-Q. Lin, C.-Q. Tang, and T.-Y.<br />

Kuang. 1997. Effects of chilling injury on the thylakoid membrane of cucumber<br />

chloroplasts. Acta Bot. Sinica. 39(12):1143–1146.<br />

Yu, S.-C., Y. J. Wang, and X. Y. Zheng. 2003. Mapping and QTL analysis controlling<br />

some morphological traits in Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp.<br />

pekinensis). Acta Gen. Sinica. 30(12):1153–1160 (In Chinese.)<br />

224 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


CONSTRUCTION OF A GENETIC MAP OF<br />

CUCUMBER USING RAPDS, SSRS, AFLPS<br />

AND MAPPING RESISTANCE GENES TO<br />

PAPAYA RINGSPOT, ZUCCHINI YELLOW<br />

MOSAIC, AND WATERMELON MOSAIC<br />

VIRUSES<br />

Haiying Zhang, Aijun Mao, Feng Zhang, Yong Xu,<br />

and Yongjian Wang<br />

National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />

Beijing, China<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis sativus, genetic distance, linkage map.<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> watermelon strains of Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV-W),<br />

Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), and Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) are<br />

potyviruses that cause significant losses in cucumber. F6 recombinant inbred<br />

lines (RILs) were generated from a cross between Cucumis sativus L. line<br />

‘European 8’ and a line from ‘QiuPeng’, which is resistant to the three viruses.<br />

A 244-point genetic map of cucumber was generated, delineating nine linkage<br />

groups and spanning 759cM, with an average distance of 3.1cM. Resistance to<br />

PRSV-W, ZYMV, and WMV were mapped to Linkage Group 2. <strong>The</strong> order of<br />

the three virus resistances was PRSV-W, ZYMV, and WMV. <strong>The</strong> distance<br />

between PRSV-W- resistant and ZYMV-resistant genes was 8cM, and the<br />

distance between ZYMV- and WMV- resistant genes was 4cM. <strong>The</strong> results<br />

indicate that this genetic map will be useful for cucumber genetics and breeding<br />

for disease resistance.<br />

T<br />

he watermelon strains of Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV-W),<br />

Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), and Watermelon<br />

mosaic virus (WMV) are potyviruses that cause significant<br />

losses in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) throughout China and<br />

the world (Provvidenti et al., 1984; Wang et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> genetics of<br />

potyvirus resistance in cucumber have been well studied. Provvidenti<br />

(1987) reported that resistance to ZYMV from TMG1 was inherited as<br />

a recessive allele at the zym single locus. ZYMV resistance from the<br />

cultivar ‘Dina’ was also inherited as a recessive allele at the same<br />

locus (Abul-Hayja and Al-Shahwan, 1991). Wang et al. (1984)<br />

reported that resistance to PRSV-W (originally named Watermelon<br />

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China<br />

(30471186, 30570997) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5062008,<br />

5050001).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 225


mosaic virus 1) in the ‘Surinam’ cultivar was inherited as a recessive<br />

allele at the prsv-1 locus. Wai and Grumet (1995a) found that the prsv-<br />

2 locus in the line TMG1 inhibited PRSV-W symptoms. Wai et al.<br />

(1997) reported that resistance to PRSV-W from ‘Surinam’ (prsv-1)<br />

and TMG1 (Prsv-2) were allelic. Cohen et al. (1971) reported that<br />

resistance to WMV was conditioned by a dominant allele at a single<br />

locus from cultivar ‘Kyoto 3 Feet’. Several studies demonstrated that<br />

numerous potyviruses such as PRSV-W, WMV, Moroccan<br />

watermelon mosaic virus, Zucchini yellow fleck virus, and ZYMV that<br />

are resistant in TMG1 are inherited at the same locus (Gilbert-<br />

Albertini et al., 1995; Wai and Grumet 1995b; Kabelka et al., 1997;<br />

Wai et al., 1997).<br />

Conventional plant breeding had a significant impact on improving<br />

cucumber breeding for resistance to potyviruses, but the timeconsuming<br />

process of making crosses, backcrosses, and the selection<br />

of desired resistance progeny makes it difficult to react adequately to<br />

the evolution of new virulent pathogens. Thus, marker-assisted<br />

selection (MAS) may be easier for the breeding of multiple-virusresistant<br />

cucumbers. Since the 1980s, molecular markers are being<br />

used widely as a principal tool for the breeding of many crops. In<br />

particular a great work has been realized in the construction of the<br />

molecular map of cucumber and in finding molecular markers linked<br />

to disease-resistance genes. Park et al. (2000) reported that resistances<br />

to PRSV-W and ZYMV were tightly linked (2.2cM) and mapped to<br />

the end of one linkage group. <strong>The</strong> AFLP marker E15/M47-F-197<br />

cosegregated with ZYMV resistance and should be a useful indirect<br />

selection tool for potyvirus resistance in cucumber. <strong>The</strong>se mapping<br />

results support the hypothesis that potyvirus resistance is controlled by<br />

different alleles at clustered loci in cucumber (Kabelka and Grumet<br />

1997; Wai et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> mapping of other resistance genes to<br />

potyviruses such as WMV should be one of the major topics for<br />

further study.<br />

Chinese cucumber and European greenhouse cucumber are two<br />

important ecological types cultivated widely. Many Chinese cucumber<br />

cultivars possess genetic resistance to four or more viruses, but the<br />

genetics of potyvirus resistance of these cultivars have not been well<br />

studied. Most of the European greenhouse-cucumber cultivars are not<br />

resistant to potyviruses. In our laboratory, we have generated<br />

recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the cross between ‘European 8’<br />

226 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


(an inbred line of European greenhouse-cucumber cultivars susceptible<br />

to ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV) and ‘QiuPeng’ (an inbred line of<br />

Chinese cucumber cultivars resistant to these viruses). <strong>The</strong> two main<br />

goals of our research were: (a) to construct the first cucumber map in<br />

China, a narrow-based genetic map using random amplified<br />

polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), amplified fragment length<br />

polymorphism (AFLP), and simple sequence repeat (SSR), and (b) to<br />

map resistance genes to ZYMV, PRSV–W, and WMV.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

CROSSES. ‘European 8’, an inbred European greenhouse-cucumber<br />

cultivar susceptible to ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV, was crossed with<br />

‘QiuPeng’, an inbred open-field cucumber cultivar of China with<br />

resistances to ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV. A total of 140 RIL6<br />

families were used for all DNA isolations and virus evaluations.<br />

VIRUS MAINTENANCE AND EVALUATION. ZYMV-CH, PRSV, and<br />

WMV were kindly provided by Dr. R. Provvidenti (Cornell<br />

University, Geneva, NY). <strong>The</strong> viruses were maintained by transferring<br />

to zucchini squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) regularly. For virus evaluation,<br />

cucumber seeds were germinated for 24 hr at 28 ο C. Fourteen days after<br />

sowing, cotyledons and the first expanding leaves were dusted with<br />

carborundum and inoculated with each of the viruses. Fourteen to 20<br />

days after inoculation, the plants were scored as: 0 = no symptoms; 1 =<br />

slight symptoms limited to lower leaves; 3 = slight mosaic on upper<br />

leaves; 5 = clear mosaic on lower leaves and moderate mosaic on<br />

upper leaves; 7 = severe mosaic on most of leaves; 9 = severe mosaic<br />

on all leaves, new leaves aberrant. Ten plants from each F6 family<br />

were evaluated in each of the three replications. Disease index (DI)<br />

was calculated by using the formula DI = (∑score x number of<br />

plants/9x total number of plants) x 100. <strong>The</strong> graphic of the frequency<br />

distribution in the RIL population for DI of ZYMV, WMV, and<br />

PRSV-W was drawn by using Systat 7.0 software,<br />

DNA ISOLATION. An improved CTAB procedure (Murray and<br />

Thompson, 1980) was used .<br />

AFLP ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> AFLP procedure was accomplished<br />

according to Vos et al. (1995).<br />

RAPD ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> RAPD procedure was accomplished<br />

according to Park et al. (2000).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 227


SSR ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> sequence of primers was obtained from Dr. J.<br />

E. Staub, University of Wisconsin. PCR amplification was conducted<br />

according to Danin-Poleg et al. (2000).<br />

LINKAGE-MAP CONSTRUCTION. Linkage-map construction was<br />

performed using Join Map3.0 for Kosambi mapping function.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE TO ZYMV, WMV AND PRSV-W<br />

IN CUCUMBER. <strong>The</strong> frequency distribution in the RIL population for<br />

DI of three viruses showed two peaks (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

demonstrated that resistances from ‘QiuPeng’ to ZYMV, WMV, and<br />

PRSV-W were all inherited as a recessive allele at a single locus. It is<br />

obvious that the resistance from ‘QiuPeng’ to WMV differed from the<br />

resistance from ‘Kyoto 3 Feet’, which was dominantly inherited.<br />

MAP CONSTRUCTION. <strong>The</strong> 244 markers, including AFLPs,<br />

RAPDs, and SSRs, formed nine linkage groups at LOD 3.0, and the<br />

nine linkage groups spanned 759cM, with an average distance of<br />

3.1cM (Figure 2). Since there are seven pairs of chromosomes in<br />

cucumber, we delineated nine linkage groups, and this map is not fully<br />

saturated.<br />

For the map construction, even distribution of markers with small<br />

intervals between was expected. Instead, however, marker clusters<br />

formed in several crops, such as tomato and maize. Our study showed<br />

that some markers, especially AFLP markers, were distributed<br />

unequally. Large intervals (>20cM) between adjacent markers were<br />

also found in some groups. Populations from various parents or more<br />

types of molecular markers, including RFLPs and SSRs, would be<br />

helpful for constructing a saturated map.<br />

MAPPING RESISTANCE TO POTYVIRUSES ZYMV PRSV-W AND<br />

WMV. In addition to resistances to ZYMV and PRSV-W, resistance<br />

to WMV was mapped on the genetic map. This was the first mapping<br />

of the gene for resistance to WMV, and we found that resistances to<br />

ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV all were closely linked in Linkage<br />

Group 1 (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> orders of three virus resistances were PRSV-<br />

W, ZYMV, and WMV. <strong>The</strong> distance between PRSV-W and ZYMV<br />

resistances was 8cM, and the distance between ZYMV and WMV<br />

resistance genes was 4.0cM. Park et al. (2000) reported that the<br />

distance between the two resistances to ZYMV and PRSV-W was<br />

2.2cM. In our study, the distance was 8cM. Although there is some<br />

difference in genetic distance, both studies show that resistance to<br />

ZYMV is linked closely to resistance to PRSV-W. A series of studies<br />

228 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


demonstrated that numerous potyvirus (PRSV-W, WMV, ZYMV)<br />

resistances in TGMT are inherited at the same locus; however, we<br />

scored about 10 families as recombinant for resistance to PRSV-W and<br />

ZYMV, to PRSV-W and WMV, and to WMV and ZYMV among 140<br />

families. Our results indicate that three important virus resistances in<br />

cucumber are conditioned by a major chromosome region, which<br />

further supports the hypothesis that potyvirus resistance is controlled<br />

by different alleles at clustered loci in cucumber (Kabelka and<br />

Grumet 1997; Kabelka et al, 1997; Wai and Grumet, 1995b).<br />

Count<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

ZYMV<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40<br />

DI<br />

50 60 70<br />

0.0<br />

80<br />

Count<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Proportion per bar<br />

WMV<br />

Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> frequency distribution in cucumber RIL populations for DI traits<br />

involving resistance to the watermelon strain of Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV-<br />

W), Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus<br />

(ZYMV). Abscissa = DI; ordinate = number of lines on the left side and the<br />

percentage on the right.<br />

Count<br />

PRSV-W<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0.0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

DI<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

0.0<br />

90<br />

DI<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 229<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Proportion per bar<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Proportion per bar


Fig. 2. A linkage map for cucumber derived from an RIL population (‘QiuPeng’<br />

× ‘European 8’).<br />

230 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Literature Cited<br />

Abul-Hayja, Z. and I. AI-Shahwan. 1991. Inheritance of resistance to zucchini yellow<br />

mosaic virus in cucumber. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 98:301–304.<br />

Ashfield. T., J. R. Danzer, D. Held, K. Clayton, and P. Keim. 1998. Rpg1, a soybean<br />

gene effective against races of bacterial blight, maps to a cluster of previously<br />

identified disease resistance genes. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 96:1013–1021.<br />

Cohen, S., E. Gertman, and N. Kedar. 1971. Inheritance of resistance to melon<br />

mosaic virus in cucumbers. Phytopathology. 61:253–255.<br />

Danin-Poleg, Y., N. Reis, S. Baudracco-Arnas, M. Pitrat, J. E. Staub, M. Oliver, P.<br />

Arus, C. M. de Vicente, and N. Katzir. 2000. Simple sequence repeats in<br />

cucumis mapping and map merging. Genome. 43:963–974.<br />

Gu, Q., Z. Fan, and H. Li. 2002. Virus list in cucurbita. Chinese Watermelon and<br />

Melon. 1:45–47.<br />

Kabelka, E. and R. Grumet. 1997. Inheritance of resistance to Moroccan watermelon<br />

mosaic virus in cucumber line TMG1 and cosegregation with zucchini yellow<br />

mosaic virus resistace. Euphytica. 95:237–242.<br />

Kabelka, E., Z. Ullah, and R. Grumet. 1997. Multiple alleles for zucchini yellow<br />

mosaic virus resistance at the zym locus in cucumber. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />

95:997–1004.<br />

Murray, H. G. and W. E. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight<br />

plant DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 8:4321–4325.<br />

Park, Y. H., S. Sensoy, C. Wye, R. Antonise, J. Peleman, and M. J. Havey. 2000. A<br />

genetic map of cucumber composed of RAPDs, RFLPs, AFLPs, and loci<br />

conditioning resistance to papaya ringspot and zucchini yellow mosaic viruses.<br />

Genome. 43:1003–1010.<br />

Provvidenti, R., D. Gonsalves, and H. Humaydan. 1984. Occurrence of zucchini<br />

yellow mosaic virus in cucurbits from Connecticut, New York, Florida, and<br />

California. Plant Dis. 68:443–446.<br />

Provvidenti, R. 1987. Viral diseases of cucurbits and sources of resistance. Rev.<br />

Plant Path. 66:425–429.<br />

Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J.<br />

Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for<br />

DNA fingerprinting. Nuleic Acids Res. 23:4407–4414.<br />

Wai, T. and R. Grumet. 1995a. Inheritance of resistance to the watermelon strain of<br />

papaya ringspot virus in the cucumber line TMG1. HortSci. 30:338–340.<br />

Wai, T. and R. Grumet. 1995b. Inheritance of resistance to the watermelon mosaic<br />

virus in the cucumber line TMG1: tissue-specific expression and relationship to<br />

zucchini yellow mosaic virus resistance. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:699–706.<br />

Wai. T., J. E. Staub, and R. Grumet. 1997. Linkage analysis of potyvirus resistance<br />

alleles in cucumber. J. Hered. 88:454–458.<br />

Wang Y., R. Provvidenti, and R. Robinson. 1984. Inheritance of resistance to<br />

watermelon mosaic virus 1 in cucumber. HortSci. 19:587–588.<br />

Wang, Y., Ming, S. Wen, and Y. Yan. 1997. Virus disease resistance breeding in main<br />

cucurbita crops. J. ChangJiang Vegetables. 1:2–5.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 231


PERIMETER TRAP CROP SYSTEMS USING<br />

BLUE HUBBARD SQUASH AS A CONTROL<br />

FOR STRIPED CUCUMBER BEETLE IN<br />

BUTTERNUT SQUASH<br />

Andrew Cavanagh and Ruth Hazzard<br />

Department of Plant, Insect, and Soil Science, University of<br />

Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Acalymma vittatum, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata, IPM<br />

ABSTRACT. Striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum (Fabricius), is the<br />

primary insect pest of cucurbit crops in the <strong>North</strong>eastern U.S. Adult beetles<br />

colonize squash crops from field borders, causing feeding damage at the<br />

seedling stage and transmitting the bacteria Erwinia tracheiphila. Conventional<br />

control methods rely on pesticide applications to the entire field. Acalymma<br />

vittatum demonstrates a marked preference for Blue Hubbard squash<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima) over butternut squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata). Perimeter<br />

trap cropping with a single or double row of Blue Hubbard squash concentrates<br />

beetles in the border where they can be controlled with timely perimeter<br />

treatments, limiting the need for pesticide in the main crop of butternut squash.<br />

We evaluated this system in commercial butternut fields in 2003 and 2004,<br />

comparing fields using perimeter trap cropping to conventionally managed<br />

fields. Equivalent control of striped cucumber beetles was achieved with >90%<br />

reduction in pesticide rates compared to conventional control methods.<br />

T<br />

he value of vegetable crops sold in the United <strong>State</strong>s was $12.7<br />

billion in 2002 (USDA, 2002 Census of Agriculture).<br />

<strong>North</strong>eastern states have a high proportion of their vegetablecrop<br />

industry invested in cucurbit crops, including squash, melons,<br />

cucumbers, and pumpkins; in Massachusetts, 40% of the vegetablecrop<br />

acreage is devoted to cucurbit crops (USDA, 2002). Yields of<br />

winter squash, one of the major cucurbit crops, exceed 20,000lb/acre,<br />

with a wholesale value estimated at $3400/acre, or greater than $5<br />

million for the state (Hollingsworth, 1998). Butternut squash is the<br />

primary winter squash crop, in part because of strong market demand<br />

and excellent storage capability.<br />

Striped cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittatum) constitute one of<br />

most serious pests of cucurbit crops in the world (Metcalf and Metcalf,<br />

1992). <strong>The</strong>se beetles are ranked as the most important insect pest in<br />

cucurbit crops in the <strong>North</strong>east, and are the primary target of<br />

insecticide applications used by growers (Hoffmann et al., 1996;<br />

Stivers, 1999). <strong>The</strong> <strong>North</strong>east Vegetable IPM Commodity Working<br />

232 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Group, with representatives from 12 northeastern states, ranked the<br />

cucumber beetle and bacterial wilt complex as a regionwide problem<br />

that causes significant reduction in yield and results in high pesticide<br />

use (IPM Priorities for Vegetables in the <strong>North</strong>east:<br />

http://northeastipm.org/work_vegepriority.cfm). Conventional pest<br />

management for many cucurbit crops requires two to eight<br />

applications of insecticides such as carbaryl (Brust and Foster, 1995)<br />

or other carbamates or synthetic pyrethroids (Howell et al., 2004).<br />

Recently, growers in the <strong>North</strong>east have adopted use of systemic<br />

insecticides (e.g., imidacloprid) in the furrow at planting, which<br />

protects cucurbit crops from early feeding damage (Hazzard, 2003).<br />

This has the advantage of less work for the grower; however, the<br />

insecticide cost is higher than with foliar applications, and widespread<br />

adoption of systemic insecticides may lead to resistance.<br />

Cucumber beetles can reduce yield in cucurbits through direct<br />

damage or by transmitting the causal agent of bacterial wilt.<br />

Cucumber beetles overwinter as adults, colonize cucurbit fields in<br />

early to mid-June, and may <strong>complete</strong>ly destroy newly germinated<br />

plants (Ferguson et al., 1983). Damage by adults to leaves and early<br />

flowers takes place over a four–five-week period in New England,<br />

followed by a period of inactivity aboveground after the overwintering<br />

generation of adults has laid eggs in the soil and died. Summer adults<br />

emerge in mid- to late summer and continue to feed, damaging leaves,<br />

flowers, and fruit, before leaving the fields for overwintering sites.<br />

Although yield losses to direct damage can be extensive, the most<br />

damaging effect of cucumber-beetle infestation may be through<br />

transmission of the bacteria Erwinia tracheiphila. Yield losses from<br />

bacterial wilt in winter squash and pumpkins have increased in the past<br />

decade (Hazzard et al., 2001; Zitter, 2001), increasing the necessity for<br />

developing control methods that prevent transmission of wilt during<br />

the most susceptible stages of plant development. To address these<br />

issues, in the spring of 2003 we began looking at the effectiveness of a<br />

perimeter-trap-cropping system to reduce the time, expense, and<br />

potential hazards that are inherent in conventional management<br />

strategies.<br />

Perimeter trap cropping, or PTC, is based on the fact that insects<br />

prefer one species or variety of plant over another, due to morphology,<br />

relative concentration of feeding stimulants, or other factors. <strong>The</strong><br />

more attractive crop is planted around the outer edge of the main cash<br />

crop, surrounding it on all sides. Striped cucumber beetles overwinter<br />

in the woods edges surrounding fields, and move into a crop from the<br />

edges. This makes them a good candidate for this method of control.<br />

It is also likely that by reducing the field area sprayed, we provide a<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 233


efuge for beetles that are still susceptible to chemical controls, thus<br />

delaying resistance. Blue Hubbard squash is highly attractive to<br />

striped cucumber beetles in comparison with butternut squash and has<br />

low susceptibility to bacterial wilt (McGrath and Shishkoff, 2000;<br />

Cavanagh and Hazzard, unpublished data). It has been used as an<br />

effective perimeter trap crop in summer squash with great success<br />

(Boucher and Durgy, 2002). It is similar to butternut squash in terms<br />

of its temperature and spacing requirements, and days to maturity.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se factors make it an ideal perimeter trap crop for butternut squash.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

On-Farm Experiment 2003<br />

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. To assess the value of perimeter-trapcropping<br />

systems in commercial agriculture, we monitored 12<br />

commercial butternut fields, 6 using a PTC system and 6 using<br />

conventional chemical controls (foliar treatment with carbaryl). Every<br />

week from 3 June 2003 to 14 July 2003 (peak period for striped<br />

cucumber beetle activity), 25 plants were randomly selected and<br />

scouted along the field border, and another 25 were randomly selected<br />

from a row halfway between the border and the center of the field.<br />

Perimeter-trap-crop growers were advised to spray their borders at the<br />

first arrival of the cucumber beetle. Additional border sprays were<br />

applied at weekly intervals if the beetle pressure in the border<br />

exceeded an average of one beetle per plant. Growers in all fields<br />

were advised to spray their main crop if beetles reached a threshold<br />

number of one beetle per plant on average.<br />

RESPONSES MEASURED. Both the border and a randomly selected<br />

row halfway between the border and the center of the field were<br />

scouted weekly for number of live beetles, number of dead beetles,<br />

presence of cotyledon damage, and percent defoliation. <strong>The</strong><br />

defoliation scale used was as follows: 0 = no damage, 1 = 1–20%<br />

damage, 2 = 21–40% damage, 3 = 41–60% damage, 4 = 61–80%<br />

damage, 5 = 81–100% damage. At the end of the season, growers<br />

rated their satisfaction with yield and management costs under this<br />

system and how it compared to expectations and past methods.<br />

FIELD MANAGEMENT. All the farmers participating in the<br />

experiment planted their fields as they normally would, except for the<br />

inclusion of a single- or double-row Hubbard border in the PTC fields.<br />

Double rows were used along woods edges where beetles were likely<br />

to have overwintered, or in fields close to previous cucurbit crops. No<br />

fields had been planted to cucurbits in the previous year. Cultivation<br />

234 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


and nutrient management were performed by the grower, according to<br />

the needs of the field and standard management practices.<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. All data in 2003 were subjected to<br />

ANOVA analysis using PROC GLM in SAS V.9.1. Beetle counts<br />

were subjected to log transformation to more closely meet<br />

expectations of normality. P values less than or equal to 0.05 were<br />

considered significant.<br />

On-Farm Experiment 2004<br />

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. <strong>The</strong> experimental design in 2004 was<br />

the same as in 2003, except that in 2004 we chose to also look at the<br />

effects of treating the border with a systemic insecticide<br />

(imidacloprid). This was done at the request of several growers who<br />

thought that a systemic would alleviate some of the difficulty in timing<br />

the initial spray correctly. <strong>The</strong> design was adapted so that there were<br />

now two pesticide treatments—systemic (imidacloprid) and foliar<br />

(carbaryl). <strong>The</strong> intention was to have three PTC foliar fields, three<br />

PTC systemic fields, three conventional foliar treated fields, and three<br />

conventional systemic treated fields. One of the PTC systemic fields<br />

failed to germinate due to poor field conditions, so we were left with<br />

only two fields in the systemic PTC category. During the 2004 trials<br />

we were also able, through increased contact with the growers during<br />

the critical early part of the season, to address many of the problems<br />

we experienced in 2003.<br />

RESPONSES MEASURED. Fields were scouted from 4 June 2004–16<br />

July 2004, which represents the period of peak beetle activity. <strong>The</strong><br />

same scouting methods were used and the same responses measured as<br />

in 2003.<br />

FIELD MANAGEMENT. Field management was essentially the same<br />

as in 2003, with the exception of a furrow drench of imidacloprid<br />

applied at planting to the systemic conventional fields and the Hubbard<br />

borders of the systemic PTC fields.<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Analysis for the 2004 data was<br />

conducted in the same manner as in 2003.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

On-Farm Experiment 2003<br />

<strong>The</strong> on-farm trials showed significant differences in total beetle<br />

numbers between both the systems overall (PTC vs. conventional;<br />

P=0.02) as well as location overall (border vs. main crop; P=0.02).<br />

This was complicated by the interaction between system and location<br />

being highly significant (df 1,10; P=0.007). When the means for each<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 235


location within each system were separated, it was clear that the<br />

number of beetles in the PTC borders was much higher than in either<br />

of the main crops or in the borders of the conventional fields (Table 1;<br />

Figure 1). We chose to use total beetles (live + dead beetles) as the<br />

measure of beetle pressure because dead beetles accumulate wherever<br />

pesticides are used, while only live beetles are present in unsprayed<br />

fields; the sum indicates total population pressure in both treated and<br />

untreated fields. <strong>The</strong>re were no significant differences in either<br />

defoliation or cotyledon-damage rankings. In three out of six plots<br />

with a Hubbard border, beetle populations in the main crops exceeded<br />

the action threshold. This occurred for several reasons. In one field<br />

the beetle pressure was high enough to overwhelm and destroy the<br />

single-row border. Plants were eaten down to the ground over a period<br />

of two days, before the border was sprayed. In two irregularly shaped<br />

fields the border was planted with wide gaps.<br />

Table 1. Average number of live plus dead beetles per plant, summed<br />

over six weeks from germination.<br />

Beetles per plant, 2003<br />

Border Main<br />

PTC 2.86a 0.39b<br />

Conventional 0.38b 0.38b<br />

Means with the same letter are not significantly different, P=0.05.<br />

Looking at the colonization of the field over time, we saw an<br />

apparent difference in the pattern of beetle dispersion. <strong>The</strong> main crop<br />

in the PTC systems had comparable levels of beetles to the other main<br />

crops, despite being in such close proximity to the highly infested<br />

Hubbard and despite the fact that half of these fields were never<br />

sprayed. All conventional fields were treated with insecticide at least<br />

once.<br />

On-Farm Experiment 2004<br />

<strong>The</strong> modifications we made to the system based on our experiences<br />

in 2003 led to greatly improved effectiveness. Beetle pressures were<br />

similar to 2003; however, the main crop of PTC fields did not exceed<br />

threshold and no PTC fields required a full-field spray. <strong>The</strong> total<br />

number of beetles was again higher in the Blue Hubbard borders,<br />

regardless of what chemical the border was treated with (P=0.037; df<br />

236 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


1,7) (Table 2). <strong>The</strong>re were no differences in beetle densities in the<br />

main crops regardless of whether or not the field was surrounded<br />

Avg per Plant Beetle count<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Average Total (live+dead) beetles per plant<br />

wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk6<br />

border - conv<br />

border - PTC<br />

main - conv<br />

main - PTC<br />

Fig. 1. Average adult beetles (sum of live plus dead beetles) per plant, by week,<br />

in the border and main crop of PTC and conventional fields, 2003.<br />

Table 2. Average number of live plus dead beetles per plant, summed<br />

over six weeks from germination.<br />

Beetles per plant, 2004<br />

Border Main<br />

PTC 3.13a 0.32b<br />

Conv 0.35b 0.30b<br />

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.<br />

Table 3. Average defoliation ratings, summed over six weeks from<br />

germination, 2004.<br />

Defoliation<br />

Pesticide Border Main<br />

Conventional carbaryl 0.44a 0.39a<br />

imidacloprid 0.52abc 0.33a<br />

PTC carbaryl 0.70c 0.49ab<br />

imidacloprid 0.65bc 0.63bc<br />

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.<br />

by a Hubbard border or what chemical the border was sprayed with. It<br />

is important to note that the beetle populations in the main crop of<br />

each field were equivalent despite the fact that the main crops of the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 237


PTC fields were not sprayed or treated with insecticide in any way,<br />

and the main crops of the other fields were either treated with<br />

imidacloprid at planting or sprayed with a foliar insecticide on<br />

multiple occasions through the growing season. <strong>The</strong>re was a small but<br />

statistically significant increase in the defoliation rating (Table 3) for<br />

the main crop of the imidacloprid treated PTC field vs. the<br />

conventional main crops (P=0.015; df 1,7). When comparing only at<br />

the vulnerable seedling stages, the difference was not significant.<br />

In 2004 the main crops of the PTC fields never exceeded the spray<br />

threshold (Figure 2). It appeared that the pressure in the main crops of<br />

the PTC fields was actually lower than in any other field at the onset of<br />

beetle colonization (Weeks 1 and 2). This has important implications<br />

for the success of the system, because beetle feeding has a<br />

disproportionate impact on young plants.<br />

GROWER-SURVEY RESULTS. When evaluating an experimental<br />

system that is designed, ultimately, to be adopted by growers, it is<br />

vitally important to evaluate the participating growers’ opinions of the<br />

effectiveness of the system. This type of evidence, while anecdotal,<br />

often carries more weight in the target community than more objective<br />

forms of measurement. In 2004, we surveyed our Massachusetts<br />

growers, along with several growers in Connecticut who had been<br />

using the Blue Hubbard/ butternut PTC system, with the following<br />

results:<br />

• 100% of surveyed growers found the PTC system and training to<br />

be good or excellent overall.<br />

• Eight out of 10 said that using PTC saved them money. <strong>The</strong> other<br />

2 said it cost about the same.<br />

• Eight out of the 10 growers we surveyed were very satisfied or<br />

thrilled with the way PTC worked for them. <strong>The</strong> remaining 2<br />

growers were satisfied.<br />

• 100% said using PTC took less or the same amount of time as<br />

using conventional methods.<br />

• 100% said they used less pesticide.<br />

Coupled with the evidence from the on-farm experiments, the<br />

survey results indicate that perimeter trap cropping can provide<br />

adequate striped cucumber beetle control while greatly reducing<br />

pesticide use in commercial butternut squash fields. <strong>The</strong> results of this<br />

study show that PTC is an excellent candidate for adoption by growers<br />

wishing to reduce their pesticide costs and exposure.<br />

238 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Average per Plant Beetle count<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Average Total (live + dead) beetles per plant<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

ptc - border<br />

ptc - main<br />

conv - border<br />

conv - main<br />

Fig. 2. Average adult beetles (sum of live plus dead beetles) per plant, by week,<br />

in the border and main crop of PTC and conventional fields, 2004.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Boucher, J. T. and Durgy, R. 2002. Perimeter trap cropping works. UCT extension<br />

system fact sheet. University of Connecticut Extension, Storrs, CT<br />

Brust, G. E., and R. E. Foster. 1995. Semiochemical based toxic baits for control of<br />

striped cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in cantaloupe. J. Econ.<br />

Ent. 88:112–116.<br />

Ferguson, J. E., E. R. Metcalf, R. L. Metcalf, and A. M. Rhodes. 1983. Influence of<br />

cucurbitacin content in cotyledons of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae cultivars upon feeding<br />

behavior of Diabroticina beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Ent.<br />

76:47–51.<br />

Hazzard, R. V. 2003. Imidacloprid for striped cucumber beetle control, p. 187–190.<br />

In: Proc. New York state vegetable conference. New York <strong>State</strong> Growers<br />

Association, Kirkville, NY<br />

Hazzard, R., F. X. Mangan, A. K. Carter, R. Wick, R. Bonanno, J. Howell, R.<br />

Bernatzky, and P. Westgate. 2001. Vegetable integrated crop and pest<br />

management program annual report. University of Massachusetts Extension<br />

Publication, Amherst, MA.<br />

Hoffmann, M. P., J. J. Kirkwyland, R. F. Smith, and R. F. Long. 1996. Field tests<br />

with kairomone-baited traps for cucumber beetles and corn rootworms in<br />

cucurbits. Env. Ent. 25:1173–1181.<br />

Hollingsworth, C., C. A. Mordhurst, R. Hazzard, and J. Howell. 1998. Pumpkin and<br />

winter squash project: 1998 grower survey and ICM project goals. University of<br />

Massachusetts Extension Vegetable Program, Amherst, MA<br />

Howell, J. C., A. R. Bonanno, T. J. Boucher, and R. L. Wick (eds.). 2004. 2004–<br />

2005 New England vegetable management guide. University of Massachusetts<br />

Extension Office of Communications and Marketing, Amherst, MA.<br />

IPM Priorities for Vegetables in the <strong>North</strong>east:<br />

.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 239


McGrath, M. T. and N. Shishkoff. 2000. Comparison of cucurbit crop types and<br />

cultivars for their attractiveness to cucumber beetles and susceptibility to<br />

bacterial wilt. Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, LIHREC,<br />

Ithaca, NY.<br />

Metcalf, R. L. and E. R. Metcalf. 1992. Plant kairomones in insect ecology and<br />

control. Chapman & Hall, New York.<br />

Stivers, L. (ed.). 1999. Crop profile for squash in New York. Cornell Cooperative<br />

Extension, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.<br />

.<br />

USDA. 2002. Census of agriculture, vol. 1, ch 2. U.S. state level data, table 29.<br />

vegetables and melons harvested for sale: 2002 and 1997.<br />

.<br />

Zitter, T. A. 2001. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> disease update part I: bacterial and angular leaf spot,<br />

Septoria leaf spot, and bacterial wilt, p. 185–188. In: Proceedings of the New<br />

York state vegetable conference. New York <strong>State</strong> Growers Association,<br />

Kirkville, NY.<br />

240 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


CHARACTERIZATION OF COMMERCIALLY<br />

AVAILABLE WATERMELON POLLENIZERS<br />

Peter J. Dittmar, Jonathan R. Schultheis, and David W. Monks<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Department of Horticultural Science,<br />

Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, triploid watermelon, seedless<br />

ABSTRACT. Pollen from triploid (seedless) watermelon (Citrullus lanatus<br />

[Thunb.] Matsum. & Nak.) is nonviable. Diploid (seeded) watermelons produce<br />

viable pollen for seedless-watermelon production. In 2004, markets continued<br />

to increase for triploid but decreased for diploid watermelons. Seed companies<br />

are commercializing diploid cultivars (pollenizers) designed as pollen sources<br />

for triploid-watermelon production. <strong>The</strong> objectives of this research were to<br />

characterize the vegetative, floral, and fruit growth and development of these<br />

pollenizers. Five pollenizers were evaluated: ‘Companion’, ‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini<br />

Pool’, ‘SP-1’, and ‘Jenny’. ‘Companion’ produced the smallest plants, reaching<br />

a maximum vine length of 183cm, 5 weeks after transplant (WAT). ‘Mickylee’,<br />

‘Mini Pool’, ‘SP-1’, and ‘Jenny’ reached maximum lengths of 294–335cm, 5<br />

WAT. ‘Companion’ had the shortest internode length, 3cm. ‘SP-1’ produced<br />

the most male flowers, 30–40 per plant per day 5 to 8 WAT. ‘Companion’,<br />

‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini Pool’, and ‘Jenny’ produced male-flower at similar rates<br />

early in the season; after 5 WAT, however, ‘Companion’ had the lowest level of<br />

all pollenizers. ‘SP-1’ produced the most female flowers and had the most fruit<br />

(8 per plant). ‘Companion’ produced the fewest female flowers and produced<br />

two fruit per vine. ‘Mickylee’ had the largest fruit, 5.9kg; ‘SP-1’ and ‘Jenny’<br />

produced the smallest, 3.1kg.<br />

T<br />

hree quarters of total watermelon production in the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s is triploid (seedless) (USDA Economic Research<br />

Service, 2005). Triploid watermelons do not provide adequate<br />

amounts of viable pollen for fruit set to occur (Kihara, 1951;<br />

Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997; Rubatzky and Yamaguchi,<br />

1997). Diploid or pollenizer plants are placed next to or near triploid<br />

watermelon plants to provide viable pollen for fruit set on the triploid<br />

plants (Kihara, 1951; Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997; Rubatzky<br />

and Yamaguchi, 1997).<br />

<strong>The</strong> pollenizer plants are planted in separate rows or in the same<br />

row as the triploid watermelon plants (Maynard and Elmstrom, 1992;<br />

NeSmith and Duval, 2001). Spacing of triploid watermelon plants has<br />

an effect on fruit number and size. Closer in-row spacing (eight per 1–<br />

2ft) of seedless cultivars ‘Crimson Jewel’ and ‘Honeyheart’ lowered<br />

the number and individual fruit weight per vine (Motsenbocker and<br />

Arancibia, 2002). <strong>The</strong> rind pattern of the pollenizer and triploid fruit<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 241


must be different so that they can be separated and correctly marketed<br />

(Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997; Rubatzky and Yamaguchi,<br />

1997).<br />

Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) are used to promote pollination and<br />

fruit set of watermelon. Diploid flowers require 6 to 8 bee visits for<br />

fruit set (Adlerz, 1966; Stanghellini et al., 1997). However, fruit set in<br />

triploid watermelons requires over 24 bee visits (Walters, 2005). <strong>The</strong><br />

objectives of this research were to evaluate several commercially sold<br />

diploid cultivars used exclusively for pollination of triploid<br />

watermelons. To evaluate the potential of these cultivars for<br />

pollination purposes, we measured vegetative growth, flower<br />

production, and individual fruit characteristics. <strong>The</strong>se measurements<br />

are important because the pollenizer plant must effectively compete<br />

with but not out-compete triploid-watermelon plant growth in the<br />

production field. Additionally, the amount of flower production is<br />

important with respect to supplying viable pollen to optimize triploid<br />

fruit set. <strong>The</strong> production of female flowers on the diploid pollenizer<br />

plant is important as substantial fruit set may inhibit pollen production<br />

while the fruit must be easily distinguished from triploid fruit.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

<strong>The</strong> study included five commercially available diploid<br />

pollenizers. ‘Companion’, a cultivar marketed by Seminis Seed<br />

Company, was released in 2003 and is sold in the United <strong>State</strong>s.<br />

‘Jenny’ is a cultivar released in 2005 by Nunhems Seed and marketed<br />

worldwide. ‘Mickylee’ is an open-pollinated cultivar available from<br />

many seed distributors, and is often used as a pollenizer in Central<br />

America and Florida. ‘Mini Pool’ was released from Hazera Seed and<br />

is predominately sold and used in Israel. ‘Super Pollenizer 1’ (‘SP1’)<br />

was released by Syngenta in 2004 and is utilized in the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />

and throughout the world.<br />

Cultivars were planted 20 April, 2004, into LE1803 transplant<br />

trays (Landmark Plastics Corp., Akron, OH). Plants were transplanted<br />

17 May, 2004 (27 days after seeding) at the Central Crops Research<br />

Station, Clayton, NC, on black polyethylene mulch. <strong>The</strong> soil type was<br />

a Norfolk loamy sand (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic typic<br />

kandiudults). Each plot had four plants spaced 1.3m in-row and 3.1m<br />

between-row. <strong>The</strong> plots were arranged in a randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />

block design and replicated five times.<br />

Vegetative and floral growth and fruit production were evaluated<br />

for each pollenizer. Vegetative growth was characterized by vine and<br />

internode length. Vine length was measured using a measuring tape,<br />

242 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


from the crown of the plant to the tip of the longest vine on a given<br />

plant. Internode length was measured between the third and fourth<br />

fully expanded leaf on the same vine. Vine and internode length were<br />

collected three, four, and five weeks after transplanting (WAT). Floral<br />

growth was characterized by the number of female and male flowers<br />

produced per plant per date. Male and female flowers were counted on<br />

a weekly basis beginning the 3 rd WAT and ending the 8 th WAT. <strong>The</strong><br />

number of fruit set was counted beginning 3 WAT and concluding 8<br />

WAT. Final fruit weights were measured at time of harvest, 19 July,<br />

2004. Fruit were considered as set when petals had <strong>complete</strong>ly dried<br />

and fallen off a healthy ovary. All data were evaluated using GLM<br />

procedures and means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range<br />

Test.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Plant size was measured by vine and internode length. <strong>The</strong><br />

cultivar ‘Companion’ was the smallest of the pollenizers evaluated<br />

(Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> internodes of ‘Companion’ were the shortest, 3.9cm,<br />

while the other pollenizers had internodes 9.3 to 10.0cm long (Figure<br />

2). ‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini Pool’ produced the longest vines (Figure 1).<br />

‘SP1’ had growth early in the season that was similar to that of<br />

‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini Pool’. However, later in the growing season (5<br />

WAT), ‘SP1’ had a shorter vine (295cm) than ‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini<br />

Pool’ (Figure 1). Although ‘SP1’ vines were not as long as those of<br />

the other pollenizers, we observed that ‘SP1’ had extensive side<br />

branching. <strong>The</strong> cultivars with the longest vines had the greatest<br />

internode length (Figure 2).<br />

Floral growth was characterized by male- and female-flower<br />

production (Figures 3 and 4). ‘SP1’ produced the most male flowers<br />

throughout the experiment, with as many as 40 male flowers per plant<br />

per day by 4 WAT, with male-flower production never falling below<br />

30 (Figure 3). All other cultivars produced fewer male flowers.<br />

‘Companion’ had the same number of male flowers as ‘Jenny’,<br />

‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ 4 and 5 WAT; however, its production<br />

lagged behind that of the other cultivars 6 WAT and thereafter.<br />

‘Companion’ had 13.5 male flowers per plant per day 5 WAT and 5 or<br />

fewer flowers for the remainder of the experiment. In comparison,<br />

‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ produced between 8 and 12<br />

flowers per plant per day 5 WAT.<br />

Of all the pollenizers evaluated, ‘SP1’ produced the most female<br />

flowers, with 3 per plant per day (Figure 4). ‘Companion’ had the<br />

lowest number. ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ produced the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 243


Fig. 1. Vegetative growth of watermelon pollenizers. Length of the longest vine<br />

from three to five weeks after transplanting (WAT). Bars with a different letter<br />

are significantly different for pollenizers tested for a given week (P>.05).<br />

Fig. 2. Vegetative growth of watermelon pollenizers. Length of internode<br />

between the third and fourth internode from the tip, averaged over the season.<br />

Bars with a different letter are significantly different for pollenizers tested for a<br />

given week (P>.05).<br />

same number of female flowers as ‘SP1’ 3 and 4 WAT but produced<br />

fewer after 5 WAT.<br />

‘SP1’ set the most fruit and produced eight fruit per plant by the<br />

end of the season (Figure 5). <strong>The</strong> fruit, however, were the smallest,<br />

10kg (Figure 6). <strong>The</strong> other four cultivars set fruit at similar times.<br />

‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ continued to set additional fruit 7<br />

and 8 WAT, while ‘Companion’ remained at 2 fruits per vine<br />

244 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


(Figure 5). ‘Mickylee’ had the largest fruit, 22.9kg (Figure 6).<br />

At time of harvest, fruit rind pattern was determined for each<br />

cultivar. ‘Companion’ fruit has a ‘Charleston Gray’ rind, a boxy,<br />

blocky oblong shape, and red flesh. ‘Jenny’ is round with distinct dark<br />

green stripes on a light green background and red flesh. ‘Mickylee’<br />

Fig. 3. Floral growth of watermelon pollenizers. Number of male flowers per<br />

plant per day. Points with a different letter are significantly different (P>.05).<br />

z<br />

‘SP1’ is in Group a; ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ are in Group ab;<br />

‘Companion’ is in Group c.<br />

y<br />

‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini Pool’, and ‘Companion’ are in Group b.<br />

Fig. 4. Number of female flowers per plant per day. Points with a different<br />

letter are significantly different (P>.05).<br />

z<br />

‘Jenny’ is in Group b; ‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini Pool’ are in Group ab;<br />

‘Companion’ is in Group c.<br />

y<br />

All pollenizers are in Group a.<br />

x<br />

‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini Pool’, and ‘Companion’ are in Group b.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 245


Fig. 5. Fruit set on watermelon pollenizer vines from three to eight WAT.<br />

‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ had the same number on all dates except 5<br />

WAT, and are shown on the same line. Points on the lines with a different letter<br />

are significantly different (P>.05).<br />

y<br />

All pollenizers are in Group a.<br />

x<br />

‘Companion’, ‘Jenny’, and ‘Mini Pool’ are in Group ab; ‘Mickylee’ is in<br />

Group b.<br />

z<br />

‘SP1’ is in Group a; ‘Companion’, ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ are in<br />

Group b.<br />

Fig. 6. <strong>The</strong> weight of individual watermelon at time of harvest.<br />

and ‘Mini Pool’ have round to oval fruit, a ‘Charleston Gray’ rind<br />

pattern, and red flesh. ‘SP1’ is round, with indistinct medium green<br />

stripes on a light green background and white flesh. Its rind is brittle<br />

and can split when very little pressure is applied to the fruit.<br />

Vegetative characteristics of the pollenizers provide some clues as to<br />

how competitive these cultivars will be when grown among triploid<br />

cultivars. <strong>The</strong> dwarf growing habit of ‘Companion’ provides less<br />

competition with triploid plants. However, the dense canopy produced<br />

by its shorter internodes may deter bees from accessing the pollenizer<br />

246 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


flowers and pollinating the triploid flowers. ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and<br />

‘Mini Pool’ had longer vines and a more open growth habit. With<br />

these cultivars, the male flowers could be easily accessed by bees. If<br />

interplanted with the triploid watermelons, the more vigorous vines<br />

might compete more with triploid plants for water and nutrients<br />

thereby reducing triploid fruit set and/or size. This practice would<br />

likely reduce seedless-watermelon yields. If competition is a problem,<br />

it could be minimized by planting the pollenizers in a dedicated hill or<br />

in separate rows from the triploid plants. ‘SP1’ had slightly shorter<br />

vines than ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’; however, the<br />

additional side branching could cause competition with the triploidwatermelon<br />

plants.<br />

In this research, these pollenizers were given optimal space for<br />

light interception, nutrition, and water. <strong>The</strong>y need to be tested and<br />

evaluated further by interplanting them with triploid plants. We are<br />

currently conducting such studies on several pollenizers to determine<br />

their effects of triploid-watermelon production.<br />

<strong>The</strong> production of sufficient male flowers with viable pollen is<br />

important for fruit set in triploid watermelons. ‘Companion’ produces<br />

a comparable number of male flowers to other diploid pollenizers early<br />

in the season; however, the number of male flowers is reduced later in<br />

the season. If this cultivar is used as the pollenizer, triploid plants may<br />

have an earlier fruit set and harvest. An extended harvest season may<br />

be questionable since male-flower production levels were substantially<br />

reduced after fruit set occurred on ‘Companion’ plants. Both ‘Jenny’<br />

and ‘Mini Pool’ hybrids have the same number of male flowers as the<br />

open-pollinated cultivar ‘Mickylee’. <strong>The</strong> high number of ‘SP1’ male<br />

flowers produced throughout the season may result in steady<br />

production of triploid fruit throughout the extended growing season.<br />

<strong>The</strong> characterization of the fruit is important for harvesting. A<br />

large number of unharvestable pollenizer fruit can interfere with<br />

harvest operations in the field, with workers tripping over or stepping<br />

on the fruit. Additionally, pollenizer cultivars must have a distinct<br />

rind pattern if used in a triploid-production field so that they can easily<br />

be distinguished from seedless fruit. This is even more imperative<br />

should miniwatermelons be produced and be of similar size as the<br />

pollenizers.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Adlerz, W. C. 1966. Honey bee visit number and watermelon pollination. J. Econ.<br />

Ent.. 59:28–30.<br />

Kihara, H. 1951. Triploid watermelons. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58:217–230.<br />

Maynard, D. N. and G. W. Elmstrom. 1992. Triploid watermelon production<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 247


practices and varieties. Acta Hort. 318:169–173.<br />

Motsenbocker, C. E. and R. A. Arancibia. 2002. In-row spacing influences triploid<br />

watermelon yield and crop value. HortTech. 12:437–440.<br />

NeSmith, D. S. and J. R. Duval. 2001. Fruit set of triploid watermelons as a<br />

function of distance from a diploid pollinizer. HortSci. 36:60–61.<br />

Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB, New York.<br />

Rubatzky, V. E. and M. Yamaguchi. 1997. World vegetables, 2 nd ed. Chapman &<br />

Hall, New York.<br />

Stanghellini, M. S., J. T. Ambrose, and J. R. Schultheis. 1997. <strong>The</strong> effects of honey<br />

bee and bumble bee pollination on fruit set and abortion of cucumber and<br />

watermelon. Amer. Bee J. 137:386–391.<br />

USDA Economic Research Service. 2005. Vegetables and melons situation and<br />

outlook year<strong>book</strong>/VGS-2005/July 21, 2005: x.<br />

Walters, S. A. 2005. Honey bee pollination requirements for triploid watermelon.<br />

HortSci. 40:1268–1270.<br />

248 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


GALIA MUSKMELON PRODUCTION IN HIGH<br />

TUNNELS IN THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS<br />

USA<br />

Lewis W. Jett<br />

Department of Horticulture, University of Missouri,<br />

Columbia, MO 65211<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>The</strong>rmal water tubes, row covers, transplants,<br />

direct seeding<br />

ABSTRACT. High tunnels are rapidly being adopted as a season-extension<br />

technology for horticulture producers in the Central Great Plains. A distinct<br />

advantage of high tunnels is their use in growing diverse crops that could not<br />

normally be grown in the field environment of the Central Great Plains.<br />

Specialty melons such as Galia muskmelons (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus)<br />

are a high-value, warm-season vegetable that has the potential for early-season<br />

high-tunnel production. Research was conducted in 2004–2005 at the<br />

University of Missouri-Columbia using ‘Galia 152’ muskmelon within passively<br />

vented, solar-heated high tunnels. Transplanting significantly accelerated early<br />

harvest of Galia muskmelons relative to direct seeding within a high tunnel.<br />

When transplanting was combined with the use of thermal water tubes and row<br />

covers, ambient air temperature and early-season yield was significantly<br />

increased. Early-season harvest of quality Galia muskmelons within high<br />

tunnels can be profitable for growers in the Central Great Plains.<br />

H<br />

igh tunnels are a low-cost season-extension technology used<br />

for producing a diversity of horticulture crops (Lamont et al.,<br />

2003). Specifically, high tunnels are passively vented, solar<br />

greenhouses covered with one layer of greenhouse plastic. Crops are<br />

grown directly in the soil beneath the high tunnel, and the only<br />

external connection is the drip irrigation system. In addition to<br />

accelerating crop growth and maturity, high tunnels protect the crop<br />

from a capricious environment where extremes in temperature, wind,<br />

rainfall, pests, and light intensity can severely reduce marketable<br />

yields and quality. Using a high tunnel, crops can be harvested at peak<br />

horticulture maturity over a longer growing season because the crops<br />

are not weakened by insects, weeds, or diseases.<br />

<strong>The</strong> choice of which crops to grow within a high tunnel is based on<br />

market potential, economics, yield per plant, and improved quality<br />

(Waterer, 2003). In a survey of high-tunnel producers in the Central<br />

Great Plains, the dominant crops growers produced within high tunnels<br />

were tomatoes, peppers, salad greens (lettuce, spinach, etc.), and<br />

cucurbits, respectively (Jett and Carey 2006). Most high-tunnel<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 249


producers in the Central Great Plains use high tunnels for 1–2 crops<br />

per year and desire early-season harvest of high-value warm-season<br />

vegetables. Each crop occupies the high tunnel for approximately four<br />

months or one-third of each calendar year. While early-season<br />

tomatoes may be the dominant crop grown within high tunnels in the<br />

Central Great Plains, growers are interested in diversifying their<br />

production with other warm-season crops that can be double-cropped<br />

or rotated with tomatoes and peppers. <strong>The</strong>re is a premium price for<br />

early muskmelons in the Midwest, and many specialty melons are<br />

becoming increasingly popular with consumers (Simon et al., 1993).<br />

Galia muskmelons (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) are greenfleshed<br />

melons with a yellow, netted rind, high soluble solids, and a<br />

robust aroma that are adapted to warm, dry growing environments<br />

(Karchi, 2000). Although not widely found in U.S. markets, they are<br />

very popular in Europe, and production has been evaluated in Florida<br />

within passively vented greenhouses (Cantliffe, et al., 2002). Rainfall<br />

during flowering and fruit formation significantly lowers quality of<br />

Galia melons, and they should be harvested at the vine-ripe stage for<br />

maximum quality (Cantliffe, et al., 2002). Hochmuth et al. (1998)<br />

noted less cracking of Galia muskmelons when grown in protected<br />

culture versus the field in Florida. High tunnels may provide an<br />

optimal environment for growing Galia muskmelons in the Central<br />

Great Plains.<br />

Muskmelons are susceptible to chilling injury at temperatures<br />

between 41–59°F (Mitchell and Madore, 1992). <strong>The</strong>re are several<br />

production practices that are used to protect muskmelons from lowtemperature<br />

stress and to increase early yields. Transplants can<br />

significantly increase early, marketable yield of muskmelons relative<br />

to direct seeding (Wiedenfeld et al., 1990). Spunbonded and perforated<br />

polyethylene row covers used in combination with black plastic mulch<br />

significantly increased early and total marketable yield of muskmelons<br />

(Waterer, 1993; Hemphill and Mansour, 1986; Loy and Wells, 1982;<br />

Wiebe, 1973). Water is a very efficient collector of radiant energy.<br />

Water-filled polyethylene tubes have been shown to reduce<br />

greenhouse heating costs by accumulating energy during the day and<br />

releasing heat during the night time (Pavlou, 1990). <strong>The</strong> use of waterfilled<br />

poly tubes in conjunction with clear plastic mulch and<br />

nonperforated polyethylene row covers significantly increased early<br />

yield of field-grown muskmelon in Quebec, Canada (Jenni et al.,<br />

1998). Many of these techniques have been evaluated in the field<br />

environment but have not been evaluated in concert with a high tunnel.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of this research project was to evaluate the production<br />

250 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


and economic potential of early-season Galia muskmelons within a<br />

high tunnel and to determine which combination of season-extension<br />

practices is the most effective in accelerating early harvest in the<br />

Central Great Plains.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

HIGH-TUNNEL STRUCTURES AND PLOT ESTABLISHMENT. Three<br />

freestanding, Quonset high-tunnel units (Stuppy Greenhouse<br />

Manufacturing, Kansas City, MO) were constructed in early March<br />

2002 at the University of Missouri Bradford Research and Extension<br />

Center near Columbia, MO (lat. 90’11” W; long. 38’37” N). Each<br />

high tunnel was covered with a single layer of greenhouse-grade, 6-mil<br />

(0.006-in. thick) polyethylene plastic (K-50, Klerk’s Plastic<br />

Manufactures, Inc., Richburg, SC). <strong>The</strong> dimensions of each high<br />

tunnel were 6m (wide) x 11m (long) x 3.7m (high), with each arch<br />

spaced 1.2m apart. <strong>The</strong> high tunnels were oriented in a north-south<br />

direction with 3m between each high tunnel. Temperature and<br />

humidity were managed by manually rolling up the sidewalls or<br />

removing two end-wall panels from each end of the high tunnel.<br />

Whenever air temperatures inside the high tunnel exceeded 35°C, the<br />

sidewalls were rolled up to lower temperature and humidity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> soil within each high tunnel was a Mexico silt loam with a pH<br />

of 6 that was tilled and formed into raised beds 15cm high x 61cm<br />

wide beginning in mid-March of 2004 and 2005. Each high tunnel<br />

accommodated 5 rows of raised beds on 1.2-m centers. Preplant<br />

fertilizer (13N-5.7P-11K) was top-dressed and incorporated into each<br />

raised bed at a rate of 336g/90 m 2 nitrogen (N), 1120g /90 m 2<br />

potassium (K2O), and 1120g/90m 2 phosphorus (P2O5) (Jett, 2006).<br />

Calcium nitrate (15.5N-0P-0K-19Ca) was fertigated at a rate of<br />

560g/90m 2 /week commencing 2 weeks after seeding or transplanting<br />

and continuing through harvest.<br />

Black embossed plastic mulch (0.9m width) was laid over each<br />

raised bed. Each row was irrigated with one 8-mil (0.008-in.) T-Tape<br />

(T-Systems International, San Diego, CA) plastic drip tube with<br />

drippers spaced on-center 31cm apart. Irrigation was scheduled using<br />

a tensiometer placed 31cm deep in the center of each bed (Jett, 2004).<br />

TRANSPLANTS VERSUS DIRECT SEEDING WITHIN A HIGH TUNNEL.<br />

‘Galia 152’ (Hazera Genetics, El Segundo, CA) was chosen for this<br />

experiment based on performance in cultivar trials (Shaw et al., 2004).<br />

In early February of 2004 and 2005, ‘Galia 152’seeds were planted in<br />

the greenhouse in 72-cell polystyrene trays (Speedling, Sun City, FL)<br />

filled with a moistened soilless mix (Pro-Mix BX, Premier Brands,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 251


Yonkers, NY) and allowed to grow for 6 weeks before transplanting<br />

within each high tunnel. <strong>The</strong> plants were fertilized once per week with<br />

a 20N-8.7P-16.6K (Peter’s 20-20-20 water-soluble fertilizer)<br />

containing 200ppm N. <strong>The</strong> transplants were watered as needed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> minimum temperature for muskmelon seed germination is<br />

16°C (Maynard and Hochmuth, 1997). When the soil temperature at<br />

the 5-cm depth equaled or exceeded this temperature level, the plants<br />

or seeds were planted within the high tunnel. To evaluate direct<br />

seeding within a high tunnel, two seeds of ‘Galia 152’ were handseeded<br />

approximately 1.9cm deep and 61cm apart in 5-cm diameter<br />

planting holes on each raised bed. After emergence, the muskmelons<br />

were thinned to one vigorous seedling per hill. Six-week-old ‘Galia<br />

152’ melon transplants were planted at the same spacing. Both<br />

seeding and transplanting occurred on 30 March 2004 and 2005.<br />

Cultural practices consisted of standard recommendations for growing<br />

melons within a high tunnel (Jett, 2006).<br />

ROW COVERS AND THERMAL WATER BAGS. Immediately after<br />

seeding and transplanting, low tunnels were fashioned using wire<br />

hoops (#9 gauge) covered with two layers of lightweight, spunbonded<br />

polypropylene row cover (AG-19; Agribon Inc., Mooresville, NC).<br />

<strong>The</strong> row covers remained on the plants continuously until anthesis,<br />

defined as the time when the first perfect muskmelon flower was<br />

observed. After anthesis, the row covers were held in reserve in the<br />

event of a frost event.<br />

Water was evaluated as a solar collector that could increase the<br />

microclimate temperature around each muskmelon plant rather than as<br />

a technique to affect the air temperature within the entire high-tunnel<br />

structure. Two 3.8-L Ziploc storage bags (2-mil thickness) holding<br />

3.6kg of water per bag were filled with water and placed on either side<br />

of each planting hole immediately after planting or seeding. Initially a<br />

7.6-cm-diameter polyethylene water tube was used but was discarded<br />

after discovering the tube leaked water and failed to remain stationary<br />

on the raised beds.<br />

To facilitate harvest, the muskmelon vines were trellised using a 2m-high<br />

plastic mesh trellis (Johnnys’ Selected Seeds, Albion, ME)<br />

supported by tensile wire and metal posts. <strong>The</strong> vines were not pruned,<br />

and each lateral was trained or directed to grow on the trellis using<br />

plastic vine clips.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL DATA. Treatments consisted of combinations of<br />

two planting methods, transplanting (TRP) and direct seeding (DS),<br />

with or without spunbonded row covers (RC), and with or without<br />

thermal water bags (WB). Individual plots were one raised bed, 2.4m<br />

252 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


long, containing four muskmelon plants. Treatments were randomized<br />

within each of the three high tunnels.<br />

Replicated air temperature was recorded 46cm above the crop<br />

canopy using Hobo H8 data loggers (Onset Computers, Bourne, MA)<br />

in 2005. Temperature was measured under row covers, (with or<br />

without thermal water bags), within the high tunnel, as well as the<br />

ambient air temperature. Temperature was logged hourly and<br />

averaged to determine average daily temperature.<br />

Since muskmelons require physical transfer of pollen from<br />

staminate to perfect flowers to set fruit, honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)<br />

colonies were placed 300ft from the high tunnels to facilitate<br />

pollination. In 2005, small bumblebee (Bombus impatiens Cresson)<br />

colonies (Koppert Biological Systems, Ann Arbor, MI) containing<br />

approximately 150 bees per colony were placed within each high<br />

tunnel on 10 April to aid in pollination after it was determined<br />

honeybees were not entering the high tunnels in sufficient numbers to<br />

pollinate early, perfect flowers in 2004.<br />

Thirty days after flowering, most muskmelons hanging on the<br />

trellis were supported with mesh onion sacks cradled around the fruit<br />

and secured to the trellis. Fruits were harvested at full slip twice per<br />

week and individually weighed beginning 22 June 2004 and 15 June<br />

2005. Fruits weighing less than 0.9kg were categorized as<br />

unmarketable. Harvest continued until 31 July of each year.<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> experiment was a randomized<br />

<strong>complete</strong> block design with three blocks (high tunnels). Data were<br />

analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and orthogonal<br />

contrasts (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

EFFECT ON AIR TEMPERATURE. Throughout most of the vegetative<br />

growth in 2005, high tunnels maintained an average temperature of<br />

15.8°C compared with an outside temperature of 11.7°C. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

temperatures are consistent with research conducted at Penn <strong>State</strong><br />

where the average temperature difference between a single-layer<br />

plastic high tunnel and the outside was 4.3°C (Lamont, et al., 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong> addition of two layers of row covers increased the average<br />

microclimate temperature by 2.7°C (18.5°C), while row covers<br />

combined with thermal water bags increased the microclimate<br />

temperature by 3.3°C (19.1°C). Photosynthesis and anthesis of Galia<br />

muskmelons is reduced when temperatures decrease below 18.3°C (D.<br />

Cantliffe, personal communication).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 253


High tunnels alone generally don’t provide significant frost<br />

protection but may protect against chilling temperatures. Minimum<br />

temperatures within a high tunnel eventually equilibrate with the<br />

outside temperature, as was observed in Kansas during March (Kadir,<br />

et al., 2006). Ambient temperatures did not decrease below 0°C in<br />

2004. However, on 24 April 2005 a frost event occurred, and the air<br />

temperature within the high tunnel was < 0°C for 5h and < 5°C for<br />

11h. Muskmelons with only a row cover had microclimate<br />

temperatures


Table 1. Marketable yield of Galia muskmelons grown within a high<br />

tunnel combined with inputs to accelerate harvest.<br />

Early yield Total marketable yield<br />

fruits/plant kg/plant fruits/plant kg/plant<br />

Treatment z<br />

2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005<br />

DS 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.6 2.0 1.9 2.0 3.8<br />

DS+RC 0.2 0.6 0.4 1.1 1.5 0.8 2.9 1.4<br />

DS+WB 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.9 1.3 5.8 2.4<br />

DS+WB+RC 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.7 2.1 1.0<br />

TRP 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.8 1.8 2.3 3.6 3.8<br />

TRP+ RC 0.2 0.8 0.3 1.7 1.9 2.0 3.2 3.6<br />

TRP+WB 0.3 1.0 0.4 1.7 2.7 1.9 4.4 3.2<br />

TRP+WB+RC<br />

Treatments y<br />

0.5 2.7 1.0 4.4 3.8 3.2 6.9 5.3<br />

Orthogonal<br />

contrasts<br />

NS ** NS ** ** ** ** **<br />

TRP vs. DS<br />

TRP+WB+RC<br />

NS ** NS ** ** ** ** **<br />

vs. TRP NS ** NS ** NS NS NS NS<br />

WB vs. NWB NS NS NS NS NS NS ** NS<br />

RC vs. NRC NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

z<br />

TRP = Transplanted; DS = Direct Seeded; RC = Row cover; WB = (<strong>The</strong>rmal) water<br />

bag.<br />

y<br />

Significant at P ≤ 0.05.<br />

marketable yield. Plants that had only thermal water bags showed no<br />

signs of chilling injury relative to the controls (data not shown).<br />

EFFECT ON TOTAL MARKETABLE YIELD. Fruit quality was<br />

excellent, with most melons averaging 14° brix regardless of<br />

treatment. Due to the longer harvest period, transplanted melons had a<br />

significantly higher total-season yield in both years of this study.<br />

Direct-seeded Galia muskmelons averaged 1.2–1.9 melons per plant<br />

while transplanted muskmelons averaged 2.4–2.6 melons per plant.<br />

Despite earlier flowering and harvest of transplanted melons, average<br />

fruit mass did not differ with planting method. In both years, fruit<br />

mass averaged 1.7kg across all treatments.<br />

In a commercial high tunnel, which is typically 225m 2 ,<br />

approximately 300 muskmelon plants can be planted. If each plant<br />

yielded three marketable fruits, 900 Galia muskmelons can be<br />

harvested per high tunnel. In 2004, inadequate pollination delayed<br />

early fruit set on transplanted Galia melons with row cover and<br />

thermal water bags. Transplanted melons produced only 20–25% of<br />

their total yield before early July in 2004, but in 2005, more than 50%<br />

of the total yield was early. Given adequate density of pollinators in<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 255


2005, 86% of the total marketable yield of transplanted melons with<br />

row cover and thermal water bags was harvested before 4 July.<br />

Galia muskmelons are a potentially profitable warm-season crop<br />

for high-tunnel production in the Central Great Plains. Galia<br />

muskmelons can be rotated or double- cropped with popular hightunnel<br />

vegetables such as tomatoes, peppers, and lettuces. Production<br />

practices that increase microclimate temperature and early growth,<br />

such as using transplants, row covers, and thermal water bags, will<br />

increase both early and total marketable yield. <strong>The</strong> increased yields<br />

will offset the increase in production costs. Wholesale prices may not<br />

be high enough for a significant profit to occur. Most high-tunnel<br />

producers in the Central Great Plains market their produce via local<br />

farmers’ markets where a price premium for vine-ripe early<br />

muskmelons may be attained. In addition, high tunnels enable Galia<br />

melons to be grown using fewer pesticides, which may further increase<br />

the price premium.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Cantliffe, D. J., N. L. Shaw, and E. Jovicich. 2002. New vegetable crops for<br />

greenhouses in the southeastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Acta Hort. 633.<br />

Hemphill, D. D. and N. S. Mansour. 1986. Response of muskmelon to three<br />

floating row covers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:513–517.<br />

Hochmuth, G. J., D. J. Cantliffe, Z. Karchi, and I. Secker. 1998. <strong>The</strong> plasticulture<br />

research and demonstration project in Florida. Proc. Intl. Cong. Plastics in<br />

Agric. Tel Aviv, Israel. 163–170.<br />

Jenni, S., K. A. Stewart, D. C. Cloutier, and G. Bourgeois. 1998. Chilling injury<br />

and yield of muskmelon grown with plastic mulches, rowcovers and thermal<br />

water tubes. HortSci. 33:215–221.<br />

Jett, L. W. 2004. High Tunnel Tomato Production Guide. University of Missouri<br />

Extension Publication M170.<br />

Jett, L. W. 2006. High tunnel melon and watermelon guide. University of Missouri<br />

Extension Publication M173.<br />

Jett, L. W. and E. Carey. 2006. High tunnel survey results.<br />

.<br />

Kadir, S., E. Carey, and S. Ennahli. 2006. Influence of high tunnel and field<br />

conditions on strawberry growth and development. HortSci. 41:329–335.<br />

Karchi, Z. 2000. Development of melon culture and breeding in Israel. Acta Hort.<br />

510:13–17.<br />

Lamont, W. J., M. Orzolek, E. Holcomb, K. Demchak, E. Burkhart, L. White, and B.<br />

Dye. 2003. Production system for horticulture crops grown in the Penn <strong>State</strong><br />

high tunnel. HortTech. 13:358–362.<br />

Loy, J. B. and O. S. Wells. 1982. A comparison of slitted polyethylene and<br />

spunbonded polyester for plant row covers. HortSci. 17:405–407.<br />

Maynard, D. N. and G. J. Hochmuth. 1997. Knott’s hand<strong>book</strong> for vegetable<br />

growers. 4 th ed. Wiley, New York.<br />

256 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Mitchell, D. E. and M. A. Madore. 1992. Patterns of assimilate production and<br />

translocation in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) II. Low temperature effects.<br />

Plant Physiol. 99:966–971.<br />

Pavlou, G. 1990. Evaluation of thermal performance of water-filled polyethylene<br />

tubes used for passive solar greenhouse heating. Acta Hort. 287:89–97.<br />

Shaw, N. L., D. Cantliffe, J. Rodriguez, and C. Shine. 2004. Economic feasibility of<br />

producing Galia muskmelons in passive ventilated greenhouses and soilless<br />

culture in north central Florida. Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 117:38–42.<br />

Simon, J. E., M. R. Morales, and D. J. Charles. 1993. Specialty melons for the fresh<br />

market, p. 547–553. In: J. Janick and J. E. Simon (eds.). New crops. Wiley,<br />

New York.<br />

Waterer, D. R. 1993. Influence of planting date and row covers on yield and<br />

economic value of muskmelons. Can J. Plant Sci. 73:281–288.<br />

Waterer, D. R. 2003. Yield and economics of high tunnels for production of warmseason<br />

vegetable crops. HortTech. 13:339–343.<br />

Wiebe, J. 1973. Tunnel covers and mulches for muskmelon production. Can. J.<br />

Plant Sci. 53:157–160.<br />

Wiedenfeld, R., R. Hinojosa and R. Stubblefield. 1990. Plant method, ground cover<br />

and irrigation level effects on muskmelon production. HortSci. 25:863.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 257


A COMPARISON OF NOVEL GRAFTING<br />

METHODS FOR WATERMELON IN HIGH-<br />

WIND AREAS<br />

Stephen R. King<br />

Vegetable & Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural<br />

Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-2133<br />

Angela R. Davis<br />

USDA, ARS, South Central Agriculture Research Laboratory, P.O.<br />

Box 159, Lane, OK 74555<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus<br />

ABSTRACT. Grafted watermelon transplants are not commonly used by growers<br />

in the U.S., despite the advantages associated with their use. <strong>The</strong> two major<br />

disadvantages of using grafted watermelons are the high cost associated with<br />

performing the graft, and the potential for increased transplant losses,<br />

particularly under high-wind conditions. We found that modifying the grafting<br />

techniques to provide additional support to the graft union resulted in<br />

nonsignificant increases in transplant survivors one week after transplanting<br />

compared to a nonsupported grafting technique. <strong>The</strong> effort required for the<br />

modifications was slightly increased for the tube-supported method, and slightly<br />

decreased for the toothpick-supported method. More study is needed to identify<br />

grafting modifications that will reduce costs and increase transplant<br />

survivability under high-wind conditions.<br />

G<br />

rafting of watermelon to various rootstocks is a common<br />

practice in many parts of the world but, despite the reported<br />

advantages, such as resistance to soil-borne diseases and<br />

increased water-use efficiency, the practice is not common in the U.S.<br />

<strong>The</strong> use of rootstocks has been shown to enhance the vigor of the scion<br />

through avoidance of soil pathogens, tolerance of low soil<br />

temperatures and/or salinity, and increased scavenging of soil nutrients<br />

(Ruiz et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> type of rootstock has been shown to affect<br />

watermelon plant growth and yields (Yetisir and Sari, 2003). Yetisir<br />

and Sari (2004) demonstrated that the survival rate of grafted plants<br />

was inversely correlated with the difference in diameters of scion and<br />

rootstock; although they could not show that survival rate was affected<br />

by the number of vascular bundles, the number of vascular bundles<br />

positively affected the growth rate of the grafted watermelon plants.<br />

Edelstein et al. (2004) showed that stem diameter and number of<br />

vascular bundles of the rootstock did not correlate with scion-plant<br />

fresh weight for C. melo scions and 22 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp. rootstocks.<br />

258 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Increases in soil-borne pathogens accompanied by the loss of<br />

effective pesticides such as methyl bromide may necessitate the use of<br />

alternative forms of disease control, such as the use of disease-resistant<br />

rootstocks. Other advantages, such as increased water-use efficiency<br />

and tolerance to salt and/or low temperatures, that may accompany the<br />

use of grafted watermelon would most likely speed acceptance of<br />

grafting in the U.S. One disadvantage that has been observed by<br />

growers in the U.S. is a higher mortality of grafted watermelon plants<br />

when transplants are subjected to high winds shortly after<br />

transplanting. It is suspected that the graft union is more susceptible to<br />

breakage under high-wind conditions. Despite the potential benefits of<br />

using grafted watermelon, little research has been done in the U.S. on<br />

local cultivars utilizing local cultural practices. <strong>The</strong> purpose of this<br />

research was to investigate the potential of various grafting procedures<br />

for establishing local diploid and triploid cultivars in the field using<br />

different rootstocks under established growing conditions that include<br />

high wind shortly after transplanting.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL. Scions included ‘Royal Sweet’ (diploid<br />

watermelon), ‘Sugar Time,’ ‘Super Seedless 7167’, and ‘Tri-X 313’<br />

(triploid watermelons). Rootstocks used included ‘Strongtosa’ (an<br />

interspecific hybrid between <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima and C. moschata),<br />

‘Destiny III’ (C. pepo), ‘Red Kuri’ (C. maxima), ‘Long Island Cheese’<br />

(C. moschata), ‘Musque de Provence’ (C. moschata), ‘Rouge vif<br />

D’etampes’ (C. maxima), and ‘Birdhouse’ (Lagenaria siceraria).<br />

Seeds were sown into flats with individual cell sizes of 4.4cm x 3.8cm<br />

x 6cm deep (1006 X-Line insert, BWI, Shulenberg, TX) filled with<br />

Pro-Mix PGX germination medium (Premier Horticulture, Dorval,<br />

We would like to thank Anthony Dillard, Amy Helms, and Ashley Gammon for<br />

providing valuable technical support. Special thanks go to Tom Williams, and Glen<br />

Price for supplied seed. Partial funding was provided by USDA-CSREES grant<br />

2004-34402-14768. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is<br />

solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply<br />

recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All<br />

programs and services of the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a<br />

nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex,<br />

age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA employee<br />

as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not<br />

available for such works. Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />

the private publication in which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not<br />

affect the material of the U.S. Government, which can be freely reproduced by the<br />

public.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 259


QC, Canada) or into 3.8cm square x 6.3cm deep Speedling flats<br />

(#F128A, Speedling, Inc., Sun City, FL) containing Redi-earth growth<br />

medium (SunGro, Vancouver, BC, Canada). <strong>The</strong> watermelon cultivars<br />

were sown approximately 7days prior to sowing the rootstock, except<br />

for ‘Destiny III’, which was sown on the same day as the watermelon.<br />

All watermelon and‘Destiny III’ squash plants were approximately 4w<br />

old at time of grafting, and the remaining rootstocks were<br />

approximately 3weeks old.<br />

Fig. 1. Tube-grafting method as described in text. Tube is placed over rootstock<br />

and scion is inserted into tubing (A, B). A binder clip holds the tube in place for<br />

ca. 72 hours (C). <strong>The</strong> tube is left in place at transplanting.<br />

TUBE-MODIFIED SLANT-CUT METHOD AT COLLEGE STATION,<br />

TX. Scions were grafted using modifications of the slant-cut method.<br />

<strong>The</strong> slant-cut method incorporated the use of 0.64-cm vinyl tubing cut<br />

into approximately 2-cm lengths and slit lengthwise, and then inserting<br />

the rootstock and scion into the tubing, which was held in place with<br />

¾”-wide binder clips (Figure 1). ‘Super Seedless 7167’ and ‘Tri-X<br />

313’ were grafted onto ‘Destiny III’, ‘Red Kuri’, ‘Long Island<br />

Cheese’, ‘Musque de Provence’, ‘Rouge vif D’etampes’, and<br />

‘Birdhouse’ using the vinyl-tubing method. Grafted plants were placed<br />

in flats covered with clear plastic domes for approximately 48h in the<br />

greenhouse, when the domes were removed and plants were left in the<br />

greenhouse. <strong>The</strong> binder clips were removed after approximately 72h,<br />

but the vinyl tubing was left in place, with the slit allowing for stem<br />

expansion. Temperatures ranged from a high of 28 o C to a low of 20 o C.<br />

Survivability counts were taken prior to transplanting in the field, and<br />

at 3 days and 7 days after transplanting. Seedlings were fieldtransplanted<br />

into raised beds covered with black plastic mulch and drip<br />

irrigation 2 weeks after grafting in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block<br />

design with two replications in a serpentine arrangement. Beds were<br />

200cm apart and plant spacing was 90cm. <strong>The</strong> field soil was Robco<br />

loamy fine sand. <strong>The</strong>re were no windbreaks in the field.<br />

260 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


TONGUE-AND-GROOVE METHOD AT LANE, OK. Scions were<br />

grafted using the tongue-and-groove method with or without the aid of<br />

a wooden pin. <strong>The</strong> tongue-and-groove method involved cutting a slit<br />

in the rootstock and sharpening the scion to fit the groove made in the<br />

rootstock. Clamps were unavailable, so the two were held together<br />

either with Parafilm or with a toothpick inserted into both the scion<br />

and rootstock to align the two and then Parafilm (Figure 2).<br />

Fig. 2. <strong>The</strong> toothpick-modified tongue-and-groove procedure. A groove is made<br />

in the rootstock and a tongue is made in the scion to fit the groove. For the<br />

modification, a toothpick is inserted into the rootstock and the scion inserted<br />

into the toothpick (A) and pressed down to make contact with the rootstock.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nonmodified method uses Parafilm to hold the graft in place.<br />

‘Royal Sweet’ and ‘Sugar Time’ were grafted onto the<br />

‘Strongtosa’ rootstock. Grafted plants were placed in flats and were<br />

placed in a warm environment for 48h. Temperatures ranged from<br />

23°C to 28°C, but the environment was not sufficiently humid and we<br />

had a high loss of plants early. Seedlings were planted in the field<br />

3weeks later in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design with four<br />

replications in a serpentine arrangement. <strong>The</strong> field had Bernow fineloamy,<br />

siliceous, thermic, glossic palendalf soil. <strong>The</strong>re were no<br />

windbreaks in the field. Survivability counts were taken prior to<br />

transplanting in the field, and at 3 days and 7 days after transplanting.<br />

STATISTICS. Means were calculated for grafting frequency by<br />

dividing the number of graft attempts by successful grafts (prior to<br />

transplanting) for each variety and method, and 7-day-survival<br />

frequencies were calculated by dividing the number of transplants<br />

surviving after 10 days by the number of transplants for each variety.<br />

Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (Cary, NC).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 261


Results<br />

TUBE-MODIFIED SLANT-CUT METHOD. It was hoped that the tube<br />

method would speed the grafting procedure by not using clips;<br />

however, it was found that for most grafts, a clip was needed to<br />

support the scion on the rootstock, which resulted in an increase in<br />

time compared to using the clips alone. Survivability counts showed<br />

that grafting efficiency prior to transplant ranged from a low of 25% to<br />

a high of 42% (Table 1). Stand counts 7 days after transplanting<br />

showed a survival range from 78 to 84%, which was significantly<br />

reduced from the 7-day transplant survival of the nongrafted control<br />

plants. <strong>The</strong> primary cause of this reduction appeared to be breakage<br />

and/or tissue tearing at the graft union. Wind conditions in College<br />

Table 1. Comparison of grafting frequency and 7-day transplant<br />

survival frequency for cultivars and grafting methods.<br />

Grafting<br />

7-daysurvival<br />

Location Variety<br />

Tri-X<br />

Rootstock Method N Frequency frequency<br />

Texas 313<br />

Tri-X<br />

Multiple Tube 36 0.42 0.78<br />

Texas 313 None Nongrafted 12 NA 1.00<br />

Texas S.S.7167 Multiple Tube 36 0.25 0.84<br />

Texas S.S.7167 None<br />

Royal<br />

Nongraftedf 12 NA 1.00<br />

Oklahoma Sweet<br />

Royal<br />

Strongtosa Parafilm 75 0.35 0.83<br />

Oklahoma Sweet<br />

Royal<br />

Strongtosa Toothpick 0 0.83<br />

Oklahoma Sweet<br />

Sugar<br />

None Nongrafted 33 NA 1.00<br />

Oklahoma Time<br />

Sugar<br />

Strongtosa Parafilm 75 0.40 0.70<br />

Oklahoma Time<br />

Sugar<br />

Strongtosa Toothpick 75 0.39 0.73<br />

Oklahoma Time None Nongrafted 33 NA 0.98<br />

*Grafting frequency = successful grafts/attempted grafts. <strong>The</strong>re were no significant<br />

differences at the P0.5 level of probability.<br />

**Frequency of plants surviving 7 days after transplanting.<br />

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P0.5 level of<br />

probablilty.<br />

262 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Station following transplanting ranged from a daily high of 13mph to<br />

32mph, with maximum gusts of 37mph (Table 2).<br />

TONGUE-AND-GROOVE METHOD. <strong>The</strong> toothpick modification of<br />

the tongue-and-groove method did speed grafting compared to the<br />

nonmodified method because the toothpick provided sufficient<br />

support. Survivability of the tongue-and-groove and toothpickmodified<br />

tongue-and-groove method were similar, ranging from 33 to<br />

40% success (Table 1), which indicates that the toothpick modification<br />

did not hinder the healing process. <strong>The</strong> two methods were also similar<br />

for transplant survival after 7 days, with a range from 70 to 83%,<br />

which was significantly reduced when compared to the 7-day survival<br />

of nongrafted plants. <strong>The</strong> primary cause of transplant loss appeared to<br />

be tissue breakage at the graft union. Wind conditions in Lane<br />

following transplanting ranged from a daily high of 9 to 25mph with<br />

maximum gusts of 32 mph (Table 2).<br />

COMPARISON OF THE METHODS. While the different methods were<br />

used on different rootstocks and varieties at different locations,<br />

statistical analysis showed no significant interactions among variety,<br />

rootstock, or location (data not shown). A comparison of the methods<br />

showed no significant differences (Table 3). All methods did have a<br />

lower 7-day transplant survival than the nongrafted control, but the<br />

range was still fairly high at 77 to 81%. <strong>The</strong> primary cause of<br />

transplant loss at both locations appeared to be tissue breakage at the<br />

graft union. Wind conditions were similar at both locations, with gusts<br />

in the 30+mph range.<br />

Table 2. Wind-speed weather data for the two locations for 7 days<br />

following transplanting.<br />

College Station, TX Lane, OK<br />

Days after Average Gust Average Gust<br />

transplant (mph) (mph) (mph) (mph)<br />

0 10 33 5 18<br />

1 10 26 8 27<br />

2 8 17 5 32<br />

3 14 35 9 22<br />

4 11 37 8 19<br />

5 6 16 9 20<br />

6 11 24 8 21<br />

7 11 23 7 24<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 263


Table 3. Grafting frequency and 7-day-survival frequency of the<br />

transplant methods.<br />

Grafting 7-day-survival<br />

Grafting method* frequency** frequency***<br />

Control NA 0.99<br />

Tube 0.40 0.81<br />

Toothpick 0.36 0.79<br />

Parafilm 037 0.77<br />

*Grafting methods described in text. **Successful grafts/attempted grafts. All<br />

frequencies n.s. at the P0.5 level of probability.<br />

***Frequency of plants surviving 7 days after transplanting.<br />

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P0.5 level of<br />

probability.<br />

Discussion<br />

This study showed that the grafting modifications we used result in<br />

survival frequencies similar to those of conventional grafting methods.<br />

<strong>The</strong> goals of any grafting modifications should be to reduce input costs<br />

and increase survivability in the field. <strong>The</strong> stabilized grafting methods<br />

did not show a marked increase in survivability, but the toothpick<br />

method did decrease the amount of time required to make the grafts,<br />

which will result in lower costs. <strong>The</strong> tube method did not reduce<br />

grafting time because of the need to clip the plants, but further<br />

investigation may reduce the need for the clip, which may reduce<br />

grafting time. Further study is needed to dertermine whether the added<br />

graft-union support afforded by the tube-modified and/or toothpickmodified<br />

grafting methods will result in increased survival of grafted<br />

watermelon plants under high-wind conditions.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Edelstein, M., Y. Burger, C. Horev, A. Porat, A. Meir, and R. Cohen. 2004.<br />

Assessing the effect of genetic and anatomic variation of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks<br />

on vigour, survival and yield of grafted melons. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 79:370–<br />

374.<br />

Lee, J. M. and M. Oda. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetables and ornamental<br />

plants. Hort. Rev. 28:61–124.<br />

Ruiz, J. M., A. Belakbir, I. Lopez-Cantarero, and L. Romero. 1997. Leafmacronutrient<br />

content and yield in grafted melon plants. a model to evaluate the<br />

influence of rootstock genotype. Sci. Hort. 71:227–234.<br />

Yetisir, H. and N. Sari. 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield and<br />

quality of watermelon. Austral. J. Expt. Agr. 43:1269–1274.<br />

Yetisir, H. and N. Sari. 2004. Effect of hypocotyl morphology on survival rate and<br />

growth of watermelon seedlings grafted on rootstocks with different emergence<br />

performance at various temperatures. Turkish J. Agric. & For. 28:231–237.<br />

264 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


CUCURBITS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN<br />

NORTH CAROLINA<br />

Jonathan R. Schultheis<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Department of Horticultural Science,<br />

Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Acreage, cucumber, Cucumis sativus, melon,<br />

Cucumis melo, pumpkin, squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata, watermelon, Citrullus lanatus, dollar value<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> agriculture is very diversified, accounts for 22% of<br />

the state’s income, and employs 20% of its work force. Net farm income<br />

accounts for $2 billion, while annual vegetable farm-gate value is approximately<br />

$300 million, with cucurbits accounting for approximately $60 million. In the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the second largest state producer of pickling<br />

cucumber, fourth in fresh market cucumber, sixth in muskmelon, and seventh<br />

in watermelon. It is a leading state when it comes to the production, marketing,<br />

and research of traditionally grown cucurbits as well as in the development and<br />

marketing of new or specialty cucurbit crops.<br />

W<br />

orldwide, cucurbits have always been of importance to<br />

mankind. <strong>The</strong>y have been used in a variety of ways;<br />

utensils, sponges, filters, musical instruments, and<br />

especially for food and fiber (Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997).<br />

Many of the cucurbits contain needed dietary components that are rich<br />

in vitamins A and C. Squashes (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.) and melons (Cucumis<br />

melo) are especially rich in vitamin A and/or C (Rubatzky and<br />

Yamaguchi, 1997). Other cucurbits, such as certain watermelon<br />

cultivars, have recently been documented to be a rich source of<br />

lycopene (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2001), an antioxidant that purportedly<br />

reduces cancer (Sies and Stahl, 1998). <strong>The</strong> diversity of cucurbits is<br />

large and various regions in the world have certain crop types that are<br />

more commonly grown and consumed (Robinson and Decker-Walters,<br />

1997). In the United <strong>State</strong>s (US), some of the most commonly grown<br />

and/or consumed cucurbits are fresh market and processing cucumbers<br />

(Cucumis sativus), various kinds of winter squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.) (i.e,<br />

acorn, butternut, Hubbard, kabocha) and summer squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

pepo) (yellow and zucchini), melons [primarily muskmelon (Cucumis<br />

melo var. reticulata) and honeydew (Cucumis melo var. inoderous)],<br />

pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Other<br />

minor cucurbit crops are grown and sold in the US. New cucurbit<br />

crops continue to be discovered, grown, and markets developed. A<br />

review of cucurbit production worldwide and in the US was given<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 265


during <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002 in Naples, Florida (Taylor and Brant,<br />

2002). <strong>The</strong> purpose of this manuscript is to give some perspective of<br />

the importance of the role that cucurbits have in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (NC)<br />

horticulture with respect to the state’s agricultural economy and<br />

compared with US production.<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> has a diversified agriculture industry. <strong>The</strong> industry<br />

accounts for 22 percent of the state's income, and employs over 20<br />

percent of the work force (http://www.ncagr.com/stats/general/<br />

general.htm). This includes food production, fiber, and forestry, which<br />

contribute $62.6 billion annually to the state's economy.<br />

Approximately 56,000 farmers grow over 80 different commodities.<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> produces more tobacco and sweetpotatoes than any<br />

other US state and ranks second in the production of hogs, turkeys,<br />

Christmas trees, trout, and pickling cucumbers. <strong>The</strong> state ranks sixth<br />

nationally with respect to farm profits. Net farm income for the state<br />

is over $2 billion, while net income per farm in the state is over<br />

$36,000.<br />

In NC, the vegetable industry makes up an important part of the<br />

agricultural industry, with farm-gate values totaling about $308<br />

million in 2003 (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and<br />

Consumer Sciences, 2004). Key vegetable crops produced within the<br />

state of <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> in which reported values are more than $5<br />

million are: bell pepper (Capsicum annuum), cabbage (Brassica<br />

oleracea var. capitata), cucumbers, potato (Solanum tuberosum), snap<br />

beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), sweet corn (Zea<br />

mays var. rugosa), sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas), tomato<br />

(Lycopersicon esculentum L.), and watermelon.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are approximately 2,550 commercial farmers who grow<br />

vegetables in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (U.S. Department of Agriclture, 2002).<br />

Individual farms range from one hectare up to a thousand hectares, and<br />

produce is marketed locally, nationally, and internationally. In the last<br />

10 years, decreasing revenues due to lower profit margins on federally<br />

subsidized crops such as corn, soybeans, cotton, and tobacco have<br />

stimulated NC growers to look for more profitable alternative<br />

agricultural enterprises. In some cases, this includes vegetables.<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the largest US producer of sweetpotatoes,<br />

growing about 17,000 hectares valued at nearly $85.3 million in 2003<br />

and accounting for 37% of the national production (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 2004, 2005).<br />

266 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


<strong>The</strong> second highest value vegetable crop to NC is cucumber at<br />

$30.7 million (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and<br />

Consumer Services, 2004; Table 1). Thus, cucumber is the most<br />

important cucurbit crop with respect to farm-gate value and acreage in<br />

NC. <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the second largest US producer of pickling<br />

cucumbers, growing about 6883 hectares valued at $19.4 million in<br />

2004 (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer<br />

Services, 2004). Two large pickling cucumber-processing companies,<br />

Mt. Olive Pickle Company (Mt. Olive, NC) and Bay Valley Foods<br />

(Faison, NC), are located less than 15km apart in eastern NC. Labor<br />

has until recent years generally been quite adequate for hand-harvest<br />

operations. <strong>The</strong> availability and accessibility of migrant labor,<br />

primarily from Mexico, has been reduced and may not be available<br />

pending legislation at the national level that may further restrict or<br />

eliminate the accessibility of Mexican workers into the US. It is<br />

interesting to note that Michigan, number one producing state of<br />

pickling cucumbers, hand-harvested all their production acreage in<br />

1964 (Motes, 1977). By 1972, over 90% of its pickling-cucumber<br />

acreage was once-over machine-harvested. A similar scenario may<br />

occur in NC as less than five years ago, there were few acres that were<br />

once-over machine-harvested. Currently, in 2006, about one-third of<br />

NC's pickling-cucumber acreage is once-over machine-harvested. It is<br />

possible that most pickling-cucumber acreage will be machineharvested<br />

by 2010 in NC. All of NC’s pickling-cucumber production<br />

is in the eastern part of the state due to its large, flat expanses of land<br />

that are typically composed of a sandy loam soil and conducive for<br />

pickling-cucumber production (Schultheis et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong>re is a<br />

state growers association, the NC Pickle Producers Association, which<br />

promotes and supports various research and marketing efforts related<br />

to pickling cucumbers.<br />

In NC, “slicer” cucumbers were planted on an additional 2834<br />

hectares for fresh market, placing it fourth nationally in area planted,<br />

with the value of production totaling $11.3 million in 2003 (<strong>North</strong><br />

<strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences, 2004;<br />

Table 1). Fresh market cucumbers are produced both on bare ground<br />

and on plasticulture (black polyethylene mulch and drip irrigation)<br />

(Schultheis et al., 1998). All fresh market cucumbers are handharvested.<br />

Important production areas are located in both eastern and<br />

western <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. In 2002, there were nearly 700 commercial<br />

growers who produced either fresh market or processing cucumbers in<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2002). <strong>North</strong><br />

<strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University has the only national public breeding<br />

program for both slicing and pickling cucumbers.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 267


Following cucumbers, the cucurbit that is most widely produced in<br />

NC is watermelon (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and<br />

Consumer Services, 2004). <strong>The</strong> land devoted to watermelon<br />

production in NC from 1994 to 2004 has ranged from 3238 to 4615<br />

hectares (Arney et al., 2006). <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the seventh leading<br />

state with respect to watermelon production and value compared with<br />

other US producing states (Table 1). <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> primarily<br />

produces red-flesh, seedless watermelon since market demand has<br />

shifted away from seeded, red-flesh cultivars (U.S. Department of<br />

Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2005). NC also produces<br />

and sells specialty watermelon melon types: yellow-flesh, orangeflesh,<br />

and miniwatermelons. Marketing and production of<br />

watermelons is supported by a growers' association (the <strong>North</strong><br />

<strong>Carolina</strong> Watermelon Association), <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

and the <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer<br />

Services. <strong>The</strong> 2004 watermelon crop was valued at $6.3 million<br />

(Arney et al., 2006).<br />

In 2004, summer squash was reportedly grown on over 1,500<br />

hectares in NC and valued at $8.4 million (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department<br />

of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 2004; Table 1). This reference<br />

report accounts for only summer squash, which includes the yellow<br />

straightneck and crookneck types and zucchini. <strong>The</strong>re are many<br />

winter squashes that are grown in NC for which no published statistics<br />

are kept. <strong>The</strong>se winter types include butternut, acorn, spaghetti,<br />

cushaw, and kabocha. <strong>The</strong> summer squash types are marketed<br />

nationally, mainly along the east coast, while most of the winter<br />

squash types are sold in more localized markets.<br />

Pumpkins are grown across the state of NC. In 2002,<br />

approximately 280 farms produced pumpkins valued at $2.7 million<br />

(Table 1) on a total of 540 hectares (U.S. Department of Agriculture,<br />

2002). Pumpkins are grown primarily for decorative/display purposes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fruit are used to adorn the home and festivals and are one<br />

indicator that the autumn season has arrived. In addition, the primary<br />

use of pumpkins by US citizens is as jack o’lanterns. Jack o’lanterns<br />

are used for display or are carved at Halloween. <strong>The</strong> primary specie<br />

used for jack o’lanterns is <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. C. maxima and C.<br />

moschata are also used, but to a lesser extent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary melon produced in NC is muskmelon. Muskmelon<br />

(Cucumis melo var. reticulatus), commonly referred to in the US as<br />

cantaloupe, was produced by over 600 NC growers on approximately<br />

1100 hectares and valued at approximately $15 million in 2002 (U.S.<br />

Department of Agriculture, 2002; Table 1). <strong>The</strong> primary cultivar<br />

grown in NC and throughout the southeastern US is ‘Athena’. Most<br />

268 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Production of cucurbits in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> in comparison with<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s production. Z<br />

Crop<br />

genera &<br />

species<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> United <strong>State</strong>s<br />

Rank<br />

in<br />

value<br />

among<br />

US<br />

states<br />

Hectares<br />

planted<br />

Farmgate<br />

value<br />

(in<br />

millions<br />

$US)<br />

Hectares<br />

planted<br />

Farmgate<br />

value<br />

(in<br />

millions<br />

$US)<br />

Cucumbers Cucumis sativus<br />

Fresh 4 2834 11.3 47,085 157.1<br />

Processing 2 6883 19.4 22,741 212.7<br />

Muskmelon Cucumis melo var. reticulatus<br />

6 1133 15.0 38,420 315.6<br />

Squash <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.<br />

Fresh &<br />

processing 6 1579 8.4 21,296 222.7<br />

Pumpkin <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.<br />

Fresh &<br />

processing<br />

Y<br />

537 2.7 18,502 91.7<br />

Watermelon Citrullus lanatus<br />

7 3441 6.3 65,182 343.1<br />

z<br />

Data were obtained for cucumbers and squash for 2004 from U.S. Department of<br />

Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2005; for muskmelon for 2002 from U.S.<br />

Department of Agriculture, 2002; watermelon for 2004 from Arney et al., 2006.<br />

Y<br />

Data not available.<br />

melons in NC are produced in the eastern or south central part of the<br />

state, where the soils have a sandy or sandy loam texture.<br />

Most US melon, especially honeydew, production is located in the<br />

more arid regions of the country in Arizona and California (U.S.<br />

Department of Agriculture, 2005). <strong>The</strong> irregular and often heavy<br />

rainfalls during the production season in NC and the southeastern US<br />

often cause the honeydew fruit to split (Elmstrom and Maynard, 1992).<br />

In recent years, honeydew production area has increased in NC. <strong>The</strong><br />

development of new hybrids that have better disease and splitting<br />

resistance has contributed to this increase (Jester, 2004).<br />

To a much lesser extent, NC also produces other melon types—<br />

crenshaw, casaba, galia, juan canary, and piel de sapo. Most of these<br />

melons have limited markets, which need to be developed for more<br />

sales to occur. <strong>The</strong> oriental, crisp-flesh melon, cultivar Sprite, is an<br />

exception. <strong>The</strong> ‘Sprite’ melon was researched and marketed through<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 269


the Specialty Crops Program at NC <strong>State</strong> University (Schultheis et al.,<br />

2001; Jester and Schultheis, 2004). ‘Sprite’ has many positive<br />

attributes including crisp flesh, unique flavor, high soluble solids (up<br />

to 18), and small size (0.6 to 0.8kg)—about one-third to one-fourth the<br />

size of most marketed muskmelon fruit (2 to 3kg) or honeydew fruit<br />

(2.5 to 3.5 kg). Production practices for ‘Sprite’, such as spacing<br />

(Jester and Taylor, 2005) and time of harvest, were determined by<br />

researchers at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University. On-farm testing was<br />

conducted on small acreages with several growers in collaboration<br />

with extension personnel, and marketing was conducted by the <strong>North</strong><br />

<strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services in<br />

collaboration with NC <strong>State</strong> University faculty and NC growers<br />

(Schultheis et al., 2001). Through these collective efforts, a new<br />

product was developed with its own price look-up number (PLU#) and<br />

specifications. Other program melons are currently under<br />

development in the Specialty Crops Program. More production of<br />

specialty and honeydew melons in NC and along the east coast is<br />

likely as increasing transportation costs continue to drive up the price<br />

of melons from western states.<br />

Summary<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is a leading producer of cucurbits in the US.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s contribute nearly $60 million to the state’s agricultural<br />

industry. <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the second leading state producer of<br />

pickling cucumber in the US, fourth in muskmelon production, and<br />

seventh in watermelon production. In addition to growing the<br />

commonly grown cucurbit crops, NC is a leader in the development of<br />

new and improved cucurbit crops for production and market.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Arney, M., S. R. Fore, and R. Brancucci. 2006. Watermelon reference <strong>book</strong>.<br />

National Watermelon Promotion Board. 80pp.<br />

Elmstrom, G. W. and D. N. Maynard. 1992. Exotic melons for commercial<br />

production in humid regions. Second Int. Symp. Specialty & Exotic Vegetable<br />

Crops. 318:117–124.<br />

Jester, B. and J. Schultheis. 2004. <strong>The</strong> commercialization of an oriental crisp flesh<br />

‘Sprite’ through the NC specialty crops program. HortSci. 39(3)660(Abstr.).<br />

Jester, B. 2004. Honeydew melon: a new niche for melon growers in the Southeast.<br />

In: G. Holmes (ed.). <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> vegetable growers association 2004<br />

year<strong>book</strong>. 6:35(Abstr.).<br />

Jester, W. R. and B. Taylor. 2005. <strong>The</strong> effect of in-row transplant spacing on sprite<br />

melon yield and sizes. HortSci. 40(3):887(Abstr.).<br />

Motes, J. E. 1977. Picking cucumbers production harvesting. Coop. Ext. Serv.<br />

Mich. St. Univ. Printing. Ext. Bull. E-837. 8pp.<br />

270 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences. 2004.<br />

Agricultural Statistics Division. 130pp. .<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences. 2005.<br />

Marketing <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> sweetpotatoes including Louisiana, 2003–2004 crop.<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Dept. Agric. & Consumer Services. 28pp.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene<br />

content differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric.<br />

81:1–5.<br />

Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB Intl., New<br />

York.<br />

Rubatzky, V. E. and M. Yamaguchi. 1997. World vegetables. 2 nd ed. Chapman &<br />

Hall, New York.<br />

Schultheis, J. R., C. W. Averre, M. D. Boyette, E. A. Estes, G. J. Holmes, D. W.<br />

Monks, and K. A. Sorensen. 1998. Commercial production of pickling and<br />

slicing cucumbers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. NC Coop. Ext. Serv. AG-552.<br />

Schultheis, J. R., W. R. Jester, and N. J. Augostini. 2001. Screening melons for<br />

adaptability in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, p. 439–444. In: J. Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.).<br />

Trends in new crops and new uses. Proc. 5th Nat. Symp. new crops & new uses<br />

strength in diversity. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Sies, H. and W. Stahl. 1998. Lycopene: antioxidant and biological effects and its<br />

bioavailability in the human. Proc. Exp. Biol. Med. 218:121–124.<br />

Taylor, M. J. and J. Brant. 2002. Trends in world cucurbit production 1991 to 2001,<br />

p. 373–379. In: <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences Web site.<br />

(accessed June 2006).<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2005. Vegetables and<br />

melons situation and outlook year<strong>book</strong>/VGS-2005.<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2002. 2002 Census of Agriculture. National<br />

Agriculture Statistics Service.<br />

(accessed June 2006).<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. Vegetables 2004 summary. National<br />

Agriculture Statistics Service. 71 pp.<br />

<br />

(accessed June 2006).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 271


APPROACHES TO MINIMIZE THE DEFECTS<br />

OF SEEDLESS WATERMELON<br />

Xiaowu Sun and Fuqing Luo<br />

Melons Institute of Hunan Province, Shaoyang, Hunan 422001,<br />

P. R. China<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Polyploid, triploid hybrid, Citrullus lanatus<br />

ABSTRACT. Triploid seedless watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) is a polyploid F1<br />

hybrid. Triploid seedless watermelon offers both the benefits of polyploid and<br />

the heterosis of F1 hybrids. However, it has the defects of low hybrid seed yield,<br />

low germination, weak and slow seedling development, misshapen fruit,<br />

variable rind thickness, hard seed coats, and hollow heart. <strong>The</strong> authors have<br />

learned, from over 25 years of breeding and seedless-watermelon production,<br />

that these defects can be reduced through breeding and cultural practices.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se include using F1 hybrids of similar tetraploid lines as the female parent,<br />

selecting proper hybrid combinations, improving seed-production protocol, and<br />

utilizing proper seed treatment and application of fertilizer. With all these<br />

approaches we have improved seed yield over 80%, seed germination and<br />

usable plants to over 95%, and fruit yield over 30%, as well as improving the<br />

stability of marketable yield.<br />

T<br />

riploid seedless watermelon is a polyploid hybrid created<br />

through chromosome engineering. Triploid seedless<br />

watermelon can offer the benefits of polyploid and the heterosis<br />

of a properly selected hybrid (An and Sun, 1991; Sun, 1998; Gong<br />

1993; Yu, 1975). <strong>The</strong> key benefits of triploid seedless watermelon<br />

include high quality derived from seedlessness and high sugar content,<br />

high yields, vigorous plants, tolerance to diseases and humidity, better<br />

shipping ability, and economic return. However, triploid seedless<br />

watermelon also has its special defects (Sun, 1998). <strong>The</strong> main defects<br />

include low hybrid seed yield, slow development of seedlings, hard<br />

seed coats in the flesh, hollow heart, thick rind, misshapen fruit, late<br />

maturity, and the requirement for excellent cultural practices. This<br />

article outlines the approaches to minimize the defects of seedless<br />

watermelon, which we learned from our over 25 years of breeding and<br />

production of triploid seedless watermelon.<br />

Key Approaches To Minimize <strong>The</strong> Defects Of<br />

Seedless Watermelon<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIRABLE TETRAPLOIDS. Improvement of<br />

chromosome-doubling techniques has allowed development of many<br />

272 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


tetraploid watermelon varieties (An, 1991; Sun, 1998; Gong, 1993).<br />

However, availability of desirable tetraploids is limited. We have<br />

learned from our own and other breeders’ research that the fruit set and<br />

quality of tetraploids are critical for the fruit set and quality of triploid<br />

hybrids. Better tetraploids can be selected from the progenies that are<br />

derived from the crosses between tetraploids. <strong>The</strong> seed yield of<br />

tetraploids Beijing No.1, Zhengguo 401, and Shaohuan 4201,<br />

developed from the crosses of tetraploids, is almost double that of<br />

Tetra 1, the tetraploid derived directly from chromosome doubling.<br />

This can be an effective approach to improving the fruit set of yellowfleshed<br />

and small-fruited tetraploids (Deng and Sun, 2003). Selection<br />

of tetraploid progenies of chromosome-doubled F1 hybrids may take<br />

more generations to fix a desirable genotype; however, these kinds of<br />

populations provide more genetic variation from which to select.<br />

UTILIZATION OF TETRAPLOID HYBRIDS. Our breeding practices<br />

have shown that hybrids of similar tetraploid lines can be desirable in<br />

female parents for overcoming the defects of low seed yield, low<br />

germination, and low seedling vigor of a triploid hybrid. <strong>The</strong> seed<br />

yield of the hybrid between Tetra 452 and 404 is about 50% higher<br />

than its parents. Improvement of triploid hybrid seed yield over 80%<br />

was achieved by using tetraploid hybrids of similar lines as the female<br />

parent (Sun, 1998).<br />

SELECTION OF DESIRABLE TRIPLOID HYBRID COMBINATIONS.<br />

Triploid hybrids are sterile (An and Sun, 1991; Gong, 1993; Yu, 1975).<br />

<strong>The</strong> proper combination of tetraploid and diploid is critical for the<br />

performance of the triploid hybrid. Significant hybrid seed-yield<br />

variation was observed among hybrids of the same tetraploid female<br />

parent and different diploid male parents (Sun et al., 1998). When<br />

‘Sugar Baby’, ‘Crimson Sweet’, and ‘Du No. 3’ were used as male<br />

parents for the same tetraploid female parent, Tetra 404, the average<br />

number of hybrid seed per fruit was 76, 84, and 63, respectively. We<br />

also observed significant effects of hybrid combinations on triploid<br />

seed germination, seedling vigor, hollow heart, rind thickness, size of<br />

empty seed coats, fruit shape, flesh quality, and fruit yield.<br />

IMPROVEMENT OF SEED-PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES. Seedproduction<br />

techniques are not only important for genetic purity, but<br />

also critical for seed yield, germination, and seed vigor. Fermentation<br />

of harvested seed in the flesh significantly affects the germination of<br />

triploid seed. Extended fermentation will kill most of the triploid<br />

embryos (Sun et al., 1998). Larger seeds in the same seedlot with welldeveloped<br />

embryos germinate much better than small seeds with lessdeveloped<br />

embryos. Fruit set and seed yields are improved when the<br />

tetraploid female parent plants are grafted onto Lagenaria gourd.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 273


Increased applications of phosphorous fertilizer significantly enhance<br />

embryo development, and therefore increase seed weight and<br />

germination. Humidity and temperature during pollination are<br />

important for triploid seed yield. We usually get better seed yield from<br />

the spring crop than from the fall crop in Hunan. We get more than a<br />

20% seed yield increase by properly managing plant density.<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF SEEDLESS MINIWATERMELON VARIETY.<br />

Regular seedless watermelons are later than seeded varieties, and are<br />

not suitable for early production in the spring and late production in<br />

the fall. We have been breeding seedless watermelon with small fruit<br />

size since 1995 (Deng and Sun, 2003). We have released over 10<br />

triploid hybrids with small fruit size, e.g., Snow Peak TM XiaoYuHong<br />

Seedless. Two to three crops of seedless watermelon can be produced<br />

a year in subtropical areas with small-fruited seedless watermelon<br />

varieties. This significantly extends supplies of seedless fruit from the<br />

concentrated months of July and August to the months of May through<br />

November (Sun et al., 1997).<br />

IMPROVEMENT OF SEED-PRODUCTION PROTOCOL. Triploid hybrid<br />

seeds are produced by using a tetraploid as the female parent and a<br />

diploid as the male parent in a ratio of 10 female to 1 male (Sun, 1998).<br />

<strong>The</strong> female and male parents are usually grown in different sections of<br />

the seed-production field. Manual emasculation, for some tetraploids<br />

and/or at some production periods, and controlled hand-pollination are<br />

the common practices for hybrid triploid-seed production.<br />

Uncontrolled pollination is also used to reduce the cost of triploid-seed<br />

production. <strong>The</strong> tetraploid female and diploid male parents are mixedplanted<br />

in the same row in the ratio of 2:1 or 4:1. Male flowers of the<br />

male parent are collected in the early morning, 6 to 8 AM, to pollinate<br />

the female flowers of the female parent. Seeds are harvested only from<br />

the fruit of female parent. This kind of production can be done only in<br />

isolated fields. <strong>The</strong> tetraploid seeds are removed from the triploid<br />

seedlot based on seed morphology by experienced workers. <strong>The</strong><br />

tetraploid plants or fruits can also be identified later in commercial<br />

seedless-watermelon production fields based on seedling morphology<br />

or fruit characteristics (Sun, 1998).<br />

We investigated the possibility of producing triploid hybrid seed<br />

using a diploid as the female parent and a tetraploid as the male parent.<br />

However, the pollinated fruit produced only a normal-sized hard seed<br />

coat, with no visible embryo. Zhang also found a similar result;<br />

however, about 10% of the seeds studied produced triploid plants in<br />

vitro (X. P. Zhang, personal communication). More investigation is<br />

needed to understand this phenomenon. It would be very helpful if<br />

274 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


triploid hybrid seed could be produced by using a diploid line as the<br />

female parent.<br />

IMPROVEMENT OF CULTURAL PRACTICES OF SEEDLESS-<br />

WATERMELON PRODUCTION. Cultural practices are very important for<br />

the success of seedless-watermelon production (Li et al., 1994; Sun,<br />

1990, 1992, 1998; Sun et al., 1997). We recommend these tips to<br />

improve germination of triploid hybrid seed: (1) Carefully control the<br />

temperature and moisture during seed germination. <strong>The</strong> temperature<br />

should be set at 32–35˚C during germination. High moisture levels<br />

will damage the triploid seeds with less-developed embryos. (2)<br />

Mechanically cut open the hard seed coat of the triploid seed before<br />

germination. <strong>The</strong> seed coat should be removed once the seedling has<br />

emerged from soil. (3) Carefully disinfect the triploid seed using<br />

fungicides or disinfectant before germination. More than 90%<br />

germination and 85% usable seedlings have been achieved by using<br />

these three techniques.<br />

Cultural practices have significant impact on yield, fruit quality,<br />

hollow heart, and hard seed coat of seedless watermelon (Li et el.,<br />

1994; Sun, 1990, 1992, 1998; Sun et al., 1997). Stable nutrient and<br />

water supplies are critical for fruit yield, fruit shape, and fruit quality.<br />

Drought stress during fruit development reduces fruit size and<br />

increases rind thickness. Over-fertilization and -irrigation cause<br />

vegetative overgrowth, delayed fruit set, small fruit size, misshapen<br />

fruit, hard flesh, and hollow heart. Early-stage mismanagement of<br />

fertilizer and water are difficult to correct at the late stage. Overuse of<br />

nitrogen increases rind thickness and reduces sugar content. <strong>The</strong> hard<br />

seed-coat defect is low at moderate phosphate levels; higher levels of<br />

phosphate will increase it. Potassium improves the sweetness of<br />

seedless watermelon. Fruit quality is also affected by production<br />

season, plant population, and grafting.<br />

MICROPROPAGATION OF SEEDLESS WATERMELON USING TISSUE<br />

CULTURE. <strong>The</strong> combination of tissue-culture micropropagation and<br />

grafting can provide a solution to the problems of low seed yield, low<br />

germination, and low seedling vigor (Deng, 1987; Tang et el., 1994;<br />

Gao, 1983; Xu, 1979). <strong>The</strong> shoot tips of in vitro germinated seedlings<br />

were harvested and cultured on MS media containing 2–5mg/l BA for<br />

proliferation. Ploidy change and somaclonal variation were not<br />

observed during the subculture period of 10 months. As many as<br />

50,000–100,000 plantlets can be obtained from single shoot tip in 6<br />

months. However, the higher cost of tissue-culture plants and<br />

relatively low propagation rate prevents the commercial application of<br />

this technology. More research is needed in this area.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 275


Conclusion<br />

With the techniques described above we have been able to<br />

overcome the problems of low hybrid seed yield, low seed germination,<br />

and low seedling vigor of triploid seedless watermelon. Hybrid seed<br />

yields have increased from an average 2kg per 1000m 2 in the 1970s–<br />

1980s to an average 7kg per 1000m 2 today. Seed germination has been<br />

enhanced from 60% to 95%, and the usable-seedling rate is<br />

approaching 95%. We have developed several seedless varieties with<br />

small fruit size. Seedless plants are more vigorous and more tolerant to<br />

diseases and unfavorable conditions than seeded varieties, and their<br />

yields are 30% higher. Seedless watermelon also produces better<br />

quality fruit with a longer shelf life and better marketability. All these<br />

qualities make triploid seedless watermelon a strong-growing segment<br />

of the market. However, more tetraploids with desirable horticultural<br />

traits and good combining ability are needed. Tetraploid male sterile<br />

lines can be helpful for hybrid seed production. An improved seedproduction<br />

protocol is needed to ensure high seed quality and seed<br />

health.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

An, P. S. and X. W. Sun. 1991. <strong>Breeding</strong> and utilization of polyploid watermelon.<br />

Acta Huan Agric. Coll. 17(addition):126.<br />

Deng, D. C, X. W. Sun, P. Y. Zuo, Y. H Liu, and X. D. Xie. 2003. A new smallsized<br />

seedless watermelon “Xuefeng Xiaoyuhong”. Acta Hort. Sinica. 30(3):375.<br />

Deng, Z. P. 1987. Studies on asexual propagation of seedless watermelon and<br />

grafting. <strong>North</strong>ern Hort. (2):9–11.<br />

Gao, X. Y. 1983. Studies on asexual propagation of seedless watermelon. China<br />

Agric. Sci. (2):5–17.<br />

Gong, Z. J. 1993. Advances of polyploid watermelon breeding. China Watermelon &<br />

Melon. (3):22-23.<br />

Li, Z. S., C. H. Ling, and H. L. Gao. 1994. Cultural practices affect quality of<br />

seedless watermelon. China Watermelon & Melon. (1):16-18.<br />

Sun, X. W. 1990. Growing seedless watermelon for high quality. China Watermelon<br />

& Melon. (1):39–41.<br />

Sun, X. W. 1992. Cultural management of seedless watermelon. Hunan Agric. (4):14.<br />

Sun, X. W., F. Q. Luo, and X. P. Muo. 1997. Cultivation models for seedless<br />

watermelon production, p 54–59. Melon & Watermelon Working Group of<br />

CSHS (ed.). Advances of China watermelon and melon research. China<br />

Agriculture Press. Beijing.<br />

Sun, X. W. 1998. Studies on cultivation model of seedless watermelons, p. 388. Proc.<br />

25 th Int. Hort. Congress (IHC). 2–7 August, 1998, Brussels.<br />

Sun, X. W., F. Q. Luo, and S. Y. Tan. 1998. Solutions to the defects of seedless<br />

watermelon, p. 229–232. In H. Y. Luo and X. W. Sun (eds.). Proc. Hort. Sci.<br />

Hunan Sci. & Tech. Press. Hunan.<br />

Tang, S. H., Y. Liao, and Y. C. Xu. 1994. Screening of tissue culture medium and<br />

micropropagation of seedless watermelon. Acta Southwest Agric. Univ. Sinica.<br />

16(6):540–542.<br />

Xu, Z. H. 1979. Propagation of triploid seedless watermelon in vitro. Acta Plant<br />

Physiol. Sinica. 15(3):245–251.<br />

Yu, Z. X. 1975. Achievements of watermelon breeding in Taiwan. Agric. Sci.<br />

23.(3/4):123–131.<br />

276 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


COST BENEFIT ANALYSES OF USING<br />

GRAFTED WATERMELONS FOR DISEASE<br />

CONTROL AND THE FRESH-CUT MARKET<br />

Merritt Taylor 1 , Benny Bruton 2 , Wayne Fish 2, and Warren<br />

Roberts 1<br />

1 Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University, Wes Watkins Agricultural Research and<br />

Extension Center, Lane, OK<br />

2 USDA/ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory,<br />

Lane, OK<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Risk management, Fusarium wilt, soil-borne,<br />

pathogens, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp., Lagenaria sp.<br />

ABSTRACT. Soil-borne diseases such as Fusarium wilt continue to plague<br />

watermelon growers in intensive-production areas where land resources are<br />

scarce and rotation of various crops is limited. Risk-management alternatives<br />

available to the farmer have been reduced by the loss of soil-fumigation<br />

chemicals such as methyl bromide. Grafting of watermelon onto resistant<br />

rootstock onto certain scions has been found to provide effective resistance to<br />

Fusarium wilt but at an increased cost of production. <strong>The</strong>re is potential for<br />

these grafted plants to have an increased demand by the cut-fruit industry, in<br />

the long run, due to the superior quality of the flesh. Fruit from certain<br />

scion/rootstocks may even bring a premium from the cut-fruit industry as they<br />

are recognized for their superior shelf life and firmness of flesh. <strong>The</strong> resistance<br />

of these plants to soil-borne diseases provides the farmer a viable riskmanagement<br />

strategy as an alternative to methyl bromide as a means of disease<br />

control.<br />

G<br />

rafting watermelon onto other <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceous crops for soilborne<br />

disease and nematode control has been practiced for<br />

many years (Oda, 1999). Because of limited ability for crop<br />

rotation, the practice of grafting has provided a useful method for<br />

growing watermelons on land that would otherwise require fumigation<br />

or be abandoned. Grafting has been routinely utilized in Japan and<br />

Korea since the late 1920s for the control of Fusarium wilt, caused by<br />

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (Lee, 1994). Grafting watermelons<br />

in the United <strong>State</strong>s had not been attempted because of sufficient land<br />

for rotation, availability of methyl bromide, and increased costs of<br />

grafted transplants. However, we have experienced in recent years<br />

constraints of new land for rotation, loss of methyl bromide, and an<br />

increased incidence and severity of soil-borne diseases (Bruton, 1998).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 277


Evolution of Grafting Watermelons<br />

Historically, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Benincasa, Lagenaria spp., and some<br />

hybrid rootstocks have been utilized for grafting watermelon.<br />

However, these rootstocks are not resistant to all diseases. In Spain,<br />

Armengol et al. (2000) noted that Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae<br />

Race 1 could be particularly damaging to the rootstock of grafted<br />

watermelon. Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) is often used as<br />

rootstock for watermelon and is susceptible to the seed-borne<br />

(Kuniyasu, 1981) fungus F. oxysporum f. sp. lagenariae (Matsuo and<br />

Yamamoto, 1967). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> yellow vine disease (CYVD), caused by<br />

Serratia marcescens, causes a vine decline of watermelon, squash, and<br />

pumpkin (Bruton et al., 2003). More recently, CYVD has been<br />

observed in watermelon grafted onto Lagenaria or <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.<br />

rootstocks (B. Bruton, 2006, unpublished data).<br />

More than 95% of the watermelon in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan is<br />

being grafted onto squash and gourd rootstocks (Lee et al., 1998).<br />

However, rootstock-scion selection has a profound effect on yield and<br />

fruit-quality attributes (Huh et al., 2003; Pulgar et al., 2000; Yetisir<br />

and Sari, 2003). When squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.) was used as the<br />

rootstock, the yield and/or quality of the fruit was often inferior to fruit<br />

of plants grafted on bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) or of<br />

nongrafted watermelon (Yetisir et al., 2003).<br />

Despite some advantages, the use of methyl bromide has been<br />

associated with major problems, including the depletion of the ozone<br />

layer (Montreal Protocol, 1987). Because of this, its use was scheduled<br />

to be phased out on a worldwide scale—by the end of 2005 in the E.U.<br />

and other developed countries, including the United <strong>State</strong>s, and by<br />

2015 in the developing countries (Rowlands, 1993). <strong>The</strong>refore, there is<br />

an urgent need to define and implement alternative solutions for<br />

managing soil-borne pathogens. Grafting is one such alternative<br />

practice that has potential for cucurbits.<br />

Benefits of Grafting Other Than Disease Control<br />

Ioannou et al. (2000) stated, “Although growing grafted<br />

watermelon represents a novel horticultural practice for Cyprus, the<br />

technique has been quickly and widely adopted by growers. Presently,<br />

over 80% of watermelons grown in the open field and under low<br />

tunnels are grafted on various rootstocks. Grafted plants are produced<br />

by fully equipped commercial nurseries. Research efforts have been<br />

directed towards the utilization of wilt-resistant rootstocks for offseason<br />

watermelon production in heated greenhouses. Although there<br />

are still many technical aspects that need further investigation, results<br />

278 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


so far are quite promising since this method enables watermelon<br />

production as early as March, when prices are very high.” <strong>The</strong>y also<br />

stated, “<strong>The</strong> yield of grafted Crimson Sweet watermelon reached a<br />

record level of 150 tons/ha.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> use of grafted watermelon as a technique to prevent loss due to<br />

diseases is widespread throughout the world, but other positive aspects<br />

may be equally important to the producer/decision maker regarding the<br />

potential to harvest watermelons during a market window where high<br />

prices exist that were previously unreachable (Ioannou et al., 2000).<br />

In Greece, grafting is highly popular for watermelon and melons,<br />

especially in the southern areas, where early cropping under low<br />

tunnels is practiced (Traka-Mavrona et. al, 2000).<br />

Findings at Lane, Oklahoma<br />

Researchers at Lane, Oklahoma, <strong>complete</strong>d two years of<br />

experiments that included tests of five watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)<br />

scions on four rootstocks of squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.)or gourd<br />

(Lagenaria sp.) to test for resistance to Fusarium wilt in fields where<br />

heavy disease pressure would make production of nongrafted cultivars<br />

impractical.<br />

Treatments consisted of watermelon cultivars SF800, SS5244,<br />

SS7167, SS7177, and SS7187 from Abbott & Cobb Seed Co., grown<br />

as nongrafted plants or grafted onto rootstocks of RS1330, RS1332,<br />

RS1420, or RS1421. <strong>The</strong> grafting was done by Alamo Transplants Inc.<br />

of Alamo, Texas. Additional controls consisted of the nongrafted<br />

cultivars ‘Sangria’, ‘Royal Sweet’, ‘Jubilee’, and ‘Jamboree’. Two<br />

fields were planted each year with three replications of each treatment<br />

per field. Plants were grown with 1-m spacing between plants, with<br />

rows 3m apart.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were no grafted plants lost to Fusarium wilt. However, the<br />

other cultivars, especially ‘Jubilee’, did exhibit varying degrees of wilt<br />

incidence. Yields of grafted plants were generally equal to or greater<br />

than those of the nongrafted plants. Tests were run on firmness,<br />

lycopene content, sugar, storability, etc. Sugar content, measured as<br />

soluble solids, was affected minimally, if any, by grafting. Lycopene<br />

content of fruit from grafted plants was equal to, or marginally better<br />

than, fruit from nongrafted plants. Fruit firmness, as measured by a<br />

penetrometer, was significantly greater in the grafted fruit than in the<br />

nongrafted fruit. <strong>The</strong> firmest fruit occurred with SS7167 and SS7187<br />

scions grafted onto RS1420 rootstock, which had a value of about 2.0<br />

x 10 5 Pa. Fruit from nongrafted plants had values of about 1.0 x 10 5 Pa<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 279


or less. Matching of scions with appropriate rootstocks was important,<br />

as interactions did occur. Certain combinations were significantly<br />

superior to other combinations.<br />

Fresh-Cut Market Potential<br />

According to the International Fresh-Cut Produce Association,<br />

fresh-cut fruits and vegetables make up one of the fastest-growing<br />

food categories in U.S. supermarkets. U.S. sales of fresh-cut produce<br />

sprang from $3.3 billion in 1994 to $11 billion in 2000, and are<br />

projected to reach $15 billion in 2005 (Peabody, 2005). On average,<br />

sales of fresh-cut products increased by 8% in 2003 compared to 2002.<br />

Of the three fresh-cut categories, fresh-cut fruits had the largest<br />

increase at 15%, followed by packaged-salad sales at 9%, and freshcut<br />

vegetables at 6% (Clement, 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong> market for fresh-cut fruit continues to grow at a rapid rate.<br />

Sanitation and microbial contamination are of particular concern due<br />

to the high water/sugar content of watermelon fruit. Because of<br />

microbial concerns and product deterioration, the shelf life of fresh-cut<br />

watermelon is generally considered by the industry to be about five to<br />

seven days. However, product safety is the major concern.<br />

Several minimum quality criteria appear to be required for<br />

watermelon to be acceptable for sale as a fresh-cut product. <strong>The</strong> flesh<br />

must be firm, with a minimal juice loss, and have the “crunch” of a<br />

freshly cut piece of watermelon. It should have a soluble solids<br />

measurement of Brix greater than 10%. It should be seedless. It<br />

should have a positive visual perception of red and be high in<br />

lycopene. It should have the taste and aroma of a freshly cut<br />

watermelon. It should be safe, with minimal levels of fungal and<br />

bacterial contaminants.<br />

In our studies at Lane, Oklahoma, the shelf life and overall quality<br />

of fresh-cut watermelon from two cultivars grafted onto one of four<br />

rootstocks were compared with fresh-cut fruit from the nongrafted<br />

cultivars. Fresh-cut cubic pieces of about 4.5cm per side were prepared<br />

from ripe watermelons grown at the Lane Research Center and were<br />

stored at 5 o C in 35-oz. PETE containers. Quality attributes of firmness,<br />

soluble solids content, lycopene content, and bacterial counts of the<br />

pieces were measured after 0, 5, and 10 days of storage. Sugar content<br />

of the cut fruit was independent of rootstock and remained constant<br />

over the 10 days of storage. Lycopene content of the fruit decreased by<br />

5–10% during the storage period, regardless of treatment. Bacterial<br />

count on the fruit from all treatments remained low and variable<br />

during the 10 days at 5 o C. Firmness of cut pieces from fruit originating<br />

280 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


from the grafted plants was dependent upon the rootstock employed.<br />

Watermelons from grafted plants possessed firmer flesh than did those<br />

from the nongrafted plants. Overall, the firmness of fruit from all<br />

sources decreased 20–30% during the 10 days of cold storage.<br />

However, the firmness of fruit from some of the rootstocks after 10<br />

days of storage was equal to or significantly higher than that of the<br />

fruit from nongrafted plants when it was initially cut. Thus, these<br />

studies suggest that grafting to a proper rootstock will produce freshcut<br />

watermelon that is equal in sweetness and lycopene content to its<br />

nongrafted counterpart, but that will maintain greater crispness<br />

throughout its storage on the supermarket shelf.<br />

A separate study currently underway of fresh-cut watermelon<br />

being sold in several retail locations in Oklahoma and Texas provided<br />

the following preliminary general information: Brix ranged from 6.2 to<br />

13.2, with the average being 9.6. Firmness ranged from 0.4x10 5 Pa to<br />

3.1x10 5 Pa, with an average of 1.4x10 5 Pa. Lycopene ranged from<br />

22.6µg/g to 79.8µg/g, with an average of 44.3µg/g. <strong>The</strong> cost of this<br />

fresh-cut watermelon ranged from a low of $1.17/lb ($2.58/kg) to a<br />

high of $12.00/lb ($26.46/kg), and an average cost to the consumer of<br />

$3.13/lb ($6.90/kg). Assuming the average cost of whole watermelon<br />

to be $0.11/lb ($0.24/kg) and a 50% recovery percentage, the actual<br />

cost of the watermelon in the package would be approximately<br />

$0.22/lb ($0.485/kg) or 19% of the total cost of the package at the lowcost<br />

package, 1.8% of the high-cost package, and approximately 7% of<br />

the total cost of the average package.<br />

What does this mean to the grower? <strong>The</strong> discovery by the Lane,<br />

Oklahoma, scientists that some of the grafted watermelon<br />

scion/rootstock combinations provided superior firmness at the end of<br />

10 days shelf life compared to the firmness of the nongrafted<br />

watermelons at the beginning of the test has huge ramifications for the<br />

potential of these watermelons in the cut-fruit industry. Although<br />

industry officials state that maintaining quality and firmness during<br />

shelf life is one of the critical issues for maintaining or increasing<br />

market share, the question arises regarding the willingness of the<br />

industry to pay the farmer a premium price for a superior-quality<br />

product. <strong>The</strong> cost per acre of growing grafted watermelons is greater<br />

than that for nongrafted.<br />

We estimate that the cost to purchase a grafted seedling plant from<br />

a seedling supplier currently would be $0.75, which would include the<br />

cost of the seed and the grafting operation. Nongrafted seedless plants<br />

cost approximately $0.28 per plant. Assuming 1,500 plants per acre<br />

(3,706 per hectare), grafted seedless transplants would cost<br />

approximately $705.00 per acre ($1,743 per hectare) more than the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 281


nongrafted plants (Table 1). Since methyl bromide usage is not an<br />

option in the United <strong>State</strong>s, comparing the costs between planting<br />

grafted plants versus fumigating with methyl bromide and planting<br />

conventional transplants is a moot point for US growers, but should be<br />

of interest to international growers. <strong>The</strong> following costs of production<br />

are estimated with the single variable being whether grafted or<br />

nongrafted seedless watermelons are planted. All other costs are held<br />

constant.<br />

Table 1. Comparative cost in $US of production per acre and per<br />

hectare.<br />

Nongrafted Grafted Nongrafted Grafted<br />

seedless/acre seedless/acre seedless/ha seedless/ha<br />

Preplant<br />

Growing<br />

250 250 618 618<br />

season 842 1,546 2,080 3,823<br />

Total 1,092 1,797 2,698 4,441<br />

Difference $705 per acre $1,743 per hectare<br />

Assuming variable yields and prices per acre (per hectare), the<br />

following sensitivity analyses were developed to evaluate the breakeven<br />

yield, or price required for the farmer to consider planting grafted<br />

seedless watermelons versus nongrafted seedless watermelons.<br />

Calculations (Table 2) indicate that a farmer producing 25,000<br />

pounds per acre (28,021 kg/ha) would be breaking even at $0.08/lb<br />

($0.1764/kg) with nongrafted transplants but would need $0.11/lb<br />

($0.2425/kg) to break even with the grafted transplants (Table 3). In<br />

the calculations of the fresh-cut products above, if the fresh-cut facility<br />

paid the farmer $0.08/lb ($0.1764/kg) for a 50% recovery on<br />

traditional seedless watermelon and sold the product at the average<br />

retail price of $3.13/lb ($6.90/kg), the actual watermelon in the<br />

package would cost $0.16/lb ($0.35/kg) or 5.11% of the average retail<br />

price. Alternatively, if the grafted watermelon, with superior<br />

crunchiness/firmness and shelf life, were purchased at a $0.02/lb<br />

($0.044/kg) premium ($0.10/lb or $0.22/kg), the 50% recovery<br />

watermelon would cost the processor $0.20/lb ($0.485/kg) or 6.38% of<br />

the average retail price. <strong>The</strong> question is thus raised whether the freshcut<br />

processor would be willing to assure the farmer of a premium price<br />

of $0.02–$0.03/lb ($0.044–$0.066/kg) higher than the spot market<br />

price for a contract to provide a superior product to their customers.<br />

282 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Expected net return per hectare for nongrafted seedless<br />

watermelon at different yields and prices.<br />

$2,698 production<br />

cost per hectare<br />

$US price per kg<br />

$0.0661 cost/kg<br />

harvest, pack, and<br />

ship<br />

Yield<br />

kg/ha $0.1323 $0.1543 $0.1764 $0.1984 $0.2205 $0.2425<br />

11,209 -1,956.68 -1,709.57 -1,462.47 -1,215.36 -968.25 -721.15<br />

16,813 -1,586.01 -1,215.36 -844.70 -474.04 -103.38 267.28<br />

22,417 -1,215.35 -721.14 -226.93 267.28 761.49 1,255.70<br />

28,021 -844.69 -226.93 390.84 1,008.60 1,626.36 2,244.13<br />

33,626 -474.03 267.29 1,008.60 1,749.92 2,491.24 3,232.55<br />

39,230 -103.37 761.50 1,626.37 2,491.24 3,356.11 4,220.98<br />

44,834 267.30 1,255.72 2,244.14 3,232.56 4,220.98 5,209.40<br />

50,438 637.96 1,749.93 2,861.91 3,973.88 5,085.85 6,197.83<br />

56,043 1,008.62 2,244.15 3,479.67 4,715.20 5,950.73 7,186.25<br />

Risk Management and Disease Control<br />

A more practical question facing a farmer is the potential of losing all<br />

or part of the crop after the entire costs of production have been<br />

expended. In most cases of an outbreak of Fusarium wilt, the plants<br />

begin to decline late in the production season after virtually all<br />

production costs have been spent. This is one of the conditions<br />

frequently faced by a farmer when symptoms of Fusarium wilt are<br />

observed. Returning to the sensitivity tables, let us now assume a<br />

current market price of $0.10/lb ($0.22/kg) and an average yield of<br />

30,000lbs per acre (33,626 kg/ha). Under the two scenarios, the farmer<br />

would make a profit of $303/acre ($748/ha) with the grafted plants<br />

(Table 3) and $1,008/acre ($2,491/ha) with the nongrafted plants<br />

(Table 2) when no Fusarium wilt occurred. Now assume conditions of<br />

heavy Fusarium wilt disease in the field such that 50% of the<br />

nongrafted production is lost before harvest. In the grafted-watermelon<br />

fields, where the plants are resistant to Fusarium wilt, the farmer could<br />

expect a yield of 30,000lbs per acre (33,626kg/ha) and obtain<br />

approximately $303 per acre ($748/ha) profit (Table 3). In the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 283


nongrafted field, the farmer may be lucky to harvest 15,000lbs per acre<br />

(16,812 kg/ha) and thus show a net loss of -$42.00 per acre<br />

(-$103.00/ha) (Table 2). As disease pressures increase over time,<br />

grafted disease-resistant plants, such as the ones tested at Lane, will<br />

become part of risk-management decisions for the farmer.<br />

Table 3. Expected net return per hectare for grafted seedless<br />

watermelon at different yields and prices.<br />

$4,440.00 production<br />

cost per hectare<br />

$0.0661 cost/kg harvest,<br />

pack, and ship<br />

$US price per kg<br />

Yield kg/ha $0.1323 $0.1543 $0.1764 $0.1984 $0.2205 $0.2425 $0.2646<br />

11,209 -3,698.68 -3,451.57 -3,204.47 -2,957.36 -2,710.25 -2,463.15 -2,216.04<br />

16,813 -3,328.01 -2,957.36 -2,586.70 -2,216.04 -1,845.38 -1,474.72 -1,104.07<br />

22,417 -2,957.35 -2,463.14 -1,968.93 -1,474.72 -980.51 -486.30 7.91<br />

28,021 -2,586.69 -1,968.93 -1,351.16 -733.40 -115.64 502.13 1,119.89<br />

33,626 -2,216.03 -1,474.71 -733.40 7.92 749.24 1,490.55 2,231.87<br />

39,230 -1,845.37 -980.50 -115.63 749.24 1,614.11 2,478.98 3,343.85<br />

44,834 -1,474.70 -486.28 502.14 1,490.56 2,478.98 3,467.40 4,455.82<br />

50,438 -1,104.04 7.93 1,119.91 2,231.88 3,343.85 4,455.83 5,567.80<br />

56,043 -733.38 502.15 1,737.67 2,973.20 4,208.73 5,444.25 6,679.78<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Armengol, J., C. M. Jose, M. J. Moya, R. Sales, A. Vicent, and J. Garcia-Jimenez.<br />

2000. Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae race 1, a potential pathogen of grafting<br />

watermelon production in Spain. Bull. OEPP. 30:179–183.<br />

Bruton, B. D. 1998. Soilborne diseases in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae: Pathogen virulence and<br />

host resistance, p. 143–166. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98. ASHS<br />

Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Bruton, B. D., F. Mitchell, J. Fletcher, S. D. Pair, A. Wayadande, U. Melcher, J.<br />

Brady, B. Bextine, and T. H. Popham. 2003. Serratia marcescens, a phloemcolonizing,<br />

squash bug-transmitted bacterium: causal agent of cucurbit yellow<br />

vine disease. Plant Dis. 87:937–944.<br />

Clement, B. D. (ed.). 2003. Fresh-cut sales of retail produce approaching $4 billion a<br />

year. Fresh Cut. Nov., 2003.<br />

Huh, Y. C., Y. H. Woo, J. M. Lee, and Y. H. Om. 2003. Growth and fruit<br />

characteristics of watermelon grafted onto Citrullus rootstocks selected for<br />

disease resistance. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44:649–654.<br />

Ioannou, N. 2000. Soil solarization as a substitute for methyl bromide fumigation in<br />

greenhouse tomato production in Cyprus. Phytoparasitica. (28)3.<br />

Ioannou, N., C. Poullis, and J. B. Heale. 2000. Fusarium wilt of watermelon in<br />

Cyprus and its management by solarization combined with fumigation or<br />

ammonium fertilizers. EPPO Bull. 30:223–230.<br />

284 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Kuniyasu, K. 1981. Seed transmission of Fusarium wilt of bottle gourd, Lagenaria<br />

siceraria, used as rootstock of watermelon. Jpn. Ag. Res. Quart. 14:157–162.<br />

Lee, J. M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. current status, grafting<br />

methods and benefits. HortSci. 29:235–239.<br />

Lee, J. M., H. J. Bang, and H. S. Ham. 1998. Grafting of vegetables. J. Jpn. Soc.<br />

Hort. Sci. 67:1098–1104.<br />

Matsuo, T. and I. Yamamoto. 1967. On Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lageneriae n. f.<br />

causing wilt of Lagenaria vulgaris var. hispida. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Jpn. 8:61–<br />

63.<br />

Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. 1987. International<br />

treaty. Hand<strong>book</strong> for the international treaties for the protection of the ozone<br />

layer: the Vienna convention (1985); the Montreal protocol (1987). Ozone<br />

Secretariat, UNEP, 2000. xv, 367p.<br />

Oda, M. 1999. Grafting of vegetables to improve greenhouse production. Ext. Bull.<br />

Food & Fert. Tech. Center. 480:11pp.<br />

Peabody, E. 2005. Fresh-cut moves into the fast lane. Agric. Res. Aug., 2005.<br />

Pulgar, G., G. Villora, D. A. Moreno, and L. Romero. 2000. Improving the mineral<br />

nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: nitrogen metabolism. Biol. Plant.<br />

43:607–609.<br />

Rowlands, I. H. 1993. <strong>The</strong> fourth meeting of the parties to the Montreal protocol:<br />

report and reflection. Environ. 35(6): 25–34.<br />

Traka-Mavrona, E., M. Koutsika-Sotiriou, and T. Pritsa. 2000. Response of squash<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.) as rootstock for melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sci. Hort. 83:353–<br />

362.<br />

Yetisir, H., and N. Sari. 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield<br />

and quality of watermelon. Aust. J. Exp. Agri. 43:1269–1274.<br />

Yetisir, H., N. Sari, and S. Yucel. 2003. Rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and<br />

effect on watermelon fruit yield and quality. Phytoparasitica. 31:163–169.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 285


NITAMIN ® LIQUID: BACKGROUND AND USE<br />

ON CUCURBITACEAE FAMILY<br />

James Wargo and Anne Cothran<br />

Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc., Decatur, Georgia<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Cucumis sativus, cucumber,<br />

watermelon, ammonium nitrate, urea, fertilizer, slow-release nitrogen<br />

ABSTRACT. Nitamin ® is a slowly available nitrogen source developed by<br />

Georgia-Pacific that contains 60% slowly available nitrogen (AAPFCO, Rules<br />

and Regulations-Fertilizer, 3 (b), 2004). <strong>The</strong> patented urea polymer-based<br />

fertilizer is broken down by soil microbes and releases nitrogen over 60–75<br />

days. <strong>The</strong> release profile is dependent on soil texture, temperature, and<br />

moisture. Nitamin 30L demonstrates increased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)<br />

compared to quick-release fertilizers by reducing nitrogen loss via ammonia<br />

volatilization and leaching. In 2005, Nitamin 30L liquid fertilizer demonstrated<br />

increased yields in three studies conducted on cucurbits on a range of soil types.<br />

Split applications were required with watermelon on sand in FL, but single<br />

applications prior to planting were sufficient in trials on watermelon in TX and<br />

pickling cucumbers in NC. <strong>The</strong> higher value created through increased yield<br />

was demonstrated to have positive economic results and suggests that slowly<br />

available fertilizers such as Nitamin are feasible for moderate to high value<br />

vegetable production.<br />

itamin ® N<br />

30L is a 30-0-0 liquid N fertilizer with slow-release<br />

properties. It is composed of 40% urea and 60% slowly<br />

available nitrogen in the form of polymeric chains of<br />

methylene urea and various triazone species (closed ring structures).<br />

<strong>The</strong> combination of readily available N and slow-release N provides a<br />

steady N release over a period of 60 to 75 days. Nitamin polymers are<br />

converted from organic nitrogen to plant-available forms through<br />

microbial degradation. This process is dependent on soil temperature,<br />

texture, water availability, and oxygen content—all of which can<br />

affect the N-release profile. <strong>The</strong> breakdown begins with the simplest<br />

molecules (urea), then methylene urea compounds, and eventually the<br />

triazone ring structures with strong carbon-to-nitrogen bonds. Once<br />

<strong>The</strong> universities listed as conducting studies on Nitamin ® do not<br />

endorse Georgia-Pacific, Nitamin, or the use of Nitamin. Costs given are<br />

not guaranteed prices but estimates on current raw material costs available.<br />

Nitamin ® is a registered trademark and STEADY-DELIVERY is a<br />

trademark of Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. All rights reserved. U.S. patent<br />

nos. 6,632,262; and 6,900,162. Additional domestic and international<br />

patents pending.<br />

286 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


the monomers are cleaved from the chain or ring structures<br />

they undergo normal N-transformation processes in the soil to<br />

convert to nitrate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> steady release of N can provide several agronomic<br />

and environmental advantages over quick-release N fertilizers.<br />

University studies with Nitamin have shown more consistent<br />

plant nitrogen status during the growing season, higher<br />

cumulative N uptake, and reduced ammonia volatilization<br />

(Figure 1) (Miguel Cabrera, unpublished data) and reduced<br />

nitrate leaching (Figure 2) (Elizabeth Guertal, unpublished<br />

data). All these factors combine to result in higher N use<br />

efficiency. Other potential benefits include the need for less<br />

frequent N applications during the growing season and<br />

reduced N application rates compared to the standard grower<br />

program. In many cases improved yield and fruit quality have<br />

been achieved by limiting fluctuations in soil N status and<br />

increasing N availability to the plants.<br />

Studies on watermelon and cucumbers in TX, FL, and NC showed<br />

that Nitamin could supplant the current N fertilization practice and<br />

improve fruit yield and quality. <strong>The</strong> results of those trials are<br />

discussed below.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

FLORIDA STUDY. A watermelon trial was conducted by Dr. George<br />

Hochmuth with the University of Florida at the IFAS <strong>North</strong> Florida<br />

Research Center in Live Oak, FL (George Hochmuth, unpublished<br />

data). <strong>The</strong> soil was Lakeland sand (96% sand, 0% silt, and 4% clay)<br />

with a pH of 6.0, and organic matter less than 1%. Beds were formed<br />

with black plastic mulch and fumigated with methyl bromide:<br />

chloropicrin at 449kg/ha. <strong>The</strong> test area was drip irrigated to maintain a<br />

soil moisture of -8cb to -12cb measured by a tensiometer at 15.2cm<br />

soil depth. <strong>The</strong> plots were irrigated for periods of 15 min twice/day<br />

from planting until 10 May, 30 min twice/day from 10 May to 26 May,<br />

and 38 min twice/day through harvest. Transplants (variety<br />

‘Mardigras’) were planted on March 10, 2005, in a single row with<br />

0.91m spacing. <strong>The</strong> experimental design was randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />

block with four replicates in 2.4m x 10.7m plots. One block was<br />

eliminated from the results due to poor plant stand caused by poor<br />

water drainage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> treatments included ammonium nitrate and Nitamin 30L<br />

applied at different rates and times. Nitrogen rates were 117, 168, and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 287


Urea<br />

UAN<br />

Nitamin 30L<br />

Fig. 1. Ammonia volatilization results from UGA incubation. Study conducted<br />

by Dr. Miguel Cabrera, University of Georgia, 2005. Data was analyzed weekly<br />

for significant difference by Fisher LSD (0.05) by week 1) 3.2, 2) 0.3, 3) 0.2 NS<br />

4) 0.05 NS, 5) 0.02 NS.<br />

211kg N/ha for Nitamin and 168 and 211kg N/ha for ammonium<br />

nitrate. Ammonium nitrate was applied through weekly fertigation for<br />

12 weeks with 25% of the N applied to the bed preplant. All three<br />

Nitamin rates were applied to the bed prior to planting and<br />

incorporated before plastic mulch was laid. An additional Nitamin<br />

30L treatment was injected through the irrigation system in three<br />

applications spaced 2 weeks apart beginning 3 weeks after planting.<br />

<strong>The</strong> total rate for the injected treatment was 168kg N/ha with 25% of<br />

the N total applied to the bed before planting.<br />

TEXAS STUDY. A second watermelon study with Nitamin 30L<br />

liquid fertilizer was conducted by Russ Wallace at the Texas<br />

Agricultural Research & Extension Center (AREC) in Lubbock,<br />

Texas, in 2005 (Russ Wallace, unpublished data). <strong>The</strong> soil was an<br />

Amarillo clay loam (47% sand, 20% silt, and 33% clay) with 0.9%<br />

OM, pH 8.1, and a CEC of 16.5. Core samples were taken<br />

pretreatment from 15.2cm–20.3cm depth and showed 9kg NO3/ha<br />

were available in April 2005. <strong>The</strong> test plots were treated with Prefar<br />

4E herbicide and other standard practices were used for disease and<br />

pest control in addition to weeding by hand. Plot size was 5.1m x<br />

7.62m with four replicates in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design.<br />

<strong>The</strong> plots were transplanted with 3-week old watermelon seedlings<br />

(cv. Sugar Baby) on June 9 and drip irrigated as needed. Harvest<br />

occurred once, on August 9, 2005. Other variables measured were<br />

vigor, rated on July 10 and August 4, and vine length, rated on June<br />

28.<br />

288 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Urea<br />

UAN<br />

Nitamin Liquid<br />

Fig. 2. Auburn University leaching results. Cumulative mineral<br />

nitrogen (mg) in leachate as affected by fertilizer. Study conducted by<br />

Dr. Elizabeth Guertal, Auburn University, 2005.<br />

<strong>The</strong> treatments included urea broadcast preplant and incorporated<br />

(PP) at rates of 89 and 135kg N/ha; Nitamin 30L applied all at planting<br />

(AP) or as split applications (S) at planting and just before vine run on<br />

June 27 at rates of 45, 89, and 135kg N/ha. Nitamin was applied to<br />

open trenches 10cm deep and 10cm to the side of each row with a<br />

pressurized backpack sprayer.<br />

NORTH CAROLINA STUDY. <strong>The</strong> third cucurbit study was a trial<br />

conducted by Dr. Jonathan Schultheis, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

University, on cucumber cultivar ‘Jackson’ at Kinston, NC (Jonathan<br />

R. Schultheis and Bradfred W. Thompson, unpublished data). <strong>The</strong> soil<br />

classification is Norfolk loamy sand (85% sand, 10% silt, and 8%<br />

clay) with 1.3% organic matter and pH 6.5. <strong>The</strong> plots were 25’ X 3.5’<br />

having 10’ alleyways between plots. Each treatment consisted of five<br />

replicates in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design. Plots were thinned<br />

to a target plant stand of 50 plants per plot in a single row. <strong>The</strong> seeds<br />

were hand-sown on April 26, 2005, and thinned on May 20 and June<br />

15. Weed control was applied after planting, while insecticides and<br />

fungicides were applied as needed. Irrigation was supplemented as<br />

necessary to maintain 1 inch per week, and no excessive rain events<br />

occurred. Measurements included: vine length, petiole nitrate by<br />

Cardy meter, and graded yield. Vine length was measured on June 10.<br />

Twenty petiole samples from each plot were collected June 10 at the<br />

fruit bloom, June16 at first harvest, and June 29 after the fourth<br />

harvest. <strong>The</strong> cucumbers were harvested eight times (biweekly) from<br />

June 16 through July 8, 2005. <strong>The</strong> yield was graded into US No. 1,<br />

No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4, and marketable yield included No. 1, 2, and 3<br />

(all noncull fruit). Some of the plots were infected with powdery<br />

mildew, bacterial wilt, or poor plant stand, resulting in poor yields.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se plots were excluded from the yield calculations.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 289


<strong>The</strong> treatments included ammonium nitrate and Nitamin 30L<br />

applied at rates of 45, 89, 135, and 180kg N/ha. An untreated control<br />

was also included. Recommended rates are 89 to 135kg/ha for<br />

pickling cucumbers in NC. Nitamin treatments were applied once just<br />

prior to planting on April 26, 2005. <strong>The</strong> ammonium nitrate treatments<br />

were applied in split applications in 45-kg increments except the 45-kg<br />

rate, which was applied 31 days after planting at the third-leaf-growth<br />

stage on May 26, 2005. <strong>The</strong> 89kg and 135kg rates were applied at the<br />

first-true-leaf stage (May 19) and again on May 31. Part of the 135<br />

rate was applied at planting. Applications of the 180-kg rate started at<br />

planting and continued (fourth application) until “vine out” growth<br />

stage on June 7, 2005. <strong>The</strong> ammonium nitrate treatment schedule was<br />

intended to mimic a typical grower application program.<br />

Results<br />

FLORIDA STUDY. Nitamin produced the highest yield of any<br />

treatment when 75% of the N was injected through the irrigation<br />

system biweekly during the first half of the growing season (Table 1).<br />

Yield increases with the injected Nitamin treatment over the two<br />

ammonium nitrate treatments ranged from 60 to 86cwt(kg)/ha. <strong>The</strong><br />

injected Nitamin treatment also tended to have fewer cull fruit than<br />

ammonium nitrate and all at-planting Nitamin treatments. <strong>The</strong><br />

Nitamin treatments that consisted of a one-time preplant application<br />

underneath the plastic produced the lowest yields regardless of N rate.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se treatments produced higher yields in the first harvest, but had a<br />

much lower second-harvest yield, suggesting insufficient nitrogen<br />

availability late in the growing season. <strong>The</strong> results demonstrate that<br />

split N applications are necessary on sand with low organic matter and<br />

low cation-exchange capacity. However, it was evident that a<br />

Table 1. University of FL Watermelon Trial, Live Oak.<br />

Total-season yield<br />

(metric tons/ha)<br />

Treatment Marketable Culls<br />

Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 168kg N/ha 45.3 3.4<br />

Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 211kg N/ha 47.9 1.1<br />

Nitamin 30L preplant – 117kg N/ha 37.7 1.2<br />

Nitamin 30L preplant – 168kg N/ha 34.9 2.7<br />

Nitamin 30L preplant – 211kg N/ha 38.4 4.1<br />

Nitamin 30L injected 3 times – 168kg N/ha 53.9 0.8<br />

LSD 0.05 9.8 NS<br />

290 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


educed application schedule can be employed since only 3 Nitamin<br />

injections were made compared to 12 weekly injections of ammonium<br />

nitrate. Furthermore, the last Nitamin injection was made 7 weeks<br />

after transplanting, ending 5 weeks earlier than the ammonium nitrate<br />

treatments. <strong>The</strong> results demonstrate that injecting Nitamin 30L<br />

through the drip-irrigation system can be more effective than spoonfeeding<br />

ammonium nitrate every week over the growing season.<br />

TEXAS STUDY. Nitamin liquid fertilizer increased total yield and<br />

marketable yield compared to urea (Figure 3). Yields were slightly<br />

higher when Nitamin was applied in split applications compared to a<br />

single application, but the difference was not statistically significant.<br />

<strong>The</strong> high clay content and cation-exchange capacity of the soil at the<br />

experimental site may have resulted in some ammonium fixation when<br />

applied all preplant. Yield differences between fertilizers were<br />

greatest at the highest N rates, and split applications of Nitamin at 89<br />

and 135kg N/ha increased average fruit size compared to the 135kg<br />

N/ha urea treatment. Vigor ratings and vine-length measurements in<br />

late June and early July showed that Nitamin plants got off to a faster<br />

start, which may have resulted in earlier fruit set and increased fruit<br />

size (Table 2).<br />

NORTH CAROLINA STUDY. All of the N treatments promoted<br />

increased fruit set and higher yield than the untreated (0 N) control<br />

treatment (Table 3). Ammonium nitrate did not demonstrate a yield<br />

response with respect to N rate, while the Nitamin treatments did<br />

produce a more typical yield response curve.<br />

With Nitamin, marketable yield increased up to 89kg N/ha, then<br />

leveled off at 135kg N/ha until decreasing at the highest (180kg N/ha)<br />

nitrogen- application rate. It is not unusual for yields to decrease when<br />

such a high rate of N is applied all in one application. No plant burning<br />

Table 1. University of FL Watermelon Trial, Live Oak.<br />

Total-season yield<br />

(metric tons/ha)<br />

Treatment Marketable Culls<br />

Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 168kg N/ha 45.3 3.4<br />

Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 211kg N/ha 47.9 1.1<br />

Nitamin 30L preplant – 117kg N/ha 37.7 1.2<br />

Nitamin 30L preplant – 168kg N/ha 34.9 2.7<br />

Nitamin 30L preplant – 211kg N/ha 38.4 4.1<br />

Nitamin 30L injected 3 times – 168kg N/ha 53.9 0.8<br />

LSD 0.05 9.8 NS<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 291


was noted at the highest Nitamin rate even though yields were<br />

depressed.<br />

Numerically, Nitamin applied at 89kg N/ha was the highest<br />

yielding treatment, followed by Nitamin applied at 135kg N/ha, and<br />

then ammonium nitrate applied at 45kg N/ha. It is not clear why the<br />

lowest ammonium nitrate treatment was one of the highest yielding in<br />

metric tons / hectare<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Urea preplant Nitamin liquid preplant<br />

Nitamin liquid split application<br />

Total Marketable<br />

Fig. 3. Watermelon yield at Texas AREC. LSD (0.05) Total 9.1, marketable 9.1.<br />

this study. While yields were not always statistically significant<br />

between N sources, the Nitamin rates of 89 and 135kg N/ha tended to<br />

produce increased vine growth, higher early-season yields, and higher<br />

total yield compared to ammonium nitrate.<br />

Nitrogen rate resulted in some differences in vine growth. <strong>The</strong><br />

lowest N rate, the no-N treatment, and the 180kg/ha Nitamin treatment<br />

had the least vine growth (Table 4). <strong>The</strong> highest Nitamin rate<br />

(180kg/ha) appeared to inhibit vine growth while the ammonium<br />

nitrate at 180kg/ha did not. This appears to be a function of how the<br />

material was applied–Nitamin all in one application vs. ammonium<br />

nitrate split evenly in four applications. <strong>The</strong> nitrate samples for all N<br />

treatments except the 45- and 89-kg/ha Nitamin treatments were at or<br />

above sufficiency ranges (Figure 4). Although the petiole nitrate was<br />

not at sufficient levels for 89kg/ha Nitamin, it was numerically the<br />

highest-yielding treatment.<br />

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS. One factor that must be considered with<br />

any new or existing technology is the cost to implement it.<br />

Controlled-release technology has been in existence for several<br />

decades but its use has been primarily restricted to the turf,<br />

292 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Watermelon vine length and vigor Texas AREC.<br />

Length<br />

Average<br />

June 28 Vigor Vigor size<br />

Treatment<br />

(cm) July 10 Aug. 4 (kg)<br />

Urea 89kg N/ha 86.45 6.75 8.00 4.98<br />

Urea 135kg N/ha 76.23 7.25 9.25 4.20<br />

Nitamin 89kg N/ha (AP) 106.58 8.25 9.75 4.68<br />

Nitamin 135kg N/ha (AP) 108.98 9.25 9.5 5.02<br />

Nitamin 89kg N/ha (S) 90.43 7.75 9.25 5.10<br />

Nitamin 135kg N/ha (S) 96.45 8.75 9.00 5.11<br />

LSD (0.05) 25.12 1.92 1.24 0.86<br />

Vigor ratings: 1= dead; 3 = poor; 6 = fair; 7 = good; 10 = excellent. AP = at<br />

planting; S = split application.<br />

ornamental, and greenhouse industries because of cost. As<br />

environmental concerns with nitrogen contamination increase and the<br />

cost of controlled-release fertilizer decreases, this barrier is coming<br />

down. An evaluation of fertilizer costs, crop value, and increased<br />

grower profit comparing Nitamin to ammonium nitrate or urea is<br />

presented in Tables 5 and 6. As the data show, the increased<br />

production with Nitamin results in significantly higher returns.<br />

Discussion<br />

Nitamin 30L increased yields in three studies but differences were not<br />

always statistically significant at p=0.05. In two cases, applying<br />

Nitamin all at planting outperformed up to four split applications of<br />

quick-release fertilizer. It appears the 60–75 day Nitamin release rate<br />

matched the plants’ N-uptake pattern in those studies. For soils that<br />

ppm nitrate<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

45 51 64<br />

Days after planting<br />

Ammo. Nitrate 45 Kg/ha<br />

Ammo. Nitrate 89 Kg/ha<br />

Ammo. Nitrate 135<br />

Kg/ha<br />

Ammo. Nitrate 180<br />

Kg/ha<br />

Nitamin 45 Kg/ha<br />

Nitamin 89 Kg/ha<br />

Nitamin 135 Kg/ha<br />

Nitamin 180 Kg/ha<br />

No N fertilizer<br />

Fig. 4. Cucumber petiole nitrate. Statistical data by SAS. LSD (0.05)<br />

values: Day 45, 274; Day 51, 218; Day 64, 300.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 293


Table 3. Weight of cucumbers in metric tons per hectare by grade.<br />

Market-<br />

Treatment kg/ha No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 able total<br />

No N fertilizer 2.1 3.8 4.6 1.9 10.5<br />

NH4NO3, 45 3.5 6.7 7.5 2.7 17.7<br />

NH4NO3, 89 2.8 6.4 6.2 2.0 15.4<br />

NH4NO3, 135 3.1 6.1 7.3 2.6 16.4<br />

NH4NO3, 180 2.7 5.6 7.6 2.1 15.9<br />

Nitamin, 45 2.6 5.0 6.1 2.4 13.6<br />

Nitamin, 89 3.1 6.1 9.9 3.3 19.1<br />

Nitamin, 135 3.1 6.1 9.1 2.7 18.3<br />

Nitamin, 180 2.5 4.5 5.4 1.7 12.3<br />

Average 2.8 5.6 7.1 2.4 15.5<br />

LSD (0.05) 0.9 1.9 3.0 1.2 4.2<br />

Table 4. Cucumber-vine measurements.<br />

Vine<br />

Vine<br />

length Treatment length<br />

(cm) (kg/ha)<br />

(cm)<br />

No N fertilizer 39 Nitamin, 45 39<br />

NH4NO3, 45 38 Nitamin, 89 48<br />

NH4NO3, 89 39 Nitamin, 135 46<br />

NH4NO3, 135 43 Nitamin, 180 36<br />

NH4NO3, 180 42<br />

LSD (0.05) 9<br />

are over 90% sand and < 1.0% organic matter, split applications of<br />

Nitamin should be used. Application rates of 135 to 168kg N/ha from<br />

Nitamin appeared to be adequate for watermelon, whereas rates as low<br />

as 89kg N/ha were sufficient for pickling cucumbers. In general,<br />

Nitamin application rates should be 75–100% of the local cooperative<br />

extension recommendation for each crop. Further research is needed<br />

to refine application rates and scheduling in each geographical area.<br />

<strong>The</strong> potential profit advantages of using affordable slow-release N<br />

products such as liquid Nitamin demonstrates their feasibility for use<br />

on cucurbits and other vegetables, especially considering such benefits<br />

as reduced N losses through leaching and ammonia volatilization.<br />

Growers may also find advantages in reducing the number of sidedress<br />

applications or lowering overall N rates with slow-release products.<br />

294 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 5. Value proposition of Florida watermelons per hectare based<br />

on N source.<br />

Fertilizer<br />

Grower profit<br />

Fertilizer kg/ha cost Crop value increase<br />

Nitamin 30L 168 $370 $10420 $1479<br />

Ammo. nitrate 168 $128 $8941 0<br />

Ammo. nitrate 211 $138 $9452 $511<br />

Watermelon price of $2.002/metric ton, Nitamin 30L = $600/ton, Nitamin 42G =<br />

450/ton (ton is U.S. short, not metric), ammonium nitrate = $208/ton.<br />

Table 6. Value proposition of Texas watermelons per hectare based on<br />

N source.<br />

Fertilizer<br />

Grower profit<br />

Fertilizer kg/ha cost Crop value increase<br />

Nitamin 30L 89 $196 $6076 $39<br />

Nitamin 30L 135 $297 $7499 $1,462<br />

Urea 89 $63 $6037 0<br />

Urea 135 $95 $5787 0<br />

Watermelon price of $2.816/metric ton, Nitamin 30L = $600/ton, urea<br />

$224/ton (ton is U.S. short, not metric).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Green Markets, May 8, 2006. 30(19):4, col. 1 & 2.<br />

Official Publication AAPFCO. 2004. 57:40.<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006. Agricultural statistics for 2005.<br />

USDA, Washington, DC. .<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 295


TRIPLOID SEEDLESS WATERMELON<br />

PRODUCTION IN CHINA<br />

Liu Wenge, Yan Zhihong, Zhao Shengjie, and He Nan<br />

Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute,<br />

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,<br />

Zhengzhou, Henan 450009, P. R. China<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, watermelon, China, triploid,<br />

seedless, production<br />

ABSTRACT. More than 1,000,000ha of watermelon are grown annually in China.<br />

Seedless watermelon is an important part of watermelon production in China,<br />

accounting for 20% of total watermelon production acreage. Ninety percent of<br />

seedless watermelon production is south of the Yellow River. Chinese consumers<br />

like red- or deep pink-fleshed seedless watermelon with black or dark green skin<br />

color. More recently, yellow-fleshed seedless watermelons have been introduced<br />

and gradually accepted. Small-fruited seedless watermelons are also becoming<br />

popular. Some easy yet effective technologies aimed at helping China increase its<br />

production of seedless watermelon have been developed and implemented .<br />

W<br />

atermelon is a warm-season crop similar to cantaloupe,<br />

squash, cucumber, and pumpkin. In China, watermelons are<br />

grown on any well-drained soil throughout the country.<br />

Watermelons are cultivated year-round by utilizing low tunnels and<br />

greenhouses. Watermelons are transported throughout the country.<br />

More than 1,000,000 hectares of watermelon are produced in China<br />

annually, accounting for 58% of the world watermelon production area<br />

and 73% of world watermelon yield in 2003. Yields of 45 to 50 metric<br />

tons per ha are common (Liu, 2005), similar to those of the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s (Maynard, 2001).<br />

Seedless watermelon is an important part of watermelon production<br />

in China. Commercial varieties of seedless watermelon are triploid<br />

hybrids (Tan, 2002). <strong>The</strong>re were 7,000ha of seedless watermelon in<br />

1990. Since 1995, seedless watermelon has become more popular, and<br />

the production acreage has increased to 200,000ha in 2005. Seedless<br />

production now accounts for 20% of total watermelon acreage,<br />

providing a tremendous boost to the watermelon industry (Liu, 2005).<br />

Major Seedless Watermelon Production Areas in<br />

China<br />

<strong>The</strong> major seedless watermelon cultivation areas, based on a 2005<br />

survey, are listed Table 1. More than 200,000ha of seedless watermelon<br />

were produced in 2005. Henan, Hunan, Hubei, Hainan, and Jiangxi<br />

296 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


provinces are the top suppliers of seedless watermelon. Anhui, Guangxi,<br />

Guangdong, Guizhou, Shaanxi, Shandong, Beijing, and Jiangsu are the<br />

second for harvested production areas. <strong>The</strong> provinces with fewer than<br />

1000ha of seedless watermelon include Hebei, Sichuan, Jilin, Shanghai,<br />

Zhejiang, Chongqing, Yunnan, Tianjin, Heilongjiang, Gansu, Ningxia,<br />

Shanxi, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia. Hainan is the primary supplier of<br />

seedless watermelon in December, January, and February. Seedless<br />

watermelon production has increased even though total watermelon<br />

area is decreasing (Liu, 2005). Eighty percent of seedless watermelon<br />

production is located south of the Yangtze River, with 90% south of the<br />

Yellow River. This is because of seedless watermelon’s higher tolerance<br />

to humidity and disease resistance than that of diploid seeded<br />

watermelon (Tan, 2002). Seedless watermelon production is growing<br />

rapidly in some new areas such as the provinces of Yunnan, Sichuan and<br />

Shaanxi, where there was little seedless watermelon cultivation in the<br />

past.<br />

Seedless Watermelon Varieties Used in China<br />

<strong>The</strong> key seedless watermelon varieties grown in different regions of<br />

China are listed in Table 2. Consumers traditionally like red- or<br />

deep-pink-fleshed seedless watermelon. Yellow-fleshed seedless<br />

watermelons have recently been introduced and gradually accepted by<br />

Chinese consumers. Small-fruited seedless watermelon is also<br />

becoming popular. <strong>The</strong> major seedless watermelon varieties used in<br />

China in 1990s were ‘Mimeiwuzi 1’, ‘Guangxi 2’, ‘Heimi 2’, ‘Xuefeng<br />

304’, ‘Dongting 1’, ‘Xuefenghuapi’, and ‘Xinxiu 2’. Since the<br />

registration of ‘Heimi No. 5’ in the national variety identification<br />

system in 2000, Chinese watermelon breeders have made significant<br />

efforts to develop new seedless varieties. In 2002 the following varieties<br />

were registered in the state variety identification system:<br />

‘Zhengkangwuzi No. 1’, ‘Zhengkangwuzi No. 2’, ‘Zhengkangwuzi No.<br />

3’, ‘Mihuangwuzi’, ‘Mihongwuzi’, ‘Xiaoyuhongwuzi’, ‘Fenglewuzi<br />

No. 1’, ‘Fenglewuzi No. 2’, ‘Fenglewuzi No. 3’, and ‘Jinmi 20’. Some<br />

varieties have been registered in the provincial variety identification<br />

system. Midseason and later-maturity varieties have also been released<br />

recently. <strong>The</strong> major objectives for triploid watermelon breeding include<br />

disease resistance, yield, fruit type, high soluble solid contents, free of<br />

hard seed coats, eating quality, and shipping ability. <strong>The</strong> new varieties<br />

have facilitated rapid growth of seedless watermelon production in<br />

China.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 297


Table 1. Seedless watermelon production in China.<br />

Acreage Yield Harvesting<br />

Province (ha) (kg/ha) period<br />

Henan 33000 45,000–75,000 June–Aug.<br />

Hunan 33000 37,500–52,500 June–July<br />

Hubei 32000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />

Hainan 26600 37,500–75,000 Dec.–Feb.<br />

Jiangxi 21300 30,000–45,000 June–July<br />

Anhui 8000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />

Guangxi 6600 30,000–52,500 April–May<br />

Guangdong 4000 30,000–52,500 April–May<br />

Guizhou 2600 30,000–52,500 July–Aug.<br />

Shaanxi 2600 60,000–75,000 May–June<br />

Shandong 2000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />

Beijing 2000 60,000–75,000 July–Aug.<br />

Jiangsu 1000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />

Impact of Research on Triploid Seedless<br />

Watermelon Production<br />

Low germination, low seedling vigor, and low seed yield of triploid<br />

hybrids are the three major obstacles for seedless watermelon<br />

production. Scientists have tried to find solutions to these problems<br />

(Liu, 2005). Key cultivation techniques have been developed for<br />

growing seedless watermelon in different climatic regions in China.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se techniques include (1) Pregerminating triploid seed with high<br />

temperature (30–32°C). Triploid seeds are placed between moistened<br />

towels, placed on an electric blanket and/or under heating lights, until<br />

the radical has emerged from seed coat. (2) Using plastic mulch to<br />

improve survival rate of triploid seedlings in the field. (3) Producing<br />

triploid hybrid seed under dry climates. <strong>The</strong>se changes have lead to<br />

acceptable seed germination rates (>85%), seedling survival rates<br />

(>80%), and triploid seed yields (>6kg/667m 2 ). <strong>The</strong>se improvements<br />

have made commercial seedless watermelon production possible in<br />

different regions in China. (Tan, 2002).<br />

Transplants and hand-pollination are used in most production areas<br />

where labor is abundant. Bee-pollination is not common for seedless<br />

watermelon production in China. National and provincial (such as<br />

Anhui, Guangxi, and Jiangsu) standards for seedless watermelon<br />

cultivation have been established. Seedless watermelon is also suitable<br />

298 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


for plastic-tunnel and greenhouse production. A year-round supply of<br />

seedless watermelon is achieved through protected production in<br />

northern regions and open-field production in southern regions.<br />

Examples of protected seedless watermelon production include<br />

double-plastic-mulch cultivation in Beijing and greenhouse cultivation<br />

in Shannxi. Hainan island is the most important seedless watermelon<br />

production area for the winter season. Guangxi and Yunnan are the<br />

important production areas for the spring season.<br />

Table 2. Triploid seedless watermelon varieties grown in major<br />

production areas in China.<br />

Fruit type Varieties Characteristics Production areas<br />

Crimson<br />

Sweet<br />

Zhengkangwuzi No. 3,<br />

Fenglewuzi No. 2,<br />

Mihongwzui<br />

Oval-shaped Zhengkangwuzi No. 1,<br />

Cuibao No. 5, Xuefeng<br />

wuzi<br />

Sugar Baby Zhengkangwuzi No. 5,<br />

Dongting No. 1, Jinmi<br />

No. 20<br />

Hei Mi Heimi No. 5,<br />

Zhengkangwuzi No. 2,<br />

Shubao, Zhengkang<br />

2008<br />

Xin Yihao Fenglewuzi No. 3,<br />

Quality No. 1, Guangxi<br />

No. 3<br />

Yellow<br />

flesh<br />

Yellow<br />

skin<br />

Zhengkangwuzi No. 4,<br />

Xiangxigua No. 19,<br />

Mihuang wuzi,<br />

Huangbaoshi<br />

Round, dark narrow<br />

stripes on a light<br />

green background,<br />

red flesh<br />

Large, round, dark<br />

wide stripes on a light<br />

green background,<br />

red flesh<br />

Large, round, no<br />

stripes, solid dark,<br />

red flesh<br />

Large, round, dark<br />

wide stripes on a dark<br />

green background,<br />

red flesh<br />

Large, Round, Dark<br />

medium stripes on a<br />

medium green<br />

background, red flesh<br />

Large, round, yellow<br />

flesh<br />

Henan, Hubei,<br />

Jiangxi,<br />

Guangdong<br />

Henan, Hubei,<br />

Hunan, Guizhou,<br />

Xinjiang<br />

Henan, Hubei,<br />

Jiangxi, Hunan,<br />

Anhui, Guangxi,<br />

Shanxi<br />

Hunan,Hubei,<br />

Jiangxi,Anhui,<br />

Shaanxi,Beijing,<br />

Jiangsu, Hebei,<br />

Liaoning<br />

Hainan,Guangxi,<br />

Shandong<br />

Hubei, Hunan,<br />

Guangxi<br />

Jin Taiyang No. 1 Yellow rind, red flesh Sichuan, Gansu,<br />

Jiangxi, Henan<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 299


Literature Cited<br />

Liu, W. G. 2005. Review and perspectives of scientific research and production<br />

cooperation of seedless watermelon in China. China watermelon and melon.<br />

2005(2):19–20<br />

Maynard, D. N. (ed.). 2001. Watermelon. characteristics, production, and marketing.<br />

ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Tan, S. Y. (ed). 2002. Seedless watermelon culture and breeding. Agriculture Press,<br />

Beijing, China.<br />

300 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


HERBIVORY BY CUCUMBER BEETLES<br />

AFFECTS POLLEN PRODUCTION AND<br />

POLLEN PERFORMANCE IN A WILD GOURD<br />

Andrew G. Stephenson, James A. Winsor, Daolin Du,<br />

Andrew DeNicco, and Matthew Smith<br />

Department of Biology, <strong>The</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

University Park, PA 16802<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. texana, diabroticite beetles,<br />

Erwinia tracheiphila, fitness, male function, pollen competition<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> impact of herbivory and other biotic stress on fitness through<br />

the male function is rarely studied in wild plants. To examine the effects of<br />

cucumber-beetle herbivory on the male function of wild gourds (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

ssp. texana [Bailey] Andres), inbred and outbred plants from five families were<br />

grown in one-acre experimental plots for four field seasons. On these plants we<br />

nondestructively assessed foliar beetle damage and recorded staminate-flower<br />

production, pollen production per male flower, and in vitro pollen-tube growth.<br />

We also examined in vivo pollen performance in a pollen-competition<br />

experiment. Our results reveal that as beetle damage increases on plants, both<br />

pollen production and pollen performance decreases. Moreover, we found that<br />

as beetle damage increases, the probability that the plants will survive to 1<br />

September decreases, as a result of increased exposure to the causative agent of<br />

bacterial wilt disease, Erwinia tracheiphila. <strong>The</strong>se findings suggest that foliar<br />

beetle damage is likely to decrease fitness through the male function by<br />

reducing both the amount of pollen that a plant donates to conspecifics and the<br />

probability that the pollen will sire a seed after deposition onto a stigma.<br />

M<br />

ost flowering plants are hermaphrodites and consequently<br />

achieve half of their fitness through the male function<br />

(Yampolsky and Yampolsky, 1922). In cultivated species<br />

for which the flowers, fruits, or seeds are the desired commodity, there<br />

have been few studies of the impact of soil nutrients, abiotic stress,<br />

herbivory, disease, etc., on the male function. Although there have<br />

been many ecological studies using noncultivated species that have<br />

examined the effects of various environmental stresses on growth and<br />

We thank T. Kinney, J. Thaller, N. Myers, and B. Leyshon for field and greenhouse<br />

assitance; R. Oberheim and his staff for use of <strong>The</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University<br />

Agriculture Experiment Station at Rock Springs, PA (Horticulture Farms); and A.<br />

Omeis for use of the Buckhout greenhouse. This research was supported by NSF<br />

grant DEB02-35217 to AGS and JAW and by a China Scholarship Council<br />

Fellowship to DD.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 301


eproduction through the female (fruit and seed) functions, only<br />

recently have ecologists begun to study the effects of environmental<br />

stress on pollen production per flower, pollen performance, or the<br />

number of seeds sired in the population (Delph et al., 1997;<br />

Stephenson et al., 2003). This neglect is most likely due to the<br />

difficulty of assessing pollen production, pollen performance, and<br />

patterns of gene flow in species for which biochemical, molecular, and<br />

genetic resources are unavailable. Moreover, for most wild species<br />

little is known about the herbivores and even less about the pathogens<br />

that are likely to be the causes of the biotic stress.<br />

Because of the comparative wealth of resources available in<br />

cultivated species (e.g., knowledge of the full suite of herbivores and<br />

pathogens and their vectors, and of the volatile compounds;<br />

biochemical and genetic resources; and, in some cases, commercially<br />

available immunological test kits for the pathogens, transgenes for<br />

disease resistance, microarrays, and other genomic, proteomic, and<br />

metabolomic tools), ecologists have recently begun to transfer some of<br />

this information and technology to wild relatives of the cultivated<br />

species in order to address fundamental ecological and evolutionary<br />

questions (Richman et al., 1995; DeMoraes et al., 1998; Halitschke et<br />

al., 2003). Over the last five years, we have been investigating the<br />

interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease<br />

establishment and transmission in a wild gourd (free-living squash,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. texana). <strong>The</strong>se studies have revealed that there is<br />

genetic variation for resistance to cucumber beetles in families of<br />

seeds collected from the wild; that inbred plants suffer higher levels of<br />

herbivory by cucumber beetles and harbor larger aphid populations<br />

than outbred plants; that inbred plants are more likely to be infected<br />

with aphid-transmitted viral diseases than outbred plants; and that<br />

outbred plants produce more floral volatiles than inbred plants (Hayes<br />

et al., 2004; Stephenson et al., 2004; Ferrari, 2006). Here, we use data<br />

from four field seasons to examine the impact of herbivory and disease<br />

on the male function of this wild gourd.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. texana (also known as C. pepo ssp. ovifera<br />

var. texana) is an annual monoecious vine with indeterminate growth<br />

and reproduction. It is native to Texas and adjacent areas and is<br />

thought to be either the wild progenitor of the cultivated squashes (C.<br />

pepo ssp. pepo, also known as C. pepo ssp. ovifera var. ovifera) or an<br />

early escape from cultivation (Decker, 1988). When the two<br />

subspecies are grown in the same vicinity, they frequently produce<br />

hybrid progeny, and the F1 progeny are highly viable and fertile<br />

(Quesada et al., 1993).<br />

302 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


After a period of vegetative growth (5–7 nodes), the wild gourd<br />

produces one large yellow flower (either staminate or pistillate) in the<br />

axil of each leaf. <strong>The</strong> flowers last for only one morning and are<br />

pollinated by bees, especially squash bees. <strong>The</strong> leaves and other organs<br />

of the wild gourd produce bitter compounds called cucurbitacins<br />

(oxygenated tetracyclic triterpenes) that deter most herbivores<br />

(Tallamy, 1985; Metcalf and Rhodes, 1990). Interestingly,<br />

cucurbitacins are phagostimulants to cucumber beetles from the<br />

Luperini subtribes Diabroticina and Aulacophorina (Chyrsomelidae:<br />

Galerucinae). It is generally thought that by consuming cucurbitacins,<br />

cucumber beetles embitter themselves and make themselves less<br />

attractive to potential predators (Tallamy and Krischik, 1989).<br />

Furthermore, cucurbitacins may play a role in the beetle mating system<br />

(Tallamy et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong>se cucumber beetles cause a characteristic<br />

pattern of holes (typically 1–1.5cm in diameter) in the portions of the<br />

leaf serviced by the smallest veins. Aphids also feed on the leaves, leaf<br />

axils, and growing tips of the vine.<br />

Cucumber beetles and aphids are also known to transmit the most<br />

important growing-season diseases of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. Consequently, the<br />

full impact of herbivory on wild gourds includes increased exposure to<br />

a variety of pathogens. Cucumber beetles are the primary vector of the<br />

bacterial wilt pathogen Erwinia tracheiphila (Yao et al., 1996). In<br />

Pennsylvania, the bacterium is transmitted via the feeding of the<br />

striped and spotted cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittata and<br />

Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi) (Fleischer et al., 1999).<br />

Erwinia proliferates in the xylem and secretes a mucilaginous matrix<br />

that cuts off water supply, resulting in wilting and eventual death of<br />

the plant. Wilt symptoms typically develop 10–15 days following<br />

infection in mature plants and are nearly always fatal. Aphids are the<br />

sole vectors for four of the most common viral diseases of cucurbits,<br />

Cucumber mosaic virus, Papaya ringspot virus-Type W, Watermelon<br />

mosaic virus, and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

An experimental population of C. pepo ssp. texana was initiated<br />

from seeds sampled randomly from a natural population in Texas. A<br />

random sample of five progeny was used to found five maternal lines,<br />

and the remaining lines were reserved as potential pollen donors. A<br />

multiyear crossing program was used to generate plants with a range<br />

of inbreeding coefficients to study inbreeding depression in a host of<br />

traits (Stephenson et al., 2001; Hayes et al., 2005). For the purposes of<br />

this study, we were concerned only with offspring from outcrossed<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 303


matings (ƒ = 0) and first generation self-matings (ƒ = 0.5 ) in each<br />

year. In the summers of 2002–2005 we conducted field experiments to<br />

examine the effects of inbreeding and genetic variability on herbivory<br />

and patterns of disease spread. In each year, we germinated selfed and<br />

outcrossed progeny from the five maternal lines in a greenhouse and<br />

transplanted to 2–4 fields of 0.4-ha each at the Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong><br />

Agricultural Experimental Station at Rock Springs, Pennsylvania, on<br />

18–22 May. Plants were arrayed in a grid of 12 plants by 15 plants in a<br />

systematic pattern to assure mixing of genotypes.<br />

To assess the male function of each plant in each year we (1)<br />

recorded male (staminate) flower production on each plant in each<br />

field during each year two days per week until 31 August (because the<br />

flowers last only a single morning, this provides an unbiased estimate<br />

of male-flower production). (2) In late July 2002, we collected the<br />

anthers from one flower on each plant, placed them into a glass vial,<br />

and placed the vial into a drying oven. Subsequently, we counted the<br />

pollen produced by the staminate flowers using an Elzone Particle<br />

Counter (Micromeritics Corp., Norcross, GA). (3) In early August of<br />

2002, 2004, and 2005, we again collected the anthers from one flower<br />

on each plant in one field, and then brushed the pollen onto Petri plates<br />

containing a modified Brewbaker and Kwack (1963) medium with<br />

12% sucrose and 1% agar. After 20 minutes, we added a few drops of<br />

80% ethanol to stop the germination and growth of pollen tubes (see<br />

Stephenson et al., 2001). We recorded the lengths of a sample of 30<br />

pollen tubes on each plate using an image analysis system. (4) In 2003,<br />

we assessed the in vivo performance of pollen by collecting pollen<br />

from outbred plants growing in the same fields that were hand-sprayed<br />

weekly with esfenvalerate (Asana XL, DuPont Corp., Wilmington,<br />

DE) (which decreased both herbivory and disease symptoms compared<br />

to unsprayed plants; see Stephenson et al., 2004) and from unsprayed<br />

outbred plants from each of the five families used in the study. Pollen<br />

from each of the 10 combinations (5 families x 2 spray/no spray<br />

treatments) was then placed onto stigmas of an inbred line of zucchini<br />

(‘Black Beauty’) along with an equal amount of zucchini pollen<br />

(Figure 1). Three replicate pollinations of each type were made on<br />

different plants and the resulting fruits were harvested at the end of the<br />

growing season. A sample of the progeny was germinated, grown, and<br />

scored for paternity based on the shape of the ovary and other singlegene<br />

traits (see Quesada et al., 1993, for pollination and scoring<br />

techniques).<br />

Three times during the growing season (mid-June, mid-July, and<br />

mid-August) each year, we nondestructively recorded the amount of<br />

beetle damage on the new growth along the main stem of each plant<br />

304 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Fig. 1. Diagram of design of pollen-mixture experiment. Equal amounts of wildgourd<br />

pollen and zucchini pollen were placed onto zucchini stigmas.<br />

using a 0–5 scale in which 0 = most leaves with no beetle damage and<br />

no leaf with more than 5% of the leaf area removed, and 5 = all leaves<br />

damaged and at least one leaf with > 50% of the leaf area removed<br />

(Stephenson et al., 2004). Similarly, two times during the 2002<br />

growing season (late June and early August), we nondestructively<br />

recorded symptoms of viral infection on a 0–5 scale by inspecting the<br />

leaves on the new growth along the main stem. During the twiceweekly<br />

flower counts (above) in each field during each year, we also<br />

recorded the onset of bacterial wilt symptoms and the date in which<br />

the plant died (bacterial wilt disease is 100% fatal once visual<br />

symptoms appear).<br />

Separate analyses of variance were conducted for the three<br />

components of male reproductive output (staminate flowers/plant,<br />

pollen/flower, and in vitro pollen-tube growth) using a mixed-effects<br />

ANOVA (Proc GLM, SAS Institute Inc., 2002). Type III sums of<br />

squares were used to test the significance of family (random), f (the<br />

coefficient of inbreeding, 0 or 0.5), beetle damage (a covariate<br />

summed for the three dates that it was assessed), and the two-way<br />

interactions. For brevity, the results and discussion will focus only on<br />

the effects of beetle damage on the male function.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 305


Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of our mixed-effects model analysis of variance using<br />

only those plants that survived until 31 August revealed that beetle<br />

damage had no significant effect on staminate-flower production<br />

(F1,606 = 0.47; p > 0.10). However, when we analyzed the data using all<br />

plants that survived to 1 July (the approximate date of first flower<br />

production in each year), we found that beetle damage significantly<br />

decreased staminate-flower production (F1,1076 = 5.22; p < 0.003).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se findings suggest that the plants that died prior to the end of the<br />

growing season had significantly higher levels of beetle damage than<br />

the plants that survived. In fact, a preliminary analysis that will be<br />

explored in more detail in another publication indicates that the plants<br />

that died in the month following each assessment of beetle damage had<br />

significantly higher levels of beetle damage than those that survived.<br />

In our fields, the greatest cause of mortality during the growing season<br />

was due to E. tracheiphila—a pathogen that is vectored by cucumber<br />

beetles. In the four years of this study, 8 to 35% of the plants died after<br />

exhibiting symptoms of wilt disease before 31 August (Ferrari, 2006).<br />

Our analyses of variance also reveal that beetle damage<br />

significantly decreases both pollen production per flower (F1,112 = 4.70;<br />

p < 0.04) and in vitro pollen-tube growth rate (F1,396 = 4.48; p < 0.04).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se findings indicate that beetle damage decreases total pollen<br />

production per plant even though those plants that survive to August<br />

do not differ in total staminate-flower production. Consequently,<br />

damaged plants have fewer pollen grains to donate to conspecifics.<br />

Moreover, the in vitro pollen-tube-growth data suggest that as beetle<br />

damage increases on plants, the plants have fewer or lower quality<br />

resources for their developing pollen grains (Delph et al., 1997;<br />

Stephenson et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> amount of stored nutrient and energy<br />

compounds, in turn, affects the growth of pollen tubes in vitro and the<br />

initial (autotrophic phase) growth of pollen tubes in vivo (Stephenson<br />

et al., 2003). A chi-square ANOVA (Proc CATMOD; SAS Institute,<br />

2002) reveals that pollen produced from sprayed plants (plants with<br />

significantly less cucumber beetle and aphid herbivory and<br />

significantly lower levels of the diseases transmitted by aphids and<br />

cucumber beetles; Stephenson et al., 2004) sired significantly more<br />

seeds (53%) in competition with zucchini pollen than pollen from<br />

nonsprayed plants (37%).<br />

Although the male function of cultivated species rarely merits<br />

attention, the ecological impacts of biotic stress on the male function<br />

and its evolutionary implications are very important to their<br />

noncultivated relatives. <strong>The</strong> findings from this study suggest that<br />

306 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


damage by cucumber beetles can impact fitness by decreasing pollen<br />

production, which in turn decreases the probability that a plant’s<br />

pollen will be deposited onto stigmas of conspecifics. Moreover, the in<br />

vitro pollen-tube-growth data and the in vivo pollen-competition data<br />

suggest that beetle damage decreases the probability that those pollen<br />

grains that are deposited onto a stigma will actually get their genes into<br />

the next generation. Because studies of the wild species in the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae can draw upon the comparative wealth of information<br />

and resources that are available in the cultivated species, it is likely<br />

that the wild relatives will become important as model systems for<br />

addressing basic issues in evolutionary biology, disease ecology, and<br />

population genetics.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Brewbaker, J. L. and B. H. Kwack. 1963. <strong>The</strong> essential role of calcium ion in pollen<br />

germination and pollen tube growth. Amer. J. Bot. 50:747–758.<br />

Decker, D. S. 1988. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a-pepo<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 42:4–15.<br />

Delph, L. F., M. H. Jóhannsson, and A. G. Stephenson. 1997. How environmental<br />

factors affect pollen performance: ecological and evolutionary perspectives.<br />

Ecology. 78:1632–1639.<br />

DeMoraes, C. M., W. J. Lewis, P. W. Paré, H. T. Alborn and J. H. Tumlinson. 1998.<br />

Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasites. Nature. 393:570–573.<br />

Ferrari, M. 2006. Mixing models and the geometry of epidemics. PhD Diss., Ecology<br />

Program, Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University, University Park, PA.<br />

Fleischer, S. J., D. de Mackiewicz, F. E. Gildow, and F. L. Lukezic. 1999.<br />

Serological estimates of the seasonal dynamics of Erwinia tracheiphila in<br />

Acalymma vittata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Env. Ent. 28:470–476.<br />

Halitschke, R., K. Gase, D. Hui, D. D. Schmidt, and I. T. Baldwin. 2003. Molecular<br />

interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera,<br />

Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VI. microarray analysis<br />

reveals that most herbivore-specific transcriptional changes are mediated by<br />

fatty acid-amino acid conjugates. Plant Phys. 131:1894–1902.<br />

Hayes, C. N., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. 2004. Inbreeding influences<br />

herbivory in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp texana (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Oecologia. 140:601–<br />

608.<br />

Hayes, C. N., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. 2005. A comparison of male and<br />

female responses to inbreeding in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo subsp Texana<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92:107–115.<br />

Metcalf, R. L. and A. M. Rhodes. 1990. Coevolution of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Luperini<br />

(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): basic and applied aspects, p. 167–182. In: D. M.<br />

Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey (eds.). Biology and utilizaton of the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.<br />

Quesada, M. R., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. 1993. Effects of pollen<br />

competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous <strong>Cucurbit</strong>. Amer. Nat.<br />

142:694–706.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 307


Richman, A. D., T-H. Kao, S. W. Schaeffer, and M. K. Uyenoyama. 1995. S-allele<br />

sequence diversity in natural populations of Solanum carolinense (horsenettle).<br />

Heredity. 75:405–415.<br />

SAS Institute. 2002. SAS user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC<br />

Stephenson, A. G., B. Leyshon, S. E. Travers, C. N. Hayes, and J. A. Winsor. 2004.<br />

Interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease on reproduction in a<br />

wild gourd. Ecology. 85:3023–3034.<br />

Stephenson, A. G., C. N. Hayes, M. H. Johannsson, and J. A. Winsor. 2001. <strong>The</strong><br />

performance of microgametophytes is affected by inbreeding depression and<br />

hybrid vigor in the sporophytic generation. Sex. Plant Repro. 14:77–83.<br />

Stephenson, A. G., S. E. Travers, J. I. Mena-Ali, and J. A. Winsor. 2003. Pollen<br />

performance before and during the autotrophic-heterotrophic transition of pollen<br />

tube growth. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 358:1009–1018.<br />

Tallamy, D. W. 1985. Squash beetle feeding behavior: an adaptation against induced<br />

cucurbit defenses. Ecology. 66:1574–1579.<br />

Tallamy, D. W. and V. A. Krischik. 1989. Variation and function of cucurbitacins in<br />

Curcurbita: an examination of current hypotheses. Amer. Nat. 133:766–786.<br />

Tallamy, D. W., B. E. Powell, and J. A. McClafferty. 2002. Male traits under cryptic<br />

female choice in the spotted cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).<br />

Behav. Ecol. 13:511–518.<br />

Yao, C. B., G. Zehnder, E. Bauske, and J. Klopper. 1996. Relationship between<br />

cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) density and incidence of bacterial<br />

wilt of cucurbits. J. Econ. Ent. 89:510–514.<br />

Yampolsky, C. and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the<br />

phanerogamic flora. Bibl. Genet. 3:1–62.<br />

308 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


WHITEFLY TRANSMISSION OF A NEW<br />

VIRUS INFECTING CUCURBITS IN FLORIDA<br />

Susan E. Webb<br />

University of Florida, Entomology and Nematology Department,<br />

Gainesville, FL 32611-0620<br />

Scott Adkins<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s Department of Agriculture-Agricultural<br />

Research Service, Fort Pierce, FL<br />

Carlye A. Baker<br />

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services,<br />

Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. Citrullus lanatus,<br />

Bemisia tabaci, Potyviridae<br />

ABSTRACT. A virus isolated from squash collected in Hillsborough County, FL<br />

in 2003 was subsequently determined to be an ipomovirus. <strong>The</strong> virus was<br />

transmitted by the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci B strain, in laboratory<br />

experiments. <strong>The</strong> virus was acquired by whiteflies after a 3-h access period on<br />

infected plants. After sequential inoculation access periods on healthy seedlings,<br />

whiteflies (15–20 per clip cage) transmitted the virus during the second and<br />

subsequent access periods, with the highest rate of transmission during the<br />

second access period (2–4h postacquisition). A limited host-range study<br />

suggested that the virus is restricted to cucurbits. All <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species tested<br />

showed vein yellowing and were stunted compared to healthy controls. <strong>The</strong><br />

Cucumis species tested showed transient vein yellowing and apparent recovery.<br />

Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) leaves yellowed, petioles collapsed, and plants<br />

became necrotic and died 7–10 days after inoculation. <strong>The</strong> relationship between<br />

this virus and the highly damaging disease known in Florida as mature<br />

watermelon vine decline is being explored.<br />

D<br />

uring a survey of cucurbit viruses in Florida from 2000 to<br />

2003 (Webb et al., 2003), leaf samples were collected from a<br />

field of yellow summer squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) in<br />

Hillsborough County. All samples were tested by DAS ELISA for the<br />

common cucurbit viruses in Florida (Watermelon mosaic virus 2,<br />

Zucchini yellow mosaic virus, Papaya ringspot virus watermelon<br />

strain [PRSV-W]) and for five other viruses that have been found<br />

occasionally (Cucumber mosaic virus, Watermelon leaf mottle virus,<br />

Tobacco streak virus, Squash mosaic virus, Tomato spotted wilt virus).<br />

Of the 40 samples tested from the field, 39 tested positive for PRSV-<br />

W and one was negative for all 8 viruses, although it had symptoms<br />

typical of a viral infection (Whidden and Webb, 2004). This sample<br />

was used to mechanically inoculate 'Prelude II' squash, and the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 309


esulting infection maintained in the greenhouse for further study by<br />

weekly transfer to fresh plants.<br />

Tissue samples were sent to Agdia (Elkhart, IN) to be tested for 14<br />

viruses, including 6 of the viruses for which we had already tested.<br />

Results, including those from a general potyvirus test, were negative.<br />

Agdia also performed group tests, using PCR, for carmoviruses,<br />

nepoviruses, and geminiviruses, with negative results. Our initial<br />

efforts to detect viral inclusions in epidermal strips (Christie and<br />

Edwardson, 1994) and to detect particles in leaf dip preparations by<br />

electron microscopy were not successful. However, we were later able<br />

to purify the virus, and preliminary sequence comparisons showed that<br />

it was an ipomovirus (unpublished data), a genus in the family<br />

Potyviridae whose members are transmitted by whiteflies (Bemisia<br />

tabaci).<br />

Experiments described in this paper confirm that the virus found in<br />

Florida is also transmitted by whiteflies and begin host-range<br />

comparisons with the other ipomovirus found in cucurbits in Europe<br />

and the Middle East, Cucumber vein yellowing virus (CVYV) (Al-<br />

Musa et al., 1985; Cuadrado et al., 2001; Harpaz and Cohen, 1965;<br />

Louro et al., 2004; Yilmaz et al., 1989).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

WHITEFLIES, PLANTS, AND VIRUS. Adult whiteflies (Bemisia<br />

argentifolii Bellows & Perring, also known as the B strain of Bemisia<br />

tabaci) of mixed ages (newly enclosed to 4d old) were obtained from a<br />

colony maintained on cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. (‘DPL 90’) and<br />

collard, Brassica oleracea var. acephala (‘Georgia’) as described by<br />

Chen et al. (2004).<br />

<strong>The</strong> yellow crookneck squash cultivar ‘Prelude II’, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

L. (Seminis Seeds, Oxnard, CA) was used for all experiments. Plants<br />

were grown in a 3:1 (vol/vol) mixture of Metro-Mix Ag Lite Mix (Sun<br />

Gro Horticulture, Bellevue, WA) and pasteurized sand (Quikrete C.,<br />

Atlanta, GA).<br />

Virus was maintained in ‘Prelude II’ plants in the greenhouse by<br />

mechanical transmission, using 20mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH<br />

7.0) containing 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium sulfite and 1% (wt/vol) Celite.<br />

<strong>The</strong> culture used for transmission experiments was started from<br />

purified virus.<br />

TRANSMISSION EXPERIMENTS. An infected source plant (10d<br />

postinoculation) and a healthy plant of the same age were placed in<br />

separate cages (61cm x 61cm x 61cm) consisting of frames<br />

constructed of PVC pipe (1.3cm diameter) enclosed in organdy covers.<br />

310 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Approximately 100 adult whiteflies were added to each cage for a 24-h<br />

acquisition period. At the end of that time, six 2-w-old squash plants<br />

were added to each cage. Plants were removed from the cages after 2d<br />

and moved to a greenhouse after the remaining adult whiteflies were<br />

destroyed. Plants were monitored for symptom development for 10d.<br />

A second experiment was done to compare the level of<br />

transmission and retention time after a much shorter acquisition access<br />

period with fewer whiteflies based on the results of Mansour and Al-<br />

Musa (1993) with a Jordanian isolate of CVYV, one of the three<br />

described ipomoviruses. Five source plants, 10d postinoculation with<br />

strong vein yellowing symptoms, were placed in one of the cages<br />

described above. Approximately 2000 whiteflies were released in the<br />

cage. A second cage, set up in a different room, contained mockinoculated<br />

healthy plants and approximately 500 whiteflies. After a 3h<br />

acquisition access period, whiteflies were aspirated into glass tubes<br />

using a hand-operated vacuum pump and transferred to cylindrical<br />

polystyrene clip cages that were screened on both top and bottom with<br />

a mesh that allowed feeding and oviposition through the mesh, but did<br />

not allow whiteflies to escape. Approximately 15–20 whiteflies were<br />

placed in each of 25 cages. Each cage was clipped to the youngest<br />

expanded leaf of a healthy 20-d-old squash plant, so that whiteflies had<br />

access to the underside of the leaf. After 2h, cages were removed and<br />

placed on a second set of plants. After 2h on the second set of 25<br />

plants, cages were moved to a third set of plants and left overnight<br />

(16h). <strong>The</strong> cages were moved to a fourth set of plants for 2h on the<br />

following morning. Control plants were exposed to whiteflies that had<br />

access to the mock-inoculated plants for 22h. Plants were moved to a<br />

greenhouse and treated with pymetrozine (Fulfill, Syngenta,<br />

Greensboro, NC). Presence or absence of symptoms was monitored for<br />

12d and samples of all plants were tested by RT-PCR (unpublished)<br />

for the presence of virus.<br />

HOST RANGE. Fifteen species in six families were mechanically<br />

inoculated with the virus. Twenty plants of each species were grown<br />

from seed in the greenhouse in the growing medium described earlier<br />

and monitored for typical symptoms for 2 to 3w after inoculation.<br />

Tissue from some plants of each species not showing symptoms was<br />

used to mechanically inoculate ‘Prelude II’, which was observed for<br />

2w for symptom development.<br />

Results<br />

WHITEFLY TRANSMISSION. In the initial whitefly transmission<br />

experiment, 3 of 6 plants developed typical vein clearing symptoms,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 311


eginning 8d after exposure to whiteflies. Infection was confirmed by<br />

RT-PCR (data not shown).<br />

In the second experiment, no plants from the first 2-h inoculation<br />

access period developed symptoms. Of the 25 plants from the second<br />

inoculation access period (2–4h postacquisition), 3 developed typical<br />

symptoms. One of 25 plants in the third access period (4–20h<br />

postacquisition) developed symptoms, and no plants in the last group<br />

(20–22h postacquisition) showed any symptoms. However, when<br />

plants were tested by RT-PCR, 1 additional plant without symptoms<br />

from the third time period was positive, as were 2 of the plants from<br />

the final time period.<br />

HOST RANGE. Only plants in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae developed<br />

symptoms (Table 1) and only <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species and Luffa acutangula<br />

developed strong, systemic vein clearing (Figure 1). Cucumber,<br />

Cucumis sativus, and Cucumis melo showed vein-clearing symptoms<br />

on only the first leaf to develop after inoculation. Virus could be<br />

occasionally recovered from this leaf by using it to mechanically<br />

inoculate ‘Prelude II’. When watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) was<br />

inoculated, the first symptoms consisted of yellowing of the youngest<br />

leaves and petioles, followed by collapse of the petioles, and finally<br />

necrosis and death of the whole plant (Figure 2).<br />

Table 1. Experimental host range of new ipomovirus.<br />

Family Species Common name Symptoms a<br />

Amaranthaceae Gomphrena<br />

globosa<br />

Globe amaranth -<br />

Chenopodiaceae Chenopodium<br />

-<br />

amaranticolor<br />

Cruciferae Brassica oleracea<br />

var acephala cv.<br />

Georgia<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae Citrullus lanatus<br />

cv. Sangria<br />

Citrullus lanatus<br />

cv. Crimson Sweet<br />

Cucumis melo cv.<br />

Athena<br />

Cucumis sativus<br />

cv. Dasher II<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima<br />

cv. Big Max<br />

Collard -<br />

Watermelon SWN<br />

Watermelon SWN<br />

Muskmelon TVY<br />

Cucumber -<br />

Pumpkin VY<br />

312 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1 cont’d<br />

Family Species Common name Symptoms a<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata cv. El<br />

Calabaza VY<br />

Dorado<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

cv. Prelude II<br />

Yellow<br />

crookneck<br />

squash<br />

Luffa acutangula Luffa VY<br />

Fabaceae Phaseolus<br />

vulgaris cv. Bush<br />

Blue Lake<br />

Green bean -<br />

Pisum sativum cv.<br />

Alaska Pea<br />

English pea -<br />

Solanaceae Nicotiana<br />

benthamiana<br />

-<br />

Lycopersicum<br />

esculentum cv.<br />

Sunny<br />

Tomato -<br />

Datura<br />

stramonium<br />

Jimson weed -<br />

a<br />

Symptoms on uninoculated leaves: = no infection, TVY = transient vein yellowing,<br />

VY = vein yellowing, SWN = systemic wilt and necrosis.<br />

VY<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> new ipomovirus isolated from squash is transmitted by<br />

silverleaf whitefly, a common pest of cucurbits in Florida. <strong>The</strong><br />

efficiency of transmission was low (50%) in our first experiment, even<br />

when whiteflies (100 per 6 plants) were given free access to plants for<br />

relatively long periods of time. Mansour and Al-Musa (1993) found a<br />

similar level of transmission (56%) of CVYV when they used 15–20<br />

whiteflies and 24-h acquisition and inoculation access periods. To<br />

begin to determine the lower limits of acquisition and inoculation<br />

access times and the period of retention of the virus, we allowed<br />

whiteflies a 3-h acquisition access period followed by several serial<br />

inoculation access periods. That we obtained transmission under these<br />

conditions suggests that it does not take long for whiteflies to acquire<br />

the virus. <strong>The</strong> very low rates of transmission (a high of 12% at 2–4 h<br />

postacquisition) suggest that either the screened clip cages interfered<br />

with transmission, or that there were not enough actively feeding<br />

whiteflies to attain higher levels of transmission. However, it was<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 313


Fig. 1. Symptoms on squash, ‘Prelude II’.<br />

Fig. 2. Symptoms on watermelon, ‘Crimson Sweet’.<br />

314 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


surprising to find plants that tested positive for virus by PCR in the<br />

group receiving whiteflies that were 20h postacquisition. Both<br />

Mansour and Al-Musa (1993) and Harpaz and Cohen (1965) found<br />

that whiteflies were unable to transmit CVYV after 6h.<br />

Harpaz and Cohen (1965) found that, for CVYV, a <strong>complete</strong> cycle<br />

of acquisition and inoculation could be <strong>complete</strong>d within 60 min. This<br />

and the short time that the whiteflies remained viruliferous led them to<br />

suggest a semipersistent mode of transmission. We are now beginning<br />

a systematic exploration of the transmission parameters of the Florida<br />

ipomovirus in order to more fully compare it with CVYV and to<br />

develop management recommendations for growers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> host range of the virus so far appears to be limited to the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Unlike CVYV, which causes yellowing, stunting, and<br />

sudden plant death in Cucumis melo (Louro et al., 2004), the Florida<br />

ipomovirus causes only mild and transitory vein yellowing in melon.<br />

In contrast, infection of watermelon results in death of the plant. A<br />

mature watermelon vine decline and fruit rot has resulted in serious<br />

crop losses in Florida in the past few years (Roberts et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />

virus described in this paper has been found in watermelon in a limited<br />

survey (unpublished data) and may be the causal agent of the disease.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Al-Musa, A. M., S. J. Qusus, and A. N. Mansour. 1985. Cucumber vein yellowing<br />

virus on cucumber in Jordan. Plant Dis. 69:361.<br />

Chen, J., H. J. McAuslane, R. B. Carle, and S. E. Webb. 2004. Effects of Bemisia<br />

argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation and squash silverleaf disorder<br />

on zucchini yield and quality. J. Econ. Entomol. 97:2083–2094.<br />

Christie, R. G. and J. R. Edwardson. 1994. Light and electron microscopy of plant<br />

virus inclusions. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural<br />

Sciences. Monograph 9, rev.<br />

Cuadrado, I. M., D. Janssen, L. Velasco, L. Ruiz, and E. Segundo. 2001. First report<br />

of cucumber vein yellowing virus in Spain. Plant Dis. 85:336.<br />

Harpaz, I. and S. Cohen. 1965. Semipersistent relationship between cucumber vein<br />

yellowing virus (CVYV) and its vector, the tobacco whitefly (Bemisia tabaci<br />

Gennadius). Phytopathol. Z. 54:240–248.<br />

Louro, D., A. Quinot, E. Neto, J. E. Fernandes, D. Marian, M. Vecchiati, P. Caciagli,<br />

and A. M. Vaira. 2004. Occurrence of cucumber vein yellowing virus in<br />

cucurbitaceous species in southern Portugal. Plant Pathol. 53:241.<br />

Mansour, A. and A. Al-Musa. 1993. Cucumber vein yellowing virus; host range and<br />

virus vector relationships. J. Phytopathol. 137:73–78.<br />

Roberts, P., R. M. Muchovej, P. Gilreath, G. McAvoy, C. A. Baker, and S. Adkins.<br />

2004. Mature vine decline and fruit rot of watermelon. Citrus and Vegetable<br />

Magazine. Dec. 12.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 315


Webb, S. E., E. Hiebert, and T. A. Kucharek. 2003. Identity and distribution of<br />

viruses infecting cucurbits in Florida. Phytopathology. 93:S89(Abstr.)<br />

Whidden, A. and S. Webb. 2004. Virus in yellow squash in Hillsborough County.<br />

Vegetarian 4(1). Horticultural Sciences Dept., Vegetable Crops Extension<br />

Newsletter, University of Florida, Gainesville.<br />

.<br />

Yilmaz, M. A., M. Ozaslan, and D. Ozaslan. 1989. Cucumber vein yellowing virus<br />

in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae in Turkey. Plant Dis. 73:610.<br />

316 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


GENETIC DIVERSITY AND PHYLOGENETIC<br />

RELATIONSHIP AMONG MELON<br />

ACCESSIONS FROM AFRICA AND ASIA<br />

REVEALED BY RAPD ANALYSIS<br />

Y. Akashi, K. Tanaka, H. Nishida, and K. Kato<br />

Faculty of Agriculture, Okayama University, 1-1-1 Tsushima, Naka,<br />

Okayama, Japan<br />

M. T. Khaing, S. S. Yi, and T. T. Chou<br />

Vegetable and Fruit Research and Development Center (VFRDC),<br />

Yemon, Indaingpo, Hlecuts, Yangon, Myanmar<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, Group conomon, polyphyletic<br />

origin, small-seed type, transmission route,<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> genetic diversity of melon from the Middle East and Africa was<br />

studied by RAPD analysis, and compared with that of Asian landraces.<br />

Polymorphic index was higher in Africa, Middle East, and India, and decreased<br />

toward East Asia. A total of 291 samples were classified into seven clusters,<br />

among which Cluster II consisted of the conomon group and small-seed type of<br />

East India and Southeast Asia. Cluster III consisted mostly of the small-seed<br />

type of areas from Yunnan (China) to Pakistan, as well as the southern part of<br />

Africa. Cluster V consisted mostly of the large-seed type from Southeast Asia to<br />

the Middle East and <strong>North</strong> Africa. Cluster VII consisted of the small-seed type<br />

from the central and southern parts of Africa. From these results, it appeared<br />

that the small-seed type was transmitted from the southern part of Africa to<br />

India, and that the primitive form of Group Conomon originated in East India.<br />

Another type of melon introduced from <strong>North</strong> Africa to Europe and India via<br />

the Middle East was the large-seed type. Small- and large-seed melons appeared<br />

to be established allopatrically and then differentiated into several varieties.<br />

M<br />

elon (Cucumis melo L.) is an important horticultural crop<br />

cultivated in various areas of the world. Great morphological<br />

variation exists in melon for fruit characteristics such as size,<br />

shape, color, and taste of the fruit. <strong>The</strong>refore, C. melo is considered to<br />

be the most diversified species in the genus Cucumis (Bates and<br />

Robinson, 1995). Melon cultivars commonly cultivated in Europe and<br />

America are classified as Group Cantalupensis or Group Inodorus,<br />

We would like to thank K. R. Reitsma, Iowa <strong>State</strong> University, for kindly supplying<br />

the seed. This study was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for International<br />

Scientific Research of Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, Japan<br />

(No. 15255011), titled “Genetic Assay and Study of Crop Germplasm In and Around<br />

China”. This is Contribution number 5 from the Sato Project of Research Institute for<br />

Humanity and Nature (RIHN), Japan.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 317


and are characterized by sweet flesh and seeds longer than 9.0mm<br />

(large-seed type). Other groups of melon, such as flexuosus,<br />

momordica, chito (dudaim), and Group Conomon, are cultivated in the<br />

Middle East, and are characterized by smooth skin and small seeds<br />

shorter than 9mm (small-seed type).<br />

<strong>The</strong> genetic relationship among different types of melon has been<br />

analyzed in various ways. Fujishita et al. (1993) classified melon<br />

accessions into three groups by the expression of bitterness in the<br />

young fruit placenta of intraspecific F1 hybrids. Cultivated and wild<br />

melons in East Asia were both classified as Type I, which was different<br />

from Type III (South and Southeast Asia) and Type II (the other areas<br />

including the western part of East Asia). Stepansky et al. (1999)<br />

detected the largest divergence between <strong>North</strong> American and European<br />

melon and Asian melon. Furthermore, Akashi et al. (2002) and<br />

McCreight et al. (2004) evaluated genetic variation in East and South<br />

Asian melon by the analysis of isozyme, and indicated that Indian<br />

melon was richer in genetic diversity compared with those in East<br />

Asia. Akashi et al. (2002) also suggested that Group Conomon could<br />

have originated from the small-seed type melon (


from Africa, using USDA-GRIN database, indicated that a dessert-type<br />

melon is cultivated in the northern part of Africa, while melons with<br />

small seeds and a sour taste are common in the southern part of Africa.<br />

Genetic differentiation among melon accessions from northern and<br />

central parts of Africa and those from the southern part of Africa was<br />

confirmed by RAPD analysis (Mliki et al., 2001).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, in this study, RAPD polymorphism was surveyed for<br />

melon accessions from the Middle East and Africa, and genetic<br />

diversity and phylogenetic relationships among local melon<br />

populations were investigated by integrating RAPD data of Asian<br />

landraces (Tanaka et al., unpublished) and cytoplasmic genotype<br />

(Tanaka et al., 2006). <strong>The</strong> origin and transmission routes of cultivated<br />

melon were also considered.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIALS. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) accessions<br />

examined in the present study were 108 landraces collected from<br />

various areas of the world, consisting of 31 landraces from Africa, 20<br />

from the Middle East, 1 from Southeast Asia, 51 from South Asia, and<br />

5 from East Asia. In addition, 2 accessions of C. sativus. var.<br />

hardwickii were examined as wild relatives distributed in India. <strong>The</strong><br />

details of plant materials are shown in Table 1. All landraces of<br />

unknown variety were classified into large-seed type (≥9.0 mm) and<br />

small-seed type (


Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> proportion of melon accessions having small seeds in the<br />

present study was 0% in the northern part of Africa and 15% in the<br />

Middle East (Table 1), as low as in Europe and America where the<br />

small-seed type is not cultivated. On the other hand, the proportion<br />

increased drastically in areas east of the Middle East, being 67.6% in<br />

South Asia, 73.3% in Southeast Asia, and 100% in East Asia. It was<br />

also different within Africa; nearly as high as in South and East Asia in<br />

the central (90.9%) and southern (73.3%) parts, and <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />

different from that in the northern part (0%). <strong>The</strong> same pattern of<br />

geographical distribution was observed by the analysis of seed-weight<br />

data of 7396 samples obtained from USDA-GRIN database.<br />

Twenty-seven polymorphic bands observed by Tanaka et al.<br />

(unpublished) were produced using 18 random primers. Polymorphic<br />

index (PI) within each population was calculated, and the highest PI<br />

was observed in the large-seed type from India (average = 0.300) and<br />

in accessions from the Middle East (0.300). On the other hand, PI was<br />

0.2 0.1<br />

0<br />

Africa-South-L<br />

Japan-S<br />

Korea-S<br />

China-S<br />

Maldives-S<br />

Yunnan-S<br />

Myanmar-S<br />

India-East-S<br />

India-Center-S a<br />

India-South-S<br />

India-West-S<br />

Southeast Asia-S<br />

Nepal and Bangladesh-S<br />

Myanmar-L<br />

India-East-L<br />

India-<strong>North</strong>-L<br />

India-Center-L b<br />

India-South-L<br />

India-<strong>North</strong>-S<br />

India-West-L<br />

Pakistan<br />

Middle East-S<br />

Africa-Center-S<br />

Africa-South-S<br />

Southeast Asia-L<br />

Middle East-L<br />

Africa-<strong>North</strong>-L<br />

Fig. 1. Genetic relationship between 27 populations of melon landraces, as<br />

revealed by cluster analysis with UPGMA method based on RAPD. L = largeseed<br />

type; S = small-seed type.<br />

320 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

V


0.221 and 0.222 in large- and small-seed-type populations from Africa,<br />

respectively, as high as those in the small-seed type from India and<br />

accessions from Southeast Asia. However, PI calculated from the<br />

pooled data of all accessions from Africa was 0.399, and as high as<br />

those in the Middle East (0.323) and India (0.332).<br />

Genetic distance between 27 populations of local melon ranged<br />

from 0.013 to 0.729 and was 0.229 on average. Twenty-seven<br />

populations were classified into five clusters using cluster analysis<br />

based on GD (Fig. 1). Cluster I consisted of a large-seed-type<br />

population from the southern part of Africa. Cluster II consisted of<br />

three populations of Group Conomon from East Asia. Cluster III was a<br />

large cluster consisting of populations from India, Myanmar, and<br />

Southeast Asia, further divided into subclusters based on their seed<br />

size: IIIa, small-seeded, and IIIb, large-seeded. Clusters IV and V<br />

consisted of populations from the Middle East and Africa, and they<br />

were divided based on their seed size rather than by their cultivated<br />

area. As summarized above, melon populations from geographically<br />

related areas were grouped together and divided into subclusters based<br />

on their seed size. As to melon populations from Africa, they were<br />

divided into two clusters, and the small-seed type from central and<br />

southern parts of Africa was closely related with South and East Asian<br />

melons rather than with the large-seed type from the northern part of<br />

Africa.<br />

By principal coordinate analysis (PCO) based on similarity matrix<br />

among each group, up to 53.5% of the total variation was explained by<br />

the first two eigenvectors, which accounted for 37.4% and 16.1%,<br />

respectively. Melon populations were mostly separated into small- and<br />

large-seed types by the first principal axis (Fig. 2). In contrast, by the<br />

second principal axis, populations were separated by the area of origin;<br />

one group of Africa, Middle East, and East Asia and another group of<br />

India and Southeast Asia. Interestingly, the small-seed type of East<br />

Asia and South Asia appeared close to that of southern Africa on the<br />

PCO-plot, though these populations were clustered rather distantly by<br />

UPGMA methods. <strong>The</strong> close relationship can be seen from GD for the<br />

small-seed type from southern Africa and small-seed type from India<br />

and Southeast Asia, which ranged from 0.122 to 0.294 and was 0.166<br />

on average.<br />

Genetic relationship among the 291 samples was visualized by<br />

cluster analysis, and they were classified into seven clusters. <strong>The</strong><br />

number of melon accessions classified into each cluster is summarized<br />

in Table 1. Cluster II consisted of Group Conomon from East Asia, and<br />

also included the small-seed type of East India and Southeast Asia.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 321


PCO 2<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

-0.2<br />

×<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4<br />

PCO 1<br />

Fig. 2. Principal coordinate plot of first two axes based on the genetic similarity<br />

matrix of 27 populations of melon landraces from Africa to Asia, based on<br />

RAPD. Geographical group of each population is indicated by the following<br />

symbols: = East Asia; = Southeast Asia, Myanmar, Nepal, and<br />

Bangladesh; × = Pakistan and the Middle East; = Africa; = India;.<br />

Black and open symbols indicate small- and large-seed type, respectively.<br />

Cluster III consisted mostly of the small-seed type (85.7%) of the areas<br />

from Yunnan in China to Pakistan, and also included small-seed type<br />

of southern Africa. Cluster V consisted mostly of the large-seed type<br />

(69.0%) of the areas from Southeast Asia to the Middle East; the largeseed<br />

type of <strong>North</strong> Africa was also included. Cluster VII consisted of<br />

the small-seed type from central and southern parts of Africa and C.<br />

sativus var. hardwickii.<br />

Tanaka et al. (2006) analyzed PS-ID sequence of the chloroplast<br />

genome for 221 accessions among 291 accessions examined in this<br />

study, and determined their cytoplasmic genotype. Most of the<br />

accessions of Clusters II and III proved to be of A-type, and their<br />

proportion was 93.2% and 90.4%, respectively, suggesting that smallseed-type<br />

accessions of both clusters belong to the same maternal<br />

lineage, which is different from that of the large-seed type. <strong>The</strong> results<br />

summarized in Table 1 indicate that small-seeded melons from<br />

southern Africa seemed to relate with those from India, as also<br />

suggested by Mliki et al. (2001). Small-seeded melons from East India<br />

seemed to relate with Group Conomon from China, Korea, and Japan,<br />

as also indicated by Yashiro et al. (2005) and Tanaka et al.<br />

(unpublished). Based on these results, we propose the following<br />

hypothesis about the transmission route of small and large seed types:<br />

<strong>The</strong> A-type with small seeds was transmitted from southern Africa to<br />

322 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

×<br />

×


Table 1. Number of melon accessions classified into seven<br />

clusters in each population.<br />

Country Area<br />

Seed<br />

size<br />

Cluster<br />

No. of<br />

accessions I II III IV V VI VII<br />

Africa<br />

Algeria <strong>North</strong> L 1 - - - - 1 - -<br />

Egypt <strong>North</strong> L 5 - - - - 5 - -<br />

Mali <strong>North</strong> L 1 - - - - 1 - -<br />

Morocco <strong>North</strong> L 2 - - - - 2 - -<br />

Cameroon Center S 2 - - - - - - 2<br />

Chad Center S 1 - - - - - - 1<br />

Ghana Center S 1 - - - - - - 1<br />

Senegal Center S 5 - - - - 1 - 4<br />

Sierra Leone Center L 1 - - - - 1 - -<br />

Sudan Center S 1 - - - - - - 1<br />

South Africa South L 2 - - 1 - 1 - -<br />

Zimbabwe South S 5 - - 3 - - - 2<br />

Zambia South L+S 4 - - 1 - - - 3<br />

Middle East<br />

Afghanistan L 5 - - - - 3 - 2<br />

Iran L+S 5 - - 1 - 4 - -<br />

Iraq L+S 2 1 - - - 1 - -<br />

Lebanon L 2 - - 1 - 1 - -<br />

Syria L 2 - - - - 2 - -<br />

Turkey L 4 - - - - 4 - -<br />

South Asia<br />

Nepal L 6 - - 5 - 1 - -<br />

Maldives S 4 - - 4 - - - -<br />

Bangladesh L+S 12 - - 10 - 2 - -<br />

Pakistan S 4 - - 2 - 2 - -<br />

India West L 10 - - 2 2 4 - 2<br />

<strong>North</strong> L 9 - - 2 - 5 2 -<br />

Center L 6 - - 2 1 3 - -<br />

South L 10 - - 1 - 8 - -<br />

East L 13 - 1 3 1 8 - -<br />

India West S 10 - - 7 1 2 - -<br />

<strong>North</strong> S 7 - - 2 2 3 - -<br />

Center S 10 - - 8 1 1 - -<br />

East S 24 - 2 18 2 2 - -<br />

Myanmar L 5 - - 2 - 3 - -<br />

S 36 - 1 26 1 8 - -<br />

Southeast Asia<br />

Indonesia L&S 4 - 1 1 - 2 - -<br />

Laos L 1 - - 1 - - - -<br />

Malaysia L&S 2 - - 1 - 1 - -<br />

Thailand S 6 - - 4 - 2 - -<br />

Vietnam S 2 - 1 1 - - - -<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 323


Table 1, continued<br />

Country Area<br />

Seed<br />

size<br />

No. of<br />

accessions I II III IV V VI VII<br />

East Asia<br />

China S 24 - 23 1 - - - -<br />

China-Yunnan S 5 - - 5 - - - -<br />

Korea S 9 - 9 - - - - -<br />

Japan S 15 - 15 - - - - -<br />

C. sativus var. hardwickii 2 - - - - - - 2<br />

Total 291 1 48 119 11 73 2 21<br />

L = large-seed type; S = small-seed type.<br />

India by the sea route, and the prototype of Group Conomon originated<br />

from small-seeded melons under wet conditions in East India.<br />

African melon accessions were divided into three groups by RAPD,<br />

which classified their respective cytoplasm type as follows: A-type<br />

(100%) in Cluster III, T-type (82.3%) in Cluster V, and NA-type<br />

(78.6%) in Cluster VII. Tanaka et al. (2006) suggested that NA is the<br />

primitive type of cultivated melon, and that the large-seeded T-type and<br />

small-seeded A-type have been independently established in northern<br />

and southern Africa, respectively, during the long history of cultivation<br />

and transmission of melon. <strong>The</strong> result obtained by the analysis of the<br />

nuclear genome supports this hypothesis, and suggests that large- and<br />

small-seed types had a polyphyletic origin, and thereafter differentiated<br />

into different varieties. <strong>The</strong>refore, for further analysis of origin,<br />

domestication, and differentiation of cultivated melon, more accessions<br />

of melon collected from various parts of Africa should be analyzed for<br />

nuclear and cytoplasm genomes.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Akashi, Y., N. Fukuda, T. Wako, M. Masuda, and K. Kato. 2002. Genetic variation<br />

and phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo<br />

L., based on the analysis of five isozymes. Euphytica .125:385–396.<br />

Apostol, B. L., W. C. Black IV, B. R. Miller, P. Reiter, and B. J. Beaty. 1993.<br />

Estimation of the number of full sibling families at an oviposition site using<br />

RAPD-PCR markers: applications to the mosquito Aedes aegypti. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl.<br />

Genet. 86:991–1000.<br />

Bates, D. M. and R. W. Robinson. 1995. Cucumber, melons and water-melons,<br />

Cucumis and Citrullus (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae), p. 89–111. In: J. Smartt and N. W.<br />

Simmonds (eds.). Evolution of crop plant. John Wiley and Sons, New York.<br />

Fujishita, N., H. Furukawa and S. Morii. 1993. Distribution of three genotypes for<br />

bitterness of F1 immature fruit in Cucumis melo. Jpn. J. Breed. 43(Suppl.2):206<br />

(in Japanese).<br />

324 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used<br />

in multivariate analysis. Biometrika. 53: 325–338.<br />

McCreight, J. D., J. E. Staub, A. López-Sesé, and S. Chung. 2004. Isozyme variation<br />

in Indian and Chinese melon (Cucumis melo L.) germplasm collections. J. Amer.<br />

Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:811–818.<br />

Mliki, A., J. E. Staub, Z. Sun, and A. Ghorbel. 2001. Genetic diversity in melon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.): an evaluation of African germplasm. Genet. Res. Crop Evol.<br />

48:587–597.<br />

Nakata, E., J. E. Staub, and A. I. López-Sesé. 2005. Genetic diversity in Japanese<br />

melon (Cucumis melo L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />

and simple sequence repeat markers. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 52:405–419.<br />

Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283–292.<br />

Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />

New York.<br />

Silberstein, L., I. Kovalski, R. Huang, K. Anagnostou, M. Kyle, and R. Perl-Treves.<br />

1999. Molecular variation in melon (Cucumis melo L.) as revealed by RFLP and<br />

RAPD markers. Sci. Hort. 79:101–111.<br />

Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of<br />

melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation.<br />

Plant Syst. Evol. 217:313–332.<br />

Tanaka, K., A. Nishitani, Y. Akashi, Y. Sakata, H. Nishida, H. Yoshino and K. Kato.<br />

2006. Molecular characterization of South and East Asian melon, Cucumis melo<br />

L., and the origin of two varieties makuwa and conomon revealed by RAPD<br />

analysis. (in preparation).<br />

Tanaka, K., Y. Akashi, H. Nishida, K. Fukunaga and K. Kato. 2006. Polyphyletic<br />

origin of cultivated melon inferred by the analysis of chloroplast genome.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006.<br />

Weir, B. S. 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland,<br />

Massachusetts.<br />

Yashiro, K., H. Iwata, Y. Akashi, K. Tomita, M. Kuzuya, Y. Tsumura, and K. Kato.<br />

2005. Genetic relationship among East and South Asian melon (Cucumis melo<br />

L.) revealed by AFLP analysis. Breed. Sci. 55:197–206.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 325


ORIGIN, MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION, AND<br />

USES OF CUCURBITA FICIFOLIA, THE<br />

MOUNTAIN SQUASH<br />

Thomas C. Andres<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Network, Bronx, New York, 10471<br />

Additional Index Words. Fig leaf squash, black-seeded pumpkin, Malabar<br />

gourd, chilacayote, crop domestication<br />

Abstract. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia Bouché is the most important domesticated species<br />

of squash in the highland regions of the Neotropics, including the seven Andean<br />

countries in South America. In addition to this extensive area of traditional<br />

cultivation, this species has spread within the last few centuries throughout the<br />

highland tropical regions of the world. This popularity appears to be due to ease<br />

of cultivation in cool regions under extreme conditions, both dry and moist. <strong>The</strong><br />

fruits possess no more nutritional or flavor qualities than other cultivated<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species, but they do have a particularly long shelf life. Usage varies in<br />

different regions, but mostly it is eaten where it is grown under small,<br />

sustainable agricultural systems. Otherwise, the fruits are sold in local markets.<br />

More commercial uses occur in Mexico, Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, and<br />

Argentina, where it is made into confections and jams as well as cooked in<br />

nonsweetened traditional dishes. <strong>The</strong> archaeological record shows that it was<br />

extensively used and traded in pre-Incan times in northern Peru. Morphological<br />

variation in the species, while comparatively small for a domesticated<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, is greatest in the region from Peru to Colombia, which indicates its<br />

potential domestication in this area. <strong>The</strong> wild ancestor is unknown.<br />

T<br />

he biosystematics of the cultigen <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia Bouché<br />

has been reviewed (Andres, 1990). Since then, no discoveries<br />

have been made of a possible wild ancestor of the species. A<br />

survey of its uses and morphological diversity throughout its range in<br />

Latin America is reported here, along with evidence from the<br />

archaeological record, to ascertain where the species may have been<br />

domesticated. Field investigations have been undertaken over the last<br />

20 years specifically in Mexico, Panama, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia.<br />

Herbarium specimens from numerous countries have been examined.<br />

<strong>The</strong> survey of C. ficifolia in Peru and Bolivia was made possible by the Amy<br />

Goldman Ancestors of Squashes grant through the New York Botanical Garden. Also<br />

thanks to Sumru Aricanli and Craig Morris at the American Museum of Natural<br />

History for their permission to examine the Junius Bird Huaca Prieta archaeological<br />

collection and to the curators of the New York Botanical Garden, particularly<br />

Michael Nee, for their assistance in making the field and herbarium work possible.<br />

326 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Like all other species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, C. ficifolia originated in the<br />

Americas. It is known only under cultivation or as recent escapes. Its<br />

wild ancestor has been hypothesized to be from southern Mexico<br />

(Sauer, 1969) or the Andes (Nee, 1990). Present-day distribution<br />

ranges from northern Mexico to central Chile and northern Argentina,<br />

or from 30° north to 30° south latitude.<br />

Elsewhere in the world, it is most frequently grown in Eurasia,<br />

Africa, and Oceania in the following countries: Portugal, France,<br />

Germany, India, China, Japan, Korea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania,<br />

Angola, New Zealand, and the Philippines. It is planted elsewhere<br />

primarily as a curiosity or ornamental.<br />

In Latin America, the common names most frequently used are<br />

chilacayote (Mexico and Guatemala), chiverre (Costa Rica and<br />

Honduras), victoria (Colombia), zambo (Ecuador), chiclayo (Peru),<br />

lacayote (Bolivia), and cayote (Argentina). But perhaps the most<br />

descriptive name is calabaza serrana in Peru, which means “mountain<br />

squash.” <strong>The</strong> common name most applied in English is “fig leaf<br />

squash,” derived from the scientific specific epithet. But since this leaf<br />

shape is not unique among <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a as the extreme high altitudes<br />

where it is cultivated, perhaps mountain squash makes a better name.<br />

Another frequently used English name for C. ficifolia is “Malabar<br />

gourd,” derived from the once-held mistaken belief that it originated in<br />

India. Portuguese trade routes in the 16 th and 17 th centuries extended<br />

between the Americas, where C. ficifolia was collected, and both India<br />

and Europe, where it was introduced. <strong>The</strong> Malabar region includes wet<br />

tropical mountains where C. ficifolia is still grown.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are no production statistics on C. ficifolia since it is typically<br />

grown on a small, home-garden scale as landraces, i.e., locally adapted<br />

and propagated populations by traditional farmers. Due to their<br />

aggressive growth habit, they are often planted on marginal<br />

agricultural land, such as steep embankments, not suitable for other<br />

crop plants. <strong>The</strong>re is little need to attend to the plants during their long<br />

growing season of six to eight months. <strong>The</strong>refore, C. ficifolia is<br />

commonly dismissed as an unimportant crop plant. But throughout the<br />

Andes, it is widely grown and popular in most communities lying<br />

between 1000 and nearly 4000m in altitude. It is more tolerant of<br />

cooler temperatures than the other domesticated species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a,<br />

although all <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a are frost-tender.<br />

<strong>The</strong> plants seem to do best where conditions are moist, particularly<br />

in cloud forests. In such habitat, the fruits, flowers, and vines reach<br />

their greatest size. But at the other extreme, they are also cultivated in<br />

arid regions where there may be only a brief wet season just enough<br />

for stand establishment. Fruit size varies from as short as 12cm under<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 327


dry conditions to 60cm long and weighing 20kg in cloud forests;<br />

roadside vendors have reported specimens of up to 100cm long. It has<br />

not been ascertained whether this difference in fruit size is strictly<br />

environmentally induced or whether there are genetic differences<br />

between populations. All C. ficifolia fruits have a very hard or<br />

lignified rind. <strong>The</strong> flesh is fibrous and nearly white. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

characteristics are typical for wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species and primitive<br />

landraces; yet C. ficifolia also has some of the largest pollen grains and<br />

flowers in the genus. One possibility is that there is no wild population<br />

that differs genetically from the cultivated plants. This seems unlikely<br />

since all other wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species are known to have fruits with<br />

bitter flesh, and the plants are never as big in leaf size, stem, flower,<br />

and fruit.<br />

Morphological diversity is small for a domesticated plant,<br />

especially compared to the other domesticated <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species. <strong>The</strong><br />

fruit shape is nearly round to somewhat elongate like a watermelon.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are basically three fruit coloration patterns, (1) all white, (2) a<br />

distinct reticulated green/white pattern, and (3) dark green. Ten white<br />

longitudinal stripes spreading from the floral end are usually present in<br />

the latter two (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> three fruit colorations occur not only<br />

throughout its range, but also generally in the same field. In Costa<br />

Rica, large fields are sometimes planted with only all-white fruits. <strong>The</strong><br />

seeds are most commonly black or dark brown, a color not found in<br />

any other species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. But tan seeds, more typical of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, also occur throughout its range. <strong>The</strong> genetics of these<br />

differences have not been studied nor has the plant undergone any<br />

modern breeding.<br />

In my survey, other fruit characteristics were found. In Peru and<br />

Bolivia, uniform light green fruits were seen, in addition to all white<br />

and all dark green fruits. A unique fruit shape was found in northern<br />

Peru. A few populations had elongated fruits that were bottle-shaped<br />

or somewhat pyriform with a length to diameter ratio of close to three<br />

(Figure 1). Cárdenas (1989) reports seeing “victoria” squashes with<br />

“necks like a bottle” in Colombian markets. No other reports in the<br />

literature record the occurrence of this fruit shape in C. ficifolia. It is<br />

not known how widespread this morphology is in northwest South<br />

America and whether it represents a primitive character or derives<br />

from an ancestral population.<br />

<strong>The</strong> archaeological record is sparse, except in Peru where abundant<br />

pedicels and seed fragments dating back to 5000–6000 B.C. are found<br />

along the central and northern coast. While C. ficifolia is not grown in<br />

this lowland region, trade between the Andean cultures and the coastal<br />

people were evidently widely practiced (Cohen, 1977). Still today, C.<br />

328 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


ficifolia is brought down from the highlands and sold in coastal<br />

markets, such as at Trujillo (Figure 2). Since the coastal region is arid,<br />

ancient plant remains are well preserved. Archaeological sites in the<br />

highly humid cloud forests are less likely to contain any plant<br />

macromaterial. <strong>The</strong>re is no apparent change to a smaller seed size in<br />

the earlier archaeological strata, thus suggesting that the imported<br />

squash was always a domesticate. <strong>The</strong>re are reports that the Aztecs<br />

used C. ficifolia during the Spanish conquest of Mexico (Sahagun,<br />

1956), but no definitive archaeological remains have been found north<br />

of South America.<br />

Fig. 1. Comparison between a typical nearly round-shaped fruit and a white<br />

elongated pyriform or bottle-shaped fruit from the Department of Cajamarca,<br />

Peru.<br />

<strong>The</strong> present-day uses of C. ficifolia are diverse and vary in<br />

different regions. <strong>The</strong> most popular is in the preparation of jams,<br />

puddings, and confections, or dulce, made by cooking the pulp of the<br />

mature fruit in sugar or honey, for example, dulce de cayote in<br />

Argentina (Figure 3). <strong>The</strong>re are many variations on this recipe ranging<br />

from the addition of mineral lime to make solid candies to teasing<br />

apart the spaghetti squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo)-like fibers by boiling to<br />

make a dessert called cabello de angel—angel’s hair—in Spanish.<br />

Other ingredients, including coconut, tamarind, and cream, are often<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 329


added to these desserts. <strong>The</strong> sweetened products are used in<br />

empanadas and other baked products in South America.<br />

Other uses of the mature fruits are for making an alcoholic drink<br />

and for adding to stews or picadillos and soups. In regions of more<br />

recent introduction, such as parts of Africa, the long-lasting fruits are<br />

considered unfit for human consumption but are fed to livestock<br />

during the dry season. Elsewhere, most notably in the Chiriquí<br />

province of Panama, C. ficifolia is not used at all; however, the plants<br />

persist in weedy vegetable fields, suggesting that it was once used<br />

there.<br />

<strong>The</strong> large protein-rich seeds are popularly consumed in a few<br />

regions, including Ecuador and China, but ignored elsewhere. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

used along with honey in Chiapas, Mexico to make palanquetas, a<br />

dessert snack.<br />

Nearly as popular as the mature fruits are the tender young fruits<br />

(Figure 2), which are consumed like summer squash (C. pepo)<br />

throughout Latin America and the Philippines. <strong>The</strong>se fruits are said to<br />

fetch a good price in Bogotá (National Research Council, 1989). Other<br />

sporadic uses are made of the flowers and as a green leafy vegetable.<br />

In Japan, Germany, and the Netherlands, cucumber is grafted onto<br />

rootstock of C. ficifolia for winter production in greenhouses.<br />

Fig. 2. Diversity of immature C. ficifolia fruits in the main market in Trujillo,<br />

Peru.<br />

330 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


<strong>The</strong> most commercial use occurs in southern Mexico, Costa Rica,<br />

Colombia, Ecuador, and northern Argentina. In Costa Rica, C. ficifolia<br />

is an Easter holiday staple, commemorated by fairs, such as Feria del<br />

Chiverre. Up to 20-hectare plantations are cultivated.<br />

While the fruits do not possess as many nutritional benefits as<br />

other cultivated <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species, or any notable flavor qualities, they<br />

do have an especially long shelf life of well over a year. During this<br />

postharvest period, the flesh becomes sweeter. This long storage<br />

period makes the fruits useful during times of need, such as during<br />

long dry seasons and ocean voyages, a property that may have<br />

facilitated their spread throughout pre-Incan and Aztec empires.<br />

This survey of C. ficifolia throughout Latin America broadens our<br />

understanding of the biology and uses of this species. Not only is C.<br />

ficifolia widely cultivated throughout the highlands of the Neotropics<br />

for a wide range of uses, but it is a more important crop than generally<br />

recognized. It should perhaps be renamed the mountain squash.<br />

Fig. 3. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia jam (left) and candy with walnuts (right) from the<br />

Province of Jujuy, Argentina.<br />

Evidence from the archaeological record and the geographical<br />

distribution of the limited morphological variation supports the<br />

hypothesis that domestication first took place on the eastern slope of<br />

the northern Andes in northwestern South America. This region<br />

represents the latitudinal midpoint of the range of C. ficifolia in Latin<br />

America. Also, this region contains one of the most species-rich<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 331


endemic floras of the world. Since this terrain is quite rugged with<br />

complex, often inaccessible microenvironments, it is quite possible<br />

that wild ancestral populations still occur there.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Andres, T. C. 1990. Biosystematics, theories on the origin, and breeding potential of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia. p. 102–119. In: D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey<br />

(eds.). Biology and utilization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press,<br />

Ithaca, New York.<br />

Cárdenas, M. 1989. Manual de las plantas economicas de Bolivia. 2 nd Edition. Los<br />

Amigos del Libro, La Paz, Bolivia.<br />

Cohen, M. N. 1977. Population pressure and the origins of agriculture: an<br />

archaeological example from the coast of Peru. In: C. A. Reed (ed.). Origins of<br />

agriculture. Mouton, <strong>The</strong> Hague.<br />

Nee, M. 1990. <strong>The</strong> domestication of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 44:56–<br />

68.<br />

National Research Council. 1989. Lost crops of the Incas: little-known plants of the<br />

Andes with promise for worldwide cultivation. National Academy Press,<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

Sahagun, F. B. 1956. Historia General de las Cosas de Nueva España. Tom. 1, Lib.<br />

1, Cap. 21:13. A. M. Garibay K. Editorial Porrua, Mexico City.<br />

Sauer, C. O. 1969. Agricultural origins and dispersals. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge,<br />

MA.<br />

332 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


LOCHE: A UNIQUE PRE-COLUMBIAN<br />

SQUASH LOCALLY GROWN IN NORTH<br />

COASTAL PERU<br />

Thomas C. Andres<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Network, Bronx, New York 10471<br />

Roberto Ugás and Fiorela Bustamante<br />

Programa de Hortalizas,<br />

Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata, zapallo, vegetative<br />

propagation, seedlessness<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> loche is a high-quality landrace of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata<br />

Duchesne grown only on the north coast of Peru and practically unknown<br />

elsewhere. Moche pottery depicting the fruit shows that it has been used for<br />

thousands of years, yet it is not a primitive landrace. <strong>The</strong> fruits today, indicated<br />

as well by the archaeological record, have some morphological diversity.<br />

Typical loche fruits are small, straight, and warted along longitudinal ridges<br />

with nonlignified rinds. <strong>The</strong>y contain few to no seeds, and the fruits vary<br />

respectively in having a slightly swollen end to being tapered at both ends. <strong>The</strong><br />

orange flesh is very high in total soluble solids and is used only in small amounts<br />

for flavoring traditional regional dishes. In the local markets, loche is sold in<br />

cut-up pieces at premium prices. <strong>The</strong> entire fruit, rind included, is consumed.<br />

Propagation using shoot cuttings has been practiced for at least the past 100<br />

years. Fruits from such plants are considered more desirable than those from<br />

direct-seeded plants. This unique crop is at risk of being displaced by industrial<br />

agriculture of export crops, but at the same time plays a clear role in the revival<br />

of Peruvian gastronomy within the country and abroad.<br />

L<br />

ittle is known about the highly regarded landrace of squash<br />

from the north coast of Peru called loche or zapallo loche. <strong>The</strong><br />

literature is sparse except for mention of loche in publications<br />

Renán Valega Rosas, Michael Nee, Victor Vásquez, and Teresa Rosales all helped<br />

with fieldwork, while Miguel Holle, Abundio Sagástegui, Eric Rodríguez, Karen E.<br />

Stothert, Dolores Piperno, and Craig Morris were important consultants. Rolando<br />

Santa Maria provided reproductive material and extremely useful loche horticultural<br />

information. Thanks also to Pilar Kuriyama and Cecilia Ono for their kind help in<br />

processing the fruits and seeds. Special thanks to the Amy Goldman “Ancestors of<br />

Squashes” grant through the New York Botanical Garden for making this study<br />

possible, and to the Vegetable Crops Research Program of UNALM and the project<br />

for the conservation of Andean plant genetic resources executed by UNALM and the<br />

Council of Francophone Universities (CIUF) of Belgium, for their support of<br />

fieldwork in Illimo and La Molina.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 333


about the distinct gastronomy of the region. Even there, it is usually<br />

assumed that the reader knows what a loche is, and therefore no<br />

description is given. Some recipes state that if loche is not available,<br />

other orange-fleshed squashes (in most South American countries<br />

called zapallo) may be substituted. Even more confusingly, the<br />

meaning of the word “loche” has become more generalized to apply to<br />

any desirable orange-fleshed squash, especially if the seller does not<br />

have any good loches. For instance, along the central coast of Peru, as<br />

early as 1957, a crookneck squash with a dark green, smooth rind was<br />

called loche (Diaz, 1957). <strong>The</strong>refore, for clarification, adjectives are<br />

sometimes applied, such as “true loche” or “black loche” when<br />

referring to the traditional genuine loche.<br />

Loche is listed on Web sites and in literature as being either<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duchesne (Soukup, 1987; Custer, 2000) or<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne, but there is a common understanding<br />

in Peru that all loches are C. moschata (Diaz, 1957; Ugás et al., 2000).<br />

Both species are cultivated in the region. And both have been found in<br />

local archaeological sites, although C. moschata, along with <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

ficifolia Bouché, is much more abundant in earlier layers back to 5000<br />

B.P. <strong>The</strong> traditional cultivar of C. maxima, called ‘macre’, with fruits<br />

that can weigh up to about 80kg, is by far the most cultivated squash in<br />

Peru.<br />

Methods<br />

Starting in 2003, in both northern Peru and in Lima, we visited<br />

marketplaces where loches are sold. We interviewed farmers in loche<br />

fields and cooks in restaurants in northern Peru. We also visited<br />

national and regional archaeological museums that contain ceramic<br />

pieces identified as depicting the loche. Fieldwork has begun at the<br />

Vegetable Crops Research Program of Universidad Nacional Agraria<br />

La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Peru to observe and describe the growth<br />

habit and diversity of loche under uniform field conditions, both from<br />

seed and from shoot cuttings.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> shape of the leaves and flowers, seed morphology, and<br />

indumentation of the loche show that it belongs to C. moschata. <strong>The</strong><br />

leaves are unlobed or shallow-lobed. <strong>The</strong> male flower hypanthium is<br />

campanulate rather than conical as in C. maxima. <strong>The</strong> seeds are typical<br />

of light-colored C. moschata seeds, with a slightly coarse margin of a<br />

color a shade darker. <strong>The</strong> indument along the primary nerves on the<br />

334 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


abaxial surface of the leaf blade as well as on the petiole and on the<br />

floral bud is short to long pilose or villous and soft.<br />

<strong>The</strong> one character that is not typical of other C. moschata is the<br />

shape of the pedicel attachment to the fruit. This species typically has<br />

a rounded expanded pedicel where it attaches to the fruit, but in loche<br />

the shape of the pedicel varies from typical C. moschata shape to not<br />

expanded, but extending along its ridges down a couple of centimeters<br />

of the fruit. This may be due to the shape of the fruit base, which is<br />

acute rather than flattened or rounded like most cultivars.<br />

Loche plants are viny, but have smaller parts than most other C.<br />

moschata cultivars, including the leaves, flowers, and fruits. <strong>The</strong> fruits<br />

are up to 1.2kg, 20 to 30cm long and 10cm wide, oblong to oblate, and<br />

not crooknecked, but sometimes shaped like butternut squashes with a<br />

bulbous end. <strong>The</strong>y start out light green but gradually turn to dark green<br />

with a glaucous waxy covering at maturity. A diagnostic character is<br />

10 loosely defined warty longitudinal ridges that are often a darker<br />

shade than the rest of the fruit and thus make the fruit subtly striped.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rind is nonlignified, which is unusual for warty <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fruits.<br />

<strong>The</strong> flesh is various shades of orange, but never as deeply orange<br />

as some other local landraces of C. moschata. But the total soluble<br />

solids or sugar content has been measured with a handheld<br />

refractometer to be 18°Brix, which is extremely high for any cucurbit.<br />

<strong>The</strong> flavor is excellent.<br />

Loche is unique to the species in having naturally occurring<br />

seedless fruits. Fruits that are tapered at both ends are seedless and<br />

solid, whereas those with a bulbous end generally contain a small seed<br />

cavity with up to 20 fully developed seeds and additional undeveloped<br />

seeds (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> seedless fruits with their soft rinds are consumed<br />

in their entirety with no waste. However, the bulbous fruits are<br />

considered to be of higher quality.<br />

In general, seedlessness in edible fruits is becoming more<br />

widespread and more popular. This is the trend as well with cucurbits,<br />

such as watermelon, cucumber, and some summer squash. In winter<br />

squash, except for minor exceptions, there are no seedless commercial<br />

cultivars. Some butternut cultivars have small seed cavities containing<br />

a decreased number of seeds. Commercially produced interspecific<br />

hybrids between C. maxima and C. moschata may lack seeds.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cause of infertility in loche is not known. In the field, loche<br />

plants are monoecious and develop normal-looking male and female<br />

flowers with abundant pollen on the stamens. <strong>The</strong>re are many more<br />

male flowers than female flowers per plant. An abundance of bee<br />

activity in the morning transfers pollen between male and female<br />

flowers so that stigmas are covered with pollen by midmorning.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 335


Fig. 1. Longitudinal section through a loche fruit showing the seed cavity at the<br />

apical end and the total number of seeds in the fruit, consisting in this case of<br />

four or five probably viable seeds (the darker colored seeds to the left) and four<br />

aborted seeds to the right.<br />

Pollination, therefore, does occur naturally of both selfs and sibs. Fruit<br />

set and productivity appear to be comparable to seed-bearing winter<br />

squash of the region. But the plants in loche fields are usually not<br />

uniform, with fruits varying somewhat in size, shape, color, and<br />

wartiness, thus indicating some genetic diversity. <strong>The</strong>refore, a theory<br />

among growers that the loche is a sterile hybrid does not seem<br />

plausible, but needs to be tested further. It is not known whether the<br />

fruits are parthenocarpic or the ovules abort after fertilization.<br />

Another unique feature of loche is that it is commercially<br />

reproduced vegetatively. Shoot-tip cuttings of around 50–70cm long<br />

are made after the fruit is harvested. <strong>The</strong>se are planted and watered,<br />

and roots grow from the underground nodes where the leaves have<br />

been removed. If the dry season is particularly severe, not only may a<br />

336 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


crop season be lost, but no further cuttings will be available. Saved<br />

seeds are then sowed. But the fruit quality of this first generation is<br />

considered inferior and generally not harvested. Cuttings are made<br />

from this generation to produce more-desirable fruits in subsequent<br />

generations. To avoid direct seeding, loche farmers cooperate by<br />

trading cuttings. Sometimes a few irrigated “mother plants” of a region<br />

are used solely as a backup source for cuttings. <strong>The</strong> difference between<br />

direct-seeded plants and those propagated asexually is being<br />

investigated at UNALM.<br />

<strong>The</strong> practice of vegetative propagation for improving quality of the<br />

loche has been in use at least since the late 19 th century, according to<br />

the notes of Enrique Brüning, a German engineer whose private<br />

archaeological collection is now housed in the Brüning Museum,<br />

Lambayeque (Schaedel, 1988). Brüning also reported that growers<br />

would burn a stone shaped like the fruit in the pile of soil where loche<br />

was planted as an amulet to encourage growth.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main pest problems in loche are pickleworm (Diaphania sp.)<br />

and whitefly (Bemisia sp). Insecticides are commonly applied. <strong>The</strong><br />

most common diseases appear to be wilt (Fusarium sp., Phytophthora<br />

sp.) and fruit rot (Phythium sp). Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) has<br />

been isolated from loche plants, and its symptoms are often observed<br />

in the field. Loche is apparently highly susceptible to root-knot<br />

nematode (Meloidogyne incognita).<br />

Because of the high value of the crop, loche fields are often kept<br />

hidden from roads. <strong>The</strong>re is a problem with poachers stealing not only<br />

the fruits, but also stems for transplanting. <strong>The</strong> fields range in size<br />

from backyard gardens to a few hectares (Figure 2). Loche is<br />

cultivated almost exclusively in the lowland valleys of northern Peru<br />

in the departments of Lambayeque, Piura, and La Libertad. <strong>The</strong><br />

climate is temperate to hot in the north, with no rain except during a<br />

possible short rainy season or when El Niño occurs. Surprisingly<br />

under such arid conditions, irrigation is normally not used. <strong>The</strong> fruits<br />

are sold in local markets and in Lima. Loche is neither<br />

grown in nor exported to neighboring countries.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most productive region lies around Chiclayo, the capital city<br />

of Lambayeque. In the past, this was a major trade center between the<br />

coast and the highlands and the Amazon beyond, as well as settlements<br />

to the north and south. <strong>The</strong> area is rich in important pre-Inca<br />

archaeological sites where <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a remains have been found.<br />

Unfortunately, the loche, unlike other squashes, does not preserve<br />

well. Squash seeds, pedicels, and rind macrofragments are often found<br />

well preserved in the dry coastal archaeological sites. But the loche<br />

produces few seeds; the pedicels are weak and do not separate from<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 337


Fig. 2. Rolando Santa María, expert grower from Illimo, Lambayeque, Peru, in<br />

his field of loche.<br />

the decaying fruit, and the rinds are nonlignified. Microremains of<br />

squash rind phytoliths are abundant in these sites, but there are no<br />

phytoliths in loche rind. Reevaluation by Andres and Nee<br />

(unpublished) since the study of Whitaker and Bird (1949) of the<br />

thousands of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a macroremains from Huaca Prieta, Chicama<br />

Valley, Peru, where some of the earliest such specimens have been<br />

found in South America (now housed at the American Museum of<br />

Natural History in New York), show that some of these pedicels<br />

resemble the distinct pedicels of loche.<br />

A better source of information in archaeological records comes<br />

from the Moche people, a pre-Inca culture that flourished in the coastal<br />

valleys of northern Peru approximately A.D. 50–800. <strong>The</strong>y were highly<br />

skilled in ceramics and left a legacy in tombs of realistic life-sized fruit<br />

and vegetable sculptures, as well as depictions of all aspects of their<br />

daily life. Whilst farming in the region using desert irrigation began in<br />

pre-Moche times, the Moche ceramics show that they had a rich<br />

assortment of crop plants, including a few species of cucurbits<br />

composed of a diversity of landraces. <strong>The</strong> most common squash<br />

depicted is a warty crooknecked C. moschata. But there are some<br />

ceramic fruits that are identical to loche. Figure 3 shows one such fruit,<br />

photographed at the Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca-Jaén, found<br />

338 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


at Batan Grande, an important archaeological site located only 40km<br />

northeast of Chiclayo, where in the adjacent picture the fresh fruits in<br />

the main market were photographed. This is evidence that the loche<br />

has an ancient origin. <strong>The</strong> warty crooknecked squashes are also found<br />

in the region today, as well as other landraces depicted in the hundreds<br />

of surviving Moche ceramics.<br />

Fig. 3. Comparison between an archaeological ceramic loche fruit (left) and<br />

present-day seedless and seeded fruits (right).<br />

Brüning (Schaedel, 1988) considered the loche semiwild, and<br />

believed that it was crossed with cultivated squashes to produce a<br />

more appetizing fruit. <strong>The</strong>re is no known wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the region<br />

today except for C. ecuadorensis H. C. Cutler & Whitaker.<br />

Furthermore, except for its relatively small size, loche does not have<br />

any primitive characteristics of a wild cucurbit. On the contrary, the<br />

following characterististics indicate an advanced state of<br />

domestication: reduced to no seed cavity, fruit that does not readily<br />

“slip” or abscise from the vine, no lignification of the rind, and<br />

nonbitter flesh. It is widely believed that squash was domesticated<br />

initially for the edible seeds since all wild species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a have<br />

large seed cavities full of numerous seeds, with a small amount of<br />

bitter flesh, and hard rinds. Although this may be true in <strong>North</strong> and<br />

Central America, south of Ecuador, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a seeds are rarely<br />

consumed and were therefore probably never an important source of<br />

food, although now they are commonly used in traditional medicine.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 339


Area under loche production appears to be decreasing, although the<br />

word itself, being misapplied to a broader range of cultivars, is in more<br />

frequent use. <strong>The</strong> agriculture of the region is shifting to industrialscale<br />

crop production mostly for export, primarily of rice, sugarcane,<br />

cotton, asparagus, mango, and Capsicum peppers.<br />

Like the loche itself, the highly prized cuisine of northern Peru<br />

deserves to be better known elsewhere. <strong>The</strong> dishes include a rich<br />

assortment of ingredients, including a number of endemic crop plants.<br />

<strong>The</strong> loche is used in small amounts to flavor desserts, soups, and<br />

stews, most notably the traditional regional dish made with kid goat<br />

called seco de cabrito a la norteña. In the local markets, loche is sold<br />

in cut-up pieces at premium prices; for example, in April 2006, prices<br />

in supermarkets in Lima were 16.50 soles per kg versus 2.5 soles per<br />

kg for macre (C. maxima). Loche is one of the landmarks of trendy<br />

“nouveau Andean cuisine” and, because of its distinctive taste, is an<br />

ingredient in new dishes oriented to international palates. For instance,<br />

in a recent gastronomic showroom in Vienna organized by the<br />

government of Peru, European chefs highlighted loche and<br />

‘escabeche’ chili pepper (Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum) as their<br />

most remarkable discoveries.<br />

A broader effort should be made to promote traditional dishes from<br />

northern Peru incorporating loche, increasing demand for it, so that<br />

more farmers will grow it. <strong>North</strong>ern Peru is expected to become a<br />

major tourist area in the near future because of major archaeological<br />

discoveries, new museums, and beach hotels, as well as an interesting<br />

endemic living culture. This will contribute to new demand for loche<br />

and other local crops. <strong>The</strong> loche deserves study from ethnobotanical,<br />

taxonomic, and horticultural standpoints.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Custer, T. 2000. <strong>The</strong> art of Peruvian cuisine. Ediciones Ganesha, Lima.<br />

Diaz, A. 1957. Estudio de las variedades nacionales de zapallos. Tesis para Ingeniero<br />

Agrónomo, Escuela Nacional de Agricultura, Lima.<br />

Schaedel, R. P. 1988. La etnografía muchik en las fotografías de H. Brüning,1886–<br />

1925. Corporación Financiera de Desarrollo, Lima.<br />

Soukup, J. 1987. Vocabulario de los nombres vulgares de la flora peruana y catálogo<br />

de los géneros. Editorial Salesiana, Lima.<br />

Ugás, R., S. Siura, F. Delgado de la Flor, A. Casas, and J. Toledo. 2000. Hortalizas,<br />

datos básicos. Programa de Hortalizas, Universidad Nacional Agraria La<br />

Molina, Lima.<br />

Whitaker, T. W. and J. B. Bird. 1949. Identification and significance of the cucurbit<br />

materials from Huaca Prieta, Peru. Amer. Mus. Novit. 1426:1–15.<br />

340 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


OLD WORLD CUCURBITS IN PLANT<br />

ICONOGRAPHY OF THE RENAISSANCE<br />

Jules Janick<br />

Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture,Purdue<br />

University,625 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />

Harry S. Paris<br />

Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research Center,<br />

P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Cucumis melo, Cucumis sativus,<br />

Ecballium elaterium, Lagenaria siceraria, Momordica balsamina, plant<br />

iconography<br />

ABSTRACT. Old World cucurbits include Citrullus lanatus (watermelon),<br />

Cucumis melo (melon), Cucumis sativus (cucumber), Ecballium elaterium<br />

(squirting cucumber), Lagenaria siceraria (bottle gourd), and Momordica<br />

balsamina (balsam apple). Fruit images of each of these cucurbits appear in<br />

festoons painted on a ceiling of the Villa Farnesina in Rome between 1515 and<br />

1518. <strong>The</strong>se cucurbits are also depicted in paintings and botanical herbals of the<br />

Renaissance. <strong>The</strong>se images provide information on cucurbit history, dispersal,<br />

and genetic diversity.<br />

I<br />

n 1505, one of the richest men in Europe, the Sienese banker<br />

Agostino Chigi (1466–1520), began construction of an extravagant<br />

new home on the west bank of the Tiber River in Rome. Although<br />

not particularly well-educated, Chigi was attracted to the rediscovery<br />

of ancient Greek and Latin writings and science. <strong>The</strong> decorations in his<br />

villa, now known as the Villa Farnesina because it was sold to<br />

Cardinal Farnese by Chigi’s heirs, were a revocation of the classical<br />

world, the rooms filled with paintings, statues, and opulent<br />

furnishings. Attached was a repository or garden of rare plants, the<br />

viridarium. <strong>The</strong> ceiling of one room, decorated with scenes of the<br />

heavenly adventures of Venus, Cupid, and Psyche, was executed in<br />

fresco in the spaces between the arches by the workshop of Raphael<br />

Sanzio (1483–1520). Festoons or wreaths painted by Giovanni<br />

Martini da Udine (1487–1564) on the ribs of the arches contain<br />

thousands of images of individual fruits, vegetables, and flowers<br />

encompassing about 170 species (Caneva, 1992a,b; Janick and<br />

Caneva, 2005; Janick and Paris, 2006). <strong>The</strong> festoon images have been<br />

deconstructed by scanning the images and collating each species. Our<br />

objective is to describe and discuss the Old World cucurbits in the<br />

ceiling festoons of the Villa Farnesina and compare them with other<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 341


Renaissance images of these plants appearing in art and botanical<br />

herbals.<br />

Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. &<br />

Nakai<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are five images of watermelons in the festoons of the Villa<br />

Farnesina (Figure 1A). All of the depicted fruits are round, medium<br />

green with narrow darker stripes. Four appear to be “icebox” size,<br />

Fig. 1. Old World cucurbit images from the Loggia of Cupid and Psyche ceiling<br />

of the Villa Farnesina: (A) Citrullus lanatus. (B) Cucumis melo Cantalupensis<br />

Group. (C) Cucumis melo Reticulatis Group. (D) Cucumis melo Flexuosus<br />

Group. (E) Cucumis sativus. F. Ecballium elaterium. (G) Lagenaria siceraria<br />

(bottle-shaped). (H) Lagenaria siceraria (elongate). (I) Momordica balsamina.<br />

342 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


about 4kg, and one is smaller and covered by what appears to be white<br />

fungal growth. Overall, little genetic variability is depicted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> festoon images in the Villa Farnesina appear to be the first<br />

Renaissance paintings of watermelons. Depictions of watermelon<br />

fruits are common in 16 th - and 17 th -century European paintings and<br />

appear to be similar in size, shape, and rind coloration to those of the<br />

Farnesina festoons. <strong>The</strong>se include a watermelon fruit in the frieze of<br />

the chamber of Dominio Fiorentino painted by Jacopo Zucchi circa<br />

1586 (Janick, 2004a), Caravaggio’s 1603 painting Fruits and<br />

Vegetables on a Ledge (Janick, 2004b), and a painting of Pensionante<br />

del Saracceni titled Still Life with Melons and Carafe of White Wine,<br />

painted between 1615 and 1620. Black-and-white images of<br />

watermelons are found in the printed botanical herbals of the 16 th<br />

century. <strong>The</strong>se images do not show rind color or pattern but do include<br />

the foliage, allowing them to be easily identified as watermelons by<br />

the characteristic pinnatifid leaves. Such images can be found in the<br />

tomes of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1554), Mattioli (1558),<br />

du Pinet (1561), L’Obel (1576), and many others.<br />

Melon, Cucumis melo L.<br />

Sixteen melons from three cultivar-groups (Pitrat et al., 2000) are<br />

depicted in the festoons of the Villa Farnesina, reflecting great genetic<br />

diversity. Represented are 11 cantaloupes (Cantalupensis Group), three<br />

muskmelons (Reticulatus Group), and two snake melons (Flexuosus<br />

Group) (Figure 1B, C, D).<br />

<strong>The</strong> 11 cantaloupes represent four different cultivars, all of which<br />

have distinct longitudinal furrows. One of them, represented by four<br />

fruits with dark green furrows alternating with tan lobes, resembles<br />

‘Cantalun’ (syn. ‘Charentais’), the leading market type of melon in<br />

France and some other countries. Three of the four fruits are split at<br />

the furrows, revealing their deep orange flesh (mesocarp). A second<br />

cultivar, represented by five smaller, round to slightly oblate fruits,<br />

lacks the dark green coloration in the furrows, resembling ‘De<br />

Bellegarde’ (Goldman, 2002). One of these five fruits has a split at the<br />

peduncle end that reveals orange flesh. A third cantaloupe cultivar,<br />

represented by one oval fruit beginning to rot at the split calyx end, is<br />

dark green splashed with yellow, revealing orange flesh, and<br />

resembles ‘Noir des Carmes’. <strong>The</strong> fourth cantaloupe cultivar,<br />

represented by two dark green, warted fruits, one large and one small,<br />

resembles the ‘Black Rock’ melon (Stuart, 1984; Paris and Janick,<br />

2005).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 343


<strong>The</strong> three muskmelons are most easily distinguished from the<br />

cantaloupes by their reticulate (netted) rind. Of the three muskmelons<br />

depicted in the festoons, two are oblong and the other quite oblate,<br />

indicating that two distinct cultivars or market types are represented.<br />

Although the two oblong melons differ in external color, one having<br />

an orange cast and the other yellow-green, this color difference might<br />

be attributable to different stages of fruit maturity, the orange one<br />

being fully ripe or overripe. <strong>The</strong> oblate melon has a section cut out,<br />

revealing orange flesh.<br />

<strong>The</strong> snake melons are represented by two images. One of them<br />

shows clearly that the fruit has a warty skin, an unusual characteristic<br />

for this cultivar-group.<br />

Warty cantaloupes appeared in an Italian painting from 1580,<br />

Fruttivendola (Fruit Seller) by Vincenzo Campi (Paris and Janick,<br />

2005). Cantaloupes appear, in black and white, in many of the early<br />

Renaissance herbals, including those of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546),<br />

Dodoens (1554), Cordi (1561) depicting two different cultivars,<br />

L’Obel (1576), Camerarius (1586), and many others. Muskmelons<br />

seem to have been introduced into Europe later than the cantaloupes.<br />

An illustration of what appears to be a long oval muskmelon appears<br />

in Tabernaemontanus (1591) and in Gerard (1597) as “Spanish<br />

Melons.” Chabrey (1666) presented this illustration too, together with<br />

an illustration of another netted melon, named Melo Reticulatus (with<br />

the label and description misplaced on the page). An image of a warty<br />

flexuosus appeared in the work of Camerarius (1586); this image may<br />

have been derived from the estate of Conrad Gesner (1516–1565).<br />

Smooth flexuosus appeared in the herbals of L’Obel (1576), two<br />

images in Dalechamps (1587), Tabernaemontanus (1591), Gerard<br />

(1597), Dodoens (1616), and Chabrey (1666).<br />

Cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.<br />

Thirteen clusters of cucumber (Figure 1E) are included in the<br />

festoons, all resembling fruits of cultivars commonly grown today in<br />

the U.S.A. for pickling. Fruits are prominently warted, short,<br />

cylindrical but tapering to narrow at the stylar end, straight or slightly<br />

curved, and some have distinct furrows. Some are <strong>complete</strong>ly light<br />

green, apparently immature. Others are mature (ripe) and <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />

orange and yet others are turning from green to orange. Some of the<br />

immature fruits show whitening of the stylar end, which extends as<br />

striping in the furrows (where present) along part of the length of the<br />

fruit. Many of the fruits show remnants of the corolla at the distal end.<br />

<strong>The</strong> slight differences in fruit striping and furrowing suggest the fruits<br />

344 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


were derived from several plants, but this modest variation may have<br />

been typical of that found within an open-pollinated cultivar.<br />

Nearly all European Renaissance depictions of cucumbers are of<br />

the American pickling type, like those of the festoons and those<br />

sculpted in the ceramics of Luca della Robbia (1399–1482) and<br />

depicted in 15 th century paintings by Carlo Crivelli of the Madonna<br />

(Impelluso, 2004). <strong>The</strong>y appear in a painting, Still Life with Flowers,<br />

Fruits and Vegetables, attributed to the Master of Hartford (thought to<br />

be the young Caravaggio) and in Caravaggio’s Lute Player (1586). A<br />

famous Still life by the Spanish artist Juan Sanches Cotán (ca. 1600)<br />

prominently features cucumbers. Similar sculpted cucumbers, dating<br />

to 1601, appear on the bronze doors of the Cathedral in the Piazza<br />

Miracoli in Pisa. Plants bearing similar fruits appear in the works of<br />

Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1554), Mattioli (1558), L’Obel<br />

(1576), Camerarius (1586), Tabernaemontanus (1591), Gerard (1597),<br />

and Chabrey (1666). However, one other type of cucumber, much less<br />

common, appears in Europe during the Renaissance. This is a<br />

pyriform cucumber, painted between 1505 and 1508 in the single-copy<br />

prayer <strong>book</strong> Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne (Bilimoff, 2001). An<br />

illustration of a cucumber plant bearing pear-shaped fruits also<br />

appeared in the herbals of Tabernaemontanus (1591), Gerard (1597),<br />

and Chabrey (1666). Cucumer minor pyriformis (Chabrey, 1666) was<br />

probably an andromonoecious cultivar, a possible forerunner of<br />

‘Lemon’. Overall, little diversity is depicted for the cucumbers of<br />

Renaissance Europe, perhaps indicative of only one or two prior<br />

introductions.<br />

Squirting Cucumber, Ecballium elaterium A. Rich.<br />

One festoon image with five fruits is identifiable as squirting<br />

cucumber (Figure 1F). Used as a medicinal plant in Roman antiquity,<br />

this cucurbit was occasionally cultivated for this purpose in<br />

Renaissance Europe (Jeffrey, 2001). Frequently encountered growing<br />

wild in Mediterranean countries, it is unusual for a wild cucurbit<br />

because it has a bushy rather than a viney growth habit. <strong>The</strong> fruits of<br />

squirting cucumber are small, light yellow-green ovals, approximately<br />

2 or 3cm long, five-furrowed, and stiffly hairy. We have not found<br />

images of squirting cucumber in Renaissance paintings. Depictions of<br />

squirting cucumber appeared in the herbals of Fuchs (1542), L’Obel<br />

(1576), Dodoens (1616), Gerard (1597), and others.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 345


Bottle Gourd, Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standley<br />

Bottle gourds are the most abundant cucurbit images in the<br />

festoons (Figure 1 G, H), with at least 37 fruits depicted. Three<br />

distinct morphological variants of bottle gourd—large bottle-shaped,<br />

small bottle-shaped, and elongate—are depicted,.<br />

<strong>The</strong> large bottle-shaped type is represented by portraits of eight<br />

fruits. Some are light gray-green whilst others are tan, the latter<br />

probably reflecting more advanced fruit maturity. Three images are<br />

associated with white flowers, typical of the genus. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

differences in shape: three have a short squat neck, four have a<br />

pinched neck, and one has a thin tapering neck. One fruit shows<br />

splitting at the calyx end, while another, a mature, yellowed fruit, is<br />

covered with dark fungal spots and shows an oblong slit on the surface<br />

displaying yellow flesh.<br />

<strong>The</strong> small bottle-shaped type is represented by seven fruits. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are tan, tan-orange, or green-yellow, again probably reflecting<br />

differing fruit maturity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> elongate, cocuzzi type is represented by 23 fruits, most of<br />

which are slightly curved, but one is quite contorted. Unlike the bottleshaped<br />

types, which are used as vessels, utensils, and a variety of other<br />

purposes, fruits of the cocuzzi type are consumed when young and<br />

tender. <strong>The</strong>re are differences in shape among the 23 fruits, suggesting<br />

that some of them might have been hybrids between the elongate and<br />

bottle-shaped types. At least 4 fruits are associated with white flowers.<br />

One of them, the well-known phallic representation of an elongated<br />

gourd penetrating a fig, is based on an imaginary cocuzza. Two others<br />

depict the gourds wrapped with strands of red currant berries (Ribes<br />

rubrum), a not-too-subtle erotic association of the serpentine gourd<br />

with the worship of Priapus (Morel, 1985). After completing the<br />

images in the Villa Farnesina, Raphael and Giovanni da Udine, at the<br />

request of Leo X, decorated a loggia of the Vatican, including many<br />

cocuzzi in the borders. This was repeated in the Villa Medici by<br />

Jocobo Zucchi and the Villa d’Este in Tivoli (Morel, 1985; Janick,<br />

2004a).<br />

Each of the three fruit forms of bottle gourds depicted in the<br />

festoons appeared in printed botanical herbals of the 16 th century,<br />

among them those of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1554),<br />

Tabernaemontanus (1591), and Gerard (1597). La Zucca nella Natura<br />

Morta dal Cinquecento al Novecento (Ravelli, 2004) contains<br />

reproductions of a number of Renaissance artworks depicting longfruited<br />

Lagenaria siceraria. Caravaggio’s 1603 painting Fruits and<br />

Vegetables on a Ledge also includes a cocuzza (Janick, 2004b). An<br />

346 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


early color depiction of a bottle-shaped gourd, painted between 1505<br />

and 1508, appeared in the Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne<br />

(Bilimoff, 2001). <strong>The</strong>re are a number of depictions of L. siceraria,<br />

both bottle-shaped and elongate, from Europe, Asia Minor, and <strong>North</strong><br />

Africa, that considerably antedate these.<br />

Balsam Apple, Momordica balsamina L.<br />

Four images of balsam apple (Figure 1I) appear in the festoons<br />

with a total of 12 fruits. <strong>The</strong> fruits are slightly warty, with a pointed<br />

end, and some of them are red and others are orange. Balsam apple<br />

has bitter fruit and is grown for vegetable or medicinal purposes in<br />

relatively dry tropical areas, but it is not well adapted to most parts of<br />

Europe. This species is depicted in the painting Stilleben mit<br />

Kűrbissen, 1657, at the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna (T. C.<br />

Andres, personal communication). We have not found any other<br />

Renaissance paintings of balsam apple, but depictions of this plant<br />

appeared in the herbals of Fuchs (1542), Dodoens (1616), and Chabrey<br />

(1666), among others, and it was also described by Ray (1686).<br />

Conclusions<br />

A number of the images of cultivated cucurbits in the festoons of<br />

the Villa Farnesina are similar to fruits of existing market types, which<br />

would seem to have been maintained over the course of the past 500<br />

years. This is remarkable considering the tendency of cucurbit<br />

cultivars of the same species to cross with one another, thereby<br />

mutually diluting their distinguishing characteristics. Moreover, the<br />

same market types of cucurbit fruits depicted in the festoons can also<br />

be found in works of art and botanical herbals that appeared decades<br />

later.<br />

<strong>The</strong> intraspecific diversity exhibited in the festoons of the Villa<br />

Farnesina differs among the cucurbit species, with watermelon and<br />

cucumber showing little and bottle gourd and melon showing<br />

extensive variation. <strong>The</strong> festoons appear to contain the first European<br />

paintings of sweet melons, documenting a wide phenotypic range that<br />

includes cultivars of both the Cantalupensis and Reticulatus groups,<br />

within a century of their introduction from southwestern Asia.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bilimoff, M. 2001. Promenade dans des jardins disparus: les plantes au moyen age,<br />

d’après les Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. Editions Ouest-France,<br />

Rennes.<br />

Bock, H. 1546. Kreuter Buch. Rihel, Strasbourg.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 347


Camerarius, J. 1586. Kreutterbuch. Calceolario, Frankfurt-on-Main.<br />

Caneva, G. 1992a. La Loggia di Psiche. Att. Accadem. Nazl. Linc. 9(3):163–172.<br />

Caneva, G. 1992b. Il mondo di Cerera nella Loggia di Psiche. Fratelli Palombi,<br />

Rome.<br />

Chabrey, D. 1666. Stirpium sciagraphia et icones. Gamoneti & de la Pierre,<br />

Geneva.<br />

Cordi, V. 1561. Annotationes in Pedacii Dioscoridis Anazarbei de medica materia<br />

libros V. Rihel, Strasbourg.<br />

Dalechamps, J. 1587. Historia generalis plantarum. Roville, Lyons.<br />

Dodoens, R. 1554. De stirpium historia. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />

Dodoens, R. 1616. Stirpium historiae pemptades. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />

Fuchs, L. 1542. De historia stirpium. Isingrin, Basel.<br />

Gerard, J. 1597. <strong>The</strong> herball or generall historie of plants. Norton, London.<br />

Goldman, A. 2002. Melons for the passionate grower. Artisan, New York.<br />

Impelluso, L. 2004. Nature and its symbols. Getty Publications, Los Angeles.<br />

Janick, J. 2004a. Erotic use of Lagenaria in Renaissance art. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Network<br />

News. 11(2):7.<br />

Janick, J. 2004b. Caravaggio’s fruits: mirror on Baroque horticulture. Chron. Hort.<br />

44(4):9–15.<br />

Janick, J. and G. Caneva. 2005. <strong>The</strong> first images of maize in Europe. Maydica.<br />

50:71–80.<br />

Janick, J. and H. S. Paris. 2006. <strong>The</strong> cucurbit images (1515–1518) of the Villa<br />

Farnesina, Rome. Ann. Bot. 97:165–176.<br />

Jeffrey, C. 2001. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. In: P. Hanelt et al., Mansfeld’s encyclopedia of<br />

agricultural and horticultural crops, p. 1510–1557. Springer, Berlin.<br />

L’Obel, M. de. 1576. Sev stirpium historia. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />

Mattioli, P. A. 1558. Apologia adversus Amathum Lusitanum, cum censura in<br />

eiusdem enarrationes. Valgrisi, Venice.<br />

Morel, P. 1985. Priape à la Renaissance. Les guirlandes de Giovanni da Udine à la<br />

Farnésine. Revue de L’Art. 69:13–28.<br />

Paris, H. S. and J. Janick. 2005. Early evidence for the culinary use of squash<br />

flowers in Italy. Chron. Hort. 45(2):20–21.<br />

Pinet, A. du. 1561. Historia plantarum. Coter, Lyons.<br />

Pitrat, M., P. Hanelt, and K. Hammer. 2000. Some comments on infraspecific<br />

classification of cultivars of melon. In: N. Katzir and H. S. Paris (eds.). Proc.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2000. Acta Hort. 510:29–36.<br />

Ravelli, L. 2004. La zucca nella natura morta dal cinquecento al novecento.<br />

Sometti, Mantova, Italy.<br />

Ray, J. 1686. Historia plantarum, vol. 1. Clark, London.<br />

Stuart, D. C. 1984. <strong>The</strong> kitchen garden, a historical guide to traditional crops.<br />

Guernsey Press, Guernsey, UK.<br />

Tabernaemontanus, D. J. T. 1591. Kraeuter Buch. Basse, Frankfurt-on-Main.<br />

348 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


JONAH AND THE “GOURD” AT NINEVEH:<br />

CONSEQUENCES OF A CLASSIC<br />

MISTRANSLATION<br />

Jules Janick<br />

Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Purdue<br />

University, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive,<br />

West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />

Harry S. Paris<br />

Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research Center,<br />

P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus colocynthis, Lagenaria siceraria, Ricinus<br />

communis, plant iconography<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> fast-growing plant referred to in the biblical Book of Jonah is<br />

most often translated into English as “gourd.” However, this is a mistranslation<br />

that dates to the appended Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew<br />

Bible, in which the Hebrew word qiqayon (castor, Ricinus communis,<br />

Euphorbiaceae) was transformed into the somewhat similar-sounding Greek<br />

word kolokynthi (colocynth, Citrullus colocynthis). In translation of the Greek<br />

into Latin, kolokynthi became the similar-sounding cucurbita (gourd). This is<br />

reflected in early iconography, the plant most often depicted being a longfruited<br />

Lagenaria siceraria (bottle or calabash gourd), a fast-growing climber.<br />

C<br />

ucurbits are frequent subjects of art, literature, and myth. Since<br />

ancient times, people the world over have been fascinated by<br />

the fast growth of cucurbits, from a seed to a rampant vine<br />

bearing prominent, attractive fruits within two or three months.<br />

Metaphorically, the cucurbits are associated with warmth, sunshine,<br />

health, vitality, fertility, sexuality, and abundance, leading to mirth and<br />

laughter (Norrman and Haarberg, 1980).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong> fruits have been valued by humans for thousands of<br />

years, for food and a multitude of other uses. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae are<br />

extremely polymorphic for fruit size, shape, and color and the fruits of<br />

some species can exhibit great similarity to those of others (Chester,<br />

1951). Often, the result has been different names for the same species<br />

and the same name for different species, resulting in the confusion that<br />

has afflicted cucurbit terminology since ancient times. This confusion<br />

has been enhanced by the translation of names to different languages<br />

and by mistranslations. One of the most striking cases of<br />

mistranslation occurred when the biblical Book of Jonah, which is read<br />

in its entirety by Jews as part of the afternoon prayer of the Day of<br />

Atonement, was translated into other languages.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 349


Jonah, more accurately Yona the son of Amittay, is one of the<br />

remarkable figures of the Hebrew Bible. He was ordered by God to get<br />

up and go to Nineveh (a destroyed Assyrian city near the present-day<br />

Mosul, Iraq), the great city, and call upon it because its wickedness<br />

has risen up to Me. But Jonah disobeyed the Divine command and<br />

tried to run away, boarding at the port of Jaffa (Yafo, Israel) a boat<br />

bound for the city of Tarshish (a Mediterranean port, perhaps in<br />

Spain). However, the craft was soon overtaken by a squall, for which<br />

Jonah admitted responsibility and persuaded the crew of the boat to<br />

throw him overboard. Swallowed by a providential fish in whose belly<br />

he remained for three days and three nights, Jonah composed a psalm<br />

of thanksgiving. He was then vomited out on the shoreline. <strong>The</strong> Divine<br />

command to preach to Nineveh was repeated. As a result of Jonah’s<br />

exhortations, the populace heeded the warning of destruction and<br />

atoned, and the city was spared. Jonah, who had withdrawn and<br />

watched the city from a booth, was displeased at the Divine mercy<br />

toward Nineveh. A fast-growing plant had provided him with muchneeded<br />

shade, but at the break of dawn one day a worm attacked the<br />

plant, causing it to wither. Jonah was rebuked for his distress at the<br />

loss of the plant, in view of his displeasure toward the Divine mercy<br />

that spared 120,000 Ninevans their lives (Jonah 4:6–11).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hebrew name for the fast-growing plant that provided relief<br />

for Jonah is qiqayon. Derived from ancient Egyptian, this word<br />

signifies castor, Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae), castor oil being<br />

shemen qiq in Hebrew. However, in a number of biblical translations,<br />

including the King James Version of 1611, qiqayon is translated as<br />

“gourd”: And the LORD God prepared a gourd, and made it to come<br />

up over Jonah, that it might be a shadow over his head, to deliver him<br />

from his grief. So Jonah was exceeding glad of the gourd. But God<br />

prepared a worm when the morning rose the next day, and it smote the<br />

gourd that it withered (Jonah 4:6–7).<br />

A translation more faithful to the Hebrew is given in the Jerusalem<br />

Bible (Fisch, 1992): And the LORD God appointed a castor oil plant,<br />

and made it to come up over Yona, that it might be a shade over his<br />

head, to deliver him from his distress. And Yona was exceeding glad of<br />

the plant. But God appointed a worm when the dawn came up the next<br />

day, and it attacked the plant, so that it withered.<br />

<strong>The</strong> story of Jonah is one of the best-known biblical tales and is<br />

referred to both in the New Testament and in the Qur’an. <strong>The</strong> giant<br />

fish, referred to as a whale by Jesus (Matthew 10:39–40), has captured<br />

the imagination of children, like the marvelous but less well-known<br />

miraculous “gourd” that resonates in the story of Jack and the<br />

Beanstalk. It is not our purpose here to reflect on the theological<br />

350 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


meaning of Jonah or its historical accuracy. Our objective is twofold:<br />

first, to trace the story of how the fast-growing qiqayon eventually<br />

became translated as “gourd” and second, to identify the cucurbit<br />

depicted in ancient images of the story of Jonah.<br />

Translation from Hebrew to Greek: Septuagint<br />

<strong>The</strong> translation of the Hebrew Bible to Greek began in the 3 rd<br />

century BCE in Alexandria. Philadelphus II (Ptolemy, 285–247 BCE)<br />

requested of El’azar, the High Priest in Jerusalem, a translation from<br />

Hebrew into Greek for the library at Alexandria. Initially, only the<br />

Tora (Instruction), known in Greek as the Pentateuch or Five Books of<br />

Moses, was translated. This Greek translation became known as the<br />

Septuagint (Seventy) as it was supposedly conducted by a committee<br />

composed of six translators from each of the 12 tribes of Israel. Only<br />

later were the other <strong>book</strong>s comprising the Jewish scriptures translated<br />

and appended to the original Septuagint, becoming an inseparable part<br />

of it. <strong>The</strong> Septuagint is still a part of the Bible of the Eastern Orthodox<br />

Christian churches.<br />

In the Septuagint translation of the Book of Jonah, the Hebrew<br />

qiqayon is translated as the somewhat similar-sounding word kolokynthi<br />

(also kolokynthan), colocynth, Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrader. <strong>The</strong><br />

intensely bitter colocynth is referred to in the Bible as the Hebrew<br />

paqqu’ot sade. During a famine, its fruit was gathered from vines in the<br />

field and were then mistakenly included in a pottage prepared for the<br />

disciples of the prophet Elisha’: And they poured for the people to eat<br />

and it was when eating from the pottage that they yelled and said death<br />

is in the pot of the man of God and they could not eat (2 Kings 4:39–40).<br />

Elisha’ was able to ameliorate the taste of the pottage by adding flour.<br />

Citrullus colocynthis is a prostrate, relatively small vine with<br />

pinnatifid leaves. It is not adapted to climbing nor could it be thought<br />

of as a good provider of shade. Possibly, the ancient Greek usage<br />

could have been less specific and included a broader spectrum of<br />

cucurbits. <strong>The</strong> colocynth was used by the ancients medically as a<br />

purgative, and is specifically mentioned in three works of the first<br />

century CE: Materia Medica of Pedanius Dioscorides, Historia<br />

Naturalis (Book 20) of Pliny the Elder (Jones, 1951), and the Mishna,<br />

a series of six <strong>book</strong>s of commentary on Jewish Law. In Book 2 of the<br />

Mishna an entirely different use of the paqqu’ot is revealed. Oil was<br />

pressed from the seeds, for illumination, but was deemed inappropriate<br />

for lighting the Sabbath (Mishna 2, Massekhet Shabbat). In Book 6 yet<br />

another usage is described. Young shoots of paqqu’ot plants were<br />

eaten after pickling in salt or vinegar (Mishna 6, Massekhet ‘Oqazin)<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 351


(Feliks, 1957). An ancient illustration labeled with Greek Kolokynthis<br />

clearly depicting a plant of Citrullus colocynthis (Figure 1) is in the<br />

Codex Vindobonensis (Anciae Juliana), a 512 CE rendition of<br />

Dioscorides’ Materia Medica.<br />

Citrullus colocynthis was described as being used for medicinal<br />

purposes in botanical herbals of the Renaissance and was depicted in<br />

the herbals of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1616), Chabrey<br />

(1666), and others. Subsequently, the usage of colocynth or coloquinte<br />

was expanded to encompass other bitter cucurbits, most often the<br />

small-fruited <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L. gourds (Gerard 1597;<br />

Tabernaemontani 1664). Bauhin (1651) illustrated and described the<br />

true colocynth and listed and described briefly nine other gourds that<br />

were also denoted colocynth. Seven were described as having rough<br />

foliage, probably indicative of C. pepo, an eighth was pyriform,<br />

probably also C. pepo. <strong>The</strong> last was described as having soft foliage<br />

and white flowers, evidently a small, bitter gourd of Lagenaria<br />

siceraria (Molina) Standley. <strong>The</strong> loose usage of the word colocynth in<br />

the later Renaissance gives credence to the supposition that the word<br />

kolokynthi was occasionally used loosely for cucurbits in ancient<br />

times.<br />

Translation to Latin<br />

<strong>The</strong> translation of the Hebrew Bible into Latin was originally by<br />

way of the Septuagint. <strong>The</strong> Greek kolokynthi was translated with the<br />

similar-sounding cucurbita (gourd) (Norrman and Haarberg, 1980).<br />

Eusebius Hieronymus Sophronius, 340–420 CE (later Saint Jerome),<br />

who was fluent in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin, translated directly from<br />

Hebrew to Latin. His translation is known as the Vulgate. <strong>The</strong> plant in<br />

the Book of Jonah was to become a source of contention in early<br />

Christianity between Augustine of Hippo, 354–430 CE (later Saint<br />

Augustine), and Jerome. Augustine was concerned about differences<br />

that could arise about biblical mistranslations, and the precise name of<br />

the plant in the Book of Jonah became the basis of a heated exchange<br />

of letters between Augustine and Jerome starting in 394 and<br />

continuing through 406. Augustine stridently objected to Jerome<br />

translating the Bible into Latin without adding notes and was<br />

especially vexed about mistranslations of the fast-growing plant of the<br />

Book of Jonah that Jerome translated as hedera (ivy). <strong>The</strong> English<br />

translations of Augustine’s letter of 403 and Jerome’s response of 406<br />

are quoted below (http://www.bible-researcher.com/vulgate2.html):<br />

352 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Augustine: A certain bishop, one of our brethren, having<br />

introduced in the church over which he presides the reading of<br />

your version, came upon a word in the <strong>book</strong> of the prophet<br />

Jonah, of which you have give a very different rendering from<br />

that which had been of old familiar to the senses and memory of<br />

all the worshippers, and had been chanted for so many<br />

generations in the church. <strong>The</strong>reupon arose such a tumult in the<br />

congregation, especially amongst the Greeks, correcting what<br />

had been read, and denouncing the translation as false, that the<br />

bishop was compelled to ask the testimony of the Jewish<br />

residents (it was in the town of Oea). <strong>The</strong>se, whether from<br />

ignorance or from spite, answered that the words in the Hebrew<br />

manuscripts were correctly rendered in the Greek version, and<br />

in the Latin one taken from it. What further need I say? <strong>The</strong> man<br />

was compelled to correct your version in that passage as if it<br />

have been falsely translated, as he desired not to be left without<br />

a congregation—a calamity which he narrowly escaped. From<br />

this case we also are led to think that you may be occasionally<br />

mistaken. You will also observe how great must have been the<br />

difficulty if this had occurred in those writings which cannot be<br />

explained by comparing the testimony of languages now in use.<br />

Jerome: You tell me that I have given a wrong translation of<br />

some word in Jonah, and that a worthy bishop narrowly escaped<br />

losing his charge through the clamorous tumult of his people,<br />

which was caused by the different rendering of this one word. At<br />

the same time, you withhold from me what the word was which I<br />

have mistranslated; thus taking away the possibility of my saying<br />

anything in my own vindication, lest my reply should be fatal to<br />

your objection. Perhaps it is the old dispute about the gourd<br />

which has been revived, after slumbering for many long years<br />

since the illustrious man, who in that day combined in his own<br />

person the ancestral honours of the Cornelii and of Asinius<br />

Pollio, brought against me the charge of giving in my translation<br />

the word “ivy” instead of “gourd.” I have already given a<br />

sufficient answer to this in my commentary on Jonah. At present,<br />

I deem it enough to say that in that passage, where the<br />

Septuagint has “gourd,” and Aquila and the others have<br />

rendered the word “ivy” (kissos), the Hebrew MS. has<br />

“ciceion,” which is in the Syriac tongue, as now spoken,<br />

“ciceia.” It is a kind of shrub having large leaves like a vine,<br />

and when planted it quickly springs up to the size of a small tree,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 353


standing upright by its own stem, without requiring any support<br />

of canes or poles, as both gourds and ivy do. If, therefore, in<br />

translating word for word, I had put the word “ciceia,” no one<br />

would know what it meant; if I had used the word “gourd,” I<br />

would have said what is not found in the Hebrew. I therefore put<br />

down “ivy,” that I might not differ from all other translators.<br />

But if your Jews said, either through malice or ignorance, as you<br />

yourself suggest, that the word is in the Hebrew text which is<br />

found in the Greek and Latin versions, it is evident that they<br />

were either unacquainted with Hebrew, or have been pleased to<br />

say what was not what was not true, in order to make sport of<br />

the gourd-planters.<br />

Clearly, then, as now, misuse and mistranslations of plant names,<br />

especially names of cucurbits, have led to misunderstandings and<br />

controversy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Translation in the Qur’an<br />

In the Qur’an, written in the 7 th century, the plant at Nineveh is<br />

identified as yaqtin: there grew over Jonah a kind of yaqtin (Sura<br />

37:139–146). Usually, the Arabic yaqtin is identified with Lagenaria<br />

siceraria. Commentators of the Qur’an have offered a spectrum of<br />

opinions concerning the identity of the yaqtin, which can be<br />

summarized as indicating an herbaceous, summer-annual plant lacking<br />

support tissue, a climbing, quick-growing vine, having large foliage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> identification of the Hebrew qiqayon as Ricinus communis, Arabic<br />

kharua’, is not accepted in Islamic tradition (Amar, 1998), echoing<br />

Latin translations of the Septuagint rather than the Hebrew Bible or the<br />

Vulgate.<br />

English Translations<br />

<strong>The</strong> famous Authorized Version of King James I, 1611, has many<br />

mistranslations of biblical plants (Moldenke and Moldenke, 1952).<br />

<strong>The</strong> erroneous use of “gourd” for qiqayon in the Book of Jonah was<br />

copied in a number of subsequent English translations. <strong>The</strong> English<br />

translations based on the French Douay version of Roman Catholics<br />

use “ivy,” following Jerome’s Vulgate. A number of new translations<br />

based on modern scholarship equivocate and call it either “plant”<br />

(Revised Standard Version) or “vine” (New International Version).<br />

354 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Images from Antiquity<br />

A gourd is used for the story of Jonah in Judeo-Christian<br />

iconography of the 3 rd to the 16 th centuries. One example is a sculpture<br />

from 3 rd -century Phrygia (Central Turkey) showing Jonah under a vine<br />

bearing a fruit that is clearly an elongated Lagenaria siceraria (Figure<br />

2). Two others are mosaics, one from Tunisia dating to the end of the<br />

3 rd or beginning of the 4 th century (Figure 3) and the other from Italy<br />

(4 th century) (Figure 4). <strong>The</strong>ir similarity suggests that a standard<br />

representation of the incident was copied. <strong>The</strong> two mosaics show a<br />

nearly nude figure of the reclining Jonah under a trellis from which<br />

hang eight elongate fruits. Based on the swollen peduncular ends the<br />

fruits (Figure 4), these too appear to be L. siceraria. <strong>The</strong> young fruits<br />

of elongate L. siceraria are a food crop in some regions, such as Sicily,<br />

to the present day. Long-fruited L. siceraria are also depicted in<br />

Roman mosaics of the 2 nd to 3 rd century, indicating that they were a<br />

familiar esculent in the ancient Mediterranean region, and specific<br />

mention of the use of trellises for gourds is made by Columella and<br />

Pliny. A 12 th century image (Figure 5) captures the entire story of<br />

Jonah, including his being tossed overboard, being swallowed by the<br />

fish, and reclining under a cucurbit vine, but the image is too crude to<br />

make an identification of the species. Later images, from the 14 th and<br />

16 th centuries, depict Jonah’s gourd as the more familiar bottle-shaped<br />

L. siceraria.<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> identification of the fast-growing plant in the Book of Jonah as<br />

a gourd is due to a mistranslation of the Hebrew word qiqayon (castor)<br />

to the Greek word kolokynthi and then to the Latin word cucurbita.<br />

<strong>The</strong> error is reflected in early iconography, the qiqayon being depicted<br />

as a long-fruited Lagenaria siceraria. <strong>The</strong> confusion over the plant<br />

shows how, then as now, misuse and mistranslation of plant names,<br />

especially names of cucurbits, have led to misunderstandings and<br />

controversy. <strong>The</strong> qiqayon of Jonah was a lush, fast-growing provider<br />

of shade. By rendering it an edible-fruited cucurbit, it became, in<br />

addition, a symbol of sustenance, well-being, and life itself.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 355


Fig. 1. Painting of Citrullus colocynthis from Codex Vindobonensis, 512 CE (Der<br />

Wiener Dioskurides, 1998).<br />

Fig. 2. Jonah at Nineveh in a paleo-Christian sculpture from Phrygia (Central<br />

Turkey), ca. 270–280 (Cleveland Museum of Art).<br />

Fig. 3. Jonah at Nineveh in a 3 rd –4 th -century mosaic at Tunis (Baggio et al.,<br />

1995).<br />

Fig. 4. Jonah at Nineveh in a mosaic at Aquileia, Italy (Rossi, 1968).<br />

Fig. 5. <strong>The</strong> story of Jonah from a 12 th century manuscript. Sinai Peninsula,<br />

Monastery of Saint Catherine, Ms. 1186, fol. 110r. Photo Richard Cleave.<br />

(Encyclopedia Judaica, 1972).<br />

356 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Literature Cited<br />

Amar, Z. 1998. Zihuy hazomeah hamiqra’i bir’i parshanut haQur’an [Scriptural<br />

plant identification mirrored in Qur’an commentary]. Bet Miqra. 43(1):67–77.<br />

Baggio, M., M. De Paoli, M. T. Lachin, M. Salvadori, and S. Toso. 1995. Mosaici<br />

Romani di Tunisias. CNRS Editions, Paris.<br />

Bauhin, J. 1651. Historiae plantarum universalis. Graffenried, Yverdon.<br />

Bock, H. 1546. Kreuter Buch. Rihel, Strasbourg.<br />

Chabrey, D. 1666. Stirpium sciagraphia et icones. Gamoneti & de la Pierre, Geneva.<br />

Chester, K. S. 1951. Selected writings of N. I. Vavilov. <strong>The</strong> origin, variation,<br />

immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, MA.<br />

Der Wiener Dioskurides. 1998. Codex medicus Graecus 1 der Österreichischen<br />

Nationalbibliothek. Graz.<br />

Dodoens, R. 1616. Stirpium historiae pemptades. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />

Encyclopedia Judaica. 1972. Jerusalem.<br />

Feliks, J. 1957. ‘Olam hazomeah hamiqra’i [Plant world of the Bible], 1 st ed.<br />

Massada, Tel Aviv.<br />

Fisch, H. 1992. <strong>The</strong> holy scriptures. <strong>The</strong> Jerusalem Bible. Koren, Jerusalem.<br />

Fuchs, L. 1542. De historia stirpium. Isingrin, Basel.<br />

Gerard, J. 1597. <strong>The</strong> herbal or generall historie of plants. Bollifant, London.<br />

Jones, W. H. S. 1951. Pliny natural history. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.<br />

Moldenke, H. N. and A. L. Moldenke. 1952. Plants of the Bible. Chronica Botanica,<br />

Waltham, MA.<br />

Norrmann, R. and J. Haarberg. 1980. Nature and language: a semiotic study of<br />

cucurbits in literature. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.<br />

Rossi, F. 1968. Il mosaico: pittura a de pietra. Alflieri & Lacroix, Milan.<br />

Tabernaemontani, J. T. 1664. Kraeuter-Buch. Koenigs, Basel.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 357


DEVELOPMENT OF AN IMAGE DATABASE<br />

OF CUCURBITACEAE<br />

Jules Janick and Anna Whipkey<br />

Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Purdue<br />

University,<br />

625 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />

Harry S. Paris<br />

Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center,<br />

P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />

Marie-Christine Daunay and E. Jullian<br />

INRA, Unité de Génétique & Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes,<br />

Domaine St Maurice, BP 94, 84143 Montfavet cedex, France<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. plant iconography, taxonomy, crop history, crop<br />

evolution<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> systematic collection of plant iconography would be an<br />

invaluable resource to researchers, providing significant information on<br />

taxonomy, crop history and evolution, lost traits, and genetic diversity. To this<br />

end a project, “Plant Image”, is being organized to assemble a searchable<br />

database of plant images, focusing on the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Solanaceae.<br />

Searches have been made from various sources including art (mosaics,<br />

paintings, and sculpture), illustrated manuscripts, and hand illustrated and<br />

printed herbals and <strong>book</strong>s. We are concentrating our search on antiquity (Old<br />

and New World), medieval, and Renaissance sources but we intend to include<br />

more recent images as well. Bibliographic information on primary and<br />

secondary sources will be associated with each image and, in the case of herbals,<br />

associated text material will eventually be included. We hope to receive images<br />

and information from all persons interested in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and<br />

Solanaceae, so that the database will be a living, dynamic document. <strong>The</strong><br />

working database is online: www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/iconography.<br />

P<br />

lant iconography is a valuable resource for such fields as<br />

taxonomy, genetics, crop domestication and crop evolution, and<br />

genetic diversity. It is one of the tools for assessing the<br />

historical presence of botanical taxa in a particular region (Eisendrath,<br />

1961). A large, maybe even enormous, amount of ancient illustrative<br />

material exists, but it is fragile, rare, and widely scattered among<br />

libraries and collections, public and private, and is often difficult to<br />

access. Hence, there is no easy way for one person to assemble all of<br />

the illustrations for any plant family. Moreover, copyrights to images<br />

are often involved, and policy for access to the images varies from one<br />

library or collection to another. <strong>The</strong> viewing and usage of the many<br />

images are restricted.<br />

358 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


On the other hand, the digitizing of information by some of the<br />

major world libraries has greatly facilitated the search for ancient<br />

illustrations and, for the first time, made their collection feasible.<br />

Collection of all of the ancient illustrations of such a large, diverse,<br />

and attractive family as the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae would especially be too<br />

huge for any single individual to undertake and therefore a joint effort<br />

is necessary. Our goal is to develop a database assembling plant<br />

images based on botanical names, so that plant researchers can easily<br />

focus their iconographic research on taxa of interest. We call this<br />

project “Plant Image” and have initiated it with two plant families:<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Solanaceae.<br />

Description<br />

We are concentrating our searches on antiquity (Old and New<br />

World), and Medieval, Renaissance, and Baroque periods but we<br />

intend to include images from the 18 th century to the present. <strong>The</strong><br />

images collected so far are from various sources, including art<br />

(mosaics, paintings, and sculpture), illustrated manuscripts, printed<br />

herbals, <strong>book</strong>s, and private collections. In the case of herbals, we hope<br />

to eventually associate text material. We are aware that many of the<br />

images from printed herbals are merely copies of preexisting images<br />

but we will include as many as feasible; for works that went through<br />

many editions, we will concentrate on the primary sources. Our<br />

intention is to include the following bibliographic information<br />

associated with each image:<br />

Bibliographic Information for Images:<br />

Family: family name<br />

Species: modern binomial with authority<br />

Common name: common name or names, English first<br />

Original label: designation in original document<br />

Original document: where image was first published or created<br />

Time period: time when image was produced<br />

Associated text: yes/no (list separately)<br />

Author: author of text of original document<br />

Illustrator: creator of image<br />

Color: black and white, hand tinted, painted, printed in color<br />

Library/collection: source from where document was obtained<br />

Library reference: library identification of source document<br />

Secondary source: used if image was obtained from a later document<br />

Comments: additional information<br />

Donor: contributor of image<br />

Web link: original Website<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 359


Operation<br />

<strong>The</strong> database was created using FileMaker Pro®, currently on the<br />

server of Purdue University. <strong>The</strong> database is maintained by Anna<br />

Whipkey of the Department of Horticulture and Landscape<br />

Architecture (awhipkey@purdue.edu). All images need to be defined<br />

with the bibliographic information described above. <strong>The</strong> donor of the<br />

image will be acknowledged and identified. We hope to have the<br />

highest resolution possible, but we are aware that in many cases the<br />

highest resolution images are available only by purchase from specific<br />

institutions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> project must be a living, dynamic collection and success will<br />

depend on images obtained from willing scientists, art historians,<br />

archivists, enthusiasts, and others. We invite anyone to contribute<br />

images and are willing to acknowledge and identify each donor. <strong>The</strong><br />

database is intended to be freely open to all. We are attempting to<br />

solicit modest grants to facilitate this project. As an example of the<br />

database contents, representative cucurbit images with associated<br />

information are shown in Figures 1 to 5. <strong>The</strong> information we are<br />

compiling is freely available as part of the Purdue NewCROPWebsite:<br />

.<br />

Fig. 1. Typical page of database.<br />

360 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Fig. 2. Ecballium elaterium<br />

(squirting cucumber) from<br />

Dioscorides, De Materia Medica,<br />

Codex Vindobonensis 512 CE.<br />

Source: Der Wiener Dioskurides,<br />

1998.<br />

Fig. 4. Cucumis melo,<br />

cantalupensis Group, painted by<br />

Giovanni da Udine from the Villa<br />

Farnesina (1515–1518). Source:<br />

Janick and Paris, 2006.<br />

Fig. 3. Lagenaria siceraria (bottle<br />

gourd). Source: Schoeffer, 1485.<br />

Fig. 5. Citrullus lanatus<br />

(watermelon), woodcut from De<br />

Historia Stirpium (Fuchs, 1542) and<br />

republished in Fuchs’ New<br />

Kreuterbuch, 1543, coloring from<br />

his personal copy (Meyer et al.,<br />

1999)<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 361


Literature Cited<br />

Der Wiener Dioskurides. 1998. Codex medicus Graecus 1 der Österreichishchen<br />

Nationalbibliothek. Graz.<br />

Eisendrath, E. R. 1961. Portraits of plants. a limited study of the “icones”. Ann.<br />

Missouri Bot. Gard. 48:291–327.<br />

Schoeffer, P. 1485. Gart der gesundheit, p. 83. Schoeffer, Mainz, Germany.<br />

Janick, J. and Paris, H. S. 2006. <strong>The</strong> cucurbit images (1515–1518) of the Villa<br />

Farnesina, Rome. Ann. Bot. 97:165–176.<br />

Meyer, F. G., Trueblood, E. E., and Heller, J. L. 1999. <strong>The</strong> great herbal of Leonhart<br />

Fuchs, vol. 1, commentary, p. 522–523, 669–670, pl. 64. Stanford Univ. Press,<br />

Stanford, CA.<br />

362 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


FIRST IMAGES OF CUCURBITA IN EUROPE<br />

Harry S. Paris<br />

Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research Center,<br />

P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />

Jules Janick<br />

Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Purdue<br />

University, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive,<br />

West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />

Marie-Christine Daunay<br />

I.N.R.A., Unité de Génétique & Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes,<br />

Domaine St. Maurice, BP 94, 84143, Montfavet cedex, France<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata, crop dispersal, crop history, plant iconography<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (pumpkin, squash, gourd) is native to the<br />

Americas and diffused to other continents subsequent to European contact in<br />

1492. For quite some time, the earliest images of this genus in Europe that were<br />

known to cucurbit specialists were two illustrations of C. pepo pumpkins that<br />

were published in Fuchs’ De Historia Stirpium, 1542, exactly 50 years after<br />

Columbus’ first voyage. Other images considerably antedating these have come<br />

to light recently as the result of the publication of two <strong>book</strong>s in which are<br />

reproduced highly realistic botanical and horticultural color paintings from the<br />

first two decades of the 16 th century. One of these images appears in the prayer<br />

<strong>book</strong> of Anne de Bretagne, Queen of France. Completed by 1508, this painting<br />

shows a living branch bearing flowers and fruits, which we interpret as being a<br />

gourd of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo subsp. texana. Other images appear in festoons painted<br />

on the ceiling of the Villa Farnesina in Rome, <strong>complete</strong>d by 1518. <strong>The</strong>se lifelike<br />

color depictions include pumpkins and gourds of C. maxima, C. pepo, and,<br />

possibly, C. moschata.<br />

he genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a L. (pumpkins, squash, and some gourds)<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae) is native to the Americas (Gray and Trumbull,<br />

1883; Whitaker, 1947). Pumpkins and squash were dispersed to<br />

other continents by transoceanic voyagers at the turn of the 16 th<br />

T<br />

century and have become a familiar and important vegetable crop in<br />

many countries. Whilst C. pepo L. is by far the most widely distributed<br />

and economically important species of the genus, C. maxima<br />

Duchesne and C. moschata Duchesne are also economically important<br />

in various regions.<br />

Plant iconography is the most unequivocal tool for assessing the<br />

historical presence of botanical taxa in a particular region; this is<br />

especially the case for the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae (Eisendrath, 1961). <strong>The</strong> first<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 363


known images of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a outside of the Americas had long been<br />

believed to be two illustrations of pumpkins of C. pepo that appeared<br />

in De Historia Stirpium (Fuchs, 1542), a half-century after Columbus’<br />

first voyage to the New World. Indeed, the earliest unequivocal<br />

depiction of C. maxima appeared the botanical herbal of L’Obel<br />

(1576) and the earliest generally accepted illustration of C. moschata<br />

is in the tome of Rheede tot Draakenstein (1688). Several recent<br />

publications have brought to light the existence of even earlier<br />

depictions of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in Europe. One of these depictions is in the<br />

personally painted prayer <strong>book</strong> that belonged to Anne de Bretagne,<br />

Queen of France and Duchess of Brittany (1477–1514) (Bilimoff,<br />

2001). With time, this <strong>book</strong> was to become known as the Grandes<br />

Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. Other depictions are in the festoons that<br />

surround frescoes decorating ceilings of a fabulous early Renaissance<br />

residence in Rome (Caneva, 1992). This building was later to become<br />

known as the Villa Farnesina. <strong>The</strong> objective of this paper is to describe<br />

and discuss these depictions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Grandes Heures<br />

<strong>The</strong> Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne was compiled and<br />

illustrated between 1503 and 1508 (Bilimoff, 2001). At the request of<br />

Queen Anne, Jean Bourdichon (1457–1521) of Touraine, who was<br />

official court painter to four successive French kings, richly adorned<br />

an Horae ad usum romanum, that is, a prayer <strong>book</strong>, for the Queen’s<br />

personal use (Camus, 1894; Bilimoff, 2001). On many of the 30 ×<br />

19cm pages, he painted fairly accurately a part of a plant and, on or<br />

next to it, several small animals, mostly insects. Well over 300 plant<br />

species are represented in the <strong>book</strong>, drawn from live specimens found<br />

in the fields, woods, and royal gardens at Tours and Blois in the Loire<br />

Valley. Most of the paintings are vertically oriented 165 × 45mm<br />

rectangles positioned on the outside margins of the prayers, whilst<br />

other paintings surround or bracket the prayers. Each painting is<br />

labeled with a Latin name and a French vernacular name of the plant.<br />

Catalogued as Ms. Latin 9474 at the Bibliothèque Nationale de<br />

France, the <strong>book</strong> can be browsed on-line in its entirety at<br />

, by clicking on<br />

Recherche, typing Latin 9474 in the small window Manuscrits,<br />

clicking on Chercher and then on Images.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most outstanding feature of this <strong>book</strong> is the lifelike<br />

representation of so many species of living plants and animals, even<br />

though these are not always biologically accurate (Camus, 1894). <strong>The</strong><br />

relative sizes of the various plant parts and the animals, the shapes of<br />

364 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


the leaves, and the colors of the flowers and the animals sometimes<br />

succumbed to fantasy in order to enhance the artistic effects.<br />

Nonetheless, the paintings are accurate enough to allow positive<br />

identification of most of the plants to genus and species. Each of the<br />

paintings is labeled with a Latin name and a French name.<br />

Used by Queen Anne until her death, this <strong>book</strong> remained within<br />

the collection of precious documents of the French kings. In 1722,<br />

King Louis XV th allowed the royal botanist, Antoine de Jussieu (1686–<br />

1758), to critically analyze the illustrations of plants in the royal<br />

collection. Jussieu considered the plant images in the Grandes Heures<br />

to be much more realistic than those of earlier documents but he<br />

considered many of the Latin plant labels in the Grandes Heures to be<br />

inappropriate. <strong>The</strong>refore, he prepared a catalogue, in which he<br />

tabulated the Latin and French labels of the plants in the Grandes<br />

Heures next to Latin designations used in major botanical works such<br />

as those of L’Obel, the Bauhin brothers, and Tournefort, as well as the<br />

contemporary French common names. Joseph Decaisne (1807–1882),<br />

the Belgian botanist, also examined the <strong>book</strong> and catalogued the<br />

plants, apparently without knowing that Jussieu had done so a century<br />

earlier. Camus (1894) compared the identifications of the plants by<br />

Jussieu and by Decaisne and, noticing they were not always the same,<br />

he offered his own identifications of the plants. Bilimoff (2001), in her<br />

<strong>book</strong> Promenade dans des Jardins Disparus, reproduced in color,<br />

some whole and some in part, the paintings in the Grandes Heures.<br />

This <strong>book</strong>, through which we became aware of the existence of these<br />

images, also has a catalogue of its own, listing the names from the<br />

Grandes Heures alongside Latin and contemporary French names.<br />

Four cucurbits are depicted in the Grandes Heures. One is bryony,<br />

Bryonia dioica Jacq., which grows wild but is not cultivated. Another,<br />

bearing the Latin name Cucumer and the French name Concombres, is<br />

indeed cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Another cucurbit, bearing the<br />

Latin name <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a and the French name Quegourdes, is bottle<br />

gourd, Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standley. <strong>The</strong>se three cucurbits<br />

are of Old World origin. <strong>The</strong> fourth cucurbit image bears the Latin<br />

name Colloqui[n]tida and the French label Quegourdes de turquie.<br />

Jussieu, Decaisne, Camus, and Bilimoff agreed that this image was<br />

modeled from a plant of the New World genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, but the<br />

identification of the species has been controversial and to our<br />

knowledge no cucurbit specialists have examined the image previously<br />

and positively identified it to that taxonomic level.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 365


<strong>The</strong> Image of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the Grandes Heures<br />

<strong>The</strong> image of Quegourdes de turquie in the Grandes Heures<br />

d’Anne de Bretagne is bracket-shaped with a golden background<br />

(Figure 1) (Paris et al., 2006). It depicts a branch with three pistillate<br />

flowers at anthesis that closely resemble those of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. <strong>The</strong><br />

large orange-yellow corollas are moderately flaring, fused at the base<br />

and parted, as petals, near the apex. <strong>The</strong> corollas are 6-parted, rather<br />

than the typical 5-parted, but 6-parted and even 7-parted corollas do<br />

occur occasionally in C. pepo (Duchesne, 1786). <strong>The</strong> calyx is short<br />

and its sepals are thin, tapering to a point at the apex, like an awl. <strong>The</strong><br />

ovaries are inferior and pyriform. A fourth pistillate flower, one day<br />

prior to anthesis, is depicted near the apex of the branch. Six leaf<br />

laminae and parts of three petioles are depicted. <strong>The</strong> leaf laminae are<br />

acute, serrated, and deeply indented, as in C. pepo, but their shape is 7parted<br />

rather than the usual more-or-less 5-parted. <strong>The</strong> two pyriform<br />

fruits are connected to the stem by long, narrow peduncles. No detail is<br />

evident for the petioles, stem, or peduncles, and no tendrils are<br />

depicted. On and next to the plant are depicted a snail and four<br />

arthropods: a caterpillar, a fly, a moth, and a beetle, all in lifelike<br />

color.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two pyriform fruits of the Quegourdes de turquie appear to be<br />

similar to gourds of C. pepo (Figure 1). Upon closer examination, the<br />

fruits of the Quegourdes de turquie can be seen to bear longitudinal<br />

stripes: broad, light yellow-green ones alternating with narrow light<br />

blue-green ones. <strong>The</strong> striped color pattern is quite common among the<br />

pyriform gourds, wild and ornamental, of C. pepo, although most often<br />

the broad stripes are dark green (Paris, 2000). On the mature fruits of<br />

such pyriform gourds, the broad dark green stripes alternate with<br />

narrow ivory white stripes; when the fruits are immature, the narrow<br />

stripes are light blue-green, as shown in the image. <strong>The</strong> green<br />

coloration of both the broad and the narrow stripes suggests that the<br />

fruits were immature.<br />

<strong>The</strong> image is labeled at the bottom with the French vernacular<br />

name Quegourdes de turquie (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> French word quegourdes<br />

apparently had been used during that era, first for bottle gourds and<br />

then extended to include other gourds. Quegourdes was to become<br />

cougourdes or gourdes, epithets applied to forms of Lagenaria<br />

(Duchesne, 1786). During the 16 th century, the adjective “Turkish”<br />

implied an exotic origin. For example, one of the two C. pepo<br />

pumpkins appearing in the herbal of Fuchs (1542) is labeled<br />

“Türckisch Cucumer” whilst maize (Zea mays L.) is labeled<br />

“Türckisch Korn”; both of these species, of course, are native<br />

366 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


American plants. <strong>The</strong>refore, this particular plant, the Quegourdes de<br />

turquie, was recognized in the Grandes Heures as being new or<br />

foreign, de turquie, distinguishing it from the Lagenaria gourds.<br />

As has been asserted concerning the identity of the cucurbits<br />

illustrated in the botanical herbals of the Renaissance (Eisendrath,<br />

1961), the identification of the plants illustrated in the Grandes Heures<br />

d’Anne de Bretagne must take into account the artistic style of the<br />

illustrator. <strong>The</strong>refore, comparison of the illustration of Quegourdes de<br />

turquie with that of each of the two other cultivated species of<br />

cucurbits offers valuable assistance in interpretation. <strong>The</strong> illustration<br />

of Lagenaria siceraria (Figure 1) in the Grandes Heures accurately<br />

depicts the plant as having rounded leaf laminae and large white<br />

flowers, but it too lacks detail of the stem. <strong>The</strong> illustration of Cucumis<br />

sativus (Figure 1) also lacks details of the stems and petioles.<br />

Moreover, the leaf laminae are depicted as deeply lobed, whilst in<br />

reality those of C. sativus are angular but shallowly pentalobate. <strong>The</strong><br />

peduncles of the cucumber fruits are depicted as originating separately<br />

Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> paintings of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo subsp. texana, Lagenaria siceraria, and<br />

Cucumis sativus in the Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne (1503–1508).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 367


Fig. 2. A painting of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima from the Loggia of Cupid and Psyche<br />

ceiling of the Villa Farnesina (1515–1518).<br />

on the main stem rather than in leaf axils; they are very long, narrow,<br />

and smooth. However, C. sativus peduncles are typically spiculate and<br />

not so long, and furthermore originate in leaf axils. <strong>The</strong> long, narrow,<br />

smooth peduncles not originating in leaf axils are in common, though,<br />

with the illustration of Quegourdes de turquie. So it would seem that<br />

these anomalous characteristics were stylistic of the artist.<strong>The</strong> striping<br />

pattern of the fruits of Quegourdes de turquie is inconsistent with the<br />

possibility that this depiction is of the cultivated species <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata, C. argyrosperma Huber, or C. ficifolia Bouché. C. maxima<br />

fruits can exhibit narrow light-colored stripes, but this species has<br />

rounded, rather than angular leaves. Wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a taxa invariably<br />

have round fruits, with the exception of C. pepo subsp. texana, which<br />

bears fruits that are most often oviform to globose, with pyriform<br />

variants being fairly common (Erwin, 1938; Bailey, 1943; Andres,<br />

1987). Whilst on most fruits the broad stripes are dark, intense green,<br />

fruits having light-colored broad stripes or that are even entirely lightcolored<br />

or ivory white have also been observed (Bailey, 1937; Decker-<br />

Walters et al., 1993). Quegourdes de turquie, therefore, is a<br />

representation of a pyriform gourd of C. pepo subsp. texana.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Villa Farnesina<br />

<strong>The</strong> festoons on ceilings in the Villa Farnesina were painted by<br />

Giovanni Martini da Udine (1487–1564) from 1515 to early 1518.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se festoons and the frescoes that they surround, designed by<br />

Raphael Sanzio (1483–1520), were painted for Agostino Chigi, an<br />

extremely wealthy Sienese banker, in this, his new home on the west<br />

368 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


ank of the Tiber in Rome. Today, the Villa Farnesina is open to<br />

tourists and a <strong>complete</strong> photographic study of the decorations was<br />

recently published by Frommel (2003). Identifications of the fruits and<br />

plants in the festoons were offered in the <strong>book</strong> by Caneva (1992),<br />

through which we became aware of the existence of these paintings.<br />

Remarkably, within the festoons are the first European images of Zea<br />

mays (Janick and Caneva, 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong> depictions in the festoons are in lifelike color and highly<br />

accurate, to the point of showing blemishes and diseases on the fruits.<br />

Most of the species have more than one fruit depicted. <strong>The</strong> variation<br />

among fruits of the same species is a mirror on intraspecific genetic<br />

diversity. Analysis of the maize images has suggested that in some<br />

cases prototypes were copied, and, while some artistic license was<br />

used, the portraits nonetheless do appear to be quite accurate and can<br />

be considered true representations of the flowers and fruits that were<br />

probably harvested from the gardens that at the time surrounded the<br />

Villa Farnesina (Janick and Caneva, 2005). <strong>The</strong> images in the festoons<br />

of the Villa Farnesina led to the painting of similar images, beginning<br />

in 1517, in the Vatican, the Villa Medici in Rome, and the Villa d’Este<br />

in Tivoli.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Images of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the Villa Farnesina<br />

<strong>The</strong> festoons in the Villa Farnesina contain seven images of fruits<br />

of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima (Janick and Paris, 2006). <strong>The</strong>se are from three<br />

cultivars, two of which appear to be representative of the market class<br />

of show pumpkins, although they are not nearly so large as those that<br />

are customarily encountered today. One of the show-pumpkin cultivars<br />

has intense-orange fruits, which are shallowly furrowed and have a<br />

somewhat protruding stylar end surrounded by a narrow but large<br />

circular scar (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> other show-pumpkin cultivar has graywhite<br />

fruits with shallow furrows and a small stylar scar. <strong>The</strong> third C.<br />

maxima is a smaller pumpkin, greenish gray and oblate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> festoons contain 15 images of fruits of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. All but<br />

three of these are of small, oviform to pyriform, striped fruits, C. pepo<br />

subsp. texana. Gourds of this appearance occur in cultivation and in<br />

the wild. If cultivated, they are referred to the Oviform, Smooth-<br />

Rinded Group (Paris, 2001). Two of the remaining fruits occur close<br />

together in the festoons. <strong>The</strong>y appear to be larger than the gourds, but<br />

are nonetheless modest in size. <strong>The</strong>y are striped with two shades of<br />

green and apparently immature. <strong>The</strong>ir oblate shape indicates that they<br />

are of the Pumpkin Group, which belongs to C. pepo subsp. pepo. <strong>The</strong><br />

remaining fruit is a large pumpkin. It is oval, slightly furrowed, and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 369


mostly light orange-yellow though partly gray-green, indicating a fruit<br />

that has just barely attained ripeness. <strong>The</strong> identity of this fruit is not<br />

entirely certain. While the coloration is more consistent with C. pepo,<br />

the lobing of the fruit is more reminiscent of C. moschata. A lobed<br />

pumpkin growing on a plant having leaf laminae like those of C. pepo<br />

was illustrated in the herbal of Tabernaemontanus (1591).<br />

Discussion and Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> image of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the Grandes Heures (1503–1508) and<br />

most of the images of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fruits in the Villa Farnesina (1515–<br />

1518) are small, pyriform or oviform striped gourds of C. pepo subsp.<br />

texana. <strong>The</strong>se inedible gourds are most often cultivated today for<br />

ornament, but may have been grown for some other purposes in the<br />

past. Often, they are indistinguishable phenotypically from wild C.<br />

pepo subsp. texana gourds, which are native to the southern,<br />

southeastern, and central U.S.A. Wild plants of this subspecies have<br />

been encountered most often in Texas, on the floodplains of several<br />

creeks and rivers that enter the Gulf of Mexico, and including two<br />

coastal counties (Erwin, 1938; Nee, 1990; Decker-Walters et al.,<br />

1993). It is possible that these early 16 th -century images of C. pepo<br />

subsp. texana were based on offspring of plants found growing wild<br />

along the Gulf Coast of what is now the United <strong>State</strong>s. Europeans first<br />

entered the Gulf of Mexico no later than 1498 (Mollat, 2005).<br />

Significantly, no edible fruits of C. pepo subsp. texana are represented<br />

in the Grandes Heures or the Villa Farnesina.<br />

Remarkably, the depictions in the Villa Farnesina of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

maxima and C. pepo indicate that several types of both species were<br />

introduced into Europe within 25 years of the first voyage of<br />

Columbus. <strong>The</strong> images of C. maxima and of C. pepo subsp. pepo in<br />

the Villa Farnesina are pumpkins and, by definition, esculents, serving<br />

as evidence of European contact with American horticulture.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Andres, T. C. 1987. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fraterna, the closest wild relative and progenitor of C.<br />

pepo. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genet. Coop. Rep. 10:69–71.<br />

Bailey, L. H. 1937. <strong>The</strong> garden of gourds. Macmillan, New York.<br />

Bailey, L. H. 1943. Species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. Gentes Herbarum. 6:266–322.<br />

Bilimoff, M. 2001. Promenade dans des jardins disparus: les plantes au moyen age,<br />

d’après les Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. Editions Ouest-France, Rennes.<br />

Camus, G. 1894. Les noms des plantes du livre d’Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. J.<br />

Botanique 8:325–335, 345–352, 366–375, 396–401.<br />

Caneva, G. 1992. Il mondo di cerere nella loggia di Psiche. Fratelli Palombi, Rome.<br />

370 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Decker-Walters, D. S., T. W. Walters, C. W. Cowan, and B. D. Smith. 1993.<br />

Isozymic characterization of wild populations of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. J. Ethnobiol.<br />

13:55–72.<br />

Duchesne, A. N. 1786. Essai sur l’histoire naturelle des courges. Panckoucke, Paris.<br />

Eisendrath, E. R. 1961. Portraits of plants. a limited study of the “icones”. Ann.<br />

Missouri Bot. Gard. 48:291–327.<br />

Erwin, A. T. 1938. An interesting Texas cucurbit. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 12:253–261.<br />

Frommel, C. L. 2003. La Villa Farnesina a Roma. Franco Cosimo Panini, Modena.<br />

Fuchs, L. 1542. De historia stirpium. Isingrin, Basel.<br />

Gray, A. and J. H. Trumbull. 1883. Review of DeCandolle’s origin of cultivated<br />

plants. Amer. J. Sci. 25:370–379.<br />

Janick, J. and G. Caneva. 2005. <strong>The</strong> first images of maize in Europe. Maydica.<br />

50:71–80.<br />

Janick, J. and H. S. Paris. 2006. <strong>The</strong> cucurbit images (1515–1518) of the Villa<br />

Farnesina, Rome. Ann. Bot. 97:165–176.<br />

L’Obel, M. de. 1576. Sev stirpium historia. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />

Mollat, M. 2005. Les explorateurs du XIII e au XVI e siècle: premiers regards sur des<br />

mondes nouveaux. Editions du comité de trauvaux historiques et scientifiques,<br />

Paris.<br />

Nee, M. 1990. <strong>The</strong> domestication of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 44(3,<br />

suppl.):56–68.<br />

Paris, H. S. 2000. Gene for broad, contiguous stripes in cocozelle squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

pepo). Euphytica. 115:191–196.<br />

Paris, H. S. 2001. History of the cultivar-groups of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. Hort. Revs.<br />

25:71–170, 4 pl.<br />

Paris, H. S., M.-C. Daunay, M. Pitrat, and J. Janick. 2006. First known image of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in Europe, 1503–1508. Ann. Bot. 98:41–47.<br />

Rheede tot Draakenstein, H. A. van. 1688. Hortus indicus malabaricus 8:3 p. 2.<br />

Tabernaemontanus, D. J. T. 1591. Kraeuter Buch. Basse, Frankfurt-on-Main.<br />

Whitaker, T. W. 1947. American origin of the cultivated cucurbits. Ann. Missouri<br />

Bot. Gard. 34:101–111.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 371


POLYPHYLETIC ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED<br />

MELON INFERRED FROM ANALYSIS OF ITS<br />

CHLOROPLAST GENOME<br />

K. Tanaka, K. Fukunaga<br />

Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, 457-7 Motoyama,<br />

Kamigamo, Kita-ku, Kyoto, Japan<br />

Y. Akashi, H. Nishida, K. Kato<br />

Faculty of Agriculture, Okayama University, 1-1-1 Tsushima, Naka,<br />

Okayama, Japan<br />

M. T. Khaing<br />

Vegetable and Fruit Research and Development Center (VFRDC), Yemon,<br />

Indaingpo, Hlecuts, Yangon, Myanmar.<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. ccSSR, Cucumis melo, PS-ID<br />

ABSTRACT. To discover the origin and differentiation of cultivated melon, the plastid<br />

type of 245 melon accessions was assessed using PS-ID sequence analysis. European<br />

melon groups with large seeds (≥9.0mm length) and East Asian melon groups with<br />

small seeds (


Decker-Walters, 1997). During the long history of cultivation and<br />

transmission, melon has been diversified and different types of melon<br />

have been established in various parts of the world. <strong>The</strong>y have been<br />

classified into seven groups by Munger and Robinson (1991). Genetic<br />

relationships and differentiation among these groups have been<br />

investigated by the analysis of morphological characters and molecular<br />

markers such as ISSR, SSR, and RAPD. East Asian melon of the group<br />

Conomon, whose seed length is shorter than 8.5mm, proved to be<br />

genetically differentiated from European and American melon, Groups<br />

Cantalupensis and Inodorus, with seeds longer than 9.0mm (Fujishita et<br />

al., 1993; Stepansky et al., 1999; Mliki et al., 2001; Monforte et al., 2003;<br />

Nakata et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> analysis of isozyme, AFLP, and RAPD markers<br />

of eastern and southern Asian melons can also be differentiated by<br />

seed-size groups rather than geographical groups (Akashi et al., 2002;<br />

Yashiro et al., 2005; K. Tanaka et al., unpublished). However, the<br />

evolutionary process that resulted in the difference in seed size among the<br />

western and the eastern melon and the origin of the Indian small-seed<br />

melon remains to be investigated.<br />

Molecular markers of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) have advantages for<br />

the analysis of genetic relationship among plant species or varieties, since<br />

they have a low rate of nucleotide substitution and show maternal<br />

inheritance, which lowers the impact of intermolecular recombination<br />

(Clegg et al., 1994). In the chloroplast genome, the linker sequence<br />

between the genes rpl16 and rpl14 proved to be polymorphic among plant<br />

species, and Nakamura et al. (1998) proposed to designate it as the plastid<br />

subtype ID sequence (PS-ID). PS-ID was also polymorphic within species<br />

and could be applicable to the identification of subspecies japonica and<br />

indica of rice (Ishikawa et al., 2002). Another marker of the chloroplast<br />

genome, the consensus chloroplast SSR marker (ccSSR), applicable to<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae crops, has been developed by Chung et al. (2003), who<br />

have suggested its potential utility for taxonomic and phylogenetic<br />

analyses.<br />

In this study, therefore, chloroplast genome type was determined for<br />

245 melon accessions from various parts of the world by the analysis of<br />

PS-ID sequence and four ccSSR markers. Based on varietal and<br />

geographical variation of cytoplasmic genotype, genetic differentiation in<br />

cultivated melon and the origin of small-seed-type melon predominately<br />

cultivated in Asia are discussed.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 373


Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIALS. A total of 245 accessions of cultivated melon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.) were examined in this study. <strong>The</strong>y were selected to<br />

represent five groups of C. melo from wide geographic areas, and were<br />

classified into small (


Table 1. Classification of 245 melon accessions based on the analysis of PS-ID, ccSSR7 and seed length.<br />

Variety/Area Countory /<br />

Cultivar group<br />

No. of<br />

PS-ID type<br />

ccSSR7 (bp)<br />

accessions Large seed Small seed Large seed Small seed<br />

T A NA T A NA 331 336 331 336<br />

Group cantalupensis European cantaloup<br />

England house type<br />

American field type<br />

Japan breeding line<br />

4<br />

5<br />

8<br />

12<br />

4<br />

5<br />

8<br />

12<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

3<br />

-<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

12<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Group inodorus Honeydew 6 6 - - - - - 6 - - -<br />

Hmi-Gua 5 5 - - - - - - 5 - -<br />

Group flexuosus<br />

Group conomon<br />

Spain•Russia<br />

India•Indonesia<br />

China<br />

6<br />

6<br />

16<br />

6<br />

1<br />

-<br />

-<br />

4<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1<br />

16<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

5<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1<br />

5<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1<br />

16<br />

Korea 4 - - - 1 3 - - - - 4<br />

Japan 10 - - - - 10 - - - - 10<br />

Group agrestis Africa <strong>North</strong> 1 - - - - - 1 - - - 1<br />

Center 6 - - - - - 6 - - - 6<br />

South 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1<br />

unknown 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1<br />

Iran 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2<br />

Pakistan 6 - - - - 6 - - - - 6<br />

India 5 - - - - 5 - - - - 5<br />

Maldives 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1<br />

South America<br />

Nepal•Bangladesh<br />

Korea•Japan<br />

Bolivia<br />

6<br />

6<br />

1<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

6<br />

6<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

6<br />

6<br />

-<br />

Europe 2 - - - 1 1 - - - - 2<br />

Africa <strong>North</strong> 8 8 - - - - - 2 6 - -<br />

Center 6 1 1 1 - - 3 - 3 - 3<br />

South 9 1 - - - 5 3 1 - - 8<br />

unknown 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 - -<br />

West•Central Asia Turkey<br />

Syria<br />

5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

5<br />

2<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Lebanon 4 2 2 - - - - - 4 - -<br />

Iraq 2 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - 1<br />

Iran 3 3 - - - - - 2 1 - -<br />

Afghanistan 5 4 1 - - - - 1 4 - -<br />

Uzbekistan 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 - -<br />

South Asia Pakistan 1 1 - - - - - - 1 - -<br />

India West<br />

<strong>North</strong><br />

7<br />

9<br />

3<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

5<br />

5<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2<br />

4<br />

Center 8 2 1 - - 5 - - 3 - 5<br />

South 7 4 - - 1 2 - 2 2 - 3<br />

East 12 3 4 - 1 4 - - 7 - 5<br />

Maldives 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2<br />

Nepal 3 - - - 1 2 - - - - 3<br />

Bangladesh 8 - 2 - - 6 - - 2 - 6<br />

Myanmer 8 - 2 - - 6 - - 2 - 5<br />

Southeast Asia 14 2 1 - 1 10 - 1 2 - 11<br />

245 91 26 1 9 105 13 24 94 - 126<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

PS-ID sequences were compared among 24 accessions of various<br />

groups, and PS-ID sequences were compared among 24 accessions of<br />

various groups, and two SSR polymorphisms (SSR1; (T)n, SSR2; (T)n)<br />

and one SNP at S2 (A/T, 425th base from common primer A) were<br />

detected. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) types of 245 accessions<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 375


Table 2. Four types of chloroplast genome revealed by the analysis of PS-ID sequence<br />

of 18 melon accessions.<br />

Name/ Country/ variety/Aria Seed PS-ID SNPs SSR (T) n<br />

accession No. Cultivar group size type S1 S2 S3 SSR1 SSR2<br />

PI 505602 Zambia Ssp. melo S NA C T C 16 15<br />

PI 436533 Senegal Ssp. melo S NA C T C 15 13<br />

940108 Senegal Group agrestis S NA C T C 15 13<br />

PI 436534 Senegal Group agrestis S NA C T C 15 13<br />

PI 482398 Zimbabwe Ssp. melo S NA C T G 16 14<br />

PI 185111 Ghana Group agrestis S NA C T G 15 13<br />

940111 Sudan Group agrestis S NA C T G 16 15<br />

Cam-84-3 Cameroon S NA C T G 16 15<br />

PI 169379-1 Turkey Ssp. melo L T A T G 15 14<br />

PI 525105 Egypt Ssp. melo L T A T G 15 14<br />

PI 164585 India Tamil Nadu L T A T G 14 14<br />

PI 124096 India Andra Pradesh S T A T G 15 14<br />

Earls' Favourite England house type Group cantalupensis L T A T G 14 9<br />

Kinpyo Japan Group conomon S A A A G 12 13<br />

PI 482411 Zimbabwe Ssp. melo S A A A G 11 13<br />

PI 126054 Afghanistan Ssp. melo L A A A G 11 13<br />

PI 536480 Maldives Ssp. melo S A A A G 11 13<br />

PI 116666 India Pun Punjab L A A A G 11 13<br />

Arabidopsis thaliana (NC_000932) C T G 7 7<br />

of melon from various parts of the world were determined by dCAPS<br />

analysis. One hundred accessions were proved to be of T-type and 131 of<br />

A-type (Table 1); PCR amplification was unsuccessful in 14 accessions<br />

(NA-type). For the characterization of NA-type, PCR product amplified<br />

by Psid1F and Psid1R primers were sequenced, and additional SNPs were<br />

detected at S1 (C/A) and S3 (C/G) in NA-type (Table 2). NA-type proved<br />

to be of T-type at S2. Furthermore, since S1 is included in the sequence<br />

complementary to dCAPS forward primer, no amplification by dCAPS<br />

primer was caused by this SNP. According to the result of dCAPS<br />

analysis, all of the 46 large-seed accessions classified as Group<br />

Cantalupensis and Group Inodorus were of T-type, while 34 of 35<br />

small-seed accessions belonging to Group Agrestis and Group Conomon<br />

were of A-type. This result clearly indicated that chloroplast genome type<br />

was different between areas of origin and between small- and large-seed<br />

types.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SNP type of landraces from Africa and Asia is rather diversified,<br />

and differs among geographical groups even in Africa. T-type with large<br />

seed was frequent in the northern part of Africa, while A-type with small<br />

seed was frequent in the southern part. NA-type was commonly found in<br />

central and southern parts of Africa, where wild species of Cucumis were<br />

abundant. Furthermore, the sequence of NA-type (C-T-G) at S1, S2, and<br />

S3 was the same as that of Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana tabacum.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that NA-type could be the primitive type of<br />

376 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


cultivated melon, and that the T-type has evolved by single nucleotide<br />

substitution from C to A at S1. A-type seems to have originated from<br />

T-type by single nucleotide substitution from T to A at S2, or from<br />

NA-type by double nucleotide substitutions from C to A at S1 and from T<br />

to A at S2. Another NA-type (C-T-C) should appear by single nucleotide<br />

substitution from G to C at S3. Taking the geographical distribution of<br />

each PS-ID type and seed length of each accession into consideration, the<br />

results suggest that large-seed T-type and small-seed A-type were<br />

independently established in the northern and southern parts of Africa,<br />

respectively. Genetic difference among melon accessions from the<br />

northern and southern parts of Africa detected by RAPD analysis (Mliki et<br />

al., 2001; Akashi et al., 2006) could be explained by the difference in their<br />

origin.<br />

In Asia, NA-type was not found; T-type with large seed was<br />

predominant in West and Central Asia. Indian melon was diversified and<br />

both T- and A-types were found in large-seed type as well as in<br />

small-seed type. <strong>The</strong> existence of recombinant types, that is, A-type with<br />

large seed and T-type with small seed, could be explained by the genetic<br />

interchange that has occurred in India. Based on these results, we propose<br />

the following hypothesis about the transmission route of small- and<br />

large-seed types (Figure 1): A-type with small seed was transmitted from<br />

South Africa to India by the so-called sea route, and the prototype of<br />

Group Conomon vars. makuwa and conomon originated from small-seed<br />

melon under wet conditions in East India. Another type of melon<br />

introduced from <strong>North</strong> Africa to Europe and India via the Middle East<br />

(Robinson and Decker-Walters 1997) was the large-seed T-type. After the<br />

establishment of the two types in India, the interchange between them<br />

resulted in differentiation into several varieties, enhancing India’s genetic<br />

diversity. India is considered as the secondary center of diversity in melon<br />

(Whitaker and Davis 1962). <strong>The</strong> result obtained by the analysis of nuclear<br />

genome (Akashi et al., 2006) also supports this hypothesis.<br />

Among the four ccSSR markers analyzed, ccSSR7 proved to be<br />

polymorphic by the deletion of 5bp (ATATT), and its size polymorphism<br />

was surveyed for 245 accessions of melon. Most of the melon accessions<br />

possessed this 5bp, and amplicon size was 336bp. <strong>The</strong> deletion of 5bp, the<br />

amplicon size being 331bp, was found in 24 accessions of large-seed<br />

melon whose PS-ID sequence was of T-type (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> deletion type<br />

was found in accessions of Group Inodorus (Honeydew and Russian or<br />

Spanish winter melon) and landraces from <strong>North</strong> Africa and West and<br />

Central Asia. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is likely that the deletion occurred in the<br />

population of T-type with large seed and that Group Inodorus has evolved<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 377


from such deletion type. However, ccSSR7 of ‘Hami Gua’, cultivated in<br />

the western part of China, is without this deletion, though this melon is<br />

also classified as Group Inodorus. Further study is necessary to discover<br />

the origin of ‘Hami Gua’. Deletion type found in the American field type<br />

should be ascribable to the use of Honeydew-type cultivars as<br />

cross-parents for breeding.<br />

By the analysis of PS-ID sequence, we could hypothesize that T-type<br />

melon with large seed and A-type melon with small seed has been<br />

polyphyletically differentiated from NA-type melon originating in the<br />

central part of Africa. Differentiation into several groups or varieties<br />

within T-type melon with large seed could be partially discovered by the<br />

analysis of ccSSR marker. Wild species of Cucumis should be analyzed,<br />

using cytoplasmic markers, to understand the origin of cultivated melon.<br />

Large-seed type<br />

T / 336bp type<br />

Group Inodorus<br />

T / 331bp type<br />

Large-seed type<br />

T / 336bp & 331bp types<br />

Small-seed type<br />

NA type<br />

Small-seed type<br />

NA, A types<br />

Group Inodorus<br />

T / 331bp type<br />

Group Inodorus<br />

T / 336bp type<br />

Large-seed type<br />

T / 336bp type<br />

interchange<br />

Small-seed type<br />

A type<br />

Small-seed type<br />

A type<br />

Fig. 1. Polyphyletic origin and transmission route of cultivated melon, revealed by<br />

the analysis of chloroplast genome. White and black arrows indicate the<br />

transmission route of the large- and small-seed type, respectively. PS-ID type (T, A,<br />

NA) and size (bp) of ccSSR7 are also indicated.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Akashi, Y., N. Fukuda, T. Wako, M. Masuda, and K. Kato. 2002. Genetic variation and<br />

phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo L., based<br />

on the analysis of five isozymes. Euphytica 125:385–396.<br />

Akashi, Y., K. Tanaka, H. Nishida, S. S. Yi, T. T. Chou, and K. Kato. 2006. Genetic<br />

diversity and phylogenetic relationship among melon germplasm from Africa and<br />

Asia revealed by RAPD analysis. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006.<br />

Chung, S., D. S. Decker-Walters, and J. E. Staub. 2003. Genetic relationships within the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae as assessed by consensus chloroplast simple sequence repeats<br />

(ccSSR) marker and sequence analyses. Can. J. Bot. 81:1–19.<br />

378 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Clegg, M. T., B. S. Gaut, G. H. Learn, Jr., and B. R. Morton. 1994. Rates and patterns of<br />

chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91:6795–6801.<br />

Fujishita, N., H. Furukawa, and S. Morii. 1993. Distribution of three genotypes for<br />

bitterness of F1 immature fruit in Cucumis melo. Jpn. J. Breed. 43(Suppl.2):206 (in<br />

Japanese).<br />

Ishikawa, R., Y.-I. Sato, T. Tang, and I. Nakamura. 2002. Different maternal origins of<br />

Japanese lowland and upland rice populations. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 104:976–980.<br />

Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions<br />

through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111–120.<br />

Mliki, A., J. E. Staub, Z. Sun, and A. Ghorbel. 2001. Genetic diversity in melon (Cucumis<br />

melo L.): an evaluation of African germplasm. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 48:587–597.<br />

Monforte, A. J., J. Garcia-Mas, and P. Arus. 2003. Genetic variability in melon based on<br />

microsatellite variation. Plant Breed. 122:153–157.<br />

Munger, H. M. and R. W. Robinson. 1991. Nomenclature of Cucumis melo L. <strong>Cucurbit</strong><br />

Genet. Coop. Rpt. 14:43–44.<br />

Murray, G. C. and W. F. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA.<br />

Nuc. Acid Res. 8:4321–4325.<br />

Nakamura, I., N. Kameya, K. Kato, S. I. Yamanaka, H. Jomori, and Y. I. Sato. 1998. A<br />

proposal for identifying the short ID sequence which addresses the plastid subtype of<br />

higher plants. Breed. Sci. 47:385–388.<br />

Nakata, E., J. E. Staub, and A. I. López-Sesé. 2005. Genetic diversity in Japanese melon<br />

cultivars (Cucumis melo L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA and<br />

simple sequence repeat markers. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 52:405–419.<br />

Neff, M. M., J. D. Neff, J. Chory, and A. E. Peper, 2002. dCAPS, a simple technique for<br />

the genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: experimental applications in<br />

Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J. 14:387–392.<br />

Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International, New<br />

York.<br />

Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of melons<br />

(Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation. Plant Syst.<br />

Evol. 217:313–332.<br />

Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the<br />

sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting<br />

positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nuc. Acids Res.<br />

22:4673–4680.<br />

Whitaker, T. W. and G. N. Davis. 1962. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s: botany, cultivation, utilization.<br />

Interscience, New York.<br />

Yashiro, K., H. Iwata, Y. Akashi, K. Tomita, M. Kuzuya, Y. Tsumura, and K. Kato. 2005.<br />

Genetic relationship among East and South Asian melon (Cucumis melo L.) revealed<br />

by AFLP analysis. Breed. Sci. 55:197–206.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 379


RESISTANCE OF CITRULLUS LANATUS VAR.<br />

CITROIDES GERMPLASM TO ROOT-KNOT<br />

NEMATODES<br />

Judy A. Thies and Amnon Levi<br />

U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Charleston, SC<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus colocynthis, Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus,<br />

Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne incognita, nematode resistance, root-knot<br />

nematode, watermelon<br />

ABSTRACT. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause extensive damage to<br />

watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai var. lanatus] and rootknot<br />

nematode-resistant watermelon cultivars are not available. Twenty-nine<br />

accessions from the U.S. Plant Introduction (USPI) collection of Citrullus spp. were<br />

evaluated for resistance to the southern root-knot nematode [Meloidogyne incognita<br />

(Kofoid & White) Chitwood Race 3] in greenhouse tests. <strong>The</strong> Plant Introductions<br />

(PI) evaluated in these studies included: 25 Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. &<br />

Nakai var. citroides (L. H. Bailey) Mansf., 1 C. lanatus var. lanatus, and 3 Citrullus<br />

colocynthis (L.) Schrad. Twenty-three of the C. lanatus var. citroides PI and the C.<br />

lanatus var. lanatus PI had been previously identified as moderately resistant to M.<br />

arenaria Race 1. In general, the C. lanatus var. citroides PI exhibited low to<br />

moderate resistance to M. incognita Race 3 and the C. lanatus var. lanatus and C.<br />

colocynthis PI were susceptible. <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI 482303 was the most<br />

resistant PI with gall index (GI) = 2.97 and reproductive index (RI) = 0.34 (1 = no<br />

galling; 5 = 26 to 38% root system galled; 9 = 81 to 100% root system galled).<br />

Significant genetic variability was observed within C. lanatus var. citroides for<br />

reaction to M. incognita, and several C. lanatus var. citroides PI may be useful<br />

sources of resistance to root-knot nematodes.<br />

R<br />

oot-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause significant damage<br />

to watermelon throughout the southern U.S. (Sumner and Johnson,<br />

1973; Thies, 1996; Thomason and McKinney, 1959; Winstead and<br />

Riggs, 1959), and increase the severity of Fusarium wilt in watermelon<br />

fields (Sumner and Johnson, 1973). Several reports describe the reactions<br />

of cultivated watermelon to root-knot nematodes. Winstead and Riggs<br />

(1959) evaluated 78 watermelon cultivars and five breeding lines, and all<br />

were susceptible to root-knot nematode. In Puerto Rico, 10 watermelon<br />

cultivars were evaluated and found susceptible to M. incognita (Montalvo<br />

and Esnard, 1994). Thomason and McKinney (1959) reported that<br />

‘Striped Klondike’ watermelon was susceptible to M. incognita acrita and<br />

M. javanica.<br />

380 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Root-knot nematodes are chiefly managed in watermelon by<br />

fumigation with methyl bromide or other fumigant nematicides.<br />

Watermelon and melon (Cucumis melo L.) account for approximately 6%<br />

of methyl bromide used for preplant soil treatments in vegetable crops<br />

worldwide (USDA, 1993). According to the Montreal Protocol and the<br />

U.S. Clean Air Act, methyl bromide was phased out 1 January 2005 (Rich<br />

and Olson, 2004; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000);<br />

however, under the U.S. nomination for critical-use exemption program,<br />

growers continue to use specified allocations (U.S. Environmental<br />

Protection Agency, 2006). <strong>The</strong> use of methyl bromide in watermelon may<br />

be underestimated because watermelon is often grown as the second crop<br />

in double-crop systems. In the double-crop system, soil fumigation prior<br />

to planting the first crop also greatly benefits the second crop by<br />

preventing build-up of root-knot nematodes and disease pathogens in the<br />

soil. In Florida and Georgia, annual yield losses of 15 to 20% have been<br />

predicted for watermelon due to the imminent loss of methyl bromide for<br />

preplant soil fumigation (Lynch and Carpenter, 1999). Alternative<br />

methods to methyl bromide are urgently needed for managing root-knot<br />

nematodes in watermelon. Root-knot-nematode-resistant cultivars would<br />

provide the most economical and environmentally friendly alternative for<br />

managing root-knot nematodes in watermelon.<br />

In an earlier study, we identified moderate resistance to M. arenaria<br />

Race 1 among C. lanatus var. citroides PI (Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong><br />

objective of this study was to evaluate selected C. lanatus var. citroides<br />

PI, previously shown to be moderately resistant to M. arenaria Race 1, for<br />

reaction to M. incognita Race 3.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

NEMATODE INOCULUM. Meloidogyne incognita Race 3 was cultured<br />

on ‘Rutgers’ tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in isolated<br />

greenhouse benches. Egg inocula were extracted from tomato roots using<br />

0.5% sodium hypochlorite (Hussey and Barker, 1973).<br />

CITRULLUS GERMPLASM. Twenty-five PI of C. lanatus var. citroides,<br />

one PI of C. lanatus var. lanatus, and three PI of C. colocynthis from the<br />

U.S. PI Citrullus germplasm collection were evaluated for resistance to M.<br />

incognita Race 3 in greenhouse tests. <strong>The</strong> PI were selected based on their<br />

reactions to M. arenaria Race 1 in earlier greenhouse studies (Thies and<br />

Levi, 2003). ‘Charleston Gray’, ‘Crimson Sweet’, and ‘Dixie Lee’ (C.<br />

lanatus var. lanatus) were included as susceptible control cultivars in all<br />

tests.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 381


EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. <strong>The</strong> experimental design was a randomized<br />

<strong>complete</strong> block with five plants per replicate. <strong>The</strong> experiment was<br />

conducted twice with four replicates in the first experiment and three<br />

replicates in the second experiment.<br />

GREENHOUSE EVALUATIONS. Seeds of each watermelon entry were<br />

sown in trays containing 50 0.2-L cells (one seed per cell) filled with a<br />

commercial potting medium in the greenhouse. When seedlings were at<br />

the first-true-leaf stage, approximately 3mL distilled water containing<br />

approximately 2,500 eggs of M. incognita Race 3 was pipetted into the<br />

rhizosphere soil of each plant. Two and five weeks after sowing, plants<br />

were fertilized with one-half strength 20N-20P-16K water-soluble<br />

fertilizer. Greenhouse temperatures ranged from 26 to 31˚C during the<br />

experiments. Eight weeks after inoculation, shoots of all plants were<br />

clipped at the crown, and roots were removed from each cell and carefully<br />

washed. <strong>The</strong> root system of each plant was placed in a 15% solution of<br />

McCormick’s red food color (Thies et al., 2002) for approximately 15 min<br />

to stain the egg masses. <strong>The</strong>n the root system was rinsed under tap water<br />

and evaluated for galling severity and egg-mass production using a 1 to 9<br />

scale where 1 = 0; 2 = 1 to 3%; 3 = 4 to 12%; 4 = 13 to 25%; 5 = 26 to<br />

38%; 6 = 39 to 50%; 7 = 51 to 65%; 8 = 66 to 80%; and 9 = 81 to 100% of<br />

the root system galled or covered with egg masses, respectively (Thies and<br />

Fery, 1998). Ratings of 1 to 2.9 = high resistance; 3.0 to 4.0 = moderate<br />

resistance; 4.1 to 4.9 = low resistance; 5.0 to 6.9 = susceptible; and 7.0 to<br />

9.0 = highly susceptible (Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong>n the entire root<br />

system of all plants of each genotype in a replicate were cut into 1- to 2cm<br />

pieces, total root weight was recorded, and root-knot nematode eggs<br />

were extracted from the root sample using 1.0% NaOCl (Hussey and<br />

Barker, 1973). Eggs were counted with a stereomicroscope. Nematode<br />

reproduction was assessed by calculating the reproductive index (RI) in<br />

which RI = Pf/Pi, where Pi = the initial inoculum level and Pf = final egg<br />

recovery (Sasser et al., 1984). Eggs per g fresh root and nematode<br />

reproductive index data were transformed by log10 (x+1) before analysis.<br />

Data were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows, v.8.0,<br />

and the means were separated using Fisher’s Protected Least Significant<br />

Difference Test.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In general, the C. lanatus var. citroides PI exhibited higher resistance<br />

to M. incognita than the watermelon cultivars C. lanatus var. lanatus PI<br />

and C. colocynthis PI. <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides root systems had<br />

382 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


minimal to moderate galling (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI<br />

had more fibrous roots and fewer, smaller galls than the C. colocynthis PI,<br />

the C. lanatus var. lanatus PI, and the control watermelon cultivars. <strong>The</strong><br />

C. lanatus var. lanatus PI was susceptible and the PI of the desert species<br />

C. colocynthis were highly susceptible to M. incognita Race 3. Results of<br />

Experiments 1 and 2 were similar; results of the second experiment are<br />

shown.<br />

Table 1. Gall indices, egg-mass indices, numbers of Meloidogyne<br />

incognita Race 3 eggs per g fresh root, and reproductive indices for<br />

selected accessions of Citrullus lanatus var. citroides, C. lanatus var.<br />

lanatus, and C. colocynthis from the U.S. Citrullus spp. Plant Introduction<br />

(PI) Collection, and control cultivars inoculated with M. incognita Race 3<br />

in a replicated greenhouse test. a<br />

Accession Gall<br />

(PI No.) index b<br />

Citrullus lanatus var. citroides<br />

Egg-mass<br />

index b<br />

Eggs/g fresh<br />

root c<br />

Reproductive<br />

index c<br />

482303 2.97 a d<br />

2.11 a 1,535 a-c 0.34 ab<br />

482307 3.22 a 2.13 a 889 a 0.29 ab<br />

270563 3.00 a 2.50 a 4,151 a-g 0.59 a-d<br />

482379 3.28 a 2.52 a 5,577 b-g 1.08 b-f<br />

482338 3.39 ab 2.11 a 1,221 ab 0.24 a<br />

532624 3.53 ab 3.03 a 6,869 c-h 1.59 d-g<br />

482326 3.40 ab 2.67 a 2,967 a-e 0.55 a-d<br />

482319 3.47 ab 2.80 a 2,863 a-e 0.97 b-f<br />

482324 3.58 ab 2.61 a 3,963 a-g 0.55 a-d<br />

189225 3.67 ab 2.80 a 16,508 f-h 2.17 d-g<br />

255137 3.25 ab 2.32 a 3,145 a-f 0.82 b-g<br />

482333 3.67 3.00 a 4,045 a-g 0.89 b-g<br />

482342 3.69 ab 2.88 a 3,607 a-g 0.75 a-g<br />

482301 3.83 a-c 2.60 a 2,299 a-d 0.37 a-d<br />

244019 3.87 a-c 3.07 a 3,954 a-g 0.69 a-f<br />

500331 3.93 a-c 2.93 a 4,902 b-g 0.61 a-e<br />

512854 3.90 a-c 3.40 ab 2,225 a-d 0.61 a-e<br />

482259 4.00 a 3.40 ab 4,749 b-g 1.60 e-i<br />

542119 4.07 a-c 3.80 a-c 6,191 b-h 1.46 e-i<br />

244017 4.07 a-c 2.67 a 4,006 a-g 0.57 a-e<br />

244018 4.11 a-c 2.70 a 12,873 e-h 1.96 f-i<br />

485583 4.25 a-c 2.93 a 4,193 a-g 0.80 b-g<br />

248774 4.50 a-d 3.78 a-c 6,343 b-h 1.12 d-i<br />

542114 5.38 b-e 5.25 b-d 29,020 hi 5.56 jk<br />

532666 6.52 e-g 5.12 b-d 18,789 gh 3.15 i-k<br />

288316 --- --- --- ---<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 383


(Table 1,<br />

continued)<br />

Accession<br />

(PI No.)<br />

Gall<br />

index b<br />

Egg-mass<br />

index b<br />

Eggs/g fresh<br />

root c<br />

Reproductive<br />

index c<br />

Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus<br />

459074 4.82 a-e 2.97 a 10,278 d-h 2.96 h-k<br />

C. colocynthis<br />

525082 5.75 c-f 3.07 a 4,080 a-g 1.18 e-i<br />

386015 7.67 gh 7.67 e 100,577 i 8.45 k<br />

432337 8.42 h 5.93 de 8,327 d-h 1.62 e-i<br />

C. lanatus var. lanatus controls<br />

Charleston Gray 7.53 f-h 6.87 de 9,658 d-h 5.37 jk<br />

Crimson Sweet 6.25 d-g 5.25 b-d 5,530 b-g 1.08 d-i<br />

Dixie Lee 6.09 d-g 5.49 cd 3,497 a-f 0.57 a-e<br />

a Means of 3 replicates of 5 plants per replicate (n=15).<br />

b 1 to 9 scale where 1 = no galling or visible egg masses present; 2 = 1% to 3%; 3<br />

= 4% to 10%; 4 = 11% to 25%; 5 =26% to 35%; 6 =36% to 50%; 7 = 51% to 65%; 8 =<br />

66% to 80%; and 9 = 81 to 100% of root system galled or covered with egg masses,<br />

respectively.<br />

c Data were log10(x+1) transformed before analysis. Nontransformed data are shown.<br />

d Mean separation within columns by Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference Test,<br />

P < 0.05.<br />

<strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI 482303 exhibited high resistance to M.<br />

incognita Race 3; GI = 2.97 with 1,535 M. incognita eggs per g fresh root<br />

and RI = 0.34 (Table 1). Likewise, 21 additional C. lanatus var. citroides<br />

PI exhibited low to moderate resistance to M. incognita Race 3, based on<br />

root gall severity (GI ranges: 3.00 to 4.25). Some of these PI had<br />

relatively high numbers of eggs per g fresh root (>5,000) and RI>1.0. For<br />

example, PI 189225 supported 16,508 eggs of M. incognita per g fresh<br />

root and RI = 2.17. <strong>The</strong> PI 248774 and 532666 exhibited susceptible<br />

reactions to M. arenaria Race 1 in previous tests (Thies and Levi, 2003)<br />

and also were susceptible to M. incognita Race 3 in the current study. <strong>The</strong><br />

PI 542114 exhibited low resistance to M. arenaria Race 1 in a previous<br />

unreplicated test (Thies and Levi, 2003), but was moderately susceptible,<br />

based on nematode reproduction, to M. incognita in the present study.<br />

PI 459074 was the only one of 156 C. lanatus var. lanatus PI<br />

evaluated that exhibited any resistance to M. arenaria Race 1 (Thies and<br />

Levi, 2003). However, in this study, PI 459074 was susceptible to M.<br />

incognita Race 3, based on both root-gall severity and nematode<br />

reproduction. <strong>The</strong> three C. lanatus var. lanatus watermelon cultivars<br />

(‘Crimson Sweet’, ‘Dixie Lee’, and ‘Charleston Gray’) were also<br />

susceptible to M. incognita Race 3, as in a previous study with M arenaria<br />

384 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Race 1 (Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong> GI ranged from 6.09 to 7.53 for<br />

‘Crimson Sweet,’ ‘Dixie Lee’, and ‘Charleston Gray’; numbers of eggs<br />

per g fresh root ranged from 3,497 to 9,658 and RI ranged from 0.57 to<br />

5.37.<br />

<strong>The</strong> three C. colocynthis PI were highly susceptible to M. incognita<br />

Race 3, similar to their reactions to M. arenaria Race 1 in prior tests<br />

(Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong> root-gall severity indices for the C.<br />

colocynthis accessions ranged from 5.75 to 8.42; numbers of eggs per g<br />

fresh root ranged from 4,080 to 100,577; and RI ranged from 1.18 to 8.45.<br />

In general, the C. lanatus var. citroides PI exhibited low to moderate<br />

resistance to M. incognita. <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI 482303 was<br />

the most resistant with GI of 2.97 and the RI was 0.34. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

demonstrate that there is significant genetic variability within C. lanatus<br />

var. citroides for reaction to M. incognita, and several C. lanatus var.<br />

citroides PI may provide sources of resistance to root-knot nematodes for<br />

the development of resistant watermelon cultivars.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Hussey, R. S. and K. R. Barker. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of<br />

Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:1025–1028.<br />

Lynch, L. and J. Carpenter. 1999. <strong>The</strong> economic impacts of banning methyl bromide:<br />

where do we need more research? 1999 Annual Research Conference on Methyl<br />

Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions.<br />

.<br />

Montalvo, A. E. and J. Esnard. 1994. Reaction of ten cultivars of watermelon (Citrullus<br />

lanatus) to a Puerto Rican population of Meloidogyne incognita. Suppl. J. Nematol.<br />

26(4S):640–643.<br />

Rich, J. R., and S. M. Olson. 2004. Influence of MI-gene resistance and soil fumigant<br />

application in first crop tomato on root-galling and yield in a succeeding cantaloupe<br />

crop. Nematropica. 34:103–108.<br />

Sasser, J. N., C. C. Carter, and K. M. Hartman. 1984. Standardization of host suitability<br />

studies and reporting of resistance to root-knot nematodes. Crop Nematode<br />

Resistance Control Project, N.C. <strong>State</strong> Univ., U.S. Agency for Intl. Dev., Raleigh,<br />

NC.<br />

Sumner, D. R. and A. W. Johnson. 1973. Effect of root-knot nematodes on Fusarium<br />

wilt of watermelon. Phytopathology. 63:857–861.<br />

Thies, J. A. 1996. Diseases caused by nematodes, p. 56–58. In: T. A. Zitter, D. L.<br />

Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press,<br />

St. Paul, MN.<br />

Thies, J. A. and A. Levi. 2003. Resistance of watermelon germplasm to the peanut rootknot<br />

nematode. HortSci. 38:1417–1421.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 385


Thies, J. A. and R. L. Fery. 1998. Modified expression of the N gene for southern rootknot<br />

nematode resistance in pepper at high soil temperatures. J. Amer. Soc. Hort.<br />

Sci. 123:1012–1015.<br />

Thies, J. A., S. B. Merrill, and E. L. Corley, Jr. 2002. Red food coloring stain: new,<br />

safer procedures for staining nematodes in roots and egg masses on root surfaces. J.<br />

Nematol. 34:179–181.<br />

Thomason, I. J. and H. E. McKinney. 1959. Reaction of some <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae to rootknot<br />

nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). Plant Dis. Rep. 43:448–450.<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Protection of stratospheric<br />

ozone: incorporation of Clean Air Act amendments for reductions in Class I, Group<br />

VI controlled substances. Fed. Reg. 65 (No. 229):70795–70804.<br />

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Ozone depletion rules & regulations.<br />

Fact Sheet: U.S. Nomination for Methyl Bromide Critical Use Exemptions from the<br />

2007 Phaseout of Methyl Bromide.<br />

.<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s Department of Agriculture. 1993. USDA workshop on alternatives for<br />

methyl bromide. June 29–Jul. 1, 1993. Crystal City, VA.<br />

Winstead, N. N. and R. D. Riggs. 1959. Reaction of watermelon varieties to root-knot<br />

nematodes. Plant Dis. Rep. 43:909–912.<br />

386 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


FACTORS INFLUENCING A CUCUMBER<br />

FRUIT SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INFECTION BY<br />

PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI<br />

Kaori Ando and Rebecca Grumet<br />

Plant <strong>Breeding</strong> and Genetics Program Michigan <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

A291-A Department of Horticulture PSSB, East Lansing, MI 48824<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Age-related resistance, fruit rot, epidermal<br />

ABSTRACT. Phytophthora capsici-induced fruit rot causes severe losses in<br />

cucumber production. Our earlier studies showed that cucumber fruit are most<br />

susceptible when very young, but become resistant as the fruit stop elongating.<br />

In the field, infection occurs primarily at the blossom end. To determine<br />

whether preferential infection of the blossom end was due to position-related<br />

differences, or was a result of earlier contact with inoculum-containing soil,<br />

greenhouse-grown cucumber fruit ranging in age from 6–14 days<br />

postpollination (dpp) were inoculated with P. capsici at the stem and blossom<br />

ends. <strong>The</strong> youngest fruits supported sporulation on both ends. As fruit age<br />

increased, the stem end became less susceptible sooner, suggesting a<br />

developmental gradient within the fruit influencing susceptibility. We tested<br />

whether the increase in resistance is due to changes in surface or mesocarp<br />

properties by inoculating peeled fruit or epidermal sections from 7- or 14-dpp<br />

fruit that were placed onto intact 7- or 14-dpp fruit. Peeled fruits rapidly<br />

became infected. Peel sections from 7-dpp, but not 14-dpp, fruit supported<br />

sporulation. Intact, underlying 7-dpp fruit were protected if covered with 14dpp,<br />

but not 7-dpp, peels. <strong>The</strong>se results indicate that the epidermal section plays<br />

a role in the age-related resistance.<br />

I<br />

n recent years, Phytophthora capsici has become an increasingly<br />

severe disease of a wide range of vegetable crops, including<br />

cucumber, where it can cause devastating yield losses (Hausbeck<br />

and Lamour, 2004). Cucumber fruit infected by P. capsici typically<br />

develop a depressed fruit surface with a water-soaked appearance<br />

followed by white powdery mycelium covering the affected region.<br />

Field observations show that cucumber fruit are susceptible to P.<br />

capsici, while roots or crowns are much less susceptible. Fields will<br />

frequently look healthy at time of harvest as judged by vegetative<br />

growth, but the fruits can be heavily diseased (Hausbeck and Lamour,<br />

2004). Fruit are usually located under the canopy where the<br />

This research was supported in part by the Pickle Seed Research Fund and MSU-<br />

GREEEN. We would like to thank Drs. Mary Hausbeck and Amanda Gevens for<br />

helpful advice and providing the P. capsici isolate OP97. We also thank Dr. Hua<br />

Zhang for helpful suggestions and Seminis Vegetable Seed Inc. for providing seeds.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 387


environment is moist, warm, and close to the pathogen in the soil, thus<br />

favoring conditions for disease development. Trellis and plant<br />

architecture studies have indicated that removal of fruit from the soil<br />

surface can reduce disease incidence (Ando and Grumet, 2006).<br />

Genetic resistance would be the optimal method of disease control.<br />

Unfortunately, screening of a diverse collection of the cucumber<br />

germplasm accessions for fruit resistance to P. capsici has not<br />

identified any resistant genotypes to date (Gevens et al., 2006). In the<br />

course of screening, however, we observed an effect of fruit age on<br />

susceptibility (Gevens et al., 2006). ‘Vlaspik’ fruits used as susceptible<br />

controls did not become uniformly infected. It appeared that smaller,<br />

younger fruit were more susceptible, while larger, older fruit were less<br />

frequently infected. When hand-pollinated fruit of known ages were<br />

tested, most fruit younger than 10 days postpollination (dpp) exhibited<br />

sporulation at 4 days postinoculation (dpi), whereas fruit at 14dpp<br />

generally remained symptom-free (Gevens et al., 2006). Fruit of<br />

intermediate ages (10 to 14dpp) often exhibited water-soaked regions<br />

without sporulation. <strong>The</strong> effect of fruit age was observed for several<br />

different genotypes. Field-grown cucumbers (cv. Straight Eight),<br />

harvested to test a range of fruit sizes, exhibited the same trend as<br />

observed with greenhouse-grown fruit. <strong>The</strong>se results indicated that<br />

there are changes in the degree of susceptibility among fruit of<br />

different ages in both greenhouse and field conditions, and that the<br />

age-related decrease in susceptibility is not genotype specific.<br />

Interestingly, the transition from susceptible to resistant appeared<br />

to coincide with the transition from the period of rapid fruit elongation<br />

to the period of increased fruit diameter (approximately 12cm length,<br />

3cm width). Cucumber fruit rapidly elongate longitudinally until they<br />

reach mature size; elongation then ceases, while width of the fruit<br />

continues to grow (Wehner and Saltveit, 1983). Physiological changes<br />

associated with fruit growth and development might explain changing<br />

susceptibility among fruit of different ages.<br />

Further examination of P. capsici-infected cucumber fruit in the<br />

field led to the observation that field-grown cucumbers are typically<br />

covered with mycelium on the blossom end of the fruit rather than the<br />

stem end (Figure1A). We speculated that this was due either to the<br />

tendency of the blossom end to come into contact with the inoculumcontaining<br />

soil sooner than the stem end, or that there is a<br />

susceptibility gradation within the fruit such that the blossom end is<br />

more susceptible than the stem end. In these experiments we sought to<br />

determine the nature of the difference in occurrence of disease at the<br />

blossom and stem ends and also to further examine the basis for age-<br />

388 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


elated increased resistance by asking whether it is due to changes in<br />

surface or mesocarp properties.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

FRUIT POSITION EXPERIMENTS. ‘Vlaspik’ fruits were grown in the<br />

MSU Research greenhouse, East Lansing, MI, during spring 2004.<br />

Fruits were hand-pollinated over a period of days to allow for<br />

simultaneous harvest of fruit ranging in age from 6 to 14dpp.<br />

Harvested fruit were screened for P. capsici resistance according to the<br />

methods of Gevens et al. (2006). Two 6-mm-diameter plugs of isolate<br />

OP97 were placed approximately 2cm from the stem and blossom ends<br />

of each fruit, and covered with an inverted lidless 1.5-ml<br />

microcentrifuge tube held in place with petroleum jelly (Figure 1B).<br />

Inoculated fruit were incubated at room temperature in sealed<br />

aluminum trays, and were scored for symptoms (0 = no symptoms, 1 =<br />

water soaked, and 2 = sporulation) at 4dpi.<br />

EPIDERMAL SECTION EXPERIMENTS. Field-grown (MSU<br />

Horticulture Research Farm, East Lansing, MI, summer 2004)<br />

oversized ‘Vlaspik’ fruits of unknown age were harvested, washed<br />

with distilled water, and air-dried. Fruits were peeled with a<br />

conventional peeler to remove a section of fruit surface of<br />

approximately 1.5cm x 23cm, 0.2cm from the center of the fruit.<br />

Peeled and unpeeled fruits were then inoculated with P. capsici<br />

mycelium as described above and evaluated for symptoms at 4dpi.<br />

In a second set of experiments, greenhouse-grown, hand-pollinated<br />

fruit-surface sections (1.6cm diameter and 0.1cm thick) were removed<br />

from 7 or 14dpp with a cork bore and a petit knife. Surface sections of<br />

7-dpp fruit were placed on 7- and 14-dpp fruit, and 14-dpp surface<br />

sections were placed on 7- and 14-dpp fruit. <strong>The</strong> underlying tissue was<br />

left intact. P. capsici mycelia were placed on top of the transplanted<br />

fruit-surface sections. Inoculated fruits were evaluated for symptoms<br />

at 4dpi on both the fruit-surface section and underlying intact fruit.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

EFFECT OF FRUIT POSITION. P. capsici-infected cucumber fruit in the<br />

field are typically covered with mycelium on the blossom end of the<br />

fruit rather than the stem end. To determine whether this phenomenon<br />

is due to a greater tendency of the blossom end of the fruit to touch the<br />

soil, or if there is a difference in susceptibility due to position on the<br />

fruit, hand-pollinated greenhouse-grown fruit (ranging from 6 to<br />

14dpp) were inoculated with P. capsici mycelium approximately 2cm<br />

from the blossom end and the stem end (Figure 1B).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 389


Fig. 1. Typical symptoms of P. capsici in the field: (A) Mycelium covering the<br />

blossom end of fruits. (B) Mycelium inoculation of the stem and blossom ends of<br />

6- to 14-dpp fruit. <strong>The</strong> picture was taken at 4dpi. Arrows indicate blossom end<br />

of fruit. (C) Greenhouse-grown, hand-pollinated ‘Vlaspik’ inoculated on stem<br />

and blossom ends of fruit age ranging from 6 to 14dpp. (D) Symptoms of fruit<br />

ranging from 6 to 14dpp evaluated at 4dpi (0 = no symptoms, 1 = water soaking,<br />

and 2 = sporulation). Each point is the mean of a minimum of 10 fruits ± S. E.<br />

When fruit were very young (6dpp), both the blossom end and the<br />

stem end sporulated (Figure 1 C, D). However, as fruit develop, the<br />

stem end becomes less susceptible earlier than the blossom end, so that<br />

sporulation occurs on the blossom end, but not the stem end (e.g., at 8–<br />

12dpp). At 14dpp the stem end did not develop symptoms, whereas the<br />

blossom end sometimes developed water-soaked regions. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

suggest a developmental gradient within the fruit with the stem end<br />

maturing more rapidly than the blossom end.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results indicate that there are differences in susceptibility<br />

within a fruit. Fruit-growth analyses performed by Wehner and<br />

Salveit (1983) showed that the blossom end continues growing after<br />

the stem end has stopped elongating, and that the differential transition<br />

in growth phase occurs in the 7–14-dpp time period. This positional<br />

difference in growth rate is consistent with the observations that the<br />

blossom end is more susceptible than the stem end, and with our<br />

390 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


previous studies (Gevens et al., 2006) showing that the degree of P.<br />

capsici susceptibility decreases as the fruit matures beyond the stage of<br />

rapid elongation.<br />

ROLE OF FRUIT SURFACE. Preliminary tests were conducted to<br />

examine whether the age-related decrease in susceptibility is<br />

associated with the fruit surface, mesocarp, or both. <strong>The</strong> peeled fruits<br />

all sporulated, whereas intact control fruit did not sporulate at 4dpi,<br />

indicating that the fruit surface is an important factor for the resistance<br />

of older fruits to infection by P. capsici (Figure 2). However, these<br />

experiments do not allow us to rule out possible effects of wounding<br />

due to peeling.<br />

To further study the role of the epidermis using intact (nonwounded)<br />

fruit, epidermal exchanges were made between fruits at 7 and 14dpp (i.e.,<br />

pieces of epidermis from one fruit were placed on top of a second, intact<br />

fruit). <strong>The</strong> 7-dpp fruit-surface pieces sporulated regardless of fruit age<br />

underneath (mean disease rating = 2 ± 0) (Figure 3). Fruit-surface<br />

sections from 14-dpp fruit generally did not sporulate regardless of fruit<br />

age underneath; however, approximately 50% developed water-soaked<br />

symptoms (mean disease rating = 1 ± 0.3). <strong>The</strong> fruit underneath the 7dpp<br />

fruit-surface pieces showed susceptibility similar to the fruit-age<br />

study; 7-dpp fruit generally sporulated while 14-dpp fruit generally did<br />

not, even in the presence of sporulating 7-dpp fruit-surface sections.<br />

However, when 14-dpp fruit-surface pieces were inoculated, the<br />

underlying 7-dpp fruit did not sporulate, indicating that the 14-dpp fruitsurface<br />

sections protected the underlying 7-dpp fruit. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

suggest that 14-dpp fruit-surface sections possess properties that inhibit<br />

P. capsici infection.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 391


Fig. 2. Greenhouse-grown ‘Vlaspik’ were inoculated with P. capsici mycelium<br />

after peeling. (A) 0dpi, (B) 4dpi (arrows indicate sporulation), and (C)<br />

summary of fruit symptoms at 4 dpi. Each value is the mean of 7 fruit ± S. E.<br />

This study suggests that properties of the epidermal sections could<br />

be the source for the susceptibility difference associated with fruit<br />

development. This difference could be due to cuticle properties, as was<br />

observed to be a physical barrier to P. capsici infection in New<br />

Mexican-type pepper (Capsicum annuum) (Biles et al., 1993).<br />

Another possibility is a difference in frequency of stomata, since<br />

Smith et al. (1979) reported that stomata are almost absent from the<br />

stem end compared to the blossom end, and are less frequent in larger<br />

(older) fruits relative to younger fruit. Whether the P. capsici<br />

sporangia enter primarily through cucumber fruit stomata remains to<br />

be determined. Other possibilities include changes in cell-wall<br />

properties, production of defense compounds, or induced resistance<br />

mechanisms.<br />

392 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Disease score: 0-no symptoms, 1-water<br />

soaked, 2-sporulation<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

7 on 7 7 on 14 14 on 7 14 on 14<br />

Fig. 3. Response to P. capsici inoculation for the 7- or 14-dpp isolated epidermis<br />

section and intact 7- or 14-dpp fruit underneath. Left bar is the epidermal<br />

section and right bar is intact fruit underneath the peel. <strong>The</strong> open bar is 7 dpp<br />

and the dotted bar is 14 dpp. <strong>The</strong> P. capsici mycelium plug was placed on the<br />

peel. Each point is the mean of a minimum of 4 fruits ± S. E.<br />

In conclusion, these results demonstrate that there is a gradation of<br />

susceptibility within the fruit such that the stem end of the fruit<br />

becomes less susceptible to P. capsici sooner than the blossom end.<br />

This difference in susceptibility could be due to position-related<br />

differences in fruit development between the stem and blossom end, as<br />

older fruit are less susceptible than younger fruit, and the stem end<br />

<strong>complete</strong>s the elongation phase sooner than the blossom end. <strong>The</strong><br />

increased resistance appears to be associated, at least in part, with<br />

epidermal properties. Further experiments are required to determine<br />

the properties responsible for the change in susceptibility that occurs<br />

as fruit develop.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Ando, K. and R. Grumet. 2006. Evaluation of altered cucumber plant architecture as<br />

a means to reduce Phytophthora capsici disease incidence on cucumber fruit. J.<br />

Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. (In press.)<br />

Biles, C. L., M. M. Wall, M. Waugh, and H. Palmer. 1993. Relationship of<br />

Phytophthora fruit rot to fruit maturation and cuticle thickness of New<br />

Mexican–type peppers. Phytopathology. 83:607–611.<br />

Gevens, A. J., K. Ando, K. Lamour, R. Grumet, and M. K. Hausbeck. 2006.<br />

Development of a detached cucumber fruit assay to screen for resistance and<br />

effect of fruit age on susceptibility to infection by Phytophthora capsici. Plant<br />

Dis. (In press.)<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 393


Hausbeck, M. and K. Lamour. 2004. Phytophthora capsici on vegetable crops:<br />

research progress and management challenges. Plant Dis. 88(12):1292–1302.<br />

Smith, K. R., H. P. Fleming, C. G. van Dyke, and R. L. Lower. 1979. Scanning<br />

electron microscopy of the surface of pickling cucumber fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hort.<br />

Sci. 104(4):528–533.<br />

Wehner, T. C. and M. E. Saltveit. 1983. Photographic analysis of cucumber fruit<br />

elongation. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108(4):465–468.<br />

394 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


EARLY PROTECTION AGAINST ROOT-KNOT<br />

NEMATODES THROUGH NEMATICIDAL<br />

SEED COATING PROVIDES SEASON-LONG<br />

BENEFITS FOR CUCUMBERS<br />

J. O. Becker and J. Smith Becker<br />

Department of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, CA<br />

92521,<br />

H. V. Morton<br />

VIVA, 1212 Heathrow Drive, Greensboro, NC 27410<br />

D. Hofer<br />

Syngenta Crop Protection AG, WRO-1004 7.10, CH-4002, Basel, CH.<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Meloidogyne incognita, abamectin, nematicides,<br />

oxamyl, fosthiazate<br />

ABSTRACT. Seed coating of cucumber with the microbial-derived<br />

abamectin at rates of 0.1 to 0.3mg a.i./seed resulted in excellent earlyseason<br />

seedling protection against root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne<br />

incognita) and their detrimental effects on root development. Ten days<br />

after seeding in root-knot nematode-infested sandy soil, cucumber<br />

seedlings derived from abamectin-coated seeds contained<br />

approximately 3–4 times fewer juveniles in their root systems than<br />

nontreated check plants. <strong>The</strong> reduction in nematode attack resulted in a<br />

doubling of the total root length at Day 12 of the greenhouse trial. In a<br />

Southern California field trial in root-knot nematode-infested sandy<br />

loam, abamectin seed coating on fresh market cucumber (cv. Kahina) at<br />

0.3mg a.i./seed (approximately 20g/ha) resulted in growth improvement<br />

after the first four weeks over the nontreated control . <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

were similar to the soil-applied nematicides oxamyl and fosthiazate.<br />

Abamectin seed coating resulted in increased numbers of fruit and<br />

higher yields compared to the nontreated control and equal to<br />

carbamate and organophosphate nematicides. <strong>The</strong> seed coating offers a<br />

dramatic reduction in nematicide application rate per ha, which is a<br />

milestone in reduced-risk farming. Nematicidal seed coating promises<br />

to be a valuable new tool for economically feasible and ecologically<br />

sensible plant protection.<br />

R<br />

oot-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are major pests in<br />

cucurbits, especially in warmer climates. In US cucurbit<br />

production, estimated yield losses due to plant-parasitic<br />

nematodes exceed 4% (Koenning et al., 1999). Young seedlings are<br />

particularly susceptible to the effects of nematode attack and the<br />

consequent morphological and physiological changes associated with<br />

the host-parasite relationship. Under favorable environmental<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 395


conditions, high population densities of infectious second-stage<br />

Meloidogyne juveniles at seeding result in massive invasion of roots<br />

just behind their tips. Fine secondary roots are often aborted under<br />

such attack. <strong>The</strong> establishment of permanent feeding sites, the socalled<br />

giant cells, lead to nematode-induced changes in root tissues<br />

that ultimately manifest in root galls. <strong>The</strong> lack of useful crop resistance<br />

in cucurbits against root-knot nematodes has lead to the use of<br />

nematicides as the almost exclusive nematode management tool in<br />

commercial production. However, in recent years the use of many of<br />

these compounds has been severely restricted by regulatory action.<br />

<strong>The</strong> relatively high application rates are a concern for both the user<br />

and potential environmental pollution. In addition, the high cost for the<br />

nematicides and their application has become prohibitive for many<br />

growers. Some of the contact nematicides have been investigated as<br />

potential seed treatments (Truelove et al., 1977; Brown, 1984;<br />

Rodriguez-Kabána and Weaver, 1987; Orion and Shlevin, 1989). But<br />

issues related to crop tolerance and low efficacy in comparison to high<br />

soil application rates, as well as lack of interest of the agrochemical<br />

industry, have hindered their further development. <strong>The</strong> most potent<br />

nematicide known has never been developed against plant parasitic<br />

nematodes. Abamectin is composed of macrocyclic lactones (≥ 80%<br />

avermectin B1a and ≤ 20% avermectin B1b) that are metabolites of the<br />

actinomycete Streptomyces avermitilis. Insecticidal and antihelmintic<br />

activity (Putter et al., 1981) led to its development in antiparasite drugs<br />

as well as foliar insecticides. Despite some encouraging results by<br />

low-volume chemigation (Garabedian and Van Gundy, 1983), the<br />

efficacy of abamectin against root-knot nematodes in other field trials<br />

was considered insufficient (Nordmeyer and Dickson, 1985). We have<br />

recently reported on the potential of abamectin as an effective seed<br />

coating for early- season protection against plant-parasitic nematodes<br />

(Becker et al., 2003, 2004). This report will further strengthen our<br />

notion that seed-delivered plant protection will achieve similar benefits<br />

for the grower while reducing the cost on production and unintentional<br />

impacts on the environment.<br />

Materials And Methods<br />

GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENTS. All cucumber seeds were coated by<br />

Syngenta Crop Protection. Initially, abamectin was evaluated in<br />

greenhouse trials using seed-coating loading rates on cucumber cv.<br />

Mondeo of 0.0, 0.1, and 0.3 mg a.i./seed. <strong>The</strong> seeds were additionally<br />

treated with the fungicide thiram (1.6g a.i./kg seed). <strong>The</strong> trials were<br />

conducted in soil infested with root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne<br />

396 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


incognita Race 1). Root-knot inoculum was raised during the previous<br />

two months on tomato plants in the greenhouse. Nematode eggs were<br />

harvested by a bleach/sieving extraction (Hussey and Barker, 1973)<br />

and hatched on Baerman funnels at 26˚C for 3 days. Steam-pasteurized<br />

river bottom sand (90% sand, 1% silt, 8% clay, 0.2% OM, pH 7.5) was<br />

infested with 500 J2/100cm 3 soil and filled into 250-cm 3 cups. Each<br />

cup was seeded with one cucumber seed. <strong>The</strong> cups were arranged in<br />

the greenhouse in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design with six<br />

replications per treatment at 25˚C +/- 2˚C and ambient lighting.<br />

Irrigation was applied daily as needed. After 12 days, the seedlings<br />

were carefully removed from the cups and washed free of debris with a<br />

water spray. <strong>The</strong> roots were floated in a transparent tray with a<br />

shallow water layer. <strong>The</strong>y were scanned at 300dpi with an HP flatbed<br />

scanner and analyzed for total root length with MacRhizo V3.10B<br />

software (Régent Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada).<br />

Pots were filled with 500-cm 3 steam-pasteurized river bottom sand<br />

infested at planting with 5,000 eggs of M. incognita Race 1.<br />

Abamectin seed coatings were evaluated at loading rates of 0.0, 0.03,<br />

0.1, and 0.3 mg a.i./seed. <strong>The</strong> cucumber (cv. Straight Eight) seeds<br />

were additionally treated with the fungicide thiram (1.6g a.i./kg seed).<br />

Each pot was seeded with one seed. Fenamiphos was used as a<br />

nematicide check and drenched onto the soil at 3mg a.i./L to waterholding<br />

capacity. <strong>The</strong> pots were incubated in the greenhouse at ca.<br />

24˚C +/- 3˚C and ambient lighting. Irrigation and fertilization was<br />

applied as needed. Five weeks after seeding, root galling was rated on<br />

a scale of 0–10 (Zeck, 1971).<br />

FIELD TRIAL. A cucumber trial was conducted at the University of<br />

California South Coast Research and Extension Center, Irvine, CA,<br />

during August/September. <strong>The</strong> soil was a San Emigdio sandy loam<br />

(12.5% sand, 75.4% silt, 12% clay, 0.45% organic matter, and pH 7.2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> field was previously cropped to root-knot nematode-susceptible<br />

tomatoes. At seeding, the plot site was fairly uniformly infested (73<br />

J2/cm 3 ) with M. incognita Race 1. Fresh market cucumber seeds (cv.<br />

Kahina) were coated with abamectin (0.3 mg a.i./seed) and thiram<br />

(1.6g a.i./kg seed) or with only the fungicides that were used for the<br />

check and the soil nematicide treatments. Oxamyl and fosthiazate were<br />

band-applied at 2.03kg a.i./ha and thoroughly incorporated into the top<br />

10cm soil. <strong>The</strong> trial was designed as a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block<br />

with five replications on 10m x 0.68m beds. Weed and insect control<br />

as well as fertilization and irrigation were applied using drip tubing<br />

with 2-L/hr emitters spaced at 0.3m. <strong>The</strong>se agricultural operations<br />

were conducted according to local standards. <strong>The</strong> trial was harvested<br />

after eight and nine weeks and both fruit number and weight per pot<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 397


were taken. Root galling and number of J2/100cm 3 soil at harvest were<br />

determined. All data were subject to ANOVA and, if appropriate,<br />

means separation with Fisher’s LSD (SuperANOVA, Abacus,<br />

Berkeley, CA).<br />

Results And Discussion<br />

GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENTS. <strong>The</strong> first impact of an intense rootknot<br />

nematode attack on cucumber seedlings is stunting and death of<br />

many small secondary roots. Galling is more easily recognized and<br />

more often reported than the reduction in root length, and its<br />

consequence on seedling development is equally important. Abamectin<br />

seed coating mitigated this impact and increased the total root length<br />

by 75 and 92% with 0.1 and 0.3mg a.i./seed, respectively (Figure 1).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no difference in rate response. in another greenhouse trial at<br />

five weeks after seeding. At this time, the abamectin seed coatings<br />

reduced the disease expression by 1 to 3 rating classes depending on<br />

the nematicide seed loading rate (Figure 2). While even the lowest rate<br />

of 0.03mg a.i./seed reduced galling, the higher rates were more<br />

effective. A soil-drench application of fenamiphos was the most<br />

effective.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect of the nematicidal seed coating on root galling was<br />

assessed in another greenhouse trial at 5 weeks after seeding. At this<br />

time, the abamectin seed coatings reduced the disease expression by 1<br />

to 3 rating classes depending on the nematicide seed loading rate<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

check aba 0.1<br />

treatments<br />

aba 0.3<br />

Fig.1. Effect of abamectin seed coatings on root length of cucumber seedlings<br />

after 12 days in root-knot nematode-infested sandy soil. Bar indicated standard<br />

error (P = 0.05).<br />

398 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


(Fig.2). While even the lowest rate of 0.03 mg a.i./seed reduced galling,<br />

the higher rates were more effective. A soil drench application of<br />

fenamiphos was the most effective.<br />

FIELD TRIAL. <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted under a high initial rootknot<br />

nematode-population density. All nematicide treatments resulted<br />

in more vigorous growth that became obvious about three–four weeks<br />

after seeding in comparison to the check. At the first harvest, eight<br />

weeks after seeding, the number of fruits in all nematicide treatments<br />

was increased by 40–50% compared to the nontreated check (Figure 3).<br />

This resulted in fruit weight increases that exceeded the check by more<br />

than 100% (Figure 4). <strong>The</strong>re was no difference among treatments in<br />

the second harvest (Figures 3 and 4). This may be an indication that<br />

the presumably larger and healthier root systems in the nematicide<br />

treatments provided more feeding sites for the nematodes. <strong>The</strong><br />

increasing root-knot nematode population started to affect the treated<br />

plants by diminishing the root-size advantage. At termination of the<br />

trial, there were no differences in galling or number of J2 among the<br />

treatments (data not shown).<br />

root galling (scale 0-10)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

check<br />

0.03 mg aba<br />

0.1 mg aba<br />

Fig. 2. Effect of abamectin seed coating (aba) on cucumber root galling (0–10<br />

scale) in M. incognita-infested sandy soil five weeks after seeding. Fenamiphos<br />

was applied as a soil drench. Bars indicate standard error (P = 0.05).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 399<br />

0.3 mg aba<br />

fenamiphos 3 ppm


160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

check abamectin oxamyl fosthiazate<br />

1. harvest<br />

2. harvest<br />

Fig. 3. Yield comparison of abamectin seed coating (0.3mg a.i./seed) to soil<br />

nematicides (each 2.03kg a.i./ha) in a cucumber field trial in M. incognitainfested<br />

sandy loam. Bars indicate standard error (P = 0.05).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results challenge earlier opinions that predicted a limited<br />

value of nematicidal seed coatings due to their inability to provide the<br />

soil-population reduction necessary for season-long control<br />

(Thomason, 1987). <strong>The</strong> presented data show that under high nematode<br />

disease pressure a significant reduction in root loss can be avoided<br />

with an effective protection by a seed-delivered nematicide. Seed<br />

treatments are ideally positioned to mitigate nematode attack against<br />

the young root system. In addition, the protection of the area around<br />

the seed might last much longer than that achieved by a soil-applied<br />

nematicide. Although this protection might not be sufficient for longseason<br />

crops or in situations were multiple nematode generations<br />

occur, it has been shown for a number of crops that the first couple of<br />

weeks determine a large part of the yield potential (Seinhorst, 1995;<br />

Ploeg and Phillips, 2001). Equally important, the huge reduction in<br />

pesticide-application rates as a consequence of seed-coating<br />

technology must be considered a major breakthrough in crop<br />

protection against plant-parasitic nematodes and a significant<br />

contribution to reduced-risk farming.<br />

400 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


fruit weight (%)<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

check abamectin oxamyl fosthiazate<br />

1. harvest<br />

2. harvest<br />

Fig. 4. Yield comparison of abamectin seed coating (0.3mg a.i./seed) to soil<br />

nematicides (each 2.03kg a.i./ha) in a cucumber field trial in M. incognitainfested<br />

sandy loam. Bars indicate standard error (P = 0.05).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Becker, J. O., B. Slaats, and D. Hofer. 2004. Cucumber seed coating with abamectin<br />

guards against early root damage by root-knot nematodes. Phytopathology.<br />

94:S149.<br />

Becker, J. O., H. V. Morton, and D. Hofer. 2003. Seedling protection against plant<br />

parasitic nematodes by abamectin seed dressing. 8th International Congress of<br />

Plant Pathology. 2:251.<br />

Brown, R. H. 1984. Cereal cyst nematode and its chemical control in Australia. Plant<br />

Dis. 68:922–928.<br />

Garabedian, S. and S. D. Van Gundy. 1983. Use of avermectins for the control of<br />

Meloidogyne incognita on tomatoes. J. Nematol. 13:503–510.<br />

Hussey, R. S., and K. Barker. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula<br />

of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:1025–1028.<br />

Koenning, S. R., C. Overstreet, J. W. Noling, P. A. Donald, J. O. Becker, and B. A.<br />

Fortnum. 1999. Survey of crop losses in response to phytoparasitic nematodes in<br />

the United <strong>State</strong>s for 1994. J. Nematol. 31: 587618.<br />

Nordmeyer, D. and D. Dickson. 1985. Management of Meloidogyne javanica, M.<br />

arenaria, M. incognita on flue cured tobacco with organophosphate, carbamate,<br />

and avermectin nematicides. Plant Dis. 69:67–69.<br />

Orion, D. and E. Shlevin.1989. Nematicide seed dressing for cyst and lesion<br />

nematode control in wheat. J. Nematol. 21(4S): 629-631.<br />

Ploeg, A. T. and M. S. Phillips. 2001. Damage to melon (Cucumis melo L.) cv.<br />

Durango by Meloidogyne incognita in Southern California. Nematology. 3:151–<br />

157.<br />

Putter, I., J. G. MacConnell, F. A. Preiser, A. A. Haidri, S. S. Ristich, and R. A.<br />

Dybas. 1981. Avermectins: novel insecticides, acaricides, and nematicides form<br />

a soil microorganism. Experientia. 37:963–964.<br />

Rodriguez-Kabana, R. and C. F. Weaver. 1987. Nematicide seed treatments for<br />

control of soybean nematodes. Nematropica. 17:79–93.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 401


Seinhorst, J. W. 1995. <strong>The</strong> effect of delay of attack of oats by Heterodera avenae on<br />

the relation between initial nematode density and plant growth, plant weight,<br />

water consumption and dry matter content. Nematologica. 41:487–504.<br />

Thomason, I. 1987. Challenges facing nematology: environmental risks with<br />

nematicides and the need for new approaches, p. 469–476. In: J. Veech, D.<br />

Dickson, and E. O. Painter (eds.). Vista on nematology. Printing Co., DeLeon<br />

Springs, FL.<br />

Truelove, B., R. Rodriguez-Kabana, and P. S. King. 1977. Seed treatment as a means<br />

of preventing nematode damage to crop plants. J. Nematol. 9:326–330.<br />

Zeck, W. M. 1971. A rating scheme for field evaluation of root-knot nematode<br />

infestations. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten, Bayer AG. 24:141–144.<br />

402 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


THE DOWNY MILDEW EPIDEMIC OF 2004<br />

AND 2005 IN THE EASTERN UNITED<br />

STATES<br />

Susan J. Colucci 1 , Todd C. Wehner 2 , and Gerald J. Holmes 1<br />

1 Department of Plant Pathology, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

Raleigh, NC 27695-7616<br />

2 Department of Horticultural Science, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Cucumis sativus,<br />

cucumber, disease resistance, pathology<br />

ABSTRACT. Downy mildew of cucurbits is caused by Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis (Berk. & M. A. Curtis) Rostovtsev. It has always been considered one<br />

of the most important diseases of cucumber worldwide. In the United <strong>State</strong>s,<br />

successful breeding efforts in the 1950s and 1960s were responsible for<br />

effectively controlling the disease in cucumber. In May 2004 downy mildew<br />

struck cucumber early and severely, resulting in huge economic losses<br />

(approximately 40% of the crop or $20 million) to growers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>,<br />

Delaware, and Maryland. In 2005 the disease spread to Michigan and Ontario,<br />

Canada, where it was equally virulent on cucumber, but due to a late arrival,<br />

spared most of the acreage. Forecasting efforts at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

University, which began in 1998, were temporarily suspended in 2004 due to<br />

lack of funding, but resumed in 2005 due to a renewed interest in the disease.<br />

This paper puts the epidemics of 2004 and 2005 into historical perspective with<br />

regard to breeding and forecasting efforts and outlines future efforts to combat<br />

this disease.<br />

D<br />

owny mildew of cucurbits is caused by Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis (Berk. & M. A. Curtis) Rostovtsev. P. cubensis is an<br />

obligate parasite and requires living host tissue to survive.<br />

Oospores are extremely rare, reported only on cucumber, and their role<br />

in reproduction and survival is uncertain (Waterhouse, 1981; Lange et<br />

al., 1987). As a result, the pathogen must travel from locations where<br />

a frost sufficient to kill a host plant does not occur. <strong>The</strong> pathogen can<br />

overwinter as active mycelium on wild or cultivated cucurbits in areas<br />

that experience mild winters, such as southern Florida (Bains and<br />

Jhooty, 1976). Infection is initiated by sporangia, which are<br />

transported via air currents and travel from local or distant sources.<br />

Moisture, as leaf wetness and high relative humidity, is required for<br />

sporangia to release zoospores and for zoospore movement (Cohen,<br />

1981; Lange et al., 1987; Palti and Cohen, 1980).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 403


Downy mildew threatens warm and humid cucurbit production<br />

areas worldwide and has been reported on species in the genus<br />

Cucumis in 70 countries (Cohen, 1981; Palti, 1974; Thomas, 1996).<br />

Historically, in the eastern United <strong>State</strong>s, the disease frequently occurs<br />

on squash, pumpkin, and melons in late summer and fall. <strong>The</strong> disease<br />

also occurs on watermelon, although less commonly than on squash,<br />

pumpkin, and melons, and is most common in Florida. In each of<br />

these crops, fungicides are necessary to control the disease. In<br />

contrast, downy mildew on cucumber has been successfully controlled<br />

through the use of resistant cultivars. Although the disease has<br />

occurred on cucumber during the last several decades, its presence was<br />

inconspicuous and did not result in obvious crop losses.<br />

In 2004 the story on cucumber changed dramatically. A new<br />

pathogen more virulent than the previous emerged and downy mildewresistant<br />

cultivars were not sufficient to prevent severe economic<br />

losses. <strong>The</strong> disease ravaged cucumber-growing areas of <strong>North</strong><br />

<strong>Carolina</strong>, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia in 2004. In 2005, the<br />

disease continued its path of destruction in Florida, then moved<br />

northward reaching Michigan and southwestern Ontario, Canada. As<br />

in 2004, the disease was quite severe on cucumber, but owing to its<br />

late arrival, most of the Michigan/Ontario, Canada, crop was spared.<br />

While the timing of the epidemic was different each year, it was clear<br />

that the pathogen was similar in virulence to that which was initially<br />

found on cucumber in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> in May of 2004.<br />

This paper provides a brief account of historical breeding efforts<br />

and disease forecasting to control cucurbit downy mildew, and<br />

summarizes the epidemics of 2004 and 2005 by tracing the dates and<br />

locations of disease occurrence and giving estimates of economic<br />

losses.<br />

<strong>Breeding</strong> for Resistance<br />

<strong>Breeding</strong> efforts in the 1940s led to the release in 1948 of cultivar<br />

Palmetto with moderate resistance to downy mildew. In 1966, cultivar<br />

Poinsett was released. This cultivar proved highly resistant to downy<br />

mildew. Early research on resistance of cucumbers to downy mildew<br />

showed that at least one single recessive gene, dm, controlled<br />

resistance in ‘Poinsett’ (Van Vliet and Meysing, 1977). Since<br />

‘Poinsett’s release, this disease resistance has been bred into most of<br />

the popular cultivars used today.<br />

As cucurbit breeding progressed through the twentieth century, a<br />

review by Pierce and Wehner indicated that several genes are actually<br />

involved in downy mildew resistance (1990). In 1992, Doruchowski<br />

404 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


and Lakowska-Ryk reported that three recessive genes, dm-1, dm-2,<br />

and dm-3 control resistance in Wisconsin-4783. In addition, a single<br />

dominant gene, Dm-3, and two complementary genes, Dm-1 and Dm-<br />

2, control susceptibility of cultivar SMR-18 (Doruchowskin and<br />

Lakowska-Ryk, 1992).<br />

New cultivars incorporated these genetic factors and were doing a<br />

magnificent job of controlling downy mildew on cucumbers for<br />

several decades. Because of this successful breeding effort, downy<br />

mildew was no longer a threat to cucumber production in the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s. In most cases, this resistance controlled the disease without the<br />

use of fungicides.<br />

Disease-Forecasting Efforts<br />

Downy mildew was the most important disease of cucumber in the<br />

1940s in the United <strong>State</strong>s. It was during this time that J. G. Horsfall<br />

at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station and C. J. Nusbaum<br />

of Clemson University in South <strong>Carolina</strong> began reporting the presence<br />

and spread of the disease in the eastern United <strong>State</strong>s from Florida to<br />

Massachusetts. Nusbaum noted that the disease occurred nearly every<br />

year, and that it progressed northward from Florida. He used a<br />

network of cooperators in 11 states along the eastern seaboard to track<br />

progress of the disease. Nusbaum also reported that the disease<br />

usually didn’t reach South <strong>Carolina</strong> until late May at the very earliest.<br />

In addition, he noted the sporadic nature of P. cubensis and that the<br />

disease was destructive in only four out of eight years (Nusbaum,<br />

1944).<br />

While downy mildew has not been a problem on cucumbers since<br />

the late 1960s, it is present nearly every year on other cucurbits<br />

(squash, pumpkin, melon, and watermelon) in the United <strong>State</strong>s. In<br />

1997 Holmes and Main at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University developed a<br />

forecasting system to predict the spread and development of cucurbit<br />

downy mildew. <strong>The</strong> system is made available to growers via a Web<br />

site: . <strong>The</strong> system is<br />

based on the tobacco blue mold (Peronospora tabacina) forecasting<br />

system created by C. E. Main (Main et al., 2001). Forecasting downy<br />

mildew began in 1998 and continued for the next six years. <strong>The</strong> Web<br />

site reported the progression of downy mildew on all commercially<br />

grown cucurbits. However, in 2004 forecasts ceased due to lack of<br />

funding.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 405


2004 Epidemic<br />

Interestingly, 2004 marked a turning point for downy mildew. In<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, the spring crop was looking unusually good. Rainfall<br />

and temperatures were such that growers were expecting very high<br />

yields. In mid-May a grower in Sampson County, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>,<br />

reported a blighted area in his cucumber field that had occurred so<br />

rapidly that it was initially thought to be herbicide injury. <strong>The</strong><br />

problem was soon diagnosed as downy mildew. Two things were<br />

particularly important about this event: (1) the disease had reached the<br />

state earlier than had ever been reported before; and (2) it was highly<br />

virulent on cucumber. Within days the presence of downy mildew was<br />

reported in six counties in eastern <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. Within a few weeks<br />

the disease was present in nearly every field of cucumbers throughout<br />

eastern <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (Holmes et al., 2006).<br />

By the first week in July the disease had spread to Accomack<br />

County, Virginia, and soon thereafter to cucumber fields in Delaware.<br />

Nearly all of the pickling-cucumber acreage on the Eastern Shore of<br />

Delaware was affected. Early August brought P. cubensis spores to<br />

more counties throughout <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> and also north to<br />

Connecticut and Suffolk County, New York. As the fall cucumber<br />

crop was planted in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, even more devastation was<br />

apparent. Some growers experienced as much as 95% yield loss.<br />

Many fields were abandoned without harvesting.<br />

In an effort to provide adequate control options, an emergency<br />

fungicide performance trial was established in 2004 in the heart of the<br />

affected area (Sampson County, NC) during the worst part of the<br />

epidemic (late summer). <strong>The</strong> trial consisted of 15 treatments and<br />

included old standards, new materials, and several products that<br />

growers had speculated about, but had little or no data to support.<br />

Treatments were applied at 5- to 7-day intervals for a total of 11<br />

applications. Disease was detected 10 days after plant emergence and,<br />

in the nontreated plots, prevented a single fruit from being produced.<br />

Many other fungicides failed to control the disease, but four products<br />

provided excellent disease control: Tanos (fenamidone + cymoxanil),<br />

Previcur Flex (propamocarb), Ranman (cyazofamid), and Gavel<br />

(zoxamide + mancozeb). <strong>The</strong>se products mixed with protectants such<br />

as Bravo (chlorothalonil) and mancozeb now form the backbone of<br />

successful downy mildew-control programs throughout the eastern<br />

U.S.<br />

In <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> the 2004 spring and fall cucumber crops were<br />

devastated. An estimated 40% crop loss for a total of $16 million was<br />

the result. Loss estimates are based on economic value of the crop as<br />

406 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


eported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (Quick Stats,<br />

2006) (Fig.1) as well as the cost of fungicide applications (ranging $12<br />

to $86/hectare/application). Additional economic repercussions were<br />

felt from lost markets, increased commodity prices, and dramatic<br />

changes in the demand for labor and machinery. A similar level of<br />

disease (i.e., 40% crop loss) occurred in Delaware, Maryland, and<br />

Virginia, with losses estimated at $4 million.<br />

Later in the year, the disease began to make its way southward. By<br />

November the disease was present in Charleston county South<br />

<strong>Carolina</strong> on cucumber. By mid-December the South Florida<br />

Vegetable Pest and Disease Hotline reported that the University of<br />

Florida/IFAS Plant Pathology Clinic in Immokalee had received more<br />

cucumber downy mildew samples than ever before.<br />

This news was of particular interest since southern Florida<br />

represents the starting point of the disease for areas northward. In this<br />

case, it looked as if it was the end point of the 2004 epidemic. If the<br />

disease was present on cucumber, it meant that the disease had gone<br />

south and would likely go north again leading to a possible repeat of<br />

2004. During the months of January through April, Florida reported<br />

downy mildew in all areas where cucumbers were grown. Fields were<br />

described with 100% disease incidence. Major yield decreases and<br />

field abandonment was reported (economic loss data are not available).<br />

Many growers were calling the epidemic the worst case of downy<br />

mildew they could ever remember.<br />

2005 Epidemic<br />

When <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>’s 2005 season began, growers hoped that the<br />

epidemic of 2004 was a fluke that would not repeat. Florida’s<br />

experience with the disease suggested that the pathogen was still<br />

virulent on cucumber and would remain so in 2005. <strong>The</strong> bigger<br />

question was when and where would it strike.<br />

With interest in downy mildew rekindled, forecasting resumed in<br />

March. In addition, based on the 2004 field trial results, a<br />

management program where Tanos + mancozeb is alternated with<br />

Previcur Flex + Bravo on a 5- to 7-day interval was recommended for<br />

2005. In early June, two fields with downy mildew were reported in<br />

Georgia. Oddly, the next report of the disease came from New Jersey,<br />

far to the north of the Georgia outbreaks with hundreds of miles of<br />

cucurbits in between. Sources reported that the New Jersey outbreak<br />

involved a field where transplants, purchased in Florida, were used.<br />

New Jersey also reported downy mildew in several of its cucumbergrowing<br />

counties in early July. By the middle of July, Maryland had<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 407


eported widespread infection of their cucumber crop. In Delaware,<br />

Maryland, and Virginia growers reduced acreage by about 20% and<br />

when P. cubensis arrived in early July, many simply stopped planting<br />

altogether (Ed Kee, personal communication).<br />

It was also at this time that P. cubensis showed up in <strong>North</strong><br />

<strong>Carolina</strong>. Fortunately, the timing was such that the spring crop was<br />

spared, but the summer crop was just beginning. Once again,<br />

cucumber was very susceptible and fungicides were necessary to<br />

prevent severe economic losses.<br />

On 5 August, an outbreak was reported in Michigan, the top<br />

cucumber-producing state in the U.S., whose average production is<br />

approximately 16,000ha of cucumbers annually (Figure 1).<br />

Eventually, 15 counties throughout Michigan reported the disease on<br />

cucumber. Downy mildew had not been confirmed in Michigan for at<br />

least fifteen years and had not been a problem there in the past (Mary<br />

Hausbeck, personal communication).<br />

In Ohio, the disease was again mistaken for herbicide injury;<br />

however, pumpkins planted nearby did not exhibit any symptoms.<br />

(This same observation of host-specificity for cucumber but not<br />

pumpkin or squash has been made in many other locations.)<br />

Reports from Ontario, Canada, were also received. In 2005, in<br />

Ontario, 1,983ha of cucumbers and gherkins were harvested (Ontario<br />

Ministry of Agriculture, 2006). Fortunately, the disease did not show<br />

up until late in the season for the Ontario growers. All of the acreage<br />

still in production during that time had at least some level of downy<br />

mildew present in their fields. <strong>The</strong> industry overall did not suffer;<br />

however, many smaller growers were devastated. Ontario had had<br />

incidence of downy mildew previously, but not at such high levels.<br />

Smuckers (a commercial processor) reported that much of the<br />

production was affected. About 12 acres were <strong>complete</strong>ly abandoned<br />

and 12 acres were used for relish for a total loss of about a $30,000<br />

Canadian ($27,095 US) (George Pape, personal communication).<br />

Determining Economic Losses<br />

Reports of downy mildew on cucurbit crops were compiled<br />

throughout the 2004 and 2005 growing seasons. Information was<br />

gathered through personal communication via email, telephone, and<br />

personal interviews with commercial and independent growers,<br />

researchers, and agricultural extension agents throughout the eastern<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s and Ontario, Canada. In 2004, there was personal<br />

communication with 18 individuals, and approximately 30 individuals<br />

in 2005. <strong>The</strong>se include many key industry representatives who are<br />

408 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


intimately familiar with production across several states. We consider<br />

our estimates to be fair and unexaggerated.<br />

Hectares (x 1000)<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

<strong>North</strong><br />

<strong>Carolina</strong><br />

Fresh<br />

Processed<br />

Value<br />

Michigan Florida Maryland New<br />

Jersey<br />

Ontario,<br />

CAN<br />

Fig. 1. Cucumber production and value in the eastern U.S. and southwestern<br />

Ontario, Canada.<br />

Summary of Forecasts<br />

In 2004, 14 states representing over 20 counties had reported<br />

downy mildew. Of these, 7 states had confirmed it on cucumber. By<br />

the end of 2005, 18 states, representing more than 62 counties, plus<br />

Ontario, Canada, reported downy mildew (nearly all on cucumber).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were approximately 320,000 hits to the forecasting Web site, an<br />

average of 1350 hits per day. This is almost a threefold increase over<br />

previous years.<br />

Summary<br />

<strong>The</strong> events of 2004 and 2005 strongly suggest the development or<br />

introduction of a variant of P. cubensis previously not present in the<br />

U.S. <strong>The</strong> virulence on previously resistant cucumber cultivars is<br />

unprecedented in the last 40 years. <strong>Breeding</strong> programs in all the major<br />

seed companies are again focused on developing cultivars for the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s with resistance to downy mildew. Growers should still<br />

plant resistant cultivars since they hold up better than susceptible<br />

cultivars when attacked by the new variant. However, resistance is no<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 409<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Value (x million USD)


longer sufficient to prevent foliar damage, so fungicides are now<br />

needed in addition to the resistance genes. Meanwhile, the fungicide<br />

performance trials in 2004 and 2005 and grower reports have<br />

confirmed excellent disease control following the Tanos + mancozeb<br />

alternated with Previcur Flex + Bravo (chlorothalonil) on a 5- to 7-day<br />

interval program.<br />

That this new variant of P. cubensis has spread to all of the major<br />

cucumber-producing areas of the eastern United <strong>State</strong>s and<br />

southwestern Ontario, Canada, within two years is further evidence of<br />

the method of dispersal for this pathogen (first reported by Nusbaum<br />

in the mid-1940s) and the potential to forecast its movement.<br />

Current research efforts are focused on determining the pathotype<br />

using the methods described by Lebeda (2003) and Thomas et al.<br />

(1987) and on determining fungicide sensitivity. <strong>The</strong> latter arises from<br />

reports of control failures of several popular fungicides. Research<br />

efforts are also focused on validating the cucurbit downy mildewforecasting<br />

system that serves as a valuable decision-making tool for<br />

growers. One thing that will drastically reduce the value of forecasting<br />

is the existence of overwintering sites for the pathogen in greenhouses<br />

in areas where the pathogen cannot overwinter, or the long-distance<br />

transport of infected transplants from infested areas to noninfested<br />

areas.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bains, S. S. and J. S. Jhooty. 1976. Over wintering of Pseudoperonospora cubensis<br />

causing downy mildew of muskmelon. Indian Phytopathology. 29:213–214.<br />

Cohen, Y. 1981. Downy mildew of cucurbits, p. 341–345. In: D. M. Spencer (ed).<br />

<strong>The</strong> downy mildews. Academic Press, New York.<br />

Doruchowski, R. W. and E. Lakowska-Ryk. 1992. Inheritance of resistance to<br />

downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis Berk. & Curt.) in Cucumis<br />

sativus. Proc. 5th Eucarpia Symposium, 27–31 July, Poland:132–138.<br />

Holmes, G., Wehner, T., and Thornton, A. 2006. An old enemy re-emerges.<br />

American Vegetable Grower. February.<br />

Lange, L., U. Eden, and L. W. Olson. 1987. Internal mycelium of<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis, the causal agent of cucurbit downy mildew.<br />

Nordic J. Bot. 8(5):505–510.<br />

Lebeda, A. and Widrlechner. 2003. A set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae taxa for the<br />

differentiation of Pseudoperonospora cubensis pathotypes. J. Plant Dis. & Prot.<br />

110(4):337–349.<br />

Main, C. E., T. Keever, G. J. Holmes, and J. M. Davis. 2001. Forecasting long-range<br />

transport of downy mildew spores and plant disease epidemics. APSnet Feature<br />

Story. Apr 25 through May 31, 2001.<br />

.<br />

Nusbaum, C. J. 1944. <strong>The</strong> seasonal spread and development of cucurbit downy<br />

mildew in the Atlantic coastal states. Plant Dis. Rep. 28:82–85.<br />

410 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Ontario Ministry of Agriculture. 2006. Food and Rural Affairs. Ontario Agriculture<br />

and Food Statistics, Ontario Processing Vegetable Growers and Statistics<br />

Canada: Fruit and Vegetable Survey. Online.<br />

Palti, J. 1974. <strong>The</strong> significance of pronounced divergences in the distribution of<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis on its crop hosts. Phytoparasitica. 2:109–115.<br />

Palti, J. and Y. Cohen. 1980. Downy mildew of cucurbits (Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis): the fungus and its hosts, distribution, epidemiology and control.<br />

Phytoparasitica. 8(2):109–147.<br />

Pierce, L. K. and T. C. Wehner. 1990. Review of genes and linkage groups in<br />

cucumber. HortSci. 25:605–615.<br />

Quick Stats. 2006. National Agriculture Statistics Service-United <strong>State</strong>s Department<br />

of Agriculture. On-line.<br />

Thomas, C. E., T. Inaba, and Y. Cohen. 1987. Physiological specialization in<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Phytopathology. 77:1621–1624.<br />

Thomas, C. E. 1996. Downy mildew, p. 25–27 In: T. A. Zitter, D. L. Hopkins, and<br />

C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press, St. Paul,<br />

MN.<br />

Van Vliet, G. J. A. and W. D. Meysing. 1977. Relation in the inheritance of<br />

resistance to Pseudoperonospora cubensis Rost. and Sphaerotheca fuliginea<br />

Poll. in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica. 26, 793–796.<br />

Waterhouse, G. M. and M. P. Brothers. 1981. <strong>The</strong> taxonomy of Pseudoperonospora.<br />

Mycolog. Papers. 148:1–28.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 411


WATERMELON RESISTANCE TO POWDERY<br />

MILDEW RACE 1 AND<br />

RACE 2<br />

Angela R. Davis<br />

USDA, ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Lab, Lane, OK<br />

74555<br />

Antonia Tetteh and Todd Wehner<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />

Amnon Levi<br />

USDA, ARS, U. S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC 29414<br />

Michel Pitrat<br />

INRA - Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Montfavet,<br />

France<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Podosphaera xanthii,<br />

Sphaerotheca fuliginea, resistance<br />

ABSTRACT. Powdery mildew is an emerging disease of watermelon in the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s. To date, Race 1 and Race 2 of Podosphaera xanthii have been<br />

detected on watermelon. In this study, the entire available U.S. Plant<br />

Introduction collection of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. &<br />

Nakai) was evaluated for resistance to P. xanthii Race 1 and Race 2 in six to<br />

nine replications of one plant per accession in greenhouse studies. Eight of the<br />

1,573 accessions were resistant to Race 1, and five accessions were resistant to<br />

Race 2. <strong>The</strong> majority of the resistant lines for Race 1 came from plants collected<br />

from Zimbabwe, while those resistant to Race 2 came from Iran, Egypt, and<br />

Zambia, along with one of unknown origin.<br />

I<br />

n the past six years, powdery mildew has been noted as a disease<br />

of watermelon in the United <strong>State</strong>s (McGrath, 2001b; Davis et al.,<br />

2001). Previously, powdery mildew affected other cucurbit crops,<br />

but was not a significant problem on watermelon (Robinson and<br />

Provvidenti, 1975). In recent years, research on watermelon powdery<br />

mildew has increased as crop damage from this disease has increased<br />

in South <strong>Carolina</strong>, Georgia, Florida, Oklahoma, Texas, Maryland, New<br />

York, Arizona, and California (McGrath, 2001b; Davis et al., 2001).<br />

This disease decreases plant canopy and can reduce yields through<br />

decreased fruit size and number of fruit per plant (McGrath and<br />

Thomas, 1996). <strong>The</strong> reduced canopy may also result in sunscald of the<br />

remaining fruit, making it unmarketable. Detection of powdery mildew<br />

can be difficult because the presence of the pathogen is less apparent<br />

on watermelon than on pumpkin and squash.<br />

412 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Two genera, Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea<br />

auct. p.p.) and Golovinomyces cichoracearum (formerly Erysiphe<br />

cichoracearum DC), are considered the predominant fungi that incite<br />

powdery mildew in cucurbits. <strong>The</strong>se two organisms differ in virulence<br />

against cucurbit species and in their sensitivity to fungicides (Bertrand,<br />

1991; Epinat et al., 1993; McGrath, 2001a and 2001b). P. xanthii has<br />

frequently been reported based on differential reactions of 10 melon<br />

(Cucumis melo) genotypes (Pitrat et al., 1998; McCreight et al., 1987),<br />

but 28 races have been described on a larger set of 32 melon genotypes<br />

(McCreight, 2006).<br />

Powdery mildew has been controlled on pumpkin by using<br />

resistant cultivars and fungicide applications (Keinath, 2001).<br />

Unfortunately, resistance of P. xanthii to certain fungicides has been<br />

detected, and application of fungicides to the undersides of leaves is<br />

difficult and often requires the use of systemic materials to achieve<br />

adequate control of the disease (McGrath and Thomas, 1996). We<br />

reported resistance in watermelon to Race 1 P. xanthii after screening<br />

100 Plant Introduction (PI) accessions in field studies (Davis et al.,<br />

2001). <strong>The</strong>se experiments led to the release of a watermelon breeding<br />

line (PI 525088-PMR) that has resistance to Race 1 P. xanthii (Davis<br />

et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> inheritance of resistance in that line to Race 1 was<br />

multigenic (Davis et al., 2002), and was independent from resistance<br />

to P. xanthii Race 2. In the current study, we evaluated the available<br />

U.S. PI accessions of Citrullus sp. from the USDA, ARS, Southern<br />

Regional Plant Introduction Station, Griffin, GA, for Race 1 and Race<br />

2 P. xanthii resistance.<br />

We would like to thank Amy Helms, Anthony Dillard, and Tammy Ellington for<br />

technical assistance. Some melon differentials were kindly supplied by Dr. Claude<br />

Thomas. This work was partially supported by the <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Crop Germplasm<br />

Committee and the National Germplasm System, USDA, ARS. Mention of trade<br />

names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing<br />

specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S.<br />

Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of the U.S. Department of<br />

Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color,<br />

national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was<br />

prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection<br />

under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works. Accordingly, there is no<br />

copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in which the article<br />

appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S. Government,<br />

which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 413


Materials and Methods<br />

RACE 1. One seed of each of the available PI accessions was<br />

planted in Speedling flats containing Redi-earth growth medium<br />

(SunGro, Vancouver, BC, Canada) in six <strong>complete</strong>ly randomized<br />

greenhouse experiments. Seedlings were inoculated with the Lane,<br />

OK, isolate of P. xanthii maintained on greenhouse-grown<br />

watermelon. Inoculation was carried out by brushing an infected leaf<br />

onto each seedling at the two-leaf stage of growth. Ratings were taken<br />

when 50% of the leaf surface areas of susceptible differentials<br />

demonstrated symptoms. Three ratings were made of each plant (stem,<br />

upper side of the leaves, and cotyledons) using the Horsfall and Barratt<br />

(1945) method. <strong>The</strong> plants were then classified as resistant,<br />

intermediate, or susceptible according to the mean of three ratings:<br />

≤6% = resistant; >6% and ≤12% = intermediate; and >12% =<br />

susceptible. Some plants were missing cotyledons at rating and thus<br />

the mean rating of leaves and stems were used. <strong>The</strong> following melon<br />

differentials were included in all experiments to determine the race of<br />

P. xanthii present: ‘Delicious 51’, ‘Edisto 47’, ‘Iran H’, ‘MR-1’,<br />

‘Nantais Oblong’, PI 124112, PI 414723, ‘PMR 45’, ‘PMR 5’, ‘PMR<br />

6’, ‘WMR 29’, and ‘TopMark’. Race 1 was the only powdery mildew<br />

found in these experiments.<br />

RACE 2. Seeds were planted in 100-mm diameter pots containing<br />

4P Fafard mix growing medium (Fafard, Agawam, MA) in a<br />

randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design in nine greenhouse experiments. At<br />

the first-true-leaf stage, seedlings were inoculated with P. xanthii Race<br />

2 isolate that had been maintained on melon (Cucumis melo) ‘PMR<br />

45’ and Gray Zucchini (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo) in the greenhouses in<br />

Charleston, SC. Inoculation was done with a spore suspension<br />

prepared by washing six mildewed leaves with a spray of distilled<br />

water and making the volume up to 1L. Each seedling was sprayed<br />

with a 2-ml spore suspension once each week for six weeks. Plants<br />

were maintained at 24 to 32 o C, with a relative humidity of 60 to 80%.<br />

Spreader plants were placed between rows as an additional source of<br />

powdery mildew infection (Sivapalan, 1993; Ziv and Zitter, 1992).<br />

Disease ratings were collected two weeks after the first and two weeks<br />

after the last inoculation on the leaves and stem separately using a<br />

rating scale of 0 (no disease) to 9 (plant was fully covered with mildew<br />

and had turned yellow). <strong>The</strong> plants were then classified as resistant,<br />

intermediate, or susceptible according to the mean of three ratings:<br />

5.5 susceptible. ‘PMR 45’,<br />

which is susceptible to Race 2, was included to increase the inoculum<br />

of Race 2 for use in the studies. <strong>The</strong> melon differentials mentioned<br />

414 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


above were included in all experiments to determine which race of P.<br />

xanthii was present. Race 2 was the only powdery mildew found in<br />

these experiments.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

RACE 1 RESISTANCE. In each of the six randomized experiments,<br />

we saw a range of symptoms from none detectable to 97% coverage<br />

with sporulation in all replications. <strong>The</strong> majority of the PI lines (92%)<br />

had mean detectable infection covering 12 to 50% of the plant surface<br />

(data not shown). <strong>The</strong> 50 most Race 1-resistant PI lines are listed in<br />

Table 1. <strong>The</strong>y were given a numerical ranking, with 1 being the most<br />

resistant. Only 8 PI lines were ranked as resistant, with an average<br />

percent sporulation of 6% or less. In our judgment, all 50 of these lines<br />

had commercially significant resistance to the disease. <strong>The</strong> average<br />

sporulation for PI 189318, which was ranked as number 50, was less<br />

than 12% coverage.<br />

Table 1. Ranking of the 50 watermelon PI lines most resistant to<br />

Race 1 P. xanthii.<br />

PI<br />

PI<br />

Rank<br />

line Resistance Rank line Resistance<br />

1 Grif5601 R 27 P179881 I<br />

2 PI482255 R 28 P179885 I<br />

3 PI388770 R 29 P184800 I<br />

4 PI482362 R 30 PI71749 I<br />

5 PI381750 R 31 PI296334 I<br />

6 PI459074 R 32 PI381731 I<br />

7 PI386015 R 33 PI386025 I<br />

8 PI482248 R 34 PI482251 I<br />

9 PI381742 I 35 PI482278 I<br />

10 PI532738 I 36 PI482295 I<br />

11 PI500331 I 37 PI482302 I<br />

12 PI508443 I 38 PI482355 I<br />

13 PI 60008 I 39 PI500332 I<br />

14 PI525082 I 40 PI512343 I<br />

15 PI482264 I 41 PI525088 I<br />

16 PI482258 I 42 PI482312 I<br />

17 PI217938 I 43 PI482259 I<br />

18 PI250145 I 44 PI482308 I<br />

19 PI482333 I 45 PI482380 I<br />

20 PI526233 I 46 PI500334 I<br />

21 PI482313 I 47 PI270545 I<br />

22 PI482328 I 48 PI482268 I<br />

23 P 500323 I 49 Grif5602 1<br />

24 PI505585 I 50 P189318 I<br />

25 P169241 I<br />

26 P179239 I<br />

R = resistant; I = intermediate resistance.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 415


Many of the PI lines were heterogeneous for resistance, which<br />

reduced their ranking; individuals in one accession ranged from 6% to<br />

94% sporulation coverage. We kept the most-resistant plants from each<br />

replicate for self-pollination and retesting. Out of 1,573 PI lines tested,<br />

only 13 had no data due to lack of germination or early death of<br />

seedlings. <strong>The</strong> most Race 1-susceptible PI lines are listed in Table 2,<br />

with 1 being the highest severity of infectivity. All PI lines in Table 2<br />

were rated as susceptible.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was an unexpectedly high percentage of Praecitrullus<br />

fistulosus (12%) and Citrullus colocynthis (8%) in the 50 accessions<br />

most resistant to Race 1; these two species comprise


soaking of the stem and petioles. Of all the USDA accessions, fewer<br />

than 1% were found to be resistant. No data were obtained for<br />

theremaining percentage. Out of 1,573 PI lines tested, only 11 had no<br />

data due to poor germination or early death of seedlings.<br />

RACE 2 RESISTANCE. A range of symptoms on the watermelon<br />

accessions was observed in each of the nine replications. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

symptoms varied from no detectable powdery mildew to <strong>complete</strong><br />

(100%) mildew coverage; few chlorotic spots to <strong>complete</strong> yellowing<br />

of entire leaves; little necrosis with some curling of leaf margins to<br />

necrosis of the entire plant; and no water soaking to extensive water<br />

soaking of the stem and petioles. Of all the USDA accessions, less<br />

than 1% were found to be resistant. No data were obtained for the<br />

remaining percentage. Out of 1,573 PI lines tested, only 11 had no data<br />

due to poor germination or early death of seedlings.<br />

Table 3. Ranking of the 50 watermelon PI lines most resistant to<br />

Race 2 P. xanthii.<br />

PI<br />

PI<br />

Rank line Resistance Rank line Resistance<br />

1 PI386015 R 27 PI482307 I<br />

2 PI632755 R 28 PI388770 I<br />

3 PI525082 R 29 PI482326 I<br />

4 PI307608 R 30 PI386019 I<br />

5 PI500354 R 31 Grif14202 I<br />

6 PI346082 R 32 PI482246 I<br />

7 PI560010 R 33 PI500331 I<br />

8 PI482286 R 34 PI269365 I<br />

9 PI494531 I 35 PI482278 I<br />

10 PI482333 I 36 PI186489 I<br />

11 PI386021 I 37 PI595203 I<br />

12 PI500334 I 38 PI381752 I<br />

13 PI386024 I 39 PI512828 I<br />

14 PI482361 I 40 PI386026 I<br />

15 PI500329 I 41 PI532722 I<br />

16 PI386016 I 42 PI482324 I<br />

17 PI482302 I 43 PI482308 I<br />

18 PI326516 I 44 PI560003 I<br />

19 PI560020 I 45 PI482288 I<br />

20 PI500332 I 46 PI482301 I<br />

21 PI500303 I 47 PI482299 I<br />

22 PI540911 I 48 PI381720 I<br />

23 PI500312 I 49 PI482338 I<br />

24 PI251244 I 50 PI381750 I<br />

25 PI482319 I<br />

26 PI482355 I<br />

R = resistant; I = intermediate resistance.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 417


Table 4. Ranking of the 50 watermelon PI lines most susceptible to<br />

Race 2 P. xanthii.<br />

Rank PI line Rank PI line Rank PI line Rank PI line<br />

1 PI357751 14 PI370427 27 PI370434 40 PI368526<br />

2 PI369220 15 PI169297 28 PI508442 41 PI211582<br />

3 PI357745 16 PI175652 29 PI278058 42 PI368506<br />

4 PI368519 17 PI271132 30 PI357752 43 PI277980<br />

5 PI512355 18 PI169284 31 PI370428 44 PI368521<br />

6 PI357737 19 PI537277 32 PI512360 45 PI178873<br />

7 PI536449 20 PI176907 33 PI271308 46 PI278003<br />

8 PI172792 21 PI278038 34 PI379235 47 PI379239<br />

9 PI176917 22 PI278049 35 PI379229 48 PI538888<br />

10 PI593373 23 PI174105 36 PI271987 49 PI593363<br />

11 PI357686 24 PI269677 37 PI271771 50 PI278034<br />

12 PI512361 25 PI176923 38 PI600903<br />

13 PI490380 26 PI357666 39 PI368496<br />

Table 5. Ranking of 25 cultivars for Race 2 P. xanthii resistance.<br />

Rank Cultivar Rank Cultivar<br />

1 Tastigold 14 Giza<br />

2 Blacklee 15 Rhode Island<br />

3 Florida Favorite 16 Sugarlee<br />

4 Chubby Gray 17 Black Boy<br />

5 Black Diamond Yellow Belly 18 Golden<br />

6 Graybelle 19 Tendersweet<br />

7 Tendergold 20 Picnic<br />

8 Black Diamond Yellow Fish 21 Charleston Gray<br />

9 Big Crimson 22 Sugarloaf<br />

10 Crimson Sweet 23 Hopi Red Flesh<br />

11 Perola 24 Early Arizona<br />

12 Desert King 25 Moon & Stars<br />

13 <strong>Carolina</strong> Cross 18<br />

Table 3 shows the 50 most-resistant PI lines in rank order. PI<br />

482299 had an average rating of 3.3. As expected, many of the<br />

watermelon accessions were heterogeneous for expression of<br />

resistance, with a mean rating from 2 to 7 within a PI accession over<br />

the replications. <strong>The</strong> most-resistant accessions and most- susceptible<br />

accessions were identified for retesting and self-pollination. Many of<br />

the resistant PI accessions came from Zimbabwe as in the Race-1 test,<br />

and there were many from Zambia, Iran, and India. PI 269677,<br />

reported susceptible in 1975 (Robinson and Provvidenti, 1975), was<br />

susceptible to P. xanthii Race 2 in our test. Eleven of the PI accessions<br />

demonstrated resistance or intermediate resistance to both Race 1 and<br />

Race 2 P. xanthii. Table 4 lists the 50 PI lines most susceptible to<br />

418 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Race 2 P. xanthii; all had a rating of susceptible. Table 5 shows the<br />

ranking of 25 cultivars used as checks for the PI screening study. All<br />

watermelon cultivars were susceptible, with ‘Tastigold’ showing less<br />

susceptibility than the other cultivars to Race 2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> experiments reported here evaluated watermelon germplasm<br />

for resistance to P. xanthii Races 1 and 2 in greenhouse experiments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 50 most resistant and most susceptible will be retested to verify<br />

our results.<br />

Since we were using cantaloupe differentials to determine the race<br />

present in these studies and we do not currently have differentials of<br />

Citrullus sp., we can state only that the races detected show the same<br />

infectivity on the differentials as Race 1 and Race 2 P. xanthii of<br />

Cucumis melo. We are currently developing watermelon lines with<br />

homogeneous expression for infectivity to these two isolates of P.<br />

xanthii; once produced, we will likely find that the P. xanthii strain<br />

that affects watermelon will differ from that which infects cantaloupe.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bertrand, F. 1991. Les Oidiums des <strong>Cucurbit</strong>acees: maintien en culture pure, étude<br />

de leur variabilité et de la sensibilité chez le melon. PhD Diss., Université of<br />

Paris XI, Orsay, France.<br />

Davis, A. R., B. D. Bruton, S. D. Pair, and C. E. Thomas. 2001. Powdery mildew: an<br />

emerging disease of watermelon in the United <strong>State</strong>s. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt.<br />

24:42–48.<br />

Davis, A. R., C. E. Thomas, A. Levi, B. D. Bruton, and S. D. Pair. 2002.<br />

Watermelon resistance to powdery mildew race 1, p. 192–198. In: D. N.<br />

Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’02. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Davis, A. R., T. Wehner, A. Levi, and M. Pitrat. 2005. Notice of release of PI<br />

525088-PMR: a watermelon line useful for introducing race 1 powdery mildew<br />

resistance into watermelon lines. USDA-ARS Germplasm Release.<br />

Epinat, C., M. Pitrat, and F. Bertrand. 1993. Genetic analysis of resistance of five<br />

melon lines to powdery mildews. Euphytica. 65:135–144.<br />

Horsfall, J. G. and R. W. Barratt. 1945. An improved grading system for measuring<br />

plant disease. Phytopathology. 35:655(Abstr.).<br />

Keinath, A. P. 2001. Powdery mildew-resistant cultivars. SC Pumpkin News. 5:1.<br />

McCreight, J. D., M. Pitrat, C. E. Thomas, A. N. Kishaba, and G. W. Bohn. 1987.<br />

Powdery mildew resistance genes in muskmelon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

112:156–160.<br />

McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />

melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

131:59–65.<br />

McGrath, M. 2001a. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences<br />

and challenges. Plant Dis. 85:236–245.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2001b. Distribution of cucurbit powdery mildew races 1 and 2 on<br />

watermelon and muskmelon. Phytopath. 91:S197(Abstr.).<br />

McGrath, M. T. and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Powdery mildew, p. 28–30. In: T. A.<br />

Zitter, D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 419


diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

Pitrat, M., C. Dogimont, and M. Bardin. 1998. Resistance to fungal diseases of<br />

foliage in melon, p. 167–173. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae’98.<br />

ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Robinson, R. W. and R. Provvidenti. 1975. Susceptibility to powdery mildew in<br />

Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100:328–<br />

330.<br />

Sivapalan, A. 1993. Effect of water on germination of powdery mildew conidia.<br />

Mycol. Res. 97:71–76.<br />

Ziv, O. and T. A. Zitter. 1992. Effects of bicarbonates and film-forming polymers on<br />

cucurbit foliar diseases. Plant Dis. 76:513–517.<br />

420 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUNGICIDE<br />

MANDIPROPAMID IN THE UNITED<br />

STATES FOR CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW<br />

OF CUCURBITS<br />

Tyler L. Harp, Donald R. Tory, and Paul J. Kuhn<br />

Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Vero Beach, FL<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Oomycete, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, cucumber,<br />

cantaloupe, disease control, nonionic surfactant, NIS<br />

ABSTRACT. Mandipropamid 250 SC is a new fungicide developed by Syngenta<br />

for control of foliar oomycete pathogens, including cucurbit downy mildew. On<br />

cucurbits, mandipropamid provides outstanding preventive control of downy<br />

mildew when applied at rates of 100 to 150GA/ha on a 7- to 10-day application<br />

interval. <strong>The</strong> use of a nonionic surfactant at a rate of 0.125% v:v in mixture<br />

with mandipropamid significantly improves efficacy against cucurbit downy<br />

mildew, and should be included for optimal performance. <strong>The</strong> results presented<br />

here, along with fungicide-resistance management practices, formed the basis<br />

for use recommendations described in labeling for mandipropamid.<br />

D<br />

owny mildew caused by the oomycete fungus<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk. & M.A. Curtis)<br />

Rostovzev is an important foliar disease of cucurbits, and the<br />

last two to three seasons have witnessed serious epidemics in Florida<br />

and other cucurbit-producing states on the east coast of the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s. In 2004, grower losses to the disease were estimated to be ca.<br />

40% in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, Virginia, Delaware, and Maryland (Gerald<br />

Holmes, personal communication).<br />

Integrated pest management of the disease is based in part on hostplant<br />

resistance and on cultural practices such as spacing plants widely<br />

enough to reduce canopy density and avoiding overhead irrigation.<br />

However, effective control relies on the use of fungicide programs that<br />

include both conventional protectant and systemic products.<br />

At the most recent British Crop Protection Council International<br />

Congress in Glasgow, Scotland, Huggenberger, Lamberth, Iwanzik,<br />

and Knauf-Beiter (2005) introduced mandipropamid (Figure 1), a new<br />

fungicide from Syngenta that is highly effective in the control of<br />

We would like to thank colleagues working with Syngenta in Greensboro, NC (Jim<br />

Frank, Allison Tally, and David Laird) and Basel, Switzerland (Fritz Huggenberger)<br />

for reviewing the manuscript and for their helpful advice during the studies described<br />

here.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 421


oomycete diseases such as downy mildews. A submission to the EPA<br />

was made in March 2006, with registration anticipated in time for<br />

launch early in 2008. Mandipropamid will be available as a solo<br />

product and also in premixes with a range of partner fungicides. This<br />

paper describes biological studies conducted in the US to develop use<br />

recommendations for mandipropamid on downy mildew of cucurbits.<br />

Cl<br />

O<br />

O<br />

H<br />

N<br />

Fig. 1. Chemical structure of mandipropamid<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANTS. All of the biological evaluations reported here were<br />

conducted in field trials at Vero Beach Research Center, Vero Beach,<br />

Florida, using either cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Straight Eight)<br />

or cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L. cv. Athena), and naturally occurring<br />

epidemics of downy mildew. Trials were laid out in a randomized<br />

block design with four replicates per treatment. Cucumbers were<br />

direct-seeded on bare ground, while cantaloupes were transplanted into<br />

plastic mulch with drip irrigation. Plots consisted of double rows,<br />

typically 6–9m in length. Local agronomic practices were employed<br />

for weed control, insect control, and fertility.<br />

FUNGICIDES. Mandipropamid (NOA446510) was a 250g/L<br />

(2.08lb/gal) suspension concentrate (SC), which will be the<br />

commercial solo formulation. Commercial standards and surfactants<br />

were obtained through Syngenta or purchased locally. Applications, at<br />

a spray volume of 375L/ha and a pressure of 345kPa, were made from<br />

a boom mounted on the front end of a spray ram. Unless stated<br />

otherwise, applications were initiated at the onset of visible disease<br />

symptoms in the foliage.<br />

DISEASE ASSESSMENT. Levels of disease were evaluated as %<br />

severity of the leaf area infected. For determination of statistical<br />

significance, data were analyzed by analysis of variance (p = 0.05).<br />

For comparison of disease development over time, disease levels were<br />

expressed as Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) values.<br />

422 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

O<br />

O


Results and Discussion<br />

EFFICACY. In numerous field trials in the US and elsewhere,<br />

mandipropamid at rates of 100–150GA/ha has provided excellent<br />

control of downy mildew on cucurbits (Figure 2).<br />

Mandipropamid Untreated<br />

Fig. 2. Control of downy mildew on cucumber (‘Straight Eight’) from<br />

mandipropamid (150GA/ha) + 0.125% (v:v) NIS (Activator 90).<br />

In the trial illustrated in Figure 3, the first application was made<br />

when disease symptoms were first observed in older leaves. By 20<br />

days after the final application, disease severity in untreated checks<br />

was 46%. By contrast, in plots receiving a program of mandipropamid<br />

(150GA/ha) alternated with Bravo ® Weather Stik ® (1262GA/ha),<br />

severity was less than 5%, indicating greater than 90% disease control.<br />

A range of commercial standards each alternated with Bravo ® Weather<br />

Stik ® and representing diverse modes of action, also provided good<br />

control of downy mildew, statistically equivalent to mandipropamid,<br />

though numerically slightly inferior.<br />

EFFECT OF RATE AND APPLICATION INTERVAL ON EFFICACY. In<br />

order to evaluate the effect of rate and application interval on efficacy,<br />

a trial was undertaken on cucumber in which sprays of mandipropamid<br />

were applied at intervals of 7, 10, or 14 days with three rates of<br />

mandipropamid (100, 125, and 150GA/ha) tested for each (Figure 4).<br />

Disease control was observed in all treatment régimes, and for each<br />

application interval a dose-response effect was observed, with<br />

progressively improved control with increasing rate of product. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 423


was also a clear trend toward better efficacy with shorter application<br />

intervals. In practice, the application interval and rates used will<br />

depend on a number of factors, including susceptibility of the cultivar,<br />

level of disease at first application, and environmental conditions<br />

during growth of the crop.<br />

Disease Severity (%)<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

check check<br />

a<br />

mandipropamid mandipropamid (150 (150 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />

b<br />

Cabrio Cabrio (150 (150 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />

b<br />

Ranman Ranman (80GA/Ha) (80GA/Ha)<br />

b<br />

b<br />

Tanos Tanos (280 (280 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />

b<br />

Gavel Gavel (1261 (1261 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />

Fig. 3. Protectant disease control from mandipropamid in comparison with<br />

commercial standards. For each fungicide program, there were a total of three<br />

applications on a 7–10-day interval. <strong>The</strong> second application in each case was<br />

Bravo Weather Stik (1262GA/ha). <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted on cucumber var.<br />

‘Straight Eight’, and the data shown are for evaluations taken at 20 days after<br />

the last application. Mandipropamid and Ranman were mixed with 0.125%<br />

Activator 90 or 0.06% (v:v) Silwet L77, respectively.<br />

EFFECT OF NONIONIC SURFACTANT ON EFFICACY. <strong>The</strong> effect on<br />

disease control from the addition of a nonionic surfactant (NIS) to<br />

spray solutions was evaluated in trials on cucumber (data not shown)<br />

and cantaloupe (Figure 5). In this case, the first spray was made when<br />

disease severity was ca. 15%, therefore representing a curative<br />

application. Mandipropamid (150GA/ha) was applied solo or with<br />

424 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


NIS (Activator 90) to final concentrations of 0.06, 0.125, or 0.25%<br />

(v:v), and disease progress monitored periodically over the following<br />

five weeks.<br />

Mandipropamid alone had good effect, with ca. 70% control at the<br />

final rating, by which time severity in the untreated check was<br />

approaching 100%. However, efficacy was significantly (p = 0.05)<br />

better in treatments containing NIS at all rates, but especially at 0.125<br />

and 0.25% (Figure 5). Careful observation of the disease progress<br />

revealed the development of lesions on initially asymptomatic leaves<br />

that expanded after the first application timing in the untreated checks<br />

and, to a lesser extent, in plants treated with mandipropamid alone.<br />

AUDPC<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Untreated 7 10 14<br />

Application Interval (days)<br />

Untreated<br />

100 GA/Ha<br />

125 GA/Ha<br />

150 GA/Ha<br />

Fig. 4. Effect of application interval on protectant disease control from<br />

mandipropamid. Values for Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) are<br />

based on five assessments of disease severity. At the time of the last evaluation,<br />

disease severity in the untreated check was ca. 71%. All mandipropamid<br />

applications included NIS at 0.125% (v:v). <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted on<br />

cucumber var. ‘Straight Eight’.<br />

By contrast, lesions did not develop in the corresponding leaves of<br />

plants treated with mandipropamid + NIS. Consequently, in the latter<br />

treatments, overall disease severities either remained similar to those<br />

present at the time of the first application, or even decreased slightly<br />

due to the contribution of newly developing, healthy foliage (Figure 5).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 425


<strong>The</strong>se observations suggest that the inclusion of NIS in the spray<br />

mixture may boost the preventive activity of the fungicide on the<br />

younger leaves where no subsequent symptoms were observed, or<br />

possibly enhance any curative effect that mandipropamid exhibits, so<br />

reducing inoculum production on and spread from older infected<br />

leaves. Regardless of the basis for the beneficial effect, the addition of<br />

an adjuvant certainly optimizes the level of downy mildew control<br />

provided by mandipropamid. Consequently, inclusion of an adjuvant<br />

is strongly recommended especially in circumstances where the first<br />

application is made after disease onset and where conditions are<br />

conducive to the development of an epidemic.<br />

Disease severity (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Nov 11<br />

Nov 18<br />

Nov 24<br />

Dec 2<br />

Dec 9<br />

Assessment Dates (2004)<br />

Check<br />

Mandipropamid<br />

+NIS (0.06%)<br />

+NIS (0.125%)<br />

+NIS (0.25%)<br />

Fig. 5. Effect of NIS (Activator 90) on protectant disease control from<br />

mandipropamid. Mandipropamid (150GA/ha) was applied alone or with NIS at<br />

0.06, 0.125, or 0.25% (v:v). <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted on cantaloupe var.<br />

‘Athena’, with the applications made on Nov 10, Nov 14, Nov 19, and Nov 26,<br />

2004.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Huggenberger, F., C. Lamberth, W. Iwanzik, and G. Knauf-Beiter. 2005.<br />

Mandipropamid a new fungicide against oomycete pathogens. Proc. BCPC<br />

Congress Crop Sci. & Tech. 1:93–98.<br />

426 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

Dec 16


INTEGRATING CULTURAL AND CHEMICAL<br />

STRATEGIES TO CONTROL<br />

PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI AND LIMIT ITS<br />

SPREAD<br />

M. K. Hausbeck, A. J. Gevens, and B. Cortright<br />

Department of Plant Pathology,<br />

Michigan <strong>State</strong> University, E. Lansing, MI 48824<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Fruit rot, irrigation baiting, fungicide efficacy, soil<br />

fumigation<br />

ABSTRACT. Phytophthora root, crown, and fruit rot caused by the oomycete<br />

Phytophthora capsici Leonian causes significant disease on cucurbits and other<br />

vegetables nationwide. We investigated the efficacy of fungicide and fumigant<br />

programs, the use of surface water for irrigation, and susceptibility of snap<br />

beans to P. capsici. All fungicides tested in three efficacy trials provided<br />

significant disease control when compared to the untreated. In one trial,<br />

fungicides were evaluated with different sprayer types, and air-assisted<br />

applications provided better fruit protection than conventional sprays. All but<br />

one of the seven fumigant regimes compared provided significant control. <strong>The</strong><br />

consistent detection of P. capsici in surface water used for irrigation suggests<br />

that this is an important means of pathogen dissemination. With the recent<br />

identification of P. capsici on beans, rotating P. capsici-susceptible crops with<br />

beans is no longer recommended. Results of this study can be used to develop<br />

an overall management scheme for limiting P. capsici on susceptible crops in<br />

Michigan.<br />

M<br />

ichigan has over 22,900 hectares of cucurbits that are<br />

susceptible to root, crown, and fruit rot caused by the<br />

soilborne pathogen Phytophthora capsici. P. capsici has<br />

two mating types that allow for the production of long-term survival<br />

spores (oospores) and genetic recombination that can result in<br />

fungicide resistance. Oospores can survive in soil for up to 10 years<br />

without a susceptible crop, and both mating types have been found in<br />

every sampled field in Michigan (Lamour and Hausbeck, 2000; 2001).<br />

P. capsici is favored by rain and warm temperatures, which occur<br />

during the Michigan growing season. <strong>The</strong> pathogen has recently been<br />

detected in Michigan irrigation ponds and other surface water sources<br />

(Gevens and Hausbeck, 2004; Hausbeck and Lamour, 2004).<br />

Movement of other Phytophthora spp. via irrigation water has been<br />

documented and aboveground water sources may play a role in the<br />

long-distance movement of P. capsici (Jung and Blaschke, 2004;<br />

Ouedmans, 1999; Yamak, et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> most effective control<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 427


measure that growers have available is to avoid planting in infested<br />

soil. Crop rotation is difficult as infested acreage and urban pressure is<br />

increasing across vegetable-production areas. Raised plant beds can<br />

be helpful as they reduce saturated soil conditions (Hausbeck and<br />

Lamour, 2004). At one time, the systemic fungicide, mefenoxam<br />

(Ridomil, Ultra Flourish) was widely effective. However, repeated use<br />

of this fungicide and genetic adaptation of P. capsici has resulted in<br />

resistant pathogen populations in many Michigan fields (Lamour and<br />

Hausbeck, 2000). Once resistance occurs, the use of mefenoxam does<br />

not offer the needed control and alternative fungicides should be used.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fungicides Acrobat (dimethomorph), Gavel (mancozeb +<br />

zoxamide), and Tanos 50DF (famoxadone + cymoxanil) provide<br />

growers with alternatives to mefenoxam (Hausbeck and Lamour,<br />

2004).<br />

A combined approach of all available cultural and chemical control<br />

techniques is necessary to manage this pathogen and limit its spread.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objectives of this research were to evaluate the role of cultural<br />

practices, such as irrigating cucurbits with surface water and rotating<br />

cucurbits with snap bean, and the efficacy of fungicides and fumigants<br />

in managing disease caused by P. capsici.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

FUNGICIDE STUDIES. Two trials were conducted on a farm with<br />

sandy loam soil using registered and unregistered fungicides (Table 1).<br />

<strong>The</strong> farm has a history of P. capsici, and in the year prior, had been<br />

planted to cucumber. Plots were 183m long with nine rows per plot,<br />

76cm between rows and 7.6cm between plants. Treatments were<br />

replicated in a random order. Fungicide treatments were applied with<br />

a conventional boom sprayer with XR8003 nozzles spaced 51cm apart,<br />

operating at 415kPa and delivering 281l/ha. Sprays were applied<br />

when the oldest fruits on the vine were 2.5, 7.6, and 12.7cm in size. In<br />

Trial 2, a fourth spray was made three days after the third application.<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of infected fruit that came across the transfer belt of the<br />

harvester was recorded for a pass of three rows by 183m (418m 2 ).<br />

Fruit were collected from each treatment strip and stored for five days<br />

under ambient conditions prior to disease evaluation.<br />

A third trial was conducted on sandy loam soil with a history of P.<br />

capsici. <strong>The</strong> plot was 274m long with 9 rows per plot, 76cm between<br />

rows and 7.6cm between plants. Fungicide treatments were applied<br />

with a conventional boom sprayer or an air-assisted sprayer. <strong>The</strong><br />

conventional sprayer had XR8003 nozzles spaced 51cm apart,<br />

operated at 415kPa and delivered 281l/ha. <strong>The</strong> air-assisted sprayer<br />

428 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Products used in fungicide trials.<br />

Product Active ingredient Company Crops on label<br />

Acrobat 50WP dimethomorph BASF cucurbits<br />

Forum 500SC dimethomorph BASF cucurbits<br />

Gavel 75DF mancozeb + Dow cucumber, melon,<br />

zoxamide<br />

summer squash<br />

Kocide 2000 54DF copper hydroxide DuPont cucurbits<br />

Maestro 80DF captan Arysta no<br />

ManKocide 61DF mancozeb + copper DuPont cucumber, melon,<br />

hydroxide<br />

summer squash<br />

Manzate 75DF mancozeb DuPont cucumber, melon,<br />

summer squash<br />

Ridomil Gold MZ mefenoxam + Syngenta cucumber, melon,<br />

mancozeb<br />

summer/winter squash<br />

Tanos 50DF famoxadone +<br />

cymoxanil<br />

DuPont cucurbits<br />

had 4 Proptec nozzles spaced 152cm apart and delivered 94l/ha.<br />

Sprays were applied when the oldest fruits on the vine were 2.5, 7.6,<br />

and 12.7cm in size. During harvest the number of infected fruit that<br />

came across the transfer belt of the mechanical harvester was recorded<br />

for a pass of 3 rows by 274m (626m 2 ). Three bulk bins of fruit were<br />

collected at harvest from each treatment strip and stored for four days<br />

under ambient conditions prior to disease evaluation.<br />

FUMIGANT STUDIES. Studies conducted on P. capsicisusceptible<br />

crops (tomato, eggplant, pepper, zucchini, winter<br />

squash, melon, and watermelon) compared the efficacy of<br />

registered fumigants for the control of P. capsici and evaluated<br />

their potential as replacement products for methyl bromide.<br />

Two trials were conducted in fields with severe P. capsici<br />

disease pressure. Treatments of methyl bromide/chloropicrin,<br />

chloropicrin alone (100%), and Telone C-35 TM (1,3dichloropropene/<br />

chloropicrin) were applied using standard<br />

gas-injection knives 25.4-30.5cm below the soil and then<br />

covered with plastic mulch. Applications of Vapam TM (metam<br />

sodium) and K-Pam TM (metam potassium) were made via drip<br />

tapes installed under the plastic mulch. In 2003, each product<br />

was applied alone. For 2004, K-Pam TM was tested alone and in<br />

combination with chloropicrin. Each crop was planted after the<br />

appropriate period of off-gassing had expired for each<br />

treatment. Plots were rated for the number of plants killed by<br />

P. capsici.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 429


SURFACE WATER STUDIES. Surface water sources in<br />

Michigan used for irrigating cucurbit crops were monitored for<br />

the presence of P. capsici during 2001 and the pathogen was<br />

recovered from irrigation ponds on two farms. Additional<br />

water sites including a creek, a river, naturally fed ponds,<br />

ponds fed by wells, a culvert, and two ditches were monitored<br />

for P. capsici during 2002 to 2005. <strong>The</strong> pathogen was baited<br />

from the irrigation sources using green pears and cucumber<br />

fruits. Studies are ongoing in 2006.<br />

ROTATIONAL BEAN STUDIES. From 2003 through 2005,<br />

several bean (snap and yellow wax) fields in Michigan were<br />

diagnosed with disease caused by P. capsici. In all situations,<br />

the beans were being used as a rotational crop to either pickling<br />

cucumber or zucchini. Infected bean plants exhibited watersoaked<br />

lesions, necrosis, and wilt. In some instances, pods<br />

were blighted. Diseased tissues were excised, surface<br />

sterilized, and plated onto antibiotic-amended V-8 agar.<br />

Isolates of P. capsici collected from beans were tested for<br />

pathogenicity on cucumber fruit and other bean types.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

FUNGICIDE STUDIES. In Trial 1, excessive rain (38.1cm total)<br />

occurred during the 12 days between the first and final fungicide<br />

sprays. <strong>The</strong> soil remained wet throughout the trial and disease<br />

developed uniformly across all untreated plots. All treatments<br />

significantly reduced the amount of infected pickling cucumber fruits<br />

at the time of harvest (Table 2). Significant differences were not<br />

observed among treatments when assessing postharvest fruit rot.<br />

In Trial 2, a driving rainstorm between the second and third<br />

fungicide applications provided 2.5cm of rain. All treatments<br />

significantly reduced the amount of infected fruits at the time of<br />

harvest (Table 3). All treatments of Maestro 80DF (both<br />

rates)+Kocide 2000 54DF applied either alone or in rotation with<br />

Acrobat 50WP+Kocide 2000 54DF were very effective in limiting P.<br />

capsici infection to fewer than 16 fruit per pass of the harvester. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were no significant differences among the treatments for the number of<br />

infected pickling cucumber fruits evaluated after five days of storage.<br />

In Trial 3, all fungicides limited disease compared to the control<br />

(Table 4). <strong>The</strong> least amount of disease occurred when an air-assisted<br />

sprayer was used. This may be due to the ability of the air-assisted<br />

sprayer to force the fungicide into the plant canopy and reach the fruit.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of this trial indicate the need for good coverage when<br />

430 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Efficacy of fungicides for Phytophthora fruit rot of pickling<br />

cucumbers in 2004.<br />

Phytophthorainfected<br />

fruit<br />

Treatment and rate/ha (fruit size when treated)<br />

At<br />

harvest<br />

(number)<br />

After 5<br />

days<br />

storage<br />

(%)<br />

Untreated......................................................................................1,092.5 b * Forum 500SC 0.5L+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5, 7.6,<br />

33.0<br />

12.7cm) ........................................................................................<br />

Forum 500SC 0.5L+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

6.5 a 11.5<br />

+ Manzate 75DF 2.2kg (2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ................................<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5cm)<br />

12.5 a 11.5<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6, 12.7cm) 10.5<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5, 7.6cm)<br />

a 24.0<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />

Tanos 50DF 0.6kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

+Manzate 75DF 2.3kg (2.5cm)<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />

11.5 a 17.0<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />

Tanos 50DF 0.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

+Manzate 75DF 2.2kg (2.5cm)<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />

1.0 a 10.0<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />

Tanos 50DF 0.8kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

+Manzate 75DF 2.2kg (2.5cm)<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2 kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />

y a 36.0<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg (12.7cm) ..............................................<br />

Tanos 50DF 0.7kg+ManKocide 61DF 2.2kg (2.5cm)<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />

2.0 a 3.5<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />

Ridomil Gold MZ 2.8kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

10.0 a 7.5<br />

(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ......................................................................<br />

Maestro 80DF 6.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5, 7.6,<br />

10.0 a 31.0<br />

12.7cm) ........................................................................................ 37.0 a 5.5<br />

*<br />

Column means with a letter in common or no letter are not significantly different<br />

(SNK; P = 0.05).<br />

applying fungicides to control fruit rot. Plant-row spacing may need to<br />

be increased to prevent an especially dense canopy from forming,<br />

thereby increasing the potential of a fungicide spray reaching the<br />

underlying fruit.<br />

FUMIGANT STUDIES. Melon and watermelon plants were<br />

especially susceptible to P. capsici. In 2004, applications of both rates<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 431


%P<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

b<br />

Untreated<br />

a<br />

Vapam 704l/ha<br />

2003<br />

a<br />

MBr/pic<br />

Combined data for:<br />

Tomato<br />

Eggplant<br />

Pepper<br />

Zucchini<br />

Winter Squash<br />

Melon<br />

Watermelon<br />

a<br />

Telone C35<br />

Fig. 1. Fumigant evaluation for P. capsici, 2003 (left) and 2004 (right).<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

of K-Pam TM applied either alone or in combination with chloropicrin<br />

were very effective in controlling P. capsici in both melon and<br />

watermelon (Table 5). Applications of methyl bromide/chloropicrin<br />

and chloropicrin alone also significantly limited disease.<br />

Combining the data of plant death (%) for all crops in this trial showed<br />

that significant disease control was achieved for all treatments in 2003<br />

(Figure 1). In 2004, both rates of K-Pam TM applied alone or in<br />

combination with chloropicrin were very effective in limiting P.<br />

capsici (Figure 1). Applications of methyl bromide/chloropicrin and<br />

chloropicrin alone were also significantly better than the untreated.<br />

Telone C-35 TM allowed more disease in 2003 compared with 2004.<br />

SURFACE WATER STUDIES. Phytophthora capsici was frequently<br />

detected in a river, creek, and a naturally fed pond. All water sources<br />

monitored were located near crops infected with P. capsici and/or<br />

fields with a history of disease. Using surface water that may be<br />

contaminated with P. capsici to irrigate healthy crops must be avoided<br />

to limit pathogen spread.<br />

ROTATIONAL BEAN STUDIES. All P. capsici isolates from beans<br />

caused disease on cucumber fruit, and resulted in dark, water-soaked<br />

lesions with pathogen sporulation. Isolates of P. capsici from snap<br />

beans caused disease on 12 bean cultivars that represented four<br />

Phaseolus species (lunatus, vulgaris, vulgaris var. humilis, and<br />

vulgaris var. vulgaris) and one Glycine species (max). <strong>The</strong> use of<br />

beans as a rotational crop with P. capsici-susceptible hosts is not<br />

recommended.<br />

5<br />

0<br />

c<br />

Untreated<br />

bc<br />

Telone C35 35 327<br />

ab<br />

Chloropicrin 234 l/ha<br />

2004<br />

ab<br />

MBr/Pic 392 kg/ha<br />

a<br />

K-Pam 280 l/ha<br />

a<br />

K-Pam 561 l/ha<br />

Combined data for:<br />

Tomato<br />

Eggplant<br />

Pepper<br />

Zucchini<br />

Winter Squash<br />

Melon<br />

Watermelon<br />

432 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

a<br />

K-Pam<br />

a<br />

K-Pam High


Table 3. Efficacy of fungicides for Phytophthora fruit rot of pickling<br />

cucumbers in 2004.<br />

Phytophthorainfected<br />

fruit<br />

After 5<br />

days<br />

At harvest storage<br />

Treatment and rate/ha (fruit size when treated) (number) (%)<br />

Untreated............................................................................ 83.3 b * Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg +Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

4.4<br />

(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 29.3<br />

Maestro 80DF 4.5kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

a 0.2<br />

(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 15.7<br />

Maestro 80DF 6.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

a 0.8<br />

(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................<br />

Tanos 50DF 0.8 kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

5.0 a 0.0<br />

(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 30.3<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2 kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

a 2.3<br />

(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 20.0<br />

Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

(2.5cm) Tanos 50DF 0.8kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

(7.6cm) Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF<br />

a 0.2<br />

1.7kg (12.7cm) ................................................................ 28.0<br />

Maestro 80DF 6.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />

(2.5, 12.7cm) Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000<br />

a 0.0<br />

54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)........................................................ 7.7 a 0.0<br />

*<br />

Column means with a letter in common are not significantly different (SNK; P =<br />

0.05).<br />

In summary, our studies indicate that managing P. capsici on<br />

susceptible crops requires attention to cultural and chemical practices<br />

at all stages of crop production. A recommended disease program<br />

includes: (1) selecting a site without P. capsici infestation or preplant<br />

fumigation of infested sites, (2) irrigating crops with water from wells<br />

or well-fed ponds, (3) applying effective fungicides and thoroughly<br />

covering foliage and fruit, and (4) choosing appropriate rotational<br />

crop(s) to limit pathogen buildup in the soil.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 433


Table 4. Evaluation of fungicides and sprayers to manage<br />

Phytophthora fruit rot on pickling cucumbers in 2004.<br />

Phytophthora-infected<br />

fruit<br />

Spray regime, treatment and rate/ha<br />

At harvest<br />

(number) *<br />

After 5 days<br />

storage (%)<br />

Air assisted sprayer<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54WG 1.7kg ....... 16.3 a ** Conventional boom sprayer<br />

5.9 a<br />

Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54WG 1.7kg ....... 89.3 b 27.5 bc<br />

Gavel 80WG 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54WG 1.7kg.......... 70.0 ab 27.4 bc<br />

Untreated ........................................................................ 178.0 c 37.4 c<br />

*<br />

Number of infected fruit crossing the harvest belt over a 3-row x 274-m plot.<br />

**<br />

Column means with a letter in common are not significantly different (SNK; P =<br />

0.05).<br />

Table 5. Evaluation of fumigants for P. capsici of cucurbits in 2004.<br />

Plant death (%) y<br />

Treatment<br />

Rate/<br />

ha<br />

Application<br />

method z Melon<br />

Watermelon<br />

Untreated ............................................ – – 97.8 b x 37.7 b<br />

Methyl bromide/chloropicrin (67/33) . 392kg Shank 22.2 a 11.1 ab<br />

Telone C35 ......................................... 327L Shank 66.7 b 36.7 b<br />

Chloropicrin<br />

234L Shank<br />

K-Pam................................................. 280L Drip 0.0 a 0.0 a<br />

Chloropicrin<br />

234L Shank<br />

K-Pam................................................. 561L Drip 0.0 a 0.0 a<br />

Chloropicrin........................................ 234L Shank 20.0 a 33.3 b<br />

K-Pam................................................. 561L Drip 3.3 a 8.8 a<br />

K-Pam................................................. 280L Drip 8.8 a 0.0 a<br />

z<br />

Materials were applied either at time of bed formation using swept-back knives or<br />

preplant through drip tape.<br />

y<br />

Percentage of plants killed by disease out of nine original plants.<br />

x<br />

Column means with no letter or a letter in common are not significantly different,<br />

SNK, P = 0.05.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Gevens, A. J. and M. K. Hausbeck. 2004. Characterization and distribution of<br />

Phytophthora capsici from irrigation water near Michigan cucurbit fields: a first<br />

report of P. capsici in irrigation water in Michigan. Phytopathology. 94:S157.<br />

Hausbeck, M. K. and K. H. Lamour. 2004. Phytophthora capsici on vegetable crops:<br />

research progress and management challenges. Plant Dis. 88:1292–1303.<br />

434 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Jung, T. and M. Blaschke. 2004. Phytophthora root and collar rot of alders in<br />

Bavaria: distribution, modes of spread, and possible management strategies.<br />

Plant Path. 53:197–208.<br />

Lamour, K. H. and M. K. Hausbeck. 2000. Mefenoxam insensitivity and the sexual<br />

stage of Phytophthora capsici in Michigan cucurbit fields. Phytopathology.<br />

90:396–400.<br />

Lamour, K. H. and M. K. Hausbeck. 2001. Investigating the spatiotemporal genetic<br />

structure of Phytophthora capsici in Michigan. Phytopathology. 91:973–980.<br />

Ouedmans, P. V. 1999. Phytophthora species associated with cranberry root rot and<br />

surface irrigation water in New Jersey. Plant Dis. 83:251–258.<br />

Yamak, F., T. L. Peever, G. G. Grove, and R. J. Boal. 2002. Occurrence and<br />

identification of Phytophthora spp. pathogenic to pear fruit in irrigation water in<br />

the Wenatchee River valley of Washington <strong>State</strong>. Phytopathology. 92:1210–<br />

1217.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 435


TREATMENTS TO PREVENT SEED<br />

TRANSMISSION OF BACTERIAL FRUIT<br />

BLOTCH OF WATERMELON<br />

D. L. Hopkins and C. M. Thompson<br />

University of Florida, Mid-Florida Research and Education Center,<br />

2725 Binion Road, Apopka, FL 32703-8504, USA<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli,<br />

hot-water treatment, chemical treatments, fermentation of seeds<br />

ABSTRACT. Contaminated seed lots have been the primary way in which<br />

bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) (Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli [Schaad et al.]<br />

Willems et al.) has been introduced into watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.]<br />

Matsum. & Nakai) fields or transplant houses. In this study, various wet-seed<br />

treatments were evaluated for the elimination of A. avenae subsp. citrulli from<br />

watermelon seeds. Peroxyacetic acid (PA), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and acetic<br />

acid were all effective in eliminating seed transmission of BFB; however, HCl<br />

can adversely affect seed quality. Hot-water treatments at 55 o C for 2 h and at<br />

60 o C for 1 h eliminated seed transmission, but the 60 o C treatment also reduced<br />

seed germination. Natural fermentation in watermelon pulp for 16–24 h<br />

eliminated seed transmission in most but not all seed lots. With 16-h<br />

fermentations containing Lactobacillus brevis or L. plantarum additives, seed<br />

transmission of BFB was prevented in all of our seed lots tested. Shorter<br />

fermentations were ineffective and the effect of 16-h fermentation on triploid<br />

seed quality is unknown.<br />

B<br />

acterial fruit blotch (BFB) of watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus),<br />

caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli, was first<br />

observed in commercial production areas in the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />

in the spring of 1989 (Latin and Rane, 1990; Somodi et al., 1991), but<br />

had been observed in Australia and Guam earlier (Wall and Santos,<br />

1988). BFB on watermelon has occurred somewhere every year since<br />

1989 (Maynard and Hopkins, 1999; D. L. Hopkins, unpublished),<br />

occasionally resulting in losses of more than 90% of the total<br />

marketable fruit in a field.<br />

<strong>The</strong> causal agent of BFB causes disease and can be seed-borne in<br />

various cucurbits (Hopkins and Thompson, 2002: Kucarek et al., 1993;<br />

Rane and Latin, 1992). Contaminated seed lots of cucurbits have been<br />

the primary way in which A. avenae subsp. citrulli has been introduced<br />

into cucurbit fields or transplant houses (Hopkins and Thompson,<br />

Financial support for this research came in part from USDA/CSREES award number<br />

2003-34135-14077.<br />

436 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


2002). <strong>The</strong> most effective control of BFB of cucurbits, is the<br />

exclusion of the bacterium (Latin, 1996). <strong>The</strong> intensive efforts of the<br />

cucurbit seed and transplant industry to produce seeds and transplants<br />

free of A. avenae subsp. citrulli have reduced the incidence of BFB<br />

over the last few seasons, but the disease still occurs every year. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is a need for more consistent, efficient methods of producing cucurbit<br />

seed free of the bacterium.<br />

Fermentation and hydrochloric acid (HCI) treatments are effective<br />

in removing the bacterium from seed, but may adversely affect seed<br />

quality (Hopkins et al., 1996). Peroxyacetic acid (PA) can be very<br />

effective when properly used with good quality control (Hopkins et al.,<br />

2003). <strong>The</strong>se strategies have been used successfully as wet-seed<br />

treatments at seed harvest; however, there is a need for a treatment to<br />

clean up contaminated seed lots already dried and stored. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

remains a need for seed treatments that can efficaciously eradicate<br />

seed-borne A. avenae subsp. citrulli while ensuring the safety of the<br />

worker and the environment, and not reducing any measurable<br />

parameters of seed quality. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to evaluate<br />

various chemical, biological, and hot-water seed treatments for the<br />

elimination of A. avenae subsp. citrulli from wet seeds of watermelon.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PRODUCTION OF INFESTED WATERMELON SEEDS. In the fall of<br />

2003, as well as in the spring and fall of 2004 and 2005, BFB-infected<br />

‘Charleston Gray’ watermelon seeds were produced on the MREC<br />

research farm in Apopka. In most seasons, the bacterium occurred<br />

naturally in the seed-production areas. To assure infected seed, fruit<br />

also were inoculated with strain WFB89-1, which has given<br />

reproducible symptoms on watermelon. For inoculation of fruit in the<br />

field, A. avenae subsp. citrulli was grown on nutrient agar for 48 h,<br />

washed from the agar surface with sterile, deionized water, and<br />

adjusted to a suspension of approximately 10 6 colony-forming<br />

units/ml. Inoculations were done 14–21 days prior to fruit maturation<br />

by misting the upper rind surface with the bacterial suspension. Seeds<br />

were collected by hand from mature fruit with symptoms and were<br />

bulked. <strong>The</strong> seeds were divided into batches of approximately 2,000<br />

seeds in 3L of watermelon juice and pulp and placed in 9-L buckets<br />

for treatment. All treatments were initiated within 3 h of the<br />

completion of seed harvesting.<br />

CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENTS. Seeds were washed thoroughly<br />

with tap water on screens to remove all watermelon tissue and juice<br />

prior to treatment. Chemical treatments were applied for 15 or 30<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 437


minutes to approximately 2,000 seeds each in a 2-L treatment solution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> solutions were stirred periodically throughout the treatments.<br />

Treatments with 10,000μg/ml (1%) HCl and 1600μg/ml PA (Tsunami<br />

100; 15% PA and 11% hydrogen peroxide; Ecolab Inc., Mendota<br />

Heights, MN) were included in the tests because they had been<br />

effective seed treatments in previous studies (Hopkins et al., 1996,<br />

2003). Other chemicals evaluated included 10,000μg/ml acetic acid,<br />

10,000μg/ml NaOCl, 2,700μg/ml hydrogen dioxide (1:100 Zerotol;<br />

BioSafe Systems, Gastonbury, CT), and 667μg/ml quaternary<br />

ammonia compounds (1:300 Physan 20; Maril Products Inc., Tustin,<br />

CA). After treatment, seeds were rinsed in two changes of water, air<br />

dried on screens for 48 h on the greenhouse bench at temperatures<br />

ranging from 26 o C at night to 40 o C in the afternoon, and stored in a<br />

seed-storage room.<br />

For the greenhouse assay of seed transmission of BFB to seedlings,<br />

seeds were planted in 28 x 52cm plastic trays filled with commercial<br />

potting mix. Four replications of 250 or more seeds were planted from<br />

each treatment. Watering was done carefully on the surface of the<br />

potting mix with a hose, avoiding contact with the seedlings.<br />

Greenhouse temperatures ranged from 26 o C to 40 o C. Disease<br />

incidence evaluations were made 9–10 days after planting. Percent<br />

seed transmission was calculated based on the number of emerged<br />

seedlings. Analyses of variance were performed for all experiments<br />

and means were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.05).<br />

Percentage seed transmission data were analyzed after transformation<br />

to arc sine √x.<br />

HOT-WATER SEED TREATMENTS. Seeds were washed thoroughly<br />

with tap water on screens to remove all watermelon tissue and juice<br />

prior to hot-water treatment. Approximately 2,000 seeds per treatment<br />

were submerged in a hot-water bath at the desired temperature for the<br />

specified time. Seeds were stirred regularly throughout the treatments.<br />

Treatment temperatures ranged from 45 o C to 60 o C and treatment times<br />

ranged from 0.5 h to 2 h. After treatment, seeds were air dried on<br />

screens for 48 h on the greenhouse bench at temperatures ranging from<br />

26 o C at night to 40 o C in the afternoon and stored in a seed-storage<br />

room. <strong>The</strong> greenhouse assay was as described above for the chemical<br />

treatments.<br />

FERMENTATION SEED TREATMENTS. Fermentation of watermelon<br />

seeds in the pulp from the fruit for 24 to 48 h was found to be an<br />

effective way of eliminating seed transmission of bacterial fruit blotch<br />

(Hopkins, et al., 1996). <strong>The</strong> problem with this long fermentation<br />

treatment was its effect on seed quality, especially with triploid seed.<br />

438 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


For fermentation treatments, seeds were divided into batches of<br />

approximately 2,000 seeds in 3L watermelon juice and pulp and<br />

placed in 9-L buckets for treatment. Bacterial fermentation additives<br />

included Lactobacillus brevis, L. plantarum, and Bacillus subtilus.<br />

Both 5- and 16-h fermentations were evaluated. After fermenting at<br />

air temperatures of 23 o C to 33 o C with periodic stirring, seeds were<br />

washed thoroughly to remove watermelon tissue, air dried on screens<br />

for 48 h on the greenhouse bench at temperatures ranging from 26 o C at<br />

night to 40 o C in the afternoon, and stored in a seed-storage room. <strong>The</strong><br />

greenhouse assay was as described above for the chemical treatments.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENTS. As in previous studies (Hopkins<br />

et al., 1996, 2003), PA and HCl were effective in eliminating A.<br />

avenae subsp. citrulli from watermelon seed, whether applied for 15<br />

min or 30 min (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> 0.1% seed transmission in the PA<br />

treatment of watermelon seeds in the fall of 2003 may have been the<br />

result of cross-contamination in the grow-out rather than a failure of<br />

the seed treatment. Acetic acid at 1% concentration was also very<br />

effective in eliminating seed transmission of BFB. Sodium<br />

hypochlorite at 1% reduced the seed transmission of BFB, but did not<br />

<strong>complete</strong>ly eliminate it. Zerotol and Physan were ineffective as seed<br />

treatments for bacterial fruit blotch. Both PA and acetic acid appear to<br />

be good options to use in the control of seed transmission of BFB.<br />

HOT-WATER SEED TREATMENTS. In the spring and fall of 2004,<br />

none of the hot-water treatments of infected watermelon seeds<br />

eliminated seed transmission of BFB (Table 2). At 50 o C, the 1-h<br />

treatment was more effective than 0.5 h. Based on these results, longer<br />

treatment times and higher temperatures were investigated in 2005. In<br />

both the spring and fall of 2005, a 2-h treatment at 55 o C eliminated<br />

seed transmission of BFB in watermelon without affecting seed<br />

germination. One-hour treatment at 60 o C eliminated BFB transmission,<br />

but also reduced seed germination. While hot-water treatment did<br />

eliminate seed transmission without adversely affecting seed<br />

germination, the margin for error is apparently very small. Increasing<br />

the temperature by only 5 o C resulted in reduced seed germination.<br />

FERMENTATION SEED TREATMENTS. Three-hour fermentation<br />

was not sufficient to eliminate seed transmission in watermelon<br />

regardless of the bacterial additive (data not shown). Five-h<br />

fermentation with or without added bacteria was variable in efficacy,<br />

reducing seed transmission but not eliminating it (Table 3). With 16-h<br />

fermentation, L. brevis and L. plantarum additives eliminated seed<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 439


Table 1. Elimination of seed transmission of bacterial fruit blotch<br />

(BFB) in watermelon with various chemical seed treatments.<br />

Seed treatment<br />

% seed transmission in seed<br />

from: a<br />

Exposure<br />

time (min) Fall03 Spring04<br />

Untreated - 5.5 c 11.2 b<br />

1% HCl 15 0 a 0 a<br />

1600μg/ml PA b 15 0 a 0 a<br />

1% acetic acid 15 0 a 0 a<br />

1600μg/ml PA 30 0.1 a 0 a<br />

1% acetic acid 30 0 a -<br />

1% Na0Cl 30 1.0 b 0.3 a<br />

2700μg/ml<br />

hydrogen dioxide 30 5.5 c -<br />

667μg/ml<br />

quaternary ammonia<br />

products 30 6.8 c -<br />

a <strong>The</strong> percent seed transmission of BFB was determined by a greenhouse grow-out of<br />

the seedlings and represents the percentage of seedlings (germinated seeds) that were<br />

symptomatic. Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly<br />

different (P=0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data were analyzed after<br />

transformation to arc sine √x.<br />

b PA = peroxyacetic acid.<br />

transmission of BFB in watermelon. Natural fermentation in the<br />

watermelon pulp for 16–24 h eliminated most but not always all seed<br />

transmission. <strong>The</strong>re did not seem to be any benefit from combining L.<br />

plantarum and L. brevi.<br />

440 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Elimination of seed transmission of bacterial fruit blotch<br />

(BFB) in watermelon with hot-water treatments.<br />

% seed transmission in seed from: a<br />

Hot-water<br />

treatments Spring04 Fall04 Spring05 Fall05<br />

Untreated 8.3 bc 4.3 b 2.1 b<br />

(94) b<br />

1.8 bc (91)<br />

45 o C for 2 h 5.0 ab - - -<br />

50 o C for 0.5 h 11.8 cd 2.3 ab - -<br />

50 o C for 1 h 3.6 a - - -<br />

50 o C for 2 h - - - 2.2 c (91)<br />

55 o C for 0.5 h 15.1 d 1.0 a - -<br />

55 o C for 1 h - - 0.2 a (99) 1.4 b (95)<br />

55 o C for 2 h - - 0 a (94) 0 a (90)<br />

60 o C for 1 h - - - 0 a (80)<br />

a<br />

<strong>The</strong> percent seed transmission of BFB was determined by a greenhouse grow-out of<br />

the seedlings and represents the percentage of seedlings (germinated seeds) that were<br />

symptomatic. Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly<br />

different (P=0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data were analyzed after<br />

transformation to arc sine √x.<br />

b<br />

<strong>The</strong> number in parenthesis is the percent seed germination.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was an apparent benefit from adding L. brevis or L.<br />

plantarum to the seed fermentation mixture and, overall, L. plantarum<br />

appeared to be the most effective bacterial additive. Fermentation<br />

continues to be an effective way of eliminating seed transmission of<br />

BFB in watermelon; however, even with the bacterial additives, it<br />

remained necessary to ferment overnight, which may be detrimental to<br />

triploid seed quality. Combining a 5-h fermentation with a bacterial<br />

additive and chemical treatment may provide the best chance of<br />

eliminating A. avenae subsp. citrulli from watermelon seeds.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 441


Table 3. Effect of various bacterial additives on elimination of seed<br />

transmission of bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) in watermelon with<br />

fermentation.<br />

% seed transmission in seed from: a<br />

Fermentation Fall03 Spring04 Fall04 Spring05 Fall05<br />

None 5.5 b 8.3 b 4.3 c 2.1 b 1.8 b<br />

Natural, 5 h - - 0.1 ab - -<br />

Natural, 16 h 0 a - - 0 a -<br />

Lactobacillus<br />

brevis, 5 h<br />

- - 0.3 b 0.1 a -<br />

L. brevis, 16 h - 0 a 0 a - -<br />

L. plantarum, 5 h - - 0.1 ab 0.1 a 0.4 a<br />

L. plantarum, 16 h - 0 a 0 a 0 a -<br />

Bacillus subtilus, 5<br />

h<br />

- - - 0 a 0.3 a<br />

B. subtilus, 16 h - - - 0.1 a -<br />

L. plantarum + L.<br />

brevi, 5 h<br />

L. plantarum, 5 h<br />

+ 1600μg/ml PA,<br />

30 min<br />

- - - 0.1 a -<br />

- - 0 a - -<br />

a <strong>The</strong> percent seed transmission of BFB was determined by a greenhouse grow-out of<br />

the seedlings and represents the percentage of seedlings (germinated seeds) that were<br />

symptomatic. Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly<br />

different (P=0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data were analyzed after<br />

transformation to arc sine √x.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Hopkins, D. L. and C. M. Thompson. 2002. Seed transmission of Acidovorax<br />

avenae subsp. citrulli in cucurbits. HortSci. 37:924–926.<br />

Hopkins, D. L., C. M. Thompson, J. Hilgren, and B. Lovic. 2003. Wet seed<br />

treatment with peroxyacetic acid for the control of bacterial fruit blotch and<br />

other seedborne diseases of watermelon. Plant Dis. 87:1495–1499.<br />

442 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Hopkins, D. L., J. D. Cucuzza, and J. C. Watterson. 1996. Wet seed treatments for<br />

the control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Plant Dis. 80:529–532.<br />

Kucharek, T., Y. Perez, and C. Hodge. 1993. Transmission of the watermelon fruit<br />

blotch bacterium from infested seed to seedlings. Phytopathology.<br />

83:466(Abstr.).<br />

Latin, R. X. 1996. Bacterial fruit blotch, p.34–35. In: T. A. Zitter, D. L. Hopkins,<br />

and C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press, St.<br />

Paul, MN.<br />

Latin, R. X. and K. K. Rane. 1990. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon in Indiana.<br />

Plant Dis. 74:331.<br />

Maynard, D. N. and D. L. Hopkins. 1999. Watermelon fruit disorders. HortTech.<br />

9:155–161.<br />

Rane, K. K. and R. X. Latin. 1992. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon:<br />

Association of the pathogen with seed. Plant Dis. 76:509–512.<br />

Somodi, G. C., J. B. Jones, D. L. Hopkins, R. E. Stall, T. A. Kucharek, N. C. Hodge,<br />

and J. C. Watterson. 1991. Occurrence of a bacterial watermelon fruit blotch in<br />

Florida. Plant Dis. 75:1053–1056.<br />

Wall, G. C. and V. M. Santos. 1988. A new bacterial disease of watermelon in the<br />

Mariana Islands. Phytopathology. 78:1605(Abstr.).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 443


IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEY OF<br />

CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW RACES IN<br />

CZECH POPULATIONS<br />

A. Lebeda and B. Sedláková<br />

Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />

Botany, Šlechtitelů 11, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Golovinomyces cichoracearum, Podosphaera<br />

xanthii, Cucumis melo, differential genotypes, pathogenicity variation, race<br />

identification<br />

ABSTRACT. Physiological races of two cucurbit powdery mildew species<br />

[Golovinomyces cichoracearum s.l. (Gc) and Podosphaera xanthii (Px)], were<br />

identified by using 11 differential genotypes of Cucumis melo. Altogether, 89<br />

different races (63 Gc, 26 Px) were recorded in the studied set of 218 isolates<br />

(172 Gc, 46 Px) collected in the Czech Republic in the years 2000–2004. Isolates<br />

virulent to C. melo (line MR-1) and avirulent to C. melo (Iran H) were found as<br />

well as both powdery mildew species. <strong>The</strong>se data demonstrate the existence of<br />

new and until now unknown virulence/avirulence and susceptibility/resistance<br />

factors in pathogen populations and differential host genotypes. Repeated<br />

occurrence of some races (28 Gc, 8 Px) was noted during the period of<br />

investigation. Races S of Gc and F of Px were virulent on all C. melo<br />

differentials. <strong>The</strong> races with medium and high virulence prevailed in cucurbit<br />

powdery mildew (CPM) populations. <strong>The</strong> most frequent hosts were <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

pepo and C. maxima for both CPMs with the highest number of detected races.<br />

A remarkable shift toward increased virulence was observed for both Gc and<br />

Px over a five-year period.<br />

P<br />

owdery mildew is the major cause of losses in production in<br />

cucurbits worldwide (Cohen et al., 2004; Jahn et al., 2002;<br />

McCreight, 2006; Vakalounakis et al., 1994). In Central Europe,<br />

the disease is caused by two obligate biotrophic ectoparasites:<br />

Golovinomyces cichoracearum s.l. (Gc) (syn. Erysiphe cichoracearum<br />

s.l.) and Podosphaera xanthii (Px) (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea) (Jahn<br />

et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong>se two species induce identical symptoms; however,<br />

they can be distinguished easily under light microscopy (Braun et al.,<br />

2002). <strong>The</strong> two species differ in host range, ecological requirements,<br />

geographic distribution (Lebeda, 1983; Lebeda et al., 2006; Sitterly,<br />

This research was supported by grants MSM 6198959215, MSM 153100010, and<br />

QD 1357; and by the National Programme of Genepool Conservation of<br />

Microorganisms and Small Animals of Economic Importance.<br />

444 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


1978), and response to fungicides (McGrath, 2001; Sedláková and<br />

Lebeda, 2004a, b). Broad pathogenic variation is represented by the<br />

existence of different pathotypes and races (Bertrand, 1991; Bertrand<br />

et al., 1992; Jahn et al., 2002; Vakalounakis and Klironomou, 1995).<br />

Twenty-two races of Px and two races of Gc have been described on<br />

melons (Cohen et al., 2004; Hosoya et al., 2000; McCreight, 2006;<br />

Pitrat et al., 1998); however, recent results suggest that even more<br />

pathotypes and races exist (Lebeda and Sedláková, 2004; Lebeda et<br />

al., 2004, 2006).<br />

Long-lasting study of CPMs virulence variation is one of the<br />

priorities of our laboratory. <strong>The</strong> aim of the current paper is to<br />

summarize the recent knowledge about physiological races identified<br />

in cucurbit powdery mildew (CPM) populations in the Czech Republic<br />

in the years 2000–2004. <strong>The</strong> main purpose of our work was to study in<br />

more detail the virulence variation of CPM populations as a part of the<br />

complex research of population biology, ecology, genetics, and spatial<br />

and temporal dynamics.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PATHOGEN COLLECTING, IDENTIFICATION, ISOLATION,<br />

MULTIPLICATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ISOLATES. Samples of<br />

powdery-mildew-infected cucurbit plants were obtained during<br />

collecting expeditions in the territory of the Czech Republic in the<br />

years 2000–2004. Before isolation, the samples were microscopically<br />

examined in a 3% KOH solution (Lebeda, 1983). Isolates with a<br />

mixture of powdery mildew species were excluded. Conidia of pure<br />

cultures were transferred by tapping onto primary leaves of the highly<br />

susceptible cucumber (Cucumis sativus) ‘Stela F1’ (Lebeda, 1986). A<br />

total of 218 (172 Gc, 46 Px) isolates were used for race determination.<br />

Isolates were multiplied and cultured in plastic boxes (24°C/18°C<br />

day/night) for 12h.<br />

DETERMINATION OF RACES. Altogether, 218 isolates of Gc and Px<br />

were used for screening: 3 (2 Gc,1 Px) from 2000; 34 (27 Gc, 7 Px)<br />

from 2001; 52 (45 Gc, 7 Px) from 2002; 67 (45 Gc, 22 Px) from 2003;<br />

and 62 (53 Gc, 9 Px) from 2004. Race determination was made by a<br />

leaf-disc method (Bertrand et al., 1992; Lebeda, 1986). Races were<br />

identified by using 11 differential genotypes of Cucumis melo (‘Iran<br />

H’, ‘Védrantais’, ‘Solartur’, ‘PMR 45’, ‘WMR 29’, ‘Edisto 47’, PI<br />

414723, ‘PMR 5’, PI 124112, ‘MR-1’, and ‘Nantais Oblong’) (Pitrat et<br />

al.,1998; Bardin et al., 1999). Each genotype was represented by three<br />

leaf discs (15mm in diameter) in three replicates (one replicate = one<br />

plant). Discs from true leaves (2–3-leaf stage) of cucumber and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 445


muskmelon plants were used for screening. Discs were inoculated by<br />

tapping leaf discs with 3–4-day-old sporulating mycelia of CPMs and<br />

then incubated under the conditions described above. Evaluations were<br />

conducted 6–14 days after inoculation by using a 0–4 scale (Lebeda,<br />

1984). Differential genotypes with little or no sporulation (degree of<br />

infection [DI] = 0–1) were considered as resistant (R); genotypes with<br />

DI = 2–4 were scored as susceptible (S). <strong>The</strong> degree of virulence of<br />

CPM isolates was expressed by the number of differentials (from 1 to<br />

11) infected by the individual isolate.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In total, 89 races (63 Gc and 26 Px) were determined in the studied<br />

set of isolates in the years 2000–2004 (Tables 1 and 2). Obtained<br />

results showed that Czech CPM populations are very heterogeneous<br />

and markedly different in comparison with those of some western and<br />

southern European countries (Pitrat et al., 1998) and other parts of the<br />

world (Cohen et al., 2004; Hosoya et al., 2000; McCreight, 2006). All<br />

recorded Gc races and 23 Px races have not yet been described in<br />

Europe and elsewhere. Nevertheless, occurrence of three Px known<br />

races (1, 2US, 3) was confirmed in the Czech Republic. Seven isolates<br />

of Gc and five isolates of Px were avirulent to C. melo ‘Iran H’, which<br />

is consistent with our previous observations (Křístková et al., 2004).<br />

Until now, ‘Iran H’ was considered to be susceptible to all races<br />

(McCreight, 2006). Our results indicate that even in ‘Iran H’ there<br />

exist as yet unidentified race-specific resistance factors to both CPM<br />

species. Repeated occurrence of some races (28 Gc, 8 Px) was noted<br />

during the study period. <strong>The</strong> most frequently occurring Gc races were<br />

S (28x), Y (14x), e (13x), and P (8x). <strong>The</strong> most frequent Px race was B<br />

(7x). Races S of Gc and F of Px were virulent on all C. melo<br />

differential genotypes (Tables 1 and 2). <strong>The</strong>se results and our previous<br />

observations (Křístková et al., 2004) indicate that, in Czech pathogen<br />

populations, races exist that are able to overcome the resistance of C.<br />

melo lines MR-1 and PI 124112.<br />

Virulence data for Gc and Px isolates are summarized in Table 3.<br />

Gc isolates were in the range of medium (32%) and high (58%)<br />

virulence and were classified into 31 and 27 races, respectively. In the<br />

case of Px, isolates of medium virulence were the most frequent (61%)<br />

and were classified into 16 races. As was found in preliminary studies<br />

(Lebeda and Sedláková, 2004; Lebeda et al., 2004), Czech CPM<br />

populations exhibited a temporal shift to higher virulence. Occurrence<br />

of Gc and Px races on different cucurbit hosts is shown in Table 4. <strong>The</strong><br />

most frequently infected host plants were <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo and C.<br />

446 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Races of Golovinomyces cichoracearum identified in the<br />

Czech Republic in the years 2000–2004.<br />

Differential genotype of Cucumis melo a /<br />

Reaction patterns of G. cichoracearum isolates<br />

IrH Véd Sol P45 W29 E47 PI41 P5 PI12 MR1 Nobl Race<br />

R R S R R R R R R R R N1 1<br />

R S S S R R R R R R S f 1<br />

R S S S R S R R R R S T R 1<br />

R S S S R S S R R R S T 1<br />

R S S S S R R S R R S A 1<br />

R S S S S S S S R R R B 1<br />

R S S S S S S S S R S C 1<br />

S R R S S S R R S R S D 1<br />

S R S R S R S R R R R E 1<br />

S R S S R R R R R R S N2 1<br />

S S R R S S S R R R R U 1<br />

S S S R R R R R R R S e 13<br />

S S S R R R R S R R S g 6<br />

S S S R R R S R R R S N3 2<br />

S S S R R R S S R R S h 5<br />

S S S R R S R R R R S ch 4<br />

S S S R R S S R R R S N4 3<br />

S S S R R S S S R R S i 1<br />

S S S R R S S S S R S N5 1<br />

S S S R S R R R R R S N6 1<br />

S S S R S S S S S R S b 1<br />

S S S S R R R R R R S N7 2<br />

S S S S R R R S R R R j 1<br />

S S S S R R R S R R S d R 1<br />

S S S S R R S R R R R F R 2<br />

S S S S R R S R R R S F 1<br />

S S S S R R S S R R R k 1<br />

S S S S R R S S R R S d 3<br />

S S S S R S R R R R S I R 2<br />

S S S S R S R R R S S l 1<br />

S S S S R S R S R R S I 1<br />

S S S S R S R S S R R H 1<br />

S S S S R S S R R R S N8 2<br />

S S S S R S S R S R R G 2<br />

S S S S R S S R S R S u 1<br />

S S S S R S S S R R R N9 1<br />

S S S S R S S S R R S n 3<br />

S S S S R S S S S R R o 6<br />

S S S S R S S S S R S s 3<br />

S S S S R S S S S S S N11 2<br />

No<br />

IS*<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 447


(Table 1, continued)<br />

Differential genotype of Cucumis melo a /<br />

Reaction patterns of G. cichoracearum isolates<br />

IrH Véd Sol P45 W29 E47 PI41 P5 PI12 MR1 Nobl Race<br />

S S S S S R S R R R S K 2<br />

S S S S S R S S R R R J R 2<br />

S S S S S R S S R R S J 1<br />

S S S S S R S S S R S J S 1<br />

S S S S S R S S S S S a 2<br />

S S S S S S R R R R S L R 1<br />

S S S S S S R R R S S v 1<br />

S S S S S S R R S R S M 1<br />

S S S S S S R S R R S L 1<br />

S S S S S S R S S R R w 1<br />

S S S S S S S R R R R O R 1<br />

S S S S S S S R R R S N 4<br />

S S S S S S S R R S S x 1<br />

S S S S S S S R S R R c 1<br />

S S S S S S S R S R S N S 4<br />

S S S S S S S R S S R X 1<br />

S S S S S S S S R R R O 3<br />

S S S S S S S S R R S P 8<br />

S S S S S S S S R S S V 4<br />

S S S S S S S S S R R R 4<br />

S S S S S S S S S R S Y 14<br />

S S S S S S S S S S R R S 2<br />

S S S S S S S S S S S S 28<br />

*IS = isolates; R = resistant reaction; S = susceptible reaction.<br />

a Genotypes of Cucumis melo: IrH (Iran H), Véd (Védrantais), Sol (Solartur), P45<br />

(PMR 45), W29 (WMR 29), E47 (Edisto 47), PI41 (PI 414 723), P5 (PMR 5), PI12<br />

(PI 124 112), MR1 (MR-1), Nobl (Nantais oblong).<br />

No.<br />

IS*<br />

maxima. On these hosts both CPM species with the highest number of<br />

races were detected. Cucumis sativus was the species least frequently<br />

infected by CPMs (Lebeda and Sedláková, 2004; Lebeda et al., 2004,<br />

2006) (Table 4). Cucumis melo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a foetidissima, and Lagenaria<br />

siceraria were very rare hosts of CPMs, and only one isolate of Px<br />

from each host was obtained (Table 4).<br />

448 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Races of Podosphaera xanthii identified in the Czech<br />

Republic in the years 2000–2004.<br />

Differential genotype of Cucumis melo a /<br />

Reaction patterns of P. xanthii isolates<br />

IrH Véd Sol P45 W29 E47 PI41 P5 PI12 MR1 Nobl Race<br />

R S S R R R R R R R S A 1<br />

R S S R R S R R R R S D R 1<br />

R S S R R S S R R R S D 1<br />

R S S S R R S R R S S CH 1<br />

R S S S R R S S R R S R1 1<br />

S R S R R R S R R R S I 1<br />

S S S R R R R R R R S 1 4<br />

S S S R R R R S R R S K 2<br />

S S S R R R S R R R S B 7<br />

S S S R R R S R S S S C 1<br />

S S S R R R S S R R S R2 1<br />

S S S R R S R S R R S R3 1<br />

S S S R R S R R R R S J 1<br />

S S S R R S S R R R S B R 4<br />

S S S R R S S S R R S L 1<br />

S S S R S S S R R R S M 1<br />

S S S S R R S S R R S 3 1<br />

S S S S R S R R R R S N 2<br />

S S S S R S R S R R S O 1<br />

S S S S R S S S R R S E 3<br />

S S S S R S S S S R S P 1<br />

S S S S R S S S R S S R4 1<br />

S S S S R S S S S S S H 1<br />

S S S S het S S R R R S 2US 2<br />

S S S S S S S S R R S G 4<br />

S S S S S S S S S S S F 1<br />

*IS = isolates; het = heterogenous reaction; R = resistant reaction; S = susceptible<br />

reaction.<br />

a Genotypes of Cucumis melo: IrH (Iran H), Véd (Védrantais), Sol (Solartur), P45<br />

(PMR 45), W29 (WMR 29), E47 (Edisto 47), PI41(PI 414 723), P5 (PMR 5), PI12<br />

( PI 124 112), MR1 (MR-1), Nobl (Nantais oblong).<br />

No.<br />

IS*<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 449


Table 3. Virulence of Golovinomyces cichoracearum and<br />

Podosphaera xanthii isolates in the years 2000–2004.<br />

Category of isolate*<br />

No. of<br />

isolates<br />

% of all<br />

isolates<br />

No. of<br />

races<br />

Golovinomyces cichoracearum<br />

Low virulence (1–4) 17 10 5<br />

Medium virulence (5–7) 55 32 31<br />

High virulence (8–11) 100 58 27<br />

Total<br />

Podosphaera xanthii<br />

172 100 63<br />

Low virulence (1–4) 7 15 4<br />

Medium virulence (5–7) 28 61 16<br />

High virulence (8–11) 11 24 6<br />

Total 46 100 26<br />

*1–11 = Number of infected differentials.<br />

Table 4. Frequency of Golovinomyces cichoracearum and<br />

Podosphaera xanthii races on different host species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae<br />

in the years 2000–2004.<br />

G. cichoracearum P. xanthii<br />

Host species<br />

No. of<br />

isolates<br />

No. of<br />

races<br />

No. of<br />

isolates<br />

No. of<br />

races<br />

Cucumis sativus 13 9 5 5<br />

Cucumis melo - - 1 1<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo 104 50 24 18<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

55 27 14 10<br />

foetidissima - - 1 1<br />

Lagenaria siceraria - - 1 1<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bardin, M., J. Carlier, and P. C. Nicot. 1999. Genetic differentiation in the French<br />

population of Erysiphe cichoracearum, a causal agent of powdery mildew of<br />

cucurbits. Plant Pathol. 48:531–540.<br />

Bertrand, F. 1991. Les oïdiums des <strong>Cucurbit</strong>acées: maintien en culture pure, étude de<br />

leur variabilité et de la sensibilité chez le melon. Thése, Université Paris-Sud-<br />

Orsay. Specialité «Phytopathologie».<br />

Bertrand, F., M. Pitrat, A. Glandard, and J. M. Lemaire. 1992. Diversité et variabilité<br />

des champignons responsables de ľ oïdium des cucurbitacées. Phytoma-La<br />

Défense des Végétaux. 438:46–49.<br />

450 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Braun, U., R. T. A. Cook, A. J. Inman, and H.-D. Shin. 2002. <strong>The</strong> taxonomy of the<br />

powdery mildew fungi, p. 13–55. In: R. R. Bélanger, W. R. Bushnell, A. J. Dik,<br />

and L. W. Carver (eds.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. a comprehensive treatise. APS<br />

Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

Cohen, R., Y. Burger, and N. Katzir. 2004. Monitoring physiological races of<br />

Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea), the causal agent of powdery<br />

mildew in cucurbits: factors affecting race identification and the importance for<br />

research and commerce. Phytoparasit. 32:174–183.<br />

Hosoya, K., M. Kuzuya, T. Murakami, K. Kato, K. Narisawa, and H. Ezura. 2000.<br />

Impact of resistant melon cultivars on Sphaerotheca fuliginea. Plant Breed.<br />

119:286–288.<br />

Jahn, M., H. M. Munger, and J. D. McCreight. 2002. <strong>Breeding</strong> cucurbit crops for<br />

powdery mildew resistance, p. 239–248. In: R. R. Bélanger, W. R. Bushnell, A.<br />

J. Dik, and L. W. Carver (eds.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. a comprehensive<br />

treatise. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

Křístková, E., A. Lebeda, and B. Sedláková. 2004. Virulence of Czech cucurbit<br />

powdery mildew isolates on Cucumis melo genotypes MR-1 and PI 124112. Sci.<br />

Hort. 99:257–265.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1983. <strong>The</strong> genera and species spectrum of cucumber powdery mildew in<br />

Czechoslovakia. Phytopath. Z. 108:71–79.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1984. Screening of wild Cucumis species for resistance to cucumber<br />

powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum and Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Sci.<br />

Hort. 24:241–249.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1986. Padlí okurkové. Erysiphe cichoracearum, Sphaerotheca fuliginea<br />

(Cucumber powdery mildew. Erysiphe cichoracearum, Sphaerotheca fuliginea),<br />

p. 87–91. In: A. Lebeda (ed.). Methods of testing vegetable crops for resistance<br />

to plant pathogens. VHJ Sempra, Research Institute of Vegetable Crops,<br />

Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Lebeda, A. and B. Sedláková. 2004. Disease impact and pathogenicity variation in<br />

Czech populations of cucurbit powdery mildews, p. 281–287. In: A. Lebeda and<br />

H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in cucurbit genetics and breeding research. Proc.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8th EUCARPIA Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and<br />

<strong>Breeding</strong>. Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Lebeda, A., B. Sedláková, and E. Křístková. 2004. Distribution, harmfulness and<br />

pathogenic variability of cucurbit powdery mildew in the Czech Republic. Acta<br />

fytotechnica et zootechnica. 7:174–176.<br />

Lebeda, A., B. Sedláková, and E. Křístková. 2006. Temporal changes in<br />

pathogenicity structure of cucurbit powdery mildews populations. Acta Hort. (In<br />

press.)<br />

McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />

melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

131:59–65.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2001. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences<br />

and challenges. Plant Dis. 85:236–245.<br />

Pitrat, M., C. Dogimont, and M. Bardin. 1998. Resistance to fungal diseases of<br />

foliage in melon, p. 167–173. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98,<br />

evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />

VA.<br />

Sedláková, B. and A. Lebeda. 2004a. Variation in sensitivity to fungicides in Czech<br />

populations of cucurbit powdery mildews, p. 289–294. In: A. Lebeda and H. S.<br />

Paris (eds.). Progress in <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong> Research. Proc.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8 th EUCARPIA Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and<br />

<strong>Breeding</strong>. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 451


Sedláková, B. and A. Lebeda. 2004b. Resistance to fungicides in cucurbit powdery<br />

mildew populations in the Czech Republic. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica.<br />

7:269–271.<br />

Sitterly, W. R. 1978. Powdery mildews on cucurbits, p. 359–379. In: D. M. Spencer<br />

(ed.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. Academic Press, London, New York, San<br />

Francisco.<br />

Vakalounakis, D. J. and E. Klironomou. 1995. Race and mating type identification of<br />

powdery mildew on cucurbits in Greece. Plant Pathol. 44:1033–1038.<br />

Vakalounakis, D. J., E. Klironomou, and A. Papadakis. 1994. Species spectrum, host<br />

range and distribution of powdery mildews on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae in Crete. Plant<br />

Pathol. 43:813–818.<br />

452 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION ASPECTS OF<br />

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CUCURBITS AND<br />

PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS:<br />

PATHOTYPES AND RACES<br />

A. Lebeda 1, M.P. Widrlechner 2 , and J. Urban 1<br />

1 Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />

Botany, Šlechtitelů 11, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic<br />

2 USDA-Agricultural Research Service, <strong>North</strong> Central Regional Plant<br />

Introduction Station, Iowa <strong>State</strong> University, Departments of Agronomy<br />

and Horticulture, Ames, Iowa 50011-1170<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, cucurbit downy mildew, hostpathogen<br />

specificity, race-specific resistance, pathogenicity, genetic structure<br />

ABSTRACT. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge regarding<br />

variation in interactions between <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis as a backdrop for the development and use of systems to characterize<br />

pathogenicity at the individual and population levels. Host-parasite specificity<br />

and interactions between <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and P. cubensis exhibit significant<br />

variation on both the individual and population level. However, our<br />

phytopathological and genetic knowledge of the interactions between individual<br />

P. cubensis isolates and a broad range of accessions of most important genera of<br />

cultivated cucurbits (e.g., Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Citrullus) remains limited.<br />

Recently, an improved differential set of cucurbit accessions was developed to<br />

characterize pathogenic variability (pathotypes) among P. cubensis isolates<br />

(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003). That set included 12 genotypes from six<br />

genera (Benincasa, Citrullus, Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Lagenaria, and Luffa) and is<br />

now being used for pathotype differenatiation. Nevertheless, we have reasons to<br />

believe that these differentials are in<strong>complete</strong>. Data on patterns of pathogenic<br />

variation are available only for certain countries (e.g., the Czech Republic,<br />

India, Israel, Japan, and the USA), but even those studies are typically based on<br />

individual isolates, not populations. Some highlights and future trends<br />

regarding the development of new differential sets are suggested. For example,<br />

recent research in the Czech Republic demonstrated how data at the population<br />

level can contribute to elucidating temporal and spatial pathogen distribution<br />

and dynamics, as well as to clarifying host-pathogen interactions. It is also<br />

important to consider the practical application of these data in resistance<br />

breeding and disease management. We conclude by proposing some ideas to<br />

promote research and collaboration on these topics.<br />

This research was supported by grants MSM 6198959215 and MSM 153100010, QD<br />

1357; and by the National Programme of Genepool Conservation of Microorganisms<br />

and Small Animals of Economic Importance of the Czech Republic. <strong>The</strong> assistance<br />

of Dr. Charles Block in locating references is much appreciated.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 453


P<br />

seudoperonospora cubensis (cucurbit downy mildew) is one of<br />

the most important foliar pathogens infecting cucurbits (Palti<br />

and Cohen, 1980; Thomas, 1996; Lebeda and Widrlechner,<br />

2003). It is widely distributed throughout the world and can inflict<br />

major production losses in both open-field and protected culture<br />

(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2004).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are about 60 cucurbit species known as hosts of P. cubensis<br />

(Palti and Cohen, 1980; Lebeda, 1990, 1992a, 1999; Lebeda and<br />

Widrlechner, 2003). However, most of the published information on<br />

its host range and specificity originates from Asia and the USA (Bains<br />

and Sharma, 1986; Cohen et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 1987), with<br />

relatively little information obtained from Europe (Lebeda, 1999;<br />

Lebeda and Gadasová, 2002; Lebeda and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006) or<br />

other parts of the world. Although our understanding of intraspecific<br />

variation and genetics in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae -Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis pathosystem is rather limited, given the damage that this<br />

pathogen can cause, it is extremely important from both the theoretical<br />

and practical perspectives (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003, 2004). This<br />

information is crucial to the development of effective differential sets<br />

of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae for the characterization of P. cubensis variability<br />

(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis is characterized by large variation in<br />

pathogenicity, which was recently reviewed by Lebeda and<br />

Widrlechner (2003). Pathogenicity of P. cubensis, on the basis of<br />

individual isolates, has been characterized in India (Bains and Sharma,<br />

1986), Israel (Cohen et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 1987), Japan and the<br />

USA (Thomas et al., 1987), and recently in the Czech Republic<br />

(Lebeda, 1991, 1999; Lebeda and Gadasová, 2002; Lebeda and Urban,<br />

2004a,b, 2006), leaving much of its geographic range unstudied. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

studies solely defined pathotypes (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003), not<br />

races. <strong>The</strong> main reason for this situation is the lack of differentials to<br />

distinguish among races on the most important <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae host<br />

taxa (e.g., Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Citrullus). Recently, the first detailed<br />

studies to focus on the variation and dynamics of pathogenicity of P.<br />

cubensis at the population level were conducted in the Czech Republic<br />

(Lebeda and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006). However, comparable studies are<br />

needed from other parts of Europe, the USA, and Asia.<br />

<strong>The</strong> aims of this paper are to review and critically consider the<br />

current state of knowledge on host-parasite (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae-P.<br />

cubensis) specificity and interactions and to suggest future directions<br />

for basic and applied research in this area. Our primary focus is on the<br />

characterization and differentiation of P. cubensis pathogenic<br />

variability, at both the pathotype and race level.<br />

454 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


General Aspects of Host-Pathogen Specificity and<br />

Variation from the Viewpoint of Characterization of<br />

P. cubensis Pathogenicity<br />

In host plant-downy mildew interactions, there is often a very clear<br />

expression of reaction, i.e., susceptibility (+) or resistance (-). This<br />

binary system can serve as a simple classification system for<br />

pathotypes or races, based on the reaction patterns of differential host<br />

genera, species, and/or genotypes (Lebeda and Jendrulek, 1987). Each<br />

differential-host genotype may differ by presence of resistance alleles,<br />

which interact with corresponding pathogen avirulence genes. In<br />

investigating downy mildew pathogenic variability, the following<br />

issues are of importance (Lebeda & Schwinn, 1994): (1) Pathogen and<br />

host phenotypes (host range, virulence, and specificity); (2) pathogen<br />

and host genetics; and (3) genetic models to explain host-pathogen<br />

interactions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most recent review of P. cubensis variation and its<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae host genera was presented by Lebeda and Widrlechner<br />

(2003). Data presented therein clearly demonstrated the existence of<br />

distinct physiological forms of P. cubensis, i.e., pathotypes and races<br />

(Table 1). On the basis of an initial set of differentials (Thomas et al.,<br />

1987; Table 2) and new experimental data, the authors develepod an<br />

improved set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae differentials for more detailed<br />

determination of pathotypes (Table 3), including the creation of a<br />

tetrade coding system for precise pathotype description (Table 4)<br />

(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003). That review also outlined the most<br />

important reasons for a more detailed examination of host and<br />

pathogen variation from the viewpoint of development of specific<br />

differential sets for P. cubensis.<br />

Host-Plant Resistance Variation and Possibilities<br />

for the Development of Race Differential Sets for<br />

the Determination of P. cubensis<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are at least three candidate genera (Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, and<br />

Citrullus) for the development of differential sets for race<br />

differentiation of P. cubensis. All these genera are known as natural<br />

hosts of P. cubensis (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003; Palti and Cohen,<br />

1980).<br />

CUCUMIS. <strong>The</strong> genus Cucumis is rather diverse, encompassing 32<br />

species (Kirkbride, 1993). Of these, in addition to the two<br />

economically important species, cucumber (C. sativus L.) and melon<br />

(C. melo L.), two additional species, C. anguria L. (“West Indian<br />

gherkin”) and C. metuliferus E. Meyer ex Naudin (“African horned<br />

cucumber” or “jelly melon”), are also commercially exploited for fruit<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 455


production (Baird and Thieret, 1988; Morton, 1987). Other wild<br />

species originating mostly from arid and/or semi-arid regions of Africa<br />

are cultivated as ornamental plants, e.g., C. dipsaceus Ehrenberg ex<br />

Spach (“hedgehog gourd”) and C. myriocarpus Naudin (“gooseberry<br />

gourd”) (Kirkbride, 1993). A comprehensive review of recent<br />

knowledge about Cucumis germplasm and its genetic variation can be<br />

consulted for more information (Lebeda et al., 2006).<br />

Table 1. Survey of data on the occurrence of pathotype- and racespecificity<br />

in interactions between key <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae host genera and<br />

P. cubensis.<br />

Hostparasite<br />

specificity Pathotype Race<br />

Data<br />

Data<br />

Host taxon availability References availability References<br />

Cucumis<br />

3-6,8,9,12,<br />

1, 4-6,8,9,11sativus<br />

-? 13 -? 13,14<br />

Cucumis<br />

2,3,5,6,9,12,<br />

melo<br />

Cucumis<br />

+ 2,3,5,6,7,12,13 + 13<br />

spp.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

+ 3,5,9 -? 3,5,9<br />

pepo<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

+ 6,7,9,10,12,13 + 6,7,9,10,12,13<br />

maxima<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

+ 6,9,10,13 + 6,9,10,13<br />

foetidissima<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

+ 10 + 10<br />

spp.<br />

Citrullus<br />

+ 15 + 15<br />

lanatus + 6,9,12,13 + 6,9,12,13<br />

- = pathotype- or race-specificity absent; + = pathotype- or race-specificity present;<br />

? = data not available or confirmed.<br />

References (for full references see Literature Cited):<br />

(1) Horejsi et al. (2000); (2) Lebeda (1991); (3) Lebeda (1992a); (4) Lebeda (1992b);<br />

(5) Lebeda (1999); (6) Lebeda and Gadasová (2002); (7) Lebeda and Kristkova<br />

(1993, 2000); (8) Lebeda and Prasil (1994); (9) Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003); (10)<br />

Lebeda and Widrlechner (2004); (11) Shetty et al. (2002); (12) Thomas (1982); (13)<br />

Thomas et al. (1987); (14) Wehner and Shetty (1997); (15) Wessel-Beaver (1993).<br />

456 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Critical analysis of the scientific literature demonstrated (Lebeda<br />

and Widrlechner, 2003) that available C. sativus germplasm accessions<br />

and recent commercial cucumber cultivars do not possess effective<br />

sources of resistance, and experimentally verified, race-specific<br />

interactions are unknown. It was concluded that C. sativus genotypes<br />

could be used in differential sets only as a susceptible control (Tables<br />

1–3). Nevertheless, it was suggested to continue investigations of this<br />

host-parasite interaction because there may still be opportunities to<br />

discover race-specific resistance in this species (Lebeda and<br />

Widrlechner, 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong> natural range of C. melo has yet to be determined conclusively<br />

(Lebeda et al., 2006). Prior to its domestication, it may have been<br />

limited to Africa or may have reached the Near East or perhaps farther<br />

east into Asia (Bates and Robinson, 1995). <strong>The</strong> center of diversity and<br />

perhaps of the origin of the principal melons of world commerce (i.e.,<br />

the C. melo Inodorus and Cantalupensis groups) is located in the Near<br />

East and adjacent central Asian regions (Jeffrey, 1980). In contrast to<br />

C. sativus, recent reports characterize C. melo as displaying<br />

considerable intraspecific variation at various levels, i.e.,<br />

morphological, resistance, genetic, and molecular (Pitrat et al., 2000;<br />

Stepansky et al., 1999). Cucumis melo is the only species in the genus<br />

where the phenomenon of pathotype- and race-specificity of P.<br />

cubensis is relatively well known (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />

Recent, more detailed research on about 100 accessions of C. melo<br />

maintained in the US National Plant Germplasm System’s collection<br />

held at the USDA-ARS <strong>North</strong> Central Regional Plant Introduction<br />

Station in Ames, Iowa, is yielding new information on host-pathogen<br />

interactions (i.e., identifying various and unknown pathotype-specific<br />

reaction patterns) (Lebeda and Widrlechner, unpublished data).<br />

Among the 100 accessions, susceptible responses were most<br />

common, but there were also very clear and diverse race-specific<br />

reaction patterns, giving an opportunity for the development of a<br />

differential set composed solely of C. melo accessions, resembling the<br />

system developed for race differentiation of cucurbit powdery mildew<br />

(Bardin et al., 1999; McCreight, 2006; Pitrat et al., 1998).<br />

Beyond the cultivated Cucumis species, there are about 30 wild<br />

Cucumis species, mostly native to Africa (Kirkbride, 1993). However,<br />

Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003) concluded that wild Cucumis species<br />

are unlikely to haveplayed an important role in the differentiation of P.<br />

cubensis pathotypes and races. More research is needed in this area.<br />

CUCURBITA. <strong>The</strong> genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a is native exclusively to the New<br />

World, but has been widely cultivated in the Old World since the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 457


1500s (Paris, 1989, 2001a,b). It is not closely related to other cucurbit<br />

genera (Merrick, 1995).<br />

<strong>The</strong> genus is now thought to consist of between 12 and 15 species,<br />

with 5 regularly cultivated (Lira-Saade, 1995; Sanjur et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong><br />

current state of knowledge about the origin, evolution, and genetic<br />

variation of domesticated <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species was recently reviewed<br />

(Lebeda et al., 2006).<br />

Host-parasite specificity among <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species and various P.<br />

cubensis isolates is a complex phenomenon deserving closer analysis<br />

(Lebeda and Křístková, 1993; Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003). To<br />

date, fairly limited evaluation of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species for resistance to P.<br />

cubensis has been conducted (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003, 2004).<br />

Only a few papers describing the variation of interactions between<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. and P. cubensis, and their specificity, are available. An<br />

evaluation of the responses of 60 cultivars of C. pepo to three<br />

pathotypes of P. cubensis suggested that host-parasite specificity was<br />

controlled by race-specific resistance factors (Lebeda and Křístková,<br />

1993).<br />

Table 2. Differential set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and differentiation of P.<br />

cubensis pathotypes (adapted from Thomas et al., 1987).<br />

Groups of P. cubensis isolates (country)<br />

M1, M2<br />

(Japan)<br />

Host plant C1 C2 83, 85 C T<br />

differential taxon (Japan) (Japan) (Israel) (US) (US)<br />

Cucumis sativus<br />

C. melo var.<br />

+ + + + +<br />

reticulatus*<br />

C. melo var.<br />

+ + + + +<br />

conomon<br />

C. melo var.<br />

- + + + +<br />

acidulus - - + + +<br />

Citrullus lanatus - - - + +<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.<br />

Pathotype<br />

- - - - +<br />

designation 1 2 3 4 5<br />

* also known as C. melo var. cantalupensis Naudin.<br />

- = incompatible to slightly compatible response; + = highly compatible response.<br />

458 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Pathotype-specificity has also been described for C. maxima and<br />

C. moschata (Bains and Sharma, 1986; Thomas et al., 1987). More<br />

recently, a study was initiated to evaluate a set of wild and weedy<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a populations (97 accessions representing 10 species and 14<br />

taxa), representing a wide phylogenetic cross-section of the genus with<br />

relationships to all five domesticated species, for their responses to<br />

diverse P. cubensis pathotypes (altogether 11 isolates representing 9<br />

pathotypes) (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2004). That study reported<br />

extensive variation in the responses of these <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a accessions to<br />

11 isolates of P. cubensis. In total, 57 different reaction patterns were<br />

recorded with 13 accessions <strong>complete</strong>ly resistant, 12 accessions<br />

<strong>complete</strong>ly susceptible, and 32 accessions expressing pathotype/racespecific<br />

patterns. <strong>The</strong>se data demonstrated that most of the studied<br />

taxa displayed pathotype- and/or race-specificity. <strong>The</strong> most variable<br />

taxa included C. argyrosperma, C. foetidissima, C. okeechobensis, and<br />

C. pepo (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2004). <strong>The</strong> screening of about 50<br />

accessions of different C. pepo morphotypes for resistance to different<br />

P. cubensis pathotypes, as a basis for more detailed understanding of<br />

this host-pathogen interaction, is now underway (Lebeda and Paris,<br />

unpublished results). Collectively, these data can serve as a strong<br />

foundation for the future development of an improved differential set<br />

of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. for race determination of P. cubensis.<br />

CITRULLUS. Four species of Citrullus (C. lanatus [syn. C.<br />

vulgaris], C. colocynthis, C. ecirrhosus, and C. rehmii) have been<br />

generally recognized (Lebeda et al., 2006). Two species (C. lanatus<br />

and C. colocynthis) are widely distributed, and the others are restricted<br />

to the desert regions of Namibia (Jarret and Newman, 2000; Levi et<br />

al., 2000). Citrullus lanatus and C. colocynthis are natural hosts of P.<br />

cubensis (Palti and Cohen, 1980). <strong>The</strong> first clear pathotype/racespecific<br />

reaction pattern between Citrullus spp. and P. cubensis was<br />

identified in C. lanatus (Thomas et al., 1987). This initial report was<br />

verified by inoculation with some European isolates (Lebeda and<br />

Gadasová, 2002; Lebeda and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006). Reactionspecificity<br />

has not been identified in other Citrullus species. A broader<br />

screening of Citrullus species germplasm collections should be<br />

conducted to obtain information about patterns of variation for<br />

resistance (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />

As noted above, there are at least three candidate groups of<br />

cucurbitaceous host plants (Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, and Citrullus) that<br />

could be used for the development of race differential sets for P.<br />

cubensis. Of course, to accomplish this end we need more information<br />

about the phenotypic expression of host-pathogen variation,<br />

mechanisms responsible for resistance, and their genetic bases.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 459


Table 3. Differential set of cucurbit taxa for determination of P.<br />

cubensis pathotypes (adapted from Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae<br />

Accession<br />

number<br />

Cultivar<br />

name<br />

Dif. Differential<br />

No. Value Taxon<br />

Donor EVIGEZ<br />

H39- Marketer<br />

1 1 Cucumis sativus<br />

0121 430<br />

C. melo subsp. PI H40- Ananas<br />

2 2 melo<br />

292008 1117 Yoqne´am<br />

3 4<br />

4 8<br />

5 1<br />

6 2<br />

C. melo subsp.<br />

agrestis var.<br />

conomon<br />

C. melo subsp.<br />

agrestis var.<br />

acidulous<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

subsp. pepo *<br />

C. pepo subsp.<br />

ovifera var. texana<br />

CUM<br />

238/1974<br />

PI<br />

200819<br />

PI<br />

171622<br />

PI<br />

614687<br />

H40-<br />

0625<br />

H40-<br />

0611<br />

H42-<br />

0117<br />

H42-<br />

0130<br />

Baj-Gua<br />

Dolmalik<br />

C. pepo var. PI H42-<br />

7 4 fraterna ** 532355 0136<br />

H42-<br />

8 8 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima<br />

0137<br />

H37-<br />

Goliáš<br />

9 1 Citrullus lanatus<br />

0008<br />

H15-<br />

Malali<br />

10 2 Benincasa hispida BEN 485 0001<br />

H63-<br />

11 4 Luffa cylindrical<br />

0010<br />

Lagenaria<br />

H63-<br />

12 8 siceraria<br />

0009<br />

EVIGEZ - Czech genebank number.<br />

*taxonomy of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species follows recent correspondence with J.H. Wiersema<br />

(USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA).<br />

**originally described as <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fraterna (Lebeda and Gadasová, 2002).<br />

460 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Variation in the Pathogenicity of<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis<br />

INDIVIDUAL LEVEL (PATHOTYPE AND RACE DETERMINATION).<br />

Variability in pathogenicity (virulence) has been described in several<br />

downy mildew isolates at the level of pathotype or race (Table 5).<br />

When there is clear expression of susceptibility or resistance,<br />

classification of pathotypes and races can be based on the patterns of<br />

these reactions in differential hosts (for pathotypes, mostly at the<br />

generic level; for races, mostly at the specific level) (Lebeda and<br />

Schwinn, 1994). However, when relatively good information on host<br />

variation for specific resistance is available (i.e., a validated genetic<br />

model explaining host-pathogen interactions), then there is an<br />

opportunity to move from solely the taxonomic classification of<br />

pathogen races to the concept of virulence phenotypes, i.e., presence or<br />

absence of specific virulence/avirulence factors in individual pathogen<br />

isolates (Lebeda and Schwinn, 1994). For pathotypes, this translates<br />

into the presence or absence of specific disease phenotypes for each<br />

differential genotype (e.g., Table 3).<br />

We can now describe very precisely the pathogenicity of<br />

individual isolates as a pathotype (as a unique tetrade code [Lebeda<br />

and Widrlechner, 2003]) (Table 4) and characterize the structure of<br />

pathogen population at the individual level (Lebeda and Urban,<br />

2004a,b, 2006). This approach is more understandable and efficient<br />

than the previous system of pathotype description (Cohen et al., 2003;<br />

Thomas et al., 1987).<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of a comparable system for race differentiation is<br />

clearly needed, at least for Cucumis melo, the most economically<br />

important <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species, and Citrullus lanatus. This system can<br />

serve as a foundation for future developments in resistance breeding<br />

and the effective deployment of various resistance alleles and loci for<br />

coordinated control of pathogen populations. Two control strategies<br />

that could function as models for P. cubensis management are the use<br />

of carefully selected multilines or cultivar mixtures (Mundt, 2002) and<br />

the development of cultivars with pyramided resistance alleles (Castro<br />

et al., 2003), which may be facilitated through advances in markerassisted<br />

selection (Servin et al., 2004).<br />

POPULATION STUDIES. <strong>The</strong> development of differentiation systems<br />

provides an opportunity for the more exact description of pathotypes<br />

or races of P. cubensis and is creating the basis for the application of<br />

population biology and genetic studies, and for comparative<br />

investigations of virulence variation in distinct pathogen populations<br />

(Lebeda, 1982). <strong>The</strong> recent system of description of P. cubensis<br />

pathotypes (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003) is providing a good base<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 461


Table 4. Examples of different P. cubensis pathotypes (expressed in<br />

tetrade codes; see Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003) collected in the<br />

Czech Republic in 2001–2004.<br />

Level of<br />

pathogenicity/<br />

Year/no. of isolates<br />

pathotype<br />

Low<br />

pathogenicity<br />

(PF = 1–4)<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

3.0.12. 1 0 0 0<br />

11.0.8.<br />

Medium<br />

pathogenicity<br />

(PF = 5–8)<br />

1 0 0 0<br />

15.2.10. 1 5 0 0<br />

15.10.10.<br />

High<br />

pathogenicity<br />

(PF = 9–12)<br />

1 10 0 0<br />

15.14.10. 1 8 4 2<br />

15.14.11. 1 0 11 4<br />

15.14.14. 4 6 6 3<br />

15.15.11. 0 0 2 10<br />

15.15.14. 2 1 6 1<br />

15.15.15. 1 0 6 2<br />

PF = pathogenicity factor (for explanation see Population Studies heading).<br />

for such studies on the level of frequencies of “pathogenicity factors”<br />

(each hypothetical pathogenicity factor [PF] is able to overcome<br />

resistance of one differential genotype [see Table 3]). PF frequencies<br />

(0–100%, or 0.0–1.0) can express very clearly the pathogen population<br />

structure (Figure 1), and their spatial and temporal changes (Lebeda<br />

and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006). Elaboration of this system on the level of<br />

races (i.e., specific virulences to specific genotypes of host species),<br />

could bring a new methodological approach for this plant pathosystem,<br />

i.e., investigations of the genetic structure of virulence of P. cubensis<br />

populations. This approach has been very beneficial for practical<br />

breeding and cultivar use in some other vegetable crops, such as lettuce<br />

(Lebeda, 1981; Lebeda and Zinkernagel, 2003).<br />

We are confident that similar benefits could be gained for cucurbit<br />

breeding and research. Detailed virulence surveys on the local,<br />

462 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


national, and international levels are very important for elucidating<br />

pathogen population structure and behaviour (Lebeda, 1982), including<br />

the understanding of pathogen virulence tactics, strategy, and evolution<br />

(McDonald and Linde, 2002).<br />

Frequency (%)<br />

Fig. 1. Frequency of pathogenicity factors (see Table 3) in P. cubensis popula-<br />

tions in the Czech Republic in the years 2001–2004.<br />

Table 5. Survey of recent data on the determination of P. cubensis<br />

pathotypes and races in various countries.<br />

Pathogenicity<br />

category<br />

Pathotype Race<br />

Data<br />

References<br />

Data<br />

References<br />

Country<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Pathogenicity factor<br />

avail.<br />

avail.<br />

China ? +? 10<br />

Czech Republic + 5,6,7,8,9 + 5,6,7,8,9<br />

Bulgaria +? 1 +? 1<br />

India + 2 +? 2,10<br />

Israel + 3,11 + 3,11<br />

Japan + 11 +? 11<br />

Poland ? +? 10<br />

USA + 10 + 4,10,11<br />

Others (FR, NL, SP) * + 6 + 6,8<br />

- = pathotype or race absent; + = pathotype or race present; ? = data not available or<br />

not experimentally confirmed; * only one isolate determined.<br />

References (for full references see Literature Cited):<br />

(1) Angelov et al. (2000); (2) Bains and Sharma (1986); (3) Cohen et al. (2003); (4)<br />

Horejsi et al. (2000); (5) Lebeda (1999); (6) Lebeda and Gadasová (2002); (7)<br />

Lebeda and Urban (2004a,b, 2006); (8) Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003); (9) Lebeda<br />

and Widrlechner (2004); (10) Shetty et al. (2002); (11) Thomas et al. (1987).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 463<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004


Conclusions and Recommendations<br />

In conclusion, most of the summary comments and<br />

recommendations made by Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003) remain<br />

timely today:<br />

1. It is evident that P. cubensis is an extremely variable<br />

pathogen from the viewpoint of host specificity/pathogenicity<br />

and virulence.<br />

2. Pathogenicity must be clearly described, first at the<br />

pathotype and race levels, and then at the level of virulence<br />

phenotypes.<br />

3. To this end, internationally recognized and accepted<br />

differential host genotypes (at the level of genera and species<br />

for pathotype differentiation) and differential host lines (at the<br />

species level within a single genus for race differentiation)<br />

must be defined, conserved, and made widely available to the<br />

research and breeding community.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong>re must be a clear and standardized system for P.<br />

cubensis pathotype description (now available [Lebeda and<br />

Widrlechner, 2003]), and for race determination (under<br />

development for Cucumis melo and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. [Lebeda et<br />

al., unpublished]).<br />

5. Differential host lines for race differentiation must be<br />

sufficiently genetically characterized (i.e., genetics of racespecific<br />

resistance [race-specific resistance genes and/or<br />

factors]).<br />

6. <strong>The</strong> above-mentioned systems should be incorporated into<br />

basic research (e.g., host-pathogen interactions, resistance<br />

mechanisms, population genetic studies, genetics of virulence,<br />

etc.), and also broadly applied in practical resistance breeding<br />

of the world’s most important cucurbit crops.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Angelov, D., P. Georgiev, and L. Krasteva. 2000. Two races of Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis on cucumbers in Bulgaria. Acta Hort. 510:81–83.<br />

Bains, S. S. and N. K. Sharma. 1986. Differential response of certain cucurbits to<br />

isolates of Pseudoperonospora cubensis and characteristics of identified races.<br />

Phytophylactica. 18:31–33.<br />

Baird, J. R. and J. W. Thieret. 1988. <strong>The</strong> bur gherkin (Cucumis anguria var. anguria,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 42:447–451.<br />

Bardin, M., J. Carlier, and P. C. Nicot. 1999. Genetic differentiation in the French<br />

population of Erysiphe cichoracearum, a causal agent of powdery mildew of<br />

cucurbits. Plant Pathol. 48:531–540.<br />

464 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Bates, D. M. and R. W. Robinson. 1995. Cucumbers, melons and water-melons, p.<br />

89–96. In: J. Smartt and N. W. Simmonds (eds.). Evolution of crop plants, 2 nd<br />

ed. Longman Scientific, Harlow, Essex, UK.<br />

Castro, A. J., X. Chen, P. M. Hayes, and M. Johnston. 2003. Pyramiding quantitative<br />

trait locus (QTL) alleles determining resistance to barley stripe rust: effects on<br />

resistance at the seedling stage. Crop. Sci. 43:651–659.<br />

Cohen, Y., I. Meron, N. Mor, and S. Zuriel. 2003. A new pathotype of<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis causing downy mildew in cucurbits in Israel.<br />

Phytoparasitica. 31:458–466.<br />

Horejsi, T., J. E. Staub, and C. Thomas. 2000. Linkage of random amplified<br />

polymorphic DNA markers to downy mildew resistance in cucumber (Cucumis<br />

sativus L.). Euphytica. 115:105–113.<br />

Jarret, R. L. and M. Newman. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among species of<br />

Citrullus and the placement of C. rehmii De Winter as determined by Internal<br />

Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequence heterogeneity. Genet. Res. Crop Evol.<br />

47:215–222.<br />

Jeffrey, C. 1980. A review of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 81:233–247.<br />

Kirkbride, J. H., Jr.. 1993. Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumis<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Parkway Publishers, Boone, NC.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1981. Population genetics of lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae).<br />

Phytopath. Z. 101:228–239.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1982. Population genetics aspects in the study of phytopathogenic fungi.<br />

Acta Phytopath. Acad. Sci. Hung. 17:215–219.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1990. Biology and ecology of cucurbit downy mildew, p. 13–46. In: A.<br />

Lebeda (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> downy mildew. Czechoslovak Scientific Society for<br />

Mycology by Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1991. Resistance in muskmelons to Czechoslovak isolates of<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis from cucumbers. Sci. Hort. 45:255–260.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1992a. Screening of wild Cucumis species against downy mildew<br />

(Pseudoperonospora cubensis) isolates from cucumbers. Phytoparasitica.<br />

20:203–210.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1992b. Susceptibility of accessions of Cucumis sativus to<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Tests of Agrochem. and Cult. 13 (Ann. Appl.<br />

Biol., 120[Suppl.]):102–103.<br />

Lebeda, A. 1999. Pseudoperonospora cubensis on Cucumis spp. and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.–<br />

resistance breeding aspects. Acta Hort. 492:363–370.<br />

Lebeda, A. and V. Gadasová. 2002. Pathogenic variation of Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis in the Czech Republic and some other European countries. Acta Hort.<br />

588:137–141.<br />

Lebeda, A. and E. Křístková. 1993. Resistance in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata varieties to cucurbit downy mildew. Plant Var. Seeds. 6:109–114.<br />

Lebeda, A. and E. Křístková. 2000. Interactions between morphotypes <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

pepo and obligate biotrophs (Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Erysiphe<br />

cichoracearum and Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Acta Hort. 510:219–225.<br />

Lebeda, A. and F. J. Schwinn. 1994. <strong>The</strong> downy mildews–an overview of recent<br />

research progress. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 101:225–254.<br />

Lebeda, A. and J. Prášil. 1994. Susceptibility of Cucumis sativus cultivars to<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Acta Phytopath. Entom. Hung. 29:89–94.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 465


Lebeda, A. and J. Urban. 2004a. Disease impact and pathogenicity variation in<br />

Czech populations of Pseudoperonospora cubensis, p. 267–273. In: A. Lebeda<br />

and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in <strong>Cucurbit</strong> genetics and breeding research. Proc.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8 th EUCARPIA Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and<br />

<strong>Breeding</strong>. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Lebeda, A. and J. Urban. 2004b. Distribution, harmfulness and pathogenic variability<br />

of cucurbit downy mildew in the Czech Republic. Acta Fytotechnica et<br />

Zootechnica. 7:170–173.<br />

Lebeda, A. and J. Urban. 2006. Temporal changes in pathogenicity and fungicide<br />

resistance in Pseudoperonospora cubensis populations. Acta Hort. (In press.)<br />

Lebeda, A. and M. P. Widrlechner. 2003. A set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae taxa for<br />

differentiation of Pseudoperonospora cubensis pathotypes. J. Plant Dis. Protect.<br />

110:337–349.<br />

Lebeda, A. and M. P. Widrlechner. 2004. Response of wild and weedy <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a L.<br />

to pathotypes of Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk. & Curt.) Rostov. (cucurbit<br />

downy mildew), p. 203–210. In: P. T. N. Spencer-Phillips and M. Jeger (eds.).<br />

Advances in downy mildew research, vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers,<br />

Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />

Lebeda, A., M. P. Widrlechner, J. Staub, H. Ezura, J. Zalapa, and E. Křístková. 2006.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae; Cucumis spp., <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp., Citrullus spp.), ch. 8.<br />

In: R. J. Singh (ed.). Genetic resources, chromosome engineering, and crop<br />

improvement series, vol. 3–vegetable crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. (In<br />

press.)<br />

Lebeda, A. and T. Jendrulek. 1987. Cluster analysis as a method for evaluation of<br />

genetic similarity in specific host-parasite interaction (Lactuca sativa-Bremia<br />

lactucae). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 75: 194–199.<br />

Lebeda, A. and V. Zinkernagel. 2003. Evolution and distribution of virulence in the<br />

German population of Bremia lactucae. Plant Pathol. 52:41–51.<br />

Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, A. P. Keinath, and T. C. Wehner. 2000. Estimation of<br />

genetic diversity among Citrullus accessions using RAPD markers. Acta Hort.<br />

510:385–390.<br />

Lira-Saade, R. 1995. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a L. In: Estudios taxonómicos y ecogeográphicos de<br />

las <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae Latinoamericanas de importancia económica. Systematics and<br />

Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Genepools, No. 9. IPGRI, Rome.<br />

McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />

melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

131:59–65.<br />

McDonald, B. A. and C. Linde. 2002. Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary<br />

potential, and durable resistance. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:349–379.<br />

Merrick, L. C. 1995. Squashes, pumpkins and gourds, p. 97–105. In: Smartt, J. and<br />

Simmonds, N. W. (eds.). Evolution of crop plants, 2 nd ed. Longman Scientific &<br />

Technical, London, UK.<br />

Morton, J. F. 1987. <strong>The</strong> horned cucumber, alias ‘Kiwano’ (Cucumis metuliferus,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 41:325–327.<br />

Mundt, C. C. 2002. Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease<br />

management. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:381–410.<br />

Palti, J. and Y. Cohen. 1980. Downy mildew of cucurbits (Pseudoperonospora<br />

cubensis): the fungus and its hosts, distribution, epidemiology and control.<br />

Phytoparasitica. 8:109–147.<br />

Paris, H. S. 1989. Historical records, origins, and development of the edible cultivar<br />

groups of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 43:13–43.<br />

466 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Paris, H. S. 2001a. Characterization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo collection at the Newe<br />

Ya’ar Research Center, Israel. Plant Genet. Res. Newslet. 126:41–45.<br />

Paris, H. S. 2001b. History of the cultivar-groups of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. Hort. Rev.<br />

25:71–170.<br />

Pitrat, M., C. Dogimont, and M. Bardin. 1998. Resistance to fungal diseases of<br />

foliage in melon, p. 167–173. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98,<br />

Evaluation and Enhancement of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />

VA.<br />

Pitrat, M., P. Hanelt, and K. Hammer. 2000. Some comments on infraspecific<br />

classification of cultivars of melon. Acta Hort. 510:29–36.<br />

Sanjur, O. I., D. R. Piperno, T. C. Andres, and L. Wessel-Beaver. 2002. Phylogenetic<br />

relationships among domesticated and wild species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: implications for crop plant<br />

evolution and areas of origin. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA). 99:535–540.<br />

Servin, B., O. C. Martin, M. Mezard, and F. Hospital. 2004. Toward a theory of<br />

marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Genetics. 168:513–523.<br />

Shetty, N. V., T. C. Wehner, C. E. Thomas, R. W. Doruchowski, and K. P. V. Shetty.<br />

2002. Evidence for downy mildew races in cucumber tested in Asia, Europe,<br />

and <strong>North</strong> America. Sci. Hort. 94:231–239.<br />

Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of<br />

melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation.<br />

Plant Syst. Evol. 217: 313–332.<br />

Thomas, C. E. 1982. Resistance to downy mildew in Cucumis melo plant<br />

introductions and American cultivars. Plant Dis. 66:500–502.<br />

Thomas, C. E. 1996. Downy mildew, p. 25–27. In: T. A. Zitter, D. L. Hopkins, and<br />

C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> diseases. APS Press, St. Paul,<br />

MN.<br />

Thomas, C. E., T. Inaba, and Y. Cohen. 1987. Physiological specialization in<br />

Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Phytopathology. 77:1621–1624.<br />

Wehner, T. C. and N. V. Shetty. 1997. Downy mildew resistance of the cucumber<br />

germplasm collection in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> field tests. Crop Sci. 37:1331–1340.<br />

Wessel-Beaver, L. 1993. Powdery and downy mildew resistance in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

moschata accessions. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genet. Coop. Rep. 16:73–74.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 467


EVALUATING ZUCCHINI YELLOW MOSAIC<br />

VIRUS RESISTANCE IN WATERMELON<br />

Kai-Shu Ling and Amnon Levi<br />

USDA-ARS, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC 29414<br />

Nihat Guner and Todd C. Wehner<br />

Department of Horticultural Science, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />

Raleigh, NC 27695<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus, inheritance, recessive gene, SRAP<br />

ABSTRACT. Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) resistance was previously<br />

identified in Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus U.S. Plant Introduction (PI) 595203,<br />

and inheritance studies indicated that the ZYMV resistance is conferred by a<br />

single recessive gene. In this study we examined the inheritance of resistance to<br />

the original ZYMV Florida strain (ZYMV-FL) using F1, F2, and reciprocal BC1<br />

populations derived from PI 595203 and the watermelon cultivar ‘New<br />

Hampshire Midget’ (NHM). <strong>The</strong> results confirmed that PI 595203 is resistant<br />

to ZYMV-FL and the resistance was conferred by a single recessive gene. A<br />

study was initiated to identify DNA markers closely linked to the gene<br />

conferring the ZYMV resistance. Genomic DNA was isolated from the parents<br />

(PI 595203 and NHM) as well as their F1, F2, and BC1 plants. Two hundred and<br />

seventy sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers were tested<br />

for polymorphism between the parents (PI 595203 and NHM). Of these, 135<br />

markers appeared to be polymorphic, and are being used (with the mapping<br />

BC1 and F2 populations) for constructing a genetic linkage map and locating the<br />

ZYMV-resistance gene locus.<br />

Z<br />

ucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), Watermelon mosaic virus<br />

(WMV), Papaya ringspot virus watermelon strain (PRSV-W),<br />

and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) are considered major<br />

viruses of cucurbits. Provvidenti et al. (1984) identified two major<br />

ZYMV strains in the United <strong>State</strong>s and showed that although ZYMV-<br />

CT incites more severe disease symptoms in watermelon, its<br />

distribution is limited to the <strong>North</strong>east. On the other hand, ZYMV-FL<br />

is the most prevalent strain in cucurbit crops in <strong>North</strong> America.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore it is important to first develop watermelon cultivars that are<br />

resistant to ZYMV-FL. Provvidenti (1991) identified four watermelon<br />

(C. lanatus) landraces (PI 482322, PI 482299, PI 482261, and PI<br />

482308) that are resistant to ZYMV-FL. Inheritance studies indicated<br />

that a single recessive gene (zym) is conferring ZYMV-FL resistance<br />

in PI 482261 (Provvidenti, 1991). Boyhan et al. (1992) was the first to<br />

identify cv. Egun (apparently PI 595203) with strong resistance to<br />

ZYMV-FL. Lecoq et al. (1998) also identified other PI accessions<br />

468 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


with resistance to ZYMV. Guner (2004) reevaluated a large PI<br />

collection of watermelon for ZYMV resistance and identified a few<br />

more PIs (including PI 595203). Xu et al. (2004) examined ZYMV-<br />

China Strain (ZYMV-CH) and WMV resistance in watermelon (PI<br />

595203) and determined that the resistance to ZYMV-CH is also<br />

conferred by a single recessive gene (zym-CH). <strong>The</strong> objective of this<br />

study is to evaluate the inheritance of resistance to ZYMV-FL in<br />

watermelon, and identify molecular markers closely linked to the<br />

resistance gene. <strong>The</strong>se markers will be useful in marker-assisted<br />

selection (MAS) to incorporate the resistance into watermelon<br />

cultivars.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

HOST PLANT AND GENETIC MATERIALS. F1, F2, and reciprocal<br />

BC1 populations, derived from a cross between PI 595203 (ZYMVresistant)<br />

and cv. New Hampshire Midget (NHM) (ZYMVsusceptible),<br />

were developed by Guner and Wehner at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

<strong>State</strong> University (Guner, 2004). Seeds were germinated in an insectfree<br />

greenhouse with temperature of 18–30C and 14–16 hours of<br />

natural lighting period at the U. S. Vegetable Laboratory in<br />

Charleston, SC. <strong>The</strong> two youngest leaves were collected from young<br />

seedlings (4–5 leaf stage) for DNA isolation. Plants were then<br />

mechanically inoculated with the ZYMV-FL culture.<br />

VIRUS ISOLATE AND INOCULATION. <strong>The</strong> ZYMV-FL culture is<br />

derived from the original ZYMV-FL strain isolated by Provvidenti<br />

(1984). <strong>The</strong> virus was propagated and maintained on Gray zucchini<br />

squash. Virus inoculum was prepared by macerating virus-infected<br />

leaves (1:5 w/v) in 0.01M phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, with<br />

mortar and pestle. Seedlings were inoculated by lightly dusting the<br />

leaves with carborundum then mechanical rubbing with acotton Q-tip<br />

soaked in the virus inoculum. Application involved several circular<br />

motions until the entire leaf was covered. Excess carborundum was<br />

rinsed with water and the inoculated seedlings were placed under the<br />

shade for a few hours to minimize direct sunlight damage to the newly<br />

inoculated leaves. Three weeks after inoculation, plants were<br />

evaluated for virus symptoms (Figure 1). Virus disease severity was<br />

rated as: 0 = no symptoms; 1= slight mosaic on leaves; 2 = mosaic<br />

patches and/or necrotic spots on leaves; 3 = leaves near apical<br />

meristem are slightly deformed, with yellow color and reduced leaf<br />

size; 4 = apical meristem has deformed shape and with mosaic<br />

appearance; 5 = extensive mosaic appearance and severe leaf<br />

deformation, or plant is dead (Xu et al., 2004).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 469


ELISA. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was<br />

performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioReba,<br />

Switzerland). Microtiter plates were first coated with 1μg/ml of<br />

ZYMV antibody, and virus particles were trapped after incubating the<br />

tissue extract on the coated plates. Leaf extract was prepared by<br />

processing the collected leaf tissue with a tissue homogenizer Homex-<br />

6 (BioReba) in tissue extraction buffer (1:20 w/v). <strong>The</strong> alkaline<br />

phosphatase conjugated antibody to ZYMV was then added to the<br />

plate. Finally, yellow color developed in positive samples due to<br />

enzyme-substrate hydrolysis was measured with an ELISA reader. A<br />

sample with absorbance value of at least twice the mean health<br />

controls (OD at 405nm) is regarded as positive.<br />

Fig. 1: Comparison of the resistant PI 595203 (left) and the susceptible cv. New<br />

Hampshire Midget (right) to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus infection.<br />

SEQUENCE-RELATED AMPLIFICATION POLYMORPHISM. Genomic<br />

DNA was isolated from the parent plants (PI 595203 and NHM), and<br />

from their F1, F2, and BC1 plants as described by Levi et al. (2004).<br />

Two hundred and seventy sequence-related amplified polymorphism<br />

(SRAP) markers were tested for polymorphism between the parents<br />

(PI 595203 and NHM) as described by Levi et al. (2006).<br />

470 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Results and Discussion<br />

All 19 F1 plants from the cross between NHM and PI 595203 were<br />

susceptible, indicating that the ZYMV-FL resistance in PI 595203 is<br />

controlled by a recessive gene. <strong>The</strong> F2, BC1R, and BC1S segregation<br />

data were tested against the expected ratio for a single recessive gene<br />

and to confirm the observations by Provvidenti (1991) and Xu et al.<br />

(2004). Interestingly, the F2 segregation data (71S:10R) did not<br />

support the expected 3:1 (susceptible: resistance) ratio (Table 1). <strong>The</strong><br />

cause for this skewed characterization toward susceptibility to ZYMV-<br />

FL in the F2 population was not determined. However, BC1S<br />

population was all susceptible and BC1R population was segregating<br />

in 1:1 (69S:61R) ratio supporting a single recessive gene.<br />

Of the 270 SRAP primer pairs tested, 135 produced polymorphism<br />

between the parents PI 595203 and NHM. <strong>The</strong>se polymorphic markers<br />

are being used with mapping BC1 and F2 populations for constructing<br />

a genetic linkage map and locating the ZYMV-resistance gene locus.<br />

Table 1. Single locus goodness-of-fit-test for ZYMV-FL resistance in<br />

watermelon (‘New Hampshire Midget’ x PI 595203).<br />

Generation Total Susceptible Resistance Expected ratio X 2 df P-value<br />

NHM 12 12 0<br />

PI 595203 11 0 11<br />

F1 19 19 0<br />

F2 81 71 10 3:1 7.78 1 0.005<br />

BC1R 130 69 61 1:1 0.49 1 0.5<br />

BC1S 20 20 0<br />

This study confirmed that a single recessive gene confers<br />

resistance to ZYMV-FL in PI 595203. <strong>The</strong> slight deviation from the<br />

expected 3:1 ratio in the F2 population may be a result of preferential<br />

segregation that may occur in wide crosses between Citrullus PIs and<br />

watermelon cultivars (Levi et al. 2006). <strong>The</strong> preliminary SRAP<br />

analysis revealed sufficient polymorphism between NHM and PI<br />

595203 that might be useful in identifying a DNA marker linked to the<br />

ZYMV-resistance gene locus. <strong>The</strong> marker will be useful in markerassisted<br />

selection (MAS) to incorporate the resistance into watermelon<br />

cultivars.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 471


Literature Cited<br />

Boyhan, G., J. D. Norton, B. J. Jacobsen, and B. R. Abrahams. 1992. Evaluation of<br />

watermelon and related germplasm for resistance to Zucchini yellow mosaic<br />

virus. Plant Dis. 76:251–252.<br />

Guner, N. 2004. Papaya ringspot virus watermelon strain and Zucchini yellow<br />

mosaic virus resistance in watermelon. PhD Diss., Department of Horticultural<br />

Sciences, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> Univ., Raleigh, NC.<br />

Lecoq, H., G. Wisler, and M. Pitrat. 1998. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> viruses: the classics and the<br />

emerging, p. 126–142. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998:<br />

evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />

VA.<br />

Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, M. Newman, O. U. K. Reddy, X. Zhang, and Y. Xu. 2004.<br />

ISSR and AFLP markers sufficiently differentiated among American<br />

watermelon cultivars with limited genetic diversity. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

129:553–558.<br />

Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, T. Trebitsh, A. Salman, J. King, J. Karalius, M. Newman, O.<br />

U. K. Reddy, Y. Xu, and X. Zhang. 2006. An extended linkage map for<br />

watermelon based on SRAP, AFLP, SSR, ISSR and RAPD markers. J. Amer.<br />

Soc. Hort. Sci. (In press.)<br />

Provvidenti, R. 1991. Inheritance of resistance to the Florida strain of Zucchini<br />

yellow mosaic virus in watermelon. HortSci. 26:407–408.<br />

Provvidenti, R., D. Gonsalves, and H. S. Humaydan. 1984. Occurrence of Zucchini<br />

yellow mosaic virus in cucurbits from Connecticut, New York, Florida, and<br />

California. Plant Dis. 68:443–446.<br />

Xu, Y., D. Kang, Z. Shi, H. Shen, and T. Wehner, T. 2004. Inheritance of resistance<br />

to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus and Watermelon mosaic virus in watermelon.<br />

J. Hered. 95:498–502.<br />

472 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


OCCURRENCE OF FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE<br />

IN PODOSPHAERA XANTHII AND IMPACT<br />

ON CONTROLLING CUCURBIT POWDERY<br />

MILDEW IN NEW YORK<br />

Margaret Tuttle McGrath<br />

Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University<br />

Long Island Horticultural Research and Extension Center<br />

3059 Sound Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901-1098<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. QoI fungicides, Strobilurin fungicides, DMI<br />

fungicides, pumpkin<br />

ABSTRACT. Frequency of QoI-resistant strains of Podosphaera xanthii<br />

(Castagne) U. Braun & N. Shishkoff was low in commercial production fields at<br />

the start of powdery mildew development in 2003 (detected in one of five fields),<br />

but increased greatly to 61–100% in all fields, and was associated with poor<br />

disease control. Resistant strains were found in nontreated fields at the end of<br />

the season. Frequency was high at the start of powdery mildew development in<br />

2004 (32–91%). Strains moderately insensitive to DMI fungicides were detected<br />

in all fields in 2003 (1–25%) and in 2004 (15–84%) before these fungicides were<br />

used but the DMIs Nova and Procure provided excellent control when<br />

evaluated in 2005 where DMI-insensitive strains were present, indicating that<br />

DMI resistance has not reached a degree that control is affected. Programs<br />

with QoI, DMI, and protectant fungicides were effective, but not as effective as<br />

the new fungicide Quintec applied alone.<br />

P<br />

owdery mildew is a common disease of cucurbits under field<br />

and greenhouse conditions in most areas of the world.<br />

Management is needed to avoid loss in fruit quantity and market<br />

quality. Mobile fungicides (those with systemic, translaminar, or<br />

volatile activity) are needed to control powdery mildew on the<br />

underside of leaves where this disease typically develops best.<br />

Unfortunately these fungicides tend to be at risk for resistance<br />

development due to their single-site mode of action. And the cucurbit<br />

powdery mildew fungus, Podosphaera (sect. Sphaerotheca) xanthii<br />

(Castagne) U. Braun & N. Shishkoff, has a history of developing<br />

resistance, beginning with benomyl in the late 1960s, which was one<br />

of the first cases of fungicide resistance (McGrath, 2001).<br />

Application of fungicides continues to be the principal practice for<br />

managing powdery mildew in cucurbit crops, but successful control is<br />

challenged by development of resistance to key fungicides (McGrath<br />

2001). While there are varieties with genetic resistance to this disease,<br />

an integrated program is recommended to reduce selection pressure for<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 473


pathogen strains able to overcome the genetic resistance in the plant as<br />

well as fungicide resistance. Powdery mildew is the most common<br />

disease occurring every year throughout the U.S. <strong>The</strong> pathogen<br />

develops best on the lower surface (underside) of leaves, thus a<br />

successful management program necessitates controlling the pathogen<br />

on the lower as well as the upper surface. It is difficult to deliver<br />

fungicide directly to the lower surface, even with new nozzle types and<br />

air-assist sprayers. Consequently, an important component of<br />

fungicide programs has been fungicides able to move to the lower leaf<br />

surface. Most of these fungicides are systemic (e.g., Topsin M,<br />

Nova) or have translaminar activity (e.g., Amistar, Cabrio,<br />

Flint, Quadris). Some, notably the new fungicide Quintec<br />

(Fungicide Resistance Action Committee [FRAC] Group 13), have<br />

high volatility, enabling redistribution from upper to lower leaf<br />

surfaces.<br />

Unfortunately, these fungicides effective on lower leaf surfaces<br />

have been prone to resistance development due to their single-site<br />

mode of action. Additionally, the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus has<br />

demonstrated ability to evolve new strains resistant to these fungicides.<br />

Presence of resistant strains has been associated with control failure.<br />

With some fungicides, including MBC (methyl benzimidazole<br />

carbamate) fungicides, aka benzimidazoles (e.g., Topsin M) (FRAC<br />

Group 1), and QoI (quinone outside inhibiting) fungicides, aka<br />

strobilurins (e.g., Amistar, Cabrio, Flint, Quadris) (FRAC Group 11),<br />

this change renders the pathogen strain <strong>complete</strong>ly resistant to the<br />

fungicide (qualitative resistance). With other fungicides, including the<br />

DMI (demethylation inhibiting) fungicides (Bayleton, Nova, and<br />

Procure) (FRAC Group 3), pathogen strains exhibit a range in<br />

fungicide sensitivity depending on the number of genetic changes they<br />

possess that affect the fungicide’s ability to function (quantitative<br />

resistance).<br />

During the 1990s, grower complaints of inadequate control of<br />

powdery mildew in New York, as well as elsewhere in the U.S., were<br />

found to be due to resistance to Bayleton (DMI) and Benlate (MBC),<br />

the only mobile fungicides registered at that time (McGrath et al.,<br />

1996). For a few years after detection of Bayleton resistance, initial<br />

resistance frequency was found to be sufficiently low that one<br />

application of this fungicide was effective; however, the proportion of<br />

the pathogen population that was resistant subsequently increased<br />

greatly, thus additional applications were ineffective (McGrath, 1996).<br />

This information combined with efficacy data from fungicide<br />

evaluation experiments provided the necessary support to obtain<br />

474 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


emergency registration of Quadris and Nova, a new DMI, in some<br />

states in 1998 and 1999, respectively. <strong>The</strong>se fungicides received full<br />

federal registration in the U.S. in 1999 and 2000, respectively. Nova<br />

was effective while Bayleton was not because resistance to the DMIs<br />

is quantitative and Nova is inherently more active. DMI resistance did<br />

have some impact on Nova efficacy: the lowest labeled rate was no<br />

longer as effective as higher rates. Growers were encouraged to use<br />

high rates to obtain good control as well as to manage further<br />

development of DMI resistance. Strains of P. xanthii fully resistant to<br />

Bayleton but controlled by high rates of Nova were called moderately<br />

insensitive to DMIs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> recommendation to growers was to apply Quadris in<br />

alternation with Nova plus a protectant fungicide on a seven-day<br />

schedule, beginning before powdery mildew started to develop or,<br />

preferably, after reaching the action threshold of 1 leaf with symptoms<br />

out of 50 older leaves examined. Initially QoIs were thought to have<br />

medium resistance risk and resistance would be quantitative. After<br />

reports of rapid development of qualitative resistance that rendered<br />

QoIs ineffective elsewhere in the world, the recommended fungicide<br />

program was modified to include a protectant with the QoI. Protectants<br />

are a valuable component of the program because they have low<br />

resistance risk and control strains resistant to the mobile fungicides.<br />

QoI resistance was detected in NY and elsewhere in the U.S. in<br />

2002 when QoIs failed in fungicide-efficacy experiments (McGrath<br />

and Shishkoff, 2003a). This was three years after federal registration<br />

and the fourth year that QoIs were used by growers in some states.<br />

Resistance was detected in the geographically separated east and west<br />

regions. In the eastern U.S., P. xanthii is thought to survive over<br />

winter in southern Florida and then move northward with the<br />

successive cropping seasons. Winds do not move in a southward<br />

direction often enough to provide the pathogen a means to move back<br />

down the coast in the fall. It could survive north of Florida as<br />

ascomata (cleistothecia), but these are not thought to play an important<br />

role considering cropping practices.<br />

In 2002 fungicide sensitivity was determined for isolates of P.<br />

xanthii collected at crop maturity from fungicide-efficacy experiments<br />

in Georgia (GA), <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (NC) and NY. <strong>The</strong> maximum<br />

concentration tolerated by most of the 73 isolates (89%) was either 0.5<br />

or 100mg/ml of the QoI trifloxystrobin, indicating that resistance was<br />

qualitative. Four of 9 NY isolates, 19 of 21 GA isolates, and 13 of 15<br />

NC isolates from plants treated weekly with a QoI fungicide were able<br />

to grow well on leaf disks treated with 100mg/ml trifloxystrobin. In<br />

the NY fungicide-efficacy experiment, after two applications, Quadris<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 475


used alone was as effective as Quadris alternated with Nova plus<br />

sulfur; but at the assessment made eight days later following two more<br />

applications, powdery mildew was as severe on Quadris-treated leaves<br />

as on nontreated leaves (McGrath and Shishkoff, 2003a, 2003c).<br />

Surprisingly, many isolates resistant to QoIs were moderately<br />

insensitive to DMIs, an unrelated fungicide group: 56% of the NY<br />

isolates and 90% of the NC isolates. No isolate was found that was<br />

resistant to QoIs and sensitive to DMIs. This situation constrains<br />

managing QoI and DMI resistance (McGrath and Shishkoff, 2003b).<br />

Research was conducted in 2003 to 2005 in NY to (1) examine<br />

occurrence of fungicide-resistant strains in commercial production<br />

fields before mobile fungicides for powdery mildew were applied to<br />

these crops, and (2) examine the impact of fungicide use on resistance<br />

and of resistance on fungicide efficacy. <strong>The</strong>se goals were achieved by<br />

monitoring resistance in commercial fields using a seedling bioassay,<br />

examining powdery mildew control, and assessing fungicide efficacy<br />

and resistance occurrence in replicated experiments. Preliminary<br />

reports of the individual experiments have been published and contain<br />

additional detail on methods and results (McGrath, 2004a, 2004b,<br />

2005a, 2005b; McGrath and Davey, 2006).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

An in-field seedling bioassay was used in 2003 and 2004 to<br />

determine the fungicide sensitivity of the powdery mildew fungal<br />

pathogen population in cucurbit fields at commercial farms and at the<br />

Cornell University Long Island Horticultural Research and Extension<br />

Center (LIHREC) in Suffolk County, NY.<br />

<strong>The</strong> seedling bioassay entailed placing fungicide-treated seedlings<br />

in a field of cucurbits with powdery mildew. Summer squash<br />

seedlings were grown in a growth chamber. <strong>The</strong>ir growing point and<br />

unexpanded leaves were removed just before treatment. Seedlings<br />

varied in size from one to nine true leaves. Treatments were no<br />

fungicide, QoI fungicide (50mg/L trifloxystrobin formulated as Flint),<br />

DMI fungicide (20mg/L myclobutanil; Nova), and a combination of<br />

the QoI and DMI fungicides. Seedlings were dipped in the fungicide<br />

solutions, then allowed to dry overnight before setting in a cucurbit<br />

crop in groups of four plants with the four treatments. <strong>The</strong>re were two<br />

to seven groups per field. After being in fields for 4 to 22 hours,<br />

seedlings were kept in a greenhouse until symptoms of powdery<br />

mildew were visible, which took at least one week. <strong>The</strong>n severity<br />

(percent tissue with symptoms) was visually estimated for each leaf on<br />

a 0 to 100% continuous scale. Frequency of resistant pathogen strains<br />

476 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


in a field was estimated by calculating the ratio of severity on<br />

fungicide-treated plants relative to nontreated plants for each group,<br />

then determining the field average.<br />

In 2003, three early crops of zucchini and yellow summer squash<br />

that had not been sprayed with QoI or DMI fungicides were identified<br />

for the first bioassay. Two early plantings of pumpkin that had not<br />

been treated with fungicides were also selected for this bioassay<br />

because powdery mildew was observed in these plants in late July at<br />

the same time symptoms were first observed in the squash plants.<br />

Another bioassay was conducted about one month later on 31 August<br />

in six commercial pumpkin fields and a winter squash experiment at<br />

LIHREC after QoI and/or DMI fungicides were used in these fields.<br />

Powdery mildew severity was assessed in some of these fields before<br />

the bioassay was conducted and again at the time of the bioassay. A<br />

third assay conducted on 25 September included pumpkin fields where<br />

no QoI or DMI fungicides were used.<br />

In 2004, the seedling assay was conducted in seven fields at six<br />

farms on 29 July. Due to the high frequency of resistance the assay<br />

was not conducted again.<br />

Efficacy of fungicides used alone plus combined in fungicide<br />

programs and impact of fungicide use on fungicide resistance were<br />

assessed through three replicated experiments conducted with<br />

pumpkin at LIHREC in 2003 to 2005. Most treatments were initiated<br />

after the IPM threshold of one leaf with powdery mildew symptoms of<br />

50 old leaves examined was reached. Upper and lower surfaces of 5 to<br />

25 leaves in each plot were examined weekly for powdery mildew.<br />

Average severity for the entire canopy was calculated from the<br />

individual leaf assessments. Area under the disease progress curve<br />

(AUDPC) was calculated for severity over all assessment dates to<br />

obtain a summation value for the entire epidemic. Fungicides were<br />

applied weekly with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer equipped with<br />

D5-25 hollow cone nozzles spaced 17 inches apart that delivered 85–<br />

100gpa at 100–110psi. Fungicide sensitivity was determined for<br />

isolates collected from select plots using a leaf disk assay (McGrath,<br />

1996).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In 2003, QoI resistance was detected in one of four fields at the<br />

start of powdery mildew development before QoIs had been applied<br />

(Table 1). QoI resistance was not detected in a research field.<br />

Moderate resistance to DMIs was detected in all fields (at a frequency<br />

of 1–25%). One month later, QoI resistance was detected at a high<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 477


level (61–100%) in all six commercial fields examined, including a<br />

field where only DMI fungicides had been used, plus the research site.<br />

Moderately DMI-insensitive strains were also more common (13–<br />

56%). Control of powdery mildew in commercial pumpkin fields was<br />

poor. <strong>The</strong> lower surface of most leaves was at least 50% covered by<br />

powdery mildew and many leaves had died prematurely by 31 August.<br />

Control appeared to be only slightly better in plots in a fungicideefficacy<br />

experiment where a fungicide program recommended to<br />

growers (QoI plus sulfur alternated with DMI plus sulfur on a weekly<br />

schedule) was applied (Table 2). Another bioassay was conducted in<br />

2003 to determine how widespread QoI resistance had become. It was<br />

detected in three fields where neither QoI nor DMI fungicides had<br />

been used. Two were organic production fields. Typically in these<br />

bioassays powdery mildew severity on plants treated with a DMI was<br />

similar to severity on plants treated with both a DMI and a QoI,<br />

indicating that most strains moderately insensitive to DMIs were also<br />

resistant to QoIs.<br />

Several fungicide programs were evaluated in 2003 (Table 2). On<br />

8 September after five weekly applications to pumpkin (7 Aug to 6<br />

Sept), the QoI Flint applied in alternation with sulfur was providing<br />

poor control (37% on upper leaf surfaces and 0% on lower surfaces).<br />

Control was improved by applying sulfur every week and applying on<br />

alternate weeks a DMI fungicide; using Nova provided 84% and 48%<br />

control on upper and lower leaf surfaces, respectively; the DMI<br />

Procure provided a similar level of control (89% and 34%). Control<br />

was not improved significantly by applying Flint and Procure more<br />

than once in a fungicide program with weekly applications of sulfur,<br />

most likely due to high frequency of resistant strains. Flint plus sulfur<br />

applied Week 1 followed by Procure plus sulfur Week 2, then sulfur<br />

alone Weeks 3 to 5 provided 68% and 24% control. Sulfur applied<br />

alone Weeks 3 to 5 did contribute to control; where only Week 1 and 2<br />

applications of Flint, Procure, and sulfur were made, powdery mildew<br />

on 8 September, 25 days after the last application, was as severe as<br />

where no fungicides were applied. In comparison, 95% and 91%<br />

control was obtained with Quintec (quinoxyfen) applied on the same<br />

dates. Strains moderately insensitive to DMIs and resistant to QoIs<br />

were present.<br />

In 2004, QoI resistance was detected in all seven fields at the start<br />

of powdery mildew development (frequency of 32–91%) (Table 3).<br />

QoIs had been applied only in one field. Moderate insensitivity to<br />

DMIs was detected in all fields (15–84%). Although MBC fungicides<br />

are now very rarely used for cucurbit disease control, resistant strains<br />

of P. xanthii were common (31–91%). Fungicide programs with a QoI<br />

478 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Proportion of cucurbit powdery mildew fungal population<br />

estimated to be moderately insensitive to DMI fungicides and<br />

proportion resistant to QoI fungicides based on results from a<br />

fungicide-sensitivity seedling bioassay in 2003.<br />

DMI moderately<br />

insensitive isolates<br />

(%) z<br />

QoI-resistant<br />

isolates<br />

(%) z<br />

Site 7/27 8/31 9/25 7/27 8/31 9/25<br />

1<br />

33 61<br />

2 1 13 0 100<br />

Cornell LIHREC 16 56 0 100<br />

3 (no QoIs) 44 5 83 88<br />

4 6 56 61 91<br />

5 12 1 89 89<br />

6 25 0<br />

7 35 1 97 97<br />

8 (Organic) 1 2<br />

9 (Organic) 1 56<br />

10 (no QoIs or<br />

DMIs)<br />

17 1 0 38<br />

z<br />

blank indicates bioassay not conducted at that site on that date.<br />

(Flint or Pristine) and a DMI (Nova or Procure) were not as effective as<br />

applying Quintec weekly even when Quintec was in two of the six<br />

applications (Table 2). When efficacy of products as well as programs<br />

was examined in 2005, the DMIs were more effective than Pristine,<br />

which was equal in efficacy to Endura (FRAC Group 7), which<br />

contains the second active ingredient in Pristine. <strong>The</strong>refore, strains<br />

moderately insensitive to DMIs are controlled by Nova and Procure,<br />

and QoIs no longer appear to be effective due to resistance.<br />

As a result of QoI and DMI resistance, the cost of controlling<br />

powdery mildew plus other foliar diseases with fungicides has doubled<br />

due to the need to apply DMIs at a high rate, to include a protectant<br />

fungicide with each application, and to include additional fungicides in<br />

the control program. QoIs have broader spectrum activity than other<br />

mobile fungicides effective for powdery mildew.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 479


Table 2. Control of powdery mildew achieved on upper and lower leaf<br />

surfaces of pumpkin with fungicide programs evaluated in replicated<br />

experiments conducted in 2003 to 2005. Control based on AUDPC<br />

values relative to nontreated control.<br />

Powdery mildew control (%)<br />

Year Treatment (week of application) Upper Lower<br />

2003 Flint (1,3,5) alternated with sulfur (2,4) 63 c 25 b<br />

2003 Flint + sulfur (1,3,5), Nova + sulfur (2,4) 91 e 59 de<br />

2003 Flint + sulfur (1,3,5), Procure + sulfur (2,4) 93 e 56 de<br />

2003 Flint + S + Nova (1,3,5), Procure + S (2,4) 92 e 68 e<br />

2003 Flint + S (1), Procure + S (2), S (3–5) 85 de 44 cd<br />

2003 Flint + S (1), Procure + S (2) 33 b 37 bc<br />

2003 Quintec (1–5) 93 e 86 f<br />

2004 Pristine + sulfur (1,3,5), Nova + S (2,4), S (6) 95 cd 87 cd<br />

2004 Pristine + sulfur (1), Quintec + S (2), Nova +<br />

S (3), Quintec + S (4), Pristine + S (5), S (6)<br />

97 cd 92 d<br />

2004 Procure + sulfur (1,3,5), Flint + S (2,4), S (6) 92 c 83 c<br />

2004 Procure + sulfur (1), Quintec + S (2), Procure<br />

+ S (3), Quintec + S (4), Procure + S (5), S(6)<br />

97 cd 88 cd<br />

2004 Procure + sulfur (1), Quintec + S (2), Quintec<br />

+ S (3), Procure + S (4), Procure + S (5), S (6)<br />

95 cd 98 e<br />

2004 Quintec (1–6) 99 d 98 e<br />

2005 Bravo Ultrex(1–5) 91 bcde 44 b<br />

2005 Pristine (1–5) 94 cde 46 b<br />

2005 Endura (1–5) 87 bcd 56 bc<br />

2005 Nova (1–5) 91 bcde 82 ef<br />

2005 Procure 50WS (1–5) 98 e 93 f<br />

2005 Procure 480SC (1–5) 96 cde 76 def<br />

2005 Procure 480SC (1,3,5), Quintec (2,4) 91 bcde 88 ef<br />

2005 Procure 480SC (1,3,5), Pristine (2,4) 89 bcde 75 cdef<br />

2005 Nova (1,4,5), Pristine (2,4) 78 b 60 bcd<br />

2005 Pristine (1), Quintec (2), Nova (3),<br />

Pristine(4), Quintec (5), S (1–5)<br />

97 de 71 cde<br />

2005 Quintec (1), Pristine (2), Quintec (3), Nova<br />

(4), Pristine (5), S(1–5)<br />

96 cde 74 cdef<br />

2005 Quintec (1), Pristine (2), Quintec (3), Nova<br />

(4), Quintec (5), S (2X premildew,1–5)<br />

98 e 87 ef<br />

S = sulfur. Treatments in year with a letter in common are not significantly different.<br />

480 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 3. Proportion of cucurbit powdery mildew fungal population<br />

estimated to be moderately insensitive to DMI fungicides and<br />

proportion resistant to QoI or MBC fungicides based on results from a<br />

fungicide-sensitivity seedling bioassay in 2004.<br />

Resistant isolates (%) on July 29, 2004<br />

QoI +<br />

Site Crop QoI DMI DMI MBC<br />

1 Pumpkin<br />

Summer<br />

39 20 1 36<br />

2 squash<br />

91 57 59 91<br />

2 Pumpkin<br />

Summer<br />

56 26 34 84<br />

3 squash<br />

Summer<br />

88 78 64 75<br />

4 squash<br />

87 84 53 90<br />

5 Pumpkin 66 15 24 73<br />

6 Pumpkin 32 31 50 31<br />

Literature Cited<br />

McGrath, M. T. 1996. Increased resistance to triadimefon and to benomyl in<br />

Sphaerotheca fuliginea populations following fungicide usage over one season.<br />

Plant Dis. 80:633–639.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2001. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew:<br />

experiences and challenges. Plant Dis. 85(3):236–245.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2004a. Evaluation of fungicide programs for managing powdery<br />

mildew of pumpkin, 2003. Fungicide & Nematicide Tests. 59:V056.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2004b. Seasonal dynamics of resistance to QoI and DMI fungicides<br />

in Podosphaera xanthii and impact on control of cucurbit powdery mildew. Res.<br />

Pest Mgmt. 13(2).<br />

.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2005a. Evaluation of fungicide programs for managing pathogen<br />

resistance and powdery mildew of pumpkin, 2004. Fungicide & Nematicide<br />

Tests. 60:V049.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2005b. Occurrence of resistance to QoI, DMI, and MBC fungicides<br />

in Podosphaera xanthii in 2004 and implication for controlling cucurbit<br />

powdery mildew. Res. Pest Mgmt. 14(2).<br />

.<br />

McGrath, M. T. and Davey, J. F. 2006. Evaluation of fungicide programs for<br />

managing powdery mildew of pumpkin, 2005. Fungicide & Nematicide Tests.<br />

61:V038<br />

McGrath, M. T. and Shishkoff, N. 2003a. Evaluation of fungicide programs for<br />

managing powdery mildew of pumpkin, 2002. Fungicide & Nematicide Tests.<br />

58:V023.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 481


McGrath, M. T. and Shishkoff, N. 2003b. First report of the cucurbit powdery<br />

mildew fungus (Podosphaera xanthii) resistant to strobilurin fungicides in the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s. Plant Dis. 87:1007.<br />

McGrath, M. T. and Shishkoff, N. 2003c. Resistance to strobilurin fungicides in<br />

Podosphaera xanthii associated with reduced control of cucurbit powdery<br />

mildew in research fields in the Eastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Res. Pest Mgmt. 12(2).<br />

.<br />

McGrath, M. T, Staniszewska, H., Shishkoff, N., and Casella, G. 1996. Fungicide<br />

sensitivity of Sphaerotheca fuliginea populations in the United <strong>State</strong>s. Plant<br />

Dis. 80:697–703.<br />

482 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


FRUIT YIELD, QUALITY PARAMETERS, AND<br />

POWDERY MILDEW (SPHAEROTHECA<br />

FULIGINEA) SUSCEPTIBILITY OF<br />

SPECIALTY MELON (CUCUMIS MELO L.)<br />

CULTIVARS GROWN IN A PASSIVELY<br />

VENTILATED GREENHOUSE<br />

J. M. Mitchell, D. J. Cantliffe, and S. A. Sargent<br />

University of Florida, IFAS, Horticultural Sciences Dept., Gainesville,<br />

FL 32611<br />

L. E. Datnoff<br />

University of Florida, IFAS, Plant Pathology Dept., Gainesville, FL<br />

32611<br />

P. J. Stoffella<br />

University of Florida, IFAS, Horticultural Sciences Dept., Indian<br />

River Research and Education Center, Ft. Pierce, FL 34945<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Galia, muskmelon, protected agriculture, disease<br />

progress curves<br />

ABSTRACT. Like other cucurbits, many specialty melons (Cucumis melo L.) are<br />

susceptible to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Although greenhouse<br />

production decreases the risk for some diseases, greenhouses provide an optimal<br />

environment for the development of powdery mildew. Eighteen specialty melon<br />

cultivars were grown during fall 2005 in a passively ventilated greenhouse in<br />

Citra, FL, and rated for their fruit yield, fruit-quality characteristics, and<br />

susceptibility to powdery mildew. Disease-severity ratings (DSR) based on the<br />

percentage of leaf area infected were taken once per week from 47 days after<br />

transplanting (DAT) until the final harvest. Plants were sprayed with potassium<br />

bicarbonate (Milstop) once per week, beginning at first sign of disease (after the<br />

first rating), to suppress mildew infection. Area under disease progress curve<br />

(AUDPC) values were calculated from the weekly DSR ratings. Yield as number<br />

of fruit per plant was similar for all cultivars. Although three cultivars with<br />

100% DSR had among the lowest yields, powdery mildew severity could not be<br />

correlated with yield or fruit quality for any of the cultivars. <strong>The</strong> Charentaistype<br />

cultivars were the most susceptible to powdery mildew and had the lowest<br />

yields; two Galia-type cultivars had favorable yields and quality and were less<br />

susceptible to powdery mildew.<br />

S<br />

pecialty melons have been gaining in popularity throughout the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s (Jett, 2005a; Rangarajan and Ingall, 2003;<br />

Schultheis and Jester. 2004; Shaw et al., 2001; Simon et al.,<br />

1993; Smith and Bartolo, 2005). <strong>The</strong>se melons are extremely<br />

attractive and come with diverse tastes, colors and aromas (Simon et<br />

al., 1993). A few of these melons include the yellow-netted, green-<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 483


fleshed, highly aromatic and sweet ‘Galia’ (Cucumis melo L. var.<br />

reticulatus Ser.)—a favorite throughout the Mediterranean and Europe<br />

with prices averaging $2 to $4 each (Karchi, 2000; Rodriguez et al.,<br />

2002). A French favorite is the ‘Charentais’ (Cucumis melo L. var.<br />

cantalupenis Naud.), which has a smooth exterior with green sutures, a<br />

bright orange flesh, and a rich honey flavor and aroma (Goldman,<br />

2002; Rangarajan and Ingall, 2003). Another distinct type, named for<br />

both its bright yellow exterior and the island where it first became<br />

popular, Canary (Cucumis melo L. var. inodorus Naud.) has a smooth,<br />

and a sugary, white flesh (Goldman, 2002; Anon., 2004). <strong>The</strong>se<br />

melons are an ideal high-value crop for protected culture (Cantliffe et.<br />

al., 2003).<br />

Unfortunately, the high temperatures (25–35°C), high humidity<br />

(90%), and dense plant growth of a greenhouse melon crop provide the<br />

optimum conditions for powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea)<br />

disease development (Elad et. al., 1996; Jett, 2005b; Pottorff, 2005).<br />

Sphaerotheca fuliginea is the most common and aggressive powdery<br />

mildew fungus of cucurbits (McGrath, 1997). It is easily recognized<br />

by its white or gray talcum powder-like spots or patches (Pottorff,<br />

2005). Powdery mildew can be a devastating disease because a severe<br />

epidemic can reduce photosynthesis, increase respiration and<br />

transpiration, impair vegetative and fruit growth, and ultimately reduce<br />

yields (Agrios, 2005). Because of this potential for yield reduction,<br />

even in a protected environment, information on how powdery mildew<br />

affects specialty melons’ fruit yield and quality parameters in a<br />

greenhouse environment would be useful to growers and plant<br />

breeders. For this study, 18 different cultivars were grown in a<br />

passively ventilated greenhouse to ascertain any relationships between<br />

the incidence of powdery mildew and melon fruit yields and quality.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Seeds of 18 melon cultivars (Table 1) were sown in polystyrene<br />

trays (Model 128A, Speedling, Bushnell, FL) on 22 July 2005. <strong>The</strong><br />

growing medium used was a commercial fine-grade mixture (Premier<br />

ProMix FPX, Quakertown, PA). Seedlings were grown at the<br />

University of Florida, Gainesville campus in a growth chamber<br />

(Controlled Env. Ltd., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) at temperatures<br />

of 28 ° C (day) and 22 ° C (night) with 12-hour daily artificial lighting.<br />

When cotyledons were fully expanded, seedlings were fertilized once<br />

per week with a solution of 100ppm each of 20N: 20P: 20K (Peters<br />

Professional All Purpose Plant Food, Spectrum Group, St. Louis, MO).<br />

484 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Specialty melon (Cucumis melo) cultivars, fall 2005.<br />

Diseasetolerance<br />

Cultivar Type<br />

listing z Seed source y<br />

Kamila x<br />

Galia N.R. Outstanding Seed<br />

Co.<br />

Gallicum Galia PM1,2 Seigers Seed Co.<br />

(Seminis variety)<br />

Gala Galia PM2 D. Palmer Seed Co.<br />

GVS 125 Galia N.R. Golden Valley Seed<br />

GVS 205 Galia N.R. Golden Valley Seed<br />

GVS 206 Galia N.R. Golden Valley Seed<br />

Melon 96-Nestor Galia PM Hazera Genetics<br />

Melon 6003-<br />

Elario<br />

Galia PM Hazera Genetics<br />

Melon 6004 Galia N.R. Hazera Genetics<br />

Angel Mediterranean N.R. Known-You Seed<br />

Amy Canary/<br />

Mediterranean<br />

N.R. Known-You Seed<br />

Galia F1 (H) Galia N.T. Hazera Genetics<br />

Vedrantais Charantais N.R. Technisem<br />

Vicar Galia PM1 Rogers/Syngenta<br />

Galileo Galia PM1 Rogers/Syngenta<br />

z<br />

Disease tolerance to powdery mildew (S. fuliginea) as listed by suppliers: PM1,2 =<br />

tolerance to race 1 or 2; N.R.= not reported; N.T.= no tolerance.<br />

y<br />

Seeds were kindly donated by these suppliers.<br />

x<br />

‘Kamila’ was advertised as a ‘Galia-type’, but it was found to be a Japanese-type.<br />

Seedlings were transplanted on 18 August 2005 when they had<br />

three true leaves in a passively ventilated, high-roof, sawtooth<br />

greenhouse (TOP greenhouses, Ltd., Barkan, Israel) located at the UF<br />

Plant Science Research Education Unit, Citra, FL. Commercial<br />

greenhouse production techniques and nutrient requirements for<br />

producing ‘Galia’ melons hydroponically were used according to<br />

guidelines of Shaw et al. (2001). Plants were pollinated by bumble<br />

bees (Bombus impatiens, Natupol, Koppert Biological Systems, Inc.,<br />

Romulus, MI).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 485


Table 2. Final AUDPC and disease severity ratings for specialty<br />

melon (Cucumis melo) cultivars, fall 2005.<br />

Cultivar<br />

AUDPC z<br />

Disease-severity<br />

rating y (%)<br />

Vedrantais 3182 x 100<br />

Charantais 2910 100<br />

Gala 2262 100<br />

Kamila 1173 80<br />

Galia (T) 1143 83<br />

Amy 1116 78<br />

GVS 206 970 55<br />

GVS 125 794 48<br />

GVS 205 786 54<br />

Gallicum 594 50<br />

Galia (H) 534 49<br />

Angel 478 53<br />

Girlie 444 42<br />

Vicar 431 38<br />

Melon 6004 236 28<br />

Melon 6003-Elario 127 14<br />

Galileo 87 15<br />

Melon 96-Nestor 42 3<br />

LSD (0.05) 516* 9*<br />

z<br />

AUDPC = area under disease progress curve.<br />

y<br />

Disease severity ratings (0–100%) were the mean of three leaves per plant and<br />

recorded as percent leaf area infected.<br />

x<br />

Means separated using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (P


Systems, Inc., Romulus, MI) were released on 8 Sept. 2005.<br />

Neoseiulus californicus (Biotactics Inc., Perris, CA) predatory mites<br />

were used to control the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae).<br />

N. californicus (3000) were released on 8 Sept., 6,000 on 28 Sept., and<br />

10,000 on 5 Oct. 2005. Erotmocerus eremicus (ERCAL, Koppert<br />

Biological Systems, Inc., Romulus, MI) were released to control<br />

whitefly (Bemisia tabaci biotype B). E. eremicus (500) were released<br />

on 8 Sept. and 7,000 on 5 Oct. 2005. Orius insidiosus (THRIPOR-I,<br />

Koppert Biological Systems, Inc., Romulus, MI), a predatory bug for<br />

control of flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), were released on<br />

8 Sept. (500 O. insidiosus) and again on 5 Oct. 2005.<br />

Disease ratings were recorded at first sign of disease symptoms.<br />

Ratings were taken on each of the five plants per plot. Plants were<br />

divided into three sections—lower, middle and upper—and ratings<br />

were taken as a percentage of leaf area infected per one sample leaf<br />

per section once per week until the end of the crop production (seven<br />

ratings total). Mean of three sample leaves represents the disease<br />

severity rating (DSR). In order to keep the crop alive, plants were<br />

sprayed with potassium bicarbonate (Milstop, BioWorks Inc., Fairport,<br />

NY), a foliar fungicide that suppresses powdery mildew, once a week<br />

directly after the ratings. No other chemical fungicides were used.<br />

Final area under disease progress curves (AUDPC) were generated by<br />

the method of Shaner and Finney (1967) from the weekly DSR.<br />

AUDPC indicates the total amount of disease that occurred throughout<br />

the crop production period whereas DSR reflects the amount of disease<br />

present at a given time interval only.<br />

Fruits were harvested at full-slip stage. First harvest began on 17<br />

Oct. 2005 and ended on 21 Nov. 2005. Harvest data collected<br />

included mean number of fruit per plant, weight, flesh thickness,<br />

soluble solids content (SSC), and firmness. All postharvest parameters<br />

were measured on the day of harvest.<br />

After fruits were weighed, a 2.5-cm slice was taken from the<br />

equatorial region of each fruit and flesh thickness, firmness, and<br />

soluble solids content measured. A caliper (Digimatic Mycal,<br />

Mitutoyo, Japan) was used to measure flesh thickness from peel to<br />

cavity. A firmness reading was taken at two equidistant points on the<br />

equatorial region of each fruit slice using an Instron Universal Testing<br />

Instrument (Model 4411-C8009, Canton, MA). <strong>The</strong> Instron was fitted<br />

with a 50-kg load cell and an 11-mm convex probe with a crosshead<br />

speed of 50mm/min. Firmness data were expressed as the maximum<br />

force (Newton) attained during deformation. Soluble solids content<br />

(°Brix) (SSC) was measured with a temperature-compensating,<br />

handheld refractometer (Model 10430, Reichert Scientific Instrument,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 487


Buffalo, NY) from three samples taken from the equatorial slice. <strong>The</strong><br />

means from five plants in each plot were subjected to an analysis of<br />

variance (ANOVA) by the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute,<br />

Version 9, Cary, NC). Cultivar means were subjected to Fisher’s least<br />

significant difference (LSD 0.05).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Powdery mildew was first observed 47 days after transplanting.<br />

After seven weeks of ratings, cultivars ‘Vedrantais’, ‘Charentais’ and<br />

‘Gala’ had the highest final AUDPC and the final DSR for each was<br />

100% (Table 2). Final DSR was over 50% for ‘Angel,’ ‘GVS-205,’<br />

‘GVS-206,’ ‘Amy,’ ‘Kamila’, and ‘Galia (T)’; and from 25 to 50% for<br />

‘Melon 6004,’ ‘Vicar,’ ‘Girlie’ ‘GVS-125’, ‘Gallicum’, and ‘Galia<br />

(H).’ Cultivars ‘Galileo’ and ‘Elario’ had a final DSR of less than 20%<br />

and ‘Nestor’ was the lowest with 3%. Cultivars ‘Charentais’ and<br />

‘Vedrantais’ are Charentais-type melons, which are highly susceptible<br />

to powdery mildew (Jett, 2005a) and were at 100% DSR by Week 6.<br />

‘Gala’ is a Galia-type that is also highly susceptible to powdery<br />

mildew. Also interesting was the difference between the two true<br />

‘Galia’ cultivars, ‘Galia (Hazera)’ and ‘Galia (Technisem).’ ‘Galia<br />

(H)’ had a final DSR rating 49%, which was significantly lower than<br />

‘Galia (T)’—83%. Also, soluble solids content (°Brix) was higher for<br />

‘Galia (H)’ (11.5°Brix) than ‘Galia (T)’ (9.6°Brix); and ‘Galia (H)’<br />

was a firmer fruit (18N) than ‘Galia (T)’ (8N) (Table 3), yet yields<br />

were the same. Thus, although fruit quality was potentially reduced by<br />

powdery mildew in this case, yields were not. <strong>The</strong> AUDPC was lower<br />

for ‘Galia (H)’ than ‘Galia (T)’, which may have helped contribute to<br />

the better fruit quality of ‘Galia (H).’<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of marketable fruit per plant was similar among all<br />

cultivars. Each cultivar averaged only one to two fruit (data not<br />

shown). Fruit numbers per plant were low due to poor bumble bee<br />

activity. Previous greenhouse melon cultivar trials averaged 2.2 to 3.6<br />

fruits per plant (Shaw et. al., 2001). Mean fruit weight per plant was<br />

different among cultivars. Average individual fruit weight ranged<br />

from 0.7kg (‘Charentais’) to 1.9kg (‘Girlie’) (Table 3). Several<br />

cultivars, ‘Angel,’ ‘Vedrantais,’ ‘GVS 206,’ ‘Nestor,’ ‘Gala’, and<br />

‘Charantais’, had significantly lower yields (less than 40, 000kg · ha -1 )<br />

than ‘Galileo,’ ‘Elario,’ ‘Kamila’ and ‘Girlie’ (more than 70,000 kg ·<br />

ha -1 ); however, the final DSR varied from 100 to 3% on the lowest<br />

yielding cultivars. Soluble solids content also seemed to have no<br />

relationship to DSR or yield since ‘Gala’ had a final DSR of 100 and<br />

488 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 3. Marketable yields and fruit quality of screened specialty<br />

melons (Cucumis melo), fall 2005.<br />

Fruit Fruit<br />

weight number<br />

per per Fruit<br />

plant square yield<br />

Cultivar (kg) meter (kg · ha -1 Flesh Fruit Soluble<br />

thickness firmness solids<br />

) (mm) (N) (°Brix)<br />

Vedrantais 0.9 Z 4.1 34,063 27 2 8.5<br />

Charentais 0.7 5.6 39,644 24 12 11.0<br />

Gala 1.5 2.5 39,158 35 17 11.8<br />

Kamila 1.5 5.2 76,272 35 31 15.0<br />

Galia (T) 1.6 3.5 55,526 32 8 9.6<br />

Amy 1.1 4.1 45,646 28 12 14.3<br />

GVS 206 1.4 2.6 36,396 33 24 9.4<br />

GVS 125 1.1 4.0 45,139 31 22 10.3<br />

GVS 205 1.4 3.9 53,674 34 17 9.6<br />

Gallicum 1.3 5.2 65,163 33 13 10.1<br />

Galia (H) 1.3 3.8 50,456 33 18 11.7<br />

Angel 1.1 2.9 30,851 30 12 16.3<br />

Girlie 1.9 3.9 72,609 34 16 11.5<br />

Vicar<br />

Melon<br />

1.2 4.8 59,990 33 30 11.7<br />

6004<br />

Melon<br />

6003-<br />

1.7 3.7 64,576 38 20 8.9<br />

Elario 1.7 4.6 76,917 41 20 8.8<br />

Galileo<br />

Melon 96-<br />

1.5 5.5 81,499 36 32 12.4<br />

Nestor 1.1 3.6 38,940 32 23 10.3<br />

z<br />

LSD (0.05) 0.3* 2.0 28,615* 4* 7* 1.3*<br />

Z<br />

Means separated using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (P


SSC were ‘Angel’ (16.3°Brix) and ‘Kamila’ (15°Brix), which also had<br />

a DSR >50% but still maintained Brix. However, the lowest SSC was<br />

found for ‘Vedrantais’ (8.4°Brix, 100 DSR), ‘Elario’ (8.8°Brix, 14<br />

DSR), and ‘Melon 6004’ (8.9°Brix, 28 DSR). Charentais melons may<br />

reach 14 to 16°Brix (Rangarajan and Ingall, 2003), whereas in<br />

this study they were below this at 8.4°Brix (‘Vedrantais’) and<br />

11.0°Brix (‘Charentais’).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Charentais-type cultivars in this trial (‘Charentais’ and<br />

‘Vedrantais’) were the most susceptible to powdery mildew (final<br />

DSR=100%), had the lowest yields and smallest fruit size, and are not<br />

recommended for greenhouse production. <strong>The</strong> Canary and<br />

Mediterranean types had less flavor and quality than the Galia-type<br />

melons. <strong>The</strong> cultivar ‘Kamila’ also had a high SSC and was<br />

advertised as a Galia-type; however, it did not slip, netting and flesh<br />

were not similar to ‘Galia’, and it had little flavor. Of the Galia-type<br />

cultivars, ‘Galileo’ and ‘Vicar’ had high yields, SSC and fruit quality<br />

that were considered good, and were less susceptible to powdery<br />

mildew.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Agrios, G. 2005. Plant pathology. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA.<br />

Anon. 2004. Melon F1 ‘Amy’ vegetable award winner. Colorado <strong>State</strong> Cooperatve<br />

Extension. 20 April, 2006. .<br />

Cantliffe, D. J., N. Shaw, and E. Jovicich. 2003. New vegetable crops for<br />

greenhouses in the Southeastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Acta Hort. 626:483–485.<br />

Elad, Y., N. Malathrakis, and A. Dik. 1996. Biological control of Botrytis-incited<br />

diseases and powdery mildews in greenhouse crops. Crop Protection.<br />

15(3):229–240.<br />

Goldman, A. 2002. Melons for the passionate grower. Workman, New York.<br />

Jett, L. 2005a. High tunnel cantaloupe and specialty melon cultivar evaluation. 10<br />

April, 2006. .<br />

Jett, L. 2005b. High tunnel melon and watermelon production. 10 April, 2006.<br />

.<br />

Karchi, Z. 2000. Development of melon culture and breeding in Israel. Acta Hort<br />

510:13–17.<br />

McGrath, M. 1997. Powdery mildew of cucurbits. Fact Sheet Page: 732.30 Date: 2-<br />

1997. Cooperative Extension, New York <strong>State</strong>, Cornell Univ. 17 Nov., 2005.<br />

.<br />

Pottorff, L. 2005. Powdery mildews. Colorado <strong>State</strong> University Cooperative<br />

Extension, Jefferson County, no. 2.902. 16 Nov.,<br />

2005..<br />

Rangarajan, A. and B. Ingall. 2003. Charentais melons 2003. 11 April, 2006.<br />

.<br />

490 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Rodriguez, J., N. Shaw, and D. Cantliffe. 2002. Production of Galia-type muskmelon<br />

using a passive ventilated greenhouse and soilless culture, p. 365–372.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Schultheis, J. and B. Jester. 2004. Screening and advancing new specialty melons<br />

for market potential. 10 April, 2006.<br />

.<br />

Shaner, G. and R. Finney. 1967. <strong>The</strong> effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression<br />

of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology. 67:1051–1056.<br />

Shaw, N. and D.J. Cantliffe. 2003. Hydroponically produced mini-cucumber with<br />

improved powdery mildew resistance. Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 116:58–62.<br />

Shaw, N., D. J. Cantliffe, and B. S. Taylor. 2001. Hydroponically produced 'Galia’<br />

muskmelon—what’s the secret? Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 114:288–293.<br />

Simon, J. E., M. R. Morales, and D. J. Charles. 1993. Specialty melons for the fresh<br />

market, p. 547–553. In: J. Janick and J. E. Simon (eds.), New crops. Wiley, New<br />

York.<br />

Smith, G. and M. Bartolo. 2005. Exotic and specialty melons for the Rocky Ford<br />

area. 10 April, 2006. .<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 491


INTEGRATION OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL<br />

AND PLASTIC MULCHES TO MANAGE<br />

WATERMELON MOSAIC VIRUS IN SQUASH<br />

John F. Murphy and Micky D. Eubanks<br />

Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL<br />

36849<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Plant virus, WMV, vegetable, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo,<br />

PGPR<br />

ABSTRACT. A study was undertaken to evaluate the combined effects of<br />

reflective plastic mulch and a commercially available biological control<br />

treatment to reduce the incidence and resulting disease-related yield losses<br />

caused by an aphid-borne plant virus in squash. Squash plants grown on silveron-black<br />

mulch did not have reduced incidence of Watermelon mosaic virus<br />

(WMV) relative to plants grown on black mulch. In contrast, squash plants<br />

grown on a highly reflective silver mulch had significantly less WMV incidence<br />

relative to those grown on silver-on-black and black mulches. <strong>The</strong> silver-onblack<br />

mulch treatment led to greater squash fruit yields relative to the other<br />

mulch treatments. <strong>The</strong> biological control treatment, BioYield TM , did not reduce<br />

virus incidence or result in increased fruit yields relative to nontreated control<br />

plants.<br />

P<br />

lant viruses are difficult to manage when resistant varieties are<br />

not available. <strong>The</strong> application of management strategies<br />

becomes more complicated and typically less effective when the<br />

viruses of concern are transmitted by aphids in a nonpersistent manner.<br />

This manner of transmission leads to very rapid acquisition of virus<br />

from infected plants and transmission to healthy plants. This rapid<br />

transmission process essentially eliminates the effectiveness of<br />

insecticides as a means to manage virus by way of its vector.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong> crops are vulnerable to infection by several viruses in the<br />

genus Potyvirus, the most frequent being: Papaya ringspot virus<br />

(PRSV), Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), and Zucchini yellow<br />

mosaic virus (ZYMV). Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV, genus<br />

Cucumovirus) also poses a serious threat to cucurbit crops since it too<br />

is transmitted by aphids in a nonpersistent manner (Zitter et al., 1996).<br />

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been used in<br />

previous studies to induce resistance in cucumber plants against CMV<br />

(Raupach et al., 1996) and in tomato plants against CMV and Tomato<br />

mottle virus (genus Begomovirus) (Murphy et al., 2003; Murphy et al.,<br />

2000). In cucumber and particularly in tomato, the PGPR treatment<br />

resulted in an enhancement of plant growth. Protection against CMV<br />

492 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


infection was observed in the form of a <strong>complete</strong> lack of symptoms or<br />

mild symptoms with reduced virus accumulation in systemically<br />

infected leaves, or interference in systemic infection.<br />

Although protection against virus infection occurred in response to<br />

treatment with PGPR, it varied in level of protection under greenhouse<br />

conditions and even more so in the field. In the project described in<br />

this report, efforts were made to integrate a commercially available<br />

PGPR product with different types of plastic mulch in an effort to<br />

reduce the incidence of aphid-borne plant viruses in squash.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Two field trials were performed in 2005 at the E.V. Smith<br />

Agricultural Research and Education Center, Shorter, AL.: one trial in<br />

the spring (referred to as Spring trial) and the second trial in the fall<br />

(referred to as Fall trial).<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective was to evaluate silver-based reflective versus<br />

nonreflective plastic mulch in conjunction with the biological control<br />

treatment BioYield TM . <strong>The</strong> field design was a split-plot with mulch as<br />

the whole-plot treatment and plant treatment (i.e., BioYield TM and<br />

nontreated control) as the subplot treatment. For the Spring trial, two<br />

mulch treatments were used: black, nonreflective mulch and silver-onblack<br />

reflective mulch. For the Fall trial, three mulch treatments were<br />

used: black, nonreflective mulch, silver-on-black reflective mulch,<br />

and a highly reflective silver mulch.<br />

Within each mulch treatment, a BioYield TM and a nontreated<br />

control treatment were arranged in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block with<br />

four replications consisting of 12 plants in each. BioYield TM was a<br />

commercial product marketed by Gustafson, Inc. and consisted of two<br />

PGPR strains, GB03 and IN937a, Bacillis subtilis and B.<br />

amolyliquefaciens, respectively, and the carrier chitosan. Each PGPR<br />

strain was formulated as endospores at 4.0 x 10 10 colony-forming units<br />

(CFU)/liter. BioYield TM was mixed with soil-less growth medium<br />

(Speedling Inc., Busnell, FL) at a ratio of 1:40 (v/v) to achieve a<br />

bacterial density of 10 9 CFU/litre medium. <strong>The</strong> medium was placed<br />

into Styrofoam trays (Speedling Inc.,) containing 72 cavities per tray.<br />

To produce transplants, squash seeds (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L cv<br />

‘Dixie’) were individually placed into each cavity, and given 2–3<br />

weeks to germinate and grow in a temperature-controlled greenhouse<br />

at the Auburn University Plant Science Research Complex, Auburn,<br />

AL. At the time of transplant, seedlings were transported to the<br />

appropriate field location and planted 30cm apart on raised beds (20cm<br />

high by 84cm wide). Prior to bed preparation, P205 fertilizer was<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 493


applied as a broadcast at 2.5Kg per 30.5m of row. All beds were<br />

fumigated with methyl bromide (335Kg/ha of 67% methyl bromide +<br />

33% chloropicrin) before being covered with polyethylene plastic tarp<br />

(mulch). After bedding, 15-0-30 fertilizer was banded onto the bed<br />

shoulders at 9.5Kg per 30.5m of row.<br />

Disease evaluations included visual and serological assessments.<br />

Plants in each treatment were monitored routinely for virus symptoms<br />

such as mosaic patterns on leaves and leaf deformation. Foliar tissues<br />

were collected from each plant at the midway point to harvest (Spring<br />

trial) and once fruit harvest was underway (Spring and Fall trials).<br />

Each sample was wrapped in a dampened paper towel, placed in a ziplock<br />

bag and transported to Auburn University for analysis. Virus was<br />

detected using Agdia, Inc. (Elkhart, IN) enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits specific to CMV, PRSV, WMV, or<br />

ZYMV and performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.<br />

Squash fruit was harvested and graded as marketable and total<br />

(marketable and nonmarketable), and each grade measured by number<br />

and weight of fruit.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data were analyzed with analysis of variance (SAS, Cary, NC)<br />

and for significant ANOVA’s treatment means separated using LSD<br />

mean separation tests. Significant interactions were tested at P = 0.05.<br />

Results<br />

SPRING TRIAL. Two viruses were detected among infected squash<br />

plants in the Spring trial, CMV and WMV, with CMV incidence being<br />

very low (~2.5%) but with high incidence of WMV (~66%). <strong>The</strong> low<br />

incidence of CMV made analysis difficult and, therefore, data<br />

presentations will focus on WMV.<br />

For the Spring trial, there was no difference in the incidence of<br />

WMV infection among plants grown on black versus silver-on-black<br />

mulches (P < 0.05; although significantly less WMV occurred on<br />

silver-on-black mulch at P < 0.10). Similarly, no difference in WMV<br />

incidence occurred among squash plants treated with BioYield TM<br />

versus the nontreated control (P < 0.05) and no mulch x plant<br />

treatment interaction occurred.<br />

Squash marketable yields, both in number of fruit and weight, were<br />

significantly greater for plants grown on silver-on-black mulch than<br />

for plants grown on black mulch (P < 0.05). For both marketable fruit<br />

number and weight, there was no significant difference among plants<br />

treated with BioYield TM versus the nontreated controls. <strong>The</strong> same<br />

trend occurred for total fruit number, i.e., significantly more fruit for<br />

plants grown in silver-on-black mulch with no difference due to plant<br />

494 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


treatment; however, total fruit weight did not differ among mulch or<br />

plant treatments.<br />

FALL TRIAL. As observed in the Spring trial, CMV incidence was<br />

low with a high incidence of WMV. Significantly fewer squash plants<br />

grown on silver mulch were infected with WMV than on silver-onblack<br />

or black mulch (P < 0.05). No difference in WMV incidence<br />

was observed for plants treated with BioYield TM versus those in the<br />

nontreated control treatment.<br />

All parameters for squash yield, marketable number and weight,<br />

and total number and weight resulted in significantly greater yields for<br />

plants grown on silver-on-black mulch than the other mulches with no<br />

difference occurring for BioYield TM versus nontreated control plants.<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> goal of this research was to reduce aphid-borne plant virus<br />

incidence in squash and thereby reduce yield losses due to virus<br />

infection. <strong>The</strong> four viruses examined represent commonly occurring<br />

viruses that, due to their mode of transmission, are difficult to manage<br />

without availability of resistant varieties. WMV was the predominant<br />

virus in both trials with a low incidence of CMV and no PRSV or<br />

ZYMV detected.<br />

Two methods were used to reduce virus incidence: reflective<br />

plastic mulch and a commercially available PGPR treatment shown<br />

previously to enhance plant growth. <strong>The</strong> reflective mulch was<br />

intended to delay the introduction of virus into the crop by deterring<br />

aphids from flying onto the plants. <strong>The</strong> PGPR treatment was intended<br />

to induce systemic resistance to virus infection and enhance plant<br />

growth, the latter of which was expected to shorten the window of<br />

time when plants are small and more vulnerable to development of<br />

severe disease symptoms if infected by a plant virus during this early<br />

stage of growth.<br />

<strong>The</strong> use of silver-on-black plastic mulch did not reduce WMV<br />

incidence in either trial; however, silver mulch had significantly fewer<br />

WMV-infected plants than the two other mulch treatments in the Fall<br />

trial. Based on a simple visual assessment, the reflective properties of<br />

the silver mulch were far greater than those of the silver-on-black; the<br />

greater reflective property of the silver mulch may have deterred<br />

aphids from entering the crop, thereby leading to a reduction in WMV<br />

incidence. Yet there is a possibility that the effect on plant growth<br />

from silver-on-black is not only better than that of silver but that the<br />

highly reflective nature of the silver mulch has a negative effect. This<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 495


could be important since it might offset the positive effects of reduced<br />

virus incidence.<br />

Silver reflective mulch, also referred to as UV-reflective mulch,<br />

has been shown to reduce insect densities on plants and/or virus<br />

incidence relative to other mulches (Diaz-Perez et al., 2003;<br />

Loebenstein et al., 1975; Momol et al., 2004; Summers et al., 2004;<br />

Summers, et al., 1995; Wilson, 1999; Wyman et al., 1979). Silver<br />

mulches deterred aphids and delayed the introduction of aphid-borne<br />

viruses in spring- and fall-grown zucchini squash crops (Summers et<br />

al., 1995). <strong>The</strong>re was a corresponding effect on squash fruit yields<br />

with an approximately 70% greater yield for plants grown on silver<br />

mulch than those grown on nonmulched plots. Wyman et al. (1979)<br />

described a similar effect of reflective mulch on reducing aphid<br />

numbers on summer squash plants, with a corresponding reduction in<br />

the incidence of WMV.<br />

<strong>The</strong> BioYield TM treatment did not lead to any apparent increase in<br />

plant growth relative to plants in the nontreated control treatment, nor<br />

to any reduction in virus incidence. <strong>The</strong> lack of an increase in fruit<br />

yield for BioYield TM -treated squash plants further supports the<br />

observation that the PGPR treatment did not enhance plant growth and<br />

development. <strong>The</strong> treatment of tomato plants with BioYield TM led to<br />

significant enhancement of plant growth with significant reductions in<br />

CMV infection when tested in greenhouse conditions (Murphy et al.,<br />

2003). <strong>The</strong> tomato plants responded to inoculation with CMV in a<br />

similar manner to older, more mature plants, which suggested the<br />

protection afforded the BioYield TM -treated plants may have been a<br />

form of induced mature plant resistance rather than induced systemic<br />

resistance.<br />

Our hypothesis at the onset of this work was that the integration of<br />

the insect-deterring properties of the reflective mulch along with<br />

enhanced plant growth induced by the PGPR treatment would combine<br />

to have a highly significant effect on reduction of virus incidence and<br />

corresponding fruit yields. Silver-reflective mulch was effective at<br />

reducing WMV incidence; this was dependent on the reflective<br />

properties of the mulch, i.e., higher levels of reflectance are necessary<br />

for effective deterrence of aphid vectors.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no evidence that the BioYield TM treatment resulted in<br />

enhanced plant growth, development, or yield increase relative to the<br />

nontreated control. Likewise, there was no evidence of protection<br />

against virus infection, whether from induced systemic resistance or<br />

induced mature plant resistance, for plants treated with BioYield TM .<br />

Previous studies using PGPR-based treatments suggested that the<br />

protection afforded plants against infection by CMV did not occur<br />

496 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


when a virus in the genus Potyvirus was used as inoculum (e.g., J. F.<br />

Murphy, unpublished data). This may explain, in part, the lack of<br />

protection observed for BioYield TM -treated plants against the<br />

potyvirus, WMV. <strong>The</strong> possibility that a PGPR-based treatment may<br />

protect plants against CMV but not a virus in the genus Potyvirus is<br />

intriguing and should be pursued in future studies.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Diaz-Perez, J. C., K. D. Batal, D. Granberry, D. Bertrand, D. Giddings, and<br />

H. Pappu. 2003. Growth and yield of tomato on plastic film mulches as<br />

affected by tomato spotted wilt virus. HortSci. 38:395–399.<br />

Loebenstein, G., M. Alper, S. Levy, D. Palevitch, and E. Menagem. 1975.<br />

Protecting peppers from aphid-borne viruses with aluminum foil and<br />

plastic mulch. Phytoparasitica. 3:43–53.<br />

Momol, M. T., S. M. Olson, J. E. Funderburk, J. Stavisky, and J. J. Marois.<br />

2004. Integrated management of tomato spotted wilt on field-grown<br />

tomatoes. Plant Dis. 88:882–890.<br />

Murphy, J. F., G. W. Zehnder, D. J. Schuster, E. J. Sikora, J. E. Polston, and<br />

J. W. Kloepper. 2000. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated<br />

protection in tomato against Tomato mottle virus. Plant Dis. 84:779–<br />

784.<br />

Murphy, J. F., M. S. Reddy, C. M. Ryu, J. W. Kloepper, and R. Li. 2003.<br />

Rhizobacteria-mediated growth promotion of tomato leads to protection<br />

against Cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopathology. 93:1301–1307.<br />

Raupach, G. S., L. Liu, J. F. Murphy, S. Tuzun, and J.W. Kloepper. 1996.<br />

Induced systemic resistance against cucumber mosaic cucumovirus using<br />

plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Plant Dis. 80:891–894.<br />

Summers, C. G., J. J. Stapleton, A. S. Newton, R. A. Duncan, and D. Hart.<br />

1995. Comparison of sprayable and film mulches in delaying the onset of<br />

aphid-transmitted virus diseases in zucchini squash. Plant Dis. 79:1126–<br />

1131.<br />

Summers, C. G., J. P. Mitchell, and J. J. Stapleton. 2004. Management of<br />

aphid-borne viruses and Bemisia argentifolii (Homptera: Aleyrodidae) in<br />

zucchini squash by using UV reflective plastic and wheat straw mulches.<br />

Env. Entomol. 33:1447–1457.<br />

Wilson, C. R. 1999. <strong>The</strong> potential of reflective-mulching in combination with<br />

insecticide sprays for control of aphid-borne viruses of iris and tulip in<br />

Tasmania. Ann. Appl. Biol. 134:293–297.<br />

Wyman, J. A., N. C. Toscano, K. Kido, H. Johnson, and K. S. Mayberry.<br />

1979. Effects of mulching on spread of aphid-transmitted watermelon<br />

mosaic virus to summer squash. J. Econ. Entomol. 72:139–143.<br />

Zitter, T. A., D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Compendium of<br />

cucurbit diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 497


BACTERIAL LEAF SPOT (XANTHOMONAS<br />

CAMPESTRIS PV. CUCURBITAE) AS A<br />

FACTOR IN CUCURBIT PRODUCTION AND<br />

EVALUATION OF SEED TREATMENTS FOR<br />

CONTROL IN NATURALLY INFESTED SEEDS<br />

Zahide Özdemir<br />

Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />

Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, 09100, Turkey<br />

Thomas A. Zitter<br />

Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, pumpkin, kabutiá<br />

squash<br />

ABSTRACT. Pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo cv. New Rocket) seeds naturally infested<br />

with Xanthomonas campestris pv. cucurbitae, the pathogen responsible for<br />

bacterial leaf spot disease of winter squash, pumpkin, gourd, and cucumbers,<br />

were treated with four different chemicals to determine the most effective<br />

treatment to eliminate bacteria from the infested seeds. <strong>The</strong> seed treatments<br />

included 3% hydrogen peroxide, 1% peroxyacetic acid, 1% sodium<br />

hypochlorite, copper hydroxide plus mancozeb (0.36g + 0.27 g/100ml of water,<br />

respectively), and sterile distilled water as control. Seeds were treated in<br />

aqueous solutions of chemicals for 15 min. Treated seeds were washed in sterile<br />

cold saline solution and dilution platings were made onto XCS agar.<br />

Treatments with copper plus mancozeb, 1% peroxyacetic acid, and 1% sodium<br />

hypochlorite were effective in eliminating the pathogen on seed. Hydrogen<br />

peroxide was less effective, resulting in a 90–92% reduction in bacteria<br />

recovered from seed in the first experiment. In a second experiment, no<br />

bacteria were recovered following treatment.<br />

B<br />

acterial leaf spot of cucurbits, caused by the bacterium<br />

Xanthomonas campestris pv. cucurbitae (Xcc), was first<br />

described in New York on Hubbard squash (Bryan, 1926).<br />

<strong>The</strong> disease was subsequently reported on other winter squash,<br />

pumpkins, summer squash, cucumber, and gourds. Foliar symptoms<br />

are common on pumpkin and winter squash, and lesions on fruit can<br />

be severe enough to result in a total loss. <strong>The</strong> disease occurs<br />

sporadically, and literature on its epidemiology is currently limited<br />

(Zitter et al., 1996). Recently, bacterial leaf spot has been observed on<br />

pumpkins (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), causing reduced fruit quality in the U.S.<br />

(Latin, 1996; Zitter et al., 1996), and it continues to be an issue in crop<br />

production in several midwestern states. In Uruguay, the disease was<br />

observed in both 2005 and 2006 in kabutiá winter squash (C. moschata<br />

498 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


x C. maxima), and has spread into neighboring butternut squash (C.<br />

moschata) fields (T. A. Zitter, unpublished data). Since growers also<br />

use locally produced seed saved from two pollinator species (C.<br />

moschata and C. pepo), it is not known which seed may have<br />

introduced the pathogen and may be perpetuating the problem. <strong>The</strong><br />

pathogen appears to be short-lived in the soil (Bryan, 1930; Vincent-<br />

Sealy and Brathwaite, 1982) and infested seed is the primary source of<br />

inoculum (McLean, 1958; Moffett and Wood, 1979).<br />

Chemical seed treatments were evaluated by Moffett and Wood<br />

(1979) on winter squash (C. maxima cv. Queensland Blue) seeds<br />

collected from naturally Xcc-infected fruits. One percent sodium<br />

hypochlorite with 1% nonionic spreader sticker and hot-water<br />

treatment at 54˚C and 56˚C for 30 min reduced the incidence of the<br />

disease in the field, but the pathogen was not eliminated from the seed.<br />

Hydrochloric acid treatment (31.5% w/w) at 1:20 diluted concentration<br />

eradicated the pathogen from seed and no disease was observed in the<br />

field; however, seed germination was adversely affected. Treatment of<br />

cucumber seeds with 10% Clorox ® (sodium hypochlorite) for 1, 10, or<br />

15 min, with 1:1000 diluted mercuric chloride solution for 10 min, or<br />

with 400ppm streptomycin sulfate for 10 min, also reduced seed<br />

infection, but hot-water treatment at 55˚C for 25–30 min was not<br />

effective (Vincent-Sealy and Brathwaite, 1982).<br />

In this study, several chemical seed treatments were evaluated for<br />

the elimination of Xcc from naturally infested pumpkin seeds and their<br />

effects on seed germination were noted.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENTS. Chemical treatments tested were<br />

hydrogen peroxide (Fisher Scientific) at 3%; copper hydroxide<br />

(Kocide 101, Griffin LLC, Valdosta, GA) plus mancozeb (Dithane DF,<br />

Griffin LLC) at 0.36g + 0.27g, respectively, per 100ml of sterile<br />

distilled water; peroxyacetic acid at 1% (BioSide HS 5.2%, Enviro-<br />

Tech, Modesto, CA); and sodium hypochlorite at 1%. Sterile distilled<br />

water was used as control. <strong>The</strong> experiment was repeated twice.<br />

APPLICATION OF THE TREATMENTS. Approximately 500 seeds<br />

weighing 71.2g were used for each treatment. Seeds were added to<br />

500-ml sterile flasks with 200ml of the prepared chemical solutions.<br />

Seeds were shaken vigorously (250rpm) at room temperature (RT) for<br />

15 min. Treated seeds were drained and thoroughly rinsed with sterile<br />

distilled water. Seeds were placed in surface-sterilized plastic boxes<br />

containing sterile filter paper and incubated overnight at 4˚C.<br />

Incubated seeds were put in 200ml of 0.85% cold sterile saline<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 499


solution with one drop of Tween 20 in 500-ml sterile flasks for each<br />

treatment and were shaken vigorously (250rpm) for 3 hrs at RT.<br />

Dilutions of 10 -1 and 10 -2 of the slurry for each treatment were<br />

prepared in 0.85% sterile sodium chloride. From each sample, 50μl of<br />

the slurry was plated in duplicate for the undiluted solutions and<br />

dilutions onto Xanthomonas campestris semiselective medium (XCS)<br />

(Williford and Schaad, 1984). Plates were incubated at 27–29˚C and<br />

observed over 5–6 days for bacterial growth, and the number of<br />

colonies counted for each plate. Suspected colonies of Xcc were<br />

sampled for identification by plating onto yeast extract-dextrose-<br />

CaC03 medium (YDC), by Biolog carbohydrate utilization plates, and<br />

by pathogenicity testing. YDC (Wilson et al., 1967) is a nonselective<br />

medium for the genus Xanthomonas, and was used to identify<br />

suspected colonies from XCS medium.<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF SUSPECTED COLONIES ON YDC MEDIUM BY<br />

BIOLOG AND PATHOGENICITY TESTS. On XCS medium, suspected<br />

colonies of Xcc were distinguishable in 3–5 days. <strong>The</strong> colony<br />

morphology of Xcc was previously observed on XCS medium using<br />

Xcc LMG 690, type strain for this pathogen. All isolated colonies on<br />

YDC were additionally tested on Biolog GN2 carbohydrate utilization<br />

plates.<br />

Pathogenicity of the suspected Xcc colonies was confirmed on<br />

Blue Hubbard winter squash (C. maxima). Leaves of 5-week-old<br />

plants were infiltrated with bacteria using a sterile needleless syringe.<br />

Inoculum was prepared from 48-hr-old pure colonies grown on YDC<br />

medium. Inoculum was standardized at OD600=0.3<br />

spectrophotometrically. Xcc LMG 690 was used as the positive<br />

control, and both Pseudomonas fluorescens LMG 5849 and sterile<br />

water were used as negative controls. Two leaves were used for each<br />

isolate and controls. Inoculated plants were incubated for 24–48 hrs in<br />

a mist chamber for symptom development. Plants were later<br />

transferred to the greenhouse for disease development. Pathogenicity<br />

was determined by the expansion of necrotic lesions and appearance of<br />

greasy pinpoint spots as observed on the bottom surface of the leaves.<br />

EFFECTS OF SEED TREATMENTS ON GERMINATION. One hundred<br />

and ten seeds were counted out for each treatment and placed in 600ml<br />

sterile beakers. Seeds were covered with 50ml of the chemical<br />

solutions for each treatment and were soaked for 15 min at RT, with<br />

occasional mixing of the solutions. Soaked seeds were drained,<br />

thoroughly rinsed with sterile water, transferred to blotter papers, and<br />

covered with another layer of blotter paper. Germination was based on<br />

emergence of the radicle from the seed. Seeds were observed for 5–6<br />

500 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


days for maximal germination and the blotter paper was remoisturized<br />

as needed. <strong>The</strong> number of germinated seeds was counted for each<br />

treatment and the percentage of germination calculated. Germination<br />

assays were repeated three times.<br />

DATA ANALYSIS. Seed germination data were analyzed by twoway<br />

analysis of variance (ANOVA) model by using MINITAB (<strong>State</strong><br />

College, PA) statistical software.<br />

Results<br />

EVALUATION OF THE SEED TREATMENTS. Preliminary studies<br />

were performed for the detection of Xcc in order to confirm the<br />

presence of the bacteria on naturally infested seeds and to select the<br />

semiselective media for detection of the pathogen. <strong>The</strong> pathogen was<br />

detected only once out of five trials from the seed lot (ca. 10,000<br />

seeds) examined. <strong>The</strong> performance of YDC, semiselective media SX,<br />

and XCS, as recommended by STA Laboratories (personal<br />

communication, Longmont, CO), was evaluated. XCS medium<br />

provided a higher recovery rate of Xcc colonies than either YDC or SX<br />

media. When plating on XCS medium, a known strain of Xcc was<br />

used to facilitate the distinction of its colony morphology from that of<br />

saprophytes. On XCS, suspected colonies of Xcc were observed in 3–<br />

5 days. <strong>The</strong> suspected colonies were round, almost colorless, and<br />

translucent; they later became darker, shiny with smooth edges,<br />

domed, and yellow brown. Saprophytic bacterial growth was reduced<br />

on XCS medium as compared to growth on YDC medium. Detection<br />

of Xcc on SX medium was very difficult because many saprophytic<br />

bacteria covered the medium before the growth of the Xcc colonies<br />

began. Overall, recovery of the bacteria was low and it required 9<br />

days for growth of the suspected colonies.<br />

No bacteria were detected from the copper plus mancozeb,<br />

peroxyacetic acid, and sodium hypochlorite treatments in undiluted<br />

and diluted plates of XCS medium in either experiment (Table 1). In<br />

the first experiment, Xcc colonies were detected in the 3% hydrogen<br />

peroxide treatment. <strong>The</strong> number of colonies detected in this treatment<br />

was 8% of those found on the water control on 1:10 dilution colony<br />

counts (Table 1). Hydrogen peroxide reduced the number of bacteria<br />

by 90–92% of those found on the water control of undiluted and 1:10<br />

diluted colony counts, respectively. In the second experiment, the<br />

number of colonies detected in the water control was one-tenth of that<br />

found in the first experiment. No Xcc colonies were detected in seed<br />

that had been subjected to any of the chemical treatments. Saprophytic<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 501


colonies were not eliminated when the 3% hydrogen peroxide<br />

treatment was used.<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF SUSPECT COLONIES ON YDC BY BIOLOG AND<br />

PATHOGENICITY TESTS. In the first experiment, 15 suspect colonies<br />

plated on XCS medium were isolated to YDC medium. Six of these<br />

colonies were from hydrogen peroxide-treated seed and 9 were from<br />

water-control plates on XCS medium. In the second experiment, 16<br />

suspect colonies from water-control plates on XCS were transferred to<br />

YDC. All isolated colonies on YDC medium were identical in colony<br />

morphology to the positive control Xcc LMG 690. Colonies on YDC<br />

medium appeared within two days, were distinctive in colony<br />

morphology, and were shiny, yellow, and mucoid, with round, smooth<br />

edges. Biolog carbohydrate utilization profiles of the isolates<br />

were identified at the genus level as Xanthomonas, confirming the<br />

identity of the isolates identified on YDC.<br />

Pathogenicity of 21 isolated colonies from both experiments was<br />

tested on Blue Hubbard winter squash. All the isolates were<br />

pathogenic (data not shown). Xcc LMG 690 gave positive symptoms<br />

as described above.<br />

EFFECTS OF SEED TREATMENTS ON SEED GERMINATION. Data<br />

analysis showed no statistically significant differences among the<br />

treatments on seed germination as compared with the water control<br />

(data not shown). Germination rates were 92% to 98% for all<br />

treatments. Sodium hypochlorite-treated seeds tended to germinate<br />

more slowly than the others, but these differences were not apparent<br />

when the final readings were made. Peroxyacetic acid-treated seeds<br />

germinated faster than seeds from the other treatments; however, the<br />

treated seeds had a bleached appearance and weaker radicle<br />

development in two of the three assays. Copper hydroxide-plusmancozeb-treated<br />

seeds looked healthy, except for showing weak<br />

radicle growth in one of the assays. Hydrogen peroxide-treated seeds<br />

showed no adverse effects on germination.<br />

Discussion<br />

Elimination of Xcc from naturally infested pumpkin seeds by<br />

chemical seed treatments with copper hydroxide plus mancozeb,<br />

peroxyacetic acid, and sodium hypochlorite was successful as<br />

determined by dilution plating of seed washings. In this study,<br />

chemicals were applied in fixed concentrations and time. Pernezny et<br />

al. (2002) used different concentrations and application times of<br />

sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and copper hydroxide plus<br />

mancozeb, and included some other chemicals including the antibiotic<br />

502 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


streptomycin as chemical seed treatments on artificially inoculated<br />

lettuce seeds to control X. campestris pv. vitians, which causes<br />

bacterial leaf spot of lettuce. In their study, treatments with 3% and<br />

5% hydrogen peroxide for 5 and 15 min eliminated bacteria; however,<br />

the 5% hydrogen peroxide treatment also reduced seed germination<br />

significantly. Sodium hypochlorite treatment of seeds at 1%<br />

concentration for 15 min reduced bacterial infestation to as low as 2%.<br />

Copper hydroxide plus mancozeb treatment significantly reduced the<br />

seed infestation to 2% or less when applied for 5 and 15 min and at<br />

three different concentrations: 0.18g copper hydroxide plus 0.14<br />

mancozeb; 0.24g copper hydroxide plus 0.18g mancozeb; and 0.36g<br />

copper hydroxide plus 0.27g mancozeb /100 ml of water.<br />

Table 1. Evaluation of seed treatments for elimination of<br />

Xanthomonas campestris pv. cucurbitae (Xcc) from naturally infected<br />

pumpkin seeds.<br />

Experiment Treatment<br />

Conc. of Xcc<br />

(cfu/ml) a<br />

I. Water control 5000<br />

Hydrogen peroxide, 3%<br />

Copper hydroxide +<br />

mancozeb (0.36g + 0.27<br />

400<br />

g/100ml) 0<br />

Peroxyacetic acid, 1% 0<br />

Sodium hypochlorite, 1% 0<br />

II Water control 600<br />

Hydrogen peroxide, 3%<br />

Copper hydroxide +<br />

mancozeb (0.36g + 0.27<br />

0<br />

g/100ml) 0<br />

Peroxyacetic acid, 1% 0<br />

Sodium hypochlorite, 1% 0<br />

a<br />

Colony-forming units per ml (cfu/ml) was calculated by average colony number on<br />

duplicate 1:10 dilution plates x dilution factor x 20[1000µl (1ml)/50µl of (seed<br />

slurry)].<br />

In our study, seed treatments of sodium hypochlorite at 1%, copper<br />

hydroxide at 0.36g plus 0.27g mancozeb /100 ml of water, and<br />

peroxyacetic acid at 1% for 15 min eliminated Xcc on naturally<br />

infested pumpkin seeds. <strong>The</strong> 3% hydrogen peroxide treatment did not<br />

eliminate bacteria, but reduced the infestation by 90–92% as compared<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 503


to those on water-control plates in the first experiment (Table 1). In<br />

the second experiment, the 3% hydrogen peroxide treatment<br />

eliminated the pathogen, although recovery of the bacteria in watercontrol<br />

plates was only 10% of that recovered in the first experiment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> differences with recovery of bacteria observed could be due to the<br />

overgrowth of the plates by saprophytic bacteria or to the<br />

heterogeneous infestation of the seed lot tested. In preliminary<br />

experiments for detection of Xcc from this naturally infested seed lot,<br />

bacteria were detected in only one of five trials conducted. In the one<br />

successful trial, a high number of Xcc colonies were detected.<br />

Franken et al. (1991) evaluated agar plating assays for detection of<br />

X. campestris pv. campestris from naturally contaminated crucifer<br />

seeds. <strong>The</strong>y tested the efficacy of a centrifugation step prior to plating<br />

the seed washings, and concluded that this step should be omitted<br />

since no increase in recovery of the bacteria was obtained. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

suggested that, theoretically, the centrifugation step could be useful if<br />

bacterial counts on seeds are low, as low as 1cfu of X. campestris pv.<br />

campestris in the undiluted seed washing of 50μl plated onto a 9-cm<br />

Petri dish, and with less than 250cfu of saprophytes present in the<br />

same plate. However, they indicated that they had not found seed lots<br />

that met these requirements. <strong>The</strong>y also realized that seed lots could<br />

have varying levels of saprophytic bacteria depending on the growing<br />

area and season in which the seed was produced, and that the numbers<br />

of X. campestris pv. campestris would also vary.<br />

Roberts et al. (2002) tested several nondestructive methods of<br />

detection of bacteria for seeds stored in a germplasm collection. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

used artificially inoculated and naturally infected seeds of several<br />

crops. Naturally infested pea seeds were soaked in sterile tap water for<br />

three incubation periods for recovery of Pseudomonas syringae pv.<br />

pisi, but results were inconclusive due to high sample-to-sample<br />

variability in naturally infected seed lots.<br />

Peroxyacetic acid, a peroxygen compound and oxidizing agent, is<br />

used mainly in the food industry as a disinfectant (Block, 1991).<br />

Recently, Hopkins et al. (2001) evaluated this oxidizing agent for<br />

seed-borne eradication of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli, the causal<br />

agent of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Peroxyacetic acid at<br />

concentrations of 1600ppm and higher eliminated the seed<br />

transmission of bacteria to the seedlings in greenhouse grow-out tests,<br />

with no adverse effects on germination observed. In the current study,<br />

peroxyacetic acid at 1% concentration eliminated Xcc from infected<br />

seeds, also with no adverse effect on germination. However, slightly<br />

weaker root growth was observed in two of the three germination<br />

504 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


assays. This most probably occurred from residual chemical left on<br />

the seed coats due to inadequate rinsing. Seed coats also appeared<br />

bleached in all assays. None of the chemical treatments we tested<br />

adversely affected seed germination; however, seedling vigor was<br />

slightly reduced with peroxyacetic acid and for one assay with copper<br />

hydroxide plus mancozeb. Seeds treated with sodium hypochlorite<br />

tended to germinate more slowly than the others. In order to evaluate<br />

the effects of seed treatment on seedling vigor and stand appearance,<br />

grow-out tests using sterilized soils in a temperature-controlled<br />

greenhouse would be required. Fatmi et al. (1991) treated tomato<br />

seeds with acidified cupric acetate to control Clavibacter<br />

michiganensis subsp. michiganensis and found that the adverse effects<br />

of this chemical on seed germination were eliminated by sowing<br />

treated seeds in sterilized soil. Germination blotter tests, however,<br />

showed a significant reduction in germination. Fatmi et al. suggested<br />

that this reduction could be due to inadequate dispersal of acidic cupric<br />

acetate residues, whereas the binding of these residues to soil particles<br />

would enhance seed germination.<br />

<strong>The</strong> hydrogen peroxide treatment in our study did not affect<br />

seedling vigor and germination. This chemical has been used for<br />

promotion of seed germination for certain crops such as tomatoes and<br />

legumes. It may promote germination by providing the rapid release of<br />

oxygen as a respiration stimulant (Copeland and McDonald, 2001) or<br />

by oxidation of germination inhibitors as in treatment of Zinnia<br />

elegans seeds (Ogawa and Iwabuchi, 2001). Compared to peroxyacetic<br />

acid, hydrogen peroxide is relatively inefficient in eliminating bacteria,<br />

possibly because it has fewer bactericidal properties (Baldry, 1983).<br />

Baldry compared the bactericidal, fungicidal, and sporicidal properties<br />

of the two chemicals and found that peroxyacetic acid had strong<br />

bactericidal properties. Hydrogen peroxide had poorer bactericidal<br />

properties but was more effective as a sporocide. Hydrogen peroxide<br />

can easily be decomposed by enzymes such as catalase or peroxidase<br />

and by heat to harmless end products of oxygen and water, whereas<br />

peroxyacetic acid is not degraded by these enzymes (Block, 1991).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Baldry, M. G. C. 1983. Bactericidal, fungicidal and sporicidal properties of<br />

hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 54:417–423.<br />

Block, S. 1991. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation, 4 th ed. Lea and Febiger,<br />

Malvern, Pa.<br />

Bryan, M. K. 1926. Bacterial leaf spot on Hubbard squash. Science 63:165.<br />

Bryan, M. K. 1930. Bacterial leaf spot of squash. J. Agric. Res. 40:385–391.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 505


Copeland, O. L. and McDonald, M. B. 2001. Principles of seed science and<br />

technology, 4 th ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.<br />

Fatmi, M., N. W. Schaad, and H. A. Bolkan. 1991. Seed treatments for eradicating<br />

Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis from naturally infected tomato<br />

seeds. Plant Dis. 75:383–385.<br />

Franken, A. A. J. M., C. Van Zeijl, J. G. P. M. Van Bilsen, A. Neuvel, R. De Vogel,<br />

Y. Van Wingerden, Y. E. Birnbaum, J. Van Hateren, and P. S. Van Der<br />

Zouwen.1991. Evaluation of a plating assay for Xanthomonas campestris pv.<br />

campestris. Seed Sci. Tech. 19:215–226.<br />

Hopkins, D., C. Thompson, J. Hilgren, and B. Lovic. 2001. Wet seed treatment with<br />

peroxyacetic acid for the control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon.<br />

Phytopathology. 91:S40 (Abstr.).<br />

Latin, R. 1996. Bacterial spot hits the pumpkin patch. Am. Veg. Grower. 44–46.<br />

McLean, D. M. 1958. A seed-borne bacterial cotyledon spot of squash. Plant Dis.<br />

Rep. 42:425–426.<br />

Moffett, M. L., and B. A. Wood. 1979. Seed treatment for bacterial spot of<br />

pumpkin. Plant Dis. Rep. 63:537–539.<br />

Ogawa, K., and M. Iwabuchi. 2001. A mechanism for promoting the germination of<br />

Zinnia elegans seeds by hydrogen peroxide. Plant Cell Physiol. 42:286–291.<br />

Pernezny, K., R. Nagata, R. N. Raid, J. Collins, and A. Carroll. 2002. Investigation<br />

of seed treatments for management of bacterial leaf spot of lettuce. Plant Dis.<br />

86:151–155.<br />

Roberts, S. J., J. Brough, and S. Chakrabarty. 2002. Non-destructive seed testing for<br />

bacterial pathogens in germplasm material. Seed Sci. Tech.. 30:69–85.<br />

Vincent-Sealy, L., and W. D. Brathwaite. 1982. Bacterial leaf spot of cucumber<br />

in Trinidad. Trop. Agricl. 59:287–288.<br />

Williford, R. E., and N. W. Schaad. 1984. Agar medium for selective isolation of<br />

Xanthomonas campestris pv. carotae from carrot seeds. Phytopathology.<br />

74:1142.<br />

Wilson, E. E., F. M. Zeitoun, and D. L. Frederickson. 1967. Bacterial phloem<br />

canker, a new disease of Persian walnut trees. Phytopathology. 57:618–621.<br />

Zitter, T. A., D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Compendium of cucurbit<br />

diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

506 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


DETERMINING DENSITY OF<br />

PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI OOSPORES IN<br />

SOIL<br />

C. Pavon and M. Babadoost<br />

Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois,<br />

1102 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, USA, 61801<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

ABSTRACT. A sucrose-centrifugation method was developed to extract oospores<br />

of Phytophthora capsici from soil. <strong>The</strong> relationship between the number of<br />

oospores recovered from soil and the number of oospores incorporated into the<br />

soil was Ŷ= -0.75 + 1.21X -0.02X 2 (R 2 =0.98), where Ŷ = log10 of the number of<br />

oospores recovered from soil and X = log10 of the number of oospores in soil.<br />

<strong>The</strong> oospores were germinated after treating with 0.1% KMnO4 solution for 10<br />

min. Using a sucrose-centrifugation method, oospores of P. capsici were<br />

successfully extracted from soil samples collected from commercial squash<br />

fields. A real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) protocol was<br />

developed to assay the density of P. capsici oospores in soil. PCR-inhibition was<br />

avoided by extracting oospores from soil using the sucrose-centrifugation<br />

method. <strong>The</strong> relationship between the amount of DNA measured and the<br />

number of oospores of P. capsici included in the test was Ŷ = - 3.57 - 0.54X +<br />

0.30X 2 (R 2 = 0.93), where Ŷ = log10 (ng of P. capsici DNA), X = log10 (number of<br />

oospores).<br />

P<br />

hytophthora blight of cucurbits, caused by Phytophthora capsici<br />

Leonian, is one of the most serious threats to production of<br />

cucurbits, pepper, and eggplant worldwide. P. capsici is a soilborne<br />

oomycete that infects more than 50 plant species in 15 families<br />

(Erwin and Ribeiro. 1996; Tian and Babadoost, 2004). It can infect<br />

plants at any stage of growth, causing seedling damping-off, crown<br />

rot, foliage blight, and fruit rot. Phytophthora blight can cause yield<br />

losses of up to 100% in cucurbits and pepper fields (Babadoost and<br />

Islam, 2003; Hausbeck and Lamour, 2004). At present, there is no<br />

long-term sustainable solution for disease management, however, a<br />

combination of cultural practices, fungicide application, and genetic<br />

resistance can be used to minimize the damages caused by P. capsici<br />

to vegetable crops (Babadoost and Islam, 2003; Hausbeck and<br />

Lamour, 2004).<br />

P. capsici is a heterothallic organism in which two compatible<br />

mating types, designated as A1 and A2, are needed for sexual<br />

reproduction. <strong>The</strong> sexual spore of P. capsici is the oospore, which is<br />

the primary source of inoculum and the overwintering propagule in the<br />

soil (Erwin and Ribeiro. 1996). A reliable method for quantifying P.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 507


capsici oospores in soil is needed to assess survival of the pathogen<br />

and the potential for disease development in the field. Methods used<br />

for assessing density of P. capsici in soil have been primarily dilution<br />

plating and baiting assays but, these methods are time-consuming and<br />

the accuracy of the assays is questionable (Erwin and Ribeiro, 1996;<br />

Silvar et al., 2005).<br />

Sucrose-centrifugation and sieving is basically a method t\hat<br />

separate particles based on their density and size. This method has<br />

been used to extract propagules of mycorrhizal fungi (Smith and<br />

Skipper, 1979), teliospores of Tilletia species (Babadoost and Mathre,<br />

1998), and nematodes (Jenkins, 1964) from soil.<br />

Silvar et al. (2005) used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based<br />

method to detect P. capsici in soil. <strong>The</strong> protocol they used was for<br />

detecting the pathogen only and the method cannot determine quantity<br />

of P. capsici oospores in soil. Also, they reported the presence of PCR<br />

inhibitory factors in the DNA extracts for molecular detection of plant<br />

pathogens in soil (Van de Graaf, 2003). Real-time quantitative<br />

polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) is a relatively new molecular<br />

technique that has been used to quantify nematodes (Cao et al., 2005),<br />

viruses (Delanoy et al., 2003), bacteria (Bach et al., 2003), and fungal<br />

plant pathogens (Hayden et al., 2004: Silvar et al., 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to develop a reliable QPCR method<br />

to quantify P. capsici oospores in soil.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

IN VITRO OOSPORE PRODUCTION. For in vitro production of<br />

oospores of P. capsici, two plugs of opposite mating types (A1 and<br />

A2) of the pathogen were grown in 40-ml aliquots of V8-CaCO3<br />

medium in 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks at 24°C for 2 mo in darkness.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, oospores were harvested, blending the culture at full speed for<br />

90s in a Hamilton Beach blender (model 52250, Southern Pines, NC).<br />

<strong>The</strong> suspension in the blender was passed through 68- and 38-µm<br />

metal sieves and the filtrate was collected. <strong>The</strong> filtrate then was passed<br />

through a 20-µm Spectra/Mesh nylon filter (Spectrum, Houston, TX).<br />

<strong>The</strong> oospores collected on the mesh were washed into a beaker and the<br />

number of oospores was determined using a spore-counting chamber<br />

(Hauser Scientific, Horsham, PA).<br />

OOSPORE EXTRACTION FROM SOIL. Five agricultural soils,<br />

including a sandy loam, a silt clay, and three silt loam, collected from<br />

various locations in Illinois, were used in this study to develop the<br />

procedure for extraction of oospores of P. capsici from soil. <strong>The</strong><br />

calculations were based on the air-dried weight for all of the soils.<br />

508 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Samples of the five soil types were air dried at room temperature<br />

on a laboratory bench for 14 days and passed through a 2-mm sieve.<br />

Predetermined quantities of oospores were added to soil samples and<br />

thoroughly mixed. <strong>The</strong> artificially infested soil samples were estimated<br />

to have10 1 , 10 2 , 10 3 , 10 4 , and 10 5 oospores of P. capsici per 10g of airdried<br />

soil.<br />

Each 10-g infested soil sample was suspended in 400ml tap water<br />

with two drops of Tween-20 and shaken for 15 min. <strong>The</strong> soil<br />

suspension was passed through nested 106-, 63-, and 38-µm metal<br />

sieves. <strong>The</strong> material caught on the 38-µm sieve was washed using a<br />

sprinkler with a gentle stream of water and the filtrate was collected.<br />

This suspension (approximately 2L) was then passed through a 20-µm<br />

mesh filter. <strong>The</strong> materials caught on the 20-µm mesh were washed into<br />

two 50-ml centrifuge tubes and spun for 4 min (900 x g) using a<br />

bench-top centrifuge. <strong>The</strong> supernatant was discarded and the pellet<br />

was suspended in 30ml of 1.6M sucrose solution. This suspension was<br />

centrifuged for 45s (190 x g) and the supernatant was passed through<br />

the 20-µm mesh. <strong>The</strong> pellet was resuspended in the sucrose solution<br />

and centrifuged again (45s, 190 x g). <strong>The</strong> procedure was repeated six<br />

times to maximize oospore recovery from soil. <strong>The</strong> materials caught<br />

on the 20-µm mesh were washed into a 50-ml centrifuge tube and spun<br />

for 4 min (900 x g). <strong>The</strong> pellet was resuspended in 0.5 to 1.5ml of<br />

distilled water, depending on the original number of oospores added to<br />

the soil, and the number of oospores was determined using a sporecounting<br />

chamber.<br />

<strong>The</strong> oospore recovery at each inoculum level for each of the five<br />

artificially infested soils was determined using four replicates of 10-g<br />

soil sample and with four oospore counts per replicate (a total of 16<br />

spore counts for each inoculum level for each soil type).<br />

EXTRACTION OF OOSPORES FROM FIELD SOIL. Eight commercial<br />

fields in three counties, with a history of Phytophthora blight, were<br />

sampled to test the soil for presence of P. capsici oospores. In each<br />

field, 20 subsamples of soil were taken from 0–20cm deep from<br />

approximately 0.4ha area using a soil probe. <strong>The</strong> subsamples from<br />

each field were mixed thoroughly and a 1-kg sample was taken. Four<br />

replicates of 10-g soil samples from each field were processed using<br />

the procedure described above, to extract and enumerate oospores of<br />

P. capsici.<br />

OOSPORE GERMINATION. Extracted oospores from soil were<br />

germinated to determine their viability. <strong>The</strong> oospores were plated onto<br />

the semiselective medium PARP in Petri plates (50 oospores per<br />

plate). <strong>The</strong> effect of potassium permanganate (KMnO4) treatment on<br />

oospore germination was evaluated by suspending oospores in 0.02,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 509


0.04, 0.1, and 0.2% of KMnO4 solution in water for 10 min. After the<br />

treatment, oospores were washed three times with sterile-distilled<br />

water and plated onto PARP medium. <strong>The</strong> plates were incubated at<br />

24°C under fluorescent light for 4 days and the percentage of<br />

germinated spores was determined. Four replica plates of oospore<br />

germination were included for each treatment. Single colonies of<br />

germinated oospores from commercial fields were transferred to lima<br />

bean agar in Petri plates and P. capsici colonies were identified from<br />

colonies of other Phytophthora and Pythium species based on<br />

sporangial morphology.<br />

REAL-TIME QPCR QUANTIFICATION OF OOSPORES. P. capsici<br />

DNA was extracted from the oospores using a protocol based on<br />

FastDNA kit (Qbiogene, Inc., Carlsbad, CA), which was modified for<br />

removal of PCR inhibitors by Malvick and Grunden (2005). <strong>The</strong><br />

QPCR assays were conducted in a 96-well plate format with the ABI<br />

PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System instrument and software (PE<br />

Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). P. capsici primers were:<br />

forward, 5’-GGA ACC GTA TCA ACC CTT TTA GTT G-3’; reverse,<br />

5’-CGC CCG GAC CGA AGT C-3’; and probe, 5’-6FAM-TCT TGT<br />

ACC CTA TCA TGG CG-MGBNFQ-3’. <strong>The</strong> manufacturer’s<br />

instructions were followed, except that 25-µl reaction mixtures were<br />

used instead of 50µl. <strong>The</strong>rmal cycling conditions consisted of 10 min<br />

at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C, in<br />

addition to a 2-min preincubation at 50°C.<br />

<strong>The</strong> modified QPCR procedure was used to detect P. capsici<br />

oospores in soil samples collected from the eight commercial fields.<br />

First, oospores were extracted using the sucrose-centrifugation<br />

method. <strong>The</strong>n the extracted oospores were tested to determine the<br />

quantity of P. capsici oospores.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

IN VITRO OOSPORE PRODUCTION. Both mating types of P. capsici<br />

(A1 and A2) were identified among the isolates tested. <strong>The</strong> three<br />

pairings used for oospore production yielded almost the same amount<br />

of oospores per plate. <strong>The</strong> number of oospores per plate after 2 mo<br />

ranged from 4.41 x 10 5 to 6.72 x 10 5 (mean 5.56 x 10 5 ) oospores per<br />

plate.<br />

OOSPORE EXTRACTION FROM SOIL. Oospores of P. capsici were<br />

successfully recovered from all five artificially infested soil types.<br />

Overall, 50.9% of oospores incorporated into the soil were recovered.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in oospore recovery among the soil<br />

types. <strong>The</strong> relationship between the number of oospores recovered<br />

510 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


from soil and the number of oospores incorporated into the soil was<br />

Ŷ= -0.75 + 1.21X -0.02X 2 (R 2 =0.98), where Ŷ = log10 of the number<br />

of oospores recovered from soil and X = log10 of the number of<br />

oospores in soil (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> average recovery rates of P. capsici<br />

oospores from the soils were 25.5 (13.5-37.8), 43.7 (33.0-54.4), 53.6<br />

(42.9-64.4), 60.3 (49.5-71.0), and 72.1% (61.3-82.8%) from soil<br />

samples containing 10 1 , 10 2 , 10 3 , 10 4 , and 10 5 oospores per 10g,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in oospore recovery<br />

between soil samples containing 10 4 and 10 5 oospores per 10g.<br />

Percentage of oospores recovered from soil samples with 10 1 oospores<br />

per 10g was significantly lower than the percentage of oospores<br />

recovered from the samples with 10 2 , 10 3 , 10 4 , and 10 5 oospores per<br />

10g. Similarly, percentage of oospores recovered from soil<br />

_ = - 0.75 + 1.21X - 0.02X 2<br />

R 2 = 0.98<br />

Fig. 1. Relationship between number of oospores recovered from soil and<br />

number of oospores incorporated into soil.<br />

samples with 10 2 oospores per 10g soil was significantly lower than<br />

those of soil samples with 10 4 and 10 5 oospores per 10g soil. In<br />

addition, the percentage of oospores recovered from soil samples with<br />

10 3 oospores per 10g was not significantly different than the<br />

percentage of oospores recovered from samples with 10 2 , and 10 4<br />

oospores per 10g.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 511


OOSPORES IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS. We extracted oospores from<br />

soil samples collected from all eight commercial fields in Illinois. <strong>The</strong><br />

number of oospores recovered from commercial fields ranged from<br />

694 to 2,467 per 10g of soil. <strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in<br />

diameter of oospores recovered from different fields. Number of P.<br />

capsici oospores extracted from commercial fields ranged from 79 to<br />

529 per 10g soil. <strong>The</strong> rate of P. capsici oospores of the total number of<br />

oospores extracted from soil samples from commercial fields ranged<br />

from 9.2% to 18.5% (mean 14%).<br />

OOSPORE GERMINATION. Germination rates of oospores produced<br />

in vitro with the pretreatment with 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.1, and 0.2 solution<br />

of KMnO4 were 15.2, 29.8, 27.6, 44.5, and 40.7%, respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />

rates of oospore germination for 0.1 and 0.2% solution of KMnO4<br />

were not significantly different. But the rates of oospore germination<br />

after treating with either 0.1 or 0.2% solution of KMnO4 were<br />

significantly higher than those of treatments with 0.02 and 0.04%<br />

KMnO4 solutions. <strong>The</strong>refore, for germination of oospores extracted<br />

from soil samples from commercial fields, we used a 0.1% KMnO4<br />

solution and oospores were treated for 10 min. Germination rates of<br />

oospores extracted from commercial fields ranged from 18.8% to<br />

51.1% (mean 36.8%). In addition to P. capsici, P. sojae and Pythium<br />

spp. were identified in the culture plates.<br />

REAL-TIME PCR QUANTIFICATION OF OOSPORES. <strong>The</strong><br />

relationship between the number of oospores and P. capsici DNA<br />

quantity was Ŷ = -3.57 - 0.54X - 0.30X 2 (R 2 = 0.93), where Ŷ = log10<br />

(ng of P. capsici DNA), X = log10 (number of oospores) (Figure 2).<br />

According to this model, the DNA quantities corresponding to 10 1 ,<br />

10 1.5 , 10 2 , 10 2.5 , 10 3 , 10 3.5 , 10 4 , 10 4.5 and 10 5 oospores were 1.4 × 10 -4 ,<br />

1.9 × 10 -4 , 3.5 × 10 -4 , 9.0 × 10 -4 , 3.2 × 10 -3 , 1.6 × 10 -2 , 1.5 × 10 -1 , 1.2 ×<br />

10 0 , and 1.7 × 10 1 ng, respectively.<br />

Using the QPCR procedure, we detected P. capsici in all field soil<br />

samples tested. <strong>The</strong>re was no PCR-inhibition in the DNA extracts<br />

from oospores extracted from soil using the sieving-sucrosecentrifugation<br />

method, although some soil particles and organic matter<br />

were associated with the oospores. PCR inhibition, however, was<br />

found in the DNA extraction directly from soil.<br />

Using the sieving-centrifugation with sucrose solution method, we<br />

were able to recover oospores of P. capsici from soil with a spore<br />

density as low as 10 spores per g of soil. <strong>The</strong> results showed that the<br />

method can be used to determine density of P. capsici oospores in<br />

fields with different soil types. <strong>The</strong>re were, however, some difficulties<br />

in the identification of the oospores extracted from naturally infested<br />

commercial field soils, because oospores of other Phytophthora and<br />

512 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Pythium species were co-extracted by the procedure. <strong>The</strong>se difficulties<br />

were overcome by germinating and identifying oospores based on<br />

morphological characteristics of sporangia. Thus, the sieving-sucrosecentrifugation<br />

procedure can be used to estimate P. capsici oospores in<br />

soil in areas where Phytophthora blight of vegetables is a problem, or<br />

any other area suspected of having P. capsici.<br />

_ = -3.57 - 0.54X + 0.30X 2<br />

R 2 = 0.93<br />

Fig. 2. Relationship between quantity of DNA and number of oospores used in<br />

quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests.<br />

Difficulty in the in vitro germination of oospores of Phytophthora<br />

species has been reported. <strong>The</strong>se difficulties have been overcome by<br />

pretreatment of oospores with KMnO4 solution. For example,<br />

germination of oospores of P. parasitica was improved by a<br />

pretreatment with 0.25% solution of KMnO4 for 20 min. Similarly,<br />

germination of oospores of P. megasperma was enhanced by a<br />

pretreatment of 0.05% of KMnO4 for 10 min. Similarly, we increased<br />

percent of germination of P. capsici oospores from about 10% to 50%<br />

by pretreatment with 0.1% KMnO4 solution.<br />

QPCR is useful for detecting and quantifying nonculturable and<br />

slow-growing organisms. Some reports indicated that P. capsici can be<br />

outgrown by closely related and fast-growing Pythium spp. <strong>The</strong> QPCR<br />

procedure used in this study is a reliable method for quantifying P.<br />

capsici oospores in soil. <strong>The</strong> procedure detected P. capsici in all field<br />

soil samples tested. This QPCR protocol is a fast, accurate, and<br />

sensitive method for quantifying P. capsici oospores in soil. Also, the<br />

combination of sieving-centrifugation and QPCR is effective in<br />

eliminating PCR inhibitors that affect PCR tests in direct assays from<br />

soil samples.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 513


Literature Cited<br />

Babadoost, M. and D. E. Mathre. 1998. A method for extraction and enumeration<br />

of teliospores of Tilletia indica, T. controversa, and T. barclayana in soil. Plant<br />

Dis. 82:1357–1361.<br />

Babadoost, M. and S. Z. Islam. 2003. Fungicide seed treatment effects on seedling<br />

damping-off of pumpkin caused by Phytophthora capsici. Plant Dis. 87:63–68.<br />

Bach, H. J., I. Jessen, M. Schloter, and J. C. Munch. 2003. A TaqMan-PCR<br />

protocol for quantification and identification of the phytopathogenic<br />

Clavibacter michiganensis subspecies. J. Microbiol. Meth. 52:85–91.<br />

Cao, A. X., X. Z. Liu, S. F. Zhu, and B. S. Lu. 2005. Detection of pinewood<br />

nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, using a real-time polymerase chain<br />

reaction assay. Phytopathology 95:566–571.<br />

Delanoy, M., M. Salmon, and J. Kummert. 2003. Development of real-time PCR<br />

for rapid detection of episomal Banana streak virus (BSV). Plant Dis. 87:33–<br />

38.<br />

Erwin, D. C. and O. K. Ribeiro. 1996. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide.<br />

American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />

Hausbeck, M. K. and K. H. Lamour. 2004. Phytophthora capsici on vegetable<br />

crops: research progress and management challenges. Plant Dis. 88:1292–1303.<br />

Hayden, K. J., D. Rizzo, J. Tse, and M. Garbelotto. 2004. Detection and<br />

quantification of Phytophthora ramorum from California forest using a realtime<br />

polymerase chain reaction assay. Phytopathology 94:1075–1083.<br />

Jenkins, W. R. 1964. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating<br />

nematodes from soil. Plant Dis. Rep. 48:692.<br />

Malvick, D. K., and E. Grunden. 2005. Isolation of fungal DNA from plant tissues<br />

and removal of DNA amplification inhibitors. Molec. Ecol. 5: 958–960.<br />

Silvar, C., J. Diaz, and F. Merino. 2005. Real-time polymerase chain reaction<br />

quantification of Phytophthora capsici in different pepper genotypes.<br />

Phytopathology. 95:1423–1429.<br />

Smith, G. W. and H. D. Skipper. 1979. Comparison of methods to extract spores<br />

of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:722–725.<br />

Tian, D. and M. Babadoost. 2004. Host range of Phytophthora capsici from<br />

pumpkin and pathogenicity of isolates. Plant Dis. 88:485–489.<br />

Van de Graaf, P., A. K. Lees, D. W. Cullen, and J.M. Duncan. 2003. Detection and<br />

quantification of Spongospora subterranea in soil, water and plant tissue<br />

samples using real-time PCR. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109:589–597.<br />

514 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


CHARACTERISTICS OF DOUBLE-HAPLOID<br />

CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS SATIVUS L.) LINES<br />

RESISTANT TO DOWNY MILDEW<br />

(PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS [BERK.<br />

ET CURT.] ROSTOVZEV)<br />

J. Sztangret-Wiśniewska<br />

Plant <strong>Breeding</strong> and Acclimatization Institute, Mlochow Research Center,<br />

19 Platanowa Str., 05-831 Mlochow, Poland<br />

T. Gałecka, A. Korzeniewska, L. Marzec, G. Kołakowska, U.<br />

Piskurewicz, M. Śmiech, and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt<br />

Department of Plant Genetics, <strong>Breeding</strong>, and Biotechnology, Warsaw<br />

Agricultural University, Nowoursynowska St., 02-776 Warszawa, Poland<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. DH lines, diploidization, haploid embryo rescue,<br />

irradiated pollen<br />

ABSTRACT. Downy mildew caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk et Curt.)<br />

Rostovzev is one of the most important diseases of field-grown cucumbers. A<br />

study was designed to determine the feasibility of obtaining double-haploid (DH)<br />

lines from cucumber hybrids tolerant to Pseudoperonospora cubensis that would<br />

result in creation of diverse, genetically fixed lines that are homozygous for<br />

resistance to downy mildew. On average, 20% of embryos generated in two<br />

experiments were converted to haploid plants. Utilization of two diploidization<br />

methods, direct regeneration and colchicine treatment, resulted in the doubling of<br />

these haploids (53% and 33% conversion rate, respectively). This is the first report<br />

on DH cucumber lines tolerant to downy mildew.<br />

E<br />

fficient generation of haploid (H) and double-haploid (DH) lines<br />

in cultivated plants can significantly contribute to breeding<br />

efforts. DH cucumber lines characterized by useful agronomic<br />

characteristics could be used as inbred lines in hybrid production. This<br />

study was undertaken to test the feasibility of production of DH lines that<br />

are resistant to downy mildew, one of the most important diseases of<br />

cultivated cucumber.<br />

Two methods of cucumber haploid production are known. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

method utilizes an in vitro culture of either ovules or ovaries. <strong>The</strong> second<br />

method, called haploid parthenogenesis, consists of pollination with<br />

irradiated pollen followed by haploid embryo rescue and in vitro culture<br />

This research was partially supported by a grant from AWRSP – Poland. <strong>The</strong> authors<br />

thank E. Gniazdowska and J. Szewczyk for careful technical assistance.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 515


(Gemes-Juhasz et al., 2002; Truong-Andre, 1988; Niemirowicz-Szczytt<br />

and Dumas de Vaulx, 1989; Sauton, 1989; Przyborowski and<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994; Caglar and Abak, 1996).<br />

In 1990 the Dutch seed company Nunhems Zaden BV (Haelen, <strong>The</strong><br />

Netherlands) patented a method for the ovule-culture method (patent NP-<br />

374755); however, no data were provided on the efficacy and application<br />

of this invention. More recently, a similar approach was reported by<br />

Gemes-Juhasz et al. (2002). In the latter, longitudinally sliced<br />

unpollinated ovaries were harvested six hours before anthesis of the<br />

hermaphrodite flower and cultured in vitro on various media at 24°, 28°,<br />

and 35°C. <strong>The</strong> best result was regeneration of plants from 7.1% of<br />

approximately 150 ovaries, of which 87.7% were haploids. This result<br />

was obtained by culturing the ovaries at 35 o C after 2–4 days of treatment<br />

on induction medium containing thidiazuron (TDZ). No information was<br />

reported on morphology and number of DH plants obtained in that study.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second approach, the embryo-rescue method, has given in<br />

general better results than ovary culture (Truong-Andre, 1988;<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Dumas de Vaulx, 1989; Sauton, 1989;<br />

Przyborowski and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994; Caglar and Abak, 1996).<br />

In this method, pollination with an irradiated pollen resulted in direct<br />

formation of haploid embryos that developed into haploid plants. For<br />

instance, Przyborowski and Niemirowicz-Szczytt (1994) reported that an<br />

average of 1.2 to 3.1 embryos per fruit were obtained in six cucumber<br />

genotypes and approximately 50% of the excised haploid embryos<br />

developed into plants.<br />

Since cucumber haploid plants are sterile (Przyborowski and<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994), their use in plant breeding requires<br />

chromosome doubling. Two methods for chromosome doubling are in<br />

use. <strong>The</strong> first method involves colchicine treatment of the apical<br />

meristem (Nikolova and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1996), and the second<br />

method employs direct regeneration of plants from young haploid leaf<br />

tissue (Faris et al., 2000). <strong>The</strong> method of repeated treatment of the<br />

meristems with colchicine solution resulted in generation of 20.9%<br />

diploid plants. <strong>The</strong> method of direct regeneration of plants resulted in<br />

29.5% of diploid plants.<br />

<strong>The</strong> process of H and DH plant production is both time- and laborconsuming.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it is important to estimate at a relatively early<br />

stage of employment of this technology the potential breeding value (i.e.,<br />

presence of valuable characteristics, such as resistance to downy mildew)<br />

of the obtained plants. Moreover, it is important to be able to recover DH<br />

plants from genetically diverse material. To evaluate the efficacy of DH<br />

production in different genotypes, a study was designed to determine<br />

516 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


whether DH cucumber plants could be obtained effectively from three<br />

cucumber hybrids resistant to Pseudoperonospora cubensis.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

HAPLOID PLANT PRODUCTION. <strong>The</strong> haploid embryo production<br />

utilized the process of haploid parthenogenesis (Przyborowski and<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994). Female flowers of three commercial<br />

hybrids resistant to Pseudoperonospora cubensis, ‘Krak’, ‘Frykas’, and<br />

‘Izyd’, and one susceptible hybrid, ‘Polan’, were pollinated with pollen<br />

irradiated at 0.3kGy gamma rays, cobalt source, 0.80Gy/min at the<br />

Department of Food Safety and Public Health, Warsaw Agricultural<br />

University. Flowers of 40 plants of each cultivar grown at a Warsaw<br />

Agricultural University greenhouse at the Wolica Experimental Station<br />

were used in the pollination. Three to five weeks after pollination,<br />

presence of individual haploid embryos was detected using a<br />

stereomicroscope. <strong>The</strong> embryos were removed aseptically from the<br />

ovaries and transferred to E20A medium (Sauton and Dumas de Vaulx,<br />

1987). Embryos that developed into plants were maintained on MS<br />

medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). <strong>The</strong> experiment was conducted<br />

during the months of May and June and then August and September,<br />

1999.<br />

DIPLOIDIZATION METHODS. Two methods of diploidization were<br />

used. One method consisted of direct regeneration of plants from young<br />

haploid leaf tissue and the second method was a colchicine treatment of<br />

apical meristems of H plants. Direct regeneration from leaf explants of<br />

haploid plants obtained in the spring of 1999 (May and June) was<br />

conducted in the autumn (September–November) of the same year,<br />

whereas the haploids obtained in the summer/autumn of 1999 (August–<br />

September) were used in regeneration during winter/spring of 2000<br />

(January–April).<br />

DIRECT-REGENERATION METHOD. In vitro-grown haploid plants<br />

that were about 10cm were used in the direct-regeneration method. <strong>The</strong><br />

first and second leaves, closest to the apical shoot meristem and between<br />

0.50 to 0.75cm 2 , were cut into 2- to 3-mm 2 squares (explants), placed on<br />

a modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Burza and Malepszy,<br />

1995), and incubated in the dark at 25±2 o C for 11 to 15 days. Next, the<br />

explants were transferred to a hormone-free medium (1/2 MS<br />

macroelements, <strong>complete</strong> MS microelements, <strong>complete</strong> MS vitamins),<br />

and cultured in a 16-h photoperiod (54μmol m -2 s -1 ) until shoots were<br />

formed on the cut edge of the explant. <strong>The</strong> explants and the shoots were<br />

transferred to a fresh medium every 15 days. To induce rooting, three to<br />

five shoots detached from the explant-tissue shoots were placed<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 517


aseptically in 0.33-dm -3 glass jars containing 1/2 MS medium containing<br />

1mg /dm -3 indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Rooted plants were grown in 0.6dm<br />

-3 pots filled with universal substrate for cucumber (Hollas, Pasłęk,<br />

Poland) under greenhouse conditions (23/25°C, 16/h day, 1000μmol m -2<br />

s -1 ).<br />

<strong>The</strong> ploidy level of actively growing young plants was estimated by<br />

flow-cytometry according to Galbraith et al. (1983). In brief, two weeks<br />

after transplanting to soil, two–three top leaves were collected, the nuclei<br />

were extracted and stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)<br />

for flow-cytometry measurements using a PARTEC model ANII<br />

cytometer (Partec GmbH, Münster, Germany).<br />

MERISTEM COLCHICINE TREATMENT. All regenerated H plants were<br />

subjected to colchicine treatment according to Nikolova and<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt (1996). In this method H plants were maintained<br />

aseptically in glass jars on 1/2 MS medium. Each plant was clonally<br />

propagated by cutting the stem into segments, each segment containing<br />

one leaf. After 10 to15 days each cutting produced four to five leaves<br />

and roots. Colchicine solution (0.1% in water) was applied to apical<br />

meristems of actively growing plants by placing a 50-μL drop on the<br />

meristem. At least 15 clones of each H plant were treated. <strong>The</strong>re were<br />

three successive applications with a 24-h interval between treatments.<br />

This method resulted in the death of approximately 50% of the treated<br />

plants. New shoots developed from the main and auxiliary meristems of<br />

the surviving plants after three to four weeks. <strong>The</strong>se shoots were<br />

removed and transferred to jars containing 1/2 MS medium and 1mg<br />

/dm -3 IAA for root induction. <strong>The</strong> ploidy level of these shoots was<br />

estimated by flow-cytometry as described above.<br />

PHENOTYPIC OBSERVATIONS OF DH LINES. Visual observations of<br />

DH lines were made on 20 plants per line grown at the Warsaw<br />

Agriculture University experimental field nursery. Four-week-old<br />

seedlings were transplanted to the field on May 25, 2001, with 50 x 120cm<br />

spacing between plants. Plants were grown in a randomized block<br />

design with four replicates of 5 plants each. <strong>The</strong>y were evaluated for the<br />

following traits: sex expression (female or monoecious), growth type<br />

(vine, intermediate, dwarf), leaf color (A = dark green, B = dark<br />

green/light green, C = light green [Green group 135, R.H.S Colour Chart,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Royal Horticultural Society London, Flower Council of Holland,<br />

Leiden, 1995]), and susceptibility to downy mildew. <strong>The</strong> evaluation of<br />

plant infection was made in the field on August 15–20, 2001. Symptoms<br />

were assessed using a scale from 0 to 9 (0 = no visible symptoms; 1 =<br />

several necrotic spots on leaves; 3 = 25% of infected leaves; 5 = 50%<br />

infected leaves; 7 = 75% infected leaves; and 9 = 100% infected leaves,<br />

leaf decay), according to Jenkins and Wehner (1983) and Doruchowski<br />

518 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


and Łąkowska-Ryk (1992). In each class, a disease index (DI) was<br />

calculated by averaging the scores for each DH line according to<br />

Happstadius et al. (2003). A one-way analysis of variance for DI was<br />

performed using the Statgraphics Plus 4.1 (Manugistics, Rockville, MD)<br />

statistical software package.<br />

Results<br />

CUCUMBER HAPLOID DEVELOPMENT. Fruit developed from about<br />

50% of pollinated flowers and numerous haploid embryos and plants<br />

were obtained in four hybrid varieties as a result of pollination with<br />

irradiated pollen (Table 1).<br />

Typically, 2–3 fruit per plant for a total of 119 fruit were obtained<br />

from pollination of 40 plants in each cultivar. <strong>The</strong> number of embryos<br />

that developed from seeds within five weeks after pollination ranged<br />

between 70 and 116 per cultivar. In total, the number of embryos<br />

developed from the four cultivars was similar in each season (356 in<br />

spring and 333 in summer/autumn). Average number of embryos that<br />

developed into plants varied from experiment to experiment and from<br />

cultivar to cultivar, ranging between 7.8 and 41.9%. Haploid plants were<br />

obtained in each genetic background; the results were consistent over the<br />

two years. Using cytometric evaluation, all plants were classified as<br />

monohaploids (n = 7). <strong>The</strong>se plants were maintained in vitro and<br />

vegetatively propagated to provide material for chromosome doubling.<br />

CHROMOSOME DOUBLING. Chromosome doubling was<br />

accomplished using two methods applied consecutively: (1) direct<br />

regeneration from young leaf explants (Tables 2 and 3), and (2)<br />

colchicine treatment of the apical meristem (Tables 4 and 5).<br />

Not all H plants developed juvenile leaves that were suitable for<br />

direct regeneration during the first six months when the juvenile leaves<br />

were collected (96.3% and 42.4% in the first and the second experiment,<br />

respectively).<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of plant regeneration in five genetically different haploid<br />

clones are shown in Table 3. <strong>The</strong> number of regenerated plants ranged<br />

between 2 and 45, while the cumulative percentage of diploids in these<br />

clones was 53.3%.<br />

A summary of results of six experiments with colchicine treatment is<br />

shown in Table 4. Out of a total of 245 plants, 132 plants (53.9%)<br />

developed new shoots after colchicine treatment. Ploidy estimation on<br />

rooted cuttings revealed that 32.6% were diploid, 57.6% were haploid,<br />

and 9.8% were either mixoploid and/or chimeras. Table 5 shows the<br />

results of colchicine treatment on five haploid clones, represented by 15–<br />

27 plants. <strong>The</strong> mean percentage of shoot recovery after colchicine<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 519


treatment for all five clones was 61.5%, while the diploid recovery was<br />

25.0%. Not all haploid clones could be “diploidized” (e.g., Clone no. 2).<br />

Table 1. Cucumber haploid embryo and plant development from four F1<br />

donor cultivars in two environments.<br />

a. Spring 1999<br />

Embryos<br />

regener-<br />

F1 donor cultivar<br />

Fruits<br />

(no.)<br />

Embryos<br />

(no.)<br />

Plants<br />

(no.)<br />

ated into<br />

plants (%)<br />

Polan<br />

132 116 9 7.8<br />

Krak<br />

102 76 16 21.1<br />

Frykas<br />

127 79 15 19.0<br />

Izyd<br />

120 85 14 16.5<br />

Total 481 356 54 15.2<br />

b. Summer/autumn 1999<br />

Polan<br />

123 92 20 21.7<br />

Krak<br />

100 74 31 41.9<br />

Frykas<br />

130 70 25 35.7<br />

Izyd<br />

117 97 9 9.3<br />

Total 470 333 85 25.5<br />

Table 2. Direct regeneration of plants from young leaf explants of<br />

cucumber haploid plants in two environments.<br />

a. 1999<br />

Total no. Explant Regenerating<br />

F1 donor haploid donor plants donor plants<br />

cultivar<br />

Polan<br />

Krak<br />

Frykas<br />

Izyd<br />

plants No. % No. %<br />

9<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

9<br />

15<br />

14<br />

14<br />

100.0<br />

93.7<br />

93.3<br />

100.0<br />

6<br />

4<br />

4<br />

6<br />

66.7<br />

25.0<br />

26.7<br />

42.9<br />

Total 54 52 96.3 20 37.0<br />

b. 1999/2000<br />

Polan<br />

Krak<br />

Frykas<br />

Izyd<br />

20<br />

31<br />

25<br />

9<br />

9<br />

9<br />

11<br />

7<br />

45.0<br />

29.0<br />

44.0<br />

77.8<br />

3<br />

3<br />

12<br />

5<br />

15.0<br />

9.7<br />

48.0<br />

55.5<br />

Total 85 36 42.4 23 27.1<br />

520 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 3. Ploidy level and number of plants regenerated from leaf<br />

explants of five haploid cucumber clones.<br />

Haploid plant<br />

No.<br />

regenerated<br />

Ploidy level of plants*<br />

plants 2n 1n<br />

Mixoploids<br />

and<br />

chimeras<br />

1 2 2 0 0<br />

2 45 16 17 12<br />

3 29 11 15 3<br />

4 13 11 2 0<br />

5 31 24 6 1<br />

Total 120 64 40 16<br />

(53.3%) (33.3%) (13.4%)<br />

*Ploidy determined using a flow-cytometric procedure as described by Galbraith et al.<br />

(1983).<br />

Table 4. <strong>The</strong> number and ploidy of plants recovered from colchicine<br />

treatment of the apical meristem.<br />

Exp.<br />

no.<br />

No.<br />

treated<br />

haploid<br />

plants<br />

Shoot<br />

Recovery<br />

No. %<br />

No. plants according to<br />

ploidy level*<br />

Mixoploids<br />

2n 1n and chimeras<br />

1 45 20 44.4 8 9 3<br />

2 30 12 40.0 6 3 3<br />

3 33 24 72.7 5 13 6<br />

4 42 36 85.7 11 25 0<br />

5 25 14 56.0 3 11 0<br />

6 70 26 37.1 10 15 1<br />

Total 245 132 53.9 43 76 13<br />

(32.6%) (57.6%) (9.8%)<br />

*Ploidy determined using a flow-cytometric procedure as described by Galbraith et al.<br />

(1983).<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF DH LINES. Table 6 presents data from DH<br />

lines derived from the three hybrid cultivars tolerant to downy mildew<br />

and the susceptible control hybrid ‘Polan’. In each line plants were<br />

morphologically homogenous.<br />

Most numerous fertile DH plants were obtained from the cultivar<br />

‘Izyd’. Because the group of 14 lines derived from the cultivar ‘Izyd’<br />

was the largest, it represents the majority of the morphological<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 521


Table 5. Number of cucumber plants obtained from colchicine treatment<br />

from five haploid clones.<br />

Shoot No. plants according<br />

Hap- No. treated recovery<br />

to ploidy level<br />

loid<br />

clone<br />

haploid<br />

plants No. % 2n 1n Mixoploids<br />

and chimeras<br />

1 21 15 71.4 7 6 2<br />

2 17 6 35.3 0 3 3<br />

3 24 18 75.0 3 12 3<br />

4 27 20 74.0 5 14 1<br />

5 15 5 33.3 1 2 2<br />

Total 104 64 61.5 16 37 11<br />

(25.0%) (57.8%) (17.2%)<br />

* Ploidy determined using a flow-cytometric procedure as described by Galbraith et al.<br />

(1983).<br />

Table 6. Phenotype characteristics of cucumber DH (10 plants per line),<br />

grown in the open field in 2001.<br />

Suscepti-<br />

DH line<br />

Growth Leaf bility to downy<br />

denomination Sex type color mildew DI<br />

F-1 100 F V C 5.90*<br />

F-2 310 F V C 4.25<br />

F-3 311 F V C 4.40<br />

I-1 18 M V C 8.50*<br />

I-2 89 F V B 8.80*<br />

I-3 114 M V B 8.75*<br />

I-4 150 M V B 8.75*<br />

I-5 228 F I A 8.75*<br />

I-6 243 F I B 3.85<br />

I-7 275 M V A 2.65*<br />

I-8 280 M V B 8.65*<br />

I-9 290 M V B 6.00*<br />

I-10 321 F V A 6.95*<br />

I-11 502 F I A 2.65*<br />

I-12 503 F I A 2.60*<br />

I-13 504 F I A 4.95*<br />

I-14 506 M V B 8.70*<br />

K-1 25 F V A 4.55<br />

K-2 228 F V A 4.55<br />

P-1 356 F V C 8.45*<br />

Izyd F1 (standard) F V B 4.15<br />

Sex expression: F = female, M = monoecious; Growth type: V = vine, I = intermediate,<br />

D = dwarf; Leaf color: A = dark green, B = dark green/light green, C = light green.<br />

522 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


observations that were made. <strong>The</strong> lines within this group differed in sex<br />

expression, growth type, leaf color, and susceptibility to downy mildew<br />

(disease ratings between 2.6 and 8.8). <strong>The</strong> cultivar ‘Izyd’ is gynoecious<br />

with indeterminate (vine) growth, has a leaf color rating of “B,” and is<br />

tolerant to downy mildew (Table 6). Out of the 14 DH lines derived from<br />

‘Izyd’, 3 lines were more tolerant to downy mildew than the original<br />

cultivar. Increased resistance was not observed among the DH lines<br />

developed from the other two resistant varieties.<br />

Discussion<br />

In this study we demonstrated a <strong>complete</strong> procedure for cucumber<br />

DH line production based on previous partial investigations<br />

(Przyborowski and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994; Nikolova and<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1996; Faris et al., 2000).<br />

<strong>The</strong> frequency of embryo development was comparable in the two<br />

experiments performed in this study (about 0.7 embryo per fruit). This<br />

efficiency is not considered high when compared to the efficiency of 1.2<br />

to 3.1 embryos per fruit published earlier (Przyborowski and<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994). However, the results presented here are<br />

unique in the fact that embryos and haploid plants were obtained from<br />

each of the four tested varieties.<br />

As reported here, the frequency of plant regeneration, calculated by<br />

dividing the total number of plants by the number of ovaries that<br />

produced embryos, ranges from 0.07% to 0.31%. Frequency of 0.0 to<br />

7.1% was reported by Gemes-Juhasz et al. (2002); however, in that study<br />

the plantlets were obtained through ovary culture.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results presented here are similar to those observed in<br />

muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), which has been studied to a greater<br />

extent than cucumber (Sauton and Dumas de Vaulx, 1987; Cuny et al.,<br />

1993; Ficcadenti et al., 1995; Abak et al., 1996; Ficcadenti et al., 1999,<br />

Lotfi et al., 2003).<br />

It was reported that ovary culture results in fewer plants and in the<br />

increase in the percentage of mixoploids as compared to haploid embryo<br />

rescue (Ficcadenti et al., 1999; Lotfi et al., 2003). In contrast, pollination<br />

with irradiated pollen, embryo rescue, and subsequent in vitro culture<br />

was reported to produce stable muskmelon haploid plants (Sauton and<br />

Dumas de Vaulx, 1987; Cuny et al., 1993; Ficcadenti et al., 1995; Abak<br />

et al., 1996). <strong>The</strong> latter method clearly produces more desirable results.<br />

Haploid plant production is only the first step in DH production.<br />

Cucumber H embryos do not double spontaneously during in vitro<br />

culture, and efficient methods of chromosome doubling are needed.<br />

Colchicine treatment, the technique most frequently used for<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 523


chromosome doubling, has been applied to cucumber DH production<br />

previously (Nikolova and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1996). <strong>The</strong> most<br />

effective procedure (28% of diploids) proved to be colchicine treatment<br />

of young plants grown in vitro. <strong>The</strong> results of the current study are<br />

similar to the previously published data, but indicate that not every<br />

haploid clone is amenable to doubling.<br />

Another drawback of the colchicine treatment is the death of 38.5%<br />

to 46.1% of plants (Tables 4 and 5). A complementary haploid-doubling<br />

procedure of direct regeneration from haploid leaf explants was applied<br />

to augment the low recovery of diploids (25.0 to 32.6%) resulting from<br />

the application of colchicine (Tables 4 and 5).<br />

Direct regeneration from leaf tissue allows the production of both<br />

haploid and diploid plants (Faris et al., 2000), and has the additional<br />

benefit of multiplying the haploid plants, which in turn provides more<br />

plant material for colchicine treatment. However, only a portion of the<br />

haploid plants (27.1 to 37.0%) was amenable to in vitro regeneration<br />

(Table 2). Furthermore, only some (53.3%) of the regenerated plants<br />

were diploid. This result confirms a similar observation made earlier in<br />

our laboratory (Faris et al., 2000).<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of H plants obtained from H embryos in both<br />

experiments (Table 1) was relatively high, with 20.2% embryos<br />

developing into plants. However, the outcome of the two methods of<br />

chromosome doubling is not satisfactory. Only 20 DH plants (14.4 % of<br />

all haploid plants, Table 2) produced viable seeds. This frequency is low<br />

as compared to the frequency reported for Triticum aestivum (60–81%)<br />

(Lefebvre and Devaux, 1996) and Hordeum vulgare (64%) (Furusho et<br />

al., 1999).<br />

<strong>The</strong> reason for the low fertility and consequently low seed set is<br />

unclear. It is possible that the diploid plants are either partial chimeras or<br />

even low-level mixoploids. Fertility problems were also reported by<br />

Gemes-Juhasz et al. (2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an additional difficulty in achieving self-pollination in DH<br />

plants, namely, there is a need for the induction of male flowers in<br />

otherwise female plants by the application of silver nitrate. In our<br />

experience induction of male flowers is especially difficult in plants<br />

derived from in vitro culture.<br />

It appears that the difficulty of diploidization of cucumber and melon<br />

plants is the main reason for insufficient production of DH lines. For<br />

example, the recent report by Lotfi et al. (2003) describes a spontaneous<br />

appearance of two DH and one mixoploid melon plant in an in vitro<br />

culture of a total of 175 haploid plants, whereas 10 diploid and 100<br />

mixoploid plants were obtained after treating 167 shoots with colchicine.<br />

524 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


In order to be useful in breeding, DH lines must be produced in large<br />

quantities. It appears that the most serious obstacle to cucumber DH line<br />

production occurs at the stage of haploid doubling (Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5).<br />

Such limitation was not reported in Triticum aestivum (Lefebvre and<br />

Devaux, 1996; Inagaki et al., 1998) or Hodeum vulgare (Furusho et al.,<br />

1999). In the studies cited above, the colchicine treatment gave better<br />

results than in cucumber.<br />

Relatively facile production of numerous DH lines (65 to 97), as<br />

described in wheat (Inagaki et al., 1998), allows evaluation of agronomic<br />

characteristics and comparisons with lines produced by conventional<br />

reproductive methods.<br />

Although the number of the DH lines obtained in our study is rather<br />

small, this is the first reported characterization of cucumber DH lines.<br />

Moreover, 3 DH lines showed significantly lower susceptibility to<br />

downy mildew than their donor variety. This characteristic, together with<br />

a high fruit yield of several other DH lines (data not published), as well<br />

as the possibility of early detection of downy mildew resistance using<br />

RAPD markers, may prove to be useful in cucumber breeding.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Abak, K., N. Sari, M. Paksoy, H. Yimaz, H. Aktas, and C. Tunali. 1996. Genotype<br />

response to haploid embryo induction with pollination by irradiated pollen in<br />

melon, production of dihaploid lines, and determination of haploid and diploid<br />

plants by different techniques. Turk. J. Agric. For. 20:425–430.<br />

Burza, W. and S. Malepszy. 1995. Direct regeneration from leaf explants in cucumber<br />

(Cucumis sativus L.) is free of stable genetic variation. Plant Breed. 114:341–345.<br />

Caglar, G. and K. Abak. 1996. <strong>The</strong> effect of season and irradiation doses on haploid<br />

embryo production in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), p. 25–30. In: Proc. 6 th<br />

Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Malaga, Spain.<br />

Cuny, F., M. Grotte, R. Dumas de Vaulx, and A. Rieu. 1993. Effect of gamma<br />

irradiation of pollen on parthenogenetic haploid production in muskmelon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 33:301–312.<br />

Doruchowski, R. and E. Łąkowska-Ryk. 1992. Inheritance of resistance to downy<br />

mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis Berk & Court) in Cucumis sativus, p. 66–69.<br />

In: Proc. 5 th Eucarpia <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae Symposium, Warsaw, Poland.<br />

Faris, N. M., M. Rakoczy-Trojanowska, S. Malepszy, and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt.<br />

2000. Diploidization of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) haploids by in vitro culture<br />

of leaf explant, p. 49–54. In: S. Bielecki, J. Tramper, and J. Polak (eds.). Food<br />

biotech. Elsevier Science,<br />

Ficcadenti, N., P. Veronese, S. Sestili, P. Crino, S. Lucretti, M. Schiavi, and F.<br />

Saccardo. 1995. Influence of genotype on the induction of haploids in Cucumis<br />

melo L. by using irradiated pollen. J. Genet. Breed. 49:359–364.<br />

Ficcadenti, N., S. Sestili, S. Annibali, M. Marco, and M. Schiavi. 1999. In vitro<br />

gynogenesis to induce haploid plants in melon Cucumis melo L. J. Genet. Breed.<br />

53:255–257.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 525


Furusho, M., T. Baba, O. Yamaguchi, T. Yoshida, Y. Hamachi, R. Yoshikawa, K.<br />

Mizuta, and M. Yoshino. 1999. <strong>Breeding</strong> of a new malting barley cultivar Houshun<br />

by the bulbosum method. Breed. Sci. 49:281–284.<br />

Galbraith, D. W., K. R. Harkins, J. M. Maddox, N. M. Ayres, D. P. Sharma, and E.<br />

Firoozabady. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle in intact plant<br />

tissues. Sci. 220:1049–1051.<br />

Gemes-Juhasz, A., P. Balogh, A. Ferenczy, and Z. Kristof. 2002. Effect of optimum<br />

stage of female gametophyte and heat treatment on in vitro gynogenesis induction<br />

in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell Rep. 21:105–111.<br />

Happstadius, I., A. Ljungberg, B. Kristansson, and C. Dixelius. 2003. Identification of<br />

Brassica oleracea germplasm with improved resistance to Verticillium wilt. Plant<br />

Breed. 122:30–34.<br />

Inagaki, M. N., G. Varughese, S. Rajaram, van M. Ginkel, and A. Mujeeb-Kazi. 1998.<br />

Comparison of bread wheat lines selected by doubled haploid, single-seed descent<br />

and pedigree selection methods. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Gen. 97:550–556.<br />

Jenkins, S. F. and T. C. Wehner. 1983. A system for the measurement of foliar diseases<br />

in cucumbers. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 6:10–12.<br />

Lefebvre, D. and P. Devaux. 1996. Doubled haploids of wheat from wheat X maize<br />

crosses: genotypic influence, fertility and inheritance of 1BL-1RS chromosome.<br />

<strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Gen. 93:1267–1273.<br />

Lotfi, M., A. R. Alan, M. J. Henning, M. M. Jahn, and E. D. Earle. 2003. Production of<br />

haploid and doubled haploid plants of melon (Cucumis melo L.) for use in breeding<br />

for multiple virus resistance. Plant Cell. Rep. 21:1121–1128.<br />

Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays<br />

with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497.<br />

Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. and R. Dumas de Vaulx. 1989. Preliminary data on haploid<br />

cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) induction. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 12:24–25.<br />

Nikolova, V. and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt. 1996. Diploidization of cucumber (Cucumis<br />

sativus L.) haploids by colchicine treatment. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 65:311–317.<br />

Przyborowski, J. and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt. 1994. Main factors affecting cucumber<br />

(Cucumis sativus L.) haploid embryo development and characteristics. Plant Breed.<br />

112:70–75.<br />

Sauton, A. 1989. Haploid gynogenesis in Cucumis sativus L. induced by irradiated<br />

pollen. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 12:22–23.<br />

Sauton, A. and R. Dumas de Vaulx.1987. Obtention de plantes haploides chez le melon<br />

(Cucumis melo L.) par gynogenese induite par du pollen irradie. Agronomie.<br />

7:141–148.<br />

Truong-Andre, I. 1988. In vitro haploid plants derived from pollination by irradiated<br />

pollen of cucumber, p. 143–144. Proc. Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics<br />

and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Avignon-Montfavet, France<br />

526 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


NATURALLY OCCURRING STRAINS OF<br />

BIPARTITE BEGOMOVIRUSES AFFECT<br />

SOME MEMBERS OF CUCURBITACEAE<br />

FAMILY INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE COTTON<br />

ZONE IN PAKISTAN<br />

M. Tahir and M. S. Haider<br />

School of Biological Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore,<br />

Pakistan<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Luffa cylindrica, Momordica charantia, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />

pepo, Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus, Pumpkin yellow mosaic Lucknow virus,<br />

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)<br />

ABSTRACT. Young symptomatic leaves of Luffa cylindrica, Momordica charantia,<br />

and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo were collected from vegetable fields from both the cotton<br />

zone (Multan) and noncotton zone (Lahore) in Pakistan. Total DNA was<br />

extracted by the CTAB method. For each of the six samples, PCR products of<br />

expected size (i.e., 2.8kb for both full-length DNA A and DNA B) were amplified<br />

by using specific primers designed from published sequences of ToLCNDV. <strong>The</strong><br />

PCR-amplified products were cloned, sequenced, and analyzed. <strong>The</strong> partial<br />

DNA A sequences obtained from M. charantia (Lahore) and L. cylindrica<br />

(Lahore and Multan) showed the highest sequence homology (91% to 98% over<br />

a stretch of 486 to 728 nucleotides) to Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus<br />

(ToLCNDV). <strong>The</strong> partial DNA A sequence obtained from <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

(Lahore) showed the highest sequence homology (97% over a stretch of 503<br />

nucleotides) to Pumpkin yellow mosaic Lucknow virus (PYMLkV). <strong>The</strong> partial<br />

DNA B sequences obtained from M. charantia (Multan) and L. cylindrica<br />

(Lahore and Multan) had the highest level of sequence identity (88% to 94%<br />

over a stretch of 447 to 606 nucleotides) to ToLCNDV. However, the sequence<br />

for DNA A component of M. charantia (Multan) and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (Multan)<br />

and for DNA B component of M. charantia (Lahore) and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

(Lahore and Multan both) have yet to be determined.<br />

B<br />

egomoviruses (Family Geminiviridae) are single-stranded<br />

DNA viruses that infect dicotyledonous plants, are transmitted<br />

by a single species of whitefly [Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)],<br />

and typically have genomes consisting of two components (Rybicki et<br />

al., 2000), referred to as DNA A and DNA B, both of which are<br />

essential for virus proliferation. <strong>The</strong> components share a region of high<br />

sequence identity known as the “common region” that contains motifs<br />

required for the control of gene expression and replication, notably<br />

conserved reiterated motifs and a putative stem-loop structure<br />

containing the highly conserved nonanucleotide motif (TAATATTAC)<br />

that functions in the initiation of rolling circle replication.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 527


<strong>The</strong> genome component designated DNA A encodes all virus<br />

functions required for DNA replication (Stanley, 1983; Hanley-<br />

Bowdoin et al., 1999), as well as the coat protein, which plays an<br />

essential role in insect transmission (Briddon et al., 1998; Azzam et<br />

al., 1994).<br />

<strong>The</strong> DNA B component encodes two genes involved in virus<br />

movement within plants (Noueiry et al., 1994) and their products are<br />

symptoms determinants for the bipartite begomoviruses (Klinkenberg<br />

and Stanley, 1990; von Arnim and Stanley, 1992).<br />

However, a small number of monopartite begomoviruses, for<br />

instance Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), have been identified<br />

that lack the second component. For these viruses, all viral products<br />

required for replication, gene expression, whitefly transmission, and<br />

systemic infection are encoded on a single component (a homolog of<br />

the DNA A component of the bipartite begomoviruses; Navot et al.,<br />

1991; Rojas et al., 2001).<br />

Satellite molecules have been identified for several monopartite<br />

begomoviruses. <strong>The</strong>se molecules, called DNA β, are approximately<br />

1350nts in length (approximately half that of the genomes of their<br />

helper viruses) and are unrelated in sequence to their helper viruses;<br />

they require their helper viruses for replication, movement in plants,<br />

and insect transmission. DNA β satellites affect the replication of their<br />

helper begomoviruses and alter the symptoms induced in some host<br />

plants (Saunders et al., 2000; Briddon et al., 2001).<br />

A B<br />

Fig. 1. (A) L. cylindrica (mosaic); (B) Bitter gourd (yellow vein).<br />

528 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


<strong>The</strong> characteristic symptoms include leaf curling, vein thickening,<br />

yellow leaf curling, vein yellowing, mosaic, and, in some cases,<br />

yellow blotch and stunting (Briddon and Markham, 2001, Harrison, et<br />

al., 1997).<br />

Geminiviruses cause several of the world’s most serious viral<br />

diseases of crop plants in tropical and subtropical regions, e.g., cassava<br />

in Africa and India, tomato, legumes, and cucurbits worldwide, and<br />

cotton in Pakistan.<br />

Occurrence of whitefly-transmitted diseases in plants, particularly in<br />

vegetables, ornamental plants, and agricultural and economic crops,<br />

presents a challenge for plant scientists concerned with yield and<br />

quality in plant production. In recent years, the role of whitefly and<br />

begomoviruses both in yield and quality has been recognized. During<br />

the last decade the output of cotton from Pakistan has been seriously<br />

compromised due to an epidemic of Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD),<br />

with losses between 1992 and 1997 estimated at US$5 billion.<br />

Disease incidence on cucurbits is quite high; it ranges from 60–<br />

90% depending on disease severity. It is hard to find a field without<br />

begomovirus infection over a distance of hundreds of kilometres. <strong>The</strong><br />

present study aimed at the analysis of the genetic variability of<br />

cucurbit viruses within each location and for two distant locations in<br />

Pakistan: Multan (cotton zone) and Lahore (noncotton zone).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

SAMPLE COLLECTION. Young leaves of Luffa cylindrica,<br />

Momordica charantia, and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo showing typical<br />

begomovirus-like symptoms and symptomless leaves were collected<br />

from both cotton-growing (Multan) and non-cotton-growing (Lahore)<br />

regions separated by 350Km. Leaf samples were kept separately in<br />

plastic bags and stored at -80 о C in a freezer. Total DNA from both<br />

healthy and infected leaves was isolated by the cetyl trimethyl<br />

ammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987) by<br />

using 1g of leaf tissues.<br />

POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION. To amplify full-length DNA A<br />

and B, specific primers were designed from published sequences of<br />

ToLCNDV. PCR was performed in volumes of 50μl containing<br />

1.5mM MgCl2, 200μM dNTPs, 2.5μM each of primers, 100ng of<br />

Total DNA, and 2.5U of Taq polymerase (Fermentas). Reactions were<br />

carried out in an Applied Biosystems 2720 thermal cycler programmed<br />

for 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 о C, 1 min at 55 о C, and 3 mins at 72 о C.<br />

Amplified PCR products were detected by 1% agarose gel<br />

electrophoresis using DNA ladder Mix (Fermentas) as marker.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 529


LIGATION AND TRANSFORMATION. Amplified products were<br />

ligated into pTZ57R/T (Fermentas) cloning vector according to the<br />

supplier’s instructions and transformed in DH5α strain of E. coli. Blue<br />

and white selection was made by spreading the transformed cells onto<br />

the surface of LB medium agar plates (0.5% NaCl, 0.5% yeast extract,<br />

1% trypton, and 1.5% agar) containing 130μg/ml of IPTG, 270μg/ml<br />

of X-gal, and 100μg/ml of ampicillin. Plates were incubated at 37 о C<br />

for 14–16 hours.<br />

<strong>The</strong> white colonies were selected and reinoculated in LB broth<br />

(0.5% NaCl, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% trypton) for small-scale<br />

preparation and restricted analysis was done by HindIII, EcoRI, and<br />

BamHI restriction endonucleases. Sequencing was performed by<br />

CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman and Coulter<br />

sequencer).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> objectives of this study were to confirm the relation between<br />

the observed diseases in local vegetable fields and the presence of<br />

begomoviruses, to have an idea about the distribution of the problem<br />

around the country, and to determine the genetic diversity of<br />

begomoviruses infecting cucurbits. This study also aimed to find out if<br />

cucurbits could function as reservoir hosts of the begomoviruses<br />

infecting other vegetables, or vice versa.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong> vegetables showing begomovirus-like symptoms<br />

collected from two distant locations (the cotton-growing area of<br />

Multan and the non-cotton-growing area of Lahore) from Pakistan<br />

produced PCR products of expected size (i.e., 2.8kb each for DNA A<br />

and DNA B), and there was no amplification from any of the healthy<br />

plant samples. <strong>The</strong> PCR products were detected on 1% agarose gel<br />

using DNA ladder as marker (Figure 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> partial sequences obtained from virus isolates were compared<br />

with sequences from other begomoviruses available in databases. <strong>The</strong><br />

presence of begomoviruses, in the symptomatic plant species<br />

evaluated was positive for nearly all the samples tested. <strong>The</strong>re is about<br />

the same level of variability when comparing sequence identities (%)<br />

between all begomovirus isolates from different cucurbit plant species<br />

as there is within a single plant species.<br />

<strong>The</strong> partial DNA A sequences obtained from M. charantia<br />

(Lahore) and L. cylindrica (Lahore and Multan) showed the highest<br />

sequence homology (91% to 97% over a stretch of 486 to 728<br />

nucleotides) to Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV). <strong>The</strong><br />

partial DNA A sequence obtained from <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (Lahore)<br />

530 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


1. M. charantia Lhr, A<br />

2. M. charantia, Lhr, B<br />

3. M. charantia Mn, A<br />

4. Luffa, Mn, A<br />

5. Luffa, Mn, B<br />

6. Luffa, Lhr, A<br />

7. DNA ladder<br />

8. C. pepo Lhr, A<br />

9. C. pepo Lhr, B<br />

Mn = Multan<br />

Lhr= Lahore<br />

A = DNA A<br />

B= DNA B<br />

Fig 2. Ethidium bromide stained 1% agarose gel. Samples from Lane 1–9 are<br />

described on the right-hand side of figure.<br />

showed the highest sequence homology (97% over a stretch of 503<br />

nucleotides) to Pumpkin yellow mosaic Lucknow virus (PYMLkV).<br />

<strong>The</strong> partial DNA B sequences obtained from M. charantia (Multan)<br />

and L. cylindrica (Lahore and Multan) had the highest level of<br />

sequence identity (88% to 94% over a stretch of 447 to 606<br />

nucleotides) to ToLCNDV (Table 1). However, the sequence for the<br />

DNA A component of M. charantia (Multan) and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />

(Multan) and the DNA B component of M. charantia (Lahore) and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (Lahore and Multan both) have yet to be determined.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of these studies on cucurbits showed that begomovirus<br />

diseases are widespread in Pakistan as in many countries of the world.<br />

Begomoviruses were detected in all six samples collected from two<br />

distant locations. According to the comparisons and their partial<br />

sequence analysis, they were arranged in two groups in relation to the<br />

previously described begomoviruses. <strong>The</strong>y were found to be widely<br />

distributed (present in almost every part of Asia, especially Pakistan)<br />

and belonged to at least two species, i.e., ToLCNDV and PYMLkV.<br />

ToLCNDV covers quite a broad host range from diverse plant families<br />

including Compositeae (Haider et al., 2005) and Solanaceae (Hussain<br />

et al., 2004). This indicates that ToLCNDV is a potential threat to<br />

vegetables and to the cotton industry in Pakistan. <strong>The</strong> results suggest<br />

the existence of ToLCNDV on Luffa cylindrica and M. charantia and<br />

of PYMLkV on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo under natural conditions in two<br />

regions of Pakistan.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 531


Table 1. Percentage blast homology of the sequences from investigated<br />

sample.<br />

Blast<br />

Sample<br />

Size<br />

homology<br />

name Location Genome (kb) Virus (%)<br />

M. charantia Multan A 2.8 ToLCNDV 95<br />

M. charantia Lahore A 2.8 ToLCNDV 91<br />

L. cylindrica Lahore A 2.8 ToLCNDV 91<br />

L. cylindrica Lahore A 2.8 ToLCNDV 95<br />

C. pepo Lahore A 2.8 PYMLkV 97<br />

M. charantia Multan B 2.8 ToLCNDV 88<br />

L. cylindrica Lahore B 2.8 ToLCNDV 94<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Azzam, O., J. Frazer, D. de la Rose, J. S. Beaver, P. Ahiquist, and D. P. Maxwell.<br />

1994. Whitefly transmission and efficient ssDNA accumulation of bean golden<br />

mosaic geminivirus requires functional coat protein. Virol. 204:289–296.<br />

Briddon, R. W. and P. G. Markham. 2001. Cotton leaf curl disease. Virus Res.<br />

71:151–159.<br />

Briddon, R. W., S. Liu, M. S. Pinner, and P. G. Markham. 1998. Infectivity of<br />

African cassava mosaic virus clones to cassava by biolistic inoculation. Arch.<br />

Virol. 143:2487–2492.<br />

Doyle, J. J. and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small<br />

quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11–15.<br />

Haider M. S, M. Tahir, Latif, and R. W. Briddon. 2005. First report of Tomato leaf<br />

curl New Delhi virus infecting Eclipta prostrata in Pakistan.<br />

.<br />

Hanley-Bowdoin, L., S. B. Settlage, B. M. Orozco, S. Nagar, and D. Robertson.<br />

1999. Geminiviruses: models for plant DNA replication, transcription, and cell<br />

cycle regulation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18:71–106.<br />

Harrison, B. D., S. Khalid, S. Hameed, G. W. Otim-Nape, Y. L. Liu, and D. J.<br />

Robinson. 1997. Detection and relationships of cotton leaf curl virus and allied<br />

whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses occurring in Pakistan. Ann. Appl. Biol.<br />

130:61–75.<br />

Hussain, M., S. Mansoor, S. Iram, Y. Zafar, and R. W. Briddon. 2004. First report of<br />

Tomato leaf curl New Delhi Virus infecting Chilli pepper in Pakistan.<br />

.<br />

Klinkenberg, F. A. and J. Stanley. 1990. Encapsidation and spread of African<br />

cassaca mosaic virus DNA A in the absence of DNA B when agro-inoculated to<br />

Nicotiana benthaniana. J. Gen. Virol. 71:1409–1412.<br />

Navot, N., E. Pichersky, M. Zeidan, D. Zamir, and H. Czosnek. 1991. Tomato<br />

yellow leaf curl virus: a whitelfy transmitted geminivirus with a single genomic<br />

component. Virol. 185:151–161.<br />

Noueiry, A. O., W. J. Lucas, and R. L. Gilbertson. 1994. Two proteins of a plant<br />

DNA virus coordinate nuclear and plasmodesmal transport. Cell. 76:925–932.<br />

Rojas, M. R., H. Jiang, R. Salati, B. Xoconostle-Cazares, M. R. Sudarshana, W. J.<br />

Lucas, and R. L. Gilbertson. 2001. Functional analysis of proteins involved in<br />

532 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


movement of the monopartite begomovirus, tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Virol.<br />

291:110–125.<br />

Rybicki, E. P., R. W. Briddon, J. E. Brown, C. M. Fouquet, D. P. Maxwell, B. D.<br />

Harrison, P. G. Markhan, D. M. Bisaro, D. Robinson, and J. Stanley. 2000.<br />

Geminiviridae, p. 285–297. In: M. H. V. Van Regenmortel, C. M. Fauquet, D.<br />

H. L. Bishop, E. B. Carstens, M. K. Estes, S. M. Lemon, J. Maniloff, M. A.<br />

Mayo, D. J. McGeoch, C. R. Pringle, R. B. Wicker (eds.). Virus taxonomy:<br />

eighth report on the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Academic<br />

Press, San Diego, CA.<br />

Saunders, K., I. D. Bedford, R. W. Briddon, P. G. Markham, S. M. Wong, and J.<br />

Stanley. 2000. A novel virus complex causes Ageratum yellow vein disease.<br />

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:6890–6895.<br />

Stanley, J. 1983. Infectivity of the cloned geminivirus genome requires sequencers<br />

from both DNAs. Nature. 305:643–645.<br />

Von Arnim, A. and J. Stanley. 1992. Determinants of tomato golden mosaic virus<br />

symptom development located on DNA B. Virol. 186:286–293.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 533


EFFECT OF FUNGICIDE CHEMISTRY AND<br />

CULTIVAR ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF<br />

CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW ON PUMPKIN<br />

IN NEW JERSEY<br />

Christian A. Wyenandt<br />

Rutgers University, Rutgers Cooperative Research and Extension<br />

Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center<br />

121 <strong>North</strong>ville Road, Bridgeton, New Jersey 08302<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Podosphaera xanthii, fungicide resistance, FRAC<br />

groups<br />

ABSTRACt. A trial was conducted in 2005 at the Rutgers Agricultural Research<br />

and Extension Center in southern New Jersey to determine if resistance to<br />

commonly used fungicides would develop in cucurbit powdery mildew. Five<br />

fungicide application programs were applied to two pumpkin cultivars every 7<br />

to 10 days season-long: (1) mancozeb (Manzate) + sulfur alternated with<br />

Maneb + fixed copper (Champ) (protectant fungicides only); (2) chlorothalonil<br />

(Bravo) + myclobutanil (Nova) alternated with azoxystrobin (Amistar); (3)<br />

myclobutanil + Maneb alternated with famoxadone+cymoxanil (Tanos); (4)<br />

chlorothalonil + myclobutanil alternated with myclobutanil; and (5)<br />

chlorothanolil + azoxystrobin alternated with azoxystrobin. Area under the<br />

disease progress curve (AUDPC) values were significantly higher when<br />

azoxystrobin was applied weekly. AUDPC values were 1067.0 for ‘Howden’ and<br />

1245.0 for ‘Magic Lantern’ compared to 625.6 in ‘Howden’ and 489.2 in ‘Magic<br />

Lantern’ when azoxystrobin was alternated weekly with a myclobutanil.<br />

AUDPC was lowest when myclobutanil was applied weekly.<br />

O<br />

ver 2,400 hectares of cucurbit crops are grown annually for<br />

commercial wholesale or roadside markets in New Jersey.<br />

Powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne)<br />

U. Braun & N. Shishkoff (also known as Sphaerotheca fusca (Fr.) S.<br />

Blumer and S. fuliginea (Schlechtend.:Fr.) Pollacci) is one of the most<br />

destructive diseases of pumpkin and other cucurbit crops in the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s. Without proper fungicide applications, powdery mildew can<br />

cause 100% premature defoliation leading to sunscald injury to fruit<br />

and reduced yield. Fungicide applications are the principle practice in<br />

most cucurbit crops for managing powdery mildew (McGrath, 2001).<br />

In recent years new fungicide chemistries, such as the QoIs (Fungicide<br />

Resistance Action Committee [FRAC] Group 11) have been<br />

introduced to the market for the control of powdery mildew (Kuck and<br />

Mehl, 2003). <strong>The</strong>se new chemistries, although highly effective at<br />

controlling powdery mildew, have a high risk for the development of<br />

534 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


esistance by the pathogen (McGrath, 2001). Powdery mildew<br />

resistance to FRAC Group 11 (QoI) as well as to DMIs (FRAC Group<br />

3) fungicides has been reported in other states and other countries<br />

(McGrath, 2001). In recent years, cucurbit growers in northern New<br />

Jersey have stated that some of the fungicides (i.e., DMIs and QoIs)<br />

commonly used in recommended powdery mildew control programs<br />

have not been as effective as in previous years. This noticeable<br />

reduction in control may be the result of resistance development in<br />

commercial fields where QoI and DMI fungicides are being used<br />

extensively for cucurbit powdery mildew control in New Jersey.<br />

In 2005, a fungicide trial was conducted at Rutgers Agricultural<br />

Research and Extension Center (RAREC) in Bridgeton (Cumberland<br />

County), New Jersey, to determine if P. xanthii would develop<br />

resistance to either a DMI and/or QoI fungicide chemistry.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Five blocks, each consisting of 2 rows on 3.1m centers, of<br />

pumpkin cvs. Howden and Magic Lantern were established 22 June.<br />

Prior to pumpkin establishment, and on 20 April 2005, Sudangrass was<br />

seeded at 68 kg/ha between each block to provide a windbreak and<br />

prevent fungicide drift between blocks. Each block consisted of five<br />

replications each of sprayed (fungicide treatment) or unsprayed plots<br />

(7.6m long) with in-row breaks of 3.1m between plots. Five different<br />

fungicide programs consisting of (1) 2.24kg/ha Manzate + 2.24kg/ha<br />

sulfur alternated with 2.24kg/ha Maneb + 1.51L/ha Champ (protectant<br />

fungicides only); (2) 3.5L/ha Bravo + 0.34kg/ha Nova alternated with<br />

0.34kg/ha Amistar (standard program, FRAC Groups 3 and 11); (3)<br />

0.34kg/ha Nova + 2.24kg/ha Maneb alternated with 0.55kg/ha Tanos<br />

(FRAC Groups 11 + 27); (4) 3.5L/ha Bravo + 0.34kg/ha Nova<br />

alternated with 0.34kg/ha Nova (FRAC Group 3 weekly); and (5)<br />

3.5L/ha Bravo + 0.34kg/ha Amistar alternated with 0.34kg/ha Amistar<br />

(FRAC Group 11 weekly) were applied season-long starting on 27<br />

July and repeated every 7 to 10 days (10 total applications/block).<br />

Fungicide was applied using a tractor-mounted CO2-assisted 3.1m<br />

boom sprayer (R&D Sprayers, Opelousa, LA) with flat fan nozzles<br />

(TeeJet 8002VS) on 0.51m centers with a delivery rate of 412L/ha at<br />

58psi. All sprayed and unsprayed plots in each block were rated on a<br />

weekly basis on a scale of 0.0 to 1.0 (0.05 increments) for percentage<br />

of foliage with powdery mildew symptoms. At the end of the season<br />

arcsine transformed AUPDC values were calculated for all plots. On 3<br />

Oct five pumpkin leaves from each plot were visually rated for the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 535


percentage of leaf surface (top and bottom) with symptoms of powdery<br />

mildew. On 17 Oct all fruit were harvested and weighed.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> effects of fungicide chemistry and pumpkin cultivar on the<br />

development of cucurbit powdery mildew were studied in southern<br />

New Jersey in 2005. Powdery mildew was most severe when a Group<br />

11 fungicide was applied weekly to either a fully susceptible<br />

‘Howden’ or powdery mildew-tolerant ‘Magic Lantern’ (Figure 1).<br />

Powdery mildew severity was lower when a Group 11 fungicide was<br />

alternated with a Group 3 fungicide weekly, and lowest when a Group<br />

3 fungicide was applied weekly (Figure 1). At the end of the growing<br />

season, powdery mildew severity was visually<br />

Fig. 1. Effects of fungicide program and cultivar on the development of<br />

powdery mildew on pumpkin in southern New Jersey in 2005.<br />

rated on the top and bottom sides of leaves of the fully susceptible<br />

‘Howden’ or the powdery mildew-tolerant ‘Magic Lantern’. Powdery<br />

mildew was highest on the bottom side of leaves when a FRAC Group<br />

11 fungicide was applied weekly (71% in ‘Howden’ and 66% in<br />

‘Magic Lantern’) compared to the protectant fungicide program (48%<br />

in ‘Howden’; 38% in ‘Magic Lantern’) and standard program (Group<br />

536 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


3 alt. Group 11) (27% in ‘Howden’; 26% in ‘Magic Lantern’). When a<br />

Group 3 fungicide was applied weekly, powdery mildew was only 2%<br />

on the bottom side of leaves in both ‘Howden’ and ‘Magic Lantern’.<br />

AUDPC values were significantly higher in ‘Howden’ and ‘Magic<br />

Lantern’ when Group 11 fungicide was applied weekly. AUDPC<br />

values were 1067.0 for ‘Howden’ and 1245.0 for ‘Magic Lantern’<br />

compared to 625.6 in ‘Howden’ and 489.2 in ‘Magic Lantern’ when<br />

Group 11 fungicide was alternated weekly with a Group 3 fungicide.<br />

AUDPC was lowest when Group 3 fungicide was applied weekly,<br />

362.7 in ‘Howden’ and 321.6 in ‘Magic Lantern’ (Table 1). In general,<br />

pumpkin yield (tons/ha) was higher in the powdery mildew-tolerant<br />

‘Magic Lantern’ compared to the susceptible ‘Howden’. <strong>The</strong><br />

respective yields (tons/ha) for ‘Howden’ and ‘Magic Lantern’ were<br />

15.4 and 19.6 for the Group 11/weekly program; 12.5 and 20.7 for<br />

Group 3/weekly; 9.3 and 13.6 for Group 3 alternated with Group 11<br />

(standard); 9.8 and 15.0 in protectant fungicides only; and 9.3 and 13.6<br />

in Group 3 alternated with Groups 11 + 27.<br />

This research suggests that cucurbit powdery mildew developed<br />

resistance to the FRAC Group 11 fungicide azoxystrobin when applied<br />

on a weekly basis during the production season, and that a resistant<br />

powdery mildew population is most likely to develop on the bottom<br />

side of the leaf surface when protectant fungicides, such as<br />

chlorothalonil (FRAC Group M5), are included in fungicide program.<br />

Importantly, from a control standpoint, once QoI resistance develops<br />

to one strobilurin chemistry, the pathogen is expected to develop<br />

cross-resistance to other QoIs, even if those chemistries haven’t been<br />

applied. Powdery mildew severity was lower when a FRAC Group 11<br />

fungicide was alternated weekly with a FRAC Group 3 fungicide,<br />

suggesting that the alternation of these chemistries is effective in<br />

slowing the development of a resistant population. Powdery mildew<br />

severity was lowest when a FRAC Group 3 fungicide was applied<br />

weekly, suggesting that in the case of this study, the use of a Group 3<br />

fungicide was not selecting for a resistant population.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 537


Table 1. Fungicide program (rate per hectare), FRAC grouping(s), and<br />

AUDPC values for cucurbit mildew development in pumpkin cvs.<br />

Howden and Magic Lantern at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and<br />

Extension Center (RAREC) in southern New Jersey in 2005.<br />

Fungicide FRAC<br />

AUDPC value<br />

program<br />

3.5L/ha Bravo<br />

+ 0.34kg/ha<br />

Amistar alt.<br />

0.34kg/ha<br />

Amistar<br />

groups(s) Howden Magic Lantern<br />

Group 11<br />

weekly 1067.0 1245.0<br />

2.24kg/ha<br />

Manzate + 2.24<br />

kg/ha sulfur alt.<br />

2.24kg /ha<br />

Maneb + 1.51<br />

L/ha Champ Group M only 910.3 796.1<br />

0.34kg/ha Nova<br />

+ 2.24kg/ha<br />

Maneb alt.<br />

0.55kg/ha<br />

Tanos<br />

3.5L/ha Bravo<br />

+ 0.34kg/ha<br />

Nova alt<br />

0.34kg/ha<br />

Amistar<br />

Group 3 alt<br />

Group 11+27 858.3 912.2<br />

Group 3 alt<br />

Group 11 625.6 489.2<br />

3.5L/ha Bravo<br />

+ 0.34kg/ha<br />

Nova alt<br />

0.34kg/ha Nova Group 3 weekly 362.7 321.6<br />

LSD (p = 0.05) 162.9 215.4<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Kuck, K.-H. and A. Mehl. 2003. Trifloxystrobin: resistance risk and resistance<br />

management. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer. 56:313–325.<br />

McGrath, M. T. 2001. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences<br />

and challenges. Plant Dis. 85:236–245.<br />

538 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


SURVEY FOR CUCURBIT VIRUSES IN<br />

COMMERCIAL FIELDS AND EVALUATION OF<br />

VIRUS-RESISTANT SUMMER SQUASH<br />

BREEDING LINES IN NEW JERSEY<br />

Christian A. Wyenandt<br />

Rutgers University, Rutgers Cooperative Research and Extension<br />

Michelle Infante-Casella<br />

Gloucester County Agricultural Agent<br />

Melvin R. Henninger<br />

Specialist in Vegetable Crops<br />

Richard Buckley<br />

Coordinator, Plant Diagnostic and Nematode Detection Service<br />

Resource Center<br />

Sabrina Tirpak<br />

Principle Lab Technician, Plant Diagnostic and Nematode Detection<br />

Service Resource Center<br />

Kristian E. Holmstrom<br />

IPM Research Project Coordinator II<br />

Peter J. Nitzsche<br />

Morris County Agricultural Agent<br />

William H. Tietjen<br />

Warren County Agricultural Agent<br />

Raymond J. Samulis<br />

Burlington County Agricultural Agent<br />

Wesley L. Kline<br />

Cumberland County Agricultural Agent<br />

Win Cowgill<br />

Hunterdon County Agricultural Agent<br />

Joseph R. Heckman<br />

Extension Specialist in Soil Fertility, Rutgers Cooperative Research<br />

and Extension, Rutgers University, 88 Lipman Drive,<br />

New Brunswick, NJ 08901<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. ELISA, mosaic virus<br />

ABSTRACT. A survey of commercial fields was carried out to determine which<br />

viruses were most prevalent in cucurbit production areas of New Jersey in 2005.<br />

Concurrently, 22 summer squash breeding lines and named cultivars were<br />

sampled for virus infection. In total, 22 summer squash breeding lines and<br />

cultivars and 37 virus-infected cucurbits from commercial plantings from eight<br />

counties in New Jersey were tested for CMV (Cucumber mosaic virus), WMV-2<br />

(Watermelon mosaic virus 2), PRSV (Papaya ring spot virus), and ZYMV<br />

(Zucchini yellow mosaic virus). In total, 85% of the samples tested positive for<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 539


WMV, 33% tested positive for ZYMV, 12% tested positive for CMV, and 5%<br />

tested positive for PRSV. Thirty-five percent of the samples tested positive for<br />

two viruses and 2% tested positive for three viruses. Of the 22 squash breeding<br />

lines and cultivars, only 2, ‘Payroll’ and ‘Patriot II’, tested negative for all four<br />

viruses during this survey.<br />

O<br />

ver 2,400 hectares of cucurbit crops are grown annually for<br />

commercial wholesale and roadside markets in New Jersey.<br />

New summer squash cultivars are regularly released that<br />

contain resistance packages for important cucurbit viruses. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

resistance packages may include resistance and/or tolerance to one or<br />

more cucurbit viruses, such as Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV 2),<br />

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Zucchini yellow mosaic virus<br />

(ZYMV), and/or Papaya ring spot virus (PRSV). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> growers in<br />

New Jersey rely on summer squash cultivars with virus-resistance<br />

packages along with resistance and/or tolerance to other important<br />

diseases, such as powdery or downy mildew, to reduce the chances for<br />

significant losses. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to survey<br />

commercial fields to determine which viruses were most prevalent in<br />

cucurbit production areas of New Jersey in 2005. Concurrently, 22<br />

summer squash breeding lines and named cultivars with and without<br />

resistance/tolerance packages were sampled for virus infection.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

During the summer of 2005, commercial cucurbit fields from eight<br />

counties in New Jersey were surveyed for symptoms of virus infection.<br />

Infected plant tissue was collected by county agricultural agents and<br />

sent to the Plant Diagnostic Laboratory in New Brunswick, New<br />

Jersey, for virus identification. At the Plant Diagnostic Laboratory,<br />

commercially available Agdia, DAS ELISA, alkaline phosphatase<br />

label, PathoScreen Test Kits for CMV, WMV, ZYMV, and PRSV<br />

detection were used for the testing protocol. Symptomatic plant<br />

material was selected from each sample. Most samples were leaf<br />

tissue, but some fruit and stems were tested. A 1:10 ratio (0.5g to 5ml)<br />

solution of tissue and extraction buffer was placed in Agdia sample<br />

extraction pouches and ground using Agdia’s tissue homogenizer<br />

attached to a 9-volt drill press. <strong>The</strong> buffer/tissue solution was<br />

subsequently loaded into sample wells alongside positive and negative<br />

controls supplied with the test kit. <strong>The</strong> test plates were incubated for<br />

two hours at room temperature. After incubation the plates were<br />

washed with PBST. An enzyme conjugate was added and the plates<br />

were incubated again at room temperature for two hours. After<br />

540 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


incubation, as before, the plates were washed with PBST. PNP buffer<br />

(100ul) was added to the plates and then incubated for another hour.<br />

Lastly, sodium hydroxide (50ul) was added to each well to stop the<br />

reaction. <strong>The</strong> wells were examined and color change was interpreted<br />

visually. Wells in which color developed indicated positive results.<br />

Individual wells in which there was no significant color development<br />

indicated negative results.<br />

Results<br />

In total, 22 summer squash breeding lines and cultivars and 37<br />

virus-infected cucurbit plantings from eight counties were tested for<br />

CMV, WMV-2, PRSV, and ZYMV in 2005 (Table 1). In the<br />

breeding-line and cultivar evaluation, symptoms of virus infection first<br />

appeared on 8 Sept. in ‘Sunray’, which tested positive for WMV-2. Of<br />

the 22 squash breeding lines and cultivars, only 2, ‘Payroll’ and<br />

‘Patriot II’, tested negative for all four viruses, although ‘Payroll’<br />

developed virus-like symptoms during this survey (Tables 2 and 3).<br />

Only ‘Patriot II’, ‘Liberator III’, ‘Seminis Exp.’, and ‘Conqueror III’<br />

showed no symptoms of virus infection on foliage or fruit. However,<br />

‘Liberator III’, ‘Conqueror III’, and ‘Seminis Exp.’ tested positive for<br />

CMV. Although ‘Payroll’ developed virus-like symptoms, it tested<br />

negative for all four viruses (Table 3). ‘Independence II’ showed<br />

symptoms of virus-like infection on developing fruit only. In total,<br />

85% of the samples collected from commercial fields and from a<br />

breeding-line and cultivar evaluation tested positive for WMV-2, 33%<br />

tested positive for ZYMV, 12% tested positive for CMV, and 5%<br />

tested positive for PRSV. Thirty-five percent of the samples tested<br />

positive for two viruses and 2% tested positive for three viruses.<br />

Watermelon mosaic virus was the most commonly identified virus in<br />

cucurbit crops in New Jersey in 2005. Overall, 35 % of the samples<br />

tested positive for two viruses. Because of this, cucurbit growers in<br />

New Jersey, as well as elsewhere, should continue to plant cultivars<br />

with resistance packages for one or more of the important viruses in<br />

cucurbits.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 541


Table 1. Host, county, and ELISA results for commercial cucurbit fields<br />

sampled for Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Watermelon mosaic virus<br />

(WMV), Papaya ring spot virus (PRSV), and Zucchini mosaic virus<br />

(ZYMV) in New Jersey in 2005.<br />

Host County CMV PRSV WMV2 ZYMV<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + +<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + +<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + +<br />

Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Warren - - + +<br />

Pumpkin Warren - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Warren - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Warren - - + +<br />

Pumpkin Warren - - + +<br />

Pumpkin Sussex - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Middlesex - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Warren - - - +<br />

Pumpkin Hunterdon - - + +<br />

Zucchini Hunterdon - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + +<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - + + +W<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - + + +w<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - + + +w<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Gourd Burlington - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Squash Burlington - - + +w<br />

Yellow<br />

squash Burlington - - + +w<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />

Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />

Zucchini Cumberland - - + -<br />

Yellow<br />

squash Cumberland - - + -<br />

(+) = positive for virus, (-) = negative for virus, (+w) = weak positive.<br />

542 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. ELISA test results for yellow summer squash breeding line(s)<br />

and cultivars evaluated at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and<br />

Extension Center, Bridgeton, New Jersey, in 2005.<br />

Company/<br />

Cultivar CMV PRSV WMV2 ZYMV<br />

Resistance<br />

package<br />

Seminis<br />

‘General Patton’<br />

- - + - CMV, WMV<br />

(PY)<br />

Seminis<br />

+ - - - CMV, WMVII,<br />

experimental<br />

ZYMV<br />

(trans)<br />

Seminis ‘Patriot<br />

II’<br />

Seminis<br />

‘Liberator III’<br />

Seminis<br />

Conquerer III’<br />

Seminis<br />

‘Sunray’<br />

Harris Moran<br />

‘Cougar’<br />

Harris Moran<br />

‘Lioness’<br />

- - - - WMII, ZYMV<br />

(trans)<br />

+W - - CMV,<br />

WMVII,<br />

ZYMV (trans)<br />

+ - - - CMV,<br />

WMVII,<br />

ZYMV<br />

(trans), PRSV<br />

(conv)<br />

- - + - CMV,<br />

WMVII, (PY)<br />

- - + - CMV,<br />

WMVII, (PY),<br />

PRSV, ZYMV<br />

(T)<br />

- - + - CMV,<br />

WMVII,<br />

PRSV (IR),<br />

ZYMV (T)<br />

(+) = positive for virus, (-) = negative for virus, (+w) = weak positive.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 543


Table 3. ELISA test results for zucchini breeding lines and cultivars<br />

evaluated at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center,<br />

Bridgeton, New Jersey, in 2005.<br />

Resistance<br />

Company/cultivar CMV PRSV WMV2 ZYMV<br />

Harris Moran/<br />

‘Tigress’<br />

Harris Moran/<br />

‘Leopard’<br />

package<br />

- - - + ZYMV,<br />

WMVII (T)<br />

+W - + - WMV,<br />

PRSV (IR)<br />

Harris Moran/‘Lynx’ - - + + WMVII,<br />

ZYMV,<br />

PRSV (T)<br />

Harris Moran/<br />

‘Wildcat’<br />

- - +W -<br />

Sieger/experimental - - + -<br />

Sieger/ experimental - - + -<br />

Sieger/ experimental - - + +W<br />

Sieger/ experimental - - + -<br />

Sieger/‘Payroll’ - - - - WMVII,<br />

ZYMV<br />

(T)(trans)<br />

Sieger/‘Revenue’ - - + - CMV,<br />

WMVII,<br />

ZYMV<br />

(T)(trans)<br />

Sieger/‘Independence<br />

II’<br />

- - +W - WMVII,<br />

ZYMV<br />

(R)(trans)<br />

Sieger/‘Justice III’ - - + + CMV,<br />

WMVII,<br />

ZYMV<br />

(R)(trans)<br />

Seminis/‘Senator’ - - + + none<br />

Seminis/<br />

experimental<br />

+ - - - CMV,<br />

WMVII,<br />

ZYMV<br />

(trans)<br />

(+) = positive for virus, (-) = negative for virus, (+w) = weak positive.<br />

544 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


A RAPID HEXANE-FREE METHOD FOR<br />

ANALYZING TOTAL CAROTENOID CONTENT<br />

IN CANARY YELLOW-FLESHED<br />

WATERMELON<br />

Angela R. Davis, Julie Collins, Wayne W. Fish,<br />

Charles Webber III, and Penelope Perkins-Veazie<br />

USDA, ARS, South Central Agriculture Research Laboratory,<br />

P.O. Box 159, Lane, OK 74555<br />

Y. Tadmor<br />

Newe Ya’ar Research Center, ARO, Israel<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, light-absorption method, puree<br />

absorbance method, carotenoid quantification<br />

ABSTRACT. Lycopene is the predominant carotenoid in red watermelon<br />

(Citrullus lanatus [Thunb. ] Matsum. and Nakai) and pro-lycopene is the<br />

predominant carotenoid in most orange watermelon. However, yellow<br />

watermelons contain many different carotenoids, all in low to trace amounts.<br />

Since carotenoids have antioxidant properties and potential health benefits,<br />

selecting varieties with high concentrations of these valuable pigments is<br />

important for breeding lines. Unfortunately, current methods to assay total<br />

carotenoid content are time consuming and require hazardous organic solvents.<br />

This report describes a rapid and reliable light-absorption method to assay total<br />

carotenoid content for yellow watermelon that does not require organic<br />

solvents. Light absorption of 67 watermelon flesh purees was measured with a<br />

diode array xenon flash spectrophotometer that can measure actual light<br />

absorption from opaque samples; results were compared with a hexane<br />

extraction method. <strong>The</strong> puree absorbance method gave a linear relationship<br />

(R 2 =0.85) to total carotenoid content and was independent of watermelon<br />

variety within the total carotenoid concentration range measured (0μg/g to<br />

7μg/g fresh weight).<br />

C<br />

arotenoids have been linked to lower risk of myocardial<br />

infarction (Kohlmeier et al., 1997), may possess anticancer<br />

properties (Gerster, 1997), and promote healthy eye function<br />

(Rodriguez-Carmona et al., 2006; Giovannucci, 1999; Simon, 1997;<br />

Stahl and Sies, 1996). <strong>The</strong>se attributes may be in part responsible for<br />

increased purchase of products containing these compounds (McBride,<br />

1999; National Watermelon Promotion Board, 1999). Red-fleshed<br />

watermelons contain high quantities of lycopene, a red-pigmented<br />

carotenoid with powerful antioxidant properties (Di Mascio et al.,<br />

1989, Tomes et al., 1963). Orange watermelons typically contain high<br />

amounts of pro-lycopene, similar to the tomato “tangerine” mutation<br />

(Isaacson et al., 2002), and, in some watermelon varieties, β-carotene<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 545


and ζ-carotene (Tadmor et al., 2004, 2005; Tomes and Johnson, 1965;<br />

Perkins-Veazie et al., unpublished data). Yellow watermelons are<br />

divided into two major types: canary yellow and salmon yellow<br />

(Henderson et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong> salmon yellow is a “tangerine type”<br />

watermelon that contains small amounts of pro-lycopene, whereas the<br />

canary yellow contains multiple carotenoids all in low or trace<br />

amounts (Tadmor et al., 2004, 2005; Perkins-Veazie and King,<br />

unpublished data).<br />

Carotenoid content varies greatly among watermelon cultivars and<br />

production environments (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2001), but yellow<br />

watermelon seems to be consistently low in all of these potent<br />

antioxidants. Total carotenoid content was tested for ‘Early<br />

Moonbeam’, a canary yellow watermelon (Henderson et al., 1998);<br />

only trace amounts of carotenoids were detected (Tadmor et al., 2004,<br />

2005). Tadmor and others suggest that this may be similar to tomatoes,<br />

where a nonfunctioning phytoene synthase gene results in the<br />

accumulation of very low levels of carotenoids in yellow-fleshed fruits<br />

(Camara, 1993). Because carotenoids are valued as phytonutrients, a<br />

quick, reliable screening method for carotenoid content is needed for<br />

germplasm evaluations. Conventional spectrophotometric or HPLC<br />

assays to quantify total carotenoids utilize organic solvents to extract<br />

and solubilize these compounds from tissue (Adsule and Dan, 1979;<br />

Beerh and Siddappa, 1959; Sadler et al., 1990). <strong>The</strong>se methods are<br />

time consuming, require the use and disposal of hazardous organic<br />

solvents, and do not work well for the more hydrophilic carotenoids. A<br />

simple, inexpensive, and reliable method to determine total carotenoid<br />

content without organic solvents is highly desirable for the watermelon<br />

industry. One such approach is a modified method from Davis et al.<br />

(2003), which utilizes a diode array xenon flash spectrophotometer to<br />

measure absorbed visible color and correlate these values to lycopene<br />

We would like to thank Amy Helms, Buddy Faulkenberry, Anthony Dillard, and<br />

Bryan Deak for providing valuable technical support, and Pat Bischof and Gordon<br />

Leggett of Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., for technical assistance. Mention of<br />

trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of<br />

providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement<br />

by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of the U.S.<br />

Department of Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to<br />

race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article<br />

cited was prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties. Copyright<br />

protection under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works. Accordingly,<br />

there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in which the<br />

article appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S.<br />

Government, which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />

546 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


content. In this report, we demonstrate that watermelon puree<br />

evaluated with a diode array xenon flash spectrophotometer is a novel<br />

and fast method for accurately quantifying total carotenoid content in<br />

yellow watermelon. This method overcomes detection problems with<br />

carotenoid levels and missing hydrophilic carotenoids.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

WATERMELON FRUIT. Watermelons ranging from yellow to offwhite<br />

were grown at Lane, OK, in 2005. Four open-pollinated varieties<br />

(‘Early Moonbeam’, ‘Yellow Baby’, ‘Yellow Doll’, and ‘Cream of<br />

Saskatchewan’), and five Plant Introduction (PI) lines (271773,<br />

271769, 299378, 314655, 494531) were evaluated. Uncut watermelons<br />

were stored at room temperature. Heart tissue was removed within<br />

one week of harvest.<br />

SAMPLE PREPARATION. All steps from the time watermelons were<br />

cut lengthwise were performed in subdued lighting at room<br />

temperature, unless otherwise stated. <strong>The</strong> heart tissue was collected cut<br />

into chunks approximately 3cm 3 or smaller. Samples were pureed<br />

immediately or after storage for several months at -80 o C. Tissue<br />

(~30g) was homogenized using a Brinkmann Polytron Homogenizer<br />

(Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, NY) with a 20mm O.D.<br />

blade to produce a uniform slurry with particles smaller then 3mm 3 .<br />

Samples were not allowed to heat or froth.<br />

LOW-VOLUME HEXANE EXTRACTION METHOD. <strong>The</strong> low-volume<br />

hexane extraction method, performed as described by Fish et al.<br />

(2002), was used to measure total carotenoid content of watermelon<br />

purees. Briefly, approximately 0.6g samples were weighed from each<br />

puree into two 40-mL amber screw-top vials containing 5mL of 0.05%<br />

(w/v) BHT in acetone, 5mL of 95% ethanol, and 10mL of hexane.<br />

Purees were stirred on a magnetic stirring plate during sampling.<br />

Samples were placed on ice on an orbital shaker at 180rpm for 15 min.<br />

After shaking, 3mL of deionized water were added and samples<br />

shaken for an additional 5 min on ice. <strong>The</strong> vials were left at room<br />

temperature for 5 min to allow for phase separation. <strong>The</strong> absorbance of<br />

the upper, hexane layer was measured at 450nm in a 1-cm path length<br />

quartz cuvette blanked with hexane. Total carotenoid content of<br />

watermelon was calculated based on sample weight using the<br />

absorbance at 450nm (Fish et al., 2002). A comparison was made<br />

between the hexane extraction, methanol extractions, and ethanol<br />

extractions for each variety and PI used to ensure the hexane method<br />

was adequately extracting all carotenoids. Additionally, the aqueous<br />

phase of the hexane extraction was scanned to ensure all carotenoids<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 547


were extracted into the hexane layer. This step was deemed necessary<br />

since the carotenoid profile of all yellow watermelons is not known<br />

and it was necessary to determine that water-soluble carotenoids were<br />

not missed.<br />

PUREE ABSORBANCE METHOD. <strong>The</strong> UltraScan XE (Hunter<br />

Associates Laboratory, Inc., Reston, VA) is a diode array xenon flash<br />

colorimeter/spectrophotometer with a wavelength range from 360 to<br />

750nm that reads both reflectance and transmittance. All tristimulus<br />

integrations are based on a triangular bandpass of 10nm and a<br />

wavelength interval of 10nm. <strong>The</strong> instrument sensor uses a specially<br />

coated plastic integrating sphere (6-in. diameter) that diffuses the light<br />

from the xenon light source. <strong>The</strong> light source illuminates and is<br />

transmitted through the sample. A lens located at an angle of 8 o<br />

perpendicular to the sample surface collects the transmitted light and<br />

directs it to a diffraction grating that separates the light into its<br />

component wavelengths. <strong>The</strong> intensities of these component<br />

wavelengths of transmitted light are then measured by two<br />

polychromators, each with 40-element diode array detectors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> instrument was standardized per company specifications and<br />

blanked on an empty cuvette. Watermelon puree was mixed well to<br />

keep separation to a minimum; about 20mL of the sample were<br />

immediately poured into a 1-cm, 20- mL SR101A cuvette (Spectrocell,<br />

Oreland, PA). <strong>The</strong> sample was scanned in the transmittance (TTRAN)<br />

mode under the following settings: the large reflectance port (1.00”),<br />

Illuminant at D65, MI Illuminant Fcw, and observer 10 o . Absorbance<br />

at 670nm was subtracted from absorbance at the maximum absorbance<br />

(430nm) to adjust for light scatter. <strong>The</strong> low-volume hexane analysis<br />

and the Hunter UltraScan XE readings were performed on the same<br />

day.<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Linear least square regression analyses<br />

were performed using the statistical component of Microsoft ® Excel<br />

2002 SP-2 software (Redmond, WA).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

ABSORBANCE SPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS OF WATERMELON-<br />

TISSUE PUREE. Previous attempts at reliably correlating reflectance<br />

parameters to carotenoid content of watermelon with handheld<br />

colorimeters were unsuccessful (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2001). Use of<br />

tissue puree can overcome this limitation as well as provide access to<br />

light absorption to provide a reliable quantification method. <strong>The</strong><br />

Hunter UltraScan XE subjects samples to light intensities that are<br />

orders of magnitude greater than those of analytical<br />

548 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


spectrophotometers with quartz halogen lamps. <strong>The</strong> UltraScan XE also<br />

has sphere collectors that collect scattered as well as nonscattered<br />

light. This potentially allows reliable spectral measurements on<br />

translucent samples that scatter light. <strong>The</strong> spectra for yellow<br />

watermelon exhibit apparent absorption maxima of 410, 430, and<br />

480nm (data not shown).<br />

ABSORBANCE BEHAVIOR OF WATERMELON PUREE AS RELATED<br />

TO TOTAL CAROTENOID CONTENT. Based on the spectral results<br />

obtained from the UltraScan XE, we investigated the possibility of<br />

employing absorbance measurements of watermelon puree at 430nm<br />

as a means to estimate total carotenoid content of watermelon tissue.<br />

Since many purified carotenoids are not soluble in an aqueous phase,<br />

and because the carotenoid profile of yellow watermelon is not fully<br />

known, a standard curve with purified carotenoids could not be<br />

performed. <strong>The</strong>refore, visible absorbance of watermelon puree using<br />

the UltraScan XE was correlated with total carotenoid content<br />

determined by absorption measurement of organic solvent extraction.<br />

Flesh of tissue from 47 yellow to off-white watermelons from four<br />

varieties and four PIs were used in the study. <strong>The</strong> absorbance at<br />

430nm measured for each puree (adjusted for light scatter by<br />

subtracting the absorbance at 670nm) was plotted against its total<br />

carotenoid content as measured by hexane extraction (Figure 1).<br />

Hexane method total carotenoid estimate<br />

(ug/g fresh tissue)<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

y = 2.9993x - 0.5497<br />

R 2 = 0.8509<br />

0<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5<br />

Puree absorbance (A430nm-A670nm)<br />

Fig. 1. Forty-seven yellow watermelon heart tissue purees (4 varieties and 4 PI<br />

lines) were analyzed with the UltraScan XE. Absorbance is plotted versus total<br />

carotenoid content as determined by hexane extraction. <strong>The</strong> absorbance at<br />

430nm is adjusted for scatter by subtracting the absorbance at 670nm. <strong>The</strong> R 2<br />

value and the linear least squares fit equation are given in the figure.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 549


<strong>The</strong> scatter-adjusted absorbance at 430nm appears to obey Beer’s<br />

law with respect to total carotenoid content. <strong>The</strong> absorbance reading is<br />

linearly correlated with total carotenoid content, and the linear least<br />

squares fit to the data yields the equation: y = 2.9993x - 0.5497 with<br />

an R 2 value of 0.85 (p< 0.05).<br />

USE OF WATERMELON-PUREE ABSORBANCE TO QUANTIFY TOTAL<br />

CAROTENOID CONTENT. To validate the equation obtained in Figure 1<br />

as a predictive equation for total carotenoid content in watermelon<br />

tissue, the scatter-adjusted absorbances (430nm - 670nm) of 20<br />

additional watermelon purees (two hybrid varieties and three PI lines)<br />

were measured. <strong>The</strong>n, each value was inserted into the linear equation<br />

generated by Figure 1 to estimate the total carotenoid content of the<br />

tissue. Predicted values were plotted against the total carotenoid values<br />

estimated by hexane extraction (Figure 2). A linear relationship was<br />

obtained between the estimates by the two methods with an R 2 of 0.85.<br />

<strong>The</strong> equation for the linear least squares fit to the data, y = 0.9875x -<br />

0.0337, differs only slightly from that expected for an ideal fit, y = x.<br />

Hexane method total carotenoid content<br />

(ug/g fresh tissue)<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

y = 0.9875x - 0.0337<br />

R 2 = 0.8476<br />

0<br />

-0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5<br />

-0.5<br />

Predicted lycopene content from puree absorbance method<br />

(ug/g fresh tissue)<br />

Fig. 2. Total carotenoid content determined for 20 individual yellow<br />

watermelons (3 varieties and 2 PI lines) by the puree absorbance method as<br />

compared with the determinations by the low-volume hexane assay. <strong>The</strong><br />

adjusted absorbance at 430nm (i.e., 430 nm - 670nm) for each watermelon<br />

puree was converted to a total carotenoid content with the use of the linear least<br />

squares equation of Fig. 1 (y = 2.9993x - 0.5497). <strong>The</strong> R 2 value and the linear<br />

least squares fit equation are given in the figure. <strong>The</strong> hatched line indicates a<br />

perfect predictive model, i.e., y = x.<br />

550 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


To achieve the desired level of reliability in the puree absorbance<br />

procedure, one must: (1) maintain subdued light, since light degrades<br />

carotenoids, (2) thoroughly homogenize the tissue, and (3) mix the<br />

puree before reading the samples.<br />

This paper details a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method to<br />

quantify total carotenoids in flesh of canary yellow watermelons. We<br />

evaluated 67 watermelon samples (four hybrid varieties and five PI<br />

lines) with total carotenoid contents ranging from 0μg/g to 7μg/g fresh<br />

weight. <strong>The</strong> puree absorbance method gave a linear relationship to<br />

carotenoid content and is independent of watermelon variety. This<br />

method offers an improvement to the conventional method by<br />

reducing sample-processing time by at least half and requires no<br />

hazardous reagents. It is important to note that this equation may have<br />

to be altered for yellow fruit that have a higher total carotenoid than<br />

tested here (> 7ug/g). Until this germplasm is found, if it indeed exists,<br />

this method is a good screening tool to search for high-carotenoidcontaining<br />

yellow-watermelon germplasm.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Adsule, P. G. and A. Dan. 1979. Simplified extraction procedure in the rapid<br />

spectrophotometric method for lycopene estimation in tomato. J. Food Sci. &<br />

Tech. 16:216.<br />

Beerh, O. P. and G. S. Siddappa. 1959. A rapid spectrophotometric method for the<br />

detection and estimation of adulterants in tomato ketchup. Food Tech. 13:414–<br />

418.<br />

Camara, B. 1993. Plant phytoene synthase complex: component enzymes,<br />

immunology, and biogenesis. Methods in Enzymol. 214:352–365.<br />

Davis, A. R., W. W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method<br />

for analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />

Di Mascio, P., S. P. Kaiser, and H. Sies. 1989. Lycopene as the most efficient<br />

biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.<br />

274:532–538.<br />

Fish, W. W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />

lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food Comp. &<br />

Anal. 15:309–317.<br />

Gerster, H. 1997. <strong>The</strong> potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Amer. Coll.<br />

Nutr. 16:109–126.<br />

Giovannucci, E. 1999. Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer:<br />

review of the epidemiological literature. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91:317–331.<br />

Henderson, W. R., G. H. Scott, and T. C. Wehner. 1998. Interaction of flesh color<br />

genes in watermelon. J. Hered. 89:50–53.<br />

Isaacson, T., G. Ronen, D. Zamir, and J. Hirschberg. 2002. Cloning of tangerine<br />

from tomato reveals a carotenoid isomerase essential for production of βcarotene<br />

and xanthophylls in plants. Plant Cell. 14:333–342.<br />

Kohlmeier, L., J. D. Kark, G. E. Gomez, B. C. Martin, S. E. Steck, A. F. M.<br />

Kardinaal, J. Ringstad, T. M. Thamm, V. Masaev, R. Riemersma, J. M. Moreno-<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 551


Martin, J. K. Huttunene, and F. J. Kok. 1997. Lycopene and myocardial<br />

infarction risk in the EURAMIC study. Amer. J. Epidemiol. 146:618–626.<br />

McBride, J. 1999. Phytonutrients take center stage. Agr. Res. 47:24–25.<br />

National Watermelon Promotion Board. 1999. Consumer research on watermelon<br />

purchase and promotion. National Watermelon Promotion Board, Orlando, FL.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene content<br />

differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food & Agr. 81:983–<br />

987.<br />

Rodriguez-Carmona, M., J. Kvansakul, J. Alister Harlow, W. Kopcke, W. Schalch,<br />

and J. L. Barbur. 2006. <strong>The</strong> effects of supplementation with lutein and/or<br />

zeaxanthin on human macular pigment density and colour vision. Ophthal. &<br />

Physiol. Optics. 26:137–147.<br />

Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and bcarotene<br />

from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />

Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />

Simon, P. 1997. Plant pigments for color and nutrition. HortSci. 32:12–13.<br />

Stahl, W. and H. Sies. 1996. Lycopene: a biologically important carotenoid for<br />

humans? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 336:1–9.<br />

Tadmor, Y., N. Katzir, S. King, A. Levi, A. Davis, and J. Hirschberg. 2004. Fruit<br />

coloration in watermelon: lessons from the tomato, p. 181–185. In: A. Lebeda<br />

and H. S. Paris (eds.). Eucarpia 2004, progress in cucurbit genetics and<br />

breeding. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />

Tadmor, Y., S. King, A. Levi, A. Davis, A. Meir, B. Wasserman, J. Hirschberg, and<br />

E. Lewinsohn. 2005. Comparative fruit colouration in watermelon and tomato.<br />

Food Res. Intl. 38:837–841.<br />

Tomes, M. L. and K. W. Johnson. 1965. Carotene pigments of an orange-fleshed<br />

watermelon. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 87: 438–442.<br />

Tomes, M. L., K. W. Johnson, and M. Hess. 1963. <strong>The</strong> carotene pigment content of<br />

certain red fleshed watermelons. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 82:460–464.<br />

552 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI ASSOCIATED<br />

WITH SUSCEPTIBILITY TO POSTHARVEST<br />

PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORDERS AND DECAY<br />

OF MELON FRUIT<br />

J. P. Fernández-Trujillo, J. A. Martínez, J. Obando, C. Miranda<br />

Technical University of Cartagena (ETSIA) and Institute of Plant<br />

Biotechnology, Cartagena, Spain<br />

A. J. Monforte, I. Eduardo, and P. Arús<br />

Laboratori de Genética Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Cabrils, Spain<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, fruit quality, near isogenic lines,<br />

chilling injury, overripening, water-soaking texture, necrosis of placental tissue<br />

ABSTRACT. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is a perishable fruit that requires<br />

refrigeration to extend its shelf life. A genomic library of near isogenic lines<br />

(NILs) derived from a cross between the Spanish cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS)<br />

and an exotic Korean accession (PI 161375), each of them with a single<br />

introgression from PI 161375 into the PS background, was used to detect<br />

quantitative trait loci (QTLs). <strong>The</strong> analyzed polygenes included those affecting<br />

the susceptibility of fruit to physiological disorders and associated decay after<br />

long-term storage (35d at 8 o C and 75%RH). One QTL improved overall fruit<br />

flavor after refrigeration while another reduced total losses compared with PS.<br />

However, most of the QTLs identified had a detrimental effect on melon fruit<br />

quality compared with PS because they increased flesh susceptibility to watersoaking<br />

texture, overripening, and flavor loss. Other QTLs were associated<br />

with decreased susceptibility to chilling injury or Fusarium sp. decay, or<br />

increased susceptibility to Stemphylium sp. decay. <strong>The</strong> association of two QTLs<br />

to necrosis of the placental tissue at harvest was confirmed after the postharvest<br />

phase. Hollow flesh disorder was associated with three QTLs.<br />

P<br />

hysiological disorders, including chilling injury (CI), are a<br />

serious problem for melon exporters, because most commercial<br />

melon varieties are sensitive to CI (Tatsumi and Murata, 1981).<br />

Other disorders such as water-soaking (du Chatenet et al., 2000) and<br />

overripening are also important problems for the melon-processing<br />

This work was funded by grants 00620/PI/04 (Fundación Séneca, Región de Murcia),<br />

AGL2003-09175-C02-01, and AGL2003-09175-C02-02 from the Spanish Ministry<br />

of Education and Science and FEDER (EU). JO is grateful to the Spanish Ministry of<br />

Foreign Affairs for an MAE-AECI fellowship, and IE to the Spanish Ministry of<br />

Education and Science for an FPI grant. <strong>The</strong> parental line of PS melon was provided<br />

by Semillas Fitó S. A. (Barcelona, Spain) and plastic liners by Plásticos del Segura S.<br />

L. (Murcia, Spain).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 553


industry, and for when attempts are made to promote whole or freshcut<br />

melon consumption in the marketplace, as in fast-food or<br />

conventional restaurants (Fernández-Trujllo, 2006). Typical CI<br />

symptoms in melon are pitting and scald, which are usually colonized<br />

in a few days by saprophytic or necrotrophic fungi (Miccolis and<br />

Saltveit, 1995; Xu et al., 1990). Sensitivity to some disorders is<br />

strongly dependent on cultivar, storage time, and temperature<br />

(Miccolis and Saltveit, 1995).<br />

Wild or exotic germplasm can be used to improve input or output<br />

traits (i.e., fruit yield and quality, respectively) if selected genomic<br />

regions are introgressed into elite genetic backgrounds (Bernacchi et<br />

al., 1998; Fernández-Trujillo et al., 2005; Schauer et al., 2006).<br />

Approaches to identify the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) responsible<br />

for low-temperature responses in the introgressed region of tomato<br />

have been conducted with near isogenic lines (NILs) by Oyanedel et al.<br />

(2001). A genomic library of NILs derived from a cross between the<br />

Spanish cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) and an exotic Korean accession<br />

(PI 161375) has been recently developed (Eduardo et al., 2005). NIL<br />

genomic libraries facilitate the genetic dissection of complex traits<br />

(Zamir 2001). <strong>The</strong> NIL melon genomic library has been used to<br />

identify QTLs affecting fruit-quality traits during refrigerated storage.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Twenty-seven NILs derived from a cross between the Spanish<br />

cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) and the exotic Korean accession<br />

‘Shongwan Charmi’ PI 161375 (SC) were used. Each of the NILs had<br />

a single introgression from SC into the PS background covering the<br />

whole genome of the SC (Eduardo et al., 2005). Ten plants for each<br />

NIL and SC and 50 plants for the PS were grown in a <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />

randomized design in Torre Pacheco (Murcia, Spain) using standard<br />

growing practices under Mediterranean summer conditions<br />

(Fernández-Trujillo et al., 2005). Every single plant of the NIL or<br />

parentals was considered a replication.<br />

Fruit from the previous experiment were used for the storage<br />

experiment. At least two fruit of 23 replications of PS and at least 5<br />

replications of eight NILs with introgression of SC located in six<br />

linkage groups (LG) (II, IV, V, VIII, IX, and X) were tested. At least<br />

two fruit from 3 to 5 replications of eight additional NILs with<br />

introgressions from SC located in seven LG (I, III, IV, V, VIII, IX, and<br />

XII) were also analyzed. Fruit were stored, distributed randomly in the<br />

cold chamber, for 35d at 8±0.5ºC and 75±3% relative humidity (RH),<br />

covered with plastic liners (Plásticos del Segura S.L., Murcia, Spain).<br />

554 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


<strong>The</strong> skin CI symptoms of PI161375 were also inspected after one, two,<br />

or three weeks at 8 o C. After this time, the stored fruits were examined<br />

for CI, decay, loss of whole-fruit finger texture, internal overripening,<br />

disorders, and flavor.<br />

Typical symptoms of CI were pitting, surface pitting, skin scald,<br />

and watery breakdown as a result of decay by secondary infection of<br />

microorganisms as reported by Tatsumi and Murata (1981). <strong>The</strong><br />

degree of rind CI was evaluated subjectively. Fruit were divided into<br />

five classes depending on the skin-surface area affected by CI: 0 =<br />

absent; 1 = very slight, 0–5%; 2 = slight, 5–10%; 3 = moderate, 10–<br />

25%; 4 = severe, 25–50% (Fernández-Trujillo and Artés, 1998;<br />

Miccolis and Saltveit, 1995). Moderately to severely injured fruit was<br />

considered unmarketable since these disorders affected more than 20%<br />

of the epidermis surface in a double cut parallel to the longitudinal<br />

diameter. In the case of water-soaking texture (glassy texture,<br />

vitrescence), moderate to severely injured fruit were not of commercial<br />

quality since these disorders affected more than 20% of the epidermis<br />

surface. A hedonic test after storage scored whole-fruit hardness<br />

(finger texture), flesh overripening, and loss of fruit flavor by using a<br />

five-degree scale as follows: 1 = poor, soft, <strong>complete</strong> loss of flavor; 2<br />

= insipid and nonsweet, or senescent aroma; 3 = fair texture, slightly<br />

sweet and aromatic flavor; 4 = good, firm, balance between sweetness<br />

and flavor; 5 = very firm, excellent.<br />

Decay caused by necrotrophic fungi and other rots was recorded<br />

and considered as losses according to Blancard et al. (1995). <strong>The</strong> fungi<br />

were recorded with digital pictures and later identified by light<br />

microscopy. When only sterile mycelium appeared, melon fruits were<br />

subjected to additional storage (around one week at 22±2ºC with<br />

>90%RH) in order to facilitate the emergence of the conidiophores and<br />

conidia. In cases of doubt (due, for example, to the absence of<br />

conidiophores and conidia), potato dextrose agar culture and other<br />

techniques for stimulating the reproductive hyphae, such as cutting the<br />

mycelium, were applied. Decay-causing fungi were identified up to<br />

genus level by using the <strong>complete</strong> manual of imperfect fungi of<br />

Barnett and Hunter (1999). No index of severity was applied and fruits<br />

were classified according to the absence or presence of decay.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect of the SC introgressions was studied by an analysis of<br />

variance (ANOVA) of the data untransformed or transformed into<br />

their respective arc sin or the arc sin of the square root of the data. <strong>The</strong><br />

data transformation was performed to follow a normal distribution<br />

according to a normal probability plot. Mean NIL values were<br />

compared with the control genotype PS using the Dunnet contrast with<br />

Type-I error α ≤ 0.05 calculated by JMP 5.1.2 (SAS Institute Inc.,<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 555


Cary, NC). <strong>The</strong> number of QTLs was estimated assuming that there<br />

was only one QTL per introgression. When two NILs with overlapping<br />

introgressions showed significant effects, the QTL was considered to<br />

be located in the overlapping region. <strong>The</strong> effects of the QTLs located<br />

in NILs with significant effects are reported as relative to the PS mean:<br />

QTL effect =<br />

( NILmean − PSmean)<br />

100 *<br />

PSmean<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

PI161375 showed slight CI symptoms after one week at 8 o C and<br />

moderate CI symptoms after two weeks at 8 o C, while PS showed no<br />

CI symptoms even after two–three weeks at 8 o C. CI developed mostly<br />

on fruit with netted skin, which was later colonized by Alternaria sp.<br />

and Cladosporium sp., generally growing together at 8 o C, as has been<br />

previously reported (Snowdon, 1991).<br />

One QTL located in LG VIII reduced total losses due to lower<br />

levels of CI and associated decay than observed in the PS control<br />

(Table 1). <strong>The</strong> main rots that developed after one month of storage at<br />

8 o C were Alternaria, Cladosporium, Stemphylium, and Fusarium sp.,<br />

and, to a lesser extent, Botrytis sp. <strong>The</strong>se necrotrophic fungi developed<br />

mainly on scald and pitting caused by CI. In some NILs the above<br />

fungi developed in cracks and CI associated to netting, and in the<br />

peduncle. No QTLs were found for susceptibility to Alternaria sp. or<br />

Cladosporium sp., or other occasional rots such as Aspergillus sp. or<br />

Botrytis sp. In agreement with Snowdon (1991), Fusarium sp. was<br />

found mainly in the peduncle. This rot was not specific to CI fruit<br />

because it also grew in fruit stored at 10 o C (data not shown). One QTL<br />

in LG VIII was responsible for a higher incidence of Stemphylium sp.<br />

in the NILs than in PS while another QTL in LG VIII showed the<br />

opposite trend for Fusarium sp. rot (Table 1). Other QTLs located in<br />

LGs IV, VIII, and IX may have reduced the sensitivity to CI (P


absent in PS. One QTL in LG X also had some influence in the<br />

development of the water-soaked texture associated with late ripening.<br />

In fact, harvesting fruits from every NIL with the QTL in LG X in the<br />

right state of maturity was difficult because the abscission layer beside<br />

the peduncle was not defined.<br />

Table 1. Analyzed disorders, decay, and flavor after storage for 35d at<br />

8 o C in the parent control ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) and quantitative trait loci<br />

(QTLs) detected with near isogenic line (NIL) genomic library. PS<br />

column indicates the mean for this genotype, the first number of the<br />

QTL indicates the linkage group number of the genetic map of melon<br />

where the QTL was mapped, the range of QTL effects and and P was<br />

the significance of the Dunnett test.<br />

PS<br />

Quality trait mean QTL Range of QTL effects relative to PS P<br />

Total losses 87% tl8.1 -86%


Four to 10% of fruits in NILs with introgressions in LGs III, VIII,<br />

and IX were affected by slight symptoms of hollow flesh disorder<br />

probably due to fruit senescence (Figure 1A). This disorder has not<br />

received attention in melons, but in cucumber or watermelon one that<br />

may be related (pillowy fruit disorder) has been associated with<br />

environmental and postharvest stress (Navazio and Staub, 1994). At<br />

least two QTLs (n2.3 and n9.2) located in LGs II and IX at harvest<br />

were responsible for necrosis of the placental tissue and surrounding<br />

flesh tissue (Figure 1B). <strong>The</strong> necrosis was also detected in another<br />

experiment analyzing fruit at harvest (data not shown), and was<br />

confirmed after the postharvest phase. <strong>The</strong> NILs with QTLs n2.3 and<br />

n9.2 had 100 and 60% of the fruit affected by the necrosis disorder,<br />

respectively.<br />

A B<br />

Fig. 1. Internal disorders in near isogenic lines (NILs) of melons after storage<br />

for 35d at 8 o C. (A) Necrosis of the placental tissue and adjacent areas in<br />

Linkage Group IX (QTL n9.2). (B) Hollow flesh disorder located in a NIL with<br />

a PI161375 introgression in LG IX.<br />

It is possible to identify the QTLs involved in the detrimental<br />

effects on melon fruit during refrigerated storage by using NILs, but to<br />

get good results a minimum number of replicates (five to eight) and<br />

fruit per replicate (to give at least thirty to forty fruit per NIL) are<br />

required to confirm these results. QTL identification can be<br />

implemented in breeding programs to develop new varieties suitable<br />

for long-term storage with improved flavor and reduced susceptibility<br />

to internal disorders and CI. <strong>The</strong> effect of these introgressions should<br />

be evaluated in a range of elite genetic backgrounds, to assess the<br />

558 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


suitability of using them as sources of new genetic variability in<br />

modern breeding programs.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Barnett, H. L. and B. B. Hunter. 1999. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. Burgess<br />

Pub. Co., Minneapolis, MN.<br />

Bernacchi, D., T. Beck-Bunn, D. Emmatty, Y. Eshed S. Inai, J. López, V. Petiard, H.<br />

Sayama, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir, and S. Tanksley. 1998. Advanced backcross QTL<br />

analysis of tomato. II. evaluation of near-isogenic lines carrying single-donor<br />

introgressions for desirable wild QTL-alleles derived from Lycopersicon<br />

hirsutum and L. pimpinellifolium. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 97:170–180.<br />

Blancard, D., H. Lecoq, and M. Pitrat. 1995. A colour atlas of cucurbit diseases.<br />

Manson Pub. Co., London.<br />

du Chatenet, C., A. Latche, E. Olmos, B. Ranty, M. Charpenteau, R. Ranjeva, J. C.<br />

Pech, and A. Graziana. 2000. Spatial-resolved analysis of histological and<br />

biochemical alterations induced by water-soaking in melon fruit. Physiol. Plant.<br />

110:248–255.<br />

Eduardo, I., P. Arús, and A. J. Monforte. 2005. Development of a genomic library of<br />

near isogenic lines (NILs) in melon (Cucumis melo L.) from the exotic accession<br />

PI161375. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 112:139–148.<br />

Fernández-Trujillo, J. P. 2006. Análisis del punto de venta de frutas y hortalizas y<br />

propuestas de mejora desde la poscosecha. Hort. XXIV:38–47.<br />

.<br />

Fernández-Trujillo, J. P. and F. Artés. 1998. Chilling injury in peaches during<br />

conventional and intermittent warming storage. Int. J. Refrig. 21:265–272.<br />

Fernández-Trujillo, J. P., J. Obando, J. A. Martínez, A. Alarcón, I. Eduardo, A. J.<br />

Monforte, and P. Arús. 2005. Statistical multivariate analysis of melon shape: a<br />

case study using near isogenic lines. Acta Hort. 674:537–544.<br />

Miccolis, V. and M. E. Saltveit. 1995. Influence of storage period and temperature<br />

on the postharvest characteristics of six melon (Cucumis melo L., Inodorus<br />

Group) cultivars. Postharvest Biol. Tech. 5:211–219.<br />

Navazio, J. P. and J. E. Staub. 1994. Effects of soil moisture, cultivar, and<br />

postharvest handling on pillowy fruit disorder in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc. Hort.<br />

Sci. 119:1234–1242.<br />

Oyanedel, E., D. W. Wolfe, A. J. Monforte, S. D. Tanksley, and T. G. Owens. 2001.<br />

Using Lysopcersicon hirsutum as a source of cold tolerance in processing<br />

tomato breeding. Acta Hort. 542:387–391.<br />

Schauer, N., Y. Semel, U. Roessner, A. Gur, I. Balbo, F. Carrari, T. Pleban, A.<br />

Pérez-Melis, C. Bruedigam, J. Kopka, L. Willmitzer, D. Zamir, and A. R. Fernie.<br />

2006. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific<br />

introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotech. 24:447–454.<br />

Snowdon, A. L. 1991. A colour atlas of postharvest diseases and disorders of fruits<br />

and vegetables. 2. vegetables. Wolfe Scientific, London, UK.<br />

Tatsumi, Y. and T. Murata. 1981. Relation between chilling sensitivity of<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae fruits and the membrane permeability. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

50:108–113.<br />

Xu, L., W. Y. Zhang, and Y.W. Tian. 1990. Effects of chilling injury on the<br />

morphology and cell structure of Hami melon fruits. Acta Bot. Sin. 32:772–776.<br />

Zamir, D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev.<br />

Genet. 2:983–989.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 559


POSTHARVEST CHARACTERIZATION OF A<br />

CUSHAW SQUASH BREEDING LINE<br />

L. Fernando Grajeda-García and Sergio Garza-Ortega<br />

Departamento de Agricultura y Ganadería, Universidad de Sonora,<br />

Rosales y Blvd. Encinas, Hermosillo, Sonora, México 83000<br />

Alberto Sánchez-Estrada and Rosalba Troncoso-Rojas<br />

Dirección de Tecnología de Alimentos de Origen Vegetal, Centro de<br />

Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Carr. a La Victoria km<br />

0.6. Hermosillo, Sonora, México 83000<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Winter squash, firmness, soluble solids content,<br />

respiratory rate, weight loss<br />

ABSTRACT. Work was conducted to study the postharvest characteristics of<br />

Cushaw squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma) mature fruit stored at 20ºC and 80%<br />

relative humidity for 98 days. Respiratory rate and ethylene production rate<br />

fluctuated from 32.28 to 79.19mg CO2.kg -1 hr -1 and from 0 to 3.09µL C2H4 .kg -<br />

1 hr -1 , respectively. <strong>The</strong> soluble solids content was 10% (highest value) after 56<br />

days of storage and the average fructose, glucose, and sucrose was 0.66, 2.02,<br />

and 2.16mg.mL -1 , respectively. <strong>The</strong> highest weight loss was obtained after 98<br />

days of storage and the fruit firmness changed from 155N to 55N after 77 days<br />

of storage. Fruit density decreased from 0.72 at the beginning of the experiment<br />

to 0.6 after 98 days. Titratable acidity ranged from 0.018 to 0.041% and pH<br />

values from 7.4 to 7.84. We conclude that cushaw squash fruit showed the<br />

typical physiological behavior of other mature winter squash, but weight losses<br />

in storage may be significant.<br />

C<br />

ushaw squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma Huber, has been<br />

cultivated in Mexico, its domestication site, for at least 7000<br />

years. Contrary to the more widely grown species of winter<br />

squash, C. pepo L., C. maxima Duchesne, and C. moschata Duchesne,<br />

the information related to C. argyrosperma culture and management is<br />

very limited, particularly concerning fruit quality and postharvest<br />

behavior. Landraces of Cushaw squash that are grown in northwest<br />

Mexico, usually under rain-fed conditions, are taxonomically<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma subsp. argyrosperma var. callicarpa. Fruits<br />

collected in the mountain region of this part of the country have a pale<br />

yellow to orange flesh color and an average weight of 2.5kg per fruit<br />

(Merrick, 1991).<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors are thankful to MSI F. Alfonso Aguilar-Valenzuela for his assistance in<br />

graph construction.<br />

560 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


In mature squash, high soluble solids content (SSC) is an indicator<br />

of good fruit quality. Nineteen days after harvest, fruits of cushaw<br />

squash breeding lines, hybrids, and landraces had SSCs ranging from 4<br />

to 7.5% for a spring crop and from 3.6 to 10.4% for a fall crop (Nuñez-<br />

Grajeda and Garza-Ortega, 2005). Using the same equipment for<br />

measuring SSC, Garza-Ortega et al. (2002) observed that fruits of<br />

‘Waltham Butternut’ (C. moschata), after one month of storage at 15<br />

to 22°C, had a higher SSC, 13.1%.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SSC of the kabocha (C. maxima) squash ‘Delica’ was 13.6%<br />

when measured 60 days after flowering plus 3 weeks of simulated<br />

refrigerated shipment at 12–14ºC (Harvey et al., 1997). In Australia,<br />

kabocha cultivars grown in different sites and seasons had SSCs that<br />

fluctuated from 5.7 to 13.3% at harvest time (Morgan and Midmore,<br />

2003). In butternut-type germplasm, the SSC increased from 2.6% at<br />

harvest to 9.4% after a period of storage of 60 days at 20ºC (Morales-<br />

Munguía et al., 2004).<br />

Winter squash fruits have a long postharvest life but weight losses<br />

in storage may be significant. <strong>The</strong> internal appearance of ‘Butternut’<br />

squash began to deteriorate when fruits reached a weight loss of 15%<br />

(Francis and Thomson, 1965). This cultivar showed weight losses of<br />

15.8, 17.4, and 15% when stored at room temperature after 63, 70, and<br />

84 days, respectively, in different years (Holmes, 1951). Weight loss<br />

of ‘Delica’ reached 11.3% when stored at 20ºC and 75%RH for 12<br />

weeks (Arvayo-Ortiz et al., 1994).<br />

Fruit firmness of ‘Delica’ at harvest time was 81N but increased to<br />

100N and then slightly decreased to 94N after two and three months of<br />

storage at 12ºC and 80–85%RH, respectively (Ratnayake et al., 1999).<br />

<strong>The</strong> firmness of butternut fruit increased after 15 days of storage at<br />

20ºC and 70%RH but decreased after 45 days of storage, reaching a<br />

value of 51N; in this work, the average density of fruits at harvest was<br />

1.13 but decreased to 1.06 after 60 days of storage (Morales-Munguía<br />

et al., 2004).<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of the present work was to study quality attributes<br />

and the physiological behavior of mature fruit from a true-to-type<br />

cushaw squash breeding line after harvest.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

FRUIT MATERIAL. C. argyrosperma A-43, a breeding line that<br />

was selected for having uniform fruit size, shape, color, and tolerance<br />

to Squash leaf curl virus, was used in this experiment. In the fall<br />

season of 2002, A-43 had an average fruit weight of 2.1kg (0.8 to 4.6)<br />

and a seed weight per fruit of 84.2g. <strong>The</strong> soluble solids content and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 561


flesh color measured 19 days after harvest was 7.4% and 7.3Y<br />

respectively (results not published). Seeds were directly sown into<br />

moist soil on August 14, 2002, and on September 24 the first female<br />

flowers appeared. Young fruits were removed on October 5, the date<br />

on which all plants had female flowers and set fruits uniformly<br />

afterwards. Mature fruits were harvested on November 29, so that<br />

most fruits had been on the vines for 55 days. After harvesting, fruits<br />

were stored in a laboratory at room temperature (15–24°C) and<br />

40%RH for five days. Fruits were then sorted, selecting those of<br />

uniform size and free of physical damage, washed with chlorinated<br />

water (250μL/L), and air-dried at room temperature. A group of 168<br />

fruits was stored for 98 days at 20°C and 80%RH and evaluated every<br />

1, 2, or 3 weeks. Evaluations consisted of measuring respiration,<br />

ethylene production, SSC, sugar content, weight loss, firmness,<br />

density, pH, and titratable acidity.<br />

RESPIRATION AND ETHYLENE PRODUCTION. Respiratory rate (RR)<br />

and ethylene-production rate (EPR) were determined (Troncoso-Rojas<br />

et al., 2005) by using six fruits that were weighed and placed<br />

individually in 6-L glass containers and kept at 20°C. Every week, the<br />

containers were covered with a plastic cap fitted with a septum. After<br />

1 h, 1-mL samples from the headspace were withdrawn and injected<br />

into a Varian 3400 cx gas chromatograph. RR and EPR were reported<br />

as mg CO2kg -1 .hr -1 and µL C2H4kg -1 .hr -1 , respectively.<br />

WEIGHT LOSS. In order to estimate weight losses, 12 fruits were<br />

individually marked, weighed in a digital balance (Mettler Pe Mod.<br />

2000), and stored at 20°C and 80%RH. Each fruit was weighed every<br />

week for 12 weeks and weight loss was calculated as a percentage.<br />

DENSITY. <strong>The</strong> volume of fruit was measured by water<br />

displacement in a graduated cylinder and expressed as milliliters (mL),<br />

and weight was measured in grams (g). Fruit density was calculated by<br />

dividing weight by volume.<br />

FIRMNESS. Six fruits were longitudinally cut in two pieces, for<br />

testing each piece with a Chatillon penetrometer model DFG-50<br />

equipped with a 10-mm plunger (J. Chatillon and Sons, NY). Firmness<br />

was expressed as the force in Newtons (N) needed to penetrate the<br />

mesocarp tissue.<br />

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS (TSS) AND SUGARS. <strong>The</strong><br />

total soluble solids content was determined in fruit juice using an<br />

ABBE Leica Mark II refractometer model 10459 (American Optical<br />

Co.) expressing the TSS as a percentage. <strong>The</strong> sugar content was<br />

determined after every 2 or 3 weeks of storage at 20°C by a<br />

chromatographic method using an HPLC equipped with a refractive<br />

index detector (López-Hernández et al., 1994). Quantification was<br />

562 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


done with a standard curve of glucose with different concentrations.<br />

Sugar concentration is expressed as mg.mL -1 of tissue.<br />

TITRATABLE ACIDITY AND PH. An automatic Mettler DL21 tritator<br />

standardized at pH 4 was used to determine both parameters. <strong>The</strong><br />

TA% is reported using citric acid as standard.<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. ANOVA were performed based in a<br />

<strong>complete</strong>ly randomized design. When significant differences were<br />

found, (P


EPR had values from 0 to 3.09µL kg -1 .hr -1 (Figure 1). During the first<br />

43 days of storage, EP was low (0 to 0.84µL C2H4kg -1 .hr -1 ) but a sharp<br />

increase was observed at day 59 (3.09µL C2H4kg -1 .hr -1 ). Other than<br />

this peak, the EPR was low. It is known that winter squash produce<br />

only trace amounts of ethylene, but wounding greatly increases the<br />

production (Brecht, 2004).<br />

SOLUBLE SOLIDS AND SUGAR CONTENT. <strong>The</strong> soluble solids content<br />

(SSC) reached a maximum value of 10% in fruits stored for 56 days<br />

and then decreased significantly at 98 days of storage (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong><br />

same pattern for SSC changes after harvest was reported for both<br />

kabocha and butternut squash (Harvey et al., 1997; Morales-Munguía<br />

et al., 2004). However, the SSC of cushaw squash was lower than the<br />

SSC of kabocha squash measured at harvest (Morgan and Midmore,<br />

2003) and that of ‘Waltham Butternut’ measured 4 weeks after harvest<br />

(Garza-Ortega et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> average fructose, glucose, and sucrose<br />

concentrations for the six sample dates were 0.66, 2.02, and<br />

2.16mg.mL -1 , respectively, increasing similarly to the SSC at 56 days<br />

of storage and decreasing afterwards (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> fructose plus<br />

glucose levels increased slightly after 35 and 56 days of storage and<br />

then decreased at 98 days. In kabocha squash, the fructose plus<br />

glucose levels decreased in fruit picked 60 days after flowering and<br />

stored for 3 weeks at 12ºC (Harvey et al., 1997).<br />

Fig. 2. Changes in soluble solids concentration (SSC%) and sugar content in<br />

Cushaw squash fruit during storage at 20°C. Each value is the mean of 24<br />

replicates ± standard deviation.<br />

564 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


WEIGHT LOSS. As expected, the weight loss increased as storage<br />

time increased, reaching a maximum of 18.2% after 98 days of<br />

storage. At this point fruits showed yellowing of the skin but had no<br />

signs of shrivelling. However, fruits that were stored at 4°C for 3<br />

weeks and then at 20°C for 6 weeks showed depressions of the skin,<br />

mold development, and dehydration of the seed cavity (results not<br />

shown). Cushaw squash fruits usually become mummified when<br />

stored for long periods of time, sometimes keeping their original<br />

shape. <strong>The</strong> weight loss in this study was higher than the loss reported<br />

for kabocha and butternut squash (Arvayo-Ortiz et al., 1994; Holmes,<br />

1951).<br />

FRUIT FIRMNESS AND DENSITY. Fruit firmness at the beginning of<br />

the experiment was 115N, decreased slightly after 35 and 56 days, but<br />

then markedly decreased to 55N after 77 days of storage (Figure 3).<br />

However, firmness increased again, reaching 138.6N, after 98 days of<br />

storage. Initial firmness in this experiment was higher than the one<br />

reported for butternut squash (Morales-Munguía et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />

firmness of cushaw squash measured through the skin was similar to<br />

that found for kabocha (Ratnayake et al., 1999) after 6 weeks of<br />

storage, but the cushaw squash fruits were firmer after 12 weeks of<br />

storage to that observed previously.<br />

Fig. 3. Changes in firmness and density in Cushaw fruit during storage<br />

at 20°C. Each value is the mean of 24 replicates for firmness and 6<br />

replicates for density ± standard deviation.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 565


Fruit density measured at the beginning of the storage period was<br />

0.72, but significantly decreased to 0.6 after 98 days of storage (Figure<br />

3). <strong>The</strong> density of butternut fruit changed from an initial value of 1.13<br />

to 1.06 after 60 days of storage (Morales-Munguía et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />

large seed cavity of these more rounded cushaw fruits is most likely<br />

the reason for the lower density.<br />

TITRATABLE ACIDITY AND PH. Titratable acidity (TA) ranged<br />

from 0.018 to 0.041%, being higher at the beginning of the experiment<br />

but significantly decreasing after 35 days of storage. <strong>The</strong> pH values of<br />

the cushaw squash fruit ranged from 7.40 to 7.84, with no changes<br />

during the storage period at 20°C. <strong>The</strong>se results agree with those<br />

reported by Alosi et al. (1988), who found pH values in phloem<br />

exudates of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata from 7.5 to 7.8.<br />

Under the conditions of this study, cushaw squash fruits showed<br />

the typical physiological behavior of a mature winter squash,<br />

characterized by low ethylene production and low respiratory rate. <strong>The</strong><br />

high weight loss indicates that further study is required, using lower<br />

storage temperatures and relative humidity combinations in order to<br />

prolong storage life. Cushaw squash fruits might have a favorable<br />

response to modified atmosphere storage. In regions where the fruit<br />

flesh is the main part of the fruit used for food, breeding programs<br />

should target higher soluble solids content and selection of fruits with<br />

smaller seed cavities and thus higher densities.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Alosi, M. C., D. L. Melroy, and R. B. Park. 1988. <strong>The</strong> regulation of gelation of<br />

phloem exudate from <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fruit by dilution, glutathione, and glutathione<br />

reductase. Plant Physiol. 86:1089–1094.<br />

Arvayo-Ortiz, R. M., S. Garza-Ortega, and E. M. Yahia. 1994. Postharvest response<br />

of winter squash to hot-water treatment, temperature, and length of storage.<br />

HortTech. 4:253–255.<br />

Brecht, J. K. 2004. Pumpkins and winter squash. In: <strong>The</strong> commercial storage of<br />

fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. USDA Agriculture Hand<strong>book</strong><br />

66. .<br />

Francis, F. J. and C. L. Thomson. 1965. Optimum storage conditions for Butternut<br />

squash. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 86:441–456.<br />

Garza-Ortega, S., A. Serrano-Esquer, and J. K. Brown. 2002. Yield, quality, and<br />

SLCV and SSL reactions of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne lines and hybrids<br />

evaluated in Sonora, México, p. 109–115. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Harvey, W. J., D. G. Grant, and J. P. Lammerink. 1997. Physical and sensory<br />

changes during the development and storage of buttercup squash. New Zealand<br />

J. Crop & Hort. Sci. 25:341–351.<br />

Holmes, A. D. 1951. Factors that affect the storage life of butternut squashes. Food<br />

Tech. 5:372–373.<br />

566 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


López-Hernández, J., M. J. González-Castro, M. E. Vazquez-Blanco, M. L.<br />

Vazquez-Oderiz, and J. Simal-Lozano. 1994. HPLC determination of sugars and<br />

starch in green beans. J. Food Sci. 59:1048–1049.<br />

Merrick, L. C. 1991. Systematics, evolution, and ethnobotany of a domesticated<br />

squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma. PhD Diss., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.<br />

Morales-Munguía, J. C., S. Garza-Ortega, R. Báez-Sañudo, and B. Ramírez Wong.<br />

2004. Evaluación de la calidad de líneas e híbridos de calabaza tipo Butternut<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne). Biotecnia. 6:43–52.<br />

Morgan, W. and D. Midmore. 2003. Kabocha and Japanese pumpkin in Australia.<br />

Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation 02/167,<br />

Barton-Kingston Australia.<br />

Nuñez-Grajeda, H. C. and S. Garza-Ortega. 2005. Differential response of cushaw<br />

squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma Huber) lines, hybrids, and landraces in spring<br />

versus fall culture in Sonora, Mexico. HortSci. 40:1108(Abstr.).<br />

Ratnayake, R. M. S., P. L. Hurst, and L. D. Melton. 1999. Texture and the cell wall<br />

polysaccharides of buttercup squash ‘Delica’ (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima). New Zealand<br />

J. Crop & Hort. Sci. 27:133–143.<br />

Troncoso-Rojas, R., A. Sánchez-Estrada, C. Ruelas, H. S. García, and M. E.<br />

Tiznado-Hernández. 2005. Effect of benzyl isothiocyanate on tomato fruit<br />

infection development by Alternaria alternata. J. Sci. & Food Agric. 85:1427–<br />

1434.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 567


HARVEST PERIOD AND STORAGE AFFECT<br />

BIOMASS PARTITIONING AND ATTRIBUTES<br />

OF EATING QUALITY IN ACORN SQUASH<br />

(CUCURBITA PEPO)<br />

J. Brent Loy<br />

University of New Hampshire, Department of Plant Biology,<br />

Durham, NH<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS: Biomass allocation, Brix levels, embryo growth<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> effects of harvest date and storage on eating quality and<br />

biomass partitioning in acorn squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo) were evaluated in two<br />

years. In 2003, ‘Table Ace’ and NH1605 were harvested at 30–35, 40–45, or 50–<br />

55 days after pollination (DAP), with or without storage for 20 days at 14 o C. In<br />

2005, NH1634, NH1635, NH1636, and ‘Tip Top’ were evaluated 25, 35, and 45<br />

DAP, with or without 10-day storage at 21 o C. In 2003, peak mesocarp dry<br />

weight (DW) occurred at 30 DAP, but Brix levels for good eating quality were<br />

not attained until 50 DAP. In 2005, the NH hybrids attained peak DWs 25<br />

DAP; ‘Tip Top’ at 35 DAP. Brix levels were low (5.9 to 7.2) across all cultivars<br />

25 DAP; 8.1 –10.9 35 DAP; and 9.7–13.4 45 DAP. Following 10-day storage at<br />

21 o C, o Brix reached acceptable (11+) levels 35 and 45 DAP in all NH hybrids,<br />

and 45 DAP in ‘Tip Top’. Embryos were 8–19mg DW 25 DAP and grew linearly<br />

until 55 DAP (45 DAP + 10-d storage). Reallocation of assimilates from<br />

mesocarp to embryos during storage significantly increased the proportion of<br />

seed to total DW biomass in NH1636 and ‘Tip Top’ 25 35 DAP.<br />

A<br />

corn squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L. subsp. texana (Scheele) Filov<br />

Acorn Group is one of the three most popular classes of<br />

squash consumed in <strong>North</strong> America. Based on evaluation of<br />

numerous samples of acorn squash from supermarkets and from<br />

cultivars grown at the University of New Hampshire research farms,<br />

eating quality appears to be inconsistent and generally poor. This is in<br />

contrast to buttercup/kabocha cultivars of C. maxima Duchesne, which<br />

generally exhibit uniformly good quality because of the high<br />

percentage of dry weight (DW) and sugar content. Kabocha squash<br />

are an important export crop in New Zealand, and this has led to<br />

extensive studies on culture (Buwalda and Freeman, 1986a, b), harvest<br />

time (Harvey and Grant, 1992; Harvey et al., 1997), and establishment<br />

of quality standards (Harvey et al., 1997). Such is not the case for<br />

acorn squash. Mesocarp DW in acorn squash is usually in the range of<br />

12 to 20% (Culpepper and Moon, 1945; J. B. Loy, unpublished data),<br />

considerably below that of kabocha squash (20 to 30%). An additional<br />

problem is that fruit of most modern acorn squash cultivars reach near<br />

568 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


full size and assume mature fruit pigmentation within two weeks from<br />

pollination, and may appear mature and thus be harvested well ahead<br />

of peak mesocarp DW (30 days), before acceptable Brix levels are<br />

attained, and considerably before seed maturation at 50 to 55 DAP<br />

(Loy, 2004). <strong>The</strong> objectives of the current studies were (1) to examine<br />

the relationship between harvest date and physiological factors<br />

affecting eating quality in acorn squash, and (2) to quantify the effect<br />

of harvest date and subsequent storage on allocation of biomass<br />

between mesocarp tissue and seeds.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Field studies in 2003 and 2005 were conducted at the Woodman<br />

Horticultural Research Farm in Durham, NH. <strong>The</strong> soil type was a<br />

Charlton fine sandy loam (Inceptisol). In 2003, the experimental<br />

design was a split plot with two black-green acorn cultivars, ‘Table<br />

Ace’ (semibush) and NH1605 (bush), as main plots and six treatments<br />

as subplots. <strong>The</strong> six treatments were stored or nonstored fruit<br />

harvested at 30 to 35, 40 to 45, and 50 to 55 days after pollination<br />

(DAP). Fruit were tagged within two days of anthesis, and treatments<br />

were assigned randomly to plants within plots. For the three storage<br />

treatments, fruit were stored for 20 days at 14 o C. Raised beds, covered<br />

with 1.5-mil black polyethylene mulch and provided with 8-mil drip<br />

tape (T-tape with 12-inch emitter spacing), were spaced 1.8m on<br />

center. Each plot was seeded on 10 June 2003, and consisted of 10<br />

plants spaced 0.6m apart. Fertilizer at 56kg.ha -1 N and K2O was<br />

broadcast preplant, prior to bed formation. Additional soluble<br />

fertilizer was applied weekly as a 20-2-20 formulation at 5.6kg.ha -1 N<br />

and K2O through fertigation, beginning at one week prior to flowering,<br />

and continuing for five weeks. One application of imidacloprid<br />

applied through drip irrigation shortly after seeding was the only insect<br />

control. <strong>The</strong> fungicides chlorothalonil, azoxystrobin, and mycobutanil<br />

were applied as recommended in the 2002–2003 New England<br />

Vegetable Management Guide to control foliar diseases.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 2005 study consisted of four PMT F1 hybrids: ‘Tip Top’<br />

(semibush; Johnny’s Selected Seeds, Albion, ME), NH1634 (bush), with<br />

black-green exterior pigmentation, and two semibush hybrids, NH1635<br />

and NH1636, with yellow and green striped exterior pigmentation<br />

similar to that of ‘Sweet Dumpling’. Plots were seeded on 03 June,<br />

2005. Each hybrid was grown as a separate experimental unit (row),<br />

with five replications and six treatments randomized within each plot of<br />

20 plants spaced 1.5m apart. <strong>The</strong> six treatments were harvests at 25, 35,<br />

or 45 DAP, with or without storage for 10 days at 21 o C. All fruits were<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 569


tagged at or near the pollination date, and treatments were assigned<br />

randomly to different fruits. Cultural conditions and pest control were<br />

the same as for the 2003 study.<br />

In 2003, data were taken on fruit number per plant, fruit fresh<br />

weight (FW), mesocarp FW, DW, and o Brix, and seed/placental FW<br />

and DW. DW of mesocarp tissue was determined by multiplying FW<br />

x % DW of two core samples taken from the middle of fruit. Samples<br />

were dried for 48h at 60 o C in a VWR Model 1350FM drying oven.<br />

Subjective ratings (1 to 5 scale) were made by the investigator and<br />

research technician on perceived dryness, sweetness, texture, and<br />

overall eating quality of all squash. In 2005, data were taken on fruit<br />

FW, mesocarp FW and DW, seed/placental FW and DW, and seed<br />

coat and embryo FW and DW (20-seed sample). <strong>The</strong>se data were used<br />

to generate data on biomass partitioning between seeds and mesocarp.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

FRUIT YIELD AND BIOMASS PARTITIONING IN 2003. ‘Table Ace’<br />

had significantly larger fruit than NH1605, but about the same number<br />

of fruit per plant, so produced higher FW yields than NH1605 (Table<br />

1). ‘Table Ace’ has a semibush growth habit, and leaf-canopy cover<br />

was nearly <strong>complete</strong> at time for fruit set, whereas NH1605 is a bush<br />

hybrid, and the leaf canopy did not <strong>complete</strong>ly fill in rows spaced 1.8m<br />

apart. In preliminary studies in 2003 on plant population density with<br />

NH1605, decreases in within-row spacing from 0.6 to 0.3m increased<br />

fruit yields by about 20% without affecting fruit size or quality (J. B.<br />

Loy, unpublished data).<br />

Table 1. Comparison of fresh weight (FW) yield components in ‘Table<br />

Ace’ and NH1605 acorn squash in 2003, across all treatments.<br />

Mean<br />

fruit<br />

Cultivar FW (kg) z<br />

Mesocarp<br />

FW per<br />

fruit z<br />

Mean<br />

fruit<br />

no. z<br />

Means fruit<br />

FW per<br />

plant (kg) z<br />

Table Ace 0.78 a 0.67 a 3.75 a 2.92 a<br />

NH1605 0.56 b 0.45 a 3.92 a 2.19 b<br />

z<br />

Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significant by analysis of<br />

variance, P = 0.05.<br />

Total fruit DW per plant, total mesocarp DW per fruit, total<br />

mesocarp DW per plant, and total seed DW per fruit were not<br />

significantly different between cultivars (Table 2). <strong>The</strong> lack of<br />

significant differences between cultivars for DW as compared to FW<br />

570 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 2. Comparison of dry weight (DW) yield components in ‘Table<br />

Ace’ and NH1605 acorn squash in 2003, across all treatments.<br />

Ratio seed<br />

Fruit Fruit DW Mesocarp DW total<br />

Cultivar DW (g) plant (g) DW fruit DW<br />

Table Ace 121.2 a 454.5 a 324.0 a 28.7 a<br />

NH1605 105.2 a 412.3 a 304.7 a 26.1 a<br />

z<br />

Means within rows followed by the same letter are not significantly different at<br />

P = 0.05 according to analysis of variance.<br />

y<br />

Seed DW includes placental mesocarp tissue surrounding seed.<br />

attributes of yield was due to the higher percentage of DW of<br />

mesocarp tissue in NH1605 (17.8%) as compared to ‘Table Ace’<br />

(13.6) across all treatment comparisons. <strong>The</strong> proportion of biomass<br />

allocated to seeds and placental tissue was similar for both hybrids,<br />

amounting to slightly more than one fourth of the total fruit biomass.<br />

As elucidated in detail by Harvey et al. (1997), in kabocha squash<br />

grown in New Zealand, sugar levels and dry-matter content of the<br />

mesocarp are the overriding factors in determining eating quality of<br />

squash. Sugar levels and perceived sweetness of squash were highly<br />

correlated with measurements of o Brix with a refractometer. Squash<br />

with high dry matter (% DW) have a high starch content, and much of<br />

the starch is converted to sugars during the maturation of squash or<br />

during storage following harvest (Phillips, 1946; Schales and Isenberg,<br />

1963). A smooth pasty texture produced by a high starch content<br />

together with high Brix levels following conversion of some of the<br />

starch to sugar contributes to high eating quality in squash. For<br />

kabocha squash, 20% DW and 11 o Brix have been suggested as the<br />

minimum standards for acceptable eating quality at point of<br />

consumption (Harvey et al., 1997). For shipping and long term<br />

storage, % DW should be higher than 20%, so as to account for<br />

biomass loss due to respiration.<br />

In the present study, time of harvest did not significantly affect<br />

mesocarp % DW prior to storage (Table 3). Previous studies showed<br />

that maximum DW occurs at about 30 DAP in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo squash<br />

(Culpepper and Moon, 1945), the time of first harvest in the present<br />

study. A significant reduction in mesocarp biomass during storage<br />

was expected, however, due to respiratory losses (Irving et al., 1997)<br />

and remobilization of assimilates to developing seeds (Loy, 2004).<br />

Storage did not have a consistent effect of % DW, possibly because of<br />

excessive error variance with only six replications, but also because<br />

moisture loss in storage increases % DW. However, using paired<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 571


comparisons of nonstored to stored fruit, significant decreases in %<br />

DW following storage were obtained for ‘Table Ace’ harvested at 30<br />

DAP, and NH1605 harvested at 40 DAP.<br />

Time of harvest had a strong impact on o Brix (Table 3). Brix<br />

levels increased linearly over time of harvest for both cultivars.<br />

However, because ‘Table Ace’ had low dry biomass, the increase in<br />

o Brix from 6.0 at 30 DAP to 8.4 at 50 DAP was not sufficient to<br />

provide acceptable eating quality. In NH1605, o Brix increased from<br />

6.6 at 30 DAP to 8.8 at 40 DAP and to 11.2 at 50 DAP, the latter level<br />

being sufficient for good eating quality. Brix levels increased<br />

significantly during all three storage periods for ‘Table Ace’.<br />

However, the highest Brix levels, 10 to 10.5 attained at 40 and 50 DAP<br />

in stored ‘Table Ace’, largely depleted starch reserves, resulting in<br />

squash with a fibrous, watery texture that did not have acceptable<br />

eating quality. On the other hand, acceptable Brix levels were attained<br />

during all three storage periods with NH1605, and sufficient starch<br />

remained following storage so that texture remained good.<br />

Table 3. Dry weight and o Brix in ‘Table Ace’ (TA) and NH1605<br />

acorn squash harvested at 30, 40 and 50 DAP, with or without storage<br />

for 20 days at 14 o C.<br />

Harvest periods z<br />

Cultivar/storage 30 DAP 40 DAP 50 DAP<br />

Mesocarp % DW<br />

TA nonstored 14.4 a 14.7 a 13.6 a<br />

TA stored 10.9 a 14.8 a 13.6 a<br />

NH1605 nonstored 17.3 a 19.5 a 17.8 a<br />

NH1605 stored 17.7 a 16.3 a 17.2 a<br />

Mesocarp o Brix<br />

TA nonstored 6.1 d 7.3 cd 8.7 b<br />

TA stored 7.6 bc 10.6 a 10.0 a<br />

NH1605 nonstored 6.9 c 8.9 b 11.3 a<br />

NH1605 stored 11.5 a 11.0 a 11.6 a<br />

z Harvest periods of 30 to 35, 40 to 45 and 50 to 55 days after pollination(DAP).<br />

y Means for the 6 treatments within each hybrid followed by same letter were not<br />

significantly different at P = 0.05 by Duncans’ New Multiple Range Test.<br />

Texture, along with overall eating quality of squash cooked in a<br />

microwave, was subjectively evaluated by the author and a technician<br />

on a scale of 1–5: 1 = watery/fibrous; 2 = moist/fibrous; 3 =<br />

grainy/moist; 4 = smooth/moist; 5 = smooth/dry. For Treatment 6 (50<br />

DAP harvest + 20-day storage), the average texture rating for 16<br />

572 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


samples of ‘Table Ace’ was 2.4, and for 24 samples of NH1605 was 3.9.<br />

Evaluation of eating quality on a 1 to 5 scale (1 = poor; 2 = fair; 3 =<br />

good; 4 = very good; 5 = excellent) was similar, with ‘Table Ace’<br />

averaging 1.9 for Treatment 6 and NH1605 averaging 4.3.<br />

2005 BIOMASS STUDY. Among the four hybrids, ‘Tip Top’ had the<br />

largest fruit (792g), followed by the ‘Sweet Dumpling’ type hybrids,<br />

NH1635 (638g) and NH1636 (604g), and the acorn hybrid NH1634 at<br />

559g (Table 4). Between 81 to 85% of fruit biomass was allocated to<br />

mesocarp tissue among the four hybrid cultivars.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary aim of this study was to quantify the effect of<br />

remobilization of assimilates from mesocarp tissue to embryos (seed<br />

fill) on quality parameters (% DW and soluble solids) of the edible<br />

mesocarp. However, variation in fruit size and % DW of mesocarp<br />

tissue both within and among treatments precluded a precise<br />

determination of this relationship. Nonetheless, it is possible to show<br />

the magnitude o f the effect of remobilization by following increases<br />

in embryo DW biomass, and changes in the proportion of seed DW<br />

before and after storage of squash harvested at different time periods<br />

(Table 5).<br />

Table 4. Comparison of fruit biomass components among four C. pepo<br />

hybrids grown in 2005, and harvested at 25, 35, and 45 days after<br />

pollination (DAP).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo F1 hybrids<br />

Fruit biomass<br />

components NH1634 NH1635 NH1636 Tip Top<br />

Fruit FW 559 638 604 792<br />

Fruit DW 111 126 123 139<br />

Mesocarp DW 91 107 101 112<br />

% Meso. DW/Total DW 82 85 82 81<br />

Mean seed number 276 247 219 260<br />

Reallocation of assimilates from mesocarp tissue to seeds varied<br />

considerably among cultivars, primarily because of variation in seed<br />

fill (embryo DW), but also due to differences in seed numbers.<br />

Changes in biomass distribution during storage were most evident in<br />

‘Tip Top’ and NH1636 because these cultivars had the largest seeds.<br />

With both of these cultivars, fruit harvested at 25 and 35 DAP showed<br />

significant increases in the proportion of seed DW biomass to total<br />

biomass following 10 days of storage at 21 o C. <strong>The</strong> increases were<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 573


greatest, 52% in NH1636 and 67% in ‘Tip Top’, in fruit harvested at<br />

35 DAP.<br />

In nonstored fruit, increases in embryo biomass between 25 and 45<br />

DAP were nearly linear in ‘Tip Top’, but were more curvilinear in<br />

NH1634 and 1636 (Table 5). Seed fill was poor and reached a plateau<br />

at 35 DAP in NH1635. Increases in embryo biomass during 10-day<br />

intervals in stored fruit were comparable to those in fruit remaining on<br />

the plant. Moreover, fruit harvested at 45 DAP and stored continued<br />

to show large increases in embryo biomass, corroborating previous<br />

studies in C. pepo (Vining and Loy, 1998) showing that substantial<br />

seed fill may occur up to 55 DAP.<br />

Table 5. Changes in mesocarp % DW, o Brix, ratios of seed DW to<br />

total fruit DW, and increases in embryo biomass before and after 10<br />

days storage at 21 o C following harvest at 25, 35, or 45 days after<br />

pollination (DAP).<br />

25 DAP 35 DAP 45 DAP<br />

Treat-<br />

ments<br />

NS<br />

S<br />

Ratio seed/total DW<br />

NH1634 0.18a 0.23a 0.15a 0.20a 0.18a 0.23a<br />

NH1635 0.15a 0.21a 0.12a 0.16a 0.16a 0.19a<br />

NH1636 0.18a 0.23bc 0.21c 0.32a 0.29ab 0.24bc<br />

Tip Top 0.19ab 0.26a 0.15b 0.25a 0.19ab 0.25a<br />

20 Embryo DW (mg) y<br />

NH1634 8.6a 31.1b 31.3b 38.8b 36.2b 57.1c<br />

NH1635 11.3a 24.9a 28.4a 33.4a 25.5a 28.5a<br />

NH1636 19.1c 45.5b .42.0b 68.6a 48.5b 76.9a<br />

Tip Top 16.0d 54.9c 48.8c 74.3b 73.7b 87.5a<br />

20 Seed coat DW (mg) y<br />

NH1634 30.4a 22.7bc 26.3ab 23.2bc 22.8bc 22.5c<br />

NH1635 35.1a 23.5c 27.9b 23.8c 25.2bc 21.7c<br />

NH1636 39.7a 28.6b 29.2b 27.5b 27.9b 27.3b<br />

Tip Top 31.6a 28.0bc 29.6ab 26.6bc 27.3bc 25.4c<br />

Embryo DW per fruit (g) x<br />

NH1634 2.6 9.4 9.5 11.8 9.9 15.6<br />

NH1635 2.9 6.4 7.5 8.8 7.7 8.6<br />

NH1636 5.0 12.0 9.9 16.1 10.0 15.9<br />

Tip Top 4.6 15.6 15.6 23.8 16.7 19.8<br />

z Harvest and storage treatments within the same cultivar having the same letter are<br />

not significantly different at P = 0.05 by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test.<br />

y Biomass of 20 embryo or seed coat samples.<br />

x Embryo DW per fruit determined by embryo DW x seed number per fruit.<br />

NS<br />

574 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />

S<br />

NS<br />

S


<strong>The</strong> largest increase in total embryo biomass per fruit during<br />

storage was 11g in fruit of ‘Tip Top’ harvested at 25 DAP. In ‘Tip<br />

Top’, the mesocarp DW averaged 80g for fruit harvested at 25 DAP<br />

and stored. <strong>The</strong> 11g of embryo growth represents a fairly large sink<br />

for remobilization of assimilates from the mesocarp because in terms<br />

of energy equivalents, embryos, composed chiefly of lipids and<br />

protein, contain about twice those of mesocarp tissue (Loy, 2004).<br />

In squash harvested after seed maturation is <strong>complete</strong> (50 to 55 DAP),<br />

there is a steady loss of moisture during storage (Hopp et al., 1960;<br />

Phillips, 1946; Schales and Isenberg, 1963), along with a steady<br />

decline in dry biomass due to respiration of sugars (Hopp et al., 1960;<br />

Phillips, 1946; Irving et al., 1997). In squash harvested prematurely,<br />

respiratory biomass losses are compounded by additional losses,<br />

primarily of starch reserves, because of remobilization of mesocarp<br />

assimilates to developing seed. <strong>The</strong> effect on eating quality may not<br />

be readily evident in squash with relatively high dry matter content,<br />

but can be quite substantial in cultivars having low starch levels at<br />

time of harvest.<br />

Changes in seed-coat biomass were also evident (Table 5). Seedcoat<br />

biomass was greatest at 25 DAP, and decreased about 25% to<br />

30% within 10 days to stationary levels throughout the rest of seed<br />

development. Previous studies in seed pumpkins (Stuart and Loy,<br />

1988; Vining and Loy, 1998) showed that seed-coat DW peaks at 20 to<br />

25 DAP and then decreases, indicating that the seed coat may function<br />

as a transient storage organ, capable of providing assimilates to the<br />

developing embryo.<br />

COMPONENTS OF EATING QUALITY. Compared to the 2003 study,<br />

mesocarp % DW was relatively high for all of the cultivars in the 2005<br />

study (Table 6). Harvest time and storage did not have a statistically<br />

significant effect on mesocarp DW, with the exception of a significant<br />

drop in % DW during storage of ‘Tip Top’ fruit harvested at 25 DAP.<br />

It also appeared that mesocarp DW may not have reached maximum<br />

levels in ‘Tip Top’ at 25 DAP as compared to the other cultivars.<br />

Soluble solids levels, on the other hand, were markedly affected by<br />

harvest date and subsequent storage (Table 6). Fruit harvested at 25<br />

DAP had low Brix levels. Storage for 10 days increased o Brix, but in<br />

most cases the levels were not sufficient (11 or greater) for good eating<br />

quality. Brix levels increased at 35 DAP, and approached reasonable<br />

levels for good eating quality in all of the NH experimental hybrids.<br />

Brix levels were further elevated during storage, but were still<br />

insufficient in ‘Tip Top’ for good eating quality. At 45 DAP all<br />

experimental hybrids exhibited high Brix levels with or without<br />

storage, and ‘Tip Top’ attained 12.1 o Brix after 10 days of storage.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 575


Table 6. Changes in mesocarp % DW and o Brix before and after 10<br />

days storage at 21 o C, following harvest at 25, 35 or 45 days after<br />

pollination (DAP).<br />

25 DAP z<br />

35 DAP z<br />

45 DAP z<br />

Treatments NS S NS S NS S<br />

Mesocarp %DW<br />

NH1634 20.3a 18.0a 20.7a 20.5a 21.3a 21.1a<br />

NH1635 19.2a 16.9a 22.6a 20.6a 20.3a. 20.1a<br />

NH1636 20.3a 19.0a 20.8a 16.4a 21.3a 19.3a<br />

Tip Top 16.9a 12.6b 19.3a 16.7ab 19.8a 17.5a<br />

Mesocarp o Brix<br />

NH1634 7.2c 10.3b 9.6b 13.8a 12.8a 13.0a<br />

NH1635 6.8d 8.4c 10.9b 13.3a 13.4a 14.4a<br />

NH16346 6.8c 10.6b 10.2b 10.9b 12.8ab 13.9a<br />

Tip Top 5.9d 7.1cd 8.1c 9.7b 9.7b 12.1a<br />

z Harvest and storage treatments within the same cultivar having the same letter are<br />

not significantly different at P = 0.05 by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test.<br />

Conclusions<br />

As noted in previous studies (Culpepper and Moon, 1945) and as<br />

illustrated in the present study, cultivars of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo squash<br />

may vary considerably in soluble solids content and mesocarp DW,<br />

primary parameters contributing to eating quality. Premature harvest<br />

can markedly affect eating quality because peak dry matter is not<br />

attained until 25 to 30 DAP, and even in cultivars having sufficient dry<br />

matter, adequate o Brix are often not attained until after the fruit are<br />

fully mature in terms of seed maturation (50 to 55 DAP). Cultivars<br />

with low mesocarp DW are impacted more adversely than those with<br />

high DW by early harvest because conversion of starch to sugar and<br />

remobilization of sugars to seeds depletes starch below a threshold<br />

level necessary for an acceptable smooth, pasty texture. Acorn<br />

cultivars of C. pepo are particularly prone to being harvested immature<br />

because the fruit of most cultivars attain near full size and mature fruit<br />

rind coloration within two weeks of fruit set. <strong>The</strong> popularity among<br />

growers of cultivars with poor eating quality, along with negligence in<br />

harvesting squash at the proper time, negatively impacts consumer<br />

demand for a potentially excellent vegetable crop. New cultivars with<br />

higher dry matter should help to alleviate this problem.<br />

576 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Literature Cited<br />

Buwalda, J. G. and R. E. Freeman. 1986a. Growth and development of hybrid squash<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima L.) in the field. Proc. Agron. Soc. New Zealand. 16:7–11.<br />

Buwalda, J. G. and R. E. Freeman. 1986b. Hybrid squash: responses to nitrogen,<br />

potassium, and phosphorus fertilizers on a soil of moderate fertility. New<br />

Zealand J. Exp. Agr. 14:339–345.<br />

Culpepper, C. W. and H. H. Moon. 1945. Differences in the composition of the fruits<br />

of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a varieties at different ages in relation to culinary use. J. Agr. Res.<br />

71:111.136.<br />

Harvey, W. J. and D. G. Grant. 1992. Effect of maturity on the sensory quality of<br />

buttercup squash. Proc. Agron. Soc. New Zealand. 22:25–30.<br />

Harvey, W. J., D. G. Grant, and J. P. Lammerink. 1997. Effect of maturity on the<br />

sensory changes during development and storage of buttercup squash. New<br />

Zealand J. Crop & Hort. Sci. 25:341–351.<br />

Hopp, R. J., S. B. Merrow, and E. M. Elbert. 1960. Varietal differences and storage<br />

changes in β-carotene content of six varieties of squashes. Proc. Amer. Soc.<br />

Hort. Sci. 76:568–576.<br />

Irving, D. E., P. L. Hurst, and J. S. Ragg. 1997. Changes in carbohydrates and<br />

carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes during development, maturation, and<br />

ripening of buttercup squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima D. ‘Delica’). J. Amer. Soc.<br />

Hort. Sci. 122:310–314.<br />

Loy, J. B. 2004. Morpho-physiological aspects of productivity and quality in squash<br />

and pumpkins (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.). Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23:337–363.<br />

Phillips, T. G. 1946. Changes in composition of squash during storage. Plant Physiol.<br />

21:533–541.<br />

Schales, F. D. and F. M. Isenberg. 1963. <strong>The</strong> effect of curing and storage on<br />

chemical composition and taste acceptability of winter squash. Proc. Amer. Soc.<br />

Hort. Sci. 83:667–674.<br />

Stuart, S. G. and J. B. Loy. 1988. Changes in testa composition during seed<br />

development in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L. Plant Physiol. (Life Sci. Adv.). 7:191–195.<br />

Vining, K. J. and J. B. Loy. 1998. Seed development and seed fill in hull-less seeded<br />

cultigens In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 98: evaluation and<br />

enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.of pumpkin<br />

(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.), p. 64–69.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 577


RIPENING CHANGES IN MINIWATERMELON<br />

FRUIT<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie and Julie K. Collins<br />

South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory<br />

USDA-ARS, Lane, OK 74555<br />

Donald J. Huber<br />

Horticulture Department,<br />

University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611<br />

Niels Maness<br />

Department of Horticulture, Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University<br />

Stillwater, OK 74074<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, lycopene, beta-carotene, pectin,<br />

cell wall<br />

ABSTRACT. In this study, seedless and seeded miniwatermelons (Citrullus<br />

lanatus) of ripe, underripe, and overripe stages were evaluated for quality<br />

characteristics and changes in carotenoids and pectins. Similar to seeded, large<br />

watermelon, minimelon weight, pH, and soluble solids content increased in fruit<br />

between underripe and ripe stages, while firmness decreased. Phytofluene,<br />

total, trans-, and cis- lycopene, and total carotenoid content increased as fruit<br />

changed from underripe to ripe stages. Beta-carotene content increased in<br />

overripe fruit compared to ripe fruit and may explain the orange tint that is<br />

seen in overripe watermelons. <strong>The</strong> proportion of large molecular weight pectins<br />

increased as minimelons became fully ripe, then overripe. Among cultivars,<br />

‘Xite’ had firmer flesh, thicker rind, and more lycopene than ‘Minipool’ or<br />

‘Valdoria’. ‘Minipool’ had fewer large molecular weight pectins while<br />

‘Valdoria’ had more beta-carotene and large molecular weight pectins<br />

compared to ‘Xite’.<br />

I<br />

n the U.S., the market has shifted from seeded to seedless<br />

watermelons, and from large (>10kg) to small fruit (4–10kg) fruit.<br />

A new introduction to the market is the miniwatermelon. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

fruit are round and weigh less than 4kg. In addition, several of these<br />

selections, especially the seedless types, feature extremely firm, almost<br />

crunchy flesh.<br />

Little is known about the ripening events in watermelon fruit.<br />

Corey and Schlimme (1988) found that seeded watermelons exhibited<br />

a slight loss in soluble solids content and an increase in pH as fruit<br />

progressed from under- to overripe stages. At about 10 days<br />

postanthesis, lycopene accumulation is initiated in the locular area of<br />

the fruit (P. Perkins-Veazie, unpublished), while sugar accumulation<br />

occurs well before full color formation (Elmstrom and Davis, 1981).<br />

578 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


As fruit become overripe, cell-wall and membrane breakdown occur,<br />

yielding a mealy or grainy texture as cell wall fragments aggregate.<br />

Elkashif and Huber (1988) found that cell-wall changes in seeded<br />

‘Charleston Gray’ fruit shifted from large molecular weight to small<br />

molecular weights as fruit went from ripe to overripe stages. Although<br />

several of the minimelon cultivars exhibit firm flesh and high soluble<br />

solids and lycopene content, the ripening characteristics of<br />

miniwatermelons is unknown.<br />

Table 1. Indicators of watermelon ripeness (subjective and objective).<br />

Indicator Description<br />

Color Underripe is pink in locule first, then pink all<br />

over; overripe has orange cast; color expands<br />

into rind (rind looks thinner).<br />

Lycopene Underripe has 20 to 50% less, depending on<br />

variety and days from full ripeness; overripe<br />

will have slightly more, the same, or 10% less.<br />

pH Increases slightly from under to overripe.<br />

Soluble solids content (SSC)<br />

Difficult to separate ripe from overripe; can<br />

sometimes see higher SSC in locule compared<br />

to heart in slightly underripe; locations are<br />

equal in ripe; heart slightly higher in overripe.<br />

Texture (finger/mouth feel) Mealy in overripe; slimy in very overripe.<br />

Ripe fruit may be crunchy (‘Xite’) or crisp<br />

Flavor (taste)<br />

(‘Minipool’).<br />

Underripe has a ‘green’ or cucumber like<br />

flavor; overripe has pumpkin flavor.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL. Miniwatermelons were planted in Bixby, OK,<br />

in 2005, following recommended cultural practices for Oklahoma<br />

(Bolin and Brandenberger, 1999). Three cultivars were used:<br />

‘Minipool’ (seeded, crisp texture), ‘Valdoria’ (seedless, crisp texture),<br />

and ‘Xite’ (Hazera 6007) (seedless, crunchy texture, high lycopene).<br />

Fruit were harvested at underripe (7 to 10 days before ripe), ripe, and<br />

overripe (2–7 days after ripeness) stages using planting date, ground<br />

spot, and tendril browning as ripeness guides. Fruit were transported<br />

to Lane, OK, washed, weighed, measured for diameter and length, and<br />

cut into halves from stem end to blossom end. Fruit were classified by<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 579


ipeness stage using subjective and objective measurements (Table 1).<br />

Rind thickness was measured at four points (stem and blossom ends<br />

and each side) with digital calipers. Firmness of flesh was measured at<br />

corresponding locations in the heart (center of watermelon) and in the<br />

interlocular tissues using a handheld Wagner gauge (2 to 25N) and flat<br />

(8mm) probe. Percent soluble solids content was measured on heart<br />

and locular samples using a digital refractometer. Ripeness of each<br />

fruit was determined using the indicators listed in Table 1. Three to<br />

four fruit per ripeness stage and cultivar were sampled. Samples of<br />

heart tissue were frozen at -80˚C for lycopene, carotenoid, and pectin<br />

analysis.<br />

FRUIT ANALYSIS. For sugar, carotenoid, and cell-wall analysis,<br />

three melons per ripeness stage were selected from each of the three<br />

cultivars. Lycopene and carotenoid content of frozen samples was<br />

determined within four months of harvest by spectrophotometry,<br />

scanning colorimetry, and HPLC using established methods (Fish et<br />

al., 2002; Davis et al., 2003; Craft, 2001). Ethanol insoluble powders<br />

were extracted from about 200g of fresh tissue per fruit using the<br />

methods of Karakurt and Huber (2002). Molecular size of chelatorsoluble<br />

polyuronides was determined using a Sepharose CL-2B-300<br />

gel column (Chun and Huber, 2000). <strong>The</strong> experiment was designed as<br />

a factorial arrangement and data were analyzed using ANOVA and<br />

general linear means model (SAS, v.9.0, Cary, NC). A significant<br />

interaction of cultivar and ripeness stage was seen only in β-carotene<br />

and in percent polyuronic acids. Main-effect means were separated by<br />

LSD, P


the minimelons, averaging 80mg/kg in ripe fruit. Phytofluene<br />

decreased in overripe fruit, while cis and trans lycopene were not<br />

significantly different in ripe and overripe fruit. Only beta-carotene<br />

increased significantly in overripe watermelon. As a percent of total<br />

carotenoids, beta-carotene increased from 2 to 4 to 6% in underripe,<br />

ripe, and overripe fruit, respectively. This increase may explain the<br />

distinct orange tint that appeared in overripe fruit.<br />

Among cultivars, ‘Xite’ had the thickest rind, firmest flesh, and<br />

highest lycopene content (Table 3). Beta-carotene was higher in<br />

‘Valdoria’, especially in overripe fruit (5.6 vs. 3.3 and 3.8mg/kg for<br />

‘Valdoria’, ‘Minipool’, and ‘Xite’, respectively; data not shown).<br />

mg/kg carotenoid<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A<br />

b a a b a a b a a<br />

translycopene<br />

total lycopene total<br />

carotenoids<br />

Fig. 1. Changes in the carotenoids trans-lycoepne, total lycopene, and total<br />

carotenoids (A), and beta-carotene, phytofluene, and cis-lycopene (B) with<br />

ripening of minimelons.<br />

Pectins (measured as chelator-soluble uronic acids) from the<br />

minimelons underwent a distinct downshift in molecular size during<br />

ripening, largely evident as a disappearance of polymers excluded<br />

from the molecular sieve gel (Figure 2). With overripening,<br />

proportionally greater quantities of low-molecular size polymers were<br />

evident, as seen also in pectins from ‘Charleston Gray’, a large,<br />

seeded watermelon cultivar (Elkashif and Huber 1988). Mao et al.<br />

(2004) reported a loss of membrane integrity and subsequent increase<br />

in lipoxygenase activity in watermelon gassed with ethylene. Similar<br />

changes in lipoxygenase activity may occur in watermelon as they pass<br />

from ripe to overripe stages, leading to a loss of cell integrity and<br />

changes in carotenoid and polyuronic profiles.<br />

Among cultivars, ‘Valdoria’ had the largest percent and ‘Minipool’<br />

the smallest percent of large molecular weight uronic acids in ripe fruit<br />

(Figure 3). <strong>The</strong>se results fail to explain the crunchy eating texture of<br />

‘Xite’ compared the more crisp texture of the other cultivars. <strong>The</strong><br />

mg/kg carotenoid<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

B<br />

b a a<br />

b a a<br />

cis-lycopene phytofluene _-carotene<br />

underripe<br />

ripe<br />

c b a<br />

overripe<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 581


Table 2. Changes in ripening watermelons averaged over 3 minimelon<br />

cultivars.<br />

Averages of Xite, Valdoria, and Minipool<br />

Ripeness stage Underripe Ripe Overripe<br />

Weight (kg) 2.4b 3.4a 2.9ab<br />

Length (cm) 17.1a 19.2a 18.8a<br />

Diameter (cm) 16.2a 17.9a 17.4a<br />

Rind thickness (mm) 13.6a 12.4a 12.2a<br />

Firmness (N) 19.6a 14.6b 13.0b<br />

SSC (%) 8.1b 11.1a 11.2a<br />

pH 5.2b 5.8a 6.0a<br />

Total lycopene x mg/kg 30.6b 80.4a 70.7a<br />

Values represent means of 12–28 fruit; means separated by LSD, P


A<br />

C<br />

Fig. 2. Changes in pectin fragment size (% total uronic acids) in underripe (A),<br />

ripe (B), and overripe (C) miniwatermelons. Pectin fragment size decreases with<br />

volume.<br />

A Minipool<br />

B<br />

Xite<br />

C<br />

Fig. 3. Changes in pectin fragment size in ‘Minipool’ (seeded, crisp) (A), ‘Xite’<br />

(seedless, crunchy) (B), and ‘Valdoria’ (seedless, crisp) (C) miniwatermelons.<br />

Pectin fragment size decreases with volume.<br />

B<br />

Valdoria<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 583


Literature Cited<br />

Bolin, P. and Brandenberger, L. 1999. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> integrated crop management.<br />

Chun, J. P. and D. J. Huber. 2000. Firmness, ultrastructure, and polygalacturonase<br />

activity in tomato fruit expressing an antisense gene for the ß-subunit protein. J.<br />

Plant Physiol.121:1273–1279<br />

Corey, K. A. and D. V.Schlimme. 1988. Relationship of rind gloss and groundspot<br />

color to flesh quality of watermelon fruits during maturation. Sci. Hort. 34:211–<br />

218.<br />

Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />

Prot. Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15. Don’t understand coent about cited in<br />

text-Corey and Schlimme or Bolin and Brandenberger?<br />

Davis,A. R., W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method for<br />

analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />

Elkashif, M. E. and D. J. Huber. 1989. Enzymic hydrolysis of placental cell wall<br />

pectins and cell separation in watermleon (Citrullus lanatus) fruits exposed to<br />

ethylene. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:81–85.<br />

Elmstrom, G. W. and P. L. Davis. 1981. Sugars in developing and mature fruits of<br />

several watermelon cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:330–333.<br />

Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K.Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />

lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food<br />

Composition Anal. 15:309–317.<br />

Karakurt, Y. and D. J. Huber. 2002. Cell wall-degrading enzymes and pectin<br />

solubility and depolymerization in immature and ripe watermelon (Citrullus<br />

lanatus) fruit in response to exogenous ethylene. Physiol. Plant. 116:398–405.<br />

Mao, L-C., Y. Karakurt, and D. J. Huber. 2004. Incidence of water-soaking and<br />

phospholipid catabolism in ripe watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) fruit: induction<br />

by ethylene and prophylactic effects of 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol.<br />

Tech. 33:1–9.<br />

584 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


CHANGES IN CAROTENOID CONTENT<br />

DURING PROCESSING OF WATERMELON<br />

FOR JUICE CONCENTRATES<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie and J. K. Collins<br />

USDA-ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory<br />

Lane, OK 74555<br />

M. Siddiq and K. Dolan<br />

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition<br />

Michigan <strong>State</strong> University, East Lansing, MI 48824<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, processing, lycopene, betacarotene<br />

ABSTRACT. Watermelons (Citrullus lanatus) are used primarily as a fresh<br />

product in the U.S. <strong>The</strong>re is interest in developing value-added products for<br />

additional markets and for use of cosmetically damaged fruit. In this study,<br />

watermelons were processed into juice concentrates, using a series of heat and<br />

treatment applications. Application of heat (50ºC) and a pectinase slightly<br />

increased juice yield from fruit macerate. Pasteurization had little or no effect<br />

on carotenoid content of most juices. Application of heat up to 40 or 50ºC<br />

slightly increased lycopene content of juice concentrates, while concentrating<br />

the juice to 42ºBrix increased lycopene content fivefold but reduced betacarotene<br />

content by 40 to 50%. Results indicate that watermelon juice exhibits<br />

lycopene stability with application of short or longer durations of heat<br />

treatment.<br />

I<br />

n the U.S., watermelon is consumed mostly as a fresh fruit. Fresh<br />

watermelon juice is popular in summer months, but there is little<br />

commercialization of the processed product. Challenges in<br />

developing a shelf-stable watermelon juice product include stabilizing<br />

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Watermelon Promotion<br />

Board and the USDA Rural Development Value-Added Producer Grants Program.<br />

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the<br />

purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or<br />

endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of<br />

the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without<br />

regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap.<br />

<strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties.<br />

Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works.<br />

Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in<br />

which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S.<br />

Government, which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 585


color and flavor (J. K. Collins, unpublished data). Additionally, as<br />

fresh watermelon contains large amounts of lycopene, a juice naturally<br />

high in lycopene and other carotenoids is desirable.<br />

Generally, during tomato fruit processing, lycopene is stabilized<br />

with heat application, and beta-carotene is lost (Takeoka et al., 2001;<br />

Abushita et al., 2000). Changes in watermelon carotenoids during<br />

food processing and pasteurization steps are unknown. This project<br />

was undertaken to determine carotenoid content in processed<br />

watermelon.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PROCESSING STEPS. Seedless watermelons were obtained from<br />

local markets in East Lansing, MI. Fruit were sanitized using a 5-min<br />

dip in SCJ Fruit and Vegetable Wash (SC Johnson Professional,<br />

Sturtevant, WI.) (100µl/L available chlorine), peeled and cut by hand,<br />

and macerated with a propeller-type blender. Macerate was subjected<br />

to no heat, heat (50ºC in steam-jacketed kettle), or heat + enzyme<br />

treatments (50ºC plus pectinase [Crystalzyme]). Macerates were then<br />

filtered through a nylon cloth and stored at -20ºC (Figure 1). Batch<br />

pasteurization was done by placing 1-L juice samples into heated<br />

water in double-jacketed steam kettles, 15 sec at 85ºC. Juice was<br />

concentrated to 42ºBrix using a lab-scale vacuum evaporator at 40 or<br />

50ºC.<br />

POMACE<br />

MACERATE<br />

SIEVE<br />

JUICE<br />

+HEAT<br />

+ PASTUERIZATION<br />

+HEAT (40 or 50ºC)<br />

CONCENTRATE (42ºBrix)<br />

Fig. 1. Food-processing steps of watermelon to develop juices and juice<br />

concentrates.<br />

586 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


LYCOPENE AND CAROTENOID MEASUREMENT. Duplicate<br />

watermelon samples were pureed using a tissue homogenizer and a 0.2<br />

to 0.5g sample was extracted with hexane:ethanol:acetone (2:2:1 v/v),<br />

following the methods of Sadler et al. (1990) and a modified<br />

micromethod developed by Fish et al. (2002). Pomace samples were<br />

diluted 1:3 w/w with distilled deionized water prior to<br />

homogenization, and sonicated for 10 min to aid lycopene release from<br />

fibers. Concentrates were diluted 2:1 w/w with ddi water prior to<br />

homogenization. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)<br />

was used to determine carotenoid profiles of each sample in triplicate<br />

using a modified method of Craft (2001), as outlined in Perkins-<br />

Veazie et al. (2006). Tomato lycopene and carrot beta-carotene from<br />

Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and synthetic trans-lycopene from Lycovit<br />

(BASF) were used to verify spectra and calculate lycopene<br />

concentrations.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Juice yield from watermelon was 55–57% on a per melon basis,<br />

and 82–86% of the flesh, with 5 to 8% of the flesh left as pomace<br />

(Table 1). Addition of pectinase and heat increased juice yields by 4%<br />

and reduced amounts of pomace by 3%. Lycopene and total<br />

carotenoid recovery after juicing was 61 to 66% of the original<br />

lycopene content of the macerate (Table 2). Heating and adding a<br />

pectinase to the watermelon macerate prior to filtering the juice had<br />

little effect on the amount of lycopene or carotenoids recovered in the<br />

juice, but greatly increased the amount of lycopene, beta-carotene, and<br />

total carotenoids in the pomace (Table 2). Although percent yield of<br />

pomace was less than 10% of the beginning amount of flesh,<br />

significant amounts of carotenoids appeared to remain bound to the<br />

fibers in the pomace.<br />

In the second experiment, use of pasteurization had no effect on<br />

individual carotenoids or on total carotenoid content of the juice<br />

(Table 3). Use of heat and pectinase in initial juice extraction slightly<br />

reduced lycopene, beta-carotene, and total carotenoid contents. When<br />

juice was concentrated to 42ºBrix, using 40 or 50ºC heat, all<br />

carotenoids were concentrated (Table 4). However, about 50% of<br />

beta-carotene was lost during heating. Isomerization of trans-lycopene<br />

to cis-lycopene was not found during pasteurization or heating (about<br />

4mg/kg cis-lycopene in all treatments). In tomato, exposure to heat<br />

during processing stabilizes lycopene, but can also cause losses of 9–<br />

28% of total lycopene with losses from lycopene oxidation or<br />

isomerization (Re et al., 2002; Takeoka et al., 2001; Stahl and<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 587


Sies, 1992). Abushita et al. (2000) found that heating raw tomatoes<br />

followed by dehydration into paste stabilized lycopene but decreased<br />

beta-carotene by 30%, much of which was due to isomerization. With<br />

watermelon, an increase to 9mg/kg beta-carotene was expected due to<br />

concentration to 42ºBrix (Table 4). <strong>The</strong> 50% lower yield of betacarotene<br />

indicates a significant loss of this carotenoid during heating at<br />

40 or 50ºC.<br />

Table 1. Yield of juice and pomace.<br />

% Juice yield (per Juice yield Pomace yield<br />

Macerate melon basis) (%w/w, flesh (%w/w, flesh<br />

treatment<br />

basis)<br />

basis)<br />

Cold (no heat) 54.7 82.5 8.0<br />

Heat (50ºC)<br />

Heat (50ºC) +<br />

55.5 83.8 5.2<br />

enzyme 57.2 86.2 5.0<br />

Table 2. Changes in carotenoids after processing of watermelon flesh<br />

into juice and loss/gain in carotenoids from macerate to juice and<br />

pomace.<br />

Product<br />

Macerate Juice Pomace<br />

Heat<br />

(50ºC)<br />

+<br />

Enzyme<br />

Heat<br />

(50ºC)<br />

+<br />

Enzyme<br />

Heat<br />

(50ºC)<br />

+<br />

Enzyme<br />

Quality<br />

component<br />

Soluble<br />

Cold<br />

Cold<br />

Cold<br />

solids (%)<br />

8.3 8.7 8.5 8.9 8.5 8.9<br />

pH<br />

Total<br />

5.4 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.2 5.2<br />

lycopene<br />

Beta-<br />

36.4+1.3 36.0+1.9 24.1+0.6 21.6+1.1 122.8+3.5 176.1+3.2<br />

carotene<br />

Total<br />

1.4+0.7 1.2+0.1 0.9+0 0.8+0.8 4.2+0.2 5.3+0.02<br />

carotenoids 38.6+1.3 37.2+2.0 26.8+0.6 22.3+1.1 129.0+1.0 181.4+3.2<br />

% loss/gain<br />

Total<br />

Macerate to juice Macerate to pomace<br />

lycopene<br />

Beta-<br />

- - -33.8 -40.0 +237.4 +389.2<br />

carotene<br />

Total<br />

- - -35.7 -33.3 +200.0 +341.7<br />

carotenoids - - -30.6 -40.0 +234.2 +387.6<br />

Means of duplicate samples, +standard deviation. Gain/loss is calculated from juice<br />

minus macerate value/macerate value for cold and heat, respectively.<br />

588 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 3. Changes in carotenoids (mg/kg fresh wt) of watermelon juice<br />

subjected to pasteurization.<br />

Unpasteurized<br />

Pasteurized juice<br />

Macerate<br />

treatment<br />

None<br />

(cold)<br />

Total<br />

lycopene<br />

22.1+<br />

0.1<br />

Betacarotene<br />

1.8+<br />

0.1<br />

juice<br />

Total<br />

carotenoids<br />

26.5+<br />

0.1<br />

Heat<br />

(50ºC) + 20.8+ 1.5+ 24.0+<br />

enzyme 0.3 0.1 0.3<br />

Means of duplicate samples, +standard deviation.<br />

Total<br />

lycopene<br />

22.7+<br />

0.7<br />

20.3+<br />

0.1<br />

(85ºC, 15 sec)<br />

Beta- Total<br />

carotene carotenoids<br />

1.8+ 27.0+<br />

0.1 0.8<br />

1.4+<br />

0.01<br />

23.6+<br />

0.01<br />

In the second experiment, use of pasteurization had no effect on<br />

individual carotenoids or on total carotenoid content of the juice<br />

(Table 3). Use of heat and pectinase in initial juice extraction slightly<br />

reduced lycopene, beta-carotene, and total carotenoid contents. When<br />

juice was concentrated to 42ºBrix, using 40 or 50ºC heat, all<br />

carotenoids were concentrated (Table 4). However, about 50% of<br />

beta-carotene was lost during heating. Isomerization of trans-lycopene<br />

to cis-lycopene was not found during pasteurization or heating (about<br />

4mg/kg cis-lycopene in all treatments). In tomato, exposure to heat<br />

during processing stabilizes lycopene, but can also cause losses of 9–<br />

28% of total lycopene with losses from lycopene oxidation or<br />

isomerization (Re et al., 2002; Takeoka et al., 2001; Stahl and Sies,<br />

1992). Abushita et al. (2000) found that heating raw tomatoes<br />

followed by dehydration into paste stabilized lycopene but decreased<br />

beta-carotene by 30%, much of which was due to isomerization. With<br />

watermelon, an increase to 9mg/kg beta-carotene was expected due to<br />

concentration to 42ºBrix (Table 4). <strong>The</strong> 50% lower yield of beta-<br />

carotene indicates a significant loss of this carotenoid during heating at<br />

40 or 50ºC.<br />

Table 4. Effects of heating juice to 40 or 50ºC on carotenoid content<br />

(mg/kg) of 42ºBrix unpasteurized juice concentrate.<br />

Beta- Total<br />

Temperature Treatment Total lycopene carotene carotenoids<br />

40ºC<br />

Cold macerate<br />

Heat (50ºC) +<br />

91.9±2.1 3.6±0.1 95.5±2.2<br />

enzyme<br />

111.2±6.3 4.6±0.01 119.0±6.4<br />

50ºC<br />

Cold macerate<br />

Heat (50ºC) +<br />

109.5±3.0 4.8±0.1 117.6±3.2<br />

enzyme<br />

94.8±1.7 3.6±0.1 98.4±1.8<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 589


Conclusions<br />

Recovery of lycopene from a juice product was approximately<br />

60% of the original fruit. Methods using heat and pectinase enzymes<br />

slightly increased juice recovery but reduced recovery of lycopene and<br />

total carotenoids. Heat pasteurization had no effect on lycopene loss<br />

but may have helped stabilize the color of the juice during storage.<br />

Watermelon juice products as a source of lycopene and beta-carotene<br />

were successfully developed.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Abushita, A. A., H. G. Daood, and P. A. Biacs. 2000. Change in carotenoids and<br />

antioxidant vitamins in tomato as a function of varietal and technological<br />

factors. J. Agri. Food Chem. 48:2075–2081.<br />

Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />

Prot. Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15.<br />

Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />

lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food Comp.<br />

Anal. 15:309–317.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K.Collins, A. R. Davis, and W. Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />

content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Ag. Food Chem. 54:2593–2597.<br />

Re, R., P. M. Bramley, and C. Rice-Evans. 2002. Effects of food processing on<br />

flavonoids and lycopene status in a Mediterranean tomato variety. Free Radical<br />

Res. 36:803–810.<br />

Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and b-<br />

carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />

Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />

Stahl, W. and H. Sies. 1992. Uptake of lycopene and its geometrical isomers is<br />

greater from heat-processed than from unprocessed tomato juice in humans. J.<br />

Nutr. 122:2161–2166.<br />

Takeoka, G. R., L. Dao, S. Flessa, D. M. Gillespie, W. T. Jewell, B. Huebner,<br />

D. Bertow, and S. E. Ebeler. 2001. Processing effects on lycopene content and<br />

antioxidant activity of tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:3713–3717.<br />

590 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


VARIATION IN CAROTENOIDS AMONG<br />

MINIWATERMELONS PRODUCED IN FOUR<br />

LOCATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S.<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie and Julie K. Collins<br />

USDA-ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory,<br />

Hwy 3W, Lane, OK 74555<br />

Richard L. Hassell<br />

Clemson University, Coastal Research and Education Center,<br />

2700 Davannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414<br />

Donald N. Maynard<br />

Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida,<br />

14625 CR 672, Wimanma, FL 33598<br />

Jonathan Schultheis<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Dept. Horticultural Science,<br />

Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />

Bill Jester<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Dept. Horticultural Science, Specialty<br />

Crops Program, Cunningham Research Station, 202 Cunningham Rd.,<br />

Kinston, NC 28501<br />

Steve Olson<br />

<strong>North</strong> Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida,<br />

155 Research Rd., Quincy, FL 32351<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, lycopene, beta-carotene,<br />

environmental effects<br />

ABSTRACT. Eighteen miniwatermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cultivars or lines<br />

(cultigens), all representing mini size (less than 4kg), were grown in South and<br />

<strong>North</strong> Florida, South <strong>Carolina</strong>, and <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. <strong>The</strong> watermelon was<br />

produced at each location using plasticulture (black plastic mulch and drip<br />

irrigation) at an in-row spacing of 0.46m and row center spacing of 2.7m.<br />

Fertilization and pest-management practices were varied according to<br />

recommendations for each state. Germplasm had the greatest effect on total<br />

lycopene content. A strong geographical production effect on total lycopene was<br />

detected, with fruit from the two Florida locations having 10 to 15mg/kg more<br />

lycopene than fruit from the other two locations. Two minimelon cultigens had<br />

unusually high beta-carotene levels. On average, minimelons have high amounts<br />

of lycopene, over 100mg/kg in some cultigens, and production environment can<br />

significantly affect lycopene content.<br />

S<br />

eedless watermelons usually contain more lycopene than seeded<br />

cultivars, and irrigation and growing season (winter/summer) can<br />

slightly affect lycopene content (Leskovar et al., 2004; Perkins-<br />

Veazie et al., 2001; 2006). Miniwatermelons have been marketed in the<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 591


U.S. for less than five years. <strong>The</strong>se fruit are characterized by their<br />

rounded shape, size (less than 4kg), high soluble solids content (SSC);<br />

they are usually seedless. A number of minimelons are now available<br />

from seed producers. <strong>The</strong> purpose of this study was to determine the<br />

total lycopene content among minimelon cultivars, and to determine if<br />

production environment affected lycopene content.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL AND PRODUCTION PRACTICES. Eighteen<br />

miniwatermelon cultivars and cultigens were grown in three replicated<br />

blocks at four locations in the eastern U.S.: Bradenton, FL; Quincy, FL;<br />

Kinston, NC; and Charleston, SC. Standard field cultural practices for<br />

each state/location were used for the growing season. Ten plants were<br />

planted in one replication. Three replications were used per location.<br />

Plots with missing plants were replanted approximately seven days after<br />

planting to achieve 100% stand in most cases. Spacing between row<br />

middles was 2.7m while in-row spacing was 46cm. Pollenizer plants of<br />

SP-1 were interplanted in the plots at plants 1, 4, and 7. Field conditions<br />

at each location are given in Table 1.<br />

Fruits were harvested when ripe, with most subsequent harvests<br />

being made on a weekly basis. Fruits were graded for shape and disease<br />

defects according to USDA grading standards. Watermelons were cut<br />

from blossom to stem end and through the ground spot. Tissue from the<br />

center of the fruit (heart and locular area) was removed and placed in<br />

Ziploc bags held on ice. Samples were quickly frozen at -20°C,<br />

shipped to Lane, OK, and held at-80°C until analyzed. <strong>The</strong> total number<br />

of watermelons sampled per cultivar and location ranged from 6 to 12.<br />

Five miniwatermelon cultivars were selected for carotenoid-profile<br />

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Watermelon Promotion<br />

Board and the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology<br />

(AP02(2)-i05). We thank the companies listed in Table 1 for providing seed. We thank<br />

Shelia Magby, Sheli Magby, Toni Magby, and Melissa O’Hern for their technical<br />

assistance. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for<br />

the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or<br />

endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of the<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without<br />

regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong><br />

article cited was prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties.<br />

Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works.<br />

Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in<br />

which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S.<br />

Government, which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />

592 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


Table 1. Field conditions at each location.<br />

NC<br />

(Kinston)<br />

SC<br />

(Charleston)<br />

N. FL<br />

(Quincy)<br />

S. FL<br />

(Bradenton)<br />

Latitude/longitude (º) 77.5/35 80/32.8 85/30.5 82.8/26.2<br />

Soil type Norfolk<br />

sandy<br />

loam<br />

Final fertility<br />

(NPK kg/ha)<br />

Temperature (ºC)<br />

(max/min) 30 days<br />

from 10% bloom<br />

Yauhannah<br />

loamy fine<br />

sand<br />

Dothan<br />

loamy fine<br />

sand<br />

Eau Gallie<br />

fine sand<br />

84-45-168 120-80-120 164-22-136 167-45-167<br />

30/21 32/22 32/17 29/16<br />

Harvest dates 7/12–8/26 6/20–7/6 5/20–7/20 5/30–6/3<br />

determination by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se cultivars were selected as representatives of each seed company<br />

used in the variety trial. For HPLC analysis, five replicates, consisting<br />

of one to three fruit, were used from each variety and location.<br />

LYCOPENE, SSC, AND PH MEASUREMENT. Frozen watermelon<br />

tissue (40g per melon) was pureed using a tissue homogenizer. <strong>The</strong> pH<br />

of purees was taken using an Orion 8950 electrode and Orion pH meter.<br />

SSC was measured by placing about 0.5ml of puree on a digital<br />

refractometer (Atago PR 100). A 0.2- to 0.5-g sample of puree was<br />

extracted with hexane:ethanol:acetone (2:2:1 v/v), following the<br />

methods of Sadler et al. (1990) and a modified micromethod developed<br />

by Fish et al., (2002). One extraction was sufficient to <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />

remove color. <strong>The</strong> maximum absorbance of lycopene in hexane is at<br />

471nm, with an additional absorption peak at 503nm. <strong>The</strong> 503-nm<br />

wavelength was used to prevent measuring beta-carotene absorption,<br />

which can occur at 471nm. HPLC was used to check lycopene<br />

concentrations of five samples from each study, using the method of<br />

Craft (2001). Tomato lycopene from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and<br />

synthetic trans lycopene from Lycovit (BASF) were used to verify<br />

spectra and calculate lycopene concentrations. Lycopene was also<br />

measured using a scanning colorimetric method with a Hunter XE xenon<br />

colorimeter (Hunter Associates, Reston,VA). In this method, watermelon<br />

puree was placed in a cuvette and absorbance was measured at<br />

560 and 700nm (Davis et al., 2003). Absorbance was plotted against<br />

lycopene values extracted with hexane to generate the slope, which is<br />

then used to calculate lycopene in the puree (total<br />

lycopene=39.5*[abs560-abs700].<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 593


Data from the <strong>complete</strong>ly randomized block design were subjected<br />

to analysis of variance (SAS v. 8.2, Cary, NC) using a general linear<br />

means model. When significant interactions were found between main<br />

effects, means were separated using REGWQ, P


with more vine resources enhancing carbohydrate allocation and<br />

carotenoid synthesis.<br />

Carotenoid profiles of the five minimelon varieties show strong<br />

similarities between ‘Xite’ and ‘Mohican’ (Table 3). <strong>The</strong>se fruit were<br />

high in lycopene and total carotenoids. ‘Precious Petite’ fruit, although<br />

visibly red without an orange tint, had unusually high amounts of betacarotene.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se levels of beta-carotene are higher than those found in<br />

orange-tinted overripe red-fleshed watermelon. It may be desirable to<br />

enhance beta-carotene without affecting visible color as beta-carotene is<br />

a vitamin A precursor, and is necessary for healthy eyesight.<br />

Watermelon currently have 10% vitamin A in a serving size (considered<br />

a ‘good’ source); increasing vitamin A to a consistent 20% per serving<br />

would improve the nutritional labeling to the “excellent” level.<br />

Phytofluene content was higher in the high lycopene cultivars ‘Xite’ and<br />

‘Mohican’, most likely an indicator of increased lycopene synthesis.<br />

Soluble solids content and pH are indicators of ripeness, and the high<br />

average for the four locations indicates full fruit ripeness (Table 3).<br />

Conclusions<br />

All seedless miniwatermelons tested exceeded 50 mg/kg lycopene,<br />

and would provide the suggested lycopene intake of 25 mg/day in a 2cup<br />

serving (~ 500g). Five of the miniwatermelons had enhanced<br />

lycopene content when produced in Florida compared to the <strong>Carolina</strong>s.<br />

This geographic difference was unexpected and indicates germplasm<br />

sensitivity to production environment.<br />

Table 3. Carotenoid profiles (mg/kg), SSC, and pH of puree from five<br />

minimelon cultivars averaged over the four geographic locations.<br />

Total CisBeta- Total<br />

lycolycocaroPhytocaro- SSC<br />

Cultivar penepenetenefluenetenoids (%) pH<br />

Xite 96.2a 8.1a 4.0b 7.4a 108.8a 12.6a 6.2<br />

Mohican 92.5a 12.0a 3.4b 6.3b 102.2a 11.7b 6.1<br />

Petite<br />

Treat<br />

62.8b 7.8a 4.4b 5.6b 68.2b 11.8b 6.2<br />

Precious<br />

Petite<br />

68.2b 9.7a 6.1a 5.9b 70.7b 12.3a 6.0<br />

Vanessa 71.5b 8.9a 3.2b 4.3c 79.6b 12.1ab 5.9<br />

Means separated within columns by REGWQ, P


Literature Cited<br />

Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />

Prot. in Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15.<br />

Davis, A. R., W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method for<br />

analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />

Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K.Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />

lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food<br />

Comp. Anal. 15:309–317.<br />

Leskovar, D., H. Bang, K. Crosby, N. Maness, A. Franco, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2004.<br />

Lycopene, carbohydrates, ascorbic acid and yield components of<br />

diploid and triploid watermelon cultivars are affected by limited irrigation. J.<br />

Hort. Sci. Biotech. 79:75–81.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene<br />

content differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agri.<br />

81:983–987.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, A. Davis, W. and Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />

content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:2593-2597.<br />

Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and b-<br />

carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />

Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />

596 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


WATERMELON CAROTENOID CONTENT IN<br />

RESPONSE TO GERMPLASM, MATURITY,<br />

AND STORAGE<br />

Penelope Perkins-Veazie, Julie K. Collins, and Angela Davis<br />

U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service<br />

South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory,<br />

Lane, OK 74555<br />

Niels Maness<br />

Department of Horticulture<br />

Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University, Stillwater, OK 74074<br />

Warren Roberts<br />

Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University<br />

Wes Watkins Research and Extension Center,<br />

Lane, OK 74555<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, carotenoids, shelf life, triploid<br />

melon, seedless, genotype<br />

ABSTRACT. Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) contain high amounts of lycopene,<br />

the pigment that imparts red color to some fruits. Lycopene is a highly efficient<br />

oxygen radical scavenger and has been implicated in human studies as<br />

providing protection against cardiovascular disease and some cancers,<br />

particularly that of the prostate. Over the last six years, we have evaluated<br />

4,000 fruit from 80 cultivars to determine the effects of germplasm, ripeness,<br />

and storage on lycopene content. Watermelon lycopene is most affected by fruit<br />

maturity and germplasm; fruit about 7 days from full ripeness had 10–20% less<br />

lycopene. Postharvest storage of whole watermelon at room temperature<br />

enhanced lycopene content while fresh-cut watermelon lost about 10%,<br />

probably from membrane breakdown and lycopene oxidation. <strong>The</strong> results from<br />

these studies indicate that watermelon lycopene is highly dependent on<br />

germplasm and ripeness stage. Lycopene content is relatively stable in fresh-cut<br />

fruit and can be influenced by storage temperature in intact watermelon.<br />

A<br />

diet rich in fruits and vegetables has been linked to reduced<br />

incidence of some chronic diseases such as atherosclerosis and<br />

cancers (Joshipura et al., 2001; Steinmetz and Potter, 1996).<br />

<strong>The</strong> reasons for this relationship appear to be multifaceted and may<br />

include natural plant phytochemicals that act as electron scavengers in<br />

photosynthesis, and/or detoxification agents.<br />

Lycopene, a red pigment of the carotenoid class found in only a<br />

few fruits and vegetables, is a powerful singlet oxygen scavenger and<br />

highly effective antioxidant (Gerster, 1997). A high dietary intake of<br />

tomatoes, rich in lycopene content, is associated with a lower risk of<br />

certain cancers, primarily of the prostate (Giovannucci, 2002).<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 597


Watermelon and tomatoes are the most familiar sources of lycopene in<br />

the Western diet, containing on average 46 and 31mg lycopene/kg<br />

fresh weight, respectively (USDA National Nutrient Database for<br />

Standard Reference, Release 18, 2005).<br />

Most watermelon sold in the U.S. is consumed fresh, with 50 to<br />

80% of this sold as seedless (National Watermelon Promotion Board,<br />

2005, personal communication). Much of the fresh market fruit is<br />

shipped around the U.S., and shelf life of intact fruit is expected to be<br />

7 to 21 days (Rushing et al., 2001). Minimally processed (cut or<br />

cubed) watermelon represents about 20–30% of watermelon sales in<br />

the U.S, but can be as high as 80% of watermelon sales in other<br />

countries. <strong>The</strong> objectives of our work over the last six years have been<br />

to determine the genotype, germplasm, and ripeness effects on<br />

lycopene, and to determine the stability of lycopene in stored and cut<br />

(minimally processed) watermelon.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PLANT MATERIAL. Experiments were conducted at the South<br />

Central Agricultural Laboratory in Lane, OK. Types of melons<br />

sampled included seeded heirloom (such as ‘Black Diamond’); seeded<br />

hybrid (such as ‘Summer Flavor 800’); seedless (such as ‘Tri-X-313’);<br />

seeded pollinators (such as ‘Minipool’), and seedless miniwatermelons<br />

(such as ‘Extazy’). About 4,000 watermelons have been sampled from<br />

1999 to 2005. About 10 to 20 fruit per cultivar per year were sampled<br />

to determine the relative lycopene content. Fruit were cut transversely<br />

through the ground spot and watermelon center and 100–300g tissue<br />

was sampled from heart and locular areas and held at<br />

-80 o C until analyzed.<br />

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Watermelon Promotion<br />

Board, the Initiative for Future Agricultural Farming Systems (IFAFS Agreement<br />

No. 00-521021-9635), and the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science<br />

and Technology (AP02(2)-i05). Mention of trade names or commercial products in<br />

this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not<br />

imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All<br />

programs and services of the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a<br />

nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex,<br />

age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA employee<br />

as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not<br />

available for such works. Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />

the private publication in which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not<br />

affect the material of the U.S. Government, which can be freely reproduced by the<br />

public.<br />

598 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006


GERMPLASM, GENOTYPE, AND RIPENESS STUDIES. Six cultivars<br />

were selected for ripeness studies, using 10 to 20 watermelons per<br />

underripe, ripe, and overripe stage. Underripe melons were about 7<br />

days from fully ripe and overripe about 7 days past ideal ripeness, as<br />

judged by flesh color (pale red in underripe to orange in overripe),<br />

texture (firm or mealy/slimy), odor/taste (green taste in underripe and<br />

pumpkinlike in overripe), and sweetness (at least 9% soluble solids<br />

content for fully ripe). More details on analysis of these melons can be<br />

found in Perkins-Veazie et al. (2001, 2006).<br />

STORAGE AND FRESH-CUT STUDIES. For storage studies, 10 uncut<br />

melons per cultivar and temperature treatment of ripe fruit of seedless<br />

and hybrid seeded cultivars (‘Sugar Shack’ and ‘Summer Flavor 800’)<br />

were placed at 5, 13, or 21°C for 0 or 14 days, tissue was sampled as<br />

described above, and lycopene and soluble solids analyzed as<br />

described below. To determine effects of minimal processing on<br />

lycopene stability, 20 melons each of the above were cut in half and<br />

cubes of 3cm 3 flesh placed in sealed plastic boxes held at 2°C for 10<br />

days in darkness. <strong>The</strong> same melon was used to fill one box replicate<br />

for 0 and 10 days (Perkins-Veazie and Collins, 2004).<br />

LYCOPENE AND SOLUBLE SOLIDS CONTENT MEASUREMENT.<br />

Frozen watermelon tissue (40g per melon) was pureed using a tissue<br />

homogenizer. Soluble solids content was determined by placing 0.5ml<br />

puree on a digital refractometer (Atago PR100).<br />

A 0.2- to 0.5-g sample was extracted with hexane:ethanol:acetone<br />

(2:2:1 v/v), following the methods of Sadler et al. (1990) and a<br />

modified micromethod developed by Fish et al., (2002). One<br />

extraction was sufficient to <strong>complete</strong>ly remove color. Absorbance of<br />

hexane extracts was measured at 503nm by spectrophotometer<br />

(Shimazdu UV160). Lycopene purees were placed in cuvettes and also<br />

measured using a scanning colorimetric method with a Hunter XE<br />

xenon colorimeter (Hunter Associates, Reston, VA) (Davis et al.,<br />

2003). Absorbance at 560nm was plotted against lycopene values<br />

extracted with hexane to generate the slope, which is then used to<br />

calculate lycopene in the puree (total lycopene=39.5*[abs560-abs750].<br />

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to<br />

determine carotenoid profiles of cultivar subsets in triplicate using a<br />

modified method of Craft (2001), as outlined in Perkins-Veazie et al.<br />

(2006). Tomato lycopene and carrot beta-carotene from Sigma (St.<br />

Louis, MO) and synthetic trans-lycopene from Lycovit (BASF) were<br />

used to verify spectra and calculate lycopene concentrations.<br />

<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 599


STATISTICS. All studies were designed as randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />

block or factorial experiments. Data were subjected to ANOVA and a<br />

general linear model was used (SAS, v. 9.0, Cary, NC). Means were<br />

separated by REGWQ, P12 32.5 to 69.2c 0.1 to 3.0<br />

Hybrid, seeded<br />

Minipollenizer,<br />

6 to 12 45.5 to 92.7ab 0.8 to 9.3<br />

seeded 4 45.5 to 100.5ab 0.8 to 7.4<br />

(minimelon)


Table 2. Range of total lycopene content among ripeness stages of<br />

watermelon; underripe is about 7 days from full ripeness and overripe<br />

is 7 days past ideal ripeness.<br />

Total lycopene content (mg/kg)<br />

Stage<br />

Genotype<br />

Heirloom seeded<br />

Underripe Ripe Overripe<br />

(Black Diamond)<br />

Hybrid seeded (Summer<br />

26.0b 35.7a 32.8a<br />

Flavor 800; Dumara) 49.2b 55.8a 57.3a<br />

Seedless (Tri-X-313)<br />

Pollenizer,<br />

51.2b 65.5a 60.4ab<br />

seeded (Minipool)<br />

Seedless minimelon<br />

48.0ab 63.8a 53.4ab<br />

(Xite; Valdoria) 72.5b 90.3a 94.6a<br />

Means separated within row and genotype by REGWQ, P


(64 to 60mg/kg) (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2004). This loss may have<br />

been from degradation of cut surfaces exposed to air during storage,<br />

with oxidation of lycopene, or from chilling injury. Soluble solids<br />

content slightly decreased (0.5 to 1%) for most samples after storage<br />

(data not shown).<br />

Conclusions<br />

Red-fleshed watermelon consistently has large amounts of<br />

lycopene per unit fresh weight, although amounts are dependent on the<br />

germplasm and ripeness of the fruit. Holding uncut fruit at room<br />

temperature increased lycopene and beta-carotene contents.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />

Prot. Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15.<br />

Davis, A. R., W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method<br />

for analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />

Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K.Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />

lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food<br />

Comp. Anal. 15:309–317.<br />

Gerster, H. 1997. <strong>The</strong> potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Amer.<br />

Coll. Nutr. 16:109–126.<br />

Giovannucci, E. 2002. A review of epidemiologic studies of tomatoes, lycopene,<br />

and prostate cancer. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood). 227:852–859.<br />

Joshipura, K. J., F. B. Hu, and J. E. Manson. 2001. <strong>The</strong> effect of fruit and vegetable<br />

intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 134:1106–1114.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P. and J. K. Collins. 2004. Flesh quality and lycopene stability of<br />

fresh-cut watermelon. Postharv. Biol. Tech. 31:159–166.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, A. Davis, and W. Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />

content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:2593–2597.<br />

Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene<br />

content differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric.<br />

81:983–987.<br />

Rushing, J. W., J. M. Fonseca, and A. P. Keinath. 2001. Harvesting and<br />

postharvest handling. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.). Watermelons: characteristics,<br />

production, and marketing. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and b-<br />

carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />

Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />

Showalter, R. K. 1960. Watermelon color as affected by maturity and storage.<br />

Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 73:289–293.<br />

Showalter, R. K., S. A. Harmon, B. B. Brantely, D. W. Newson, and J. F. Pittman.<br />

1955.<br />

Changes in Congo watermelons after harvest. Proc. Assoc. South. Agric.<br />

Wrkrs. 52:136–137.<br />

Steinmetz, K. A., and J. D. Potter. 1996. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention:<br />

a review. J. Amer. Diet. Assoc. 96:1027–39.<br />

USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 18. 2005.<br />

.<br />

602 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!