The complete book - Cucurbit Breeding - North Carolina State ...
The complete book - Cucurbit Breeding - North Carolina State ...
The complete book - Cucurbit Breeding - North Carolina State ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE<br />
Gerald J. Holmes, Chair, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />
Jonathan R. Schultheis, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />
Todd C. Wehner, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE & EDITORIAL BOARD<br />
Angela Davis, USDA-ARS, Lane, Oklahoma, USA<br />
Maria Luisa Gomez-Guillamon, Experiment Station ‘La Mayora’, Malaga, SPAIN<br />
Elzbieta Kozik, Research Institute of Vegetable Crops, Skierniewice, POLAND<br />
Ales Lebeda, Palacky University, Olomouc, CZECH REPUBLIC<br />
Donald Maynard, University of Florida, Bradenton, Florida, USA<br />
James McCreight, USDA-ARS, Salinas, California, USA<br />
Ray Martyn, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA<br />
Harry Paris, Newe Ya’ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, ISRAEL<br />
Gordon Rogers, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA<br />
Michel Pitrat, INRA, Montfavet cedex, FRANCE<br />
Susan Webb, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA<br />
Xingping Zhang, Syngenta Seeds, Woodland, California, USA<br />
SPONSORS<br />
Diamond Silver<br />
Helena Chemical Bayer CropScience<br />
Seminis Vegetable Seed Cerexagri-Nissco<br />
Syngenta Chemtura Corporation<br />
Dow AgroSciences<br />
Hendrix and Dail, Inc.<br />
Hollar Seeds<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of<br />
Agriculture and Consumer Services<br />
Valent BioSciences<br />
Willhite Seed Inc.<br />
Gold Bronze<br />
Abbott & Cobb, Inc. Addis Cates Company, Inc.<br />
DuPont Clifton Seed Company<br />
Harris Moran FMC Corporation<br />
Mt. Olive Pickle Company Nat’l Watermelon Promotion Board<br />
Nunhems <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Watermelon Assoc.<br />
Sakata Seed USA <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Pickle Producers<br />
Association<br />
ORO Agri<br />
Pickle Packers International, Inc.<br />
Rupp Seeds, Inc.<br />
UAP <strong>Carolina</strong>s<br />
Xenacom
PREFACE<br />
n behalf of the organizing committee of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006, I<br />
welcome you to Asheville, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> for the 9 th O<br />
biennial<br />
gathering of cucurbitologists. This tradition began in 1989<br />
with Claude Thomas hosting the first conference in South <strong>Carolina</strong>,<br />
U.S.A. Poland hosted the meeting in 1992. Since then the conference<br />
has alternated between countries on both sides of the Atlantic in evennumbered<br />
years: Texas (1994), Spain (1996), California (1998), Israel<br />
(2000), Florida (2002), and the Czech Republic (2004). We are<br />
pleased to continue this rich tradition by hosting <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
in the mountains of western <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> at the lovely Grove Park<br />
Inn, Resort and Spa in Asheville.<br />
Many people have contributed to the planning and execution of<br />
this conference. I am especially grateful to the organizing committee<br />
for assistance in planning all aspects of the conference and to the<br />
scientific committee for their prompt and careful editing of these<br />
proceedings. <strong>The</strong>se committees are also responsible for selecting the<br />
three recipients of the Lifetime Achievement Award for outstanding<br />
contributions to the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 awardees<br />
are Harry Paris (breeding and genetics), Michel Pitrat (plant<br />
pathology) and Donald Maynard (crop production). Special thanks to<br />
Jane Dove Long of the Plant Pathology Department at NC <strong>State</strong><br />
University for her tireless efforts and attention to detail in coordinating<br />
and executing the endless tasks, big and small, that make a conference<br />
successful.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se proceedings contain 81 contributed papers from 236<br />
authors in 12 countries and 16 states within the U.S.A. and span the<br />
areas of research typical of any major horticultural crop. Special<br />
thanks go to Carolyn Currie for editing each manuscript,<br />
communicating with authors all over the world and especially for<br />
formatting the final document for printing.<br />
Lastly, I want to recognize the gracious support of our<br />
sponsors. Without their contributions, the cost of this conference<br />
would be much higher for every participant. Please take a moment to<br />
thank them for their generous support.<br />
On behalf of the Organizing Committee, we welcome you to<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 and look forward to a lively exchange of new<br />
ideas and discoveries in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae.<br />
GERALD J. HOLMES, CHAIR<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 Organizing Committee
Adkins, S. ............................. 309<br />
Akashi, Y. .................... 317, 372<br />
Alarcón, A. L. ...................... 146<br />
Álvarez, J. M. ....................... 146<br />
Ando, K. ............................... 347<br />
Andres, T. C. ................ 326, 333<br />
Aranda, M. ................... 180, 186<br />
Arús, P. .........146, 180, 186, 553<br />
Azulay, Y. .............................. 31<br />
Babadoost, M. ...................... 507<br />
Baker, C. A. ......................... 309<br />
Bar, E. .................................... 31<br />
Bascur, G. .............................. 65<br />
Becker, J. O. ......................... 395<br />
Becker, J. S. ......................... 395<br />
Bendahmane, A. ..................... 89<br />
Benyamini, Y. ........................ 31<br />
Besombes, D. ......................... 89<br />
Blanca, J. ...................... 180, 186<br />
Boualem, A. ........................... 89<br />
Bruton, B. ............................. 277<br />
Buckley, R. .......................... 539<br />
Burger, Y. .............................. 31<br />
Bustamente, R. ..................... 333<br />
Caboche, M. ........................... 89<br />
Caño, A. ............................... 180<br />
Cantliffe, D. J. ...................... 483<br />
Cavanagh, A. ........................ 232<br />
Chen, Q-J. ............................ 220<br />
Chou, T. T. ........................... 317<br />
Chung, S. M. ........................ 197<br />
Collins, J. K.<br />
...............545, 578, 585, 591, 597<br />
Colucci, S. J. ........................ 403<br />
Cortright, B. ......................... 427<br />
Cothran, A. ........................... 286<br />
Cowgill, W. .......................... 539<br />
Crosby, K. .........23, 70, 153, 165<br />
Cui, C. .................................. 133<br />
Dalmais, M. ............................ 89<br />
Dane, F. ............................ 48, 78<br />
Datnoff, L. E. ......................... 43<br />
Daunay, M.-C. ............. 235, 363<br />
Davis, A. .......125, 258, 412, 545<br />
Deleu, W. ............................. 180<br />
AUTHOR INDEX<br />
DeNicco, A. ........................... 301<br />
Dittmar, P. J. .......................... 241<br />
Dogimont, C. ............................ 89<br />
Dolan, K. ................................ 585<br />
Du, D. ..................................... 301<br />
Eduardo, I. ............................. 553<br />
Eubanks, M. D. .............. 146, 492<br />
Fergany, M. .............................. 89<br />
Fernández-Trujillo, J. P. . 146, 553<br />
Fish, W. ...................... 1, 277, 545<br />
Fujita, M. ................................. 14<br />
Fukino, N. ................................ 95<br />
Fukunaga, K. .......................... 372<br />
Gajdová, J. ................................. 9<br />
Gałecka, T. ................................515<br />
García-Mas, J. ................ 180, 186<br />
Garrido, D. ............................. 171<br />
Garza-Ortega, S. .................... 560<br />
Gasmanová, N. ......................... 51<br />
Gevens, A. J. .......................... 427<br />
Giovinazzo, N. ......................... 89<br />
Glala, A. ................................. 158<br />
Gómez, P. ............................... 171<br />
Gómez-Guillamón, M. L. 100, 108<br />
Gong, G. ......................... 133, 212<br />
González, D. .................. 180, 186<br />
González, M. .................. 180, 186<br />
González, V. .......................... 180<br />
González-Román, M. ............. 206<br />
Grajeda-García, L. F. ............. 560<br />
Grumet, R. ....................... 39, 387<br />
Guner, N. ............................... 468<br />
Guo, S. ................................... 212<br />
Haider, M. S. .......................... 527<br />
Hammar, S. .............................. 39<br />
Harp, T. L. ............................. 421<br />
Hassell, R. L. .......................... 591<br />
Hausbeck, M. K. .................... 427<br />
Hazzard, R. ............................ 232<br />
He, N. ..................................... 296<br />
Heckman, J. R. ....................... 539<br />
Henninger, M. R. ........... 116, 539<br />
Heredia, A. ............................. 108<br />
Hernandez, A. ........................ 125
Hofer, D. ...............................395<br />
Holmes, G. J. ........................403<br />
Holmstrom, K. E. ..................539<br />
Hopkins, D. L. ......................436<br />
Hossain, M. D. ........................14<br />
Huber, D. J. ...........................578<br />
Ibdah, M. ................................31<br />
Infante-Casella, M. L. ...116, 539<br />
Jamilena, M. .........................171<br />
Janick, J. .......341, 349, 358, 363<br />
Jester, B. ...............................591<br />
Jett, L. W. .............................249<br />
Jifon, J. ...................................23<br />
Jullian, E. ..............................358<br />
Kato, K. ........................317, 372<br />
Katzir, N. ........................31, 125<br />
Khaing, M. T. ...............317, 372<br />
King, S. .........................125, 258<br />
Kline, W. L. ..........................539<br />
Kołakowska, G. .......................515<br />
Korzeniewska, A. ....................515<br />
Kozik, E. U. .............................121<br />
Kuhn, P. J. ............................421<br />
Kunihisa, M. ...........................95<br />
Larkov, O. ...............................31<br />
Lebeda, A. ..........9, 51, 444, 453<br />
Leskovar, D. .....................23, 70<br />
Lester, Gene E. .......................70<br />
Levi, A. .........125, 380, 412, 468<br />
Lewinsohn, E. .........................31<br />
Li, H. .....................................133<br />
Li, Y. .....................................133<br />
Ling, K-S. .............................468<br />
Little, H. A. .............................39<br />
Liu, H-Y. ..............................139<br />
Liu, J. ......................................78<br />
López-Sesé, A. I. ..................100<br />
Loy, J. B. ..............................568<br />
Luo, F. ..................................272<br />
Maness, N. ....................578, 597<br />
Mao, A. .........................220, 225<br />
Martínez, J. A. ..............146, 553<br />
Marzec, L. ................................515<br />
Matsumoto, S. .........................95<br />
Maynard, D. N. .....................591<br />
McCreight, J. D. ...................139<br />
McGrath, M. T. ...................... 473<br />
Miller, M. ................................. 23<br />
Miranda, C. ............................ 553<br />
Mitchell, J. M. ........................... 483<br />
Monforte, A. ...........146, 180, 553<br />
Monks, D. W. ........................ 241<br />
Morton, H. V. ........................ 395<br />
Murphy, J. F. ......................... 492<br />
Napier, A. B. .......................... 153<br />
Navrátilová, B. ..................... 9, 51<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. .......... 515<br />
Nishida, H. ......................317, 372<br />
Nitzsche, P. J. ........................ 539<br />
Nuez, F. ..........................180, 186<br />
Obando, J. .......................146, 553<br />
Ohara, T. ...........................95, 193<br />
Olson, S. ................................ 591<br />
Omran, S. ............................... 158<br />
Özdemir, Z. ............................ 498<br />
Paris, H. S. ......341, 349, 358, 363<br />
Park, S. O. .......................153, 165<br />
Pavon, C. ............................... 507<br />
Payán, M. C. .......................... 171<br />
Peñaranda, A. ......................... 171<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P.<br />
.................545, 578, 585, 591, 597<br />
Picó, B. ...........................180, 186<br />
Piskurewicz, U. ......................... 515<br />
Pitrat, M. ...........................89, 412<br />
Pompan-Lotan, M. ................... 31<br />
Portnoy, V. ........................31, 135<br />
Puigdomènech, P. ............180, 186<br />
Rajab, M. ................................. 89<br />
Ravid, U. .................................. 31<br />
Robbins, M. D. ...................... 197<br />
Roberts, W. .....................277, 597<br />
Robles, A. .............................. 180<br />
Roig, C. ...........................180, 186<br />
Rosales, R. ............................. 171<br />
Sakata, Y. ..........................95, 193<br />
Samulis, R. J. ......................... 539<br />
Sánchez-Estrada, A. ............... 560<br />
Sargent, S. A. ......................... 483<br />
Sarria, E. .........................100, 108<br />
Schaffer, A. A. ......................... 31<br />
Schultheis, J. R. ......241, 265, 591
Sedláková, B. ......................... 444<br />
Si, Y. ........................................ 48<br />
Siddiq, M. .............................. 585<br />
Skálová, D. ............................... 51<br />
Śmiech, M. ................................ 515<br />
Smith, M. ............................... 301<br />
Staub, J. E. ............................. 197<br />
Stephenson, A. G. .................. 301<br />
Stoffella, P. J. ......................... 483<br />
Sugiyama, K. .......................... 158<br />
Sugiyama, M. ......................... 193<br />
Sun, X. ................................... 272<br />
Sun, Z. .................................... 197<br />
Sztangret-Wiśniewska, J. ......... 515<br />
Tadmor, Y. ............... 31, 125, 545<br />
Tahir, M. ................................ 527<br />
Tanaka, K. ...................... 317, 372<br />
Taylor, M. .............................. 277<br />
Tetteh, A. ............................... 412<br />
Thies, J. A. ............................. 380<br />
Thimmapuram, J. ................... 125<br />
Thompson, C. M. ................... 146<br />
Tietjen, W. H. ........................ 539<br />
Tirpak, S. ............................... 539<br />
Tory, D. R. ............................... 42<br />
Trebitsh, T. ............................. 125<br />
Troadec, C. ............................... 89<br />
Troncoso-Rojas, R. ................ 560<br />
Turíni, T. A. ........................... 139<br />
Tzuri, G. ................................... 31<br />
Ugás, R. ................................. 333<br />
Urban, J. ................................. 453<br />
van der Knaap, E. ................... 146<br />
Wang, Y. .......................... 20, 225<br />
Wargo, J. ................................ 286<br />
Webb, S. E. ............................ 309<br />
Webber, III, C. ....................... 545<br />
Wechter, W. P. ....................... 125<br />
Wehner, T. C. . 121, 403, 412, 468<br />
Wenge, L. ............................... 296<br />
Wessel-Beaver, L. .................. 206<br />
Whipkey, A. ........................... 348<br />
Widrlechner, M. P. ................. 453<br />
Wien, H. C. .............................. 60<br />
Winsor, J. A. .......................... 301<br />
Wyenandt, C. A. .... 116, 534, 539<br />
Xu, Y. ............................. 212, 225<br />
Yan, Z. ................................... 296<br />
Yariv, Y. .................................. 31<br />
Yi, S. S. .................................. 317<br />
Yuste-Lisbona, F. J. ............... 100<br />
Zhang, F. ........................ 220, 225<br />
Zhang, H-Y. ... 133, 212, 220, 225<br />
Zhao, S. .................................... 96<br />
Zitter, T. A. ...................... 60, 498
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Biotechnology and Physiology<br />
SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF WATERMELON<br />
LYCOPENE EXTRACTED INTO AQUEOUS SODIUM DODECYL<br />
SULFATE<br />
Wayne W. Fish and Angela R. Davis ..........................................................................1<br />
PROTOPLAST FUSION IN GENUS CUCUMIS<br />
J. Gajdová, B. Navrátilová, and A. Lebeda .................................................................9<br />
EXPRESSION PROPERTIES OF THREE TAU-TYPE PUMPKIN<br />
GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASES IN BACTERIA AND A SEARCH FOR<br />
THEIR INTRINSIC INHIBITORS<br />
M. D. Hossain and Masayuki Fujita ..........................................................................14<br />
PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAFTED MUSKMELON<br />
GROWN IN MONOSPORASCUS CANNONBALLUS-INFESTED SOIL IN<br />
SOUTH TEXAS<br />
John Jifon, Kevin Crosby, Marvin Miller, and Daniel Leskovar...............................23<br />
FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF GENES INVOLVED IN THE FORMATION<br />
OF MELON AROMA<br />
Nurit Katzir, Vitaly Portnoy, Yael Benyamini, Yoela Yariv, Galil Tzuri, Maya<br />
Pompan-Lotan, Olga Larkov, Einat Bar, Mwafaq Ibdah, Yaniv Azulay, Uzi Ravid,<br />
Yosef Burger, Arthur A. Schaffer, Yaakov Tadmor, and Efraim Lewinsohn ...........31<br />
STUDIES OF TRANSGENIC MELON EXPRESSING THE MUTANT<br />
ETHYLENE RECEPTOR, ETR1-1, INDICATE THAT ETHYLENE<br />
PERCEPTION BY STAMEN PRIMORDIA IS REQUIRED FOR CARPEL<br />
DEVELOPMENT IN MELON FLOWERS<br />
H. A. Little, S. Hammar, and R. Grumet ...................................................................39<br />
DROUGHT-INDUCED GENE EXPRESSION IN ROOTS OF CITRULLUS<br />
COLOCYNTHIS<br />
Ying Si and Fenny Dane ...........................................................................................48<br />
EMBRYO CULTURE AS A TOOL FOR INTERSPECIFIC<br />
HYBRIDIZATION OF CUCUMIS SATIVUS AND WILD CUCUMIS SPP.<br />
D. Skálová, B. Navrátilová, A. Lebeda, and N. Gasmanová .....................................51<br />
INIATIATING SUDDEN WILT DISORDER IN MUSKMELON WITH LOW-<br />
LIGHT STRESS<br />
H. C. Wien and T. A. Zitter .......................................................................................60
<strong>Breeding</strong> and Genetics<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED CULTIVARS OF ZUCCHINI SQUASH<br />
AND SWEETPOTATO SQUASH STARTING FROM CHILEAN<br />
LANDRACES<br />
Gabriel Bascur . .........................................................................................................65<br />
GENETIC VARIATION FOR BENEFICIAL PHYTOCHEMICAL LEVELS<br />
IN MELONS (CUCUMIS MELO L.)<br />
Kevin M. Crosby, Gene E. Lester, and Daniel I. Leskovar........................................70<br />
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND EVOLUTION OF WILD AND CULTIVATED<br />
WATERMELON<br />
Fenny Dane and Jiarong Liu ......................................................................................78<br />
FINE GENETICAL AND PHYSICAL MAPPING OF THE GENES A AND G<br />
CONTROLLING SEX DETERMINATION IN MELON<br />
M. Fergany, C. Troadec, M. Rajab, A. Boualem, M. Dalmais, M. Caboche, A.<br />
Bendahmane, D. Besombes, N. Giovinazzo, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat.................89<br />
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS ANALYSIS OF POWDERY MILDEW<br />
RESISTANCE AGAINST TWO STRAINS OF PODOSPHAERA XANTHII IN<br />
THE MELON LINE ‘PMAR NO. 5’<br />
N. Fukino, T. Ohara, Y. Sakata, M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto.............................95<br />
LINKAGE ANALYSIS AMONG RESISTANCES TO POWDERY MILDEW<br />
AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION BY APHIS GOSSYPII GLOVER IN MELON<br />
LINE ‘TGR-1551’<br />
M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, A. I. López-Sesé, E. Sarria, and F. J. Yuste-Lisbona<br />
.................................................................................................................................100<br />
EPICUTICULAR WAX MORPHOLOGY AND TRICHOME TYPES IN<br />
RELATION TO HOST PLANT SELECTION BY APHIS GOSSYPII IN<br />
MELONS<br />
M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, A. Heredia, and E. Sarria................................................108<br />
EVALUATION OF ZUCCHINI AND STRAIGHTNECK SUMMER SQUASH<br />
BREEDING LINES AND VARIETIES FOR POWDERY MILDEW AND<br />
DOWNY MILDEW TOLERANCE<br />
M. L. Infante-Casella, C. A. Wyenandt, and M. R. Henninger................................116<br />
INHERITANCE OF CHILLING RESISTANCE IN CUCUMBER SEEDLINGS<br />
Elzbieta U. Kozik and Todd C. Wehner ..................................................................121<br />
GENES EXPRESSED DURING DEVELOPMENT AND RIPENING OF<br />
WATERMELON FRUIT<br />
A. Levi, W. P. Wechter, A. Davis, A. Hernandez, J. Thimmapuram, T. Trebitsh, Y.<br />
Tadmor, N. Katzir, V. Portnoy, and S. King............................................................125
RESEARCH OF MOLECULAR MARKERS LINKED TO THE DWARF<br />
GENE IN SQUASH<br />
Haizhen Li, Haiying Zhang, Guoyi Gong, Yunlong Li, and Chongshi Cui.............133<br />
REACTION OF MELON PI 313970 TO CUCURBIT LEAF CRUMPLE VIRUS<br />
James D. McCreight, Hsing-Yeh Liu, and Thomas A. Turini .................................139<br />
THE MELON GENOMIC LIBRARY OF NEAR ISOGENIC LINES: A TOOL<br />
FOR DISSECTING COMPLEX TRAITS<br />
Antonio José Monforte, Iban Eduardo, Pere Arús, Juan Pablo Fernández-Trujillo,<br />
Javier Obando, Juan Antonio Martínez, Antonio Luís Alarcón, Esther van der Knaap,<br />
and Jose María Álvarez ...........................................................................................146<br />
MOLECULAR MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH QUANTITATIVE<br />
CONTROL OF BETA-CAROTENE SYNTHESIS IN CUCUMIS MELO L.<br />
A. B. Napier, S. O. Park, and K. M. Crosby............................................................153<br />
A NEW EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR PRODUCING SEEDLESS<br />
WATERMELON FRUITS FROM SOME DIPLOID CULTIVARS<br />
S. Omran, K. Sugiyama, A. Glala............................................................................158<br />
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI FOR SUCROSE PERCENTAGE OF<br />
TOTAL SUGARS IN MELON CROSSES UNDER GREENHOUSE<br />
AND FIELD ENVIRONMENTS<br />
Soon O. Park and Kevin M. Crosby ........................................................................165<br />
ETHYLENE MEDIATES THE INDUCTION OF FRUITS WITH ATTACHED<br />
FLOWER IN ZUCCHINI SQUASH<br />
M. C. Payán, A. Peñaranda, R. Rosales, D. Garrido, P. Gómez, and M. Jamilena<br />
.................................................................................................................................171<br />
THE MELOGEN PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC TOOLS IN<br />
MELON<br />
Pere Puigdomènech, Ana Caño, Víctor González, Pere Arús, Wim Deleu, Jordi<br />
Garcia-Mas, Mireia González, Antonio Monforte, José Blanca, Fernando Nuez,<br />
Belén Picó, Cristina Roig, Miguel Aranda, Daniel González, and Antonio Robles<br />
................................................................................................................................180<br />
THE MELOGEN PROJECT: EST SEQUENCING, PROCESSING AND<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
Pere Puigdomènech, Pere Arús, Jordi Garcia-Mas, Mireia González, Fernando Nuez,<br />
José Blanca, Belén Picó, Cristina Roig, Miguel Aranda, and Daniel González<br />
.................................................................................................................................186<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A POWDERY MILDEW-RESISTANT CUCUMBER<br />
Yoshiteru Sakata, Mitsuhiro Sugiyama and Takayoshi Ohara ...............................193<br />
HISTORY AND APPLICATION OF MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR<br />
CUCUMBER IMPROVEMENT<br />
J.E. Staub, M.D. Robbins, S.M. Chung, and Z. Sun ...............................................197
SILVERLEAF WHITEFLY AFFECTS LEAF MOTTLING IN CUCURBITA<br />
MOSCHATA DUCHESNE<br />
Linda Wessel-Beaver and Moisés González-Román ..............................................206<br />
QTL ANALYSIS OF SOLUBLE SOLIDS CONTENT IN WATERMELON<br />
UNDER DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS<br />
Yong Xu, Shaogui Guo, Haiying Zhang, and Guoyi Gong ....................................212<br />
MAPPING AND QTL ANALYSIS CONCERNING TOLERANCE TOWARD<br />
POOR LIGHT IN CUCUMBER<br />
(CUCUMIS SATIVUS L.)<br />
Yong-Jian Wang, Hai-Ying Zhang, Qing-Jun Chen,<br />
Feng Zhang, and Ai-Jun Mao .................................................................................220<br />
CONSTRUCTION OF A GENETIC MAP OF CUCUMBER USING RAPDS,<br />
SSRS, AFLPS AND MAPPING RESISTANCE GENES TO PAPAYA<br />
RINGSPOT, ZUCCHINI YELLOW MOSAIC, AND WATERMELON MOSAIC<br />
VIRUSES<br />
Haiying Zhang, Aijun Mao, Feng Zhang, Yong Xu and Yongjian Wang ...............225<br />
Crop Production<br />
PERIMETER TRAP CROP SYSTEMS USING BLUE HUBBARD SQUASH<br />
AS A CONTROL FOR STRIPED CUCUMBER BEETLE IN BUTTERNUT<br />
SQUASH<br />
Andrew Cavanagh and Ruth Hazzard ......................................................... 232<br />
CHARACTERIZATION OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE<br />
WATERMELON POLLENIZERS<br />
Peter J. Dittmar, Jonathan R. Schultheis, and David W. Monks..............................241<br />
GALIA MUSKMELON PRODUCTION IN HIGH TUNNELS IN THE<br />
CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS USA<br />
Lewis W. Jett ...........................................................................................................249<br />
A COMPARISON OF NOVEL GRAFTING METHODS FOR<br />
WATERMELON IN HIGH-WIND AREAS<br />
Stephen R. King and Angela R. Davis.....................................................................258<br />
CUCURBITS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN NORTH CAROLINA<br />
Jonathan Schultheis..................................................................................................265<br />
APPROACHES TO MINIMIZE THE DEFECTS OF SEEDLESS<br />
WATERMELON<br />
Xiaowu Sun and Fuqing Luo ...................................................................................272<br />
COST BENEFIT ANALYSES OF USING GRAFTED WATERMELONS FOR<br />
DISEASE CONTROL AND THE FRESH-CUT MARKET<br />
Merritt Taylor, Benny Bruton, Wayne Fish, and Warren Roberts ...........................277
NITAMIN ® LIQUID: BACKGROUND AND USE ON CUCURBITACEAE<br />
FAMILY<br />
James Wargo and Anne Cothran .............................................................................286<br />
TRIPLOID SEEDLESS WATERMELON PRODUCTION IN CHINA<br />
Liu Wenge, Yan Zhihong, Zhao Shengjie, and He Nan .........................................296<br />
Entomology<br />
HERBIVORY BY CUCUMBER BEETLES AFFECTS POLLEN<br />
PRODUCTION AND POLLEN PERFORMANCE IN A WILD GOURD<br />
Andrew G. Stephenson, James A. Winsor, Daolin Du, Andrew DeNicco, and<br />
Matthew Smith ........................................................................................................301<br />
WHITEFLY TRANSMISSION OF A NEW VIRUS INFECTING CUCURBITS<br />
IN FLORIDA<br />
Susan E. Webb, Scott Adkins, and Carlye A. Baker ...............................................309<br />
Germplasm<br />
GENETIC DIVERSITY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIP AMONG<br />
MELON ACCESSIONS FROM AFRICA AND ASIA REVEALED BY RAPD<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
Y. Akashi, K. Tanaka, H. Nishida, K. Kato, M. T. Khaing, S. S. Yi, and<br />
T. T. Chou................................................................................................................317<br />
ORIGIN, MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION, AND USES OF CUCURBITA<br />
FICIFOLIA, THE MOUNTAIN SQUASH<br />
Thomas C. Andres ...................................................................................................326<br />
LOCHE: A UNIQUE PRE-COLUMBIAN SQUASH LOCALLY GROWN IN<br />
NORTH COASTAL PERU<br />
Thomas C. Andres ...................................................................................................333<br />
OLD WORLD CUCURBITS IN PLANT ICONOGRAPHY OF THE<br />
RENAISSANCE<br />
Jules Janick and Harry S. Paris................................................................................341<br />
JONAH AND THE “GOURD” AT NINEVEH: CONSEQUENCES OF A<br />
CLASSIC MISTRANSLATION<br />
Jules Janick and Harry S. Paris ................................................................................349<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF AN IMAGE DATABASE OF CUCURBITACEAE<br />
Jules Janick, Anna Whipkey, Harry S. Paris, Marie-Christine Daunay, and E. Jullian<br />
.................................................................................................................................358<br />
FIRST IMAGES OF CUCURBITA IN EUROPE<br />
Harry S. Paris, Jules Janick, and Marie-Christine Daunay ......................................363
POLYPHYLETIC ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED MELON INFERRED FROM<br />
ANALYSIS OF ITS CHLOROPLAST GENOME<br />
K. Tanaka, K. Fukunaga, Y. Akashi, H. Nishida, K. Kato, and M. T. Khaing ........372<br />
RESISTANCE OF CITRULLUS LANATUS VAR. CITROIDES GERMPLASM<br />
TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES<br />
Judy A. Thies and Amnon Levi ..............................................................................380<br />
Phytopathology<br />
FACTORS INFLUENCING A CUCUMBER FRUIT SUSCEPTIBILITY TO<br />
INFECTION BY PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI<br />
Kaori Ando and Rebecca Grumet ............................................................................387<br />
EARLY PROTECTION AGAINST ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES THROUGH<br />
NEMATICIDAL SEED COATING PROVIDES SEASON-LONG BENEFITS<br />
FOR CUCUMBERS<br />
J. O. Becker, J. Smith Becker, H. V. Morton, and D. Hofer....................................395<br />
THE DOWNY MILDEW EPIDEMIC OF 2004 AND 2005 IN THE EASTERN<br />
UNITED STATES<br />
Susan J. Colucci, Todd C. Wehner, and Gerald J. Holmes......................................403<br />
WATERMELON RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW RACE 1 AND<br />
RACE 2<br />
Angela R. Davis, Antonia Tetteh, Todd Wehner, Amnon Levi, and Michel<br />
Pitrat.........................................................................................................................412<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUNGICIDE MANDIPROPAMID IN THE<br />
UNITED STATES FOR CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW OF CUCURBITS<br />
Tyler L. Harp, Donald R. Tory, and Paul J. Kuhn ...................................................421<br />
INTEGRATING CULTURAL AND CHEMICAL STRATEGIES TO<br />
CONTROL PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI AND LIMIT ITS SPREAD<br />
M. K. Hausbeck, A. J. Gevens, and B. Cortright .....................................................427<br />
TREATMENTS TO PREVENT SEED TRANSMISSION OF BACTERIAL<br />
FRUIT BLOTCH OF WATERMELON<br />
D. L. Hopkins and C. M. Thompson........................................................................436<br />
IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEY OF CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW<br />
RACES IN CZECH POPULATIONS<br />
A. Lebeda and B. Sedláková....................................................................................444<br />
INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION ASPECTS OF INTERACTIONS<br />
BETWEEN CUCURBITS AND PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS:<br />
PATHOTYPES AND RACES<br />
A. Lebeda, M. P. Widrlechner, and J. Urban ..........................................................453
EVALUATING ZUCCHINI YELLOW MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE IN<br />
WATERMELON<br />
Kai-Shu Ling and Amnon Levi, Nihat Guner and Todd C. Wehner ....................468<br />
OCCURRENCE OF FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE IN PODOSPHAERA<br />
XANTHII AND IMPACT ON CONTROLLING CUCURBIT POWDERY<br />
MILDEW IN NEW YORK<br />
Margaret Tuttle McGrath.........................................................................................473<br />
FRUIT YIELD, QUALITY PARAMETERS, AND POWDERY MILDEW<br />
(SPHAEROTHECA FULIGINEA) SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SPECIALTY<br />
MELON (CUCUMIS MELO L.) CULTIVARS GROWN IN A PASSIVE-<br />
VENTILATED GREENHOUSE<br />
J. M. Mitchell, D. J. Cantliffe, S. A. Sargent, L. E. Datnoff, and P. J. Stoffella......483<br />
INTEGRATION OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AND PLASTIC MULCHES<br />
TO MANAGE WATERMELON MOSAIC VIRUS IN SQUASH<br />
John F. Murphy and Micky D. Eubanks..................................................................492<br />
BACTERIAL LEAF SPOT (XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS PV.<br />
CUCURBITAE) AS A FACTOR IN CUCURBIT PRODUCTION AND<br />
EVALUATION OF SEED TREATMENTS FOR CONTROL IN NATURALLY<br />
INFESTED SEEDS<br />
Zahide Özdemir and Thomas A. Zitter....................................................................498<br />
DETERMINING DENSITY OF PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI OOSPORES IN<br />
SOIL<br />
C. Pavon and M. Babadoost ....................................................................................507<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF DOUBLE-HAPLOID CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS<br />
SATIVUS L.) LINES RESISTANT TO DOWNY MILDEW<br />
(PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS [BERK. ET CURT.] ROSTOVZEV)<br />
J. Sztangret-Wiśniewska, T. Gałecka, A. Korzeniewska, L. Marzec, G. Kołakowska, U.<br />
Piskurewicz, M. Śmiech, and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt ................................................. 515<br />
NATURALLY OCCURRING STRAINS OF BIPARTITE BEGOMOVIRUSES<br />
AFFECT SOME MEMBERS OF CUCURBITACEAE FAMILY INSIDE AND<br />
OUTSIDE THE COTTON ZONE IN PAKISTAN<br />
M. Tahir and M. S. Haider ......................................................................................527<br />
EFFECT OF FUNGICIDE CHEMISTRY AND CULTIVAR ON THE<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW ON PUMPKIN IN<br />
NEW JERSEY<br />
Christian A. Wyenandt ............................................................................................534
SURVEY FOR CUCURBIT VIRUSES IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS AND<br />
EVALUATION OF VIRUS-RESISTANT SUMMER SQUASH BREEDING<br />
LINES IN NEW JERSEY<br />
Christian A. Wyenandt, Michelle Infante-Casella, Melvin R. Henninger, Richard<br />
Buckley, Sabrina Tirpak, Kristian E. Holmstrom, Peter J. Nitzsche, William H.<br />
Tietjen, Raymond J. Samulis, Wesley L. Kline, Win Cowgill, and Joseph R.<br />
Heckman ..................................................................................................................539<br />
Postharvest<br />
A RAPID HEXANE-FREE METHOD FOR ANALYZING TOTAL<br />
CAROTENOID CONTENT IN CANARY YELLOW-FLESHED<br />
WATERMELON<br />
Angela R. Davis, Julie Collins, Wayne W. Fish, Charles Webber III, Penelope<br />
Perkins-Veazie, and Y. Tadmor...............................................................................545<br />
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI ASSOCIATED WITH SUSCEPTIBILITY<br />
TO POSTHARVEST PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORDERS AND DECAY OF<br />
MELON FRUIT<br />
J. P. Fernández-Trujillo, J. A. Martínez, J. Obando, C. Miranda, A. J. Monforte, I.<br />
Eduardo, and P. Arús ...............................................................................................553<br />
POSTHARVEST CHARACTERIZATION OF A CUSHAW SQUASH<br />
BREEDING LINE.<br />
L. Fernando Grajeda-García, Sergio Garza-Ortega, Alberto Sánchez-Estrada, and<br />
Rosalba Troncoso-Rojas ..........................................................................................560<br />
HARVEST PERIOD AND STORAGE AFFECT BIOMASS PARTITIONING<br />
AND ATTRIBUTES OF EATING QUALITY IN ACORN SQUASH<br />
(CUCURBITA PEPO)<br />
J. Brent Loy .............................................................................................................568<br />
RIPENING CHANGES IN MINIWATERMELON FRUIT<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie and Julie K. Collins Donald J. Huber, and Niels Maness<br />
.................................................................................................................................578<br />
CHANGES IN CAROTENOID CONTENT DURING PROCESSING OF<br />
WATERMELON FOR JUICE CONCENTRATES<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie, J. K. Collins, M. Siddiq, and K. Dolan...........................585<br />
VARIATION IN CAROTENOIDS AMONG MINIWATERMELONS<br />
PRODUCED IN FOUR LOCATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S.<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie, Julie K. Collins, Richard L. Hassell, Donald N. Maynard,<br />
Jonathan Schultheis, Bill Jester, and Steve Olson....................................................591<br />
WATERMELON CAROTENOID CONTENT IN RESPONSE TO<br />
GERMPLASM, MATURITY, AND STORAGE<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie, Julie K. Collins, Angela Davis, Niels Maness, and Warren<br />
Roberts.....................................................................................................................597
SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF<br />
WATERMELON LYCOPENE EXTRACTED<br />
INTO AQUEOUS SODIUM DODECYL<br />
SULFATE<br />
Wayne W. Fish and Angela R. Davis<br />
South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural<br />
Research Service, P.O. Box 159, Lane, OK 74555.<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> absorbance properties of aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate<br />
(SDS) extracts of watermelon tissue were examined as part of an ongoing effort<br />
to develop simpler, more economical ways to quantify carotenoids in melon<br />
fruit. Levels of SDS >0.2% extracted and solubilized watermelon lycopenecontaining<br />
chromoplasts, and the absorbances at 565nm of the extracts obeyed<br />
Beer’s law. A method was developed for the detergent extraction/spectrophotometric<br />
determination of watermelon lycopene. Its application on 110<br />
watermelons representing 14 cultivars yielded results directly comparable to<br />
conventional lycopene methods (the regression coefficient for linear fit was<br />
~0.98). <strong>The</strong> methodology, its advantages, and its limitations are presented.<br />
L<br />
ycopene, a fat-soluble carotenoid, is a precursor of β-carotene<br />
(Sandmann, 1994) and has at least twice the antioxidant<br />
capacity of β-carotene (Di Mascio et al., 1989). A number of<br />
epidemiological studies suggest positive health benefits to be derived<br />
from the consumption of diets high in lycopene (Gerster, 1997),<br />
although a consensus for either its beneficial or detrimental role in the<br />
modulation of carcinogenesis remains to be established (reviewed in<br />
Bramley, 2000; Arab et al., 2001). Red-fleshed watermelon is a rich<br />
source of lycopene. Previous research has determined that watermelon<br />
cultivars vary in lycopene content depending on genotype and<br />
We wish to thank Rick Houser for his technical assistance and Julie Collins for<br />
performing the HPLC analyses. Mention of trade names or commercial products in<br />
this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not<br />
imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All<br />
programs and services of the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a<br />
nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex,<br />
age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA<br />
employee as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection under U.S.<br />
copyright law is not available for such works. Accordingly, there is no copyright to<br />
transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in which the article appears is itself<br />
copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S. Government, which can be freely<br />
reproduced by the public.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 1
environmental conditions (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2006). To aid in<br />
breeding programs, plant breeders need a safe, economical, yet reliable<br />
method to determine lycopene content in individual watermelons.<br />
Presently, there are three principal experimental methodologies for<br />
lycopene quantitation.<br />
Conventional extraction methods coupled with spectrophotometry<br />
employ organic solvents for the extraction of lycopene from the tissue<br />
into the solvent. <strong>The</strong> extracted lycopene is then quantified<br />
spectrophotometrically by its absorbance in the visible region of the<br />
spectrum (Beerh and Siddappa, 1959; Adsule and Dan, 1979; Sadler et<br />
al, 1990; Fish et al., 2002). Though relatively simple and reliable, the<br />
extraction methodology requires the use of flammable, biologically<br />
hazardous organic solvents, and thus poses personnel-safety and<br />
environmental-waste issues.<br />
HPLC offers both separation/identification and quantitation of<br />
individual carotenoids (Craft, 2001). Although the research method of<br />
choice, HPLC requires significant technical expertise, expensive<br />
instrumentation, columns, and column standards, and the use of<br />
hazardous solvents. HPLC is too slow and too expensive for the<br />
routine screening of fruit from a breeding program.<br />
A recent methodology, Xenon flash spectrophotometry (Davis, et<br />
al., 2003), allows the direct spectrophotometric determination of<br />
lycopene in a puree of watermelon flesh. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is rapid, simple,<br />
requires little sample preparation, and uses no hazardous chemicals.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two disadvantages of the method are the high cost of the<br />
instrumentation and the fact that for quantitation, the instrumental<br />
output initially must be calibrated with lycopene values determined by<br />
one of the previously mentioned methodologies.<br />
A recent investigation showed that aqueous solutions of the<br />
anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) extracted and<br />
solubilized lycopene-containing chromoplasts from watermelon fruit<br />
tissue. <strong>The</strong> findings from this study provided sufficient fundamental<br />
information to allow development of a detergent<br />
extraction/spectrophotometric method for lycopene quantitation (W.<br />
Fish, unpublished data). That methodology, its advantages, and its<br />
limitations are described below.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL AND SAMPLING. Watermelons used for the<br />
study were from the 2003 harvest and were obtained from commercial<br />
producers in California, Texas, and Oklahoma. In addition, three<br />
watermelon cultivars were grown on research plots at Lane, OK. Two<br />
2 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
to 10 watermelons were used from each of 14 cultivars for a total of<br />
110 individual watermelons. Seedless, hybrid seeded, and openpollinated<br />
seeded types of watermelon cultivars were employed. Prior<br />
to analysis, watermelon tissue was handled in one of two ways. In one<br />
method, two 100-g tissue samples were removed from the center of the<br />
watermelon heart and stored at –80 o C until assayed. When assayed,<br />
samples of frozen watermelon tissue were partially thawed and then<br />
ground to a homogeneous puree with an electric tissue grinder<br />
(Brinkman Polytron Homogenizer, Westbury, NY). In the second<br />
method, 40-g samples were removed from the heart of a fresh<br />
watermelon and immediately ground to a homogeneous puree with an<br />
electric tissue grinder. Tissue purees were kept on ice and out of light<br />
after preparation and until assayed. Purees were stirred on a magnetic<br />
stirring plate during replicate sampling. Sampling and weighing of<br />
replicates were performed in reduced room light.<br />
LYCOPENE ASSAYS BY CONVENTIONAL METHODS. <strong>The</strong> method of<br />
Fish et al. (2002) was employed for the conventional solvent<br />
extraction/analysis procedure. In a few instances, the HPLC elution<br />
profiles of watermelon carotenoids and their relative amounts<br />
extracted into SDS were compared to those obtained by direct<br />
extraction of the tissue with hexane. <strong>The</strong> method of Craft (2001) was<br />
employed for HPLC analyses, and was carried out in the laboratory of<br />
Penny Perkins-Veazie.<br />
LYCOPENE ASSAY BY SDS EXTRACTION. Approximately 2g of<br />
watermelon-tissue puree, prepared as described above, were removed<br />
from the total puree during rapid stirring. This material was weighed<br />
to the nearest 0.01g into a tared, 15-ml screw-capped plastic centrifuge<br />
tube (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ). At the same<br />
time, 0.5-g samples of puree were removed for lycopene assay by<br />
conventional organic solvent extraction/analysis. To the ~2-g weighed<br />
sample of puree were added 6ml of 0.4% SDS in H2O, and the total<br />
weight of the puree plus added solvent was recorded. <strong>The</strong> inclusion of<br />
0.02% sodium azide in the SDS solution to prevent microbial growth<br />
in solutions that stood at room temperature for long periods had no<br />
effect on the solubilizing effect of the SDS. <strong>The</strong> suspension was<br />
thoroughly mixed either by shaking or on a vortex mixer. After<br />
standing for 1 hr to allow denaturation of some of the cellular<br />
components and the solubilization of the lycopene-containing<br />
chromoplasts, the homogenate was centrifuged at room temperature<br />
for 15 min in the 15-ml plastic conical centrifuge tube at 1,500 x g<br />
(3,000rpm) in a Sorvall TC6 bench-top centrifuge (Kendro Laboratory<br />
Products, Asheville, NC). <strong>The</strong> chromoplasts were solubilized into the<br />
aqueous supernatant, and the colorless tissue residue was pelleted at<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 3
the bottom of the tube. For watermelons that were noticeably overripe<br />
(i.e., orange coloration in the locule and tissue pulled away from the<br />
seeds), part of the lycopene in SDS was pelleted when centrifuged at<br />
1,500 x g. <strong>The</strong> result was a red pellicle on top of the extracted tissue<br />
residue at the bottom of the centrifuge tube. <strong>The</strong> amount of insoluble<br />
lycopene visually appeared to be roughly proportional to the degree of<br />
overripeness. Consequently, the lycopene contents of significantly<br />
overripe watermelons could not be as accurately quantified with the<br />
SDS extraction system (see Results).<br />
For spectrophotometric determination, ~5ml of each supernatant<br />
from the centrifugation step were pipetted into a cylindrical glass<br />
cuvette of 1.0cm path length (Milton Roy, Rochester, NY). <strong>The</strong><br />
absorbance of each sample was measured at 565nm and 700nm on a<br />
Spectronic 21 spectrophotometer (Milton Roy, Rochester, NY) versus<br />
a blank composed of the SDS solvent diluted with water (6ml solvent<br />
+ 2ml H2O). <strong>The</strong> lycopene content of the watermelon was estimated<br />
from the absorbance readings by one of two relations:<br />
Not Corrected for Light Scattering:<br />
[Lycopene]<br />
(mg/kg tissue)<br />
( A565)<br />
1 { wt reagent + wt sample}<br />
=<br />
× ×<br />
0.033 ml/ μg<br />
⋅cm<br />
1.0<br />
cm (wt sample)<br />
{ wt reagent + wt sample}<br />
= (30.3) × ( A 565)<br />
×<br />
(wt sample)<br />
Corrected for Light Scattering:<br />
[Lycopene]<br />
(mg/kg tissue)<br />
= 52.9 ×<br />
Eqn. 1<br />
3<br />
A565<br />
-{A<br />
700 (700/565) } 1 { wt reagent + wt sample}<br />
=<br />
× ×<br />
0.0189 ml/ μg<br />
⋅cm<br />
1.0 cm (wt sample)<br />
( A<br />
565<br />
−<br />
( 1.<br />
902)(<br />
A<br />
700<br />
{ wt reagent + wt sample}<br />
) ) ×<br />
(wt sample)<br />
Eqn. 2<br />
<strong>The</strong> absorptivities, 0.0189ml/μg·cm with and 0.033ml/μg·cm<br />
without light-scattering correction, and the correction term for light<br />
scattering, (A565 – {A700(700/565) 3 }), were taken from earlier<br />
determinations (W. Fish, unpublished data).<br />
STATISTICAL ANALYSES. Statistical analyses were performed with<br />
the aid of Statistica software, version 6 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK).<br />
4 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Results and Discussion<br />
We initially tested to see if the SDS system could fulfill two<br />
requirements. First, that all of the lycopene present in watermelontissue<br />
puree could be extracted by the medium. Second, that the<br />
absorbance of the lycopene extracted into the aqueous SDS was a<br />
linear function of the amount of lycopene in the assay system, i.e., did<br />
it obey Beer’s law under this assay protocol? To test the latter<br />
requirement, we combined, in different ratios, purees from two<br />
watermelons, one of lycopene content (by hexane extraction) of<br />
21.6mg/kg and the other of lycopene content of 96.1mg/kg, and<br />
assayed each by SDS extraction/absorbance. <strong>The</strong> lycopene contents of<br />
the combination samples were also verified by hexane<br />
extraction/absorbance. When the absorbances of the SDS extracts at<br />
565nm, either corrected or not corrected for light scattering, were<br />
plotted versus the lycopene contents of the various combined purees, a<br />
linear relation was obtained (data not shown).<br />
<strong>The</strong> first requirement was tested indirectly by comparing the total<br />
amount of lycopene extracted into SDS versus the total amount of<br />
lycopene estimated to be in the tissue by direct hexane<br />
extraction/absorbance. Aliquots of lycopene-containing SDS extracts<br />
were themselves extracted with hexane, and the lycopene in the total<br />
SDS extract calculated from these results. <strong>The</strong> average recovery by<br />
SDS extraction of ripe and slightly underripe watermelons compared<br />
to that extracted by hexane was 100.3% + 1.3% (n = 6). Practical<br />
validation of the aqueous SDS extraction method was carried out by<br />
comparing the lycopene contents determined by this method with<br />
those determined by a conventional hexane extraction method for 110<br />
individual watermelons. When lycopene values determined by the<br />
SDS extraction method were plotted versus their corresponding values<br />
determined by a conventional hexane extraction assay, a linear relation<br />
was obtained (Figure 1). This same relationship was also observed for<br />
a group of over 180 watermelon samples examined in earlier studies<br />
by more sophisticated instrumentation while evaluating the state of<br />
lycopene in aqueous SDS (W. Fish, unpublished data). This one-toone<br />
linear relation is consistent with the hypothesis that results from<br />
the SDS extraction and the hexane extraction methods are directly<br />
comparable, and thus it supports the validity of the SDS extraction<br />
method.<br />
For the 90 individual non-overripe watermelons for which<br />
lycopene was quantified, the SDS extraction/absorption methodology<br />
yielded value differences that averaged –0.09% + 6.8% (n = 90)<br />
without the light-scattering correction and –1.50% + 10.0% (n = 90)<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 5
with the light-scattering correction, as compared to those by hexane<br />
extraction/absorption. <strong>The</strong> differences from the earlier data referred to<br />
above were 0.1% + 5.2% (n = 181) without and –1.1% + 5.1% (n =<br />
181) with the light-scattering correction. All watermelon cultivars<br />
demonstrated normal scatter of data about the mean percent difference.<br />
This suggests that no individual cultivar exhibited aberrant behavior in<br />
the assay. Also, the average amount of lycopene determined for each<br />
cultivar was similar to that previously reported (Holden et al., 1999;<br />
Fish et al., 2002; Perkins-Veazie et al., 2006). <strong>The</strong> precision of the<br />
SDS extraction assay procedure appears to be comparable to that of<br />
the conventional hexane extraction assay. For 90 watermelon samples<br />
assayed by SDS extraction, the average standard error per triplicate<br />
was 1.12% + 1.07 % for determinations that employed light-scattering<br />
corrections and 1.00% + 1.26 % for the same samples not corrected for<br />
light scattering. As mentioned under Materials and Methods, part of<br />
the lycopene from noticeably overripe watermelons frequently<br />
sedimented when the extract was centrifuged. This resulted in an<br />
underestimation of the lycopene content of overripe melons. <strong>The</strong><br />
absorbance responses of overripe samples in the SDS assay are<br />
demonstrated by the filled triangles in Figure 1A and B. <strong>The</strong> average<br />
difference between the SDS method and the conventional hexane<br />
extraction method for these overripe melons was –7.4% + 9.8% (n =<br />
20) with the light- scattering correction employed and –9.4% + 6.5%<br />
(n = 20) when the light- scattering correction was not employed.<br />
HPLC analysis of lycopene solubilized from watermelon tissue<br />
with aqueous 0.3% SDS exhibited the same levels of all-trans<br />
lycopene and its cis-isomers as those of direct hexane extracts of the<br />
tissue. Furthermore, higher levels of the more water-soluble<br />
carotenoids, such as lutein, were detected by HPLC analysis of SDS<br />
extracts of watermelon than were seen in direct organic solvent<br />
extracts of the tissue (data not shown).<br />
Previous results demonstrate aqueous solutions of SDS to be a<br />
marginal solvent for certain carotenoids (Takagi et al., 1982, 1996).<br />
Furthermore, our studies found that SDS was unable to extract<br />
lycopene from some types of plant fruit cell matrices, such as<br />
processed tomato products (W. Fish, unpublished data). In spite of<br />
such limitations, for selected systems in which a safe and inexpensive<br />
method to quantify lycopene is desired, the SDS extraction/absorption<br />
methodology offers an acceptable alternative to existing<br />
methodologies. This appears to be especially true for watermelon.<br />
One can reasonably anticipate that lycopene estimates for watermelon<br />
using the SDS system will be within +10% of estimates by organic<br />
solvent extraction/absorption.<br />
6 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Because SDS is not toxic at the levels employed (it’s an ingredient<br />
in toothpaste), laboratory-personnel-safety concerns and hazardouswaste-disposal<br />
issues are eliminated. Furthermore, all of the<br />
equipment needed for the analysis, i.e., blender, tabletop centrifuge,<br />
and student lab-type spectrophotometer, can be purchased for under<br />
$3,500 at today’s prices. This methodology may thus afford the plant<br />
breeder or other investigator a means to quantify lycopene in<br />
watermelon or other fruits.<br />
A B<br />
Fig. 1. Lycopene levels determined for 110 individual watermelons by the SDS<br />
extraction/absorbance assay compared with the corresponding levels<br />
determined by conventional hexane extraction/absorbance. Open circles<br />
represent ripe or underripe melons and filled triangles represent overripe<br />
melons. A. <strong>The</strong> absorbance values of lycopene in SDS were adjusted for light<br />
scattering (see text). <strong>The</strong> equation of the linear least squares regression fit to<br />
the data is y = 0.569 + 0.976x. <strong>The</strong> regression coefficient for the linear fit of the<br />
data is r 2 = 0.969 (P < 0.05). B. <strong>The</strong> absorbance values of lycopene in SDS were<br />
not adjusted for light scattering. <strong>The</strong> equation of the linear least squares<br />
regression fit to the data is y = 3.163 + 0.929x. <strong>The</strong> regression coefficient for the<br />
linear fit of the data is r 2 = 0.981(P < 0.05).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Adsule, P. G. and A. Dan. 1979. Simplified extraction procedure in the rapid<br />
spectrophotometric method for lycopene estimation in tomato. J. Food Sci. &<br />
Tech. 16:216.<br />
Arab, L., S. Steck-Scott, and P. Bowen. 2001. Participation of lycopene and Betacarotene<br />
in carcinogenesis: defenders, aggressors, or passive bystanders?<br />
Epidem. Rev. 23:211–230.<br />
Beerh, O. P. and G. S. Siddappa. 1959. A rapid spectrophotometric method for the<br />
detection and estimation of adulterants in tomato ketchup. Food Tech. 13:414–<br />
418.<br />
Bramley, P. M. 2000. Is lycopene beneficial to human health? Phytochem. 54:233–<br />
236.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 7
Craft, N. E. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation, p. f2.3.1–<br />
2.3.15. In: R. E. Wrolstad, T. E. Acree, E. A. Decker, M. H. Penner, D. S. Reid,<br />
S. J. Schwartz, C. F. Shoemaker, and P. Sporns (eds.). Current protocols in food<br />
analytical chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.<br />
Davis, A. R., W. W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method<br />
for analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />
Di Mascio, P., S. P. Kaiser, and H. Sies. 1989. Lycopene as the most efficient<br />
biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.<br />
274:532 538.<br />
Fish, W. W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />
lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food Comp. Anal.<br />
15:309–317.<br />
Gerster, H. 1997. <strong>The</strong> potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Amer. College<br />
Nutr. 16:109–126.<br />
Holden, J. M., A. L. Eldridge, G. R. Beecher, I. M. Buzzard, S. A. Bhagwat, C. S.<br />
Davis, L. W. Douglass, S. E. Gebhardt, D. B. Haytowitz, and S. Schakel. 1999.<br />
Carotenoid content of U.S. foods: an update of the database. J. Food Comp.<br />
Anal. 12:169–196.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, A. R. Davis, and W. Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />
content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:2593–2597.<br />
Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and bcarotene<br />
from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />
Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />
Sandmann, G. 1994. Carotenoid biosynthesis in microorganisms and plants. Eur. J.<br />
Biochem. 223:7–24.<br />
Takagi, S., J. Itani, Y. Kimura, and K. Takeda. 1996. A spectroscopic behavior of<br />
zeaxanthin molecular aggregate and its form. Okayama Daigaku Nogakubu<br />
Gakujutsu Hokoku. 85:7–13.<br />
Takagi, S., K. Takeda, K. Kameyama, and T. Takagi. 1982. Visible circular<br />
dichroism of lutein acquired on dispersion in an aqueous solution in the presence<br />
of a limited amount of sodium dodecyl sulfate and a dramatic change of the cd<br />
spectrum with concentration of the surfactant. Agric. Biol. Chem. 46:2035–<br />
2040.<br />
8 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
PROTOPLAST FUSION IN GENUS CUCUMIS<br />
J. Gajdová, B. Navrátilová, and A. Lebeda<br />
Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />
Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Somatic hybridization, Cucumis sativus, cucumber,<br />
Cucumis melo, melon, polyethyleneglycol<br />
ABSTRACT. Protoplasts of Cucumis melo L. (MR-1, cv. Charentais D 132, cv.<br />
Charentais), Cucumis metuliferus ‘Meyer ex Naudin’, Cucumis sativus L. (line<br />
SM 6514, cv. Borciagovskij), and C. zeyheri ‘Sonder’ were isolated and then<br />
fused by PEG (polyethyleneglycol). Leaves were used along with growing<br />
apices, calli, and hypocotyls as sources of protoplasts. Various plant species and<br />
plant organs were combined for fusion. <strong>The</strong> most viable combinations were<br />
achieved using Cucumis sativus line SM 6514 (leaf) combined with either C.<br />
melo cv. Charentais (callus, leaf, growing apex), C. melo cv. Charentais D 132<br />
(callus), or C. metuliferus (leaf). Other successful combinations included: C.<br />
melo cv. Charentais (callus) with C. metuliferus (leaf), and C. sativus cv.<br />
Borciagovskij (leaf) with C. zeyheri (callus). <strong>The</strong>se combinations successfully<br />
regenerated calli. Hypocotyl explants were the least viable for protoplast fusion.<br />
P<br />
rotoplast fusion offers a potential plant-breeding technique<br />
where traditional hybridization is not possible. Somatic<br />
hybridization in the genus Cucumis also may serve as a tool for<br />
introducing pathogen resistance against Pseudoperonospora cubensis<br />
to Cucumis melo and Cucumis sativus (Fellner et al., 1996). Previous<br />
work with somatic hybridization resulted in no regeneration in most<br />
observed cases (Gajdová et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> regeneration of hybrid<br />
plants was achieved only in fusions of Cucumis melo with <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata × C. maxima (Yamaguchi and Shiga, 1993), and of C. melo<br />
with C. myriocarpus (Bordas et al., 1998). Yamaguchi and Shiga<br />
(1993) found that intergeneric hybrids did not retain <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
features. Bordas et al. (1998) found the resulting plants were unable to<br />
produce roots.<br />
Our previous studies (Gajdová et al., 2006) have investigated and<br />
optimized the factors involved in regeneration. <strong>The</strong> aim of our recent<br />
work was to establish a reliable method of somatic hybridization in<br />
the genus Cucumis. All possible combinations of genotypes were<br />
tested and various combinations of plant organs were also investigated.<br />
Only genotypes that previously indicated good regenerative capabilites<br />
This research was supported by the following grants: (1) MSM 6198959215<br />
(Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic); and (2) QD 1357<br />
(NAZV, Ministry of Agriculture, Czech Republic.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 9
(calli; in C. zeyheri microcalli obtained) (Gajdová et al., 2006) were<br />
selected for this study.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Seeds of Cucumis melo (line MR-1 [CZ 09-H40-0600]), cv.<br />
Charentais D 132 (CZ 09-H40-1114), cv. Charentais (CZ 09-H40-<br />
1116), Cucumis metuliferus (CZ 09-H41-0587), Cucumis sativus (line<br />
SM 6514 [CZ 09-H39-0768]), C. sativus (cv. Borciagovskij [09-H39-<br />
0056]), and C. zeyheri (CZ 09-H41-0595, CZ 09-H41-0196)<br />
originating from different germplasm collections and recently<br />
maintained by the Research Institute of Crop Production (Dept. of<br />
Gene Bank, Olomouc, Czech Republic) were surface-sterilized with<br />
8% chloramin B and germinated on a 50% MS (Murashige and Skoog,<br />
1962) medium in the dark at 25°C. After 7 days, hypocotyls were<br />
detached and seedlings planted on MS medium in plastic boxes.<br />
Hypocotyls were used either for protoplast isolation or for callus<br />
derivation. Leaves and growing apices of 2–8-week-old plants served<br />
as sources of protoplasts. Calli were derived from leaves of in vitro<br />
plants, except in the case of C. melo (MR-1 and cv. Charentais), where<br />
they were derived from hypocotyls. Explants were placed on MSC<br />
medium (MS with 30g/l sucrose, 2.5mg/l NAA, 1mg/l BAP, and 0.8%<br />
agar) to induce callus growth and the calli subcultured every 2 weeks.<br />
Various combinations of plant species and plant organs were<br />
investigated for protoplast fusions. Protoplasts were isolated using a<br />
novel protocol (Gajdová et al., 2006). After isolation and viability<br />
assessment (by FDA staining), protoplasts were fused in Petri dishes<br />
(diameter 40mm) by 33% (v/v) PEG 6000 (polyethyleneglycol)<br />
solution (Christey et al., 1991) according to the following protocol:<br />
protoplasts in M+C solution (Christey et al., 1991) mixed in a test<br />
tube; 4 small drops (ca 100µl) of protoplasts were left in a Petri dish<br />
for 20 min of sedimentation; 20 min of PEG treatment - 50µl added to<br />
each protoplast drop; PEG pipetted off; Stop solution (Christey et al.,<br />
1991) (200µl per 1 drop) treatment added for 20 min, then pipetted off.<br />
After the fusion liquid LCM1 medium (Debeaujon and Branchard,<br />
1992) was added into dishes (ca. 1.5ml per dish) and protoplasts were<br />
cultivated at 25°C in the dark. After 14 days samples were checked,<br />
liquid LCM 2 medium (Debeaujon and Branchard, 1992) was added,<br />
and dishes transferred under 16-hr light. Growing microcalli were<br />
transferred onto solid F medium (Pelletier et al., 1983) after 2–3 weeks<br />
and subcultured after 3 weeks.<br />
10 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> investigation revealed that the best materials for protoplast<br />
fusion were Cucumis sativus line SM 6514 (leaf) combined either with<br />
C. melo cv. Charentais (callus, leaf, growing apex) or C. melo cv.<br />
Charentais D 132 (callus), and/or with C. metuliferus (leaf). Other<br />
successful combinations were: C. sativus line SM 6514 (growing apex)<br />
× C. metuliferus (growing apex); C. melo cv. Charentais (callus) × C.<br />
metuliferus (leaf); C. sativus cv. Borciagovskij (leaf) × C. zeyheri 0595<br />
(callus). It is unclear how these were combined. In these cases growing<br />
calli were regenerated after fusion but did not undergo organogenesis or<br />
somatic embryogenesis. <strong>The</strong> induction of shoots on the callus and their<br />
development into whole plants has yet to be achieved. <strong>The</strong>se difficulties<br />
were also noted by some authors (Yamaguchi and Shiga, 1993).<br />
Table 1. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis melo cv. Charentais. *<br />
Cucumis melo cv. Charentais<br />
Callus Hypocotyl Leaf Growing apex<br />
C. metuliferus callus microcallus microcallus<br />
leaf<br />
C. sativus leaf callus callus callus<br />
Growing apex cell division microcallus<br />
Hypocotyl no<br />
regeneration<br />
C. melo MR-1 microcallus microcallus<br />
leaf<br />
Growing apex microcallus<br />
Hypocotyl cell division no<br />
regeneration<br />
Callus hyp. no<br />
regeneration<br />
* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />
Regeneration of calli in fusion of C. metuliferus with C. melo or with<br />
C. sativus has not been reported. Fusion of C. zeyheri has not been<br />
previously reported. In general, hypocotyls were found to be the least<br />
viable explant for successful protoplast fusion. Even in combination<br />
with leaves or growing apices they did not show regenerative capacity.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y also indicated low regeneration ability when cultivated in pure<br />
culture (Gajdová et al., 2006). In C. melo cv. Charentais (Table 1) all<br />
other explants were equally suitable for fusion experiments. In C. melo<br />
MR-1 (Tables 1 and 2) growing apex or leaf is better than callus;<br />
however, calli grew well in vitro but plants did not.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 11
Table 2. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis melo MR-1.*<br />
Cucumis melo MR-1<br />
C.<br />
metuliferus<br />
leaf microcallus<br />
C. sativus<br />
Leaf<br />
Callus hyp. Hypocotyl Leaf<br />
Growing<br />
apex callus<br />
Hypocotyl first division<br />
* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />
no<br />
regeneration<br />
Growing<br />
apex<br />
In C. sativus (Tables 3 and 4) the leaf is the best choice for<br />
protoplast fusion (calli were not investigated as they were not viable<br />
[Gajdová et al., 2006]). To date cotyledons have been the most<br />
common source of protoplasts (Fellner and Lebeda, 1998). Cotyledons<br />
were not used in this study due to cotyledon protoplast regeneration<br />
problems reported. Previous studies suggested that this is due to their<br />
tetraploidy (Kubaláková et al., 1996).<br />
Electrofusion has been the most commonly used method of<br />
somatic hybridization. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) or high pH/Ca 2+ has<br />
previously been used to induce fusion (Gajdová et al., 2004). PEGinduced<br />
fusions yielded improved results over previously reported<br />
electrofusion (Greplová et al., 2005). Future research will be focused<br />
on enhancing organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis on regenerated<br />
calli.<br />
Table 3. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis sativus line 6514.*<br />
Cucumis sativus<br />
Leaf Growing apex Hypocotyl<br />
C. melo<br />
Charentais D 132<br />
callus<br />
C. metuliferus<br />
callus<br />
leaf callus microcallus microcallus<br />
Growing apex microcallus callus<br />
* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />
12 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 4. Protoplast fusion in Cucumis sativus cv. Borciagovskij.*<br />
C. sativus<br />
Borciagovskij leaf<br />
C. metuliferus<br />
leaf<br />
C. zeyheri 595<br />
callus callus microcallus<br />
C. zeyheri 196<br />
callus microcallus<br />
* <strong>The</strong> highest level of regeneration is shown.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bordas, M., L. Gonzáles-Candelas, M. Dabauza, D. Ramón, and V. Moreno. 1998.<br />
Somatic hybridization between an albino Cucumis melo L. mutant and Cucumis<br />
myriocarpus. Naud. Plant Sci. 132:179–190.<br />
Christey, M. C., C. A. Makaroff, and E. D. Earle. 1991. Atrazine-resistant<br />
cytoplasmic male-sterile-nigra broccoli obtained by protoplast fusion between<br />
cytoplasmic male-sterile Brassica oleracea atrazine-resistant Brassica<br />
campestris. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 83:201–208.<br />
Debeaujon, I. and M. Branchard. 1992. Induction of somatic embryogenesis and<br />
caulogenesis from cotyledons and leaf protoplast-derived colonies of melon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.). Plant Cell Rep. 12:37–40.<br />
Fellner, M. and A. Lebeda. 1998. Callus induction and protoplast isolation from<br />
tissues of Cucumis sativus L. and C. melo L. seedlings. Biol. Plant. 41:11–24.<br />
Fellner, M., P. Binarová, and A. Lebeda. 1996. Isolation and fusion of Cucumis sativus<br />
and Cucumis melo protoplasts, p. 202–209. In: M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, C. Soria,<br />
J. Cuartero, J. A. Torés, and R. Fernández-Muňoz (eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s towards 2000.<br />
Proc. 6 th Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Malaga, Spain.<br />
Gajdová, J., A. Lebeda, and B. Navrátilová. 2004. Protoplast cultures of Cucumis<br />
and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp., p. 441–454. In: A. Lebeda and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in<br />
cucurbit genetics and breeding research. Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8th Eucarpia<br />
Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Gajdová, J., B. Navrátilová, J. Smolná, and A. Lebeda. 2006. Effect of genotype,<br />
source of protoplasts and media composition on Cucumis and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
protoplast isolation and regeneration. Acta Hort. (In press.)<br />
Greplová, M., B. Navrátilová, M. Vyvadilová, M. Klíma, J. Gajdová, and D.<br />
Skálová. 2005. <strong>The</strong> wild species of the genus Brassica, Cucumis and Solanum in<br />
somatic hybridization, p. 647–648. In: Abstracts, XVII. International Botanical<br />
Congress, Vienna, Austria.<br />
Kubaláková, M., J. Doležel, and A. Lebeda. 1996. Ploidy instability of embryogenic<br />
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) callus culture. Biol. Plant. 38:475–480.<br />
Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays<br />
with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol. 15:473–497.<br />
Pelletier, G., C. Primard, F. Vedel, P. Chetit, R. Remy, P. Rousselle, and M. Renard.<br />
1983. Intergeneric cytoplasmic hybridization in Cruciferae by protoplast fusion.<br />
Molec. Genet. 191:244–250.<br />
Yamaguchi, J. and T. Shiga. 1993. Characteristics of regenerated plants via<br />
protoplast electrofusion between melon (C. melo) and pumpkin (interspecific<br />
hybrid, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima × C. moschata). Jap. J. Breed. 43:173–182.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 13
EXPRESSION PROPERTIES OF THREE TAU-<br />
TYPE PUMPKIN GLUTATHIONE S-<br />
TRANSFERASES IN BACTERIA AND A<br />
SEARCH FOR THEIR INTRINSIC INHIBITORS<br />
M. D. Hossain and Masayuki Fujita<br />
Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa<br />
University, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0795, Japan<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, E. coli, IPTG, substrate,<br />
ligand<br />
ABSTRACT. Expression levels of three tau-type pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima)<br />
glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in bacteria and the presence of substances in<br />
pumpkin callus (PC) and leaf (PL) that inhibit activities of the GSTs were<br />
investigated. Bacterial expression systems based on E. coli transformed with<br />
CmGSTU1, CmGSTU2, or CmGSTU3 cDNA genes in pBluescripts [SK(-)] were<br />
used as enzyme sources. All GSTs were found to be expressed in E. coli XLI-<br />
Blue cells cultivated in the culture media with or without isopropyl-β-Dthiogalactopyranoside<br />
(IPTG). <strong>The</strong> chemical enhanced the expression of<br />
CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 but was found to suppress the CmGSTU3 expression<br />
level in bacterial cells. Inhibition studies indicated that alcoholic extracts of PC<br />
had strong inhibitory effects on CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU3 and a weak effect on<br />
CmGSTU2 activity toward 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB). <strong>The</strong> PL extract<br />
showed a small inhibitory effect on CmGSTU3 but negligible or no effects on<br />
CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2. Through diethylaminoethyl cellulose (anionexchange)<br />
column chromatography of PC and PL extracts, the highest<br />
inhibitions were obtained in 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fractions,<br />
respectively. HPLC analyses demonstrated that the fractions contain several<br />
inhibitors possessing hydrophobic or hydrophilic characteristics. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
suggest that some potent inhibitors charged negatively are present as substrates<br />
or physiological ligands of pumpkin GSTs in pumpkin callus and leaves.<br />
G<br />
lutathione S-transferases (GSTs, EC 2.5.1.18) are a family of<br />
multifunctional enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of<br />
reduced glutathione (GSH) with a wide range of hydrophobic,<br />
electrophilic, and usually cytotoxic substrates (Wilce and Parker,<br />
1994). In plants, GSTs are key enzymes in the detoxification of<br />
herbicides (Marrs, 1996). Some plant GSTs are involved in the<br />
metabolism of endogenous toxins and protect plants from oxidative<br />
damage. Furthermore, some plant GSTs act as binding proteins or<br />
ligandins. <strong>The</strong>y are capable of binding and transporting plant<br />
hormones and a variety of secondary metabolites (Edwards et al.,<br />
2000). <strong>The</strong>re is some evidence that binding to ligands often inhibits<br />
GST activity (Lyon et al., 2003). Little is known, however, about the<br />
14 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
functions of GSTs with endogenous compounds, despite the fact that<br />
plants synthesize numerous toxic secondary metabolites that are<br />
potential GST substrates.<br />
From pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duchesne) callus cultured in a<br />
medium containing 2,4-D, three forms of tau-type pumpkin GSTs,<br />
Puga (CmGSTU1), Pugb (CmGSTU2), and Pugc (CmGSTU3), have<br />
been purified (Fujita et al., 1994, 1998) and their cDNAs have been<br />
cloned (Fujita and Hossain, 2003b). It has also been reported that<br />
CmGSTU1 is expressed at high levels in fully expanded mature organs<br />
and that CmGSTU2 is expressed preferentially in leaves and petioles,<br />
whereas expression of CmGSTU3 in pumpkin organs is under<br />
detectable levels (Fujita and Hossain, 2003b). Since GSTs play a role<br />
in detoxification of endogenous toxins, organs of pumpkin plants as<br />
well as the callus might contain substances that interact with GSTs.<br />
Little progress has been made previously in identification of inhibitors<br />
of pumpkin GSTs (Fujita and Hossain, 2003a). Recently, we found<br />
that tissues of pumpkin seedlings contain some substances that inhibit<br />
activities of pumpkin GSTs (Hossain et al., 2006). In this study, we<br />
investigated the effects of pumpkin callus and leaf extracts on<br />
activities of three tau-type pumpkin GSTs. <strong>The</strong> study would be helpful<br />
in predicting the physiological roles of pumpkin GSTs.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIALS. Callus was induced from sarcocarp tissues of<br />
pumpkin fruit on Murashige and Skoog’s solid medium containing<br />
4.5µM 2,4-D and 0.5µM kinetin at 25˚C in the dark (Fujita et al.,<br />
1994). Fully expanded pumpkin leaves were harvested from mature<br />
plants at Kagawa University Farm.<br />
EXTRACTION. Extract was prepared from 25g of pumpkin callus<br />
(PC) using methanol : chloroform : water (12:5:3, v/v/v) and 70%<br />
ethanol solution following a method described in our previous study<br />
(Hossain et al., 2006). To prepare extract from the same quantity of<br />
pumpkin leaves (PL), 1.5-fold volume of each solvent was used.<br />
Finally, dried substances were dissolved in 10ml distilled water.<br />
COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY. To separate constituents into<br />
different fractions, alcoholic extracts of PC and PL were applied<br />
separately to a diethylaminoethyl cellulose (DE-52; Whatman, UK)<br />
column (5.0ml). After washing the column with a sufficient amount of<br />
distilled water, 1.9ml PC extract were applied to the column and eluted<br />
with different concentrations of NH4HCO3 (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4,<br />
0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1, and 2.0M) and finally with 100% methanol, using a<br />
constant volume of 20ml for each fraction. <strong>The</strong> solvents of the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 15
fractions were thereafter removed by evaporation, and dried<br />
substances were dissolved in 0.5ml distilled water. To fractionate PL<br />
extract, a 1.0-ml sample was applied to the column and the same<br />
procedure was performed. Finally, dried substances were dissolved in<br />
1.5ml distilled water. Inhibitory activities of all fractions of PC and PL<br />
extracts were examined for CmGSTU3 toward 1-chloro-2,4dinitrobenzene<br />
(CDNB) as a substrate.<br />
PREPARATION OF ENZYME. E. coli cells containing CmGSTU1,<br />
CmGSTU2, and CmGSTU3 cDNAs in pBluescripts [SK<br />
(-)] were cultivated separately for about 16 hours at 37˚C in Luria-<br />
Bertani liquid medium with ampicillin (50µg/ml). To investigate the<br />
expression properties of GSTs, 0, 1, and 10mM IPTG were added to<br />
the culture medium. After incubation, the cells were harvested by<br />
centrifugation (2400×g for 10 min) and homogenized in 25mM Tris-<br />
HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1mM EDTA, 1% (w/v) ascorbate, and<br />
10% (v/v) glycerol with a mortar and pestle. A small amount of sea<br />
sand was added to make grinding easier. Cellular debris was<br />
precipitated by centrifugation (10000×g at 4˚C for 10 min) and the<br />
supernatant was used as enzyme solution.<br />
ENZYME ASSAY, PROTEIN QUANTITATION, AND INHIBITION<br />
STUDY. GST activity was determined spectrophotometrically by the<br />
method of Booth et al. (1961) with some modifications. <strong>The</strong> reaction<br />
mixture contained 100mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5),<br />
1.5mM reduced glutathione, 1mM CDNB, and enzyme solution in a<br />
final volume of 0.7ml. To perform inhibition studies, various<br />
quantities of extracts were added to the reaction mixture. <strong>The</strong> enzyme<br />
reaction was initiated by the addition of CDNB, and A340 was<br />
monitored at 25˚C for 1 min. <strong>The</strong> protein concentration of each<br />
enzyme solution was determined by the method of Bradford (1976)<br />
using BSA as protein standard. Enzyme solutions of CmGSTU1 and<br />
CmGSTU2 extracted from E. coli cells with 1mM IPTG and<br />
CmGSTU3 with no IPTG in the culture media were used for inhibition<br />
studies.<br />
HPLC ANALYSIS AND ACTIVITY PROFILING. Fractions with the<br />
highest inhibitory potencies obtained from DE-52 column<br />
chromatography were analyzed on a LC-6AD Liquid Chromatograph<br />
(Shimadzu, Japan) fitted with a UV-VIS detector (SPD-6AV) and C-<br />
R6A Chromatopac. Separation was performed using a Shim Pack<br />
CLC-ODS column (4.6mm i.d. × 250mm, Shimadzu, Japan). <strong>The</strong> flow<br />
rate was 0.6ml min-1 and detection was carried out at 220nm. <strong>The</strong><br />
column was eluted with a linear gradient of 0–80% methanol for 40<br />
min and with 100% methanol for an additional 20 min.<br />
16 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Fifty µl of 0.2M NH4HCO3-eluted fraction of PC extract<br />
(corresponding to 475mg fresh callus) were injected onto the column.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effluent from the column was fractionated according to important<br />
peak areas or after some intervals (when no peak appeared). <strong>The</strong><br />
solvent was removed by evaporation and dried substances were<br />
redissolved in 250µl distilled water. For PL extract, 20µl of 0.3M<br />
NH4HCO3-eluted fraction (corresponding to 30mg fresh materials)<br />
were injected onto the column and the same procedure was carried out<br />
for fractionation. In both cases, inhibitory activity of each of the<br />
HPLC-eluted fractions was assayed for CmGSTU3, using samples of<br />
50 and 100µl.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In a previous investigation (Fujita and Hossain, 2003b), cDNAs of<br />
pumpkin GSTs, namely, CmGSTU1, CmGSTU2, and CmGSTU3,<br />
were subcloned in the multicloning site of the expression vector<br />
pBluescript [SK(-)], and the open reading frame of each clone was<br />
found to be in-frame with the α-complementation particle of the βgalactosidase<br />
gene. Each of the recombinant expression vectors was<br />
subsequently transformed into E. coli XLI-Blue cells and found to be<br />
expressed as a fusion protein in the presence of IPTG. In this study, we<br />
examined the effect of IPTG on expression levels of these GSTs as<br />
fusion proteins in bacterial cells. We cultivated bacterial cells<br />
containing cDNAs of the GSTs treated with 0, 1, and 10mM IPTG and<br />
then extracted proteins from the cells. Interestingly, all of the GSTs<br />
were found to be expressed without the addition of IPTG in the cells,<br />
and CmGSTU3 and CmGSTU2 showed the highest and the lowest<br />
activity, 6084 nmolmin- 1 mg- 1 protein and 60 nmolmin- 1 mg- 1 protein,<br />
respectively (Table 1). IPTG was found to significantly enhance the<br />
expression levels of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 and, in contrast, to<br />
suppress the expression of CmGSTU3 in bacterial cells. In all cases,<br />
IPTG reduced the quantities of total proteins (data not shown).<br />
IPTG activates the expression of the α-complementation particle of<br />
the β-galactosidase gene in pBluescript [SK(-)], thereby increasing the<br />
production of the GST fusion protein. This is the main reason for the<br />
high expression levels of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 in bacterial cells<br />
treated with IPTG. In the case of the suppression of CmGSTU3<br />
expression, IPTG might cause overexpression of the fusion protein,<br />
and the excessive quantity of the protein could be toxic to the bacterial<br />
cells, resulting in damage to the cells. In the control (no IPTG),<br />
bacterial growth appeared to be normal.<br />
To search for inhibitors of pumpkin GSTs, we examined the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 17
Table 1. Effect of IPTG on bacterial expression of pumpkin<br />
glutathione S-transferases. GSTs activities were measured with CDNB<br />
as a substrate.<br />
Specific activity (nmolmin- 1 mg- 1 protein)<br />
GSTs No IPTG 1mM IPTG 10mM IPTG<br />
CmGSTU1 944 3958 5315<br />
CmGSTU2 60 117 163<br />
CmGSTU3 6084 3473 2232<br />
effects of alcoholic extracts of PC and PL on the activities of the<br />
above-mentioned GSTs toward the model substrate CDNB. Our results<br />
showed that the PC extracts had strong inhibitory effects on<br />
CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU3 (Figure 1). In the assay system, 50%<br />
inhibition of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU3 was achieved with extracts<br />
corresponding to 226 and 173mg of fresh callus, respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />
extract showed only a small inhibitory effect on CmGSTU2. <strong>The</strong><br />
specific activities of different GSTs can vary markedly, possibly<br />
causing differences in inhibition among them. In our previous study<br />
(Hossain et al., 2006), we found that inhibitory substances were<br />
Fig. 1. Inhibition of pumpkin GST activities toward CDNB by pumpkin callus<br />
(PC) and pumpkin leaves (PL) extracts. Results were obtained from two<br />
independent experiments; bars indicate standard error. Each µl of both extracts<br />
corresponds to the substances present in 2.5mg of fresh materials.<br />
18 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
present in pumpkin seedlings and that they had various inhibitory<br />
effects on the same GSTs as those used in the present study. We also<br />
obtained evidence that the variation of inhibitory effects on GSTs was<br />
due to the specific characteristics of the enzymes.<br />
<strong>The</strong> alcoholic extract of PL showed a marginal inhibitory effect on<br />
CmGSTU3 and negligible effects on the other two GSTs. Moreover, a<br />
larger volume of the extract in the assay system appeared to increase<br />
the activity of all three GSTs, suggesting that pumpkin leaves might<br />
contain inhibitors as well as activators of pumpkin GSTs.<br />
To obtain further information, we fractionated PC and PL extracts<br />
using a DE-52 column (as described in Materials and Methods). Potent<br />
inhibitory substances of PC extracts seemed to be eluted with 0.2M<br />
NH4HCO3 followed by 0.3M and 0.1M NH4HCO3 (Figure 2). In the<br />
assay system, 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fractions caused 50%<br />
inhibition of CmGSTU3, with samples corresponding to 264 and<br />
361mg fresh callus, respectively. In the case of PL extract, the 0.3M<br />
NH4HCO3-eluted fraction was found to contain the major inhibitory<br />
substances. However, the inhibitory effect of this fraction at a larger<br />
volume was beyond the detectable level due to the much thicker<br />
concentration of the sample.<strong>The</strong> 100% methanol-eluted fractions of<br />
PC and PL extracts were found to contain both water-soluble and<br />
water-insoluble substances.<br />
Fig. 2. Inhibition of CmGSTU3 activity toward CDNB by the fractions of<br />
pumpkin callus (A) and pumpkin leaves (B) extracts obtained from DE-52<br />
column chromatography. Fractionation was done by eluted columns with<br />
different concentrations of NH4HCO3 solutions and finally with 100%<br />
methanol.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 19
Although the water-soluble portion had almost no effect on<br />
CmGSTU3 activity (Figure 2), the insoluble counterpart showed an<br />
apparent high increase of GST activity (data not shown). HPLC<br />
analyses revealed that the water-insoluble substances present in the<br />
100% methanol-eluted fraction of PL extract neither increased the<br />
production of dinitrophenyl-glutathione conjugate (DNP-GS) nor<br />
produced any other conjugates (data not shown), suggesting that the<br />
increase in the absorbance does not depend on GST activity.<br />
In order to evaluate the inhibitory properties of the 0.3M<br />
NH4HCO3-eluted fraction of the PL extracts, we examined the<br />
production of DNP-GS by HPLC after incubating samples (0, 20, and<br />
60µl) with GSH, CDNB, and enzyme solution. We detected a decrease<br />
in DNP-GS production (peak area decreased to 66% with 60µl) along<br />
with an increase in unconjugated GSH concentration (peak area<br />
increased to 159% with 60µl) (Figure 3), but formation of other<br />
conjugates was not observed, suggesting that the fraction contains true<br />
inhibitors of the enzyme.<br />
Fig. 3. Effect of 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fraction of PL extract on the production<br />
of DNP-GS by CmGSTU3. Reactions were performed by adding 0, 20, and 60µl<br />
of inhibitor sample to 1.5mM GSH, 1mM CDNB, 100mM potassium phosphate<br />
buffer (pH 6.5), and 5µl enzyme solution to a final volume of 0.7ml. After 10<br />
min of reaction, 20µl of each product was injected to an HPLC column. <strong>The</strong><br />
amounts of DNP-GS and unconjugated GSH among three reaction mixtures<br />
were compared by the peak areas (as shown by Chromatopac) detected at<br />
220nm.<br />
20 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
To gain some insight into the characteristics of the inhibitors, we<br />
analyzed 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted fractions of PC and PL<br />
extracts, respectively, by HPLC. <strong>The</strong> results indicated that each sample<br />
contains at least two inhibitors that have small to almost no absorption<br />
at 220nm (Figure 4). From retention time, it was revealed that both<br />
hydrophilic and hydrophobic inhibitors are present in the sample. It<br />
was also reported earlier that inhibitors of GSTs that bind to the<br />
hydrophobic site are typically hydrophobic (Koehler et al., 1997),<br />
while mimic-substrate ligands are either hydrophobic or amphipathic<br />
(Ketley et al., 1975). <strong>The</strong> present study, as well as our previous<br />
investigation (Hossain et al., 2006), also interprets the presence of<br />
some inhibitory substances with hydrophobic as well as hydrophilic<br />
characteristics.<br />
We conclude that cDNAs of pumpkin GSTs in pBluescript are<br />
expressed in E. coli cells without IPTG. Furthermore, IPTG activates<br />
the expression of CmGSTU1 and CmGSTU2 but suppresses the<br />
expression of CmGSTU3. Pumpkin callus and leaves contain some<br />
hydrophilic or hydrophobic inhibitory substances that might be<br />
physiological substrates or true inhibitors of pumpkin GSTs. In a<br />
future study, we will determine the structural properties of the<br />
inhibitors and investigate their mechanisms of inhibition.<br />
Fig. 4. HPLC-based activity profiling with 0.2M and 0.3M NH4HCO3-eluted<br />
fractions of PC and PL extracts, respectively, for CmGSTU3 activity. <strong>The</strong><br />
HPLC chromatograms show the absorbance of compounds detected at 220nm;<br />
the bar graphs above each of the chromatograms show the inhibitory activity of<br />
corresponding HPLC fractions.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 21
Literature Cited<br />
Booth, J., E. Boyland, and P. Sims. 1961. An enzyme from rat liver catalyzing<br />
conjugations. Biochem. J. 79:516–524.<br />
Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of<br />
microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.<br />
Anal Biochem. 72:248–254.<br />
Edwards, R., D. P. Dixon, and V. Walbot. 2000. Plant glutathione S-transferases:<br />
enzymes with multiple functions in sickness and in health. Trends Plant Sci.<br />
5:193–198.<br />
Fujita, M. and M. Z. Hossain. 2003a. Modulation of pumpkin glutathione Stransferases<br />
by aldehydes and related compounds. Plant Cell Physiol. 44:481–<br />
490.<br />
Fujita, M. and M. Z. Hossain. 2003b. Molecular cloning of cDNAs for three tau-type<br />
glutathione S-transferases in pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima) and their expression<br />
properties. Physiol. Plant. 117:85–92.<br />
Fujita, M., Y. Adachi, and N. Sakato. 1998. Purification of pumpkin glutathione Stransferase<br />
species specially present in cultured cells treated by excessive<br />
concentrations of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid but absent in normal plants.<br />
Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 62:2431–2434.<br />
Fujita, M., Y. Adachi, and Y. Hanada. 1994. Preliminary characterization of<br />
glutathione S-transferases that accumulate in callus cells of pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
maxima Duch.). Plant Cell Physiol. 35:275–282.<br />
Hossain, M. D., T. Suzuki, and M. Fujita. 2006. Inhibitory substances to glutathione<br />
S-transferases in pumpkin seedlings. Asian J. Plant Sci. 5:346–352.<br />
Ketley, J. N., W. H. Habig, and W. B. Jakoby. 1975. Binding of nonsubstrate ligands<br />
to the glutathione S-transferases. J. Chem. 250:8670–8673.<br />
Koehler, R. T., H. O. Villar, K. E. Bauer, and D. L. Higgins. 1997. Ligand-based<br />
protein alignment and isozyme specificity of glutathione S-transferase inhibitors.<br />
Proteins. 28:202–216.<br />
Lyon, R. P., J. J. Hill, and W. M. Atkins. 2003. Novel class bivalent glutathione Stransferase<br />
inhibitors. Biochem. 42:10418–10428.<br />
Marrs, K. A. 1996. <strong>The</strong> functions and regulation of glutathione S-transferases in<br />
plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:127–158.<br />
Wilce, M. C. J. and M. W. Parker. 1994. Structure and function of glutathione Stransferases.<br />
Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1205:1–18.<br />
22 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF<br />
GRAFTED MUSKMELON GROWN IN<br />
MONOSPORASCUS CANNONBALLUS-<br />
INFESTED SOIL IN SOUTH TEXAS<br />
John Jifon, Kevin Crosby, and Marvin Miller<br />
Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />
Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Weslaco, TX 78596;<br />
Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College<br />
Station, TX 77843<br />
Daniel Leskovar<br />
Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />
Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Uvalde, TX 7; Department<br />
of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX<br />
77843<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Vine decline, water potential, cantaloupe,<br />
rootstock, root vigor, hybrid squash, physiology<br />
ABSTRACT. Two commercial muskmelon varieties (‘Caravelle’ and ‘Primo’)<br />
were grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a and Cucumis rootstocks and grown in fields with a<br />
history of vine decline disease caused by Monosporascus cannonballus to<br />
determine whether physiological responses of the scions are consistent with<br />
predictions of a high capacity for water uptake by the rootstocks. Three<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (hybrid squashes: HS 380, HS 286, and HS 1330) and six Cucumis (PI<br />
20488, PI 1207, MR1, PI 212210, PI 124104, and hybrid melon 3105) rootstocks<br />
were used. Vines of plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks were generally<br />
longer than those of nongrafted plants, but this effect was most significant only<br />
during the vegetative developmental stages. Leaf-water potentials (Ψleaf) of<br />
plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks were consistently higher than those of<br />
nongrafted plants, especially during the critical fruit- development and<br />
maturation phases. Melon plants grafted on PI 1207, PI 12404, and PI 20488<br />
also maintained relatively high Ψleaf. Grafted plants with high Ψleaf also had<br />
high leaf stomatal conductance and transpiration rates, indicating ample water<br />
supply from the root systems. Maintenance of high Ψleaf by grafted plants<br />
indicates that such plants could better tolerate root infection and damage by M.<br />
cannonballus without late-season collapse.<br />
V<br />
ine decline of melons caused by the soil-borne fungus<br />
Monosporascus cannonballus Pollack & Uecker has become a<br />
major production problem worldwide (Bruton, 1998; Martyn<br />
and Miller, 1996). Root infection and damage occur at all stages of<br />
development, but increased water demand during fruit development<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 23
and maturation can lead to vine collapse due to loss of water-uptake<br />
capacity. Conditions that promote water loss such as high<br />
temperatures, high winds, and drought can exacerbate late-season vine<br />
collapse caused by root infection and damage (Bruton, 1998). <strong>The</strong><br />
majority of commercial melon varieties lack resistance to M.<br />
cannonballus. Resistance to M. cannonballus among germplasm<br />
accessions of Cucumis melo L. has been linked to vigorous rootsystem<br />
development (Crosby et al., 2002; Crosby and Wolff, 1998). A<br />
vigorous root system presumably compensates for the reduced<br />
absorptive capacity, thus allowing infected plants to satisfy the<br />
increased water/nutrient demands during fruit maturation. Crosby et<br />
al. (2002) and Crosby et al. (2000) have reported differences in root<br />
morphology among susceptible and tolerant Cucumis cultivars and<br />
concluded that tolerance to root infection by M. cannonballus is<br />
closely linked to the integrity of the root structure. Grafting<br />
commercial melon and watermelon varieties on disease-resistant<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks is a common practice in the Mediterranean<br />
region and Southeast Asia to manage soil-borne diseases (Lee and<br />
Oda, 2003; Lee, 1994), including vine decline of melons caused by M.<br />
cannonballus (Cohen et al., 2005). Squash rootstocks have been the<br />
primary source of rootstocks for grafting melons; however, reports of<br />
poor fruit quality have reinforced the need to find compatible Cucumis<br />
rootstocks. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to characterize the<br />
physiological responses of two commercial melon varieties grafted on<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a and Cucumis rootstocks and grown in fields naturally<br />
infested with M. cannonballus. <strong>The</strong> Cucumis accessions used were<br />
selected based on their high root-vigor ratings (Crosby and Wolff,<br />
1998; Crosby et al., 2002).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Seeds of two western shipper-type muskmelon [Cucumis melo L.<br />
(Reticulatus group)] varieties (‘Primo’ and ‘Caravelle’) (scions) and<br />
nine rootstocks (including Cucumis and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species; Table 1)<br />
were sown in 72-cell (0.04L) seedling trays filled with a commercial<br />
rooting medium (Sunshine #5 Plug Mix, Sun Gro Horticulture Inc,<br />
Bellevue, WA) and germinated in a greenhouse maintained at 28/20<br />
°C (day/night temperature regimes). Due to differences in<br />
This research was funded in part by a TDA-BARD Grant #TIE04-04, a USDA<br />
Grant: 2001-34402-10543, “Designing Foods for Health” and by the South Texas<br />
Melon Committee. We also thank technicians Yolanda Luna and Alfredo Rodríguez,<br />
Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center-Weslaco, for their assistance.<br />
24 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
development rates, the squash rootstocks were sown 7 days later than<br />
the scions. At the two-leaf stage, scions were grafted on rootstocks<br />
using the cleft grafting technique (Lee and Oda, 2003). Grafted<br />
seedlings were healed in a mist chamber (28°C, >90%RH) for 7 days<br />
and hardened outdoors for 2 days before transplanting into field plots<br />
with a history of root rot/vine decline disease caused by M.<br />
cannonballus in Weslaco, Texas.<br />
Fifteen plants of each graft combination (including nongrafted<br />
scion varieties) were transplanted during fall 2005 in a randomized<br />
<strong>complete</strong> block design. Field-culture procedures were identical to the<br />
common commercial practices—namely, raised beds covered with<br />
plastic mulch, and subsurface drip irrigation. Fourteen days after<br />
transplanting (DAT), plots were evaluated for plant survival. At 30<br />
DAT, vine lengths of each graft combination were recorded. Leafwater<br />
potential (Ψleaf), stomatal conductance, and transpiration were<br />
measured before fruit set (~30 DAT) and during the fruit maturation<br />
period (~69 DAT). Leaf gas-exchange parameters were measured on<br />
at least four plants of each graft combination using a portable<br />
photosynthesis system (CIRAS-2, PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA).<br />
Leaf-water potentials (Ψleaf) of six to eight leaves from each graft<br />
combination were measured between 11:00–14:00h (local time) with a<br />
Scholander-type pressure bomb (Plant Moisture Systems, Santa<br />
Barbara, CA). Disease incidence (% wilted plants) was evaluated<br />
visually at the onset of fruit maturity. A plant was considered wilted if<br />
more than 50% of the canopy leaves had collapsed with wilt<br />
symptoms. Mature fruits were harvested at full-slip over an 8-day<br />
period and average fruit weight, size class, total soluble solids contents<br />
(TSS, an indicator of fruit quality), and yield were recorded.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Survival rates were generally high among melon plants grafted on<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks (>85%) (Table 1). Survival rates varied among<br />
plants grafted on Cucumis rootstocks (33–86%) with PI 20488, PI<br />
124104, and PI 1207 having high rates and PI 3105 and MR1<br />
consistently having the lowest rates, regardless of scion variety.<br />
Nongrafted scion seedlings also generally had high (>80%) survival<br />
rates.<br />
Main-stem vine lengths also differed between Cucumis and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks, with seedlings on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks<br />
consistently having the longest vines compared to nongrafted plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were no differences in vine lengths among melons grafted on<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks, regardless of scion variety. Differences in vine<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 25
Table 1. Transplant survival and vine length (four weeks after<br />
transplanting) of commercial muskmelon (‘Caravelle’ and ‘Primo’)<br />
grafted on Cucumis and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks and grown in a field<br />
naturally infested with Monosporascus cannonballus.<br />
Survival Vine length<br />
Rootstock Genus %<br />
(m)<br />
Nongrafted<br />
‘Caravelle’<br />
80.0 a 0.39 cd<br />
PI 20488 Cucumis 86.6 ab 0.43 bcd<br />
MR1 Cucumis 40.0 d 0.37 cd<br />
PI 1207 Cucumis 73.3 abc 0.45 abc<br />
PI 212210 Cucumis 53.3 cd 0.42 bcd<br />
PI 124104 Cucumis 60.0 bcd 0.46 abc<br />
PI 3105 a<br />
Cucumis 33.3 d 0.35 d<br />
HS 380 a <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 86.6 ab 0.52 a<br />
HS 286 a <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 86.6 ab 0.49 ab<br />
HS 1330 b <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 93.3 a 0.49 ab<br />
Nongrafted<br />
‘Primo’<br />
86.6 ab 0.37 de<br />
PI 20488 Cucumis 73.3 abc 0.43 bcde<br />
MR1 Cucumis 46.6 cd 0.36 de<br />
PI 1207 Cucumis 73.3 abc 0.48 ab<br />
PI 212210 Cucumis 60.0 bcd 0.38 cde<br />
PI 124104 Cucumis 80.0 ab 0.43 bcd<br />
PI 3105 Cucumis 40.0 d 0.33 e<br />
HS 380 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 93.3 a 0.47 abc<br />
HS 286 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 86.7 ab 0.54 a<br />
HS 1330 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a 93.3 a 0.55 a<br />
a b<br />
Sakata Seeds; Abbot & Cobb Inc.<br />
Values for each scion variety (‘Caravelle’ or ‘Primo’) within a column followed by<br />
the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level (Duncan’s<br />
multiple range test).<br />
lengths among plants grafted on Cucumis rootstocks were similar to<br />
those for plant survival. Vines of ‘Caravelle’ grafted on Cucumis<br />
rootstocks were slightly longer than those of nongrafted plants, but this<br />
trend was not significant. ‘Primo’ grafted on PI 1207 had the longest<br />
vines compared to nongrafted ‘Primo’ plants and to ‘Primo’ grafted on<br />
other Cucumis rootstocks.<br />
Midday leaf-water potentials (Ψleaf) measured prior to fruit set (30<br />
DAT) were significantly higher than those measured during fruit<br />
maturation (69 DAT) (Table 2). For both scion varieties, plants<br />
26 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks had higher Ψleaf compared to<br />
nongrafted plants. Leaf-water potentials of ‘Caravelle’ plants grafted<br />
on Cucumis rootstocks were also generally high compared to<br />
nongrafted plants, but this trend was significant only for PI 1207 and<br />
PI 124014 during early and late development. For ‘Primo’, the trend<br />
was significant for plants grafted on PI 20488, PI 1207, and PI<br />
124014.<br />
Table 2. Leaf-water potential (Ψleaf), stomatal conductance (gs), and<br />
transpiration rates (E) of commercial muskmelon varieties (‘Caravelle’<br />
and ‘Primo’) grafted onto different rootstocks and grown in a field<br />
naturally infested with Monosporascus cannonballus. Measurements<br />
were taken before fruit set (30 days after transplanting, DAT) and<br />
during fruit maturation (69 DAT).<br />
Ψleaf Ψleaf gs gs E E<br />
30 DAT 69 DAT 30 DAT 69 DAT 30 DAT 69 DAT<br />
Rootstock MPa mmolm -2 s -1<br />
‘Caravelle’<br />
Nongrafted -1.5 c -2.1 c 650 abc 274 de 4.0 d 1.7 c<br />
PI 20488 -1.2 bc -1.7 bc 584 bc 320 bcd 4.3 cd 1.9 bc<br />
MR1 -1.4 c -1.8 c 535 c 240 e 4.5 cd 1.9 bc<br />
PI 1207 -0.9 ab -1.3 a 663 abc 375 abc 5.1 abcd 2.2 abc<br />
PI 212210 -1.0 ab -1.4 abc 622 abc 313 cd 4.7 bcd 2.1 bc<br />
PI 124104 -0.9 ab -1.3 a 667 abc 334 bcd 5.2 abcd 2.2 abc<br />
PI 3105 -1.5 c -1.9 c 564 bc 217 e 4.1 d 1.8 c<br />
HS 380 -0.7 a -1.0 a 702 ab 392 ab 5.5 abc 2.4 ab<br />
HS 286 -0.8 a -1.2 a 764 a 420 a 6.1 a 2.7 a<br />
HS 1330 -0.8 a -1.2 a 693 ab 415 a 6.0 ab 2.6 a<br />
‘Primo’<br />
Nongrafted -1.6 c -2.2 c 569 abc 321 bcd 4.5 ab 2.0 ab<br />
PI 20488 -1.0 ab -1.3 ab 666 abc 377 abc 5.2 ab 2.3 ab<br />
MR1 -1.5 c -2.1 c 546 bc 298 cd 4.9 ab 2.2 ab<br />
PI 1207 -1.1 ab -1.5 ab 754 a 355 abc 5.4 ab 2.8 a<br />
PI 212210 -1.2 b -1.6 b 604 abc 305 cd 4.5 ab 1.9 ab<br />
PI 124104 -1.2 b -1.6 b 643 abc 366 abc 4.9 ab 2.1 ab<br />
PI 3105 -1.6 c -2.0 c 525 c 241 d 3.7 b 1.6 b<br />
HS 380 -0.8 a -1.1 a 677 abc 410 a 5.9 a 2.6 ab<br />
HS 286 -0.9 a -1.2 ab 695 abc 429 a 6.4 a 2.8 a<br />
HS 1330 -1.0 ab -1.3 ab 723 ab 402 ab 5.8 a 2.2 ab<br />
Values for each scion variety (‘Caravelle’ or ‘Primo’) within a column followed by<br />
the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level (Duncan’s<br />
multiple range test).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 27
Leaf stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E) values measured<br />
during the fruit maturation period were more than 50%<br />
lower than those measured during the vegetative growth phases. Both<br />
parameters were generally higher in the plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
rootstocks than on Cucumis rootstocks but the trends were not<br />
consistent.<br />
Table 3. Average fruit weight, total soluble solids concentration<br />
(TSS), and vine decline disease incidence of commercial muskmelon<br />
varieties (‘Caravelle’ and ‘Primo’) grafted onto different rootstocks<br />
and grown in a field naturally infested with Monosporascus<br />
cannonballus.<br />
Fruit TSS Wilt<br />
Rootstock wt./kg % Incidence %<br />
‘Caravelle’<br />
Nongrafted 1.7 bc 7.9 bc 6.7 b<br />
PI 20488 2.2 ab 9.1 ab 13.3 ab<br />
MR1 1.9 abc 8.9 bc 20.0 a<br />
PI 1207 2.3 a 8.7 bc 13.3 ab<br />
PI 212210 1.6 c 7.7 c 13.3 ab<br />
PI 124104 2.4 a 8.4 bc 6.7 b<br />
PI 3105 2.0 abc 8.3 bc 20.0 a<br />
HS 380 2.4 a 9.2 ab 6.7 b<br />
HS 286 2.2 ab 10.1 a 6.7 b<br />
HS 1330 2.5 a 8.5 bc<br />
‘Primo’<br />
6.7 b<br />
Nongrafted 1.5 d 9.1 a 13.3 ab<br />
PI 20488 2.5 ab 9.5 a 13.3 ab<br />
MR1 1.8 cd 9.3 a 20.0 a<br />
PI 1207 1.7 cd 7.8 bc 13.3 ab<br />
PI 212210 2.1 bc 9.2 a 20.0 b<br />
PI 124104 2.1 bc 9.1 a 6.7 b<br />
PI 3105 1.4 d 7.4 c 26.7 a<br />
HS 380 2.7 a 8.7 ab 6.7 b<br />
HS 286 2.5 ab 8.6 ab 6.7 b<br />
HS 1330 2.8 a 9.7 a 6.7 b<br />
Values for each scion variety (‘Caravelle’ or ‘Primo’) within a column followed by<br />
the same letter are not significant different at the 0.05 probability level (Duncan’s<br />
multiple range test).<br />
28 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
<strong>The</strong> average fruit weight of nongrafted plants was significantly<br />
lower than that of plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks for both<br />
scion varieties (Table 3). For plants grafted on Cucumis rootstocks,<br />
the fruit-size differences were not consistent between the two scions<br />
varieties. <strong>The</strong> observed smaller average fruit weights for nongrafted<br />
plants was also associated with slightly higher fruit counts compared<br />
to grafted plants (data not shown). Fruit soluble solids concentrations<br />
varied among grafted and nongrafted plants for both rootstock types<br />
and scion varieties but there were no consistent trends in this<br />
parameter.<br />
Vine decline disease development was not severe due, perhaps, to<br />
generally cooler weather during the fruit maturation period. MR1 and<br />
PI 3105 had the highest incidence of plants with wilt symptoms among<br />
grafted plants. <strong>The</strong>re were no statistically significant differences in<br />
total soluble solids (TSS) among the different graft combinations and<br />
between grafted and nongrafted plants.<br />
Vine decline disease of melons caused by M. cannonballus is<br />
believed to result from reduction in the root absorptive capacity<br />
following infection and root damage by the fungus (Bruton et al.,<br />
1998). A vigorous root system presumably compensates for the root<br />
damage, thus allowing infected plants to meet the increased<br />
water/nutrient demands during fruit maturation (Dias et al., 2002).<br />
<strong>The</strong> leaf-water potential responses to grafting observed in this study<br />
are consistent with expectations of the effects of a vigorous root<br />
system on leaf-water status. Plants grafted on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks<br />
had the highest Ψleaf, especially during fruit maturation, when plant<br />
water demands are high. Plants grafted on the Cucumis rootstocks PI<br />
1207, 124104, and 20488 also had higher Ψleaf values compared to<br />
nongrafted plants, and consistent with their vigorous root system<br />
classification (Crosby et al., 2002). Even though transpirational water<br />
loss of grafted plants was high, the symptoms of vine decline disease<br />
(wilting) were generally low. Maintenance of high Ψleaf by plants<br />
grafted on rootstocks with vigorous root systems indicates that such<br />
plants could better tolerate infection and root damage without collapse<br />
compared to nongrafted plants.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bruton, B. D. 1998. Soilborne diseases in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae: pathogen virulence and<br />
host resistance, p. 143–166. In: J. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998. ASHS,<br />
Alexandria, VA.<br />
Bruton, B. D., V. M. Russo, J. Garcia-Jimenez, and M. E. Miller. 1998.<br />
Carbohydrate partitioning, cultural practices, and vine decline diseases of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s, p. 189–200. In: J. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998. ASHS,<br />
Alexandria, VA.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 29
Cohen, R., Y. Burger, C. Horev, A. Porat, and M. Edelstein. 2005. Performance of<br />
Galia-type melons grafted on to <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstock in Monosporascus<br />
cannonballus-infested and non-infested soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 146:381–387.<br />
Crosby, K. and D. Wolff. 1998. Effects of Monosporascus cannonballus on root<br />
traits on susceptible and tolerant melon (Cucumis melo L.), p. 253–256. In: J.<br />
McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Crosby, K., D. Wolff, and M. Miller. 2000. Comparisons of root morphology in<br />
susceptible and tolerant melon cultivars before and after infection by<br />
Monosporascus cannonballus. HortSci. 35:681–683.<br />
Crosby, K., M. Miller, and D. Wolff. 2002. Screening plant introductions of Cucumis<br />
melo L. for resistance to Monosporascus cannonballus, p. 188–191 In: D. N.<br />
Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Dias, R. C. S., B. Pico, J. Herraiz, A. Espinos, and F. Nuez. 2002. Modifying root<br />
structure of cultivated muskmelon to improve vine decline resistance. HortSci.<br />
37:1092–1097.<br />
Lee, J. M. and M. Oda. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental<br />
crops. Hort. Rev. 28:61–124.<br />
Lee, J. M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. current status, grafting methods,<br />
and benefits. HortSci. 29:235–239.<br />
Martyn, R. D. and M. E. Miller. 1996. Monosporascus root rot and vine decline: an<br />
emerging disease of melons worldwide. Plant Dis. 80:716–725.<br />
30 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF GENES<br />
INVOLVED IN THE FORMATION OF MELON<br />
AROMA<br />
Nurit Katzir, Vitaly Portnoy, Yael Benyamini, Yoela Yariv,<br />
Galil Tzuri, Maya Pompan-Lotan, Olga Larkov, Einat Bar,<br />
Mwafaq Ibdah, Yaniv Azulay, Uzi Ravid, Yosef Burger, Arthur A.<br />
Schaffer, Yaakov Tadmor, and Efraim Lewinsohn<br />
Department of Vegetable Crops, Agricultural Research Organization,<br />
Newe Ya’ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, fruit quality, functional genomics<br />
ABSTRACT. A multidisciplinary approach aimed at the identification and<br />
characterization of key genes that direct the biosynthesis of aroma compounds<br />
in melon (Cucumis melo) is described. <strong>The</strong> aromas of fruits are normally due to<br />
complex mixtures of volatile compounds. Volatile esters, mainly acetate<br />
derivatives, are prominent in aromatic melon varieties, along with lower<br />
amounts of sesquiterpenes, norisoprenes, short-chain alcohols, and aldehydes.<br />
Nonaromatic melon varieties often have much lower levels of total volatiles, and<br />
especially lack the volatile esters. EST libraries of melon fruits were developed,<br />
representing the great variability of C. melo. Altogether, 4,800 ESTs from these<br />
libraries were sequenced and a melon EST database was developed<br />
(http://melon.bti.cornell.edu/). <strong>The</strong> database has been mined to identify<br />
candidate genes affecting fruit ripening and fruit-quality traits, among them<br />
genes involved in aroma formation from three gene families: (1) alcohol acetyl<br />
transferases, (2) sesquiterpene synthases, and (3) carotenoid cleavage<br />
dioxygenases. Full-length clones of candidate genes were isolated, and their<br />
expression patterns in various melon cultivars were studied. Biochemical<br />
characterizations of heterologously expressed gene products, coupled with the<br />
systematic analysis of aroma volatiles and corresponding biosynthetic enzymes,<br />
were used to identify the roles of these genes in aroma formation during<br />
ripening.<br />
F<br />
ruit quality is determined by numerous traits that affect taste,<br />
aroma, texture, pigmentation, nutritional value, and duration of<br />
shelf life (for review see Giovannoni, 2004). Recently, genomic<br />
tools, such as EST libraries and DNA microarrays, have been applied<br />
to various fruit species and have provided vast information on the<br />
patterns of gene expression throughout fruit development and<br />
This work was partially supported by the A.R.O Center for the Improvement of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> Fruit Quality, by an Israel Ministry of Science Grant, and by Research<br />
Grant No. IS-3333-02C from B.A.R.D, the United <strong>State</strong>s-Israel Binational<br />
Agricultural Research and Development Fund.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 31
maturation (Aharoni et al., 2000; Alba et al., 2004; Fei et al., 2004).<br />
Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is a highly polymorphic species that<br />
comprises a broad array of wild and cultivated genotypes that differ in<br />
fruit traits such as ripening physiology (climacteric and<br />
nonclimacteric), sugar and acid content, and secondary metabolites<br />
associated with taste and aroma. In aromatic melon varieties the<br />
prominent compounds responsible for aroma formation are volatile<br />
esters, mainly acetate derivatives, and lower amounts of<br />
sesquiterpenes, norisoprenes, short-chain alcohols, and aldehydes<br />
(Shalit et al., 2001). <strong>The</strong> contribution of each component to the overall<br />
unique aromas is often difficult to assess due to the differences in odor<br />
intensity and thresholds of the different components. Thus, different<br />
components impart different notes and contribute in different ways to<br />
the overall aroma of melons. Nonaromatic varieties often have much<br />
lower levels of total volatiles, and especially lack volatile esters (Shalit<br />
et al., 2001; Burger et al., 2005; El-Sharkawy et al., 2005; Benyamini<br />
et al., unpublished).<br />
<strong>The</strong> aim of our project was to identify candidate genes that affect<br />
the aroma of melon, as part of a broader program aimed at identifying<br />
key genes that control melon quality and marketability. This project<br />
has helped to establish a platform for future marker-assisted selection<br />
and genetic modifications to generate superior varieties.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL. <strong>The</strong> melon cultivars investigated in this study<br />
included: (1) ‘Dulce’, ‘Noy Yizre’el’, ‘Arava’, and ‘En Dor’ of C.<br />
melo subsp. melo Group Reticulatus, (2) ‘Tam Dew’, ‘Rochet’, ‘Noy<br />
‘Amid’, and ‘Piel De Sapo’ of subsp. melo Group Inodorus, (3)<br />
‘Védrantais’ of subsp. melo Group Cantalupensis, (4) PI 414723 of<br />
subsp. agrestis Group Momordica, (5) ‘Dudaim’ of subsp. melo Group<br />
Dudaim, and (6) ‘Faqqous’ of subsp. melo Group Flexuosus.<br />
EST LIBRARIES. EST libraries were constructed using suppression<br />
subtractive hybridization (SSH, Diatchenko et al., 1996), PCR-<br />
SelectTM kit (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA), or ZAP cDNA<br />
Synthesis Kit and ZAP Express® cDNA Gigapack ® III Gold Cloning<br />
Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to manufacturer’s<br />
recommendations. RNA was extracted using a modification of La<br />
Claire II and Herrin (1997).<br />
CLONE SELECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION. Expression of<br />
selected clones in different tissue types and developmental stages was<br />
further analyzed on <strong>North</strong>ern blots or Real-time PCR. <strong>North</strong>ern<br />
blotting (25μg of total RNA per lane, confirmed by methylene blue<br />
32 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
staining) and hybridization were performed as described by Sambrook<br />
and Russell (2001). Real-time PCR was performed as described by<br />
Ibdah et al. (2006).<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF VOLATILES: SAMPLE PREPARATION. Melon<br />
fruits were harvested at immature and mature stages. Immediately after<br />
harvest three fruits from each cultivar were picked randomly and cut<br />
into large pieces. Samples were prepared for analysis as described in<br />
Fallik et al. (2001).<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF VOLATILES: HEADSPACE-SOLID PHASE<br />
MICROEXTRACTION (HS-SPME). <strong>The</strong> volatiles were sampled by<br />
automated headspace-solid phase microextraction using an<br />
autosampler of CTC Pal system. <strong>The</strong> headspace phase was adsorbed<br />
for 30 min at ambient temperature and desorbed for 10 min into a gaschromatograph-mass<br />
spectrometer (GC-MS) injection port. <strong>The</strong><br />
volatiles were analyzed according to Ibdah et al. (2006).<br />
ENZYMATIC ASSAYS OF ALCOHOL ACETYL TRANSFERASE,<br />
SESQUITERPENE SYNTHASE, AND CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE<br />
DIOXYGENASE ACTIVITY. Fruit extractions and enzymatic activity<br />
assays were performed as described by Shalit et al. (2001), Guterman<br />
et al. (2002), and Ibdah et al. (2006) respectively.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Our project aimed at the discovery and application of important<br />
genes controlling the metabolism of fruit-quality components in<br />
Cucumis melo. EST libraries of melon fruits were developed,<br />
representing the great genetic variability of the species C. melo. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
include subtracted and nonsubtracted, nonnormalized libraries from<br />
various genotypes. Altogether, 4,800 ESTs of these libraries were<br />
sequenced and a melon EST database was developed<br />
(http://melon.bti.cornell.edu/).<br />
<strong>The</strong> EST database has been mined to identify candidate genes<br />
affecting fruit ripening and fruit-quality traits, especially genes<br />
associated with aroma formation. To better understand the<br />
biochemistry and the molecular regulation of aroma biosynthesis,<br />
functional analyses of putative genes involved in aroma biosynthesis<br />
were studied. First we determined the main compounds in the<br />
headspace of the fruits. We then established biochemical assays to<br />
measure the enzymes putatively involved in the biosynthesis of key<br />
aroma compounds. Heterologous expression of the isolated genes in E.<br />
coli combined with enzymatic activity of their products enabled us to<br />
draw conclusions concerning their role in aroma biosynthesis. Some of<br />
our results are summarized below.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 33
ALCOHOL ACETYL TRANSFERASES. <strong>The</strong> major volatiles present in<br />
the aromatic melon varieties are volatile acetates (El-Sharkawy et al.,<br />
2005; Benyamini et al., unpublished). Total volatile acetates present in<br />
mature melon varieties are shown in Figure 1A. <strong>The</strong>se compounds are<br />
absent in unripe fruits and in the nonaromatic cultivars such as<br />
‘Rochet’, whether ripe or unripe. In accordance, cell-free extracts from<br />
aromatic melons contained alcohol acetyl transferase (AAT) activity,<br />
enabling acetylation of several alcohol substrates, while nonaromatic<br />
melons did not contain significant AAT activity with any of the<br />
substrates tested (Figure 1B).<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, the EST database was searched for putative AAT genes,<br />
leading to the identification of several members of this family. Two of<br />
them, namely CmAAT1 and CmAAT2, have been previously identified<br />
in melons (Yahyaoui et al., 2002; El-Sharkawy et al., 2005). <strong>North</strong>ern<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
µg acetates/gr f.w<br />
Pkat/gr f.w<br />
12000<br />
9000<br />
6000<br />
3000<br />
0<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
y m y m y m y m y m y m y m y m y m<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
Fig. 1. (A) Volatile acetate content in aromatic and nonaromatic melon<br />
cultivars. (B) AAT activity in crude extract of melon cultivars. (C)<br />
<strong>North</strong>ern blot of melon genotypes using probe of CmAAT1, y, young fruit;<br />
m, mature fruit. ‘Arava’ (1), ‘Noy Yizre’el’ (2), ‘Védrantais’ (3), ‘Dulce’ (4),<br />
and ‘Dudaim’ (5) have a typical melon aroma while ‘Tam Dew’ (6) and<br />
‘Rochet’ (8) are nonaromatic. PI 414723 (9) and ‘Faqqous’ (7) have distinct<br />
strong aromas.<br />
34 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
lots demonstrated expression of AAT in mature aromatic but not in<br />
nonaromatic genotypes (Figure 1C). This expression pattern fits well<br />
the composition of volatiles and AAT activity found in these melons:<br />
the majority of the volatiles of nonaromatic and unripe melons were<br />
short- and medium-chain alcohols, while the majority of the volatiles<br />
of mature aromatic melons were acetates, mostly aliphatic.<br />
CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASES. Comparative analysis of<br />
carotenoids and volatiles revealed an interesting association between<br />
carotenoid content and aroma of melon fruit flesh. <strong>The</strong> major volatile<br />
norisoprenoid present in orange-fleshed melons is β-ionone, a<br />
compound derived from the oxidative cleavage of β-carotene.<br />
β-ionone was not detected in any of the green- or white-fleshed<br />
melons. A search for a gene putatively responsible for the<br />
cleavage of β-carotene into β-ionone was carried out in our EST<br />
database, yielding a sequence (CmCCD1) highly similar (84%) to<br />
other carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase genes. Expression patterns<br />
of the gene were compared in the orange-fleshed ‘Dulce’, the green-<br />
fleshed ‘Tam Dew’ and ‘Noy Yizre’el, and the white-green-fleshed<br />
‘Rochet’ (Figure 2) in order to observe a possible relationship between<br />
mesocarp color and volatile production (Ibdah et al., 2006). CmCCD1<br />
gene expression is upregulated upon fruit development mainly in the<br />
orange melon ‘Dulce’ but also in the green and white-green melon<br />
varieties, despite the lack of norisoprenoid volatiles in the latter. Thus,<br />
the accumulation of β-ionone in melon fruit is probably limited by the<br />
availability of carotenoid substrate.<br />
Relative expression<br />
0.1<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
0.04<br />
0.02<br />
0<br />
FR-1 FR-2 FR-3 FR-4<br />
Stage of development<br />
Tam Dew<br />
Dulce<br />
Noy Yizre'el<br />
Rochet<br />
Fig. 2. Expression patterns of CmCCD1 in melon fruit. Real-time PCR analysis<br />
of RNA extracted from four genotypes. Fruits at the following stages of develop-<br />
ment were sampled: FR-1, very young green fruits; FR-2, young green fruits;<br />
FR-3, full-size mature green fruits; FR-4, ripe fruits. Values are means ± SEM<br />
of 3 different evaluations carried out in duplicates with one set of cDNA.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 35
<strong>The</strong> clone was functionally active and overexpressed in E. coli<br />
strains previously engineered to produce β-carotene. <strong>The</strong> incorporated<br />
CmCCD1 gene product cleaved β-carotene, generating β-ionone.<br />
Interestingly, the gene product is able to cleave other carotenoids that<br />
normally do not accumulate in melons, such as lycopene, phytoene,<br />
and δ-carotene, into their respective breakdown products such as<br />
pseudoionone, geranylacetone, and α-ionone as determined by HPLC<br />
(carotenoids) and GC-MS (volatiles) (Ibdah et al., 2006). β-ionone is a<br />
very potent odorant and can be detected in concentrations as low as<br />
0.07ppm. Thus β-ionone accumulates to significant amounts in orange<br />
melons, and might have a profound effect on the aroma of the fruit.<br />
White-fleshed melons that lack β-carotene also lack β-ionone.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, color has an effect on aroma.<br />
SESQUITERPENE SYNTHASES. In the case of sesquiterpenes, the<br />
volatile compounds, the appropriate enzymatic activity, and relevant<br />
gene expression were found to be cultivar-specific. Two novel<br />
sesquiterpene synthase genes have been isolated from two melon<br />
cultivars: CM-SS1 (‘Dulce’) and CM-SS2 (‘Noy Yizre’el’). <strong>The</strong> two<br />
genes were functionally expressed in E. coli and shown to encode for<br />
distinct proteins that convert farnesyl diphosphate into either farnesene<br />
(CM-SS1) or cadinene (CM-SS2). <strong>The</strong> details of the sesquiterpene<br />
study will be described in Benyamini et al. (unpublished).<br />
Conclusion<br />
We have undertaken an investigation aimed at rationalizing the<br />
biochemical and molecular events that lead to the formation of aroma<br />
volatiles in melon fruits. Cell-free enzymatic assays have enabled us to<br />
measure the potential of each melon variety to produce certain volatile<br />
compounds from their respective precursors. <strong>The</strong> expression level of<br />
the relevant genes as well as their enzymatic activity increases upon<br />
maturation, concomitantly with the appearance of their respective<br />
volatile compounds in fruit.<br />
By combining EST database mining, expression analyses,<br />
enzymatic assays, and volatile determinations, we have been able to<br />
establish a platform by which many genes typical of fruit maturation<br />
were isolated. Many of these genes play major roles in various<br />
metabolic pathways and physiological processes related to aroma<br />
volatile formation. <strong>The</strong> final confirmation of the biochemical role was<br />
assessed by heterologous functional expression. This interdisciplinary<br />
study has provided a good infrastructure to address questions related to<br />
aroma formation and other ripening processes taking place in melons.<br />
36 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Literature Cited<br />
Aharoni, A., L. C. P. Keizer, H. J. Bouwmeester, Z. Sun, M. Alvarez-Huerta, H. A.<br />
Verhoeven, J. Blaas, A. M. M. L. Van Houwelingen, R. C. H. De Vos, H. Van<br />
der Voet, R. C. Jansen, M. Guis, J. Mol, R. W. Davis, M. Schena, A. J. Van<br />
Tunen, and A. P. O’Connel. 2000. Identification of the SAAT gene involved in<br />
strawberry flavor biogenesis by use of DNA microarrays. Plant Cell. 12:647–<br />
661.<br />
Alba, R., Z. J. Fei, P. Payton, Y. Liu, S. L. Moore, P. Debbie, J. Cohn, M.<br />
D'Ascenzo, J. S. Gordon, J. K. C. Rose, G. Martin, S. T. Tanksley, M.<br />
Bouzayen, M. M. Jahn, and J. J. Giovannoni. 2004. ESTs, cDNA microarrays,<br />
and gene expression profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and<br />
development. Plant J. 39:697–714.<br />
Burger, Y., U. Sa’ar, H. S. Paris, E. Lewinsohn, N. Katzir, Y. Tadmor, and A. A.<br />
Schaffer. 2006. Genetic variability as a source of new valuable fruit quality traits<br />
in Cucumis melo. Israel J. Plant Sci. (In press).<br />
Diatchenko, L., Y.-F. C. Lau, A. P. Campbell, F. Chenchik, B. Moqadam, S. Huang,<br />
K. Lukyanov, N. Lukyanov, N. Gurskaya, E. D. Sverdlov, and P.D. Siebert.<br />
1996. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating<br />
differentially regulated or tissue specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:6025–6030.<br />
El-Sharkawy, I., D. Manriquez, F. B. Flores, F. Regad, M. Bouzayen, A. Latche, and<br />
J. C. Pech. 2005. Functional characterization of melon alcohol acyl-transferase<br />
gene family involved in the biosynthesis of ester volatiles. identification of the<br />
crucial role of a threonine residue for enzyme activity. Plant Mol. Biol. 59:345–<br />
362.<br />
Fallik E., S. Alkali-Tuvia, B. Horev, A. Copel, V. Rodov, Y. Aharoni, D. Ulrich, and<br />
H. Schulz. 2001. Characterization of ‘Galia’ melon aroma by GC and mass<br />
spectrometric sensor measurements after prolonged storage. Postharv. Biol.<br />
Technol. 22:85–91.<br />
Fei, Z., X. Tang, R. Alba, J. White, C. Ronning, G. Martin, S. Tanksley, and J.<br />
Giovannoni. 2004. Comprehensive EST analysis of tomato and comparative<br />
genomics of fruit ripening. Plant J. 40:47–59.<br />
Giovannoni, J. 2004. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant<br />
Cell. 16:S170–S180.<br />
Guterman, I., M. Shalit, M. Menda, D. Piestun, M. Dafny-Yelin, G. Shalev, E. Bar,<br />
O. Davydov, M. Ovadis, M. Emanuel, J. Wang, Z. Adam, E. Pichersky, E.<br />
Lewinsohn, D. Zamir, A. Vainstein, and D. Weiss. 2002. Rose scent: genomics<br />
approach to discovering novel floral fragrance-related genes. Plant Cell.<br />
14:2325.<br />
Ibdah, M., Y. Azulay, V. Portnoy, B. Wasserman, E. Bar, A. Meir, Y. Burger, J.<br />
Hirschberg, A. A. Schaffer, N. Katzir, Y. Tadmor, and E. Lewinsohn. 2006.<br />
Functional characterization of CmCCD1, a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase<br />
from melon. Phytochem. (In press).<br />
La Claire II, J. W. and D. J. Herrin. 1997. Co-isolation of high-quality DNA and<br />
RNA from coenocytic green algae. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 15:263–272.<br />
Sambrook, J. and D. W. Russell (eds). 2001. Molecular cloning: a<br />
laboratory manual, p. 7.21–7.45. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory<br />
Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.<br />
Shalit, M., N. Katzir, Y. Tadmor, O. Larkov, Y. Burger, F. Shalekhet, E. Lastochkin,<br />
U. Ravid, O. Amar, M. Edelstein, Z. Karchi, and E. Lewinsohn. 2001. Acetyl<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 37
CoA: alcohol acetyl transferase activity and aroma formation in ripening melon<br />
fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:794–799.<br />
Yahyaoui, F., C. Wongs-Aree, A. Latche, R. Hackett, D. Grierson, and J. C. Pech.<br />
2002. Molecular and biochemical characteristics of a gene encoding an alcohol<br />
acyl-transferase involved in the generation of aroma volatile esters during melon<br />
ripening. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:2359–2366.<br />
38 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
STUDIES OF TRANSGENIC MELON<br />
EXPRESSING THE MUTANT ETHYLENE<br />
RECEPTOR, ETR1-1, INDICATE THAT<br />
ETHYLENE PERCEPTION BY STAMEN<br />
PRIMORDIA IS REQUIRED FOR CARPEL<br />
DEVELOPMENT IN MELON FLOWERS<br />
H. A. Little, S. Hammar, and R. Grumet<br />
Department of Horticulture, Michigan <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
East Lansing, MI 48824<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, sex expression, monoecious,<br />
monoecy<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> species are characterized by a range of diverse sex<br />
phenotypes that are, at least in part, regulated by the plant hormone ethylene,<br />
which promotes increased femaleness, i.e., carpel development, on typically<br />
monoecious (male and female flowers) or andromonoecious (male and bisexual<br />
flowers) cultigens. We sought to determine the role of ethylene perception in<br />
carpel development by expression of the dominant negative Arabidopsis mutant<br />
ethylene receptor, etr1-1, under control of floral-targeted promoters in<br />
transgenic melon (Cucumis melo L.). Our previous studies with constitutively<br />
expressed etr1-1 demonstrated that etr1-1 blocked ethylene perception and<br />
prevented formation of carpel-bearing flowers when introduced into the<br />
andromonoecious melon cultivar Hale’s Best Jumbo, indicating the necessity of<br />
ethylene perception for carpel development. In these studies, we hypothesized<br />
that ethylene perception by the developing carpel primordium would be<br />
necessary for production of carpel-bearing flowers. In contrast to our<br />
prediction, expression of etr1-1 driven by the carpel-directed promoter, CRC,<br />
increased production of carpel-bearing buds, while etr1-1 driven by the stamen-<br />
and petal-specific promoter, AP3, abolished production of carpel bearing buds.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that ethylene perception by the stamen primordia is<br />
required for development of carpel primordia.<br />
C<br />
ucurbit species produce varying combinations of male, female,<br />
and bisexual flowers (Perl-Treves, 1999; Roy and Saran, 1990).<br />
Sex determination of individual flowers is hormonally<br />
regulated, with ethylene playing the predominant role (Rudich, 1990;<br />
Perl-Treves, 1999). Application of ethylene-releasing compounds<br />
We thank Drs. Eric Schaller, John Bowman, and Vivian Irish for providing the etr1-<br />
1 gene and CRC and AP3 promoters, respectively. This project was in part supported<br />
by research grants IS-3139-99 and US-3735-05C from BARD, the United <strong>State</strong>s-<br />
Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, and by a USDA-<br />
NNF fellowship to HAL.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 39
increases female or bisexual flower production, while treatment with<br />
inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis or action increases maleness.<br />
In early stages of cucumber flower development, floral buds<br />
contain primordia of all four whorls (sepals, petals, stamens, and<br />
carpels) typical of a bisexual flower (Goffinet, 1990). In male flowers,<br />
arrest of carpel primordia occurs prior to differentiation of the ovary<br />
(Bai et al., 2004). In female flowers, initial differentiation of the<br />
filament and anther is followed by DNA degradation in the primordial<br />
anther (Hao et al., 2003). Response to ethylene-releasing or ethyleneinhibiting<br />
compounds indicates that the stage just preceding, or<br />
immediately following, differentiation of stamen primordia is critical<br />
for sex determination (Yamasaki et al., 2003; Bai et al., 2004; Hao et<br />
al., 2003).<br />
Our objective is to elucidate the role of ethylene perception on sex<br />
expression in melon. Melon plants are typically andromonoecious,<br />
with an initial phase of male flowers followed by a combination of<br />
bisexual and male flowers. We previously showed that melon plants<br />
transformed to constitutively express the dominant negative ethyleneperception<br />
mutant, etr1-1 from Arabidopsis, exhibited a range of<br />
phenotypes associated with reduced ethylene sensitivity, verifying that<br />
etr1-1 is able to confer ethylene insensitivity in the heterologous<br />
melon system (Papadopoulou, 2002).<br />
As predicted, the formation of carpel-bearing buds was essentially<br />
abolished in 35S::etr1-1 melons, demonstrating that ethylene<br />
perception is necessary to promote bisexual flower development in<br />
melon.<br />
In this work, we sought to identify the critical locations for<br />
ethylene perception within the developing flower bud. <strong>The</strong> etr1-1<br />
gene was introduced under the control of the Arabidopsis floral-organ<br />
specific Crab’s Claw (CRC) and Apetela3 (AP3) promoters. <strong>The</strong> CRC<br />
promoter drives expression in carpel and nectary primordia in<br />
Arabidopsis at the outset of gynoecium development (Bowman and<br />
Smyth, 1999; Lee et al., 2005). AP3 is expressed in cells destined to<br />
become petals and stamens (Irish and Yamamoto, 1995). It was<br />
predicted that blocking ethylene perception in the carpels would<br />
prevent carpel development, resulting in male flowers, but blocking<br />
ethylene perception in the stamens would not alter sex determination.<br />
In contrast to our prediction, CRC::etr1-1 plants showed increased<br />
female sex determination, while AP3::etr1-1 plants were nearly<br />
exclusively male. <strong>The</strong>se results provide insight into the molecular<br />
basis for sex determination in melon, and indicate that ethylene<br />
perception by the stamen plays a critical role in regulating carpel<br />
development in the developing melon flower.<br />
40 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Materials and Methods<br />
PLASMID CONSTRUCTION, PLANT TRANSFORMATION, AND<br />
VERIFICATION OF TRANSFORMATION. Construction of the CRC::etr1-<br />
1 and AP3::etr1-1 plasmids is described in Little (2005).<br />
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of<br />
andromonoecious melon (cv. Hale’s Best Jumbo, Hollar Seed, Rocky<br />
Ford, CO) was performed based on the methods of Fang and Grumet<br />
(1990) and Tabei et al. (1998). Regenerated plantlets (T0) were<br />
evaluated for the presence of the neomycin phosphotransferase protein<br />
by NPTII ELISA (Agia ® , Elkhart, IN) and the etr1-1 gene by<br />
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using both etr1-1 and promoterspecific<br />
primers. PCR- and ELISA-positive T0 plants were transferred<br />
to the greenhouse and self-pollinated to produce T1 and T2 progeny.<br />
RNA was isolated from leaves, young male and female buds (3–5mm),<br />
and older male buds (10–12mm) of greenhouse-grown plants using<br />
Concert Plant RNA Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Gene<br />
expression was verified by northern analysis using standard procedures<br />
(Sambrook and Russell, 2001) and DIG-labeled probe (Roche<br />
Diagnostics, Germany).<br />
SEX EXPRESSION. <strong>The</strong> first 30 nodes of the main stem of<br />
transgenic T1 or T2 plants and nontransgenic controls were evaluated<br />
for the time of appearance of the first carpel-bearing flower bud; the<br />
total number of nodes with carpel-bearing or male buds; the number of<br />
carpel-bearing buds that reached anthesis; and, for aborted carpelbearing<br />
buds, the size reached prior to senescing. Each transgenic line<br />
was tested in at least three experiments using a randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />
block design.<br />
Results<br />
GENE INTEGRATION AND EXPRESSION. Presence of the etr1-1<br />
gene and appropriate promoter was verified in T1 progeny of<br />
AP3::etr1-1 or CRC::etr1-1 plants by PCR analysis (Little, 2005).<br />
<strong>The</strong> observed segregation ratios were consistent with a single insertion<br />
site for all lines except AP3-3, which likely has two insertions (Little,<br />
2005). <strong>North</strong>ern hybridizations demonstrated that in AP3::etr1-1<br />
lines, etr-1-1 expression was absent in leaves (Figure 1A) and present<br />
in male buds (Figure 1B), as expected based on the petal and stamen<br />
specificity of AP3 in Arabidopsis (Jack et al., 1994). CRC::etr1-1<br />
lines showed hybridization in leaves, indicating leaky expression from<br />
the promoter in the heterologous melon system. etr1-1 mRNA was<br />
detected in both young male and carpel-bearing buds of CRC::etr1-1<br />
plants; higher levels were observed in the carpel-bearing buds,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 41
consistent with expected carpel expression. Detection of etr1-1<br />
message in male CRC::etr1-1 buds could be the result of expression in<br />
the nectaries (Bowman and Smyth, 1999; Lee et al., 2005) or<br />
leakiness, as is suggested by expression in the petals.<br />
SEX EXPRESSION OF TRANSGENIC ETR1-1 MELONS.<br />
CRC::ETR1-1. <strong>The</strong> typical progression of sex expression along the main<br />
stem of andromonoecious melon is several vegetative nodes, followed<br />
Fig. 1. <strong>North</strong>ern hybridization of etrl-1 gene expression. (A) Total RNA isolated<br />
from leaf tissue of nontransgenic (WT), 35s::etr1-1 (35S), CRC::etr1-1 (CRC11<br />
and CRC15), and AP3::etr1-1 (AP3-3 and AP3-8) plants. (B) Total RNA isolated<br />
from young male buds of WT, AP3-3, AP3-8, CRC5, and CRC15 plants and<br />
young female buds of WT, CRC5 and CRC15 plants. (C) Total RNA isolated<br />
from mature male buds of WT, CRC5, CRC11, and AP3-8 plants. Mature male<br />
buds were separated into petals and lower bud, which included sepals, stamens,<br />
nectary, and floral cup. <strong>The</strong> bottom band in each pair shows rRNA.<br />
by a phase of staminate buds, then a mixture of staminate and bisexual<br />
buds. ‘Hale’s Best Jumbo’ wild-type plants produced the first bisexual<br />
flowers at approximately Node 20 (Figure 2A). Examination of the<br />
CRC::etr1-1 plants did not show the predicted failure to produce<br />
carpel-bearing buds. Instead, carpel-bearing buds occurred<br />
42 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
significantly earlier (by 6–0 nodes) on the main stem of CRC::etr1-1<br />
plants than on the nontransgenic controls. CRC::etr1-1 plants also<br />
showed a significant increase in number of carpel-bearing buds on the<br />
first 30 nodes (Figure 2B). Thus, despite leaky expression from the<br />
CRC promoter, the phenotype of the CRC::etr1-1 plants was distinct<br />
from the 35S::etr1-1 plants, which failed to produce carpel-bearing<br />
buds (Papadopoulou et al., 2005; Little, 2005).<br />
Fig. 2. Sex expression of CRC::etr1-1 melon plants. (A) Node of first carpelbearing<br />
bud on main stem. (B) Total number of nodes with carpel-bearing buds<br />
on the main stem for ‘Hale’s Best Jumbo’ (WT), azygous nontransgenic plants<br />
(AZY), and CRC5, CRC11, and CRC15 lines. <strong>The</strong> experiment was repeated<br />
three times in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design. Data are means ± standard<br />
error of 16 plants/genotype.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect of failure to perceive ethylene was, however, evident in<br />
the maturation of the carpel-bearing flowers. Typically, the majority<br />
of the buds bearing carpels initiated on the main stem of melon plants<br />
abort prior to reaching anthesis (Papadopoulou et al., 2005).<br />
Measurement of the size of the immature carpel-bearing bud at the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 43
time of abortion showed that carpel-bearing buds on CRC::etr1-1<br />
plants were four times more likely than buds on control plants to reach<br />
senescence at 4mm or less; a similar decrease was observed in the<br />
proportion of buds on CRC::etr1-1 plants that mature beyond 4mm or<br />
reach anthesis relative to controls (Figure 3).<br />
Fig. 3. Size reached by carpel-bearing buds before senescing for ‘Hale’s Best<br />
Jumbo’ (WT), azygous (AZY), and CRC::etr1-1 plants (lines CRC5, CRC11,<br />
and CRC15). <strong>The</strong> experiment was repeated three times in a randomized<br />
<strong>complete</strong> block design. Data are means ± standard error of 16 plants/genotype.<br />
AP3::ETR1-1. Inhibition of ethylene perception in the stamens was not<br />
predicted to affect sex determination in melon; however, all AP3-3<br />
plants and the majority of AP3-8 plants (61%) failed to produce any<br />
carpel-bearing buds within the first 30 nodes (Figure 4A). <strong>The</strong> AP3-8<br />
plants that did produce buds bearing carpels on the main stem reverted<br />
to male buds after producing only 1–2 buds containing a carpel.<br />
Examination of both main and lateral stems showed that less than 5%<br />
of the nodes on AP3::etr1-1 plants produced carpel-bearing buds vs.<br />
more than 50% of nodes evaluated in nontransgenic plants (WT and<br />
AZY) (Figure 4B). As was observed in previous experiments,<br />
CRC::etr1-1 plants that were included for comparison had earlier and<br />
increased formation of buds containing carpels.<br />
44 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Discussion<br />
Expression of the etr1-1 gene under the direction of the<br />
Arabidopsis floral-targeted promoters CRC and AP3 conferred unique<br />
flowering phenotypes. CRC::etr1-1 plants exhibited enhanced<br />
femaleness as indicated by earlier and increased formation of buds<br />
containing carpels. This is in contrast to the expected inhibition of<br />
carpel-bearing buds, due to inhibited ethylene perception by the carpel,<br />
and the observed production of only male flowers on plants<br />
constitutively expressing etr1-1 (35S::etr1-1). <strong>The</strong> difference in the<br />
sex expression of 35S::etr1-1 and CRC::etr1-1 plants, despite leaky<br />
expression from the CRC promoter, may result from differences in<br />
timing and/or location of etr1-1 expression at key stages in sex<br />
determination, such that the CRC-driven etr1-1 expression does not<br />
prevent sex determination leading to initial carpel development.<br />
Conversely, and in contradiction to the predicted result that blocked<br />
ethylene perception in the stamen would not affect the production of<br />
bisexual buds, AP3::etr1-1 plants produced almost exclusively male<br />
flowers, suggesting that ethylene perception by stamen primordia is<br />
necessary for development of carpels. Collectively, these results with<br />
the CRC::etr1-1 and AP3::etr1-1 plants suggest that control of early<br />
carpel development resides within the stamens.<br />
Fig. 4. Carpel-bearing bud formation on AP3::etr1-1 transgenic plants. (A)<br />
Node position of first carpel-bearing bud on main stem. (B) Percentage of nodes<br />
bearing buds containing a carpel for ‘Hale’s Best Jumbo’ (WT), azygous (AZY),<br />
AP3::etr1-1 (lines 3 and 8), and CRC::etr1-1 (CRC15) plants. <strong>The</strong> experiment<br />
was repeated three times using a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design with a total<br />
of 7–21 plants/genotype.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 45
Presumably, under normal growth conditions,<br />
andromoneocious melon plants would produce a phase of male flowers<br />
until sufficient levels of ethylene are perceived by the stamen<br />
primordia to promote bisexual buds. Morphological analyses of male<br />
and female bud development suggest that divergence from a bisexual<br />
to unisexual flower begins after the initiation of carpel primordia at<br />
Stage 5 (Bai et al., 2004), and the stage of floral development at which<br />
sex determination can be modulated by ethylene treatment just<br />
precedes, or immediately follows, differentiation of stamen primordia<br />
(Yamasaki et al., 2003).<br />
Perhaps the decision to promote or inhibit carpel development<br />
occurs at a stage in development when the stamen primordia, but not<br />
the less-developed carpel primordia, are able to perceive ethylene.<br />
Analysis of CRC::etr1-1 melon plants showed that although<br />
carpel-bearing buds were initiated, virtually all aborted very early,<br />
most before reaching 4mm in length. This suggests that ethylene plays<br />
a role in sustained maturation of the carpel. <strong>The</strong>se results support our<br />
earlier observations made in transgenic melon constitutively<br />
expressing ACS (Papadopoulou et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> 35S::ACS melon<br />
plants exhibiting increased ethylene production had earlier and<br />
increased production of carpel-bearing buds, and a marked increase in<br />
the proportion of carpel-bearing buds reaching anthesis. Thus, it<br />
appears that ethylene has separable functions for sex determination<br />
and pistillate bud-maturation in melon.<br />
In summary, the CRC::etr1-1 melon plants showed increased<br />
femaleness as demonstrated by earlier and increased carpel-bearing<br />
bud production while AP3::etr1-1 melon plants showed increased<br />
maleness as demonstrated by virtual elimination of bisexual buds.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that the critical site for ethylene perception for<br />
promotion of early carpel development does not reside within the<br />
carpel, and that perception by the stamens is required to prevent carpel<br />
arrest. Further study is necessary to determine the precise timing and<br />
localization of etr1-1 expression at key stages of sex determination.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bai, S. L., Y. B. Peng, J. X. Cui, H. T. Gu, L. Y. Xu, L. Q. Li, Z. H. Xu, and S. N.<br />
Bai. 2004. Developmental analyses reveal early arrest of the spore-bearing<br />
parts of reproductive organs in unisexual flowers of cucumber (Cucumis sativus<br />
L.). Planta. 220:230–240.<br />
Bowman, J. L. and D. R. Smyth. 1999. CRABS CLAW, a gene that regulates carpel<br />
and nectary development in Arabidopsis, encodes a novel protein with zinc<br />
finger and helix-loop-helix domains. Develop. 126:2387–2396.<br />
Fang, G. and R. Grumet. 1990. Agrobacterium tumefasciens mediated transformation<br />
and regeneration of muskmelon plants. Plant Cell Rep. 9:160–164.<br />
46 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Goffinet, M. C. 1990. Comparative ontogeny of male and female flowers in<br />
Cucumis sativus, p. 288–304. In: D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey<br />
(eds.). Biology and utilization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press,<br />
Ithaca, NY.<br />
Hao, Y., D. Wang, Y. Peng, S. Bai, L. Xu, Y. Li, Z. Xu, and S. Bai. 2003. DNA<br />
damage in the early primordial anther is closely correlated with stamen arrest in<br />
the female flower of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Planta. 217:888–895.<br />
Irish, V. F. and Y. T. Yamamoto. 1995. Conservation of floral homeotic gene<br />
function between Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Plant Cell Rep. 9:160–164.<br />
Jack, T., G. L. Fox, and E. M. Meyerowitz. 1994. Arabidopsis homeotic gene<br />
APETALA3 ectopic expression: transcription and posttranscriptional regulation<br />
determine floral organ identity. Cell. 76:703–716.<br />
Lee, J. Y., S. F. Baum, J. Alvarez, A. Patel, D. H. Chitwood, and J. L. Bowman.<br />
2005. Activation of CRABSCLAW in nectaries and carpels of Arabidopsis. Plant<br />
Cell. 17:25–36.<br />
Little, H. A. 2005. Modification of sex expression in transgenic melon via altered<br />
ethylene production and perception. PhD Diss., Dept. of Horticulture, Michigan<br />
<strong>State</strong> Univ., East Lansing.<br />
Papadopoulou, E. 2002. Sex expression in cucurbits: the role of ethylene synthesis<br />
and perception and sex determination genes. PhD Diss. Dept. of Horticulture,<br />
Michigan <strong>State</strong> Univ., East Lansing.<br />
Papadopoulou, E., H. A. Little, S. A. Hammar, and R. Grumet. 2005. Effect of<br />
modified endogenous ethylene production on sex expression, bisexual flower<br />
development and fruit production in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sex. Plant<br />
Repro. 18:131–142.<br />
Perl-Treves, R. 1999. Male to female conversion along the cucumber shoot:<br />
approaches to study sex genes and floral development in Cucumis sativus,<br />
p.189–215. In: C. C. Ainsworth (ed.). Sex determination in plants. BIOS<br />
Scientific, Oxford, UK.<br />
Roy, R. P. and S. Saran. 1990. Sex expression in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, p. 251–268. In:<br />
D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey (eds.). Biology and utilization of<br />
the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.<br />
Rudich, J. 1990. Biochemical aspects of hormonal regulation of sex expression in<br />
cucurbits, p. 288–304. In: D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey (eds.).<br />
Biology and utilization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca,<br />
NY.<br />
Sambrook, J. and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3 rd<br />
ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.<br />
Tabei, Y., S. Kitade, Y. Nishizawa, N. Kikuchi, T. Kayano, T. Hibi, and K. Akustu.<br />
1998. Transgenic cucumber plants harboring a rice chitinase gene exhibit<br />
enhanced resistance to gray mold (Botrytis cinerea). Plant Cell Rep. 17:159–<br />
164.<br />
Yamasaki, S., N. Fujii, and H. Takahashi. 2003. Characterization of ethylene effects<br />
on sex determination in cucumber plants. Sex. Plant Repro. 16:103–111.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 47
DROUGHT-INDUCED GENE EXPRESSION IN<br />
ROOTS OF CITRULLUS COLOCYNTHIS<br />
Ying Si and Fenny Dane<br />
Department of Horticulture<br />
Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Drought stress, cDNA-AFLP, real-time RT-PCR,<br />
bitter apple<br />
ABSTRACT. Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad, closely related to watermelon, is a<br />
member of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family. This plant, commonly known as the bitter<br />
apple or bitter gourd, is a tender perennial vine with a rich history as an<br />
important medicinal plant and as a source of valuable oil. It is a very drought<br />
tolerant species with deep root system, widely distributed in the Sahara-<br />
Arabian deserts in Africa and the Mediterranean region. A 20% polyethylene<br />
glycol 8000 (PEG) solution was used to induce drought stress in C. colocynthis<br />
seedlings. cDNA-AFLP analysis was used to study gene expression in roots.<br />
Genes with similarity to known function genes involved in transport facilitation,<br />
metabolism and energy, stress- and defense-related proteins, cellular<br />
organization, signal transduction and expression regulation were induced. <strong>The</strong><br />
results suggest that C. colocynthis undergoes a complex adaptive process in<br />
response to drought stress.<br />
D<br />
rought is the major abiotic stress that has adverse effects on<br />
the growth of plants and productivity of crops. A combination<br />
of biochemical and physiological changes at the cellular and<br />
molecular levels, such as an increase in the plant stress hormone<br />
abscisic acid (ABA) and accumulation of various osmolytes and<br />
proteins coupled with an efficient antioxidant system, is known to<br />
result in stress tolerance. Plant cells have evolved to perceive different<br />
signals from their surroundings, to integrate them and respond by<br />
modulating the appropriate gene expression. <strong>The</strong> products of these<br />
genes are thought to function not only in stress tolerance but also in<br />
the regulation of gene expression and signal transduction (Bartels and<br />
Sunkar, 2005; Zhu, 2001).<br />
Although research has produced an enormous amount of<br />
information, we are far from understanding the <strong>complete</strong> mechanism<br />
of the stress reaction. It is proposed that our understanding of plant<br />
stress tolerance can be refined through gene isolation, characterization<br />
of individual genes and the assessment of their contribution to stress<br />
tolerance.<br />
48 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad, closely related to watermelon, is<br />
a member of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family. This plant, commonly known<br />
as bitter apple or bitter gourd, is a tender perennial vine with a rich<br />
history as an important medicinal plant and as a source of valuable oil.<br />
It is a drought-tolerant species with deep root system, widely<br />
distributed in the Sahara-Arabian region in Africa and the<br />
Mediterranean region.<br />
In an effort to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of drought<br />
tolerance in C. colocynthis, we set out to examine genes induced<br />
during drought stress in seedling roots.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Citrullus colocynthis seeds were sown in Metromix. Seedlings at<br />
5- to 6-leaf stage were cultured in 20% PEG 8000 solution for drought<br />
induction. Leaf and root samples were collected at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24 and<br />
48 h and stored at –80 o C immediately. RNA was extracted from<br />
control and 8 h treatment samples according to Spectrum Plant Total<br />
RNA Kit protocol (Ambion, Austin, TX), and purified by DNase I<br />
treatment. <strong>The</strong> concentration of RNA was measured using an<br />
Eppendorf Biophotometer (Brinkmann Instruments, NY), and quality<br />
was checked using formaldehyde/agarose gel electrophoresis.<br />
cDNA was synthesized using RETROscript (Ambion, TX)<br />
according to the manufacturer's instructions, and digested using the<br />
MseI/EcoRI enzyme combination. AFLP analysis was conducted<br />
according to the protocol of AFLP kit from Li-COR (Li-COR<br />
Biosciences, NE). Preamplified cDNA was diluted 40-fold, before<br />
amplification with selective primers. After selective PCR with E+A<br />
and M+C primers, selective PCR products were run on 6%<br />
polyacrylamide sequencing gel at 80 W for 5 h. Fragments were<br />
visualized by silver staining according to the Silver Sequence TM DNA<br />
Sequencing System Technical Manual (Promega, WI).<br />
Transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were extracted from the gel<br />
and used as a matrix for reamplification by PCR. TDFs were ligated<br />
directly into the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega), and then<br />
transformed into competent Escherichia coli (Promega). Plasmids<br />
were isolated using Plasmid Mini Kit (BIO-RAD). Fragments were<br />
sequenced with the ABI 3100 DNA sequencer (AU Genomics Lab).<br />
Analysis of nucleotide sequence of fragments was carried out using the<br />
National Center for Biotechnology Information BLASTx search tool.<br />
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using an AB 7500<br />
RealTime PCR System (AU Genomics Lab) and 7500 System<br />
software version 1.2.3 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with β–<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 49
actin gene used as reference in parallel with the target gene allowing<br />
gene expression normalization and providing quantification. PCR<br />
efficiencies of target and reference genes were determined by<br />
generating standard curves.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
cDNA-AFLP using 32 different primer combinations resulted in 42<br />
putative differentially expressed DNA fragments, which were cloned,<br />
sequenced, and analyzed. Genes with similarity to known function<br />
genes involved in transport facilitation, metabolism and energy, stress-<br />
and defense-related proteins, cellular organization, signal transduction,<br />
and expression regulation were detected. Thus far, 5 up-regulated<br />
fragments were confirmed to be differentially expressed in treated<br />
plants using quantitative relative real-time PCR. <strong>The</strong>se genes show<br />
high similarities at the amino acid level to heat shock protein (Hsp70),<br />
putative senescence-associated protein, grpE-like protein,<br />
synaptobrevin-related protein, and putative pathogenesis-related<br />
protein. <strong>The</strong> drought-stress-induced genes are known to be regulated<br />
not only by drought signals, but also by osmotic stress and defense<br />
signals in other plants (Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Zhu, 2001). More<br />
genes will be identified and confirmed in further studies and detailed<br />
characterization will be forthcoming. It is clear that C. colocynthis<br />
undergoes a complex adaptive process in response to drought. <strong>The</strong><br />
recognition of specific genes and in-depth analysis of their function in<br />
the process of stress tolerance will enable their use in improving the<br />
stress-tolerance ability of other Citrullus species.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bartels D. and R. Sunkar. 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant<br />
Sci. 24:23–58.<br />
Zhu, J. K. 2001. Cell signaling under salt, water and cold stress. Curr. Op. Plant Biol.<br />
4:401–406.<br />
50 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
EMBRYO CULTURE AS A TOOL FOR<br />
INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION OF<br />
CUCUMIS SATIVUS AND WILD CUCUMIS<br />
SPP.<br />
D. Skálová, B. Navrátilová, A. Lebeda, and N. Gasmanová<br />
Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />
Botany, Šlechtitelů 11, 783 71 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumber, muskmelon, cross-pollination, embryo<br />
rescue, colchicine application, ploidy level, disease resistance<br />
ABSTRACT. One of the possible methods for introducing resistance to disease<br />
and pests from wild Cucumis species to cucumber genotypes is interspecific<br />
hybridization. Methods of embryo-rescue and/or ovule culture are of<br />
considerable interest for overcoming crossability barriers. In the present study,<br />
selected genotypes of Cucumis species (C. sativus L., C. melo L., C. anguria L., C.<br />
zeyheri Sonder, and C. metuliferus E. Meyer ex Naudin) were used for<br />
hybridization experiments. Cross-pollination between C. sativus (as a maternal<br />
parent) and wild Cucumis species (as paternal parent) to obtain fertile hybrid<br />
plants was unsuccessful but some callus formation (hybridization of C. sativus ×<br />
C. melo) and morphological changes on the isolated embryos and seeds<br />
(hybridization of C. sativus × C. metuliferus) were observed. <strong>The</strong> most suitable<br />
medium for the culture of immature embryos and seeds was the GA medium<br />
(with the addition of gibberelic acid). <strong>The</strong> best results were obtained from<br />
hybridization between mixoploids (2n/4n) and tetraploids (4n) of C. sativus<br />
(produced by polyploidization based on colchicine application) with wild<br />
Cucumis spp. Callus formation on the isolated embryos was followed by<br />
rhizogenesis, leaf formation, and regeneration of plants (most frequently on the<br />
GA medium).<br />
T<br />
he genus Cucumis contains two economically important<br />
species, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L., 2n = 14; from the Asian<br />
group) and muskmelon (Cucumis melo L., 2n = 24; from the<br />
African group). <strong>The</strong>se two species are different in their origins and<br />
basic chromosome numbers (Jeffrey, 2001). Cucumber is among the<br />
top 10 vegetables in world production (FAO, 2004; Lebeda et al.,<br />
2006); however, it is a crop with a narrow genetic basis and is<br />
susceptible to many diseases and pests (Chen et al., 2004). Several<br />
valuable resistances have been found in wild African species of<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors thank Dr. H.S. Paris and Dr. M.P. Widrlechner for valuable comments<br />
on this manuscript. This research was supported by the following grants: (1) MSM<br />
6198959215 (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic); and (2) QD<br />
1357 (NAZV, Ministry of Agriculture, Czech Republic.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 51
Cucumis that are not known naturally in cucumber (Lebeda et al.,<br />
2006).<br />
Because of the value of these resistances for cucumber breeding, a<br />
number of attempts have been made to cross them with cucumber.<br />
However, because of crossing barriers (Ondřej et al., 2001), most of<br />
the crosses have been rather unsuccessful (Lebeda et al., 2006;<br />
Skálová et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> primary reason for these crossing barriers is<br />
thought to be related to the differing chromosome numbers of the<br />
parents. Yet, interspecific hybridization can be one of the most<br />
efficient ways to transfer useful characters from wild relatives to the<br />
cultivated species, and embryo-rescue culture can facilitate the process<br />
(Skálová et al., 2004). Embryos at the globular stage were observed in<br />
interspecific hybridization between C. sativus and C. melo<br />
(Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Wyszogrodska, 1976), and between C.<br />
sativus and C. metuliferus (Franken et al., 1988). Some successful<br />
interspecific hybridizations between cucumber and wild Cucumis spp.<br />
have been made via such unconvential techniques as embryo-rescue<br />
culture, e.g., with C. hystrix Chakr. (Chen et al., 2003) and with C.<br />
melo L. (Lebeda et al., 1996, 1999). Interspecific hybridization<br />
between C. sativus and wild Cucumis spp. is usually unsuccessful<br />
because of the different chromosome numbers of the parents. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
are some possibilities for overcoming this problem; one of them is<br />
embryo-rescue culture (Skálová et al., 2004). Embryos at the globular<br />
stage were observed in interspecific hybridization between C. sativus<br />
and C. melo (Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Wyszogrodzka, 1976), and<br />
between C. sativus and C. metuliferus (Franken et al., 1988).<br />
Some attempts to improve the success of interspecific<br />
hybridization in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae have been made by using<br />
polyploidization or haploidization of the parental lines to obtain<br />
similar chromosome numbers (Greplová et al., 2003; Yetisir and Sari,<br />
2003). Among the techniques used for chromosome manipulation,<br />
colchicine polyploidization is the most widely employed. Other<br />
doubling agents include podophyllin, oryzalin, pronamide, etc. (Rao<br />
and Suprasanna, 1996). Several methods for polyploidization by<br />
colchicine pretreatment have been used: wetted cotton-wool on the<br />
growth apex (Rao and Suprasanna, 1996); submersion of rootlets<br />
(Mathias and Röbbelen, 1991); submersion of the main stem (Yetisir<br />
and Sari, 2003); seed treatment (Kalloo, 1988); and incubation of<br />
embryos on MS-medium containing colchicine (Chen and Staub,<br />
1997).<br />
<strong>The</strong> main aim of this research was to contribute to the work of<br />
obtaining interspecific hybrids of Cucumis sativus with different wild<br />
Cucumis spp. via the embryo-rescue-culture technique, and to transfer<br />
52 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
esistance to some cucumber diseases (e.g., downy mildew). Crosses<br />
of C. sativus with wild Cucumis spp. without special pretreatment and<br />
using colchicine treatment of cucumber mother plants have been<br />
compared.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL. Selected genotypes of Cucumis species were<br />
used for hybridization experiments (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> plant material<br />
originated from the vegetable germplasm collection of the Research<br />
Institute of Crop Production (Prague), Department of Gene Bank,<br />
Workplace Olomouc, Czech Republic (, part<br />
databases, EVIGEZ) and the Plant Introduction Station, Iowa <strong>State</strong><br />
University, Ames, IA. <strong>The</strong> plants were cultivated in a glasshouse and<br />
in insect-proof isolation cages. Various wild Cucumis species were<br />
used (Table 1) as a source of pollen, and C. sativus was used as the<br />
maternal component. <strong>The</strong> fruits were harvested on the 14th day after<br />
pollination.<br />
Table 1. Plant material.<br />
Cucumis spp. Abbreviation Accession number<br />
C. sativus (SM-6514/line) CS CZ 09H3900768<br />
C. anguria var.<br />
longaculeatus CA CZ 09H4100569<br />
C. metuliferus CME CZ 09H4100185<br />
C. zeyheri CZ CZ 09H4100196<br />
C. melo CM2 PI 124112<br />
C. melo (line MR1) CM1 CZ 09H4000600<br />
EMBRYO CULTURE. Fruits were surface-sterilized with 70%<br />
ethanol and seeds or embryos were excised. Embryos or seeds were<br />
cultivated on various media (Table 2) in test tubes for six weeks in at<br />
25 o C. After germination they were transferred to a culture room<br />
(22±2 o C and 16h-day/8h-night photoperiod).<br />
POLYPLOIDIZATION METHODS. Two C. sativus sowings were<br />
cultivated without colchicine pretreatment. Four other sowings were<br />
influenced by various types of polyploidization with colchicine<br />
(wetted cotton-wool on the growth apex with 0.5 % and 5% colchicine<br />
solution; submersion of rootlets for 24 h with 0.5 % colchicine<br />
solution). <strong>The</strong> ploidy of obtained plants was determined by flow<br />
cytometry.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 53
Table 2. Composition of culture media.<br />
Culture<br />
medium<br />
Basic<br />
medium Other components<br />
OK<br />
MS 20mg/l ascorbic acid, 0.01mg/l IBA,<br />
0.01mg/l BAP, 20mg/l sucrose, 8g/l agar<br />
(control medium)<br />
ON MS 1g/l caseinhydrolysate, 0.01mg/l IBA,<br />
0.01mg/l BAP, 20g/l sucrose, 6g/l agar<br />
CW MS 5% coconut water, 200mg/l α- glutamin,<br />
0.01mg/l IBA, 0.01mg/l BAP, 60g/l<br />
sucrose, 6g/l agar<br />
GA MS 0.3mg/l giberellic acid, 0.01mg/l IBA,<br />
0.01mg/l BAP, 20g/l sucrose, 8g/l agar<br />
MSNAA MS 2.5mg/l NAA, 1mg/l BAP, 30g sucrose,<br />
8g/l agar<br />
Abbreviations: MS = Murashige and Skoog (1962); OK, ON, CW, GA, MSNAA =<br />
abbreviations for MS-media supplemented with different type of additions<br />
supporting embryogenesis; IBA = indole butyric acid; BAP = benzylaminopurin;<br />
NAA = naphthalene acetic acid.<br />
ISOLATION AND STAINING OF NUCLEI. As an internal reference<br />
standard Cucumis sativus (CS) was used. Twenty mg of plant tissue<br />
were chopped together with the standard into small pieces in a Petri<br />
dish containing 0.5 ml OTTO I (Otto, 1990) (0.1M citric acid, 0.5%<br />
Tween 20). <strong>The</strong>n the suspension of isolated nuclei was filtered through<br />
nylon (40µm) and 50µ RNAse and 50µl PI (Propidium iodide) stock<br />
solution and 1ml OTTO II (Otto, 1990) (0.4M Na2HPO4) were added.<br />
<strong>The</strong> suspension was incubated for 5 min at room temperature. After<br />
incubation, each sample was run on a flow cytometer.<br />
ESTIMATION OF PLOIDY LEVEL. Relative fluorescence of the<br />
nuclei was measured using a PAS flow cytometer (Partec GmbH,<br />
Münster, Germany) equipped with a laser. <strong>The</strong> gain was adjusted so<br />
that the fluorescence peak of the standard (diploid) was placed on<br />
channel 100 of the 512-channel scale. Ploidy level was determined by<br />
comparing a position of peak corresponding to G1 nuclei of the sample<br />
with that of a diploid plant used as a standard. At least 5,000 nuclei<br />
were analyzed in each sample.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> regeneration of embryos isolated from fruits obtained by<br />
interspecific hybridization of Cucumis spp. was efficient only in some<br />
54 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
cases. In total, the regeneration of seven embryos from interspecific<br />
crosses of C. sativus × C. melo was observed (Table 3). Five embryos<br />
developed small roots or a shoot meristem, however callus formation<br />
predominated. Two embryos developed into flowering plants and their<br />
hybrid origin was confirmed using isozyme analyses and flow<br />
cytometry, as in the previous experiments where development of<br />
hybrid embryo of C. sativus × C. melo was confirmed (Lebeda et al.,<br />
1996, 1999).<br />
Some positive results were obtained in pollination of female<br />
flowers of C. sativus with pollen grains of C. melo and C. metuliferus<br />
(Table 3). Callus formation on some embryos from the fruits obtained<br />
after pollination of C. sativus with both Cucumis species was<br />
observed. Growth of isolated embryos (from the crosses of C. sativus<br />
× C. melo) without any subsequent regeneration was observed as well.<br />
However, the growth of embryos stopped very early. Regeneration of<br />
immature seeds from fruits of crosses of C. sativus with C. melo and<br />
C. metuliferus and some morphological changes on the seed coats<br />
and/or stems occurred. <strong>The</strong> most suitable media for the<br />
regeneration of isolated embryos and seeds were GA and CW (media<br />
with gibberelic acid and coconut water added) (Tables 2 and 3).<br />
Nevertheless, no direct or indirect regeneration of plants was observed<br />
from this type of hybridization. It can be concluded that interspecific<br />
hybridization between C. sativus and wild Cucumis spp. is rather<br />
difficult without using some special strategies of embryo-rescue<br />
culture. This conclusion is also supported in a literature survey focused<br />
on embryo-rescue culture of Cucumis spp. (Skálová et al., 2004).<br />
One possible strategy for overcoming crossing barriers is to use<br />
irradiated pollen for cross-pollination (Custers and Bergervoet, 1984).<br />
Custers et al. (1981) used AVG (aminoethoxyvinylglycine) with a<br />
positive effect on the success of reciprocal crosses between C.<br />
africanus and C. metuliferus ‘Megurk’ (2n = 19), and fertile F1 hybrid<br />
plants were derived from pollination of C. sativus with mixed pollen of<br />
C. sativus and C. melo (Van der Knaap et al., 1978). Embryo rescue<br />
after in vitro pollination has also been used to obtain hybrid calli from<br />
Cucumis spp. (Ondřej et al., 2002). Polyploidization of plant genera<br />
with lower chromosome numbers can be useful for overcoming the<br />
prezygotic barriers (Greplová et al., 2003).<br />
In this experiment we used different colchicine treatments of C.<br />
sativus (2n = 14) as a maternal parent. <strong>The</strong> main purpose of this<br />
treatment was to obtain plants with chromosome numbers closer to<br />
those of wild Cucumis spp. as sources of pollen. <strong>The</strong> polyploid<br />
character was confirmed by flow cytometry. Tetraploids (4n = 28) and<br />
mixoploids (2n/4n = 14/28) were obtained after these pretreatments.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 55
Table 3. Results of interspecific hybridization of Cucumis sativus with<br />
wild Cucumis spp.<br />
Partn.<br />
Type for<br />
of CT IH 1<br />
No. No. No. No./ Suc-<br />
No. obiso- isolated type cesspollitainedlatedemregenfulnation<br />
fruits seeds bryoser. media 2<br />
CM1 27 13 260 260 8 (C, OK,<br />
MC) CW,<br />
GA<br />
None<br />
CM2<br />
CA<br />
18<br />
11<br />
8<br />
2<br />
120<br />
80<br />
160<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
-<br />
-<br />
CZ 16 7 280 0 0 -<br />
CME 8 6 240 0 4 (C, CW,<br />
MC) GA<br />
Total 80 36 980 420 12 -<br />
CM1 9 6 219 20 1 (RE) GA<br />
CM2 7 6 240 16 7 (5 RE OK,O<br />
Wetted<br />
plants!; N, CW,<br />
cotton-<br />
2C) GA,<br />
wool,<br />
MSN<br />
0.5% col. CA 4 2 60 0 0 -<br />
CZ 3 2 70 0 0 -<br />
CME 2 2 45 25 1 (C) MSN<br />
Total 25 18 634 61 9 -<br />
CM1 28 16 505 68 6 (3RE, ON,<br />
Wetted<br />
cottonwool,<br />
5%<br />
col.<br />
CM2<br />
CA<br />
CZ<br />
9<br />
3<br />
12<br />
5<br />
1<br />
11<br />
185<br />
45<br />
302<br />
20<br />
0<br />
15<br />
3C)<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
CW,<br />
GA<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
CME 5 3 135 0 1 (MC) OK<br />
Total 57 36 1172 103 7 -<br />
CM1 12 7 180 80 1 (C) GA<br />
CM2 4 2 60 20 0 -<br />
Submer- CA 5 1 15 0 0 -<br />
sion of CZ 6 6 225 20 0 -<br />
rootlets, CME 2 2 90 0 4 (2C, 2 OK,<br />
0.5 %<br />
MC) ON,<br />
col.<br />
CW,<br />
GA,<br />
MSN<br />
Total 29 18 570 120 5 -<br />
Abbreviations: CT = colchicine treatment,; IH = interspecific hybridization; RE =<br />
regeneration and germination of embryos; C = callus formation; MC =<br />
morphological changes.<br />
1 2<br />
= particular genotypes of Cucumis spp. (Table 1). = different types of media<br />
(Table 2).<br />
56 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Regeneration of embryos and seeds, obtained by hybridization of<br />
wild Cucumis spp. (Table 1) with cucumber maternal plants (after<br />
colchicine treatment), was relatively successful. In addition to calli on<br />
both immature above-mentioned explants and morphological changes<br />
on the seed explants, organogenesis was also recorded on calli<br />
(formation of roots or shoots on callus mass) and direct formation of<br />
whole plants (from embryos derived by interspecific hybridization C.<br />
sativus × C. melo, CM2). <strong>The</strong>se embryos passed direct embryogenesis<br />
and germinated on all types of used media. <strong>The</strong> hybrid/nonhybrid<br />
origin of these plants will be confirmed by flow cytometry.<br />
Caseinhydrolysate (ON medium), coconut water (CW medium)<br />
and gibberelic acid (GA medium) promoted embryo germination,<br />
which was followed by callus formation (regeneration on the GA<br />
medium was the most frequent). Seed development was best on the<br />
ON and GA media, respectively (Table 3).<br />
<strong>The</strong> highest total number of successful regenerations occurred by<br />
pollination of C. sativus without colchicine treatment; however, no<br />
regenerated plants were obtained (Table 3). Only one type of<br />
colchicine treatment of C. sativus offered direct regeneration of<br />
embryos into plants (application of wetted cotton-wool on growth<br />
apex, 0.5% colchicine solution; crossing partner C. melo (CM2) (Table<br />
3). In this experiment, the most suitable partner for interspecific<br />
hybridization with C. sativus was C. melo (line MR1; CM1) (Table 1),<br />
because of the highest regeneration frequency (Table 3). Gibberelic<br />
acid (GA medium) appeared as the most efficient additive to<br />
cultivation media for embryos and seeds.<br />
It can be concluded that colchicine pretreatment of C. sativus is a<br />
possible way to improve the success and efficiency of interspecific<br />
hybridization with wild Cucumis species. <strong>The</strong> frequency of embryo<br />
and seed regeneration (organogenesis on the callus mass, direct<br />
regeneration to plants) was higher after colchicine treatment. From<br />
these experiments it is evident that the most suitable wild Cucumis<br />
partners for interspecific hybridization with C. sativus were C. melo<br />
(line MR1) and C. metuliferus (for both types of hybridization, i.e.,<br />
with and without colchicine treatment in the maternal genotype of C.<br />
sativus with wild Cucumis spp. as the paternal genotype). <strong>The</strong> most<br />
efficient medium, for isolated and potentially interspecific embryos,<br />
seems to be the GA medium (added gibberelic acid).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Chen, J. F. and J. E. Staub. 1997. Attempts at colchicine doubling of an interspecific<br />
hybrid of Cucumis sativus L. × hystrix Chakr. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genet. Coop. Rep.<br />
20:24–26.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 57
Chen, J. F., J. Staub, Ch. Qian, J. Jiang, X. Luo, and F. Zhuang. 2003. Reproduction<br />
and cytogenetic characterization of interspecific hybrids derived from Cucumis<br />
hystrix Chakr. × Cucumis sativus L. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 106:688–695.<br />
Chen, J. F., F. Y. Zhuang, X. A. Liu, and Ch. T. Ruin. 2004. Reciprocal differences<br />
of morphological and DNA characters in interspecific hybridization in Cucumis.<br />
Can. J. Bot. 82:16–21.<br />
Custers, J. B. M. and J. H. W. Bergervoet. 1984. Embryo size in Cucumis sativus ×<br />
Cucumis melo as affected by irradiation of the pollen and genotype of the female<br />
parent. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rep. 7:94–95.<br />
Custers, J. B. M., A. P. M. den Nijs, and A. W. Riepma. 1981. Reciprocal crosses<br />
between Cucumis africanus L. f. and C. metuliferus Naud. III. effects of<br />
pollination aids, physiological condition and genetic constitution of the<br />
maternal parent on crossability. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rep. 4:50–52.<br />
FAO. 2004. FAOSTAT Agricultural Database. .<br />
Franken, J., J. B. M. Custers, and R. J. Bino. 1988. Effects of temperature on pollen<br />
tube growth and fruit set in reciprocal crosses between Cucumis sativus and C.<br />
metuliferus. Plant Breed. 100:150–153.<br />
Greplová, M., J. Frček, M. Rejlková, D. Kopecký, J. Vagera, and J. Doležel. 2003.<br />
Polyploidizace planých druhů bramboru in vitro. Research Institute for Potatoes<br />
(VÚB), Havlíčkův Brod (Czech Republic), Research Reports. 14:55–63.<br />
Jeffrey, C. 2001. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, p. 1510–1557. In: P. Hanelt (ed.). Mansfeld’s<br />
encyclopedia of agricultural and horticultural crops, vol. 3. Springer-Verlag,<br />
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.<br />
Kalloo, G. 1988. Vegetable breeding, vol. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.<br />
Lebeda, A., E. Křístková, and M. Kubaláková. 1996. Interspecific hybridization of<br />
Cucumis sativus × Cucumis melo as a potential way to transfer resistance to<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis, p. 31–37. In: M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, C. Soria, J.<br />
Cuartero, J. A. Torés, and R. Fernández-Muňoz (eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s towards 2000.<br />
Proc. 6th Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Málaga Spain.<br />
Lebeda, A., M. Kubaláková, E. Křístková, B. Navrátilová, K. Doležal, J. Doležel,<br />
and M. Lysák. 1999. Morphological and physiological characteristics of plants<br />
issued from interspecific hybridization of Cucumis sativus × Cucumis melo.<br />
Acta Hort. 492:149–155.<br />
Lebeda, A., M. P. Widrlechner, J. Staub, H. Ezura, J. Zalapa, and E. Křístková. 2006.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae; Cucumis spp., <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp., Citrullus spp.), ch. 8. In:<br />
R. J. Singh (ed.). Genetic resources, chromosome engineering, and crop<br />
improvement series, vol. 3 – vegetable crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. (In<br />
press.)<br />
Mathias, R. and G. Röbbelen. 1991. Effective diploidization of microspore-derived<br />
haploids of rape (Brassica napus L.) by in vitro colchicine treatment. Plant<br />
Breed. 106:82–84.<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. and A. Wyszogrodzka. 1976. Embryo culture and in vitro<br />
pollination of excised ovules in the family <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, p. 571–576. In:<br />
Novák, F. J. (ed.). Use of tissue cultures in plant breeding. Proc. Int. Symp.<br />
Olomouc, Czechoslovakia.<br />
Ondřej, V., B. Navrátilová, and A. Lebeda. 2001. Determination of the crossing<br />
barriers in hybridization of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis melo. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen.<br />
Coop. Rep. 24:1–5.<br />
Ondřej, V., B. Navrátilová, P. Tarkowski, K. Doležal, and A. Lebeda. 2002. In vitro<br />
pollination as a tool of overcoming crossing barriers between Cucumis sativus L.<br />
and Cucumis melo L. Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianea Bot. 41:81–88.<br />
58 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Otto, F. 1990. DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of<br />
nuclear DNA, p. 105–110. In: H. A. Crissmann and Z. Darzynkiewicz (eds.).<br />
Methods in cell biology, vol. 33. Academic Press, New York.<br />
Rao, P. S. and P. Suprasanna. 1996. Methods to double haploid chromosome<br />
numbers, p. 317–339. In: S. M. Jain, S. K. Sopory, and R. E. Velleux (eds.). In<br />
vitro haploid production in higher plants, vol.1. Kluwer Academic Publishers,<br />
Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />
Skálová D., A. Lebeda, and B. Navrátilová. 2004. Embryo and ovule cultures in<br />
Cucumis species and their utilization in interspecific hybridization, p. 415–430.<br />
In: A. Lebeda and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in cucurbit genetics and breeding<br />
research. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Van der Knaap, B. J., A. C. de Ruiter, and B. V. Deruiterzonen. 1978. An<br />
interspecific cross between cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and muskmelon<br />
(Cucumis melo). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rep. 1:8.<br />
Yetisir, H. and N. Sari. 2003. A new method for haploid muskmelon (Cucumis melo<br />
L.) dihaploidization. Sci. Hort. 98:277–283.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 59
INITIATING SUDDEN WILT DISORDER IN<br />
MUSKMELON WITH LOW-LIGHT STRESS<br />
H. C. Wien and T. A. Zitter<br />
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 15853<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cantaloupe, vine collapse, Cucumber mosaic virus,<br />
Cucumis melo<br />
ABSTRACT. Sudden wilt or collapse of melon plants at a point close to harvest of<br />
the first mature fruit is a common disorder in the <strong>North</strong>eastern U.S. Cucumber<br />
mosaic virus, Papaya ringspot virus, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis, and<br />
powdery mildew, among others, have been implicated as causal organisms,<br />
acting singly or in combination. <strong>The</strong> disorder is often triggered by unfavorable<br />
weather conditions, such as a period of cold rainy weather. To determine if the<br />
disorder could be initiated by conditions of low light that would occur during<br />
rainy weather, shading experiments were conducted in fields of ‘Athena’ melons<br />
in 2004 and 2005. In the first year, shading frames that reduced the incident<br />
radiation by 40 and 80% were placed over the crop for a week, starting either 7<br />
days before the first fruit harvest, or a week later. None of the treatments<br />
caused plant collapse nor affected yield in 2004. In 2005, the same two levels of<br />
shade were imposed on the field plots starting a week before first ripe fruit<br />
harvest for a duration of two weeks. This time, plant collapse was noticeable by<br />
one week after the start of shade treatments, and was proportional to the degree<br />
of shade. If confirmed by our 2006 experiment, the results indicate that plant<br />
collapse of Cucumis melo can result not only from direct attack from plant<br />
pathogens, but also from a carbohydrate stress. We speculate that under the<br />
latter conditions, the plants preferentially translocate assimilates to the ripening<br />
fruits rather than the root system, leading to an impairment of root function<br />
and plant collapse.<br />
T<br />
he sudden collapse of muskmelon plants close to harvest has<br />
concerned growers and frustrated researchers in the<br />
<strong>North</strong>eastern U.S. for many years, and has defied simple<br />
answers as to causes and possible cures. Zitter (1995) summarized the<br />
state of knowledge at a previous <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae meeting, and listed a<br />
number of pathogens that have been associated with the disorder.<br />
Early reports of the disorder implicated Fusarium wilt (Fusarium<br />
oxysporum f. sp. melonis) (Crozier, 1963), but resistance to this<br />
disease in most modern cultivars has reduced the likelihood of<br />
involvement of this pathogen. Evidence that Cucumber mosaic virus<br />
(CMV) could be a causal agent for the collapse of melon plants has<br />
been more compelling. MacNab (1971) induced a vine decline of<br />
flowering melon plants by inoculating with CMV, and demonstrated<br />
the progress of wilting and necrosis of the leaves from the point of<br />
inoculation. Treatments did not lead to overall collapse of these<br />
60 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
plants, however. In other experiments with fruiting plants, MacNab<br />
(1971) could not induce collapse by late inoculation with CMV. His<br />
observations of sudden wilt in growers’ fields implicated a period of<br />
cold, rainy weather as a triggering factor. Unfortunately, his attempts<br />
to cause plant death by cooling the roots to 10 C produced only a<br />
temporary wilting, duplicating the results of similar experiments by<br />
Raleigh (1941). <strong>The</strong>se cooling experiments were conducted with<br />
flowering plants without fruit load, so the question of whether cooling<br />
of roots of fruiting plants would lead to collapse has not been<br />
addressed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence of fruit on the plant can play a significant role in the<br />
health and vigor of plant root systems. Roots of greenhouse-grown<br />
tomatoes declined when fruits were actively growing (Hurd et al.,<br />
1979), and similar observations have been made with cucumber (Van<br />
der Post, 1968). Under low-light stress, fruiting greenhouse cucumber<br />
plants allocated a smaller proportion of assimilates to roots, perhaps<br />
further impairing the capacity of the roots for water uptake (Marcelis,<br />
1994). If environmental stress factors such as low light or cold soils<br />
can contribute to the loss of function of melon roots on fruiting plants,<br />
it may be possible to stress a melon plant sufficiently with heavy shade<br />
to cause it to collapse even without the added stress of pathogens. <strong>The</strong><br />
current experiments were conducted to test this premise.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Plants for the field shading experiments were started in seedling<br />
trays in a greenhouse. Seeds of Cucumis melo cv. ‘Athena’ were sown<br />
in 72-cell trays in a commercial peat-vermiculite artificial-soil mix.<br />
Four weeks later, the seedlings were transplanted to the field, into a<br />
gravelly loam soil (mixed mesic, Glossoboric hapludalf), covered with<br />
IRT green polyethylene mulch 122cm wide, in rows 183cm wide.<br />
Plants were spaced 61cm apart in the row. Supplemental irrigation<br />
was provided by a single trickle irrigation line under the mulch, and in<br />
the very dry 2005 growing season, by additional sprinkler irrigation.<br />
At specific stages of plant growth in relation to fruiting, plots were<br />
shaded by wooden shading frames measuring 244cm wide, 488cm<br />
long, and 100cm tall, covered with black polyester shade fabric. Three<br />
degrees of shade were utilized: none, 40%, and 80%. Shade duration<br />
was one week in 2004, two weeks in 2005 and 2006. In 2004, shading<br />
treatments were begun either one week before or at first ripe fruit<br />
harvest; in 2005, shade was initiated at first fruit harvest; in 2006,<br />
shading treatments were applied when first fruits reached 3cm<br />
diameter, and at first fruit harvest. Fruits were harvested at full slip,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 61
weighed, and soluble solids measured using a refractometer. <strong>The</strong><br />
degree of vine collapse was noted by counting the number of wilted<br />
plants in the harvest area at weekly intervals. <strong>The</strong> experimental design<br />
of the experiments with more than one shading time was a split plot<br />
with four replications, and shading time as main plots. Statistical<br />
analysis of the yield and soluble solids content was by analysis of<br />
variance using the Statistix software program.<br />
Results<br />
Climatic conditions in the 2004 fruiting and harvest season were<br />
cool and cloudy. Sudden wilt or late vine collapse did not occur in the<br />
experiment in 2004, regardless of the timing and degree of shade<br />
imposed. <strong>The</strong>re was also no effect of the one-week shading treatments<br />
on marketable yield, which averaged 32MT/ha, or on soluble solids<br />
(10.83%).<br />
In 2005, the weather was dry and sunny most of the season, with<br />
higher temperatures than in 2004. From Aug. 1 to the end of fruit<br />
harvest, temperatures at the experimental farm averaged 19˚C in 2004<br />
and 21˚C in 2005. Rainfall totaled 220mm and 21mm in 2004 and<br />
2005 during the same period, respectively.<br />
First signs of plant collapse were noticed at first fruit harvest<br />
(August 10), 5 days after shade treatments were begun, and became<br />
progressively more marked (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> greater the shade level<br />
imposed, the more plants collapsed. From Aug. 22 to the final fruit<br />
harvest on Aug. 29, more of the plants subjected to 40% shade had lost<br />
turgor, and there appeared to be a slight recovery of some of the<br />
heavily shaded plants. This interaction of sampling date and shade<br />
level was significant at the 5% level.<br />
Table 1. Number of plants of ‘Athena’ melon collapsed (out of 8<br />
plants per plot) at specific dates in the harvest season of 2005, in<br />
relation to shading treatments applied. Treatment effect significant at<br />
the 0.1% level; interaction of sample date and treatment significant at<br />
the 5% level.<br />
Sample date<br />
Treatment Aug. 22 Aug. 29<br />
Control 0 1.2<br />
40% shade 2 4.5<br />
80% shade 6.2 5.2<br />
62 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
In spite of the plant collapse, marketable and total yields of fruit<br />
were not significantly affected by shading treatments. Yields averaged<br />
28MT/ha in 2005. Fruit soluble solids also did not vary significantly<br />
among treatments, and averaged 11.6%.<br />
Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> lack of response to shading in 2004 could be due to the shorter<br />
duration of the shade treatment in that year (one week compared to<br />
two weeks in 2005). This may not have depleted assimilates enough<br />
to affect root growth of the fruiting plants.<br />
If the 2005 results are more representative of the effects of a severe<br />
carbohydrate deficiency on fruiting melon plants, it would indicate that<br />
even apparently healthy melon plants can be subject to sudden wilt.<br />
‘Athena’ melon is resistant to the common races of Fusarium wilt<br />
(Races 0, 1, 2), and in our plantings did not show obvious symptoms<br />
of cucumber mosaic or powdery mildew (‘Athena’ has moderate<br />
powdery mildew resistance). <strong>The</strong> shade-induced collapse without<br />
obvious signs of disease would support the theory that melon plants<br />
near the time of fruit harvest are transferring such a high percentage of<br />
their assimilates to the fruits that support of the root system may be<br />
sacrificed, especially if the plants are under an assimilate stress.<br />
While normally one would not expect to encounter two weeks of<br />
severely low light conditions close to the time of melon harvest, under<br />
field conditions one could expect a combination of environmental<br />
stress and some plant diseases. Cucumber mosaic virus was shown by<br />
Bauerle (1971) to reduce root extension and water uptake. Powdery<br />
mildew in cucumber (Podosphaera xanthii syn. Sphaerotheca<br />
fuliginea) reduces photosynthetic rate of the leaves, and thus would<br />
contribute to an assimilate stress (Yurina et al., 1993).<br />
Given the apparent susceptibility of melon to collapse close to<br />
harvest, what practical measures can be taken to decrease its<br />
susceptibility? <strong>The</strong> development of multiple disease-resistant cultivars<br />
would be one useful solution. In addition, breeding lines that have<br />
more vigorous root systems should also help. This approach has been<br />
shown to be useful, when it was noted that grafting melon onto<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a helped to lessen the incidence of sudden wilt disease caused<br />
by Monosporascus in Israel (Cohen et al, 2000). It remains to be<br />
determined if the establishment of a stronger sink in the root system of<br />
melon plants would reduce the sugar content of the fruits.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 63
Literature Cited<br />
Bauerle, W. L. 1971. Effect of the sudden wilt disease on the physiology of the<br />
muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulates). PhD thesis, Cornell University,<br />
Ithaca, N.Y.<br />
Cohen, R., S. Pivonia, Y. Burger, M. Edelstein, A. Gamliel, and J. Katan. 2000.<br />
Various approaches toward controlling sudden wilt of melons in Israel. Acta<br />
Hort. 510:143–147.<br />
Crozier, J. A., Jr. 1963. Some factors affecting the development of a sudden wilt<br />
disease of muskmelon in New York <strong>State</strong>. PhD thesis, Cornell University,<br />
Ithaca, N.Y.<br />
Hurd, R. G., A. P. Gay, and A. C. Mountifield. 1979. <strong>The</strong> effect of partial flower<br />
removal on the relation between root, shoot and fruit growth in the<br />
indeterminate tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol. 93:77–89.<br />
MacNab, A. A. 1971. Symptomatology of decline, early-collapse, and late-collapse<br />
of muskmelons (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulates) in New York <strong>State</strong> and the<br />
etiology of decline. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.<br />
Marcelis, L. F. M. 1994. Effect of fruit growth, temperature and irradiance on<br />
biomass allocation to the vegetative parts of cucumber. Neth. J. Agric. Sci.<br />
42:115–123.<br />
Raleigh, G. J. 1941. <strong>The</strong> effect of culture solution temperature on water intake and<br />
wilting of the muskmelon. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 38:487–488.<br />
Van der Post, C. J. 1968. Simultaneous observations on root and top growth. Acta<br />
Hort. 7:138–143.<br />
Yurina, T. P., V. A. Karavaev, and M. K. Solntsey. 1993. Characteristics of<br />
metabolism in two cucumber cultivars with different resistance to powdery<br />
mildew. Russian Plant Physiol. 40:197–202.<br />
Zitter, T. A. 1995. Sudden wilt of melons from a <strong>North</strong>east US perspective, p. 44–<br />
47. In: G. Lester and J. Dunlap (eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’94.<br />
64 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED CULTIVARS<br />
OF ZUCCHINI SQUASH AND SWEETPOTATO<br />
SQUASH STARTING FROM CHILEAN<br />
LANDRACES<br />
Gabriel Bascur<br />
INIA C.R.I. La Platina, Santiago, Chile<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, inbred lines,<br />
fruit traits, new cultivar<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> CRI La Platina of INIA is developing zucchini squash<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) and sweetpotato squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duch.) crops to<br />
provide cultivars with good horticultural characteristics in a market where<br />
there are few commercial cultivars available. Starting from selections made<br />
from commercial cultivars, inbred lines were evaluated in different seasons and<br />
locations. In zucchini squash, the cultivar Curital INIA was released. It is openpollinated,<br />
with a total yield 18.9% higher than ‘Black Chilean’. Its fruit are<br />
cylindrical, shiny, and dark green with clear green stripes. In sweetpotato<br />
squash, 300 inbred lines were produced and evaluated at Curacaví and La<br />
Platina locations. <strong>The</strong>re is great variability among the inbreds both in fruit<br />
shape and size. Inbreds have been selected for adaptation, yield, and quality.<br />
Cultivars will be released for use by the growers.<br />
I<br />
n Chile, zucchini squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) and sweetpotato<br />
squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duch.) have been used traditionally in<br />
the preparation of local dishes. Those dishes require that certain<br />
characteristics be present for success in the marketplace. As a result,<br />
certain cultivars that have maintained the preferences of local<br />
consumers have been grown for a long time. Those landraces have<br />
characteristics that are not present in the new cultivars available in the<br />
world market (Escaff, 2001).<br />
Since there are no suitable cultivars being developed for this<br />
market, INIA La Platina Regional Research Centre began a geneticimprovement<br />
program to produce cultivars with the characteristics and<br />
quality required by the Chilean consumer. <strong>The</strong> leading cultivar of<br />
zucchini squash is ‘Black Chilean’. It has dark green fruit with light<br />
green longitudinal stripes. This landrace has low yield and high<br />
variability for plant and fruit characteristics (Giaconi and Escaff,<br />
1997).<br />
In sweetpotato squash, a great diversity of fruit types exist that are<br />
marketed in the country. <strong>The</strong> landraces differ in fruit color, shape, size,<br />
and appearance. <strong>The</strong>y also differ in thickness and color of the pulp,<br />
which determine the quality of the mature fruit. <strong>The</strong> Chilean market<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 65
equires large fruit (over 15kg), clear grey to brown, with thick, dense,<br />
very dark orange pulp. One of our objectives is to develop a cultivar<br />
with these fruit characteristics but of smaller size. In this way, we hope<br />
to encourage the sale of this crop without having to cut the fruit for<br />
retail marketing.<br />
Zucchini squash was grown on approximately 6,000ha, and<br />
sweetpotato squash on 4,500 to 5,000ha annually during the period<br />
1995 to 2000 (ODEPA, 2006). <strong>The</strong> cultivation of these vegetables<br />
prevails at the small-farmer level of the center north zone of Chile.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
New zucchini squash cultivars were developed at CRI La Platina<br />
starting with the ‘Black Chilean’ landrace. Single-plant selections<br />
were made for fruit type. Crosses were made to combine traits from<br />
different plants, and inbreds developed through self-pollination as<br />
described by Whitaker and Robinson (1986). From this material, the<br />
best lines selected in preliminary evaluations were evaluated in trials<br />
established at La Serena (29°53'S; 71°19'W) IV Region; Curacaví<br />
(33°22S; 71°07'W); and CRI La Platina (33°34'S; 70°38'W)<br />
Metropolitan Region (RM). Trials were run in the 2002–2003 and<br />
2003–2004 seasons to evaluate phenotypic stability, horticultural<br />
characteristics, and yield based on number and weight of commercial<br />
fruit (10 to 15cm of long, immature fruit) per area. A randomized<br />
<strong>complete</strong> block design was used with four replications, where the<br />
control treatment was ‘Black Chilean’. <strong>The</strong> fruit were evaluated for<br />
shape, color, and shininess.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
ZUCCHINI SQUASH. Several inbred lines were selected for good<br />
yield, plant, and fruit characteristics, and one line (LPZI 2002-47) was<br />
released as ‘Curital INIA’ (Bascur, 2005). ‘Curital INIA’ has an erect<br />
growth habit with vigorous stems, medium-sized lobed leaves of<br />
variegated dark green and marked areas of grizzly white, with serrated<br />
borders, and the presence of trichomes. Sex expression is monoecious<br />
and flowers are an intense yellow. <strong>The</strong> fruit at the immature stage, as<br />
sold for the commercial product, are of cylindrical elongated shape, 10<br />
to 12cm long, of intermediate thickness, with an approximate weight<br />
of 200 to 250g, and no girdle. <strong>The</strong> fruit are shiny, dark green, with<br />
light reticulation, and light green stripes.<br />
‘Curital INIA’ had similar fruit yield to ‘Black Chilean’ at the La<br />
Platina and Curacaví locations (Table 1). In the 2003–2004 season,<br />
‘Curital INIA’ had significantly higher yield than ‘Black Chilean’ at<br />
66 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
the three locations. Averaged over all environments (year and<br />
location), ‘Curital INIA’ outyielded ‘Black Chilean’, with an<br />
advantage of 24,268 fruit/ha or 18.9% higher (Figure1).<br />
Upon comparing the standard deviation, a parameter that allows<br />
the estimation of the stability of the mean, it appears that ‘Curital<br />
INIA’ has a larger value than ‘Black Chilean’, which indicates that its<br />
production is more influenced by changes in environmental conditions<br />
such as year and location (Figure1). ‘Curital INIA’ has improved fruit<br />
shape and brightness relative to ‘Black Chilean’ (Table 2).<br />
SWEETPOTATO SQUASH. <strong>The</strong> breeding work carried out on<br />
sweetpotato squash resulted in the development of 300 inbred lines,<br />
which have a high uniformity of characteristics. However, there is<br />
great variability for fruit characteristics among lines, resulting in good<br />
opportunities for selection of outstanding lines for use by growers<br />
(Bascur, 2005). Preliminary data indicated that three lines excelled in<br />
number of fruit/ha and weight of fruit/ha compared to the two controls<br />
(Table 3). Line 37-1 had the largest fruit weight.<br />
Table 1. Yield (total number of fruit/ha) of ‘Curital INIA’ and the<br />
control (‘Black Chilean’) evaluated in different seasons and locations.<br />
La Platina Curacaví La Serena Curacaví La Platina<br />
Cultivar<br />
2002–2003 2002–<br />
2003<br />
2003–<br />
2004<br />
2003–<br />
2004<br />
2003–<br />
2004<br />
Curital INIA<br />
102,000 a*<br />
143,340 a<br />
177,333 a<br />
221,333 a<br />
120,667 a<br />
Black Chilean 104,000 a 142,000 a 148,667 b 164,000 b 84,667 b<br />
*Means followed by the same letter in column are not significantly different based<br />
on LSD test (P
Table 2. Fruit characteristics of Curital INIA and the control.<br />
Stripe<br />
Cultivar Width Shape Girdle Color color Brightness<br />
Curital<br />
INIA<br />
Black<br />
Chilean<br />
Medium<br />
Thick<br />
Cylindrical,<br />
elongated<br />
Conical,<br />
short<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
Dark<br />
green<br />
Dark<br />
green<br />
Light<br />
green<br />
Light<br />
green<br />
Shiny<br />
Medium<br />
In the evaluations carried out in the 2003–2004 season, lines<br />
evaluated in the Curacaví location had higher fruit production, in<br />
number as well as in weight (Table 4). Also, the fruit produced was of<br />
larger size, in comparison with La Platina. At Curacaví, line 8-1 was<br />
better than the two controls. At La Platina, line 33-2 had the highest<br />
production. <strong>The</strong>se results demonstrate that lines having better<br />
characteristics and productive potential than the ecotypes used by<br />
farmers have been generated.<br />
High fruit quality is defined by the presence of a thick pulp of dark<br />
orange. According to the evaluations, both characteristics are present<br />
in 28.8% of the total of the evaluated inbred lines. This result indicates<br />
that approximately one third of the improved germplasm combines<br />
two relevant aspects for obtaining a very good commercial fruit.<br />
We will continue testing the inbred lines to identify those of high<br />
productivity and fruit quality. In the future, we will determine<br />
combining ability and produce hybrid cultivars of sweetpotato squash<br />
for use by growers.<br />
Table 3. Number and weight of fruit per hectare, and average weight<br />
of fruit of sweetpotato squash inbred lines and controls in Curacavi,<br />
2002–2003 season.<br />
Inbred<br />
line<br />
Fruit<br />
number/ha -1<br />
Fruit weight<br />
(kg./ha -1 )<br />
Average fruit<br />
weight (kg)<br />
79-1 2,250 abc 31,925 a 14.19 ab<br />
20-2 2,000 bcd 24,150 bcde 12.08 abcd<br />
20-1 2,250 abc 20,775 def 9.23 abcdef<br />
37-1 1,250 efg 20,000 defg 16.00 a<br />
33-1 1,500 def 17,850 efgh 11.90 abcd<br />
Farmer 1,188 fg 14,405 ghi 13.34 ab<br />
San Alfonso 1,000 fgh 10,125 ijk 10.55 abcde<br />
113-1 750 gh 3,325 k 4.43 ef<br />
*Means followed by the same letter in column are not significantly different based<br />
on LSD test (P
Table 4. Number and weight of fruit per hectare, and average weight<br />
of fruit of sweetpotato squash inbred lines and the controls in different<br />
locations, season 2003–2004.<br />
Curacavi La Platina 2003–2004<br />
Fruit<br />
weight<br />
Average<br />
fruit<br />
weight<br />
Number<br />
fruit/ha -<br />
1<br />
Fruit<br />
weight<br />
Average<br />
fruit<br />
weight<br />
(kg)<br />
Inbred Number<br />
line fruit/ha -1<br />
(kg./ha -1 ) (kg)<br />
(kg./ha -1 )<br />
8-1 3,000 31,600 10.53 2,000 17,500 8.75<br />
11-2 1,750 17,250 9.86 2,000 20,600 10.30<br />
14-2 1,250 15,300 12.24 1,000 5,325 5.33<br />
20-2 2,250 20,925 9.30 2,250 14,750 6.56<br />
33-2 2,000 22,800 11.40 3,500 27,750 7.93<br />
34-1 2,000 16,300 8.15 2,250 17,075 7.59<br />
37-1 1,250 15,875 12.70 1,000 8,375 8.38<br />
Farmer 1,750 9,500 5.43 2,500 22,700 9.08<br />
San<br />
Alfonso<br />
1,000<br />
8,250 8.25<br />
1,000 9,100 9.10<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bascur, B. G. 2005. Curital INIA: Nueva variedad de zapallito italiano tipo negro<br />
chileno. Hortic. Bras. 23(2):414(Abstr.).<br />
Bascur, B. G. 2005. Desarrollo de líneas puras en zapallo de guarda para la<br />
generación de variedades comerciales. Resúmenes 56º Congreso Agronómico de<br />
Chile:5(Abstr.).<br />
Escaff, G. M. 2001. Hortalizas, p. 717–757. In: SOQUIMICH (ed.). Agenda del<br />
salitre. Cousiño Asociados, Santiago, Chile.<br />
Giaconi, M. V. and M. G. Escaff. 1997. Cultivo de hortalizas. Editorial Universitaria,<br />
Santiago, Chile.<br />
ODEPA. 2006. Estadísticas agropecuarias. .<br />
Whitaker, W. T. and R. W. Robinson. 1986. Squash breeding, p. 209–242. In: J. M.<br />
Basset (ed.). <strong>Breeding</strong> vegetable crops. AVI Publishing Co., Westport, CT.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 69
GENETIC VARIATION FOR BENEFICIAL<br />
PHYTOCHEMICAL LEVELS IN MELONS<br />
(CUCUMIS MELO L.)<br />
Kevin M. Crosby<br />
Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />
Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Weslaco, TX 78596;<br />
Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, TX 77843<br />
Gene E. Lester<br />
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Kika<br />
de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center,<br />
Weslaco, TX 78596<br />
Daniel I. Leskovar<br />
Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, TX 77845; Texas Agricultural Research and<br />
Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Uvalde, TX 7; Department<br />
of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, TX 77843<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Vitamin C, beta-carotene, cultivars, western<br />
shipper, honeydew<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong>re is a paucity of published data on genetic variation for humanhealth-related<br />
phytochemicals in melon. Improvement of melon cultivars<br />
through traditional breeding depends on genetic variation for traits of interest.<br />
This research investigated the effects of cultivar and environment on the levels<br />
of vitamin C and beta-carotene in a diverse selection of melon cultivars and<br />
lines. Extensive variation was found for both compounds, with three- to fourfold<br />
differences between high and low entries. Several open-pollinated<br />
cultivars, including ‘TAM Uvalde’ and ‘TAM Perlita 45’, contained high levels<br />
of both these compounds, as did some older hybrid cultivars such as ‘Mission’.<br />
Many popular commercial hybrids such as ‘Cruiser’ and ‘Primo’ had lower<br />
levels of these phytochemicals, but larger fruit. Fruit grown at Uvalde were<br />
consistently higher in vitamin C than fruit grown at Weslaco. <strong>The</strong> highest levels<br />
of vitamin C recorded in this experiment (32mg·100g -1 ) were lower than the<br />
levels found in the USDA nutrition database, while the highest beta-carotene<br />
levels (62µg·g -1 ) were higher than USDA figures. <strong>The</strong>re is good potential for<br />
genetic improvement of these phytochemical levels through conventional<br />
breeding and selection.<br />
This research was funded in part by USDA Grant: 2001-34402-10543, “Designing<br />
Foods for Health.” We acknowledge financial support from the South Texas Melon<br />
Committee. We also thank technicians Alfredo Rodríguez and Hyun J. Kang, Texas<br />
Agricultural Research and Extension Center-Weslaco, for their assistance.<br />
70 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
T<br />
he melon-breeding program at the Texas Agricultural<br />
Experiment Station in Weslaco focuses on improving fruit<br />
quality to meet demands of consumers and producers. <strong>The</strong><br />
importance of melons in the human diet, coupled with their naturally<br />
high levels of vitamins, makes them ideal delivery systems for<br />
beneficial phytochemicals. Melons can provide vitamin C, betacarotene,<br />
potassium, calcium, sugars, and folate. Muskmelons are an<br />
excellent source of both vitamin C and beta-carotene (provitamin A).<br />
Among the top 10 most consumed fruits in the U.S., muskmelons are<br />
the only ones that provide the recommended daily allowance of both<br />
these vitamins (Lester, 1997). <strong>The</strong> stability of beta-carotene<br />
concentration over time is very high, which makes selection for this<br />
compound reliable (Lester and Bruton, 1986). In addition, there is a<br />
good correlation between levels of beta-carotene and desirable orange<br />
flesh color (Lester and Turley, 1990). This is both a selection and<br />
marketing advantage. Genotypic and environmental effects on betacarotene<br />
levels have been observed in field-grown fruit under<br />
commercial production practices. Lester and Eischen (1996) found<br />
that some melon varieties had higher levels of this compound than<br />
others. In addition, some varieties produced consistent beta-carotene<br />
levels across environments while others did not. Vitamin C is very<br />
susceptible to degradation over time or by exposure to high<br />
temperatures. <strong>The</strong>refore, fresh melon fruit consumption will deliver<br />
the highest concentrations of this important compound. <strong>The</strong> species<br />
Cucumis melo L. is divided into six horticultural groups based on<br />
diverse fruit and vine characteristics (Robinson and Decker-Walters,<br />
1997). <strong>The</strong> great genetic diversity within this species is valuable for<br />
screening to identify genotypes high in these beneficial compounds.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
A diverse selection of melon lines and cultivars was planted in<br />
replicated field plots at Weslaco and Uvalde Texas during the spring<br />
of 2001. Seeds were sown on beds covered with black plastic mulch.<br />
Subsurface drip tape was utilized to irrigate and supply fertilizers<br />
throughout the growing season. Several applications of pesticides<br />
were applied to prevent mildew, gummy stem blight, and insect<br />
infestations. All fruit were harvested at the full-slip stage and<br />
processed within 24 hours. An effort was made to select fruit of<br />
similar size across entries when possible. Roughly 100-g flesh<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 71
Table 1. Fresh fruit Vitamin C and beta-carotene contents of 15 melon<br />
cultivars and lines grown in field plots at Weslaco, Texas.<br />
Vitamin C<br />
Cultivar/line (mg·100g -1 Beta-carotene<br />
) (µg·g -1 ) Fruit type<br />
TAM Perlita 45 21.7 a z 62.2 a z<br />
Western shipper<br />
- size 15 y<br />
Western shipper<br />
TAM Uvalde 15.2 b 57.5 ab<br />
- size 18<br />
Western shipper<br />
Explorer 12.4 bc 45.0 cde - size 15<br />
Western shipper<br />
Cruiser 12.1 bc 36.3 e<br />
- size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
Mission 11.9 bc 40.3 de<br />
- size 15<br />
Honeydew –<br />
Green Ice 11.8 bc 4.70 f<br />
size 15<br />
TAM Mayan 11.2 bcd 11.5 f Casaba - size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
Gold Mark 10.8 bcd 41.4 cde - size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
TXC 2015 10.0 bcd 49.8 bc<br />
- size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
HMX 9583 9.4 cd 46.0 cd<br />
- size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
Valley Gold 9.3 cd 48.5 bcd - size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
Mainpak 9.2 cd 43.5 cde - size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
Pronto 8.0 cd 43.0 cde - size 12<br />
Honeydew –<br />
TAM Dew Impr. 7.2 cd 4.70 f<br />
size 12<br />
Western shipper<br />
Primo 7.0 cd 56.7 ab<br />
- size 12<br />
z<br />
Mean separations by LSD, P ≤ 0.05. Values followed by the same letter are not<br />
significantly different.<br />
y<br />
Sizes based on number of fruit that fit into a standard melon packing box.<br />
samples were taken from three replications per entry. <strong>The</strong>se samples<br />
were stored in a –80 ºC freezer prior to chemical analysis.<br />
Vitamin C (total ascorbic acid) was extracted from 10g of frozen<br />
tissue by homogenizing in ice-cold meta-phosphoric acid (5% w/v) for<br />
5s in a polytron homogenizer (Brinkman Instruments, Westbury, NY).<br />
<strong>The</strong> homogenate was then centrifuged (7000gn) for 15min at 4 ºC.<br />
Detection of free and dehydro- ascorbic acid was at 525nm, and<br />
72 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
concentrations were calculated based on a standard curve (Hodges et<br />
al., 2001). Beta-carotene was extracted from lyophilized tissue using<br />
heptane under low-light conditions as described by Lester et al. (2005).<br />
HPLC was used to separate beta-carotene in a C18 column, with<br />
detection at 454nm. Total soluble solids were measured with a<br />
handheld refractometer (ATAGO USA, Inc., Bellevue, WA) at room<br />
temperature. Total ascorbic acid and beta-carotene concentration<br />
values were subjected to ANOVA and mean separations by LSD,<br />
utilizing STATGRAPHICS plus 4.1 software (Statpoint, Inc.,<br />
Herndon, VA).<br />
Several families were developed with ‘TAM Uvalde’, ‘Mission’,<br />
‘Cruiser’, and ‘TAM Dew Improved’ as parents. <strong>The</strong> F2 progeny were<br />
screened to determine the potential for selection of larger fruit with<br />
genetically high levels of vitamin C and beta-carotene. Preliminary<br />
results demonstrated potential for transgressive segregation, with some<br />
progeny having higher concentrations of the phytochemicals and larger<br />
fruit than the parents (Crosby, unpublished data). Molecular markers<br />
linked to QTL affecting vitamin C have been developed in another F2<br />
family (Sinclair et al., 2006). Ideally, these RAPD markers, and others<br />
under development for beta-carotene QTL, will be useful to expedite<br />
selection of new melon cultivars with genetically enhanced levels of<br />
these two important phytochemicals.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is very little published information on genetic variation for<br />
fruit phytochemical traits in melon (Cucumis melo L). USDA<br />
statistics suggest that cantaloupe and honeydew melons are potentially<br />
good sources of vitamin C and beta-carotene, but do not address<br />
potential variation in these compounds across cultivars or horticultural<br />
groups (Adams and Richardson, 1981). Extensive genetic variation<br />
exists for many fruit-quality traits within the species Cucumis melo L.<br />
In addition, new cultivars and horticultural types are becoming<br />
available to U.S. consumers. It does not seem realistic to assume that<br />
all cultivars and types provide the same levels of beneficial<br />
phytochemicals. Both genetic and environmental components of<br />
variation for beta-carotene and vitamin C in melons were reported by<br />
Lester and Eischen (1996) and Lester and Crosby (2002). However,<br />
these studies included only a few cultivars of western-shipper<br />
cantaloupe or honeydew types. <strong>The</strong> present investigation included a<br />
larger number of commercial cultivars, germplasm accessions, and<br />
diverse horticultural types.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 73
Table 2. Fresh fruit vitamin C and total soluble solids of 39 melon<br />
cultivars and lines grown in field plots at Uvalde, Texas.<br />
Vitamin C<br />
Cultivar/line (mg·100g -1 Total soluble<br />
) solids (ºbrix) Fruit type<br />
TAM Uvalde 32.0 a z Western<br />
12.2 shipper<br />
Western<br />
Magnum 45 29.9 ab 8.5 shipper<br />
Western<br />
Mission 25.5 bc 12.3 shipper<br />
Western<br />
A-chapparal 22.5 cd 9.2 shipper<br />
Western<br />
TXC 2015 22.3 cd 10.4 shipper<br />
Western<br />
Durango 21.5 cde 9.0 shipper<br />
Western<br />
Tesoro 21.2 cdef 6.0 shipper<br />
Western<br />
Caravelle 21.0 cdef 11.0 shipper<br />
Western<br />
TXC 1053 20.6 cdefg 11.0 shipper<br />
Guadeloupe 20.3 cdefgh 10.5 Charentais<br />
TXC 807 19.7 defghi 10.2 Charentais<br />
Western<br />
TXC 1075 19.0 defghij 8.0 shipper<br />
Charlynne 18.8 defghijk 10.1 Ananas<br />
Western<br />
Sol Real 18.7 defghijk 10.0 shipper<br />
Ames 20488 18.2 defghijk 6.0 Momordica<br />
Western<br />
TXC 2040 17.5 defghijkl 8.5 shipper<br />
Western<br />
Primo 17.5 defghijkl 10.0 shipper<br />
Western<br />
TP 45 16.5 efghijklm 10.0 shipper<br />
Western<br />
TXC 1409 16.0 efghijklm 12.5 shipper<br />
Eastern<br />
Athena 15.7 fghijklm 8.0 shipper<br />
Western<br />
Impac 15.6 fghijklm 8.0 shipper<br />
TXC 1129 15.2 ghijklmn 13.0 Honeydew<br />
Western<br />
Cruiser 15.2 ghijklmn 8.3 shipper<br />
Trooper 14.8 hijklmno 7.7 Western<br />
74 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
(Table 2,<br />
continued)<br />
Vitamin C<br />
(mg·100g -1 )<br />
Total soluble<br />
solids (ºbrix)<br />
Cultivar/line<br />
Fruit type<br />
shipper<br />
Western<br />
TXC 1143 14.6 ijklmno 10.5 shipper<br />
PI 124104 14.4 ijklmno 6.1 Honeydew<br />
Western<br />
RML 6483 14.0 ijklmnop 10.0 shipper<br />
Deltex<br />
Crème de<br />
13.4 jklmnop 9.0 Ananas<br />
Menthe 13.2 klmnop 13.3 Honeydew<br />
PI 127546 13.1 klmnopq 5.0 Momordica<br />
PI 165449 12.5 lmnopq 7.5 Casaba<br />
Western<br />
Copa de Oro 12.1 lmnopq 7.5 shipper<br />
Morning Ice 11.3 mnopq 13.0 Honeydew<br />
TAM Dew Impr. 11.3 mnopq 14.4 Honeydew<br />
TAM Mayan 10.9 mnopq 12.8 Casaba<br />
Mega Brew 9.6 nopq 14.0 Honeydew<br />
Santa Fe 9.2 opq 11.7 Honeydew<br />
Doublon 8.6 pq 11.0 Charentais<br />
Western<br />
TXC 1405 7.5 q 7.0 shipper<br />
z<br />
Mean separations by LSD, P≤0.05. Means followed by the same letters are not<br />
significantly different.<br />
Vitamin C concentrations at Weslaco demonstrated a threefold<br />
difference between highest and lowest entries (Table 1). This<br />
represents substantial genetic variation, considering that environmental<br />
parameters and growing conditions were presumably quite similar<br />
within the small field plots. <strong>The</strong> difference in vitamin C concentrations<br />
between the highest and lowest entries at Uvalde was even greater at<br />
32 vs. 7.5mg·100g -1 (Table 2). <strong>The</strong> mean vitamin C concentrations<br />
were higher at Uvalde than at Weslaco for the best cultivars, such as<br />
‘TAM Uvalde’ and ‘Mission’, and for those on the low side, such as<br />
‘TAM Dew Improved.’ In general, the trend for higher levels of<br />
vitamin C at Uvalde than Weslaco was evident. However, in neither<br />
location did the best entries produce as much vitamin C as was<br />
reported in western-shipper cantaloupe melons by the National<br />
Agricultural Library nutritional database Website (nal.usda.gov). This<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 75
suggests that despite extensive genetic variation among cantaloupe<br />
types for vitamin C content, they may be quite susceptible to genotype<br />
x environment interaction for synthesis of this key phytochemical.<br />
This was found to be true with honeydews grown at different Texas<br />
locations (Lester and Crosby, 2002).Beta-carotene concentrations were<br />
assessed only from the Weslaco fruit. In contrast to the vitamin C<br />
data, the beta-carotene concentrations for the orange-fleshed entries<br />
were generally greater than the values reported by the USDA<br />
(nal.usda.gov.). Statistically significant differences were evident<br />
among orange-fleshed entries, with 1.7-fold greater levels in ‘TAM<br />
Perlita 45’ than in ‘Cruiser’. As expected, white- and green-fleshed<br />
honeydew cultivars had much lower levels of beta-carotene than the<br />
western-shipper types. <strong>The</strong> intermediate level in the casaba cultivar<br />
‘TAM Mayan’ is likely due to its pedigree, which includes an orangefleshed<br />
ancestor. Some light-orange coloration is evident in the<br />
placental region of this cultivar. At 62.2µg·g -1 , ‘TAM Uvalde’<br />
contained roughly 1030 retinol equivalents or 100% of the RDA for<br />
provitamin A. This is better than the value of 676 retinol equivalents<br />
(3382 IU) for cantaloupe suggested by the USDA Website. This<br />
cultivar also had high total soluble solids and vitamin C, suggesting<br />
that selection for multiple fruit-quality and antioxidant traits<br />
simultaneously should be feasible.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Adams, C. F. and M. Richardson. 1981. Nutritive value of foods. USDA Home and<br />
Garden Bul. 72. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.<br />
Hodges, D. W., C. F. Forney, and W. V. Wismer. 2001. Antioxidant responses in<br />
harvested leaves of two cultivars of spinach differing in senescence rates. J.<br />
Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:611–617.<br />
Lester, G. E. 1997. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit nutritional quality and health<br />
functionality. HortTech. 7:222–227.<br />
Lester, G. E. and B. D. Bruton. 1986. Relationship of netted muskmelon fruit water<br />
loss to postharvest storage life. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:727–731.<br />
Lester, G. E. and F. Eischen. 1996. Beta-carotene content of postharvest orangefleshed<br />
muskmelon fruit: effect of cultivar, growing location and fruit size. Plant<br />
Foods for Hum. Nutr. 49:191–197.<br />
Lester, G. E., J. L. Jifon, and G. Rogers. 2005. Supplemental foliar potassium<br />
applications during muskmelon fruit development can improve fruit quality,<br />
ascorbic acid and beta-carotene contents. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130(4):649–<br />
653.<br />
Lester, G. E. and K. M. Crosby. 2002. Ascorbic acid, folic acid, and potassium<br />
content in postharvest green-flesh honeydew muskmelon fruit: influence of<br />
cultivar, fruit size, soil type and year. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127:843–847.<br />
Lester, G. E. and R. M. Turley. 1990. Chemical, physical and sensory comparisons<br />
of netted muskmelon fruit cultivars and breeding lines at harvest. J. Rio Grande<br />
Valley Hort. Soc. 43:71–77.<br />
76 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Robinson. R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />
New York.<br />
Sinclair, J. W., S. O. Park, G. E. Lester, K. S. Yoo, and K. M. Crosby. 2006.<br />
Identification and confirmation of RAPD markers and andromonoecious<br />
associated with quantitative<br />
trait loci for sugars in melon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 131(3):360–371<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 77
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND EVOLUTION OF<br />
WILD AND CULTIVATED WATERMELON<br />
Fenny Dane and Jiarong Liu<br />
Department of Horticulture, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus, C. lanatus var.<br />
citroides, domestication, nucleotide polymorphism, cpDNA, nuclear sequence<br />
polymorphism<br />
ABSTRACT. Cultivated (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus) and wild (C. lanatus var.<br />
citroides) watermelon accessions from different geographical areas were used to<br />
study the origin and domestication history of the cultivated watermelon.<br />
Chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence analyses were conducted to infer<br />
evolutionary relationships and biogeographic patterns. Variability within C.<br />
lanatus was observed at regions of high AT content only. Distinct chlorotype<br />
lineages were identified separating the cultivated watermelon from several<br />
citroides lineages, indicating ancient splits between the cultivated and wild<br />
watermelon. While polymorphism at cpDNA regions within var. lanatus was<br />
lacking, sequence variation at glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and<br />
glutamine synthetase revealed variability, which was used to study colonization<br />
events. <strong>The</strong> egusi-type watermelon from Nigeria can be distinguished by a<br />
unique amino acid deletion at the transit peptide region of G3pdh. Variability<br />
among var. citroides accessions suggests a center of diversity in southern Africa.<br />
W<br />
ith the advent of agriculture began the process of plant<br />
domestication, which led from wild populations to plants<br />
adapted to cultivation and human use (Gepts, 2003).<br />
Human selection affected a wide array of morphological and<br />
physiological traits that distinguish cultivated crops from their wild<br />
ancestors. Research has revealed that a relatively small number of<br />
qualitative and quantitative trait loci with major effects control<br />
domestication-related traits in crops (Gepts, 2003). Understanding the<br />
process of domestication of species and colonization is fundamental to<br />
the study of evolutionary diversification. Studying the geographical<br />
distribution of plant lineages helps synthesize history and genetic<br />
exchanges and provides insights into the different factors that shape<br />
the genetic diversityof a species and the origins of crops (Avise, 2000;<br />
Gepts, 2003).<br />
Plant molecular evolution has been dominated by studies of the<br />
chloroplast (cp) genome because cpDNA is an abundant compenent of<br />
the total cellular DNA, and maternally inherited in most angiosperms.<br />
Chloroplast DNA is evolutionarily conservative in terms of genome<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors thank Rasima Bakhtiyarova for technical assitance.<br />
78 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
size, structure, gene content, and linear order of genes among plant<br />
lineages. Consequently, any change in structure or arrangement of the<br />
cp genome can have significant phylogenetic implications (Soltis et<br />
al., 1998). Both coding and noncoding sequences are used either<br />
through direct sequencing or PCR-restriction fragment length<br />
polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (Petit et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> plant<br />
mitochondrial (mt) genome has with few exceptions not yielded useful<br />
amounts of population-level variation. Because sequences of cp- and<br />
mtDNA evolve more slowly than those of the nuclear genome in<br />
plants, nuclear gene markers are needed especially for phylogenetic<br />
reconstruction at low taxonomic levels. Noncoding regions of lowcopy<br />
nuclear genes have not been extensively explored in plants,<br />
although this genome can potentially provide multiple unlinked allele<br />
genealogies at the intraspecific level. Recent studies have<br />
demonstrated that rapidly evolving introns of low-copy nuclear genes<br />
can provide information to resolve intraspecific relationships (Olsen,<br />
2002; Zhang and Hewitt, 2003).<br />
Wild and cultivated watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.]<br />
Matsum & Nakai) are native to Africa and can be divided into the<br />
botanical varieties lanatus and citroides (Jeffrey, 1990; Maynard,<br />
2001). <strong>The</strong> variety lanatus includes the cultivated watermelon, known<br />
for its large sweet red or yellow fruit, and the egusi-type, cultivated in<br />
West Africa for its oil- and protein-rich edible seeds. <strong>The</strong> variety<br />
citroides (Bailey) Mansf. includes the citron or preserving melon,<br />
which produces small spherical fruit with hard, inedible bitter flesh,<br />
and green or tan seeds.<br />
<strong>The</strong> primary gene center for watermelon is not known. One theory<br />
proposes that watermelon is derived from the perennial C. colocynthis,<br />
endemic to Africa; another that watermelon was domesticated from a<br />
putatively wild form of C. lanatus var. citroides (Maynard, 2001).<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence of 5000-year-old seeds of C. lanatus in Libya implies<br />
that domestication might have occurred in <strong>North</strong>ern Africa. <strong>The</strong> oldest<br />
published records of Citrullus remains come from the tomb of<br />
Tutankhamun in Egypt (ca. 1330 BC), and it was known in Sudan as<br />
early as 1500 BC (Hepper, 1990). Records of cultivated watermelon<br />
are known around the Mediterranean from the early first millennium<br />
BC. By the Roman period, records are widespread, ranging from<br />
Libya to Europe, but only a few are known from southern Africa.<br />
Watermelons have been cultivated in the Nile Valley since before<br />
2000 BC, and many landraces varying in fruit size, shape, flesh color,<br />
rind, and seed color were developed. From Africa, watermelons were<br />
introduced to India about 800 AD and to China about 1100 AD.<br />
Cultivation spread to Southeast Asia in the 15 th century, while the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 79
Moors introduced watermelon to Europe during their conquest of<br />
Spain. Watermelon was transported and introduced to the Americas in<br />
post-Columbian times by the early European colonists, and became<br />
readily accepted and disseminated by Native Americans, especially in<br />
the Mississippi Valley and the southwestern U.S. (Zohary and Hopf,<br />
2000). But despite the economic importance of watermelon,<br />
domestication events and phylogeographic relationships have received<br />
only limited scientific attention.<br />
Initial studies using PCR-RFLP analysis in Citrullus species were<br />
conducted using different chloroplast regions (Dane, 2002).<br />
Sequencing analysis of informative regions revealed four haplotypes<br />
within C. lanatus, one associated with the cultivated watermelon (var.<br />
lanatus), and three with var. citroides (Dane et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />
chlorotypes within C. lanatus suggest ancient splits between the<br />
cultivated and wild watermelon types (Liu, 2005). This study was<br />
conducted to provide a comprehensive review of DNA-sequence<br />
diversity and divergence within this wild/domesticated complex and to<br />
make inferences about the domestication history of the species.<br />
Variable nuclear regions were compared to information gained from<br />
cpDNA sequence analysis.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Seeds from Citrullus accessions and cultivars were obtained<br />
through the Plant Introduction (PI) Station at Griffin, Georgia, the<br />
National Plant Genetic Resources Centre (NPGC) at Windhoek,<br />
Namibia, or from the Volcani Center in Israel (Table 1). Accessions<br />
were chosen based on an extensive survey of the Citrullus collection<br />
using PCR-RFLP and cpDNA sequencing analysis (Dane et al, 2004;<br />
Liu, 2005).<br />
DNA was extracted from seedlings or cotyledon tissues using the<br />
Qiagen plant DNA easy extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).<br />
Chloroplast genome sections were amplified using universal primers<br />
(Liu, 2005). Nuclear DNA sequences were amplified with primers<br />
designed from published EST information. Primers were designed in<br />
exons to amplify fragments of around 600–800bp around intronic<br />
sequences (Table 2). PCR cycling conditions for the GS and Dip<br />
sequences were 95˚C for 2 min, followed by 10 cycles of 1 min at<br />
92˚C, 20 s at 73˚C, 20 s at 72˚C, followed by 25 cycles of 20 s at 92˚C,<br />
20 s at 55˚C, 20 s at 72˚C, and finally 5 min at 72˚C. PCR cycling<br />
conditions for the G3pdh sequences were 94˚C for 4 min, followed by<br />
35 cycles of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 52.5˚C, 2 min at 72˚C, and finally<br />
10 min at 72˚C.<br />
80 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Amplified fragments were purified using the Qiaquick PCR<br />
purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and sequence analysis was<br />
performed using an ABI 3100 sequencer. Nucleotide sequences were<br />
submitted to GenBank and accession numbers are available from the<br />
senior author. Sequences were aligned using Vector NTI ® software<br />
(InforMax, Frederick, MD), followed by manual adjustments.<br />
Single base indels were crosschecked to the original chromatograms<br />
for accuracy. Indels were scored as single binary (0 vs. 1 characters<br />
appended to the main matrix. All character states were specified as<br />
unordered and equally weighted. To test for congruence of the<br />
cpDNA and different nuclear regions, partition homogeneity tests with<br />
heuristic searches were conducted in PAUP* with 100 replicates and<br />
tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch swapping (Swofford, 2002).<br />
Table 1. Investigated Citrullus lanatus plant introductions (PI) and<br />
cultivars with their geographic origin.<br />
Taxon PI number Origin<br />
C. lanatus var.<br />
lanatus<br />
PI 179881 India<br />
PI 494529 Nigeria<br />
PI 295845 S. África<br />
AU Producer USA<br />
C. lanatus var.<br />
citroides<br />
PI 189225 Zaire<br />
PI 270563 S. Africa<br />
PI 271769 Transvaal<br />
PI 296343 Cape Province<br />
PI 485583 Botswana<br />
PI 288316 India<br />
PI 532667 Swaziland<br />
Nam1569 Namibia<br />
Nam1884 Namibia<br />
TCN1126 USA<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Since cpDNA sequence analysis did not uncover much variability<br />
within C. lanatus (Dane et al., 2004; Liu, 2005, Figure 1), wild and<br />
cultivated watermelon accessions were surveyed for sequence<br />
diversity at three nuclear regions. Characteristics of the studied<br />
nuclear regions are listed in Table 3. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 81
dehydrogenase (G3pdh) catalyzes the reduction of 1,3<br />
diphosphoglycerate to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate in the cytosol or<br />
chloroplast. <strong>The</strong> N-terminal transit peptide is interrupted by three<br />
introns, two of which are conserved across gymnosperms and<br />
angiosperms. <strong>The</strong> sequenced G3pdh region in C. lanatus spans one<br />
intron (2), flanked by AG and GT motifs typical of nuclear introns,<br />
and a short section of the transit peptide region. Sequence divergence<br />
is high mainly at the intronic region, although one informative 3-bp<br />
deletion (glu) was detected at the transit peptide exon region in some<br />
var. lanatus accessions.<br />
Glutamine synthetase (GS) functions as the major assimilatory<br />
enzyme for ammonia produced from N fixation, and nitrate or<br />
ammonia nutrition. It also reassimilates ammonia released as a result<br />
of photorespiration and the breakdown of proteins and nitrogen<br />
transport compounds. GS is distributed in different subcellular<br />
locations (chloroplast and cytoplasm) and in different tissues and<br />
organs. <strong>The</strong> enzyme is the product of multiple genes with complex<br />
promoters that ensure the expression of the genes in an organ- and<br />
tissue-specific manner and in response to a number of environmental<br />
variables affecting the nutritional status of the cell (Miflin and Habash,<br />
2002). <strong>The</strong> GS primer pairs cover two intron regions of 574 and<br />
113bp, each flanked by GT-AG sequences. Variability between var.<br />
lanatus accessions was detected at one intron region, but very low<br />
between citroides accessions.<br />
Drought-induced polypeptide-1 or Dip-1 belongs to the<br />
ArgE/DapE/Acy1/Cpg2/YcsS protein family, and is strongly induced<br />
in wild watermelon leaves by drought/high-light-stress conditions<br />
(Kawasaki et al., 2000), but the catalytic property of Dip-1 remains to<br />
Table 2. Primer pairs used to sequence Citrullus lanatus nuclear<br />
regions.<br />
GenBank<br />
accession<br />
number Forward primer Reverse primer<br />
Nuclear region<br />
Glyceraldehyde-<br />
3-phosphate<br />
dehydrogenase<br />
Glutamine<br />
synthetase<br />
AI563173 CAGGCTAATGG/<br />
AAAGGGTTT<br />
AI563060 ATGTCTCTGC/<br />
TCTC<br />
Dip-1 AB036420 TGGGTTCTG/<br />
TTCCATCCATT<br />
TTGTATCCTC/<br />
CGCTCCTTCC<br />
TACCTGTCTT/<br />
CTCC<br />
TTGTGAATCT/<br />
GCTGTGTCAA<br />
82 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
e determined. <strong>The</strong> enzyme is known to be encoded by a single gene<br />
and resides within the plastid (Slocum, 2005). <strong>The</strong> Dip primer pair<br />
covers several introns (130, 111, and 529-566bp) and sequence<br />
divergence is high at both intronic and exonic regions (Table 3). One<br />
substitution at an exon results in an amino acid substitution from<br />
serine (at position 274) in var. citroides accessions (and C.<br />
colocynthis) to glycine in var. lanatus.<br />
<strong>The</strong> C. lanatus accessions are characterized by 26 substitution<br />
polymorphisms and six indels at the nuclear regions. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
polymorphisms define a total of at least eight different haplotypes,<br />
while only four haplotypes were detected using cpDNA sequence<br />
analysis (Liu, 2005). Intravarietal differences were detected at the<br />
transit peptide region of G3pdh and intron region of GS and can<br />
subsequently be used to assess colonization patterns. Most of the<br />
accessions showed one nuclear haplotype, but heterozygosity was<br />
detected in PI 532667 and 596656 at the variable sites of the GS<br />
region. Since the PI accessions originate as seed collections and are<br />
maintained and increased under limited isolation, hybridization and<br />
recombination might have occurred and led to heterozygosity at<br />
nuclear regions. Alternatively, the C. lanatus GS shows high sequence<br />
homology with cytolosic GS1 forms of several species, which are<br />
known to be members of a small multigene family and haplotypes<br />
might not be orthologous. Sequence variability at GS was very low<br />
and not very informative.<br />
<strong>The</strong> 3-bp deletion at the G3pdh transit peptide region was found to<br />
be characteristic of egusi-type watermelon. Sequence analysis of<br />
several egusi-type watermelon originating in Nigeria showed this (glu)<br />
deletion in PIs 186490, 189318, 560012, 560023, 5559997, 494527,<br />
and 494529. <strong>The</strong> deletion was also detected in cultivars ‘Au-<br />
Producer’ and ‘Lucky’, but not in watermelons from any other<br />
geographic area (Syria, Afghanistan, India, or southern Africa). It can<br />
thus be hypothesized that the watermelon cultivars were domesticated<br />
from Nigeria. More studies will be forthcoming to test this hypothesis.<br />
<strong>The</strong> citroides accessions can be characterized by unique<br />
substitutions and indels at the nuclear regions, although a low number<br />
of substitutions were common to all citroides accessions. One major<br />
37 bp deletion at the Dip-1 intron is the result of replication slippage<br />
since a 13 bp section of this indel is homologous to contiguous<br />
flanking regions. This deletion was not detected in var. citroides PI<br />
296343, 189225, 288316, and NAM 1569.<br />
Partition homogeneity tests using Paup showed incongruence of<br />
the cpDNA and nuclear sequence data (P=0.01). <strong>The</strong> genomic regions<br />
may have been shaped by different evolutionary processes. Some<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 83
Table 3. Characterization of sections of nuclear regions within C.<br />
lanatus.<br />
Glyceral-<br />
Nuclear Glutamine dehyde-3P<br />
regions synthetase dehydrogenase Dip-1<br />
aligned 620 (575bp 672 (600bp 650-687(428length(bp)<br />
intron) intron) 465 bp intron)<br />
intron AT<br />
content<br />
exon AT<br />
65.0% 64.6% 73.8%<br />
content 52.4% 51.4% 57.5%<br />
var. lanatus PI 1 2 Ts, 1 Tv, 2 ID 2 Ts, 2 Tv, 2 ID 6 Ts, 3 Tv, 1 ID<br />
var. citroides PI 1 Tv 3 Ts, 1 Tv 4 Ts, 1 Tv, 1 ID<br />
Nucleotide<br />
diversity (%)* 0.696 1.121 2.796<br />
1 PI = parsimony informative sites; Ts = transition; Tv = transversion; ID = indel<br />
*Nucleotide diversity refers to Π x 100, calculated at noncoding regions.<br />
forces such as population bottlenecks have a genome-wide effect,<br />
others like recombination and selection may have only a regional<br />
influence. Dating of indels and substitutions is difficult for nuclear<br />
data, but the presence of the large deletion at the dip intron adds<br />
phylogenetic weight to this nuclear marker. Nucleotide diversity was<br />
clearly not random along the nuclear genome (Table 3). This<br />
unevenness is associated with differences in recombination rate, gene<br />
density in the genomic region, transmission pattern, and selection<br />
strength (Zhang and Hewitt, 2003). <strong>The</strong> lowest number of nuclear<br />
polymorphic sites was observed in PI 288316 from India, possibly due<br />
to isolation and founder effect, the highest number (9) in accessions<br />
from Namibia and South Africa, probably the center of origin of<br />
watermelon. Minimum spanning trees (Figure 2) using substitutions at<br />
two nuclear regions divide the citroides accessions into two main<br />
groups. <strong>The</strong> small group of accessions from S. Africa (PI 189225,<br />
296343, and 271769) might be considered as ancestral, since they lack<br />
the large informative indel at dip. Information gained from the<br />
cpDNA analysis shows the ancestral chlorotype in PI 596656 and<br />
532667. Traditional phylogenetic analysis methods are not the most<br />
appropriate for analyzing intraspecific polymorphic data (Zhang and<br />
Hewitt, 2003) since rare polymorphisms such as singletons are treated<br />
as noninformative from a parsimony perspective. Results from cpDNA<br />
84 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Fig. 1. Minimum spanning haplotype tree representing the relationships<br />
between Citrullus lanatus accessions inferred from sequence information at the<br />
trnS-trnG, atpA-trnR, trnE-trnT regions of the chloroplast genome (Liu, 2005).<br />
Large open circles represent observed haplotypes. Lines between haplotypes<br />
indicate mutational steps. Small circles, squares, and diamond indicate type of<br />
nucleotide substitution. <strong>The</strong> size of deletions is given in bp. <strong>The</strong> order of<br />
mutations on the branches is arbitrary.<br />
and nuclear DNA analyses support the divergence of var. lanatus and<br />
var. citroides from a common ancestor and little molecular exchange<br />
between them (Figures 1 and 2).<br />
<strong>The</strong> amount of genetic variation in cultivated crop plants is<br />
shaped in part by the way genetic material is passed from one<br />
cultivated generation to the next. In cucurbits, seeds from a limited<br />
number of wild plants were used to form cultivated populations. <strong>The</strong><br />
resulting founder effect, coupled with ongoing selection of seeds from<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 85
Fig. 2. Minimum spanning haplotype tree representing the relationships<br />
between Citrullus lanatus accessions inferred from sequence information of the<br />
glyceraldehyde- 3P-dehydrogenase and Dip nuclear genes. Observed haplotypes<br />
are in large open circles. Lines between haplotypes indicate mutational steps,<br />
small circles and squares indicate type of nucleotide substitution. <strong>The</strong> size of<br />
deletions is given in bp. <strong>The</strong> order of mutations on the branches is arbitrary.<br />
the initial pool of cultivated genotypes, produced a genetic bottleneck<br />
in the cultivated populations. Intense artificial selection during<br />
domestication results in a progressive narrowing of the genetic base of<br />
the cultivated populations. In recent times, the genetic base of<br />
cultivated populations most likely has been reduced further as modern<br />
crop-improvement programs have selectively bred only a small subset<br />
of the original cultivated gene pool (Gepts, 2003). This is clearly the<br />
case in watermelon, which is known for its narrow genetic base (Levi<br />
et al., 2004, 2005), indicating that bottlenecks have reduced the<br />
amount of genetic variability in the cultivated crop. <strong>The</strong> G3pdh and<br />
Dip primers used are applicable for intraspecific studies since they are<br />
evolutionarily conserved across different taxonomic groups and their<br />
target sequences are single or low-copy. At the nuclear regions<br />
substitutions in var. lanatus accessions were higher than in var.<br />
citroides accessions, indicative of the effects of selection and<br />
domestication. One major evolutionarily recent deletion at a nuclear<br />
86 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
intron points to citroides accessions from southern Africa as ancestral,<br />
supporting migration patterns from southern Africa to the U.S. and<br />
India.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Avise, J. C. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard<br />
University Press, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Dane, F. 2002. Chloroplast DNA investigations in Citrullus using PCR-RFLP<br />
analysis, p. 100–108. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS Press,<br />
Naples, FL.<br />
Dane, F. and P. Lang. 2004. Sequence variation at cpDNA regions of watermelon<br />
and related species: implications for the evolution of Citrullus haplotypes. Am.<br />
J. Bot. 91:1922–1929.<br />
Dane, F., P. Lang, and R. Bakhtiyarova. 2004. Comparative analysis of chloroplast<br />
DNA variability in wild and cultivated Citrullus species. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
108:958–966.<br />
Gepts, P. 2003. Ten thousand years of crop evolution. In: M. J. Chrispeels and D. E.<br />
Sadava (eds). Plants, genes and crop biotechnology. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury,<br />
MA.<br />
Hepper, F. N. 1990. Pharaoh’s flowers: the botanical treasures of Tutankhamun.<br />
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London.<br />
Jeffrey, C. 1990. Systematics of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae: an overview. Cornell University<br />
Press, Ithaca, NY.<br />
Kawasaki, S., C. Miyake, T. Kohchi, S. Fujii, M. Uchida, and A. Yokota. 2000.<br />
Responses of wild watermelon to drought stress: accumulation of an ArgE<br />
homologue and citrulline in leaves during water deficits. Plant Cell Physiol.<br />
41:864–873.<br />
Levi, A. and C. E. Thomas. 2005. Polymorphisms among chloroplast and<br />
mitochondrial genomes of Citrullus species and subspecies. Gen. Res. & Crop<br />
Evol. 52:609–617.<br />
Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, M. Newman, O. U. K. Reddy, and X. Zhang. 2004. ISSR<br />
and AFLP markers sufficiently differ among American watermelon cultivars<br />
with limited genetic diversity. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:553–558.<br />
Liu, J. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)<br />
Matsum & Nakai) based on chloroplast, nuclear sequence and AFLP molecular<br />
marker data. MS <strong>The</strong>sis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.<br />
Maynard, D. N. 2001. An introduction to the watermelon. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />
VA.<br />
Miflin, B. J. and D. Z. Habash, 2002. <strong>The</strong> role of glutamine synthetase and glutamate<br />
dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation and possibilities for improvement in<br />
nitrogen utilization of crops. J. Exp. Bot. 53:979–987.<br />
Olsen, K. M. 2002. Population history of Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae)<br />
inferred from nuclear DNA sequences. Molec. Ecol. 11:901–911.<br />
Petit, R. J., J. Duminil, S. Fineschi, A. Hampe, D. Salvini, and G. G. Vendramin.<br />
2005. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear<br />
diversity in plant populations. Molec. Ecol. 14:689–701.<br />
Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />
New York.<br />
Sauer, J. D. 1993. Historical geography of crop plants. CRC press, Boca Raton, FL.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 87
Slocum, R. D. 2005. Genes, enzymes and regulation of arginine biosynthesis in<br />
plants. Plant Physiol. & Biochem. 43:729–745.<br />
Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. 1998. Molecular systematics of plants II.<br />
DNA sequencing. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />
Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other<br />
methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.<br />
Zhang, D.-X. and G. M. Hewitt. 2003. Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of<br />
populations: practice, problems and prospects. Molec. Ecol. 12:563–584.<br />
Zohary, D. and M. Hopf. 2000. Domestication of plants in the old world. Oxford<br />
University Press, Oxford, UK.<br />
88 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
FINE GENETICAL AND PHYSICAL MAPPING<br />
OF THE GENES A AND G CONTROLLING SEX<br />
DETERMINATION IN MELON<br />
M. Fergany, C. Troadec, M. Rajab, A. Boualem, M. Dalmais, M.<br />
Caboche, and A. Bendahmane<br />
INRA, URGV, Evry, France<br />
D. Besombes, N. Giovinazzo, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat<br />
INRA, GAFL, Avignon-Montfavet, France<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, flower biology, monoecious,<br />
gynoecious, hermaphrodite, andromonoecious, genetic map<br />
ABSTRACT. Sex expression in melon (Cucumis melo L.) is controlled by 2 major<br />
genes: andromonoecious controls the presence (allele a) or the absence (allele a +<br />
or A) of stamens in the female flowers and gynoecious controls the absence<br />
(allele g) or the presence (allele g + or G) of male flowers on a plant. A program<br />
of positional cloning has been developed for these 2 genes. AFLPs linked to the 2<br />
loci were selected by the Bulk Segregant Analysis method. <strong>The</strong> identified AFLPs<br />
were transformed into PCR specific markers and mapped on more than 5000<br />
plants segregating for a or g loci. In this analysis, the markers M23 and M58<br />
were mapped at 0.23 cM and 3 cM from the a and g loci, respectively. A melon<br />
BAC library of more than 120,000 clones was built and screened to isolate BAC<br />
clones carrying the targeted loci.<br />
M<br />
ost of the higher plants (angiosperms) have hermaphrodite<br />
flowers but some are monoecious or dioecious, for instance<br />
in the Betulaceae, Salicineae, Fagaceae, Juglandaceae, and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae families. Understanding the genetic control and the<br />
biological processes leading to sex expression is of great interest for<br />
plant breeding and for producing hybrid seeds.<br />
Most species in the genus Cucumis are monoecious, with the<br />
exception of C. heptadactylus, C. kalahariensis, C. hirsutus, and C.<br />
baladensis, which are dioecious (Kirkbride, 1993). In cucumber (C.<br />
sativus L.), almost all traditional cultivars are monoecious. In the<br />
second part of the twentieth century, breeders have developed<br />
gynoecious cultivars. <strong>The</strong> genetic control of sex expression is based on<br />
two main genes (Rosa, 1928; Galun, 1961; Rowe, 1969): the gene<br />
Female (symbol F) controls the high frequency of pistillated flowers<br />
on a plant and the gene monoecious / andromonoecious (symbol m)<br />
controls the presence of stamens in pistillate flowers. Interaction<br />
between F and m results in four phenotypes: hermaphrodite (Fm),<br />
gynoecious (FM), monoecious (fM), and andromonoecious (fm).<br />
Another major gene (androecious, symbol a) controls the presence of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 89
mainly staminated flowers (phenotype androecious) if the recessive<br />
allele f is present. <strong>The</strong> gene F has been identified as an ACC synthase<br />
(Mibus and Tatlioglu, 2004).<br />
Wild melons (C. melo) are monoecious but about 60–70 % of<br />
cultivated melon accessions are andromonoecious. Monoecism is<br />
found mainly in the flexuosus, acidulus, chate, and mormordica<br />
groups. As in cucumber, andromonoecism is controlled by one gene<br />
(Rosa, 1928), which was first named monoecious (symbol M) and now<br />
andromonoecious (symbol a). Another phenotype, hermaphroditism,<br />
has been found in very few accessions. In 1937, Poole and Grimball<br />
identified in Charleston (SC) 5 hermaphroditic accessions from China,<br />
among 48 monoecious and 339 andromonecious ones. <strong>The</strong>y studied<br />
the genetic control in crosses of monoecious x hermaphrodite and<br />
andromonoecious x hermaphrodite and they concluded to the action of<br />
a gene named gynoecious (symbol g), independent from a (Poole and<br />
Grimball, 1939). Interaction between the two loci is as follows: AG<br />
monoecious, Ag gynoecious, aG andromonoecious, and ag<br />
hermaphrodite. Gynoecious lines including WI 998 have been<br />
developed from this material (Rowe, 1969; Peterson et al., 1983). At<br />
the same time, Kubicki in Poland was also studying the genetic control<br />
of sex expression. He used an “uncultured hermaphroditic form”<br />
received from the All-Union Institute of Plant Industry in the Soviet<br />
Union. He also concluded at two loci with major effects and modifiers<br />
(Kubicki, 1969). Genetic controls in melon and in cucumber are very<br />
similar: alleles m and F in cucumber corresponding respectively to the<br />
alleles a and g in melon. It should however be noted that F in<br />
cucumber is dominant, whereas g in melon is recessive.<br />
We have developed a program of positional cloning for both genes<br />
a and g in melon. We will present here the first results of the fine<br />
genetical and physical mapping of these genes.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIALS. Five melon accessions were used: PI 124112<br />
is a monoecious line (genotype AAGG) from India; ‘Védrantais’ is an<br />
andromonoecious cultivar (genotype aaGG) in the Charentais type<br />
released by Vilmorin seed company; PI 161375 is an<br />
andromonoecious cultivar from Korea; ‘Gynadou’ is a gynoecious line<br />
(4 th backcross followed by selfing) in the Charentais type derived at<br />
INRA in Avignon-Montfavet from a white mealy flesh line received<br />
from B. Kubicki in 1967; ‘WI 998’ is a gynoecious line (genotype<br />
AAgg) released by the Michigan <strong>State</strong> University (Peterson et al.,<br />
90 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
1983) and derived from an hermaphrodite accession from China<br />
studied by Poole and Grimball.<br />
MAPPING POPULATIONS. Population of recombinant inbred lines<br />
(RILs) ‘Védrantais’ x PI 124112 was already available (Perchepied et<br />
al., 2005). Backcross populations BCa = (‘Védrantais’ x PI 124112) x<br />
‘Védrantais’ and BCg = Gynadou x (Gynadou x PI 124112) have been<br />
developed.<br />
MOLECULAR MARKERS. AFLP analysis was carried out (Vos et<br />
al., 1995) using PstI and MseI primer combinations. Genomic DNA<br />
was extracted using standard procedures. Analysis was performed on<br />
bulked DNA samples of monoecious and andromonoecious plants for<br />
the a locus and monoecious and gynoecious plants for the g locus. To<br />
identify plants carrying recombination events linked to a and g loci,<br />
DNA samples were extracted from more than 5000 segregating plants<br />
and analyzed using the a- and g-flanking markers, respectively. Map<br />
distances are given in centimorgans, and represent the percentage of<br />
recombinant plants in the total number of plants analyzed.<br />
GENOMIC LIBRARY. A melon BAC library was prepared from<br />
nuclei extracted from line PI 124112, based on the method described<br />
in Peterson et al. (2000). <strong>The</strong> library consists of 120,000 BAC clones.<br />
To assess the insert size of the BAC clones, plasmid DNA was isolated<br />
from more than 100 randomly chosen clones, digested with NotI and<br />
analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, as described previously<br />
(Kanyuka et al., 1999). <strong>The</strong> screening of the BAC library was<br />
performed as described by Kanyuka et al. (1999).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
ALLELISM TESTS. All the plants in F1 and F2 progenies between<br />
‘Gynadou’ and ‘WI 998’ were gynoecious. Previously, a 3 gynoecious<br />
vs. 1 hermaphrodite segregation has been observed in crosses between<br />
a “Polish hermaphrodite” and gynoecious material derived from a<br />
Chinese line studied by Poole and Grimball (Rowe, 1969). Thus it is<br />
highly probable that the same locus g is involved in plants studied by<br />
Poole and Grimball (1939) and by Kubicki (1969).<br />
MAPPING OF THE LOCUS a. <strong>The</strong> locus a has previously been<br />
mapped on linkage group II (Périn et al., 2002) and is linked to the<br />
locus Zym for Zucchini Yellow Mosaic-virus resistance. One thousand<br />
twenty-four combinations of primers were used on 2 bulks of<br />
monoecious and 2 bulks of andromonoecious plants derived from the<br />
BCa population including 15 plants per bulk. <strong>The</strong> promising markers<br />
were mapped on the RIL population ‘Védrantais’ x PI 124112 and on<br />
96 plants of the BCa population. M19 and M47 are 2 markers flanking<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 91
0<br />
3<br />
3<br />
M17<br />
M47<br />
A M23<br />
M19 M64<br />
0<br />
9<br />
4<br />
5<br />
M17<br />
M47<br />
A M23<br />
M19 M64<br />
0<br />
3<br />
2<br />
Fig. 1. Genetic map around the locus a on LG II on 1 = 120 RILs Védrantais x<br />
PI 124112; 2 = 96 plants of the backcross population BCa = (Védrantais x<br />
PI 124112) x Védrantais; 3 = 5000 plants of BCa. Marker M23 cosegregates<br />
with the locus a on the first two populations and is at 0.23 cM from a on<br />
population 3; 4 = Construction of a BAC contig overlapping the a locus.<br />
Fig. 2. Genetic and physical map of the g locus: 1 = Fine genetic map around the<br />
g locus on 5000 plants of the BCg = Gynadou x (Gynadou x PI 124112) progeny;<br />
2 = Construction of a BAC contig overlapping the g locus.<br />
M47<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
M64<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
92 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
the locus a and M23 cosegregates with a (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong>se 3 AFLP<br />
markers have been transformed in PCR specific markers and used to<br />
screen 5000 plants of the BCa population. Marker M23 could be<br />
separated from the locus a with 11 recombinant plants corresponding<br />
to 0.23 cM. <strong>The</strong> closest marker from a previously described was a<br />
SCAR derived from an AFLP at 5.5cM (Noguera et al., 2005).<br />
MAPPING OF THE LOCUS g. We identified AFLP markers tightly<br />
linked to the g locus by screening 1024 AFLP primer combinations on<br />
DNAs derived from bulked monoecious or gynoecious segregant<br />
plants from the BCg population. <strong>The</strong> obtained AFLPs were mapped<br />
relative to the g locus in a population of 5000 segregants to develop a<br />
high-resolution genetic map. In this analysis the g locus was delimited<br />
to a genetic interval of 5cM (Figure 2).<br />
PHYSICAL MAPPING OF THE a AND g LOCI. To isolate DNA clones<br />
carrying the a or g loci, a BAC library was constructed from nuclear<br />
DNA derived from a line homozygous for the a and g alleles. <strong>The</strong><br />
library consists of 120,000 clones and represents the haploid melon<br />
genome at least 23 times over. Using a systematic PCR-based<br />
procedure, the library was screened with markers linked to a or g loci<br />
(Figs. 1 and 2). Positive BAC clones were isolated and aligned in 2<br />
single overlapping contigs.<br />
Conclusions<br />
As many recombinants have been identified in the vicinity of a and<br />
g the next step will include the anchoring of the BAC contigs to the<br />
genetic map. <strong>The</strong> outcome of this experiment will be the genetic<br />
delimitation of the a and g loci to single BAC clones. <strong>The</strong> identified<br />
BAC clones will be sequenced and annotated. <strong>The</strong> predicted genes will<br />
then be mapped relative to the identified recombination events.<br />
Complementation studies will be carried out in melon and<br />
Arabidopsis.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Galun, E. 1961. Study of the inheritance of sex expression in the cucumber, the<br />
interactions of major genes with modifying genetic and non-genetic factors.<br />
Genetica. 32:134f–163.<br />
Kanyuka, K., A. Bendahmane, J. N. A. M. Rouppe van der Voort, E. A. G. van der<br />
Vossen, and D. C. Baulcombe. 1999. Mapping of intra-locus duplications and<br />
introgressed DNA: aids to map-based cloning of genes from complex genomes<br />
illustrated by physical analysis of the Rx locus in tetraploid potato. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl.<br />
Genet. 98:679f–689.<br />
Kirkbride, J. H. (ed.). 1993. Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumis<br />
(cucurbitaceae). Parkway, Boone, NC.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 93
Kubicki, B. 1969. Sex determination in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Genet<br />
Polonica. 10:145f–165.<br />
Mibus, H. and T. Tatlioglu. 2004. Molecular characterization and isolation of the F/f<br />
gene for femaleness in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
109:1669f–1676.<br />
Noguera, F. J., J. Capel, J.I . Alvarez, and R. Lozano. 2005. Development and<br />
mapping of a codominant SCAR marker linked to the andromonoecious gene of<br />
melon. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 110:714f–720.<br />
Perchepied, L., M. Bardin, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat. 2005. Relationship between<br />
loci conferring downy mildew and powdery mildew resistance in melon<br />
assessed by QTL mapping. Phytopathology. 95:556f–565.<br />
Périn, C., L. S. Hagen, V. de Conto, N. Katzir, Y. Danin-Poleg, V. Portnoy, S.<br />
Baudracco-Arnas, J. Chadoeuf, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat. 2002. A reference<br />
map of Cucumis melo based on two recombinant inbred line populations. <strong>The</strong>or.<br />
Appl. Genet. 104:1017f–1034.<br />
Peterson, C. E., K. W. Owens, and P. R. Rowe. 1983. Wisconsin 998 muskmelon<br />
germplasm. HortSci. 18:116.<br />
Peterson, D. G., J. P. Tomkins, D. A. Frisch, R. A. Wing, and A. H. Paterson. 2000.<br />
Construction of plant bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries: an<br />
illustrated guide. J. Agricult. Genom. 5:1f–3.<br />
Poole, C. F. and P. C. Grimball. 1939. Inheritance of new sex forms in Cucumis melo<br />
L. J. Hered. 30:21f–25.<br />
Rosa, J. T. 1928. <strong>The</strong> inheritance of flower types in Cucumis and Citrullus.<br />
Hilgardia. 3:233f–250.<br />
Rowe, P. R. 1969. <strong>The</strong> genetics of sex expression and fruit shape, staminate flower<br />
induction, and F1 hybrid feasibility of a gynoecious muskmelon. PhD Diss.,<br />
Department of Horticulture, Michigan <strong>State</strong> University, Lansing.<br />
Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J.<br />
Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA<br />
fingerprinting. Nucleic Acid Res. 23:4407f–4414.<br />
94 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS ANALYSIS OF<br />
POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANCE AGAINST<br />
TWO STRAINS OF PODOSPHAERA XANTHII<br />
IN THE MELON LINE ‘PMAR NO. 5’<br />
N. Fukino, T. Ohara, Y. Sakata, M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto<br />
National Institute of Vegetable and Tea Science, Tsu, Mie 514-2392,<br />
Japan<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, genetic mapping, recombinant<br />
inbred lines<br />
ABSTRACT. Due to the appearance of new races of Podosphaera xanthii (syn.<br />
Sphaerotheca fuliginea), leading melon varieties in Japan that had previously<br />
been considered resistant are now frequently infected by powdery mildew. <strong>The</strong><br />
melon breeding line ‘PMAR No. 5’ (thought to be ‘AR5’) is resistant to these new<br />
races. To elucidate the relationship between resistance genes and strains, we<br />
constructed a genetic-linkage map of melon with a recombinant inbred line<br />
(RIL) population derived from a cross between ‘PMAR No. 5’ and the<br />
susceptible cultivar ‘Harukei 3’. Inoculations on leaf disks of this population<br />
were accomplished using two strains of P. xanthii (pxA and pxB). Quantitative<br />
trait locus (QTL) analysis allowed the detection of two QTLs on Linkage Groups<br />
II and XII at a significance threshold of 3.0. One QTL is responsible for<br />
resistance to both pxA and pxB at the cotyledon and the first-leaf stage, and the<br />
other QTL is responsible for pxA at both stages and pxB at the first-leaf stage.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, it is more likely that the effects of the two QTLs differ depending on<br />
the strain and the stage. ‘PMAR No. 5’ will be useful as a source of resistance to<br />
powdery mildew in melon breeding in Japan.<br />
P<br />
owdery mildew caused by Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne) U.<br />
Braun & S. Takam and Erysiphe cichoracearum DC limits the<br />
production of melons (Cucumis melo L.) worldwide (Sitterly,<br />
1978), with E. cichoracearum being less important than P. xanthii as the<br />
causal agent of powdery mildew. Although many melon cultivars that<br />
are resistant to powdery mildew have been produced in Japan, they are<br />
now being severely infected with powdery mildew, and the appearance<br />
of new races of P. xanthii has been reported (Hosoya et al., 1999;<br />
Orihara et al., 2001). Accordingly, melon cultivars with resistance to the<br />
new races are needed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> melon breeding line ‘PMAR No. 5’ (Yoshida & Kohyama,<br />
1986) was introduced from the University of California in 1981 and is<br />
thought to be ‘AR5’. It shows strong resistance to powdery mildew and<br />
has been used for breeding. Fukino et al. (2004a) reported that two<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 95
genes control the resistance of ‘PMAR No. 5’ to Race 1, but no reports<br />
have discussed DNA markers or provided a quantitative trait locus<br />
(QTL) analysis of powdery mildew resistance in ‘PMAR No. 5’.<br />
Because resistance to powdery mildew is greatly susceptible to<br />
environmental factors, marker-assisted selection of this trait is in great<br />
demand. Here we report the construction of a genetic-linkage map with<br />
a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross<br />
between ‘PMAR No. 5’ and ‘Harukei 3’ (type ‘Earl’s Favorite,’ which is<br />
susceptible to powdery mildew), and QTL analysis of powdery mildew<br />
resistance using two strains differing in their degree of virulence.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIALS. <strong>The</strong> population used in this study consisted of<br />
93 RILs derived from single seed descent of a cross between ‘PMAR<br />
No. 5’ and ‘Harukei 3’. RILs, their parents, and F1 plants were used for<br />
the test. Five seeds per line were sown in 34 × 48cm flats and were<br />
grown in a phytotron (28°C [day] and 20°C [night] with a 12-h<br />
photoperiod).<br />
POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANCE TEST. Two strains (tentatively<br />
denoted pxA and pxB) of P. xanthii were used for the test. <strong>The</strong> responses<br />
of these strains to the differential genotypes of melon are shown in<br />
Table 1.<br />
Leaf disks were cut from the cotyledons and first leaves and placed<br />
face up on medium with 8g/L agar in petri dishes. Three disks were used,<br />
and two independent trials were performed for each test.<br />
Table 1. Response of two strains of Podosphaera xanthii (pxA, pxB) to<br />
differential genotypes of melon. Genotypes were evaluated at the<br />
cotyledon (C) and first-leaf (FL) stages.<br />
pxA pxB<br />
Genotype C FL C FL<br />
Harukei 3 (‘Earl’s Favorite’) S S S S<br />
PMR45 M R R R<br />
WMR29 R R R R<br />
Edito47 M R R R<br />
PI414723 S S M R<br />
PMR5 R R R R<br />
MR1 M M R R<br />
R = resistant; M = moderately resistant; S = susceptible.<br />
96 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Inoculation of powdery mildew was performed by spraying a<br />
conidial suspension (Morishita et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> petri dishes were then<br />
covered and incubated at 25°C. After 10 to 14 days, a disease index (DI)<br />
indicating the degree of sporulation was scored on a scale of 0 (no<br />
sporulation) to 5 (entire disk covered with heavy sporulation) using a<br />
visual rating system.<br />
MOLECULAR MARKERS AND DATA ANALYSIS. Genomic DNA was<br />
extracted from leaf tissue as described by Fukino et al. (2002). Random<br />
amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence<br />
repeat (SSR) analyses were performed as described by Nunome et al.<br />
(2001) and Fukino et al. (2004b), respectively. Cleavage amplified<br />
polymorphic sequence (CAPS) analysis followed the procedure of<br />
Kunihisa et al. (2003). Linkage and QTL analyses were performed<br />
using MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0 (Lander et al., 1987 and<br />
MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1 (Lincoln et al., 1993), respectively.)<br />
II XII<br />
pxA(C), pxA(FL),<br />
pxB(FL)<br />
pxA(C), pxA(FL),<br />
pxB(C), pxB(FL)<br />
Fig. 1. Map locations of QTLs involved in resistance against two strains of<br />
Podosphaera xanthii.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In each test, ‘PMAR No. 5’ showed no symptoms, whereas ‘Harukei<br />
3’ was severely infected. F1 plants were moderately resistant to pxA and<br />
resistant to pxB. Average DI values of each RI line showed a continuous<br />
segregation from susceptible to resistant, suggesting the polygenic<br />
nature of this trait.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 97
<strong>The</strong> responses of 47 Japanese commercial F1 cultivars to both<br />
strains were tested (data not shown). Most cultivars were susceptible to<br />
pxA at both the cotyledon and first-leaf stages. <strong>The</strong> response to pxB was<br />
very different depending on the stage; at the cotyledon stage, 46<br />
cultivars were susceptible, whereas at the first-leaf stage, only 11<br />
cultivars were susceptible. This result indicates that the genetic system<br />
controlling resistance to the pxB strain differs depending on the growth<br />
stage.<br />
<strong>The</strong> constructed map spans 1,024cM consisting of 183 markers,<br />
which include 169 SSRs, 10 CAPs, and 13 RAPDs segregating into 18<br />
linkage groups. <strong>The</strong> localization of the QTLs is represented in Figure 1.<br />
Two QTLs were detected on Linkage Groups II and XII at a significance<br />
threshold of 3.0. Resistance to the pxA strain is conditioned by two<br />
QTLs at both the cotyledon and first-leaf stage, and the effects of two<br />
QTLs were similar and explained about 30% of the phenotypic variation.<br />
Resistance to pxB is controlled by one major QTL on Linkage Group<br />
XII at the cotyledon stage, and by two QTLs at the first-leaf stage. <strong>The</strong><br />
effect of QTLs on Linkage Group XII was much larger than on LG II,<br />
explaining 46.7% (cotyledon) and 48.7% (first leaf) of the observed<br />
phenotypic variation. This suggests that the effects of the two QTLs<br />
differ depending on the strain and the stage. Further studies will be<br />
necessary to clarify the relationship between powdery mildew strains<br />
and resistance genes. Most Japanese cultivars were susceptible to pxA<br />
at both stages and pxB at the cotyledon stage. As ‘PMAR No. 5’ is<br />
resistant to both strains at both stages, introduction of the resistance<br />
genes of ‘PMAR No. 5’ into those cultivars will enhance the resistance<br />
of Japanese cultivars.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Fukino, N., M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto. 2004a. Characterization of recombinant<br />
inbred lines derived from crosses in melon (Cucumis melo L.), ‘PMAR No. 5’ ×<br />
‘Harukei No.3.’ Breed. Sci. 54:141–145.<br />
Fukino, N., M. Kuzuya, M. Kunihisa, and S. Matsumoto. 2004b. Characterization of<br />
simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and development of SSR markers in melon<br />
(Cucumis melo). Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004. 503–506.<br />
Fukino, N., M. Taneishi, T. Saito, T. Nishijima, and M. Hirai. 2002. Construction of a<br />
linkage map and genetic analysis for resistance to cotton aphid and powdery<br />
mildew in melon. Acta Hort. 588:283–286.<br />
Hosoya, K., N. Narisawa, M. Pitrat, and H. Ezura. 1999. Race identification in<br />
powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea) on melon (Cucumis melo) in Jpn. Plant<br />
Breed. 118:259–262.<br />
Kunihisa, M., N. Fukino, and S. Matsumoto. 2003. Development of cleavage<br />
amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers for identification of strawberry<br />
cultivars. Euphytica. 134:209–215.<br />
98 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Lander, E. S., P. Green, J. Abrahamson, A. Barlow, M. J. Daly, S. E. Lincoln, and L.<br />
Newburg. 1987. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing<br />
primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics.<br />
1:174–181.<br />
Lincoln, S., M. Daly, and E. S. Lander. 1993. Mapping genes controlling quantitative<br />
traits with MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1. Whitehead Institute technical report.<br />
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Morishita, M., K. Sugiyama, T. Saito, and Y. Sakata. 2003. Powdery mildew resistance<br />
in cucumber. Jpn. Agric. Res. Quart. 37(1):7–14.<br />
Nunome, T., K. Ishiguro, T. Yoshida, and M. Hirai. 2001. Mapping of fruit shape and<br />
color development traits in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) based on RAPD<br />
and AFLP markers. Breed. Sci. 51:19–26.<br />
Orihara, N., H. Uekusa, K. Kusano, K. Abiko, and M. Morishita 2001. Race<br />
differentiation of melon powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fuliginea) from<br />
Kanagawa Prefecture, and the relationship between races and resistance of<br />
commercial varieties. Ann. Rep. Kanto-Tosan Plant Protect. Soc. 48:45–48.<br />
Sitterly, W. R. 1978. Powdery mildew of cucurbits, p. 359–379. In: D. M. Spencer<br />
(ed.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. Academic Press, New York.<br />
Yoshida,T. and T. Kohyama 1986. Mechanisms, genetics and selection methods of<br />
aphid resistance in melons, Cucumis melo. Bull. Veg. & Orn. Crops Res. Station<br />
Series C (Kurume). 9:1–12.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 99
LINKAGE ANALYSIS AMONG RESISTANCES<br />
TO POWDERY MILDEW AND VIRUS<br />
TRANSMISSION BY APHIS GOSSYPII<br />
GLOVER IN MELON LINE ‘TGR-1551’<br />
M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, A. I. López-Sesé, E. Sarria,<br />
and F. J. Yuste-Lisbona<br />
Estación Experimental ‘La Mayora,’ CSIC, 29750 Algarrobo, Málaga,<br />
Spain<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Genetic distance, Cucumis melo, Podosphaera<br />
xanthii<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> melon accession ‘TGR-1551’ shows resistance to Races 1, 2, and<br />
5 of powdery mildew and to virus transmission by A. gossypii. Linkage<br />
relationships of these four resistances were studied in a segregation F2<br />
population obtained from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola de Oro’. A<br />
very tight linkage (a distance of 2 to 4cM) among the powdery mildewresistance<br />
genes has been found. <strong>The</strong> segregation ratios (R:S) observed allow<br />
establishing the hypothesis that powdery mildew resistance is controlled by a<br />
double dominant and recessive interaction, where there could be three<br />
dominant genes tightly linked that provide specific resistance to Races 1, 2, and<br />
5 of P. xanthii, and one recessive gene that confers horizontal resistance to the<br />
three races. <strong>The</strong> estimated distance among powdery-mildew-resistance and<br />
virus-transmission-resistance genes was approximately 17cM.<br />
P<br />
owdery mildew is an important disease of cucurbits worldwide,<br />
with the reduction of quality and crop yield the most striking<br />
aspects of loss to the disease (Sitterly, 1978). Two fungal<br />
species, Podosphaera xanthii (DC.) VP. Gelyuta and Golovinomyces<br />
cichoracearum, (Castagne) U. Braun & N. Shishkoff have been<br />
reported as the common agents of powdery mildew in melon, although<br />
P. xanthii is the species usually found in regions with a temperate<br />
climate (Bertrand and Pitrat, 1989; Kenigsbuch and Cohen, 1992;<br />
Vakalounakis et al., 1994). Several physiological races of P. xanthii<br />
have been described according to the reactions of differential melon<br />
lines. To date, many races of this species have been differentiated<br />
(McCreight, 2006). <strong>The</strong> predominating race of powdery mildew<br />
changes depending on the melon cultivar, the cultivation season, and<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors thank the great collaboration of R. Tobar in all the experiments. This<br />
work has been financed by the CICYT Research Project: AGL2005-03850-C02-01.<br />
100 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
the geographical area studied (Hosoya et al., 2000), with Races 1, 2,<br />
and 5 being the most extensive in southern European regions (Bardin<br />
et al., 1997; Bertrand, 1991; Del Pino et al., 2002; Olalla, 2001).<br />
Viral diseases are the main cause of serious yield losses in<br />
cucurbits crops worldwide. Among them, the cucumovirus Cucumber<br />
mosaic virus (CMV) and the potyviruses Watermelon mosaic virus<br />
(WMV), Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), and Papaya ringspot<br />
virus-W (PRSV-W) are some of the most widespread in melon crops<br />
(Lovisolo, 1980; Luis-Arteaga et al., 1998; Nameth et al., 1986). <strong>The</strong>se<br />
viruses are naturally transmitted by aphids in a nonpersistent manner<br />
(Pirone and Harris, 1970), with the cotton-melon aphid, Aphis gossypii<br />
Glover, being one of the most important vectors (Lecoq et al., 1979).<br />
Fungicide applications are the main means of powdery mildew<br />
control, but in spite of these measures, powdery mildew continues to<br />
impose serious limitations on cucurbit production throughout the<br />
world (Zitter et al., 1996). Control of nonpersistently transmitted<br />
viruses by means of insecticide spraying against their vectors or other<br />
crop-management practices is ineffective (Loebenstein and Raccah,<br />
1980). One of the most successful procedures for controlling plant<br />
diseases is the development of resistant cultivars. Genetic resistance<br />
to diseases is one of the main components of integrated plant<br />
protection systems (Heitefuss, 1989).<br />
Melon resistance to powdery mildew has been studied for a long<br />
time and several sources of resistance have been described for Races 1<br />
and 2 (Jagger et al., 1938; Bohn and Whitaker, 1964; Epinat et al.,<br />
1993; Kenigsbuch and Cohen, 1992; Perchepied et al., 2005).<br />
Nevertheless, the inheritance of resistance remains somewhat<br />
confusing, due mainly to environmental conditions affecting trait<br />
expression (Cohen et al., 1996, 2002). <strong>The</strong>re are not many virusresistance<br />
sources in melons, so indirect resistance to viruses could be<br />
incorporated by using genes conferring resistance to virus<br />
transmission. <strong>The</strong> Korean melon line PI 161375 was reported to show<br />
resistance to virus transmission by A. gossypii conferred by the Vat<br />
gene (Lecoq et al., 1979).<br />
<strong>The</strong> melon accession ‘TGR-1551’ from Zimbabwe shows<br />
resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of powdery mildew (Gómez-Guillamón<br />
et al., 1995, 1998). In addition, ‘TGR-1551’ presents resistance to<br />
virus transmission by A. gossypii, and this resistance seems to be<br />
controlled by a single dominant gene different from Vat (Soria et al.,<br />
2003). Linkage between resistance genes has been reported in<br />
previous works. Thus, Pitrat (1991) described that resistance to virus<br />
transmission mediated by Vat appears to be tightly linked to resistance<br />
to powdery mildew provided by Pm-W (0cM). Bardin et al. (1999),<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 101
Anagnostou et al. (2000), and Klinger et al. (2001) support the<br />
hypothesis of the existence of resistance-gene clusters in melon.<br />
Montoro et al. (2004) established that resistances to powdery<br />
mildew Race 5 and to virus transmission by aphid are linked in ‘TGR-<br />
1551’. In the current study, resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of P.<br />
xanthii and to virus transmission by A. gossypii have been evaluated in<br />
the F2 population obtained from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and<br />
the susceptible cultivar ‘Bola de Oro’. Linkage among the genes<br />
involved in the resistances to the different races of powdery mildew<br />
has been estimated, as well as the linkage to the virus-transmissionresistance<br />
gene.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
Ten plants of the resistant parental ‘TGR-1551’, the susceptible<br />
parental ‘Bola de Oro’, and their F1, and 295 plants of the F2 were<br />
evaluated. Scions from each plant were taken before inoculation in<br />
order to inoculate the same genotypes with both powdery mildew and<br />
virus transmission by aphid.<br />
Artificial inoculation of powdery mildew was done by depositing a<br />
small amount of conidia on the second true leaf (Ferriere and Molot,<br />
1988). All plants were inoculated on the same leaf with Races 1<br />
(isolate 27), 2 (isolate P-15.0), and 5 (isolate C8) of P. xanthii. <strong>The</strong><br />
plants were maintained in a controlled growth chamber at 32ºC and<br />
22ºC with a 16:8h (light:dark) photoperiod. Plants were scored 12<br />
days postinoculation and classified as either resistant (R; no apparent<br />
fungal development) or susceptible (S; profuse sporulation).<br />
Virus inoculation by A. gossypii was carried out according to Soria<br />
et al. (2003) using CMV-M730 (‘Song’ pathotype). Ten days after<br />
inoculation, plants showing no symptoms were reinoculated. Presence<br />
or absence of virus symptoms was recorded 20 days after first<br />
inoculation, and plants with no or doubtful symptoms were tested by<br />
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test using CMV<br />
polyclonal antiserum (Loewe Biochemica GmbH). All plants showing<br />
clear symptoms of CMV infection, as well as plants testing positive in<br />
ELISA, were considered susceptible. <strong>The</strong> experiment was carried out<br />
in a greenhouse with temperatures that oscillated between 32ºC and<br />
20ºC under a 16:8h (light:dark) photoperiod. A. gossypii used for the<br />
experiments were taken from a nonviruliferous aphid colony<br />
maintained on plants of the susceptible accession ‘C-278’ growing at<br />
25–15ºC under a 16:8h (light:dark) photoperiod.<br />
Chi-square tests were performed to check segregation for each<br />
character in the F2 population. For linkage analysis, pairwise χ 2 tests<br />
102 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
were conducted and recombination frequency was estimated according<br />
to Fisher (1921). <strong>The</strong> Kosambi function (Kosambi, 1944) was used to<br />
convert recombination units into genetic distances.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In order to verify that the simultaneous inoculation of the three<br />
races of powdery mildew on the same leaf could modify the plant<br />
response, previous work using differential melon genotypes was<br />
carried out and no interaction among resistances was detected<br />
(unpublished data).<br />
All plants of the cultivar ‘Bola de Oro’ showed clear symptoms of<br />
Races 1, 2, and 5 of powdery mildew and clear susceptibility to CMV-<br />
M730 infection. Plants of the accession ‘TGR-1551’ showed <strong>complete</strong><br />
resistance to the three races of powdery mildew and to CMV-M730<br />
infection. <strong>The</strong> F1 plants showed a similar resistant response to the<br />
pathogens evaluated, indicating that these resistances are dominant. In<br />
the F2, segregation for these characters was observed (Table 1).<br />
Table 1. Segregation of resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of P. xanthii<br />
and to CMV-M730 transmission by A. gossypii in the F2 obtained<br />
from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola de Oro’.<br />
χ 2<br />
Observed<br />
Pathogen segregation Segregation<br />
ratio Value Probability<br />
P. xanthii Race 1 243/52* 13:3 0.244 0.621<br />
P. xanthii Race 2 242/53 13:3 0.119 0.730<br />
P. xanthii Race 5 247/48 13:3 1.189 0.275<br />
CMV-M730 190/77 3:1 2.098 0.147<br />
* Resistant plants/susceptible plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong> segregation ratios (R:S) observed after inoculation with the<br />
different races of powdery mildew were identical (13:3) (Table 1).<br />
Most of the F2 plants were clearly resistant or susceptible to all races,<br />
and only nine plants were recombinants. <strong>The</strong> presence of all the<br />
possible types of recombinants in the F2 population indicates the<br />
existence of at least one dominant resistance gene for each one of the<br />
races of powdery mildew. Although this hypothesis should be<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 103
confirmed in F3 and backcross populations, it seems that powdery<br />
mildew resistance is controlled by a double dominant and recessive<br />
interaction, where there could be three dominant genes tightly linked<br />
that provide specific resistance to Races 1, 2, and 5 of P. xanthii, and<br />
one recessive gene that confers horizontal resistance to the three races.<br />
Segregation of resistance to powdery mildew Race 1 observed by<br />
Montoro (2005) in this material could adjust to our hypothesis;<br />
however, Montoro et al. (2004) described that resistance to Race 5 in<br />
‘TGR-1551’ is controlled by one dominant gene. In the current work,<br />
inoculations with the three races of powdery mildew have been done<br />
simultaneously, while Montoro (2005) inoculated each F2 plant with a<br />
different race. We found an excess of resistance for all the races, in<br />
comparison to the segregation observed by Montoro (2005); therefore,<br />
the possibility that simultaneous inoculation could have triggered a<br />
defensive response in the inoculation zone (Gozzo, 2003) in these F2<br />
plants cannot be discarded. <strong>The</strong> segregation ratio observed for virustransmission<br />
resistance (3:1) agrees with the observations of Soria et<br />
al. (2003), suggesting a dominant monogenic control (Table 1).<br />
In order to estimate the recombination fraction between resistance<br />
genes to different races of powdery mildew, we considered the<br />
probabilities of phenotypes according to our hypothesis of digenic<br />
inheritance with a common recessive gene. A very tight linkage (a<br />
distance of 2 to 4cM) among the powdery mildew-resistance genes<br />
present in ‘TGR-1551’ has been found (Table 2). Linkage between<br />
powdery mildew-resistance genes has been reported in previous<br />
works; genetic analysis done by Bardin et al. (1999) revealed that PI<br />
124112 possessed four genes for resistance to powdery mildew and<br />
that all these genes are linked in a cluster spanning 22cM. <strong>The</strong><br />
estimated distance between powdery mildew-resistance and virustransmission-resistance<br />
genes was approximately 17cM (Table 2). In<br />
‘TGR-1551’, Montoro et al. (2004) established that the distance<br />
between the Race 5 powdery mildew-resistance gene and the virustransmission-resistance<br />
gene was 28,3cM with F2 populations, and<br />
15,9cM with backcrosses. Our results seem to agree with those<br />
observed by Montoro et al. (2004), and support the hypothesis of the<br />
existence of resistance-gene clusters in melon (Anagnostou et al.,<br />
2000; Bardin et al., 1999; Klinger et al., 2001).<br />
<strong>The</strong> evaluation of more F2 plants could implement the number of<br />
representatives of each phenotype, including recombinants, for a more<br />
precise estimation of genetic distances. Segregation of resistance to P.<br />
xanthii and virus transmission by A. gossypii in the F3 populations and<br />
backcrosses obtained from the cross between ‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola<br />
de Oro’ is under study. <strong>The</strong>se results and analysis of the RILs will<br />
104 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Linkage analyses between resistance genes to Races 1, 2, and<br />
5 of P. xanthii and between powdery mildew and CMV-M730<br />
transmission by A. gossypii in the F2 obtained from the cross between<br />
‘TGR-1551’ and ‘Bola de Oro’.<br />
Genetic distance<br />
Observed segregation Ratio (cM)<br />
R1R2 * Race 1/Race<br />
2 240<br />
R1S2<br />
3<br />
S1R2<br />
2<br />
S1S2<br />
50<br />
43:9:9:3 2.38<br />
Race 2/Race<br />
5<br />
R2R5<br />
241<br />
R2S5<br />
1<br />
S2R5<br />
6<br />
S2S5<br />
47<br />
43:9:9:3 4.27<br />
Race 1/Race<br />
5<br />
R1R5<br />
241<br />
R1S5<br />
2<br />
S1R5<br />
6<br />
S1S5<br />
46<br />
43:9:9:3 3.94<br />
P. xanthii /<br />
CMV-M730<br />
R R<br />
180<br />
R S<br />
34<br />
S R<br />
7<br />
S S<br />
43<br />
9.3:3.1 17.27<br />
*<br />
Ri: resistant to race i; Si: susceptible to race i.<br />
allow us to clarify powdery mildew genetics and estimate more precisely<br />
the distances among the genes involved.<br />
Selection of plant material resistant to several important pathogens<br />
is hard and time-consuming labor. <strong>The</strong> tight linkage among the<br />
different powdery mildew-resistance genes could allow the<br />
simultaneous selection of resistance to all three races with high<br />
probability. Moreover, the linkage between these genes and the virustransmission-resistance<br />
gene could likely allow selection of this gene.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Anagnostou, K., M. Jahn, and R. Perl-Treves. 2000. Inheritance and linkage analysis<br />
of resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus, watermelon mosaic virus, papaya<br />
ringspot virus and powdery mildew in melon. Euphytica. 116:265–270.<br />
Bardin M., C. Dogimont, P. Nicot, and M. Pitrat.1999. Genetic analysis of resistance<br />
of melon line PI 124112 to Sphaerotheca fuliginea and Erysiphe cichoracearum<br />
studied in recombinant inbred lines. Proc. 1 st International Symposium on<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. Acta Hort. 492:163–168.<br />
Bardin, M., P. C. Nicot, P. Normand, and J. M. Lemaire. 1997. Virulence variation<br />
and DNA polymorphism in Sphaerotheca fuliginea, causal agent of powdery<br />
mildew of cucurbits. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:545–554.<br />
Bertrand, F. 1991. Les oïdiums des <strong>Cucurbit</strong>acées: maintein en culture pure, étude de<br />
leur variabilité et de la sensibilité chez le melon. PhD Diss., University of Paris<br />
XI, Orsay, France.<br />
Bertrand, F. and M. Pitrat. 1989. Screening of a muskmelon germplasm for<br />
susceptibility to 5 pathogens of powdery mildew, p. 142–149. In: C. E. Thomas<br />
(ed.). Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1989. Charleston, SC.<br />
Bohn, G. W. and T. W. Whitaker. 1964. Genetics of resistance to powdery mildew<br />
race 2 in muskmelon. Phytopath. 54:587–591.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 105
Cohen, R., Y. Burger, and S. Shraiber. 2002. Physiological races of Sphaerotheca<br />
fuliginea: factors affecting their identification and the significance of this<br />
knowledge, p. 181–187. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS<br />
Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Cohen, R., Y. Burger, S. Shraiber, Y. Elkind, and E. Levin. 1996. Influence of the<br />
genetic background and environmental conditions on powdery mildew of<br />
melons. Phytoparasitica. 24:162(Abstr.).<br />
Del Pino, D., L. Olalla, A. Pérez-García, M. E. Rivera, S. García Moreno, A. de<br />
Vicente, and J. A. Torés. 2002. Occurrence of faces and pathotypes of cucurbit<br />
powdery mildew in south-eastern Spain. Phytoparasitica. 30(5):1–8.<br />
Epinat, C. M., M. Pitrat, and F. Bertrand. 1993. Genetic analysis of resistance of five<br />
melon lines to powdery mildews. Euphytica. 65:135–144.<br />
Ferriere, H. and P. M. Molot. 1988. Effect of leaf position on the susceptibility of<br />
melon plants to artificial infection with powdery mildew, Sphaerothecafuliginea.<br />
J. Phytopath./Phytopath. Zeitschrift. 121(3): 250–254.<br />
Fisher, R. A. 1921. On the “probable error” of a coefficient of correlation deduced<br />
from a small sample. Metron. 1(4): 3–32.<br />
Gómez-Guillamón, M. L., E. Moriones, M. L. Luis-Arteaga, J. M. Alvarez, J. A.<br />
Torés, A. I. López-Sesé, I. Cánovas, F. Sánchez, and R. Camero. 1998.<br />
Morphological and disease resistance evaluation in Cucumis melo and its wild<br />
relatives, p. 53–61. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998: Evaluation<br />
and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Gómez-Guillamón, M. L., J. A. Torés, C. Soria, and A. I. L. Sesé. 1995. Screening<br />
for resistances to Sphaerotheca fuliginea and two yellowing diseases in Cucumis<br />
melo and related Cucumis species, p. 205–208. In: G. E. Lester and J. R. Dunlap<br />
(eds.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1994: Evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm.<br />
ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Gozzo, F. 2003. Systemic acquired resistance in crop protection: from nature to a<br />
chemical approach. J. Agric. & Food Chem. 51:4487–4503.<br />
Heitefuss, R. 1989. Crop and plant protection. Ellis Harwood Ltd., Chichester, UK.<br />
Hosoya, K., M. Kuzuya, T. Murakami, K. Kato, K. Narisawa, and H. Ezura. 2000.<br />
Impact of resistant melon cultivars on Sphaerotheca fuliginea. Plant Breed.<br />
119:286–288.<br />
Jagger, I. C., T. W. Whitaker, and D. R. Porter. 1938. A new biotic form of powdery<br />
mildew on muskmelon in the Imperial Valley of California. Plant Dis. Rep.<br />
22:275–276.<br />
Kenigsbuch, D. and Y. Cohen. 1992. Inheritance and allelism of genes for resistance<br />
to races 1 and 2 of Sphaerotheca fuliginea in muskmelon. Plant Dis. 76:626–<br />
629.<br />
Klinger, J., I. Kovalski, L. Silberstein, G. A. Thompson, and R. Perl- Treves. 2001.<br />
Mapping of cotton melon aphid resistance in melon. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
126:56–63.<br />
Kosambi, D. D. 1944. <strong>The</strong> estimation of map distances from recombination values.<br />
Ann. Eugen. 12:172–175.<br />
Lecoq, H., S. Cohen, M. Pitrat, and G. Labonne. 1979. Resistance to cucumber<br />
mosaic virus transmission by aphids in Cucumis melo. Phytopath. 69:1223–<br />
1225.<br />
Loebenstein, G. and B. Raccah. 1980. Control on non-persistently transmitted aphidborne<br />
viruses. Phytopath. 8:221–235.<br />
Lovisolo, O. 1980. Virus and viroid diseases of cucurbits. Acta Hort. 88:33–82.<br />
106 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Luis-Arteaga, M., J. M. Alvarez, J. L. Alonso-Prados, J. J. Bernal, F. García-Arenal,<br />
A. Laviña, A. Batlle, and E. Moriones. 1998. Occurrence, distribution, and<br />
relative incidence of mosaic viruses infecting field-grown melon in Spain. Plant<br />
Dis. 82:979–982.<br />
McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />
melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
131:59–65.<br />
Montoro, T. 2005. Resistencia genética a Podosphaera xanthii en melón y<br />
caracterización molecular de distintas razas del hongo. PhD Diss., Univ. de<br />
Málaga, Spain.<br />
Montoro, T., R. Camero, A. I. López-Sesé, and M. L. Gómez-Guillamón. 2004.<br />
Posible existencia de ligamiento entre la resistencia a oídio y la transmisión de<br />
virus por pulgón en “TGR-1551”. Actas de Hort. 41:203–206.<br />
Nameth, S. T., J. A. Dodds, A. O. Paulus, and F. F. Laemmlen. 1986. <strong>Cucurbit</strong><br />
viruses of California: an ever-changing problem. Plant Dis. 70:8–12.<br />
Olalla, L. 2001. Etiología, biología y epidemiología del oídio de las cucurbitáceas en<br />
cultivos bajo plástico. PhD Diss., Univ. de Málaga, Spain.<br />
Perchepied, L., M. Bardin, C, Dogimont, and M. Pitrat. 2005. Relationship between<br />
loci conferring downy mildew and powdery mildew resistance in melon<br />
assessed by quantitative trait loci mapping. Phytopath. 95(5):556–565.<br />
Pirone, T. P. and K. F. Harris. 1970. Non-persistent transmission of plant viruses by<br />
aphids. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 15:55–73.<br />
Pitrat, M. 1991. Linkage groups in Cucumis melo L. J. Hered. 82:406–411.<br />
Sitterly, W. R. 1978. Powdery mildews of cucurbits, p. 359–379. In: D. M. Spencer<br />
(ed.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. Academic Press, London.<br />
Soria, C., E. Moriones, A. Fereres, E. Garzo, and M. L. Gómez-Guillamón. 2003.<br />
New source of resistance to mosaic virus transmission by Aphis gossypii in<br />
melon. Euphytica. 133:313–318.<br />
Vakalounakis, D. L., E. Klironomou, and A. Papadakis. 1994. Species spectrum, host<br />
range and distribution of powdery mildews on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae in Crete. Plant<br />
Path. 43:813–818.<br />
Zitter, T. A., D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Compendium of cucurbits<br />
diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 107
EPICUTICULAR WAX MORPHOLOGY AND<br />
TRICHOME TYPES IN RELATION TO HOST<br />
PLANT SELECTION BY APHIS GOSSYPII IN<br />
MELONS<br />
M. L. Gómez-Guillamón 1 , A. Heredia 2 ,<br />
and E. Sarria 1<br />
1 Experimental Station ‘La Mayora’ CSIC 29750-Algarrobo,<br />
Málaga, Spain<br />
2 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry,<br />
Málaga University, Teatinos Campus, 29071-Málaga, Spain<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Antixenosis, cotton-aphid, Cucumis melo, glandular<br />
trichomes, resistance, susceptibility<br />
ABSTRACT. Morphology of epicuticular wax layers and trichomes types and<br />
density in leaves of aphid-resistant cultivars of Cucumis melo were compared<br />
with the susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’. Epicuticular wax layer characteristics are<br />
similar in both resistant and susceptible cultivars. Three types of trichomes<br />
have been identified in Cucumis melo leaves. A relationship between the density<br />
of glandular trichomes Type I and the existence of antixenosis mechanisms to<br />
Aphis gossypii has been established.<br />
T<br />
he cotton-melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, causes serious<br />
direct and indirect damage to many crops and is considered a<br />
serious pest of melon in Mediterranean countries. Growing<br />
resistant or tolerant cultivars is the most effective, environmentally<br />
compatible control strategy. Two main genetic resistance sources have<br />
been found in melons: the lines PI-161375, carrying the Vat gene,<br />
which confers resistance to A. gossypii colonization and virus<br />
transmission (Pitrat and Lecoq, 1980), and PI-414723, carrier of the<br />
Agr gene, which confers A. gossypii resistance (Kishaba et al., 1971).<br />
More recently, Garzo et al. (2002) described resistance to this aphid in<br />
the cultivar ‘TGR-1551’. Electrical Penetration Graphs (EPGs) of A.<br />
gossypii behavior in the C. melo cultivar ‘TGR-1551’ have shown the<br />
existence of phloematic specific factors disturbing the aphids feeding<br />
on resistant plants (Garzo et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong>se authors also found<br />
antixenosis mechanisms in ‘TGR-1551’.<br />
Interaction between plants and aphids is very complex (Miles,<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors thank the valuable collaboration of R. Tobar and R. Camero in all the<br />
experiments. This work has been financed by the CICYT Research Project:<br />
AGL2005-03850-C02-01.<br />
108 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
1998). <strong>The</strong> selection or avoidance of potential host plants by aphids is<br />
guided by a complex combination of physical and chemical stimuli.<br />
<strong>The</strong> choice of host plants could be affected by the presence of<br />
chemicals, acting as repellents or deterrents. Also, the presence and<br />
density of trichomes in the leaves may become a physical barrier for<br />
aphid feeding and reproduction (Renwick, 1983).<br />
In other vegetable species, the role of the leaf epicuticular lipids<br />
composition in relation to aphid infestation and resistance has been<br />
studied (Powell et al., 1999; Ni and Quisenberry, 1997; Shepherd et.<br />
al., 1999; Bahlmann et al., 2003; Duetting et al., 2003), but no<br />
information exists for melons. Morphology, types, and density of leaf<br />
trichomes have also been related to the choice of host plants by aphids<br />
in other species (Levin, 1973; Bahlmann et al., 2003; Simmons et al.,<br />
2003; Wagner et al., 2004) and a few authors have studied trichomes<br />
types in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family (Kolb and Müller, 2004).<br />
Morphology and topography of epicuticular wax layers<br />
determination together with a description of the trichomes observed in<br />
leaves of ‘TGR-1551’ and the susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’ have been<br />
examined. Moreover, the relation between the density of glandular<br />
trichomes for three different resistant cultivars (‘TGR-1551’, PI-<br />
414723, and PI-161375), and the existence of antixenosis mechanisms<br />
to A. gossypii has been investigated.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
A. gossypii were reared on plants of the susceptible Spanish melon<br />
cultivar ‘ANC-57’, at 25ºC (day) and 20ºC (night) with a 16:8-hour<br />
(L:D) photoperiod. <strong>The</strong> melon cultivars used in the antixenosis<br />
experiments were the aphid-susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’ and the resistant<br />
cultivars ‘TGR-1551’, PI-414723, and PI-161375. In these cultivars,<br />
leaf trichome evaluations were also done. For the epicuticular wax<br />
observations only the cultivars ‘Bola de Oro’ and ‘TGR-1551’ were<br />
used. Plants were cultivated in a glasshouse in individual pots at 25ºC<br />
(day) and 18ºC (night) with a 14:10-hour (L:D) photoperiod. In the<br />
antixenosis experiment, 10 adult aphids (7–8 days old) were released<br />
on five plants from each melon line, at the five-full-expanded-leaf<br />
stage, following the methodology described by Martin and Fereres<br />
(2003).<br />
For the evaluation of epicuticular wax layer and trichomes, two<br />
leaf disks (5,94mm diameter) per plant were taken at three different<br />
levels in the plant, corresponding to young, medium-aged, and old<br />
leaves. Samples were fixed in glutaraldehyde (4% v/v, in phosphate<br />
buffer 0,2 M, pH 7) at 4ºC. <strong>The</strong>y were thoroughly rinsed in fresh<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 109
phosphate buffer and then dehydrated through acetone solutions series<br />
(25, 50, 75, and 100% v/v), 15 min each. Samples were mounted on<br />
scanning electron microscope tubes and coated with a thick layer of<br />
gold. A JEOL JSM-840 scanning electron microscope (SEM) operated<br />
at 15kV was used.<br />
Pubescence of the leaves was evaluated on fresh leaf disks using a<br />
stereoscopic magnifying glass. Using SEM, different types of<br />
trichomes were observed. To identify and count trichomes under a<br />
light microscope, staining of the samples was required. Leaf disks<br />
were decolorated using 100% alcohol and heating to 80ºC for three<br />
minutes. Samples were stained using an aqueous solution containing<br />
0,05% tolouidine blue O (O’Brien et al., 1964).<br />
Trichome numbers were analyzed using two-way ANOVA<br />
(p=0,05) and aphid data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p =<br />
0,05) to test for differences between antixenosis in different cultivars.<br />
Trichome density and antixenosis data were further analyzed by<br />
pairwise comparison using Student-Newman-Keuls test (p = 0,05).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In the antixenosis experiments, the number of adults feeding on the<br />
inoculated leaves of the ‘Bola de Oro’ cultivar 72 hours after the<br />
aphids were released was always higher than the number observed in<br />
plants of ‘TGR-1551’, PI-414723, and PI-161375, which also<br />
confirmed the existence of antixenosis in the resistant cultivars (Table<br />
1). Similar results were also obtained by Garzo et al. (2002) in their<br />
experiments under free-choice and no-choice conditions using the<br />
same cultivars.<br />
Host selection by aphids is not a random process; these insects<br />
employ a variety of sensory and behavioral mechanisms to locate and<br />
recognize their host plants. Epicuticular waxes, trichomes exudates,<br />
substrate texture, topology, and color may influence aphid behavior<br />
before stylet insertion (Powell et al., 2006). <strong>The</strong> results obtained<br />
Table 1. Number of aphids (mean ± SE) on each inoculated leaf 72 h<br />
after 10 adults were released in the antixenosis experiment.<br />
Cultivar Average number of aphids<br />
‘Bola de Oro’ 7,42 b* ± 1,62<br />
‘TGR-1551’ 1,53 a ± 1,23<br />
PI-414723 1,80 a ± 0,79<br />
PI-161375 3,60 c ± 2,07<br />
*Means in columns followed by a common letter do not differ at the 5% level by<br />
SNK test.<br />
110 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
could suggest the existence of one or more of those stimuli.<br />
Observations using SEM suggested that the epicuticular wax layer<br />
is very thin. In young leaves no wax images were observed. As the<br />
leaves increase in age, some very small crystalline wax deposits were<br />
visible, but these appeared in leaves of both the susceptible cultivar<br />
and the resistant ‘TGR-1551’. <strong>The</strong> observed morphology was also<br />
similar for both cultivars, which indicated a similar chemical<br />
composition (Barthlott et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that neither<br />
the presence of a wax layer in leaves nor its composition seem to have<br />
a relation with the antixenotic effect on A. gossypii observed in ‘TGR-<br />
1551’.<br />
Three types of trichomes have been observed in the leaves (Figure<br />
1). <strong>The</strong> most frequent trichomes were identified as columnar trichomes<br />
(Figure 1a), similar in both the resistant and susceptible cultivars.<br />
Density of trichomes has been described in other species as a factor<br />
that impedes aphid feeding and reproduction (Donald, 1973;<br />
Bahlmann et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> pubescence observed in the adaxial leaf<br />
surface of ‘Bola de Oro’ is lower than that in ‘TGR-1551’ at the three<br />
examined plant levels; however, the susceptible cultivar has the<br />
highest pubescence in the abaxial surface (differences were significant<br />
at the 5% level) (Table 2). Regarding these results, the pubescence<br />
does not seem to be an important factor in aphid resistance.<br />
Table 2. Number of columnar trichomes/cm² (mean ± SE) in abaxial<br />
and adaxial leaf surfaces of different melon cultivars.<br />
Cultivar Leaf surface Young leaf Medium leaf Old leaf<br />
Adaxial 377,1 a*± 70,4 225,5 a ± 40,6 106,8 a ± 14,5<br />
Bola de Oro<br />
Abaxial 2030,2 b ± 315,1 1346,4 b ± 295,6 782,3 b ± 128,6<br />
Adaxial 756,6 c ± 156,2 310,8 c ± 63,6 201,7 c ± 43,8<br />
TGR-1551<br />
Abaxial 1310,5 d ± 278,9 694,2 d ± 174,8 557,2 d ± 119,5<br />
*Means in columns followed by a common letter do not differ at the 5% level by<br />
SNK test.<br />
During SEM examination, two additional types of trichomes<br />
smaller than columnar trichomes were noticed in the leaf samples<br />
(Figure 1). <strong>The</strong>se trichomes were located mostly on leaf veins on the<br />
abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces in both cultivars. Regarding their<br />
morphology, one of them corresponded to Type I as described by Kolb<br />
and Müller (2004) in leaves of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. pepo var. styriaca<br />
and observed on blooms of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a by Uphof and Hummel (1962).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 111
This type consisted of a basal cell, a uniseriate stalk, and a four-celled<br />
head region (Figure 1b).<br />
Type I trichomes have been described as glandular trichomes, with<br />
a secretory function. Using specific stains, Kolb and Müller (2004)<br />
observed that the head area of this trichome stored lipids, terpenoids,<br />
and other flavonoids. Terpenoids have also been identified in similar<br />
trichomes on leaves of Calceolaria adscendens (Sacchetti et al., 1999)<br />
and Teucrium scorodonia (Antunes and Sevinate-Pinto, 1991). <strong>The</strong>se<br />
metabolites play a significant role in interactions between the plant and<br />
herbivorous or pathogenous organisms, respectively (Levin, 1973).<br />
<strong>The</strong> third type of trichome was identified as Type III as described<br />
by Kolb and Müller (2004) in oil pumpkin. Type III consisted of five<br />
cells in line, and a basal cell, and was observed very rarely on the<br />
abaxial surface of the leaves, in both the resistant and the susceptible<br />
cultivar (Figure 1c). Ascensao et al. (1999) have also found this type<br />
of glandular trichome in Plectranthus ornatus.<br />
Fig. 1. Different types of trichomes observed in melon leaves: (a) Columnar<br />
trichome, (b) trichome Type I, (c) trichome Type III.<br />
White scale-bar: 100µm; black scale-bar: 10µm<br />
In order to establish a correlation between the number of Type I<br />
trichomes in the leaves and antixenotic effects in the plants, density of<br />
these trichomes in the first three young leaves was evaluated. Results<br />
showed that Type I trichomes were also found in leaves of PI-414723<br />
and PI-161375 in numbers similar to those observed on plants of<br />
‘TGR-1551’. Density of Type I trichomes was similar in both leaf<br />
sides and they were in any case located on leaf veins. Number of<br />
trichomes/cm² was higher in younger leaves, as expected. But the most<br />
interesting observation was that their density was always higher in the<br />
112 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
esistant cultivars than in the susceptible ‘Bola de Oro’, and these<br />
differences were clearly significant (Table 3).<br />
When trichomes were stained with diphenylboric acid-2aminoethyl<br />
ester (DPBA) (results not shown), the presence of<br />
flavonoids inside them was observed. Flavonoids have been described<br />
as chemicals disturbing the behavior of aphids, forcing them to avoid<br />
plants in which they detect their presence (Levin, 1973; Dreyer and<br />
Jones, 1981; Mitchell et al., 1993; Francis et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> higher<br />
number of Type I trichomes found in resistant cultivars could be<br />
related to higher flavonoid content in the leaf environment, and that<br />
could force the aphid to leave the plant in the antixenosis experiment.<br />
<strong>The</strong> density of these trichomes in resistant cultivars could also explain<br />
the results obtained by Garzo et al. (2002) in their free-choice<br />
experiment. <strong>The</strong>ir experiments showed that aphids preferred the leaf<br />
disks of the susceptible cultivar for feeding.<br />
Table 3. Number of trichomes type I/cm² (mean ± SE) in the abaxial<br />
and adaxial leaf surfaces of different melon cultivars.<br />
Cultivar Surface leaf 1 st leaf 2 nd leaf 3 rd leaf<br />
‘Bola de Adaxial 44,0 a* ± 6,3 17,9 a ± 5,2 21,7 ab ± 3,5<br />
Oro’ Abaxial 17,6 a ± 3,7 14,3 a ± 7,2 1 3,6 a ± 6,7<br />
PI-161375<br />
PI-414723<br />
Adaxial 344,9 b ± 63,0 127,1 bc ± 11,9 41,4 b ± 7,5<br />
Abaxial 230,8 b ± 29,7 97,0 c ± 11,5 33,8 b ± 2,7<br />
Adaxial 311,7 b ± 130,3 116,9 b ± 44,2 55,2 b ± 17,4<br />
Abaxial 251,7 b ± 89,2 120,6 bc ± 43,4 61,1 b ± 12,0<br />
Adaxial 313,5 b ± 103,3 226,8 d ± 10,1 122,4 c ± 32,2<br />
‘TGR-1551’<br />
Abaxial 223,7 b ± 111,7 171,9 b ± 37,8 110,9 c ± 20,1<br />
*Means in columns followed by a common letter do not differ at the 5% level by<br />
SNK test.<br />
With these observations, the density of Type I trichomes could be<br />
related to antixenosis against A. gossypii in ‘TGR-1551’, PI-414723,<br />
and PI-161375. Results suggest that the number of Type I<br />
trichomes/cm² could be considered as a useful morphological marker<br />
for antixenosis selection in melon breeding.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 113
Literature Cited<br />
Antunes, T. and I. Sevinate-Pinto. 1991. Glandular trichomes of Teucrium<br />
scorodonia L.: morphology and histochemistry. Flora. 185:65–70.<br />
Ascensao, L., L. Mota, and M. de Castro. 1999. Glandular trichomes on the leaves<br />
and flowers of Plectranthus ornatus: morphology, distribution and<br />
histochemistry. Ann. Bot. 84:437–447.<br />
Bahlmann, L., P. Govender, and A-M. Botha. 2003. Leaf epicuticular wax<br />
ultrastructure and trichome presence on Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia)<br />
resistant and susceptible leaves. African Ent. 11(1):59–64.<br />
Barthlott, W., C. Neinhuis, D. Cutler, F. Ditsch, I. Meusel, I. <strong>The</strong>isen, and H.<br />
Wilhelmi. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot.<br />
J. Linnean Soc. 126:237–260.<br />
Donald, A. L. 1973. <strong>The</strong> role of trichomes in plant defense. Quart. Rev. Biol.<br />
48(1):3–15.<br />
Dreyer, D. L. and K. C. Jones. 1981. Feeding deterrency of flavonoids and related<br />
phenolics towards Schizaphis graminum ad Myzus persicae: aphid feeding<br />
deterrents in wheat. Phytochem. 20(11):2489–2493.<br />
Duetting, P. S., H. Ding, J. Neufeld, and S. D. Eigenbrode. 2003. Plant waxy bloom<br />
on peas affects infection of pea aphids by Pandora neoaphidis. J. Invert. Path.<br />
84:149–158.<br />
Francis, F., G. Lognay, and E. Haubruge. 2004. Olfatory responses to aphid and host<br />
plant volatile releases: (E)-b-farnesene an effective kairomone for the predator<br />
Adalia bipunctata. J. Chem. Ecol. 30(4):741–755.<br />
Garzo, E., C. Soria, M. L. Gómez-Guillamón, and A. Fereres. 2002. Feeding<br />
behavior of Aphis gossypii on resistant accessions of different melon genotypes<br />
(Cucumis melo). Phytoparasitica. 30(2):129–140.<br />
Kishaba, A. N., G. W. Bohn, and H. H. Toba. 1971. Resistance to Aphis gossypii in<br />
muskemelon. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101(5):557–561.<br />
Kolb, D. and M. Müller. 2004. Light, conventional and environmental scanning<br />
electron microscopy of the trichomes of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo sbsp. pepo var. styriaca<br />
and histochemistry of glandular secretory products. Ann. Bot. 94:515–526.<br />
Levin, D. A., 1973. <strong>The</strong> role of trichomes in plant disease. Quart. Rev. Biol. 48(1):3–<br />
15.<br />
Martin, B. and A. Fereres. 2003. Evaluation of a choice-test method to assess<br />
resistance of melon to Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) by<br />
comparison with conventional antibiosis and antixenosis trials. App. Entomol.<br />
Zool. 38(3):405–411.<br />
Miles, P. W. 1998. Aphid saliva. Biol. Rev. 74:41–85.<br />
Mitchell, M. J., D. P. Deogh, J. R. Crooks, and S. L. Smith. 1993. Effects of plant<br />
flavonoids and other allelochemicals on insect cytochrome P-450 dependent<br />
steroid hydroxylase activity. Insect Biochem. & Molec. Biol. 23(1):65–71.<br />
Ni, X. and S. S. Quisenberry. 1997. Effect of wheat leaf epicuticular structure on<br />
host selection and probing rhythm of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera:<br />
Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 90(5):1400–1407.<br />
O’Brien, T. P., N. Feder, and M. McCully. 1964. Polychromatic staining of plant cell<br />
walls by toluidine blue. Protoplasma. 59:367–373.<br />
Pitrat, M. and H. Lecoq. 1980. Inheritance of the resistance to cucumber mosaic<br />
virus transmission by Aphis gossypii in Cucumis melo. Phytopathology. 70:958–<br />
971.<br />
Powell, G., C. Tosh, and J. Hardie. 2006. Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral,<br />
evolutionary, and applied perspectives. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 51:309–330.<br />
114 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Powell, G., S. P. Maniar, J. A. Pickett, and J. Hardie. 1999. Aphid responses to nonhost<br />
epicuticular lipids. Ent. Exp. Appl. 91:115–123.<br />
Renwick, J. A. A. 1983. Nonpreference mechanisms: plant characteristics<br />
influencing insect behaviour, p. 199–213. In: P. E. Hedin (ed.). Plant resistance<br />
to insects. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.<br />
Sacchetti, G., C. Romagnoli, M. Nicoletti, A. Di Fabio, A. Bruni, and F. Poli. 1999.<br />
Glandular trichomes of Calceolaria adscendens Lidl. (Scrophulariaceae):<br />
histochemistry, development and ultrastructure. Ann. Bot. 83:87–92.<br />
Shepherd, T., G. W. Robertson, D. W. Griffiths, E. Nick, and A. Birch. 1999.<br />
Epicuticular wax composition in relation to aphid infestation and resistance in<br />
red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Phytochem. 52:1239–1254.<br />
Simmons, A. T., G. M. Gurr, D. McGrath, H. I. Nicol, and P. M. Martin. 2003.<br />
Trichomes of Lycopersicon spp. and their effect on Myzus persicae (Sulzer)<br />
(Hemiptera: Aphididae). Austral. J. Entomol. 42:373–378.<br />
Uphof, J. C. Th. and K. Hummel. 1962, v. 4, pt. 5, p. 1–206. Plant hairs. In: W.<br />
Zimmermann and P. G. Ozenda (eds.). Encyclopedia of plant anatomy.<br />
Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.<br />
Wagner, G. J., E. Wang, and R.W. Shepherd. 2004. New approaches for studying<br />
and exploiting an old protuberance, the plant trichome. Ann. Bot. 93:3–11.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 115
EVALUATION OF ZUCCHINI AND<br />
STRAIGHTNECK SUMMER SQUASH<br />
BREEDING LINES AND VARIETIES FOR<br />
POWDERY MILDEW AND DOWNY MILDEW<br />
TOLERANCE<br />
M. L. Infante-Casella<br />
Rutgers Cooperative Research and Extension of Gloucester County,<br />
Clayton, NJ 08312<br />
C. A. Wyenandt<br />
RCRE, Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center,<br />
Bridgeton, NJ 08302<br />
M. R. Henninger<br />
RCRE, Foran Hall, New Brunswick, NJ 08901<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, disease tolerance<br />
ABSTRACT. Field research was conducted with 22 green zucchini and yellow<br />
straightneck summer squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo) hybrids to evaluate tolerance to<br />
powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii) and downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis) infection under field conditions in 2005. Powdery mildew (PM) and<br />
downy mildew (DM) are important diseases of cucurbit crops in the mid-<br />
Atlantic region of the United <strong>State</strong>s annually during summer months. In New<br />
Jersey, PM is first observed in mid-July and DM is usually first observed in<br />
mid-August. However, during the 2004 and 2005 production seasons, DM was<br />
identified approximately two months earlier than expected. In 2005, AUDPC<br />
values for PM development were lowest in the straightnecks ‘Sunray’, ‘General<br />
Patton’, and ‘Patriot II’ and in the zucchinis ‘Wildcat’, ‘Judgment III’<br />
(formerly ‘EX04629728’, released December 2005), ‘Justice III’, and ‘Payroll’.<br />
AUDPC values for DM development were lowest in the straightnecks ‘Lioness’,<br />
‘Conqueror III’, and ‘Cougar’ and in the zucchinis ‘Judgment III’, ‘SSX6593’,<br />
‘Lynx’, and ‘Leopard’.<br />
Z<br />
ucchini and straightneck yellow squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) are<br />
important crops for many vegetable farmers in New Jersey.<br />
Over 1000 hectares of green zucchini and 360 hectares of<br />
yellow straightneck summer squash are grown annually in the state,<br />
with a farm-gate value of 12.8 million dollars, making New Jersey the<br />
fifth highest in the nation in production value (National Agricultural<br />
Statistics Service, 2000). Powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii)<br />
(PM) and downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) (DM) are two<br />
of the most important foliar diseases of summer squash in New Jersey<br />
(Infante-Casella et al., 2003). Without the use of fungicides, losses to<br />
PM and DM can be extremely high in the mid-Atlantic region.<br />
116 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Unfortunately, in recent years, PM resistance to certain fungicide<br />
chemistries has been detected in the U.S. (McGrath and Thomas,<br />
1996). Additionally, some fungicide chemistries used to control DM<br />
are also at risk for resistance development. This study was done to<br />
evaluate zucchini and straightneck summer squash hybrids for<br />
tolerance to PM and DM.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
A trial was conducted in the field during the summer and fall of<br />
2005 at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center<br />
(RAREC) in Bridgeton, New Jersey, on a Sassafras sandy loam soil.<br />
All squash were seeded on 14 July by hand with 75cm spacing into<br />
black plastic mulch on high raised beds. Rows were spaced 150cm<br />
apart. In total, there were 22 hybrids with six plants per block, with<br />
four replications. Drip irrigation was used for supplying water and<br />
fertilizer. Prefar 4E (bensulide) at a rate of 11.2L/ha was applied on<br />
the soil surface just before laying plastic for preemergent weed<br />
control. For control of aphids and cucumber beetles, Admire<br />
(imidacloprid) was applied in the seed hole at a rate of 1.7L/ha after<br />
planting using a backpack sprayer. On August 26, Gavel (zoxamide)<br />
at 2.4kg/ha tank-mixed with Phostrol (phosphite salts) at 5.6L/ha was<br />
applied to slow downy mildew infection. Green zucchini hybrids<br />
planted included: ‘Tigress’, ‘Leopard’, ‘Lynx’, ‘Wildcat’, ‘SSX6560’,<br />
‘SSX6593’, ‘SSX6609’, ‘SSX6713’, ‘Payroll’, ‘Revenue’, ‘Senator’,<br />
‘Independence II’, ‘Justice III’, and ‘Judgment III’ (formerly<br />
EX04629728). Yellow straightneck hybrids planted were ‘General<br />
Patton’, ‘Sunray’, ‘XPHT1832 III’, ‘Patriot II’, ‘Liberator III’,<br />
‘Conqueror III’, ‘Cougar’, and ‘Lioness’. Disease evaluations began as<br />
soon as the plants showed visual signs of PM (1 Sep.) and DM (18<br />
Aug.) infection. <strong>The</strong>reafter, weekly evaluations were done to assess<br />
PM and DM development for each of the 22 hybrids. Leaves and<br />
stems of plants were visually rated on a scale of 0.0 (no sign of<br />
infection) to 10.0 (100% infection) at 0.5 increments for presence of<br />
PM and DM infection. Arcsine-transformed AUPDC values were<br />
calculated for PM and DM development during the late-season<br />
evaluation period for observing differences in disease development.<br />
Zucchini and straightneck squash data were analyzed separately using<br />
SAS (ANOVA, P=0.05).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were significant differences in AUDPC values for PM and<br />
DM development among both straightneck (Table 1) and zucchini<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 117
(Table 2) squash cultivars. Of the straightnecks, AUDPC values for<br />
PM development were lowest in ‘Sunray’, ‘General Patton’, and<br />
‘Patriot II’, respectively. AUDPC values for DM were lowest in<br />
‘Cougar’, ‘Lioness’, and ‘Conqueror III’. No straightneck squash had<br />
acceptable levels of both PM and DM tolerance. Zucchini squash that<br />
had the lowest AUDPC values for PM development included<br />
‘Wildcat’, ‘Judgment III’, ‘Justice III’, ‘Payroll’, and ‘SSX6560’.<br />
Zucchini squash with the lowest AUDPC values for DM development<br />
included ‘Judgment III’, ‘SSX6593’, Lynx’, and ‘Leopard’,<br />
respectively. Of all the squash evaluated, ‘Judgment III’ was the only<br />
one that had a relatively low AUDPC value for both PM and DM.<br />
Table 1. AUDPC values z for powdery mildew (PM) and downy<br />
mildew (DM) on straightneck summer squash cultivars grown at the<br />
Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center (RAREC),<br />
Bridgeton, New Jersey, in 2005.<br />
Variety Seed company PM DM<br />
Cougar Harris Moran 1164.3 1531.8<br />
Lioness Harris Moran 1085.2 1432.9<br />
Conqueror III Seminis 1078.1 1531.8<br />
XPHT 1832 III Seminis 1038.84 1861.0<br />
Liberator II Seminis 1017.2 1697.9<br />
Patriot II Seminis 897.2 1674.7<br />
General Patton Seminis 684.5 1838.4<br />
Sunray Seminis 595.6 1805.5<br />
LSD 154.5 210.6<br />
z AUDPC values arcsine transformed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> identification of PM- and DM-tolerant and -resistant squash<br />
varieties is important to the future of summer squash production in<br />
New Jersey and other production areas in the mid-Atlantic region.<br />
With the high cost of fungicides and the threat of fungicide-resistance<br />
development, summer squash growers are looking for cultivars that<br />
have tolerance to both PM and DM. Vegetable producers can reduce<br />
the need for fungicides that are at high risk for resistance development<br />
by selecting resistant varieties for production (McGrath, 2005).<br />
Breeders identify disease tolerance or resistance by continually testing<br />
new lines. Much of the breeding is aimed at developing PM-tolerant<br />
or -resistant squash lines, with less effort in finding DM tolerance or<br />
118 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
esistance (T. Pagels, personal communication). While there are<br />
fungicides available to control PM, it is still a problem for many<br />
growers (Elkner and Young, 2004). <strong>The</strong> same can be said for control<br />
fungicides available to control PM, it is still a problem for many<br />
growers (Elkner and Young, 2004). <strong>The</strong> same can be said for control<br />
of DM on susceptible cucurbits, due to the difficulty of properly<br />
timing application and the potential for fungicide-resistance<br />
development. DM resistance exists in some cucumber cultivars.<br />
However, some of these cultivars appear to be losing resistance. <strong>The</strong><br />
cucumber ‘Speedway’, thought to be DM resistant, was found to be<br />
infected with DM in southern New Jersey in 2005. <strong>The</strong>re is a need to<br />
evaluate all cucurbit varieties for DM tolerance or resistance, even<br />
though DM resistance may not be the main target of many cucurbitbreeding<br />
programs.<br />
Table 2. AUDPC values z for powdery mildew (PM) and downy<br />
mildew (DM) on zucchini squash cultivars grown at the Rutgers<br />
Agricultural Research and Extension Center (RAREC), Bridgeton,<br />
New Jersey in 2005.<br />
Variety Seed company PM DM<br />
Revenue Siegers 1355.1 1835.5<br />
Leopard Harris Moran 1181.7 1635.2<br />
Lynx Harris Moran 1145.6 1628.6<br />
Independence II Seminis 1140.2 1670.5<br />
SSX6593 Siegers 1076.9 1622.3<br />
Senator Seminis 1065.1 1722.7<br />
Tigress Harris Moran 1046.4 1732.4<br />
SSX6713 Siegers 1023.3 1863.7<br />
SSX6560 Siegers 992.3 1825.4<br />
Payroll Siegers 815.4 1698.0<br />
Justice III Seminis 757.6 1752.1<br />
Judgment III Seminis 702.1 1522.9<br />
Wildcat Harris Moran 657.1 1677.7<br />
LSD (P=0.05) 192.4 161.0<br />
z AUDPC values arcsine transformed.<br />
PM and DM have continued to be a challenge when producing<br />
summer squash in New Jersey. Identifying PM and DM diseasetolerant<br />
or -resistant cultivars is necessary to improve the economics<br />
of producing summer squash in New Jersey and the mid-Atlantic<br />
region of the U.S.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 119
Literature Cited<br />
Elkner T. E. and L. Young. 2004. Mildew tolerant pumpkin variety evaluations in<br />
Pennsylvania, p. 35–38. In: Proc. 35 th Annual Mid-Atlantic Vegetable Workers<br />
Conference.<br />
Infante-Casella, M. L., G. M. Ghidiu, and B. A. Majek. 2003. Crop profile for<br />
summer and winter squash in New Jersey.<br />
.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2005. Managing fungicide resistance is key to controlling powdery<br />
mildew, p. 63–66. 2005. Proc. New Jersey Annual Vegetable Meeting. Rutgers<br />
Cooperative Research and Extension.<br />
McGrath, M. T. and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Powdery mildew, p. 28–30. In: T. A. Zitter,<br />
D. L. Hopkins, and E. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS<br />
Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2000. 2000 National rankings, squash, fresh<br />
market and processing. .<br />
120 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
INHERITANCE OF CHILLING RESISTANCE IN<br />
CUCUMBER SEEDLINGS<br />
Elzbieta U. Kozik<br />
Department of Genetics, <strong>Breeding</strong> and Biotechnology, Research<br />
Institute of Vegetable Crops, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland<br />
Todd C. Wehner<br />
Department of Horticultural Science, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cold injury, genetics, vegetable breeding<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> inheritance of the resistance in cucumber inbred NC-76<br />
(originating from PI 246930) was studied. <strong>The</strong> results clearly confirm the<br />
presence of a high level of resistance to chilling injury in NC-76. <strong>The</strong><br />
segregation data of F2 and backcross progenies of the resistant NC-76 crossed<br />
with the susceptible ‘Chipper’ and Gy 14 demonstrated that a high level of<br />
resistance from NC-76 was conferred by a single, in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene<br />
Ch.<br />
C<br />
ucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is susceptible to chilling (low<br />
temperatures above freezing). <strong>The</strong> first symptoms of chilling<br />
injury to the leaves of cucumber plants are rapid leaf wilting<br />
and development of sunken, necrotic patches within a few hours of<br />
chilling exposure. When plants return to warm temperatures, the leaf<br />
margins and necrotic patches dry out, giving the leaf a mottled and<br />
brittle appearance. Chilling injury may occur in the spring in many<br />
geographical regions where the cucumber crop is planted before the<br />
risk of frost has ended. In order to determine whether chillingresistant<br />
cultivars can be developed, a method for testing genetic<br />
variation in chilling sensitivity was developed, and germplasm having<br />
partial chilling resistance was identified, including AR75-79<br />
(sometimes called ‘Little John’) and ‘Chipper’ (Smeets and Wehner,<br />
1997). Using this method, Chung et al. (2003) investigated<br />
inheritance of chilling injury in genetic progenies of resistant<br />
‘Chipper’ and AR75-79 in crosses with susceptible Gy 14. <strong>The</strong>ir data<br />
suggested that chilling resistance was maternally inherited. In the<br />
meantime, a high level of resistance was identified in cucumber<br />
accession PI 246930, and the genetic basis of resistance in this<br />
accession is presented here.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
<strong>The</strong> plant material used in this study consisted of reciprocal F1, F2,<br />
and backcross progenies from three groups of crosses between<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 121
esistant inbred NC-76 (P1) (selected from PI 246930) and ‘Chipper’<br />
(P2) and Gy 14 (P3) (susceptible). All crosses were made by handpollination<br />
in a greenhouse.<br />
Chilling-resistance tests were conducted under controlledenvironment<br />
conditions in the growth chambers of the Southeastern<br />
Plant Environment Laboratory at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University.<br />
Seeds were sown in peat pots (57mm 2 , 100-ml volume) filled with a<br />
standard substrate of gravel and peat in a 1:1 ratio and placed in trays.<br />
One seed was sown in each pot.<br />
After their germination, the plants were placed in growth chambers<br />
set at 26/22°C (day/night) temperatures under long days, consisting of<br />
12 hours of combined fluorescent and incandescent light (from 8 AM<br />
to 8 PM). Light intensities (PPFD) were 650 and 44mmol . m -2. s -1 ,<br />
respectively. Plants were watered with the standard phytotron nutrient<br />
solution (Thomas et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> experiment was divided into 10<br />
sets for ease of handling. Each set contained 3 plants of each parent<br />
(P1, P2, P3), 6 F1, 6 BC1P1, 6 BC1P2/BC1P3, and 30 plants of the F2<br />
generation. Data from all sets were pooled for the analysis.<br />
When the plants reached the first-true-leaf stage, they were moved<br />
from the main growth chamber to the chilling chamber for treatment at<br />
4°C under a light intensity of 500mmol . m -2. s -1 PPFD during 7 hr.<br />
After the chilling treatment, they were returned to the main growth<br />
chamber and placed under the same light and temperature regime as<br />
before. Plants were evaluated 14 days after chilling, rating the damage<br />
on the first true leaf. <strong>The</strong> scale used was 0 to 9: 0 = no damage; 1–2 =<br />
trace of damage; 3–4 = slight damage; 5–6 = moderate damage; 7–8 =<br />
advanced damage; 9 = plant dead. Data were collected as means over<br />
all true leaves (not cotyledons) for each plant within each generation.<br />
Plants from Classes 0, 1, and 2 were considered highly resistant (R),<br />
those from Classes 3, 4, 5, and 6 were considered moderately resistant<br />
(M), and those from Classes 7, 8, and 9 were considered susceptible<br />
(S). Data from these three categories of F2, BC1P2, and BC1P3<br />
populations were tested for goodness-of-fit to theoretical ratios using<br />
the chi-square tests.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Analysis of the data showed that plants of NC-76 exhibited high<br />
but nonabsolute resistance level (89% highly resistant and only 11%<br />
moderately resistant plants) in response to low temperatures. In<br />
contrast, plants of either the ‘Chipper’ or Gy 14 line showed high<br />
susceptibility (100% Class 9) (Table 1).<br />
122 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
<strong>The</strong> F1, reciprocal F1, and BC1 to the resistant parent NC-76 had<br />
highly resistant and moderately resistant plants, with some excess of<br />
highly resistant plants, which is in accordance with a dominantly<br />
Table 1. Segregation ratios for chilling-resistant leaves in cucumber<br />
seedlings of populations derived from crosses between NC-76 and ‘Chipper’,<br />
and NC-76 and Gy 14.<br />
No. of plants<br />
Parent/<br />
segregating Segregation ratio<br />
Cross R M S Total Expected Obtained Chi 2 df Prob.<br />
P1 NC-76 47 6 0 53 100% R+M 100% R+M<br />
P2 Chipper 0 1 56 57 100% S 100% S<br />
P3 Gy14 0 0 27 27 00% S 100% S<br />
F1<br />
(P1xP2/P3) 53 30 1 84 00% R+M 100% R+M<br />
F1R<br />
(P2/P3xP1) 42 41 1<br />
BC1P1<br />
84 100% R+M 100% R+M<br />
(F1xP1) 49 34 0 83 100% R+M 100% R+M<br />
BC1P2/P3<br />
(F1xP2/P3) 1 45 49 95<br />
F2<br />
(F1xself) 125 247 113 485<br />
50%R+M :<br />
50%S<br />
1R+M : 1S<br />
25%R:50%<br />
M:25%S<br />
1R : 2M : 1S<br />
48%R+M :<br />
52%S<br />
1R+M : 1S 0.100 1<br />
26%R:51%<br />
M:23%S<br />
0.752<br />
1R : 2M : 1S0.76 2 0.684<br />
inherited trait. <strong>The</strong> pooled F2 population had 125 highly resistant<br />
plants, 247 moderately resistant plants, and 113 susceptible plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se data fit a ratio of 1 highly resistant : 2 moderately resistant : 1<br />
susceptible with a probability of 0.684 (pooled chi square = 0.76).<br />
<strong>The</strong> pooled BC1 to resistant NC-76 parent was considered resistant<br />
(100% highly resistant and moderately resistant, with an excess of<br />
highly resistant plants).In the pooled BC1 to both susceptible parents<br />
‘Chipper’ and Gy 14, there were 1 highly resistant, 45 moderately<br />
resistant, and 49 susceptible plants. <strong>The</strong>se data fit a ratio of 1<br />
moderately resistant : 1 susceptible with a probability of 0.752 (chi<br />
square = 0.100).<br />
<strong>The</strong> segregation pattern in the F2 (1R : 2M : 1S), BC1P1 (100%<br />
resistant plants), and BC1P2/P3 (1M : 1S) populations demonstrated<br />
that a high level of resistance was conferred by a single, in<strong>complete</strong>ly<br />
dominant gene from NC-76. <strong>The</strong>se results are different from the ones<br />
obtained by Chung et al. (2003), who suggested that chilling resistance<br />
was maternally inherited. It seems that there is a different genetic<br />
system for chilling resistance in NC-76 and ‘Chipper’. Other<br />
differences in the two studies include chilling-test methods and plant<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 123
stage. In our studies, seedlings at the first fully expanded true leaf<br />
were subjected to a chilling treatment of 7 h at 4°C, while Chung et al.<br />
(2003) treated seedlings whose first true leaf was apparent but not<br />
fully expanded for 5.5 h at 4°C. Thus, the tests they ran were less<br />
severe than ours, and ‘Chipper’ showed slight resistance under those<br />
conditions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> symbol Ch is proposed to designate the in<strong>complete</strong>ly<br />
dominant gene from C. sativus NC-76 for resistance to chilling<br />
conditions in accordance with gene nomenclature rules (Wehner,<br />
1993). <strong>The</strong> results are promising, since resistance conferred by the<br />
in<strong>complete</strong> resistance gene Ch was effective under extreme chilling<br />
conditions. <strong>The</strong> gene should be useful in breeding programs for the<br />
development of new cultivars adapted to planting in the field in early<br />
spring.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Chung, S. M., J. E. Staub, and G. Fazio. 2003. Inheritance of chilling injury: A<br />
maternally inherited trait in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128(4):526–530.<br />
Smeets, L. and T. C. Wehner. 1997. Environmental effects on genetic variation of<br />
chilling resistance in cucumber. Euphytica. 97:217–225.<br />
Thomas J. F., R. J. Downs, and C. H. Saravitz. 2005. Phytotron procedural manual<br />
for controlled environment research at the southeastern plant environment<br />
laboratory. NCARS Tech. Bull. 244 (revised), 44 p.<br />
Wehner, T. C. 1993. Gene list update for cucumber. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt.<br />
16:92–97.<br />
124 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
GENES EXPRESSED DURING DEVELOPMENT<br />
AND RIPENING OF WATERMELON FRUIT<br />
A. Levi and W. P. Wechter<br />
USDA, ARS, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, 2700 Savannah Highway,<br />
Charleston, SC 29414<br />
A. Davis<br />
USDA, ARS, P.O. Box 159, Lane, Oklahoma 74555<br />
A. Hernandez and J. Thimmapuram<br />
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Roy J. Carver<br />
Biotechnology Center, W.M. Keck Center for Comparative and<br />
Functional Genomics,<br />
1201 W. Gregory Drive, Urbana, IL 61801<br />
T. Trebitsh<br />
Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev,<br />
Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel<br />
Y. Tadmor, N. Katzir, and V. Portnoy<br />
Agricultural Research Organization, P.O. Box 1021,<br />
Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel<br />
S. King<br />
Department of Horticulture, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, Texas 77845<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. cDNA, gene expression, ESTs, Citrullus lanatus<br />
ABSTRACT. A cDNA library was constructed using watermelon fruit (flesh)<br />
mRNA from 3 distinct developmental time-points and was normalized and then<br />
subtracted by hybridization with leaf cDNA. Random cDNA clones of the<br />
watermelon flesh subtraction library were sequenced from the 5’ end in order<br />
to identify potentially informative genes associated with fruit setting,<br />
development, and ripening. One-thousand and forty-six 5’-end sequences<br />
(expressed sequence tags; ESTs) were assembled into 832 nonredundant<br />
sequences, designated as “EST-unigenes.” Of these 832 EST-unigenes, 254<br />
(~30%) have no significant homology to sequences of other plant species.<br />
Additionally, 168 EST-unigenes (~20%) correspond to genes with unknown<br />
function, whereas 410 EST-unigenes (~50%) correspond to genes with known<br />
function in other plant species. Microarray analysis indicated that a large<br />
number of the ESTs (about 15%) are differentially expressed during the<br />
development of watermelon fruit. This study provides new genetic information<br />
for watermelon as well as an expanded pool of genes associated with fruit<br />
development in watermelon. <strong>The</strong>se genes will be useful targets in future<br />
functional genomic studies dealing with watermelon fruit development.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 125
W<br />
atermelon fruits are diverse in shape and size, in rind and<br />
flesh color, and in flesh texture, aroma, flavor, and nutrient<br />
composition. Ripening watermelon fruits undergo changes<br />
in pigment accumulation, flavor and aromatic volatiles, conversion of<br />
starch to sugars, and in increased susceptibility to postharvest<br />
pathogens (Karakurt and Huber 2004). Significant knowledge has<br />
accumulated in a number of plant species with respect to genes<br />
associated with fruit development, including genes associated with<br />
cell-wall metabolism, ethylene biosynthesis, signal transduction, and<br />
hormones affecting fruit setting, growth, and ripening (Giovannoni<br />
2001). However, there is little information on genes controlling these<br />
processes in cucurbit fruits including watermelon. Identifying,<br />
mapping, and characterizing these genes will be useful to research and<br />
breeding efforts in this crop.<br />
In this study we report the development of 832 expressed<br />
sequenced tags (ESTs) for watermelon fruit, their classification based<br />
on their putative function in other plant species, and their differential<br />
expression during fruit development and ripening.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL AND RNA ISOLATION. Fruits at early<br />
development stage (white flesh; 12 days postpollination), at maturing<br />
stage (light pink flesh; 24 days postpollination), and ripe fruits (red<br />
flesh; 36 days postpollination) of the watermelon heirloom cultivar<br />
‘Illiniwake Red’ were used for RNA isolation. RNA was isolated from<br />
freeze-dried tissue of watermelon according to the procedure described<br />
by Callahan et al. (1989).<br />
CDNA SYNTHESIS, SIZE SELECTION, AND CLONING. cDNA<br />
synthesis and library construction was performed using Stratagene kits<br />
(Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA), as described by Soares and Bonaldo<br />
(1998). <strong>The</strong> primary cDNA library was normalized as described by<br />
Bonaldo et al. (1996). <strong>The</strong> library was first normalized in order to<br />
enrich it with the genes that have low expression levels in the fruit<br />
tissue. <strong>The</strong>n the normalized library was subtracted using leaf cDNAs<br />
in order to enrich the library with genes that are differentially<br />
expressed in the fruit tissue.<br />
SEQUENCING OF CDNA CLONES AND ASSEMBLING OF ESTS. <strong>The</strong><br />
cDNA clones were sequenced from the 5’ ends using standard T7<br />
primer and ABI BigDye terminator chemistry on ABI 3700 capillary<br />
systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). <strong>The</strong> sequenced cDNA<br />
clones were designated as expressed sequenced tags (ESTs). <strong>The</strong> EST<br />
clusters were assembled into contigs (contiguous sequence) by<br />
126 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
multiple-sequence alignment, which generates a consensus sequence<br />
for each cluster with criteria of 95% identity over 30 nt overlap. <strong>The</strong><br />
ESTs remaining in a cluster after the formation of contigs are<br />
designated as cluster singlets. <strong>The</strong> set of nonredundant sequences for<br />
the library includes the contigs, cluster-singlets, and singlets and was<br />
designated as “EST-unigenes.” <strong>The</strong>se sequences were used to query<br />
the GenBank database for homologs using the Basic Local Alignment<br />
Search Tool (BLAST) (Altschul et al. 1990), using e-value of 0.01, to<br />
ensure a high level of confidence that each sequence represents a<br />
nonredundant gene transcript.<br />
MICROARRAY ANALYSIS. Each of the 832 ESTs was represented<br />
on the microarray chip by 15 oligos (24 bp) x 3 replications.<br />
Microarray design, chip production, hybridizations, staining, and data<br />
extractions were performed by NimbleGen, Inc. (Madison, WI).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Of the 832 watermelon EST-unigenes analyzed, 254 (~30%) had<br />
no detectable homologs (E 0.1) to any other plant genomes or protein<br />
sequences reported so far in GenBank (Figure 1). Some of these ESTunigenes<br />
may represent untranslated (UTR) 3’regions (Mignone et al.<br />
2005). However, further studies are needed to determine if they are<br />
typical to watermelon and other cucurbit species. <strong>The</strong> majority of the<br />
watermelon fruit EST-unigenes reported in this study could be<br />
grouped into abundantly expressed gene families. However, a<br />
considerable number of the EST-unigenes could not be classified<br />
(Table 1; Figure 1). Extensive genome sequencing is still needed for<br />
cucurbit species to identify the genes that may be distinct to this<br />
family.<br />
A large number of the ESTs identified in this study are<br />
homologous to genes previously reported to be important in fruit<br />
growth and ripening in other plant species. <strong>The</strong> 1,046 random cDNA<br />
clones sequenced produced 832 EST-unigenes. Of these 832 ESTunigenes,<br />
747 were single ESTs (singletons; nonassembled sequencing<br />
reads), and 85 were contigs generated by computer-based assembly of<br />
sequence fragments from several clones (contigs). Of the 832 ESTunigenes,<br />
578 have significant homology to amino acid sequences<br />
from the GenBank nonredundant protein database. A large number of<br />
these homologous sequences have previously been ascribed to<br />
Arabidopsis proteins, and were successfully annotated using gene<br />
ontology (GO) analysis. <strong>The</strong> length of the ESTs ranges from 338 to<br />
699 bases, whereas contigs range from 555 to 2823 bases. <strong>The</strong><br />
individual sequences of 1046 ESTs have been submitted to NCBI<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 127
(Accession numbers: DV736965–DV738010, to be released on<br />
October 1, 2006).<br />
A functional class was assigned to each EST-unigene based on the<br />
degree of similarity (E-value) to the closest counterpart sequence<br />
found in other plant species. Of the 578 EST-unigenes that had<br />
significant homology to the nucleotide database (nt), 168 are<br />
homologous to genes with unknown nucleotide database (nt),<br />
Cell wall and<br />
division<br />
5%<br />
Membrane transport<br />
8%<br />
Amino acid<br />
synthesis<br />
7%<br />
Primary metabolism<br />
9%<br />
DNA/RNA<br />
Transcription<br />
8%<br />
No significant<br />
homology to genes<br />
in other plant<br />
species<br />
30%<br />
Signal transduction<br />
8%<br />
Defense/stress<br />
response<br />
4%<br />
Secondary<br />
metabolitesm<br />
1%<br />
Unknown function<br />
20%<br />
Fig. 1. Distribution of watermelon flesh ESTs according to their function.<br />
168 are homologous to genes with unknown function, while 410 are<br />
homologous to genes with known function. <strong>The</strong>se 410 EST-unigenes,<br />
based on GO annotation, were assigned to one of the following<br />
functional classes: (1) primary metabolism (74 EST-unigenes); (2)<br />
amino acid synthesis and processing (57 EST-unigenes); (3)<br />
membrane and transport (66 EST-unigenes); (4) cell division, cell wall<br />
and metabolism, cytoskeleton, and cellular organization (41 ESTunigenes);<br />
(5) DNA/RNA transcription and gene expression (63 ESTunigenes);<br />
(6) cellular communication/signal transduction (70 ESTunigenes);<br />
(7) defense- and stress-related proteins (31 EST-unigenes);<br />
and (8) secondary metabolism (8 EST-unigenes) (Figure 1).<br />
128 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Expression levels of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) during<br />
watermelon fruit development, including early-stage (12 days<br />
postpollination [PP]), maturing (24 days PP), and ripened fruit (36<br />
days PP). <strong>The</strong> levels shown are relative to the expression level in the<br />
leaf, which is determined as 1.0.<br />
EST Early Maturing Ripe<br />
AL01006B2C02.f1 22.09 26.07 16.16<br />
AL01005A1F10.f1 22.07 13.24 11.62<br />
AL-Contig4 18.98 21.89 13.91<br />
AL-Contig47 17.45 32.16 9.39<br />
AL-Contig60 17.34 5.27 2.78<br />
AL010001000B12 15.15 10.18 3.93<br />
AL01005B1D07.f1 14.93 27.32 22.52<br />
AL-Contig9 10.24 14.15 11.72<br />
AL01005B2A05.f1 10.16 10.28 7.81<br />
AL01006A2D05.f1 10.12 8.63 7.82<br />
AL01006A1C09.f1 9.94 8.83 7.99<br />
AL01006B1H12.f1 9.61 5.84 13.00<br />
AL-Contig71 9.37 10.36 3.97<br />
AL01003X1E03.f1 9.27 16.11 11.37<br />
AL01005A2B07.f1 9.03 16.71 16.33<br />
AL010002000G10 9.00 7.17 5.03<br />
AL01003X1E07.f1 7.60 9.15 8.81<br />
AL01003X1A05.f1 7.58 2.25 0.84<br />
AL01005B1E08.f1 7.49 12.53 4.36<br />
AL-Contig41 7.30 12.03 7.93<br />
AL-Contig66 7.04 13.59 9.87<br />
AL01005A2H08.f1 7.03 7.28 7.61<br />
AL01006B2E04.f1 5.85 4.81 0.73<br />
AL01005B2F12.f1 5.66 4.89 3.81<br />
AL01006A2G09.f1 4.92 22.20 5.32<br />
AL-Contig83 4.88 1.10 0.81<br />
AL01005B2E08.f1 4.80 3.33 2.46<br />
AL010002000E03 4.70 1.67 1.48<br />
AL-Contig78 4.70 8.01 7.95<br />
AL010001000D09 4.60 2.36 0.92<br />
AL-Contig64 4.41 2.22 5.22<br />
AL01006B2F11.f1 4.34 6.23 4.74<br />
AL01005A2F02.f1 3.64 11.18 8.66<br />
AL-Contig27 3.56 16.38 3.80<br />
AL01005B2D01.f1 3.47 5.55 6.52<br />
AL-Contig56 3.45 4.04 4.07<br />
AL-Contig79 3.42 7.21 6.39<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 129
(Table 1, continued)<br />
EST Early Maturing Ripe<br />
AL-Contig46 3.22 5.42 3.98<br />
AL01006A1H06.f1 2.80 7.01 5.01<br />
AL01006A2H11.f1 2.80 3.05 2.35<br />
AL010001000C07 2.80 2.90 2.03<br />
AL010002000A05 2.80 3.17 3.42<br />
AL010001000H02 2.74 2.70 1.80<br />
AL-Contig42 2.15 25.60 18.29<br />
AL010002000B05 2.09 2.50 2.47<br />
AL010002000B08 2.07 1.91 2.09<br />
AL01006B1A07.f1 2.06 3.58 1.55<br />
AL01006A1F01.f1 2.04 3.98 8.38<br />
AL01006B1G08.f1 1.90 2.14 2.27<br />
AL010001000E12 1.89 1.84 1.86<br />
AL-Contig15 1.81 2.30 2.03<br />
AL01005A2A11.f1 1.80 2.48 2.13<br />
AL010002000A07 1.70 1.45 1.55<br />
AL01004X1H02.f1 1.60 4.06 3.97<br />
AL-Contig73 1.56 2.06 1.94<br />
AL01005B2G04.f1 1.55 1.09 1.09<br />
AL010001000F05 1.48 3.75 2.17<br />
AL01005A1D10.f1 1.46 1.58 1.66<br />
AL01005B2G02.f1 1.43 1.70 1.67<br />
AL01005A2D06.f1 1.42 2.14 1.70<br />
AL010001000G11 1.34 2.58 2.80<br />
AL01006B2G09.f1 1.22 1.29 1.23<br />
AL01003X1C10.f1 1.22 1.79 1.49<br />
AL01005B2F05.f1 1.00 1.80 1.36<br />
AL01006B1G06.f1 1.00 1.51 1.36<br />
AL01005A2E07.f1 0.99 1.27 1.18<br />
AL01006A1C10.f1 0.99 1.64 1.56<br />
AL01004X1B12.f1 0.96 1.09 0.87<br />
AL01004X1A07.f1 0.96 1.52 1.25<br />
AL010002000H11 0.94 1.64 1.24<br />
AL01006B1B11.f1 0.93 1.48 1.50<br />
AL01005A1G08.f1 0.83 1.16 1.03<br />
AL-Contig32 0.83 3.79 1.82<br />
AL01003X1E11.f1 0.73 0.82 0.80<br />
AL01005B1G08.f1 0.60 0.84 0.62<br />
130 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
RNA from each fruit stage including early development stage<br />
(white flesh; 12 days postpollination), maturing stage (light pink flesh;<br />
24 days postpollination), ripe fruit (red flesh; 36 days postpollination),<br />
and young leaf was used for hybridization with the microarray chip<br />
containing the 832 EST oligos (15 oligos of 24 bases each; 3<br />
replications for each oligo). One-hundred and thirty-six ESTs showed<br />
high differential expression (expression level of 3–22 folds compared<br />
with the leaf RNA) during watermelon fruit development (as shown<br />
for a sample of ESTs in Table 1). All other ESTs (696) showed low<br />
expression (expression levels ranging from 0.11 to 2.9 folds compared<br />
with that in the leaf) (as shown in Table 1). <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
indicate that normalizing the cDNA library, and subtracting the fruit<br />
fleshcDNA library with a leaf cDNA, was effective in obtaining<br />
cDNA clones that are differentially expressed, and at the same time<br />
obtaining cDNA clones that have low expression (in a low-copy<br />
number). <strong>The</strong> results indicate that about 10–15% of ESTs (watermelon<br />
genes) are differentially expressed during watermelon fruit<br />
development and ripening. Watermelon may have a large number of<br />
ESTs with no significant sequence homology to gene sequences in<br />
other plant species reported an NCBI. <strong>The</strong> genes discovered in this<br />
study will be useful in future functional genomic studies dealing with<br />
watermelon fruit development and ripening.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Alba, R., Z. Fei, P. Payton, Y. Liu, S. L. Moore, P. Debbie, J. Cohn, M. D'Ascenzo,<br />
J. S. Gordon, J. K. Rose, G. Martin, S. D. Tanksley, M. Bouzayen, M. M. Jahn,<br />
and J. Giovannoni. 2004. ESTs, cDNA microarrays, and gene expression<br />
profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and development. Plant J.<br />
39:697–714.<br />
Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic<br />
local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410.<br />
Bonaldo, M. F., G. Lennon, and M. B. Soares. 1996. Normalization and subtraction:<br />
two approaches to facilitate gene discovery. Genome Res. 6:791–806.<br />
Callahan, A., P, Morgens, and E.Walton. 1989. Isolation and in vitro translation of<br />
RNAs from developing peach fruit. HortSci. 24:356–358.<br />
Giovannoni, J. 2001. Molecular regulation of fruit ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant<br />
Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52:725–749.<br />
Karakurt, Y. and D. J. Huber. 2004. Ethylene-induced gene expression, enzyme<br />
activities, and water soaking in immature and ripe watermelon (Citrullus<br />
lanatus) fruit. J. Plant Physiol. 161:381–388.<br />
Mignone, F., G. Grillo, F. Licciulli, M. Iacono, S. Liuni, P. J. Kersey, J. Duarte, C.<br />
Saccone, and G. Pesole. 2005. UTRdb and UTRsite: a collection of sequences<br />
and motifs of the untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res.<br />
33:D141–D146 (database issue).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 131
Soares, M. B. and M. F. Bonaldo. 1998. Constructing and screening normalized<br />
cDNA libraries in detecting genes. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring<br />
Harbor, NY. 2:49–157.<br />
132 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
RESEARCH OF MOLECULAR MARKERS<br />
LINKED TO THE DWARF GENE IN SQUASH<br />
Haizhen Li, Haiying Zhang, and Guoyi Gong<br />
National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />
Banjing, Haidian, Beijing 2443#, Beijing, 100089, P. R. China;<br />
Yunlong Li and Chongshi Cui<br />
Department of Horticulture, <strong>North</strong>east Agricultural University, 59<br />
Mucai Street, Gongbing Road, Xiangfang, Haerbing, Heilongjiang<br />
province, 150030, P.R. China<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Near isogenic line, dwarf gene D, RAPD, SCAR<br />
ABSTRACT. In this study, the first discovered dwarf mutant (Ai 10) of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata Duchesne was used as a donor parent and the normal C. maxima<br />
Duchesne (cv. MengRi) was used as a recurrent parent. Nine pure lines of the<br />
near isogenic lines (NILs) S1 through S9 were obtained through six backcrosses<br />
and two self-crosses.<br />
W<br />
ith the development of the world economy, rapid increase of<br />
global population, and decrease in arable land, an increase in<br />
food production per unit of land is especially important.<br />
Short-straw and half short-stalked crops with short and thickset stems<br />
that do not easily fall over can improve crop yields significantly (Liu,<br />
2005). With the development of intensive-cultivation agriculture, there<br />
is an urgent need for more dwarfing stock varieties and dwarf cultivars.<br />
Recently, many good dwarf and half-dwarf varieties have been<br />
developed, and some dwarf genes of Rht short-straw wheat and rice and<br />
a half short-straw sd-1 gene and Arabidopsis GA3 have been cloned<br />
(Peng et al., 1999; Sasaki et al., 2002; Helliwell et al., 1998). Because<br />
the mechanisms of short-straw and half-dwarf straw genes are not<br />
understood <strong>complete</strong>ly, their applications in crop improvement are<br />
limited. A search for new sources of dwarf genes revealed the dwarf<br />
China pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne). This rare resource,<br />
found in Shanxi Province in 1982, is the first dwarf mutant to be<br />
discovered in the world. Up to now, Chinese and foreign botanists have<br />
described the Chinese pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata D.) as having long<br />
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5042008 )<br />
and by the Special Foundation Support of Beijing’s Excellence person.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 133
vines. <strong>The</strong> discovery of a dwarf mutant has enriched the germplasm<br />
resources of pumpkin greatly. It may become a standard for breeding<br />
dwarf pumpkin. It has been proven that the short-vine and long-vine<br />
characteristics of Chinese pumpkin (C. moschata D.) are controlled by a<br />
pair of corresponding hereditary characters. Vinelessness (dwarfism) is<br />
a dominant gene (indicated with D), while long-vining is a recessive<br />
gene (indicated with d) (Zhou and Li, 1991). Mapping and cloning this<br />
gene may be helpful in understanding its mechanism, enriching plant<br />
genetic resources, and in developing dwarfs through genetic<br />
engineering, leading to improved varieties.<br />
Cloning and separation of genes often depends on the molecular<br />
genetic marker tightly linked to the gene. In this study, our objective<br />
was to find a marker that is tightly linked to the gene for dwarfism using<br />
near isogenic lines (NILs ) and RAPD technology (Fang et al., 2002).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIALS. Plant materials were provided from the<br />
pumpkin-breeding laboratory of the National Engineering Research<br />
Center for Vegetables (NERCV) in China. <strong>The</strong> plants used included<br />
‘MengRi’ (C. maxima Duchesne), the dwarf mutant Ai 10 (C. moschata<br />
Duchesne), nine pure NILs designated S1 through S9 (obtained through<br />
six backcrosses and two self-crosses) and 306 F2 individuals derived<br />
from the single-cross progeny of the NIL S2בMengRi’ and five<br />
long-vine C. maxima.<br />
METHODS. Genomic DNA was extracted from young expanding<br />
leaves following the CTAB protocol (Murray and Thompson, 1980).<br />
DNA concentration and quality were estimated by agarose gel<br />
electrophoresis. Final concentrations were adjusted to 30ng/ul. PCR<br />
reactions for RAPD markers were performed using standard procedures<br />
in the DNA PTC-100 (Dongsheng Chuangxin Biotechnology Co., Ltd).<br />
Products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels using a Kodak EDAS-120<br />
for imaging analysis and recording the polymorphic fragment.<br />
Data were analyzed Using JoinMap3.0 software (Van Ooijen and<br />
Vorrips, 2001) to calculate the genetic distance between the RAPD<br />
marker and the dwarf gene D. <strong>The</strong> data were denominated according to<br />
the rules of the JoinMap3.0 software. RAPD reamplification was<br />
performed using the marker linked to dwarf gene D. <strong>The</strong> product was<br />
detected on a 1% agarose gel. Bands were excised and purified by the<br />
Takara Agarose Gel DNA Purification Kit. PCR fragments were<br />
subcloned using the Promega PGEM-T easy Vector system. <strong>The</strong> DNA<br />
of the recombinant plasmid was verified by PCR after enzyme<br />
digestion.<br />
134 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Subcloned fragments were sequenced in ShangHai ShengGong<br />
Biological Engineering Services Limited and AoKe Biological<br />
Engineering Services Limited.<br />
PCR amplification was performed using SCAR primers on parents,<br />
nine pure lines of the NILs and 306 F2 generation plants, and visualized<br />
by agarose gel electrophoresis. <strong>The</strong> standard molecular weight marker<br />
is GeneRuler TM 100bp DNA Ladder Plus (MBI packing).<br />
Results<br />
ANALYSIS OF GENETIC DWARF GENE D. <strong>The</strong> experiments used a<br />
total of 306 separated F2 generation plants. Our field survey determined<br />
that 223 of the plants were dwarf and 83 were long-vine plants. We<br />
calculated X 2 =0.736< X 2 (0.05,1) =3.841, which is consistent with a 3:1<br />
separated ratio. This data suggests that the dwarf character is controlled<br />
by a single dominant gene, supporting the conclusions of Zhou et al.<br />
(1991).<br />
RAPD PRIMER SCREENING. Through screening 640 randomly<br />
primed amplifications, a total of 13 RAPD primers generated specific<br />
repeatable bands that appeared to associate with the drawf gene D<br />
phenotype. Selecting seven dwarf and seven long-vine plants randomly<br />
from the F2 progenies, we performed initial link analysis. A RAPD<br />
fragment amplified using primer S1225 (band 548bp, and named<br />
S1225-548) was present in the dwarf but not in the long-vine plants<br />
(Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> primer S1225 was used to carry out RAPD<br />
amplification and certification of 306 F2 plant progenies. Of these,<br />
seven plants had a dwarf phenotype inconsistent with the predicted<br />
RAPD band (Table 1). <strong>The</strong>se seven plants allowed us to map the<br />
distance between the RAPD marker and the dwarf gene D to 2.29 cM.<br />
<strong>The</strong> appearance of seven plants inconsistent with the predicted RAPD<br />
band may be due to an exchange between markers with dwarf gene D,<br />
which lost the linkage relationship. We further verified primer S1225s<br />
linkage to the dwarf gene D by screening the eight original NILs (Figure<br />
2) and the six C. maxima (Figure 3).<br />
LINKAGE ANALYSIS OF RAPD MARKER AND DWARF GENE D. <strong>The</strong><br />
F2 generation was analyzed with JoinMap3.0 software. <strong>The</strong> results<br />
suggest that the dwarf gene D has a genetic distance of 2.29cM to<br />
marker S1225-548. A SCAR marker (SCAR3-398) was developed from<br />
the sequencing of the S1225-548 RAPD marker using these primers:<br />
upstream primer sequence 5’-CTTGTCCATTCCTCCTCC-3’, and<br />
downstream primer sequence 5’-TCCACTCCCTCTTTTTCA-3’. <strong>The</strong><br />
amplification product fit to the RAPD expansion profile (Figure 4).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 135
Fig. 1. Patterns of ‘MengRi’ Ai10 S2 and some F2 individuals with RAPD primer<br />
S1225 (arrow indicates marker S1225-548). M = Marker; 1= ‘MengRi’; 2 = Ai10;<br />
3 = S2; 4–10 = normal plants in the F2 population; 11–17 = dwarf plants in the F2<br />
population.<br />
Fig. 2. Patterns of ‘MengRi’, Ai10, S2, and the other eight pure lines of NILs with<br />
RAPD primer S1225 (arrow indicates the marker S1225-548). M = Marker; 1=<br />
‘MengRi’; 2 = Ai10; 3 = S2; 4–11 = the other eight pure lines of the NILs (S1,<br />
S3–S9).<br />
136 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Fig. 3. Patterns of ‘MengRi’, Ai10, S2 and the cultivars of C. maxima with RAPD<br />
primer S1225 (arrow indicates the marker S1225-548). M = Marker; 1=<br />
‘MengRi’; 2 = Ai10; 3 = S2; 4–8 = the other five cultivars of C. maxima.<br />
Fig. 4. SCAR patterns of ‘MengRi’, Ai10, and some F2 individuals with primer<br />
SCAR3 (arrow indicates the marker SCAR3-398). M = Marker; 1= ‘MengRi’;<br />
2 = Ai10; 3–10 = normal plants in the F2 population; 11–14 = dwarf plants in the<br />
F2 population.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 137
Table 1: Cosegregation between S1225-548 and phenotype in the F2<br />
population from MengRi×Ai10 progenies.<br />
S1225-54<br />
Genetic<br />
Phenotype No. plant Presence Absence distance<br />
Long 83 4<br />
79<br />
Dwarf 223 220 3<br />
2.29cM<br />
Discussion<br />
Dwarf gene D is a dominant gene, though growing conditions can<br />
affect the growth habit of seedlings, sometimes making it difficult to<br />
accurately pheontype the plants for up to 35 days.<br />
Our RAPD and SCAR markers can be a useful tool to verify the D<br />
phenotype at the seedling stage. Bulked segregation analysis and NIL<br />
analysis allowed the linking of our RAPD marker to 2.29cM from the<br />
objective gene. Through theoretic calculation, the proportion of<br />
transmigration parents should be 98.438%. Currently we are screening<br />
more backcrosses to find a closer RAPD marker.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Fang, X-J. W-R. Wu, and J-L. Tang. 2002. Plant DNA molecular marker assisted<br />
breeding. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese.)<br />
Helliwell, C. A., C. C. Sheldon, M. R. Olive, A. R. Walker, J. A. D. Zeevaart, J. A. D.<br />
Peacock, and W. J. Dennis. 1998. Cloning of the Arabidopsis entkaurene oxidase<br />
gene GA3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:9019–9024<br />
Liu, J. and R-Z Li. 2005. Dwarf gene and GA signal transduction pathway in crops.<br />
Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 21(1):125–129. (In Chinese with English abstract.)<br />
Murray, M. G. and W. F. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight<br />
plant DNA. Nuc. Acids Res. 8:4321–4325<br />
Peng, J. R. et al. 1999. Green revolution genes encode mutant gibberellin response<br />
modulators. Nature. 400:256–261<br />
Sasaki, A. et al. 2002. Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin synthesis gene in rice:<br />
new insight into the rice variant that helped to avert famine over thirty years ago.<br />
Nature. 416:701–702<br />
Van Ooijen, J. W. and R. E. Voorrips. 2001. JoinMap3.0. Software for the calculation<br />
of genetic linkage maps. Plant Res. Int., Wageningen, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />
Zhao, S-Q. and W-H. Wu. 2000. DNA molecular markers and mapping. Biotech. Info.<br />
6:1–4. (In Chinese.)<br />
Zhou, X. and H. Li. 1991. A study on the heredity of cushaw (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a Moschata)<br />
vineless character and its utilization in production. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci. 1:1–6. (In<br />
Chinese.)<br />
138 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
REACTION OF MELON PI 313970 TO<br />
CUCURBIT LEAF CRUMPLE VIRUS<br />
James D. McCreight and Hsing-Yeh Liu<br />
U.S. Agricultural Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture,<br />
Agricultural Research Service, 1636 E. Alisal St.,<br />
Salinas, California 93905<br />
Thomas A. Turini<br />
University of California Cooperative Extension, Imperial County,<br />
1050 E. Holton Rd., Holtville, CA 92250-9615<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo, muskmelon, disease,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf curl virus, inheritance<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) is a recently described<br />
sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci [Gennadius]) biotype-B-transmitted<br />
begomovirus (Geminiviridae family) of cucurbits in the desert southwest U.S.A.<br />
‘Top Mark’, a standard, orange-flesh, western U.S. shipping-type melon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.) was susceptible and expressed severe symptoms in two<br />
naturally infected field tests in Imperial Valley, CA, in 2003 and 2004. PI<br />
313970, a kakri-type melon, exhibited resistance to CuLCrV in these tests; it<br />
was asymptomatic in 2003, but 20 of 30 plants evaluated in 2004 expressed<br />
symptoms. <strong>The</strong> difference in the reaction of PI 313970 could be due to seasonal<br />
differences in symptom expression, disease pressure, recovery from initial<br />
infection, and additional experience in assessing CuLCrV symptoms. Diseasesymptom<br />
data from a cross of ‘Top Mark’ and PI 313970 (F1, F2, and<br />
backcrosses to each parent) indicated recessive genetic control of the resistance<br />
reaction of PI 313970 to CuLCrV.<br />
S<br />
weetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), adversely<br />
affects yield and quality of a wide range of vegetable and<br />
agronomic crops worldwide directly through feeding damage or<br />
indirectly as a virus vector (Henneberry et al., 1998). Three new B.<br />
tabaci biotype-B-transmitted begomoviruses of cucurbits were<br />
observed in commercial cucurbit fields in the southwest U.S.A.,<br />
northern Mexico, and Guatemala beginning in 1998. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf<br />
crumple virus (CuLCrV) was observed in Imperial Valley, California,<br />
first on watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. & Nakai) in<br />
1998 (Guzman et al., 2000; Hernandez et al., 2000), and then on melon<br />
We thank Patti Fashing for assistance in the field and greenhouse tests, and Jeff Wasson and<br />
John Sears for assistance in the greenhouse and laboratory tests. Mention of a trade name,<br />
proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the<br />
USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 139
(Cucumis melo L.) in 1999 (Guzman et al., 2000). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf curl<br />
virus (CuLCV) occurred on pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.), honeydew, and<br />
muskmelon in Arizona, Texas, and Coahuilla, Mexico, in 1998<br />
(Brown et al., 2000). Melon chlorotic leaf curl virus (MCLCV)<br />
occurred on melon in Guatemala in 2000 (Brown et al., 2001).<br />
CuLCrV and CuLCV are identical based on percent nucleotide and<br />
amino acid similarities for open reading frames, and are distinct from<br />
Squash leaf curl virus (SLCV) on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. (Flock and Mayhew,<br />
1981) and MCLCV (Brown et al., 2002). CuLCrV symptoms are<br />
variable and include stunted and chlorotic tips and leaves (Figure 1A,<br />
B), crumpling (Figure 1B, C), and interveinal yellowing of leaves<br />
(Figure1D).<br />
C D<br />
Fig. 1. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) in a naturally infected field test:<br />
(A) susceptible plant showing stunted and chlorotic growing points; (B) close-up<br />
of chlorotic terminal bud and crumpled leaves; (C) crumpled leaves; and (D)<br />
interveinal yellowing.<br />
140 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Although the foliar symptoms have been widespread and severe<br />
during the fall cantaloupe season, from August to November, the<br />
presence of CuLCrV has not been associated with obvious decreases in<br />
cantaloupe yield or quality in Imperial Valley (T. A. Turini,<br />
unpublished). Severe and uniform infection of melons was observed in<br />
the fall of 2003 at the University of California, Desert Research and<br />
Education Center, Holtville (DREC), and the University of Arizona,<br />
Yuma Agricultural Research Center, Yuma. Symptoms were similar to<br />
SLCV, CuLCrV, and CuLCV, and were preceded by unusually high<br />
numbers of B. tabaci biotype B at the two research stations,<br />
documented at the Yuma site (J. C. Palumbo, unpublished data).<br />
Population density trends between Yuma and Imperial sites are similar<br />
(Yee et al., 1997).<br />
We report here data on the inheritance of the resistant reaction of<br />
PI 313970 to CuLCrV in two naturally infected field tests. PI 313970<br />
is a kakri-type melon from India that possesses resistance to B. tabaci<br />
biotype B (Boissot et al., 2000), Lettuce infectious yellows virus<br />
(LIYV) (McCreight, 2000), and powdery mildew incited by<br />
Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea) (McCreight, 2003).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
VIRUS CONFIRMATION AND IDENTIFICATION. Symptomatic melon<br />
leaf samples were taken from ‘Top Mark’ in both years. Total nucleic<br />
acids were isolated from 100mg of infected melon leaf tissue<br />
according to the method described by Li et al. (1998). <strong>The</strong> polymerase<br />
chain reaction (PCR) parameters used to amplify the CuLCrV DNA<br />
fragment were as follows: an initial denaturing step at 94°C for 5 min<br />
followed by 94°C, 40 sec for denaturing; 60°C, 40 sec for annealing;<br />
and 72°C, 1 min for extension for 35 cycles, with a final extension step<br />
of 72°C for 10 min. PCR-amplified DNA fragments were analyzed by<br />
electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels in 1X TAE buffer (40mM Trisacetate<br />
and 2mM EDTA, pH 8.0), stained with ethidium bromide and<br />
visualized with UV light. <strong>The</strong> primer pairs FA-908 (5’-<br />
ACCCCGTGTATGCGACATTG-3’), RA1-1419 (5’-CGACGAATA<br />
GACTTGGACTGCG-3’), and RA2-1601 (5’-<br />
AGGAATCCCATCAATCGTGC-3’) were designed from the<br />
sequence of CuLCrV DNA-A component (GenBank accession no.<br />
AF224760) to amplify AC2 and AC3 open reading frames. <strong>The</strong><br />
specific primer pair for CuLCrV, FB-1324 (5’-<br />
TTCTTCTGGTAAAATATGGC-3’) and RB-2370 (5’-<br />
CCGACGAGATATGTCAACG-3’), was designed from the sequence<br />
of CuLCrV DNA-B component (GenBank accession no. AF224761).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 141
<strong>The</strong> amplified products from AC2 and AC3 open reading frames were<br />
purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN Inc. Valencia,<br />
CA) and sequenced by a commercial company (MCLAB, South San<br />
Francisco, CA). Sequences were analyzed by the program MacVector<br />
7.0 (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA).<br />
INHERITANCE STUDY. Two naturally infected field tests were<br />
conducted in the fall melon seasons of 2003 and 2004. <strong>The</strong> studies were<br />
planted at DREC on 11 Sept. 2003 and 15 Sept. 2004, and irrigated, as<br />
needed, using subsurface drip. Each plot was 366cm long and consisted of<br />
three hills spaced 91cm apart with 91-cm buffers on each end; beds were<br />
203cm wide. Two seeds were planted per hill and thinned to one seedling<br />
at the first-true-leaf stage of growth. Each of the seven replications<br />
included one plot of each parent, one plot each of four reciprocal F1<br />
progenies (one TM x PI and three PI x TM), five plots of one F2 progeny,<br />
one plot of the backcross to ‘Top Mark’ (BCTM), and two plots of the<br />
backcross to PI 313970 (BCPI). Plants were inoculated by naturally<br />
occurring B. tabaci biotype B. Disease symptoms were recorded on 20<br />
Nov. 2003 and 7 Nov. 2004, and noted as present or absent.<br />
All F1, F2, and backcross progenies used in the field and greenhouse<br />
tests were produced using standard hand-pollination techniques for melon<br />
(Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997). Data were analyzed using chisquare.<br />
Yates correction was used for the analysis of the 2003 data from<br />
the F2 and BCPI families where the number of expected segregants in one<br />
class was less than 20 (Yates, 1931).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
VIRUS CONFIRMATION AND IDENTIFICATION. <strong>The</strong> CuLCrV-specific<br />
primer pair from BC1 region was amplified by PCR. A product size of<br />
about 1000bp was expected (Figure 2, lane 3). No products were found in<br />
similar preparations from healthy plants (Figure 2, lane 2). <strong>The</strong> expected<br />
product sizes from primer pairs used to amplify AC2 and AC3 open<br />
reading frames were obtained (Figure 2, lanes 4 and 5). <strong>The</strong> sequence<br />
analysis of AC2 and AC3 revealed a high degree of sequence identity with<br />
CuLCrV (100% and 99.0% for nucleotides and 100% and 97.7% for<br />
amino acids, respectively). <strong>The</strong> PCR and sequence analyses confirmed<br />
that the virus present in the inheritance studies was CuLCrV.<br />
INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE IN PI 313970. ‘Top Mark’ was<br />
highly susceptible in both years (Table 1) and exhibited pronounced<br />
CuLCrV symptoms (Figure 1). PI 313970 was asymptomatic in 2003,<br />
but 20 of the 31 plants in the test were symptomatic in 2004 (Table 1).<br />
PI 313970 was, therefore, not immune to CuLCrV. <strong>The</strong> difference in<br />
the observed reactions of PI 313970 in the two years could be due to<br />
142 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
one or more factors, including seasonal differences in symptom<br />
expression, disease pressure, recovery from initial infection, and<br />
additional experience in assessing CuLCrV symptoms.<br />
In 2003, whitefly and disease pressures were very high. CuLCrV<br />
generally occurred in isolated fields and to a very limited extent during<br />
May and June (Turini, unpublished). <strong>The</strong> planting in 2003 was subject<br />
to very high whitefly pressure and it is unlikely that PI 313970 escaped<br />
infection due to low or nonuniform insect pressure. Disease recovery<br />
may be a factor. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. were observed to recover from SLCV,<br />
Table 1. Reactions of ‘Top Mark’, PI 313970, and their F1, F2, and<br />
backcross families to natural infection by <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus<br />
in two field tests, Holtville, CA, Fall 2003 and Fall 2004 z .<br />
Entry<br />
Asympto-<br />
matic<br />
Sympto<br />
matic - Expected χ 2 P<br />
2003<br />
Top<br />
Mark<br />
(TM) 0 15 all S<br />
PI<br />
313970<br />
(PI) 18 0 all A<br />
F1 TM x PI 1 17 all S<br />
F1 PI x TM 2 52 all S<br />
F2 15 64 1 A:3 S 1.09 0.30<br />
BCTM 0 15 all S<br />
BC1PI 15 20 1 A:1 S 0.46 0.49<br />
2004<br />
Top<br />
Mark<br />
(TM) 3 17 all S<br />
PI<br />
313970<br />
(PI) 11 20 all A<br />
F1 TM x PI 6 24 all S<br />
F1 PI x TM 4 28 all S<br />
F2 38 129 1 A:3 S 0.08 0.78<br />
BCTM 2 19 all S<br />
BC1PI 23 34 1 A: 1 S 2.12 0.15<br />
z Yates correction applied to the 2003 analysis of F2 and BCPI segregation data.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 143
a related geminivirus, in field and greenhouse tests (McCreight and<br />
Kishaba, 1991). <strong>The</strong> 2003 test was evaluated 70 days after planting<br />
whereas the 2004 test was evaluated 53 days after planting. <strong>The</strong><br />
additional 17 days in 2003 may have been sufficient for PI 313970 to<br />
recover and appear asymptomatic.<br />
Regardless of the discrepancy in the reactions of PI 313970 to<br />
CuLCrV between years, the reciprocal F1 progenies were susceptible,<br />
and the F2 segregated in acceptable fits to a 3 susceptible:1 resistant<br />
(asymptomatic) ratio in both years (Table 1), clear indication of<br />
recessive control of the resistance reaction in PI 313970. <strong>The</strong><br />
backcrosses provided additional evidence for a recessive gene. <strong>The</strong><br />
backcross to ‘Top Mark’ was susceptible with only two escapes in<br />
2004 (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> backcross to PI 313970 segregated in an<br />
acceptable fit to a 1 susceptible:1 resistant (asymptomatic) in both<br />
years (Table 1).<br />
Fig. 2. A 1.0% agarose gel showing the products of polymerase chain reaction<br />
(PCR) for detection of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) in melon leaf<br />
tissue with CuLCrV-specific primer pairs. Lane 1, BRL 1kb ladder; Lane 2,<br />
from healthy melon leaf tissue; Lane 3 to Lane 5 from CuLCrV-infected melon<br />
leaf tissue. <strong>The</strong> primer pair for Lanes 2 and 3 was FB-1324 and RB-2370; Lane<br />
4 was primers FA-908 and RA1-1419; Lane 5 was primers FA-908 and RA2-<br />
1601.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Boissot, N., C. Pavis, R. Guillaume, D. Lafortune, and N. Sauvion. 2000. Insect<br />
resistance in Cucumis melo accession 90625. Proc. 7 th EUCARPIA meeting on<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>. Acta Hort. 510:297–304.<br />
Brown, J. K., A. M. Idris, C. Alteri, and D. C. Stenger. 2002. Emergence of a new<br />
cucurbit-infecting Begomovirus species capable of forming reassortants with<br />
144 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
elated viruses in the Squash leaf curl virus cluster. Phytopathology. 92:734–<br />
742.<br />
Brown, J. K., A. M. Idris, D. Rogan, M. H. Hussein, and M. Palmieri. 2001. Melon<br />
chlorotic leaf curl virus, a new begomovirus associated with Bemisia tabaci<br />
infestation in Guatemala. Plant Dis. 85:1027.<br />
Brown, J. K., A. M. Idris, M. W. Olsen, M. E. Miller, T. Isakeit, and J. Anciso. 2000.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf curl virus, a new whitefly-transmitted geminivirus in Arizona,<br />
Texas, and Mexico. Plant Dis. 84:809.<br />
Flock, R. A. and D. E. Mayhew. 1981. Squash leaf curl, a new disease of cucurbits<br />
in California. Plant Dis. 65:75–76.<br />
Guzman, P., M. R. Sudarshana, Y. S. Seo, M. R. Rojas, E. Natwick, T. Turini, K.<br />
Mayberry, and R. L. Gilbertson. 2000. A new bipartite geminivirus<br />
(Begomovirus) causing leaf curl and crumpling in cucurbits in the Imperial<br />
Valley of California. Plant Dis. 84:488.<br />
Henneberry, T. J., N. C. Toscano, and S. J. Castle. 1998. Bemisia spp. (Homoptera:<br />
Aleyrodidae) in the United <strong>State</strong>s history, pest status, and management. Recent<br />
Res. Dev. Ent. 2:151–161.<br />
Hernandez, N. A., M. R. Sudarshana, P. Guzman, and R. L. Gilbertson. 2000.<br />
Generation and characterization of infectious clones of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> leaf crumple<br />
virus, a new bipartite geminivirus from the Imperial Valley of California.<br />
.<br />
Li, R. H., G. C. Wisler, H. Y. Liu, and J. E. Duffus. 1998. Comparison of diagnostic<br />
techniques for detection of tomato infectious chlorosis virus. Plant Dis. 82:84–<br />
88.<br />
McCreight, J. D. 2000. Inheritance of resistance to lettuce infectious yellows virus in<br />
melon. HortSci. 35:1118–1120.<br />
McCreight, J. D. 2003. Genes for resistance to powdery mildew races 1 and 2 U.S. in<br />
melon PI 313970. HortSci. 38:591–594.<br />
McCreight, J. D.and A. N. Kishaba. 1991. Reaction of cucurbit species to squash<br />
leaf curl virus and sweetpotato whitefly. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116:137–141.<br />
Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />
NY.<br />
Yates, F. 1931. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Suppl. J.<br />
Royal Stat. Soc. 1:215–235.<br />
Yee, W. L., J. C. Palumbo, N. C. Toscano, M. J. Blua, and H. A. Yoshida. 1997.<br />
Seasonal population trends and densities of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera:<br />
Aleyrodidae) on Alfalfa in southern California and Arizona. Env. Ent. 26:241–<br />
249.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 145
THE MELON GENOMIC LIBRARY OF NEAR ISOGENIC<br />
LINES: A TOOL FOR DISSECTING COMPLEX TRAITS<br />
Antonio José Monforte, Iban Eduardo, and Pere Arús<br />
Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Cabrils, Spain<br />
Juan Pablo Fernández-Trujillo, Javier Obando,<br />
Juan Antonio Martínez, and Antonio Luís Alarcón<br />
Technical University of Cartagena (ETSIA) and Institute of Plant<br />
Biotechnology Cartagena, Spain<br />
Esther van der Knaap<br />
<strong>The</strong> Ohio <strong>State</strong> University/OARDC, Wooster, OH<br />
Jose María Álvarez<br />
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón,<br />
Zaragoza, Spain<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, QTL, fruit quality, introgression<br />
line, marker- assisted selection<br />
ABSTRACT. A doubled haploid line (DHL) population of melon derived from a<br />
cross between the Korean accession PI 161375 (SC) and the Spanish Inodorus<br />
cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) was used to develop a collection of near isogenic<br />
lines (NILs). Selected DHLs were backcrossed to PS and further backcrossing<br />
and selfing was performed, monitoring introgressions from SC using molecular<br />
markers. A final collection of 57 NILs was obtained, containing a unique<br />
independent introgression from SC in the PS genetic background. <strong>The</strong><br />
introgressions within the collection cover at least 85% of the SC genome, with<br />
an average introgression size of 41cM, corresponding to 3.4% of the SC genome.<br />
<strong>The</strong> melon NIL genomic library was used to dissect the genetic control of melon<br />
fruit shape. A total of 15 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were detected, 8 of them<br />
producing round melons and 7 producing elongated melons. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
demonstrate that the melon NIL genomic library is a powerful tool for the study<br />
of QTLs involved in important complex traits, introduction of new genetic<br />
variability in modern cultivars from exotic sources, or the development of<br />
precompetitive breeding lines in melon-breeding projects.<br />
M<br />
elon (Cucumis melo) is the most diversified species of the<br />
genus Cucumis, and this variability is reflected at the<br />
morphological, physiological, biochemical (Kirkbride,<br />
1993; Liu et al., 2004), and molecular (Stepansky et al., 1999; Mliki et<br />
al., 2001; Akashi et al., 2002; Monforte et al., 2003) levels. A high<br />
proportion of the genetic variability can be found in African, Indian,<br />
and Oriental germplasm, which are considered exotic relative to<br />
European and <strong>North</strong> American cultivars. Exotic germplasm has been<br />
used to search for resistance genes, but its potential as a source of new<br />
major gene and quantitative trait locus (QTL) alleles with favorable<br />
146 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
effects on fruit quality has not been thoroughly investigated.<br />
Furthermore, the genetic control of fruit morphological variation is<br />
largely unknown.<br />
QTLs involved in fruit-quality traits have been detected in three<br />
different crosses involving European cultivars and exotic Asian<br />
accessions (Périn et al., 2002; Monforte et al., 2004). However, a more<br />
thorough analysis is needed to assess the suitability of incorporating<br />
new alleles from exotic germplasm into elite melon cultivars.<br />
Werhahn and Allard (1965) demonstrated that individual QTL<br />
effects can be efficiently estimated using backcross inbred lines, each<br />
having a low proportion of the donor genome. Eshed and Zamir (1994,<br />
1995) further developed the idea, constructing an introgression line<br />
(IL) population consisting of a set of lines where each contained a<br />
single homozygous chromosome segment from a donor parent, in the<br />
genetic background of an elite cultivar. A NIL population can be<br />
defined as a genomic library where inserts are chromosome fragments<br />
of the donor-parent genome and the vector is the recurrent-parent<br />
genome. QTL analysis is very efficient using NIL collections (Eshed<br />
and Zamir, 1995). Fine mapping and cloning of genes underlying the<br />
QTL is more expeditious when introgression lines are used (Frary et<br />
al., 2000).<br />
In the current report, we present the construction of a NIL<br />
collection in melon. A Spanish ‘Piel de Sapo’ cultivar (PS), belonging<br />
to the horticultural group Inodorus, was chosen as the recipient<br />
genotype. PS fruits are very sweet, oval, white-fleshed, and<br />
nonclimacteric (Monforte et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> Korean cultivar<br />
‘Songwhan Charmi’ accession PI 161375 (SC), included in the<br />
horticultural group Conomon, was chosen as the donor genotype<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors thank A. Montejo, A. Ortigosa, E. Moreno, F. García, E. Truque, M. C.<br />
García-Abellán, M. Cánovas (CIFACITA S. L.), A. B. Pérez, and N. Welty for<br />
technical assistance. This work was funded in part by grants AGL2003-09175-C02-<br />
01 and AGL2003-09175-C02-02 from the Spanish Ministry of Education and<br />
Science and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER, European Union), and<br />
the Fundación Séneca de la Región de Murcia (00620/PI/04). AJM was supported in<br />
part by a contract from Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y<br />
Alimentaria (INIA) and by a fellowship from the Departament d’Universitats,<br />
Recerca i Societat de la Informació (Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain). IE and JO<br />
were supported by fellowships from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science<br />
and the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, respectively. Field space and personnel<br />
at the WO location were provided by the Ohio Research and Development Center of<br />
Ohio <strong>State</strong> University. Thanks are due to Semillas Fitó S. A. for providing the seeds<br />
of the parental PS line.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 147
ased on phenotypic and molecular data. <strong>The</strong> genetic distance between<br />
PS and SC is one of the highest described between two cultivars within<br />
melon germplasm (Garcia-Mas et al., 2000; Monforte et al., 2003). SC<br />
presents some resistance to some diseases and pests, and its fruits are<br />
pear-shaped, green-fleshed, with low sugar content (Monforte et al.,<br />
2004). <strong>The</strong> NIL collection was used to study the genetic control of<br />
melon fruit shape.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
<strong>The</strong> development of the melon NIL genomic library is detailed in<br />
Eduardo et al. (2005). Briefly, 30 selected doubled haploid lines<br />
derived from the cross between a ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) genotype and the<br />
accession PI 161375 (SC) were backcrossed to PS. <strong>The</strong> selected 30<br />
DHLxPS were considered as our initial BC1 (first generation of<br />
backcrossing) population. All 30 BC1 genotypes were backcrossed to<br />
PS. Next, 12 BC1 progenies were chosen to found the BC2 generation<br />
(192 plants in total). BC2 plants were backcrossed to PS and genotyped<br />
with 65 molecular markers, covering the whole genome (see below).<br />
BC3 families with candidate introgressions and a lower proportion of<br />
donor genome were selected according to BC2 genotypes. Seedlings<br />
from each BC3 family were genotyped in order to select the target<br />
regions and discard other exotic introgressions. Several rounds of<br />
marker-assisted selection (MAS), backcrossing with PS, and selfpollination<br />
were performed to obtain a set of NILs with a single<br />
introgression from the SC donor genome.<br />
DNA was extracted as described by Klimyuk et al. (1993) and<br />
Garcia-Mas et al. (2000) from cotyledons and young leaves. <strong>The</strong><br />
molecular markers included 62 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), one<br />
cleavage amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS), and two sequence<br />
characterized amplified regions (SCARs) selected from the map of<br />
Gonzalo et al. (2005). SSRs were amplified as in Gonzalo et al. (2005)<br />
and visualized using a LI-COR IR 2 sequencer (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln,<br />
NE). Bands were scored visually and the molecular weight of each<br />
band was estimated by comparing its migration on electrophoresis<br />
with the IRD-labelled STR molecular size marker (Li-Cor Inc.,<br />
Lincoln, NE). <strong>The</strong> SCAR markers were genotyped as described by<br />
Morales et al. (2004).<br />
A selected set of 27 NILs was evaluated in four locations in the<br />
summer of 2004: Cabrils, Spain (CA), Zaragoza, Spain (ZA),<br />
Cartagena, Spain (CT), and Wooster, Ohio, USA (WO). In CA, 10<br />
plants of each NIL and 100 controls (PS) were grown in a greenhouse<br />
in peat bags, drip-irrigated. In ZA, four plots of 3 plants for each NIL<br />
148 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
and 14 plots of PS were randomized in the field. In CT and WO, 10<br />
plants of each NIL and 50 plants of PS were transferred to the field in<br />
a <strong>complete</strong>ly randomized design.<br />
Fruit-shape index (FS) was calculated as the ratio between<br />
maximum fruit length and maximum fruit diameter. NIL mean values<br />
were compared with the control genotype PS using the Dunnet contrast<br />
(Dunnet, 1955) with Type-I error α ≤ 0.05 for each location.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> melon NIL genomic library includes 57 NILs, each of them<br />
containing a single homozygotic introgression from SC, with an<br />
average introgression size of 41.0cM (approximately 3.4% of the SC<br />
genome), ranging from 6.8 to 100.8cM (0.6% to 8.9% of the donor<br />
genome) in the PS genetic background (Eduardo et al., 2005). Each<br />
linkage group was represented by an average of 4.75 NILs with<br />
overlapping introgressions. <strong>The</strong> average genetic resolution to map new<br />
molecular markers or QTLs is 18.9cM, although the resolution can be<br />
increased easily by generating new recombinants from selected NILs<br />
allowing fine mapping or map-based cloning of QTLs (Fridman et al.,<br />
2000).<br />
Three NILs were already used to verify the QTLs involved in<br />
several fruit traits: fruit shape (fs1.1 and fs9.1), external color (ecol9.1),<br />
and flesh color (gf1.1) (Monforte et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> effects of these<br />
QTLs were verified using NILs with introgressions in the candidate<br />
regions (Eduardo et al., 2004). To assess further the suitability of the<br />
NIL library to dissect complex traits, the genetic control of fruit shape<br />
was studied with a selected set of NILs evaluated in four locations.<br />
<strong>The</strong> results of this experiment are summarized in<br />
Table 1. FS of the recurrent parent was moderately elongate. <strong>The</strong><br />
overall mean of the NIL library was similar to PS; however there was<br />
important variation among NILs, ranging from <strong>complete</strong>ly round to<br />
extremely elongate, demonstrating the high genetic variability within<br />
this population for this trait (Figure 1).<br />
Sixteen NILs were significantly different in at least one location.<br />
Eight of them had fruits that were between 11 and 52% more<br />
elongated than the control, and the other 8 produced 10–28% rounder<br />
fruits. Three showed significant effects in all locations, and 5 showed<br />
significant effects in only one location. <strong>The</strong> minimum number of<br />
QTLs estimated as affecting this trait was 15. Périn et al. (2002)<br />
detected seven QTLs for FS, as did Monforte et al. (2004). All these<br />
QTLs have been detected with the NIL genomic library in at least one<br />
location. Furthermore, the number of detected QTLs was significantly<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 149
Table 1. Fruit-shape index means and standard deviations for recurrent<br />
genotypes ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS), the overall NIL library mean, and the<br />
range among NILs among four locations.<br />
Cabrils Cartagena Wooster Zaragoza<br />
PS 1.26 ± 0.08 1.39 ± 0.10 1.42 ± 0.08 1.48 ± 0.06<br />
NIL library 1.30 ± 0.16 1.40 ± 0.16 1.45 ± 0.21 1.45 ± 0.18<br />
Range 0.98–1.72 1.00–1.74 1.11–2.03 1.09–1.86<br />
higher using the NIL genomic library, demonstrating the high<br />
efficiency of this novel population to dissect complex traits in melon.<br />
<strong>The</strong> results reported in the present article are only a first example<br />
of the possible applications of the melon NIL genomic library. This<br />
resource could also be useful for studying traits useful to consumers,<br />
such as nutrition, pharmaceutical-compound content, aroma, flavor,<br />
texture, external aspect, shelf life, and sensitivity to internal disorders,<br />
as well as for detecting new allelic variability that could also be a<br />
resource for modern breeding programs. For example, designing<br />
cultivars with appropriate fruit shape for automatic fruit processing is<br />
critical for reducing mechanical damage, and fruit shape is also an<br />
important factor in consumer preferences. In the current work, some<br />
highly heritable QTLs modifying FS have been identified that would<br />
allow the design of melons adapted for different markets by<br />
introducing these QTLs in modern cultivars, using marker-assisted<br />
selection.<br />
<strong>The</strong> allelic variability detected in this NIL population is obviously<br />
only a small portion of the melon genetic variability. New crosses<br />
between distantly related cultivars or accessions are necessary to<br />
understand globally the genetic variability in melon germplasm.<br />
Further analysis of this NIL population, including fine mapping,<br />
candidate gene analysis, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and mapbased<br />
cloning, will provide a body of data comparable to other model<br />
species.<br />
In summary, we present a study of the genetics of fruit shape in<br />
melon, using a newly available melon NIL genomic library. <strong>The</strong><br />
results presented here can provide a starting point for further<br />
characterization of the genetic factors involved in melon fruit quality.<br />
Future studies with this and other similar populations will allow<br />
150 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
efficient, systematic, and straightforward manipulation of the allelic<br />
variability present in melon germplasm.<br />
Fig. 1. Images of typical fruits from the parent genotypes PS and PI 161375 and<br />
from several NILs showing the variability in fruit shape within the NIL genomic<br />
library.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Akashi, Y., N. Fukuda, T. Wako, M. Masuda, and K. Kato. 2002. Genetic variation<br />
and phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo<br />
L., based on the analysis of five isozymes. Euphytica. 125:385–396.<br />
Dunnet, C. W. 1955. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several<br />
treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50:1096–1121.<br />
Eduardo, I., P. Arús, and A. J. Monforte. 2004. Genetics of fruit quality in melon.<br />
verification of QTLs involved in fruit shape with near-isogenic lines (NILs), p.<br />
499–502. In: A. Lebeda and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in cucurbit genetics and<br />
breeding research. Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Eduardo, I., P. Arus, and A. J. Monforte. 2005. Development of a genomic library of<br />
near isogenic lines (NILs) in melon (Cucumis melo L.) from the exotic accession<br />
PI 161375. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 112:139–148.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 151
Eshed, Y. and D. Zamir. 1994. A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L.<br />
esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica. 79:175–179.<br />
Eshed, Y. and D. Zamir. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon<br />
pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of<br />
yield-associated QTL. Genetics. 141:1147–1162.<br />
Frary, A., T. C. Nesbitt, S. Grandillo, E. van der Knaap, B. Cong, J. Liu, J. Meller, R.<br />
Elber, K. B. Alpert, and S. D. Tanksley. 2000. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus<br />
key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Sci. 289:85–88.<br />
Fridman, E., T. Pleban, and D. Zamir. 2000. A recombination hotspot delimits a<br />
wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an<br />
invertase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:4718–4723.<br />
Garcia-Mas, J., M. Oliver, H. Gómez-Paniagua, and M. C. de Vicente. 2000.<br />
Comparing AFLP, RAPD and RFLP markers for measuring genetic diversity in<br />
melon. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 101:860–864.<br />
Gonzalo, M. J., M. Oliver, J. Garcia-Mas, A. Monfort, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, N. Katzir,<br />
P. Arus, and A. J. Monforte. (2005). Simple-sequence repeat markers used in<br />
merging linkage maps of melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
110:802−811.<br />
Kirkbride, J. H. 1993. Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumis<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Parkway, Boone, NC.<br />
Klimyuk, V. I., B. J. Carroll, C. M. Thomas, and J. D. G. Jones. 1993. Alkali<br />
treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. Plant<br />
J. 3:493–494.<br />
Liu, L., F. Kakihara, and M. Kato. 2004. Characterization of six varieties of Cucumis<br />
melo L. based on morphological and physiological characters, including shelflife<br />
of fruit. Euphytica. 135:305–313.<br />
Mliki, A., J. E. Staub, Z. Y. Sun, and A. Ghorbel. 2001. Genetic diversity in melon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.): an evaluation of African germplasm. Genet. Res. Crop. Ev.<br />
48:587–597.<br />
Monforte, A. J., J. Garcia-Mas, and P. Arus. 2003. Genetic variability in melon<br />
based on microsatellite variation. Plant Breed. 122:153–157.<br />
Monforte, A. J., M. Oliver, M. J. Gonzalo, J. M. Alvarez, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, and P.<br />
Arus. 2004. Identification of quantitative trait loci involved in fruit quality traits<br />
in melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 108:750–758.<br />
Morales, M., E. Roig, A. J. Monforte, P. Arus, and J. Garcia-Mas. 2004. Singlenucleotide<br />
polymorphisms detected in expressed sequence tags of melon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.). Genome. 47:352−360.<br />
Périn, C., L. S. Hagen, N. Giovinazzo, D. Besombes, C. Dogimont, and M. Pitrat.<br />
2002. Genetic control of fruit shape acts prior to anthesis in melon (Cucumis<br />
melo L.). Mol. Genet. Genom. 266:933–941.<br />
Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of<br />
melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation.<br />
Plant Syst. & Evol. 217:313–332.<br />
Wehrhahn C. and R. W. Allard. 1965. <strong>The</strong> detection and measurement of the effects<br />
of individual genes involved in the inheritance of a quantitative character in<br />
wheat. Genetics. 51:109–119.<br />
152 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
MOLECULAR MARKERS ASSOCIATED<br />
WITH QUANTITATIVE CONTROL OF<br />
BETA-CAROTENE SYNTHESIS IN<br />
CUCUMIS MELO L.<br />
A. B. Napier, S. O. Park, and K. M. Crosby<br />
Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural<br />
Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843<br />
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Weslaco, Texas, 78596<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Inheritance, segregation, progeny, polymorphism<br />
ABSTRACT. Flesh color in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) is considered to be<br />
controlled by two genes, gf (green flesh) and wf (white flesh). <strong>The</strong> epistatic<br />
interactions between the genes produce orange flesh color. <strong>The</strong> intensity of<br />
orange flesh color, caused by the levels of beta-carotene, appears to be<br />
quantitatively inherited. Our study of two F2 populations, formed from the<br />
initial cross of ‘Sunrise’ (white fleshed) with ‘TAM Uvalde’ (orange fleshed),<br />
resulted in a continuous distribution of beta-carotene concentrations from high<br />
to low, which suggests quantitative inheritance for this trait. A chi-square test<br />
for our segregating F2 populations corresponded with expected segregation<br />
ratios. From an F2 population, two DNA bulks were composed of either eight<br />
high or eight low beta-carotene F2 individuals. <strong>The</strong> bulks were screened for<br />
detecting polymorphic molecular markers using 128 primer combinations with<br />
the polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />
technique (PCR-AFLP); this technique did not provide useful polymorphisms.<br />
Additional bulks were created using six high and six low beta-carotene F2<br />
individuals. <strong>The</strong>se bulks were screened using random amplified polymorphic<br />
DNA (RAPD) primers. Of 510 primers screened, 47 produced marker<br />
polymorphisms between parents and bulks.<br />
M<br />
uskmelons play an important role in the American diet.<br />
Ranked as one of the top 10 most-consumed fruits by the<br />
USDA, muskmelons have the highest amount of betacarotene<br />
among these top 10 fruits. Beta-carotene, also called provitamin<br />
A, is an essential nutrient required for eye health, and may<br />
have the potential as an antioxidant to reduce the risks associated with<br />
cancer, heart disease, and other illnesses (Lester, 1997).<br />
This material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative <strong>State</strong> Research,<br />
Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture “Designing Foods<br />
for Health” under Agreement No. 2004-34402-14768 or 2005-34402-16401. We<br />
would also like to acknowledge Dr. Monica Menz for her assistance with AFLP<br />
procedures, techniques, and supplies.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 153
<strong>Breeding</strong> melon varieties with increased levels of beta-carotene<br />
will benefit consumer health. Many phytonutrients are most<br />
bioavailable when consumed in their fresh form, rather than as vitamin<br />
supplements. <strong>The</strong> higher level of beta-carotene found in some melons<br />
has a genotypic component, which may be used to breed melons high<br />
in beta-carotene. Molecular markers and marker-assisted selection<br />
(MAS) can be used to increase the efficacy of the breeding process,<br />
while lowering breeding costs. Developed markers can also be used to<br />
easily screen existing lines for high beta-carotene content.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
An F2 population was created by self-pollinating F1 progeny of<br />
‘Sunrise’, the white-fleshed female parent, crossed with ‘TAM<br />
Uvalde’, a high beta-carotene variety. A field population consisting of<br />
117 F2 individuals and a greenhouse population containing 90 F2<br />
individuals were grown. <strong>The</strong> resulting fruit samples were subjected to<br />
hexane extraction followed by spectrophotometric analysis (Fish et al.,<br />
2002) and ranked according to beta-carotene content. Genomic DNA<br />
was extracted from young leaf tissue by the method of Skroch and<br />
Nienhuis (1995). Two eight-plant DNA bulks composed of either high<br />
or low beta-carotene F2 individuals were screened for polymorphic<br />
molecular markers (Michelmore et al., 1991). Primers based on<br />
EcoRI+3 and MseI+3 were used to create 128 combinations, which<br />
were screened using the amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />
(AFLP) technique described by Vos et al. (1995).<br />
Additional bulks were created consisting of six high and six low<br />
beta-carotene F2 individuals. Random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD) primers were also used to screen between bulks, using the<br />
method described by Skroch and Nienhuis (1995). A total of 510<br />
RAPD primers were screened.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> levels of beta-carotene found in the parents were as expected.<br />
‘Sunrise’ had consistently low levels while the beta-carotene quantities<br />
found in ‘TAM Uvalde’ averaged about 26µg/g. Beta-carotene levels<br />
within the F2 populations were quite variable, and in some cases much<br />
higher than ‘TAM Uvalde’ (Table 1). This indicates that the quantity<br />
of beta-carotene produced in each progeny fruit is quantitatively<br />
controlled.<br />
<strong>The</strong> segregation ratios of our F2 populations further confirm the<br />
results presented by Clayberg (1992) and Monforte et al. (2004) (Table<br />
2). If orange flesh is always dominant to white and green flesh color,<br />
154 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Beta-carotene content in fruit of field and greenhouse F2<br />
populations.<br />
Beta-<br />
Generation/<br />
Average beta- Standard carotene<br />
description<br />
carotene, μg/g deviation range, μg/g<br />
P1, Sunrise 1.41 0.41<br />
P2, TAMU 25.91 8.20<br />
F2, (P1 × P2) greenhouse 12.81 9.32 1.13-40.17<br />
F2, (P1 × P2) field 15.32 9.36 1.41-50.25<br />
Table 2. Expected and actual melon-flesh color segregation ratios<br />
Generation/<br />
Description Total Orange White Green<br />
P1, Sunrise 9 0 9 0<br />
P2, TAMU 6 6 0 0<br />
F2, (P1 × P2)<br />
green-house<br />
79 58 13 8<br />
F2, (P1 × P2)<br />
field<br />
117 92 12 13<br />
Ratios χ2<br />
Expected Actual Accept Ho Actual ά<br />
F2 g-house<br />
o:w:g 12:3:1 12:3:1 5.99 2.15 0.05<br />
o:no z F2 field<br />
3:1 3:1 3.84 0.11 0.05<br />
o:w:g 12:3:1 7:1:1 5.99 9.14 0.05<br />
o:no<br />
z<br />
no = not orange.<br />
3:1 3:1 3.84 0.82 0.05<br />
then a simple segregation of 3:1 (orange: white+green) is expected.<br />
<strong>The</strong> segregation ratios for both F2 populations match this. <strong>The</strong><br />
epistatic interaction between the genes wf and gf create the three<br />
observed flesh colors in a ratio of 12:3:1. <strong>The</strong> segregation ratio of the<br />
greenhouse F2 population corresponds to this ratio. <strong>The</strong> chi-square test<br />
indicates that the field-grown F2 population did not have the expected<br />
segregation ratio of 12:3:1. <strong>The</strong> variation found between the field and<br />
greenhouse populations could be caused by uncontrollable<br />
environmental factors or, as mentioned by Clayberg (1992), the<br />
inherent difficulties associated with differentiating white and green<br />
flesh color. <strong>The</strong> ideal ratios from the greenhouse plants are also<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 155
indicative of the previously assumed parental genotypes. To achieve<br />
the 12:3:1 ratio, the genotypes of ‘TAM Uvalde’ and ‘Sunrise’ would<br />
be wf+wf+/gf-gf- and wf-wf-/gf+gf+, respectively.<br />
After performing the initial AFLP primer screenings, no useful<br />
polymorphic data could be obtained. Of the 510 random primers<br />
screened, 47 primers have generated marker polymorphisms; an<br />
example of RAPD marker OAC09.900 is shown in Figure 1. Of those<br />
markers, 19 were derived from ‘Sunrise’ and 28 were derived from<br />
‘TAM Uvalde.’ Further screening of these primers is needed to<br />
determine their significance throughout our F2 populations, and their<br />
potential utility for marker-assisted selection within other breeding<br />
lines. <strong>The</strong> 47 RAPD primers generating clear polymorphic bands will<br />
be used to screen the entire greenhouse F2 population. RAPD markers<br />
demonstrating linkage to the high beta-carotene phenotype within the<br />
greenhouse population, will be screened within the field population to<br />
determine the extent of environmental affects on relevant genes or<br />
QTL.<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
- 1500 bp<br />
- 900 bp<br />
- 600 bp<br />
Fig. 1. RAPD marker OAC09.900 expressing polymorphism between two DNA<br />
bulks from high and low beta-carotene F2 plants. 1 = Sunrise (low parent); 2 =<br />
TAM Uvalde (high parent); 3 = DNA bulk from low beta-carotene F2 plants; 4 =<br />
DNA bulk from high beta-carotene F2 plants; and 5 = molecular size marker.<br />
Secondary evaluations of the primer combinations used in the<br />
RAPD screenings are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn<br />
156 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
egarding genetic linkage relationships. Our current findings comply<br />
with already well-known flesh-color genes, but we are still pursuing<br />
the quantitative genetic aspects of beta-carotene content.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Clayberg, C. D. 1992. Interaction and linkage tests of flesh color genes in Cucumis<br />
melo L. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. 15:53–54.<br />
Fish, W. W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative<br />
assay for lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents.<br />
J. Food Comp. Anal. 15:309–317.<br />
Lester, G. E. 1997. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit nutritional quality and health<br />
functionality. HortTech. 7:222–227.<br />
Michelmore, R. W., L. Paran, and R. V. Kesseli. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
linked to disease resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method<br />
to detect markers in specific genomic regions using segregating populations.<br />
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:9828–9832.<br />
Monforte, A. J., M. Oliver, M. J. Gonzalo, J. M Alvarez, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, and P.<br />
Arus. 2004. Identification of quantitative trait loci involved in fruit quality traits<br />
in melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.108:750–758.<br />
Skroch, P. W. and J. Nienhuis. 1995. Qualitative and quantitative characterization<br />
of RAPD variation among snap bean genotypes. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
91:1078–1085.<br />
Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters,<br />
J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique<br />
for DNA fingerprinting. Nuc. Acids Res. 23:4407–4414.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 157
A NEW EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR<br />
PRODUCING SEEDLESS WATERMELON<br />
FRUITS FROM SOME DIPLOID CULTIVARS<br />
S. Omran<br />
Horticulture Research Institute <strong>Breeding</strong> and Genetics of Vegetable<br />
Dept. Agriculture Research Center, Egypt<br />
K. Sugiyama<br />
National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region<br />
Hitsujigaoka, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo, 062-8555, Japan<br />
A. Glala<br />
Horticulture Technology Department<br />
National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Tetraploid, pollen grains, pollenizer<br />
ABSTRACT. In this paper, we present a new technique for the production of<br />
diploid seedless watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) from some diploid watermelon<br />
cultivars by using tetraploid plants as the pollen source. Diploid seedless<br />
watermelon fruits were obtained from ‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ when their<br />
female flowers were pollinated with pollen grains from tetraploid watermelon<br />
(Lines SS100 and SS200). However, this technique was not effective with those<br />
cultivars producing large seeds, such as ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’. Large, empty seed<br />
coats were obtained in their fruits when their female flowers were pollinated<br />
with pollen grains from tetraploid watermelon (Lines SS100 and SS200). Almost<br />
no difference was obtained between seeded and seedless fruits of diploid<br />
watermelon, with regard to appearance, fruit maturity, fruit weight, fruit<br />
shape, flesh color, and rind thickness. <strong>The</strong> exception was that seedless fruits<br />
recorded a slightly higher percentage of total soluble solids. No hollow heart or<br />
misshapen fruits were found when the new technique was used. This new<br />
technique has potential utility for commercial production of inexpensive<br />
seedless watermelon fruits.<br />
W<br />
hile seedless watermelon fruits have become very popular<br />
in the developed countries because they are easier to eat<br />
(Sugiyama and Morishita, 2000), seedless watermelon fruits<br />
are still very expensive for most watermelon consumers around the<br />
world due to high production costs. Moreover, the breeding of<br />
commercial triploid cultivars is more time consuming, challenging,<br />
and expensive than the breeding of diploid cultivars (Kihara 1951).<br />
Hence the diversity of triploid watermelon genetics is not as large as<br />
that of the diploid. To overcome this problem, many have investigated<br />
the potential of producing seedless watermelon fruits from diploid<br />
158 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
plants directly. Seedless watermelon fruits can be produced by using<br />
plant growth regulators such as NAA (1-naphthalene acetic acid)<br />
(Buttrose and Sedgley, 1979) and CPPU (N-[2-chloropyridyl]-Nphenylurea)<br />
(Hayata et al., 1995; Kano, 2000). However, using plant<br />
growth regulators has occasionally resulted in deformed fruits, because<br />
the female flowers (ovaries) were injured by directly spraying or<br />
rubbing growth regulators on them. This method also poses potential<br />
food-safety problems, and therefore has not been used. Producing<br />
seedless watermelon fruits on diploid plants by using pollen irradiation<br />
with soft-X-ray has been recently developed (Sugiyama and Morishita,<br />
2000; Watanabe et al 2002). This method makes it possible to produce<br />
seedless fruits from any diploid cultivars with no loss in fruit quality.<br />
One of the shortcomings of the technique lies in the occurrence of<br />
empty seed coats in the fruit (Watanabe, et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> number and<br />
size of empty seed coats varies among cultivars (Sugiyama and<br />
Marishata, 2000). Also the application of pollen irradiation with soft-<br />
X-ray can be implemented only in specialized laboratories because of<br />
safety and health considerations.<br />
<strong>The</strong> current study aims to develop a simple technique for<br />
producing seedless fruits from diploid cultivars for commercial<br />
production in the fields that can easily and safely be applied by small<br />
producers and that will eliminate the potential danger of using either<br />
growth regulators or soft X-ray-irradiation.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Seedlings of four diploid watermelons cultivars (‘Giza1’, ‘Crimson<br />
Sweet’, ‘Targi’, and ‘Aswan’ F1) and two tetraploid lines (SS100 and<br />
SS200) were transplanted in the field at a spacing of 1m in-row and<br />
2m between rows on 1 March in 2004 and 2005. Five plants of each<br />
genotype were transplanted in every treatment. Three replications in<br />
<strong>complete</strong> randomized block design were conducted. Other agriculture<br />
practices were carried out based on commercial recommendations for<br />
the growing area. At flowering stage, each male flower of the<br />
tetraploid plants and each female flower of the diploid plants was<br />
covered with a paper bag the day before anthesis. All bagged male<br />
flowers of the tetraploid plants were collected in the morning on the<br />
day of anthesis and used for hand-pollinating the bagged diploid<br />
female flowers for 40 days. In addition to the bagged flowers that were<br />
pollinated, some female flowers were artificially self-pollinated on all<br />
diploid genotypes as a comparison (control) treatment. All handpollinated<br />
female flowers were quickly re-covered with a bag for 3–5<br />
days to prevent contamination with insect-borne pollen (Sugiyama and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 159
Morishita 2000). Mature diploid fruits of ‘Giza 1’ were harvested 45<br />
days postpollination; ‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ 40 days; and<br />
‘Targi’ 35 days.<br />
Fruit weight, shape, rind thickness, sugar content (total soluble<br />
solids; TSS), and hollow heart were recorded for all treatments on the<br />
day of harvesting. All recorded data were analyzed using the Statistical<br />
Analysis System (SAS Version10.2; Cary, NC).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> response of the four diploid genotypes to the tetraploid<br />
pollenizer is shown with respect to the number of fully developed<br />
(hard) and empty (seed coats only) seeds per fruit. Note the hard seed<br />
produced with the diploid pollenizers and no seed produced with the<br />
tetraploid pollenizers in ‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’. Empty seed<br />
coats and some hard seed, however, were produced when the tetraploid<br />
was used as a pollenizer for ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’. <strong>The</strong> effect of the<br />
tetraploid pollenizer on the appearance and inner quality of fruits is<br />
shown in Figure 1. <strong>The</strong> fruits had similar rind and flesh<br />
characteristics, except for the presence of hard seeds in three of four<br />
cases.<br />
<strong>The</strong> response of maturity period and various quality characteristics<br />
of watermelon fruits to diploid and tetraploid pollenizers is provided in<br />
Table 2. <strong>The</strong>re were no observable differences in terms of fruit set<br />
between tetraploid and diploid pollenizers.<br />
All genotype entries were different at the 1% level of significance<br />
in terms of hard-seed and empty-seed-coat counts per fruit when a<br />
diploid was used (Table 1). ‘Crimson Sweet’ fruit had the highest<br />
number of hard seed and empty seed coats per fruit, while fewer were<br />
produced by (in descending order) ‘Aswan’, ‘Targi’, and ‘Giza1’. No<br />
hard seeds were found in any of the cultivars when pollen was<br />
obtained from the tetraploid. More empty seed coats per fruit were<br />
detected with ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’ when the tetraploid was used as the<br />
pollenizer. <strong>The</strong> fruits of ‘Giza1’ had the highest number of empty seed<br />
coats, followed by ‘Targi’, ‘Aswan’, and ‘Crimson Sweet’ fruits,<br />
respectively. When the tetraploid pollenizer was used, all empty seeds<br />
were white and very soft (i.e., edible) for all cultivars except ‘Targi’,<br />
which contained some colored and hard seeds.<br />
<strong>The</strong> seeds in ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’ were derived from fruit set<br />
though self-pollination. <strong>The</strong> low seed counts per fruit of these<br />
cultivars may be due to the large size of their seeds compared to<br />
‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ seeds. <strong>The</strong> same rationale may explain<br />
the high number of empty seed coats in ‘Giza1’ and ‘Targi’ versus<br />
160 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
‘Crimson Sweet’ and ‘Aswan’ cultivars when tetraploid-pollinated<br />
(Figure 2).<br />
A similar response was obtained by Henderson (1977). He<br />
reported that the triploid reciprocal cross [(2x) female x (4 x) male] in<br />
watermelon has not been successful at producing hard seeds. <strong>The</strong><br />
results we obtained also agree with those reported by Sugiyama and<br />
Morishita (1998a, b) when they used soft X-rays to produce diploid<br />
seedless watermelon fruits.<br />
While tetraploid pollen germinated on the stigma, the pollen tube<br />
didn’t elongate to reach the embryo sac, because of the wide pollentube<br />
size, compared with the diploid pollen tube. Hormones and<br />
auxins produced during the tetraploid pollen germination led to<br />
improved fruit set without any hard seeds (seedless fruit).<br />
1. A B 2. A B<br />
3. A B 4. A B<br />
Fig. 1. Exterior and interior quality of diploid watermelon in response to diploid<br />
and tetraploid pollenizers. 1 = ‘Aswan’; 2 = ‘Crimson Sweet’; 3 = ‘Giza 1’; 4=<br />
‘Targi’.<br />
A = diploid (normal fruit); B = seedless fruit by tetraploid pollenizers.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 161
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
D.Normal<br />
seeds<br />
D.Empty<br />
seeds<br />
T.Normal<br />
seeds<br />
T.Empty<br />
seeds<br />
Fig. 2. Number of hard and empty seed coats across cultivars in response to<br />
whether the pollenizer was diploid or tetraploid. D = Diploid watermelon<br />
(control); T = diploid watermelon set by tetraploid pollen. From left to right:<br />
‘Aswan’ F1, ‘Crimson Sweet’, ‘Giza 1’, and ‘Targi’.<br />
Generally, the use of a tetraploid pollenizer is an effective method<br />
for producing diploid seedless watermelon fruits. However, some<br />
diploid genotypes respond better than others.<br />
Time to fruit maturity was not affected by pollenizers; however, it<br />
varied among genotypes. ‘Targi’ had the shortest period to maturity<br />
(35 days from pollination), followed by ‘Aswan’, ‘Giza1’, and<br />
‘Crimson Sweet’, respectively (Table 1). ‘Aswan’ produced the<br />
heaviest fruits, followed by ‘Crimson Sweet’, ‘Giza1’, and ‘Targi’,<br />
respectively (Table 2).<br />
Our results agree with those reported by Hayata et al., (1995).<br />
<strong>The</strong>y produced seedless watermelon fruits using artificial hormones,<br />
resulting in fruits that were deformed and small compared with fruit<br />
that were set with pollen. Fruits produced for each cultivar from the<br />
different pollenizer types were round and free from hollow heart.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were significant differences in TSS among all fruit cultivars.<br />
<strong>The</strong> tetraploid pollenizer increased significantly in both ‘Giza1’ and<br />
‘Crimson Sweet’. <strong>The</strong>re was no significant effect of tetraploid<br />
pollenizer on rind thickness.<br />
Conclusion<br />
<strong>The</strong> use of tetraploid pollenizers may have potential for<br />
commercial production of high-quality diploid seedless watermelon<br />
fruits since this was successfully demonstrated with ‘Aswan’,<br />
‘Crimson Sweet’, and ‘Giza1’. In general, the application of this new<br />
technique not only reduces total costs of seedless watermelon fruits,<br />
but also increases net income compared to triploid watermelon<br />
162 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
(traditional method). <strong>The</strong> new technique seems to be a promising<br />
solution for many economic problems at different levels.<br />
Table 1. Hard-seed and empty-seed-coat counts per fruit and maturity<br />
period of diploid watermelon fruits in response to diploid and<br />
tetraploid pollenizers.<br />
Second season 2005 First season 2004<br />
Anthesis<br />
to<br />
Empty<br />
seed<br />
Anthesis<br />
to<br />
Empty<br />
seed<br />
Hard<br />
Hard<br />
harvest coats seeds harvest coats seeds Pollenizer Cultivar<br />
40.0b 21.0d 291.0b 40.0b 21.0d 293.0b Diploid Aswan<br />
40.0b 10.9e 0.0e 40.0b 10.8f 0.00e Tetraploid Aswan<br />
46.0a 27.0c 306.7a 46.0a 27.0c 310.0a Diploid Crimson<br />
Sweet<br />
46.0a 5.0g 0.0e 46.0a 5.0g 0.0e Tetraploid Crimson<br />
Sweet<br />
45.0a 15.0ef 181.0d 45.0a 15.0ef 180.3d Diploid Giza 1<br />
44.7a 120.2a 0.0e 45.0a 120.2a 0.00e Tetraploid Giza 1<br />
35.0c 17.0ed 255.0c 35.0c 17.0ed 253.0c Diploid Targi<br />
36.0c 85.4b 0.0e 36.0c 85.4b 0.00e Tetraploid Targi<br />
** ** ** ** ** ** Significance level<br />
NS= nonsignificant; * = significant at 5 %; **= significant at 1 %.<br />
Table 2. Response of maturity period and various quality parameters<br />
of diploid watermelon fruits to diploid and tetraploid pollenizers.<br />
TSS<br />
%<br />
Second season 2005 First season 2004<br />
Rind<br />
thickness<br />
cm<br />
Fruit<br />
weight<br />
kg<br />
TSS<br />
%<br />
Rind<br />
thickness<br />
cm<br />
Fruit<br />
weight<br />
kg Pollenizer Cultivar<br />
11.7cd 1.2a 7.4a 11.5 d 1.2a 7.5a Diploid Aswan<br />
12.6b 1.2a 7.4a 12.3 b 1.2a 7.4a Tetraploid Aswan<br />
11.3de 1.3a 7.0b 11.5de 1.3a 7.0b Diploid Crimson<br />
Sweet<br />
12.2c 1.3a 6.9b 12.2bc 1.3a 6.9b Tetraploid Crimson<br />
Sweet<br />
12.0d 1.3a 6.1c 12.0c 1.3a 6.1c Diploid Giza 1<br />
13.2a 1.3a 5.8c 13.0a 1.3a 5.8c Tetraploid Giza 1<br />
11.5d 0.8b 4.5d 11.5d 0.8b 4.5d Diploid Targi<br />
12.4bc 0.8b 4.8d 12.1c 0.8b 4.4d Tetraploid Targi<br />
* * ** * * ** Significance level<br />
NS= nonsignificant; * = significant at 5 %; **= significant at 1 %.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 163
Literature Cited<br />
Buttrose, M. and M. Sedgley. 1979. Anatomy of watermelon embryo sacs following<br />
pollination, non-pollination or parthenocarpic induction of fruit development.<br />
Ann. Bot. 43:141–146.<br />
Hayata,Y., Y. Niimi, and N. Iwasaki. 1995. Synthetic Cytokinin-1-(2-chloro-4pyridyl)-3-phenylurea<br />
(CPPU) - promotes fruit set and induces parthenocarpy in<br />
watermelon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort .Sci. 120:997–1000.<br />
Henderson, W. R. 1977. Effect of cultivar, polyploid and reciprocal hybridization on<br />
characters important in breeding triploid seedless watermelon hybrids. J. Amer.<br />
Soc. Hort. Sci. 102(3):293–297.<br />
Kano, Y. 2000. Effect of CPPU treatment on fruit and rind development of<br />
watermelons (Citrullus lanatus Matsum. et Nakai ). J. Hort. Sci. & Biotech.<br />
(6):651–654.<br />
Kihara, H. 1951. Triploid watermelon. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58:217–230.<br />
Sugiyama, K. and M. Morishita, 1998a. Induction of seedless watermelon by<br />
pseudogamy, p. 297–299. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98,<br />
evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHA Press, Alexandria,<br />
VA.<br />
Sugiyama, K. and M. Morishita. 1998b. Fruit set and seed characteristics of diploid<br />
seedless watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cultivars produced by soft-x-irradiation<br />
pollen. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 69(6):684–689.<br />
Sugiyama, K. and M. Morishita. 2000. Production of seedless watermelon using<br />
soft-x-irradiation pollen. Sci. Hort. 84:255–264.<br />
Watnabe, S., Y. Nakano, K. Okano, K. Sugiyama, and M. Morishita. 2002. Effect of<br />
cropping season on the formation of empty seeds in seedless watermelon fruit<br />
produced by soft-x- irradiation pollen. Acta Hort. 588:89–92.<br />
164 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI FOR SUCROSE<br />
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SUGARS IN MELON<br />
CROSSES UNDER GREENHOUSE AND FIELD<br />
ENVIRONMENTS<br />
Soon O. Park and Kevin M. Crosby<br />
Vegetable & Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University,<br />
College Station, TX 77843<br />
Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M<br />
University, Weslaco, TX 78596<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, glucose percentage of total<br />
sugars<br />
ABSTRACT. Our objectives were to identify RAPD markers associated with<br />
QTL for sucrose percentage of total sugars (SPTS) using bulked segregant<br />
analysis (BSA) in an F2 population derived from the melon (Cucumis melo L.)<br />
cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ (high SPTS) × TGR1551 (low SPTS) in a greenhouse<br />
experiment, and confirm the association of RAPD markers with QTL for the<br />
sweetness trait in an F2 population from the cross of ‘Deltex’ (high SPTS) ×<br />
TGR1551 in a field experiment. Continuous distribution for SPTS was observed<br />
in the genetic populations indicating quantitative inheritance for the trait. A<br />
significant positive correlation was found between SPTS and sucrose or soluble<br />
solids. Seven RAPD markers, 3 amplified from ‘TAM Dulce’ and 4 amplified<br />
from TGR1551, were detected to be significantly associated with QTL for SPTS<br />
in the greenhouse population. Three unlinked markers were significant in the<br />
full model, and accounted for 31% of the total phenotypic variation for SPTS.<br />
Four RAPD markers were confirmed in the field population to be consistently<br />
associated with QTL for SPTS. <strong>The</strong>se RAPD markers associated with QTL for<br />
the sweetness trait identified in the greenhouse and confirmed in the field could<br />
be useful in melon breeding for improving the mature fruit sweetness.<br />
D<br />
ue to consumer preference for sweet fruit, sugar content is a<br />
highly important quality trait of different melon classes. <strong>The</strong><br />
improvement of sugar content is one of the most significant<br />
goals in breeding programs of most melon types worldwide. Sucrose,<br />
glucose, and fructose are major factors determining mature melon fruit<br />
sweetness. <strong>The</strong> ratio of individual sugar compositions is also an<br />
important sweetness trait.<br />
This research was funded in part by USDA Grant 2001-34402-10543, “Designing<br />
Foods for Health.” We acknowledge financial support from the South Texas Melon<br />
Committee. We also thank technicians Alfredo Rodríguez and Hyun J. Kang, Texas<br />
Agricultural Research and Extension Center-Weslaco, for their assistance.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 165
Bulked segregant analysis (Michelmore et al., 1991) is an efficient<br />
method of rapidly identifying molecular markers linked to a specific<br />
gene using DNA bulks from F2 plants. Molecular markers linked to<br />
genes for sweetness traits may improve the breeder’s ability to recover<br />
sugar genotypes and aid in the development of sugar cultivars.<br />
However, markers associated with QTL affecting SPTS present in<br />
‘TAM Dulce’, a western-shipper muskmelon type, have not been<br />
reported. Our objective was to identify RAPD markers associated with<br />
QTL for SPTS by means of BSA in an F2 population derived from the<br />
melon cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ (high SPTS) × TGR1551 (low SPTS) in<br />
a greenhouse experiment. Park et al. (1999) emphasized the<br />
importance of confirming the marker-QTL associations in different<br />
populations and environments before using molecular markers for<br />
marker-assisted selection in breeding programs. Thus, our additional<br />
goal was to confirm the associations of RAPD markers with QTL for<br />
the sweetness trait in an F2 population from the cross of ‘Deltex’ (high<br />
SPTS) × TGR1551 in a field experiment.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL. For identification of QTL, 105 F2 plants<br />
derived from the cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 were planted in a<br />
greenhouse at the Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center-<br />
Weslaco, Texas A&M University, on 15 Oct. 2002. ‘TAM Dulce’ is a<br />
western-shipper muskmelon type with high fruit quality, while<br />
TGR1551, originally obtained from Zimbabwe, is a wild type with low<br />
fruit quality. For confirmation of QTL, 64 F2 plants from the cross of<br />
‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 were planted on black plastic mulch with drip<br />
irrigation on sandy clay loam soil at Weslaco, Texas on 10 March<br />
2005. <strong>The</strong> high-sugar ‘Deltex’ parent is a commercial ananas cultivar<br />
(Nunhems, Parma, ID). Data for SPTS were obtained from the two<br />
parental pairs as well as the 105 and 64 F2 plants.<br />
BULKED SEGREGANT ANALYSIS USING RAPD. Fully expanded<br />
leaves of the 105 and 64 F2 plants along with their parental pairs were<br />
collected at 21 days after planting. Total genomic DNA was extracted<br />
from the leaf tissue using the method of Skroch and Nienhuis (1995).<br />
A total of 500 random 10-mer primers (Operon Technologies,<br />
Alameda, CA) were used. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were<br />
performed on 96-well plates in an MJ Research thermalcycler (model<br />
PTC-0100; MJ Research, Waltham, MA). Protocols for PCR and the<br />
composition of the final volume of reactants were the same as those<br />
described by Skroch and Nienhuis (1995). Two low and high bulks<br />
were prepared from equal volumes of standardized DNA (10ng. L-1)<br />
166 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
from 8 selected F2 plants of the ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 cross with<br />
the highest and lowest SPTS values, respectively. <strong>The</strong> 500 primers<br />
were used to simultaneously screen between the low and high DNA<br />
bulks, and between the parents ‘TAM Dulce’ and TGR1551. Primers<br />
that generated marker polymorphisms between the low and high DNA<br />
bulks were tested in the F2 population from the cross between ‘TAM<br />
Dulce’ and TGR1551 for identifying QTL. Six primers were tested in<br />
the F2 population of the ‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 cross for confirming<br />
QTL.<br />
DETECTION OF QTL. To detect segregation distortion of markers,<br />
F2 population marker data were tested for goodness-of-fit to a 3:1 ratio<br />
using the chi-square test. Due to the dominant nature of RAPD<br />
markers, the linkage analyses of three markers obtained from ‘TAM<br />
Dulce’ and four markers obtained from TGR1551 were separately<br />
performed on the data for 105 F2 plants of the ‘TAM Dulce’ and<br />
TGR1551 cross using MAPMAKER version 3.0 (Lander et al., 1987).<br />
We also executed separately the linkage analyses of three markers<br />
from ‘Deltex’ and three markers from TGR1551 on the data for 64 F2<br />
plants of the ‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 cross. Simple linear regression<br />
(SLR) for each pairwise combination of quantitative traits and marker<br />
loci was used to analyze the greenhouse and field data for detection<br />
and confirmation of QTL for SPTS. Significant differences in trait<br />
associations were based on F-tests (P
Table 1. Pearson correlations of sucrose percentage of total sugars<br />
(SPTS) with other fruit-sweetness traits in two F2 populations derived<br />
from melon crosses of ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 (TT) and ‘Deltex’ ×<br />
TGR1551 (DT) in greenhouse and field experiments.<br />
Sweetness traits<br />
Trait Cross TSS z Sucrose Glucose Fructose GPTS x FPTS<br />
SPTS TT 0.33** 0.89** -0.03 NS 0.18 NS -0.85** -0.58**<br />
DT 0.53** 0.98** -0.77** -0.59** -0.95** -0.92**<br />
z<br />
TSS = total soluble solids.<br />
x<br />
GPTS = glucose percentage of total sugars; FPTS = fructose percentage of total<br />
sugars.<br />
**Nonsignificant or significant at P < 0.01.<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF QTL. A total of 500 primers were used for<br />
the RAPD analysis of two different bulks for SPTS along with their<br />
parents ‘TAM Dulce’ and TGR1551. Seven RAPD markers were<br />
polymorphic between the two DNA bulks. Three displayed an<br />
amplified DNA fragment in the high bulk that was absent in the low<br />
bulk. Four showed an amplified DNA fragment in the low bulk that<br />
was absent in the high bulk. <strong>The</strong>se seven marker fragments segregated<br />
in the F2 population of the ‘TAM Dulce’ × TGR1551 cross. A<br />
goodness-of-fit to a 3:1 ratio for band presence to band absence for<br />
each of the seven markers was observed in 105 F2 plants. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
markers were unlinked based on linkage analysis, suggesting that they<br />
are located on different chromosomes.<br />
Seven significant associations of RAPD marker loci with QTL<br />
influencing SPTS were identified in this greenhouse population based<br />
on SLR (Table 2). <strong>The</strong> ‘TAM Dulce’ parent contributed high SPTS<br />
alleles for these seven markers. Markers OAU13.1350, OAT03.250,<br />
and OAW06.1250 from ‘TAM Dulce’ explained 4% to 13% of the<br />
variation for this trait. Only one of the three unlinked markers<br />
accounting for 13% of the variation was noted using the SMR analysis.<br />
Markers OAW06.600, OAA09.350, OAU05.600, and OAQ13.750<br />
from TGR1551 explained 6% to 17% of the variation for this trait.<br />
Three of the four unlinked markers were significant in the full model,<br />
and accounted for 31% of the total variation for the trait. Six and two<br />
of the seven RAPD markers associated with QTL for SPTS were also<br />
found to be significantly associated with QTL for GPTS and FPTS,<br />
respectively. However, andromonoecious (a) on Linkage Group 4 of<br />
the classical melon map regulating stamen absence or stamen presence<br />
in female flowers was not associated with SPTS in the greenhouse<br />
population.<br />
168 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Simple linear regression (SLR) and stepwise multiple<br />
regression (SMR) analyses of marker and data for detection of QTL<br />
for sucrose percentage of total sugars (SPTS) in an F2 population<br />
derived from the melon cross of ‘TAM Dulce’ (high SPTS) ×<br />
TGR1551 (low SPTS) in the greenhouse experiment.<br />
Marker Source P<br />
OAU13.1350<br />
SLR Average value SMR<br />
R 2<br />
(%) Presence Absence P<br />
R 2<br />
(%)<br />
TAM<br />
Dulce 0.000 13 12.6 z 5.5 y 0.000 13<br />
OAT03.250 TAM<br />
Dulce 0.027 5 12.4 8.9<br />
OAW06.1250 TAM<br />
Dulce 0.04 4 12.4 9.1<br />
Cumulative R 2 = 13<br />
OAW06.600 TGR1551 0.000 17 9.8 16.5 0.000 17<br />
OAA09.350 TGR1551 0.000 13 10.1 17.1 0.000 9<br />
OAU05.600 TGR1551 0.007 7 10.5 14.4 0.008 5<br />
OAQ13.750 TGR1551 0.013 6 10.4 15.4<br />
Cumulative R 2 = 31<br />
z An average value of F2 plants with band presence for the marker.<br />
y An average value of F2 plants with band absence for the marker.<br />
Table 3. Confirmation of RAPD markers associated with QTL for<br />
sucrose percentage of total sugars (SPTS) in an F2 population derived<br />
from the melon cross of ‘Deltex’ (high SPTS) × TGR1551 (low SPTS)<br />
in the field experiment.<br />
Simple linear Stepwise multiple<br />
regression<br />
regression<br />
R<br />
Marker Source P<br />
2<br />
R<br />
(%) P<br />
2<br />
(%)<br />
OAW06.1250 Deltex 0.000 10 0.000 10<br />
OAU13.1350 Deltex 0.047 4 0.047 4<br />
Cumulative R 2 = 14<br />
OAA09.350 TGR1551 0.000 12 0.000 12<br />
OAU05.600 TGR1551 0.041 4 0.045 4<br />
Cumulative R 2 = 16<br />
Four RAPD markers associated with the sweetness trait in the<br />
greenhouse experiment were confirmed in the F2 population of the<br />
‘Deltex’ × TGR1551 cross in the field experiment to be consistently<br />
associated with QTL for the trait on the basis of SLR (Table 3).<br />
Marker OAA09.350 from TGR1551 associated with QTL for the trait<br />
in the greenhouse population was also found to be significantly<br />
associated with QTL for the trait in the field population, and accounted<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 169
for 12% of the phenotypic variation for the trait. A significant<br />
association of OAW06.1250 from ‘Deltex’ with QTL for the<br />
sweetness trait was consistently expressed in our populations derived<br />
from two different crosses under greenhouse and field environments.<br />
However, markers OAT03.250 and OAQ13.750, slightly associated<br />
with the sugar trait identified in the greenhouse F2 population, were<br />
not confirmed in this field F2 population. <strong>The</strong> RAPD markers linked to<br />
the SPTS QTL identified and confirmed in two populations and<br />
environments here should be more reliable for marker-assisted<br />
selection than those evaluated in a single population and environment.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Edwards, M. D., C. W. Stuber, and J. F. Wendell. 1987. Molecular marker-facilitated<br />
investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. I. numbers, genomic<br />
distribution, and types of gene action. Genetics. 116:113–125.<br />
Lander, E. S., P. Green, J. Abrahamson, A. Barlow, M. J. Daly, S. E. Lincoln, and L.<br />
Newburg. 1987. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for<br />
constructing primary genetic linkage maps with experimental and natural<br />
populations. Genomics. 1:174–181.<br />
Michelmore, R. W., I. Paran, and R. V. Kesseli. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
linked to disease resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method<br />
to detect markers in specific genomic regions using segregating populations.<br />
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:9828–9832.<br />
Park, S. O., D. P. Coyne, N. Mutlu, G. Jung, and J. R. Steadman. 1999. Confirmation<br />
of molecular markers and flower color associated with QTL for resistance to<br />
common bacterial blight in common beans. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 124:519–<br />
526.<br />
Paterson, A. H., S. Damon, J. D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H. D. Rabinowitch, S. E.<br />
Lincoln, E. S. Lander, and S. D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying<br />
quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and<br />
environments. Genetics. 127:181–197.<br />
Skroch, P. W. and J. Nienhuis. 1995. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of<br />
RAPD variation among snap bean genotypes. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:1078–<br />
1085.<br />
170 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
ETHYLENE MEDIATES THE INDUCTION OF<br />
FRUITS WITH ATTACHED FLOWER IN<br />
ZUCCHINI SQUASH<br />
M. C. Payán 1 , A.Peñaranda 1 , R. Rosales 2 , D. Garrido 2 , P. Gómez 1 ,<br />
and M. Jamilena 3<br />
1 Departamento de Biotecnología, IFAPA de Almería. Autovía del<br />
Mediterráneo, La Mojonera, Almería, Spain<br />
2 Departamento de Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias,<br />
Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain<br />
3 Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Escuela Politécnica Superior,<br />
Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, flower maturation, flower<br />
abscission, sex expression, high temperature<br />
ABSTRACT. We previously reported that high temperature during the springsummer<br />
growing season is the main factor increasing the incidence of zucchini<br />
fruits with attached flower, a trait that reduces the shelf life and commercial<br />
quality of the fruits produced in greenhouses. In this work, the increase in the<br />
number of fruits with attached flowers is caused by reduced ethylene<br />
production in female flower buds. Treatments with ethylene inhibitors such as<br />
aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) and silver thiosulphate (STS) promote the<br />
production of fruits with an attached flower in a number of cultivars. In<br />
addition, the flowers that remain attached to the harvested zucchini fruits are<br />
found to be transformed into bisexual, with a lower internal ethylene level than<br />
female ones. Alterations of the development of attached flowers, which exhibit<br />
different degrees of stamen development and are arrested in their maturation,<br />
indicate that ethylene is required for both the maintenance of stamen arrest and<br />
for completing the maturation of female flowers. Moreover, the incidence of<br />
this character is genotype-dependent, and the internal level of ethylene is<br />
reduced in cultivars that produce the highest proportion of fruits with attached<br />
flowers. This opens the possibility of direct or indirect contraselection of this<br />
trait in current breeding programs of zucchini squash.<br />
T<br />
he production of zucchini squash in greenhouses requires<br />
cultivars in which the abscission of the flower occurs in the<br />
earlier stages of fruit development and always before<br />
harvesting. <strong>The</strong> delay in abscission of zucchini flowers is now a major<br />
problem for greenhouse cultivation of zucchini squash in SE Spain.<br />
This work was supported by grants C03-180 and AGL2005-06677-CO2, awarded by<br />
the Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca de la Junta de Andalucía (Andalucía, Spain),<br />
and the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain), respectively.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 171
When the enormous flower of zucchini remains attached to the fruit<br />
after harvesting, it must be manually removed by growers, inducing<br />
wounding and making the fruit more susceptible to infection and<br />
rotting during storage and transport, thus diminishing its shelf life and<br />
its commercial quality and value.<br />
Previous results from two trials carried out under different<br />
environmental conditions in greenhouses in SE Spain indicate that<br />
high greenhouse temperature during the spring-summer growing<br />
season is the major environmental factor that induces the production of<br />
zucchini fruits with attached flowers (Gómez et al., 2004).<br />
Nevertheless, the incidence of this trait is genotype-dependent, and<br />
while some cultivars produce more than 80% of fruits with attached<br />
flowers under high temperatures, others scarcely reach 5% of such<br />
fruits (Gómez et al., 2004). Given that attached flowers are arrested in<br />
their maturation, not reaching anthesis but remaining green and closed<br />
even in harvested fruits, and are also transformed into bisexual<br />
flowers, showing different degrees of stamen development, we<br />
assumed that ethylene was involved in this flower-development<br />
alteration.<br />
Ethylene plays a key role in the sex expression of cucurbits.<br />
Treatments with ethylene or ethylene-releasing agents increase the<br />
production of female flowers, while treatments with inhibitors of<br />
ethylene biosynthesis or perception induce the production of a higher<br />
number of male flowers (Robinson et al., 1969; Rudich et al., 1969;<br />
Owens et al., 1980). Accordingly, the levels of endogenous ethylene in<br />
gynoecious cultivars of cucumber are two- to threefold higher than in<br />
monoecious and andromonoecious genotypes (Trebitsh et al., 1987;<br />
Yamasaki et al., 2001). In fact, the additional copy of the 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate<br />
(ACC) synthase (ACS) gene in<br />
cucumber, one of the key enzymes of the ethylene biosynthesis<br />
pathway, cosegregates with the F gene, conferring gynoecy in this<br />
species (Trebitsh et al., 1997; Mibus and Tatlioglu, 2004).<br />
It has recently been reported that ethylene is involved in the<br />
development and maturation of flowers in Arabidopsis (Hall and<br />
Bleecker, 2003) and melon (Papadopoulou et al., 2005; Little et al.,<br />
2005). Thus, flower organs of the double mutants for the ethylene<br />
receptors ers1 etr1 are arrested in development, remaining as<br />
immature closed flowers in which petals and stamens have not been<br />
elongated and anthers have not been dehisced (Hall and Bleecker,<br />
2003). Moreover, andromonoecious melon lines that overexpress an<br />
ACS transgene not only have altered sex-expression patterns but also<br />
an increased number of bisexual buds that reach anthesis, indicating<br />
that ethylene is necessary to maintain the development of ovary-<br />
172 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
earing flowers in species of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae family (Papadopoulou<br />
et al., 2005).<br />
In this paper we study the implication of ethylene in the induction<br />
of zucchini fruits with attached flowers using two different<br />
approaches. On the one hand, we analyze the effects of ethylene<br />
inhibitors on flower development and abscission in different zucchini<br />
squash grown under winter conditions. On the other hand, we compare<br />
endogenous ethylene production in different cultivars and different<br />
environments. Data demonstrate that the delay in flower abscission<br />
occurs concomitantly with the inhibition of female flower-bud<br />
maturation, a process accompanied by conversion of the female bud<br />
into a bisexual one and reduction in the levels of ethylene production.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
<strong>The</strong> four hybrid cultivars used, ‘Cora’, ‘Cavili’, ‘Consul’, and<br />
‘Xsara’, were selected because they differ in the production of fruits<br />
with attached flowers when grown under high temperatures. For<br />
treatments with ethylene inhibitors, seeds were germinated in<br />
rockwool cubes (Grodan), and when three to four leaves had<br />
developed, they were transferred to 1-m rockwool slabs at a density of<br />
two plants/slab. Plants were grown in a greenhouse in La Mojonera<br />
(Almería, Spain) in winter 2005, following standard local practices for<br />
both plant nutrition and pest management.<br />
Treatments with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) and silver<br />
thiosulphate (STS) were carried out when the fifth leaf was 2cm long.<br />
<strong>The</strong> apical meristems of these plants were treated with 25μl of a<br />
solution containing 1mM AVG and 0.1% Tween 20, or 0.5 M STS<br />
and 0.1% Tween 20. Control plants were treated with a solution<br />
containing only the same concentration of Tween 20.<br />
<strong>The</strong> release of ethylene was measured in mature flowers at anthesis<br />
in spring-summer 2005, and winter-early spring 2006. In bisexual<br />
flowers with arrested maturation, ethylene production was measured in<br />
closed flower buds, in which fruit length and width were similar to<br />
those of mature female flowers. <strong>The</strong> ethylene produced by the flowers<br />
after incubation at room temperature for 24h in the dark was measured<br />
in a Perkin-Elmer 8600 gas chromatograph, fitted with a flame<br />
ionization detector and 2m×3.2mm column packed with 80/100 mesh<br />
porapak R. <strong>The</strong> instrument was calibrated with standard ethylene gas.<br />
At least four replicates were made for each measurement.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 173
Results and Discussion<br />
EFFECTS OF ETHYLENE INHIBITORS. <strong>The</strong> cultivars ‘Cora’,<br />
‘Consul’, ‘Cavili’, and ‘Xsara’ were used to analyze the effect of<br />
ethylene-inhibitor treatments on the incidence of fruits with attached<br />
flowers. <strong>The</strong>se cultivars were selected because they represent cultivars<br />
producing low (‘Cora’ and ‘Consul’) and high (‘Cavili’ and ‘Xsara’)<br />
proportions of fruits with attached flowers when grown under springsummer<br />
conditions. <strong>The</strong> study was carried out under winter conditions<br />
since, under such conditions, all the cultivars except ‘Cavili’ produce a<br />
very low proportion of fruits with attached flowers.<br />
Number of flowers<br />
Female flowers Male flowers Bisexual flowers<br />
12<br />
Cora Cavili<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Node number in the main stem<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 111315 1719 21 23 25 2729<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
Control<br />
AVG<br />
Fig. 1. Effects of AVG on sexual expression in two cultivars of zucchini squash.<br />
Treatments increase the production of bisexual and male flowers in the nodes<br />
after the treatment (Node 5). Bisexual flowers remain attached to the fruits.<br />
<strong>The</strong> inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis or perceptions by means of<br />
AVG or STS, respectively, induced the production of fruits with<br />
attached flowers in all the studied cultivars. AVG altered the sexual<br />
expression of the plants, inducing a partial or <strong>complete</strong> conversion of<br />
female flowers into bisexual ones and thus increasing the maleness of<br />
the plants (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> effect of the treatment was similar in all four<br />
cultivars. In the nodes immediately above the treatment, AVG induced<br />
the development of bisexual flowers, while in the following nodes the<br />
treatment increased the production of male flowers (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong><br />
bisexual flowers, showing partial or <strong>complete</strong> development of stamens,<br />
174 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
were those that remained attached to the harvested fruits (Figure 2).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se bisexual flowers were all arrested in flower maturation,<br />
remaining as closed floral buds even in fruits of commercial length<br />
and width (Figure 2).<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect of the inhibition of ethylene perception by STS was<br />
very similar, inducing the production of male and bisexual flowers in<br />
all cultivars (Figure 3). Nevertheless, STS treatments induced a higher<br />
proportion of bisexual flowers than AVG (Figure 3). Moreover,<br />
besides the partial or <strong>complete</strong> development of stamens and the arrest<br />
of flower maturation, these bisexual flowers were also altered in the<br />
development of pedicel, sepals, and carpels. <strong>The</strong> pedicel and sepals of<br />
these bisexual flowers resembled those of male flowers, being larger<br />
than those of female ones (Figure 2). Moreover, in addition to the<br />
normal inferior ovary, which may be more or less developed, some of<br />
these flowers developed superior ovary tissue (Figure 2).<br />
<strong>The</strong> flower phenotypes of bisexual flowers induced by AVG and<br />
STS treatments were very similar to those found by Gomez et al.<br />
(2004) in different cultivars of zucchini grown under high<br />
temperatures. Given that these bisexual flowers appeared in the nodes<br />
just above the treatment, it is likely that they result from a reduction of<br />
ethylene in already determined female floral buds. In more immature<br />
floral buds the inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis or perception would<br />
produce a <strong>complete</strong> reversion of female into male flowers, such as was<br />
observed in higher nodes of AVG- and STS-treated plants.<br />
ETHYLENE PRODUCTION IN MALE AND FEMALE FLOWERS. <strong>The</strong><br />
production of ethylene was measured in female and male flowers of<br />
‘Cavili’ and ‘Cora’ cultivars of zucchini grown under winter or springsummer<br />
conditions. <strong>The</strong>se cultivars were selected because they<br />
produce the highest and lowest proportion of fruits with attached<br />
flowers, respectively, when grown at high temperatures. <strong>The</strong><br />
production of ethylene in all flower sex phenotypes of ‘Cavili’ was<br />
significantly lower than in those of ‘Cora’ under both environmental<br />
conditions, which may explain the higher susceptibility of ‘Cavili’<br />
plants to spring-summer environmental conditions (Gómez et al.,<br />
2004).<br />
Male flowers of both cultivars produced less ethylene than female<br />
ones (Figure 4), which is not surprising given that ethylene promotes<br />
femaleness in this species. <strong>The</strong> production of ethylene in bisexual<br />
flowers that appeared attached to the harvested fruits under very high<br />
temperatures during spring-summer conditions was intermediate<br />
between that of perfect female or male flowers. Moreover, in<br />
comparison with winter conditions, spring-summer conditions promote<br />
a reduction in internal ethylene in female flowers (Figure 4).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 175
Fig. 2. Effects of AVG (A, B, and C) and STS (D, E, and F) treatments on flower<br />
development in zucchini squash. Both treatments induced the production of<br />
fruits with attached flowers. <strong>The</strong>se flowers were arrested in their maturation,<br />
remaining green and closed even in harvested fruits (A and D). Fruits with<br />
attached flower were also bisexual, exhibiting different degrees of stamen<br />
development (B, C, E, and F). <strong>The</strong> pedicel and sepals of STS-treated plants<br />
resembled those of male flowers (D). STS also alters carpel development,<br />
inducing the growth of superior ovary tissue (E and F).<br />
<strong>The</strong> effects of ethylene inhibitors on flower development and the<br />
measurements of ethylene production in the bisexual flowers that<br />
remain attached to the fruits have indicated that the induction of fruits<br />
with attached flowers in zucchini is caused by a reduction in the<br />
internal level of ethylene in female flower buds. Differences in<br />
susceptibility to summer environmental conditions and in the<br />
incidence of fruits with attached flowers among genotypes of zucchini<br />
squash (Gómez et al., 2004) appear to be correlated with a decrease in<br />
the base level of ethylene. Indeed, we have observed that ethylene<br />
176 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
production in all the studied flowers of ‘Cavili’, a cultivar with one of<br />
the highest percentages of fruits with attached flowers in the spring-<br />
summer growing season, was significantly lower than in flowers of<br />
‘Cora’, a cultivar among those with the lowest production of fruits<br />
with attached flowers. <strong>The</strong>refore, genotypes that have a reduced level<br />
of ethylene production could be more susceptible to high temperatures,<br />
not being able to reach the threshold level necessary for normal<br />
development of female flowers.<br />
Number of flowers<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Female flowers Male flowers Bisexual flowers Bisexual flowers with<br />
Cora 10<br />
male characteristics<br />
Cavili<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
Fig. 3. Effects of STS on sexual expression in two cultivars of zucchini squash.<br />
Treatments induce the production of bisexual flowers with male secondary<br />
characteristics immediately after the treatment (Node 5).<br />
Given that the production of ethylene in the flowers that remain<br />
attached to the harvested fruits was lower than that of female flowers,<br />
the developmental arrest of these flowers before maturation supports<br />
the idea that ethylene is required to maintain the development of<br />
ovary-bearing flowers, and for the transition from immature to mature<br />
flowers in C. pepo. This conclusion agrees with other studies on<br />
Arabidopsis and melon indicating that ethylene is involved in flower<br />
maturation (Hall and Bleecker, 2003; Papadopoulou et al., 2005).<br />
<strong>The</strong> conversion of female into bisexual flowers observed in AVG-<br />
or STS-treated zucchini squash and the lower level of internal ethylene<br />
in these transformed flowers also support the conclusion that a<br />
threshold ethylene level is required to arrest stamen growth during<br />
female-flower development in C. pepo. <strong>The</strong> specificity of ethylene<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Node number in the main stem<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
Control<br />
STS<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 177
function on stamen arrest in female flowers of C. pepo may depend on<br />
the internal levels of this hormone in specific flower sex types, as we<br />
have observed in zucchini flowers, but also on a differential sensitivity<br />
of male and female flowers to ethylene as proposed by Yamasaki et al.<br />
(2001) in cucumber.<br />
nl ethilene/g fw*d<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Females Bisexuals Males<br />
Cora Summer 13,6928 11,8959 10,3283<br />
Cavili Summer 3,686 5,127666667<br />
Cora Winter 16,2097 8,6609<br />
Cavili Winter 6,6658 9,8858<br />
Fig. 4. Ethylene production of flowers in anthesis of the zucchini<br />
cultivars ‘Cora’ and ‘Cavili’ in winter or spring-summer<br />
conditions. Data represent the mean of at least 6 measurements<br />
from 3 replicates. Vertical bars represent standard deviation of<br />
the means. Bisexual flowers appeared only in the springsummer<br />
culture. Under these conditions, some of the female<br />
flowers of ‘Cora’ and nearly all the female flowers of ‘Cavili’<br />
were transformed into bisexual ones.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Gómez, P., A. Peñaranda, D Garrido, and M. Jamilena. 2004. Evaluation of flower<br />
abscission and sex expression in different cultivars of zucchini squash<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), p. 347–352. Progress in <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong><br />
Research. Eucarpia-<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004.<br />
Hall, A. E. and B. Bleecker. 2003. Analysis of combinatorial loss-of-function<br />
mutants in the Arabidopsis ethylene receptors reveals that the ers1 etr1 double<br />
mutant has severe developmental defects that are EIN2 dependent. Plant Cell.<br />
15:2032–2041.<br />
Little, H. A., S. A. Hammar, and R. Grumet. 2005. Modified sex expression in<br />
transgenic melon expressing the dominant mutant ethylene receptor gene, Atetr1-1,<br />
under control of floral targeted promoters.<br />
.<br />
178 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Mibus, H. and T. Tatlioglu. 2004. Molecular characterization and isolation of the F/f<br />
gene for femaleness in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) <strong>The</strong>oret. & App. Gen.<br />
109:1669–1676.<br />
Owens, K. W., C. W. Peterson, and G. E. Tolla. 1980. Production of hermaphrodite<br />
flowers on gynoecious muskmelon by silver nitrate and<br />
aminoethoxyvinylglycine. Hort Sci. 15:654–655.<br />
Papadopoulou, E., H. A. Little, S. A. Hammar, and R. Grumet. 2005. Effect of<br />
modified endogenous ethylene production on sex expression, bisexual flower<br />
development and fruit production in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sex. Plant<br />
Repro. 18:131–142<br />
Robinson, R. W., S. Shanno, and M. D. La Guardia. 1969. Regulation of sex<br />
expression in the cucumber. Biosci. 19:141–142.<br />
Rudich, J., A. Halevy, and N. Kedar. 1969. Increase in femaleness of three cucurbits<br />
by treatment with ethrel, an ethylene releasing compound. Planta. 86:69–76.<br />
Trebitsh, T., J. Rudich, and J. Riov. 1987. Auxin, biosynthesis of ethylene and sex<br />
expression in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Plant Growth Reg. 5:105–113.<br />
Trebitsh, T., J. E. Staub, and S. D. O´Neill. 1997. Identification of a 1minocyclopropane-1-carboxylic<br />
acid synthase gene linked to the female (F)<br />
locus that enhances femaleness expression in cucumber. Plant Physiol. 113:987–<br />
995.<br />
Yamasaki, S., N. Fujii, S. Matsuura, H. Mizusawa, H. and Takahashi. 2001. <strong>The</strong> M<br />
locus: an ethylene–controlled sex determination in andromonoecious cucumber<br />
plants. Plant & Cell Physiol. 42:608–619.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 179
THE MELOGEN PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT<br />
OF GENOMIC TOOLS IN MELON<br />
Pere Puigdomènech, Ana Caño, and Víctor González<br />
Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Departament<br />
de Genètica Molecular, Barcelona, Spain<br />
Pere Arús, Wim Deleu, Jordi Garcia-Mas,<br />
Mireia González, and Antonio Monforte<br />
Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Departament<br />
de Genètica Vegetal, Cabrils, Spain<br />
José Blanca, Fernando Nuez, Belén Picó, and Cristina Roig<br />
COMAV-UPV, Departamento de Biotecnología,<br />
Valencia, Spain<br />
Miguel Aranda and Daniel González<br />
CEBAS-CSIC, Departamento de Biología del Estrés y Patología<br />
Vegetal, Murcia, Spain<br />
Antonio Robles<br />
UPV, Departamento de Informática de Sistemas y Computadores,<br />
Valencia, Spain<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, ESTs, TILLING, SNP, oligo chip<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> Spanish Initiative in Genomics and Proteomics started <strong>The</strong><br />
MELOGEN Project: Development of Genomic Tools in Melon (C. melo L.) in<br />
2004 for the analysis of resistance to pathogens and fruit-quality traits. This is a<br />
collaborative effort involving five different research groups. After two years,<br />
several of the project objectives have been achieved including (1) EST<br />
sequencing; (2) development of a Webpage and a database that integrates the<br />
EST and genetic map information; (3) expanding the melon genetic map<br />
resolution with EST-derived SNP markers; (4) construction of a melon physical<br />
map by anchoring BAC clones with genetic markers; (5) development of BAC<br />
contigs in regions containing clusters of disease-resistance genes; (6)<br />
development of an EMS-mutagenized melon population for TILLING; and (7)<br />
construction of an oligo-based chip containing the EST unigene set.<br />
M<br />
elon (Cucumis melo L.) is a diploid species (2n=24) that<br />
belongs to the family <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and is a vegetable crop<br />
widely distributed in temperate, subtropical, and tropical<br />
climates. It is, after the tomato, the most widely grown vegetable crop<br />
in Spain in both area and production. Spain is the fifth largest melon<br />
producer worldwide and the leader in Europe. An important aspect of<br />
the melon industry in Spain is the production and commercialization of<br />
melon hybrid seed. Melon seeds command the highest prices among<br />
all vegetable crop seeds. Melon breeding is focused mainly on the<br />
180 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
incorporation of disease resistance and fruit-quality traits into<br />
commercial cultivars.<br />
<strong>The</strong> melon genome is relatively small. Some studies have<br />
estimated its genome size to be 450–500Mb (Arumuganathan and<br />
Earle, 1991), similar to that of rice (419Mb), and three times the size<br />
of the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana (125Mb). <strong>The</strong> melon<br />
genetic map has an estimated size of 1197cM (Oliver et al., 2001),<br />
which represents approximately 375kb per cM of physical map vs.<br />
genetic map. <strong>The</strong>se data make it an attractive species to study from a<br />
genomics point of view.<br />
Our genetic map was obtained from an F2 population of the cross<br />
PI 161375 (Korean accession) x ‘Piel de sapo’ T111 cultivar (Gonzalo<br />
et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> genetic map is based mainly on Restriction Fragment<br />
Length Polymorphism (RFLP) and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR)<br />
markers. Recently, several methods for the detection of single<br />
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been developed. SNPs are<br />
good markers for detecting polymorphism and they can be developed<br />
from genes with known function, which gives them added value. SNP<br />
markers will likely be the reference marker type in the near future and<br />
we have started to use them in melon (Morales et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />
primary objective of this project was to generate a high-resolution<br />
genetic map of melon based on SNPs that will complement an earlier<br />
map. This new map will be important for the achievement of the rest<br />
of objectives of the project.<br />
One of the main objectives in melon breeding in Spain is<br />
incorporating resistance to a number of plant diseases, both fungal<br />
(e.g., powdery mildew, soil-borne fungal diseases, and melon collapse)<br />
and viral (e.g., Cucumber mosaic virus [CMV], Watermelon mosaic<br />
virus [WMV-2], Zucchini yellow mosaic virus [ZYMV], and <strong>Cucurbit</strong><br />
aphid-borne yellows virus [CABYV] in the field and Melon necrotic<br />
spot virus [MNSV], Cucumber vein yellow virus [CVYV], and<br />
Cucumber yellow stunting disorder virus [CYSDV] in glasshouse<br />
production). It is important to develop melon varieties resistant to<br />
these pathogens (Nuez et al., 1999). <strong>The</strong>re are several known<br />
monogenic disease-resistance genes in melon. A few have been<br />
characterized by positional cloning (Joobeur et al., 2004; Nieto et al.,<br />
unpublished). Thus, it is important to have BAC libraries, such as the<br />
one obtained from a melon DHL containing 23,000 clones with an<br />
average size of 141kb (van Leeuwen et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> cloning and<br />
analysis of the genomic distribution of some disease-resistance genes<br />
in several plant species has revealed the existence of clusters of these<br />
genes in some genomic regions (Leister et al., 1996). We have<br />
detected at least three regions in melon that contain several known<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 181
disease-resistance genes and homologous sequences (Garcia-Mas et<br />
al., 2001). <strong>The</strong>se regions will be further studied during this project<br />
after building BAC contigs spanning 1-Mb regions, which will lead to<br />
a better understanding of the organization of the melon genome (van<br />
Leeuwen et al., 2003, 2005).<br />
On the other hand, the availability of large collections of ESTs in<br />
model species has facilitated the correct assembling of whole genomes<br />
after sequencing (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000). EST<br />
collections may allow the construction of microarrays with thousands<br />
of ESTs representing an organism, a very powerful tool for highthroughput<br />
genetic-expression studies (Seki et al., 2001). During this<br />
project we anticipate sequencing 30000 ESTs and developing a melon<br />
ESTs oligo chip. <strong>The</strong> analysis of the expression data obtained with the<br />
chip will be complex, so we will also establish a bioinformatics<br />
platform.<br />
<strong>The</strong> analysis of gene function requires the existence of mutant<br />
alleles for the genes analyzed. Plant breeding also needs genetic<br />
variability, which is not always available naturally. This can be<br />
important in the cucurbit family, a group of species relatively isolated<br />
among the cultivated crops. For this reason the TILLING approach has<br />
been developed (McCallum et al., 2000). Using this methodology we<br />
can search for allelic variants for a candidate gene. In this project we<br />
will also establish a melon mutant population and a TILLING<br />
platform.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
<strong>The</strong> melon genotypes used for contructing the cDNA libraries were<br />
the Korean accession PI 161375, two ‘Piel de sapo’ cultivars, the C35<br />
cantaloupe line, and the C. melo ssp. agrestis accession pat81. RNAs<br />
were extracted using the Tri-reagent kit (Sigma). cDNA libraries were<br />
normalized and constructed in the pBSK cloning vector. <strong>The</strong> EST<br />
sequences were produced in Macrogen (Seoul, Korea). EST annotation<br />
and analysis was performed and stored in .<br />
For SNP discovery, primers were designed from melon ESTs, and<br />
the amplified products in PI 161375 and T111 were sequenced and<br />
aligned. SNPs were genotyped using CAPS or the SNaPshot kit. SNPs<br />
were mapped in the PI 161375 x T111 genetic map using bin-mapping<br />
(Howad et al., 2005).<br />
cDNA clones corresponding to melon RFLP markers in Oliver et<br />
al. (2001) were sequenced. Specific primers were designed and used to<br />
screen the melon BAC library (van Leeuwen et al., 2003).<br />
182 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Melon seed from a ‘Piel de sapo’ breeding line from Semillas Fitó<br />
was treated with ethyl-methane sulfonate (EMS) using standard<br />
protocols. <strong>The</strong> M1 plants were selfed and M2 seed was stored. Ten M2<br />
individuals from each M2 family were grown and DNA was extracted<br />
(QIAGEN) and pooled for each family.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
MELON ESTS. We have constructed eight normalized cDNA<br />
libraries from five different melon genotypes (see Materials and<br />
Methods section). Two cDNA libraries corresponded to melon fruit<br />
tissue 15 and 46 days after pollination (DAP). Four cDNA libraries<br />
were obtained from healthy roots and roots inoculated with<br />
Monosporascus cannonballus in two different melon genotypes. Two<br />
cDNA libraries were prepared from healthy leaves and leaves infected<br />
with CMV. After sequencing 3,500–4,000 EST clones from each<br />
library (5’ sequencing), 30,675 high-quality ESTs were obtained.<br />
WEBPAGE AND EST DATABASE. Once clustered and annotated, the<br />
ESTs were classified in 6,023 contigs and 10,615 singletons, yielding<br />
16,637 unigenes. A Webpage that contains all of the EST information<br />
has been constructed (www.melogen.upv.es). <strong>The</strong> database is<br />
searchable in a user-friendly way to provide sequence information for<br />
the members of MELOGEN. For example, the system provides tools<br />
to easily identify ESTs containing SSR motifs or “in silico” SNPs.<br />
SNP DISCOVERY AND DETECTION. ESTs were selected either<br />
randomly or because they may be candidate genes for interesting<br />
agronomic traits. Two systems were used to discover SNPs between<br />
the melon genotypes PI 161375 and ‘Piel de sapo’: (a) specific primer<br />
design from each EST and resequencing the amplicons from PI<br />
161375 and ‘Piel de sapo’, and (b) in silico SNP discovery using the<br />
MELOGEN database. Because many EST contigs contain ESTs from<br />
different melon genotypes, it is possible to identify putative SNPs that<br />
can be validated later. For SNP detection and mapping we used 14<br />
DHL individuals from the PI 161375 x ‘Piel de sapo’ mapping<br />
population, which allows mapping the SNP in a known interval of the<br />
genetic map with lower resolution: selective mapping or “binmapping”<br />
(Howad et al., 2005). SNPs have been detected using either<br />
CAPS markers or, when there was no restriction enzyme differentially<br />
recognizing the SNP sequence, the SNaPshot kit. At this time we have<br />
discovered and mapped approximately 100 new SNPs, which are<br />
evenly distributed in the 12 melon linkage groups.<br />
PHYSICAL MAP. We have anchored to the genetic map 100 BAC<br />
clones using RFLP probes. For each cDNA producing an RFLP,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 183
specific primers were designed. <strong>The</strong>se primers were used to PCR<br />
amplify the melon BAC library (van Leeuwen et al., 2003), which is<br />
arranged in superpools and pools of DNA, making it easier to identify<br />
a positive BAC clone for each RFLP. <strong>The</strong>se BAC clones are the<br />
original skeleton of the melon physical map.<br />
MELON MUTANT POPULATION. A ‘Piel de sapo’ breeding line was<br />
chemically mutated with EMS at different concentrations to determine<br />
the optimum EMS concentration for an efficient mutation of the melon<br />
genome. From 17,000 M0 mutagenized seed, 8,000 M1 plants were<br />
grown and selfed in two different locations. We have obtained M2 seed<br />
from 3,000 M1 plants. This is the basis of our melon TILLING<br />
population. At the beginning of 2006, 10 to 20 seeds have been grown<br />
for 1,000 M2 families. DNA has been extracted and pooled for each<br />
M2 family. Experiments to identify mutants for several genes of<br />
interest using the heteroduplex digestion method based on the Cel1<br />
enzyme have been started.<br />
FUTURE PROSPECTS. <strong>The</strong> EST unigene set is ready for the design<br />
of the first melon oligo chip. For this purpose we will use Nimblegen<br />
technology. Expression experiments will be performed using the<br />
melon oligo chip with RNA samples from melon fruits in different<br />
stages of development, and leaf and root tissues infected with viruses<br />
and fungi, respectively. We will continue the discovery and mapping<br />
of SNPs in order to reach 300 new markers in the melon genetic map.<br />
At the same time, the SNP markers will be used to identify new BAC<br />
clones anchored to the genetic map. If the mutation rate in the EMStreated<br />
population is acceptable, we will continue extracting DNA<br />
from the M2 families until we reach an initial collection of 3,000.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the<br />
flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 408:796–815.<br />
Arumuganathan, K. and E. D. Earle. 1991. Nuclear DNA content of some important<br />
plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:208–218.<br />
Garcia-Mas, J., H. van Leeuwen, A. Monfort, M. C. de Vicente, P. Puigdomènech,<br />
and P. Arús. 2001. Cloning and mapping of resistance gene homologues in<br />
melon. Plant Sci. 161:165–172.<br />
Gonzalo, M. J., M. Oliver, J. Garcia-Mas, A. Monfort, R. Dolcet-Sanjuan, N. Katzir,<br />
P. Arús, A. J. Monforte. 2005. Simple-sequence repeat markers used in merging<br />
linkage maps of melon (Cucumis melo L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 110:802–811.<br />
Howad, W., T. Yamamoto, E. Dirlewanger, R. Testolin, P. Cossont, G. Cipriani, A.<br />
J. Monforte, L. Georgi, A. G. Abbot, and P. Arús. 2005. Mapping with a few<br />
plants: using selective mapping for microsatellite saturation of the Prunus<br />
reference map. Genetics. 171:305–1309.<br />
184 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Joobeur, T., J. J. King, S. J. Nolin, C. E. Thomas, and R. A. Dean. 2004. <strong>The</strong><br />
fusarium wilt resistance locus Fom-2 of melon contains a single resistance gene<br />
with complex features. Plant J. 39:283–297.<br />
Leister, D., A. Ballvora, F. Salamini, and C. Gebhardt. 1996. A PCR-based approach<br />
for isolating pathogen resistance genes from potato with potential for wide<br />
application in plants. Nature Gen. 14:421–429.<br />
McCallum, C. M., L. Comai, E. A. Greene, and S. Henikoff. 2000. Targeted<br />
screening for induced mutations. Nat. Biotech. 18:455–457.<br />
Morales, M., E. Roig, A. J. Monforte, P. Arús, and J. Garcia-Mas. 2004. Single<br />
nucleotide polymorphisms detected in ESTs of melon (Cucumis melo L.).<br />
Genome. 47:352–360.<br />
Nuez, F., B. Picó, A. Iglesias, J. Esteva, and M. Juarez. 1999. Genetics of melon<br />
yellows virus resistance derived from Cucumis melo spp. agrestis. Eur. J. Plant<br />
Pathol. 105:453–464.<br />
Oliver, M., J. Garcia-Mas, M. Cardús, N. Pueyo, A. I. López-Sesé, M. Arroyo, H.<br />
Gómez-Paniagua, P. Arús, and M. C. de Vicente. 2001. Construction of a<br />
reference linkage map for melon. Genome. 44:836–845.<br />
Seki, M., M. Narusaka, H. Abe, M. Kasuga, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, P. Carninci,<br />
Y. Hayashizaki, and K. Shinozaki. 2001. Monitoring the expression pattern of<br />
1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length<br />
cDNA microarray. Plant Cell. 13:61–72.<br />
van Leeuwen, H., A. Monfort, H. B. Zhang, and P. Puigdomènech. 2003.<br />
Identification and characterisation of a melon genomic region containing a<br />
resistance gene cluster from a constructed BAC library. microlinearity between<br />
Cucumis melo and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. Mol. Biol. 51:703–718.<br />
van Leeuwen, H., J. Garcia-Mas, M. Coca, P. Puigdomènech, and A. Monfort. 2005.<br />
Analysis of the melon genome in regions encompassing TIR-NBS-LRR<br />
resistance genes. Mol. Gen. Genom. 273:240–251.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 185
THE MELOGEN PROJECT: EST<br />
SEQUENCING, PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS<br />
Pere Puigdomènech<br />
Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA,<br />
Departament de Genètica Molecular, Barcelona, Spain<br />
Pere Arús, Jordi García-Mas, and Mireia González<br />
Laboratori de Genètica Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA,<br />
Departament de Genètica Vegetal, Cabrils, Spain<br />
Fernando Nuez, José Blanca, Belén Picó, and Cristina Roig<br />
COMAV-UPV, Departamento de Biotecnología, Valencia, Spain<br />
Miguel Aranda and Daniel González<br />
CEBAS-CSIC, Departamento de Biología del Estrés y Patología<br />
Vegetal, Murcia, Spain<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, expressed sequence tabs, cDNA<br />
libraries, bioinformatics, qPCR, gene expression<br />
ABSTRACT. Thirty thousand melon (Cucumis melo) ESTs have been sequenced<br />
from eight normalized cDNA libraries corresponding to different tissues in<br />
different physiological conditions: healthy leaf and root, Monosporascus<br />
cannonballus-infected root, cotyledons inoculated with Cucumber mosaic virus<br />
(CMV), and fruits of 15 and 46 days after pollination. A database and a Web<br />
page have been created (www.melogen.upv.es), with statistical information<br />
about libraries, 16,600 unigenes, 350 putative SNPs, and 1,000 putative<br />
microsatellites. In addition, we have made gene-expression analysis by Real-<br />
Time-qPCR for 20 unigenes of the database, including genes known to respond<br />
to pathogen infection such as a 70-KDa heat shock protein (Hsp70), a WRKY<br />
transcription factor, the eukaryotic translation initiation factors 4E and (iso)4E<br />
described as susceptibility factors for some plant viruses, and several other<br />
genes involved in fruit development.<br />
S<br />
pain is fifth in the world in the production of melons (Cucumis<br />
melo L.) and is the largest producer in Europe. In Spain, melon<br />
is the second most widely grown vegetable crop after tomato<br />
(F.A.O., 2006). <strong>The</strong> agricultural importance of melon and the<br />
possibilities that plant genomics offers (e.g., Rensink and Buell, 2005)<br />
have led to the establishment of a Spanish consortium to develop<br />
genomic tools in melon, focusing on resistance to pathogens and on<br />
fruit-quality traits (Melogen). <strong>The</strong> research that we present in this<br />
paper has been performed within the framework of this consortium.<br />
Partial sequencing of cDNA inserts of expressed sequence tags<br />
(ESTs) has been used as an effective method for gene discovery,<br />
molecular-marker generation, and transcript pattern characterization. It<br />
186 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
is an efficient approach for identifying sets of plant genes expressed<br />
during different developmental stages and/or responding to<br />
environmental stimuli. Despite the importance of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae,<br />
relatively little EST information is currently available. For this reason,<br />
we have undertaken a survey of the melon transcriptome by analyzing<br />
ESTs from eight normalized cDNA libraries corresponding to different<br />
tissues in different physiological conditions: healthy leaf and root,<br />
Monosporascus cannonballus-infected root, cotyledons inoculated<br />
with Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), and fruits of 15 and 46 days after<br />
pollination. Here we present the sequencing of 30,000 melon ESTs<br />
from these libraries and also a gene-expression analysis by Real-TimeqPCR<br />
for 20 unigenes of the database.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL. <strong>The</strong> genotypes used for the construction of the<br />
libraries were the ‘Piel de Sapo’-type cv. T111 (Semillas Fitó, SL,<br />
Barcelona, Spain), the cantaloupe accession C35 (germplasm<br />
collection of “La Mayora” Experimental Station, Málaga, Spain), and<br />
C. melo ssp. agrestis accession pat81 (germplasm collection of<br />
COMAV, Valencia, Spain). Inoculations with the pathogens were<br />
carried out using standard procedures (Table 1). This plant material<br />
was used as the RNA source for the construction of libraries and for<br />
gene-expression analysis by RT-qPCR.<br />
Table 1. Description of the cDNA libraries.<br />
Name Accession Tissue Physiol. cond Kind<br />
A agrestis pat_81 root healthy normalized<br />
AI agrestis pat_81 root M cannonballus normalized<br />
PS Piel de Sapo root healthy normalized<br />
PSI Piel de Sapo root M cannonballus normalized<br />
HS c35 leaf healthy normalized<br />
CI c35 cotyledon CMV infected normalized<br />
15d t111 Piel_de_Sapo 15 days fruit healthy normalized<br />
46d t111 Piel_de_Sapo 46 days fruit healthy normalized<br />
CDNA LIBRARIES. Total RNA was prepared using TriReagent<br />
(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Poly(A) RNA from total RNA was<br />
purified with a cellulose-oligo(dT)-based method [MicroPoly(A)<br />
Purist, (Ambion, Austin, TX)]. Integrity and quality of both total and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 187
poly(A) RNA were tested by gel electrophoresis. cDNA libraries were<br />
constructed with the SMART cDNA Library Construction kit<br />
(Clontech, Mountain View, CA), with a modified primer to include an<br />
Sfi I enzyme restriction site. <strong>The</strong> normalization step was carried out<br />
with TRIMMER kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). <strong>The</strong> cDNA<br />
fractionation step was made with SizeSep 400 Spun Columns<br />
(Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England). cDNA was digested with Sfi<br />
I generating Sfi IA-Sfi IB cohesive ends for directional cloning into a<br />
modified version of BlueScript SK plasmid vector (Stratagene, La<br />
Jolla, CA). <strong>The</strong> product of ligation was transformed into E. coli<br />
electrocompetent cells DH10B (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) by<br />
electroporation. Title of libraries was evaluated plating an aliquot on<br />
LB agar plates with ampicillin at 100μg/ml. Only libraries of<br />
10 5 cfu/ml or more were accepted. In order to check the average insert<br />
size, 24 plasmid DNA minipreps from randomly picked colonies were<br />
analyzed by Eco RI-Hind III restriction analyses.<br />
SEQUENCING OF ESTS. Sequencing was carried out from the 5´end<br />
of the insert without library amplification using the universal M13<br />
reverse primer. An external custom service was contracted for this task<br />
(Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea). Approximately 6,000 clones were<br />
sequenced from the “inoculated cotyledon” (CI) library, and 3,500<br />
clones from each of the other libraries (Table 2).<br />
Table 2. cDNA libraries statistical information.<br />
Raw<br />
sequen<br />
High-<br />
quality<br />
Redundancy <br />
Libspecificuni-<br />
Libraryces<br />
ESTs<br />
SingletonsContigsUnigenes<br />
(%) genes<br />
15d 3936 3582 1064 1875 2939 18 1312 45<br />
46d 3840 3493 1070 1787 2857 18 1291 45<br />
A 3936 3666 1344 1844 3188 13 1424 45<br />
Ai 3647 3255 974 1644 2618 20 1494 57<br />
Hs 3648 3012 989 1564 2553 15 1120 44<br />
Ci 6605 5664 2177 2509 4686 17 2618 56<br />
Ps 3840 3377 1245 1702 2947 13 1408 48<br />
Psi 3840 3555 1339 1768 3107 13 2000 64<br />
Total 34417 30675 10614 6023 16637 46 12844 77<br />
Nov-<br />
elty<br />
(%)<br />
GENE-EXPRESSION ANALYSIS BY RT-QPCR. Real-time<br />
quantitative PCR was performed with an AB 7500 System (Applied<br />
Biosystems, Foster City, CA) to quantify mRNA of some transcripts of<br />
interest. Twenty ESTs representing these transcripts were chosen from<br />
the database and used to generate gene-specific primers with Primer<br />
188 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Express Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). <strong>The</strong><br />
chemistry used for PCR product detection was the Power SYBR green<br />
dye (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and ROX as passive<br />
reference. Cyclophilin served as endogenous control (sequence<br />
extracted from the database) and ΔΔCt was the method of calculation<br />
used to perform relative quantification. Melting curves analyses at the<br />
end of the process and No Template Controls (NTC) were carried out<br />
to ensure product-specific amplification and no primer-dimer<br />
quantification. A control reaction as for reverse transcription but<br />
without the enzyme was performed to evaluate genomic DNA<br />
contamination.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Almost 35,000 rough sequences were generated. After processing<br />
to eliminate vector sequences, short PCR products, and poor-quality<br />
sequences, 30,675 high-quality ESTs were identified. <strong>The</strong>se were used<br />
for clustering, resulting in 16,637 unigenes (10,614 singletons and<br />
6,023 contigs) (Table 2). This high proportion of singletons could be<br />
due to the normalization step. Traditionally, normalization protocols<br />
are based on reassociation of denatured double-stranded DNA, so that<br />
most of the abundant DNA molecules will form double-stranded (ds)<br />
molecules, whereas the single-stranded (ss) fraction results equalized<br />
to a considerable extent. <strong>The</strong> normalization protocol that we have used<br />
here consists of a novel method based on a DNase treatment that, in<br />
contrast with other methods, does not require physical separation of<br />
the two fractions for selecting the ss-molecules, increasing yield and<br />
probably efficiency. As shown by electrophoresis in agarose gels,<br />
bands corresponding to the more abundant transcripts are efficiently<br />
eliminated in normalized samples (Figure 1, arrow in lane 4).<br />
Once processed and annotated, an EST database and a Web page<br />
were created to facilitate access to information (www.melogen.<br />
upv.es). In addition to the unigenes identified, clustering and<br />
redundant sequences have served as a resource for identification of<br />
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by comparing EST<br />
sequences pertaining to contigs from different melon genotypes. More<br />
than 1,000 putative short sequence repeats (SSRs) and 356 putative<br />
SNPs have been generated and have the potential to be used as<br />
molecular markers.<br />
Gene-expression analyses were made by RT-qPCR to quantify<br />
transcript accumulation for some genes of interest (Table 3).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 189
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Fig. 1. Construction of the healthy leaf library (HS). Lanes 1, 2, 3: cDNA after<br />
normalization. Lane 4: cDNA prior to normalization. Lane 5: molecular weight<br />
marker.<br />
Sequences were extracted from the database searching by keyword or<br />
BLAST result with an orthologue sequence from another species (e.g.,<br />
Arabidopsis thaliana). Transcripts were quantified altogether in the<br />
tissues and conditions used for generation of the libraries. Cyclophilin<br />
was used for normalization. Its expression pattern showed very little<br />
variation when tissues in different physiological conditions were<br />
compared (e.g., healthy vs. inoculated roots), though variation<br />
increased when different tissues were compared (e.g., root vs. leaf)<br />
(data not shown). <strong>The</strong>refore, it seemed reasonable to compare<br />
expression profiles for different physiological conditions but for a<br />
given tissue. For example, Figure 2 shows the effect of CMV<br />
inoculation on cotyledon gene expression. As already described for<br />
other plant-virus combinations, we identified an increase in the<br />
expression of the 70-KDa and 101-KDa heat shock proteins<br />
Table 3. Genes analyzed by RT-qPCR.<br />
Gene Description Gene Description<br />
4A Eukar.init.fact. 4A Hsp101 Heat shock prot.<br />
4E Eukar.init.fact. 4E Hsp70 Heat shock prot.<br />
4E novel Eukar.init.fact. 4E nov. Lsm Sm-like protein<br />
Aqp Aquaporine Ly e-lycopene cyclase<br />
Aux Auxine responsive MADS MADS box protein<br />
Chi Chitinase Tom1 Tobamovirus multip. 1<br />
Eth Ethylene recept ETR2 Tom2A Tobamovirus multip. 2A<br />
Ga2ox gibberellin 2-oxidase Tom3 Tobamovirus multip. 3<br />
Glu UDP-glucose epimerase WRKY WRKY DNA-binding<br />
Hyp hypersensitive response Xyl Xyloglucan endotransgl.<br />
190 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
(HSP70 and HSP101) associated with CMV infection (Aranda et al.,<br />
1996). Notably, the transcription factor WRKY also responded with an<br />
increased transcript accumulation (Park et al., 2006). We were<br />
interested in analyzing the response of genes described as factors<br />
required for viral infection, such as eukaryotic translation initiation<br />
factors (Robaglia and Caranta, 2006), Tom genes, and Lsm (Kushner<br />
et al., 2003). Except for Tom2A, no significant modification on their<br />
patterns of transcript accumulation could be detected after CMV<br />
infection (Figure 2).<br />
10<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
4A<br />
4e<br />
4enovel<br />
cy<br />
hsp101B<br />
hsp70<br />
Fig. 2. Pattern of transcript accumulation for 10 selected genes in healthy (CS)<br />
and CMV-infected melon cotyledons (CI). RNA accumulation is expressed<br />
relative to that of healthy cotyledons.<br />
FUTURE PROSPECTS. <strong>The</strong> unigene set will be used to construct an<br />
oligo-based microarray to perform transcriptomic analysis in melon.<br />
An international project has been initiated to further increase the<br />
collection of melon ESTs and to create a common database to continue<br />
developing genomic tools in this species.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Aranda, M. et al. 1996. Induction of HSP70 and polyubiquitin expression associated<br />
with plant virus replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:15289–15293.<br />
F.A.O. 2006. Food And Agriculture Organization Of <strong>The</strong> United Nations. 15 May, 2006,<br />
.<br />
Kushner, D. et al. 2003. Systematic, genome-wide identification of host genes<br />
affecting replication of a positive-strand RNA virus. PNAS. 100:15764–15769.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 191<br />
lsm<br />
tom1<br />
CS<br />
CI<br />
tom2A<br />
tom3<br />
WRKY
Park, C. et al. 2006. A hot pepper gene encoding WRKY transcription factor is<br />
induced during hypersensitive response to Tobacco mosaic virus and<br />
Xanthomonas campestris. Planta. 223:168–179.<br />
Rensink, W. and R. Buell. 2005. Microarray expression profiling resources for<br />
plant–genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 10(12):603–608.<br />
Robaglia, C. and C. Caranta. 2006. Translation initation factors: a weak link in plant<br />
RNA virus infection. Trends Plant Sci. 11:40–45.<br />
192 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
DEVELOPMENT OF A POWDERY MILDEW-<br />
RESISTANT CUCUMBER<br />
Yoshiteru Sakata, Mitsuhiro Sugiyama, and Takayoshi Ohara<br />
National Institute of Vegetable and Tea Science<br />
Kusawa, Ano, Tsu, Mie. 514-2392, Japan<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis sativus, Podosphaera xanthii, temperatureindependent<br />
resistance<br />
ABSTRACT. We developed a cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.; accession CP-02)<br />
with resistance to powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii [Castaggne] U. Braun<br />
& N. Shishkoff) as potential breeding material. This cucumber is the progeny<br />
from crosses among CS-PMR1, ‘Sharp 1’ (Saitama Gensyu Ikuseikai), and<br />
‘Rira’ (Enza Zaden). CP-02 shows a high level of resistance to powdery mildew,<br />
not only at higher temperatures (above 25°C), but also at relatively cool<br />
temperatures (20°C). This resistance to powdery mildew is thought to be<br />
controlled by one major recessive gene and one in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene,<br />
which enhance the resistance.<br />
P<br />
owdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii [Castaggne] U. Braun &<br />
N. Shishkoff) limits the production of cucumber (Cucumis<br />
sativus L.) worldwide. In Japan, the damage caused by<br />
powdery mildew is severe, as most Japanese commercial greenhouse<br />
cultivars are susceptible to the disease during the winter-to-spring<br />
period (Morishita et al., 2002). In addition, tolerance to powdery<br />
mildew declined after the adoption of bloomless rootstocks for the<br />
production of bloomless fruits (Hazama et al., 1993; Sakata et al.,<br />
2006).<br />
Generally, fungicides are used to control powdery mildew in<br />
cucumber production, but as daily harvests are common in Japanese<br />
cultivation it is often difficult to time the spraying of fungicides<br />
properly. <strong>The</strong> mistiming of fungicide application can lead to a decline<br />
in yield, and the labor and cost of fungicide application is an<br />
undesirable burden for growers. In addition, the demand for food<br />
produced with fewer agrochemicals has been increasing.<br />
For production with reduced agrochemicals, the use of diseaseresistant<br />
cultivars is desirable. Although some European greenhousetype,<br />
Asian open-field, and Beit Alpha-type cucumber cultivars show<br />
resistance to powdery mildew at higher temperatures (above 25°C), no<br />
known cultivars are resistant under relatively cool conditions (20°C).<br />
Morishita et al. (2002) identified an accession, CS-PMR1 (Figure 1),<br />
that showed a temperature-independent resistance to powdery mildew.<br />
This accession was derived from PI 197088, a wild-type cucumber of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 193
Indian origin, and resistance was observed at both higher and lower<br />
temperatures. Morishita et al. (2003) have started breeding powdery<br />
mildew-resistant cucumber by using CS-PMR1, but it may require a<br />
long time to breed practical cultivars, as the resistance of CS-PMR1 is<br />
controlled by one recessive gene and one in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, we intend to release an accession, CP-02, with temperatureindependent<br />
resistance to powdery mildew, as breeding material.<br />
Fig. 1. Fruit of CS-PMR1, a resistant source material for breeding<br />
powdery mildew-resistant cucumber. <strong>The</strong> fruit was harvested 8 days<br />
after anthesis. <strong>The</strong> white bar indicates 5cm.<br />
Origin<br />
<strong>The</strong> source of the resistance to powdery mildew was CS-PMR1.<br />
Progenies from crosses among CS-PMR1, ‘Sharp 1’ (Saitama Gensyu<br />
Ikuseikai), and ‘Rira’ (Enza Zaden) were evaluated for powdery<br />
mildew resistance at 20°C, and one fixed accession, CP-02, was<br />
selected (Figure 2).<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2005<br />
PI 197088 CS-PMR1<br />
F1 F2 F3 Sharp 1 F1 F2 F8 F9 Rira CP-02<br />
Fig. 2. Pedigree of the powdery mildew-resistant cucumber accession CP-02<br />
194 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Powdery mildew resistance of CP02 and control cultivars at<br />
20°C and 26°C.<br />
Disease index z<br />
Temperature<br />
20°C<br />
Cultivar 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Avg.<br />
CP02 12 0.00<br />
Sharp 1<br />
Suisei-<br />
1 7 3 8.18<br />
fushinari<br />
Kurume<br />
3 2 8.40<br />
65<br />
Poinsette<br />
2 1 5 5 2 6.27<br />
76<br />
Asomidori<br />
3 5 1 6.78<br />
5<br />
Natsu-<br />
3 6 3 2 1 4.47<br />
fushinari<br />
Freedom<br />
2 3 1 1 1 4.50<br />
House 2 3 1 2 1 5.14<br />
CS-PMR1 1 11 0.92<br />
26°C CP02 12 0.00<br />
Sharp 1<br />
Suisei-<br />
1 11 5.92<br />
fushinari<br />
Kurume<br />
1 1 6 1 5.78<br />
65<br />
Poinsette<br />
12 6.00<br />
76<br />
Asomidori<br />
12 6.00<br />
5<br />
Natsu-<br />
2 8 2 2.00<br />
fushinari<br />
Freedom<br />
4 6 2 1.83<br />
House 2 1 4 4 1.33<br />
CS-PMR1 12 0.00<br />
z<br />
Disease index: 0 = no symptoms; 9 = <strong>complete</strong>ly covered with mildew.<br />
Inoculation of powdery mildew performed as in Morishita et al., 2002.<br />
Description<br />
<strong>The</strong> characteristics of CP-02 were evaluated in a greenhouse from<br />
spring to summer 2005. A single stem was trained vertically and<br />
pinched at 180cm, and all lateral branches were pinched at the first<br />
node. <strong>The</strong> Japanese standard cultivar ‘Tokiwa’ was used as a control.<br />
<strong>The</strong> plant height, length of internodes, and leaf size of CP-02 were<br />
similar to those of ‘Tokiwa’ (data not shown), but petiole length was<br />
relatively longer. <strong>The</strong> plant was monoecious. <strong>The</strong> fruit harvest began<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 195
approximately 60 days after seeding, as is characteristic of an earlyharvest<br />
type. Eighty percent of the lateral branches bore fruit, which<br />
was cylindrical and similar to those of a Beit Alpha cucumber (Figure<br />
3). Fruit was small, weighing approximately 60g. No warts or spines<br />
were found on the surface. <strong>The</strong> fruit skin was dark green and tough,<br />
the flesh relatively soft. Parthenocarpy was evident.<br />
Fig. 3. Fruit of CP-02. <strong>The</strong> fruit was harvested 8 days after anthesis. <strong>The</strong> white<br />
bar indicates 5cm.<br />
Under growth-chamber conditions, using artificial inoculation of<br />
Podosphaera xanthii derived from naturally infected melon leaves, the<br />
powdery mildew resistance of CP-02 was found to be temperatureindependent,<br />
with resistant reactions observed at both 20°C and 26°C<br />
(Table 1). We have tested with various isolates and populations; to<br />
date, no breakdown of resistance has been observed. <strong>The</strong> resistance to<br />
powdery mildew is thought to be controlled by one major recessive<br />
gene and one in<strong>complete</strong>ly dominant gene, enhancing the resistance<br />
(data not shown).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Hazama, W., S. Morita, and T. Kato. 1993. Resistance to Corynespora target leaf<br />
spot in cucumber grafted on a bloomless rootstock. Soc. Phytopath. Soc. Jpn.<br />
59:243–248. (In Japanese with English summary.)<br />
Morishita, M., K. Sugiyama, T. Saito, and Y. Sakata. 2002. An improved evaluation<br />
method for screening and selection of powdery mildew resistant cultivars and<br />
lines of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71:94–100. (In<br />
Japanese with English summary.)<br />
Morishita, M., K. Sugiyama, T. Saito, and Y. Sakata. 2003. Powdery mildew<br />
resistance in cucumber. JARQ. 37:7–14.<br />
Sakata, Y., M. Sugiyama, T. Ohara, and M. Morishita. 2006. Influence of rootstocks<br />
on the resistance of grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) scions to powdery<br />
mildew (Podosphaera xanthii U. Braun & N. Shishkoff). J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
75:135–140.<br />
196 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
HISTORY AND APPLICATION OF<br />
MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR CUCUMBER<br />
IMPROVEMENT<br />
J. E. Staub, M. D. Robbins, S. M. Chung, and Z. Sun<br />
USDA/ARS, Vegetable Crops Unit, Department of Horticulture,<br />
University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Marker development, map construction, QTL<br />
analysis, marker-assisted selection<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> history of marker development, map construction, and the<br />
utility of marker-assisted selection (MAS) is presented. Experimental results<br />
indicate that the identification of marker-trait associations will continue to be<br />
extremely expensive and time consuming, but will likely pay large dividends for<br />
use in MAS. MAS for quantitative trait improvement will require a populationspecific<br />
evaluation of genotypic background, and an understanding of<br />
physiology (source-sink relationships), epistasis, and heritabilities.<br />
C<br />
ucumber has a narrow genetic base (3–8%) as defined by DNA<br />
assessments of genetic diversity (Dijkhuizen et al., 1996;<br />
Horejsi and Staub, 1999; Meglic et al., 1996). Nevertheless,<br />
cucumber is amenable to MAS because of its rapid life cycle (3–4<br />
months), its low chromosome number, and relatively small genome (~<br />
750cM map length). <strong>The</strong> development of genetic marker systems<br />
(Horejsi et al., 1999; Fazio et al., 2002) and unique genetic stocks<br />
(Staub et al., 1996 & 2002a) have allowed for the slow but consistent<br />
development of genetic maps for use in marker-assisted selection<br />
(MAS) (Serquen et al. 1997; Fazio et al., 2003a).<br />
<strong>The</strong> pyramiding of simply inherited genes (e.g., disease resistance)<br />
during germplasm enhancement is common, and has proven useful in<br />
the improvement of many crop species. Less well reported and<br />
understood are genetic approaches for the incorporation of<br />
quantitatively inherited traits. In cucumber, quantitative trait loci<br />
(QTL) conditioning yield components have been identified and<br />
mapped for potential use in MAS (Serquen et al. 1997; Fazio et al.,<br />
2003a). <strong>The</strong> use of MAS in cucumber improvement has been effective<br />
for increasing gain from selection for single (Fazio et al., 2003b) as<br />
well as multiple quantitatively inherited traits (Fan et al., 2006;<br />
Robbins, 2006). Because marker development and the implementation<br />
of MAS in cucumber has spanned nearly 2.5 decades, reports are often<br />
not synchronous and, therefore, a historical understanding of this<br />
process is not self-evident. This paper seeks to provide a historical<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 197
understanding of marker development, mapping, and MAS in<br />
cucumber.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
<strong>The</strong> results presented herein are a synthesis of reports on marker<br />
development (Horesji et al., 1999; Staub et al., 2002b; Robbins, 2006),<br />
map construction (Serquen et al., 1997; Bradeen et al., 2001; Fazio et<br />
al., 2003a; Sun et al., 2006), and their use in MAS (Robbins and Staub,<br />
2004; Robbins, 2006; Fazio et al., 2003b; Fan et al., 2006). While the<br />
description of marker development focuses on the difficulties<br />
encountered in marker identification and characterization, Linkage<br />
Group (LG) 1 is used to validate its importance in MAS. Previously<br />
unreported data are presented, and are used to synthesize concepts to<br />
define the use of marker systems for cucumber improvement.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> development and use of molecular markers for cucumber<br />
improvement in our laboratory is depicted in Figure 1. <strong>The</strong> process for<br />
the application of genetic markers in MAS has followed three major<br />
recurring cycles, regardless of marker type. Potentially useful markers<br />
are identified and then developed into efficient and effective systems.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se markers are then placed on a genetic map and associated with<br />
QTL through progeny analysis for their subsequent use in MAS.<br />
1980<br />
Isozymes,<br />
RFLP<br />
1990<br />
RAPD,<br />
AFLP,<br />
SSR<br />
2000<br />
SNP<br />
Resource<br />
allocation<br />
New Technologies New Technologies New Technologies<br />
Methods<br />
development<br />
Marker<br />
Development<br />
Methods<br />
evaluation<br />
New Technologies<br />
Methods<br />
assessment<br />
Map<br />
construction<br />
Mapping &<br />
QTL analysis<br />
QTL<br />
analysis<br />
Field<br />
evaluation<br />
Analysis of<br />
gain<br />
Markerassisted<br />
selection<br />
Experimental<br />
design<br />
Population<br />
development<br />
New Technologies New Technologies<br />
Fig. 1. Schematic of marker development and application in cucumber<br />
breeding.<br />
198 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
MARKER DEVELOPMENT. Marker development has occurred in<br />
several marker systems [isozymes, restriction fragment length<br />
polymorphisms (RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD), sequenced characterized amplified region (SCAR), amplified<br />
fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP), simple sequence repeats<br />
(SSR), and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)], where changes<br />
have been driven by steady advances in technology. In each case, the<br />
cost of development has been critical, since funding for markerdevelopment<br />
projects has not been abundant in U.S. public plantbreeding<br />
programs. Much-needed funding to support our laboratory<br />
was received from international seed companies between 1984 and<br />
1999 for the development of isozyme, RFLP, RAPD, and SSR<br />
technologies, with the goal of developing a moderately saturated<br />
genetic map (~150 to 200 markers to provide 90–95% coverage at 10–<br />
15-cM intervals).<br />
Between 1984 and 1995, isozyme and RFLP markers were<br />
developed and placed on unsaturated genetic maps (Knerr and Staub,<br />
1992; Meglic and Staub, 1996; Kennard et al., 1994). <strong>The</strong> use of these<br />
codominant markers was assessed, but their development was<br />
minimized because of their high utilization costs and the paucity of<br />
markers detected when compared to newly developed RAPD<br />
technologies (Figure 1). Dominant RAPD, and subsequently AFLP<br />
markers, were attractive because of their comparatively low<br />
technological costs and simple methodologies. In the case of RAPD<br />
technology, putative polymorphism declaration (i.e., number of bands)<br />
were relatively high (10–15 bands per primer), but reproducibility was<br />
low, as was their fit to 3:1 genetic ratios for many putative marker loci<br />
(recovery rate ≈ 50 markers per 1,000 evaluated) (Staub et al., 1996).<br />
This level of recovery is not unusual in other marker systems. Sun et<br />
al. (2006) found relatively few polymorphisms in RAPD, SCAR, and<br />
SSR markers between elite mapping parents in a narrow cross (Table<br />
1).<br />
Dominant markers (RAPD and AFLP) were initially useful in the<br />
development of more advanced maps (Serquen et al., 1997; Bradeeen<br />
et al.,2001), but are not preferred in breeding programs. <strong>The</strong> mapped<br />
RAPD loci were, nevertheless, strategically important (Serquen et al.,<br />
1997), and were subjected to conversion to SCAR markers by silver<br />
staining-mediated sequencing (Horejsi et al., 1999). Although 62<br />
(83%) of the 75 RAPDs were successfully cloned, only 48 (64%)<br />
RAPD markers were successfully converted to SCAR markers and 11<br />
(15%) of these reproduced the polymorphism observed in the original<br />
RAPD PCR product. <strong>The</strong> appearance of automated sequencing<br />
technologies led to the development of codominant SSR and SNP<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 199
Table 1. Marker recovery from comparative genotype screening<br />
between two elite parents (2A and Gy8) used in mapping<br />
parthenocarpy (Sun et al. 2006).<br />
Total<br />
Marker type examined<br />
No.<br />
polymorphic 1<br />
No.<br />
mapped 2<br />
RAPD 1077 77 17<br />
SCAR 3 77 2 1<br />
Melon SSR 4 89 1 0<br />
Cucumber<br />
SSR5 135 4 3<br />
1 At least one major band polymorphism between parents.<br />
2 Fitted to either 1:2:1 (codominant) or 3:1 (dominant) ratio at α = 0.01.<br />
3 SCAR according to Horejsi et al., 1999.<br />
4 Melon SSR sequences according to Danin-Poleg et al., 2000.<br />
5 Cucumber SSR sequences according to Fazio et al., 2002.<br />
technologies (Fazio et al., 2002, 2003a) and a reassessment of the<br />
conversion of RAPD to SCAR markers (Robbins, 2006; Figure 1).<br />
Two methods (sequencing and BAC library hybridization) were<br />
employed to convert RAPD to SCAR, and SCAR to SNP markers for<br />
increased efficiency (multiplexing) and effectiveness (stable and<br />
codominant) (Robbins, 2006). A total of 39 new markers (SCAR and<br />
SNP) were developed, seven of which have proven effective when<br />
multiplexed in MAS (Figure 2; Robbins, 2006).<br />
MAPPING AND QTL ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> cucumber maps of Kennard et<br />
al. (1994; wide- and narrow-based), Serquen et al. (1997), and Park et<br />
al. (2000) spanned 766 (narrow-based) and 480 (wide-based), 600, and<br />
1904<br />
1584<br />
1375<br />
947<br />
831<br />
564<br />
AW14SCAR (H)<br />
L19-2-SCAR (H)<br />
AW14SCAR (G)<br />
L18-SNP-H19 (H)<br />
Fig. 2. Example of a multiplexing reaction in a population. <strong>The</strong> far left lane is a<br />
molecular weight marker (in base pairs). <strong>The</strong> four bands (top to bottom) are:<br />
the H19 allele of AW14SCAR (a codominant marker); L19-2-SCAR (H19 allele<br />
is present, GY7 allele is absent); the GY7 allele of AW14SCAR; and L18-SNP-<br />
H19 (H19 allele is present, GY7 allele is absent).<br />
200 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
816cM, respectively. <strong>The</strong> map constructed by Serquen et al. (1997)<br />
defined 9 linkage groups with an average distance between RAPD<br />
markers of 8.4cM. Information from the Serquen et al. (1997) map<br />
was recently merged with other maps (Fanourakis and Simon, 1987;<br />
Horejsi et al. 2000; Kennard et al., 1994; Knerr and Staub, 1992;<br />
Meglic and Staub, 1996) to synthesize a consensus map spanning 10<br />
linkage groups with 255 markers, including morphological traits,<br />
disease resistance loci, isozymes, RFLPs, RAPDs, and AFLPs<br />
(Bradeen et al., 2001). <strong>The</strong> mean marker interval in this consensus<br />
map was 2.1cM with a total length of 538cM. Fazio et al. (2003a)<br />
then constructed a map containing 14 SSR, 24 SCAR, 27 AFLP, 62<br />
RAPD, 1 SNP, and 3 morphological markers (131 total markers)<br />
spanning 7 linkage groups (the theoretical number) using recombinant<br />
inbred lines (RIL). This map spanned 706cM with a mean marker<br />
interval of 5.6cM. More recently, Sun et al. (2006) constructed a map<br />
to identify the map location of parthenocarpy using an F2:3 design<br />
employing lines 2A (parthenocarpic) and Gy8 (nonparthenocarpic) as<br />
mapping parents. Linkage maps having 7 linkage groups (LG) were<br />
constructed, consisting of 47 (2A-coupling phase), 48 (Gy8-coupling<br />
phase), and 54 (coupling plus repulsion phase) DNA markers,<br />
spanning 388.6cM, 412.2cM, and 496.6cM, with an average marker<br />
interval of 8.1cM, 8.8cM, and 9.2cM, respectively. <strong>The</strong> general<br />
marker order is conserved (collinearity) in the maps of Fazio et al.<br />
(2003a), Sun et al. (2006), and Bradeen et al. (2001) (Table 2),<br />
indicating the potential utility of the consensus map of Bradeen et al.<br />
(2001). Three genomic regions conditioning parthenocarpic QTLs in<br />
Sun et al. (2006) were also mapped to the same genomic regions as<br />
QTLs detected for fruit yield at first-harvest as reported by Fazio et al.<br />
(2003a).<br />
MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION. Two experiments have been<br />
reported using marker-trait associations identified by Serquen et al.<br />
(1997) and Fazio et al., (2003a) for MAS of yield components. Five<br />
QTL for a single trait, multiple lateral branching (MLB), were linked<br />
with SNP, SSR (2), and RAPD (2) markers on different linkage<br />
groups. <strong>The</strong>se associations were used during backcrossing to increase<br />
MLB. <strong>The</strong> means of MLB after phenotypic (BC2PHE = 3.0, BC3PHE<br />
= 3.3) and marker-aided selection (BC2MAS = 3.1, BC3MAS = 3.1)<br />
were not significantly different. Thus, markers linked to MLB are<br />
effective tools in marker-assisted cucumber improvement.<br />
Multiple-trait MAS in cucumber was examined during phenotypic<br />
recurrent mass selection (population development) followed by MAS<br />
(SSR, RAPD, SCAR, and SNP) backcrossing (line extraction) (Fan et<br />
al., 2006). Similar gain from selection was detected as a result of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 201
Table 2. Common genetic markers in Linkage Group 1 across four<br />
linkage maps in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var. sativus and var.<br />
hardwickii [R.]) Alef.<br />
Sun et al., 2006<br />
(2A × Gy8) F2<br />
var. sativus ×<br />
var. sativus<br />
Linkage group 1<br />
Updated Fazio et al.<br />
2003a<br />
(Gy7 × H19)<br />
RIL var.<br />
sativus ×<br />
var. sativus<br />
Bradeen et al. 2001 Bradeen et al. 2001<br />
Narrow-<br />
based<br />
consensus<br />
F 2/BC var.<br />
sativus × var.<br />
sativus<br />
Broad-<br />
based<br />
consensus<br />
F 2/BC<br />
var. sativus<br />
× var. hardwickii<br />
F (LG1,0.0) F (LGA,0.0)<br />
CSWCT25-350 CSWCT25-350<br />
(LG1,6.5)<br />
(LG1,9.4)<br />
J5-SCAR<br />
(LG1,11.2)<br />
J5_1 (LGA,5.6)<br />
de (LG1,28.8) de (LGA,15.6)<br />
E14M62-214 E14/M62-F-214-P2 E14/M62-F-214-P2<br />
(LG1,37.2)<br />
(LGA,52.2)<br />
(LGA,77.9)<br />
E14M62-112 E14/M62-F-112-P1<br />
(LG1,43.0)<br />
(LGA,41.2)<br />
E12M62-230 E12M62-230<br />
(LG1,56.2)<br />
(LG1,49.0)<br />
E18M48-188 E18M48-188<br />
(LG1-2A,64.6) (LG1,54.7<br />
I1B-SCAR<br />
(LG1,57.5)<br />
I1_1 (LGA,54.4)<br />
OP-AJ6 (LG1,59.5) AJ6 (LGA,52.2)<br />
E12M48-107 E12/M48-F-107-P2<br />
(LG1,62.2)<br />
(LGA,53.0)<br />
BC523-SCAR<br />
(LG1,64.1)<br />
BC523 (LGA,52.2)<br />
OP-AD12-1 AD12 (LGA,49.2)<br />
(LG1,68.4)<br />
OP-W7-2<br />
(LG1,76.2)<br />
W7_2 (LGA,71.8)<br />
E14M62-224<br />
(LG1,76.9)<br />
ll (LG1,82.0)<br />
E14/M62-F-224-P2<br />
(LGA,48.2)<br />
ll (LGA,68.5)<br />
E18M48-303 (LG1-<br />
2A,68.5)<br />
E18M48-303<br />
(LG1,84.0)<br />
BC551 (LGA,69.1) BC551 (LGA,92.1)<br />
BC592-SCAR<br />
(LG1,100.1)<br />
BC592 (LGA,81.8)<br />
OP-AH14<br />
(LG1,112.7)<br />
AH14 (LGA,96.2)<br />
* Underline = single sequence repeat; italic = amplified fragment length<br />
polymorphism; bold = random amplified polymorphific DNA or sequence<br />
characterized region; and bold & underlined = restriction fragment length<br />
polymorphism. Parentheses indicate linkage group and position.<br />
202 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
phenotypic and MAS selection for MLB (~0.3 branches/cycle), and<br />
fruit length-to-diameter ratio (L:D; ~0.1 unit increase/cycle) with<br />
concomitant changes in frequency at linked marker loci. MAS<br />
operated to fix favorable alleles that were not exploited by PHE, thus<br />
MAS could be applied for altering plant architecture in cucumber to<br />
improve its yield potential.<br />
<strong>The</strong> value of MAS in population development of cucumber was<br />
examined by Robbins (2006) using the same traits and markers<br />
employed by Fan et al. (2006). Four inbred lines, complementary for<br />
the target traits, were intermated and the resulting populations<br />
underwent three cycles of MAS and PHE. Selections by PHE were<br />
visually made for all four traits at the whole-plant level and MAS was<br />
based on individuals possessing the highest number of desired marker<br />
genotypes from 20 marker loci. Both MAS and PHE provided<br />
improvements in all traits under selection in at least one population,<br />
except for earliness by MAS. Overall, PHE was most effective for<br />
gynoecious sex expression, earliness, and L:D, while MAS was most<br />
effective for MLB. <strong>The</strong> most effective selection method, however,<br />
varied by trait and between populations (Figure 3).<br />
No. of lateral branches<br />
3.50<br />
3.25<br />
3.00<br />
2.75<br />
2.50<br />
2.25<br />
2.00<br />
Population 1<br />
Multiple lateral branching<br />
C0 C1 C2 C3<br />
Cycle of selection<br />
No. of lateral branches<br />
3.50<br />
3.25<br />
3.00<br />
2.75<br />
2.50<br />
2.25<br />
2.00<br />
Population 3<br />
Multiple lateral branching<br />
C0 C1 C2 C3<br />
Cycle of selection<br />
MAS<br />
PHE<br />
RAN<br />
Linear (MAS)<br />
Linear (PHE)<br />
Linear (RAN)<br />
Fig. 3. Response to three cycles of selection (C0–C3) by marker (MAS),<br />
phenotype (PHE), and no selection (RAN) for the number of lateral branches in<br />
two populations.<br />
MAS in cucumber can be effective, but requires high resource<br />
inputs to develop markers, define valuable marker-trait associations,<br />
and conduct appropriate experiments to determine marker efficacy.<br />
Although initial marker development efforts were largely ineffective,<br />
sequencing technologies and the availability of BAC libraries (Nam et<br />
al., 2006), and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) will allow for the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 203
development of codominant SSR- and SNP-based markers that will be<br />
extremely useful in MAS in cucumber.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bradeen, J. M., J. E. Staub, C. Wyse, R. Antonise, and J. Peleman. 2001. Towards<br />
an expanded and integrated linkage map of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).<br />
Genome. 44:111–119.<br />
Danin-Poleg, Y., N. Reis, S. Baudracco-Arnas, M. Pitrat, J. E. Staub, M. Oliver, P.<br />
Arus, C. M. de Vincente, and N. Katzir. 2000. Simple sequence repeats in<br />
Cucumis mapping and map merging. Genome. 43:963–974.<br />
Dijkhuizen, A., W. C. Kennard, M. J. Havey, and J. E. Staub. 1996. RFLP<br />
variability and genetic relationships in cultivated cucumber. Euphytica. 90:79–<br />
89.<br />
Fan, Z., M. D. Robbins, and J. E. Staub. 2006. Population development by<br />
phenotypic selection with subsequent marker–assisted selection for line<br />
extraction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 112:843–<br />
855.<br />
Fanourakis, N. E. and P. W. Simon. 1987. Analysis of genetic linkage in cucumber.<br />
J. Hered. 78:238–242.<br />
Fazio, G., J. E. Staub, and M. R. Stevens. 2003a. Genetic mapping and QTL<br />
analysis of horticultural traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using<br />
recombinant inbred lines. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 107:864–874.<br />
Fazio, G., J. E. Staub, and S. M. Chung. 2002. Development and characterization of<br />
PCR markers in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
127:545–557.<br />
Fazio, G., S. M. Chung, and J. E. Staub. 2003b. Comparative analysis of response<br />
to phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for multiple lateral branching in<br />
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 107: 875–883.<br />
Horejsi, T., J. Box, and J. E. Staub. 1999. Efficiency of RAPD to SCAR marker<br />
conversion and their comparative PCR sensitivity in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sci. 124:128–135.<br />
Horejsi, T. and J. E. Staub. 1999. Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus<br />
L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet. Res. Crop Evol.<br />
46:337–350.<br />
Horejsi, T., J. Box, and J. E. Staub. 1999. Efficiency of RAPD to SCAR marker<br />
conversion and their comparative PCR sensitivity in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sci. 124:128–135.<br />
Kennard, W. C., K. Poetter, A. Dijkhuizen, V. Meglic, J. E. Staub, and M. Havey.<br />
1994. Linkages among RFLP, RAPD, isozyme, disease resistance, and<br />
morphological markers in narrow and wide crosses of cucumber. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl.<br />
Genet. 89:42–48.<br />
Knerr, L. D. and J. E. Staub. 1992. Inheritance and linkage relationships of isozyme<br />
loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L .). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 84:217–224.<br />
Meglic, V. and J. E. Staub. 1996. Inheritance and linkage relationships of allozyme<br />
and morphological loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
92:865–872.<br />
Meglic, V., F. Serquen, and J. E. Staub. 1996. Genetic diversity in cucumber<br />
(Cucumis sativus L.): I. a reevaluation of the U.S. germplasm collection.<br />
Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 46:533–546.<br />
204 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Nam, Y. W., J. R. Lee, K. Song, M. K. Lee, M. D. Robbins, S. M. Chung, J. E.<br />
Staub, and H. B. Zhang. 2006. Construction of two BAC libraries from<br />
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and identification of clones linked to yield<br />
component quantitative trait loci. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 111:150–161.<br />
Park, Y. H., S. Senory, C. Wye, R. Antonise, J. Peleman, and M. J. Havey. 2000. A<br />
genetic map of cucumber composed of RAPDs, RFLPs, AFLPs, and loci<br />
conditioning resistance to papaya ringspot and zucchini yellow mosaic viruses.<br />
Genome. 43:1003–1010.<br />
Robbins, M. D. 2006. Molecular marker development, QTL pyramiding, and<br />
comparative analysis of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection in cucumber.<br />
PhD <strong>The</strong>sis, University of Wiscosin-Madison.<br />
Robbins, M. D. and J. E. Staub. 2004. Strategies for selection of multiple<br />
quantitatively inherited yield components in cucumber, p. 401–410. Proc. 8th<br />
Eucarpia Conference, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004: progress in cucurbit genetics and<br />
breeding research. Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Serquen, F. C., J. Bacher, and J. E. Staub. 1997. Mapping and QTL analysis of a<br />
narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA markers. Molec. <strong>Breeding</strong> 3:257–268.<br />
Staub, J. E., J. Bacher, and K. Poetter. 1996. Factors affecting the application of<br />
random amplified polymorphic DNAs in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).<br />
HortSci. 31:262–266.<br />
Staub, J. E., L. K. Crubaugh, and G. Fazio. 2002a. Cucumber recombinant inbred<br />
lines. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 25:1–2.<br />
Staub, J. E., M. D. Robbins, and A. I. López-Sesé. 2002b. Molecular methodologies<br />
for improved genetic diversity assessment in cucumber and melon. Proc. 26th<br />
IRC, Horticulture: art and science for life-advances in vegetable <strong>Breeding</strong>. Acta<br />
Hort. 642:41–47.<br />
Staub, J. E., V. Meglic, L. K. Crubaugh, and L. D. Knerr. 1996. Cucumber<br />
germplasm: isozyme genetic stocks W6743, W6744, W6745. HortSci.<br />
31:1243–1245.<br />
Sun Z., R. L. Lower, S.M. Chung, and J. E. Staub. 2006. Identification and<br />
comparative analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with<br />
parthenocarpy in processing cucumber. Plant Breed. (In press.)<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 205
SILVERLEAF WHITEFLY AFFECTS LEAF<br />
MOTTLING IN CUCURBITA MOSCHATA<br />
DUCHESNE<br />
Linda Wessel-Beaver and Moisés González-Román<br />
University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Bemisia argentifolii , recessive epistatis,<br />
complementary gene action<br />
ABSTRACT. In <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata, leaf mottling (silver patches in the leaf-vein<br />
axils) is reported to be controlled by a single gene M (mottle-leaf) that is<br />
dominant over m (green-leaf). In the presence of the silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia<br />
argentifolii Bellows and Perring), some green-leaf lines express a yellow-mottle<br />
(yellow patches in the leaf-vein axils), while other lines remain green-leaf,<br />
suggesting a more complex inheritance of leaf mottling. We studied the<br />
relationship between whiteflies and leaf mottling by observing segregations in<br />
populations derived from crosses of mottle-leaf, yellow-mottle, and green-leaf<br />
phenotypes. In the presence of whiteflies, an F2 population of mottle-leaf ×<br />
green-leaf segregated 9 mottle-leaf: 3 yellow-mottle: 4 green-leaf. F2 populations<br />
of mottle-leaf × yellow-mottle segregated 3 mottle-leaf: 1 yellow-mottle. F2<br />
populations of yellow-mottle × green-leaf segregated 3 yellow-mottle: 1 greenleaf.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se segregations suggest that mottling in the presence of the silverleaf<br />
whitefly is controlled by two genes, M (previously reported) and proposed M-2<br />
(mottle leaf-2), where allele m-2 changes M/M to green-leaf (recessive epistatis<br />
of m-2 to M and m). In the absence of whiteflies, locus M-2 and M exhibit a<br />
complementary gene action where both dominant alleles are needed to produce<br />
the mottle-leaf phenotype.<br />
S<br />
ilver-grey patches in leaf-vein axils are seen in many different<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a including wild species. In C. moschata, the presence<br />
of silver patches is reported to be controlled by a single gene M<br />
(mottle-leaf) dominant over m (green-leaf) (Coyne, 1970). Coyne<br />
(1970) studied this trait in two crosses using four parents: ‘Crookneck<br />
Butternut’ × ‘Golden Cushaw’ and ‘New Hampshire Butternut’ ×<br />
‘Hercules.’ All four parents are temperate types of C. moschata and<br />
likely represent a narrow genetic background. Three of the parents are<br />
butternut types. <strong>The</strong> first author, in her breeding program, noticed that<br />
some genotypes classified as green-leaf (m/m) would sometimes<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors thank Mr. Obed Roman Hernandez for his technical assistance. This<br />
research was supported in part by the USDA/CSREES Special Grant Program in<br />
Tropical/Subtropical Agriculture Research, USDA Hatch funds, and by the Puerto<br />
Rico Agricultural Experiment Station.<br />
206 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
express an unusual type of yellow leaf mottling, not described by<br />
Coyne (1970). This yellow-mottle phenotype occurred only in the<br />
presence of the silverleaf whitefly. Other m/m genotypes would remain<br />
green-leaf in the presence of the insect. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was<br />
to determine the relationship between the presence of whiteflies and<br />
the expression of leaf mottling by observing segregations in<br />
populations derived from crossing parents with various combinations<br />
of leaf-mottling phenotypes (mottle-leaf, yellow-mottle, and greenleaf).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Crosses were made among 12 cultigens that differed in leafmottling<br />
phenotype (Table 1). With the exception of ‘Waltham’ and<br />
BN111, most parents were tropical, subtropical, or mixed (tropical ×<br />
temperate) in origin. <strong>The</strong> F2 and backcross (BC) populations were<br />
evaluated at 5 weeks after planting for leaf mottling under conditions<br />
of high natural populations of whiteflies in the field in Isabela, Puerto<br />
Rico, in either June 2001 or May 2005, or in Juana Díaz, Puerto Rico,<br />
in May 1999. Whitefly populations are typically very high during the<br />
late spring/early summer in Puerto Rico. <strong>The</strong> parents and F1s were<br />
phenotyped in those plantings and several others over the past 5 years,<br />
both in the presence and absence of whiteflies. Leaf mottling was<br />
classified from 0 to 3 (0 = green-leaf; 1 = weakly mottle-leaf; 2 =<br />
intermediate mottle-leaf; 3 = strong mottle-leaf) after Coyne (1970).<br />
This classification was used only when leaf-axil patches were silvergrey.<br />
Plants with yellow-mottle (light yellow patches in the leaf-vein<br />
axils) were simply classified as Y. Observed versus expected<br />
segregations were compared using chi-square tests. Classes 1 to 3 for<br />
silver-grey mottle-leaf were combined, leaving three mottle-leaf<br />
classes: silver-grey mottle (SM), yellow-mottle (YM), and green-leaf<br />
(G). <strong>The</strong> G phenotype included plants that had silver veins but no grey<br />
patches in the leaf-vein axils.<br />
Results<br />
Four parents (‘Waltham’, BN11, 9706, and Bol-370), classified as<br />
green-leaf (m/m) in the absence of whiteflies, express a yellow-mottle<br />
phenotype when planted in fields naturally infested with whiteflies<br />
(Table 1). Two other genotypes (Col-5 and PI 162889) remain greenleaf<br />
(defined as having no leaf-vein-axil patches) even in the presence<br />
of whiteflies. Col-5 had a slight silver color that followed, but did not<br />
concentrate in, leaf-vein axils (no patches of silver). <strong>The</strong> latter<br />
phenotype was very distinct from that of the six mottle-leaf genotypes<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 207
Table 1. Leaf mottling phenotypes expressed by <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata<br />
parents in the presence and absence of the silverleaf whitefly Bemesia<br />
argentifolii<br />
Parent<br />
Type of<br />
germplasm<br />
Phenotype/<br />
whiteflies<br />
absent<br />
Phenotype/<br />
whiteflies<br />
present<br />
Coyne<br />
(1970)<br />
genotype<br />
Soler Tropical<br />
Tropical ×<br />
SM SM M/M<br />
TP411 Temperate<br />
Tropical ×<br />
SM SM M/M<br />
TP312 Temperate SM SM M/M<br />
Col-11<br />
Nigerian<br />
Tropical SM SM M/M<br />
Local Tropical SM SM M/M<br />
CG-1 Tropical SM SM M/M<br />
Waltham Temperate G YM m/m<br />
BN111 Temperate<br />
Tropical ×<br />
G YM m/m<br />
9706 Temperate G YM m/m<br />
Bol-370 Tropical G YM m/m<br />
Col-5 Tropical G G m/m<br />
New<br />
proposed<br />
genotype<br />
M-2/M-<br />
2M/M<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
M/M<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
M/M<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
M/M<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
M/M<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
M/M<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
m/m<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
m/m<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
m/m<br />
M-2/M-2<br />
m/m<br />
m-2/m-2<br />
M/M<br />
PI162889 Subtropical G G m/m<br />
m-2/m-2<br />
m/m<br />
SM = silver-grey mottle [“mottle-leaf” of Coyne (1970)]; YM = yellow mottle-leaf;<br />
G = no patches in leaf-vein axils [“green-leaf” of Coyne (1970)].<br />
that displayed large silver-grey patches in the leaf-vein axils. <strong>The</strong> Col-<br />
5 phenotype is clearly a variation of green-leaf, and not of the silvergrey<br />
mottle-leaf. <strong>The</strong> genotypes classified as M/M according to Coyne<br />
(1970) expressed the same degree of silver mottling whether whiteflies<br />
were present or not (data not presented).<br />
Segregating F2 populations produced ratios of 3:1 or 9:3:4 (Table<br />
2). Crosses of silver-grey mottle (SM) × yellow-mottle (YM)<br />
segregated 3 silver-grey mottle: 1 yellow-mottle; crosses of silver-grey<br />
mottle (SM) × green-leaf (G) segregated 9 silver-grey mottle: 3<br />
yellow-mottle: 4 green-leaf or 3 silver-grey segregated 3: yellowmottle:<br />
1 green-leaf. Backcross populations segregated either 1 silver-<br />
208 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
grey mottle: 1 yellow-mottle or 1: silver-grey mottle: 1 green-leaf,<br />
depending on the cross.<br />
Table 2. Segregation for leaf mottling in F2 and BC populations of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata in the presence of silverleaf whiteflies (Bemesia argentifolii).<br />
Observed frequency of:<br />
F2 or BC<br />
population<br />
Description of<br />
parental<br />
phenotypes<br />
Mottleleaf<br />
(SM) 1<br />
Yellow<br />
mottleleaf<br />
(YM)<br />
Greenleaf<br />
(G) 1<br />
Exp. 2<br />
Nigerian<br />
Local (NL) ×<br />
Chi-square<br />
(probability)<br />
Col-11<br />
Waltham ×<br />
SM × SM 49 0 0 all M -<br />
TP411<br />
BN111 × TP<br />
YM × SM 80 22 0 3:1 0.64 (0.42)<br />
312<br />
YM × SM 60 17 0 3:1 0.35 (0.55)<br />
9706 × Soler<br />
TP312 ×<br />
YM × SM 24 12 0 3:1 1.33 (0.25)<br />
Waltham<br />
PI162889 ×<br />
YM × SM 84 0 0 all M -<br />
Soler<br />
G × SM 34 16 14 9:3:4 1.69 (0.43)<br />
NL × Col-5<br />
CGold-1 ×<br />
SM × G 39 0 8 3:1 1.60 (0.21)<br />
Col-5<br />
Bol-370 ×<br />
SM × G 35 0 16 3:1 1.10 (0.29)<br />
PI162889 YM × G 1 38 10 3:1 0.44 (0.50) 3<br />
(9706 × (YM × SM) ×<br />
Soler) × 9706<br />
(CG-1 × Col-<br />
YM 27 15 0 1:1 2.57 (0.11)<br />
5) × Col-5<br />
(NL × Col-5)<br />
(SM × G) × G 25 0 25 1:1 0.00 (1.00)<br />
× Col-5 (SM × G) × G 22 0 28 1:1 0.72 (0.40)<br />
(CG-1 × Col- (SM × G) ×<br />
5) × CG-1 SM 50 0 0 all M -<br />
1<br />
Mottle-leaf refers to silver-grey patches and green-leaf refers to the lack of silvergrey<br />
patches in the leaf-vein axils, as described by Coyne (1970). Terminology is<br />
also that of Coyne (1970).<br />
2<br />
Expected segregation.<br />
3<br />
Because the chi-square test is inappropriate for models with expected frequencies of<br />
zero, single observations that did not fit into the 3:1 model were not included in the<br />
calculation of the statistic.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 209
Discussion<br />
Three phenotypic classes suggest that leaf mottling is controlled<br />
either by a single locus with in<strong>complete</strong> dominance or additivity<br />
(producing an “intermediate” phenotype), or by two loci with epistasis.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ratio observed for the silver-grey mottle × green-leaf cross, 9:3:4<br />
rather than 1:2:1, indicates that the latter explanation is more likely.<br />
We propose that mottling in the presence of the silverleaf whitefly is<br />
controlled by two genes, a new gene M-2 (mottle-leaf-2) and the<br />
previously reported M. When silverleaf whiteflies are present, m-2/m-<br />
2 causes M/M to produce a green-leaf phenotype and causes 4/16 of<br />
the F2 progeny in a SM × G cross to be green-leaf. Fehr (1991) calls<br />
this type of between-locus interaction “recessive epistatis.” In the<br />
absence of whiteflies, locus M-2 and M exhibit a complementary gene<br />
action, where both dominant alleles are needed to produce the mottleleaf<br />
phenotype. Under this scheme, in the presence of whiteflies, the<br />
SM phenotype corresponds to M-2/M-2 M/M and the YM phenotype<br />
corresponds to M-2/M-2 m/m. <strong>The</strong> G phenotype corresponds to two<br />
possible genotypes: m-2/m-2 M/M or m-2/m-2 m/m. <strong>The</strong> segregations<br />
of crosses involving the two parents with the G phenotype (Col-5 and<br />
PI162889) indicate that Col-5 is M/M while PI162889 is m/m (Tables<br />
1 and 2).<br />
<strong>The</strong> genotypes Coyne (1970) used in his study were probably<br />
homozygous for M-2/M-2. This would explain why Coyne (1970)<br />
reported leaf mottling to be controlled by a single locus. What Coyne<br />
(1970) described as M/M and m/m were likely the genotypes M-2/M-2<br />
M/M and M-2/M-2 m/m, repectively. In the experience of the first<br />
author (evaluating hundreds of PIs and other germplasm of C.<br />
moschata), the m-2/m-2 genotype is very rare. We have observed it<br />
only in tropical or subtropical germplasm from South America. Col-5<br />
and PI 162889 are landraces from Colombia and Paraguay,<br />
respectively. <strong>The</strong>se materials are of special interest because they often<br />
appear to be resistant to the whitefly-induced silverleaf disorder<br />
(Wessel-Beaver, 1998).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Coyne, D. P. 1970. Inheritance of mottle-leaf in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a mochata Poir. HortSci.<br />
5(4):226–227.<br />
Fehr, W. R. 1991. Principals of cultivar development, vol. I. Iowa <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
Ames, Iowa.<br />
Wessel-Beaver, L. 1998. Sources of whitefly-induced silvering resistance in<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98: evaluation and<br />
enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS, Alexandria, VA.<br />
210 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Wessel-Beaver, L. 2000. Inheritance of silverleaf resistance in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata.<br />
In: N. Katzir and H. S. Paris (eds.). Proc. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2000, Acta Hort.<br />
510:289–295.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 211
QTL ANALYSIS OF SOLUBLE SOLIDS<br />
CONTENT IN WATERMELON UNDER<br />
DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS<br />
Yong Xu, Shaogui Guo, Haiying Zhang, and Guoyi Gong<br />
National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />
Banjing, Haidian, Beijing 2443#, Beijing, 100089, P. R. China<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. C. lanatus, quantitative trait locus, genotype ×<br />
environment interaction<br />
ABSTRACT. Soluble solid content (SSC) is an important factor affecting the<br />
quality of watermelon. It is necessary to confirm the genetic stability of the<br />
quantitative trait loci (QTLs) under different environments. An F2S8 RIL<br />
population was derived from the cross of PI 296341-FR × ‘97103’ and a highdensity<br />
molecular genetic-linkage map covering 1383.8cM with an average<br />
distance 6.8cM was constructed. QTL analysis of watermelon SSC was<br />
conducted under three environments. In total, 18 QTLs were detected, located<br />
on the Linkage Groups 1, 2, 3, 5, 14, 15, and 19. Six QTLs were detected under<br />
two environments. Only 2 QTLs, qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b (explaining the 19%<br />
and 17.6% average phenotypic variation, respectively), were comparatively<br />
stable and can be detected under the three environments observed. <strong>The</strong>se two<br />
QTLs, which may be the main loci controlling the gene expression of SSC, were<br />
mapped between the markers N02_800a and Z03_250a. <strong>The</strong> results are<br />
advantageous for using MAS for SSC in watermelon.<br />
S<br />
oluble solids content (SSC) is an important factor affecting the<br />
quality of watermelon and many breeders attach importance to<br />
this trait. But SSC is a quantitative trait locus (QTL) and<br />
controlled by several genes. <strong>The</strong> stable expression of QTL under<br />
different environments is an important factor in the use of QTL as the<br />
target gene in marker-assisted selection (MAS). Twenty-nine QTLs<br />
related to SSC were detected in the F2 and F3 populations of tomato<br />
under three different environments, but only 4 QTLs had outstanding<br />
expression under three environments (Paterson et al., 1991). QTLs are<br />
sensitive to environment and are expressed with different stability.<br />
That is to say, the QTLs with high heritability are easily detected<br />
under several different environments (Huang et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> SSC<br />
genes of watermelon have been mapped using impermanent<br />
populations, and several QTLs have been detected recently (Fan et al.,<br />
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China<br />
(30471186, 30570997) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5062008,<br />
5050001).<br />
212 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
2000; Hashizume et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> SSC genes of watermelon have<br />
been mapped using the F2 population derived from a crossing between<br />
a cultivated inbred line ‘97103’ and an African wild form PI 296341-<br />
FR, and 4 related QTLs have been mapped (Fan et al., 2000). A QTL<br />
for the SSC of watermelon had been mapped using the BC1 population<br />
derived from a crossing between a cultivated inbred line (H-7; C.<br />
lanatus) and an African wild form (SA-1; C. lanatus) (Hashizume et<br />
al., 2003). QTL analysis of watermelon SSC needs to be conducted<br />
under different environments to confirm their inheritance stability.<br />
However, the report about the analysis of the SSC expression in<br />
watermelon under different environments using permanent population<br />
has not been found up to now.<br />
In the present study, a high-density genetic map has been<br />
constructed based on the permanent population derived from a<br />
crossing between a cultivated inbred line ‘97103’ and an African wild<br />
form PI 296341-FR. <strong>The</strong> SSC of watermelon under three different<br />
environments was analyzed and their respective QTLs were compared<br />
to find the QTLs with high heritability and stability.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIALS. <strong>The</strong> high-SSC cultivated inbred line ‘97103’<br />
(Citrullus lanatus [Thunb., Mansfeld] var. lanatus) was crossed with<br />
the low-SSC African wild form PI 296341-FR (Citrullus lanatus<br />
[Thunb., Mansfeld] var. citroides). One F1 plant was self-pollinated to<br />
produce 120 F2 progeny, which were then self-pollinated by the singleseed<br />
descent method to obtain 117 F2S8 recombinant inbred lines<br />
(RILs). <strong>The</strong> RILs were planted in a randomized block design under<br />
three open-air environments: (1) Daxing, Beijng in May, 2002 (E<br />
116°13′-116°43′ N 39°26′-39°51′; altitude 54.7m; warmtemperature/semihumid<br />
climate region; annual mean temperature 13°C;<br />
annual duration of sunshine 2000–2800 hours; average annual<br />
precipitation 507.7mm; frost-free period 189 days); (2) Changji,<br />
Xinjiang in May, 2003 (E 86°24’-87°37’, N 43°06’-45°20’; altitude<br />
918.7m; midtemperate continental arid climate region; annual mean<br />
temperature 6.8°C; annual duration of sunshine 2500–3550 hours;<br />
average annual precipitation 190mm; frost-free period 160 days); and<br />
(3) Changji, Xinjiang in May, 2004. Thirty plants of every line were<br />
planted in three rows with 10 individuals in each row according to<br />
standard conventional methods. <strong>The</strong> central flesh juices of the mature<br />
fruits were analyzed for SSC using a hand refractometer (ATAGO<br />
ATC-1E, Atago Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). <strong>The</strong> RILs were used in map<br />
construction and QTL analysis.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 213
MAP CONSTRUCTION AND QTL ANALYSIS. Two molecular linkage<br />
maps have been constructed in our laboratory (Zhang et al., 2004; Yi<br />
et al., 2004). In the first, a total of 87 RAPD markers, 13 ISSR markers,<br />
and 4 SCAR markers were arranged into 15 linkage groups. A total of<br />
1027.5cM in the population was covered with an average interval<br />
length of 11.7cM (Zhang et al., 2004). In the second map, 150 AFLP<br />
markers were arranged into 17 linkage groups. A total of 1240.2cM in<br />
the population was covered with an average interval length of 8.3cM<br />
(Yi et al., 2004). Combining with the 24 polymorphic SSR markers<br />
and a morphological marker screened in our laboratory, a new<br />
molecular genetic-linkage map of watermelon was constructed using<br />
JoinMap3.0 software. In this map, 79 AFLP markers, 86 RAPD<br />
markers, 24 SSR markers, 10 ISSR markers, 3 SCAR markers, and a<br />
morphological marker were arranged into 19 linkage groups. A total of<br />
1383.8cM in the population was covered with an average interval<br />
length of 6.8cM. <strong>The</strong> distribution of SSC data of watermelon in<br />
parents and the RILs was analyzed using SYSTAT 10 software and<br />
overall genome QTL screening was conducted using MapQTL 5<br />
software. <strong>The</strong> significance of each QTL interval was tested by a<br />
likelihood-ratio statistic (LOD) score of 3.0. <strong>The</strong> variation explanation<br />
and the additive effect of the QTLs were calculated simultaneously.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se QTLs were denominated following the universal rules<br />
(McCouch et al., 1997).<br />
Results<br />
DISTRIBUTION OF SSC IN TWO PARENTS AND RIL POPULATION.<br />
<strong>The</strong> SSC of ‘97103’ is higher than SSC of PI 296341-FR under the<br />
three environments, and the differences between both values in the<br />
three environments were 7.75ºBrix, 7.90ºBrix, and 7.80ºBrix,<br />
respectively. No significant differences were detected between the<br />
values of SSC under the three environments. <strong>The</strong> SSC of the RIL<br />
population distributed broadly and there was a significant difference<br />
between the two end values. A continuous distribution near to normal<br />
for SSC was observed in the RIL population (Table 1). <strong>The</strong><br />
correlations between the SSC values observed in the RILs population<br />
under the three different environments were 0.621, 0.651 and 0.773<br />
(Table 2).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were significant and positive correlations at the level α =<br />
0.01 between the SSC values under the three environments. <strong>The</strong> result<br />
demonstrated that the SSC of the parents and the RILs are comparative<br />
stable and fit to be used in this study and the SSC is a typical<br />
quantitative trait. However the different correlation coefficients<br />
214 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Distribution of SSC of the two parents and the RIL population<br />
in ºBrix<br />
97103<br />
Parents RIL population<br />
PI<br />
296341-<br />
FR Mean Range<br />
Mean<br />
±SD<br />
Kurtosis <br />
Skewness<br />
Beijing,<br />
2002 10.50 2.75 3.39 1.40~7.50 3.39±1.26 0.37 0.89<br />
Xinjiang,<br />
2003 10.70 2.80 3.95 2.00~8.40 3.95±1.40 0.42 1.20<br />
Xinjiang,<br />
2004 10.30 2.50 5.20 2.92~10.40<br />
5.20±1.48 0.89 0.95<br />
indicated that there was GE interaction between the SSC of<br />
watermelon and the environments.<br />
QTL ANALYSIS. Interval mapping was performed analyzing the<br />
SSC data (Figure 1). A total of 18 QTLs were detected, 14 in Beijing,<br />
2002, 6 in Xinjiang, 2003, and 8 in Xinjiang, 2004; these QTLs were<br />
located on the Linkage Groups 1, 2, 3, 5, 14, 15, and 19. Two QTLs<br />
explained 19% and 17.6% of the phenotypic variation detected under<br />
the three environments. Six QTLs were detected under two of the<br />
observed environments.<br />
Two QTLs detected under the three environments, qSSC-1a and<br />
qSSC-1b, were mapped in Linkage Group 1, and their peaks were<br />
mapped in the same location of markers N02_800a and Z03_250a,<br />
respectively. <strong>The</strong> average additive effects of qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b<br />
were -0.6039ºBrix and -0.5764ºBrix, respectively. <strong>The</strong> corresponding<br />
positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’. <strong>The</strong> average variation<br />
explanation value of qSSC-1a is 19% and its allele, coming from<br />
‘97103’, could increase the SSC in 0.6039ºBrix. Its additive effect and<br />
the variation explanation were the highest among the detected QTLs.<br />
Two QTLs, qSSC-2a and qSSC-2b, were mapped in Linkage<br />
Group 2; their peaks were mapped in the same location of markers<br />
H08_1500 and Q05_675a, respectively. <strong>The</strong> average additive effect of<br />
qSSC-2a and qSSC-2b were -0.5759ºBrix and -0.5323ºBrix, and their<br />
average variation explanations were 12.9% and 13.7%. <strong>The</strong><br />
corresponding positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’. <strong>The</strong><br />
QTL qSSC-2a could be detected under two environments (Beijing,<br />
2002 and Xinjiang, 2004). <strong>The</strong> QTL qSSC-2b could be detected under<br />
two environments (Xinjiang, 2003 and Xinjiang, 2004).<br />
Five QTLs were mapped in Linkage Group 3. Two QTLs, qSSC-3a<br />
and qSSC-3b, could be detected under two environments (Beijing,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 215
Table 2. Correlation coefficients of watermelon SSC characters under three<br />
different environments.<br />
SSC<br />
Beijing, Xinjiang, Xinjiang,<br />
Location<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
Beijing, 2002 -<br />
Xinjiang, 2003 0.621 ** c<br />
Xinjiang, 2004 0.651 ** 0.773 ** ** Significant at α = 0.01<br />
-<br />
2002 and Xinjiang, 2004). <strong>The</strong> peak of qSSC-3a was mapped in the<br />
same location of the marker R05_750. <strong>The</strong> QTL qSSC-3b was mapped<br />
near the marker Z12_1800 with a distance of 2cM. <strong>The</strong>ir average<br />
additive effects were -0.5491ºBrix and -0.5835ºBrix, and their<br />
variation explanations were 16.7% and 18.1%. <strong>The</strong> corresponding<br />
positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’. <strong>The</strong> other three QTLs<br />
could be detected in Beijng, 2002, with obvious GE interaction.<br />
<strong>The</strong> QTL qSSC-5 was detected in the Linkage Group 5 with a<br />
distance of 2.1cM away from marker P17_1000. This QTL could be<br />
detected under two environments (Beijing, 2002 and Xinjiang, 2004).<br />
Its average additive effects were -0.5751ºBrix and the average variation<br />
explanation is 16.3%. <strong>The</strong> corresponding positive alleles of the QTLs<br />
came from ‘97103’.<br />
Three QTLs were mapped in Linkage Group 14 under two<br />
environments (Xinjiang, 2003 and Xinjiang, 2004) and the peak of<br />
qSSC-14a was mapped in the same location of marker Z01_2100. <strong>The</strong><br />
corresponding positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’ and<br />
could increase the SSC by an average of 0.5689ºBrix; their average<br />
variation explanation value is 15.6%. <strong>The</strong> other two QTLs could be<br />
detected only in Xinjiang, 2003.<br />
Two QTLs for SSC were mapped in Linkage Group 15 in Beijing,<br />
2002, with obvious GE interaction. <strong>The</strong> corresponding positive alleles<br />
of the QTLs coming from ‘97103’ could increase the SSC in 0.4864 to<br />
0.4956ºBrix, and their variation explanations were 14.9%–15.6%.<br />
Three QTLs mapped in Linkage Group 19 could be detected only<br />
in Beijing, 2002. <strong>The</strong> positive alleles of the QTLs came from ‘97103’<br />
and could increase the SSC in 0.4781 to 0.5499ºBrix; their variation<br />
explanations were 14.4%–19%.<br />
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS ON THE QTLS FOR SSC.<br />
Among the 18 QTLs detected, only 2, qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b, were<br />
detected under all three environments. <strong>The</strong> directions of these genetic<br />
effects were identical, whereas the additive effects and the variation<br />
216 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
explanation were different because of the influence of the<br />
environments. Six of the QTLs were detected under two environments<br />
and 10 QTLs under only one environment. <strong>The</strong> results demonstrated<br />
that these QTLs are easily affected by environmental conditions. It is<br />
necessary to do the experiments in different years and places to<br />
identify the stable major gene.<br />
Causal GE interactions can usually reduce general response to<br />
MAS across environments, and the reduction in the cumulative<br />
response is a function of the proportion of GE interactions involved in<br />
the improved trait. <strong>The</strong> QTL analysis of the agronomic traits in rice<br />
indicated that the results of the same traits were different when<br />
observed in different environments (Zhuang et al., 1997). Some<br />
researchers considered that the results of QTL mapping depend on<br />
many factors, such as the planting environment, the size of the<br />
population, the number of the markers in the genetic map, and the<br />
general heritability (Tanksley, 1993). Thus, new breeding strategies<br />
based on QTL evaluation among different environments will be<br />
necessary to realize the potential of MAS.<br />
In this study, the QTL for the SSC of watermelon was analyzed<br />
under three different environments. <strong>The</strong> significant climate distinction<br />
of the two locations, Beijing and Xinjiang, benefits the identification<br />
of the stable major genes. Comparing the QTL detected under three<br />
different environments, only 2 QTLs were comparatively stable and<br />
could be detected in all the environments. <strong>The</strong> two most stable QTLs,<br />
qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b, may be the major QTLs for SSC in<br />
watermelon. It is noted that these QTLs were mapped in the same<br />
range between markers N02_800a and Z03_250a. <strong>The</strong> result is<br />
advantageous for the use of MAS for SSC in watermelon. <strong>The</strong> QTL<br />
qSSC-1a was mapped near the flanking marker IX_334. <strong>The</strong> band of<br />
the marker IX_334 was present in the parent ‘97103’ and the distance<br />
between the marker and qSSC-1a is only 3cM. Considering that the<br />
positive allele of qSSC-1a came from ‘97103’ could increase the SSC<br />
in 0.6039ºBrix, the marker IX_334 can be used in the MAS of the<br />
corresponding positive allele of qSSC-1a came from ‘97103’.<br />
Due to the differences in the populations used, molecular markers,<br />
genetic maps, and planting environments, no identical QTLs were<br />
found between this study and other reports (Fan et al., 2000;<br />
Hashizume et al., 2003). Nevertheless, in the F2 population derived<br />
from the same parents used in this study, two QTLs were detected in<br />
which alleles from ‘97103’ could increase SSC (Fan et al., 2000).<br />
Follow-up studies will be performed to analyze the relation<br />
between the two QTLs detected in this F2 population and those found<br />
in the RILs using the flanking marker of the QTLs. <strong>The</strong> stability and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 217
eliability of qSSC-1a and qSSC-1b will be further validated using<br />
different analysis models and different combinations.<br />
N02_800a<br />
T13_850a<br />
IX_347 IX_334<br />
Z03_250a<br />
LG1<br />
0<br />
10<br />
AG_TT320<br />
AG_TT288<br />
AG_AT127<br />
CC_AA341<br />
AC_TT143<br />
AC_TC100<br />
X01_900a<br />
A08_1100a<br />
AG_AC350<br />
CC_AA110<br />
CC_AA244<br />
AC_TC122<br />
AG_TC157<br />
C06_1300a<br />
Z10_1900<br />
I835_210 I835_209<br />
Q05_500<br />
SCP01_570 X20_700<br />
K14_1500<br />
J11_1200<br />
LG4<br />
A05_800<br />
AI15_850a<br />
AG_TA260<br />
I835_565<br />
qSSC-1a<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
90<br />
100<br />
110<br />
120<br />
130<br />
140<br />
150<br />
160<br />
170<br />
180<br />
190<br />
LG13<br />
qSSC-1b<br />
A10_1031a<br />
P03_600a<br />
E08_600a<br />
AC_AA79<br />
B13_1400a<br />
AH03_1031a<br />
AL11_650a<br />
C04_1300a<br />
IXX_192<br />
H08_1500 I856_300<br />
I04_1200<br />
AC_TT141<br />
AH12_2000<br />
S09_650<br />
AG_AT104<br />
CA_AC195<br />
AG_AC120<br />
H17_550a<br />
AG_AC402<br />
Q05_675a<br />
AC_AA302<br />
N02_325a<br />
AC_TT117 AC_TT116<br />
P17_1000<br />
M18_620<br />
H02_690a<br />
AC_TC139<br />
I842_1500a<br />
B12_830a<br />
AG_TC107<br />
O13_350a<br />
IX_583<br />
AG_TT117<br />
AG_TA156<br />
0 Z01_2100<br />
10 X04_450<br />
20<br />
30<br />
AG_TC128<br />
P17_2400a<br />
LG8<br />
LG14<br />
LG2<br />
LG5<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
90<br />
100<br />
110<br />
120<br />
130<br />
140<br />
150<br />
160<br />
170<br />
180<br />
190<br />
200<br />
210<br />
220<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
qSSC-14a<br />
qSSC-5<br />
qSSC-2a qSSC-2b<br />
R05_750<br />
Z12_1800<br />
B12_1100a<br />
P17_940a<br />
AC_TT166<br />
AH13_1200a<br />
F08_2500a<br />
AC_AA347<br />
AG_AC124<br />
T17_1200a<br />
T17_800<br />
I842_525<br />
AC_AA207<br />
N02_1600<br />
CC_AA114<br />
AC_TT126<br />
A12_600<br />
H07_950<br />
XXI_283<br />
XXI_267<br />
E08_950a<br />
AG_AT122<br />
AC_AA613<br />
AC_TC92<br />
Z03_1200a<br />
AG_TA157<br />
AG_TC79<br />
CA_AC230<br />
CC_AA247<br />
AG_TA212<br />
AC_TT99<br />
AH03_1600a<br />
I856_625a<br />
CA_AC354<br />
CA_AC347<br />
C09_900a<br />
CC_AA163<br />
CC_AA162<br />
qSSC-14b<br />
qSSC-14c<br />
LG9<br />
LG6<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
90<br />
100<br />
110<br />
120<br />
LG3<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> genetic-linkage map of watermelon and the distribution of QTLs for<br />
SSC of watermelon.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Fan, M., Y. Xu, H. Y. Zhang, H. Z. Ren, G. B. Kang, Y. J. Wang, and H. Chen. 2000.<br />
Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with fruit traits in watermelon<br />
[Citrullus lanatus (Thanb) Mansf] and analysis of their genetic effects. Yichuan<br />
Xuebao (Acta Genetica Sinica). 27(10): 902–910.<br />
Hashizume, T., I. Shimamoto, and M. Hirai. 2003, Construction of a linkage map and<br />
QTL analysis of horticultural traits for watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
90<br />
100<br />
110<br />
120<br />
130<br />
140<br />
150<br />
160<br />
170<br />
180<br />
190<br />
qSSC-3a<br />
qSSC-3b qSSC-3c<br />
qSSC-3d<br />
AG_TC195 AG_TC194<br />
AG_TC206 AG_TC205<br />
F09_800<br />
AG_AC112<br />
IXX_298 IXX_296<br />
Z16_500a<br />
AL03_800a<br />
M05_1200a<br />
Subi<br />
LG15<br />
LG10<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
qSSC-15a<br />
AG_AT80<br />
K12_400a<br />
Z10_500a<br />
K12_900a<br />
CA_AC91<br />
CC_AA157<br />
II_147<br />
II_155<br />
AG_TA105<br />
AG_TT219<br />
qSSC-3e<br />
LG7<br />
0<br />
AG_AT207 AG_AT206<br />
A10_500<br />
qSSC-15b<br />
LG18<br />
H08_550<br />
M18_850a<br />
XII_205<br />
0<br />
AG_TA154 0<br />
10<br />
AC_AA121 10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
V_240<br />
V_228<br />
S15_1000a<br />
VI_678<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
VI_950 VI_1030<br />
H07_540a<br />
AG_TT223<br />
AC_TC80<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
CC_AA332 80<br />
90<br />
A07_1100<br />
O05_480 Q17_1500<br />
A18_1600<br />
AG_TT79<br />
90<br />
100<br />
110<br />
V_405 V_395 120<br />
N04_600 130<br />
I835_430 140<br />
V_257<br />
IX_689 IX_678<br />
AC_TT106<br />
AC_TT208<br />
150<br />
160<br />
170<br />
AC_AT280 180<br />
O16_550a<br />
SCP219_1600<br />
AC_AT257<br />
AC_AT258<br />
190<br />
200<br />
210<br />
I835_298 220<br />
O16_475<br />
Z12_850 V03_800<br />
B20_1200<br />
230<br />
240<br />
X04_1100 250<br />
Z04_1600<br />
Z04_900a G10_850a<br />
N04_850 N04_800a<br />
I835_328<br />
260<br />
270<br />
280<br />
N02_1031a Q05_1500 290<br />
Q05_1600a<br />
X01_650a<br />
SCP01_700a<br />
300<br />
310<br />
AC_AA375 320<br />
AC_TC84<br />
AG_AT557<br />
AC_TC314<br />
AG_AT89<br />
330<br />
340<br />
350<br />
O03_480a 360<br />
Q05_1200a 370<br />
M07_400a M07_590<br />
AC_TT327 380<br />
LG11<br />
LG12<br />
LG16<br />
0<br />
0<br />
10<br />
I_268<br />
I_224 I_276<br />
AG_TT280<br />
AG_TT98<br />
AG_TA93<br />
AG_TT278<br />
CA_AC143<br />
218 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
LG17<br />
LG19<br />
0<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
qSSC-19a<br />
qSSC-19b<br />
qSSC-19c
Matsum & Nakai] using RAPD, RFLP, and ISSR markers, <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
106:779–785.<br />
Huang, N., E. R. Angeles, J. Domingo, G. Magpantay, S. Singh, G. Zhang, N.<br />
Kumaravadivel, J. Bennett, and G. S. Khush. 1997. Pyramiding of bacterial<br />
blight resistance genes in rice: marker-assisted selection using RFLP and PCR.<br />
<strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 95:313–320.<br />
McCouch, S. R., Y. G. Cho, M. Yano, E. Paul, M. Blinstrub, H. Morishima, and T.<br />
Kinosita. 1997. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet. Newslett. 14:11–13.<br />
Paterson, A. H., S. Damon, J. D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H. D. Rabinowitch, S. E. Lincoln,<br />
E. S. Lander, and S. D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying<br />
quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and<br />
environments. Genet. 127:181–197.<br />
Tanksley, S. D. 1993. Mapping polygenes. Ann. Rev. Genet. (27):205–333.<br />
Yi, K., Y. Xu, X. Y. Lu, L. T. Xiao, X. L. Xu, G. Y. Gong, and H. Y. Zhang. 2004.<br />
Construction of AFLP molecular genetic map for RIL population of watermelon.<br />
Yuanyi Xuebao (Acta Horticulturae Sinica). 31(1): 53–55.<br />
Zhang, R. B., Y. Xu, K. Yi, H. Y. Zhang, L. G. Liu, G. Y. Gong, and A. Levi. 2004. A<br />
genetic linkage map for watermelon derived from recombinant inbred lines. J.<br />
Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129(2):237–243.<br />
Zhuang, J. Y., H. X. Lin, J. Lu, H. R. Qian, S. Hittalmani, N. Huang, and K. L.<br />
Zheng. 1997. Analysis of QTL × environment interaction for yield components<br />
and plant height in rice. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 95:799–808.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 219
MAPPING AND QTL ANALYSIS CONCERNING<br />
TOLERANCE TOWARD<br />
POOR LIGHT IN CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS<br />
SATIVUS L.)<br />
Yong-Jian Wang, Hai-Ying Zhang, Qing-Jun Chen,<br />
Feng Zhang, and Ai-Jun Mao<br />
National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />
Banjing, Haidian, Beijing 2443#, Beijing, 100089, P. R. China<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. AFLP, RAPD, RIL, SSR, genetic map<br />
ABSTRACT. An AFLP and RAPD genetic map with 235 markers and an RIL<br />
(recombinant inbred lines) population from the cross of two cultivated lines were<br />
employed in mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) concerning<br />
tolerance toward poor light in cucumber using the interval mapping method.<br />
Leaf area in seedlings under low light intensity was used as phenotypic value to<br />
detect the QTL concerning tolerance. Five QTL were mapped in four linkage<br />
groups. Four loci, including La-1, La-2, La-3, and La-4, showed a negative<br />
additive effect, while La-5 showed a positive additive effect. Of the five QTL,<br />
phenotypic variation explained by La-5 was the largest, La-2 was the second.<br />
C<br />
ucumber is an important greenhouse vegetable. <strong>The</strong> main goal<br />
of breeding for greenhouse cucumber cultivars is to increase<br />
tolerance to poor light and low temperature. <strong>The</strong> impact of<br />
poor light on cucumber growth and yield is usually stronger than that<br />
of low temperature (Chen et al, 2003). Several indexes, such as<br />
photosynthetic rate, light compensation point, and photosynthetic yield,<br />
under chilling and poor light have been reported (Aoki et al., 1988; Xu<br />
et al., 1997, Wang et al., 2001). <strong>The</strong> increase in leaf area in seedlings<br />
under low light intensity was a reliable phenotypic value to evaluate<br />
tolerance to poor light, according to our study.<br />
Tolerance to poor light was believed to be conditioned by many<br />
genes. Wang et al. (1998) indicated that light compensation at 15ºC<br />
could reflect tolerance to poor light at low temperature; the inheritance<br />
agreed with an additive-dominant epistatic model. It was impossible,<br />
using classical genetic methods, to know how many genes concerning<br />
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China<br />
(30471186, 30570997) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5062008,<br />
5050001).<br />
220 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
tolerance are involved and where they are located.<br />
Recently, molecular markers and related technologies have allowed<br />
plant geneticists and breeders to devise strategies for extensive<br />
mapping of plant genomes (Staub et al., 1996). In commercial<br />
cucumber, the application of molecular-marker technologies has<br />
increased the understanding of its genome (Kennard et al., 1994;<br />
Kennard and Havey, 1995; Meglic and Staub, 1996). Serquen et al.<br />
(1997) conducted a molecular mapping with QTLs for length of the<br />
stem and number of fruits in cucumber based on a F3 population. Up to<br />
now little information has been reported on mapping QTLs of traits<br />
concerning tolerance to poor light.<br />
<strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to map genes concerning tolerance<br />
to poor light in cucumber using the RIL population obtained from the<br />
cross of the lines ‘European 8’ and ‘Qiu Peng’ and based on a linkage<br />
map with 235 markers (AFLP, RAPD, and SSR) that had already been<br />
constructed by our research group.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
MATERIALS. <strong>The</strong> inbred line ‘European 8’, a European<br />
greenhouse-cucumber cultivar with tolerance to poor light, was<br />
crossed with the inbred line ‘QiuPeng’, an open-field Chinese<br />
cucumber cultivar sensitive to poor light. Single F1 plants were<br />
randomly selected and self-pollinated to generate F2 families. A single<br />
F2 family was randomly chosen and individual plants were<br />
self-pollinated for four more generations to generate an F2-derived F6<br />
RIL population. Those RILs were used for all DNA isolations and<br />
evaluated for tolerance to poor light.<br />
EVALUATION OF TOLERANCE TO POOR LIGHT. Cucumber seeds<br />
were germinated for 24 hr at 28ºC and sown in plastic pots of 8cm<br />
diameter with a steamed commercial peat medium. About 8 days after<br />
sowing, 24 uniform seedlings at the cotyledon fully expanded stage<br />
were treated under low illumination (80µmol·m-2·s-1, 8 h, 25ºC/18ºC)<br />
and 3 replications were conducted. Seedling leaf area was measured 12<br />
days after treatment.<br />
LINKAGE ANALYSIS. Using SYSTAT 7.0 software, a graphic of the<br />
frequency distribution in the RIL population for leaf area was drawn.<br />
<strong>The</strong> data of the mean of leaf area were used for QTL analysis. <strong>The</strong><br />
whole genome was scanned and the QTLs for tolerance were detected<br />
by using Windows QTL Cartograph vi20 at the threshold LOD score<br />
2.0.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 221
Results and Discussion<br />
PHENOTYPIC VARIATION OF THE MATERIAL. <strong>The</strong>re were significant<br />
differences between both parental lines and significant segregation<br />
among RILs (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> average increase in leaf area of RIL was<br />
45,187cm 2 and the standard deviation was 11,348cm 2. . <strong>The</strong> graphic of<br />
the frequency distribution (Kurtosis/SEK = 1.33; Skewness/SES = 0.78)<br />
fits normal distribution (Figure 1).<br />
Variance analysis indicated that there were no significant<br />
differences among replications for the increase of leaf area, while the<br />
differences among RILs were significant and the broad heritability was<br />
77.5%. <strong>The</strong> high heritability of leaf-area increase under low<br />
illumination suggested that the above index could be used as an<br />
acceptable criterion to evaluate tolerance to poor light in cucumber as<br />
well as for QTL analysis.<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0.0<br />
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />
Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> frequency distribution in cucumber RIL population for<br />
low-light-tolerance trait.<br />
Abscissa = phenotypic value; ordinate = number of lines on the left side and<br />
the percentage on the right.<br />
QTL ANALYSIS OF TOLERANCE TO POOR LIGHT IN CUCUMBER.<br />
QTL analysis was conducted by using Windows QTL Cartograph. <strong>The</strong><br />
scanning of gene tolerance to poor light in cucumber in the whole<br />
genome (Figure 2) indicated that there were five QTLs at the threshold<br />
LOD score 2.0 concerning tolerance to poor light: La-1, La-2, and<br />
La-3 on Linkage Group 1, La-4 on Group 7, and La-5 on Group 9.<br />
222 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1
Table 1. Parent values and distribution in cucumber RIL population for<br />
low-light- tolerance trait.<br />
Parent values Distribution in RIL population<br />
Agronomic<br />
traits<br />
Leaf-area<br />
No. 8<br />
EuropeanQiupeng<br />
Mean SD Range<br />
Kurtosis/<br />
SEK<br />
Skewness/<br />
SES<br />
increase<br />
(cm 2 ) 61.00±3.6 22.00±2.9 45.19 11.348 55.94 1.33 0.785<br />
<strong>The</strong> result of the scanning showed that four putative QTLs were<br />
negative (Table 2). La-5 was a positive locus contributing in 5.54<br />
additive effects to tolerance.<br />
<strong>The</strong> expression of quantitative traits is the result of the reaction<br />
between genotype and environment. It is important to limit the<br />
influence of environment to achieve accurate QTL mapping. <strong>The</strong><br />
results derived from RILs analysis could be more accurate than those<br />
using F2 populations, since replications could be conducted to reduce<br />
environment error (Paterson et al.,1991). In classical quantitative<br />
genetics, a theoretical model assumed that genes controlling quantitative<br />
traits had the same direction and similar effects. However, many studies<br />
have indicated that the genes are diverse in effect and direction. This<br />
study showed that only one locus expressed a positive effect and that the<br />
others expressed negative effects. Yu et al. (2003) also found that the<br />
effect direction of QTLs controlling some morphological traits in<br />
Chinese cabbage were opposite.<br />
Fig. 2. LR plots and additive-effect plots on cucumber genome for low-light<br />
tolerance.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 223
Table 2. QTLs controlling low-light tolerance and its effect in cucumber.<br />
Agronomic<br />
traits QTL<br />
Leaf area La-1<br />
La-2<br />
La-3<br />
La-4<br />
La-5<br />
Linkage<br />
group<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
7<br />
9<br />
QTL<br />
position<br />
6.0<br />
10.0<br />
50.2<br />
36.0<br />
54.0<br />
LR<br />
value<br />
9.8<br />
10.8<br />
12.4<br />
13.5<br />
11.0<br />
Variance<br />
explained<br />
(%)<br />
10.6<br />
11.9<br />
7.3<br />
8.3<br />
20.2<br />
Additive<br />
effect<br />
-4.58<br />
-5.17<br />
-4.02<br />
-4.34<br />
5.47<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Aoki, S., M. Oda, and M. Naga 1988. Chilling and heat sensitivities in cucumber<br />
seedlings measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. Bull. Natl. Res. Inst. Veg.<br />
Ornam. Plants Tea. A(2):81–92.<br />
Chen, Q. J., F. M. Zhang, Y. J. Wang, and K. Kenji. 2003. Studies of physiological<br />
characteristics of the reaction of cucumber to low temperature and poor light.<br />
Sci. Agr. Sinica. 36(1):23-26.<br />
Kennard, W. C. and M. J. Havey. 1995. Quantitative trait analysis of fruit quality in<br />
cucumber: QTL detection, confirmation, and comparison with mating-design<br />
variation. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:53-61.<br />
Kennard, W. C., K. Poetter, A. Dijkhuizen, V. Meglic, J. Staub, and M. Havey. 1994.<br />
Linkages among AFLP, RAPD, isozyme, disease resistance, and morphological<br />
markers in narrow and wide crosses of cucumber. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:53–61.<br />
Meglic, V. and J. E. Staub. 1996. Inheritance and linkage relationships of isozyme<br />
and morphological loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
92(7):865–872.<br />
Paterson, A. H., S. Damon, J. D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H. D. Rabinowitch, S. E. Lincoln,<br />
E. S. Lander, and S. D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying<br />
quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and<br />
environments. Genome. 127:181–197.<br />
Serquen, F. C., J. Bacher, and J. E. Staub. 1997. Mapping and QTL analysis of a<br />
narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA marker. Molec. <strong>Breeding</strong>. 3:257–268.<br />
Staub, J. E., F. C. Serquen, and M. Gupta. 1996. Genetic markers, map construction,<br />
and their application in plant breeding. Hort Sci. 31:729–741.<br />
Wang, Y. J., H. Y. Zhang, Y. W. Jiang. 2001. Effects of low temperature and low light<br />
intensity stress on photosynthesis in seedlings of different cucumber varieties.<br />
Acta Hort. Sinica. 28(3):230–234. (In Chinese.)<br />
Wang, Y. J., Y. W. Jiang, G. S. Wu, F. Zhang, and L. R. Zhang. 1998. Relationships<br />
between photosynthetic light compensation point and tolerance to low<br />
temperature and low irradiance in cucumber. Acta Hort. Sinica. 25(2):199–200.<br />
(In Chinese.)<br />
Xu, C.-H., Z.-Q. Chen, K.-B. Wang, F.-H. Zhao, S.-Q. Lin, C.-Q. Tang, and T.-Y.<br />
Kuang. 1997. Effects of chilling injury on the thylakoid membrane of cucumber<br />
chloroplasts. Acta Bot. Sinica. 39(12):1143–1146.<br />
Yu, S.-C., Y. J. Wang, and X. Y. Zheng. 2003. Mapping and QTL analysis controlling<br />
some morphological traits in Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp.<br />
pekinensis). Acta Gen. Sinica. 30(12):1153–1160 (In Chinese.)<br />
224 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
CONSTRUCTION OF A GENETIC MAP OF<br />
CUCUMBER USING RAPDS, SSRS, AFLPS<br />
AND MAPPING RESISTANCE GENES TO<br />
PAPAYA RINGSPOT, ZUCCHINI YELLOW<br />
MOSAIC, AND WATERMELON MOSAIC<br />
VIRUSES<br />
Haiying Zhang, Aijun Mao, Feng Zhang, Yong Xu,<br />
and Yongjian Wang<br />
National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables (NERCV),<br />
Beijing, China<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis sativus, genetic distance, linkage map.<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> watermelon strains of Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV-W),<br />
Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), and Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) are<br />
potyviruses that cause significant losses in cucumber. F6 recombinant inbred<br />
lines (RILs) were generated from a cross between Cucumis sativus L. line<br />
‘European 8’ and a line from ‘QiuPeng’, which is resistant to the three viruses.<br />
A 244-point genetic map of cucumber was generated, delineating nine linkage<br />
groups and spanning 759cM, with an average distance of 3.1cM. Resistance to<br />
PRSV-W, ZYMV, and WMV were mapped to Linkage Group 2. <strong>The</strong> order of<br />
the three virus resistances was PRSV-W, ZYMV, and WMV. <strong>The</strong> distance<br />
between PRSV-W- resistant and ZYMV-resistant genes was 8cM, and the<br />
distance between ZYMV- and WMV- resistant genes was 4cM. <strong>The</strong> results<br />
indicate that this genetic map will be useful for cucumber genetics and breeding<br />
for disease resistance.<br />
T<br />
he watermelon strains of Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV-W),<br />
Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), and Watermelon<br />
mosaic virus (WMV) are potyviruses that cause significant<br />
losses in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) throughout China and<br />
the world (Provvidenti et al., 1984; Wang et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> genetics of<br />
potyvirus resistance in cucumber have been well studied. Provvidenti<br />
(1987) reported that resistance to ZYMV from TMG1 was inherited as<br />
a recessive allele at the zym single locus. ZYMV resistance from the<br />
cultivar ‘Dina’ was also inherited as a recessive allele at the same<br />
locus (Abul-Hayja and Al-Shahwan, 1991). Wang et al. (1984)<br />
reported that resistance to PRSV-W (originally named Watermelon<br />
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China<br />
(30471186, 30570997) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (5062008,<br />
5050001).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 225
mosaic virus 1) in the ‘Surinam’ cultivar was inherited as a recessive<br />
allele at the prsv-1 locus. Wai and Grumet (1995a) found that the prsv-<br />
2 locus in the line TMG1 inhibited PRSV-W symptoms. Wai et al.<br />
(1997) reported that resistance to PRSV-W from ‘Surinam’ (prsv-1)<br />
and TMG1 (Prsv-2) were allelic. Cohen et al. (1971) reported that<br />
resistance to WMV was conditioned by a dominant allele at a single<br />
locus from cultivar ‘Kyoto 3 Feet’. Several studies demonstrated that<br />
numerous potyviruses such as PRSV-W, WMV, Moroccan<br />
watermelon mosaic virus, Zucchini yellow fleck virus, and ZYMV that<br />
are resistant in TMG1 are inherited at the same locus (Gilbert-<br />
Albertini et al., 1995; Wai and Grumet 1995b; Kabelka et al., 1997;<br />
Wai et al., 1997).<br />
Conventional plant breeding had a significant impact on improving<br />
cucumber breeding for resistance to potyviruses, but the timeconsuming<br />
process of making crosses, backcrosses, and the selection<br />
of desired resistance progeny makes it difficult to react adequately to<br />
the evolution of new virulent pathogens. Thus, marker-assisted<br />
selection (MAS) may be easier for the breeding of multiple-virusresistant<br />
cucumbers. Since the 1980s, molecular markers are being<br />
used widely as a principal tool for the breeding of many crops. In<br />
particular a great work has been realized in the construction of the<br />
molecular map of cucumber and in finding molecular markers linked<br />
to disease-resistance genes. Park et al. (2000) reported that resistances<br />
to PRSV-W and ZYMV were tightly linked (2.2cM) and mapped to<br />
the end of one linkage group. <strong>The</strong> AFLP marker E15/M47-F-197<br />
cosegregated with ZYMV resistance and should be a useful indirect<br />
selection tool for potyvirus resistance in cucumber. <strong>The</strong>se mapping<br />
results support the hypothesis that potyvirus resistance is controlled by<br />
different alleles at clustered loci in cucumber (Kabelka and Grumet<br />
1997; Wai et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> mapping of other resistance genes to<br />
potyviruses such as WMV should be one of the major topics for<br />
further study.<br />
Chinese cucumber and European greenhouse cucumber are two<br />
important ecological types cultivated widely. Many Chinese cucumber<br />
cultivars possess genetic resistance to four or more viruses, but the<br />
genetics of potyvirus resistance of these cultivars have not been well<br />
studied. Most of the European greenhouse-cucumber cultivars are not<br />
resistant to potyviruses. In our laboratory, we have generated<br />
recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the cross between ‘European 8’<br />
226 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
(an inbred line of European greenhouse-cucumber cultivars susceptible<br />
to ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV) and ‘QiuPeng’ (an inbred line of<br />
Chinese cucumber cultivars resistant to these viruses). <strong>The</strong> two main<br />
goals of our research were: (a) to construct the first cucumber map in<br />
China, a narrow-based genetic map using random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), amplified fragment length<br />
polymorphism (AFLP), and simple sequence repeat (SSR), and (b) to<br />
map resistance genes to ZYMV, PRSV–W, and WMV.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
CROSSES. ‘European 8’, an inbred European greenhouse-cucumber<br />
cultivar susceptible to ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV, was crossed with<br />
‘QiuPeng’, an inbred open-field cucumber cultivar of China with<br />
resistances to ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV. A total of 140 RIL6<br />
families were used for all DNA isolations and virus evaluations.<br />
VIRUS MAINTENANCE AND EVALUATION. ZYMV-CH, PRSV, and<br />
WMV were kindly provided by Dr. R. Provvidenti (Cornell<br />
University, Geneva, NY). <strong>The</strong> viruses were maintained by transferring<br />
to zucchini squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) regularly. For virus evaluation,<br />
cucumber seeds were germinated for 24 hr at 28 ο C. Fourteen days after<br />
sowing, cotyledons and the first expanding leaves were dusted with<br />
carborundum and inoculated with each of the viruses. Fourteen to 20<br />
days after inoculation, the plants were scored as: 0 = no symptoms; 1 =<br />
slight symptoms limited to lower leaves; 3 = slight mosaic on upper<br />
leaves; 5 = clear mosaic on lower leaves and moderate mosaic on<br />
upper leaves; 7 = severe mosaic on most of leaves; 9 = severe mosaic<br />
on all leaves, new leaves aberrant. Ten plants from each F6 family<br />
were evaluated in each of the three replications. Disease index (DI)<br />
was calculated by using the formula DI = (∑score x number of<br />
plants/9x total number of plants) x 100. <strong>The</strong> graphic of the frequency<br />
distribution in the RIL population for DI of ZYMV, WMV, and<br />
PRSV-W was drawn by using Systat 7.0 software,<br />
DNA ISOLATION. An improved CTAB procedure (Murray and<br />
Thompson, 1980) was used .<br />
AFLP ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> AFLP procedure was accomplished<br />
according to Vos et al. (1995).<br />
RAPD ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> RAPD procedure was accomplished<br />
according to Park et al. (2000).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 227
SSR ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> sequence of primers was obtained from Dr. J.<br />
E. Staub, University of Wisconsin. PCR amplification was conducted<br />
according to Danin-Poleg et al. (2000).<br />
LINKAGE-MAP CONSTRUCTION. Linkage-map construction was<br />
performed using Join Map3.0 for Kosambi mapping function.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE TO ZYMV, WMV AND PRSV-W<br />
IN CUCUMBER. <strong>The</strong> frequency distribution in the RIL population for<br />
DI of three viruses showed two peaks (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
demonstrated that resistances from ‘QiuPeng’ to ZYMV, WMV, and<br />
PRSV-W were all inherited as a recessive allele at a single locus. It is<br />
obvious that the resistance from ‘QiuPeng’ to WMV differed from the<br />
resistance from ‘Kyoto 3 Feet’, which was dominantly inherited.<br />
MAP CONSTRUCTION. <strong>The</strong> 244 markers, including AFLPs,<br />
RAPDs, and SSRs, formed nine linkage groups at LOD 3.0, and the<br />
nine linkage groups spanned 759cM, with an average distance of<br />
3.1cM (Figure 2). Since there are seven pairs of chromosomes in<br />
cucumber, we delineated nine linkage groups, and this map is not fully<br />
saturated.<br />
For the map construction, even distribution of markers with small<br />
intervals between was expected. Instead, however, marker clusters<br />
formed in several crops, such as tomato and maize. Our study showed<br />
that some markers, especially AFLP markers, were distributed<br />
unequally. Large intervals (>20cM) between adjacent markers were<br />
also found in some groups. Populations from various parents or more<br />
types of molecular markers, including RFLPs and SSRs, would be<br />
helpful for constructing a saturated map.<br />
MAPPING RESISTANCE TO POTYVIRUSES ZYMV PRSV-W AND<br />
WMV. In addition to resistances to ZYMV and PRSV-W, resistance<br />
to WMV was mapped on the genetic map. This was the first mapping<br />
of the gene for resistance to WMV, and we found that resistances to<br />
ZYMV, PRSV-W, and WMV all were closely linked in Linkage<br />
Group 1 (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> orders of three virus resistances were PRSV-<br />
W, ZYMV, and WMV. <strong>The</strong> distance between PRSV-W and ZYMV<br />
resistances was 8cM, and the distance between ZYMV and WMV<br />
resistance genes was 4.0cM. Park et al. (2000) reported that the<br />
distance between the two resistances to ZYMV and PRSV-W was<br />
2.2cM. In our study, the distance was 8cM. Although there is some<br />
difference in genetic distance, both studies show that resistance to<br />
ZYMV is linked closely to resistance to PRSV-W. A series of studies<br />
228 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
demonstrated that numerous potyvirus (PRSV-W, WMV, ZYMV)<br />
resistances in TGMT are inherited at the same locus; however, we<br />
scored about 10 families as recombinant for resistance to PRSV-W and<br />
ZYMV, to PRSV-W and WMV, and to WMV and ZYMV among 140<br />
families. Our results indicate that three important virus resistances in<br />
cucumber are conditioned by a major chromosome region, which<br />
further supports the hypothesis that potyvirus resistance is controlled<br />
by different alleles at clustered loci in cucumber (Kabelka and<br />
Grumet 1997; Kabelka et al, 1997; Wai and Grumet, 1995b).<br />
Count<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
ZYMV<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40<br />
DI<br />
50 60 70<br />
0.0<br />
80<br />
Count<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
Proportion per bar<br />
WMV<br />
Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> frequency distribution in cucumber RIL populations for DI traits<br />
involving resistance to the watermelon strain of Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV-<br />
W), Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus<br />
(ZYMV). Abscissa = DI; ordinate = number of lines on the left side and the<br />
percentage on the right.<br />
Count<br />
PRSV-W<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0.0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
DI<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />
0.0<br />
90<br />
DI<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 229<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
Proportion per bar<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
Proportion per bar
Fig. 2. A linkage map for cucumber derived from an RIL population (‘QiuPeng’<br />
× ‘European 8’).<br />
230 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Literature Cited<br />
Abul-Hayja, Z. and I. AI-Shahwan. 1991. Inheritance of resistance to zucchini yellow<br />
mosaic virus in cucumber. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 98:301–304.<br />
Ashfield. T., J. R. Danzer, D. Held, K. Clayton, and P. Keim. 1998. Rpg1, a soybean<br />
gene effective against races of bacterial blight, maps to a cluster of previously<br />
identified disease resistance genes. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 96:1013–1021.<br />
Cohen, S., E. Gertman, and N. Kedar. 1971. Inheritance of resistance to melon<br />
mosaic virus in cucumbers. Phytopathology. 61:253–255.<br />
Danin-Poleg, Y., N. Reis, S. Baudracco-Arnas, M. Pitrat, J. E. Staub, M. Oliver, P.<br />
Arus, C. M. de Vicente, and N. Katzir. 2000. Simple sequence repeats in<br />
cucumis mapping and map merging. Genome. 43:963–974.<br />
Gu, Q., Z. Fan, and H. Li. 2002. Virus list in cucurbita. Chinese Watermelon and<br />
Melon. 1:45–47.<br />
Kabelka, E. and R. Grumet. 1997. Inheritance of resistance to Moroccan watermelon<br />
mosaic virus in cucumber line TMG1 and cosegregation with zucchini yellow<br />
mosaic virus resistace. Euphytica. 95:237–242.<br />
Kabelka, E., Z. Ullah, and R. Grumet. 1997. Multiple alleles for zucchini yellow<br />
mosaic virus resistance at the zym locus in cucumber. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.<br />
95:997–1004.<br />
Murray, H. G. and W. E. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight<br />
plant DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 8:4321–4325.<br />
Park, Y. H., S. Sensoy, C. Wye, R. Antonise, J. Peleman, and M. J. Havey. 2000. A<br />
genetic map of cucumber composed of RAPDs, RFLPs, AFLPs, and loci<br />
conditioning resistance to papaya ringspot and zucchini yellow mosaic viruses.<br />
Genome. 43:1003–1010.<br />
Provvidenti, R., D. Gonsalves, and H. Humaydan. 1984. Occurrence of zucchini<br />
yellow mosaic virus in cucurbits from Connecticut, New York, Florida, and<br />
California. Plant Dis. 68:443–446.<br />
Provvidenti, R. 1987. Viral diseases of cucurbits and sources of resistance. Rev.<br />
Plant Path. 66:425–429.<br />
Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J.<br />
Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for<br />
DNA fingerprinting. Nuleic Acids Res. 23:4407–4414.<br />
Wai, T. and R. Grumet. 1995a. Inheritance of resistance to the watermelon strain of<br />
papaya ringspot virus in the cucumber line TMG1. HortSci. 30:338–340.<br />
Wai, T. and R. Grumet. 1995b. Inheritance of resistance to the watermelon mosaic<br />
virus in the cucumber line TMG1: tissue-specific expression and relationship to<br />
zucchini yellow mosaic virus resistance. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 91:699–706.<br />
Wai. T., J. E. Staub, and R. Grumet. 1997. Linkage analysis of potyvirus resistance<br />
alleles in cucumber. J. Hered. 88:454–458.<br />
Wang Y., R. Provvidenti, and R. Robinson. 1984. Inheritance of resistance to<br />
watermelon mosaic virus 1 in cucumber. HortSci. 19:587–588.<br />
Wang, Y., Ming, S. Wen, and Y. Yan. 1997. Virus disease resistance breeding in main<br />
cucurbita crops. J. ChangJiang Vegetables. 1:2–5.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 231
PERIMETER TRAP CROP SYSTEMS USING<br />
BLUE HUBBARD SQUASH AS A CONTROL<br />
FOR STRIPED CUCUMBER BEETLE IN<br />
BUTTERNUT SQUASH<br />
Andrew Cavanagh and Ruth Hazzard<br />
Department of Plant, Insect, and Soil Science, University of<br />
Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Acalymma vittatum, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata, IPM<br />
ABSTRACT. Striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum (Fabricius), is the<br />
primary insect pest of cucurbit crops in the <strong>North</strong>eastern U.S. Adult beetles<br />
colonize squash crops from field borders, causing feeding damage at the<br />
seedling stage and transmitting the bacteria Erwinia tracheiphila. Conventional<br />
control methods rely on pesticide applications to the entire field. Acalymma<br />
vittatum demonstrates a marked preference for Blue Hubbard squash<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima) over butternut squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata). Perimeter<br />
trap cropping with a single or double row of Blue Hubbard squash concentrates<br />
beetles in the border where they can be controlled with timely perimeter<br />
treatments, limiting the need for pesticide in the main crop of butternut squash.<br />
We evaluated this system in commercial butternut fields in 2003 and 2004,<br />
comparing fields using perimeter trap cropping to conventionally managed<br />
fields. Equivalent control of striped cucumber beetles was achieved with >90%<br />
reduction in pesticide rates compared to conventional control methods.<br />
T<br />
he value of vegetable crops sold in the United <strong>State</strong>s was $12.7<br />
billion in 2002 (USDA, 2002 Census of Agriculture).<br />
<strong>North</strong>eastern states have a high proportion of their vegetablecrop<br />
industry invested in cucurbit crops, including squash, melons,<br />
cucumbers, and pumpkins; in Massachusetts, 40% of the vegetablecrop<br />
acreage is devoted to cucurbit crops (USDA, 2002). Yields of<br />
winter squash, one of the major cucurbit crops, exceed 20,000lb/acre,<br />
with a wholesale value estimated at $3400/acre, or greater than $5<br />
million for the state (Hollingsworth, 1998). Butternut squash is the<br />
primary winter squash crop, in part because of strong market demand<br />
and excellent storage capability.<br />
Striped cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittatum) constitute one of<br />
most serious pests of cucurbit crops in the world (Metcalf and Metcalf,<br />
1992). <strong>The</strong>se beetles are ranked as the most important insect pest in<br />
cucurbit crops in the <strong>North</strong>east, and are the primary target of<br />
insecticide applications used by growers (Hoffmann et al., 1996;<br />
Stivers, 1999). <strong>The</strong> <strong>North</strong>east Vegetable IPM Commodity Working<br />
232 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Group, with representatives from 12 northeastern states, ranked the<br />
cucumber beetle and bacterial wilt complex as a regionwide problem<br />
that causes significant reduction in yield and results in high pesticide<br />
use (IPM Priorities for Vegetables in the <strong>North</strong>east:<br />
http://northeastipm.org/work_vegepriority.cfm). Conventional pest<br />
management for many cucurbit crops requires two to eight<br />
applications of insecticides such as carbaryl (Brust and Foster, 1995)<br />
or other carbamates or synthetic pyrethroids (Howell et al., 2004).<br />
Recently, growers in the <strong>North</strong>east have adopted use of systemic<br />
insecticides (e.g., imidacloprid) in the furrow at planting, which<br />
protects cucurbit crops from early feeding damage (Hazzard, 2003).<br />
This has the advantage of less work for the grower; however, the<br />
insecticide cost is higher than with foliar applications, and widespread<br />
adoption of systemic insecticides may lead to resistance.<br />
Cucumber beetles can reduce yield in cucurbits through direct<br />
damage or by transmitting the causal agent of bacterial wilt.<br />
Cucumber beetles overwinter as adults, colonize cucurbit fields in<br />
early to mid-June, and may <strong>complete</strong>ly destroy newly germinated<br />
plants (Ferguson et al., 1983). Damage by adults to leaves and early<br />
flowers takes place over a four–five-week period in New England,<br />
followed by a period of inactivity aboveground after the overwintering<br />
generation of adults has laid eggs in the soil and died. Summer adults<br />
emerge in mid- to late summer and continue to feed, damaging leaves,<br />
flowers, and fruit, before leaving the fields for overwintering sites.<br />
Although yield losses to direct damage can be extensive, the most<br />
damaging effect of cucumber-beetle infestation may be through<br />
transmission of the bacteria Erwinia tracheiphila. Yield losses from<br />
bacterial wilt in winter squash and pumpkins have increased in the past<br />
decade (Hazzard et al., 2001; Zitter, 2001), increasing the necessity for<br />
developing control methods that prevent transmission of wilt during<br />
the most susceptible stages of plant development. To address these<br />
issues, in the spring of 2003 we began looking at the effectiveness of a<br />
perimeter-trap-cropping system to reduce the time, expense, and<br />
potential hazards that are inherent in conventional management<br />
strategies.<br />
Perimeter trap cropping, or PTC, is based on the fact that insects<br />
prefer one species or variety of plant over another, due to morphology,<br />
relative concentration of feeding stimulants, or other factors. <strong>The</strong><br />
more attractive crop is planted around the outer edge of the main cash<br />
crop, surrounding it on all sides. Striped cucumber beetles overwinter<br />
in the woods edges surrounding fields, and move into a crop from the<br />
edges. This makes them a good candidate for this method of control.<br />
It is also likely that by reducing the field area sprayed, we provide a<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 233
efuge for beetles that are still susceptible to chemical controls, thus<br />
delaying resistance. Blue Hubbard squash is highly attractive to<br />
striped cucumber beetles in comparison with butternut squash and has<br />
low susceptibility to bacterial wilt (McGrath and Shishkoff, 2000;<br />
Cavanagh and Hazzard, unpublished data). It has been used as an<br />
effective perimeter trap crop in summer squash with great success<br />
(Boucher and Durgy, 2002). It is similar to butternut squash in terms<br />
of its temperature and spacing requirements, and days to maturity.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se factors make it an ideal perimeter trap crop for butternut squash.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
On-Farm Experiment 2003<br />
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. To assess the value of perimeter-trapcropping<br />
systems in commercial agriculture, we monitored 12<br />
commercial butternut fields, 6 using a PTC system and 6 using<br />
conventional chemical controls (foliar treatment with carbaryl). Every<br />
week from 3 June 2003 to 14 July 2003 (peak period for striped<br />
cucumber beetle activity), 25 plants were randomly selected and<br />
scouted along the field border, and another 25 were randomly selected<br />
from a row halfway between the border and the center of the field.<br />
Perimeter-trap-crop growers were advised to spray their borders at the<br />
first arrival of the cucumber beetle. Additional border sprays were<br />
applied at weekly intervals if the beetle pressure in the border<br />
exceeded an average of one beetle per plant. Growers in all fields<br />
were advised to spray their main crop if beetles reached a threshold<br />
number of one beetle per plant on average.<br />
RESPONSES MEASURED. Both the border and a randomly selected<br />
row halfway between the border and the center of the field were<br />
scouted weekly for number of live beetles, number of dead beetles,<br />
presence of cotyledon damage, and percent defoliation. <strong>The</strong><br />
defoliation scale used was as follows: 0 = no damage, 1 = 1–20%<br />
damage, 2 = 21–40% damage, 3 = 41–60% damage, 4 = 61–80%<br />
damage, 5 = 81–100% damage. At the end of the season, growers<br />
rated their satisfaction with yield and management costs under this<br />
system and how it compared to expectations and past methods.<br />
FIELD MANAGEMENT. All the farmers participating in the<br />
experiment planted their fields as they normally would, except for the<br />
inclusion of a single- or double-row Hubbard border in the PTC fields.<br />
Double rows were used along woods edges where beetles were likely<br />
to have overwintered, or in fields close to previous cucurbit crops. No<br />
fields had been planted to cucurbits in the previous year. Cultivation<br />
234 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
and nutrient management were performed by the grower, according to<br />
the needs of the field and standard management practices.<br />
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. All data in 2003 were subjected to<br />
ANOVA analysis using PROC GLM in SAS V.9.1. Beetle counts<br />
were subjected to log transformation to more closely meet<br />
expectations of normality. P values less than or equal to 0.05 were<br />
considered significant.<br />
On-Farm Experiment 2004<br />
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. <strong>The</strong> experimental design in 2004 was<br />
the same as in 2003, except that in 2004 we chose to also look at the<br />
effects of treating the border with a systemic insecticide<br />
(imidacloprid). This was done at the request of several growers who<br />
thought that a systemic would alleviate some of the difficulty in timing<br />
the initial spray correctly. <strong>The</strong> design was adapted so that there were<br />
now two pesticide treatments—systemic (imidacloprid) and foliar<br />
(carbaryl). <strong>The</strong> intention was to have three PTC foliar fields, three<br />
PTC systemic fields, three conventional foliar treated fields, and three<br />
conventional systemic treated fields. One of the PTC systemic fields<br />
failed to germinate due to poor field conditions, so we were left with<br />
only two fields in the systemic PTC category. During the 2004 trials<br />
we were also able, through increased contact with the growers during<br />
the critical early part of the season, to address many of the problems<br />
we experienced in 2003.<br />
RESPONSES MEASURED. Fields were scouted from 4 June 2004–16<br />
July 2004, which represents the period of peak beetle activity. <strong>The</strong><br />
same scouting methods were used and the same responses measured as<br />
in 2003.<br />
FIELD MANAGEMENT. Field management was essentially the same<br />
as in 2003, with the exception of a furrow drench of imidacloprid<br />
applied at planting to the systemic conventional fields and the Hubbard<br />
borders of the systemic PTC fields.<br />
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Analysis for the 2004 data was<br />
conducted in the same manner as in 2003.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
On-Farm Experiment 2003<br />
<strong>The</strong> on-farm trials showed significant differences in total beetle<br />
numbers between both the systems overall (PTC vs. conventional;<br />
P=0.02) as well as location overall (border vs. main crop; P=0.02).<br />
This was complicated by the interaction between system and location<br />
being highly significant (df 1,10; P=0.007). When the means for each<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 235
location within each system were separated, it was clear that the<br />
number of beetles in the PTC borders was much higher than in either<br />
of the main crops or in the borders of the conventional fields (Table 1;<br />
Figure 1). We chose to use total beetles (live + dead beetles) as the<br />
measure of beetle pressure because dead beetles accumulate wherever<br />
pesticides are used, while only live beetles are present in unsprayed<br />
fields; the sum indicates total population pressure in both treated and<br />
untreated fields. <strong>The</strong>re were no significant differences in either<br />
defoliation or cotyledon-damage rankings. In three out of six plots<br />
with a Hubbard border, beetle populations in the main crops exceeded<br />
the action threshold. This occurred for several reasons. In one field<br />
the beetle pressure was high enough to overwhelm and destroy the<br />
single-row border. Plants were eaten down to the ground over a period<br />
of two days, before the border was sprayed. In two irregularly shaped<br />
fields the border was planted with wide gaps.<br />
Table 1. Average number of live plus dead beetles per plant, summed<br />
over six weeks from germination.<br />
Beetles per plant, 2003<br />
Border Main<br />
PTC 2.86a 0.39b<br />
Conventional 0.38b 0.38b<br />
Means with the same letter are not significantly different, P=0.05.<br />
Looking at the colonization of the field over time, we saw an<br />
apparent difference in the pattern of beetle dispersion. <strong>The</strong> main crop<br />
in the PTC systems had comparable levels of beetles to the other main<br />
crops, despite being in such close proximity to the highly infested<br />
Hubbard and despite the fact that half of these fields were never<br />
sprayed. All conventional fields were treated with insecticide at least<br />
once.<br />
On-Farm Experiment 2004<br />
<strong>The</strong> modifications we made to the system based on our experiences<br />
in 2003 led to greatly improved effectiveness. Beetle pressures were<br />
similar to 2003; however, the main crop of PTC fields did not exceed<br />
threshold and no PTC fields required a full-field spray. <strong>The</strong> total<br />
number of beetles was again higher in the Blue Hubbard borders,<br />
regardless of what chemical the border was treated with (P=0.037; df<br />
236 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
1,7) (Table 2). <strong>The</strong>re were no differences in beetle densities in the<br />
main crops regardless of whether or not the field was surrounded<br />
Avg per Plant Beetle count<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Average Total (live+dead) beetles per plant<br />
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk6<br />
border - conv<br />
border - PTC<br />
main - conv<br />
main - PTC<br />
Fig. 1. Average adult beetles (sum of live plus dead beetles) per plant, by week,<br />
in the border and main crop of PTC and conventional fields, 2003.<br />
Table 2. Average number of live plus dead beetles per plant, summed<br />
over six weeks from germination.<br />
Beetles per plant, 2004<br />
Border Main<br />
PTC 3.13a 0.32b<br />
Conv 0.35b 0.30b<br />
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.<br />
Table 3. Average defoliation ratings, summed over six weeks from<br />
germination, 2004.<br />
Defoliation<br />
Pesticide Border Main<br />
Conventional carbaryl 0.44a 0.39a<br />
imidacloprid 0.52abc 0.33a<br />
PTC carbaryl 0.70c 0.49ab<br />
imidacloprid 0.65bc 0.63bc<br />
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.<br />
by a Hubbard border or what chemical the border was sprayed with. It<br />
is important to note that the beetle populations in the main crop of<br />
each field were equivalent despite the fact that the main crops of the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 237
PTC fields were not sprayed or treated with insecticide in any way,<br />
and the main crops of the other fields were either treated with<br />
imidacloprid at planting or sprayed with a foliar insecticide on<br />
multiple occasions through the growing season. <strong>The</strong>re was a small but<br />
statistically significant increase in the defoliation rating (Table 3) for<br />
the main crop of the imidacloprid treated PTC field vs. the<br />
conventional main crops (P=0.015; df 1,7). When comparing only at<br />
the vulnerable seedling stages, the difference was not significant.<br />
In 2004 the main crops of the PTC fields never exceeded the spray<br />
threshold (Figure 2). It appeared that the pressure in the main crops of<br />
the PTC fields was actually lower than in any other field at the onset of<br />
beetle colonization (Weeks 1 and 2). This has important implications<br />
for the success of the system, because beetle feeding has a<br />
disproportionate impact on young plants.<br />
GROWER-SURVEY RESULTS. When evaluating an experimental<br />
system that is designed, ultimately, to be adopted by growers, it is<br />
vitally important to evaluate the participating growers’ opinions of the<br />
effectiveness of the system. This type of evidence, while anecdotal,<br />
often carries more weight in the target community than more objective<br />
forms of measurement. In 2004, we surveyed our Massachusetts<br />
growers, along with several growers in Connecticut who had been<br />
using the Blue Hubbard/ butternut PTC system, with the following<br />
results:<br />
• 100% of surveyed growers found the PTC system and training to<br />
be good or excellent overall.<br />
• Eight out of 10 said that using PTC saved them money. <strong>The</strong> other<br />
2 said it cost about the same.<br />
• Eight out of the 10 growers we surveyed were very satisfied or<br />
thrilled with the way PTC worked for them. <strong>The</strong> remaining 2<br />
growers were satisfied.<br />
• 100% said using PTC took less or the same amount of time as<br />
using conventional methods.<br />
• 100% said they used less pesticide.<br />
Coupled with the evidence from the on-farm experiments, the<br />
survey results indicate that perimeter trap cropping can provide<br />
adequate striped cucumber beetle control while greatly reducing<br />
pesticide use in commercial butternut squash fields. <strong>The</strong> results of this<br />
study show that PTC is an excellent candidate for adoption by growers<br />
wishing to reduce their pesticide costs and exposure.<br />
238 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Average per Plant Beetle count<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Average Total (live + dead) beetles per plant<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
ptc - border<br />
ptc - main<br />
conv - border<br />
conv - main<br />
Fig. 2. Average adult beetles (sum of live plus dead beetles) per plant, by week,<br />
in the border and main crop of PTC and conventional fields, 2004.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Boucher, J. T. and Durgy, R. 2002. Perimeter trap cropping works. UCT extension<br />
system fact sheet. University of Connecticut Extension, Storrs, CT<br />
Brust, G. E., and R. E. Foster. 1995. Semiochemical based toxic baits for control of<br />
striped cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in cantaloupe. J. Econ.<br />
Ent. 88:112–116.<br />
Ferguson, J. E., E. R. Metcalf, R. L. Metcalf, and A. M. Rhodes. 1983. Influence of<br />
cucurbitacin content in cotyledons of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae cultivars upon feeding<br />
behavior of Diabroticina beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Ent.<br />
76:47–51.<br />
Hazzard, R. V. 2003. Imidacloprid for striped cucumber beetle control, p. 187–190.<br />
In: Proc. New York state vegetable conference. New York <strong>State</strong> Growers<br />
Association, Kirkville, NY<br />
Hazzard, R., F. X. Mangan, A. K. Carter, R. Wick, R. Bonanno, J. Howell, R.<br />
Bernatzky, and P. Westgate. 2001. Vegetable integrated crop and pest<br />
management program annual report. University of Massachusetts Extension<br />
Publication, Amherst, MA.<br />
Hoffmann, M. P., J. J. Kirkwyland, R. F. Smith, and R. F. Long. 1996. Field tests<br />
with kairomone-baited traps for cucumber beetles and corn rootworms in<br />
cucurbits. Env. Ent. 25:1173–1181.<br />
Hollingsworth, C., C. A. Mordhurst, R. Hazzard, and J. Howell. 1998. Pumpkin and<br />
winter squash project: 1998 grower survey and ICM project goals. University of<br />
Massachusetts Extension Vegetable Program, Amherst, MA<br />
Howell, J. C., A. R. Bonanno, T. J. Boucher, and R. L. Wick (eds.). 2004. 2004–<br />
2005 New England vegetable management guide. University of Massachusetts<br />
Extension Office of Communications and Marketing, Amherst, MA.<br />
IPM Priorities for Vegetables in the <strong>North</strong>east:<br />
.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 239
McGrath, M. T. and N. Shishkoff. 2000. Comparison of cucurbit crop types and<br />
cultivars for their attractiveness to cucumber beetles and susceptibility to<br />
bacterial wilt. Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, LIHREC,<br />
Ithaca, NY.<br />
Metcalf, R. L. and E. R. Metcalf. 1992. Plant kairomones in insect ecology and<br />
control. Chapman & Hall, New York.<br />
Stivers, L. (ed.). 1999. Crop profile for squash in New York. Cornell Cooperative<br />
Extension, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.<br />
.<br />
USDA. 2002. Census of agriculture, vol. 1, ch 2. U.S. state level data, table 29.<br />
vegetables and melons harvested for sale: 2002 and 1997.<br />
.<br />
Zitter, T. A. 2001. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> disease update part I: bacterial and angular leaf spot,<br />
Septoria leaf spot, and bacterial wilt, p. 185–188. In: Proceedings of the New<br />
York state vegetable conference. New York <strong>State</strong> Growers Association,<br />
Kirkville, NY.<br />
240 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
CHARACTERIZATION OF COMMERCIALLY<br />
AVAILABLE WATERMELON POLLENIZERS<br />
Peter J. Dittmar, Jonathan R. Schultheis, and David W. Monks<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Department of Horticultural Science,<br />
Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, triploid watermelon, seedless<br />
ABSTRACT. Pollen from triploid (seedless) watermelon (Citrullus lanatus<br />
[Thunb.] Matsum. & Nak.) is nonviable. Diploid (seeded) watermelons produce<br />
viable pollen for seedless-watermelon production. In 2004, markets continued<br />
to increase for triploid but decreased for diploid watermelons. Seed companies<br />
are commercializing diploid cultivars (pollenizers) designed as pollen sources<br />
for triploid-watermelon production. <strong>The</strong> objectives of this research were to<br />
characterize the vegetative, floral, and fruit growth and development of these<br />
pollenizers. Five pollenizers were evaluated: ‘Companion’, ‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini<br />
Pool’, ‘SP-1’, and ‘Jenny’. ‘Companion’ produced the smallest plants, reaching<br />
a maximum vine length of 183cm, 5 weeks after transplant (WAT). ‘Mickylee’,<br />
‘Mini Pool’, ‘SP-1’, and ‘Jenny’ reached maximum lengths of 294–335cm, 5<br />
WAT. ‘Companion’ had the shortest internode length, 3cm. ‘SP-1’ produced<br />
the most male flowers, 30–40 per plant per day 5 to 8 WAT. ‘Companion’,<br />
‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini Pool’, and ‘Jenny’ produced male-flower at similar rates<br />
early in the season; after 5 WAT, however, ‘Companion’ had the lowest level of<br />
all pollenizers. ‘SP-1’ produced the most female flowers and had the most fruit<br />
(8 per plant). ‘Companion’ produced the fewest female flowers and produced<br />
two fruit per vine. ‘Mickylee’ had the largest fruit, 5.9kg; ‘SP-1’ and ‘Jenny’<br />
produced the smallest, 3.1kg.<br />
T<br />
hree quarters of total watermelon production in the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s is triploid (seedless) (USDA Economic Research<br />
Service, 2005). Triploid watermelons do not provide adequate<br />
amounts of viable pollen for fruit set to occur (Kihara, 1951;<br />
Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997; Rubatzky and Yamaguchi,<br />
1997). Diploid or pollenizer plants are placed next to or near triploid<br />
watermelon plants to provide viable pollen for fruit set on the triploid<br />
plants (Kihara, 1951; Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997; Rubatzky<br />
and Yamaguchi, 1997).<br />
<strong>The</strong> pollenizer plants are planted in separate rows or in the same<br />
row as the triploid watermelon plants (Maynard and Elmstrom, 1992;<br />
NeSmith and Duval, 2001). Spacing of triploid watermelon plants has<br />
an effect on fruit number and size. Closer in-row spacing (eight per 1–<br />
2ft) of seedless cultivars ‘Crimson Jewel’ and ‘Honeyheart’ lowered<br />
the number and individual fruit weight per vine (Motsenbocker and<br />
Arancibia, 2002). <strong>The</strong> rind pattern of the pollenizer and triploid fruit<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 241
must be different so that they can be separated and correctly marketed<br />
(Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997; Rubatzky and Yamaguchi,<br />
1997).<br />
Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) are used to promote pollination and<br />
fruit set of watermelon. Diploid flowers require 6 to 8 bee visits for<br />
fruit set (Adlerz, 1966; Stanghellini et al., 1997). However, fruit set in<br />
triploid watermelons requires over 24 bee visits (Walters, 2005). <strong>The</strong><br />
objectives of this research were to evaluate several commercially sold<br />
diploid cultivars used exclusively for pollination of triploid<br />
watermelons. To evaluate the potential of these cultivars for<br />
pollination purposes, we measured vegetative growth, flower<br />
production, and individual fruit characteristics. <strong>The</strong>se measurements<br />
are important because the pollenizer plant must effectively compete<br />
with but not out-compete triploid-watermelon plant growth in the<br />
production field. Additionally, the amount of flower production is<br />
important with respect to supplying viable pollen to optimize triploid<br />
fruit set. <strong>The</strong> production of female flowers on the diploid pollenizer<br />
plant is important as substantial fruit set may inhibit pollen production<br />
while the fruit must be easily distinguished from triploid fruit.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
<strong>The</strong> study included five commercially available diploid<br />
pollenizers. ‘Companion’, a cultivar marketed by Seminis Seed<br />
Company, was released in 2003 and is sold in the United <strong>State</strong>s.<br />
‘Jenny’ is a cultivar released in 2005 by Nunhems Seed and marketed<br />
worldwide. ‘Mickylee’ is an open-pollinated cultivar available from<br />
many seed distributors, and is often used as a pollenizer in Central<br />
America and Florida. ‘Mini Pool’ was released from Hazera Seed and<br />
is predominately sold and used in Israel. ‘Super Pollenizer 1’ (‘SP1’)<br />
was released by Syngenta in 2004 and is utilized in the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />
and throughout the world.<br />
Cultivars were planted 20 April, 2004, into LE1803 transplant<br />
trays (Landmark Plastics Corp., Akron, OH). Plants were transplanted<br />
17 May, 2004 (27 days after seeding) at the Central Crops Research<br />
Station, Clayton, NC, on black polyethylene mulch. <strong>The</strong> soil type was<br />
a Norfolk loamy sand (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic typic<br />
kandiudults). Each plot had four plants spaced 1.3m in-row and 3.1m<br />
between-row. <strong>The</strong> plots were arranged in a randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />
block design and replicated five times.<br />
Vegetative and floral growth and fruit production were evaluated<br />
for each pollenizer. Vegetative growth was characterized by vine and<br />
internode length. Vine length was measured using a measuring tape,<br />
242 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
from the crown of the plant to the tip of the longest vine on a given<br />
plant. Internode length was measured between the third and fourth<br />
fully expanded leaf on the same vine. Vine and internode length were<br />
collected three, four, and five weeks after transplanting (WAT). Floral<br />
growth was characterized by the number of female and male flowers<br />
produced per plant per date. Male and female flowers were counted on<br />
a weekly basis beginning the 3 rd WAT and ending the 8 th WAT. <strong>The</strong><br />
number of fruit set was counted beginning 3 WAT and concluding 8<br />
WAT. Final fruit weights were measured at time of harvest, 19 July,<br />
2004. Fruit were considered as set when petals had <strong>complete</strong>ly dried<br />
and fallen off a healthy ovary. All data were evaluated using GLM<br />
procedures and means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range<br />
Test.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Plant size was measured by vine and internode length. <strong>The</strong><br />
cultivar ‘Companion’ was the smallest of the pollenizers evaluated<br />
(Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> internodes of ‘Companion’ were the shortest, 3.9cm,<br />
while the other pollenizers had internodes 9.3 to 10.0cm long (Figure<br />
2). ‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini Pool’ produced the longest vines (Figure 1).<br />
‘SP1’ had growth early in the season that was similar to that of<br />
‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini Pool’. However, later in the growing season (5<br />
WAT), ‘SP1’ had a shorter vine (295cm) than ‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini<br />
Pool’ (Figure 1). Although ‘SP1’ vines were not as long as those of<br />
the other pollenizers, we observed that ‘SP1’ had extensive side<br />
branching. <strong>The</strong> cultivars with the longest vines had the greatest<br />
internode length (Figure 2).<br />
Floral growth was characterized by male- and female-flower<br />
production (Figures 3 and 4). ‘SP1’ produced the most male flowers<br />
throughout the experiment, with as many as 40 male flowers per plant<br />
per day by 4 WAT, with male-flower production never falling below<br />
30 (Figure 3). All other cultivars produced fewer male flowers.<br />
‘Companion’ had the same number of male flowers as ‘Jenny’,<br />
‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ 4 and 5 WAT; however, its production<br />
lagged behind that of the other cultivars 6 WAT and thereafter.<br />
‘Companion’ had 13.5 male flowers per plant per day 5 WAT and 5 or<br />
fewer flowers for the remainder of the experiment. In comparison,<br />
‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ produced between 8 and 12<br />
flowers per plant per day 5 WAT.<br />
Of all the pollenizers evaluated, ‘SP1’ produced the most female<br />
flowers, with 3 per plant per day (Figure 4). ‘Companion’ had the<br />
lowest number. ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ produced the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 243
Fig. 1. Vegetative growth of watermelon pollenizers. Length of the longest vine<br />
from three to five weeks after transplanting (WAT). Bars with a different letter<br />
are significantly different for pollenizers tested for a given week (P>.05).<br />
Fig. 2. Vegetative growth of watermelon pollenizers. Length of internode<br />
between the third and fourth internode from the tip, averaged over the season.<br />
Bars with a different letter are significantly different for pollenizers tested for a<br />
given week (P>.05).<br />
same number of female flowers as ‘SP1’ 3 and 4 WAT but produced<br />
fewer after 5 WAT.<br />
‘SP1’ set the most fruit and produced eight fruit per plant by the<br />
end of the season (Figure 5). <strong>The</strong> fruit, however, were the smallest,<br />
10kg (Figure 6). <strong>The</strong> other four cultivars set fruit at similar times.<br />
‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ continued to set additional fruit 7<br />
and 8 WAT, while ‘Companion’ remained at 2 fruits per vine<br />
244 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
(Figure 5). ‘Mickylee’ had the largest fruit, 22.9kg (Figure 6).<br />
At time of harvest, fruit rind pattern was determined for each<br />
cultivar. ‘Companion’ fruit has a ‘Charleston Gray’ rind, a boxy,<br />
blocky oblong shape, and red flesh. ‘Jenny’ is round with distinct dark<br />
green stripes on a light green background and red flesh. ‘Mickylee’<br />
Fig. 3. Floral growth of watermelon pollenizers. Number of male flowers per<br />
plant per day. Points with a different letter are significantly different (P>.05).<br />
z<br />
‘SP1’ is in Group a; ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ are in Group ab;<br />
‘Companion’ is in Group c.<br />
y<br />
‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini Pool’, and ‘Companion’ are in Group b.<br />
Fig. 4. Number of female flowers per plant per day. Points with a different<br />
letter are significantly different (P>.05).<br />
z<br />
‘Jenny’ is in Group b; ‘Mickylee’ and ‘Mini Pool’ are in Group ab;<br />
‘Companion’ is in Group c.<br />
y<br />
All pollenizers are in Group a.<br />
x<br />
‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, ‘Mini Pool’, and ‘Companion’ are in Group b.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 245
Fig. 5. Fruit set on watermelon pollenizer vines from three to eight WAT.<br />
‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ had the same number on all dates except 5<br />
WAT, and are shown on the same line. Points on the lines with a different letter<br />
are significantly different (P>.05).<br />
y<br />
All pollenizers are in Group a.<br />
x<br />
‘Companion’, ‘Jenny’, and ‘Mini Pool’ are in Group ab; ‘Mickylee’ is in<br />
Group b.<br />
z<br />
‘SP1’ is in Group a; ‘Companion’, ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’ are in<br />
Group b.<br />
Fig. 6. <strong>The</strong> weight of individual watermelon at time of harvest.<br />
and ‘Mini Pool’ have round to oval fruit, a ‘Charleston Gray’ rind<br />
pattern, and red flesh. ‘SP1’ is round, with indistinct medium green<br />
stripes on a light green background and white flesh. Its rind is brittle<br />
and can split when very little pressure is applied to the fruit.<br />
Vegetative characteristics of the pollenizers provide some clues as to<br />
how competitive these cultivars will be when grown among triploid<br />
cultivars. <strong>The</strong> dwarf growing habit of ‘Companion’ provides less<br />
competition with triploid plants. However, the dense canopy produced<br />
by its shorter internodes may deter bees from accessing the pollenizer<br />
246 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
flowers and pollinating the triploid flowers. ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and<br />
‘Mini Pool’ had longer vines and a more open growth habit. With<br />
these cultivars, the male flowers could be easily accessed by bees. If<br />
interplanted with the triploid watermelons, the more vigorous vines<br />
might compete more with triploid plants for water and nutrients<br />
thereby reducing triploid fruit set and/or size. This practice would<br />
likely reduce seedless-watermelon yields. If competition is a problem,<br />
it could be minimized by planting the pollenizers in a dedicated hill or<br />
in separate rows from the triploid plants. ‘SP1’ had slightly shorter<br />
vines than ‘Jenny’, ‘Mickylee’, and ‘Mini Pool’; however, the<br />
additional side branching could cause competition with the triploidwatermelon<br />
plants.<br />
In this research, these pollenizers were given optimal space for<br />
light interception, nutrition, and water. <strong>The</strong>y need to be tested and<br />
evaluated further by interplanting them with triploid plants. We are<br />
currently conducting such studies on several pollenizers to determine<br />
their effects of triploid-watermelon production.<br />
<strong>The</strong> production of sufficient male flowers with viable pollen is<br />
important for fruit set in triploid watermelons. ‘Companion’ produces<br />
a comparable number of male flowers to other diploid pollenizers early<br />
in the season; however, the number of male flowers is reduced later in<br />
the season. If this cultivar is used as the pollenizer, triploid plants may<br />
have an earlier fruit set and harvest. An extended harvest season may<br />
be questionable since male-flower production levels were substantially<br />
reduced after fruit set occurred on ‘Companion’ plants. Both ‘Jenny’<br />
and ‘Mini Pool’ hybrids have the same number of male flowers as the<br />
open-pollinated cultivar ‘Mickylee’. <strong>The</strong> high number of ‘SP1’ male<br />
flowers produced throughout the season may result in steady<br />
production of triploid fruit throughout the extended growing season.<br />
<strong>The</strong> characterization of the fruit is important for harvesting. A<br />
large number of unharvestable pollenizer fruit can interfere with<br />
harvest operations in the field, with workers tripping over or stepping<br />
on the fruit. Additionally, pollenizer cultivars must have a distinct<br />
rind pattern if used in a triploid-production field so that they can easily<br />
be distinguished from seedless fruit. This is even more imperative<br />
should miniwatermelons be produced and be of similar size as the<br />
pollenizers.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Adlerz, W. C. 1966. Honey bee visit number and watermelon pollination. J. Econ.<br />
Ent.. 59:28–30.<br />
Kihara, H. 1951. Triploid watermelons. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58:217–230.<br />
Maynard, D. N. and G. W. Elmstrom. 1992. Triploid watermelon production<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 247
practices and varieties. Acta Hort. 318:169–173.<br />
Motsenbocker, C. E. and R. A. Arancibia. 2002. In-row spacing influences triploid<br />
watermelon yield and crop value. HortTech. 12:437–440.<br />
NeSmith, D. S. and J. R. Duval. 2001. Fruit set of triploid watermelons as a<br />
function of distance from a diploid pollinizer. HortSci. 36:60–61.<br />
Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB, New York.<br />
Rubatzky, V. E. and M. Yamaguchi. 1997. World vegetables, 2 nd ed. Chapman &<br />
Hall, New York.<br />
Stanghellini, M. S., J. T. Ambrose, and J. R. Schultheis. 1997. <strong>The</strong> effects of honey<br />
bee and bumble bee pollination on fruit set and abortion of cucumber and<br />
watermelon. Amer. Bee J. 137:386–391.<br />
USDA Economic Research Service. 2005. Vegetables and melons situation and<br />
outlook year<strong>book</strong>/VGS-2005/July 21, 2005: x.<br />
Walters, S. A. 2005. Honey bee pollination requirements for triploid watermelon.<br />
HortSci. 40:1268–1270.<br />
248 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
GALIA MUSKMELON PRODUCTION IN HIGH<br />
TUNNELS IN THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS<br />
USA<br />
Lewis W. Jett<br />
Department of Horticulture, University of Missouri,<br />
Columbia, MO 65211<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>The</strong>rmal water tubes, row covers, transplants,<br />
direct seeding<br />
ABSTRACT. High tunnels are rapidly being adopted as a season-extension<br />
technology for horticulture producers in the Central Great Plains. A distinct<br />
advantage of high tunnels is their use in growing diverse crops that could not<br />
normally be grown in the field environment of the Central Great Plains.<br />
Specialty melons such as Galia muskmelons (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus)<br />
are a high-value, warm-season vegetable that has the potential for early-season<br />
high-tunnel production. Research was conducted in 2004–2005 at the<br />
University of Missouri-Columbia using ‘Galia 152’ muskmelon within passively<br />
vented, solar-heated high tunnels. Transplanting significantly accelerated early<br />
harvest of Galia muskmelons relative to direct seeding within a high tunnel.<br />
When transplanting was combined with the use of thermal water tubes and row<br />
covers, ambient air temperature and early-season yield was significantly<br />
increased. Early-season harvest of quality Galia muskmelons within high<br />
tunnels can be profitable for growers in the Central Great Plains.<br />
H<br />
igh tunnels are a low-cost season-extension technology used<br />
for producing a diversity of horticulture crops (Lamont et al.,<br />
2003). Specifically, high tunnels are passively vented, solar<br />
greenhouses covered with one layer of greenhouse plastic. Crops are<br />
grown directly in the soil beneath the high tunnel, and the only<br />
external connection is the drip irrigation system. In addition to<br />
accelerating crop growth and maturity, high tunnels protect the crop<br />
from a capricious environment where extremes in temperature, wind,<br />
rainfall, pests, and light intensity can severely reduce marketable<br />
yields and quality. Using a high tunnel, crops can be harvested at peak<br />
horticulture maturity over a longer growing season because the crops<br />
are not weakened by insects, weeds, or diseases.<br />
<strong>The</strong> choice of which crops to grow within a high tunnel is based on<br />
market potential, economics, yield per plant, and improved quality<br />
(Waterer, 2003). In a survey of high-tunnel producers in the Central<br />
Great Plains, the dominant crops growers produced within high tunnels<br />
were tomatoes, peppers, salad greens (lettuce, spinach, etc.), and<br />
cucurbits, respectively (Jett and Carey 2006). Most high-tunnel<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 249
producers in the Central Great Plains use high tunnels for 1–2 crops<br />
per year and desire early-season harvest of high-value warm-season<br />
vegetables. Each crop occupies the high tunnel for approximately four<br />
months or one-third of each calendar year. While early-season<br />
tomatoes may be the dominant crop grown within high tunnels in the<br />
Central Great Plains, growers are interested in diversifying their<br />
production with other warm-season crops that can be double-cropped<br />
or rotated with tomatoes and peppers. <strong>The</strong>re is a premium price for<br />
early muskmelons in the Midwest, and many specialty melons are<br />
becoming increasingly popular with consumers (Simon et al., 1993).<br />
Galia muskmelons (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) are greenfleshed<br />
melons with a yellow, netted rind, high soluble solids, and a<br />
robust aroma that are adapted to warm, dry growing environments<br />
(Karchi, 2000). Although not widely found in U.S. markets, they are<br />
very popular in Europe, and production has been evaluated in Florida<br />
within passively vented greenhouses (Cantliffe, et al., 2002). Rainfall<br />
during flowering and fruit formation significantly lowers quality of<br />
Galia melons, and they should be harvested at the vine-ripe stage for<br />
maximum quality (Cantliffe, et al., 2002). Hochmuth et al. (1998)<br />
noted less cracking of Galia muskmelons when grown in protected<br />
culture versus the field in Florida. High tunnels may provide an<br />
optimal environment for growing Galia muskmelons in the Central<br />
Great Plains.<br />
Muskmelons are susceptible to chilling injury at temperatures<br />
between 41–59°F (Mitchell and Madore, 1992). <strong>The</strong>re are several<br />
production practices that are used to protect muskmelons from lowtemperature<br />
stress and to increase early yields. Transplants can<br />
significantly increase early, marketable yield of muskmelons relative<br />
to direct seeding (Wiedenfeld et al., 1990). Spunbonded and perforated<br />
polyethylene row covers used in combination with black plastic mulch<br />
significantly increased early and total marketable yield of muskmelons<br />
(Waterer, 1993; Hemphill and Mansour, 1986; Loy and Wells, 1982;<br />
Wiebe, 1973). Water is a very efficient collector of radiant energy.<br />
Water-filled polyethylene tubes have been shown to reduce<br />
greenhouse heating costs by accumulating energy during the day and<br />
releasing heat during the night time (Pavlou, 1990). <strong>The</strong> use of waterfilled<br />
poly tubes in conjunction with clear plastic mulch and<br />
nonperforated polyethylene row covers significantly increased early<br />
yield of field-grown muskmelon in Quebec, Canada (Jenni et al.,<br />
1998). Many of these techniques have been evaluated in the field<br />
environment but have not been evaluated in concert with a high tunnel.<br />
<strong>The</strong> objective of this research project was to evaluate the production<br />
250 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
and economic potential of early-season Galia muskmelons within a<br />
high tunnel and to determine which combination of season-extension<br />
practices is the most effective in accelerating early harvest in the<br />
Central Great Plains.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
HIGH-TUNNEL STRUCTURES AND PLOT ESTABLISHMENT. Three<br />
freestanding, Quonset high-tunnel units (Stuppy Greenhouse<br />
Manufacturing, Kansas City, MO) were constructed in early March<br />
2002 at the University of Missouri Bradford Research and Extension<br />
Center near Columbia, MO (lat. 90’11” W; long. 38’37” N). Each<br />
high tunnel was covered with a single layer of greenhouse-grade, 6-mil<br />
(0.006-in. thick) polyethylene plastic (K-50, Klerk’s Plastic<br />
Manufactures, Inc., Richburg, SC). <strong>The</strong> dimensions of each high<br />
tunnel were 6m (wide) x 11m (long) x 3.7m (high), with each arch<br />
spaced 1.2m apart. <strong>The</strong> high tunnels were oriented in a north-south<br />
direction with 3m between each high tunnel. Temperature and<br />
humidity were managed by manually rolling up the sidewalls or<br />
removing two end-wall panels from each end of the high tunnel.<br />
Whenever air temperatures inside the high tunnel exceeded 35°C, the<br />
sidewalls were rolled up to lower temperature and humidity.<br />
<strong>The</strong> soil within each high tunnel was a Mexico silt loam with a pH<br />
of 6 that was tilled and formed into raised beds 15cm high x 61cm<br />
wide beginning in mid-March of 2004 and 2005. Each high tunnel<br />
accommodated 5 rows of raised beds on 1.2-m centers. Preplant<br />
fertilizer (13N-5.7P-11K) was top-dressed and incorporated into each<br />
raised bed at a rate of 336g/90 m 2 nitrogen (N), 1120g /90 m 2<br />
potassium (K2O), and 1120g/90m 2 phosphorus (P2O5) (Jett, 2006).<br />
Calcium nitrate (15.5N-0P-0K-19Ca) was fertigated at a rate of<br />
560g/90m 2 /week commencing 2 weeks after seeding or transplanting<br />
and continuing through harvest.<br />
Black embossed plastic mulch (0.9m width) was laid over each<br />
raised bed. Each row was irrigated with one 8-mil (0.008-in.) T-Tape<br />
(T-Systems International, San Diego, CA) plastic drip tube with<br />
drippers spaced on-center 31cm apart. Irrigation was scheduled using<br />
a tensiometer placed 31cm deep in the center of each bed (Jett, 2004).<br />
TRANSPLANTS VERSUS DIRECT SEEDING WITHIN A HIGH TUNNEL.<br />
‘Galia 152’ (Hazera Genetics, El Segundo, CA) was chosen for this<br />
experiment based on performance in cultivar trials (Shaw et al., 2004).<br />
In early February of 2004 and 2005, ‘Galia 152’seeds were planted in<br />
the greenhouse in 72-cell polystyrene trays (Speedling, Sun City, FL)<br />
filled with a moistened soilless mix (Pro-Mix BX, Premier Brands,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 251
Yonkers, NY) and allowed to grow for 6 weeks before transplanting<br />
within each high tunnel. <strong>The</strong> plants were fertilized once per week with<br />
a 20N-8.7P-16.6K (Peter’s 20-20-20 water-soluble fertilizer)<br />
containing 200ppm N. <strong>The</strong> transplants were watered as needed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> minimum temperature for muskmelon seed germination is<br />
16°C (Maynard and Hochmuth, 1997). When the soil temperature at<br />
the 5-cm depth equaled or exceeded this temperature level, the plants<br />
or seeds were planted within the high tunnel. To evaluate direct<br />
seeding within a high tunnel, two seeds of ‘Galia 152’ were handseeded<br />
approximately 1.9cm deep and 61cm apart in 5-cm diameter<br />
planting holes on each raised bed. After emergence, the muskmelons<br />
were thinned to one vigorous seedling per hill. Six-week-old ‘Galia<br />
152’ melon transplants were planted at the same spacing. Both<br />
seeding and transplanting occurred on 30 March 2004 and 2005.<br />
Cultural practices consisted of standard recommendations for growing<br />
melons within a high tunnel (Jett, 2006).<br />
ROW COVERS AND THERMAL WATER BAGS. Immediately after<br />
seeding and transplanting, low tunnels were fashioned using wire<br />
hoops (#9 gauge) covered with two layers of lightweight, spunbonded<br />
polypropylene row cover (AG-19; Agribon Inc., Mooresville, NC).<br />
<strong>The</strong> row covers remained on the plants continuously until anthesis,<br />
defined as the time when the first perfect muskmelon flower was<br />
observed. After anthesis, the row covers were held in reserve in the<br />
event of a frost event.<br />
Water was evaluated as a solar collector that could increase the<br />
microclimate temperature around each muskmelon plant rather than as<br />
a technique to affect the air temperature within the entire high-tunnel<br />
structure. Two 3.8-L Ziploc storage bags (2-mil thickness) holding<br />
3.6kg of water per bag were filled with water and placed on either side<br />
of each planting hole immediately after planting or seeding. Initially a<br />
7.6-cm-diameter polyethylene water tube was used but was discarded<br />
after discovering the tube leaked water and failed to remain stationary<br />
on the raised beds.<br />
To facilitate harvest, the muskmelon vines were trellised using a 2m-high<br />
plastic mesh trellis (Johnnys’ Selected Seeds, Albion, ME)<br />
supported by tensile wire and metal posts. <strong>The</strong> vines were not pruned,<br />
and each lateral was trained or directed to grow on the trellis using<br />
plastic vine clips.<br />
EXPERIMENTAL DATA. Treatments consisted of combinations of<br />
two planting methods, transplanting (TRP) and direct seeding (DS),<br />
with or without spunbonded row covers (RC), and with or without<br />
thermal water bags (WB). Individual plots were one raised bed, 2.4m<br />
252 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
long, containing four muskmelon plants. Treatments were randomized<br />
within each of the three high tunnels.<br />
Replicated air temperature was recorded 46cm above the crop<br />
canopy using Hobo H8 data loggers (Onset Computers, Bourne, MA)<br />
in 2005. Temperature was measured under row covers, (with or<br />
without thermal water bags), within the high tunnel, as well as the<br />
ambient air temperature. Temperature was logged hourly and<br />
averaged to determine average daily temperature.<br />
Since muskmelons require physical transfer of pollen from<br />
staminate to perfect flowers to set fruit, honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)<br />
colonies were placed 300ft from the high tunnels to facilitate<br />
pollination. In 2005, small bumblebee (Bombus impatiens Cresson)<br />
colonies (Koppert Biological Systems, Ann Arbor, MI) containing<br />
approximately 150 bees per colony were placed within each high<br />
tunnel on 10 April to aid in pollination after it was determined<br />
honeybees were not entering the high tunnels in sufficient numbers to<br />
pollinate early, perfect flowers in 2004.<br />
Thirty days after flowering, most muskmelons hanging on the<br />
trellis were supported with mesh onion sacks cradled around the fruit<br />
and secured to the trellis. Fruits were harvested at full slip twice per<br />
week and individually weighed beginning 22 June 2004 and 15 June<br />
2005. Fruits weighing less than 0.9kg were categorized as<br />
unmarketable. Harvest continued until 31 July of each year.<br />
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. <strong>The</strong> experiment was a randomized<br />
<strong>complete</strong> block design with three blocks (high tunnels). Data were<br />
analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and orthogonal<br />
contrasts (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
EFFECT ON AIR TEMPERATURE. Throughout most of the vegetative<br />
growth in 2005, high tunnels maintained an average temperature of<br />
15.8°C compared with an outside temperature of 11.7°C. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
temperatures are consistent with research conducted at Penn <strong>State</strong><br />
where the average temperature difference between a single-layer<br />
plastic high tunnel and the outside was 4.3°C (Lamont, et al., 2003).<br />
<strong>The</strong> addition of two layers of row covers increased the average<br />
microclimate temperature by 2.7°C (18.5°C), while row covers<br />
combined with thermal water bags increased the microclimate<br />
temperature by 3.3°C (19.1°C). Photosynthesis and anthesis of Galia<br />
muskmelons is reduced when temperatures decrease below 18.3°C (D.<br />
Cantliffe, personal communication).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 253
High tunnels alone generally don’t provide significant frost<br />
protection but may protect against chilling temperatures. Minimum<br />
temperatures within a high tunnel eventually equilibrate with the<br />
outside temperature, as was observed in Kansas during March (Kadir,<br />
et al., 2006). Ambient temperatures did not decrease below 0°C in<br />
2004. However, on 24 April 2005 a frost event occurred, and the air<br />
temperature within the high tunnel was < 0°C for 5h and < 5°C for<br />
11h. Muskmelons with only a row cover had microclimate<br />
temperatures
Table 1. Marketable yield of Galia muskmelons grown within a high<br />
tunnel combined with inputs to accelerate harvest.<br />
Early yield Total marketable yield<br />
fruits/plant kg/plant fruits/plant kg/plant<br />
Treatment z<br />
2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005<br />
DS 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.6 2.0 1.9 2.0 3.8<br />
DS+RC 0.2 0.6 0.4 1.1 1.5 0.8 2.9 1.4<br />
DS+WB 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.9 1.3 5.8 2.4<br />
DS+WB+RC 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.7 2.1 1.0<br />
TRP 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.8 1.8 2.3 3.6 3.8<br />
TRP+ RC 0.2 0.8 0.3 1.7 1.9 2.0 3.2 3.6<br />
TRP+WB 0.3 1.0 0.4 1.7 2.7 1.9 4.4 3.2<br />
TRP+WB+RC<br />
Treatments y<br />
0.5 2.7 1.0 4.4 3.8 3.2 6.9 5.3<br />
Orthogonal<br />
contrasts<br />
NS ** NS ** ** ** ** **<br />
TRP vs. DS<br />
TRP+WB+RC<br />
NS ** NS ** ** ** ** **<br />
vs. TRP NS ** NS ** NS NS NS NS<br />
WB vs. NWB NS NS NS NS NS NS ** NS<br />
RC vs. NRC NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
z<br />
TRP = Transplanted; DS = Direct Seeded; RC = Row cover; WB = (<strong>The</strong>rmal) water<br />
bag.<br />
y<br />
Significant at P ≤ 0.05.<br />
marketable yield. Plants that had only thermal water bags showed no<br />
signs of chilling injury relative to the controls (data not shown).<br />
EFFECT ON TOTAL MARKETABLE YIELD. Fruit quality was<br />
excellent, with most melons averaging 14° brix regardless of<br />
treatment. Due to the longer harvest period, transplanted melons had a<br />
significantly higher total-season yield in both years of this study.<br />
Direct-seeded Galia muskmelons averaged 1.2–1.9 melons per plant<br />
while transplanted muskmelons averaged 2.4–2.6 melons per plant.<br />
Despite earlier flowering and harvest of transplanted melons, average<br />
fruit mass did not differ with planting method. In both years, fruit<br />
mass averaged 1.7kg across all treatments.<br />
In a commercial high tunnel, which is typically 225m 2 ,<br />
approximately 300 muskmelon plants can be planted. If each plant<br />
yielded three marketable fruits, 900 Galia muskmelons can be<br />
harvested per high tunnel. In 2004, inadequate pollination delayed<br />
early fruit set on transplanted Galia melons with row cover and<br />
thermal water bags. Transplanted melons produced only 20–25% of<br />
their total yield before early July in 2004, but in 2005, more than 50%<br />
of the total yield was early. Given adequate density of pollinators in<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 255
2005, 86% of the total marketable yield of transplanted melons with<br />
row cover and thermal water bags was harvested before 4 July.<br />
Galia muskmelons are a potentially profitable warm-season crop<br />
for high-tunnel production in the Central Great Plains. Galia<br />
muskmelons can be rotated or double- cropped with popular hightunnel<br />
vegetables such as tomatoes, peppers, and lettuces. Production<br />
practices that increase microclimate temperature and early growth,<br />
such as using transplants, row covers, and thermal water bags, will<br />
increase both early and total marketable yield. <strong>The</strong> increased yields<br />
will offset the increase in production costs. Wholesale prices may not<br />
be high enough for a significant profit to occur. Most high-tunnel<br />
producers in the Central Great Plains market their produce via local<br />
farmers’ markets where a price premium for vine-ripe early<br />
muskmelons may be attained. In addition, high tunnels enable Galia<br />
melons to be grown using fewer pesticides, which may further increase<br />
the price premium.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Cantliffe, D. J., N. L. Shaw, and E. Jovicich. 2002. New vegetable crops for<br />
greenhouses in the southeastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Acta Hort. 633.<br />
Hemphill, D. D. and N. S. Mansour. 1986. Response of muskmelon to three<br />
floating row covers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:513–517.<br />
Hochmuth, G. J., D. J. Cantliffe, Z. Karchi, and I. Secker. 1998. <strong>The</strong> plasticulture<br />
research and demonstration project in Florida. Proc. Intl. Cong. Plastics in<br />
Agric. Tel Aviv, Israel. 163–170.<br />
Jenni, S., K. A. Stewart, D. C. Cloutier, and G. Bourgeois. 1998. Chilling injury<br />
and yield of muskmelon grown with plastic mulches, rowcovers and thermal<br />
water tubes. HortSci. 33:215–221.<br />
Jett, L. W. 2004. High Tunnel Tomato Production Guide. University of Missouri<br />
Extension Publication M170.<br />
Jett, L. W. 2006. High tunnel melon and watermelon guide. University of Missouri<br />
Extension Publication M173.<br />
Jett, L. W. and E. Carey. 2006. High tunnel survey results.<br />
.<br />
Kadir, S., E. Carey, and S. Ennahli. 2006. Influence of high tunnel and field<br />
conditions on strawberry growth and development. HortSci. 41:329–335.<br />
Karchi, Z. 2000. Development of melon culture and breeding in Israel. Acta Hort.<br />
510:13–17.<br />
Lamont, W. J., M. Orzolek, E. Holcomb, K. Demchak, E. Burkhart, L. White, and B.<br />
Dye. 2003. Production system for horticulture crops grown in the Penn <strong>State</strong><br />
high tunnel. HortTech. 13:358–362.<br />
Loy, J. B. and O. S. Wells. 1982. A comparison of slitted polyethylene and<br />
spunbonded polyester for plant row covers. HortSci. 17:405–407.<br />
Maynard, D. N. and G. J. Hochmuth. 1997. Knott’s hand<strong>book</strong> for vegetable<br />
growers. 4 th ed. Wiley, New York.<br />
256 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Mitchell, D. E. and M. A. Madore. 1992. Patterns of assimilate production and<br />
translocation in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) II. Low temperature effects.<br />
Plant Physiol. 99:966–971.<br />
Pavlou, G. 1990. Evaluation of thermal performance of water-filled polyethylene<br />
tubes used for passive solar greenhouse heating. Acta Hort. 287:89–97.<br />
Shaw, N. L., D. Cantliffe, J. Rodriguez, and C. Shine. 2004. Economic feasibility of<br />
producing Galia muskmelons in passive ventilated greenhouses and soilless<br />
culture in north central Florida. Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 117:38–42.<br />
Simon, J. E., M. R. Morales, and D. J. Charles. 1993. Specialty melons for the fresh<br />
market, p. 547–553. In: J. Janick and J. E. Simon (eds.). New crops. Wiley,<br />
New York.<br />
Waterer, D. R. 1993. Influence of planting date and row covers on yield and<br />
economic value of muskmelons. Can J. Plant Sci. 73:281–288.<br />
Waterer, D. R. 2003. Yield and economics of high tunnels for production of warmseason<br />
vegetable crops. HortTech. 13:339–343.<br />
Wiebe, J. 1973. Tunnel covers and mulches for muskmelon production. Can. J.<br />
Plant Sci. 53:157–160.<br />
Wiedenfeld, R., R. Hinojosa and R. Stubblefield. 1990. Plant method, ground cover<br />
and irrigation level effects on muskmelon production. HortSci. 25:863.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 257
A COMPARISON OF NOVEL GRAFTING<br />
METHODS FOR WATERMELON IN HIGH-<br />
WIND AREAS<br />
Stephen R. King<br />
Vegetable & Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural<br />
Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-2133<br />
Angela R. Davis<br />
USDA, ARS, South Central Agriculture Research Laboratory, P.O.<br />
Box 159, Lane, OK 74555<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus<br />
ABSTRACT. Grafted watermelon transplants are not commonly used by growers<br />
in the U.S., despite the advantages associated with their use. <strong>The</strong> two major<br />
disadvantages of using grafted watermelons are the high cost associated with<br />
performing the graft, and the potential for increased transplant losses,<br />
particularly under high-wind conditions. We found that modifying the grafting<br />
techniques to provide additional support to the graft union resulted in<br />
nonsignificant increases in transplant survivors one week after transplanting<br />
compared to a nonsupported grafting technique. <strong>The</strong> effort required for the<br />
modifications was slightly increased for the tube-supported method, and slightly<br />
decreased for the toothpick-supported method. More study is needed to identify<br />
grafting modifications that will reduce costs and increase transplant<br />
survivability under high-wind conditions.<br />
G<br />
rafting of watermelon to various rootstocks is a common<br />
practice in many parts of the world but, despite the reported<br />
advantages, such as resistance to soil-borne diseases and<br />
increased water-use efficiency, the practice is not common in the U.S.<br />
<strong>The</strong> use of rootstocks has been shown to enhance the vigor of the scion<br />
through avoidance of soil pathogens, tolerance of low soil<br />
temperatures and/or salinity, and increased scavenging of soil nutrients<br />
(Ruiz et al., 1997). <strong>The</strong> type of rootstock has been shown to affect<br />
watermelon plant growth and yields (Yetisir and Sari, 2003). Yetisir<br />
and Sari (2004) demonstrated that the survival rate of grafted plants<br />
was inversely correlated with the difference in diameters of scion and<br />
rootstock; although they could not show that survival rate was affected<br />
by the number of vascular bundles, the number of vascular bundles<br />
positively affected the growth rate of the grafted watermelon plants.<br />
Edelstein et al. (2004) showed that stem diameter and number of<br />
vascular bundles of the rootstock did not correlate with scion-plant<br />
fresh weight for C. melo scions and 22 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp. rootstocks.<br />
258 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Increases in soil-borne pathogens accompanied by the loss of<br />
effective pesticides such as methyl bromide may necessitate the use of<br />
alternative forms of disease control, such as the use of disease-resistant<br />
rootstocks. Other advantages, such as increased water-use efficiency<br />
and tolerance to salt and/or low temperatures, that may accompany the<br />
use of grafted watermelon would most likely speed acceptance of<br />
grafting in the U.S. One disadvantage that has been observed by<br />
growers in the U.S. is a higher mortality of grafted watermelon plants<br />
when transplants are subjected to high winds shortly after<br />
transplanting. It is suspected that the graft union is more susceptible to<br />
breakage under high-wind conditions. Despite the potential benefits of<br />
using grafted watermelon, little research has been done in the U.S. on<br />
local cultivars utilizing local cultural practices. <strong>The</strong> purpose of this<br />
research was to investigate the potential of various grafting procedures<br />
for establishing local diploid and triploid cultivars in the field using<br />
different rootstocks under established growing conditions that include<br />
high wind shortly after transplanting.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL. Scions included ‘Royal Sweet’ (diploid<br />
watermelon), ‘Sugar Time,’ ‘Super Seedless 7167’, and ‘Tri-X 313’<br />
(triploid watermelons). Rootstocks used included ‘Strongtosa’ (an<br />
interspecific hybrid between <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima and C. moschata),<br />
‘Destiny III’ (C. pepo), ‘Red Kuri’ (C. maxima), ‘Long Island Cheese’<br />
(C. moschata), ‘Musque de Provence’ (C. moschata), ‘Rouge vif<br />
D’etampes’ (C. maxima), and ‘Birdhouse’ (Lagenaria siceraria).<br />
Seeds were sown into flats with individual cell sizes of 4.4cm x 3.8cm<br />
x 6cm deep (1006 X-Line insert, BWI, Shulenberg, TX) filled with<br />
Pro-Mix PGX germination medium (Premier Horticulture, Dorval,<br />
We would like to thank Anthony Dillard, Amy Helms, and Ashley Gammon for<br />
providing valuable technical support. Special thanks go to Tom Williams, and Glen<br />
Price for supplied seed. Partial funding was provided by USDA-CSREES grant<br />
2004-34402-14768. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is<br />
solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply<br />
recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All<br />
programs and services of the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a<br />
nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex,<br />
age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA employee<br />
as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not<br />
available for such works. Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />
the private publication in which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not<br />
affect the material of the U.S. Government, which can be freely reproduced by the<br />
public.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 259
QC, Canada) or into 3.8cm square x 6.3cm deep Speedling flats<br />
(#F128A, Speedling, Inc., Sun City, FL) containing Redi-earth growth<br />
medium (SunGro, Vancouver, BC, Canada). <strong>The</strong> watermelon cultivars<br />
were sown approximately 7days prior to sowing the rootstock, except<br />
for ‘Destiny III’, which was sown on the same day as the watermelon.<br />
All watermelon and‘Destiny III’ squash plants were approximately 4w<br />
old at time of grafting, and the remaining rootstocks were<br />
approximately 3weeks old.<br />
Fig. 1. Tube-grafting method as described in text. Tube is placed over rootstock<br />
and scion is inserted into tubing (A, B). A binder clip holds the tube in place for<br />
ca. 72 hours (C). <strong>The</strong> tube is left in place at transplanting.<br />
TUBE-MODIFIED SLANT-CUT METHOD AT COLLEGE STATION,<br />
TX. Scions were grafted using modifications of the slant-cut method.<br />
<strong>The</strong> slant-cut method incorporated the use of 0.64-cm vinyl tubing cut<br />
into approximately 2-cm lengths and slit lengthwise, and then inserting<br />
the rootstock and scion into the tubing, which was held in place with<br />
¾”-wide binder clips (Figure 1). ‘Super Seedless 7167’ and ‘Tri-X<br />
313’ were grafted onto ‘Destiny III’, ‘Red Kuri’, ‘Long Island<br />
Cheese’, ‘Musque de Provence’, ‘Rouge vif D’etampes’, and<br />
‘Birdhouse’ using the vinyl-tubing method. Grafted plants were placed<br />
in flats covered with clear plastic domes for approximately 48h in the<br />
greenhouse, when the domes were removed and plants were left in the<br />
greenhouse. <strong>The</strong> binder clips were removed after approximately 72h,<br />
but the vinyl tubing was left in place, with the slit allowing for stem<br />
expansion. Temperatures ranged from a high of 28 o C to a low of 20 o C.<br />
Survivability counts were taken prior to transplanting in the field, and<br />
at 3 days and 7 days after transplanting. Seedlings were fieldtransplanted<br />
into raised beds covered with black plastic mulch and drip<br />
irrigation 2 weeks after grafting in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block<br />
design with two replications in a serpentine arrangement. Beds were<br />
200cm apart and plant spacing was 90cm. <strong>The</strong> field soil was Robco<br />
loamy fine sand. <strong>The</strong>re were no windbreaks in the field.<br />
260 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
TONGUE-AND-GROOVE METHOD AT LANE, OK. Scions were<br />
grafted using the tongue-and-groove method with or without the aid of<br />
a wooden pin. <strong>The</strong> tongue-and-groove method involved cutting a slit<br />
in the rootstock and sharpening the scion to fit the groove made in the<br />
rootstock. Clamps were unavailable, so the two were held together<br />
either with Parafilm or with a toothpick inserted into both the scion<br />
and rootstock to align the two and then Parafilm (Figure 2).<br />
Fig. 2. <strong>The</strong> toothpick-modified tongue-and-groove procedure. A groove is made<br />
in the rootstock and a tongue is made in the scion to fit the groove. For the<br />
modification, a toothpick is inserted into the rootstock and the scion inserted<br />
into the toothpick (A) and pressed down to make contact with the rootstock.<br />
<strong>The</strong> nonmodified method uses Parafilm to hold the graft in place.<br />
‘Royal Sweet’ and ‘Sugar Time’ were grafted onto the<br />
‘Strongtosa’ rootstock. Grafted plants were placed in flats and were<br />
placed in a warm environment for 48h. Temperatures ranged from<br />
23°C to 28°C, but the environment was not sufficiently humid and we<br />
had a high loss of plants early. Seedlings were planted in the field<br />
3weeks later in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design with four<br />
replications in a serpentine arrangement. <strong>The</strong> field had Bernow fineloamy,<br />
siliceous, thermic, glossic palendalf soil. <strong>The</strong>re were no<br />
windbreaks in the field. Survivability counts were taken prior to<br />
transplanting in the field, and at 3 days and 7 days after transplanting.<br />
STATISTICS. Means were calculated for grafting frequency by<br />
dividing the number of graft attempts by successful grafts (prior to<br />
transplanting) for each variety and method, and 7-day-survival<br />
frequencies were calculated by dividing the number of transplants<br />
surviving after 10 days by the number of transplants for each variety.<br />
Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (Cary, NC).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 261
Results<br />
TUBE-MODIFIED SLANT-CUT METHOD. It was hoped that the tube<br />
method would speed the grafting procedure by not using clips;<br />
however, it was found that for most grafts, a clip was needed to<br />
support the scion on the rootstock, which resulted in an increase in<br />
time compared to using the clips alone. Survivability counts showed<br />
that grafting efficiency prior to transplant ranged from a low of 25% to<br />
a high of 42% (Table 1). Stand counts 7 days after transplanting<br />
showed a survival range from 78 to 84%, which was significantly<br />
reduced from the 7-day transplant survival of the nongrafted control<br />
plants. <strong>The</strong> primary cause of this reduction appeared to be breakage<br />
and/or tissue tearing at the graft union. Wind conditions in College<br />
Table 1. Comparison of grafting frequency and 7-day transplant<br />
survival frequency for cultivars and grafting methods.<br />
Grafting<br />
7-daysurvival<br />
Location Variety<br />
Tri-X<br />
Rootstock Method N Frequency frequency<br />
Texas 313<br />
Tri-X<br />
Multiple Tube 36 0.42 0.78<br />
Texas 313 None Nongrafted 12 NA 1.00<br />
Texas S.S.7167 Multiple Tube 36 0.25 0.84<br />
Texas S.S.7167 None<br />
Royal<br />
Nongraftedf 12 NA 1.00<br />
Oklahoma Sweet<br />
Royal<br />
Strongtosa Parafilm 75 0.35 0.83<br />
Oklahoma Sweet<br />
Royal<br />
Strongtosa Toothpick 0 0.83<br />
Oklahoma Sweet<br />
Sugar<br />
None Nongrafted 33 NA 1.00<br />
Oklahoma Time<br />
Sugar<br />
Strongtosa Parafilm 75 0.40 0.70<br />
Oklahoma Time<br />
Sugar<br />
Strongtosa Toothpick 75 0.39 0.73<br />
Oklahoma Time None Nongrafted 33 NA 0.98<br />
*Grafting frequency = successful grafts/attempted grafts. <strong>The</strong>re were no significant<br />
differences at the P0.5 level of probability.<br />
**Frequency of plants surviving 7 days after transplanting.<br />
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P0.5 level of<br />
probablilty.<br />
262 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Station following transplanting ranged from a daily high of 13mph to<br />
32mph, with maximum gusts of 37mph (Table 2).<br />
TONGUE-AND-GROOVE METHOD. <strong>The</strong> toothpick modification of<br />
the tongue-and-groove method did speed grafting compared to the<br />
nonmodified method because the toothpick provided sufficient<br />
support. Survivability of the tongue-and-groove and toothpickmodified<br />
tongue-and-groove method were similar, ranging from 33 to<br />
40% success (Table 1), which indicates that the toothpick modification<br />
did not hinder the healing process. <strong>The</strong> two methods were also similar<br />
for transplant survival after 7 days, with a range from 70 to 83%,<br />
which was significantly reduced when compared to the 7-day survival<br />
of nongrafted plants. <strong>The</strong> primary cause of transplant loss appeared to<br />
be tissue breakage at the graft union. Wind conditions in Lane<br />
following transplanting ranged from a daily high of 9 to 25mph with<br />
maximum gusts of 32 mph (Table 2).<br />
COMPARISON OF THE METHODS. While the different methods were<br />
used on different rootstocks and varieties at different locations,<br />
statistical analysis showed no significant interactions among variety,<br />
rootstock, or location (data not shown). A comparison of the methods<br />
showed no significant differences (Table 3). All methods did have a<br />
lower 7-day transplant survival than the nongrafted control, but the<br />
range was still fairly high at 77 to 81%. <strong>The</strong> primary cause of<br />
transplant loss at both locations appeared to be tissue breakage at the<br />
graft union. Wind conditions were similar at both locations, with gusts<br />
in the 30+mph range.<br />
Table 2. Wind-speed weather data for the two locations for 7 days<br />
following transplanting.<br />
College Station, TX Lane, OK<br />
Days after Average Gust Average Gust<br />
transplant (mph) (mph) (mph) (mph)<br />
0 10 33 5 18<br />
1 10 26 8 27<br />
2 8 17 5 32<br />
3 14 35 9 22<br />
4 11 37 8 19<br />
5 6 16 9 20<br />
6 11 24 8 21<br />
7 11 23 7 24<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 263
Table 3. Grafting frequency and 7-day-survival frequency of the<br />
transplant methods.<br />
Grafting 7-day-survival<br />
Grafting method* frequency** frequency***<br />
Control NA 0.99<br />
Tube 0.40 0.81<br />
Toothpick 0.36 0.79<br />
Parafilm 037 0.77<br />
*Grafting methods described in text. **Successful grafts/attempted grafts. All<br />
frequencies n.s. at the P0.5 level of probability.<br />
***Frequency of plants surviving 7 days after transplanting.<br />
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P0.5 level of<br />
probability.<br />
Discussion<br />
This study showed that the grafting modifications we used result in<br />
survival frequencies similar to those of conventional grafting methods.<br />
<strong>The</strong> goals of any grafting modifications should be to reduce input costs<br />
and increase survivability in the field. <strong>The</strong> stabilized grafting methods<br />
did not show a marked increase in survivability, but the toothpick<br />
method did decrease the amount of time required to make the grafts,<br />
which will result in lower costs. <strong>The</strong> tube method did not reduce<br />
grafting time because of the need to clip the plants, but further<br />
investigation may reduce the need for the clip, which may reduce<br />
grafting time. Further study is needed to dertermine whether the added<br />
graft-union support afforded by the tube-modified and/or toothpickmodified<br />
grafting methods will result in increased survival of grafted<br />
watermelon plants under high-wind conditions.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Edelstein, M., Y. Burger, C. Horev, A. Porat, A. Meir, and R. Cohen. 2004.<br />
Assessing the effect of genetic and anatomic variation of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a rootstocks<br />
on vigour, survival and yield of grafted melons. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 79:370–<br />
374.<br />
Lee, J. M. and M. Oda. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetables and ornamental<br />
plants. Hort. Rev. 28:61–124.<br />
Ruiz, J. M., A. Belakbir, I. Lopez-Cantarero, and L. Romero. 1997. Leafmacronutrient<br />
content and yield in grafted melon plants. a model to evaluate the<br />
influence of rootstock genotype. Sci. Hort. 71:227–234.<br />
Yetisir, H. and N. Sari. 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield and<br />
quality of watermelon. Austral. J. Expt. Agr. 43:1269–1274.<br />
Yetisir, H. and N. Sari. 2004. Effect of hypocotyl morphology on survival rate and<br />
growth of watermelon seedlings grafted on rootstocks with different emergence<br />
performance at various temperatures. Turkish J. Agric. & For. 28:231–237.<br />
264 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
CUCURBITS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN<br />
NORTH CAROLINA<br />
Jonathan R. Schultheis<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Department of Horticultural Science,<br />
Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Acreage, cucumber, Cucumis sativus, melon,<br />
Cucumis melo, pumpkin, squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata, watermelon, Citrullus lanatus, dollar value<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> agriculture is very diversified, accounts for 22% of<br />
the state’s income, and employs 20% of its work force. Net farm income<br />
accounts for $2 billion, while annual vegetable farm-gate value is approximately<br />
$300 million, with cucurbits accounting for approximately $60 million. In the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the second largest state producer of pickling<br />
cucumber, fourth in fresh market cucumber, sixth in muskmelon, and seventh<br />
in watermelon. It is a leading state when it comes to the production, marketing,<br />
and research of traditionally grown cucurbits as well as in the development and<br />
marketing of new or specialty cucurbit crops.<br />
W<br />
orldwide, cucurbits have always been of importance to<br />
mankind. <strong>The</strong>y have been used in a variety of ways;<br />
utensils, sponges, filters, musical instruments, and<br />
especially for food and fiber (Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997).<br />
Many of the cucurbits contain needed dietary components that are rich<br />
in vitamins A and C. Squashes (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.) and melons (Cucumis<br />
melo) are especially rich in vitamin A and/or C (Rubatzky and<br />
Yamaguchi, 1997). Other cucurbits, such as certain watermelon<br />
cultivars, have recently been documented to be a rich source of<br />
lycopene (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2001), an antioxidant that purportedly<br />
reduces cancer (Sies and Stahl, 1998). <strong>The</strong> diversity of cucurbits is<br />
large and various regions in the world have certain crop types that are<br />
more commonly grown and consumed (Robinson and Decker-Walters,<br />
1997). In the United <strong>State</strong>s (US), some of the most commonly grown<br />
and/or consumed cucurbits are fresh market and processing cucumbers<br />
(Cucumis sativus), various kinds of winter squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.) (i.e,<br />
acorn, butternut, Hubbard, kabocha) and summer squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
pepo) (yellow and zucchini), melons [primarily muskmelon (Cucumis<br />
melo var. reticulata) and honeydew (Cucumis melo var. inoderous)],<br />
pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Other<br />
minor cucurbit crops are grown and sold in the US. New cucurbit<br />
crops continue to be discovered, grown, and markets developed. A<br />
review of cucurbit production worldwide and in the US was given<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 265
during <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002 in Naples, Florida (Taylor and Brant,<br />
2002). <strong>The</strong> purpose of this manuscript is to give some perspective of<br />
the importance of the role that cucurbits have in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (NC)<br />
horticulture with respect to the state’s agricultural economy and<br />
compared with US production.<br />
Discussion<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> has a diversified agriculture industry. <strong>The</strong> industry<br />
accounts for 22 percent of the state's income, and employs over 20<br />
percent of the work force (http://www.ncagr.com/stats/general/<br />
general.htm). This includes food production, fiber, and forestry, which<br />
contribute $62.6 billion annually to the state's economy.<br />
Approximately 56,000 farmers grow over 80 different commodities.<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> produces more tobacco and sweetpotatoes than any<br />
other US state and ranks second in the production of hogs, turkeys,<br />
Christmas trees, trout, and pickling cucumbers. <strong>The</strong> state ranks sixth<br />
nationally with respect to farm profits. Net farm income for the state<br />
is over $2 billion, while net income per farm in the state is over<br />
$36,000.<br />
In NC, the vegetable industry makes up an important part of the<br />
agricultural industry, with farm-gate values totaling about $308<br />
million in 2003 (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and<br />
Consumer Sciences, 2004). Key vegetable crops produced within the<br />
state of <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> in which reported values are more than $5<br />
million are: bell pepper (Capsicum annuum), cabbage (Brassica<br />
oleracea var. capitata), cucumbers, potato (Solanum tuberosum), snap<br />
beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), sweet corn (Zea<br />
mays var. rugosa), sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas), tomato<br />
(Lycopersicon esculentum L.), and watermelon.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are approximately 2,550 commercial farmers who grow<br />
vegetables in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (U.S. Department of Agriclture, 2002).<br />
Individual farms range from one hectare up to a thousand hectares, and<br />
produce is marketed locally, nationally, and internationally. In the last<br />
10 years, decreasing revenues due to lower profit margins on federally<br />
subsidized crops such as corn, soybeans, cotton, and tobacco have<br />
stimulated NC growers to look for more profitable alternative<br />
agricultural enterprises. In some cases, this includes vegetables.<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the largest US producer of sweetpotatoes,<br />
growing about 17,000 hectares valued at nearly $85.3 million in 2003<br />
and accounting for 37% of the national production (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 2004, 2005).<br />
266 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
<strong>The</strong> second highest value vegetable crop to NC is cucumber at<br />
$30.7 million (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and<br />
Consumer Services, 2004; Table 1). Thus, cucumber is the most<br />
important cucurbit crop with respect to farm-gate value and acreage in<br />
NC. <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the second largest US producer of pickling<br />
cucumbers, growing about 6883 hectares valued at $19.4 million in<br />
2004 (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer<br />
Services, 2004). Two large pickling cucumber-processing companies,<br />
Mt. Olive Pickle Company (Mt. Olive, NC) and Bay Valley Foods<br />
(Faison, NC), are located less than 15km apart in eastern NC. Labor<br />
has until recent years generally been quite adequate for hand-harvest<br />
operations. <strong>The</strong> availability and accessibility of migrant labor,<br />
primarily from Mexico, has been reduced and may not be available<br />
pending legislation at the national level that may further restrict or<br />
eliminate the accessibility of Mexican workers into the US. It is<br />
interesting to note that Michigan, number one producing state of<br />
pickling cucumbers, hand-harvested all their production acreage in<br />
1964 (Motes, 1977). By 1972, over 90% of its pickling-cucumber<br />
acreage was once-over machine-harvested. A similar scenario may<br />
occur in NC as less than five years ago, there were few acres that were<br />
once-over machine-harvested. Currently, in 2006, about one-third of<br />
NC's pickling-cucumber acreage is once-over machine-harvested. It is<br />
possible that most pickling-cucumber acreage will be machineharvested<br />
by 2010 in NC. All of NC’s pickling-cucumber production<br />
is in the eastern part of the state due to its large, flat expanses of land<br />
that are typically composed of a sandy loam soil and conducive for<br />
pickling-cucumber production (Schultheis et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong>re is a<br />
state growers association, the NC Pickle Producers Association, which<br />
promotes and supports various research and marketing efforts related<br />
to pickling cucumbers.<br />
In NC, “slicer” cucumbers were planted on an additional 2834<br />
hectares for fresh market, placing it fourth nationally in area planted,<br />
with the value of production totaling $11.3 million in 2003 (<strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences, 2004;<br />
Table 1). Fresh market cucumbers are produced both on bare ground<br />
and on plasticulture (black polyethylene mulch and drip irrigation)<br />
(Schultheis et al., 1998). All fresh market cucumbers are handharvested.<br />
Important production areas are located in both eastern and<br />
western <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. In 2002, there were nearly 700 commercial<br />
growers who produced either fresh market or processing cucumbers in<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2002). <strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University has the only national public breeding<br />
program for both slicing and pickling cucumbers.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 267
Following cucumbers, the cucurbit that is most widely produced in<br />
NC is watermelon (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and<br />
Consumer Services, 2004). <strong>The</strong> land devoted to watermelon<br />
production in NC from 1994 to 2004 has ranged from 3238 to 4615<br />
hectares (Arney et al., 2006). <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the seventh leading<br />
state with respect to watermelon production and value compared with<br />
other US producing states (Table 1). <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> primarily<br />
produces red-flesh, seedless watermelon since market demand has<br />
shifted away from seeded, red-flesh cultivars (U.S. Department of<br />
Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2005). NC also produces<br />
and sells specialty watermelon melon types: yellow-flesh, orangeflesh,<br />
and miniwatermelons. Marketing and production of<br />
watermelons is supported by a growers' association (the <strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> Watermelon Association), <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
and the <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer<br />
Services. <strong>The</strong> 2004 watermelon crop was valued at $6.3 million<br />
(Arney et al., 2006).<br />
In 2004, summer squash was reportedly grown on over 1,500<br />
hectares in NC and valued at $8.4 million (<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department<br />
of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 2004; Table 1). This reference<br />
report accounts for only summer squash, which includes the yellow<br />
straightneck and crookneck types and zucchini. <strong>The</strong>re are many<br />
winter squashes that are grown in NC for which no published statistics<br />
are kept. <strong>The</strong>se winter types include butternut, acorn, spaghetti,<br />
cushaw, and kabocha. <strong>The</strong> summer squash types are marketed<br />
nationally, mainly along the east coast, while most of the winter<br />
squash types are sold in more localized markets.<br />
Pumpkins are grown across the state of NC. In 2002,<br />
approximately 280 farms produced pumpkins valued at $2.7 million<br />
(Table 1) on a total of 540 hectares (U.S. Department of Agriculture,<br />
2002). Pumpkins are grown primarily for decorative/display purposes.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fruit are used to adorn the home and festivals and are one<br />
indicator that the autumn season has arrived. In addition, the primary<br />
use of pumpkins by US citizens is as jack o’lanterns. Jack o’lanterns<br />
are used for display or are carved at Halloween. <strong>The</strong> primary specie<br />
used for jack o’lanterns is <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. C. maxima and C.<br />
moschata are also used, but to a lesser extent.<br />
<strong>The</strong> primary melon produced in NC is muskmelon. Muskmelon<br />
(Cucumis melo var. reticulatus), commonly referred to in the US as<br />
cantaloupe, was produced by over 600 NC growers on approximately<br />
1100 hectares and valued at approximately $15 million in 2002 (U.S.<br />
Department of Agriculture, 2002; Table 1). <strong>The</strong> primary cultivar<br />
grown in NC and throughout the southeastern US is ‘Athena’. Most<br />
268 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Production of cucurbits in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> in comparison with<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s production. Z<br />
Crop<br />
genera &<br />
species<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> United <strong>State</strong>s<br />
Rank<br />
in<br />
value<br />
among<br />
US<br />
states<br />
Hectares<br />
planted<br />
Farmgate<br />
value<br />
(in<br />
millions<br />
$US)<br />
Hectares<br />
planted<br />
Farmgate<br />
value<br />
(in<br />
millions<br />
$US)<br />
Cucumbers Cucumis sativus<br />
Fresh 4 2834 11.3 47,085 157.1<br />
Processing 2 6883 19.4 22,741 212.7<br />
Muskmelon Cucumis melo var. reticulatus<br />
6 1133 15.0 38,420 315.6<br />
Squash <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.<br />
Fresh &<br />
processing 6 1579 8.4 21,296 222.7<br />
Pumpkin <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.<br />
Fresh &<br />
processing<br />
Y<br />
537 2.7 18,502 91.7<br />
Watermelon Citrullus lanatus<br />
7 3441 6.3 65,182 343.1<br />
z<br />
Data were obtained for cucumbers and squash for 2004 from U.S. Department of<br />
Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2005; for muskmelon for 2002 from U.S.<br />
Department of Agriculture, 2002; watermelon for 2004 from Arney et al., 2006.<br />
Y<br />
Data not available.<br />
melons in NC are produced in the eastern or south central part of the<br />
state, where the soils have a sandy or sandy loam texture.<br />
Most US melon, especially honeydew, production is located in the<br />
more arid regions of the country in Arizona and California (U.S.<br />
Department of Agriculture, 2005). <strong>The</strong> irregular and often heavy<br />
rainfalls during the production season in NC and the southeastern US<br />
often cause the honeydew fruit to split (Elmstrom and Maynard, 1992).<br />
In recent years, honeydew production area has increased in NC. <strong>The</strong><br />
development of new hybrids that have better disease and splitting<br />
resistance has contributed to this increase (Jester, 2004).<br />
To a much lesser extent, NC also produces other melon types—<br />
crenshaw, casaba, galia, juan canary, and piel de sapo. Most of these<br />
melons have limited markets, which need to be developed for more<br />
sales to occur. <strong>The</strong> oriental, crisp-flesh melon, cultivar Sprite, is an<br />
exception. <strong>The</strong> ‘Sprite’ melon was researched and marketed through<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 269
the Specialty Crops Program at NC <strong>State</strong> University (Schultheis et al.,<br />
2001; Jester and Schultheis, 2004). ‘Sprite’ has many positive<br />
attributes including crisp flesh, unique flavor, high soluble solids (up<br />
to 18), and small size (0.6 to 0.8kg)—about one-third to one-fourth the<br />
size of most marketed muskmelon fruit (2 to 3kg) or honeydew fruit<br />
(2.5 to 3.5 kg). Production practices for ‘Sprite’, such as spacing<br />
(Jester and Taylor, 2005) and time of harvest, were determined by<br />
researchers at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University. On-farm testing was<br />
conducted on small acreages with several growers in collaboration<br />
with extension personnel, and marketing was conducted by the <strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services in<br />
collaboration with NC <strong>State</strong> University faculty and NC growers<br />
(Schultheis et al., 2001). Through these collective efforts, a new<br />
product was developed with its own price look-up number (PLU#) and<br />
specifications. Other program melons are currently under<br />
development in the Specialty Crops Program. More production of<br />
specialty and honeydew melons in NC and along the east coast is<br />
likely as increasing transportation costs continue to drive up the price<br />
of melons from western states.<br />
Summary<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is a leading producer of cucurbits in the US.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s contribute nearly $60 million to the state’s agricultural<br />
industry. <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> is the second leading state producer of<br />
pickling cucumber in the US, fourth in muskmelon production, and<br />
seventh in watermelon production. In addition to growing the<br />
commonly grown cucurbit crops, NC is a leader in the development of<br />
new and improved cucurbit crops for production and market.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Arney, M., S. R. Fore, and R. Brancucci. 2006. Watermelon reference <strong>book</strong>.<br />
National Watermelon Promotion Board. 80pp.<br />
Elmstrom, G. W. and D. N. Maynard. 1992. Exotic melons for commercial<br />
production in humid regions. Second Int. Symp. Specialty & Exotic Vegetable<br />
Crops. 318:117–124.<br />
Jester, B. and J. Schultheis. 2004. <strong>The</strong> commercialization of an oriental crisp flesh<br />
‘Sprite’ through the NC specialty crops program. HortSci. 39(3)660(Abstr.).<br />
Jester, B. 2004. Honeydew melon: a new niche for melon growers in the Southeast.<br />
In: G. Holmes (ed.). <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> vegetable growers association 2004<br />
year<strong>book</strong>. 6:35(Abstr.).<br />
Jester, W. R. and B. Taylor. 2005. <strong>The</strong> effect of in-row transplant spacing on sprite<br />
melon yield and sizes. HortSci. 40(3):887(Abstr.).<br />
Motes, J. E. 1977. Picking cucumbers production harvesting. Coop. Ext. Serv.<br />
Mich. St. Univ. Printing. Ext. Bull. E-837. 8pp.<br />
270 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences. 2004.<br />
Agricultural Statistics Division. 130pp. .<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences. 2005.<br />
Marketing <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> sweetpotatoes including Louisiana, 2003–2004 crop.<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Dept. Agric. & Consumer Services. 28pp.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene<br />
content differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric.<br />
81:1–5.<br />
Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB Intl., New<br />
York.<br />
Rubatzky, V. E. and M. Yamaguchi. 1997. World vegetables. 2 nd ed. Chapman &<br />
Hall, New York.<br />
Schultheis, J. R., C. W. Averre, M. D. Boyette, E. A. Estes, G. J. Holmes, D. W.<br />
Monks, and K. A. Sorensen. 1998. Commercial production of pickling and<br />
slicing cucumbers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. NC Coop. Ext. Serv. AG-552.<br />
Schultheis, J. R., W. R. Jester, and N. J. Augostini. 2001. Screening melons for<br />
adaptability in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, p. 439–444. In: J. Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.).<br />
Trends in new crops and new uses. Proc. 5th Nat. Symp. new crops & new uses<br />
strength in diversity. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Sies, H. and W. Stahl. 1998. Lycopene: antioxidant and biological effects and its<br />
bioavailability in the human. Proc. Exp. Biol. Med. 218:121–124.<br />
Taylor, M. J. and J. Brant. 2002. Trends in world cucurbit production 1991 to 2001,<br />
p. 373–379. In: <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences Web site.<br />
(accessed June 2006).<br />
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2005. Vegetables and<br />
melons situation and outlook year<strong>book</strong>/VGS-2005.<br />
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2002. 2002 Census of Agriculture. National<br />
Agriculture Statistics Service.<br />
(accessed June 2006).<br />
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. Vegetables 2004 summary. National<br />
Agriculture Statistics Service. 71 pp.<br />
<br />
(accessed June 2006).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 271
APPROACHES TO MINIMIZE THE DEFECTS<br />
OF SEEDLESS WATERMELON<br />
Xiaowu Sun and Fuqing Luo<br />
Melons Institute of Hunan Province, Shaoyang, Hunan 422001,<br />
P. R. China<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Polyploid, triploid hybrid, Citrullus lanatus<br />
ABSTRACT. Triploid seedless watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) is a polyploid F1<br />
hybrid. Triploid seedless watermelon offers both the benefits of polyploid and<br />
the heterosis of F1 hybrids. However, it has the defects of low hybrid seed yield,<br />
low germination, weak and slow seedling development, misshapen fruit,<br />
variable rind thickness, hard seed coats, and hollow heart. <strong>The</strong> authors have<br />
learned, from over 25 years of breeding and seedless-watermelon production,<br />
that these defects can be reduced through breeding and cultural practices.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se include using F1 hybrids of similar tetraploid lines as the female parent,<br />
selecting proper hybrid combinations, improving seed-production protocol, and<br />
utilizing proper seed treatment and application of fertilizer. With all these<br />
approaches we have improved seed yield over 80%, seed germination and<br />
usable plants to over 95%, and fruit yield over 30%, as well as improving the<br />
stability of marketable yield.<br />
T<br />
riploid seedless watermelon is a polyploid hybrid created<br />
through chromosome engineering. Triploid seedless<br />
watermelon can offer the benefits of polyploid and the heterosis<br />
of a properly selected hybrid (An and Sun, 1991; Sun, 1998; Gong<br />
1993; Yu, 1975). <strong>The</strong> key benefits of triploid seedless watermelon<br />
include high quality derived from seedlessness and high sugar content,<br />
high yields, vigorous plants, tolerance to diseases and humidity, better<br />
shipping ability, and economic return. However, triploid seedless<br />
watermelon also has its special defects (Sun, 1998). <strong>The</strong> main defects<br />
include low hybrid seed yield, slow development of seedlings, hard<br />
seed coats in the flesh, hollow heart, thick rind, misshapen fruit, late<br />
maturity, and the requirement for excellent cultural practices. This<br />
article outlines the approaches to minimize the defects of seedless<br />
watermelon, which we learned from our over 25 years of breeding and<br />
production of triploid seedless watermelon.<br />
Key Approaches To Minimize <strong>The</strong> Defects Of<br />
Seedless Watermelon<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF DESIRABLE TETRAPLOIDS. Improvement of<br />
chromosome-doubling techniques has allowed development of many<br />
272 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
tetraploid watermelon varieties (An, 1991; Sun, 1998; Gong, 1993).<br />
However, availability of desirable tetraploids is limited. We have<br />
learned from our own and other breeders’ research that the fruit set and<br />
quality of tetraploids are critical for the fruit set and quality of triploid<br />
hybrids. Better tetraploids can be selected from the progenies that are<br />
derived from the crosses between tetraploids. <strong>The</strong> seed yield of<br />
tetraploids Beijing No.1, Zhengguo 401, and Shaohuan 4201,<br />
developed from the crosses of tetraploids, is almost double that of<br />
Tetra 1, the tetraploid derived directly from chromosome doubling.<br />
This can be an effective approach to improving the fruit set of yellowfleshed<br />
and small-fruited tetraploids (Deng and Sun, 2003). Selection<br />
of tetraploid progenies of chromosome-doubled F1 hybrids may take<br />
more generations to fix a desirable genotype; however, these kinds of<br />
populations provide more genetic variation from which to select.<br />
UTILIZATION OF TETRAPLOID HYBRIDS. Our breeding practices<br />
have shown that hybrids of similar tetraploid lines can be desirable in<br />
female parents for overcoming the defects of low seed yield, low<br />
germination, and low seedling vigor of a triploid hybrid. <strong>The</strong> seed<br />
yield of the hybrid between Tetra 452 and 404 is about 50% higher<br />
than its parents. Improvement of triploid hybrid seed yield over 80%<br />
was achieved by using tetraploid hybrids of similar lines as the female<br />
parent (Sun, 1998).<br />
SELECTION OF DESIRABLE TRIPLOID HYBRID COMBINATIONS.<br />
Triploid hybrids are sterile (An and Sun, 1991; Gong, 1993; Yu, 1975).<br />
<strong>The</strong> proper combination of tetraploid and diploid is critical for the<br />
performance of the triploid hybrid. Significant hybrid seed-yield<br />
variation was observed among hybrids of the same tetraploid female<br />
parent and different diploid male parents (Sun et al., 1998). When<br />
‘Sugar Baby’, ‘Crimson Sweet’, and ‘Du No. 3’ were used as male<br />
parents for the same tetraploid female parent, Tetra 404, the average<br />
number of hybrid seed per fruit was 76, 84, and 63, respectively. We<br />
also observed significant effects of hybrid combinations on triploid<br />
seed germination, seedling vigor, hollow heart, rind thickness, size of<br />
empty seed coats, fruit shape, flesh quality, and fruit yield.<br />
IMPROVEMENT OF SEED-PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES. Seedproduction<br />
techniques are not only important for genetic purity, but<br />
also critical for seed yield, germination, and seed vigor. Fermentation<br />
of harvested seed in the flesh significantly affects the germination of<br />
triploid seed. Extended fermentation will kill most of the triploid<br />
embryos (Sun et al., 1998). Larger seeds in the same seedlot with welldeveloped<br />
embryos germinate much better than small seeds with lessdeveloped<br />
embryos. Fruit set and seed yields are improved when the<br />
tetraploid female parent plants are grafted onto Lagenaria gourd.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 273
Increased applications of phosphorous fertilizer significantly enhance<br />
embryo development, and therefore increase seed weight and<br />
germination. Humidity and temperature during pollination are<br />
important for triploid seed yield. We usually get better seed yield from<br />
the spring crop than from the fall crop in Hunan. We get more than a<br />
20% seed yield increase by properly managing plant density.<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF SEEDLESS MINIWATERMELON VARIETY.<br />
Regular seedless watermelons are later than seeded varieties, and are<br />
not suitable for early production in the spring and late production in<br />
the fall. We have been breeding seedless watermelon with small fruit<br />
size since 1995 (Deng and Sun, 2003). We have released over 10<br />
triploid hybrids with small fruit size, e.g., Snow Peak TM XiaoYuHong<br />
Seedless. Two to three crops of seedless watermelon can be produced<br />
a year in subtropical areas with small-fruited seedless watermelon<br />
varieties. This significantly extends supplies of seedless fruit from the<br />
concentrated months of July and August to the months of May through<br />
November (Sun et al., 1997).<br />
IMPROVEMENT OF SEED-PRODUCTION PROTOCOL. Triploid hybrid<br />
seeds are produced by using a tetraploid as the female parent and a<br />
diploid as the male parent in a ratio of 10 female to 1 male (Sun, 1998).<br />
<strong>The</strong> female and male parents are usually grown in different sections of<br />
the seed-production field. Manual emasculation, for some tetraploids<br />
and/or at some production periods, and controlled hand-pollination are<br />
the common practices for hybrid triploid-seed production.<br />
Uncontrolled pollination is also used to reduce the cost of triploid-seed<br />
production. <strong>The</strong> tetraploid female and diploid male parents are mixedplanted<br />
in the same row in the ratio of 2:1 or 4:1. Male flowers of the<br />
male parent are collected in the early morning, 6 to 8 AM, to pollinate<br />
the female flowers of the female parent. Seeds are harvested only from<br />
the fruit of female parent. This kind of production can be done only in<br />
isolated fields. <strong>The</strong> tetraploid seeds are removed from the triploid<br />
seedlot based on seed morphology by experienced workers. <strong>The</strong><br />
tetraploid plants or fruits can also be identified later in commercial<br />
seedless-watermelon production fields based on seedling morphology<br />
or fruit characteristics (Sun, 1998).<br />
We investigated the possibility of producing triploid hybrid seed<br />
using a diploid as the female parent and a tetraploid as the male parent.<br />
However, the pollinated fruit produced only a normal-sized hard seed<br />
coat, with no visible embryo. Zhang also found a similar result;<br />
however, about 10% of the seeds studied produced triploid plants in<br />
vitro (X. P. Zhang, personal communication). More investigation is<br />
needed to understand this phenomenon. It would be very helpful if<br />
274 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
triploid hybrid seed could be produced by using a diploid line as the<br />
female parent.<br />
IMPROVEMENT OF CULTURAL PRACTICES OF SEEDLESS-<br />
WATERMELON PRODUCTION. Cultural practices are very important for<br />
the success of seedless-watermelon production (Li et al., 1994; Sun,<br />
1990, 1992, 1998; Sun et al., 1997). We recommend these tips to<br />
improve germination of triploid hybrid seed: (1) Carefully control the<br />
temperature and moisture during seed germination. <strong>The</strong> temperature<br />
should be set at 32–35˚C during germination. High moisture levels<br />
will damage the triploid seeds with less-developed embryos. (2)<br />
Mechanically cut open the hard seed coat of the triploid seed before<br />
germination. <strong>The</strong> seed coat should be removed once the seedling has<br />
emerged from soil. (3) Carefully disinfect the triploid seed using<br />
fungicides or disinfectant before germination. More than 90%<br />
germination and 85% usable seedlings have been achieved by using<br />
these three techniques.<br />
Cultural practices have significant impact on yield, fruit quality,<br />
hollow heart, and hard seed coat of seedless watermelon (Li et el.,<br />
1994; Sun, 1990, 1992, 1998; Sun et al., 1997). Stable nutrient and<br />
water supplies are critical for fruit yield, fruit shape, and fruit quality.<br />
Drought stress during fruit development reduces fruit size and<br />
increases rind thickness. Over-fertilization and -irrigation cause<br />
vegetative overgrowth, delayed fruit set, small fruit size, misshapen<br />
fruit, hard flesh, and hollow heart. Early-stage mismanagement of<br />
fertilizer and water are difficult to correct at the late stage. Overuse of<br />
nitrogen increases rind thickness and reduces sugar content. <strong>The</strong> hard<br />
seed-coat defect is low at moderate phosphate levels; higher levels of<br />
phosphate will increase it. Potassium improves the sweetness of<br />
seedless watermelon. Fruit quality is also affected by production<br />
season, plant population, and grafting.<br />
MICROPROPAGATION OF SEEDLESS WATERMELON USING TISSUE<br />
CULTURE. <strong>The</strong> combination of tissue-culture micropropagation and<br />
grafting can provide a solution to the problems of low seed yield, low<br />
germination, and low seedling vigor (Deng, 1987; Tang et el., 1994;<br />
Gao, 1983; Xu, 1979). <strong>The</strong> shoot tips of in vitro germinated seedlings<br />
were harvested and cultured on MS media containing 2–5mg/l BA for<br />
proliferation. Ploidy change and somaclonal variation were not<br />
observed during the subculture period of 10 months. As many as<br />
50,000–100,000 plantlets can be obtained from single shoot tip in 6<br />
months. However, the higher cost of tissue-culture plants and<br />
relatively low propagation rate prevents the commercial application of<br />
this technology. More research is needed in this area.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 275
Conclusion<br />
With the techniques described above we have been able to<br />
overcome the problems of low hybrid seed yield, low seed germination,<br />
and low seedling vigor of triploid seedless watermelon. Hybrid seed<br />
yields have increased from an average 2kg per 1000m 2 in the 1970s–<br />
1980s to an average 7kg per 1000m 2 today. Seed germination has been<br />
enhanced from 60% to 95%, and the usable-seedling rate is<br />
approaching 95%. We have developed several seedless varieties with<br />
small fruit size. Seedless plants are more vigorous and more tolerant to<br />
diseases and unfavorable conditions than seeded varieties, and their<br />
yields are 30% higher. Seedless watermelon also produces better<br />
quality fruit with a longer shelf life and better marketability. All these<br />
qualities make triploid seedless watermelon a strong-growing segment<br />
of the market. However, more tetraploids with desirable horticultural<br />
traits and good combining ability are needed. Tetraploid male sterile<br />
lines can be helpful for hybrid seed production. An improved seedproduction<br />
protocol is needed to ensure high seed quality and seed<br />
health.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
An, P. S. and X. W. Sun. 1991. <strong>Breeding</strong> and utilization of polyploid watermelon.<br />
Acta Huan Agric. Coll. 17(addition):126.<br />
Deng, D. C, X. W. Sun, P. Y. Zuo, Y. H Liu, and X. D. Xie. 2003. A new smallsized<br />
seedless watermelon “Xuefeng Xiaoyuhong”. Acta Hort. Sinica. 30(3):375.<br />
Deng, Z. P. 1987. Studies on asexual propagation of seedless watermelon and<br />
grafting. <strong>North</strong>ern Hort. (2):9–11.<br />
Gao, X. Y. 1983. Studies on asexual propagation of seedless watermelon. China<br />
Agric. Sci. (2):5–17.<br />
Gong, Z. J. 1993. Advances of polyploid watermelon breeding. China Watermelon &<br />
Melon. (3):22-23.<br />
Li, Z. S., C. H. Ling, and H. L. Gao. 1994. Cultural practices affect quality of<br />
seedless watermelon. China Watermelon & Melon. (1):16-18.<br />
Sun, X. W. 1990. Growing seedless watermelon for high quality. China Watermelon<br />
& Melon. (1):39–41.<br />
Sun, X. W. 1992. Cultural management of seedless watermelon. Hunan Agric. (4):14.<br />
Sun, X. W., F. Q. Luo, and X. P. Muo. 1997. Cultivation models for seedless<br />
watermelon production, p 54–59. Melon & Watermelon Working Group of<br />
CSHS (ed.). Advances of China watermelon and melon research. China<br />
Agriculture Press. Beijing.<br />
Sun, X. W. 1998. Studies on cultivation model of seedless watermelons, p. 388. Proc.<br />
25 th Int. Hort. Congress (IHC). 2–7 August, 1998, Brussels.<br />
Sun, X. W., F. Q. Luo, and S. Y. Tan. 1998. Solutions to the defects of seedless<br />
watermelon, p. 229–232. In H. Y. Luo and X. W. Sun (eds.). Proc. Hort. Sci.<br />
Hunan Sci. & Tech. Press. Hunan.<br />
Tang, S. H., Y. Liao, and Y. C. Xu. 1994. Screening of tissue culture medium and<br />
micropropagation of seedless watermelon. Acta Southwest Agric. Univ. Sinica.<br />
16(6):540–542.<br />
Xu, Z. H. 1979. Propagation of triploid seedless watermelon in vitro. Acta Plant<br />
Physiol. Sinica. 15(3):245–251.<br />
Yu, Z. X. 1975. Achievements of watermelon breeding in Taiwan. Agric. Sci.<br />
23.(3/4):123–131.<br />
276 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
COST BENEFIT ANALYSES OF USING<br />
GRAFTED WATERMELONS FOR DISEASE<br />
CONTROL AND THE FRESH-CUT MARKET<br />
Merritt Taylor 1 , Benny Bruton 2 , Wayne Fish 2, and Warren<br />
Roberts 1<br />
1 Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University, Wes Watkins Agricultural Research and<br />
Extension Center, Lane, OK<br />
2 USDA/ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory,<br />
Lane, OK<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Risk management, Fusarium wilt, soil-borne,<br />
pathogens, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp., Lagenaria sp.<br />
ABSTRACT. Soil-borne diseases such as Fusarium wilt continue to plague<br />
watermelon growers in intensive-production areas where land resources are<br />
scarce and rotation of various crops is limited. Risk-management alternatives<br />
available to the farmer have been reduced by the loss of soil-fumigation<br />
chemicals such as methyl bromide. Grafting of watermelon onto resistant<br />
rootstock onto certain scions has been found to provide effective resistance to<br />
Fusarium wilt but at an increased cost of production. <strong>The</strong>re is potential for<br />
these grafted plants to have an increased demand by the cut-fruit industry, in<br />
the long run, due to the superior quality of the flesh. Fruit from certain<br />
scion/rootstocks may even bring a premium from the cut-fruit industry as they<br />
are recognized for their superior shelf life and firmness of flesh. <strong>The</strong> resistance<br />
of these plants to soil-borne diseases provides the farmer a viable riskmanagement<br />
strategy as an alternative to methyl bromide as a means of disease<br />
control.<br />
G<br />
rafting watermelon onto other <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceous crops for soilborne<br />
disease and nematode control has been practiced for<br />
many years (Oda, 1999). Because of limited ability for crop<br />
rotation, the practice of grafting has provided a useful method for<br />
growing watermelons on land that would otherwise require fumigation<br />
or be abandoned. Grafting has been routinely utilized in Japan and<br />
Korea since the late 1920s for the control of Fusarium wilt, caused by<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (Lee, 1994). Grafting watermelons<br />
in the United <strong>State</strong>s had not been attempted because of sufficient land<br />
for rotation, availability of methyl bromide, and increased costs of<br />
grafted transplants. However, we have experienced in recent years<br />
constraints of new land for rotation, loss of methyl bromide, and an<br />
increased incidence and severity of soil-borne diseases (Bruton, 1998).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 277
Evolution of Grafting Watermelons<br />
Historically, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Benincasa, Lagenaria spp., and some<br />
hybrid rootstocks have been utilized for grafting watermelon.<br />
However, these rootstocks are not resistant to all diseases. In Spain,<br />
Armengol et al. (2000) noted that Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae<br />
Race 1 could be particularly damaging to the rootstock of grafted<br />
watermelon. Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) is often used as<br />
rootstock for watermelon and is susceptible to the seed-borne<br />
(Kuniyasu, 1981) fungus F. oxysporum f. sp. lagenariae (Matsuo and<br />
Yamamoto, 1967). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> yellow vine disease (CYVD), caused by<br />
Serratia marcescens, causes a vine decline of watermelon, squash, and<br />
pumpkin (Bruton et al., 2003). More recently, CYVD has been<br />
observed in watermelon grafted onto Lagenaria or <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.<br />
rootstocks (B. Bruton, 2006, unpublished data).<br />
More than 95% of the watermelon in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan is<br />
being grafted onto squash and gourd rootstocks (Lee et al., 1998).<br />
However, rootstock-scion selection has a profound effect on yield and<br />
fruit-quality attributes (Huh et al., 2003; Pulgar et al., 2000; Yetisir<br />
and Sari, 2003). When squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.) was used as the<br />
rootstock, the yield and/or quality of the fruit was often inferior to fruit<br />
of plants grafted on bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) or of<br />
nongrafted watermelon (Yetisir et al., 2003).<br />
Despite some advantages, the use of methyl bromide has been<br />
associated with major problems, including the depletion of the ozone<br />
layer (Montreal Protocol, 1987). Because of this, its use was scheduled<br />
to be phased out on a worldwide scale—by the end of 2005 in the E.U.<br />
and other developed countries, including the United <strong>State</strong>s, and by<br />
2015 in the developing countries (Rowlands, 1993). <strong>The</strong>refore, there is<br />
an urgent need to define and implement alternative solutions for<br />
managing soil-borne pathogens. Grafting is one such alternative<br />
practice that has potential for cucurbits.<br />
Benefits of Grafting Other Than Disease Control<br />
Ioannou et al. (2000) stated, “Although growing grafted<br />
watermelon represents a novel horticultural practice for Cyprus, the<br />
technique has been quickly and widely adopted by growers. Presently,<br />
over 80% of watermelons grown in the open field and under low<br />
tunnels are grafted on various rootstocks. Grafted plants are produced<br />
by fully equipped commercial nurseries. Research efforts have been<br />
directed towards the utilization of wilt-resistant rootstocks for offseason<br />
watermelon production in heated greenhouses. Although there<br />
are still many technical aspects that need further investigation, results<br />
278 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
so far are quite promising since this method enables watermelon<br />
production as early as March, when prices are very high.” <strong>The</strong>y also<br />
stated, “<strong>The</strong> yield of grafted Crimson Sweet watermelon reached a<br />
record level of 150 tons/ha.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> use of grafted watermelon as a technique to prevent loss due to<br />
diseases is widespread throughout the world, but other positive aspects<br />
may be equally important to the producer/decision maker regarding the<br />
potential to harvest watermelons during a market window where high<br />
prices exist that were previously unreachable (Ioannou et al., 2000).<br />
In Greece, grafting is highly popular for watermelon and melons,<br />
especially in the southern areas, where early cropping under low<br />
tunnels is practiced (Traka-Mavrona et. al, 2000).<br />
Findings at Lane, Oklahoma<br />
Researchers at Lane, Oklahoma, <strong>complete</strong>d two years of<br />
experiments that included tests of five watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)<br />
scions on four rootstocks of squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a sp.)or gourd<br />
(Lagenaria sp.) to test for resistance to Fusarium wilt in fields where<br />
heavy disease pressure would make production of nongrafted cultivars<br />
impractical.<br />
Treatments consisted of watermelon cultivars SF800, SS5244,<br />
SS7167, SS7177, and SS7187 from Abbott & Cobb Seed Co., grown<br />
as nongrafted plants or grafted onto rootstocks of RS1330, RS1332,<br />
RS1420, or RS1421. <strong>The</strong> grafting was done by Alamo Transplants Inc.<br />
of Alamo, Texas. Additional controls consisted of the nongrafted<br />
cultivars ‘Sangria’, ‘Royal Sweet’, ‘Jubilee’, and ‘Jamboree’. Two<br />
fields were planted each year with three replications of each treatment<br />
per field. Plants were grown with 1-m spacing between plants, with<br />
rows 3m apart.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were no grafted plants lost to Fusarium wilt. However, the<br />
other cultivars, especially ‘Jubilee’, did exhibit varying degrees of wilt<br />
incidence. Yields of grafted plants were generally equal to or greater<br />
than those of the nongrafted plants. Tests were run on firmness,<br />
lycopene content, sugar, storability, etc. Sugar content, measured as<br />
soluble solids, was affected minimally, if any, by grafting. Lycopene<br />
content of fruit from grafted plants was equal to, or marginally better<br />
than, fruit from nongrafted plants. Fruit firmness, as measured by a<br />
penetrometer, was significantly greater in the grafted fruit than in the<br />
nongrafted fruit. <strong>The</strong> firmest fruit occurred with SS7167 and SS7187<br />
scions grafted onto RS1420 rootstock, which had a value of about 2.0<br />
x 10 5 Pa. Fruit from nongrafted plants had values of about 1.0 x 10 5 Pa<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 279
or less. Matching of scions with appropriate rootstocks was important,<br />
as interactions did occur. Certain combinations were significantly<br />
superior to other combinations.<br />
Fresh-Cut Market Potential<br />
According to the International Fresh-Cut Produce Association,<br />
fresh-cut fruits and vegetables make up one of the fastest-growing<br />
food categories in U.S. supermarkets. U.S. sales of fresh-cut produce<br />
sprang from $3.3 billion in 1994 to $11 billion in 2000, and are<br />
projected to reach $15 billion in 2005 (Peabody, 2005). On average,<br />
sales of fresh-cut products increased by 8% in 2003 compared to 2002.<br />
Of the three fresh-cut categories, fresh-cut fruits had the largest<br />
increase at 15%, followed by packaged-salad sales at 9%, and freshcut<br />
vegetables at 6% (Clement, 2003).<br />
<strong>The</strong> market for fresh-cut fruit continues to grow at a rapid rate.<br />
Sanitation and microbial contamination are of particular concern due<br />
to the high water/sugar content of watermelon fruit. Because of<br />
microbial concerns and product deterioration, the shelf life of fresh-cut<br />
watermelon is generally considered by the industry to be about five to<br />
seven days. However, product safety is the major concern.<br />
Several minimum quality criteria appear to be required for<br />
watermelon to be acceptable for sale as a fresh-cut product. <strong>The</strong> flesh<br />
must be firm, with a minimal juice loss, and have the “crunch” of a<br />
freshly cut piece of watermelon. It should have a soluble solids<br />
measurement of Brix greater than 10%. It should be seedless. It<br />
should have a positive visual perception of red and be high in<br />
lycopene. It should have the taste and aroma of a freshly cut<br />
watermelon. It should be safe, with minimal levels of fungal and<br />
bacterial contaminants.<br />
In our studies at Lane, Oklahoma, the shelf life and overall quality<br />
of fresh-cut watermelon from two cultivars grafted onto one of four<br />
rootstocks were compared with fresh-cut fruit from the nongrafted<br />
cultivars. Fresh-cut cubic pieces of about 4.5cm per side were prepared<br />
from ripe watermelons grown at the Lane Research Center and were<br />
stored at 5 o C in 35-oz. PETE containers. Quality attributes of firmness,<br />
soluble solids content, lycopene content, and bacterial counts of the<br />
pieces were measured after 0, 5, and 10 days of storage. Sugar content<br />
of the cut fruit was independent of rootstock and remained constant<br />
over the 10 days of storage. Lycopene content of the fruit decreased by<br />
5–10% during the storage period, regardless of treatment. Bacterial<br />
count on the fruit from all treatments remained low and variable<br />
during the 10 days at 5 o C. Firmness of cut pieces from fruit originating<br />
280 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
from the grafted plants was dependent upon the rootstock employed.<br />
Watermelons from grafted plants possessed firmer flesh than did those<br />
from the nongrafted plants. Overall, the firmness of fruit from all<br />
sources decreased 20–30% during the 10 days of cold storage.<br />
However, the firmness of fruit from some of the rootstocks after 10<br />
days of storage was equal to or significantly higher than that of the<br />
fruit from nongrafted plants when it was initially cut. Thus, these<br />
studies suggest that grafting to a proper rootstock will produce freshcut<br />
watermelon that is equal in sweetness and lycopene content to its<br />
nongrafted counterpart, but that will maintain greater crispness<br />
throughout its storage on the supermarket shelf.<br />
A separate study currently underway of fresh-cut watermelon<br />
being sold in several retail locations in Oklahoma and Texas provided<br />
the following preliminary general information: Brix ranged from 6.2 to<br />
13.2, with the average being 9.6. Firmness ranged from 0.4x10 5 Pa to<br />
3.1x10 5 Pa, with an average of 1.4x10 5 Pa. Lycopene ranged from<br />
22.6µg/g to 79.8µg/g, with an average of 44.3µg/g. <strong>The</strong> cost of this<br />
fresh-cut watermelon ranged from a low of $1.17/lb ($2.58/kg) to a<br />
high of $12.00/lb ($26.46/kg), and an average cost to the consumer of<br />
$3.13/lb ($6.90/kg). Assuming the average cost of whole watermelon<br />
to be $0.11/lb ($0.24/kg) and a 50% recovery percentage, the actual<br />
cost of the watermelon in the package would be approximately<br />
$0.22/lb ($0.485/kg) or 19% of the total cost of the package at the lowcost<br />
package, 1.8% of the high-cost package, and approximately 7% of<br />
the total cost of the average package.<br />
What does this mean to the grower? <strong>The</strong> discovery by the Lane,<br />
Oklahoma, scientists that some of the grafted watermelon<br />
scion/rootstock combinations provided superior firmness at the end of<br />
10 days shelf life compared to the firmness of the nongrafted<br />
watermelons at the beginning of the test has huge ramifications for the<br />
potential of these watermelons in the cut-fruit industry. Although<br />
industry officials state that maintaining quality and firmness during<br />
shelf life is one of the critical issues for maintaining or increasing<br />
market share, the question arises regarding the willingness of the<br />
industry to pay the farmer a premium price for a superior-quality<br />
product. <strong>The</strong> cost per acre of growing grafted watermelons is greater<br />
than that for nongrafted.<br />
We estimate that the cost to purchase a grafted seedling plant from<br />
a seedling supplier currently would be $0.75, which would include the<br />
cost of the seed and the grafting operation. Nongrafted seedless plants<br />
cost approximately $0.28 per plant. Assuming 1,500 plants per acre<br />
(3,706 per hectare), grafted seedless transplants would cost<br />
approximately $705.00 per acre ($1,743 per hectare) more than the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 281
nongrafted plants (Table 1). Since methyl bromide usage is not an<br />
option in the United <strong>State</strong>s, comparing the costs between planting<br />
grafted plants versus fumigating with methyl bromide and planting<br />
conventional transplants is a moot point for US growers, but should be<br />
of interest to international growers. <strong>The</strong> following costs of production<br />
are estimated with the single variable being whether grafted or<br />
nongrafted seedless watermelons are planted. All other costs are held<br />
constant.<br />
Table 1. Comparative cost in $US of production per acre and per<br />
hectare.<br />
Nongrafted Grafted Nongrafted Grafted<br />
seedless/acre seedless/acre seedless/ha seedless/ha<br />
Preplant<br />
Growing<br />
250 250 618 618<br />
season 842 1,546 2,080 3,823<br />
Total 1,092 1,797 2,698 4,441<br />
Difference $705 per acre $1,743 per hectare<br />
Assuming variable yields and prices per acre (per hectare), the<br />
following sensitivity analyses were developed to evaluate the breakeven<br />
yield, or price required for the farmer to consider planting grafted<br />
seedless watermelons versus nongrafted seedless watermelons.<br />
Calculations (Table 2) indicate that a farmer producing 25,000<br />
pounds per acre (28,021 kg/ha) would be breaking even at $0.08/lb<br />
($0.1764/kg) with nongrafted transplants but would need $0.11/lb<br />
($0.2425/kg) to break even with the grafted transplants (Table 3). In<br />
the calculations of the fresh-cut products above, if the fresh-cut facility<br />
paid the farmer $0.08/lb ($0.1764/kg) for a 50% recovery on<br />
traditional seedless watermelon and sold the product at the average<br />
retail price of $3.13/lb ($6.90/kg), the actual watermelon in the<br />
package would cost $0.16/lb ($0.35/kg) or 5.11% of the average retail<br />
price. Alternatively, if the grafted watermelon, with superior<br />
crunchiness/firmness and shelf life, were purchased at a $0.02/lb<br />
($0.044/kg) premium ($0.10/lb or $0.22/kg), the 50% recovery<br />
watermelon would cost the processor $0.20/lb ($0.485/kg) or 6.38% of<br />
the average retail price. <strong>The</strong> question is thus raised whether the freshcut<br />
processor would be willing to assure the farmer of a premium price<br />
of $0.02–$0.03/lb ($0.044–$0.066/kg) higher than the spot market<br />
price for a contract to provide a superior product to their customers.<br />
282 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Expected net return per hectare for nongrafted seedless<br />
watermelon at different yields and prices.<br />
$2,698 production<br />
cost per hectare<br />
$US price per kg<br />
$0.0661 cost/kg<br />
harvest, pack, and<br />
ship<br />
Yield<br />
kg/ha $0.1323 $0.1543 $0.1764 $0.1984 $0.2205 $0.2425<br />
11,209 -1,956.68 -1,709.57 -1,462.47 -1,215.36 -968.25 -721.15<br />
16,813 -1,586.01 -1,215.36 -844.70 -474.04 -103.38 267.28<br />
22,417 -1,215.35 -721.14 -226.93 267.28 761.49 1,255.70<br />
28,021 -844.69 -226.93 390.84 1,008.60 1,626.36 2,244.13<br />
33,626 -474.03 267.29 1,008.60 1,749.92 2,491.24 3,232.55<br />
39,230 -103.37 761.50 1,626.37 2,491.24 3,356.11 4,220.98<br />
44,834 267.30 1,255.72 2,244.14 3,232.56 4,220.98 5,209.40<br />
50,438 637.96 1,749.93 2,861.91 3,973.88 5,085.85 6,197.83<br />
56,043 1,008.62 2,244.15 3,479.67 4,715.20 5,950.73 7,186.25<br />
Risk Management and Disease Control<br />
A more practical question facing a farmer is the potential of losing all<br />
or part of the crop after the entire costs of production have been<br />
expended. In most cases of an outbreak of Fusarium wilt, the plants<br />
begin to decline late in the production season after virtually all<br />
production costs have been spent. This is one of the conditions<br />
frequently faced by a farmer when symptoms of Fusarium wilt are<br />
observed. Returning to the sensitivity tables, let us now assume a<br />
current market price of $0.10/lb ($0.22/kg) and an average yield of<br />
30,000lbs per acre (33,626 kg/ha). Under the two scenarios, the farmer<br />
would make a profit of $303/acre ($748/ha) with the grafted plants<br />
(Table 3) and $1,008/acre ($2,491/ha) with the nongrafted plants<br />
(Table 2) when no Fusarium wilt occurred. Now assume conditions of<br />
heavy Fusarium wilt disease in the field such that 50% of the<br />
nongrafted production is lost before harvest. In the grafted-watermelon<br />
fields, where the plants are resistant to Fusarium wilt, the farmer could<br />
expect a yield of 30,000lbs per acre (33,626kg/ha) and obtain<br />
approximately $303 per acre ($748/ha) profit (Table 3). In the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 283
nongrafted field, the farmer may be lucky to harvest 15,000lbs per acre<br />
(16,812 kg/ha) and thus show a net loss of -$42.00 per acre<br />
(-$103.00/ha) (Table 2). As disease pressures increase over time,<br />
grafted disease-resistant plants, such as the ones tested at Lane, will<br />
become part of risk-management decisions for the farmer.<br />
Table 3. Expected net return per hectare for grafted seedless<br />
watermelon at different yields and prices.<br />
$4,440.00 production<br />
cost per hectare<br />
$0.0661 cost/kg harvest,<br />
pack, and ship<br />
$US price per kg<br />
Yield kg/ha $0.1323 $0.1543 $0.1764 $0.1984 $0.2205 $0.2425 $0.2646<br />
11,209 -3,698.68 -3,451.57 -3,204.47 -2,957.36 -2,710.25 -2,463.15 -2,216.04<br />
16,813 -3,328.01 -2,957.36 -2,586.70 -2,216.04 -1,845.38 -1,474.72 -1,104.07<br />
22,417 -2,957.35 -2,463.14 -1,968.93 -1,474.72 -980.51 -486.30 7.91<br />
28,021 -2,586.69 -1,968.93 -1,351.16 -733.40 -115.64 502.13 1,119.89<br />
33,626 -2,216.03 -1,474.71 -733.40 7.92 749.24 1,490.55 2,231.87<br />
39,230 -1,845.37 -980.50 -115.63 749.24 1,614.11 2,478.98 3,343.85<br />
44,834 -1,474.70 -486.28 502.14 1,490.56 2,478.98 3,467.40 4,455.82<br />
50,438 -1,104.04 7.93 1,119.91 2,231.88 3,343.85 4,455.83 5,567.80<br />
56,043 -733.38 502.15 1,737.67 2,973.20 4,208.73 5,444.25 6,679.78<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Armengol, J., C. M. Jose, M. J. Moya, R. Sales, A. Vicent, and J. Garcia-Jimenez.<br />
2000. Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae race 1, a potential pathogen of grafting<br />
watermelon production in Spain. Bull. OEPP. 30:179–183.<br />
Bruton, B. D. 1998. Soilborne diseases in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae: Pathogen virulence and<br />
host resistance, p. 143–166. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98. ASHS<br />
Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Bruton, B. D., F. Mitchell, J. Fletcher, S. D. Pair, A. Wayadande, U. Melcher, J.<br />
Brady, B. Bextine, and T. H. Popham. 2003. Serratia marcescens, a phloemcolonizing,<br />
squash bug-transmitted bacterium: causal agent of cucurbit yellow<br />
vine disease. Plant Dis. 87:937–944.<br />
Clement, B. D. (ed.). 2003. Fresh-cut sales of retail produce approaching $4 billion a<br />
year. Fresh Cut. Nov., 2003.<br />
Huh, Y. C., Y. H. Woo, J. M. Lee, and Y. H. Om. 2003. Growth and fruit<br />
characteristics of watermelon grafted onto Citrullus rootstocks selected for<br />
disease resistance. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44:649–654.<br />
Ioannou, N. 2000. Soil solarization as a substitute for methyl bromide fumigation in<br />
greenhouse tomato production in Cyprus. Phytoparasitica. (28)3.<br />
Ioannou, N., C. Poullis, and J. B. Heale. 2000. Fusarium wilt of watermelon in<br />
Cyprus and its management by solarization combined with fumigation or<br />
ammonium fertilizers. EPPO Bull. 30:223–230.<br />
284 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Kuniyasu, K. 1981. Seed transmission of Fusarium wilt of bottle gourd, Lagenaria<br />
siceraria, used as rootstock of watermelon. Jpn. Ag. Res. Quart. 14:157–162.<br />
Lee, J. M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. current status, grafting<br />
methods and benefits. HortSci. 29:235–239.<br />
Lee, J. M., H. J. Bang, and H. S. Ham. 1998. Grafting of vegetables. J. Jpn. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sci. 67:1098–1104.<br />
Matsuo, T. and I. Yamamoto. 1967. On Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lageneriae n. f.<br />
causing wilt of Lagenaria vulgaris var. hispida. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Jpn. 8:61–<br />
63.<br />
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. 1987. International<br />
treaty. Hand<strong>book</strong> for the international treaties for the protection of the ozone<br />
layer: the Vienna convention (1985); the Montreal protocol (1987). Ozone<br />
Secretariat, UNEP, 2000. xv, 367p.<br />
Oda, M. 1999. Grafting of vegetables to improve greenhouse production. Ext. Bull.<br />
Food & Fert. Tech. Center. 480:11pp.<br />
Peabody, E. 2005. Fresh-cut moves into the fast lane. Agric. Res. Aug., 2005.<br />
Pulgar, G., G. Villora, D. A. Moreno, and L. Romero. 2000. Improving the mineral<br />
nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: nitrogen metabolism. Biol. Plant.<br />
43:607–609.<br />
Rowlands, I. H. 1993. <strong>The</strong> fourth meeting of the parties to the Montreal protocol:<br />
report and reflection. Environ. 35(6): 25–34.<br />
Traka-Mavrona, E., M. Koutsika-Sotiriou, and T. Pritsa. 2000. Response of squash<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.) as rootstock for melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sci. Hort. 83:353–<br />
362.<br />
Yetisir, H., and N. Sari. 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield<br />
and quality of watermelon. Aust. J. Exp. Agri. 43:1269–1274.<br />
Yetisir, H., N. Sari, and S. Yucel. 2003. Rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and<br />
effect on watermelon fruit yield and quality. Phytoparasitica. 31:163–169.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 285
NITAMIN ® LIQUID: BACKGROUND AND USE<br />
ON CUCURBITACEAE FAMILY<br />
James Wargo and Anne Cothran<br />
Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc., Decatur, Georgia<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Cucumis sativus, cucumber,<br />
watermelon, ammonium nitrate, urea, fertilizer, slow-release nitrogen<br />
ABSTRACT. Nitamin ® is a slowly available nitrogen source developed by<br />
Georgia-Pacific that contains 60% slowly available nitrogen (AAPFCO, Rules<br />
and Regulations-Fertilizer, 3 (b), 2004). <strong>The</strong> patented urea polymer-based<br />
fertilizer is broken down by soil microbes and releases nitrogen over 60–75<br />
days. <strong>The</strong> release profile is dependent on soil texture, temperature, and<br />
moisture. Nitamin 30L demonstrates increased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)<br />
compared to quick-release fertilizers by reducing nitrogen loss via ammonia<br />
volatilization and leaching. In 2005, Nitamin 30L liquid fertilizer demonstrated<br />
increased yields in three studies conducted on cucurbits on a range of soil types.<br />
Split applications were required with watermelon on sand in FL, but single<br />
applications prior to planting were sufficient in trials on watermelon in TX and<br />
pickling cucumbers in NC. <strong>The</strong> higher value created through increased yield<br />
was demonstrated to have positive economic results and suggests that slowly<br />
available fertilizers such as Nitamin are feasible for moderate to high value<br />
vegetable production.<br />
itamin ® N<br />
30L is a 30-0-0 liquid N fertilizer with slow-release<br />
properties. It is composed of 40% urea and 60% slowly<br />
available nitrogen in the form of polymeric chains of<br />
methylene urea and various triazone species (closed ring structures).<br />
<strong>The</strong> combination of readily available N and slow-release N provides a<br />
steady N release over a period of 60 to 75 days. Nitamin polymers are<br />
converted from organic nitrogen to plant-available forms through<br />
microbial degradation. This process is dependent on soil temperature,<br />
texture, water availability, and oxygen content—all of which can<br />
affect the N-release profile. <strong>The</strong> breakdown begins with the simplest<br />
molecules (urea), then methylene urea compounds, and eventually the<br />
triazone ring structures with strong carbon-to-nitrogen bonds. Once<br />
<strong>The</strong> universities listed as conducting studies on Nitamin ® do not<br />
endorse Georgia-Pacific, Nitamin, or the use of Nitamin. Costs given are<br />
not guaranteed prices but estimates on current raw material costs available.<br />
Nitamin ® is a registered trademark and STEADY-DELIVERY is a<br />
trademark of Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. All rights reserved. U.S. patent<br />
nos. 6,632,262; and 6,900,162. Additional domestic and international<br />
patents pending.<br />
286 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
the monomers are cleaved from the chain or ring structures<br />
they undergo normal N-transformation processes in the soil to<br />
convert to nitrate.<br />
<strong>The</strong> steady release of N can provide several agronomic<br />
and environmental advantages over quick-release N fertilizers.<br />
University studies with Nitamin have shown more consistent<br />
plant nitrogen status during the growing season, higher<br />
cumulative N uptake, and reduced ammonia volatilization<br />
(Figure 1) (Miguel Cabrera, unpublished data) and reduced<br />
nitrate leaching (Figure 2) (Elizabeth Guertal, unpublished<br />
data). All these factors combine to result in higher N use<br />
efficiency. Other potential benefits include the need for less<br />
frequent N applications during the growing season and<br />
reduced N application rates compared to the standard grower<br />
program. In many cases improved yield and fruit quality have<br />
been achieved by limiting fluctuations in soil N status and<br />
increasing N availability to the plants.<br />
Studies on watermelon and cucumbers in TX, FL, and NC showed<br />
that Nitamin could supplant the current N fertilization practice and<br />
improve fruit yield and quality. <strong>The</strong> results of those trials are<br />
discussed below.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
FLORIDA STUDY. A watermelon trial was conducted by Dr. George<br />
Hochmuth with the University of Florida at the IFAS <strong>North</strong> Florida<br />
Research Center in Live Oak, FL (George Hochmuth, unpublished<br />
data). <strong>The</strong> soil was Lakeland sand (96% sand, 0% silt, and 4% clay)<br />
with a pH of 6.0, and organic matter less than 1%. Beds were formed<br />
with black plastic mulch and fumigated with methyl bromide:<br />
chloropicrin at 449kg/ha. <strong>The</strong> test area was drip irrigated to maintain a<br />
soil moisture of -8cb to -12cb measured by a tensiometer at 15.2cm<br />
soil depth. <strong>The</strong> plots were irrigated for periods of 15 min twice/day<br />
from planting until 10 May, 30 min twice/day from 10 May to 26 May,<br />
and 38 min twice/day through harvest. Transplants (variety<br />
‘Mardigras’) were planted on March 10, 2005, in a single row with<br />
0.91m spacing. <strong>The</strong> experimental design was randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />
block with four replicates in 2.4m x 10.7m plots. One block was<br />
eliminated from the results due to poor plant stand caused by poor<br />
water drainage.<br />
<strong>The</strong> treatments included ammonium nitrate and Nitamin 30L<br />
applied at different rates and times. Nitrogen rates were 117, 168, and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 287
Urea<br />
UAN<br />
Nitamin 30L<br />
Fig. 1. Ammonia volatilization results from UGA incubation. Study conducted<br />
by Dr. Miguel Cabrera, University of Georgia, 2005. Data was analyzed weekly<br />
for significant difference by Fisher LSD (0.05) by week 1) 3.2, 2) 0.3, 3) 0.2 NS<br />
4) 0.05 NS, 5) 0.02 NS.<br />
211kg N/ha for Nitamin and 168 and 211kg N/ha for ammonium<br />
nitrate. Ammonium nitrate was applied through weekly fertigation for<br />
12 weeks with 25% of the N applied to the bed preplant. All three<br />
Nitamin rates were applied to the bed prior to planting and<br />
incorporated before plastic mulch was laid. An additional Nitamin<br />
30L treatment was injected through the irrigation system in three<br />
applications spaced 2 weeks apart beginning 3 weeks after planting.<br />
<strong>The</strong> total rate for the injected treatment was 168kg N/ha with 25% of<br />
the N total applied to the bed before planting.<br />
TEXAS STUDY. A second watermelon study with Nitamin 30L<br />
liquid fertilizer was conducted by Russ Wallace at the Texas<br />
Agricultural Research & Extension Center (AREC) in Lubbock,<br />
Texas, in 2005 (Russ Wallace, unpublished data). <strong>The</strong> soil was an<br />
Amarillo clay loam (47% sand, 20% silt, and 33% clay) with 0.9%<br />
OM, pH 8.1, and a CEC of 16.5. Core samples were taken<br />
pretreatment from 15.2cm–20.3cm depth and showed 9kg NO3/ha<br />
were available in April 2005. <strong>The</strong> test plots were treated with Prefar<br />
4E herbicide and other standard practices were used for disease and<br />
pest control in addition to weeding by hand. Plot size was 5.1m x<br />
7.62m with four replicates in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design.<br />
<strong>The</strong> plots were transplanted with 3-week old watermelon seedlings<br />
(cv. Sugar Baby) on June 9 and drip irrigated as needed. Harvest<br />
occurred once, on August 9, 2005. Other variables measured were<br />
vigor, rated on July 10 and August 4, and vine length, rated on June<br />
28.<br />
288 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Urea<br />
UAN<br />
Nitamin Liquid<br />
Fig. 2. Auburn University leaching results. Cumulative mineral<br />
nitrogen (mg) in leachate as affected by fertilizer. Study conducted by<br />
Dr. Elizabeth Guertal, Auburn University, 2005.<br />
<strong>The</strong> treatments included urea broadcast preplant and incorporated<br />
(PP) at rates of 89 and 135kg N/ha; Nitamin 30L applied all at planting<br />
(AP) or as split applications (S) at planting and just before vine run on<br />
June 27 at rates of 45, 89, and 135kg N/ha. Nitamin was applied to<br />
open trenches 10cm deep and 10cm to the side of each row with a<br />
pressurized backpack sprayer.<br />
NORTH CAROLINA STUDY. <strong>The</strong> third cucurbit study was a trial<br />
conducted by Dr. Jonathan Schultheis, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />
University, on cucumber cultivar ‘Jackson’ at Kinston, NC (Jonathan<br />
R. Schultheis and Bradfred W. Thompson, unpublished data). <strong>The</strong> soil<br />
classification is Norfolk loamy sand (85% sand, 10% silt, and 8%<br />
clay) with 1.3% organic matter and pH 6.5. <strong>The</strong> plots were 25’ X 3.5’<br />
having 10’ alleyways between plots. Each treatment consisted of five<br />
replicates in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design. Plots were thinned<br />
to a target plant stand of 50 plants per plot in a single row. <strong>The</strong> seeds<br />
were hand-sown on April 26, 2005, and thinned on May 20 and June<br />
15. Weed control was applied after planting, while insecticides and<br />
fungicides were applied as needed. Irrigation was supplemented as<br />
necessary to maintain 1 inch per week, and no excessive rain events<br />
occurred. Measurements included: vine length, petiole nitrate by<br />
Cardy meter, and graded yield. Vine length was measured on June 10.<br />
Twenty petiole samples from each plot were collected June 10 at the<br />
fruit bloom, June16 at first harvest, and June 29 after the fourth<br />
harvest. <strong>The</strong> cucumbers were harvested eight times (biweekly) from<br />
June 16 through July 8, 2005. <strong>The</strong> yield was graded into US No. 1,<br />
No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4, and marketable yield included No. 1, 2, and 3<br />
(all noncull fruit). Some of the plots were infected with powdery<br />
mildew, bacterial wilt, or poor plant stand, resulting in poor yields.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se plots were excluded from the yield calculations.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 289
<strong>The</strong> treatments included ammonium nitrate and Nitamin 30L<br />
applied at rates of 45, 89, 135, and 180kg N/ha. An untreated control<br />
was also included. Recommended rates are 89 to 135kg/ha for<br />
pickling cucumbers in NC. Nitamin treatments were applied once just<br />
prior to planting on April 26, 2005. <strong>The</strong> ammonium nitrate treatments<br />
were applied in split applications in 45-kg increments except the 45-kg<br />
rate, which was applied 31 days after planting at the third-leaf-growth<br />
stage on May 26, 2005. <strong>The</strong> 89kg and 135kg rates were applied at the<br />
first-true-leaf stage (May 19) and again on May 31. Part of the 135<br />
rate was applied at planting. Applications of the 180-kg rate started at<br />
planting and continued (fourth application) until “vine out” growth<br />
stage on June 7, 2005. <strong>The</strong> ammonium nitrate treatment schedule was<br />
intended to mimic a typical grower application program.<br />
Results<br />
FLORIDA STUDY. Nitamin produced the highest yield of any<br />
treatment when 75% of the N was injected through the irrigation<br />
system biweekly during the first half of the growing season (Table 1).<br />
Yield increases with the injected Nitamin treatment over the two<br />
ammonium nitrate treatments ranged from 60 to 86cwt(kg)/ha. <strong>The</strong><br />
injected Nitamin treatment also tended to have fewer cull fruit than<br />
ammonium nitrate and all at-planting Nitamin treatments. <strong>The</strong><br />
Nitamin treatments that consisted of a one-time preplant application<br />
underneath the plastic produced the lowest yields regardless of N rate.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se treatments produced higher yields in the first harvest, but had a<br />
much lower second-harvest yield, suggesting insufficient nitrogen<br />
availability late in the growing season. <strong>The</strong> results demonstrate that<br />
split N applications are necessary on sand with low organic matter and<br />
low cation-exchange capacity. However, it was evident that a<br />
Table 1. University of FL Watermelon Trial, Live Oak.<br />
Total-season yield<br />
(metric tons/ha)<br />
Treatment Marketable Culls<br />
Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 168kg N/ha 45.3 3.4<br />
Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 211kg N/ha 47.9 1.1<br />
Nitamin 30L preplant – 117kg N/ha 37.7 1.2<br />
Nitamin 30L preplant – 168kg N/ha 34.9 2.7<br />
Nitamin 30L preplant – 211kg N/ha 38.4 4.1<br />
Nitamin 30L injected 3 times – 168kg N/ha 53.9 0.8<br />
LSD 0.05 9.8 NS<br />
290 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
educed application schedule can be employed since only 3 Nitamin<br />
injections were made compared to 12 weekly injections of ammonium<br />
nitrate. Furthermore, the last Nitamin injection was made 7 weeks<br />
after transplanting, ending 5 weeks earlier than the ammonium nitrate<br />
treatments. <strong>The</strong> results demonstrate that injecting Nitamin 30L<br />
through the drip-irrigation system can be more effective than spoonfeeding<br />
ammonium nitrate every week over the growing season.<br />
TEXAS STUDY. Nitamin liquid fertilizer increased total yield and<br />
marketable yield compared to urea (Figure 3). Yields were slightly<br />
higher when Nitamin was applied in split applications compared to a<br />
single application, but the difference was not statistically significant.<br />
<strong>The</strong> high clay content and cation-exchange capacity of the soil at the<br />
experimental site may have resulted in some ammonium fixation when<br />
applied all preplant. Yield differences between fertilizers were<br />
greatest at the highest N rates, and split applications of Nitamin at 89<br />
and 135kg N/ha increased average fruit size compared to the 135kg<br />
N/ha urea treatment. Vigor ratings and vine-length measurements in<br />
late June and early July showed that Nitamin plants got off to a faster<br />
start, which may have resulted in earlier fruit set and increased fruit<br />
size (Table 2).<br />
NORTH CAROLINA STUDY. All of the N treatments promoted<br />
increased fruit set and higher yield than the untreated (0 N) control<br />
treatment (Table 3). Ammonium nitrate did not demonstrate a yield<br />
response with respect to N rate, while the Nitamin treatments did<br />
produce a more typical yield response curve.<br />
With Nitamin, marketable yield increased up to 89kg N/ha, then<br />
leveled off at 135kg N/ha until decreasing at the highest (180kg N/ha)<br />
nitrogen- application rate. It is not unusual for yields to decrease when<br />
such a high rate of N is applied all in one application. No plant burning<br />
Table 1. University of FL Watermelon Trial, Live Oak.<br />
Total-season yield<br />
(metric tons/ha)<br />
Treatment Marketable Culls<br />
Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 168kg N/ha 45.3 3.4<br />
Ammonium Nitrate injected 12 times – 211kg N/ha 47.9 1.1<br />
Nitamin 30L preplant – 117kg N/ha 37.7 1.2<br />
Nitamin 30L preplant – 168kg N/ha 34.9 2.7<br />
Nitamin 30L preplant – 211kg N/ha 38.4 4.1<br />
Nitamin 30L injected 3 times – 168kg N/ha 53.9 0.8<br />
LSD 0.05 9.8 NS<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 291
was noted at the highest Nitamin rate even though yields were<br />
depressed.<br />
Numerically, Nitamin applied at 89kg N/ha was the highest<br />
yielding treatment, followed by Nitamin applied at 135kg N/ha, and<br />
then ammonium nitrate applied at 45kg N/ha. It is not clear why the<br />
lowest ammonium nitrate treatment was one of the highest yielding in<br />
metric tons / hectare<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Urea preplant Nitamin liquid preplant<br />
Nitamin liquid split application<br />
Total Marketable<br />
Fig. 3. Watermelon yield at Texas AREC. LSD (0.05) Total 9.1, marketable 9.1.<br />
this study. While yields were not always statistically significant<br />
between N sources, the Nitamin rates of 89 and 135kg N/ha tended to<br />
produce increased vine growth, higher early-season yields, and higher<br />
total yield compared to ammonium nitrate.<br />
Nitrogen rate resulted in some differences in vine growth. <strong>The</strong><br />
lowest N rate, the no-N treatment, and the 180kg/ha Nitamin treatment<br />
had the least vine growth (Table 4). <strong>The</strong> highest Nitamin rate<br />
(180kg/ha) appeared to inhibit vine growth while the ammonium<br />
nitrate at 180kg/ha did not. This appears to be a function of how the<br />
material was applied–Nitamin all in one application vs. ammonium<br />
nitrate split evenly in four applications. <strong>The</strong> nitrate samples for all N<br />
treatments except the 45- and 89-kg/ha Nitamin treatments were at or<br />
above sufficiency ranges (Figure 4). Although the petiole nitrate was<br />
not at sufficient levels for 89kg/ha Nitamin, it was numerically the<br />
highest-yielding treatment.<br />
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS. One factor that must be considered with<br />
any new or existing technology is the cost to implement it.<br />
Controlled-release technology has been in existence for several<br />
decades but its use has been primarily restricted to the turf,<br />
292 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Watermelon vine length and vigor Texas AREC.<br />
Length<br />
Average<br />
June 28 Vigor Vigor size<br />
Treatment<br />
(cm) July 10 Aug. 4 (kg)<br />
Urea 89kg N/ha 86.45 6.75 8.00 4.98<br />
Urea 135kg N/ha 76.23 7.25 9.25 4.20<br />
Nitamin 89kg N/ha (AP) 106.58 8.25 9.75 4.68<br />
Nitamin 135kg N/ha (AP) 108.98 9.25 9.5 5.02<br />
Nitamin 89kg N/ha (S) 90.43 7.75 9.25 5.10<br />
Nitamin 135kg N/ha (S) 96.45 8.75 9.00 5.11<br />
LSD (0.05) 25.12 1.92 1.24 0.86<br />
Vigor ratings: 1= dead; 3 = poor; 6 = fair; 7 = good; 10 = excellent. AP = at<br />
planting; S = split application.<br />
ornamental, and greenhouse industries because of cost. As<br />
environmental concerns with nitrogen contamination increase and the<br />
cost of controlled-release fertilizer decreases, this barrier is coming<br />
down. An evaluation of fertilizer costs, crop value, and increased<br />
grower profit comparing Nitamin to ammonium nitrate or urea is<br />
presented in Tables 5 and 6. As the data show, the increased<br />
production with Nitamin results in significantly higher returns.<br />
Discussion<br />
Nitamin 30L increased yields in three studies but differences were not<br />
always statistically significant at p=0.05. In two cases, applying<br />
Nitamin all at planting outperformed up to four split applications of<br />
quick-release fertilizer. It appears the 60–75 day Nitamin release rate<br />
matched the plants’ N-uptake pattern in those studies. For soils that<br />
ppm nitrate<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
45 51 64<br />
Days after planting<br />
Ammo. Nitrate 45 Kg/ha<br />
Ammo. Nitrate 89 Kg/ha<br />
Ammo. Nitrate 135<br />
Kg/ha<br />
Ammo. Nitrate 180<br />
Kg/ha<br />
Nitamin 45 Kg/ha<br />
Nitamin 89 Kg/ha<br />
Nitamin 135 Kg/ha<br />
Nitamin 180 Kg/ha<br />
No N fertilizer<br />
Fig. 4. Cucumber petiole nitrate. Statistical data by SAS. LSD (0.05)<br />
values: Day 45, 274; Day 51, 218; Day 64, 300.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 293
Table 3. Weight of cucumbers in metric tons per hectare by grade.<br />
Market-<br />
Treatment kg/ha No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 able total<br />
No N fertilizer 2.1 3.8 4.6 1.9 10.5<br />
NH4NO3, 45 3.5 6.7 7.5 2.7 17.7<br />
NH4NO3, 89 2.8 6.4 6.2 2.0 15.4<br />
NH4NO3, 135 3.1 6.1 7.3 2.6 16.4<br />
NH4NO3, 180 2.7 5.6 7.6 2.1 15.9<br />
Nitamin, 45 2.6 5.0 6.1 2.4 13.6<br />
Nitamin, 89 3.1 6.1 9.9 3.3 19.1<br />
Nitamin, 135 3.1 6.1 9.1 2.7 18.3<br />
Nitamin, 180 2.5 4.5 5.4 1.7 12.3<br />
Average 2.8 5.6 7.1 2.4 15.5<br />
LSD (0.05) 0.9 1.9 3.0 1.2 4.2<br />
Table 4. Cucumber-vine measurements.<br />
Vine<br />
Vine<br />
length Treatment length<br />
(cm) (kg/ha)<br />
(cm)<br />
No N fertilizer 39 Nitamin, 45 39<br />
NH4NO3, 45 38 Nitamin, 89 48<br />
NH4NO3, 89 39 Nitamin, 135 46<br />
NH4NO3, 135 43 Nitamin, 180 36<br />
NH4NO3, 180 42<br />
LSD (0.05) 9<br />
are over 90% sand and < 1.0% organic matter, split applications of<br />
Nitamin should be used. Application rates of 135 to 168kg N/ha from<br />
Nitamin appeared to be adequate for watermelon, whereas rates as low<br />
as 89kg N/ha were sufficient for pickling cucumbers. In general,<br />
Nitamin application rates should be 75–100% of the local cooperative<br />
extension recommendation for each crop. Further research is needed<br />
to refine application rates and scheduling in each geographical area.<br />
<strong>The</strong> potential profit advantages of using affordable slow-release N<br />
products such as liquid Nitamin demonstrates their feasibility for use<br />
on cucurbits and other vegetables, especially considering such benefits<br />
as reduced N losses through leaching and ammonia volatilization.<br />
Growers may also find advantages in reducing the number of sidedress<br />
applications or lowering overall N rates with slow-release products.<br />
294 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 5. Value proposition of Florida watermelons per hectare based<br />
on N source.<br />
Fertilizer<br />
Grower profit<br />
Fertilizer kg/ha cost Crop value increase<br />
Nitamin 30L 168 $370 $10420 $1479<br />
Ammo. nitrate 168 $128 $8941 0<br />
Ammo. nitrate 211 $138 $9452 $511<br />
Watermelon price of $2.002/metric ton, Nitamin 30L = $600/ton, Nitamin 42G =<br />
450/ton (ton is U.S. short, not metric), ammonium nitrate = $208/ton.<br />
Table 6. Value proposition of Texas watermelons per hectare based on<br />
N source.<br />
Fertilizer<br />
Grower profit<br />
Fertilizer kg/ha cost Crop value increase<br />
Nitamin 30L 89 $196 $6076 $39<br />
Nitamin 30L 135 $297 $7499 $1,462<br />
Urea 89 $63 $6037 0<br />
Urea 135 $95 $5787 0<br />
Watermelon price of $2.816/metric ton, Nitamin 30L = $600/ton, urea<br />
$224/ton (ton is U.S. short, not metric).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Green Markets, May 8, 2006. 30(19):4, col. 1 & 2.<br />
Official Publication AAPFCO. 2004. 57:40.<br />
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006. Agricultural statistics for 2005.<br />
USDA, Washington, DC. .<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 295
TRIPLOID SEEDLESS WATERMELON<br />
PRODUCTION IN CHINA<br />
Liu Wenge, Yan Zhihong, Zhao Shengjie, and He Nan<br />
Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute,<br />
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Zhengzhou, Henan 450009, P. R. China<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, watermelon, China, triploid,<br />
seedless, production<br />
ABSTRACT. More than 1,000,000ha of watermelon are grown annually in China.<br />
Seedless watermelon is an important part of watermelon production in China,<br />
accounting for 20% of total watermelon production acreage. Ninety percent of<br />
seedless watermelon production is south of the Yellow River. Chinese consumers<br />
like red- or deep pink-fleshed seedless watermelon with black or dark green skin<br />
color. More recently, yellow-fleshed seedless watermelons have been introduced<br />
and gradually accepted. Small-fruited seedless watermelons are also becoming<br />
popular. Some easy yet effective technologies aimed at helping China increase its<br />
production of seedless watermelon have been developed and implemented .<br />
W<br />
atermelon is a warm-season crop similar to cantaloupe,<br />
squash, cucumber, and pumpkin. In China, watermelons are<br />
grown on any well-drained soil throughout the country.<br />
Watermelons are cultivated year-round by utilizing low tunnels and<br />
greenhouses. Watermelons are transported throughout the country.<br />
More than 1,000,000 hectares of watermelon are produced in China<br />
annually, accounting for 58% of the world watermelon production area<br />
and 73% of world watermelon yield in 2003. Yields of 45 to 50 metric<br />
tons per ha are common (Liu, 2005), similar to those of the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s (Maynard, 2001).<br />
Seedless watermelon is an important part of watermelon production<br />
in China. Commercial varieties of seedless watermelon are triploid<br />
hybrids (Tan, 2002). <strong>The</strong>re were 7,000ha of seedless watermelon in<br />
1990. Since 1995, seedless watermelon has become more popular, and<br />
the production acreage has increased to 200,000ha in 2005. Seedless<br />
production now accounts for 20% of total watermelon acreage,<br />
providing a tremendous boost to the watermelon industry (Liu, 2005).<br />
Major Seedless Watermelon Production Areas in<br />
China<br />
<strong>The</strong> major seedless watermelon cultivation areas, based on a 2005<br />
survey, are listed Table 1. More than 200,000ha of seedless watermelon<br />
were produced in 2005. Henan, Hunan, Hubei, Hainan, and Jiangxi<br />
296 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
provinces are the top suppliers of seedless watermelon. Anhui, Guangxi,<br />
Guangdong, Guizhou, Shaanxi, Shandong, Beijing, and Jiangsu are the<br />
second for harvested production areas. <strong>The</strong> provinces with fewer than<br />
1000ha of seedless watermelon include Hebei, Sichuan, Jilin, Shanghai,<br />
Zhejiang, Chongqing, Yunnan, Tianjin, Heilongjiang, Gansu, Ningxia,<br />
Shanxi, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia. Hainan is the primary supplier of<br />
seedless watermelon in December, January, and February. Seedless<br />
watermelon production has increased even though total watermelon<br />
area is decreasing (Liu, 2005). Eighty percent of seedless watermelon<br />
production is located south of the Yangtze River, with 90% south of the<br />
Yellow River. This is because of seedless watermelon’s higher tolerance<br />
to humidity and disease resistance than that of diploid seeded<br />
watermelon (Tan, 2002). Seedless watermelon production is growing<br />
rapidly in some new areas such as the provinces of Yunnan, Sichuan and<br />
Shaanxi, where there was little seedless watermelon cultivation in the<br />
past.<br />
Seedless Watermelon Varieties Used in China<br />
<strong>The</strong> key seedless watermelon varieties grown in different regions of<br />
China are listed in Table 2. Consumers traditionally like red- or<br />
deep-pink-fleshed seedless watermelon. Yellow-fleshed seedless<br />
watermelons have recently been introduced and gradually accepted by<br />
Chinese consumers. Small-fruited seedless watermelon is also<br />
becoming popular. <strong>The</strong> major seedless watermelon varieties used in<br />
China in 1990s were ‘Mimeiwuzi 1’, ‘Guangxi 2’, ‘Heimi 2’, ‘Xuefeng<br />
304’, ‘Dongting 1’, ‘Xuefenghuapi’, and ‘Xinxiu 2’. Since the<br />
registration of ‘Heimi No. 5’ in the national variety identification<br />
system in 2000, Chinese watermelon breeders have made significant<br />
efforts to develop new seedless varieties. In 2002 the following varieties<br />
were registered in the state variety identification system:<br />
‘Zhengkangwuzi No. 1’, ‘Zhengkangwuzi No. 2’, ‘Zhengkangwuzi No.<br />
3’, ‘Mihuangwuzi’, ‘Mihongwuzi’, ‘Xiaoyuhongwuzi’, ‘Fenglewuzi<br />
No. 1’, ‘Fenglewuzi No. 2’, ‘Fenglewuzi No. 3’, and ‘Jinmi 20’. Some<br />
varieties have been registered in the provincial variety identification<br />
system. Midseason and later-maturity varieties have also been released<br />
recently. <strong>The</strong> major objectives for triploid watermelon breeding include<br />
disease resistance, yield, fruit type, high soluble solid contents, free of<br />
hard seed coats, eating quality, and shipping ability. <strong>The</strong> new varieties<br />
have facilitated rapid growth of seedless watermelon production in<br />
China.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 297
Table 1. Seedless watermelon production in China.<br />
Acreage Yield Harvesting<br />
Province (ha) (kg/ha) period<br />
Henan 33000 45,000–75,000 June–Aug.<br />
Hunan 33000 37,500–52,500 June–July<br />
Hubei 32000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />
Hainan 26600 37,500–75,000 Dec.–Feb.<br />
Jiangxi 21300 30,000–45,000 June–July<br />
Anhui 8000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />
Guangxi 6600 30,000–52,500 April–May<br />
Guangdong 4000 30,000–52,500 April–May<br />
Guizhou 2600 30,000–52,500 July–Aug.<br />
Shaanxi 2600 60,000–75,000 May–June<br />
Shandong 2000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />
Beijing 2000 60,000–75,000 July–Aug.<br />
Jiangsu 1000 45,000–75,000 June–July<br />
Impact of Research on Triploid Seedless<br />
Watermelon Production<br />
Low germination, low seedling vigor, and low seed yield of triploid<br />
hybrids are the three major obstacles for seedless watermelon<br />
production. Scientists have tried to find solutions to these problems<br />
(Liu, 2005). Key cultivation techniques have been developed for<br />
growing seedless watermelon in different climatic regions in China.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se techniques include (1) Pregerminating triploid seed with high<br />
temperature (30–32°C). Triploid seeds are placed between moistened<br />
towels, placed on an electric blanket and/or under heating lights, until<br />
the radical has emerged from seed coat. (2) Using plastic mulch to<br />
improve survival rate of triploid seedlings in the field. (3) Producing<br />
triploid hybrid seed under dry climates. <strong>The</strong>se changes have lead to<br />
acceptable seed germination rates (>85%), seedling survival rates<br />
(>80%), and triploid seed yields (>6kg/667m 2 ). <strong>The</strong>se improvements<br />
have made commercial seedless watermelon production possible in<br />
different regions in China. (Tan, 2002).<br />
Transplants and hand-pollination are used in most production areas<br />
where labor is abundant. Bee-pollination is not common for seedless<br />
watermelon production in China. National and provincial (such as<br />
Anhui, Guangxi, and Jiangsu) standards for seedless watermelon<br />
cultivation have been established. Seedless watermelon is also suitable<br />
298 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
for plastic-tunnel and greenhouse production. A year-round supply of<br />
seedless watermelon is achieved through protected production in<br />
northern regions and open-field production in southern regions.<br />
Examples of protected seedless watermelon production include<br />
double-plastic-mulch cultivation in Beijing and greenhouse cultivation<br />
in Shannxi. Hainan island is the most important seedless watermelon<br />
production area for the winter season. Guangxi and Yunnan are the<br />
important production areas for the spring season.<br />
Table 2. Triploid seedless watermelon varieties grown in major<br />
production areas in China.<br />
Fruit type Varieties Characteristics Production areas<br />
Crimson<br />
Sweet<br />
Zhengkangwuzi No. 3,<br />
Fenglewuzi No. 2,<br />
Mihongwzui<br />
Oval-shaped Zhengkangwuzi No. 1,<br />
Cuibao No. 5, Xuefeng<br />
wuzi<br />
Sugar Baby Zhengkangwuzi No. 5,<br />
Dongting No. 1, Jinmi<br />
No. 20<br />
Hei Mi Heimi No. 5,<br />
Zhengkangwuzi No. 2,<br />
Shubao, Zhengkang<br />
2008<br />
Xin Yihao Fenglewuzi No. 3,<br />
Quality No. 1, Guangxi<br />
No. 3<br />
Yellow<br />
flesh<br />
Yellow<br />
skin<br />
Zhengkangwuzi No. 4,<br />
Xiangxigua No. 19,<br />
Mihuang wuzi,<br />
Huangbaoshi<br />
Round, dark narrow<br />
stripes on a light<br />
green background,<br />
red flesh<br />
Large, round, dark<br />
wide stripes on a light<br />
green background,<br />
red flesh<br />
Large, round, no<br />
stripes, solid dark,<br />
red flesh<br />
Large, round, dark<br />
wide stripes on a dark<br />
green background,<br />
red flesh<br />
Large, Round, Dark<br />
medium stripes on a<br />
medium green<br />
background, red flesh<br />
Large, round, yellow<br />
flesh<br />
Henan, Hubei,<br />
Jiangxi,<br />
Guangdong<br />
Henan, Hubei,<br />
Hunan, Guizhou,<br />
Xinjiang<br />
Henan, Hubei,<br />
Jiangxi, Hunan,<br />
Anhui, Guangxi,<br />
Shanxi<br />
Hunan,Hubei,<br />
Jiangxi,Anhui,<br />
Shaanxi,Beijing,<br />
Jiangsu, Hebei,<br />
Liaoning<br />
Hainan,Guangxi,<br />
Shandong<br />
Hubei, Hunan,<br />
Guangxi<br />
Jin Taiyang No. 1 Yellow rind, red flesh Sichuan, Gansu,<br />
Jiangxi, Henan<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 299
Literature Cited<br />
Liu, W. G. 2005. Review and perspectives of scientific research and production<br />
cooperation of seedless watermelon in China. China watermelon and melon.<br />
2005(2):19–20<br />
Maynard, D. N. (ed.). 2001. Watermelon. characteristics, production, and marketing.<br />
ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Tan, S. Y. (ed). 2002. Seedless watermelon culture and breeding. Agriculture Press,<br />
Beijing, China.<br />
300 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
HERBIVORY BY CUCUMBER BEETLES<br />
AFFECTS POLLEN PRODUCTION AND<br />
POLLEN PERFORMANCE IN A WILD GOURD<br />
Andrew G. Stephenson, James A. Winsor, Daolin Du,<br />
Andrew DeNicco, and Matthew Smith<br />
Department of Biology, <strong>The</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
University Park, PA 16802<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. texana, diabroticite beetles,<br />
Erwinia tracheiphila, fitness, male function, pollen competition<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> impact of herbivory and other biotic stress on fitness through<br />
the male function is rarely studied in wild plants. To examine the effects of<br />
cucumber-beetle herbivory on the male function of wild gourds (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
ssp. texana [Bailey] Andres), inbred and outbred plants from five families were<br />
grown in one-acre experimental plots for four field seasons. On these plants we<br />
nondestructively assessed foliar beetle damage and recorded staminate-flower<br />
production, pollen production per male flower, and in vitro pollen-tube growth.<br />
We also examined in vivo pollen performance in a pollen-competition<br />
experiment. Our results reveal that as beetle damage increases on plants, both<br />
pollen production and pollen performance decreases. Moreover, we found that<br />
as beetle damage increases, the probability that the plants will survive to 1<br />
September decreases, as a result of increased exposure to the causative agent of<br />
bacterial wilt disease, Erwinia tracheiphila. <strong>The</strong>se findings suggest that foliar<br />
beetle damage is likely to decrease fitness through the male function by<br />
reducing both the amount of pollen that a plant donates to conspecifics and the<br />
probability that the pollen will sire a seed after deposition onto a stigma.<br />
M<br />
ost flowering plants are hermaphrodites and consequently<br />
achieve half of their fitness through the male function<br />
(Yampolsky and Yampolsky, 1922). In cultivated species<br />
for which the flowers, fruits, or seeds are the desired commodity, there<br />
have been few studies of the impact of soil nutrients, abiotic stress,<br />
herbivory, disease, etc., on the male function. Although there have<br />
been many ecological studies using noncultivated species that have<br />
examined the effects of various environmental stresses on growth and<br />
We thank T. Kinney, J. Thaller, N. Myers, and B. Leyshon for field and greenhouse<br />
assitance; R. Oberheim and his staff for use of <strong>The</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University<br />
Agriculture Experiment Station at Rock Springs, PA (Horticulture Farms); and A.<br />
Omeis for use of the Buckhout greenhouse. This research was supported by NSF<br />
grant DEB02-35217 to AGS and JAW and by a China Scholarship Council<br />
Fellowship to DD.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 301
eproduction through the female (fruit and seed) functions, only<br />
recently have ecologists begun to study the effects of environmental<br />
stress on pollen production per flower, pollen performance, or the<br />
number of seeds sired in the population (Delph et al., 1997;<br />
Stephenson et al., 2003). This neglect is most likely due to the<br />
difficulty of assessing pollen production, pollen performance, and<br />
patterns of gene flow in species for which biochemical, molecular, and<br />
genetic resources are unavailable. Moreover, for most wild species<br />
little is known about the herbivores and even less about the pathogens<br />
that are likely to be the causes of the biotic stress.<br />
Because of the comparative wealth of resources available in<br />
cultivated species (e.g., knowledge of the full suite of herbivores and<br />
pathogens and their vectors, and of the volatile compounds;<br />
biochemical and genetic resources; and, in some cases, commercially<br />
available immunological test kits for the pathogens, transgenes for<br />
disease resistance, microarrays, and other genomic, proteomic, and<br />
metabolomic tools), ecologists have recently begun to transfer some of<br />
this information and technology to wild relatives of the cultivated<br />
species in order to address fundamental ecological and evolutionary<br />
questions (Richman et al., 1995; DeMoraes et al., 1998; Halitschke et<br />
al., 2003). Over the last five years, we have been investigating the<br />
interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease<br />
establishment and transmission in a wild gourd (free-living squash,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. texana). <strong>The</strong>se studies have revealed that there is<br />
genetic variation for resistance to cucumber beetles in families of<br />
seeds collected from the wild; that inbred plants suffer higher levels of<br />
herbivory by cucumber beetles and harbor larger aphid populations<br />
than outbred plants; that inbred plants are more likely to be infected<br />
with aphid-transmitted viral diseases than outbred plants; and that<br />
outbred plants produce more floral volatiles than inbred plants (Hayes<br />
et al., 2004; Stephenson et al., 2004; Ferrari, 2006). Here, we use data<br />
from four field seasons to examine the impact of herbivory and disease<br />
on the male function of this wild gourd.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp. texana (also known as C. pepo ssp. ovifera<br />
var. texana) is an annual monoecious vine with indeterminate growth<br />
and reproduction. It is native to Texas and adjacent areas and is<br />
thought to be either the wild progenitor of the cultivated squashes (C.<br />
pepo ssp. pepo, also known as C. pepo ssp. ovifera var. ovifera) or an<br />
early escape from cultivation (Decker, 1988). When the two<br />
subspecies are grown in the same vicinity, they frequently produce<br />
hybrid progeny, and the F1 progeny are highly viable and fertile<br />
(Quesada et al., 1993).<br />
302 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
After a period of vegetative growth (5–7 nodes), the wild gourd<br />
produces one large yellow flower (either staminate or pistillate) in the<br />
axil of each leaf. <strong>The</strong> flowers last for only one morning and are<br />
pollinated by bees, especially squash bees. <strong>The</strong> leaves and other organs<br />
of the wild gourd produce bitter compounds called cucurbitacins<br />
(oxygenated tetracyclic triterpenes) that deter most herbivores<br />
(Tallamy, 1985; Metcalf and Rhodes, 1990). Interestingly,<br />
cucurbitacins are phagostimulants to cucumber beetles from the<br />
Luperini subtribes Diabroticina and Aulacophorina (Chyrsomelidae:<br />
Galerucinae). It is generally thought that by consuming cucurbitacins,<br />
cucumber beetles embitter themselves and make themselves less<br />
attractive to potential predators (Tallamy and Krischik, 1989).<br />
Furthermore, cucurbitacins may play a role in the beetle mating system<br />
(Tallamy et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong>se cucumber beetles cause a characteristic<br />
pattern of holes (typically 1–1.5cm in diameter) in the portions of the<br />
leaf serviced by the smallest veins. Aphids also feed on the leaves, leaf<br />
axils, and growing tips of the vine.<br />
Cucumber beetles and aphids are also known to transmit the most<br />
important growing-season diseases of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. Consequently, the<br />
full impact of herbivory on wild gourds includes increased exposure to<br />
a variety of pathogens. Cucumber beetles are the primary vector of the<br />
bacterial wilt pathogen Erwinia tracheiphila (Yao et al., 1996). In<br />
Pennsylvania, the bacterium is transmitted via the feeding of the<br />
striped and spotted cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittata and<br />
Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi) (Fleischer et al., 1999).<br />
Erwinia proliferates in the xylem and secretes a mucilaginous matrix<br />
that cuts off water supply, resulting in wilting and eventual death of<br />
the plant. Wilt symptoms typically develop 10–15 days following<br />
infection in mature plants and are nearly always fatal. Aphids are the<br />
sole vectors for four of the most common viral diseases of cucurbits,<br />
Cucumber mosaic virus, Papaya ringspot virus-Type W, Watermelon<br />
mosaic virus, and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
An experimental population of C. pepo ssp. texana was initiated<br />
from seeds sampled randomly from a natural population in Texas. A<br />
random sample of five progeny was used to found five maternal lines,<br />
and the remaining lines were reserved as potential pollen donors. A<br />
multiyear crossing program was used to generate plants with a range<br />
of inbreeding coefficients to study inbreeding depression in a host of<br />
traits (Stephenson et al., 2001; Hayes et al., 2005). For the purposes of<br />
this study, we were concerned only with offspring from outcrossed<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 303
matings (ƒ = 0) and first generation self-matings (ƒ = 0.5 ) in each<br />
year. In the summers of 2002–2005 we conducted field experiments to<br />
examine the effects of inbreeding and genetic variability on herbivory<br />
and patterns of disease spread. In each year, we germinated selfed and<br />
outcrossed progeny from the five maternal lines in a greenhouse and<br />
transplanted to 2–4 fields of 0.4-ha each at the Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong><br />
Agricultural Experimental Station at Rock Springs, Pennsylvania, on<br />
18–22 May. Plants were arrayed in a grid of 12 plants by 15 plants in a<br />
systematic pattern to assure mixing of genotypes.<br />
To assess the male function of each plant in each year we (1)<br />
recorded male (staminate) flower production on each plant in each<br />
field during each year two days per week until 31 August (because the<br />
flowers last only a single morning, this provides an unbiased estimate<br />
of male-flower production). (2) In late July 2002, we collected the<br />
anthers from one flower on each plant, placed them into a glass vial,<br />
and placed the vial into a drying oven. Subsequently, we counted the<br />
pollen produced by the staminate flowers using an Elzone Particle<br />
Counter (Micromeritics Corp., Norcross, GA). (3) In early August of<br />
2002, 2004, and 2005, we again collected the anthers from one flower<br />
on each plant in one field, and then brushed the pollen onto Petri plates<br />
containing a modified Brewbaker and Kwack (1963) medium with<br />
12% sucrose and 1% agar. After 20 minutes, we added a few drops of<br />
80% ethanol to stop the germination and growth of pollen tubes (see<br />
Stephenson et al., 2001). We recorded the lengths of a sample of 30<br />
pollen tubes on each plate using an image analysis system. (4) In 2003,<br />
we assessed the in vivo performance of pollen by collecting pollen<br />
from outbred plants growing in the same fields that were hand-sprayed<br />
weekly with esfenvalerate (Asana XL, DuPont Corp., Wilmington,<br />
DE) (which decreased both herbivory and disease symptoms compared<br />
to unsprayed plants; see Stephenson et al., 2004) and from unsprayed<br />
outbred plants from each of the five families used in the study. Pollen<br />
from each of the 10 combinations (5 families x 2 spray/no spray<br />
treatments) was then placed onto stigmas of an inbred line of zucchini<br />
(‘Black Beauty’) along with an equal amount of zucchini pollen<br />
(Figure 1). Three replicate pollinations of each type were made on<br />
different plants and the resulting fruits were harvested at the end of the<br />
growing season. A sample of the progeny was germinated, grown, and<br />
scored for paternity based on the shape of the ovary and other singlegene<br />
traits (see Quesada et al., 1993, for pollination and scoring<br />
techniques).<br />
Three times during the growing season (mid-June, mid-July, and<br />
mid-August) each year, we nondestructively recorded the amount of<br />
beetle damage on the new growth along the main stem of each plant<br />
304 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Fig. 1. Diagram of design of pollen-mixture experiment. Equal amounts of wildgourd<br />
pollen and zucchini pollen were placed onto zucchini stigmas.<br />
using a 0–5 scale in which 0 = most leaves with no beetle damage and<br />
no leaf with more than 5% of the leaf area removed, and 5 = all leaves<br />
damaged and at least one leaf with > 50% of the leaf area removed<br />
(Stephenson et al., 2004). Similarly, two times during the 2002<br />
growing season (late June and early August), we nondestructively<br />
recorded symptoms of viral infection on a 0–5 scale by inspecting the<br />
leaves on the new growth along the main stem. During the twiceweekly<br />
flower counts (above) in each field during each year, we also<br />
recorded the onset of bacterial wilt symptoms and the date in which<br />
the plant died (bacterial wilt disease is 100% fatal once visual<br />
symptoms appear).<br />
Separate analyses of variance were conducted for the three<br />
components of male reproductive output (staminate flowers/plant,<br />
pollen/flower, and in vitro pollen-tube growth) using a mixed-effects<br />
ANOVA (Proc GLM, SAS Institute Inc., 2002). Type III sums of<br />
squares were used to test the significance of family (random), f (the<br />
coefficient of inbreeding, 0 or 0.5), beetle damage (a covariate<br />
summed for the three dates that it was assessed), and the two-way<br />
interactions. For brevity, the results and discussion will focus only on<br />
the effects of beetle damage on the male function.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 305
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> results of our mixed-effects model analysis of variance using<br />
only those plants that survived until 31 August revealed that beetle<br />
damage had no significant effect on staminate-flower production<br />
(F1,606 = 0.47; p > 0.10). However, when we analyzed the data using all<br />
plants that survived to 1 July (the approximate date of first flower<br />
production in each year), we found that beetle damage significantly<br />
decreased staminate-flower production (F1,1076 = 5.22; p < 0.003).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se findings suggest that the plants that died prior to the end of the<br />
growing season had significantly higher levels of beetle damage than<br />
the plants that survived. In fact, a preliminary analysis that will be<br />
explored in more detail in another publication indicates that the plants<br />
that died in the month following each assessment of beetle damage had<br />
significantly higher levels of beetle damage than those that survived.<br />
In our fields, the greatest cause of mortality during the growing season<br />
was due to E. tracheiphila—a pathogen that is vectored by cucumber<br />
beetles. In the four years of this study, 8 to 35% of the plants died after<br />
exhibiting symptoms of wilt disease before 31 August (Ferrari, 2006).<br />
Our analyses of variance also reveal that beetle damage<br />
significantly decreases both pollen production per flower (F1,112 = 4.70;<br />
p < 0.04) and in vitro pollen-tube growth rate (F1,396 = 4.48; p < 0.04).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se findings indicate that beetle damage decreases total pollen<br />
production per plant even though those plants that survive to August<br />
do not differ in total staminate-flower production. Consequently,<br />
damaged plants have fewer pollen grains to donate to conspecifics.<br />
Moreover, the in vitro pollen-tube-growth data suggest that as beetle<br />
damage increases on plants, the plants have fewer or lower quality<br />
resources for their developing pollen grains (Delph et al., 1997;<br />
Stephenson et al., 2003). <strong>The</strong> amount of stored nutrient and energy<br />
compounds, in turn, affects the growth of pollen tubes in vitro and the<br />
initial (autotrophic phase) growth of pollen tubes in vivo (Stephenson<br />
et al., 2003). A chi-square ANOVA (Proc CATMOD; SAS Institute,<br />
2002) reveals that pollen produced from sprayed plants (plants with<br />
significantly less cucumber beetle and aphid herbivory and<br />
significantly lower levels of the diseases transmitted by aphids and<br />
cucumber beetles; Stephenson et al., 2004) sired significantly more<br />
seeds (53%) in competition with zucchini pollen than pollen from<br />
nonsprayed plants (37%).<br />
Although the male function of cultivated species rarely merits<br />
attention, the ecological impacts of biotic stress on the male function<br />
and its evolutionary implications are very important to their<br />
noncultivated relatives. <strong>The</strong> findings from this study suggest that<br />
306 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
damage by cucumber beetles can impact fitness by decreasing pollen<br />
production, which in turn decreases the probability that a plant’s<br />
pollen will be deposited onto stigmas of conspecifics. Moreover, the in<br />
vitro pollen-tube-growth data and the in vivo pollen-competition data<br />
suggest that beetle damage decreases the probability that those pollen<br />
grains that are deposited onto a stigma will actually get their genes into<br />
the next generation. Because studies of the wild species in the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae can draw upon the comparative wealth of information<br />
and resources that are available in the cultivated species, it is likely<br />
that the wild relatives will become important as model systems for<br />
addressing basic issues in evolutionary biology, disease ecology, and<br />
population genetics.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Brewbaker, J. L. and B. H. Kwack. 1963. <strong>The</strong> essential role of calcium ion in pollen<br />
germination and pollen tube growth. Amer. J. Bot. 50:747–758.<br />
Decker, D. S. 1988. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a-pepo<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 42:4–15.<br />
Delph, L. F., M. H. Jóhannsson, and A. G. Stephenson. 1997. How environmental<br />
factors affect pollen performance: ecological and evolutionary perspectives.<br />
Ecology. 78:1632–1639.<br />
DeMoraes, C. M., W. J. Lewis, P. W. Paré, H. T. Alborn and J. H. Tumlinson. 1998.<br />
Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasites. Nature. 393:570–573.<br />
Ferrari, M. 2006. Mixing models and the geometry of epidemics. PhD Diss., Ecology<br />
Program, Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University, University Park, PA.<br />
Fleischer, S. J., D. de Mackiewicz, F. E. Gildow, and F. L. Lukezic. 1999.<br />
Serological estimates of the seasonal dynamics of Erwinia tracheiphila in<br />
Acalymma vittata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Env. Ent. 28:470–476.<br />
Halitschke, R., K. Gase, D. Hui, D. D. Schmidt, and I. T. Baldwin. 2003. Molecular<br />
interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera,<br />
Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VI. microarray analysis<br />
reveals that most herbivore-specific transcriptional changes are mediated by<br />
fatty acid-amino acid conjugates. Plant Phys. 131:1894–1902.<br />
Hayes, C. N., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. 2004. Inbreeding influences<br />
herbivory in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo ssp texana (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Oecologia. 140:601–<br />
608.<br />
Hayes, C. N., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. 2005. A comparison of male and<br />
female responses to inbreeding in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo subsp Texana<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92:107–115.<br />
Metcalf, R. L. and A. M. Rhodes. 1990. Coevolution of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Luperini<br />
(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): basic and applied aspects, p. 167–182. In: D. M.<br />
Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey (eds.). Biology and utilizaton of the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.<br />
Quesada, M. R., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. 1993. Effects of pollen<br />
competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous <strong>Cucurbit</strong>. Amer. Nat.<br />
142:694–706.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 307
Richman, A. D., T-H. Kao, S. W. Schaeffer, and M. K. Uyenoyama. 1995. S-allele<br />
sequence diversity in natural populations of Solanum carolinense (horsenettle).<br />
Heredity. 75:405–415.<br />
SAS Institute. 2002. SAS user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC<br />
Stephenson, A. G., B. Leyshon, S. E. Travers, C. N. Hayes, and J. A. Winsor. 2004.<br />
Interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease on reproduction in a<br />
wild gourd. Ecology. 85:3023–3034.<br />
Stephenson, A. G., C. N. Hayes, M. H. Johannsson, and J. A. Winsor. 2001. <strong>The</strong><br />
performance of microgametophytes is affected by inbreeding depression and<br />
hybrid vigor in the sporophytic generation. Sex. Plant Repro. 14:77–83.<br />
Stephenson, A. G., S. E. Travers, J. I. Mena-Ali, and J. A. Winsor. 2003. Pollen<br />
performance before and during the autotrophic-heterotrophic transition of pollen<br />
tube growth. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 358:1009–1018.<br />
Tallamy, D. W. 1985. Squash beetle feeding behavior: an adaptation against induced<br />
cucurbit defenses. Ecology. 66:1574–1579.<br />
Tallamy, D. W. and V. A. Krischik. 1989. Variation and function of cucurbitacins in<br />
Curcurbita: an examination of current hypotheses. Amer. Nat. 133:766–786.<br />
Tallamy, D. W., B. E. Powell, and J. A. McClafferty. 2002. Male traits under cryptic<br />
female choice in the spotted cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).<br />
Behav. Ecol. 13:511–518.<br />
Yao, C. B., G. Zehnder, E. Bauske, and J. Klopper. 1996. Relationship between<br />
cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) density and incidence of bacterial<br />
wilt of cucurbits. J. Econ. Ent. 89:510–514.<br />
Yampolsky, C. and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the<br />
phanerogamic flora. Bibl. Genet. 3:1–62.<br />
308 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
WHITEFLY TRANSMISSION OF A NEW<br />
VIRUS INFECTING CUCURBITS IN FLORIDA<br />
Susan E. Webb<br />
University of Florida, Entomology and Nematology Department,<br />
Gainesville, FL 32611-0620<br />
Scott Adkins<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s Department of Agriculture-Agricultural<br />
Research Service, Fort Pierce, FL<br />
Carlye A. Baker<br />
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services,<br />
Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. Citrullus lanatus,<br />
Bemisia tabaci, Potyviridae<br />
ABSTRACT. A virus isolated from squash collected in Hillsborough County, FL<br />
in 2003 was subsequently determined to be an ipomovirus. <strong>The</strong> virus was<br />
transmitted by the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci B strain, in laboratory<br />
experiments. <strong>The</strong> virus was acquired by whiteflies after a 3-h access period on<br />
infected plants. After sequential inoculation access periods on healthy seedlings,<br />
whiteflies (15–20 per clip cage) transmitted the virus during the second and<br />
subsequent access periods, with the highest rate of transmission during the<br />
second access period (2–4h postacquisition). A limited host-range study<br />
suggested that the virus is restricted to cucurbits. All <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species tested<br />
showed vein yellowing and were stunted compared to healthy controls. <strong>The</strong><br />
Cucumis species tested showed transient vein yellowing and apparent recovery.<br />
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) leaves yellowed, petioles collapsed, and plants<br />
became necrotic and died 7–10 days after inoculation. <strong>The</strong> relationship between<br />
this virus and the highly damaging disease known in Florida as mature<br />
watermelon vine decline is being explored.<br />
D<br />
uring a survey of cucurbit viruses in Florida from 2000 to<br />
2003 (Webb et al., 2003), leaf samples were collected from a<br />
field of yellow summer squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.) in<br />
Hillsborough County. All samples were tested by DAS ELISA for the<br />
common cucurbit viruses in Florida (Watermelon mosaic virus 2,<br />
Zucchini yellow mosaic virus, Papaya ringspot virus watermelon<br />
strain [PRSV-W]) and for five other viruses that have been found<br />
occasionally (Cucumber mosaic virus, Watermelon leaf mottle virus,<br />
Tobacco streak virus, Squash mosaic virus, Tomato spotted wilt virus).<br />
Of the 40 samples tested from the field, 39 tested positive for PRSV-<br />
W and one was negative for all 8 viruses, although it had symptoms<br />
typical of a viral infection (Whidden and Webb, 2004). This sample<br />
was used to mechanically inoculate 'Prelude II' squash, and the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 309
esulting infection maintained in the greenhouse for further study by<br />
weekly transfer to fresh plants.<br />
Tissue samples were sent to Agdia (Elkhart, IN) to be tested for 14<br />
viruses, including 6 of the viruses for which we had already tested.<br />
Results, including those from a general potyvirus test, were negative.<br />
Agdia also performed group tests, using PCR, for carmoviruses,<br />
nepoviruses, and geminiviruses, with negative results. Our initial<br />
efforts to detect viral inclusions in epidermal strips (Christie and<br />
Edwardson, 1994) and to detect particles in leaf dip preparations by<br />
electron microscopy were not successful. However, we were later able<br />
to purify the virus, and preliminary sequence comparisons showed that<br />
it was an ipomovirus (unpublished data), a genus in the family<br />
Potyviridae whose members are transmitted by whiteflies (Bemisia<br />
tabaci).<br />
Experiments described in this paper confirm that the virus found in<br />
Florida is also transmitted by whiteflies and begin host-range<br />
comparisons with the other ipomovirus found in cucurbits in Europe<br />
and the Middle East, Cucumber vein yellowing virus (CVYV) (Al-<br />
Musa et al., 1985; Cuadrado et al., 2001; Harpaz and Cohen, 1965;<br />
Louro et al., 2004; Yilmaz et al., 1989).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
WHITEFLIES, PLANTS, AND VIRUS. Adult whiteflies (Bemisia<br />
argentifolii Bellows & Perring, also known as the B strain of Bemisia<br />
tabaci) of mixed ages (newly enclosed to 4d old) were obtained from a<br />
colony maintained on cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. (‘DPL 90’) and<br />
collard, Brassica oleracea var. acephala (‘Georgia’) as described by<br />
Chen et al. (2004).<br />
<strong>The</strong> yellow crookneck squash cultivar ‘Prelude II’, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
L. (Seminis Seeds, Oxnard, CA) was used for all experiments. Plants<br />
were grown in a 3:1 (vol/vol) mixture of Metro-Mix Ag Lite Mix (Sun<br />
Gro Horticulture, Bellevue, WA) and pasteurized sand (Quikrete C.,<br />
Atlanta, GA).<br />
Virus was maintained in ‘Prelude II’ plants in the greenhouse by<br />
mechanical transmission, using 20mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH<br />
7.0) containing 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium sulfite and 1% (wt/vol) Celite.<br />
<strong>The</strong> culture used for transmission experiments was started from<br />
purified virus.<br />
TRANSMISSION EXPERIMENTS. An infected source plant (10d<br />
postinoculation) and a healthy plant of the same age were placed in<br />
separate cages (61cm x 61cm x 61cm) consisting of frames<br />
constructed of PVC pipe (1.3cm diameter) enclosed in organdy covers.<br />
310 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Approximately 100 adult whiteflies were added to each cage for a 24-h<br />
acquisition period. At the end of that time, six 2-w-old squash plants<br />
were added to each cage. Plants were removed from the cages after 2d<br />
and moved to a greenhouse after the remaining adult whiteflies were<br />
destroyed. Plants were monitored for symptom development for 10d.<br />
A second experiment was done to compare the level of<br />
transmission and retention time after a much shorter acquisition access<br />
period with fewer whiteflies based on the results of Mansour and Al-<br />
Musa (1993) with a Jordanian isolate of CVYV, one of the three<br />
described ipomoviruses. Five source plants, 10d postinoculation with<br />
strong vein yellowing symptoms, were placed in one of the cages<br />
described above. Approximately 2000 whiteflies were released in the<br />
cage. A second cage, set up in a different room, contained mockinoculated<br />
healthy plants and approximately 500 whiteflies. After a 3h<br />
acquisition access period, whiteflies were aspirated into glass tubes<br />
using a hand-operated vacuum pump and transferred to cylindrical<br />
polystyrene clip cages that were screened on both top and bottom with<br />
a mesh that allowed feeding and oviposition through the mesh, but did<br />
not allow whiteflies to escape. Approximately 15–20 whiteflies were<br />
placed in each of 25 cages. Each cage was clipped to the youngest<br />
expanded leaf of a healthy 20-d-old squash plant, so that whiteflies had<br />
access to the underside of the leaf. After 2h, cages were removed and<br />
placed on a second set of plants. After 2h on the second set of 25<br />
plants, cages were moved to a third set of plants and left overnight<br />
(16h). <strong>The</strong> cages were moved to a fourth set of plants for 2h on the<br />
following morning. Control plants were exposed to whiteflies that had<br />
access to the mock-inoculated plants for 22h. Plants were moved to a<br />
greenhouse and treated with pymetrozine (Fulfill, Syngenta,<br />
Greensboro, NC). Presence or absence of symptoms was monitored for<br />
12d and samples of all plants were tested by RT-PCR (unpublished)<br />
for the presence of virus.<br />
HOST RANGE. Fifteen species in six families were mechanically<br />
inoculated with the virus. Twenty plants of each species were grown<br />
from seed in the greenhouse in the growing medium described earlier<br />
and monitored for typical symptoms for 2 to 3w after inoculation.<br />
Tissue from some plants of each species not showing symptoms was<br />
used to mechanically inoculate ‘Prelude II’, which was observed for<br />
2w for symptom development.<br />
Results<br />
WHITEFLY TRANSMISSION. In the initial whitefly transmission<br />
experiment, 3 of 6 plants developed typical vein clearing symptoms,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 311
eginning 8d after exposure to whiteflies. Infection was confirmed by<br />
RT-PCR (data not shown).<br />
In the second experiment, no plants from the first 2-h inoculation<br />
access period developed symptoms. Of the 25 plants from the second<br />
inoculation access period (2–4h postacquisition), 3 developed typical<br />
symptoms. One of 25 plants in the third access period (4–20h<br />
postacquisition) developed symptoms, and no plants in the last group<br />
(20–22h postacquisition) showed any symptoms. However, when<br />
plants were tested by RT-PCR, 1 additional plant without symptoms<br />
from the third time period was positive, as were 2 of the plants from<br />
the final time period.<br />
HOST RANGE. Only plants in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae developed<br />
symptoms (Table 1) and only <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species and Luffa acutangula<br />
developed strong, systemic vein clearing (Figure 1). Cucumber,<br />
Cucumis sativus, and Cucumis melo showed vein-clearing symptoms<br />
on only the first leaf to develop after inoculation. Virus could be<br />
occasionally recovered from this leaf by using it to mechanically<br />
inoculate ‘Prelude II’. When watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) was<br />
inoculated, the first symptoms consisted of yellowing of the youngest<br />
leaves and petioles, followed by collapse of the petioles, and finally<br />
necrosis and death of the whole plant (Figure 2).<br />
Table 1. Experimental host range of new ipomovirus.<br />
Family Species Common name Symptoms a<br />
Amaranthaceae Gomphrena<br />
globosa<br />
Globe amaranth -<br />
Chenopodiaceae Chenopodium<br />
-<br />
amaranticolor<br />
Cruciferae Brassica oleracea<br />
var acephala cv.<br />
Georgia<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae Citrullus lanatus<br />
cv. Sangria<br />
Citrullus lanatus<br />
cv. Crimson Sweet<br />
Cucumis melo cv.<br />
Athena<br />
Cucumis sativus<br />
cv. Dasher II<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima<br />
cv. Big Max<br />
Collard -<br />
Watermelon SWN<br />
Watermelon SWN<br />
Muskmelon TVY<br />
Cucumber -<br />
Pumpkin VY<br />
312 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1 cont’d<br />
Family Species Common name Symptoms a<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata cv. El<br />
Calabaza VY<br />
Dorado<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
cv. Prelude II<br />
Yellow<br />
crookneck<br />
squash<br />
Luffa acutangula Luffa VY<br />
Fabaceae Phaseolus<br />
vulgaris cv. Bush<br />
Blue Lake<br />
Green bean -<br />
Pisum sativum cv.<br />
Alaska Pea<br />
English pea -<br />
Solanaceae Nicotiana<br />
benthamiana<br />
-<br />
Lycopersicum<br />
esculentum cv.<br />
Sunny<br />
Tomato -<br />
Datura<br />
stramonium<br />
Jimson weed -<br />
a<br />
Symptoms on uninoculated leaves: = no infection, TVY = transient vein yellowing,<br />
VY = vein yellowing, SWN = systemic wilt and necrosis.<br />
VY<br />
Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> new ipomovirus isolated from squash is transmitted by<br />
silverleaf whitefly, a common pest of cucurbits in Florida. <strong>The</strong><br />
efficiency of transmission was low (50%) in our first experiment, even<br />
when whiteflies (100 per 6 plants) were given free access to plants for<br />
relatively long periods of time. Mansour and Al-Musa (1993) found a<br />
similar level of transmission (56%) of CVYV when they used 15–20<br />
whiteflies and 24-h acquisition and inoculation access periods. To<br />
begin to determine the lower limits of acquisition and inoculation<br />
access times and the period of retention of the virus, we allowed<br />
whiteflies a 3-h acquisition access period followed by several serial<br />
inoculation access periods. That we obtained transmission under these<br />
conditions suggests that it does not take long for whiteflies to acquire<br />
the virus. <strong>The</strong> very low rates of transmission (a high of 12% at 2–4 h<br />
postacquisition) suggest that either the screened clip cages interfered<br />
with transmission, or that there were not enough actively feeding<br />
whiteflies to attain higher levels of transmission. However, it was<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 313
Fig. 1. Symptoms on squash, ‘Prelude II’.<br />
Fig. 2. Symptoms on watermelon, ‘Crimson Sweet’.<br />
314 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
surprising to find plants that tested positive for virus by PCR in the<br />
group receiving whiteflies that were 20h postacquisition. Both<br />
Mansour and Al-Musa (1993) and Harpaz and Cohen (1965) found<br />
that whiteflies were unable to transmit CVYV after 6h.<br />
Harpaz and Cohen (1965) found that, for CVYV, a <strong>complete</strong> cycle<br />
of acquisition and inoculation could be <strong>complete</strong>d within 60 min. This<br />
and the short time that the whiteflies remained viruliferous led them to<br />
suggest a semipersistent mode of transmission. We are now beginning<br />
a systematic exploration of the transmission parameters of the Florida<br />
ipomovirus in order to more fully compare it with CVYV and to<br />
develop management recommendations for growers.<br />
<strong>The</strong> host range of the virus so far appears to be limited to the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Unlike CVYV, which causes yellowing, stunting, and<br />
sudden plant death in Cucumis melo (Louro et al., 2004), the Florida<br />
ipomovirus causes only mild and transitory vein yellowing in melon.<br />
In contrast, infection of watermelon results in death of the plant. A<br />
mature watermelon vine decline and fruit rot has resulted in serious<br />
crop losses in Florida in the past few years (Roberts et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />
virus described in this paper has been found in watermelon in a limited<br />
survey (unpublished data) and may be the causal agent of the disease.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Al-Musa, A. M., S. J. Qusus, and A. N. Mansour. 1985. Cucumber vein yellowing<br />
virus on cucumber in Jordan. Plant Dis. 69:361.<br />
Chen, J., H. J. McAuslane, R. B. Carle, and S. E. Webb. 2004. Effects of Bemisia<br />
argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation and squash silverleaf disorder<br />
on zucchini yield and quality. J. Econ. Entomol. 97:2083–2094.<br />
Christie, R. G. and J. R. Edwardson. 1994. Light and electron microscopy of plant<br />
virus inclusions. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural<br />
Sciences. Monograph 9, rev.<br />
Cuadrado, I. M., D. Janssen, L. Velasco, L. Ruiz, and E. Segundo. 2001. First report<br />
of cucumber vein yellowing virus in Spain. Plant Dis. 85:336.<br />
Harpaz, I. and S. Cohen. 1965. Semipersistent relationship between cucumber vein<br />
yellowing virus (CVYV) and its vector, the tobacco whitefly (Bemisia tabaci<br />
Gennadius). Phytopathol. Z. 54:240–248.<br />
Louro, D., A. Quinot, E. Neto, J. E. Fernandes, D. Marian, M. Vecchiati, P. Caciagli,<br />
and A. M. Vaira. 2004. Occurrence of cucumber vein yellowing virus in<br />
cucurbitaceous species in southern Portugal. Plant Pathol. 53:241.<br />
Mansour, A. and A. Al-Musa. 1993. Cucumber vein yellowing virus; host range and<br />
virus vector relationships. J. Phytopathol. 137:73–78.<br />
Roberts, P., R. M. Muchovej, P. Gilreath, G. McAvoy, C. A. Baker, and S. Adkins.<br />
2004. Mature vine decline and fruit rot of watermelon. Citrus and Vegetable<br />
Magazine. Dec. 12.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 315
Webb, S. E., E. Hiebert, and T. A. Kucharek. 2003. Identity and distribution of<br />
viruses infecting cucurbits in Florida. Phytopathology. 93:S89(Abstr.)<br />
Whidden, A. and S. Webb. 2004. Virus in yellow squash in Hillsborough County.<br />
Vegetarian 4(1). Horticultural Sciences Dept., Vegetable Crops Extension<br />
Newsletter, University of Florida, Gainesville.<br />
.<br />
Yilmaz, M. A., M. Ozaslan, and D. Ozaslan. 1989. Cucumber vein yellowing virus<br />
in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae in Turkey. Plant Dis. 73:610.<br />
316 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
GENETIC DIVERSITY AND PHYLOGENETIC<br />
RELATIONSHIP AMONG MELON<br />
ACCESSIONS FROM AFRICA AND ASIA<br />
REVEALED BY RAPD ANALYSIS<br />
Y. Akashi, K. Tanaka, H. Nishida, and K. Kato<br />
Faculty of Agriculture, Okayama University, 1-1-1 Tsushima, Naka,<br />
Okayama, Japan<br />
M. T. Khaing, S. S. Yi, and T. T. Chou<br />
Vegetable and Fruit Research and Development Center (VFRDC),<br />
Yemon, Indaingpo, Hlecuts, Yangon, Myanmar<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, Group conomon, polyphyletic<br />
origin, small-seed type, transmission route,<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> genetic diversity of melon from the Middle East and Africa was<br />
studied by RAPD analysis, and compared with that of Asian landraces.<br />
Polymorphic index was higher in Africa, Middle East, and India, and decreased<br />
toward East Asia. A total of 291 samples were classified into seven clusters,<br />
among which Cluster II consisted of the conomon group and small-seed type of<br />
East India and Southeast Asia. Cluster III consisted mostly of the small-seed<br />
type of areas from Yunnan (China) to Pakistan, as well as the southern part of<br />
Africa. Cluster V consisted mostly of the large-seed type from Southeast Asia to<br />
the Middle East and <strong>North</strong> Africa. Cluster VII consisted of the small-seed type<br />
from the central and southern parts of Africa. From these results, it appeared<br />
that the small-seed type was transmitted from the southern part of Africa to<br />
India, and that the primitive form of Group Conomon originated in East India.<br />
Another type of melon introduced from <strong>North</strong> Africa to Europe and India via<br />
the Middle East was the large-seed type. Small- and large-seed melons appeared<br />
to be established allopatrically and then differentiated into several varieties.<br />
M<br />
elon (Cucumis melo L.) is an important horticultural crop<br />
cultivated in various areas of the world. Great morphological<br />
variation exists in melon for fruit characteristics such as size,<br />
shape, color, and taste of the fruit. <strong>The</strong>refore, C. melo is considered to<br />
be the most diversified species in the genus Cucumis (Bates and<br />
Robinson, 1995). Melon cultivars commonly cultivated in Europe and<br />
America are classified as Group Cantalupensis or Group Inodorus,<br />
We would like to thank K. R. Reitsma, Iowa <strong>State</strong> University, for kindly supplying<br />
the seed. This study was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for International<br />
Scientific Research of Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, Japan<br />
(No. 15255011), titled “Genetic Assay and Study of Crop Germplasm In and Around<br />
China”. This is Contribution number 5 from the Sato Project of Research Institute for<br />
Humanity and Nature (RIHN), Japan.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 317
and are characterized by sweet flesh and seeds longer than 9.0mm<br />
(large-seed type). Other groups of melon, such as flexuosus,<br />
momordica, chito (dudaim), and Group Conomon, are cultivated in the<br />
Middle East, and are characterized by smooth skin and small seeds<br />
shorter than 9mm (small-seed type).<br />
<strong>The</strong> genetic relationship among different types of melon has been<br />
analyzed in various ways. Fujishita et al. (1993) classified melon<br />
accessions into three groups by the expression of bitterness in the<br />
young fruit placenta of intraspecific F1 hybrids. Cultivated and wild<br />
melons in East Asia were both classified as Type I, which was different<br />
from Type III (South and Southeast Asia) and Type II (the other areas<br />
including the western part of East Asia). Stepansky et al. (1999)<br />
detected the largest divergence between <strong>North</strong> American and European<br />
melon and Asian melon. Furthermore, Akashi et al. (2002) and<br />
McCreight et al. (2004) evaluated genetic variation in East and South<br />
Asian melon by the analysis of isozyme, and indicated that Indian<br />
melon was richer in genetic diversity compared with those in East<br />
Asia. Akashi et al. (2002) also suggested that Group Conomon could<br />
have originated from the small-seed type melon (
from Africa, using USDA-GRIN database, indicated that a dessert-type<br />
melon is cultivated in the northern part of Africa, while melons with<br />
small seeds and a sour taste are common in the southern part of Africa.<br />
Genetic differentiation among melon accessions from northern and<br />
central parts of Africa and those from the southern part of Africa was<br />
confirmed by RAPD analysis (Mliki et al., 2001).<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, in this study, RAPD polymorphism was surveyed for<br />
melon accessions from the Middle East and Africa, and genetic<br />
diversity and phylogenetic relationships among local melon<br />
populations were investigated by integrating RAPD data of Asian<br />
landraces (Tanaka et al., unpublished) and cytoplasmic genotype<br />
(Tanaka et al., 2006). <strong>The</strong> origin and transmission routes of cultivated<br />
melon were also considered.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIALS. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) accessions<br />
examined in the present study were 108 landraces collected from<br />
various areas of the world, consisting of 31 landraces from Africa, 20<br />
from the Middle East, 1 from Southeast Asia, 51 from South Asia, and<br />
5 from East Asia. In addition, 2 accessions of C. sativus. var.<br />
hardwickii were examined as wild relatives distributed in India. <strong>The</strong><br />
details of plant materials are shown in Table 1. All landraces of<br />
unknown variety were classified into large-seed type (≥9.0 mm) and<br />
small-seed type (
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> proportion of melon accessions having small seeds in the<br />
present study was 0% in the northern part of Africa and 15% in the<br />
Middle East (Table 1), as low as in Europe and America where the<br />
small-seed type is not cultivated. On the other hand, the proportion<br />
increased drastically in areas east of the Middle East, being 67.6% in<br />
South Asia, 73.3% in Southeast Asia, and 100% in East Asia. It was<br />
also different within Africa; nearly as high as in South and East Asia in<br />
the central (90.9%) and southern (73.3%) parts, and <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />
different from that in the northern part (0%). <strong>The</strong> same pattern of<br />
geographical distribution was observed by the analysis of seed-weight<br />
data of 7396 samples obtained from USDA-GRIN database.<br />
Twenty-seven polymorphic bands observed by Tanaka et al.<br />
(unpublished) were produced using 18 random primers. Polymorphic<br />
index (PI) within each population was calculated, and the highest PI<br />
was observed in the large-seed type from India (average = 0.300) and<br />
in accessions from the Middle East (0.300). On the other hand, PI was<br />
0.2 0.1<br />
0<br />
Africa-South-L<br />
Japan-S<br />
Korea-S<br />
China-S<br />
Maldives-S<br />
Yunnan-S<br />
Myanmar-S<br />
India-East-S<br />
India-Center-S a<br />
India-South-S<br />
India-West-S<br />
Southeast Asia-S<br />
Nepal and Bangladesh-S<br />
Myanmar-L<br />
India-East-L<br />
India-<strong>North</strong>-L<br />
India-Center-L b<br />
India-South-L<br />
India-<strong>North</strong>-S<br />
India-West-L<br />
Pakistan<br />
Middle East-S<br />
Africa-Center-S<br />
Africa-South-S<br />
Southeast Asia-L<br />
Middle East-L<br />
Africa-<strong>North</strong>-L<br />
Fig. 1. Genetic relationship between 27 populations of melon landraces, as<br />
revealed by cluster analysis with UPGMA method based on RAPD. L = largeseed<br />
type; S = small-seed type.<br />
320 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
I<br />
II<br />
III<br />
IV<br />
V
0.221 and 0.222 in large- and small-seed-type populations from Africa,<br />
respectively, as high as those in the small-seed type from India and<br />
accessions from Southeast Asia. However, PI calculated from the<br />
pooled data of all accessions from Africa was 0.399, and as high as<br />
those in the Middle East (0.323) and India (0.332).<br />
Genetic distance between 27 populations of local melon ranged<br />
from 0.013 to 0.729 and was 0.229 on average. Twenty-seven<br />
populations were classified into five clusters using cluster analysis<br />
based on GD (Fig. 1). Cluster I consisted of a large-seed-type<br />
population from the southern part of Africa. Cluster II consisted of<br />
three populations of Group Conomon from East Asia. Cluster III was a<br />
large cluster consisting of populations from India, Myanmar, and<br />
Southeast Asia, further divided into subclusters based on their seed<br />
size: IIIa, small-seeded, and IIIb, large-seeded. Clusters IV and V<br />
consisted of populations from the Middle East and Africa, and they<br />
were divided based on their seed size rather than by their cultivated<br />
area. As summarized above, melon populations from geographically<br />
related areas were grouped together and divided into subclusters based<br />
on their seed size. As to melon populations from Africa, they were<br />
divided into two clusters, and the small-seed type from central and<br />
southern parts of Africa was closely related with South and East Asian<br />
melons rather than with the large-seed type from the northern part of<br />
Africa.<br />
By principal coordinate analysis (PCO) based on similarity matrix<br />
among each group, up to 53.5% of the total variation was explained by<br />
the first two eigenvectors, which accounted for 37.4% and 16.1%,<br />
respectively. Melon populations were mostly separated into small- and<br />
large-seed types by the first principal axis (Fig. 2). In contrast, by the<br />
second principal axis, populations were separated by the area of origin;<br />
one group of Africa, Middle East, and East Asia and another group of<br />
India and Southeast Asia. Interestingly, the small-seed type of East<br />
Asia and South Asia appeared close to that of southern Africa on the<br />
PCO-plot, though these populations were clustered rather distantly by<br />
UPGMA methods. <strong>The</strong> close relationship can be seen from GD for the<br />
small-seed type from southern Africa and small-seed type from India<br />
and Southeast Asia, which ranged from 0.122 to 0.294 and was 0.166<br />
on average.<br />
Genetic relationship among the 291 samples was visualized by<br />
cluster analysis, and they were classified into seven clusters. <strong>The</strong><br />
number of melon accessions classified into each cluster is summarized<br />
in Table 1. Cluster II consisted of Group Conomon from East Asia, and<br />
also included the small-seed type of East India and Southeast Asia.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 321
PCO 2<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
-0.2<br />
×<br />
-0.4<br />
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4<br />
PCO 1<br />
Fig. 2. Principal coordinate plot of first two axes based on the genetic similarity<br />
matrix of 27 populations of melon landraces from Africa to Asia, based on<br />
RAPD. Geographical group of each population is indicated by the following<br />
symbols: = East Asia; = Southeast Asia, Myanmar, Nepal, and<br />
Bangladesh; × = Pakistan and the Middle East; = Africa; = India;.<br />
Black and open symbols indicate small- and large-seed type, respectively.<br />
Cluster III consisted mostly of the small-seed type (85.7%) of the areas<br />
from Yunnan in China to Pakistan, and also included small-seed type<br />
of southern Africa. Cluster V consisted mostly of the large-seed type<br />
(69.0%) of the areas from Southeast Asia to the Middle East; the largeseed<br />
type of <strong>North</strong> Africa was also included. Cluster VII consisted of<br />
the small-seed type from central and southern parts of Africa and C.<br />
sativus var. hardwickii.<br />
Tanaka et al. (2006) analyzed PS-ID sequence of the chloroplast<br />
genome for 221 accessions among 291 accessions examined in this<br />
study, and determined their cytoplasmic genotype. Most of the<br />
accessions of Clusters II and III proved to be of A-type, and their<br />
proportion was 93.2% and 90.4%, respectively, suggesting that smallseed-type<br />
accessions of both clusters belong to the same maternal<br />
lineage, which is different from that of the large-seed type. <strong>The</strong> results<br />
summarized in Table 1 indicate that small-seeded melons from<br />
southern Africa seemed to relate with those from India, as also<br />
suggested by Mliki et al. (2001). Small-seeded melons from East India<br />
seemed to relate with Group Conomon from China, Korea, and Japan,<br />
as also indicated by Yashiro et al. (2005) and Tanaka et al.<br />
(unpublished). Based on these results, we propose the following<br />
hypothesis about the transmission route of small and large seed types:<br />
<strong>The</strong> A-type with small seeds was transmitted from southern Africa to<br />
322 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
×<br />
×
Table 1. Number of melon accessions classified into seven<br />
clusters in each population.<br />
Country Area<br />
Seed<br />
size<br />
Cluster<br />
No. of<br />
accessions I II III IV V VI VII<br />
Africa<br />
Algeria <strong>North</strong> L 1 - - - - 1 - -<br />
Egypt <strong>North</strong> L 5 - - - - 5 - -<br />
Mali <strong>North</strong> L 1 - - - - 1 - -<br />
Morocco <strong>North</strong> L 2 - - - - 2 - -<br />
Cameroon Center S 2 - - - - - - 2<br />
Chad Center S 1 - - - - - - 1<br />
Ghana Center S 1 - - - - - - 1<br />
Senegal Center S 5 - - - - 1 - 4<br />
Sierra Leone Center L 1 - - - - 1 - -<br />
Sudan Center S 1 - - - - - - 1<br />
South Africa South L 2 - - 1 - 1 - -<br />
Zimbabwe South S 5 - - 3 - - - 2<br />
Zambia South L+S 4 - - 1 - - - 3<br />
Middle East<br />
Afghanistan L 5 - - - - 3 - 2<br />
Iran L+S 5 - - 1 - 4 - -<br />
Iraq L+S 2 1 - - - 1 - -<br />
Lebanon L 2 - - 1 - 1 - -<br />
Syria L 2 - - - - 2 - -<br />
Turkey L 4 - - - - 4 - -<br />
South Asia<br />
Nepal L 6 - - 5 - 1 - -<br />
Maldives S 4 - - 4 - - - -<br />
Bangladesh L+S 12 - - 10 - 2 - -<br />
Pakistan S 4 - - 2 - 2 - -<br />
India West L 10 - - 2 2 4 - 2<br />
<strong>North</strong> L 9 - - 2 - 5 2 -<br />
Center L 6 - - 2 1 3 - -<br />
South L 10 - - 1 - 8 - -<br />
East L 13 - 1 3 1 8 - -<br />
India West S 10 - - 7 1 2 - -<br />
<strong>North</strong> S 7 - - 2 2 3 - -<br />
Center S 10 - - 8 1 1 - -<br />
East S 24 - 2 18 2 2 - -<br />
Myanmar L 5 - - 2 - 3 - -<br />
S 36 - 1 26 1 8 - -<br />
Southeast Asia<br />
Indonesia L&S 4 - 1 1 - 2 - -<br />
Laos L 1 - - 1 - - - -<br />
Malaysia L&S 2 - - 1 - 1 - -<br />
Thailand S 6 - - 4 - 2 - -<br />
Vietnam S 2 - 1 1 - - - -<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 323
Table 1, continued<br />
Country Area<br />
Seed<br />
size<br />
No. of<br />
accessions I II III IV V VI VII<br />
East Asia<br />
China S 24 - 23 1 - - - -<br />
China-Yunnan S 5 - - 5 - - - -<br />
Korea S 9 - 9 - - - - -<br />
Japan S 15 - 15 - - - - -<br />
C. sativus var. hardwickii 2 - - - - - - 2<br />
Total 291 1 48 119 11 73 2 21<br />
L = large-seed type; S = small-seed type.<br />
India by the sea route, and the prototype of Group Conomon originated<br />
from small-seeded melons under wet conditions in East India.<br />
African melon accessions were divided into three groups by RAPD,<br />
which classified their respective cytoplasm type as follows: A-type<br />
(100%) in Cluster III, T-type (82.3%) in Cluster V, and NA-type<br />
(78.6%) in Cluster VII. Tanaka et al. (2006) suggested that NA is the<br />
primitive type of cultivated melon, and that the large-seeded T-type and<br />
small-seeded A-type have been independently established in northern<br />
and southern Africa, respectively, during the long history of cultivation<br />
and transmission of melon. <strong>The</strong> result obtained by the analysis of the<br />
nuclear genome supports this hypothesis, and suggests that large- and<br />
small-seed types had a polyphyletic origin, and thereafter differentiated<br />
into different varieties. <strong>The</strong>refore, for further analysis of origin,<br />
domestication, and differentiation of cultivated melon, more accessions<br />
of melon collected from various parts of Africa should be analyzed for<br />
nuclear and cytoplasm genomes.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Akashi, Y., N. Fukuda, T. Wako, M. Masuda, and K. Kato. 2002. Genetic variation<br />
and phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo<br />
L., based on the analysis of five isozymes. Euphytica .125:385–396.<br />
Apostol, B. L., W. C. Black IV, B. R. Miller, P. Reiter, and B. J. Beaty. 1993.<br />
Estimation of the number of full sibling families at an oviposition site using<br />
RAPD-PCR markers: applications to the mosquito Aedes aegypti. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl.<br />
Genet. 86:991–1000.<br />
Bates, D. M. and R. W. Robinson. 1995. Cucumber, melons and water-melons,<br />
Cucumis and Citrullus (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae), p. 89–111. In: J. Smartt and N. W.<br />
Simmonds (eds.). Evolution of crop plant. John Wiley and Sons, New York.<br />
Fujishita, N., H. Furukawa and S. Morii. 1993. Distribution of three genotypes for<br />
bitterness of F1 immature fruit in Cucumis melo. Jpn. J. Breed. 43(Suppl.2):206<br />
(in Japanese).<br />
324 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used<br />
in multivariate analysis. Biometrika. 53: 325–338.<br />
McCreight, J. D., J. E. Staub, A. López-Sesé, and S. Chung. 2004. Isozyme variation<br />
in Indian and Chinese melon (Cucumis melo L.) germplasm collections. J. Amer.<br />
Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:811–818.<br />
Mliki, A., J. E. Staub, Z. Sun, and A. Ghorbel. 2001. Genetic diversity in melon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.): an evaluation of African germplasm. Genet. Res. Crop Evol.<br />
48:587–597.<br />
Nakata, E., J. E. Staub, and A. I. López-Sesé. 2005. Genetic diversity in Japanese<br />
melon (Cucumis melo L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
and simple sequence repeat markers. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 52:405–419.<br />
Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283–292.<br />
Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International,<br />
New York.<br />
Silberstein, L., I. Kovalski, R. Huang, K. Anagnostou, M. Kyle, and R. Perl-Treves.<br />
1999. Molecular variation in melon (Cucumis melo L.) as revealed by RFLP and<br />
RAPD markers. Sci. Hort. 79:101–111.<br />
Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of<br />
melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation.<br />
Plant Syst. Evol. 217:313–332.<br />
Tanaka, K., A. Nishitani, Y. Akashi, Y. Sakata, H. Nishida, H. Yoshino and K. Kato.<br />
2006. Molecular characterization of South and East Asian melon, Cucumis melo<br />
L., and the origin of two varieties makuwa and conomon revealed by RAPD<br />
analysis. (in preparation).<br />
Tanaka, K., Y. Akashi, H. Nishida, K. Fukunaga and K. Kato. 2006. Polyphyletic<br />
origin of cultivated melon inferred by the analysis of chloroplast genome.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006.<br />
Weir, B. S. 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland,<br />
Massachusetts.<br />
Yashiro, K., H. Iwata, Y. Akashi, K. Tomita, M. Kuzuya, Y. Tsumura, and K. Kato.<br />
2005. Genetic relationship among East and South Asian melon (Cucumis melo<br />
L.) revealed by AFLP analysis. Breed. Sci. 55:197–206.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 325
ORIGIN, MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION, AND<br />
USES OF CUCURBITA FICIFOLIA, THE<br />
MOUNTAIN SQUASH<br />
Thomas C. Andres<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Network, Bronx, New York, 10471<br />
Additional Index Words. Fig leaf squash, black-seeded pumpkin, Malabar<br />
gourd, chilacayote, crop domestication<br />
Abstract. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia Bouché is the most important domesticated species<br />
of squash in the highland regions of the Neotropics, including the seven Andean<br />
countries in South America. In addition to this extensive area of traditional<br />
cultivation, this species has spread within the last few centuries throughout the<br />
highland tropical regions of the world. This popularity appears to be due to ease<br />
of cultivation in cool regions under extreme conditions, both dry and moist. <strong>The</strong><br />
fruits possess no more nutritional or flavor qualities than other cultivated<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species, but they do have a particularly long shelf life. Usage varies in<br />
different regions, but mostly it is eaten where it is grown under small,<br />
sustainable agricultural systems. Otherwise, the fruits are sold in local markets.<br />
More commercial uses occur in Mexico, Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, and<br />
Argentina, where it is made into confections and jams as well as cooked in<br />
nonsweetened traditional dishes. <strong>The</strong> archaeological record shows that it was<br />
extensively used and traded in pre-Incan times in northern Peru. Morphological<br />
variation in the species, while comparatively small for a domesticated<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, is greatest in the region from Peru to Colombia, which indicates its<br />
potential domestication in this area. <strong>The</strong> wild ancestor is unknown.<br />
T<br />
he biosystematics of the cultigen <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia Bouché<br />
has been reviewed (Andres, 1990). Since then, no discoveries<br />
have been made of a possible wild ancestor of the species. A<br />
survey of its uses and morphological diversity throughout its range in<br />
Latin America is reported here, along with evidence from the<br />
archaeological record, to ascertain where the species may have been<br />
domesticated. Field investigations have been undertaken over the last<br />
20 years specifically in Mexico, Panama, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia.<br />
Herbarium specimens from numerous countries have been examined.<br />
<strong>The</strong> survey of C. ficifolia in Peru and Bolivia was made possible by the Amy<br />
Goldman Ancestors of Squashes grant through the New York Botanical Garden. Also<br />
thanks to Sumru Aricanli and Craig Morris at the American Museum of Natural<br />
History for their permission to examine the Junius Bird Huaca Prieta archaeological<br />
collection and to the curators of the New York Botanical Garden, particularly<br />
Michael Nee, for their assistance in making the field and herbarium work possible.<br />
326 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Like all other species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, C. ficifolia originated in the<br />
Americas. It is known only under cultivation or as recent escapes. Its<br />
wild ancestor has been hypothesized to be from southern Mexico<br />
(Sauer, 1969) or the Andes (Nee, 1990). Present-day distribution<br />
ranges from northern Mexico to central Chile and northern Argentina,<br />
or from 30° north to 30° south latitude.<br />
Elsewhere in the world, it is most frequently grown in Eurasia,<br />
Africa, and Oceania in the following countries: Portugal, France,<br />
Germany, India, China, Japan, Korea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania,<br />
Angola, New Zealand, and the Philippines. It is planted elsewhere<br />
primarily as a curiosity or ornamental.<br />
In Latin America, the common names most frequently used are<br />
chilacayote (Mexico and Guatemala), chiverre (Costa Rica and<br />
Honduras), victoria (Colombia), zambo (Ecuador), chiclayo (Peru),<br />
lacayote (Bolivia), and cayote (Argentina). But perhaps the most<br />
descriptive name is calabaza serrana in Peru, which means “mountain<br />
squash.” <strong>The</strong> common name most applied in English is “fig leaf<br />
squash,” derived from the scientific specific epithet. But since this leaf<br />
shape is not unique among <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a as the extreme high altitudes<br />
where it is cultivated, perhaps mountain squash makes a better name.<br />
Another frequently used English name for C. ficifolia is “Malabar<br />
gourd,” derived from the once-held mistaken belief that it originated in<br />
India. Portuguese trade routes in the 16 th and 17 th centuries extended<br />
between the Americas, where C. ficifolia was collected, and both India<br />
and Europe, where it was introduced. <strong>The</strong> Malabar region includes wet<br />
tropical mountains where C. ficifolia is still grown.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are no production statistics on C. ficifolia since it is typically<br />
grown on a small, home-garden scale as landraces, i.e., locally adapted<br />
and propagated populations by traditional farmers. Due to their<br />
aggressive growth habit, they are often planted on marginal<br />
agricultural land, such as steep embankments, not suitable for other<br />
crop plants. <strong>The</strong>re is little need to attend to the plants during their long<br />
growing season of six to eight months. <strong>The</strong>refore, C. ficifolia is<br />
commonly dismissed as an unimportant crop plant. But throughout the<br />
Andes, it is widely grown and popular in most communities lying<br />
between 1000 and nearly 4000m in altitude. It is more tolerant of<br />
cooler temperatures than the other domesticated species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a,<br />
although all <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a are frost-tender.<br />
<strong>The</strong> plants seem to do best where conditions are moist, particularly<br />
in cloud forests. In such habitat, the fruits, flowers, and vines reach<br />
their greatest size. But at the other extreme, they are also cultivated in<br />
arid regions where there may be only a brief wet season just enough<br />
for stand establishment. Fruit size varies from as short as 12cm under<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 327
dry conditions to 60cm long and weighing 20kg in cloud forests;<br />
roadside vendors have reported specimens of up to 100cm long. It has<br />
not been ascertained whether this difference in fruit size is strictly<br />
environmentally induced or whether there are genetic differences<br />
between populations. All C. ficifolia fruits have a very hard or<br />
lignified rind. <strong>The</strong> flesh is fibrous and nearly white. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
characteristics are typical for wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species and primitive<br />
landraces; yet C. ficifolia also has some of the largest pollen grains and<br />
flowers in the genus. One possibility is that there is no wild population<br />
that differs genetically from the cultivated plants. This seems unlikely<br />
since all other wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species are known to have fruits with<br />
bitter flesh, and the plants are never as big in leaf size, stem, flower,<br />
and fruit.<br />
Morphological diversity is small for a domesticated plant,<br />
especially compared to the other domesticated <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species. <strong>The</strong><br />
fruit shape is nearly round to somewhat elongate like a watermelon.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are basically three fruit coloration patterns, (1) all white, (2) a<br />
distinct reticulated green/white pattern, and (3) dark green. Ten white<br />
longitudinal stripes spreading from the floral end are usually present in<br />
the latter two (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> three fruit colorations occur not only<br />
throughout its range, but also generally in the same field. In Costa<br />
Rica, large fields are sometimes planted with only all-white fruits. <strong>The</strong><br />
seeds are most commonly black or dark brown, a color not found in<br />
any other species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. But tan seeds, more typical of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, also occur throughout its range. <strong>The</strong> genetics of these<br />
differences have not been studied nor has the plant undergone any<br />
modern breeding.<br />
In my survey, other fruit characteristics were found. In Peru and<br />
Bolivia, uniform light green fruits were seen, in addition to all white<br />
and all dark green fruits. A unique fruit shape was found in northern<br />
Peru. A few populations had elongated fruits that were bottle-shaped<br />
or somewhat pyriform with a length to diameter ratio of close to three<br />
(Figure 1). Cárdenas (1989) reports seeing “victoria” squashes with<br />
“necks like a bottle” in Colombian markets. No other reports in the<br />
literature record the occurrence of this fruit shape in C. ficifolia. It is<br />
not known how widespread this morphology is in northwest South<br />
America and whether it represents a primitive character or derives<br />
from an ancestral population.<br />
<strong>The</strong> archaeological record is sparse, except in Peru where abundant<br />
pedicels and seed fragments dating back to 5000–6000 B.C. are found<br />
along the central and northern coast. While C. ficifolia is not grown in<br />
this lowland region, trade between the Andean cultures and the coastal<br />
people were evidently widely practiced (Cohen, 1977). Still today, C.<br />
328 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
ficifolia is brought down from the highlands and sold in coastal<br />
markets, such as at Trujillo (Figure 2). Since the coastal region is arid,<br />
ancient plant remains are well preserved. Archaeological sites in the<br />
highly humid cloud forests are less likely to contain any plant<br />
macromaterial. <strong>The</strong>re is no apparent change to a smaller seed size in<br />
the earlier archaeological strata, thus suggesting that the imported<br />
squash was always a domesticate. <strong>The</strong>re are reports that the Aztecs<br />
used C. ficifolia during the Spanish conquest of Mexico (Sahagun,<br />
1956), but no definitive archaeological remains have been found north<br />
of South America.<br />
Fig. 1. Comparison between a typical nearly round-shaped fruit and a white<br />
elongated pyriform or bottle-shaped fruit from the Department of Cajamarca,<br />
Peru.<br />
<strong>The</strong> present-day uses of C. ficifolia are diverse and vary in<br />
different regions. <strong>The</strong> most popular is in the preparation of jams,<br />
puddings, and confections, or dulce, made by cooking the pulp of the<br />
mature fruit in sugar or honey, for example, dulce de cayote in<br />
Argentina (Figure 3). <strong>The</strong>re are many variations on this recipe ranging<br />
from the addition of mineral lime to make solid candies to teasing<br />
apart the spaghetti squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo)-like fibers by boiling to<br />
make a dessert called cabello de angel—angel’s hair—in Spanish.<br />
Other ingredients, including coconut, tamarind, and cream, are often<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 329
added to these desserts. <strong>The</strong> sweetened products are used in<br />
empanadas and other baked products in South America.<br />
Other uses of the mature fruits are for making an alcoholic drink<br />
and for adding to stews or picadillos and soups. In regions of more<br />
recent introduction, such as parts of Africa, the long-lasting fruits are<br />
considered unfit for human consumption but are fed to livestock<br />
during the dry season. Elsewhere, most notably in the Chiriquí<br />
province of Panama, C. ficifolia is not used at all; however, the plants<br />
persist in weedy vegetable fields, suggesting that it was once used<br />
there.<br />
<strong>The</strong> large protein-rich seeds are popularly consumed in a few<br />
regions, including Ecuador and China, but ignored elsewhere. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />
used along with honey in Chiapas, Mexico to make palanquetas, a<br />
dessert snack.<br />
Nearly as popular as the mature fruits are the tender young fruits<br />
(Figure 2), which are consumed like summer squash (C. pepo)<br />
throughout Latin America and the Philippines. <strong>The</strong>se fruits are said to<br />
fetch a good price in Bogotá (National Research Council, 1989). Other<br />
sporadic uses are made of the flowers and as a green leafy vegetable.<br />
In Japan, Germany, and the Netherlands, cucumber is grafted onto<br />
rootstock of C. ficifolia for winter production in greenhouses.<br />
Fig. 2. Diversity of immature C. ficifolia fruits in the main market in Trujillo,<br />
Peru.<br />
330 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
<strong>The</strong> most commercial use occurs in southern Mexico, Costa Rica,<br />
Colombia, Ecuador, and northern Argentina. In Costa Rica, C. ficifolia<br />
is an Easter holiday staple, commemorated by fairs, such as Feria del<br />
Chiverre. Up to 20-hectare plantations are cultivated.<br />
While the fruits do not possess as many nutritional benefits as<br />
other cultivated <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species, or any notable flavor qualities, they<br />
do have an especially long shelf life of well over a year. During this<br />
postharvest period, the flesh becomes sweeter. This long storage<br />
period makes the fruits useful during times of need, such as during<br />
long dry seasons and ocean voyages, a property that may have<br />
facilitated their spread throughout pre-Incan and Aztec empires.<br />
This survey of C. ficifolia throughout Latin America broadens our<br />
understanding of the biology and uses of this species. Not only is C.<br />
ficifolia widely cultivated throughout the highlands of the Neotropics<br />
for a wide range of uses, but it is a more important crop than generally<br />
recognized. It should perhaps be renamed the mountain squash.<br />
Fig. 3. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia jam (left) and candy with walnuts (right) from the<br />
Province of Jujuy, Argentina.<br />
Evidence from the archaeological record and the geographical<br />
distribution of the limited morphological variation supports the<br />
hypothesis that domestication first took place on the eastern slope of<br />
the northern Andes in northwestern South America. This region<br />
represents the latitudinal midpoint of the range of C. ficifolia in Latin<br />
America. Also, this region contains one of the most species-rich<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 331
endemic floras of the world. Since this terrain is quite rugged with<br />
complex, often inaccessible microenvironments, it is quite possible<br />
that wild ancestral populations still occur there.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Andres, T. C. 1990. Biosystematics, theories on the origin, and breeding potential of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a ficifolia. p. 102–119. In: D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey<br />
(eds.). Biology and utilization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Cornell University Press,<br />
Ithaca, New York.<br />
Cárdenas, M. 1989. Manual de las plantas economicas de Bolivia. 2 nd Edition. Los<br />
Amigos del Libro, La Paz, Bolivia.<br />
Cohen, M. N. 1977. Population pressure and the origins of agriculture: an<br />
archaeological example from the coast of Peru. In: C. A. Reed (ed.). Origins of<br />
agriculture. Mouton, <strong>The</strong> Hague.<br />
Nee, M. 1990. <strong>The</strong> domestication of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 44:56–<br />
68.<br />
National Research Council. 1989. Lost crops of the Incas: little-known plants of the<br />
Andes with promise for worldwide cultivation. National Academy Press,<br />
Washington, DC.<br />
Sahagun, F. B. 1956. Historia General de las Cosas de Nueva España. Tom. 1, Lib.<br />
1, Cap. 21:13. A. M. Garibay K. Editorial Porrua, Mexico City.<br />
Sauer, C. O. 1969. Agricultural origins and dispersals. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge,<br />
MA.<br />
332 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
LOCHE: A UNIQUE PRE-COLUMBIAN<br />
SQUASH LOCALLY GROWN IN NORTH<br />
COASTAL PERU<br />
Thomas C. Andres<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Network, Bronx, New York 10471<br />
Roberto Ugás and Fiorela Bustamante<br />
Programa de Hortalizas,<br />
Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata, zapallo, vegetative<br />
propagation, seedlessness<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> loche is a high-quality landrace of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata<br />
Duchesne grown only on the north coast of Peru and practically unknown<br />
elsewhere. Moche pottery depicting the fruit shows that it has been used for<br />
thousands of years, yet it is not a primitive landrace. <strong>The</strong> fruits today, indicated<br />
as well by the archaeological record, have some morphological diversity.<br />
Typical loche fruits are small, straight, and warted along longitudinal ridges<br />
with nonlignified rinds. <strong>The</strong>y contain few to no seeds, and the fruits vary<br />
respectively in having a slightly swollen end to being tapered at both ends. <strong>The</strong><br />
orange flesh is very high in total soluble solids and is used only in small amounts<br />
for flavoring traditional regional dishes. In the local markets, loche is sold in<br />
cut-up pieces at premium prices. <strong>The</strong> entire fruit, rind included, is consumed.<br />
Propagation using shoot cuttings has been practiced for at least the past 100<br />
years. Fruits from such plants are considered more desirable than those from<br />
direct-seeded plants. This unique crop is at risk of being displaced by industrial<br />
agriculture of export crops, but at the same time plays a clear role in the revival<br />
of Peruvian gastronomy within the country and abroad.<br />
L<br />
ittle is known about the highly regarded landrace of squash<br />
from the north coast of Peru called loche or zapallo loche. <strong>The</strong><br />
literature is sparse except for mention of loche in publications<br />
Renán Valega Rosas, Michael Nee, Victor Vásquez, and Teresa Rosales all helped<br />
with fieldwork, while Miguel Holle, Abundio Sagástegui, Eric Rodríguez, Karen E.<br />
Stothert, Dolores Piperno, and Craig Morris were important consultants. Rolando<br />
Santa Maria provided reproductive material and extremely useful loche horticultural<br />
information. Thanks also to Pilar Kuriyama and Cecilia Ono for their kind help in<br />
processing the fruits and seeds. Special thanks to the Amy Goldman “Ancestors of<br />
Squashes” grant through the New York Botanical Garden for making this study<br />
possible, and to the Vegetable Crops Research Program of UNALM and the project<br />
for the conservation of Andean plant genetic resources executed by UNALM and the<br />
Council of Francophone Universities (CIUF) of Belgium, for their support of<br />
fieldwork in Illimo and La Molina.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 333
about the distinct gastronomy of the region. Even there, it is usually<br />
assumed that the reader knows what a loche is, and therefore no<br />
description is given. Some recipes state that if loche is not available,<br />
other orange-fleshed squashes (in most South American countries<br />
called zapallo) may be substituted. Even more confusingly, the<br />
meaning of the word “loche” has become more generalized to apply to<br />
any desirable orange-fleshed squash, especially if the seller does not<br />
have any good loches. For instance, along the central coast of Peru, as<br />
early as 1957, a crookneck squash with a dark green, smooth rind was<br />
called loche (Diaz, 1957). <strong>The</strong>refore, for clarification, adjectives are<br />
sometimes applied, such as “true loche” or “black loche” when<br />
referring to the traditional genuine loche.<br />
Loche is listed on Web sites and in literature as being either<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima Duchesne (Soukup, 1987; Custer, 2000) or<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne, but there is a common understanding<br />
in Peru that all loches are C. moschata (Diaz, 1957; Ugás et al., 2000).<br />
Both species are cultivated in the region. And both have been found in<br />
local archaeological sites, although C. moschata, along with <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
ficifolia Bouché, is much more abundant in earlier layers back to 5000<br />
B.P. <strong>The</strong> traditional cultivar of C. maxima, called ‘macre’, with fruits<br />
that can weigh up to about 80kg, is by far the most cultivated squash in<br />
Peru.<br />
Methods<br />
Starting in 2003, in both northern Peru and in Lima, we visited<br />
marketplaces where loches are sold. We interviewed farmers in loche<br />
fields and cooks in restaurants in northern Peru. We also visited<br />
national and regional archaeological museums that contain ceramic<br />
pieces identified as depicting the loche. Fieldwork has begun at the<br />
Vegetable Crops Research Program of Universidad Nacional Agraria<br />
La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Peru to observe and describe the growth<br />
habit and diversity of loche under uniform field conditions, both from<br />
seed and from shoot cuttings.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> shape of the leaves and flowers, seed morphology, and<br />
indumentation of the loche show that it belongs to C. moschata. <strong>The</strong><br />
leaves are unlobed or shallow-lobed. <strong>The</strong> male flower hypanthium is<br />
campanulate rather than conical as in C. maxima. <strong>The</strong> seeds are typical<br />
of light-colored C. moschata seeds, with a slightly coarse margin of a<br />
color a shade darker. <strong>The</strong> indument along the primary nerves on the<br />
334 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
abaxial surface of the leaf blade as well as on the petiole and on the<br />
floral bud is short to long pilose or villous and soft.<br />
<strong>The</strong> one character that is not typical of other C. moschata is the<br />
shape of the pedicel attachment to the fruit. This species typically has<br />
a rounded expanded pedicel where it attaches to the fruit, but in loche<br />
the shape of the pedicel varies from typical C. moschata shape to not<br />
expanded, but extending along its ridges down a couple of centimeters<br />
of the fruit. This may be due to the shape of the fruit base, which is<br />
acute rather than flattened or rounded like most cultivars.<br />
Loche plants are viny, but have smaller parts than most other C.<br />
moschata cultivars, including the leaves, flowers, and fruits. <strong>The</strong> fruits<br />
are up to 1.2kg, 20 to 30cm long and 10cm wide, oblong to oblate, and<br />
not crooknecked, but sometimes shaped like butternut squashes with a<br />
bulbous end. <strong>The</strong>y start out light green but gradually turn to dark green<br />
with a glaucous waxy covering at maturity. A diagnostic character is<br />
10 loosely defined warty longitudinal ridges that are often a darker<br />
shade than the rest of the fruit and thus make the fruit subtly striped.<br />
<strong>The</strong> rind is nonlignified, which is unusual for warty <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fruits.<br />
<strong>The</strong> flesh is various shades of orange, but never as deeply orange<br />
as some other local landraces of C. moschata. But the total soluble<br />
solids or sugar content has been measured with a handheld<br />
refractometer to be 18°Brix, which is extremely high for any cucurbit.<br />
<strong>The</strong> flavor is excellent.<br />
Loche is unique to the species in having naturally occurring<br />
seedless fruits. Fruits that are tapered at both ends are seedless and<br />
solid, whereas those with a bulbous end generally contain a small seed<br />
cavity with up to 20 fully developed seeds and additional undeveloped<br />
seeds (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> seedless fruits with their soft rinds are consumed<br />
in their entirety with no waste. However, the bulbous fruits are<br />
considered to be of higher quality.<br />
In general, seedlessness in edible fruits is becoming more<br />
widespread and more popular. This is the trend as well with cucurbits,<br />
such as watermelon, cucumber, and some summer squash. In winter<br />
squash, except for minor exceptions, there are no seedless commercial<br />
cultivars. Some butternut cultivars have small seed cavities containing<br />
a decreased number of seeds. Commercially produced interspecific<br />
hybrids between C. maxima and C. moschata may lack seeds.<br />
<strong>The</strong> cause of infertility in loche is not known. In the field, loche<br />
plants are monoecious and develop normal-looking male and female<br />
flowers with abundant pollen on the stamens. <strong>The</strong>re are many more<br />
male flowers than female flowers per plant. An abundance of bee<br />
activity in the morning transfers pollen between male and female<br />
flowers so that stigmas are covered with pollen by midmorning.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 335
Fig. 1. Longitudinal section through a loche fruit showing the seed cavity at the<br />
apical end and the total number of seeds in the fruit, consisting in this case of<br />
four or five probably viable seeds (the darker colored seeds to the left) and four<br />
aborted seeds to the right.<br />
Pollination, therefore, does occur naturally of both selfs and sibs. Fruit<br />
set and productivity appear to be comparable to seed-bearing winter<br />
squash of the region. But the plants in loche fields are usually not<br />
uniform, with fruits varying somewhat in size, shape, color, and<br />
wartiness, thus indicating some genetic diversity. <strong>The</strong>refore, a theory<br />
among growers that the loche is a sterile hybrid does not seem<br />
plausible, but needs to be tested further. It is not known whether the<br />
fruits are parthenocarpic or the ovules abort after fertilization.<br />
Another unique feature of loche is that it is commercially<br />
reproduced vegetatively. Shoot-tip cuttings of around 50–70cm long<br />
are made after the fruit is harvested. <strong>The</strong>se are planted and watered,<br />
and roots grow from the underground nodes where the leaves have<br />
been removed. If the dry season is particularly severe, not only may a<br />
336 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
crop season be lost, but no further cuttings will be available. Saved<br />
seeds are then sowed. But the fruit quality of this first generation is<br />
considered inferior and generally not harvested. Cuttings are made<br />
from this generation to produce more-desirable fruits in subsequent<br />
generations. To avoid direct seeding, loche farmers cooperate by<br />
trading cuttings. Sometimes a few irrigated “mother plants” of a region<br />
are used solely as a backup source for cuttings. <strong>The</strong> difference between<br />
direct-seeded plants and those propagated asexually is being<br />
investigated at UNALM.<br />
<strong>The</strong> practice of vegetative propagation for improving quality of the<br />
loche has been in use at least since the late 19 th century, according to<br />
the notes of Enrique Brüning, a German engineer whose private<br />
archaeological collection is now housed in the Brüning Museum,<br />
Lambayeque (Schaedel, 1988). Brüning also reported that growers<br />
would burn a stone shaped like the fruit in the pile of soil where loche<br />
was planted as an amulet to encourage growth.<br />
<strong>The</strong> main pest problems in loche are pickleworm (Diaphania sp.)<br />
and whitefly (Bemisia sp). Insecticides are commonly applied. <strong>The</strong><br />
most common diseases appear to be wilt (Fusarium sp., Phytophthora<br />
sp.) and fruit rot (Phythium sp). Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) has<br />
been isolated from loche plants, and its symptoms are often observed<br />
in the field. Loche is apparently highly susceptible to root-knot<br />
nematode (Meloidogyne incognita).<br />
Because of the high value of the crop, loche fields are often kept<br />
hidden from roads. <strong>The</strong>re is a problem with poachers stealing not only<br />
the fruits, but also stems for transplanting. <strong>The</strong> fields range in size<br />
from backyard gardens to a few hectares (Figure 2). Loche is<br />
cultivated almost exclusively in the lowland valleys of northern Peru<br />
in the departments of Lambayeque, Piura, and La Libertad. <strong>The</strong><br />
climate is temperate to hot in the north, with no rain except during a<br />
possible short rainy season or when El Niño occurs. Surprisingly<br />
under such arid conditions, irrigation is normally not used. <strong>The</strong> fruits<br />
are sold in local markets and in Lima. Loche is neither<br />
grown in nor exported to neighboring countries.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most productive region lies around Chiclayo, the capital city<br />
of Lambayeque. In the past, this was a major trade center between the<br />
coast and the highlands and the Amazon beyond, as well as settlements<br />
to the north and south. <strong>The</strong> area is rich in important pre-Inca<br />
archaeological sites where <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a remains have been found.<br />
Unfortunately, the loche, unlike other squashes, does not preserve<br />
well. Squash seeds, pedicels, and rind macrofragments are often found<br />
well preserved in the dry coastal archaeological sites. But the loche<br />
produces few seeds; the pedicels are weak and do not separate from<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 337
Fig. 2. Rolando Santa María, expert grower from Illimo, Lambayeque, Peru, in<br />
his field of loche.<br />
the decaying fruit, and the rinds are nonlignified. Microremains of<br />
squash rind phytoliths are abundant in these sites, but there are no<br />
phytoliths in loche rind. Reevaluation by Andres and Nee<br />
(unpublished) since the study of Whitaker and Bird (1949) of the<br />
thousands of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a macroremains from Huaca Prieta, Chicama<br />
Valley, Peru, where some of the earliest such specimens have been<br />
found in South America (now housed at the American Museum of<br />
Natural History in New York), show that some of these pedicels<br />
resemble the distinct pedicels of loche.<br />
A better source of information in archaeological records comes<br />
from the Moche people, a pre-Inca culture that flourished in the coastal<br />
valleys of northern Peru approximately A.D. 50–800. <strong>The</strong>y were highly<br />
skilled in ceramics and left a legacy in tombs of realistic life-sized fruit<br />
and vegetable sculptures, as well as depictions of all aspects of their<br />
daily life. Whilst farming in the region using desert irrigation began in<br />
pre-Moche times, the Moche ceramics show that they had a rich<br />
assortment of crop plants, including a few species of cucurbits<br />
composed of a diversity of landraces. <strong>The</strong> most common squash<br />
depicted is a warty crooknecked C. moschata. But there are some<br />
ceramic fruits that are identical to loche. Figure 3 shows one such fruit,<br />
photographed at the Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca-Jaén, found<br />
338 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
at Batan Grande, an important archaeological site located only 40km<br />
northeast of Chiclayo, where in the adjacent picture the fresh fruits in<br />
the main market were photographed. This is evidence that the loche<br />
has an ancient origin. <strong>The</strong> warty crooknecked squashes are also found<br />
in the region today, as well as other landraces depicted in the hundreds<br />
of surviving Moche ceramics.<br />
Fig. 3. Comparison between an archaeological ceramic loche fruit (left) and<br />
present-day seedless and seeded fruits (right).<br />
Brüning (Schaedel, 1988) considered the loche semiwild, and<br />
believed that it was crossed with cultivated squashes to produce a<br />
more appetizing fruit. <strong>The</strong>re is no known wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the region<br />
today except for C. ecuadorensis H. C. Cutler & Whitaker.<br />
Furthermore, except for its relatively small size, loche does not have<br />
any primitive characteristics of a wild cucurbit. On the contrary, the<br />
following characterististics indicate an advanced state of<br />
domestication: reduced to no seed cavity, fruit that does not readily<br />
“slip” or abscise from the vine, no lignification of the rind, and<br />
nonbitter flesh. It is widely believed that squash was domesticated<br />
initially for the edible seeds since all wild species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a have<br />
large seed cavities full of numerous seeds, with a small amount of<br />
bitter flesh, and hard rinds. Although this may be true in <strong>North</strong> and<br />
Central America, south of Ecuador, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a seeds are rarely<br />
consumed and were therefore probably never an important source of<br />
food, although now they are commonly used in traditional medicine.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 339
Area under loche production appears to be decreasing, although the<br />
word itself, being misapplied to a broader range of cultivars, is in more<br />
frequent use. <strong>The</strong> agriculture of the region is shifting to industrialscale<br />
crop production mostly for export, primarily of rice, sugarcane,<br />
cotton, asparagus, mango, and Capsicum peppers.<br />
Like the loche itself, the highly prized cuisine of northern Peru<br />
deserves to be better known elsewhere. <strong>The</strong> dishes include a rich<br />
assortment of ingredients, including a number of endemic crop plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong> loche is used in small amounts to flavor desserts, soups, and<br />
stews, most notably the traditional regional dish made with kid goat<br />
called seco de cabrito a la norteña. In the local markets, loche is sold<br />
in cut-up pieces at premium prices; for example, in April 2006, prices<br />
in supermarkets in Lima were 16.50 soles per kg versus 2.5 soles per<br />
kg for macre (C. maxima). Loche is one of the landmarks of trendy<br />
“nouveau Andean cuisine” and, because of its distinctive taste, is an<br />
ingredient in new dishes oriented to international palates. For instance,<br />
in a recent gastronomic showroom in Vienna organized by the<br />
government of Peru, European chefs highlighted loche and<br />
‘escabeche’ chili pepper (Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum) as their<br />
most remarkable discoveries.<br />
A broader effort should be made to promote traditional dishes from<br />
northern Peru incorporating loche, increasing demand for it, so that<br />
more farmers will grow it. <strong>North</strong>ern Peru is expected to become a<br />
major tourist area in the near future because of major archaeological<br />
discoveries, new museums, and beach hotels, as well as an interesting<br />
endemic living culture. This will contribute to new demand for loche<br />
and other local crops. <strong>The</strong> loche deserves study from ethnobotanical,<br />
taxonomic, and horticultural standpoints.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Custer, T. 2000. <strong>The</strong> art of Peruvian cuisine. Ediciones Ganesha, Lima.<br />
Diaz, A. 1957. Estudio de las variedades nacionales de zapallos. Tesis para Ingeniero<br />
Agrónomo, Escuela Nacional de Agricultura, Lima.<br />
Schaedel, R. P. 1988. La etnografía muchik en las fotografías de H. Brüning,1886–<br />
1925. Corporación Financiera de Desarrollo, Lima.<br />
Soukup, J. 1987. Vocabulario de los nombres vulgares de la flora peruana y catálogo<br />
de los géneros. Editorial Salesiana, Lima.<br />
Ugás, R., S. Siura, F. Delgado de la Flor, A. Casas, and J. Toledo. 2000. Hortalizas,<br />
datos básicos. Programa de Hortalizas, Universidad Nacional Agraria La<br />
Molina, Lima.<br />
Whitaker, T. W. and J. B. Bird. 1949. Identification and significance of the cucurbit<br />
materials from Huaca Prieta, Peru. Amer. Mus. Novit. 1426:1–15.<br />
340 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
OLD WORLD CUCURBITS IN PLANT<br />
ICONOGRAPHY OF THE RENAISSANCE<br />
Jules Janick<br />
Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture,Purdue<br />
University,625 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />
Harry S. Paris<br />
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research Center,<br />
P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Cucumis melo, Cucumis sativus,<br />
Ecballium elaterium, Lagenaria siceraria, Momordica balsamina, plant<br />
iconography<br />
ABSTRACT. Old World cucurbits include Citrullus lanatus (watermelon),<br />
Cucumis melo (melon), Cucumis sativus (cucumber), Ecballium elaterium<br />
(squirting cucumber), Lagenaria siceraria (bottle gourd), and Momordica<br />
balsamina (balsam apple). Fruit images of each of these cucurbits appear in<br />
festoons painted on a ceiling of the Villa Farnesina in Rome between 1515 and<br />
1518. <strong>The</strong>se cucurbits are also depicted in paintings and botanical herbals of the<br />
Renaissance. <strong>The</strong>se images provide information on cucurbit history, dispersal,<br />
and genetic diversity.<br />
I<br />
n 1505, one of the richest men in Europe, the Sienese banker<br />
Agostino Chigi (1466–1520), began construction of an extravagant<br />
new home on the west bank of the Tiber River in Rome. Although<br />
not particularly well-educated, Chigi was attracted to the rediscovery<br />
of ancient Greek and Latin writings and science. <strong>The</strong> decorations in his<br />
villa, now known as the Villa Farnesina because it was sold to<br />
Cardinal Farnese by Chigi’s heirs, were a revocation of the classical<br />
world, the rooms filled with paintings, statues, and opulent<br />
furnishings. Attached was a repository or garden of rare plants, the<br />
viridarium. <strong>The</strong> ceiling of one room, decorated with scenes of the<br />
heavenly adventures of Venus, Cupid, and Psyche, was executed in<br />
fresco in the spaces between the arches by the workshop of Raphael<br />
Sanzio (1483–1520). Festoons or wreaths painted by Giovanni<br />
Martini da Udine (1487–1564) on the ribs of the arches contain<br />
thousands of images of individual fruits, vegetables, and flowers<br />
encompassing about 170 species (Caneva, 1992a,b; Janick and<br />
Caneva, 2005; Janick and Paris, 2006). <strong>The</strong> festoon images have been<br />
deconstructed by scanning the images and collating each species. Our<br />
objective is to describe and discuss the Old World cucurbits in the<br />
ceiling festoons of the Villa Farnesina and compare them with other<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 341
Renaissance images of these plants appearing in art and botanical<br />
herbals.<br />
Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. &<br />
Nakai<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are five images of watermelons in the festoons of the Villa<br />
Farnesina (Figure 1A). All of the depicted fruits are round, medium<br />
green with narrow darker stripes. Four appear to be “icebox” size,<br />
Fig. 1. Old World cucurbit images from the Loggia of Cupid and Psyche ceiling<br />
of the Villa Farnesina: (A) Citrullus lanatus. (B) Cucumis melo Cantalupensis<br />
Group. (C) Cucumis melo Reticulatis Group. (D) Cucumis melo Flexuosus<br />
Group. (E) Cucumis sativus. F. Ecballium elaterium. (G) Lagenaria siceraria<br />
(bottle-shaped). (H) Lagenaria siceraria (elongate). (I) Momordica balsamina.<br />
342 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
about 4kg, and one is smaller and covered by what appears to be white<br />
fungal growth. Overall, little genetic variability is depicted.<br />
<strong>The</strong> festoon images in the Villa Farnesina appear to be the first<br />
Renaissance paintings of watermelons. Depictions of watermelon<br />
fruits are common in 16 th - and 17 th -century European paintings and<br />
appear to be similar in size, shape, and rind coloration to those of the<br />
Farnesina festoons. <strong>The</strong>se include a watermelon fruit in the frieze of<br />
the chamber of Dominio Fiorentino painted by Jacopo Zucchi circa<br />
1586 (Janick, 2004a), Caravaggio’s 1603 painting Fruits and<br />
Vegetables on a Ledge (Janick, 2004b), and a painting of Pensionante<br />
del Saracceni titled Still Life with Melons and Carafe of White Wine,<br />
painted between 1615 and 1620. Black-and-white images of<br />
watermelons are found in the printed botanical herbals of the 16 th<br />
century. <strong>The</strong>se images do not show rind color or pattern but do include<br />
the foliage, allowing them to be easily identified as watermelons by<br />
the characteristic pinnatifid leaves. Such images can be found in the<br />
tomes of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1554), Mattioli (1558),<br />
du Pinet (1561), L’Obel (1576), and many others.<br />
Melon, Cucumis melo L.<br />
Sixteen melons from three cultivar-groups (Pitrat et al., 2000) are<br />
depicted in the festoons of the Villa Farnesina, reflecting great genetic<br />
diversity. Represented are 11 cantaloupes (Cantalupensis Group), three<br />
muskmelons (Reticulatus Group), and two snake melons (Flexuosus<br />
Group) (Figure 1B, C, D).<br />
<strong>The</strong> 11 cantaloupes represent four different cultivars, all of which<br />
have distinct longitudinal furrows. One of them, represented by four<br />
fruits with dark green furrows alternating with tan lobes, resembles<br />
‘Cantalun’ (syn. ‘Charentais’), the leading market type of melon in<br />
France and some other countries. Three of the four fruits are split at<br />
the furrows, revealing their deep orange flesh (mesocarp). A second<br />
cultivar, represented by five smaller, round to slightly oblate fruits,<br />
lacks the dark green coloration in the furrows, resembling ‘De<br />
Bellegarde’ (Goldman, 2002). One of these five fruits has a split at the<br />
peduncle end that reveals orange flesh. A third cantaloupe cultivar,<br />
represented by one oval fruit beginning to rot at the split calyx end, is<br />
dark green splashed with yellow, revealing orange flesh, and<br />
resembles ‘Noir des Carmes’. <strong>The</strong> fourth cantaloupe cultivar,<br />
represented by two dark green, warted fruits, one large and one small,<br />
resembles the ‘Black Rock’ melon (Stuart, 1984; Paris and Janick,<br />
2005).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 343
<strong>The</strong> three muskmelons are most easily distinguished from the<br />
cantaloupes by their reticulate (netted) rind. Of the three muskmelons<br />
depicted in the festoons, two are oblong and the other quite oblate,<br />
indicating that two distinct cultivars or market types are represented.<br />
Although the two oblong melons differ in external color, one having<br />
an orange cast and the other yellow-green, this color difference might<br />
be attributable to different stages of fruit maturity, the orange one<br />
being fully ripe or overripe. <strong>The</strong> oblate melon has a section cut out,<br />
revealing orange flesh.<br />
<strong>The</strong> snake melons are represented by two images. One of them<br />
shows clearly that the fruit has a warty skin, an unusual characteristic<br />
for this cultivar-group.<br />
Warty cantaloupes appeared in an Italian painting from 1580,<br />
Fruttivendola (Fruit Seller) by Vincenzo Campi (Paris and Janick,<br />
2005). Cantaloupes appear, in black and white, in many of the early<br />
Renaissance herbals, including those of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546),<br />
Dodoens (1554), Cordi (1561) depicting two different cultivars,<br />
L’Obel (1576), Camerarius (1586), and many others. Muskmelons<br />
seem to have been introduced into Europe later than the cantaloupes.<br />
An illustration of what appears to be a long oval muskmelon appears<br />
in Tabernaemontanus (1591) and in Gerard (1597) as “Spanish<br />
Melons.” Chabrey (1666) presented this illustration too, together with<br />
an illustration of another netted melon, named Melo Reticulatus (with<br />
the label and description misplaced on the page). An image of a warty<br />
flexuosus appeared in the work of Camerarius (1586); this image may<br />
have been derived from the estate of Conrad Gesner (1516–1565).<br />
Smooth flexuosus appeared in the herbals of L’Obel (1576), two<br />
images in Dalechamps (1587), Tabernaemontanus (1591), Gerard<br />
(1597), Dodoens (1616), and Chabrey (1666).<br />
Cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.<br />
Thirteen clusters of cucumber (Figure 1E) are included in the<br />
festoons, all resembling fruits of cultivars commonly grown today in<br />
the U.S.A. for pickling. Fruits are prominently warted, short,<br />
cylindrical but tapering to narrow at the stylar end, straight or slightly<br />
curved, and some have distinct furrows. Some are <strong>complete</strong>ly light<br />
green, apparently immature. Others are mature (ripe) and <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />
orange and yet others are turning from green to orange. Some of the<br />
immature fruits show whitening of the stylar end, which extends as<br />
striping in the furrows (where present) along part of the length of the<br />
fruit. Many of the fruits show remnants of the corolla at the distal end.<br />
<strong>The</strong> slight differences in fruit striping and furrowing suggest the fruits<br />
344 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
were derived from several plants, but this modest variation may have<br />
been typical of that found within an open-pollinated cultivar.<br />
Nearly all European Renaissance depictions of cucumbers are of<br />
the American pickling type, like those of the festoons and those<br />
sculpted in the ceramics of Luca della Robbia (1399–1482) and<br />
depicted in 15 th century paintings by Carlo Crivelli of the Madonna<br />
(Impelluso, 2004). <strong>The</strong>y appear in a painting, Still Life with Flowers,<br />
Fruits and Vegetables, attributed to the Master of Hartford (thought to<br />
be the young Caravaggio) and in Caravaggio’s Lute Player (1586). A<br />
famous Still life by the Spanish artist Juan Sanches Cotán (ca. 1600)<br />
prominently features cucumbers. Similar sculpted cucumbers, dating<br />
to 1601, appear on the bronze doors of the Cathedral in the Piazza<br />
Miracoli in Pisa. Plants bearing similar fruits appear in the works of<br />
Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1554), Mattioli (1558), L’Obel<br />
(1576), Camerarius (1586), Tabernaemontanus (1591), Gerard (1597),<br />
and Chabrey (1666). However, one other type of cucumber, much less<br />
common, appears in Europe during the Renaissance. This is a<br />
pyriform cucumber, painted between 1505 and 1508 in the single-copy<br />
prayer <strong>book</strong> Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne (Bilimoff, 2001). An<br />
illustration of a cucumber plant bearing pear-shaped fruits also<br />
appeared in the herbals of Tabernaemontanus (1591), Gerard (1597),<br />
and Chabrey (1666). Cucumer minor pyriformis (Chabrey, 1666) was<br />
probably an andromonoecious cultivar, a possible forerunner of<br />
‘Lemon’. Overall, little diversity is depicted for the cucumbers of<br />
Renaissance Europe, perhaps indicative of only one or two prior<br />
introductions.<br />
Squirting Cucumber, Ecballium elaterium A. Rich.<br />
One festoon image with five fruits is identifiable as squirting<br />
cucumber (Figure 1F). Used as a medicinal plant in Roman antiquity,<br />
this cucurbit was occasionally cultivated for this purpose in<br />
Renaissance Europe (Jeffrey, 2001). Frequently encountered growing<br />
wild in Mediterranean countries, it is unusual for a wild cucurbit<br />
because it has a bushy rather than a viney growth habit. <strong>The</strong> fruits of<br />
squirting cucumber are small, light yellow-green ovals, approximately<br />
2 or 3cm long, five-furrowed, and stiffly hairy. We have not found<br />
images of squirting cucumber in Renaissance paintings. Depictions of<br />
squirting cucumber appeared in the herbals of Fuchs (1542), L’Obel<br />
(1576), Dodoens (1616), Gerard (1597), and others.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 345
Bottle Gourd, Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standley<br />
Bottle gourds are the most abundant cucurbit images in the<br />
festoons (Figure 1 G, H), with at least 37 fruits depicted. Three<br />
distinct morphological variants of bottle gourd—large bottle-shaped,<br />
small bottle-shaped, and elongate—are depicted,.<br />
<strong>The</strong> large bottle-shaped type is represented by portraits of eight<br />
fruits. Some are light gray-green whilst others are tan, the latter<br />
probably reflecting more advanced fruit maturity. Three images are<br />
associated with white flowers, typical of the genus. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />
differences in shape: three have a short squat neck, four have a<br />
pinched neck, and one has a thin tapering neck. One fruit shows<br />
splitting at the calyx end, while another, a mature, yellowed fruit, is<br />
covered with dark fungal spots and shows an oblong slit on the surface<br />
displaying yellow flesh.<br />
<strong>The</strong> small bottle-shaped type is represented by seven fruits. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
are tan, tan-orange, or green-yellow, again probably reflecting<br />
differing fruit maturity.<br />
<strong>The</strong> elongate, cocuzzi type is represented by 23 fruits, most of<br />
which are slightly curved, but one is quite contorted. Unlike the bottleshaped<br />
types, which are used as vessels, utensils, and a variety of other<br />
purposes, fruits of the cocuzzi type are consumed when young and<br />
tender. <strong>The</strong>re are differences in shape among the 23 fruits, suggesting<br />
that some of them might have been hybrids between the elongate and<br />
bottle-shaped types. At least 4 fruits are associated with white flowers.<br />
One of them, the well-known phallic representation of an elongated<br />
gourd penetrating a fig, is based on an imaginary cocuzza. Two others<br />
depict the gourds wrapped with strands of red currant berries (Ribes<br />
rubrum), a not-too-subtle erotic association of the serpentine gourd<br />
with the worship of Priapus (Morel, 1985). After completing the<br />
images in the Villa Farnesina, Raphael and Giovanni da Udine, at the<br />
request of Leo X, decorated a loggia of the Vatican, including many<br />
cocuzzi in the borders. This was repeated in the Villa Medici by<br />
Jocobo Zucchi and the Villa d’Este in Tivoli (Morel, 1985; Janick,<br />
2004a).<br />
Each of the three fruit forms of bottle gourds depicted in the<br />
festoons appeared in printed botanical herbals of the 16 th century,<br />
among them those of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1554),<br />
Tabernaemontanus (1591), and Gerard (1597). La Zucca nella Natura<br />
Morta dal Cinquecento al Novecento (Ravelli, 2004) contains<br />
reproductions of a number of Renaissance artworks depicting longfruited<br />
Lagenaria siceraria. Caravaggio’s 1603 painting Fruits and<br />
Vegetables on a Ledge also includes a cocuzza (Janick, 2004b). An<br />
346 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
early color depiction of a bottle-shaped gourd, painted between 1505<br />
and 1508, appeared in the Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne<br />
(Bilimoff, 2001). <strong>The</strong>re are a number of depictions of L. siceraria,<br />
both bottle-shaped and elongate, from Europe, Asia Minor, and <strong>North</strong><br />
Africa, that considerably antedate these.<br />
Balsam Apple, Momordica balsamina L.<br />
Four images of balsam apple (Figure 1I) appear in the festoons<br />
with a total of 12 fruits. <strong>The</strong> fruits are slightly warty, with a pointed<br />
end, and some of them are red and others are orange. Balsam apple<br />
has bitter fruit and is grown for vegetable or medicinal purposes in<br />
relatively dry tropical areas, but it is not well adapted to most parts of<br />
Europe. This species is depicted in the painting Stilleben mit<br />
Kűrbissen, 1657, at the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna (T. C.<br />
Andres, personal communication). We have not found any other<br />
Renaissance paintings of balsam apple, but depictions of this plant<br />
appeared in the herbals of Fuchs (1542), Dodoens (1616), and Chabrey<br />
(1666), among others, and it was also described by Ray (1686).<br />
Conclusions<br />
A number of the images of cultivated cucurbits in the festoons of<br />
the Villa Farnesina are similar to fruits of existing market types, which<br />
would seem to have been maintained over the course of the past 500<br />
years. This is remarkable considering the tendency of cucurbit<br />
cultivars of the same species to cross with one another, thereby<br />
mutually diluting their distinguishing characteristics. Moreover, the<br />
same market types of cucurbit fruits depicted in the festoons can also<br />
be found in works of art and botanical herbals that appeared decades<br />
later.<br />
<strong>The</strong> intraspecific diversity exhibited in the festoons of the Villa<br />
Farnesina differs among the cucurbit species, with watermelon and<br />
cucumber showing little and bottle gourd and melon showing<br />
extensive variation. <strong>The</strong> festoons appear to contain the first European<br />
paintings of sweet melons, documenting a wide phenotypic range that<br />
includes cultivars of both the Cantalupensis and Reticulatus groups,<br />
within a century of their introduction from southwestern Asia.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bilimoff, M. 2001. Promenade dans des jardins disparus: les plantes au moyen age,<br />
d’après les Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. Editions Ouest-France,<br />
Rennes.<br />
Bock, H. 1546. Kreuter Buch. Rihel, Strasbourg.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 347
Camerarius, J. 1586. Kreutterbuch. Calceolario, Frankfurt-on-Main.<br />
Caneva, G. 1992a. La Loggia di Psiche. Att. Accadem. Nazl. Linc. 9(3):163–172.<br />
Caneva, G. 1992b. Il mondo di Cerera nella Loggia di Psiche. Fratelli Palombi,<br />
Rome.<br />
Chabrey, D. 1666. Stirpium sciagraphia et icones. Gamoneti & de la Pierre,<br />
Geneva.<br />
Cordi, V. 1561. Annotationes in Pedacii Dioscoridis Anazarbei de medica materia<br />
libros V. Rihel, Strasbourg.<br />
Dalechamps, J. 1587. Historia generalis plantarum. Roville, Lyons.<br />
Dodoens, R. 1554. De stirpium historia. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />
Dodoens, R. 1616. Stirpium historiae pemptades. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />
Fuchs, L. 1542. De historia stirpium. Isingrin, Basel.<br />
Gerard, J. 1597. <strong>The</strong> herball or generall historie of plants. Norton, London.<br />
Goldman, A. 2002. Melons for the passionate grower. Artisan, New York.<br />
Impelluso, L. 2004. Nature and its symbols. Getty Publications, Los Angeles.<br />
Janick, J. 2004a. Erotic use of Lagenaria in Renaissance art. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Network<br />
News. 11(2):7.<br />
Janick, J. 2004b. Caravaggio’s fruits: mirror on Baroque horticulture. Chron. Hort.<br />
44(4):9–15.<br />
Janick, J. and G. Caneva. 2005. <strong>The</strong> first images of maize in Europe. Maydica.<br />
50:71–80.<br />
Janick, J. and H. S. Paris. 2006. <strong>The</strong> cucurbit images (1515–1518) of the Villa<br />
Farnesina, Rome. Ann. Bot. 97:165–176.<br />
Jeffrey, C. 2001. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. In: P. Hanelt et al., Mansfeld’s encyclopedia of<br />
agricultural and horticultural crops, p. 1510–1557. Springer, Berlin.<br />
L’Obel, M. de. 1576. Sev stirpium historia. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />
Mattioli, P. A. 1558. Apologia adversus Amathum Lusitanum, cum censura in<br />
eiusdem enarrationes. Valgrisi, Venice.<br />
Morel, P. 1985. Priape à la Renaissance. Les guirlandes de Giovanni da Udine à la<br />
Farnésine. Revue de L’Art. 69:13–28.<br />
Paris, H. S. and J. Janick. 2005. Early evidence for the culinary use of squash<br />
flowers in Italy. Chron. Hort. 45(2):20–21.<br />
Pinet, A. du. 1561. Historia plantarum. Coter, Lyons.<br />
Pitrat, M., P. Hanelt, and K. Hammer. 2000. Some comments on infraspecific<br />
classification of cultivars of melon. In: N. Katzir and H. S. Paris (eds.). Proc.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2000. Acta Hort. 510:29–36.<br />
Ravelli, L. 2004. La zucca nella natura morta dal cinquecento al novecento.<br />
Sometti, Mantova, Italy.<br />
Ray, J. 1686. Historia plantarum, vol. 1. Clark, London.<br />
Stuart, D. C. 1984. <strong>The</strong> kitchen garden, a historical guide to traditional crops.<br />
Guernsey Press, Guernsey, UK.<br />
Tabernaemontanus, D. J. T. 1591. Kraeuter Buch. Basse, Frankfurt-on-Main.<br />
348 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
JONAH AND THE “GOURD” AT NINEVEH:<br />
CONSEQUENCES OF A CLASSIC<br />
MISTRANSLATION<br />
Jules Janick<br />
Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Purdue<br />
University, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive,<br />
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />
Harry S. Paris<br />
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research Center,<br />
P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus colocynthis, Lagenaria siceraria, Ricinus<br />
communis, plant iconography<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> fast-growing plant referred to in the biblical Book of Jonah is<br />
most often translated into English as “gourd.” However, this is a mistranslation<br />
that dates to the appended Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew<br />
Bible, in which the Hebrew word qiqayon (castor, Ricinus communis,<br />
Euphorbiaceae) was transformed into the somewhat similar-sounding Greek<br />
word kolokynthi (colocynth, Citrullus colocynthis). In translation of the Greek<br />
into Latin, kolokynthi became the similar-sounding cucurbita (gourd). This is<br />
reflected in early iconography, the plant most often depicted being a longfruited<br />
Lagenaria siceraria (bottle or calabash gourd), a fast-growing climber.<br />
C<br />
ucurbits are frequent subjects of art, literature, and myth. Since<br />
ancient times, people the world over have been fascinated by<br />
the fast growth of cucurbits, from a seed to a rampant vine<br />
bearing prominent, attractive fruits within two or three months.<br />
Metaphorically, the cucurbits are associated with warmth, sunshine,<br />
health, vitality, fertility, sexuality, and abundance, leading to mirth and<br />
laughter (Norrman and Haarberg, 1980).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> fruits have been valued by humans for thousands of<br />
years, for food and a multitude of other uses. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae are<br />
extremely polymorphic for fruit size, shape, and color and the fruits of<br />
some species can exhibit great similarity to those of others (Chester,<br />
1951). Often, the result has been different names for the same species<br />
and the same name for different species, resulting in the confusion that<br />
has afflicted cucurbit terminology since ancient times. This confusion<br />
has been enhanced by the translation of names to different languages<br />
and by mistranslations. One of the most striking cases of<br />
mistranslation occurred when the biblical Book of Jonah, which is read<br />
in its entirety by Jews as part of the afternoon prayer of the Day of<br />
Atonement, was translated into other languages.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 349
Jonah, more accurately Yona the son of Amittay, is one of the<br />
remarkable figures of the Hebrew Bible. He was ordered by God to get<br />
up and go to Nineveh (a destroyed Assyrian city near the present-day<br />
Mosul, Iraq), the great city, and call upon it because its wickedness<br />
has risen up to Me. But Jonah disobeyed the Divine command and<br />
tried to run away, boarding at the port of Jaffa (Yafo, Israel) a boat<br />
bound for the city of Tarshish (a Mediterranean port, perhaps in<br />
Spain). However, the craft was soon overtaken by a squall, for which<br />
Jonah admitted responsibility and persuaded the crew of the boat to<br />
throw him overboard. Swallowed by a providential fish in whose belly<br />
he remained for three days and three nights, Jonah composed a psalm<br />
of thanksgiving. He was then vomited out on the shoreline. <strong>The</strong> Divine<br />
command to preach to Nineveh was repeated. As a result of Jonah’s<br />
exhortations, the populace heeded the warning of destruction and<br />
atoned, and the city was spared. Jonah, who had withdrawn and<br />
watched the city from a booth, was displeased at the Divine mercy<br />
toward Nineveh. A fast-growing plant had provided him with muchneeded<br />
shade, but at the break of dawn one day a worm attacked the<br />
plant, causing it to wither. Jonah was rebuked for his distress at the<br />
loss of the plant, in view of his displeasure toward the Divine mercy<br />
that spared 120,000 Ninevans their lives (Jonah 4:6–11).<br />
<strong>The</strong> Hebrew name for the fast-growing plant that provided relief<br />
for Jonah is qiqayon. Derived from ancient Egyptian, this word<br />
signifies castor, Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae), castor oil being<br />
shemen qiq in Hebrew. However, in a number of biblical translations,<br />
including the King James Version of 1611, qiqayon is translated as<br />
“gourd”: And the LORD God prepared a gourd, and made it to come<br />
up over Jonah, that it might be a shadow over his head, to deliver him<br />
from his grief. So Jonah was exceeding glad of the gourd. But God<br />
prepared a worm when the morning rose the next day, and it smote the<br />
gourd that it withered (Jonah 4:6–7).<br />
A translation more faithful to the Hebrew is given in the Jerusalem<br />
Bible (Fisch, 1992): And the LORD God appointed a castor oil plant,<br />
and made it to come up over Yona, that it might be a shade over his<br />
head, to deliver him from his distress. And Yona was exceeding glad of<br />
the plant. But God appointed a worm when the dawn came up the next<br />
day, and it attacked the plant, so that it withered.<br />
<strong>The</strong> story of Jonah is one of the best-known biblical tales and is<br />
referred to both in the New Testament and in the Qur’an. <strong>The</strong> giant<br />
fish, referred to as a whale by Jesus (Matthew 10:39–40), has captured<br />
the imagination of children, like the marvelous but less well-known<br />
miraculous “gourd” that resonates in the story of Jack and the<br />
Beanstalk. It is not our purpose here to reflect on the theological<br />
350 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
meaning of Jonah or its historical accuracy. Our objective is twofold:<br />
first, to trace the story of how the fast-growing qiqayon eventually<br />
became translated as “gourd” and second, to identify the cucurbit<br />
depicted in ancient images of the story of Jonah.<br />
Translation from Hebrew to Greek: Septuagint<br />
<strong>The</strong> translation of the Hebrew Bible to Greek began in the 3 rd<br />
century BCE in Alexandria. Philadelphus II (Ptolemy, 285–247 BCE)<br />
requested of El’azar, the High Priest in Jerusalem, a translation from<br />
Hebrew into Greek for the library at Alexandria. Initially, only the<br />
Tora (Instruction), known in Greek as the Pentateuch or Five Books of<br />
Moses, was translated. This Greek translation became known as the<br />
Septuagint (Seventy) as it was supposedly conducted by a committee<br />
composed of six translators from each of the 12 tribes of Israel. Only<br />
later were the other <strong>book</strong>s comprising the Jewish scriptures translated<br />
and appended to the original Septuagint, becoming an inseparable part<br />
of it. <strong>The</strong> Septuagint is still a part of the Bible of the Eastern Orthodox<br />
Christian churches.<br />
In the Septuagint translation of the Book of Jonah, the Hebrew<br />
qiqayon is translated as the somewhat similar-sounding word kolokynthi<br />
(also kolokynthan), colocynth, Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrader. <strong>The</strong><br />
intensely bitter colocynth is referred to in the Bible as the Hebrew<br />
paqqu’ot sade. During a famine, its fruit was gathered from vines in the<br />
field and were then mistakenly included in a pottage prepared for the<br />
disciples of the prophet Elisha’: And they poured for the people to eat<br />
and it was when eating from the pottage that they yelled and said death<br />
is in the pot of the man of God and they could not eat (2 Kings 4:39–40).<br />
Elisha’ was able to ameliorate the taste of the pottage by adding flour.<br />
Citrullus colocynthis is a prostrate, relatively small vine with<br />
pinnatifid leaves. It is not adapted to climbing nor could it be thought<br />
of as a good provider of shade. Possibly, the ancient Greek usage<br />
could have been less specific and included a broader spectrum of<br />
cucurbits. <strong>The</strong> colocynth was used by the ancients medically as a<br />
purgative, and is specifically mentioned in three works of the first<br />
century CE: Materia Medica of Pedanius Dioscorides, Historia<br />
Naturalis (Book 20) of Pliny the Elder (Jones, 1951), and the Mishna,<br />
a series of six <strong>book</strong>s of commentary on Jewish Law. In Book 2 of the<br />
Mishna an entirely different use of the paqqu’ot is revealed. Oil was<br />
pressed from the seeds, for illumination, but was deemed inappropriate<br />
for lighting the Sabbath (Mishna 2, Massekhet Shabbat). In Book 6 yet<br />
another usage is described. Young shoots of paqqu’ot plants were<br />
eaten after pickling in salt or vinegar (Mishna 6, Massekhet ‘Oqazin)<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 351
(Feliks, 1957). An ancient illustration labeled with Greek Kolokynthis<br />
clearly depicting a plant of Citrullus colocynthis (Figure 1) is in the<br />
Codex Vindobonensis (Anciae Juliana), a 512 CE rendition of<br />
Dioscorides’ Materia Medica.<br />
Citrullus colocynthis was described as being used for medicinal<br />
purposes in botanical herbals of the Renaissance and was depicted in<br />
the herbals of Fuchs (1542), Bock (1546), Dodoens (1616), Chabrey<br />
(1666), and others. Subsequently, the usage of colocynth or coloquinte<br />
was expanded to encompass other bitter cucurbits, most often the<br />
small-fruited <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L. gourds (Gerard 1597;<br />
Tabernaemontani 1664). Bauhin (1651) illustrated and described the<br />
true colocynth and listed and described briefly nine other gourds that<br />
were also denoted colocynth. Seven were described as having rough<br />
foliage, probably indicative of C. pepo, an eighth was pyriform,<br />
probably also C. pepo. <strong>The</strong> last was described as having soft foliage<br />
and white flowers, evidently a small, bitter gourd of Lagenaria<br />
siceraria (Molina) Standley. <strong>The</strong> loose usage of the word colocynth in<br />
the later Renaissance gives credence to the supposition that the word<br />
kolokynthi was occasionally used loosely for cucurbits in ancient<br />
times.<br />
Translation to Latin<br />
<strong>The</strong> translation of the Hebrew Bible into Latin was originally by<br />
way of the Septuagint. <strong>The</strong> Greek kolokynthi was translated with the<br />
similar-sounding cucurbita (gourd) (Norrman and Haarberg, 1980).<br />
Eusebius Hieronymus Sophronius, 340–420 CE (later Saint Jerome),<br />
who was fluent in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin, translated directly from<br />
Hebrew to Latin. His translation is known as the Vulgate. <strong>The</strong> plant in<br />
the Book of Jonah was to become a source of contention in early<br />
Christianity between Augustine of Hippo, 354–430 CE (later Saint<br />
Augustine), and Jerome. Augustine was concerned about differences<br />
that could arise about biblical mistranslations, and the precise name of<br />
the plant in the Book of Jonah became the basis of a heated exchange<br />
of letters between Augustine and Jerome starting in 394 and<br />
continuing through 406. Augustine stridently objected to Jerome<br />
translating the Bible into Latin without adding notes and was<br />
especially vexed about mistranslations of the fast-growing plant of the<br />
Book of Jonah that Jerome translated as hedera (ivy). <strong>The</strong> English<br />
translations of Augustine’s letter of 403 and Jerome’s response of 406<br />
are quoted below (http://www.bible-researcher.com/vulgate2.html):<br />
352 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Augustine: A certain bishop, one of our brethren, having<br />
introduced in the church over which he presides the reading of<br />
your version, came upon a word in the <strong>book</strong> of the prophet<br />
Jonah, of which you have give a very different rendering from<br />
that which had been of old familiar to the senses and memory of<br />
all the worshippers, and had been chanted for so many<br />
generations in the church. <strong>The</strong>reupon arose such a tumult in the<br />
congregation, especially amongst the Greeks, correcting what<br />
had been read, and denouncing the translation as false, that the<br />
bishop was compelled to ask the testimony of the Jewish<br />
residents (it was in the town of Oea). <strong>The</strong>se, whether from<br />
ignorance or from spite, answered that the words in the Hebrew<br />
manuscripts were correctly rendered in the Greek version, and<br />
in the Latin one taken from it. What further need I say? <strong>The</strong> man<br />
was compelled to correct your version in that passage as if it<br />
have been falsely translated, as he desired not to be left without<br />
a congregation—a calamity which he narrowly escaped. From<br />
this case we also are led to think that you may be occasionally<br />
mistaken. You will also observe how great must have been the<br />
difficulty if this had occurred in those writings which cannot be<br />
explained by comparing the testimony of languages now in use.<br />
Jerome: You tell me that I have given a wrong translation of<br />
some word in Jonah, and that a worthy bishop narrowly escaped<br />
losing his charge through the clamorous tumult of his people,<br />
which was caused by the different rendering of this one word. At<br />
the same time, you withhold from me what the word was which I<br />
have mistranslated; thus taking away the possibility of my saying<br />
anything in my own vindication, lest my reply should be fatal to<br />
your objection. Perhaps it is the old dispute about the gourd<br />
which has been revived, after slumbering for many long years<br />
since the illustrious man, who in that day combined in his own<br />
person the ancestral honours of the Cornelii and of Asinius<br />
Pollio, brought against me the charge of giving in my translation<br />
the word “ivy” instead of “gourd.” I have already given a<br />
sufficient answer to this in my commentary on Jonah. At present,<br />
I deem it enough to say that in that passage, where the<br />
Septuagint has “gourd,” and Aquila and the others have<br />
rendered the word “ivy” (kissos), the Hebrew MS. has<br />
“ciceion,” which is in the Syriac tongue, as now spoken,<br />
“ciceia.” It is a kind of shrub having large leaves like a vine,<br />
and when planted it quickly springs up to the size of a small tree,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 353
standing upright by its own stem, without requiring any support<br />
of canes or poles, as both gourds and ivy do. If, therefore, in<br />
translating word for word, I had put the word “ciceia,” no one<br />
would know what it meant; if I had used the word “gourd,” I<br />
would have said what is not found in the Hebrew. I therefore put<br />
down “ivy,” that I might not differ from all other translators.<br />
But if your Jews said, either through malice or ignorance, as you<br />
yourself suggest, that the word is in the Hebrew text which is<br />
found in the Greek and Latin versions, it is evident that they<br />
were either unacquainted with Hebrew, or have been pleased to<br />
say what was not what was not true, in order to make sport of<br />
the gourd-planters.<br />
Clearly, then, as now, misuse and mistranslations of plant names,<br />
especially names of cucurbits, have led to misunderstandings and<br />
controversy.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Translation in the Qur’an<br />
In the Qur’an, written in the 7 th century, the plant at Nineveh is<br />
identified as yaqtin: there grew over Jonah a kind of yaqtin (Sura<br />
37:139–146). Usually, the Arabic yaqtin is identified with Lagenaria<br />
siceraria. Commentators of the Qur’an have offered a spectrum of<br />
opinions concerning the identity of the yaqtin, which can be<br />
summarized as indicating an herbaceous, summer-annual plant lacking<br />
support tissue, a climbing, quick-growing vine, having large foliage.<br />
<strong>The</strong> identification of the Hebrew qiqayon as Ricinus communis, Arabic<br />
kharua’, is not accepted in Islamic tradition (Amar, 1998), echoing<br />
Latin translations of the Septuagint rather than the Hebrew Bible or the<br />
Vulgate.<br />
English Translations<br />
<strong>The</strong> famous Authorized Version of King James I, 1611, has many<br />
mistranslations of biblical plants (Moldenke and Moldenke, 1952).<br />
<strong>The</strong> erroneous use of “gourd” for qiqayon in the Book of Jonah was<br />
copied in a number of subsequent English translations. <strong>The</strong> English<br />
translations based on the French Douay version of Roman Catholics<br />
use “ivy,” following Jerome’s Vulgate. A number of new translations<br />
based on modern scholarship equivocate and call it either “plant”<br />
(Revised Standard Version) or “vine” (New International Version).<br />
354 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Images from Antiquity<br />
A gourd is used for the story of Jonah in Judeo-Christian<br />
iconography of the 3 rd to the 16 th centuries. One example is a sculpture<br />
from 3 rd -century Phrygia (Central Turkey) showing Jonah under a vine<br />
bearing a fruit that is clearly an elongated Lagenaria siceraria (Figure<br />
2). Two others are mosaics, one from Tunisia dating to the end of the<br />
3 rd or beginning of the 4 th century (Figure 3) and the other from Italy<br />
(4 th century) (Figure 4). <strong>The</strong>ir similarity suggests that a standard<br />
representation of the incident was copied. <strong>The</strong> two mosaics show a<br />
nearly nude figure of the reclining Jonah under a trellis from which<br />
hang eight elongate fruits. Based on the swollen peduncular ends the<br />
fruits (Figure 4), these too appear to be L. siceraria. <strong>The</strong> young fruits<br />
of elongate L. siceraria are a food crop in some regions, such as Sicily,<br />
to the present day. Long-fruited L. siceraria are also depicted in<br />
Roman mosaics of the 2 nd to 3 rd century, indicating that they were a<br />
familiar esculent in the ancient Mediterranean region, and specific<br />
mention of the use of trellises for gourds is made by Columella and<br />
Pliny. A 12 th century image (Figure 5) captures the entire story of<br />
Jonah, including his being tossed overboard, being swallowed by the<br />
fish, and reclining under a cucurbit vine, but the image is too crude to<br />
make an identification of the species. Later images, from the 14 th and<br />
16 th centuries, depict Jonah’s gourd as the more familiar bottle-shaped<br />
L. siceraria.<br />
Conclusion<br />
<strong>The</strong> identification of the fast-growing plant in the Book of Jonah as<br />
a gourd is due to a mistranslation of the Hebrew word qiqayon (castor)<br />
to the Greek word kolokynthi and then to the Latin word cucurbita.<br />
<strong>The</strong> error is reflected in early iconography, the qiqayon being depicted<br />
as a long-fruited Lagenaria siceraria. <strong>The</strong> confusion over the plant<br />
shows how, then as now, misuse and mistranslation of plant names,<br />
especially names of cucurbits, have led to misunderstandings and<br />
controversy. <strong>The</strong> qiqayon of Jonah was a lush, fast-growing provider<br />
of shade. By rendering it an edible-fruited cucurbit, it became, in<br />
addition, a symbol of sustenance, well-being, and life itself.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 355
Fig. 1. Painting of Citrullus colocynthis from Codex Vindobonensis, 512 CE (Der<br />
Wiener Dioskurides, 1998).<br />
Fig. 2. Jonah at Nineveh in a paleo-Christian sculpture from Phrygia (Central<br />
Turkey), ca. 270–280 (Cleveland Museum of Art).<br />
Fig. 3. Jonah at Nineveh in a 3 rd –4 th -century mosaic at Tunis (Baggio et al.,<br />
1995).<br />
Fig. 4. Jonah at Nineveh in a mosaic at Aquileia, Italy (Rossi, 1968).<br />
Fig. 5. <strong>The</strong> story of Jonah from a 12 th century manuscript. Sinai Peninsula,<br />
Monastery of Saint Catherine, Ms. 1186, fol. 110r. Photo Richard Cleave.<br />
(Encyclopedia Judaica, 1972).<br />
356 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Literature Cited<br />
Amar, Z. 1998. Zihuy hazomeah hamiqra’i bir’i parshanut haQur’an [Scriptural<br />
plant identification mirrored in Qur’an commentary]. Bet Miqra. 43(1):67–77.<br />
Baggio, M., M. De Paoli, M. T. Lachin, M. Salvadori, and S. Toso. 1995. Mosaici<br />
Romani di Tunisias. CNRS Editions, Paris.<br />
Bauhin, J. 1651. Historiae plantarum universalis. Graffenried, Yverdon.<br />
Bock, H. 1546. Kreuter Buch. Rihel, Strasbourg.<br />
Chabrey, D. 1666. Stirpium sciagraphia et icones. Gamoneti & de la Pierre, Geneva.<br />
Chester, K. S. 1951. Selected writings of N. I. Vavilov. <strong>The</strong> origin, variation,<br />
immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, MA.<br />
Der Wiener Dioskurides. 1998. Codex medicus Graecus 1 der Österreichischen<br />
Nationalbibliothek. Graz.<br />
Dodoens, R. 1616. Stirpium historiae pemptades. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />
Encyclopedia Judaica. 1972. Jerusalem.<br />
Feliks, J. 1957. ‘Olam hazomeah hamiqra’i [Plant world of the Bible], 1 st ed.<br />
Massada, Tel Aviv.<br />
Fisch, H. 1992. <strong>The</strong> holy scriptures. <strong>The</strong> Jerusalem Bible. Koren, Jerusalem.<br />
Fuchs, L. 1542. De historia stirpium. Isingrin, Basel.<br />
Gerard, J. 1597. <strong>The</strong> herbal or generall historie of plants. Bollifant, London.<br />
Jones, W. H. S. 1951. Pliny natural history. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Moldenke, H. N. and A. L. Moldenke. 1952. Plants of the Bible. Chronica Botanica,<br />
Waltham, MA.<br />
Norrmann, R. and J. Haarberg. 1980. Nature and language: a semiotic study of<br />
cucurbits in literature. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.<br />
Rossi, F. 1968. Il mosaico: pittura a de pietra. Alflieri & Lacroix, Milan.<br />
Tabernaemontani, J. T. 1664. Kraeuter-Buch. Koenigs, Basel.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 357
DEVELOPMENT OF AN IMAGE DATABASE<br />
OF CUCURBITACEAE<br />
Jules Janick and Anna Whipkey<br />
Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Purdue<br />
University,<br />
625 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />
Harry S. Paris<br />
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center,<br />
P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />
Marie-Christine Daunay and E. Jullian<br />
INRA, Unité de Génétique & Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes,<br />
Domaine St Maurice, BP 94, 84143 Montfavet cedex, France<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. plant iconography, taxonomy, crop history, crop<br />
evolution<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> systematic collection of plant iconography would be an<br />
invaluable resource to researchers, providing significant information on<br />
taxonomy, crop history and evolution, lost traits, and genetic diversity. To this<br />
end a project, “Plant Image”, is being organized to assemble a searchable<br />
database of plant images, focusing on the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Solanaceae.<br />
Searches have been made from various sources including art (mosaics,<br />
paintings, and sculpture), illustrated manuscripts, and hand illustrated and<br />
printed herbals and <strong>book</strong>s. We are concentrating our search on antiquity (Old<br />
and New World), medieval, and Renaissance sources but we intend to include<br />
more recent images as well. Bibliographic information on primary and<br />
secondary sources will be associated with each image and, in the case of herbals,<br />
associated text material will eventually be included. We hope to receive images<br />
and information from all persons interested in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and<br />
Solanaceae, so that the database will be a living, dynamic document. <strong>The</strong><br />
working database is online: www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/iconography.<br />
P<br />
lant iconography is a valuable resource for such fields as<br />
taxonomy, genetics, crop domestication and crop evolution, and<br />
genetic diversity. It is one of the tools for assessing the<br />
historical presence of botanical taxa in a particular region (Eisendrath,<br />
1961). A large, maybe even enormous, amount of ancient illustrative<br />
material exists, but it is fragile, rare, and widely scattered among<br />
libraries and collections, public and private, and is often difficult to<br />
access. Hence, there is no easy way for one person to assemble all of<br />
the illustrations for any plant family. Moreover, copyrights to images<br />
are often involved, and policy for access to the images varies from one<br />
library or collection to another. <strong>The</strong> viewing and usage of the many<br />
images are restricted.<br />
358 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
On the other hand, the digitizing of information by some of the<br />
major world libraries has greatly facilitated the search for ancient<br />
illustrations and, for the first time, made their collection feasible.<br />
Collection of all of the ancient illustrations of such a large, diverse,<br />
and attractive family as the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae would especially be too<br />
huge for any single individual to undertake and therefore a joint effort<br />
is necessary. Our goal is to develop a database assembling plant<br />
images based on botanical names, so that plant researchers can easily<br />
focus their iconographic research on taxa of interest. We call this<br />
project “Plant Image” and have initiated it with two plant families:<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Solanaceae.<br />
Description<br />
We are concentrating our searches on antiquity (Old and New<br />
World), and Medieval, Renaissance, and Baroque periods but we<br />
intend to include images from the 18 th century to the present. <strong>The</strong><br />
images collected so far are from various sources, including art<br />
(mosaics, paintings, and sculpture), illustrated manuscripts, printed<br />
herbals, <strong>book</strong>s, and private collections. In the case of herbals, we hope<br />
to eventually associate text material. We are aware that many of the<br />
images from printed herbals are merely copies of preexisting images<br />
but we will include as many as feasible; for works that went through<br />
many editions, we will concentrate on the primary sources. Our<br />
intention is to include the following bibliographic information<br />
associated with each image:<br />
Bibliographic Information for Images:<br />
Family: family name<br />
Species: modern binomial with authority<br />
Common name: common name or names, English first<br />
Original label: designation in original document<br />
Original document: where image was first published or created<br />
Time period: time when image was produced<br />
Associated text: yes/no (list separately)<br />
Author: author of text of original document<br />
Illustrator: creator of image<br />
Color: black and white, hand tinted, painted, printed in color<br />
Library/collection: source from where document was obtained<br />
Library reference: library identification of source document<br />
Secondary source: used if image was obtained from a later document<br />
Comments: additional information<br />
Donor: contributor of image<br />
Web link: original Website<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 359
Operation<br />
<strong>The</strong> database was created using FileMaker Pro®, currently on the<br />
server of Purdue University. <strong>The</strong> database is maintained by Anna<br />
Whipkey of the Department of Horticulture and Landscape<br />
Architecture (awhipkey@purdue.edu). All images need to be defined<br />
with the bibliographic information described above. <strong>The</strong> donor of the<br />
image will be acknowledged and identified. We hope to have the<br />
highest resolution possible, but we are aware that in many cases the<br />
highest resolution images are available only by purchase from specific<br />
institutions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> project must be a living, dynamic collection and success will<br />
depend on images obtained from willing scientists, art historians,<br />
archivists, enthusiasts, and others. We invite anyone to contribute<br />
images and are willing to acknowledge and identify each donor. <strong>The</strong><br />
database is intended to be freely open to all. We are attempting to<br />
solicit modest grants to facilitate this project. As an example of the<br />
database contents, representative cucurbit images with associated<br />
information are shown in Figures 1 to 5. <strong>The</strong> information we are<br />
compiling is freely available as part of the Purdue NewCROPWebsite:<br />
.<br />
Fig. 1. Typical page of database.<br />
360 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Fig. 2. Ecballium elaterium<br />
(squirting cucumber) from<br />
Dioscorides, De Materia Medica,<br />
Codex Vindobonensis 512 CE.<br />
Source: Der Wiener Dioskurides,<br />
1998.<br />
Fig. 4. Cucumis melo,<br />
cantalupensis Group, painted by<br />
Giovanni da Udine from the Villa<br />
Farnesina (1515–1518). Source:<br />
Janick and Paris, 2006.<br />
Fig. 3. Lagenaria siceraria (bottle<br />
gourd). Source: Schoeffer, 1485.<br />
Fig. 5. Citrullus lanatus<br />
(watermelon), woodcut from De<br />
Historia Stirpium (Fuchs, 1542) and<br />
republished in Fuchs’ New<br />
Kreuterbuch, 1543, coloring from<br />
his personal copy (Meyer et al.,<br />
1999)<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 361
Literature Cited<br />
Der Wiener Dioskurides. 1998. Codex medicus Graecus 1 der Österreichishchen<br />
Nationalbibliothek. Graz.<br />
Eisendrath, E. R. 1961. Portraits of plants. a limited study of the “icones”. Ann.<br />
Missouri Bot. Gard. 48:291–327.<br />
Schoeffer, P. 1485. Gart der gesundheit, p. 83. Schoeffer, Mainz, Germany.<br />
Janick, J. and Paris, H. S. 2006. <strong>The</strong> cucurbit images (1515–1518) of the Villa<br />
Farnesina, Rome. Ann. Bot. 97:165–176.<br />
Meyer, F. G., Trueblood, E. E., and Heller, J. L. 1999. <strong>The</strong> great herbal of Leonhart<br />
Fuchs, vol. 1, commentary, p. 522–523, 669–670, pl. 64. Stanford Univ. Press,<br />
Stanford, CA.<br />
362 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
FIRST IMAGES OF CUCURBITA IN EUROPE<br />
Harry S. Paris<br />
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research Center,<br />
P. O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel<br />
Jules Janick<br />
Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Purdue<br />
University, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive,<br />
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010<br />
Marie-Christine Daunay<br />
I.N.R.A., Unité de Génétique & Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes,<br />
Domaine St. Maurice, BP 94, 84143, Montfavet cedex, France<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata, crop dispersal, crop history, plant iconography<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (pumpkin, squash, gourd) is native to the<br />
Americas and diffused to other continents subsequent to European contact in<br />
1492. For quite some time, the earliest images of this genus in Europe that were<br />
known to cucurbit specialists were two illustrations of C. pepo pumpkins that<br />
were published in Fuchs’ De Historia Stirpium, 1542, exactly 50 years after<br />
Columbus’ first voyage. Other images considerably antedating these have come<br />
to light recently as the result of the publication of two <strong>book</strong>s in which are<br />
reproduced highly realistic botanical and horticultural color paintings from the<br />
first two decades of the 16 th century. One of these images appears in the prayer<br />
<strong>book</strong> of Anne de Bretagne, Queen of France. Completed by 1508, this painting<br />
shows a living branch bearing flowers and fruits, which we interpret as being a<br />
gourd of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo subsp. texana. Other images appear in festoons painted<br />
on the ceiling of the Villa Farnesina in Rome, <strong>complete</strong>d by 1518. <strong>The</strong>se lifelike<br />
color depictions include pumpkins and gourds of C. maxima, C. pepo, and,<br />
possibly, C. moschata.<br />
he genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a L. (pumpkins, squash, and some gourds)<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae) is native to the Americas (Gray and Trumbull,<br />
1883; Whitaker, 1947). Pumpkins and squash were dispersed to<br />
other continents by transoceanic voyagers at the turn of the 16 th<br />
T<br />
century and have become a familiar and important vegetable crop in<br />
many countries. Whilst C. pepo L. is by far the most widely distributed<br />
and economically important species of the genus, C. maxima<br />
Duchesne and C. moschata Duchesne are also economically important<br />
in various regions.<br />
Plant iconography is the most unequivocal tool for assessing the<br />
historical presence of botanical taxa in a particular region; this is<br />
especially the case for the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae (Eisendrath, 1961). <strong>The</strong> first<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 363
known images of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a outside of the Americas had long been<br />
believed to be two illustrations of pumpkins of C. pepo that appeared<br />
in De Historia Stirpium (Fuchs, 1542), a half-century after Columbus’<br />
first voyage to the New World. Indeed, the earliest unequivocal<br />
depiction of C. maxima appeared the botanical herbal of L’Obel<br />
(1576) and the earliest generally accepted illustration of C. moschata<br />
is in the tome of Rheede tot Draakenstein (1688). Several recent<br />
publications have brought to light the existence of even earlier<br />
depictions of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in Europe. One of these depictions is in the<br />
personally painted prayer <strong>book</strong> that belonged to Anne de Bretagne,<br />
Queen of France and Duchess of Brittany (1477–1514) (Bilimoff,<br />
2001). With time, this <strong>book</strong> was to become known as the Grandes<br />
Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. Other depictions are in the festoons that<br />
surround frescoes decorating ceilings of a fabulous early Renaissance<br />
residence in Rome (Caneva, 1992). This building was later to become<br />
known as the Villa Farnesina. <strong>The</strong> objective of this paper is to describe<br />
and discuss these depictions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Grandes Heures<br />
<strong>The</strong> Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne was compiled and<br />
illustrated between 1503 and 1508 (Bilimoff, 2001). At the request of<br />
Queen Anne, Jean Bourdichon (1457–1521) of Touraine, who was<br />
official court painter to four successive French kings, richly adorned<br />
an Horae ad usum romanum, that is, a prayer <strong>book</strong>, for the Queen’s<br />
personal use (Camus, 1894; Bilimoff, 2001). On many of the 30 ×<br />
19cm pages, he painted fairly accurately a part of a plant and, on or<br />
next to it, several small animals, mostly insects. Well over 300 plant<br />
species are represented in the <strong>book</strong>, drawn from live specimens found<br />
in the fields, woods, and royal gardens at Tours and Blois in the Loire<br />
Valley. Most of the paintings are vertically oriented 165 × 45mm<br />
rectangles positioned on the outside margins of the prayers, whilst<br />
other paintings surround or bracket the prayers. Each painting is<br />
labeled with a Latin name and a French vernacular name of the plant.<br />
Catalogued as Ms. Latin 9474 at the Bibliothèque Nationale de<br />
France, the <strong>book</strong> can be browsed on-line in its entirety at<br />
, by clicking on<br />
Recherche, typing Latin 9474 in the small window Manuscrits,<br />
clicking on Chercher and then on Images.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most outstanding feature of this <strong>book</strong> is the lifelike<br />
representation of so many species of living plants and animals, even<br />
though these are not always biologically accurate (Camus, 1894). <strong>The</strong><br />
relative sizes of the various plant parts and the animals, the shapes of<br />
364 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
the leaves, and the colors of the flowers and the animals sometimes<br />
succumbed to fantasy in order to enhance the artistic effects.<br />
Nonetheless, the paintings are accurate enough to allow positive<br />
identification of most of the plants to genus and species. Each of the<br />
paintings is labeled with a Latin name and a French name.<br />
Used by Queen Anne until her death, this <strong>book</strong> remained within<br />
the collection of precious documents of the French kings. In 1722,<br />
King Louis XV th allowed the royal botanist, Antoine de Jussieu (1686–<br />
1758), to critically analyze the illustrations of plants in the royal<br />
collection. Jussieu considered the plant images in the Grandes Heures<br />
to be much more realistic than those of earlier documents but he<br />
considered many of the Latin plant labels in the Grandes Heures to be<br />
inappropriate. <strong>The</strong>refore, he prepared a catalogue, in which he<br />
tabulated the Latin and French labels of the plants in the Grandes<br />
Heures next to Latin designations used in major botanical works such<br />
as those of L’Obel, the Bauhin brothers, and Tournefort, as well as the<br />
contemporary French common names. Joseph Decaisne (1807–1882),<br />
the Belgian botanist, also examined the <strong>book</strong> and catalogued the<br />
plants, apparently without knowing that Jussieu had done so a century<br />
earlier. Camus (1894) compared the identifications of the plants by<br />
Jussieu and by Decaisne and, noticing they were not always the same,<br />
he offered his own identifications of the plants. Bilimoff (2001), in her<br />
<strong>book</strong> Promenade dans des Jardins Disparus, reproduced in color,<br />
some whole and some in part, the paintings in the Grandes Heures.<br />
This <strong>book</strong>, through which we became aware of the existence of these<br />
images, also has a catalogue of its own, listing the names from the<br />
Grandes Heures alongside Latin and contemporary French names.<br />
Four cucurbits are depicted in the Grandes Heures. One is bryony,<br />
Bryonia dioica Jacq., which grows wild but is not cultivated. Another,<br />
bearing the Latin name Cucumer and the French name Concombres, is<br />
indeed cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Another cucurbit, bearing the<br />
Latin name <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a and the French name Quegourdes, is bottle<br />
gourd, Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standley. <strong>The</strong>se three cucurbits<br />
are of Old World origin. <strong>The</strong> fourth cucurbit image bears the Latin<br />
name Colloqui[n]tida and the French label Quegourdes de turquie.<br />
Jussieu, Decaisne, Camus, and Bilimoff agreed that this image was<br />
modeled from a plant of the New World genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, but the<br />
identification of the species has been controversial and to our<br />
knowledge no cucurbit specialists have examined the image previously<br />
and positively identified it to that taxonomic level.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 365
<strong>The</strong> Image of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the Grandes Heures<br />
<strong>The</strong> image of Quegourdes de turquie in the Grandes Heures<br />
d’Anne de Bretagne is bracket-shaped with a golden background<br />
(Figure 1) (Paris et al., 2006). It depicts a branch with three pistillate<br />
flowers at anthesis that closely resemble those of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. <strong>The</strong><br />
large orange-yellow corollas are moderately flaring, fused at the base<br />
and parted, as petals, near the apex. <strong>The</strong> corollas are 6-parted, rather<br />
than the typical 5-parted, but 6-parted and even 7-parted corollas do<br />
occur occasionally in C. pepo (Duchesne, 1786). <strong>The</strong> calyx is short<br />
and its sepals are thin, tapering to a point at the apex, like an awl. <strong>The</strong><br />
ovaries are inferior and pyriform. A fourth pistillate flower, one day<br />
prior to anthesis, is depicted near the apex of the branch. Six leaf<br />
laminae and parts of three petioles are depicted. <strong>The</strong> leaf laminae are<br />
acute, serrated, and deeply indented, as in C. pepo, but their shape is 7parted<br />
rather than the usual more-or-less 5-parted. <strong>The</strong> two pyriform<br />
fruits are connected to the stem by long, narrow peduncles. No detail is<br />
evident for the petioles, stem, or peduncles, and no tendrils are<br />
depicted. On and next to the plant are depicted a snail and four<br />
arthropods: a caterpillar, a fly, a moth, and a beetle, all in lifelike<br />
color.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two pyriform fruits of the Quegourdes de turquie appear to be<br />
similar to gourds of C. pepo (Figure 1). Upon closer examination, the<br />
fruits of the Quegourdes de turquie can be seen to bear longitudinal<br />
stripes: broad, light yellow-green ones alternating with narrow light<br />
blue-green ones. <strong>The</strong> striped color pattern is quite common among the<br />
pyriform gourds, wild and ornamental, of C. pepo, although most often<br />
the broad stripes are dark green (Paris, 2000). On the mature fruits of<br />
such pyriform gourds, the broad dark green stripes alternate with<br />
narrow ivory white stripes; when the fruits are immature, the narrow<br />
stripes are light blue-green, as shown in the image. <strong>The</strong> green<br />
coloration of both the broad and the narrow stripes suggests that the<br />
fruits were immature.<br />
<strong>The</strong> image is labeled at the bottom with the French vernacular<br />
name Quegourdes de turquie (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> French word quegourdes<br />
apparently had been used during that era, first for bottle gourds and<br />
then extended to include other gourds. Quegourdes was to become<br />
cougourdes or gourdes, epithets applied to forms of Lagenaria<br />
(Duchesne, 1786). During the 16 th century, the adjective “Turkish”<br />
implied an exotic origin. For example, one of the two C. pepo<br />
pumpkins appearing in the herbal of Fuchs (1542) is labeled<br />
“Türckisch Cucumer” whilst maize (Zea mays L.) is labeled<br />
“Türckisch Korn”; both of these species, of course, are native<br />
366 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
American plants. <strong>The</strong>refore, this particular plant, the Quegourdes de<br />
turquie, was recognized in the Grandes Heures as being new or<br />
foreign, de turquie, distinguishing it from the Lagenaria gourds.<br />
As has been asserted concerning the identity of the cucurbits<br />
illustrated in the botanical herbals of the Renaissance (Eisendrath,<br />
1961), the identification of the plants illustrated in the Grandes Heures<br />
d’Anne de Bretagne must take into account the artistic style of the<br />
illustrator. <strong>The</strong>refore, comparison of the illustration of Quegourdes de<br />
turquie with that of each of the two other cultivated species of<br />
cucurbits offers valuable assistance in interpretation. <strong>The</strong> illustration<br />
of Lagenaria siceraria (Figure 1) in the Grandes Heures accurately<br />
depicts the plant as having rounded leaf laminae and large white<br />
flowers, but it too lacks detail of the stem. <strong>The</strong> illustration of Cucumis<br />
sativus (Figure 1) also lacks details of the stems and petioles.<br />
Moreover, the leaf laminae are depicted as deeply lobed, whilst in<br />
reality those of C. sativus are angular but shallowly pentalobate. <strong>The</strong><br />
peduncles of the cucumber fruits are depicted as originating separately<br />
Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> paintings of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo subsp. texana, Lagenaria siceraria, and<br />
Cucumis sativus in the Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne (1503–1508).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 367
Fig. 2. A painting of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima from the Loggia of Cupid and Psyche<br />
ceiling of the Villa Farnesina (1515–1518).<br />
on the main stem rather than in leaf axils; they are very long, narrow,<br />
and smooth. However, C. sativus peduncles are typically spiculate and<br />
not so long, and furthermore originate in leaf axils. <strong>The</strong> long, narrow,<br />
smooth peduncles not originating in leaf axils are in common, though,<br />
with the illustration of Quegourdes de turquie. So it would seem that<br />
these anomalous characteristics were stylistic of the artist.<strong>The</strong> striping<br />
pattern of the fruits of Quegourdes de turquie is inconsistent with the<br />
possibility that this depiction is of the cultivated species <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata, C. argyrosperma Huber, or C. ficifolia Bouché. C. maxima<br />
fruits can exhibit narrow light-colored stripes, but this species has<br />
rounded, rather than angular leaves. Wild <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a taxa invariably<br />
have round fruits, with the exception of C. pepo subsp. texana, which<br />
bears fruits that are most often oviform to globose, with pyriform<br />
variants being fairly common (Erwin, 1938; Bailey, 1943; Andres,<br />
1987). Whilst on most fruits the broad stripes are dark, intense green,<br />
fruits having light-colored broad stripes or that are even entirely lightcolored<br />
or ivory white have also been observed (Bailey, 1937; Decker-<br />
Walters et al., 1993). Quegourdes de turquie, therefore, is a<br />
representation of a pyriform gourd of C. pepo subsp. texana.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Villa Farnesina<br />
<strong>The</strong> festoons on ceilings in the Villa Farnesina were painted by<br />
Giovanni Martini da Udine (1487–1564) from 1515 to early 1518.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se festoons and the frescoes that they surround, designed by<br />
Raphael Sanzio (1483–1520), were painted for Agostino Chigi, an<br />
extremely wealthy Sienese banker, in this, his new home on the west<br />
368 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
ank of the Tiber in Rome. Today, the Villa Farnesina is open to<br />
tourists and a <strong>complete</strong> photographic study of the decorations was<br />
recently published by Frommel (2003). Identifications of the fruits and<br />
plants in the festoons were offered in the <strong>book</strong> by Caneva (1992),<br />
through which we became aware of the existence of these paintings.<br />
Remarkably, within the festoons are the first European images of Zea<br />
mays (Janick and Caneva, 2005).<br />
<strong>The</strong> depictions in the festoons are in lifelike color and highly<br />
accurate, to the point of showing blemishes and diseases on the fruits.<br />
Most of the species have more than one fruit depicted. <strong>The</strong> variation<br />
among fruits of the same species is a mirror on intraspecific genetic<br />
diversity. Analysis of the maize images has suggested that in some<br />
cases prototypes were copied, and, while some artistic license was<br />
used, the portraits nonetheless do appear to be quite accurate and can<br />
be considered true representations of the flowers and fruits that were<br />
probably harvested from the gardens that at the time surrounded the<br />
Villa Farnesina (Janick and Caneva, 2005). <strong>The</strong> images in the festoons<br />
of the Villa Farnesina led to the painting of similar images, beginning<br />
in 1517, in the Vatican, the Villa Medici in Rome, and the Villa d’Este<br />
in Tivoli.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Images of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the Villa Farnesina<br />
<strong>The</strong> festoons in the Villa Farnesina contain seven images of fruits<br />
of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima (Janick and Paris, 2006). <strong>The</strong>se are from three<br />
cultivars, two of which appear to be representative of the market class<br />
of show pumpkins, although they are not nearly so large as those that<br />
are customarily encountered today. One of the show-pumpkin cultivars<br />
has intense-orange fruits, which are shallowly furrowed and have a<br />
somewhat protruding stylar end surrounded by a narrow but large<br />
circular scar (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> other show-pumpkin cultivar has graywhite<br />
fruits with shallow furrows and a small stylar scar. <strong>The</strong> third C.<br />
maxima is a smaller pumpkin, greenish gray and oblate.<br />
<strong>The</strong> festoons contain 15 images of fruits of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. All but<br />
three of these are of small, oviform to pyriform, striped fruits, C. pepo<br />
subsp. texana. Gourds of this appearance occur in cultivation and in<br />
the wild. If cultivated, they are referred to the Oviform, Smooth-<br />
Rinded Group (Paris, 2001). Two of the remaining fruits occur close<br />
together in the festoons. <strong>The</strong>y appear to be larger than the gourds, but<br />
are nonetheless modest in size. <strong>The</strong>y are striped with two shades of<br />
green and apparently immature. <strong>The</strong>ir oblate shape indicates that they<br />
are of the Pumpkin Group, which belongs to C. pepo subsp. pepo. <strong>The</strong><br />
remaining fruit is a large pumpkin. It is oval, slightly furrowed, and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 369
mostly light orange-yellow though partly gray-green, indicating a fruit<br />
that has just barely attained ripeness. <strong>The</strong> identity of this fruit is not<br />
entirely certain. While the coloration is more consistent with C. pepo,<br />
the lobing of the fruit is more reminiscent of C. moschata. A lobed<br />
pumpkin growing on a plant having leaf laminae like those of C. pepo<br />
was illustrated in the herbal of Tabernaemontanus (1591).<br />
Discussion and Conclusion<br />
<strong>The</strong> image of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in the Grandes Heures (1503–1508) and<br />
most of the images of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fruits in the Villa Farnesina (1515–<br />
1518) are small, pyriform or oviform striped gourds of C. pepo subsp.<br />
texana. <strong>The</strong>se inedible gourds are most often cultivated today for<br />
ornament, but may have been grown for some other purposes in the<br />
past. Often, they are indistinguishable phenotypically from wild C.<br />
pepo subsp. texana gourds, which are native to the southern,<br />
southeastern, and central U.S.A. Wild plants of this subspecies have<br />
been encountered most often in Texas, on the floodplains of several<br />
creeks and rivers that enter the Gulf of Mexico, and including two<br />
coastal counties (Erwin, 1938; Nee, 1990; Decker-Walters et al.,<br />
1993). It is possible that these early 16 th -century images of C. pepo<br />
subsp. texana were based on offspring of plants found growing wild<br />
along the Gulf Coast of what is now the United <strong>State</strong>s. Europeans first<br />
entered the Gulf of Mexico no later than 1498 (Mollat, 2005).<br />
Significantly, no edible fruits of C. pepo subsp. texana are represented<br />
in the Grandes Heures or the Villa Farnesina.<br />
Remarkably, the depictions in the Villa Farnesina of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
maxima and C. pepo indicate that several types of both species were<br />
introduced into Europe within 25 years of the first voyage of<br />
Columbus. <strong>The</strong> images of C. maxima and of C. pepo subsp. pepo in<br />
the Villa Farnesina are pumpkins and, by definition, esculents, serving<br />
as evidence of European contact with American horticulture.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Andres, T. C. 1987. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fraterna, the closest wild relative and progenitor of C.<br />
pepo. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genet. Coop. Rep. 10:69–71.<br />
Bailey, L. H. 1937. <strong>The</strong> garden of gourds. Macmillan, New York.<br />
Bailey, L. H. 1943. Species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a. Gentes Herbarum. 6:266–322.<br />
Bilimoff, M. 2001. Promenade dans des jardins disparus: les plantes au moyen age,<br />
d’après les Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. Editions Ouest-France, Rennes.<br />
Camus, G. 1894. Les noms des plantes du livre d’Heures d’Anne de Bretagne. J.<br />
Botanique 8:325–335, 345–352, 366–375, 396–401.<br />
Caneva, G. 1992. Il mondo di cerere nella loggia di Psiche. Fratelli Palombi, Rome.<br />
370 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Decker-Walters, D. S., T. W. Walters, C. W. Cowan, and B. D. Smith. 1993.<br />
Isozymic characterization of wild populations of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. J. Ethnobiol.<br />
13:55–72.<br />
Duchesne, A. N. 1786. Essai sur l’histoire naturelle des courges. Panckoucke, Paris.<br />
Eisendrath, E. R. 1961. Portraits of plants. a limited study of the “icones”. Ann.<br />
Missouri Bot. Gard. 48:291–327.<br />
Erwin, A. T. 1938. An interesting Texas cucurbit. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 12:253–261.<br />
Frommel, C. L. 2003. La Villa Farnesina a Roma. Franco Cosimo Panini, Modena.<br />
Fuchs, L. 1542. De historia stirpium. Isingrin, Basel.<br />
Gray, A. and J. H. Trumbull. 1883. Review of DeCandolle’s origin of cultivated<br />
plants. Amer. J. Sci. 25:370–379.<br />
Janick, J. and G. Caneva. 2005. <strong>The</strong> first images of maize in Europe. Maydica.<br />
50:71–80.<br />
Janick, J. and H. S. Paris. 2006. <strong>The</strong> cucurbit images (1515–1518) of the Villa<br />
Farnesina, Rome. Ann. Bot. 97:165–176.<br />
L’Obel, M. de. 1576. Sev stirpium historia. Plantin, Antwerp.<br />
Mollat, M. 2005. Les explorateurs du XIII e au XVI e siècle: premiers regards sur des<br />
mondes nouveaux. Editions du comité de trauvaux historiques et scientifiques,<br />
Paris.<br />
Nee, M. 1990. <strong>The</strong> domestication of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 44(3,<br />
suppl.):56–68.<br />
Paris, H. S. 2000. Gene for broad, contiguous stripes in cocozelle squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
pepo). Euphytica. 115:191–196.<br />
Paris, H. S. 2001. History of the cultivar-groups of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. Hort. Revs.<br />
25:71–170, 4 pl.<br />
Paris, H. S., M.-C. Daunay, M. Pitrat, and J. Janick. 2006. First known image of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a in Europe, 1503–1508. Ann. Bot. 98:41–47.<br />
Rheede tot Draakenstein, H. A. van. 1688. Hortus indicus malabaricus 8:3 p. 2.<br />
Tabernaemontanus, D. J. T. 1591. Kraeuter Buch. Basse, Frankfurt-on-Main.<br />
Whitaker, T. W. 1947. American origin of the cultivated cucurbits. Ann. Missouri<br />
Bot. Gard. 34:101–111.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 371
POLYPHYLETIC ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED<br />
MELON INFERRED FROM ANALYSIS OF ITS<br />
CHLOROPLAST GENOME<br />
K. Tanaka, K. Fukunaga<br />
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, 457-7 Motoyama,<br />
Kamigamo, Kita-ku, Kyoto, Japan<br />
Y. Akashi, H. Nishida, K. Kato<br />
Faculty of Agriculture, Okayama University, 1-1-1 Tsushima, Naka,<br />
Okayama, Japan<br />
M. T. Khaing<br />
Vegetable and Fruit Research and Development Center (VFRDC), Yemon,<br />
Indaingpo, Hlecuts, Yangon, Myanmar.<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. ccSSR, Cucumis melo, PS-ID<br />
ABSTRACT. To discover the origin and differentiation of cultivated melon, the plastid<br />
type of 245 melon accessions was assessed using PS-ID sequence analysis. European<br />
melon groups with large seeds (≥9.0mm length) and East Asian melon groups with<br />
small seeds (
Decker-Walters, 1997). During the long history of cultivation and<br />
transmission, melon has been diversified and different types of melon<br />
have been established in various parts of the world. <strong>The</strong>y have been<br />
classified into seven groups by Munger and Robinson (1991). Genetic<br />
relationships and differentiation among these groups have been<br />
investigated by the analysis of morphological characters and molecular<br />
markers such as ISSR, SSR, and RAPD. East Asian melon of the group<br />
Conomon, whose seed length is shorter than 8.5mm, proved to be<br />
genetically differentiated from European and American melon, Groups<br />
Cantalupensis and Inodorus, with seeds longer than 9.0mm (Fujishita et<br />
al., 1993; Stepansky et al., 1999; Mliki et al., 2001; Monforte et al., 2003;<br />
Nakata et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> analysis of isozyme, AFLP, and RAPD markers<br />
of eastern and southern Asian melons can also be differentiated by<br />
seed-size groups rather than geographical groups (Akashi et al., 2002;<br />
Yashiro et al., 2005; K. Tanaka et al., unpublished). However, the<br />
evolutionary process that resulted in the difference in seed size among the<br />
western and the eastern melon and the origin of the Indian small-seed<br />
melon remains to be investigated.<br />
Molecular markers of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) have advantages for<br />
the analysis of genetic relationship among plant species or varieties, since<br />
they have a low rate of nucleotide substitution and show maternal<br />
inheritance, which lowers the impact of intermolecular recombination<br />
(Clegg et al., 1994). In the chloroplast genome, the linker sequence<br />
between the genes rpl16 and rpl14 proved to be polymorphic among plant<br />
species, and Nakamura et al. (1998) proposed to designate it as the plastid<br />
subtype ID sequence (PS-ID). PS-ID was also polymorphic within species<br />
and could be applicable to the identification of subspecies japonica and<br />
indica of rice (Ishikawa et al., 2002). Another marker of the chloroplast<br />
genome, the consensus chloroplast SSR marker (ccSSR), applicable to<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae crops, has been developed by Chung et al. (2003), who<br />
have suggested its potential utility for taxonomic and phylogenetic<br />
analyses.<br />
In this study, therefore, chloroplast genome type was determined for<br />
245 melon accessions from various parts of the world by the analysis of<br />
PS-ID sequence and four ccSSR markers. Based on varietal and<br />
geographical variation of cytoplasmic genotype, genetic differentiation in<br />
cultivated melon and the origin of small-seed-type melon predominately<br />
cultivated in Asia are discussed.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 373
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIALS. A total of 245 accessions of cultivated melon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.) were examined in this study. <strong>The</strong>y were selected to<br />
represent five groups of C. melo from wide geographic areas, and were<br />
classified into small (
Table 1. Classification of 245 melon accessions based on the analysis of PS-ID, ccSSR7 and seed length.<br />
Variety/Area Countory /<br />
Cultivar group<br />
No. of<br />
PS-ID type<br />
ccSSR7 (bp)<br />
accessions Large seed Small seed Large seed Small seed<br />
T A NA T A NA 331 336 331 336<br />
Group cantalupensis European cantaloup<br />
England house type<br />
American field type<br />
Japan breeding line<br />
4<br />
5<br />
8<br />
12<br />
4<br />
5<br />
8<br />
12<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
3<br />
-<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
12<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Group inodorus Honeydew 6 6 - - - - - 6 - - -<br />
Hmi-Gua 5 5 - - - - - - 5 - -<br />
Group flexuosus<br />
Group conomon<br />
Spain•Russia<br />
India•Indonesia<br />
China<br />
6<br />
6<br />
16<br />
6<br />
1<br />
-<br />
-<br />
4<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1<br />
16<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
5<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1<br />
5<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1<br />
16<br />
Korea 4 - - - 1 3 - - - - 4<br />
Japan 10 - - - - 10 - - - - 10<br />
Group agrestis Africa <strong>North</strong> 1 - - - - - 1 - - - 1<br />
Center 6 - - - - - 6 - - - 6<br />
South 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1<br />
unknown 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1<br />
Iran 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2<br />
Pakistan 6 - - - - 6 - - - - 6<br />
India 5 - - - - 5 - - - - 5<br />
Maldives 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1<br />
South America<br />
Nepal•Bangladesh<br />
Korea•Japan<br />
Bolivia<br />
6<br />
6<br />
1<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
6<br />
6<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
6<br />
6<br />
-<br />
Europe 2 - - - 1 1 - - - - 2<br />
Africa <strong>North</strong> 8 8 - - - - - 2 6 - -<br />
Center 6 1 1 1 - - 3 - 3 - 3<br />
South 9 1 - - - 5 3 1 - - 8<br />
unknown 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 - -<br />
West•Central Asia Turkey<br />
Syria<br />
5<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
5<br />
2<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Lebanon 4 2 2 - - - - - 4 - -<br />
Iraq 2 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - 1<br />
Iran 3 3 - - - - - 2 1 - -<br />
Afghanistan 5 4 1 - - - - 1 4 - -<br />
Uzbekistan 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 - -<br />
South Asia Pakistan 1 1 - - - - - - 1 - -<br />
India West<br />
<strong>North</strong><br />
7<br />
9<br />
3<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
5<br />
5<br />
-<br />
-<br />
2<br />
4<br />
Center 8 2 1 - - 5 - - 3 - 5<br />
South 7 4 - - 1 2 - 2 2 - 3<br />
East 12 3 4 - 1 4 - - 7 - 5<br />
Maldives 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2<br />
Nepal 3 - - - 1 2 - - - - 3<br />
Bangladesh 8 - 2 - - 6 - - 2 - 6<br />
Myanmer 8 - 2 - - 6 - - 2 - 5<br />
Southeast Asia 14 2 1 - 1 10 - 1 2 - 11<br />
245 91 26 1 9 105 13 24 94 - 126<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
PS-ID sequences were compared among 24 accessions of various<br />
groups, and PS-ID sequences were compared among 24 accessions of<br />
various groups, and two SSR polymorphisms (SSR1; (T)n, SSR2; (T)n)<br />
and one SNP at S2 (A/T, 425th base from common primer A) were<br />
detected. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) types of 245 accessions<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 375
Table 2. Four types of chloroplast genome revealed by the analysis of PS-ID sequence<br />
of 18 melon accessions.<br />
Name/ Country/ variety/Aria Seed PS-ID SNPs SSR (T) n<br />
accession No. Cultivar group size type S1 S2 S3 SSR1 SSR2<br />
PI 505602 Zambia Ssp. melo S NA C T C 16 15<br />
PI 436533 Senegal Ssp. melo S NA C T C 15 13<br />
940108 Senegal Group agrestis S NA C T C 15 13<br />
PI 436534 Senegal Group agrestis S NA C T C 15 13<br />
PI 482398 Zimbabwe Ssp. melo S NA C T G 16 14<br />
PI 185111 Ghana Group agrestis S NA C T G 15 13<br />
940111 Sudan Group agrestis S NA C T G 16 15<br />
Cam-84-3 Cameroon S NA C T G 16 15<br />
PI 169379-1 Turkey Ssp. melo L T A T G 15 14<br />
PI 525105 Egypt Ssp. melo L T A T G 15 14<br />
PI 164585 India Tamil Nadu L T A T G 14 14<br />
PI 124096 India Andra Pradesh S T A T G 15 14<br />
Earls' Favourite England house type Group cantalupensis L T A T G 14 9<br />
Kinpyo Japan Group conomon S A A A G 12 13<br />
PI 482411 Zimbabwe Ssp. melo S A A A G 11 13<br />
PI 126054 Afghanistan Ssp. melo L A A A G 11 13<br />
PI 536480 Maldives Ssp. melo S A A A G 11 13<br />
PI 116666 India Pun Punjab L A A A G 11 13<br />
Arabidopsis thaliana (NC_000932) C T G 7 7<br />
of melon from various parts of the world were determined by dCAPS<br />
analysis. One hundred accessions were proved to be of T-type and 131 of<br />
A-type (Table 1); PCR amplification was unsuccessful in 14 accessions<br />
(NA-type). For the characterization of NA-type, PCR product amplified<br />
by Psid1F and Psid1R primers were sequenced, and additional SNPs were<br />
detected at S1 (C/A) and S3 (C/G) in NA-type (Table 2). NA-type proved<br />
to be of T-type at S2. Furthermore, since S1 is included in the sequence<br />
complementary to dCAPS forward primer, no amplification by dCAPS<br />
primer was caused by this SNP. According to the result of dCAPS<br />
analysis, all of the 46 large-seed accessions classified as Group<br />
Cantalupensis and Group Inodorus were of T-type, while 34 of 35<br />
small-seed accessions belonging to Group Agrestis and Group Conomon<br />
were of A-type. This result clearly indicated that chloroplast genome type<br />
was different between areas of origin and between small- and large-seed<br />
types.<br />
<strong>The</strong> SNP type of landraces from Africa and Asia is rather diversified,<br />
and differs among geographical groups even in Africa. T-type with large<br />
seed was frequent in the northern part of Africa, while A-type with small<br />
seed was frequent in the southern part. NA-type was commonly found in<br />
central and southern parts of Africa, where wild species of Cucumis were<br />
abundant. Furthermore, the sequence of NA-type (C-T-G) at S1, S2, and<br />
S3 was the same as that of Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana tabacum.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that NA-type could be the primitive type of<br />
376 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
cultivated melon, and that the T-type has evolved by single nucleotide<br />
substitution from C to A at S1. A-type seems to have originated from<br />
T-type by single nucleotide substitution from T to A at S2, or from<br />
NA-type by double nucleotide substitutions from C to A at S1 and from T<br />
to A at S2. Another NA-type (C-T-C) should appear by single nucleotide<br />
substitution from G to C at S3. Taking the geographical distribution of<br />
each PS-ID type and seed length of each accession into consideration, the<br />
results suggest that large-seed T-type and small-seed A-type were<br />
independently established in the northern and southern parts of Africa,<br />
respectively. Genetic difference among melon accessions from the<br />
northern and southern parts of Africa detected by RAPD analysis (Mliki et<br />
al., 2001; Akashi et al., 2006) could be explained by the difference in their<br />
origin.<br />
In Asia, NA-type was not found; T-type with large seed was<br />
predominant in West and Central Asia. Indian melon was diversified and<br />
both T- and A-types were found in large-seed type as well as in<br />
small-seed type. <strong>The</strong> existence of recombinant types, that is, A-type with<br />
large seed and T-type with small seed, could be explained by the genetic<br />
interchange that has occurred in India. Based on these results, we propose<br />
the following hypothesis about the transmission route of small- and<br />
large-seed types (Figure 1): A-type with small seed was transmitted from<br />
South Africa to India by the so-called sea route, and the prototype of<br />
Group Conomon vars. makuwa and conomon originated from small-seed<br />
melon under wet conditions in East India. Another type of melon<br />
introduced from <strong>North</strong> Africa to Europe and India via the Middle East<br />
(Robinson and Decker-Walters 1997) was the large-seed T-type. After the<br />
establishment of the two types in India, the interchange between them<br />
resulted in differentiation into several varieties, enhancing India’s genetic<br />
diversity. India is considered as the secondary center of diversity in melon<br />
(Whitaker and Davis 1962). <strong>The</strong> result obtained by the analysis of nuclear<br />
genome (Akashi et al., 2006) also supports this hypothesis.<br />
Among the four ccSSR markers analyzed, ccSSR7 proved to be<br />
polymorphic by the deletion of 5bp (ATATT), and its size polymorphism<br />
was surveyed for 245 accessions of melon. Most of the melon accessions<br />
possessed this 5bp, and amplicon size was 336bp. <strong>The</strong> deletion of 5bp, the<br />
amplicon size being 331bp, was found in 24 accessions of large-seed<br />
melon whose PS-ID sequence was of T-type (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> deletion type<br />
was found in accessions of Group Inodorus (Honeydew and Russian or<br />
Spanish winter melon) and landraces from <strong>North</strong> Africa and West and<br />
Central Asia. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is likely that the deletion occurred in the<br />
population of T-type with large seed and that Group Inodorus has evolved<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 377
from such deletion type. However, ccSSR7 of ‘Hami Gua’, cultivated in<br />
the western part of China, is without this deletion, though this melon is<br />
also classified as Group Inodorus. Further study is necessary to discover<br />
the origin of ‘Hami Gua’. Deletion type found in the American field type<br />
should be ascribable to the use of Honeydew-type cultivars as<br />
cross-parents for breeding.<br />
By the analysis of PS-ID sequence, we could hypothesize that T-type<br />
melon with large seed and A-type melon with small seed has been<br />
polyphyletically differentiated from NA-type melon originating in the<br />
central part of Africa. Differentiation into several groups or varieties<br />
within T-type melon with large seed could be partially discovered by the<br />
analysis of ccSSR marker. Wild species of Cucumis should be analyzed,<br />
using cytoplasmic markers, to understand the origin of cultivated melon.<br />
Large-seed type<br />
T / 336bp type<br />
Group Inodorus<br />
T / 331bp type<br />
Large-seed type<br />
T / 336bp & 331bp types<br />
Small-seed type<br />
NA type<br />
Small-seed type<br />
NA, A types<br />
Group Inodorus<br />
T / 331bp type<br />
Group Inodorus<br />
T / 336bp type<br />
Large-seed type<br />
T / 336bp type<br />
interchange<br />
Small-seed type<br />
A type<br />
Small-seed type<br />
A type<br />
Fig. 1. Polyphyletic origin and transmission route of cultivated melon, revealed by<br />
the analysis of chloroplast genome. White and black arrows indicate the<br />
transmission route of the large- and small-seed type, respectively. PS-ID type (T, A,<br />
NA) and size (bp) of ccSSR7 are also indicated.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Akashi, Y., N. Fukuda, T. Wako, M. Masuda, and K. Kato. 2002. Genetic variation and<br />
phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo L., based<br />
on the analysis of five isozymes. Euphytica 125:385–396.<br />
Akashi, Y., K. Tanaka, H. Nishida, S. S. Yi, T. T. Chou, and K. Kato. 2006. Genetic<br />
diversity and phylogenetic relationship among melon germplasm from Africa and<br />
Asia revealed by RAPD analysis. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006.<br />
Chung, S., D. S. Decker-Walters, and J. E. Staub. 2003. Genetic relationships within the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae as assessed by consensus chloroplast simple sequence repeats<br />
(ccSSR) marker and sequence analyses. Can. J. Bot. 81:1–19.<br />
378 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Clegg, M. T., B. S. Gaut, G. H. Learn, Jr., and B. R. Morton. 1994. Rates and patterns of<br />
chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91:6795–6801.<br />
Fujishita, N., H. Furukawa, and S. Morii. 1993. Distribution of three genotypes for<br />
bitterness of F1 immature fruit in Cucumis melo. Jpn. J. Breed. 43(Suppl.2):206 (in<br />
Japanese).<br />
Ishikawa, R., Y.-I. Sato, T. Tang, and I. Nakamura. 2002. Different maternal origins of<br />
Japanese lowland and upland rice populations. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 104:976–980.<br />
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions<br />
through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111–120.<br />
Mliki, A., J. E. Staub, Z. Sun, and A. Ghorbel. 2001. Genetic diversity in melon (Cucumis<br />
melo L.): an evaluation of African germplasm. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 48:587–597.<br />
Monforte, A. J., J. Garcia-Mas, and P. Arus. 2003. Genetic variability in melon based on<br />
microsatellite variation. Plant Breed. 122:153–157.<br />
Munger, H. M. and R. W. Robinson. 1991. Nomenclature of Cucumis melo L. <strong>Cucurbit</strong><br />
Genet. Coop. Rpt. 14:43–44.<br />
Murray, G. C. and W. F. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA.<br />
Nuc. Acid Res. 8:4321–4325.<br />
Nakamura, I., N. Kameya, K. Kato, S. I. Yamanaka, H. Jomori, and Y. I. Sato. 1998. A<br />
proposal for identifying the short ID sequence which addresses the plastid subtype of<br />
higher plants. Breed. Sci. 47:385–388.<br />
Nakata, E., J. E. Staub, and A. I. López-Sesé. 2005. Genetic diversity in Japanese melon<br />
cultivars (Cucumis melo L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA and<br />
simple sequence repeat markers. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 52:405–419.<br />
Neff, M. M., J. D. Neff, J. Chory, and A. E. Peper, 2002. dCAPS, a simple technique for<br />
the genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: experimental applications in<br />
Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J. 14:387–392.<br />
Robinson, R. W. and D. S. Decker-Walters. 1997. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s. CAB International, New<br />
York.<br />
Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of melons<br />
(Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation. Plant Syst.<br />
Evol. 217:313–332.<br />
Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the<br />
sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting<br />
positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nuc. Acids Res.<br />
22:4673–4680.<br />
Whitaker, T. W. and G. N. Davis. 1962. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>s: botany, cultivation, utilization.<br />
Interscience, New York.<br />
Yashiro, K., H. Iwata, Y. Akashi, K. Tomita, M. Kuzuya, Y. Tsumura, and K. Kato. 2005.<br />
Genetic relationship among East and South Asian melon (Cucumis melo L.) revealed<br />
by AFLP analysis. Breed. Sci. 55:197–206.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 379
RESISTANCE OF CITRULLUS LANATUS VAR.<br />
CITROIDES GERMPLASM TO ROOT-KNOT<br />
NEMATODES<br />
Judy A. Thies and Amnon Levi<br />
U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Charleston, SC<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus colocynthis, Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus,<br />
Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne incognita, nematode resistance, root-knot<br />
nematode, watermelon<br />
ABSTRACT. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause extensive damage to<br />
watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai var. lanatus] and rootknot<br />
nematode-resistant watermelon cultivars are not available. Twenty-nine<br />
accessions from the U.S. Plant Introduction (USPI) collection of Citrullus spp. were<br />
evaluated for resistance to the southern root-knot nematode [Meloidogyne incognita<br />
(Kofoid & White) Chitwood Race 3] in greenhouse tests. <strong>The</strong> Plant Introductions<br />
(PI) evaluated in these studies included: 25 Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. &<br />
Nakai var. citroides (L. H. Bailey) Mansf., 1 C. lanatus var. lanatus, and 3 Citrullus<br />
colocynthis (L.) Schrad. Twenty-three of the C. lanatus var. citroides PI and the C.<br />
lanatus var. lanatus PI had been previously identified as moderately resistant to M.<br />
arenaria Race 1. In general, the C. lanatus var. citroides PI exhibited low to<br />
moderate resistance to M. incognita Race 3 and the C. lanatus var. lanatus and C.<br />
colocynthis PI were susceptible. <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI 482303 was the most<br />
resistant PI with gall index (GI) = 2.97 and reproductive index (RI) = 0.34 (1 = no<br />
galling; 5 = 26 to 38% root system galled; 9 = 81 to 100% root system galled).<br />
Significant genetic variability was observed within C. lanatus var. citroides for<br />
reaction to M. incognita, and several C. lanatus var. citroides PI may be useful<br />
sources of resistance to root-knot nematodes.<br />
R<br />
oot-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause significant damage<br />
to watermelon throughout the southern U.S. (Sumner and Johnson,<br />
1973; Thies, 1996; Thomason and McKinney, 1959; Winstead and<br />
Riggs, 1959), and increase the severity of Fusarium wilt in watermelon<br />
fields (Sumner and Johnson, 1973). Several reports describe the reactions<br />
of cultivated watermelon to root-knot nematodes. Winstead and Riggs<br />
(1959) evaluated 78 watermelon cultivars and five breeding lines, and all<br />
were susceptible to root-knot nematode. In Puerto Rico, 10 watermelon<br />
cultivars were evaluated and found susceptible to M. incognita (Montalvo<br />
and Esnard, 1994). Thomason and McKinney (1959) reported that<br />
‘Striped Klondike’ watermelon was susceptible to M. incognita acrita and<br />
M. javanica.<br />
380 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Root-knot nematodes are chiefly managed in watermelon by<br />
fumigation with methyl bromide or other fumigant nematicides.<br />
Watermelon and melon (Cucumis melo L.) account for approximately 6%<br />
of methyl bromide used for preplant soil treatments in vegetable crops<br />
worldwide (USDA, 1993). According to the Montreal Protocol and the<br />
U.S. Clean Air Act, methyl bromide was phased out 1 January 2005 (Rich<br />
and Olson, 2004; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000);<br />
however, under the U.S. nomination for critical-use exemption program,<br />
growers continue to use specified allocations (U.S. Environmental<br />
Protection Agency, 2006). <strong>The</strong> use of methyl bromide in watermelon may<br />
be underestimated because watermelon is often grown as the second crop<br />
in double-crop systems. In the double-crop system, soil fumigation prior<br />
to planting the first crop also greatly benefits the second crop by<br />
preventing build-up of root-knot nematodes and disease pathogens in the<br />
soil. In Florida and Georgia, annual yield losses of 15 to 20% have been<br />
predicted for watermelon due to the imminent loss of methyl bromide for<br />
preplant soil fumigation (Lynch and Carpenter, 1999). Alternative<br />
methods to methyl bromide are urgently needed for managing root-knot<br />
nematodes in watermelon. Root-knot-nematode-resistant cultivars would<br />
provide the most economical and environmentally friendly alternative for<br />
managing root-knot nematodes in watermelon.<br />
In an earlier study, we identified moderate resistance to M. arenaria<br />
Race 1 among C. lanatus var. citroides PI (Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong><br />
objective of this study was to evaluate selected C. lanatus var. citroides<br />
PI, previously shown to be moderately resistant to M. arenaria Race 1, for<br />
reaction to M. incognita Race 3.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
NEMATODE INOCULUM. Meloidogyne incognita Race 3 was cultured<br />
on ‘Rutgers’ tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in isolated<br />
greenhouse benches. Egg inocula were extracted from tomato roots using<br />
0.5% sodium hypochlorite (Hussey and Barker, 1973).<br />
CITRULLUS GERMPLASM. Twenty-five PI of C. lanatus var. citroides,<br />
one PI of C. lanatus var. lanatus, and three PI of C. colocynthis from the<br />
U.S. PI Citrullus germplasm collection were evaluated for resistance to M.<br />
incognita Race 3 in greenhouse tests. <strong>The</strong> PI were selected based on their<br />
reactions to M. arenaria Race 1 in earlier greenhouse studies (Thies and<br />
Levi, 2003). ‘Charleston Gray’, ‘Crimson Sweet’, and ‘Dixie Lee’ (C.<br />
lanatus var. lanatus) were included as susceptible control cultivars in all<br />
tests.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 381
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. <strong>The</strong> experimental design was a randomized<br />
<strong>complete</strong> block with five plants per replicate. <strong>The</strong> experiment was<br />
conducted twice with four replicates in the first experiment and three<br />
replicates in the second experiment.<br />
GREENHOUSE EVALUATIONS. Seeds of each watermelon entry were<br />
sown in trays containing 50 0.2-L cells (one seed per cell) filled with a<br />
commercial potting medium in the greenhouse. When seedlings were at<br />
the first-true-leaf stage, approximately 3mL distilled water containing<br />
approximately 2,500 eggs of M. incognita Race 3 was pipetted into the<br />
rhizosphere soil of each plant. Two and five weeks after sowing, plants<br />
were fertilized with one-half strength 20N-20P-16K water-soluble<br />
fertilizer. Greenhouse temperatures ranged from 26 to 31˚C during the<br />
experiments. Eight weeks after inoculation, shoots of all plants were<br />
clipped at the crown, and roots were removed from each cell and carefully<br />
washed. <strong>The</strong> root system of each plant was placed in a 15% solution of<br />
McCormick’s red food color (Thies et al., 2002) for approximately 15 min<br />
to stain the egg masses. <strong>The</strong>n the root system was rinsed under tap water<br />
and evaluated for galling severity and egg-mass production using a 1 to 9<br />
scale where 1 = 0; 2 = 1 to 3%; 3 = 4 to 12%; 4 = 13 to 25%; 5 = 26 to<br />
38%; 6 = 39 to 50%; 7 = 51 to 65%; 8 = 66 to 80%; and 9 = 81 to 100% of<br />
the root system galled or covered with egg masses, respectively (Thies and<br />
Fery, 1998). Ratings of 1 to 2.9 = high resistance; 3.0 to 4.0 = moderate<br />
resistance; 4.1 to 4.9 = low resistance; 5.0 to 6.9 = susceptible; and 7.0 to<br />
9.0 = highly susceptible (Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong>n the entire root<br />
system of all plants of each genotype in a replicate were cut into 1- to 2cm<br />
pieces, total root weight was recorded, and root-knot nematode eggs<br />
were extracted from the root sample using 1.0% NaOCl (Hussey and<br />
Barker, 1973). Eggs were counted with a stereomicroscope. Nematode<br />
reproduction was assessed by calculating the reproductive index (RI) in<br />
which RI = Pf/Pi, where Pi = the initial inoculum level and Pf = final egg<br />
recovery (Sasser et al., 1984). Eggs per g fresh root and nematode<br />
reproductive index data were transformed by log10 (x+1) before analysis.<br />
Data were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows, v.8.0,<br />
and the means were separated using Fisher’s Protected Least Significant<br />
Difference Test.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In general, the C. lanatus var. citroides PI exhibited higher resistance<br />
to M. incognita than the watermelon cultivars C. lanatus var. lanatus PI<br />
and C. colocynthis PI. <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides root systems had<br />
382 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
minimal to moderate galling (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI<br />
had more fibrous roots and fewer, smaller galls than the C. colocynthis PI,<br />
the C. lanatus var. lanatus PI, and the control watermelon cultivars. <strong>The</strong><br />
C. lanatus var. lanatus PI was susceptible and the PI of the desert species<br />
C. colocynthis were highly susceptible to M. incognita Race 3. Results of<br />
Experiments 1 and 2 were similar; results of the second experiment are<br />
shown.<br />
Table 1. Gall indices, egg-mass indices, numbers of Meloidogyne<br />
incognita Race 3 eggs per g fresh root, and reproductive indices for<br />
selected accessions of Citrullus lanatus var. citroides, C. lanatus var.<br />
lanatus, and C. colocynthis from the U.S. Citrullus spp. Plant Introduction<br />
(PI) Collection, and control cultivars inoculated with M. incognita Race 3<br />
in a replicated greenhouse test. a<br />
Accession Gall<br />
(PI No.) index b<br />
Citrullus lanatus var. citroides<br />
Egg-mass<br />
index b<br />
Eggs/g fresh<br />
root c<br />
Reproductive<br />
index c<br />
482303 2.97 a d<br />
2.11 a 1,535 a-c 0.34 ab<br />
482307 3.22 a 2.13 a 889 a 0.29 ab<br />
270563 3.00 a 2.50 a 4,151 a-g 0.59 a-d<br />
482379 3.28 a 2.52 a 5,577 b-g 1.08 b-f<br />
482338 3.39 ab 2.11 a 1,221 ab 0.24 a<br />
532624 3.53 ab 3.03 a 6,869 c-h 1.59 d-g<br />
482326 3.40 ab 2.67 a 2,967 a-e 0.55 a-d<br />
482319 3.47 ab 2.80 a 2,863 a-e 0.97 b-f<br />
482324 3.58 ab 2.61 a 3,963 a-g 0.55 a-d<br />
189225 3.67 ab 2.80 a 16,508 f-h 2.17 d-g<br />
255137 3.25 ab 2.32 a 3,145 a-f 0.82 b-g<br />
482333 3.67 3.00 a 4,045 a-g 0.89 b-g<br />
482342 3.69 ab 2.88 a 3,607 a-g 0.75 a-g<br />
482301 3.83 a-c 2.60 a 2,299 a-d 0.37 a-d<br />
244019 3.87 a-c 3.07 a 3,954 a-g 0.69 a-f<br />
500331 3.93 a-c 2.93 a 4,902 b-g 0.61 a-e<br />
512854 3.90 a-c 3.40 ab 2,225 a-d 0.61 a-e<br />
482259 4.00 a 3.40 ab 4,749 b-g 1.60 e-i<br />
542119 4.07 a-c 3.80 a-c 6,191 b-h 1.46 e-i<br />
244017 4.07 a-c 2.67 a 4,006 a-g 0.57 a-e<br />
244018 4.11 a-c 2.70 a 12,873 e-h 1.96 f-i<br />
485583 4.25 a-c 2.93 a 4,193 a-g 0.80 b-g<br />
248774 4.50 a-d 3.78 a-c 6,343 b-h 1.12 d-i<br />
542114 5.38 b-e 5.25 b-d 29,020 hi 5.56 jk<br />
532666 6.52 e-g 5.12 b-d 18,789 gh 3.15 i-k<br />
288316 --- --- --- ---<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 383
(Table 1,<br />
continued)<br />
Accession<br />
(PI No.)<br />
Gall<br />
index b<br />
Egg-mass<br />
index b<br />
Eggs/g fresh<br />
root c<br />
Reproductive<br />
index c<br />
Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus<br />
459074 4.82 a-e 2.97 a 10,278 d-h 2.96 h-k<br />
C. colocynthis<br />
525082 5.75 c-f 3.07 a 4,080 a-g 1.18 e-i<br />
386015 7.67 gh 7.67 e 100,577 i 8.45 k<br />
432337 8.42 h 5.93 de 8,327 d-h 1.62 e-i<br />
C. lanatus var. lanatus controls<br />
Charleston Gray 7.53 f-h 6.87 de 9,658 d-h 5.37 jk<br />
Crimson Sweet 6.25 d-g 5.25 b-d 5,530 b-g 1.08 d-i<br />
Dixie Lee 6.09 d-g 5.49 cd 3,497 a-f 0.57 a-e<br />
a Means of 3 replicates of 5 plants per replicate (n=15).<br />
b 1 to 9 scale where 1 = no galling or visible egg masses present; 2 = 1% to 3%; 3<br />
= 4% to 10%; 4 = 11% to 25%; 5 =26% to 35%; 6 =36% to 50%; 7 = 51% to 65%; 8 =<br />
66% to 80%; and 9 = 81 to 100% of root system galled or covered with egg masses,<br />
respectively.<br />
c Data were log10(x+1) transformed before analysis. Nontransformed data are shown.<br />
d Mean separation within columns by Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference Test,<br />
P < 0.05.<br />
<strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI 482303 exhibited high resistance to M.<br />
incognita Race 3; GI = 2.97 with 1,535 M. incognita eggs per g fresh root<br />
and RI = 0.34 (Table 1). Likewise, 21 additional C. lanatus var. citroides<br />
PI exhibited low to moderate resistance to M. incognita Race 3, based on<br />
root gall severity (GI ranges: 3.00 to 4.25). Some of these PI had<br />
relatively high numbers of eggs per g fresh root (>5,000) and RI>1.0. For<br />
example, PI 189225 supported 16,508 eggs of M. incognita per g fresh<br />
root and RI = 2.17. <strong>The</strong> PI 248774 and 532666 exhibited susceptible<br />
reactions to M. arenaria Race 1 in previous tests (Thies and Levi, 2003)<br />
and also were susceptible to M. incognita Race 3 in the current study. <strong>The</strong><br />
PI 542114 exhibited low resistance to M. arenaria Race 1 in a previous<br />
unreplicated test (Thies and Levi, 2003), but was moderately susceptible,<br />
based on nematode reproduction, to M. incognita in the present study.<br />
PI 459074 was the only one of 156 C. lanatus var. lanatus PI<br />
evaluated that exhibited any resistance to M. arenaria Race 1 (Thies and<br />
Levi, 2003). However, in this study, PI 459074 was susceptible to M.<br />
incognita Race 3, based on both root-gall severity and nematode<br />
reproduction. <strong>The</strong> three C. lanatus var. lanatus watermelon cultivars<br />
(‘Crimson Sweet’, ‘Dixie Lee’, and ‘Charleston Gray’) were also<br />
susceptible to M. incognita Race 3, as in a previous study with M arenaria<br />
384 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Race 1 (Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong> GI ranged from 6.09 to 7.53 for<br />
‘Crimson Sweet,’ ‘Dixie Lee’, and ‘Charleston Gray’; numbers of eggs<br />
per g fresh root ranged from 3,497 to 9,658 and RI ranged from 0.57 to<br />
5.37.<br />
<strong>The</strong> three C. colocynthis PI were highly susceptible to M. incognita<br />
Race 3, similar to their reactions to M. arenaria Race 1 in prior tests<br />
(Thies and Levi, 2003). <strong>The</strong> root-gall severity indices for the C.<br />
colocynthis accessions ranged from 5.75 to 8.42; numbers of eggs per g<br />
fresh root ranged from 4,080 to 100,577; and RI ranged from 1.18 to 8.45.<br />
In general, the C. lanatus var. citroides PI exhibited low to moderate<br />
resistance to M. incognita. <strong>The</strong> C. lanatus var. citroides PI 482303 was<br />
the most resistant with GI of 2.97 and the RI was 0.34. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
demonstrate that there is significant genetic variability within C. lanatus<br />
var. citroides for reaction to M. incognita, and several C. lanatus var.<br />
citroides PI may provide sources of resistance to root-knot nematodes for<br />
the development of resistant watermelon cultivars.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Hussey, R. S. and K. R. Barker. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of<br />
Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:1025–1028.<br />
Lynch, L. and J. Carpenter. 1999. <strong>The</strong> economic impacts of banning methyl bromide:<br />
where do we need more research? 1999 Annual Research Conference on Methyl<br />
Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions.<br />
.<br />
Montalvo, A. E. and J. Esnard. 1994. Reaction of ten cultivars of watermelon (Citrullus<br />
lanatus) to a Puerto Rican population of Meloidogyne incognita. Suppl. J. Nematol.<br />
26(4S):640–643.<br />
Rich, J. R., and S. M. Olson. 2004. Influence of MI-gene resistance and soil fumigant<br />
application in first crop tomato on root-galling and yield in a succeeding cantaloupe<br />
crop. Nematropica. 34:103–108.<br />
Sasser, J. N., C. C. Carter, and K. M. Hartman. 1984. Standardization of host suitability<br />
studies and reporting of resistance to root-knot nematodes. Crop Nematode<br />
Resistance Control Project, N.C. <strong>State</strong> Univ., U.S. Agency for Intl. Dev., Raleigh,<br />
NC.<br />
Sumner, D. R. and A. W. Johnson. 1973. Effect of root-knot nematodes on Fusarium<br />
wilt of watermelon. Phytopathology. 63:857–861.<br />
Thies, J. A. 1996. Diseases caused by nematodes, p. 56–58. In: T. A. Zitter, D. L.<br />
Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press,<br />
St. Paul, MN.<br />
Thies, J. A. and A. Levi. 2003. Resistance of watermelon germplasm to the peanut rootknot<br />
nematode. HortSci. 38:1417–1421.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 385
Thies, J. A. and R. L. Fery. 1998. Modified expression of the N gene for southern rootknot<br />
nematode resistance in pepper at high soil temperatures. J. Amer. Soc. Hort.<br />
Sci. 123:1012–1015.<br />
Thies, J. A., S. B. Merrill, and E. L. Corley, Jr. 2002. Red food coloring stain: new,<br />
safer procedures for staining nematodes in roots and egg masses on root surfaces. J.<br />
Nematol. 34:179–181.<br />
Thomason, I. J. and H. E. McKinney. 1959. Reaction of some <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae to rootknot<br />
nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). Plant Dis. Rep. 43:448–450.<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Protection of stratospheric<br />
ozone: incorporation of Clean Air Act amendments for reductions in Class I, Group<br />
VI controlled substances. Fed. Reg. 65 (No. 229):70795–70804.<br />
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Ozone depletion rules & regulations.<br />
Fact Sheet: U.S. Nomination for Methyl Bromide Critical Use Exemptions from the<br />
2007 Phaseout of Methyl Bromide.<br />
.<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s Department of Agriculture. 1993. USDA workshop on alternatives for<br />
methyl bromide. June 29–Jul. 1, 1993. Crystal City, VA.<br />
Winstead, N. N. and R. D. Riggs. 1959. Reaction of watermelon varieties to root-knot<br />
nematodes. Plant Dis. Rep. 43:909–912.<br />
386 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
FACTORS INFLUENCING A CUCUMBER<br />
FRUIT SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INFECTION BY<br />
PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI<br />
Kaori Ando and Rebecca Grumet<br />
Plant <strong>Breeding</strong> and Genetics Program Michigan <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
A291-A Department of Horticulture PSSB, East Lansing, MI 48824<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Age-related resistance, fruit rot, epidermal<br />
ABSTRACT. Phytophthora capsici-induced fruit rot causes severe losses in<br />
cucumber production. Our earlier studies showed that cucumber fruit are most<br />
susceptible when very young, but become resistant as the fruit stop elongating.<br />
In the field, infection occurs primarily at the blossom end. To determine<br />
whether preferential infection of the blossom end was due to position-related<br />
differences, or was a result of earlier contact with inoculum-containing soil,<br />
greenhouse-grown cucumber fruit ranging in age from 6–14 days<br />
postpollination (dpp) were inoculated with P. capsici at the stem and blossom<br />
ends. <strong>The</strong> youngest fruits supported sporulation on both ends. As fruit age<br />
increased, the stem end became less susceptible sooner, suggesting a<br />
developmental gradient within the fruit influencing susceptibility. We tested<br />
whether the increase in resistance is due to changes in surface or mesocarp<br />
properties by inoculating peeled fruit or epidermal sections from 7- or 14-dpp<br />
fruit that were placed onto intact 7- or 14-dpp fruit. Peeled fruits rapidly<br />
became infected. Peel sections from 7-dpp, but not 14-dpp, fruit supported<br />
sporulation. Intact, underlying 7-dpp fruit were protected if covered with 14dpp,<br />
but not 7-dpp, peels. <strong>The</strong>se results indicate that the epidermal section plays<br />
a role in the age-related resistance.<br />
I<br />
n recent years, Phytophthora capsici has become an increasingly<br />
severe disease of a wide range of vegetable crops, including<br />
cucumber, where it can cause devastating yield losses (Hausbeck<br />
and Lamour, 2004). Cucumber fruit infected by P. capsici typically<br />
develop a depressed fruit surface with a water-soaked appearance<br />
followed by white powdery mycelium covering the affected region.<br />
Field observations show that cucumber fruit are susceptible to P.<br />
capsici, while roots or crowns are much less susceptible. Fields will<br />
frequently look healthy at time of harvest as judged by vegetative<br />
growth, but the fruits can be heavily diseased (Hausbeck and Lamour,<br />
2004). Fruit are usually located under the canopy where the<br />
This research was supported in part by the Pickle Seed Research Fund and MSU-<br />
GREEEN. We would like to thank Drs. Mary Hausbeck and Amanda Gevens for<br />
helpful advice and providing the P. capsici isolate OP97. We also thank Dr. Hua<br />
Zhang for helpful suggestions and Seminis Vegetable Seed Inc. for providing seeds.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 387
environment is moist, warm, and close to the pathogen in the soil, thus<br />
favoring conditions for disease development. Trellis and plant<br />
architecture studies have indicated that removal of fruit from the soil<br />
surface can reduce disease incidence (Ando and Grumet, 2006).<br />
Genetic resistance would be the optimal method of disease control.<br />
Unfortunately, screening of a diverse collection of the cucumber<br />
germplasm accessions for fruit resistance to P. capsici has not<br />
identified any resistant genotypes to date (Gevens et al., 2006). In the<br />
course of screening, however, we observed an effect of fruit age on<br />
susceptibility (Gevens et al., 2006). ‘Vlaspik’ fruits used as susceptible<br />
controls did not become uniformly infected. It appeared that smaller,<br />
younger fruit were more susceptible, while larger, older fruit were less<br />
frequently infected. When hand-pollinated fruit of known ages were<br />
tested, most fruit younger than 10 days postpollination (dpp) exhibited<br />
sporulation at 4 days postinoculation (dpi), whereas fruit at 14dpp<br />
generally remained symptom-free (Gevens et al., 2006). Fruit of<br />
intermediate ages (10 to 14dpp) often exhibited water-soaked regions<br />
without sporulation. <strong>The</strong> effect of fruit age was observed for several<br />
different genotypes. Field-grown cucumbers (cv. Straight Eight),<br />
harvested to test a range of fruit sizes, exhibited the same trend as<br />
observed with greenhouse-grown fruit. <strong>The</strong>se results indicated that<br />
there are changes in the degree of susceptibility among fruit of<br />
different ages in both greenhouse and field conditions, and that the<br />
age-related decrease in susceptibility is not genotype specific.<br />
Interestingly, the transition from susceptible to resistant appeared<br />
to coincide with the transition from the period of rapid fruit elongation<br />
to the period of increased fruit diameter (approximately 12cm length,<br />
3cm width). Cucumber fruit rapidly elongate longitudinally until they<br />
reach mature size; elongation then ceases, while width of the fruit<br />
continues to grow (Wehner and Saltveit, 1983). Physiological changes<br />
associated with fruit growth and development might explain changing<br />
susceptibility among fruit of different ages.<br />
Further examination of P. capsici-infected cucumber fruit in the<br />
field led to the observation that field-grown cucumbers are typically<br />
covered with mycelium on the blossom end of the fruit rather than the<br />
stem end (Figure1A). We speculated that this was due either to the<br />
tendency of the blossom end to come into contact with the inoculumcontaining<br />
soil sooner than the stem end, or that there is a<br />
susceptibility gradation within the fruit such that the blossom end is<br />
more susceptible than the stem end. In these experiments we sought to<br />
determine the nature of the difference in occurrence of disease at the<br />
blossom and stem ends and also to further examine the basis for age-<br />
388 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
elated increased resistance by asking whether it is due to changes in<br />
surface or mesocarp properties.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
FRUIT POSITION EXPERIMENTS. ‘Vlaspik’ fruits were grown in the<br />
MSU Research greenhouse, East Lansing, MI, during spring 2004.<br />
Fruits were hand-pollinated over a period of days to allow for<br />
simultaneous harvest of fruit ranging in age from 6 to 14dpp.<br />
Harvested fruit were screened for P. capsici resistance according to the<br />
methods of Gevens et al. (2006). Two 6-mm-diameter plugs of isolate<br />
OP97 were placed approximately 2cm from the stem and blossom ends<br />
of each fruit, and covered with an inverted lidless 1.5-ml<br />
microcentrifuge tube held in place with petroleum jelly (Figure 1B).<br />
Inoculated fruit were incubated at room temperature in sealed<br />
aluminum trays, and were scored for symptoms (0 = no symptoms, 1 =<br />
water soaked, and 2 = sporulation) at 4dpi.<br />
EPIDERMAL SECTION EXPERIMENTS. Field-grown (MSU<br />
Horticulture Research Farm, East Lansing, MI, summer 2004)<br />
oversized ‘Vlaspik’ fruits of unknown age were harvested, washed<br />
with distilled water, and air-dried. Fruits were peeled with a<br />
conventional peeler to remove a section of fruit surface of<br />
approximately 1.5cm x 23cm, 0.2cm from the center of the fruit.<br />
Peeled and unpeeled fruits were then inoculated with P. capsici<br />
mycelium as described above and evaluated for symptoms at 4dpi.<br />
In a second set of experiments, greenhouse-grown, hand-pollinated<br />
fruit-surface sections (1.6cm diameter and 0.1cm thick) were removed<br />
from 7 or 14dpp with a cork bore and a petit knife. Surface sections of<br />
7-dpp fruit were placed on 7- and 14-dpp fruit, and 14-dpp surface<br />
sections were placed on 7- and 14-dpp fruit. <strong>The</strong> underlying tissue was<br />
left intact. P. capsici mycelia were placed on top of the transplanted<br />
fruit-surface sections. Inoculated fruits were evaluated for symptoms<br />
at 4dpi on both the fruit-surface section and underlying intact fruit.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
EFFECT OF FRUIT POSITION. P. capsici-infected cucumber fruit in the<br />
field are typically covered with mycelium on the blossom end of the<br />
fruit rather than the stem end. To determine whether this phenomenon<br />
is due to a greater tendency of the blossom end of the fruit to touch the<br />
soil, or if there is a difference in susceptibility due to position on the<br />
fruit, hand-pollinated greenhouse-grown fruit (ranging from 6 to<br />
14dpp) were inoculated with P. capsici mycelium approximately 2cm<br />
from the blossom end and the stem end (Figure 1B).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 389
Fig. 1. Typical symptoms of P. capsici in the field: (A) Mycelium covering the<br />
blossom end of fruits. (B) Mycelium inoculation of the stem and blossom ends of<br />
6- to 14-dpp fruit. <strong>The</strong> picture was taken at 4dpi. Arrows indicate blossom end<br />
of fruit. (C) Greenhouse-grown, hand-pollinated ‘Vlaspik’ inoculated on stem<br />
and blossom ends of fruit age ranging from 6 to 14dpp. (D) Symptoms of fruit<br />
ranging from 6 to 14dpp evaluated at 4dpi (0 = no symptoms, 1 = water soaking,<br />
and 2 = sporulation). Each point is the mean of a minimum of 10 fruits ± S. E.<br />
When fruit were very young (6dpp), both the blossom end and the<br />
stem end sporulated (Figure 1 C, D). However, as fruit develop, the<br />
stem end becomes less susceptible earlier than the blossom end, so that<br />
sporulation occurs on the blossom end, but not the stem end (e.g., at 8–<br />
12dpp). At 14dpp the stem end did not develop symptoms, whereas the<br />
blossom end sometimes developed water-soaked regions. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
suggest a developmental gradient within the fruit with the stem end<br />
maturing more rapidly than the blossom end.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results indicate that there are differences in susceptibility<br />
within a fruit. Fruit-growth analyses performed by Wehner and<br />
Salveit (1983) showed that the blossom end continues growing after<br />
the stem end has stopped elongating, and that the differential transition<br />
in growth phase occurs in the 7–14-dpp time period. This positional<br />
difference in growth rate is consistent with the observations that the<br />
blossom end is more susceptible than the stem end, and with our<br />
390 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
previous studies (Gevens et al., 2006) showing that the degree of P.<br />
capsici susceptibility decreases as the fruit matures beyond the stage of<br />
rapid elongation.<br />
ROLE OF FRUIT SURFACE. Preliminary tests were conducted to<br />
examine whether the age-related decrease in susceptibility is<br />
associated with the fruit surface, mesocarp, or both. <strong>The</strong> peeled fruits<br />
all sporulated, whereas intact control fruit did not sporulate at 4dpi,<br />
indicating that the fruit surface is an important factor for the resistance<br />
of older fruits to infection by P. capsici (Figure 2). However, these<br />
experiments do not allow us to rule out possible effects of wounding<br />
due to peeling.<br />
To further study the role of the epidermis using intact (nonwounded)<br />
fruit, epidermal exchanges were made between fruits at 7 and 14dpp (i.e.,<br />
pieces of epidermis from one fruit were placed on top of a second, intact<br />
fruit). <strong>The</strong> 7-dpp fruit-surface pieces sporulated regardless of fruit age<br />
underneath (mean disease rating = 2 ± 0) (Figure 3). Fruit-surface<br />
sections from 14-dpp fruit generally did not sporulate regardless of fruit<br />
age underneath; however, approximately 50% developed water-soaked<br />
symptoms (mean disease rating = 1 ± 0.3). <strong>The</strong> fruit underneath the 7dpp<br />
fruit-surface pieces showed susceptibility similar to the fruit-age<br />
study; 7-dpp fruit generally sporulated while 14-dpp fruit generally did<br />
not, even in the presence of sporulating 7-dpp fruit-surface sections.<br />
However, when 14-dpp fruit-surface pieces were inoculated, the<br />
underlying 7-dpp fruit did not sporulate, indicating that the 14-dpp fruitsurface<br />
sections protected the underlying 7-dpp fruit. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
suggest that 14-dpp fruit-surface sections possess properties that inhibit<br />
P. capsici infection.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 391
Fig. 2. Greenhouse-grown ‘Vlaspik’ were inoculated with P. capsici mycelium<br />
after peeling. (A) 0dpi, (B) 4dpi (arrows indicate sporulation), and (C)<br />
summary of fruit symptoms at 4 dpi. Each value is the mean of 7 fruit ± S. E.<br />
This study suggests that properties of the epidermal sections could<br />
be the source for the susceptibility difference associated with fruit<br />
development. This difference could be due to cuticle properties, as was<br />
observed to be a physical barrier to P. capsici infection in New<br />
Mexican-type pepper (Capsicum annuum) (Biles et al., 1993).<br />
Another possibility is a difference in frequency of stomata, since<br />
Smith et al. (1979) reported that stomata are almost absent from the<br />
stem end compared to the blossom end, and are less frequent in larger<br />
(older) fruits relative to younger fruit. Whether the P. capsici<br />
sporangia enter primarily through cucumber fruit stomata remains to<br />
be determined. Other possibilities include changes in cell-wall<br />
properties, production of defense compounds, or induced resistance<br />
mechanisms.<br />
392 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Disease score: 0-no symptoms, 1-water<br />
soaked, 2-sporulation<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
7 on 7 7 on 14 14 on 7 14 on 14<br />
Fig. 3. Response to P. capsici inoculation for the 7- or 14-dpp isolated epidermis<br />
section and intact 7- or 14-dpp fruit underneath. Left bar is the epidermal<br />
section and right bar is intact fruit underneath the peel. <strong>The</strong> open bar is 7 dpp<br />
and the dotted bar is 14 dpp. <strong>The</strong> P. capsici mycelium plug was placed on the<br />
peel. Each point is the mean of a minimum of 4 fruits ± S. E.<br />
In conclusion, these results demonstrate that there is a gradation of<br />
susceptibility within the fruit such that the stem end of the fruit<br />
becomes less susceptible to P. capsici sooner than the blossom end.<br />
This difference in susceptibility could be due to position-related<br />
differences in fruit development between the stem and blossom end, as<br />
older fruit are less susceptible than younger fruit, and the stem end<br />
<strong>complete</strong>s the elongation phase sooner than the blossom end. <strong>The</strong><br />
increased resistance appears to be associated, at least in part, with<br />
epidermal properties. Further experiments are required to determine<br />
the properties responsible for the change in susceptibility that occurs<br />
as fruit develop.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Ando, K. and R. Grumet. 2006. Evaluation of altered cucumber plant architecture as<br />
a means to reduce Phytophthora capsici disease incidence on cucumber fruit. J.<br />
Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. (In press.)<br />
Biles, C. L., M. M. Wall, M. Waugh, and H. Palmer. 1993. Relationship of<br />
Phytophthora fruit rot to fruit maturation and cuticle thickness of New<br />
Mexican–type peppers. Phytopathology. 83:607–611.<br />
Gevens, A. J., K. Ando, K. Lamour, R. Grumet, and M. K. Hausbeck. 2006.<br />
Development of a detached cucumber fruit assay to screen for resistance and<br />
effect of fruit age on susceptibility to infection by Phytophthora capsici. Plant<br />
Dis. (In press.)<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 393
Hausbeck, M. and K. Lamour. 2004. Phytophthora capsici on vegetable crops:<br />
research progress and management challenges. Plant Dis. 88(12):1292–1302.<br />
Smith, K. R., H. P. Fleming, C. G. van Dyke, and R. L. Lower. 1979. Scanning<br />
electron microscopy of the surface of pickling cucumber fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hort.<br />
Sci. 104(4):528–533.<br />
Wehner, T. C. and M. E. Saltveit. 1983. Photographic analysis of cucumber fruit<br />
elongation. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108(4):465–468.<br />
394 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
EARLY PROTECTION AGAINST ROOT-KNOT<br />
NEMATODES THROUGH NEMATICIDAL<br />
SEED COATING PROVIDES SEASON-LONG<br />
BENEFITS FOR CUCUMBERS<br />
J. O. Becker and J. Smith Becker<br />
Department of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, CA<br />
92521,<br />
H. V. Morton<br />
VIVA, 1212 Heathrow Drive, Greensboro, NC 27410<br />
D. Hofer<br />
Syngenta Crop Protection AG, WRO-1004 7.10, CH-4002, Basel, CH.<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Meloidogyne incognita, abamectin, nematicides,<br />
oxamyl, fosthiazate<br />
ABSTRACT. Seed coating of cucumber with the microbial-derived<br />
abamectin at rates of 0.1 to 0.3mg a.i./seed resulted in excellent earlyseason<br />
seedling protection against root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne<br />
incognita) and their detrimental effects on root development. Ten days<br />
after seeding in root-knot nematode-infested sandy soil, cucumber<br />
seedlings derived from abamectin-coated seeds contained<br />
approximately 3–4 times fewer juveniles in their root systems than<br />
nontreated check plants. <strong>The</strong> reduction in nematode attack resulted in a<br />
doubling of the total root length at Day 12 of the greenhouse trial. In a<br />
Southern California field trial in root-knot nematode-infested sandy<br />
loam, abamectin seed coating on fresh market cucumber (cv. Kahina) at<br />
0.3mg a.i./seed (approximately 20g/ha) resulted in growth improvement<br />
after the first four weeks over the nontreated control . <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
were similar to the soil-applied nematicides oxamyl and fosthiazate.<br />
Abamectin seed coating resulted in increased numbers of fruit and<br />
higher yields compared to the nontreated control and equal to<br />
carbamate and organophosphate nematicides. <strong>The</strong> seed coating offers a<br />
dramatic reduction in nematicide application rate per ha, which is a<br />
milestone in reduced-risk farming. Nematicidal seed coating promises<br />
to be a valuable new tool for economically feasible and ecologically<br />
sensible plant protection.<br />
R<br />
oot-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are major pests in<br />
cucurbits, especially in warmer climates. In US cucurbit<br />
production, estimated yield losses due to plant-parasitic<br />
nematodes exceed 4% (Koenning et al., 1999). Young seedlings are<br />
particularly susceptible to the effects of nematode attack and the<br />
consequent morphological and physiological changes associated with<br />
the host-parasite relationship. Under favorable environmental<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 395
conditions, high population densities of infectious second-stage<br />
Meloidogyne juveniles at seeding result in massive invasion of roots<br />
just behind their tips. Fine secondary roots are often aborted under<br />
such attack. <strong>The</strong> establishment of permanent feeding sites, the socalled<br />
giant cells, lead to nematode-induced changes in root tissues<br />
that ultimately manifest in root galls. <strong>The</strong> lack of useful crop resistance<br />
in cucurbits against root-knot nematodes has lead to the use of<br />
nematicides as the almost exclusive nematode management tool in<br />
commercial production. However, in recent years the use of many of<br />
these compounds has been severely restricted by regulatory action.<br />
<strong>The</strong> relatively high application rates are a concern for both the user<br />
and potential environmental pollution. In addition, the high cost for the<br />
nematicides and their application has become prohibitive for many<br />
growers. Some of the contact nematicides have been investigated as<br />
potential seed treatments (Truelove et al., 1977; Brown, 1984;<br />
Rodriguez-Kabána and Weaver, 1987; Orion and Shlevin, 1989). But<br />
issues related to crop tolerance and low efficacy in comparison to high<br />
soil application rates, as well as lack of interest of the agrochemical<br />
industry, have hindered their further development. <strong>The</strong> most potent<br />
nematicide known has never been developed against plant parasitic<br />
nematodes. Abamectin is composed of macrocyclic lactones (≥ 80%<br />
avermectin B1a and ≤ 20% avermectin B1b) that are metabolites of the<br />
actinomycete Streptomyces avermitilis. Insecticidal and antihelmintic<br />
activity (Putter et al., 1981) led to its development in antiparasite drugs<br />
as well as foliar insecticides. Despite some encouraging results by<br />
low-volume chemigation (Garabedian and Van Gundy, 1983), the<br />
efficacy of abamectin against root-knot nematodes in other field trials<br />
was considered insufficient (Nordmeyer and Dickson, 1985). We have<br />
recently reported on the potential of abamectin as an effective seed<br />
coating for early- season protection against plant-parasitic nematodes<br />
(Becker et al., 2003, 2004). This report will further strengthen our<br />
notion that seed-delivered plant protection will achieve similar benefits<br />
for the grower while reducing the cost on production and unintentional<br />
impacts on the environment.<br />
Materials And Methods<br />
GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENTS. All cucumber seeds were coated by<br />
Syngenta Crop Protection. Initially, abamectin was evaluated in<br />
greenhouse trials using seed-coating loading rates on cucumber cv.<br />
Mondeo of 0.0, 0.1, and 0.3 mg a.i./seed. <strong>The</strong> seeds were additionally<br />
treated with the fungicide thiram (1.6g a.i./kg seed). <strong>The</strong> trials were<br />
conducted in soil infested with root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne<br />
396 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
incognita Race 1). Root-knot inoculum was raised during the previous<br />
two months on tomato plants in the greenhouse. Nematode eggs were<br />
harvested by a bleach/sieving extraction (Hussey and Barker, 1973)<br />
and hatched on Baerman funnels at 26˚C for 3 days. Steam-pasteurized<br />
river bottom sand (90% sand, 1% silt, 8% clay, 0.2% OM, pH 7.5) was<br />
infested with 500 J2/100cm 3 soil and filled into 250-cm 3 cups. Each<br />
cup was seeded with one cucumber seed. <strong>The</strong> cups were arranged in<br />
the greenhouse in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design with six<br />
replications per treatment at 25˚C +/- 2˚C and ambient lighting.<br />
Irrigation was applied daily as needed. After 12 days, the seedlings<br />
were carefully removed from the cups and washed free of debris with a<br />
water spray. <strong>The</strong> roots were floated in a transparent tray with a<br />
shallow water layer. <strong>The</strong>y were scanned at 300dpi with an HP flatbed<br />
scanner and analyzed for total root length with MacRhizo V3.10B<br />
software (Régent Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada).<br />
Pots were filled with 500-cm 3 steam-pasteurized river bottom sand<br />
infested at planting with 5,000 eggs of M. incognita Race 1.<br />
Abamectin seed coatings were evaluated at loading rates of 0.0, 0.03,<br />
0.1, and 0.3 mg a.i./seed. <strong>The</strong> cucumber (cv. Straight Eight) seeds<br />
were additionally treated with the fungicide thiram (1.6g a.i./kg seed).<br />
Each pot was seeded with one seed. Fenamiphos was used as a<br />
nematicide check and drenched onto the soil at 3mg a.i./L to waterholding<br />
capacity. <strong>The</strong> pots were incubated in the greenhouse at ca.<br />
24˚C +/- 3˚C and ambient lighting. Irrigation and fertilization was<br />
applied as needed. Five weeks after seeding, root galling was rated on<br />
a scale of 0–10 (Zeck, 1971).<br />
FIELD TRIAL. A cucumber trial was conducted at the University of<br />
California South Coast Research and Extension Center, Irvine, CA,<br />
during August/September. <strong>The</strong> soil was a San Emigdio sandy loam<br />
(12.5% sand, 75.4% silt, 12% clay, 0.45% organic matter, and pH 7.2).<br />
<strong>The</strong> field was previously cropped to root-knot nematode-susceptible<br />
tomatoes. At seeding, the plot site was fairly uniformly infested (73<br />
J2/cm 3 ) with M. incognita Race 1. Fresh market cucumber seeds (cv.<br />
Kahina) were coated with abamectin (0.3 mg a.i./seed) and thiram<br />
(1.6g a.i./kg seed) or with only the fungicides that were used for the<br />
check and the soil nematicide treatments. Oxamyl and fosthiazate were<br />
band-applied at 2.03kg a.i./ha and thoroughly incorporated into the top<br />
10cm soil. <strong>The</strong> trial was designed as a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block<br />
with five replications on 10m x 0.68m beds. Weed and insect control<br />
as well as fertilization and irrigation were applied using drip tubing<br />
with 2-L/hr emitters spaced at 0.3m. <strong>The</strong>se agricultural operations<br />
were conducted according to local standards. <strong>The</strong> trial was harvested<br />
after eight and nine weeks and both fruit number and weight per pot<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 397
were taken. Root galling and number of J2/100cm 3 soil at harvest were<br />
determined. All data were subject to ANOVA and, if appropriate,<br />
means separation with Fisher’s LSD (SuperANOVA, Abacus,<br />
Berkeley, CA).<br />
Results And Discussion<br />
GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENTS. <strong>The</strong> first impact of an intense rootknot<br />
nematode attack on cucumber seedlings is stunting and death of<br />
many small secondary roots. Galling is more easily recognized and<br />
more often reported than the reduction in root length, and its<br />
consequence on seedling development is equally important. Abamectin<br />
seed coating mitigated this impact and increased the total root length<br />
by 75 and 92% with 0.1 and 0.3mg a.i./seed, respectively (Figure 1).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was no difference in rate response. in another greenhouse trial at<br />
five weeks after seeding. At this time, the abamectin seed coatings<br />
reduced the disease expression by 1 to 3 rating classes depending on<br />
the nematicide seed loading rate (Figure 2). While even the lowest rate<br />
of 0.03mg a.i./seed reduced galling, the higher rates were more<br />
effective. A soil-drench application of fenamiphos was the most<br />
effective.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect of the nematicidal seed coating on root galling was<br />
assessed in another greenhouse trial at 5 weeks after seeding. At this<br />
time, the abamectin seed coatings reduced the disease expression by 1<br />
to 3 rating classes depending on the nematicide seed loading rate<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
check aba 0.1<br />
treatments<br />
aba 0.3<br />
Fig.1. Effect of abamectin seed coatings on root length of cucumber seedlings<br />
after 12 days in root-knot nematode-infested sandy soil. Bar indicated standard<br />
error (P = 0.05).<br />
398 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
(Fig.2). While even the lowest rate of 0.03 mg a.i./seed reduced galling,<br />
the higher rates were more effective. A soil drench application of<br />
fenamiphos was the most effective.<br />
FIELD TRIAL. <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted under a high initial rootknot<br />
nematode-population density. All nematicide treatments resulted<br />
in more vigorous growth that became obvious about three–four weeks<br />
after seeding in comparison to the check. At the first harvest, eight<br />
weeks after seeding, the number of fruits in all nematicide treatments<br />
was increased by 40–50% compared to the nontreated check (Figure 3).<br />
This resulted in fruit weight increases that exceeded the check by more<br />
than 100% (Figure 4). <strong>The</strong>re was no difference among treatments in<br />
the second harvest (Figures 3 and 4). This may be an indication that<br />
the presumably larger and healthier root systems in the nematicide<br />
treatments provided more feeding sites for the nematodes. <strong>The</strong><br />
increasing root-knot nematode population started to affect the treated<br />
plants by diminishing the root-size advantage. At termination of the<br />
trial, there were no differences in galling or number of J2 among the<br />
treatments (data not shown).<br />
root galling (scale 0-10)<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
check<br />
0.03 mg aba<br />
0.1 mg aba<br />
Fig. 2. Effect of abamectin seed coating (aba) on cucumber root galling (0–10<br />
scale) in M. incognita-infested sandy soil five weeks after seeding. Fenamiphos<br />
was applied as a soil drench. Bars indicate standard error (P = 0.05).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 399<br />
0.3 mg aba<br />
fenamiphos 3 ppm
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
check abamectin oxamyl fosthiazate<br />
1. harvest<br />
2. harvest<br />
Fig. 3. Yield comparison of abamectin seed coating (0.3mg a.i./seed) to soil<br />
nematicides (each 2.03kg a.i./ha) in a cucumber field trial in M. incognitainfested<br />
sandy loam. Bars indicate standard error (P = 0.05).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results challenge earlier opinions that predicted a limited<br />
value of nematicidal seed coatings due to their inability to provide the<br />
soil-population reduction necessary for season-long control<br />
(Thomason, 1987). <strong>The</strong> presented data show that under high nematode<br />
disease pressure a significant reduction in root loss can be avoided<br />
with an effective protection by a seed-delivered nematicide. Seed<br />
treatments are ideally positioned to mitigate nematode attack against<br />
the young root system. In addition, the protection of the area around<br />
the seed might last much longer than that achieved by a soil-applied<br />
nematicide. Although this protection might not be sufficient for longseason<br />
crops or in situations were multiple nematode generations<br />
occur, it has been shown for a number of crops that the first couple of<br />
weeks determine a large part of the yield potential (Seinhorst, 1995;<br />
Ploeg and Phillips, 2001). Equally important, the huge reduction in<br />
pesticide-application rates as a consequence of seed-coating<br />
technology must be considered a major breakthrough in crop<br />
protection against plant-parasitic nematodes and a significant<br />
contribution to reduced-risk farming.<br />
400 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
fruit weight (%)<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
check abamectin oxamyl fosthiazate<br />
1. harvest<br />
2. harvest<br />
Fig. 4. Yield comparison of abamectin seed coating (0.3mg a.i./seed) to soil<br />
nematicides (each 2.03kg a.i./ha) in a cucumber field trial in M. incognitainfested<br />
sandy loam. Bars indicate standard error (P = 0.05).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Becker, J. O., B. Slaats, and D. Hofer. 2004. Cucumber seed coating with abamectin<br />
guards against early root damage by root-knot nematodes. Phytopathology.<br />
94:S149.<br />
Becker, J. O., H. V. Morton, and D. Hofer. 2003. Seedling protection against plant<br />
parasitic nematodes by abamectin seed dressing. 8th International Congress of<br />
Plant Pathology. 2:251.<br />
Brown, R. H. 1984. Cereal cyst nematode and its chemical control in Australia. Plant<br />
Dis. 68:922–928.<br />
Garabedian, S. and S. D. Van Gundy. 1983. Use of avermectins for the control of<br />
Meloidogyne incognita on tomatoes. J. Nematol. 13:503–510.<br />
Hussey, R. S., and K. Barker. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula<br />
of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:1025–1028.<br />
Koenning, S. R., C. Overstreet, J. W. Noling, P. A. Donald, J. O. Becker, and B. A.<br />
Fortnum. 1999. Survey of crop losses in response to phytoparasitic nematodes in<br />
the United <strong>State</strong>s for 1994. J. Nematol. 31: 587618.<br />
Nordmeyer, D. and D. Dickson. 1985. Management of Meloidogyne javanica, M.<br />
arenaria, M. incognita on flue cured tobacco with organophosphate, carbamate,<br />
and avermectin nematicides. Plant Dis. 69:67–69.<br />
Orion, D. and E. Shlevin.1989. Nematicide seed dressing for cyst and lesion<br />
nematode control in wheat. J. Nematol. 21(4S): 629-631.<br />
Ploeg, A. T. and M. S. Phillips. 2001. Damage to melon (Cucumis melo L.) cv.<br />
Durango by Meloidogyne incognita in Southern California. Nematology. 3:151–<br />
157.<br />
Putter, I., J. G. MacConnell, F. A. Preiser, A. A. Haidri, S. S. Ristich, and R. A.<br />
Dybas. 1981. Avermectins: novel insecticides, acaricides, and nematicides form<br />
a soil microorganism. Experientia. 37:963–964.<br />
Rodriguez-Kabana, R. and C. F. Weaver. 1987. Nematicide seed treatments for<br />
control of soybean nematodes. Nematropica. 17:79–93.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 401
Seinhorst, J. W. 1995. <strong>The</strong> effect of delay of attack of oats by Heterodera avenae on<br />
the relation between initial nematode density and plant growth, plant weight,<br />
water consumption and dry matter content. Nematologica. 41:487–504.<br />
Thomason, I. 1987. Challenges facing nematology: environmental risks with<br />
nematicides and the need for new approaches, p. 469–476. In: J. Veech, D.<br />
Dickson, and E. O. Painter (eds.). Vista on nematology. Printing Co., DeLeon<br />
Springs, FL.<br />
Truelove, B., R. Rodriguez-Kabana, and P. S. King. 1977. Seed treatment as a means<br />
of preventing nematode damage to crop plants. J. Nematol. 9:326–330.<br />
Zeck, W. M. 1971. A rating scheme for field evaluation of root-knot nematode<br />
infestations. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten, Bayer AG. 24:141–144.<br />
402 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
THE DOWNY MILDEW EPIDEMIC OF 2004<br />
AND 2005 IN THE EASTERN UNITED<br />
STATES<br />
Susan J. Colucci 1 , Todd C. Wehner 2 , and Gerald J. Holmes 1<br />
1 Department of Plant Pathology, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
Raleigh, NC 27695-7616<br />
2 Department of Horticultural Science, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />
University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Cucumis sativus,<br />
cucumber, disease resistance, pathology<br />
ABSTRACT. Downy mildew of cucurbits is caused by Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis (Berk. & M. A. Curtis) Rostovtsev. It has always been considered one<br />
of the most important diseases of cucumber worldwide. In the United <strong>State</strong>s,<br />
successful breeding efforts in the 1950s and 1960s were responsible for<br />
effectively controlling the disease in cucumber. In May 2004 downy mildew<br />
struck cucumber early and severely, resulting in huge economic losses<br />
(approximately 40% of the crop or $20 million) to growers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>,<br />
Delaware, and Maryland. In 2005 the disease spread to Michigan and Ontario,<br />
Canada, where it was equally virulent on cucumber, but due to a late arrival,<br />
spared most of the acreage. Forecasting efforts at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />
University, which began in 1998, were temporarily suspended in 2004 due to<br />
lack of funding, but resumed in 2005 due to a renewed interest in the disease.<br />
This paper puts the epidemics of 2004 and 2005 into historical perspective with<br />
regard to breeding and forecasting efforts and outlines future efforts to combat<br />
this disease.<br />
D<br />
owny mildew of cucurbits is caused by Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis (Berk. & M. A. Curtis) Rostovtsev. P. cubensis is an<br />
obligate parasite and requires living host tissue to survive.<br />
Oospores are extremely rare, reported only on cucumber, and their role<br />
in reproduction and survival is uncertain (Waterhouse, 1981; Lange et<br />
al., 1987). As a result, the pathogen must travel from locations where<br />
a frost sufficient to kill a host plant does not occur. <strong>The</strong> pathogen can<br />
overwinter as active mycelium on wild or cultivated cucurbits in areas<br />
that experience mild winters, such as southern Florida (Bains and<br />
Jhooty, 1976). Infection is initiated by sporangia, which are<br />
transported via air currents and travel from local or distant sources.<br />
Moisture, as leaf wetness and high relative humidity, is required for<br />
sporangia to release zoospores and for zoospore movement (Cohen,<br />
1981; Lange et al., 1987; Palti and Cohen, 1980).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 403
Downy mildew threatens warm and humid cucurbit production<br />
areas worldwide and has been reported on species in the genus<br />
Cucumis in 70 countries (Cohen, 1981; Palti, 1974; Thomas, 1996).<br />
Historically, in the eastern United <strong>State</strong>s, the disease frequently occurs<br />
on squash, pumpkin, and melons in late summer and fall. <strong>The</strong> disease<br />
also occurs on watermelon, although less commonly than on squash,<br />
pumpkin, and melons, and is most common in Florida. In each of<br />
these crops, fungicides are necessary to control the disease. In<br />
contrast, downy mildew on cucumber has been successfully controlled<br />
through the use of resistant cultivars. Although the disease has<br />
occurred on cucumber during the last several decades, its presence was<br />
inconspicuous and did not result in obvious crop losses.<br />
In 2004 the story on cucumber changed dramatically. A new<br />
pathogen more virulent than the previous emerged and downy mildewresistant<br />
cultivars were not sufficient to prevent severe economic<br />
losses. <strong>The</strong> disease ravaged cucumber-growing areas of <strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong>, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia in 2004. In 2005, the<br />
disease continued its path of destruction in Florida, then moved<br />
northward reaching Michigan and southwestern Ontario, Canada. As<br />
in 2004, the disease was quite severe on cucumber, but owing to its<br />
late arrival, most of the Michigan/Ontario, Canada, crop was spared.<br />
While the timing of the epidemic was different each year, it was clear<br />
that the pathogen was similar in virulence to that which was initially<br />
found on cucumber in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> in May of 2004.<br />
This paper provides a brief account of historical breeding efforts<br />
and disease forecasting to control cucurbit downy mildew, and<br />
summarizes the epidemics of 2004 and 2005 by tracing the dates and<br />
locations of disease occurrence and giving estimates of economic<br />
losses.<br />
<strong>Breeding</strong> for Resistance<br />
<strong>Breeding</strong> efforts in the 1940s led to the release in 1948 of cultivar<br />
Palmetto with moderate resistance to downy mildew. In 1966, cultivar<br />
Poinsett was released. This cultivar proved highly resistant to downy<br />
mildew. Early research on resistance of cucumbers to downy mildew<br />
showed that at least one single recessive gene, dm, controlled<br />
resistance in ‘Poinsett’ (Van Vliet and Meysing, 1977). Since<br />
‘Poinsett’s release, this disease resistance has been bred into most of<br />
the popular cultivars used today.<br />
As cucurbit breeding progressed through the twentieth century, a<br />
review by Pierce and Wehner indicated that several genes are actually<br />
involved in downy mildew resistance (1990). In 1992, Doruchowski<br />
404 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
and Lakowska-Ryk reported that three recessive genes, dm-1, dm-2,<br />
and dm-3 control resistance in Wisconsin-4783. In addition, a single<br />
dominant gene, Dm-3, and two complementary genes, Dm-1 and Dm-<br />
2, control susceptibility of cultivar SMR-18 (Doruchowskin and<br />
Lakowska-Ryk, 1992).<br />
New cultivars incorporated these genetic factors and were doing a<br />
magnificent job of controlling downy mildew on cucumbers for<br />
several decades. Because of this successful breeding effort, downy<br />
mildew was no longer a threat to cucumber production in the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s. In most cases, this resistance controlled the disease without the<br />
use of fungicides.<br />
Disease-Forecasting Efforts<br />
Downy mildew was the most important disease of cucumber in the<br />
1940s in the United <strong>State</strong>s. It was during this time that J. G. Horsfall<br />
at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station and C. J. Nusbaum<br />
of Clemson University in South <strong>Carolina</strong> began reporting the presence<br />
and spread of the disease in the eastern United <strong>State</strong>s from Florida to<br />
Massachusetts. Nusbaum noted that the disease occurred nearly every<br />
year, and that it progressed northward from Florida. He used a<br />
network of cooperators in 11 states along the eastern seaboard to track<br />
progress of the disease. Nusbaum also reported that the disease<br />
usually didn’t reach South <strong>Carolina</strong> until late May at the very earliest.<br />
In addition, he noted the sporadic nature of P. cubensis and that the<br />
disease was destructive in only four out of eight years (Nusbaum,<br />
1944).<br />
While downy mildew has not been a problem on cucumbers since<br />
the late 1960s, it is present nearly every year on other cucurbits<br />
(squash, pumpkin, melon, and watermelon) in the United <strong>State</strong>s. In<br />
1997 Holmes and Main at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University developed a<br />
forecasting system to predict the spread and development of cucurbit<br />
downy mildew. <strong>The</strong> system is made available to growers via a Web<br />
site: . <strong>The</strong> system is<br />
based on the tobacco blue mold (Peronospora tabacina) forecasting<br />
system created by C. E. Main (Main et al., 2001). Forecasting downy<br />
mildew began in 1998 and continued for the next six years. <strong>The</strong> Web<br />
site reported the progression of downy mildew on all commercially<br />
grown cucurbits. However, in 2004 forecasts ceased due to lack of<br />
funding.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 405
2004 Epidemic<br />
Interestingly, 2004 marked a turning point for downy mildew. In<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, the spring crop was looking unusually good. Rainfall<br />
and temperatures were such that growers were expecting very high<br />
yields. In mid-May a grower in Sampson County, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>,<br />
reported a blighted area in his cucumber field that had occurred so<br />
rapidly that it was initially thought to be herbicide injury. <strong>The</strong><br />
problem was soon diagnosed as downy mildew. Two things were<br />
particularly important about this event: (1) the disease had reached the<br />
state earlier than had ever been reported before; and (2) it was highly<br />
virulent on cucumber. Within days the presence of downy mildew was<br />
reported in six counties in eastern <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. Within a few weeks<br />
the disease was present in nearly every field of cucumbers throughout<br />
eastern <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (Holmes et al., 2006).<br />
By the first week in July the disease had spread to Accomack<br />
County, Virginia, and soon thereafter to cucumber fields in Delaware.<br />
Nearly all of the pickling-cucumber acreage on the Eastern Shore of<br />
Delaware was affected. Early August brought P. cubensis spores to<br />
more counties throughout <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> and also north to<br />
Connecticut and Suffolk County, New York. As the fall cucumber<br />
crop was planted in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, even more devastation was<br />
apparent. Some growers experienced as much as 95% yield loss.<br />
Many fields were abandoned without harvesting.<br />
In an effort to provide adequate control options, an emergency<br />
fungicide performance trial was established in 2004 in the heart of the<br />
affected area (Sampson County, NC) during the worst part of the<br />
epidemic (late summer). <strong>The</strong> trial consisted of 15 treatments and<br />
included old standards, new materials, and several products that<br />
growers had speculated about, but had little or no data to support.<br />
Treatments were applied at 5- to 7-day intervals for a total of 11<br />
applications. Disease was detected 10 days after plant emergence and,<br />
in the nontreated plots, prevented a single fruit from being produced.<br />
Many other fungicides failed to control the disease, but four products<br />
provided excellent disease control: Tanos (fenamidone + cymoxanil),<br />
Previcur Flex (propamocarb), Ranman (cyazofamid), and Gavel<br />
(zoxamide + mancozeb). <strong>The</strong>se products mixed with protectants such<br />
as Bravo (chlorothalonil) and mancozeb now form the backbone of<br />
successful downy mildew-control programs throughout the eastern<br />
U.S.<br />
In <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> the 2004 spring and fall cucumber crops were<br />
devastated. An estimated 40% crop loss for a total of $16 million was<br />
the result. Loss estimates are based on economic value of the crop as<br />
406 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
eported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (Quick Stats,<br />
2006) (Fig.1) as well as the cost of fungicide applications (ranging $12<br />
to $86/hectare/application). Additional economic repercussions were<br />
felt from lost markets, increased commodity prices, and dramatic<br />
changes in the demand for labor and machinery. A similar level of<br />
disease (i.e., 40% crop loss) occurred in Delaware, Maryland, and<br />
Virginia, with losses estimated at $4 million.<br />
Later in the year, the disease began to make its way southward. By<br />
November the disease was present in Charleston county South<br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> on cucumber. By mid-December the South Florida<br />
Vegetable Pest and Disease Hotline reported that the University of<br />
Florida/IFAS Plant Pathology Clinic in Immokalee had received more<br />
cucumber downy mildew samples than ever before.<br />
This news was of particular interest since southern Florida<br />
represents the starting point of the disease for areas northward. In this<br />
case, it looked as if it was the end point of the 2004 epidemic. If the<br />
disease was present on cucumber, it meant that the disease had gone<br />
south and would likely go north again leading to a possible repeat of<br />
2004. During the months of January through April, Florida reported<br />
downy mildew in all areas where cucumbers were grown. Fields were<br />
described with 100% disease incidence. Major yield decreases and<br />
field abandonment was reported (economic loss data are not available).<br />
Many growers were calling the epidemic the worst case of downy<br />
mildew they could ever remember.<br />
2005 Epidemic<br />
When <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>’s 2005 season began, growers hoped that the<br />
epidemic of 2004 was a fluke that would not repeat. Florida’s<br />
experience with the disease suggested that the pathogen was still<br />
virulent on cucumber and would remain so in 2005. <strong>The</strong> bigger<br />
question was when and where would it strike.<br />
With interest in downy mildew rekindled, forecasting resumed in<br />
March. In addition, based on the 2004 field trial results, a<br />
management program where Tanos + mancozeb is alternated with<br />
Previcur Flex + Bravo on a 5- to 7-day interval was recommended for<br />
2005. In early June, two fields with downy mildew were reported in<br />
Georgia. Oddly, the next report of the disease came from New Jersey,<br />
far to the north of the Georgia outbreaks with hundreds of miles of<br />
cucurbits in between. Sources reported that the New Jersey outbreak<br />
involved a field where transplants, purchased in Florida, were used.<br />
New Jersey also reported downy mildew in several of its cucumbergrowing<br />
counties in early July. By the middle of July, Maryland had<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 407
eported widespread infection of their cucumber crop. In Delaware,<br />
Maryland, and Virginia growers reduced acreage by about 20% and<br />
when P. cubensis arrived in early July, many simply stopped planting<br />
altogether (Ed Kee, personal communication).<br />
It was also at this time that P. cubensis showed up in <strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong>. Fortunately, the timing was such that the spring crop was<br />
spared, but the summer crop was just beginning. Once again,<br />
cucumber was very susceptible and fungicides were necessary to<br />
prevent severe economic losses.<br />
On 5 August, an outbreak was reported in Michigan, the top<br />
cucumber-producing state in the U.S., whose average production is<br />
approximately 16,000ha of cucumbers annually (Figure 1).<br />
Eventually, 15 counties throughout Michigan reported the disease on<br />
cucumber. Downy mildew had not been confirmed in Michigan for at<br />
least fifteen years and had not been a problem there in the past (Mary<br />
Hausbeck, personal communication).<br />
In Ohio, the disease was again mistaken for herbicide injury;<br />
however, pumpkins planted nearby did not exhibit any symptoms.<br />
(This same observation of host-specificity for cucumber but not<br />
pumpkin or squash has been made in many other locations.)<br />
Reports from Ontario, Canada, were also received. In 2005, in<br />
Ontario, 1,983ha of cucumbers and gherkins were harvested (Ontario<br />
Ministry of Agriculture, 2006). Fortunately, the disease did not show<br />
up until late in the season for the Ontario growers. All of the acreage<br />
still in production during that time had at least some level of downy<br />
mildew present in their fields. <strong>The</strong> industry overall did not suffer;<br />
however, many smaller growers were devastated. Ontario had had<br />
incidence of downy mildew previously, but not at such high levels.<br />
Smuckers (a commercial processor) reported that much of the<br />
production was affected. About 12 acres were <strong>complete</strong>ly abandoned<br />
and 12 acres were used for relish for a total loss of about a $30,000<br />
Canadian ($27,095 US) (George Pape, personal communication).<br />
Determining Economic Losses<br />
Reports of downy mildew on cucurbit crops were compiled<br />
throughout the 2004 and 2005 growing seasons. Information was<br />
gathered through personal communication via email, telephone, and<br />
personal interviews with commercial and independent growers,<br />
researchers, and agricultural extension agents throughout the eastern<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s and Ontario, Canada. In 2004, there was personal<br />
communication with 18 individuals, and approximately 30 individuals<br />
in 2005. <strong>The</strong>se include many key industry representatives who are<br />
408 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
intimately familiar with production across several states. We consider<br />
our estimates to be fair and unexaggerated.<br />
Hectares (x 1000)<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
<strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong><br />
Fresh<br />
Processed<br />
Value<br />
Michigan Florida Maryland New<br />
Jersey<br />
Ontario,<br />
CAN<br />
Fig. 1. Cucumber production and value in the eastern U.S. and southwestern<br />
Ontario, Canada.<br />
Summary of Forecasts<br />
In 2004, 14 states representing over 20 counties had reported<br />
downy mildew. Of these, 7 states had confirmed it on cucumber. By<br />
the end of 2005, 18 states, representing more than 62 counties, plus<br />
Ontario, Canada, reported downy mildew (nearly all on cucumber).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were approximately 320,000 hits to the forecasting Web site, an<br />
average of 1350 hits per day. This is almost a threefold increase over<br />
previous years.<br />
Summary<br />
<strong>The</strong> events of 2004 and 2005 strongly suggest the development or<br />
introduction of a variant of P. cubensis previously not present in the<br />
U.S. <strong>The</strong> virulence on previously resistant cucumber cultivars is<br />
unprecedented in the last 40 years. <strong>Breeding</strong> programs in all the major<br />
seed companies are again focused on developing cultivars for the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s with resistance to downy mildew. Growers should still<br />
plant resistant cultivars since they hold up better than susceptible<br />
cultivars when attacked by the new variant. However, resistance is no<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 409<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Value (x million USD)
longer sufficient to prevent foliar damage, so fungicides are now<br />
needed in addition to the resistance genes. Meanwhile, the fungicide<br />
performance trials in 2004 and 2005 and grower reports have<br />
confirmed excellent disease control following the Tanos + mancozeb<br />
alternated with Previcur Flex + Bravo (chlorothalonil) on a 5- to 7-day<br />
interval program.<br />
That this new variant of P. cubensis has spread to all of the major<br />
cucumber-producing areas of the eastern United <strong>State</strong>s and<br />
southwestern Ontario, Canada, within two years is further evidence of<br />
the method of dispersal for this pathogen (first reported by Nusbaum<br />
in the mid-1940s) and the potential to forecast its movement.<br />
Current research efforts are focused on determining the pathotype<br />
using the methods described by Lebeda (2003) and Thomas et al.<br />
(1987) and on determining fungicide sensitivity. <strong>The</strong> latter arises from<br />
reports of control failures of several popular fungicides. Research<br />
efforts are also focused on validating the cucurbit downy mildewforecasting<br />
system that serves as a valuable decision-making tool for<br />
growers. One thing that will drastically reduce the value of forecasting<br />
is the existence of overwintering sites for the pathogen in greenhouses<br />
in areas where the pathogen cannot overwinter, or the long-distance<br />
transport of infected transplants from infested areas to noninfested<br />
areas.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bains, S. S. and J. S. Jhooty. 1976. Over wintering of Pseudoperonospora cubensis<br />
causing downy mildew of muskmelon. Indian Phytopathology. 29:213–214.<br />
Cohen, Y. 1981. Downy mildew of cucurbits, p. 341–345. In: D. M. Spencer (ed).<br />
<strong>The</strong> downy mildews. Academic Press, New York.<br />
Doruchowski, R. W. and E. Lakowska-Ryk. 1992. Inheritance of resistance to<br />
downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis Berk. & Curt.) in Cucumis<br />
sativus. Proc. 5th Eucarpia Symposium, 27–31 July, Poland:132–138.<br />
Holmes, G., Wehner, T., and Thornton, A. 2006. An old enemy re-emerges.<br />
American Vegetable Grower. February.<br />
Lange, L., U. Eden, and L. W. Olson. 1987. Internal mycelium of<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis, the causal agent of cucurbit downy mildew.<br />
Nordic J. Bot. 8(5):505–510.<br />
Lebeda, A. and Widrlechner. 2003. A set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae taxa for the<br />
differentiation of Pseudoperonospora cubensis pathotypes. J. Plant Dis. & Prot.<br />
110(4):337–349.<br />
Main, C. E., T. Keever, G. J. Holmes, and J. M. Davis. 2001. Forecasting long-range<br />
transport of downy mildew spores and plant disease epidemics. APSnet Feature<br />
Story. Apr 25 through May 31, 2001.<br />
.<br />
Nusbaum, C. J. 1944. <strong>The</strong> seasonal spread and development of cucurbit downy<br />
mildew in the Atlantic coastal states. Plant Dis. Rep. 28:82–85.<br />
410 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture. 2006. Food and Rural Affairs. Ontario Agriculture<br />
and Food Statistics, Ontario Processing Vegetable Growers and Statistics<br />
Canada: Fruit and Vegetable Survey. Online.<br />
Palti, J. 1974. <strong>The</strong> significance of pronounced divergences in the distribution of<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis on its crop hosts. Phytoparasitica. 2:109–115.<br />
Palti, J. and Y. Cohen. 1980. Downy mildew of cucurbits (Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis): the fungus and its hosts, distribution, epidemiology and control.<br />
Phytoparasitica. 8(2):109–147.<br />
Pierce, L. K. and T. C. Wehner. 1990. Review of genes and linkage groups in<br />
cucumber. HortSci. 25:605–615.<br />
Quick Stats. 2006. National Agriculture Statistics Service-United <strong>State</strong>s Department<br />
of Agriculture. On-line.<br />
Thomas, C. E., T. Inaba, and Y. Cohen. 1987. Physiological specialization in<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Phytopathology. 77:1621–1624.<br />
Thomas, C. E. 1996. Downy mildew, p. 25–27 In: T. A. Zitter, D. L. Hopkins, and<br />
C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press, St. Paul,<br />
MN.<br />
Van Vliet, G. J. A. and W. D. Meysing. 1977. Relation in the inheritance of<br />
resistance to Pseudoperonospora cubensis Rost. and Sphaerotheca fuliginea<br />
Poll. in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica. 26, 793–796.<br />
Waterhouse, G. M. and M. P. Brothers. 1981. <strong>The</strong> taxonomy of Pseudoperonospora.<br />
Mycolog. Papers. 148:1–28.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 411
WATERMELON RESISTANCE TO POWDERY<br />
MILDEW RACE 1 AND<br />
RACE 2<br />
Angela R. Davis<br />
USDA, ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Lab, Lane, OK<br />
74555<br />
Antonia Tetteh and Todd Wehner<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />
Amnon Levi<br />
USDA, ARS, U. S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC 29414<br />
Michel Pitrat<br />
INRA - Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Montfavet,<br />
France<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Podosphaera xanthii,<br />
Sphaerotheca fuliginea, resistance<br />
ABSTRACT. Powdery mildew is an emerging disease of watermelon in the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s. To date, Race 1 and Race 2 of Podosphaera xanthii have been<br />
detected on watermelon. In this study, the entire available U.S. Plant<br />
Introduction collection of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. &<br />
Nakai) was evaluated for resistance to P. xanthii Race 1 and Race 2 in six to<br />
nine replications of one plant per accession in greenhouse studies. Eight of the<br />
1,573 accessions were resistant to Race 1, and five accessions were resistant to<br />
Race 2. <strong>The</strong> majority of the resistant lines for Race 1 came from plants collected<br />
from Zimbabwe, while those resistant to Race 2 came from Iran, Egypt, and<br />
Zambia, along with one of unknown origin.<br />
I<br />
n the past six years, powdery mildew has been noted as a disease<br />
of watermelon in the United <strong>State</strong>s (McGrath, 2001b; Davis et al.,<br />
2001). Previously, powdery mildew affected other cucurbit crops,<br />
but was not a significant problem on watermelon (Robinson and<br />
Provvidenti, 1975). In recent years, research on watermelon powdery<br />
mildew has increased as crop damage from this disease has increased<br />
in South <strong>Carolina</strong>, Georgia, Florida, Oklahoma, Texas, Maryland, New<br />
York, Arizona, and California (McGrath, 2001b; Davis et al., 2001).<br />
This disease decreases plant canopy and can reduce yields through<br />
decreased fruit size and number of fruit per plant (McGrath and<br />
Thomas, 1996). <strong>The</strong> reduced canopy may also result in sunscald of the<br />
remaining fruit, making it unmarketable. Detection of powdery mildew<br />
can be difficult because the presence of the pathogen is less apparent<br />
on watermelon than on pumpkin and squash.<br />
412 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Two genera, Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea<br />
auct. p.p.) and Golovinomyces cichoracearum (formerly Erysiphe<br />
cichoracearum DC), are considered the predominant fungi that incite<br />
powdery mildew in cucurbits. <strong>The</strong>se two organisms differ in virulence<br />
against cucurbit species and in their sensitivity to fungicides (Bertrand,<br />
1991; Epinat et al., 1993; McGrath, 2001a and 2001b). P. xanthii has<br />
frequently been reported based on differential reactions of 10 melon<br />
(Cucumis melo) genotypes (Pitrat et al., 1998; McCreight et al., 1987),<br />
but 28 races have been described on a larger set of 32 melon genotypes<br />
(McCreight, 2006).<br />
Powdery mildew has been controlled on pumpkin by using<br />
resistant cultivars and fungicide applications (Keinath, 2001).<br />
Unfortunately, resistance of P. xanthii to certain fungicides has been<br />
detected, and application of fungicides to the undersides of leaves is<br />
difficult and often requires the use of systemic materials to achieve<br />
adequate control of the disease (McGrath and Thomas, 1996). We<br />
reported resistance in watermelon to Race 1 P. xanthii after screening<br />
100 Plant Introduction (PI) accessions in field studies (Davis et al.,<br />
2001). <strong>The</strong>se experiments led to the release of a watermelon breeding<br />
line (PI 525088-PMR) that has resistance to Race 1 P. xanthii (Davis<br />
et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> inheritance of resistance in that line to Race 1 was<br />
multigenic (Davis et al., 2002), and was independent from resistance<br />
to P. xanthii Race 2. In the current study, we evaluated the available<br />
U.S. PI accessions of Citrullus sp. from the USDA, ARS, Southern<br />
Regional Plant Introduction Station, Griffin, GA, for Race 1 and Race<br />
2 P. xanthii resistance.<br />
We would like to thank Amy Helms, Anthony Dillard, and Tammy Ellington for<br />
technical assistance. Some melon differentials were kindly supplied by Dr. Claude<br />
Thomas. This work was partially supported by the <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Crop Germplasm<br />
Committee and the National Germplasm System, USDA, ARS. Mention of trade<br />
names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing<br />
specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S.<br />
Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of the U.S. Department of<br />
Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color,<br />
national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was<br />
prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection<br />
under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works. Accordingly, there is no<br />
copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in which the article<br />
appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S. Government,<br />
which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 413
Materials and Methods<br />
RACE 1. One seed of each of the available PI accessions was<br />
planted in Speedling flats containing Redi-earth growth medium<br />
(SunGro, Vancouver, BC, Canada) in six <strong>complete</strong>ly randomized<br />
greenhouse experiments. Seedlings were inoculated with the Lane,<br />
OK, isolate of P. xanthii maintained on greenhouse-grown<br />
watermelon. Inoculation was carried out by brushing an infected leaf<br />
onto each seedling at the two-leaf stage of growth. Ratings were taken<br />
when 50% of the leaf surface areas of susceptible differentials<br />
demonstrated symptoms. Three ratings were made of each plant (stem,<br />
upper side of the leaves, and cotyledons) using the Horsfall and Barratt<br />
(1945) method. <strong>The</strong> plants were then classified as resistant,<br />
intermediate, or susceptible according to the mean of three ratings:<br />
≤6% = resistant; >6% and ≤12% = intermediate; and >12% =<br />
susceptible. Some plants were missing cotyledons at rating and thus<br />
the mean rating of leaves and stems were used. <strong>The</strong> following melon<br />
differentials were included in all experiments to determine the race of<br />
P. xanthii present: ‘Delicious 51’, ‘Edisto 47’, ‘Iran H’, ‘MR-1’,<br />
‘Nantais Oblong’, PI 124112, PI 414723, ‘PMR 45’, ‘PMR 5’, ‘PMR<br />
6’, ‘WMR 29’, and ‘TopMark’. Race 1 was the only powdery mildew<br />
found in these experiments.<br />
RACE 2. Seeds were planted in 100-mm diameter pots containing<br />
4P Fafard mix growing medium (Fafard, Agawam, MA) in a<br />
randomized <strong>complete</strong> block design in nine greenhouse experiments. At<br />
the first-true-leaf stage, seedlings were inoculated with P. xanthii Race<br />
2 isolate that had been maintained on melon (Cucumis melo) ‘PMR<br />
45’ and Gray Zucchini (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo) in the greenhouses in<br />
Charleston, SC. Inoculation was done with a spore suspension<br />
prepared by washing six mildewed leaves with a spray of distilled<br />
water and making the volume up to 1L. Each seedling was sprayed<br />
with a 2-ml spore suspension once each week for six weeks. Plants<br />
were maintained at 24 to 32 o C, with a relative humidity of 60 to 80%.<br />
Spreader plants were placed between rows as an additional source of<br />
powdery mildew infection (Sivapalan, 1993; Ziv and Zitter, 1992).<br />
Disease ratings were collected two weeks after the first and two weeks<br />
after the last inoculation on the leaves and stem separately using a<br />
rating scale of 0 (no disease) to 9 (plant was fully covered with mildew<br />
and had turned yellow). <strong>The</strong> plants were then classified as resistant,<br />
intermediate, or susceptible according to the mean of three ratings:<br />
5.5 susceptible. ‘PMR 45’,<br />
which is susceptible to Race 2, was included to increase the inoculum<br />
of Race 2 for use in the studies. <strong>The</strong> melon differentials mentioned<br />
414 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
above were included in all experiments to determine which race of P.<br />
xanthii was present. Race 2 was the only powdery mildew found in<br />
these experiments.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
RACE 1 RESISTANCE. In each of the six randomized experiments,<br />
we saw a range of symptoms from none detectable to 97% coverage<br />
with sporulation in all replications. <strong>The</strong> majority of the PI lines (92%)<br />
had mean detectable infection covering 12 to 50% of the plant surface<br />
(data not shown). <strong>The</strong> 50 most Race 1-resistant PI lines are listed in<br />
Table 1. <strong>The</strong>y were given a numerical ranking, with 1 being the most<br />
resistant. Only 8 PI lines were ranked as resistant, with an average<br />
percent sporulation of 6% or less. In our judgment, all 50 of these lines<br />
had commercially significant resistance to the disease. <strong>The</strong> average<br />
sporulation for PI 189318, which was ranked as number 50, was less<br />
than 12% coverage.<br />
Table 1. Ranking of the 50 watermelon PI lines most resistant to<br />
Race 1 P. xanthii.<br />
PI<br />
PI<br />
Rank<br />
line Resistance Rank line Resistance<br />
1 Grif5601 R 27 P179881 I<br />
2 PI482255 R 28 P179885 I<br />
3 PI388770 R 29 P184800 I<br />
4 PI482362 R 30 PI71749 I<br />
5 PI381750 R 31 PI296334 I<br />
6 PI459074 R 32 PI381731 I<br />
7 PI386015 R 33 PI386025 I<br />
8 PI482248 R 34 PI482251 I<br />
9 PI381742 I 35 PI482278 I<br />
10 PI532738 I 36 PI482295 I<br />
11 PI500331 I 37 PI482302 I<br />
12 PI508443 I 38 PI482355 I<br />
13 PI 60008 I 39 PI500332 I<br />
14 PI525082 I 40 PI512343 I<br />
15 PI482264 I 41 PI525088 I<br />
16 PI482258 I 42 PI482312 I<br />
17 PI217938 I 43 PI482259 I<br />
18 PI250145 I 44 PI482308 I<br />
19 PI482333 I 45 PI482380 I<br />
20 PI526233 I 46 PI500334 I<br />
21 PI482313 I 47 PI270545 I<br />
22 PI482328 I 48 PI482268 I<br />
23 P 500323 I 49 Grif5602 1<br />
24 PI505585 I 50 P189318 I<br />
25 P169241 I<br />
26 P179239 I<br />
R = resistant; I = intermediate resistance.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 415
Many of the PI lines were heterogeneous for resistance, which<br />
reduced their ranking; individuals in one accession ranged from 6% to<br />
94% sporulation coverage. We kept the most-resistant plants from each<br />
replicate for self-pollination and retesting. Out of 1,573 PI lines tested,<br />
only 13 had no data due to lack of germination or early death of<br />
seedlings. <strong>The</strong> most Race 1-susceptible PI lines are listed in Table 2,<br />
with 1 being the highest severity of infectivity. All PI lines in Table 2<br />
were rated as susceptible.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was an unexpectedly high percentage of Praecitrullus<br />
fistulosus (12%) and Citrullus colocynthis (8%) in the 50 accessions<br />
most resistant to Race 1; these two species comprise
soaking of the stem and petioles. Of all the USDA accessions, fewer<br />
than 1% were found to be resistant. No data were obtained for<br />
theremaining percentage. Out of 1,573 PI lines tested, only 11 had no<br />
data due to poor germination or early death of seedlings.<br />
RACE 2 RESISTANCE. A range of symptoms on the watermelon<br />
accessions was observed in each of the nine replications. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
symptoms varied from no detectable powdery mildew to <strong>complete</strong><br />
(100%) mildew coverage; few chlorotic spots to <strong>complete</strong> yellowing<br />
of entire leaves; little necrosis with some curling of leaf margins to<br />
necrosis of the entire plant; and no water soaking to extensive water<br />
soaking of the stem and petioles. Of all the USDA accessions, less<br />
than 1% were found to be resistant. No data were obtained for the<br />
remaining percentage. Out of 1,573 PI lines tested, only 11 had no data<br />
due to poor germination or early death of seedlings.<br />
Table 3. Ranking of the 50 watermelon PI lines most resistant to<br />
Race 2 P. xanthii.<br />
PI<br />
PI<br />
Rank line Resistance Rank line Resistance<br />
1 PI386015 R 27 PI482307 I<br />
2 PI632755 R 28 PI388770 I<br />
3 PI525082 R 29 PI482326 I<br />
4 PI307608 R 30 PI386019 I<br />
5 PI500354 R 31 Grif14202 I<br />
6 PI346082 R 32 PI482246 I<br />
7 PI560010 R 33 PI500331 I<br />
8 PI482286 R 34 PI269365 I<br />
9 PI494531 I 35 PI482278 I<br />
10 PI482333 I 36 PI186489 I<br />
11 PI386021 I 37 PI595203 I<br />
12 PI500334 I 38 PI381752 I<br />
13 PI386024 I 39 PI512828 I<br />
14 PI482361 I 40 PI386026 I<br />
15 PI500329 I 41 PI532722 I<br />
16 PI386016 I 42 PI482324 I<br />
17 PI482302 I 43 PI482308 I<br />
18 PI326516 I 44 PI560003 I<br />
19 PI560020 I 45 PI482288 I<br />
20 PI500332 I 46 PI482301 I<br />
21 PI500303 I 47 PI482299 I<br />
22 PI540911 I 48 PI381720 I<br />
23 PI500312 I 49 PI482338 I<br />
24 PI251244 I 50 PI381750 I<br />
25 PI482319 I<br />
26 PI482355 I<br />
R = resistant; I = intermediate resistance.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 417
Table 4. Ranking of the 50 watermelon PI lines most susceptible to<br />
Race 2 P. xanthii.<br />
Rank PI line Rank PI line Rank PI line Rank PI line<br />
1 PI357751 14 PI370427 27 PI370434 40 PI368526<br />
2 PI369220 15 PI169297 28 PI508442 41 PI211582<br />
3 PI357745 16 PI175652 29 PI278058 42 PI368506<br />
4 PI368519 17 PI271132 30 PI357752 43 PI277980<br />
5 PI512355 18 PI169284 31 PI370428 44 PI368521<br />
6 PI357737 19 PI537277 32 PI512360 45 PI178873<br />
7 PI536449 20 PI176907 33 PI271308 46 PI278003<br />
8 PI172792 21 PI278038 34 PI379235 47 PI379239<br />
9 PI176917 22 PI278049 35 PI379229 48 PI538888<br />
10 PI593373 23 PI174105 36 PI271987 49 PI593363<br />
11 PI357686 24 PI269677 37 PI271771 50 PI278034<br />
12 PI512361 25 PI176923 38 PI600903<br />
13 PI490380 26 PI357666 39 PI368496<br />
Table 5. Ranking of 25 cultivars for Race 2 P. xanthii resistance.<br />
Rank Cultivar Rank Cultivar<br />
1 Tastigold 14 Giza<br />
2 Blacklee 15 Rhode Island<br />
3 Florida Favorite 16 Sugarlee<br />
4 Chubby Gray 17 Black Boy<br />
5 Black Diamond Yellow Belly 18 Golden<br />
6 Graybelle 19 Tendersweet<br />
7 Tendergold 20 Picnic<br />
8 Black Diamond Yellow Fish 21 Charleston Gray<br />
9 Big Crimson 22 Sugarloaf<br />
10 Crimson Sweet 23 Hopi Red Flesh<br />
11 Perola 24 Early Arizona<br />
12 Desert King 25 Moon & Stars<br />
13 <strong>Carolina</strong> Cross 18<br />
Table 3 shows the 50 most-resistant PI lines in rank order. PI<br />
482299 had an average rating of 3.3. As expected, many of the<br />
watermelon accessions were heterogeneous for expression of<br />
resistance, with a mean rating from 2 to 7 within a PI accession over<br />
the replications. <strong>The</strong> most-resistant accessions and most- susceptible<br />
accessions were identified for retesting and self-pollination. Many of<br />
the resistant PI accessions came from Zimbabwe as in the Race-1 test,<br />
and there were many from Zambia, Iran, and India. PI 269677,<br />
reported susceptible in 1975 (Robinson and Provvidenti, 1975), was<br />
susceptible to P. xanthii Race 2 in our test. Eleven of the PI accessions<br />
demonstrated resistance or intermediate resistance to both Race 1 and<br />
Race 2 P. xanthii. Table 4 lists the 50 PI lines most susceptible to<br />
418 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Race 2 P. xanthii; all had a rating of susceptible. Table 5 shows the<br />
ranking of 25 cultivars used as checks for the PI screening study. All<br />
watermelon cultivars were susceptible, with ‘Tastigold’ showing less<br />
susceptibility than the other cultivars to Race 2.<br />
<strong>The</strong> experiments reported here evaluated watermelon germplasm<br />
for resistance to P. xanthii Races 1 and 2 in greenhouse experiments.<br />
<strong>The</strong> 50 most resistant and most susceptible will be retested to verify<br />
our results.<br />
Since we were using cantaloupe differentials to determine the race<br />
present in these studies and we do not currently have differentials of<br />
Citrullus sp., we can state only that the races detected show the same<br />
infectivity on the differentials as Race 1 and Race 2 P. xanthii of<br />
Cucumis melo. We are currently developing watermelon lines with<br />
homogeneous expression for infectivity to these two isolates of P.<br />
xanthii; once produced, we will likely find that the P. xanthii strain<br />
that affects watermelon will differ from that which infects cantaloupe.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bertrand, F. 1991. Les Oidiums des <strong>Cucurbit</strong>acees: maintien en culture pure, étude<br />
de leur variabilité et de la sensibilité chez le melon. PhD Diss., Université of<br />
Paris XI, Orsay, France.<br />
Davis, A. R., B. D. Bruton, S. D. Pair, and C. E. Thomas. 2001. Powdery mildew: an<br />
emerging disease of watermelon in the United <strong>State</strong>s. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt.<br />
24:42–48.<br />
Davis, A. R., C. E. Thomas, A. Levi, B. D. Bruton, and S. D. Pair. 2002.<br />
Watermelon resistance to powdery mildew race 1, p. 192–198. In: D. N.<br />
Maynard (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’02. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Davis, A. R., T. Wehner, A. Levi, and M. Pitrat. 2005. Notice of release of PI<br />
525088-PMR: a watermelon line useful for introducing race 1 powdery mildew<br />
resistance into watermelon lines. USDA-ARS Germplasm Release.<br />
Epinat, C., M. Pitrat, and F. Bertrand. 1993. Genetic analysis of resistance of five<br />
melon lines to powdery mildews. Euphytica. 65:135–144.<br />
Horsfall, J. G. and R. W. Barratt. 1945. An improved grading system for measuring<br />
plant disease. Phytopathology. 35:655(Abstr.).<br />
Keinath, A. P. 2001. Powdery mildew-resistant cultivars. SC Pumpkin News. 5:1.<br />
McCreight, J. D., M. Pitrat, C. E. Thomas, A. N. Kishaba, and G. W. Bohn. 1987.<br />
Powdery mildew resistance genes in muskmelon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
112:156–160.<br />
McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />
melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
131:59–65.<br />
McGrath, M. 2001a. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences<br />
and challenges. Plant Dis. 85:236–245.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2001b. Distribution of cucurbit powdery mildew races 1 and 2 on<br />
watermelon and muskmelon. Phytopath. 91:S197(Abstr.).<br />
McGrath, M. T. and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Powdery mildew, p. 28–30. In: T. A.<br />
Zitter, D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 419
diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
Pitrat, M., C. Dogimont, and M. Bardin. 1998. Resistance to fungal diseases of<br />
foliage in melon, p. 167–173. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae’98.<br />
ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Robinson, R. W. and R. Provvidenti. 1975. Susceptibility to powdery mildew in<br />
Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100:328–<br />
330.<br />
Sivapalan, A. 1993. Effect of water on germination of powdery mildew conidia.<br />
Mycol. Res. 97:71–76.<br />
Ziv, O. and T. A. Zitter. 1992. Effects of bicarbonates and film-forming polymers on<br />
cucurbit foliar diseases. Plant Dis. 76:513–517.<br />
420 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUNGICIDE<br />
MANDIPROPAMID IN THE UNITED<br />
STATES FOR CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW<br />
OF CUCURBITS<br />
Tyler L. Harp, Donald R. Tory, and Paul J. Kuhn<br />
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Vero Beach, FL<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Oomycete, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, cucumber,<br />
cantaloupe, disease control, nonionic surfactant, NIS<br />
ABSTRACT. Mandipropamid 250 SC is a new fungicide developed by Syngenta<br />
for control of foliar oomycete pathogens, including cucurbit downy mildew. On<br />
cucurbits, mandipropamid provides outstanding preventive control of downy<br />
mildew when applied at rates of 100 to 150GA/ha on a 7- to 10-day application<br />
interval. <strong>The</strong> use of a nonionic surfactant at a rate of 0.125% v:v in mixture<br />
with mandipropamid significantly improves efficacy against cucurbit downy<br />
mildew, and should be included for optimal performance. <strong>The</strong> results presented<br />
here, along with fungicide-resistance management practices, formed the basis<br />
for use recommendations described in labeling for mandipropamid.<br />
D<br />
owny mildew caused by the oomycete fungus<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk. & M.A. Curtis)<br />
Rostovzev is an important foliar disease of cucurbits, and the<br />
last two to three seasons have witnessed serious epidemics in Florida<br />
and other cucurbit-producing states on the east coast of the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s. In 2004, grower losses to the disease were estimated to be ca.<br />
40% in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, Virginia, Delaware, and Maryland (Gerald<br />
Holmes, personal communication).<br />
Integrated pest management of the disease is based in part on hostplant<br />
resistance and on cultural practices such as spacing plants widely<br />
enough to reduce canopy density and avoiding overhead irrigation.<br />
However, effective control relies on the use of fungicide programs that<br />
include both conventional protectant and systemic products.<br />
At the most recent British Crop Protection Council International<br />
Congress in Glasgow, Scotland, Huggenberger, Lamberth, Iwanzik,<br />
and Knauf-Beiter (2005) introduced mandipropamid (Figure 1), a new<br />
fungicide from Syngenta that is highly effective in the control of<br />
We would like to thank colleagues working with Syngenta in Greensboro, NC (Jim<br />
Frank, Allison Tally, and David Laird) and Basel, Switzerland (Fritz Huggenberger)<br />
for reviewing the manuscript and for their helpful advice during the studies described<br />
here.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 421
oomycete diseases such as downy mildews. A submission to the EPA<br />
was made in March 2006, with registration anticipated in time for<br />
launch early in 2008. Mandipropamid will be available as a solo<br />
product and also in premixes with a range of partner fungicides. This<br />
paper describes biological studies conducted in the US to develop use<br />
recommendations for mandipropamid on downy mildew of cucurbits.<br />
Cl<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
N<br />
Fig. 1. Chemical structure of mandipropamid<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANTS. All of the biological evaluations reported here were<br />
conducted in field trials at Vero Beach Research Center, Vero Beach,<br />
Florida, using either cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Straight Eight)<br />
or cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L. cv. Athena), and naturally occurring<br />
epidemics of downy mildew. Trials were laid out in a randomized<br />
block design with four replicates per treatment. Cucumbers were<br />
direct-seeded on bare ground, while cantaloupes were transplanted into<br />
plastic mulch with drip irrigation. Plots consisted of double rows,<br />
typically 6–9m in length. Local agronomic practices were employed<br />
for weed control, insect control, and fertility.<br />
FUNGICIDES. Mandipropamid (NOA446510) was a 250g/L<br />
(2.08lb/gal) suspension concentrate (SC), which will be the<br />
commercial solo formulation. Commercial standards and surfactants<br />
were obtained through Syngenta or purchased locally. Applications, at<br />
a spray volume of 375L/ha and a pressure of 345kPa, were made from<br />
a boom mounted on the front end of a spray ram. Unless stated<br />
otherwise, applications were initiated at the onset of visible disease<br />
symptoms in the foliage.<br />
DISEASE ASSESSMENT. Levels of disease were evaluated as %<br />
severity of the leaf area infected. For determination of statistical<br />
significance, data were analyzed by analysis of variance (p = 0.05).<br />
For comparison of disease development over time, disease levels were<br />
expressed as Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) values.<br />
422 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
O<br />
O
Results and Discussion<br />
EFFICACY. In numerous field trials in the US and elsewhere,<br />
mandipropamid at rates of 100–150GA/ha has provided excellent<br />
control of downy mildew on cucurbits (Figure 2).<br />
Mandipropamid Untreated<br />
Fig. 2. Control of downy mildew on cucumber (‘Straight Eight’) from<br />
mandipropamid (150GA/ha) + 0.125% (v:v) NIS (Activator 90).<br />
In the trial illustrated in Figure 3, the first application was made<br />
when disease symptoms were first observed in older leaves. By 20<br />
days after the final application, disease severity in untreated checks<br />
was 46%. By contrast, in plots receiving a program of mandipropamid<br />
(150GA/ha) alternated with Bravo ® Weather Stik ® (1262GA/ha),<br />
severity was less than 5%, indicating greater than 90% disease control.<br />
A range of commercial standards each alternated with Bravo ® Weather<br />
Stik ® and representing diverse modes of action, also provided good<br />
control of downy mildew, statistically equivalent to mandipropamid,<br />
though numerically slightly inferior.<br />
EFFECT OF RATE AND APPLICATION INTERVAL ON EFFICACY. In<br />
order to evaluate the effect of rate and application interval on efficacy,<br />
a trial was undertaken on cucumber in which sprays of mandipropamid<br />
were applied at intervals of 7, 10, or 14 days with three rates of<br />
mandipropamid (100, 125, and 150GA/ha) tested for each (Figure 4).<br />
Disease control was observed in all treatment régimes, and for each<br />
application interval a dose-response effect was observed, with<br />
progressively improved control with increasing rate of product. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 423
was also a clear trend toward better efficacy with shorter application<br />
intervals. In practice, the application interval and rates used will<br />
depend on a number of factors, including susceptibility of the cultivar,<br />
level of disease at first application, and environmental conditions<br />
during growth of the crop.<br />
Disease Severity (%)<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
check check<br />
a<br />
mandipropamid mandipropamid (150 (150 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />
b<br />
Cabrio Cabrio (150 (150 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />
b<br />
Ranman Ranman (80GA/Ha) (80GA/Ha)<br />
b<br />
b<br />
Tanos Tanos (280 (280 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />
b<br />
Gavel Gavel (1261 (1261 GA/Ha) GA/Ha)<br />
Fig. 3. Protectant disease control from mandipropamid in comparison with<br />
commercial standards. For each fungicide program, there were a total of three<br />
applications on a 7–10-day interval. <strong>The</strong> second application in each case was<br />
Bravo Weather Stik (1262GA/ha). <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted on cucumber var.<br />
‘Straight Eight’, and the data shown are for evaluations taken at 20 days after<br />
the last application. Mandipropamid and Ranman were mixed with 0.125%<br />
Activator 90 or 0.06% (v:v) Silwet L77, respectively.<br />
EFFECT OF NONIONIC SURFACTANT ON EFFICACY. <strong>The</strong> effect on<br />
disease control from the addition of a nonionic surfactant (NIS) to<br />
spray solutions was evaluated in trials on cucumber (data not shown)<br />
and cantaloupe (Figure 5). In this case, the first spray was made when<br />
disease severity was ca. 15%, therefore representing a curative<br />
application. Mandipropamid (150GA/ha) was applied solo or with<br />
424 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
NIS (Activator 90) to final concentrations of 0.06, 0.125, or 0.25%<br />
(v:v), and disease progress monitored periodically over the following<br />
five weeks.<br />
Mandipropamid alone had good effect, with ca. 70% control at the<br />
final rating, by which time severity in the untreated check was<br />
approaching 100%. However, efficacy was significantly (p = 0.05)<br />
better in treatments containing NIS at all rates, but especially at 0.125<br />
and 0.25% (Figure 5). Careful observation of the disease progress<br />
revealed the development of lesions on initially asymptomatic leaves<br />
that expanded after the first application timing in the untreated checks<br />
and, to a lesser extent, in plants treated with mandipropamid alone.<br />
AUDPC<br />
2000<br />
1800<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Untreated 7 10 14<br />
Application Interval (days)<br />
Untreated<br />
100 GA/Ha<br />
125 GA/Ha<br />
150 GA/Ha<br />
Fig. 4. Effect of application interval on protectant disease control from<br />
mandipropamid. Values for Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) are<br />
based on five assessments of disease severity. At the time of the last evaluation,<br />
disease severity in the untreated check was ca. 71%. All mandipropamid<br />
applications included NIS at 0.125% (v:v). <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted on<br />
cucumber var. ‘Straight Eight’.<br />
By contrast, lesions did not develop in the corresponding leaves of<br />
plants treated with mandipropamid + NIS. Consequently, in the latter<br />
treatments, overall disease severities either remained similar to those<br />
present at the time of the first application, or even decreased slightly<br />
due to the contribution of newly developing, healthy foliage (Figure 5).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 425
<strong>The</strong>se observations suggest that the inclusion of NIS in the spray<br />
mixture may boost the preventive activity of the fungicide on the<br />
younger leaves where no subsequent symptoms were observed, or<br />
possibly enhance any curative effect that mandipropamid exhibits, so<br />
reducing inoculum production on and spread from older infected<br />
leaves. Regardless of the basis for the beneficial effect, the addition of<br />
an adjuvant certainly optimizes the level of downy mildew control<br />
provided by mandipropamid. Consequently, inclusion of an adjuvant<br />
is strongly recommended especially in circumstances where the first<br />
application is made after disease onset and where conditions are<br />
conducive to the development of an epidemic.<br />
Disease severity (%)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Nov 11<br />
Nov 18<br />
Nov 24<br />
Dec 2<br />
Dec 9<br />
Assessment Dates (2004)<br />
Check<br />
Mandipropamid<br />
+NIS (0.06%)<br />
+NIS (0.125%)<br />
+NIS (0.25%)<br />
Fig. 5. Effect of NIS (Activator 90) on protectant disease control from<br />
mandipropamid. Mandipropamid (150GA/ha) was applied alone or with NIS at<br />
0.06, 0.125, or 0.25% (v:v). <strong>The</strong> trial was conducted on cantaloupe var.<br />
‘Athena’, with the applications made on Nov 10, Nov 14, Nov 19, and Nov 26,<br />
2004.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Huggenberger, F., C. Lamberth, W. Iwanzik, and G. Knauf-Beiter. 2005.<br />
Mandipropamid a new fungicide against oomycete pathogens. Proc. BCPC<br />
Congress Crop Sci. & Tech. 1:93–98.<br />
426 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
Dec 16
INTEGRATING CULTURAL AND CHEMICAL<br />
STRATEGIES TO CONTROL<br />
PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI AND LIMIT ITS<br />
SPREAD<br />
M. K. Hausbeck, A. J. Gevens, and B. Cortright<br />
Department of Plant Pathology,<br />
Michigan <strong>State</strong> University, E. Lansing, MI 48824<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Fruit rot, irrigation baiting, fungicide efficacy, soil<br />
fumigation<br />
ABSTRACT. Phytophthora root, crown, and fruit rot caused by the oomycete<br />
Phytophthora capsici Leonian causes significant disease on cucurbits and other<br />
vegetables nationwide. We investigated the efficacy of fungicide and fumigant<br />
programs, the use of surface water for irrigation, and susceptibility of snap<br />
beans to P. capsici. All fungicides tested in three efficacy trials provided<br />
significant disease control when compared to the untreated. In one trial,<br />
fungicides were evaluated with different sprayer types, and air-assisted<br />
applications provided better fruit protection than conventional sprays. All but<br />
one of the seven fumigant regimes compared provided significant control. <strong>The</strong><br />
consistent detection of P. capsici in surface water used for irrigation suggests<br />
that this is an important means of pathogen dissemination. With the recent<br />
identification of P. capsici on beans, rotating P. capsici-susceptible crops with<br />
beans is no longer recommended. Results of this study can be used to develop<br />
an overall management scheme for limiting P. capsici on susceptible crops in<br />
Michigan.<br />
M<br />
ichigan has over 22,900 hectares of cucurbits that are<br />
susceptible to root, crown, and fruit rot caused by the<br />
soilborne pathogen Phytophthora capsici. P. capsici has<br />
two mating types that allow for the production of long-term survival<br />
spores (oospores) and genetic recombination that can result in<br />
fungicide resistance. Oospores can survive in soil for up to 10 years<br />
without a susceptible crop, and both mating types have been found in<br />
every sampled field in Michigan (Lamour and Hausbeck, 2000; 2001).<br />
P. capsici is favored by rain and warm temperatures, which occur<br />
during the Michigan growing season. <strong>The</strong> pathogen has recently been<br />
detected in Michigan irrigation ponds and other surface water sources<br />
(Gevens and Hausbeck, 2004; Hausbeck and Lamour, 2004).<br />
Movement of other Phytophthora spp. via irrigation water has been<br />
documented and aboveground water sources may play a role in the<br />
long-distance movement of P. capsici (Jung and Blaschke, 2004;<br />
Ouedmans, 1999; Yamak, et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> most effective control<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 427
measure that growers have available is to avoid planting in infested<br />
soil. Crop rotation is difficult as infested acreage and urban pressure is<br />
increasing across vegetable-production areas. Raised plant beds can<br />
be helpful as they reduce saturated soil conditions (Hausbeck and<br />
Lamour, 2004). At one time, the systemic fungicide, mefenoxam<br />
(Ridomil, Ultra Flourish) was widely effective. However, repeated use<br />
of this fungicide and genetic adaptation of P. capsici has resulted in<br />
resistant pathogen populations in many Michigan fields (Lamour and<br />
Hausbeck, 2000). Once resistance occurs, the use of mefenoxam does<br />
not offer the needed control and alternative fungicides should be used.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fungicides Acrobat (dimethomorph), Gavel (mancozeb +<br />
zoxamide), and Tanos 50DF (famoxadone + cymoxanil) provide<br />
growers with alternatives to mefenoxam (Hausbeck and Lamour,<br />
2004).<br />
A combined approach of all available cultural and chemical control<br />
techniques is necessary to manage this pathogen and limit its spread.<br />
<strong>The</strong> objectives of this research were to evaluate the role of cultural<br />
practices, such as irrigating cucurbits with surface water and rotating<br />
cucurbits with snap bean, and the efficacy of fungicides and fumigants<br />
in managing disease caused by P. capsici.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
FUNGICIDE STUDIES. Two trials were conducted on a farm with<br />
sandy loam soil using registered and unregistered fungicides (Table 1).<br />
<strong>The</strong> farm has a history of P. capsici, and in the year prior, had been<br />
planted to cucumber. Plots were 183m long with nine rows per plot,<br />
76cm between rows and 7.6cm between plants. Treatments were<br />
replicated in a random order. Fungicide treatments were applied with<br />
a conventional boom sprayer with XR8003 nozzles spaced 51cm apart,<br />
operating at 415kPa and delivering 281l/ha. Sprays were applied<br />
when the oldest fruits on the vine were 2.5, 7.6, and 12.7cm in size. In<br />
Trial 2, a fourth spray was made three days after the third application.<br />
<strong>The</strong> number of infected fruit that came across the transfer belt of the<br />
harvester was recorded for a pass of three rows by 183m (418m 2 ).<br />
Fruit were collected from each treatment strip and stored for five days<br />
under ambient conditions prior to disease evaluation.<br />
A third trial was conducted on sandy loam soil with a history of P.<br />
capsici. <strong>The</strong> plot was 274m long with 9 rows per plot, 76cm between<br />
rows and 7.6cm between plants. Fungicide treatments were applied<br />
with a conventional boom sprayer or an air-assisted sprayer. <strong>The</strong><br />
conventional sprayer had XR8003 nozzles spaced 51cm apart,<br />
operated at 415kPa and delivered 281l/ha. <strong>The</strong> air-assisted sprayer<br />
428 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Products used in fungicide trials.<br />
Product Active ingredient Company Crops on label<br />
Acrobat 50WP dimethomorph BASF cucurbits<br />
Forum 500SC dimethomorph BASF cucurbits<br />
Gavel 75DF mancozeb + Dow cucumber, melon,<br />
zoxamide<br />
summer squash<br />
Kocide 2000 54DF copper hydroxide DuPont cucurbits<br />
Maestro 80DF captan Arysta no<br />
ManKocide 61DF mancozeb + copper DuPont cucumber, melon,<br />
hydroxide<br />
summer squash<br />
Manzate 75DF mancozeb DuPont cucumber, melon,<br />
summer squash<br />
Ridomil Gold MZ mefenoxam + Syngenta cucumber, melon,<br />
mancozeb<br />
summer/winter squash<br />
Tanos 50DF famoxadone +<br />
cymoxanil<br />
DuPont cucurbits<br />
had 4 Proptec nozzles spaced 152cm apart and delivered 94l/ha.<br />
Sprays were applied when the oldest fruits on the vine were 2.5, 7.6,<br />
and 12.7cm in size. During harvest the number of infected fruit that<br />
came across the transfer belt of the mechanical harvester was recorded<br />
for a pass of 3 rows by 274m (626m 2 ). Three bulk bins of fruit were<br />
collected at harvest from each treatment strip and stored for four days<br />
under ambient conditions prior to disease evaluation.<br />
FUMIGANT STUDIES. Studies conducted on P. capsicisusceptible<br />
crops (tomato, eggplant, pepper, zucchini, winter<br />
squash, melon, and watermelon) compared the efficacy of<br />
registered fumigants for the control of P. capsici and evaluated<br />
their potential as replacement products for methyl bromide.<br />
Two trials were conducted in fields with severe P. capsici<br />
disease pressure. Treatments of methyl bromide/chloropicrin,<br />
chloropicrin alone (100%), and Telone C-35 TM (1,3dichloropropene/<br />
chloropicrin) were applied using standard<br />
gas-injection knives 25.4-30.5cm below the soil and then<br />
covered with plastic mulch. Applications of Vapam TM (metam<br />
sodium) and K-Pam TM (metam potassium) were made via drip<br />
tapes installed under the plastic mulch. In 2003, each product<br />
was applied alone. For 2004, K-Pam TM was tested alone and in<br />
combination with chloropicrin. Each crop was planted after the<br />
appropriate period of off-gassing had expired for each<br />
treatment. Plots were rated for the number of plants killed by<br />
P. capsici.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 429
SURFACE WATER STUDIES. Surface water sources in<br />
Michigan used for irrigating cucurbit crops were monitored for<br />
the presence of P. capsici during 2001 and the pathogen was<br />
recovered from irrigation ponds on two farms. Additional<br />
water sites including a creek, a river, naturally fed ponds,<br />
ponds fed by wells, a culvert, and two ditches were monitored<br />
for P. capsici during 2002 to 2005. <strong>The</strong> pathogen was baited<br />
from the irrigation sources using green pears and cucumber<br />
fruits. Studies are ongoing in 2006.<br />
ROTATIONAL BEAN STUDIES. From 2003 through 2005,<br />
several bean (snap and yellow wax) fields in Michigan were<br />
diagnosed with disease caused by P. capsici. In all situations,<br />
the beans were being used as a rotational crop to either pickling<br />
cucumber or zucchini. Infected bean plants exhibited watersoaked<br />
lesions, necrosis, and wilt. In some instances, pods<br />
were blighted. Diseased tissues were excised, surface<br />
sterilized, and plated onto antibiotic-amended V-8 agar.<br />
Isolates of P. capsici collected from beans were tested for<br />
pathogenicity on cucumber fruit and other bean types.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
FUNGICIDE STUDIES. In Trial 1, excessive rain (38.1cm total)<br />
occurred during the 12 days between the first and final fungicide<br />
sprays. <strong>The</strong> soil remained wet throughout the trial and disease<br />
developed uniformly across all untreated plots. All treatments<br />
significantly reduced the amount of infected pickling cucumber fruits<br />
at the time of harvest (Table 2). Significant differences were not<br />
observed among treatments when assessing postharvest fruit rot.<br />
In Trial 2, a driving rainstorm between the second and third<br />
fungicide applications provided 2.5cm of rain. All treatments<br />
significantly reduced the amount of infected fruits at the time of<br />
harvest (Table 3). All treatments of Maestro 80DF (both<br />
rates)+Kocide 2000 54DF applied either alone or in rotation with<br />
Acrobat 50WP+Kocide 2000 54DF were very effective in limiting P.<br />
capsici infection to fewer than 16 fruit per pass of the harvester. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
were no significant differences among the treatments for the number of<br />
infected pickling cucumber fruits evaluated after five days of storage.<br />
In Trial 3, all fungicides limited disease compared to the control<br />
(Table 4). <strong>The</strong> least amount of disease occurred when an air-assisted<br />
sprayer was used. This may be due to the ability of the air-assisted<br />
sprayer to force the fungicide into the plant canopy and reach the fruit.<br />
<strong>The</strong> results of this trial indicate the need for good coverage when<br />
430 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Efficacy of fungicides for Phytophthora fruit rot of pickling<br />
cucumbers in 2004.<br />
Phytophthorainfected<br />
fruit<br />
Treatment and rate/ha (fruit size when treated)<br />
At<br />
harvest<br />
(number)<br />
After 5<br />
days<br />
storage<br />
(%)<br />
Untreated......................................................................................1,092.5 b * Forum 500SC 0.5L+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5, 7.6,<br />
33.0<br />
12.7cm) ........................................................................................<br />
Forum 500SC 0.5L+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
6.5 a 11.5<br />
+ Manzate 75DF 2.2kg (2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ................................<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5cm)<br />
12.5 a 11.5<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6, 12.7cm) 10.5<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5, 7.6cm)<br />
a 24.0<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />
Tanos 50DF 0.6kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
+Manzate 75DF 2.3kg (2.5cm)<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />
11.5 a 17.0<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />
Tanos 50DF 0.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
+Manzate 75DF 2.2kg (2.5cm)<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />
1.0 a 10.0<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />
Tanos 50DF 0.8kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
+Manzate 75DF 2.2kg (2.5cm)<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2 kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />
y a 36.0<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg (12.7cm) ..............................................<br />
Tanos 50DF 0.7kg+ManKocide 61DF 2.2kg (2.5cm)<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)<br />
2.0 a 3.5<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (12.7cm).......<br />
Ridomil Gold MZ 2.8kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
10.0 a 7.5<br />
(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ......................................................................<br />
Maestro 80DF 6.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg (2.5, 7.6,<br />
10.0 a 31.0<br />
12.7cm) ........................................................................................ 37.0 a 5.5<br />
*<br />
Column means with a letter in common or no letter are not significantly different<br />
(SNK; P = 0.05).<br />
applying fungicides to control fruit rot. Plant-row spacing may need to<br />
be increased to prevent an especially dense canopy from forming,<br />
thereby increasing the potential of a fungicide spray reaching the<br />
underlying fruit.<br />
FUMIGANT STUDIES. Melon and watermelon plants were<br />
especially susceptible to P. capsici. In 2004, applications of both rates<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 431
%P<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
b<br />
Untreated<br />
a<br />
Vapam 704l/ha<br />
2003<br />
a<br />
MBr/pic<br />
Combined data for:<br />
Tomato<br />
Eggplant<br />
Pepper<br />
Zucchini<br />
Winter Squash<br />
Melon<br />
Watermelon<br />
a<br />
Telone C35<br />
Fig. 1. Fumigant evaluation for P. capsici, 2003 (left) and 2004 (right).<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
of K-Pam TM applied either alone or in combination with chloropicrin<br />
were very effective in controlling P. capsici in both melon and<br />
watermelon (Table 5). Applications of methyl bromide/chloropicrin<br />
and chloropicrin alone also significantly limited disease.<br />
Combining the data of plant death (%) for all crops in this trial showed<br />
that significant disease control was achieved for all treatments in 2003<br />
(Figure 1). In 2004, both rates of K-Pam TM applied alone or in<br />
combination with chloropicrin were very effective in limiting P.<br />
capsici (Figure 1). Applications of methyl bromide/chloropicrin and<br />
chloropicrin alone were also significantly better than the untreated.<br />
Telone C-35 TM allowed more disease in 2003 compared with 2004.<br />
SURFACE WATER STUDIES. Phytophthora capsici was frequently<br />
detected in a river, creek, and a naturally fed pond. All water sources<br />
monitored were located near crops infected with P. capsici and/or<br />
fields with a history of disease. Using surface water that may be<br />
contaminated with P. capsici to irrigate healthy crops must be avoided<br />
to limit pathogen spread.<br />
ROTATIONAL BEAN STUDIES. All P. capsici isolates from beans<br />
caused disease on cucumber fruit, and resulted in dark, water-soaked<br />
lesions with pathogen sporulation. Isolates of P. capsici from snap<br />
beans caused disease on 12 bean cultivars that represented four<br />
Phaseolus species (lunatus, vulgaris, vulgaris var. humilis, and<br />
vulgaris var. vulgaris) and one Glycine species (max). <strong>The</strong> use of<br />
beans as a rotational crop with P. capsici-susceptible hosts is not<br />
recommended.<br />
5<br />
0<br />
c<br />
Untreated<br />
bc<br />
Telone C35 35 327<br />
ab<br />
Chloropicrin 234 l/ha<br />
2004<br />
ab<br />
MBr/Pic 392 kg/ha<br />
a<br />
K-Pam 280 l/ha<br />
a<br />
K-Pam 561 l/ha<br />
Combined data for:<br />
Tomato<br />
Eggplant<br />
Pepper<br />
Zucchini<br />
Winter Squash<br />
Melon<br />
Watermelon<br />
432 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
a<br />
K-Pam<br />
a<br />
K-Pam High
Table 3. Efficacy of fungicides for Phytophthora fruit rot of pickling<br />
cucumbers in 2004.<br />
Phytophthorainfected<br />
fruit<br />
After 5<br />
days<br />
At harvest storage<br />
Treatment and rate/ha (fruit size when treated) (number) (%)<br />
Untreated............................................................................ 83.3 b * Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg +Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
4.4<br />
(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 29.3<br />
Maestro 80DF 4.5kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
a 0.2<br />
(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 15.7<br />
Maestro 80DF 6.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
a 0.8<br />
(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................<br />
Tanos 50DF 0.8 kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
5.0 a 0.0<br />
(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 30.3<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2 kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
a 2.3<br />
(2.5, 7.6, 12.7cm) ............................................................ 20.0<br />
Gavel 75DF 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
(2.5cm) Tanos 50DF 0.8kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
(7.6cm) Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54DF<br />
a 0.2<br />
1.7kg (12.7cm) ................................................................ 28.0<br />
Maestro 80DF 6.7kg+Kocide 2000 54DF 1.7kg<br />
(2.5, 12.7cm) Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000<br />
a 0.0<br />
54DF 1.7kg (7.6cm)........................................................ 7.7 a 0.0<br />
*<br />
Column means with a letter in common are not significantly different (SNK; P =<br />
0.05).<br />
In summary, our studies indicate that managing P. capsici on<br />
susceptible crops requires attention to cultural and chemical practices<br />
at all stages of crop production. A recommended disease program<br />
includes: (1) selecting a site without P. capsici infestation or preplant<br />
fumigation of infested sites, (2) irrigating crops with water from wells<br />
or well-fed ponds, (3) applying effective fungicides and thoroughly<br />
covering foliage and fruit, and (4) choosing appropriate rotational<br />
crop(s) to limit pathogen buildup in the soil.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 433
Table 4. Evaluation of fungicides and sprayers to manage<br />
Phytophthora fruit rot on pickling cucumbers in 2004.<br />
Phytophthora-infected<br />
fruit<br />
Spray regime, treatment and rate/ha<br />
At harvest<br />
(number) *<br />
After 5 days<br />
storage (%)<br />
Air assisted sprayer<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54WG 1.7kg ....... 16.3 a ** Conventional boom sprayer<br />
5.9 a<br />
Acrobat 50WP 0.4kg+Kocide 2000 54WG 1.7kg ....... 89.3 b 27.5 bc<br />
Gavel 80WG 2.2kg+Kocide 2000 54WG 1.7kg.......... 70.0 ab 27.4 bc<br />
Untreated ........................................................................ 178.0 c 37.4 c<br />
*<br />
Number of infected fruit crossing the harvest belt over a 3-row x 274-m plot.<br />
**<br />
Column means with a letter in common are not significantly different (SNK; P =<br />
0.05).<br />
Table 5. Evaluation of fumigants for P. capsici of cucurbits in 2004.<br />
Plant death (%) y<br />
Treatment<br />
Rate/<br />
ha<br />
Application<br />
method z Melon<br />
Watermelon<br />
Untreated ............................................ – – 97.8 b x 37.7 b<br />
Methyl bromide/chloropicrin (67/33) . 392kg Shank 22.2 a 11.1 ab<br />
Telone C35 ......................................... 327L Shank 66.7 b 36.7 b<br />
Chloropicrin<br />
234L Shank<br />
K-Pam................................................. 280L Drip 0.0 a 0.0 a<br />
Chloropicrin<br />
234L Shank<br />
K-Pam................................................. 561L Drip 0.0 a 0.0 a<br />
Chloropicrin........................................ 234L Shank 20.0 a 33.3 b<br />
K-Pam................................................. 561L Drip 3.3 a 8.8 a<br />
K-Pam................................................. 280L Drip 8.8 a 0.0 a<br />
z<br />
Materials were applied either at time of bed formation using swept-back knives or<br />
preplant through drip tape.<br />
y<br />
Percentage of plants killed by disease out of nine original plants.<br />
x<br />
Column means with no letter or a letter in common are not significantly different,<br />
SNK, P = 0.05.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Gevens, A. J. and M. K. Hausbeck. 2004. Characterization and distribution of<br />
Phytophthora capsici from irrigation water near Michigan cucurbit fields: a first<br />
report of P. capsici in irrigation water in Michigan. Phytopathology. 94:S157.<br />
Hausbeck, M. K. and K. H. Lamour. 2004. Phytophthora capsici on vegetable crops:<br />
research progress and management challenges. Plant Dis. 88:1292–1303.<br />
434 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Jung, T. and M. Blaschke. 2004. Phytophthora root and collar rot of alders in<br />
Bavaria: distribution, modes of spread, and possible management strategies.<br />
Plant Path. 53:197–208.<br />
Lamour, K. H. and M. K. Hausbeck. 2000. Mefenoxam insensitivity and the sexual<br />
stage of Phytophthora capsici in Michigan cucurbit fields. Phytopathology.<br />
90:396–400.<br />
Lamour, K. H. and M. K. Hausbeck. 2001. Investigating the spatiotemporal genetic<br />
structure of Phytophthora capsici in Michigan. Phytopathology. 91:973–980.<br />
Ouedmans, P. V. 1999. Phytophthora species associated with cranberry root rot and<br />
surface irrigation water in New Jersey. Plant Dis. 83:251–258.<br />
Yamak, F., T. L. Peever, G. G. Grove, and R. J. Boal. 2002. Occurrence and<br />
identification of Phytophthora spp. pathogenic to pear fruit in irrigation water in<br />
the Wenatchee River valley of Washington <strong>State</strong>. Phytopathology. 92:1210–<br />
1217.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 435
TREATMENTS TO PREVENT SEED<br />
TRANSMISSION OF BACTERIAL FRUIT<br />
BLOTCH OF WATERMELON<br />
D. L. Hopkins and C. M. Thompson<br />
University of Florida, Mid-Florida Research and Education Center,<br />
2725 Binion Road, Apopka, FL 32703-8504, USA<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli,<br />
hot-water treatment, chemical treatments, fermentation of seeds<br />
ABSTRACT. Contaminated seed lots have been the primary way in which<br />
bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) (Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli [Schaad et al.]<br />
Willems et al.) has been introduced into watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.]<br />
Matsum. & Nakai) fields or transplant houses. In this study, various wet-seed<br />
treatments were evaluated for the elimination of A. avenae subsp. citrulli from<br />
watermelon seeds. Peroxyacetic acid (PA), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and acetic<br />
acid were all effective in eliminating seed transmission of BFB; however, HCl<br />
can adversely affect seed quality. Hot-water treatments at 55 o C for 2 h and at<br />
60 o C for 1 h eliminated seed transmission, but the 60 o C treatment also reduced<br />
seed germination. Natural fermentation in watermelon pulp for 16–24 h<br />
eliminated seed transmission in most but not all seed lots. With 16-h<br />
fermentations containing Lactobacillus brevis or L. plantarum additives, seed<br />
transmission of BFB was prevented in all of our seed lots tested. Shorter<br />
fermentations were ineffective and the effect of 16-h fermentation on triploid<br />
seed quality is unknown.<br />
B<br />
acterial fruit blotch (BFB) of watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus),<br />
caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli, was first<br />
observed in commercial production areas in the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />
in the spring of 1989 (Latin and Rane, 1990; Somodi et al., 1991), but<br />
had been observed in Australia and Guam earlier (Wall and Santos,<br />
1988). BFB on watermelon has occurred somewhere every year since<br />
1989 (Maynard and Hopkins, 1999; D. L. Hopkins, unpublished),<br />
occasionally resulting in losses of more than 90% of the total<br />
marketable fruit in a field.<br />
<strong>The</strong> causal agent of BFB causes disease and can be seed-borne in<br />
various cucurbits (Hopkins and Thompson, 2002: Kucarek et al., 1993;<br />
Rane and Latin, 1992). Contaminated seed lots of cucurbits have been<br />
the primary way in which A. avenae subsp. citrulli has been introduced<br />
into cucurbit fields or transplant houses (Hopkins and Thompson,<br />
Financial support for this research came in part from USDA/CSREES award number<br />
2003-34135-14077.<br />
436 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
2002). <strong>The</strong> most effective control of BFB of cucurbits, is the<br />
exclusion of the bacterium (Latin, 1996). <strong>The</strong> intensive efforts of the<br />
cucurbit seed and transplant industry to produce seeds and transplants<br />
free of A. avenae subsp. citrulli have reduced the incidence of BFB<br />
over the last few seasons, but the disease still occurs every year. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
is a need for more consistent, efficient methods of producing cucurbit<br />
seed free of the bacterium.<br />
Fermentation and hydrochloric acid (HCI) treatments are effective<br />
in removing the bacterium from seed, but may adversely affect seed<br />
quality (Hopkins et al., 1996). Peroxyacetic acid (PA) can be very<br />
effective when properly used with good quality control (Hopkins et al.,<br />
2003). <strong>The</strong>se strategies have been used successfully as wet-seed<br />
treatments at seed harvest; however, there is a need for a treatment to<br />
clean up contaminated seed lots already dried and stored. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
remains a need for seed treatments that can efficaciously eradicate<br />
seed-borne A. avenae subsp. citrulli while ensuring the safety of the<br />
worker and the environment, and not reducing any measurable<br />
parameters of seed quality. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to evaluate<br />
various chemical, biological, and hot-water seed treatments for the<br />
elimination of A. avenae subsp. citrulli from wet seeds of watermelon.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PRODUCTION OF INFESTED WATERMELON SEEDS. In the fall of<br />
2003, as well as in the spring and fall of 2004 and 2005, BFB-infected<br />
‘Charleston Gray’ watermelon seeds were produced on the MREC<br />
research farm in Apopka. In most seasons, the bacterium occurred<br />
naturally in the seed-production areas. To assure infected seed, fruit<br />
also were inoculated with strain WFB89-1, which has given<br />
reproducible symptoms on watermelon. For inoculation of fruit in the<br />
field, A. avenae subsp. citrulli was grown on nutrient agar for 48 h,<br />
washed from the agar surface with sterile, deionized water, and<br />
adjusted to a suspension of approximately 10 6 colony-forming<br />
units/ml. Inoculations were done 14–21 days prior to fruit maturation<br />
by misting the upper rind surface with the bacterial suspension. Seeds<br />
were collected by hand from mature fruit with symptoms and were<br />
bulked. <strong>The</strong> seeds were divided into batches of approximately 2,000<br />
seeds in 3L of watermelon juice and pulp and placed in 9-L buckets<br />
for treatment. All treatments were initiated within 3 h of the<br />
completion of seed harvesting.<br />
CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENTS. Seeds were washed thoroughly<br />
with tap water on screens to remove all watermelon tissue and juice<br />
prior to treatment. Chemical treatments were applied for 15 or 30<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 437
minutes to approximately 2,000 seeds each in a 2-L treatment solution.<br />
<strong>The</strong> solutions were stirred periodically throughout the treatments.<br />
Treatments with 10,000μg/ml (1%) HCl and 1600μg/ml PA (Tsunami<br />
100; 15% PA and 11% hydrogen peroxide; Ecolab Inc., Mendota<br />
Heights, MN) were included in the tests because they had been<br />
effective seed treatments in previous studies (Hopkins et al., 1996,<br />
2003). Other chemicals evaluated included 10,000μg/ml acetic acid,<br />
10,000μg/ml NaOCl, 2,700μg/ml hydrogen dioxide (1:100 Zerotol;<br />
BioSafe Systems, Gastonbury, CT), and 667μg/ml quaternary<br />
ammonia compounds (1:300 Physan 20; Maril Products Inc., Tustin,<br />
CA). After treatment, seeds were rinsed in two changes of water, air<br />
dried on screens for 48 h on the greenhouse bench at temperatures<br />
ranging from 26 o C at night to 40 o C in the afternoon, and stored in a<br />
seed-storage room.<br />
For the greenhouse assay of seed transmission of BFB to seedlings,<br />
seeds were planted in 28 x 52cm plastic trays filled with commercial<br />
potting mix. Four replications of 250 or more seeds were planted from<br />
each treatment. Watering was done carefully on the surface of the<br />
potting mix with a hose, avoiding contact with the seedlings.<br />
Greenhouse temperatures ranged from 26 o C to 40 o C. Disease<br />
incidence evaluations were made 9–10 days after planting. Percent<br />
seed transmission was calculated based on the number of emerged<br />
seedlings. Analyses of variance were performed for all experiments<br />
and means were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.05).<br />
Percentage seed transmission data were analyzed after transformation<br />
to arc sine √x.<br />
HOT-WATER SEED TREATMENTS. Seeds were washed thoroughly<br />
with tap water on screens to remove all watermelon tissue and juice<br />
prior to hot-water treatment. Approximately 2,000 seeds per treatment<br />
were submerged in a hot-water bath at the desired temperature for the<br />
specified time. Seeds were stirred regularly throughout the treatments.<br />
Treatment temperatures ranged from 45 o C to 60 o C and treatment times<br />
ranged from 0.5 h to 2 h. After treatment, seeds were air dried on<br />
screens for 48 h on the greenhouse bench at temperatures ranging from<br />
26 o C at night to 40 o C in the afternoon and stored in a seed-storage<br />
room. <strong>The</strong> greenhouse assay was as described above for the chemical<br />
treatments.<br />
FERMENTATION SEED TREATMENTS. Fermentation of watermelon<br />
seeds in the pulp from the fruit for 24 to 48 h was found to be an<br />
effective way of eliminating seed transmission of bacterial fruit blotch<br />
(Hopkins, et al., 1996). <strong>The</strong> problem with this long fermentation<br />
treatment was its effect on seed quality, especially with triploid seed.<br />
438 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
For fermentation treatments, seeds were divided into batches of<br />
approximately 2,000 seeds in 3L watermelon juice and pulp and<br />
placed in 9-L buckets for treatment. Bacterial fermentation additives<br />
included Lactobacillus brevis, L. plantarum, and Bacillus subtilus.<br />
Both 5- and 16-h fermentations were evaluated. After fermenting at<br />
air temperatures of 23 o C to 33 o C with periodic stirring, seeds were<br />
washed thoroughly to remove watermelon tissue, air dried on screens<br />
for 48 h on the greenhouse bench at temperatures ranging from 26 o C at<br />
night to 40 o C in the afternoon, and stored in a seed-storage room. <strong>The</strong><br />
greenhouse assay was as described above for the chemical treatments.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENTS. As in previous studies (Hopkins<br />
et al., 1996, 2003), PA and HCl were effective in eliminating A.<br />
avenae subsp. citrulli from watermelon seed, whether applied for 15<br />
min or 30 min (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> 0.1% seed transmission in the PA<br />
treatment of watermelon seeds in the fall of 2003 may have been the<br />
result of cross-contamination in the grow-out rather than a failure of<br />
the seed treatment. Acetic acid at 1% concentration was also very<br />
effective in eliminating seed transmission of BFB. Sodium<br />
hypochlorite at 1% reduced the seed transmission of BFB, but did not<br />
<strong>complete</strong>ly eliminate it. Zerotol and Physan were ineffective as seed<br />
treatments for bacterial fruit blotch. Both PA and acetic acid appear to<br />
be good options to use in the control of seed transmission of BFB.<br />
HOT-WATER SEED TREATMENTS. In the spring and fall of 2004,<br />
none of the hot-water treatments of infected watermelon seeds<br />
eliminated seed transmission of BFB (Table 2). At 50 o C, the 1-h<br />
treatment was more effective than 0.5 h. Based on these results, longer<br />
treatment times and higher temperatures were investigated in 2005. In<br />
both the spring and fall of 2005, a 2-h treatment at 55 o C eliminated<br />
seed transmission of BFB in watermelon without affecting seed<br />
germination. One-hour treatment at 60 o C eliminated BFB transmission,<br />
but also reduced seed germination. While hot-water treatment did<br />
eliminate seed transmission without adversely affecting seed<br />
germination, the margin for error is apparently very small. Increasing<br />
the temperature by only 5 o C resulted in reduced seed germination.<br />
FERMENTATION SEED TREATMENTS. Three-hour fermentation<br />
was not sufficient to eliminate seed transmission in watermelon<br />
regardless of the bacterial additive (data not shown). Five-h<br />
fermentation with or without added bacteria was variable in efficacy,<br />
reducing seed transmission but not eliminating it (Table 3). With 16-h<br />
fermentation, L. brevis and L. plantarum additives eliminated seed<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 439
Table 1. Elimination of seed transmission of bacterial fruit blotch<br />
(BFB) in watermelon with various chemical seed treatments.<br />
Seed treatment<br />
% seed transmission in seed<br />
from: a<br />
Exposure<br />
time (min) Fall03 Spring04<br />
Untreated - 5.5 c 11.2 b<br />
1% HCl 15 0 a 0 a<br />
1600μg/ml PA b 15 0 a 0 a<br />
1% acetic acid 15 0 a 0 a<br />
1600μg/ml PA 30 0.1 a 0 a<br />
1% acetic acid 30 0 a -<br />
1% Na0Cl 30 1.0 b 0.3 a<br />
2700μg/ml<br />
hydrogen dioxide 30 5.5 c -<br />
667μg/ml<br />
quaternary ammonia<br />
products 30 6.8 c -<br />
a <strong>The</strong> percent seed transmission of BFB was determined by a greenhouse grow-out of<br />
the seedlings and represents the percentage of seedlings (germinated seeds) that were<br />
symptomatic. Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly<br />
different (P=0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data were analyzed after<br />
transformation to arc sine √x.<br />
b PA = peroxyacetic acid.<br />
transmission of BFB in watermelon. Natural fermentation in the<br />
watermelon pulp for 16–24 h eliminated most but not always all seed<br />
transmission. <strong>The</strong>re did not seem to be any benefit from combining L.<br />
plantarum and L. brevi.<br />
440 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Elimination of seed transmission of bacterial fruit blotch<br />
(BFB) in watermelon with hot-water treatments.<br />
% seed transmission in seed from: a<br />
Hot-water<br />
treatments Spring04 Fall04 Spring05 Fall05<br />
Untreated 8.3 bc 4.3 b 2.1 b<br />
(94) b<br />
1.8 bc (91)<br />
45 o C for 2 h 5.0 ab - - -<br />
50 o C for 0.5 h 11.8 cd 2.3 ab - -<br />
50 o C for 1 h 3.6 a - - -<br />
50 o C for 2 h - - - 2.2 c (91)<br />
55 o C for 0.5 h 15.1 d 1.0 a - -<br />
55 o C for 1 h - - 0.2 a (99) 1.4 b (95)<br />
55 o C for 2 h - - 0 a (94) 0 a (90)<br />
60 o C for 1 h - - - 0 a (80)<br />
a<br />
<strong>The</strong> percent seed transmission of BFB was determined by a greenhouse grow-out of<br />
the seedlings and represents the percentage of seedlings (germinated seeds) that were<br />
symptomatic. Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly<br />
different (P=0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data were analyzed after<br />
transformation to arc sine √x.<br />
b<br />
<strong>The</strong> number in parenthesis is the percent seed germination.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was an apparent benefit from adding L. brevis or L.<br />
plantarum to the seed fermentation mixture and, overall, L. plantarum<br />
appeared to be the most effective bacterial additive. Fermentation<br />
continues to be an effective way of eliminating seed transmission of<br />
BFB in watermelon; however, even with the bacterial additives, it<br />
remained necessary to ferment overnight, which may be detrimental to<br />
triploid seed quality. Combining a 5-h fermentation with a bacterial<br />
additive and chemical treatment may provide the best chance of<br />
eliminating A. avenae subsp. citrulli from watermelon seeds.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 441
Table 3. Effect of various bacterial additives on elimination of seed<br />
transmission of bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) in watermelon with<br />
fermentation.<br />
% seed transmission in seed from: a<br />
Fermentation Fall03 Spring04 Fall04 Spring05 Fall05<br />
None 5.5 b 8.3 b 4.3 c 2.1 b 1.8 b<br />
Natural, 5 h - - 0.1 ab - -<br />
Natural, 16 h 0 a - - 0 a -<br />
Lactobacillus<br />
brevis, 5 h<br />
- - 0.3 b 0.1 a -<br />
L. brevis, 16 h - 0 a 0 a - -<br />
L. plantarum, 5 h - - 0.1 ab 0.1 a 0.4 a<br />
L. plantarum, 16 h - 0 a 0 a 0 a -<br />
Bacillus subtilus, 5<br />
h<br />
- - - 0 a 0.3 a<br />
B. subtilus, 16 h - - - 0.1 a -<br />
L. plantarum + L.<br />
brevi, 5 h<br />
L. plantarum, 5 h<br />
+ 1600μg/ml PA,<br />
30 min<br />
- - - 0.1 a -<br />
- - 0 a - -<br />
a <strong>The</strong> percent seed transmission of BFB was determined by a greenhouse grow-out of<br />
the seedlings and represents the percentage of seedlings (germinated seeds) that were<br />
symptomatic. Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly<br />
different (P=0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data were analyzed after<br />
transformation to arc sine √x.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Hopkins, D. L. and C. M. Thompson. 2002. Seed transmission of Acidovorax<br />
avenae subsp. citrulli in cucurbits. HortSci. 37:924–926.<br />
Hopkins, D. L., C. M. Thompson, J. Hilgren, and B. Lovic. 2003. Wet seed<br />
treatment with peroxyacetic acid for the control of bacterial fruit blotch and<br />
other seedborne diseases of watermelon. Plant Dis. 87:1495–1499.<br />
442 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Hopkins, D. L., J. D. Cucuzza, and J. C. Watterson. 1996. Wet seed treatments for<br />
the control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Plant Dis. 80:529–532.<br />
Kucharek, T., Y. Perez, and C. Hodge. 1993. Transmission of the watermelon fruit<br />
blotch bacterium from infested seed to seedlings. Phytopathology.<br />
83:466(Abstr.).<br />
Latin, R. X. 1996. Bacterial fruit blotch, p.34–35. In: T. A. Zitter, D. L. Hopkins,<br />
and C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press, St.<br />
Paul, MN.<br />
Latin, R. X. and K. K. Rane. 1990. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon in Indiana.<br />
Plant Dis. 74:331.<br />
Maynard, D. N. and D. L. Hopkins. 1999. Watermelon fruit disorders. HortTech.<br />
9:155–161.<br />
Rane, K. K. and R. X. Latin. 1992. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon:<br />
Association of the pathogen with seed. Plant Dis. 76:509–512.<br />
Somodi, G. C., J. B. Jones, D. L. Hopkins, R. E. Stall, T. A. Kucharek, N. C. Hodge,<br />
and J. C. Watterson. 1991. Occurrence of a bacterial watermelon fruit blotch in<br />
Florida. Plant Dis. 75:1053–1056.<br />
Wall, G. C. and V. M. Santos. 1988. A new bacterial disease of watermelon in the<br />
Mariana Islands. Phytopathology. 78:1605(Abstr.).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 443
IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEY OF<br />
CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW RACES IN<br />
CZECH POPULATIONS<br />
A. Lebeda and B. Sedláková<br />
Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />
Botany, Šlechtitelů 11, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Golovinomyces cichoracearum, Podosphaera<br />
xanthii, Cucumis melo, differential genotypes, pathogenicity variation, race<br />
identification<br />
ABSTRACT. Physiological races of two cucurbit powdery mildew species<br />
[Golovinomyces cichoracearum s.l. (Gc) and Podosphaera xanthii (Px)], were<br />
identified by using 11 differential genotypes of Cucumis melo. Altogether, 89<br />
different races (63 Gc, 26 Px) were recorded in the studied set of 218 isolates<br />
(172 Gc, 46 Px) collected in the Czech Republic in the years 2000–2004. Isolates<br />
virulent to C. melo (line MR-1) and avirulent to C. melo (Iran H) were found as<br />
well as both powdery mildew species. <strong>The</strong>se data demonstrate the existence of<br />
new and until now unknown virulence/avirulence and susceptibility/resistance<br />
factors in pathogen populations and differential host genotypes. Repeated<br />
occurrence of some races (28 Gc, 8 Px) was noted during the period of<br />
investigation. Races S of Gc and F of Px were virulent on all C. melo<br />
differentials. <strong>The</strong> races with medium and high virulence prevailed in cucurbit<br />
powdery mildew (CPM) populations. <strong>The</strong> most frequent hosts were <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
pepo and C. maxima for both CPMs with the highest number of detected races.<br />
A remarkable shift toward increased virulence was observed for both Gc and<br />
Px over a five-year period.<br />
P<br />
owdery mildew is the major cause of losses in production in<br />
cucurbits worldwide (Cohen et al., 2004; Jahn et al., 2002;<br />
McCreight, 2006; Vakalounakis et al., 1994). In Central Europe,<br />
the disease is caused by two obligate biotrophic ectoparasites:<br />
Golovinomyces cichoracearum s.l. (Gc) (syn. Erysiphe cichoracearum<br />
s.l.) and Podosphaera xanthii (Px) (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea) (Jahn<br />
et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong>se two species induce identical symptoms; however,<br />
they can be distinguished easily under light microscopy (Braun et al.,<br />
2002). <strong>The</strong> two species differ in host range, ecological requirements,<br />
geographic distribution (Lebeda, 1983; Lebeda et al., 2006; Sitterly,<br />
This research was supported by grants MSM 6198959215, MSM 153100010, and<br />
QD 1357; and by the National Programme of Genepool Conservation of<br />
Microorganisms and Small Animals of Economic Importance.<br />
444 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
1978), and response to fungicides (McGrath, 2001; Sedláková and<br />
Lebeda, 2004a, b). Broad pathogenic variation is represented by the<br />
existence of different pathotypes and races (Bertrand, 1991; Bertrand<br />
et al., 1992; Jahn et al., 2002; Vakalounakis and Klironomou, 1995).<br />
Twenty-two races of Px and two races of Gc have been described on<br />
melons (Cohen et al., 2004; Hosoya et al., 2000; McCreight, 2006;<br />
Pitrat et al., 1998); however, recent results suggest that even more<br />
pathotypes and races exist (Lebeda and Sedláková, 2004; Lebeda et<br />
al., 2004, 2006).<br />
Long-lasting study of CPMs virulence variation is one of the<br />
priorities of our laboratory. <strong>The</strong> aim of the current paper is to<br />
summarize the recent knowledge about physiological races identified<br />
in cucurbit powdery mildew (CPM) populations in the Czech Republic<br />
in the years 2000–2004. <strong>The</strong> main purpose of our work was to study in<br />
more detail the virulence variation of CPM populations as a part of the<br />
complex research of population biology, ecology, genetics, and spatial<br />
and temporal dynamics.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PATHOGEN COLLECTING, IDENTIFICATION, ISOLATION,<br />
MULTIPLICATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ISOLATES. Samples of<br />
powdery-mildew-infected cucurbit plants were obtained during<br />
collecting expeditions in the territory of the Czech Republic in the<br />
years 2000–2004. Before isolation, the samples were microscopically<br />
examined in a 3% KOH solution (Lebeda, 1983). Isolates with a<br />
mixture of powdery mildew species were excluded. Conidia of pure<br />
cultures were transferred by tapping onto primary leaves of the highly<br />
susceptible cucumber (Cucumis sativus) ‘Stela F1’ (Lebeda, 1986). A<br />
total of 218 (172 Gc, 46 Px) isolates were used for race determination.<br />
Isolates were multiplied and cultured in plastic boxes (24°C/18°C<br />
day/night) for 12h.<br />
DETERMINATION OF RACES. Altogether, 218 isolates of Gc and Px<br />
were used for screening: 3 (2 Gc,1 Px) from 2000; 34 (27 Gc, 7 Px)<br />
from 2001; 52 (45 Gc, 7 Px) from 2002; 67 (45 Gc, 22 Px) from 2003;<br />
and 62 (53 Gc, 9 Px) from 2004. Race determination was made by a<br />
leaf-disc method (Bertrand et al., 1992; Lebeda, 1986). Races were<br />
identified by using 11 differential genotypes of Cucumis melo (‘Iran<br />
H’, ‘Védrantais’, ‘Solartur’, ‘PMR 45’, ‘WMR 29’, ‘Edisto 47’, PI<br />
414723, ‘PMR 5’, PI 124112, ‘MR-1’, and ‘Nantais Oblong’) (Pitrat et<br />
al.,1998; Bardin et al., 1999). Each genotype was represented by three<br />
leaf discs (15mm in diameter) in three replicates (one replicate = one<br />
plant). Discs from true leaves (2–3-leaf stage) of cucumber and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 445
muskmelon plants were used for screening. Discs were inoculated by<br />
tapping leaf discs with 3–4-day-old sporulating mycelia of CPMs and<br />
then incubated under the conditions described above. Evaluations were<br />
conducted 6–14 days after inoculation by using a 0–4 scale (Lebeda,<br />
1984). Differential genotypes with little or no sporulation (degree of<br />
infection [DI] = 0–1) were considered as resistant (R); genotypes with<br />
DI = 2–4 were scored as susceptible (S). <strong>The</strong> degree of virulence of<br />
CPM isolates was expressed by the number of differentials (from 1 to<br />
11) infected by the individual isolate.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In total, 89 races (63 Gc and 26 Px) were determined in the studied<br />
set of isolates in the years 2000–2004 (Tables 1 and 2). Obtained<br />
results showed that Czech CPM populations are very heterogeneous<br />
and markedly different in comparison with those of some western and<br />
southern European countries (Pitrat et al., 1998) and other parts of the<br />
world (Cohen et al., 2004; Hosoya et al., 2000; McCreight, 2006). All<br />
recorded Gc races and 23 Px races have not yet been described in<br />
Europe and elsewhere. Nevertheless, occurrence of three Px known<br />
races (1, 2US, 3) was confirmed in the Czech Republic. Seven isolates<br />
of Gc and five isolates of Px were avirulent to C. melo ‘Iran H’, which<br />
is consistent with our previous observations (Křístková et al., 2004).<br />
Until now, ‘Iran H’ was considered to be susceptible to all races<br />
(McCreight, 2006). Our results indicate that even in ‘Iran H’ there<br />
exist as yet unidentified race-specific resistance factors to both CPM<br />
species. Repeated occurrence of some races (28 Gc, 8 Px) was noted<br />
during the study period. <strong>The</strong> most frequently occurring Gc races were<br />
S (28x), Y (14x), e (13x), and P (8x). <strong>The</strong> most frequent Px race was B<br />
(7x). Races S of Gc and F of Px were virulent on all C. melo<br />
differential genotypes (Tables 1 and 2). <strong>The</strong>se results and our previous<br />
observations (Křístková et al., 2004) indicate that, in Czech pathogen<br />
populations, races exist that are able to overcome the resistance of C.<br />
melo lines MR-1 and PI 124112.<br />
Virulence data for Gc and Px isolates are summarized in Table 3.<br />
Gc isolates were in the range of medium (32%) and high (58%)<br />
virulence and were classified into 31 and 27 races, respectively. In the<br />
case of Px, isolates of medium virulence were the most frequent (61%)<br />
and were classified into 16 races. As was found in preliminary studies<br />
(Lebeda and Sedláková, 2004; Lebeda et al., 2004), Czech CPM<br />
populations exhibited a temporal shift to higher virulence. Occurrence<br />
of Gc and Px races on different cucurbit hosts is shown in Table 4. <strong>The</strong><br />
most frequently infected host plants were <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo and C.<br />
446 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Races of Golovinomyces cichoracearum identified in the<br />
Czech Republic in the years 2000–2004.<br />
Differential genotype of Cucumis melo a /<br />
Reaction patterns of G. cichoracearum isolates<br />
IrH Véd Sol P45 W29 E47 PI41 P5 PI12 MR1 Nobl Race<br />
R R S R R R R R R R R N1 1<br />
R S S S R R R R R R S f 1<br />
R S S S R S R R R R S T R 1<br />
R S S S R S S R R R S T 1<br />
R S S S S R R S R R S A 1<br />
R S S S S S S S R R R B 1<br />
R S S S S S S S S R S C 1<br />
S R R S S S R R S R S D 1<br />
S R S R S R S R R R R E 1<br />
S R S S R R R R R R S N2 1<br />
S S R R S S S R R R R U 1<br />
S S S R R R R R R R S e 13<br />
S S S R R R R S R R S g 6<br />
S S S R R R S R R R S N3 2<br />
S S S R R R S S R R S h 5<br />
S S S R R S R R R R S ch 4<br />
S S S R R S S R R R S N4 3<br />
S S S R R S S S R R S i 1<br />
S S S R R S S S S R S N5 1<br />
S S S R S R R R R R S N6 1<br />
S S S R S S S S S R S b 1<br />
S S S S R R R R R R S N7 2<br />
S S S S R R R S R R R j 1<br />
S S S S R R R S R R S d R 1<br />
S S S S R R S R R R R F R 2<br />
S S S S R R S R R R S F 1<br />
S S S S R R S S R R R k 1<br />
S S S S R R S S R R S d 3<br />
S S S S R S R R R R S I R 2<br />
S S S S R S R R R S S l 1<br />
S S S S R S R S R R S I 1<br />
S S S S R S R S S R R H 1<br />
S S S S R S S R R R S N8 2<br />
S S S S R S S R S R R G 2<br />
S S S S R S S R S R S u 1<br />
S S S S R S S S R R R N9 1<br />
S S S S R S S S R R S n 3<br />
S S S S R S S S S R R o 6<br />
S S S S R S S S S R S s 3<br />
S S S S R S S S S S S N11 2<br />
No<br />
IS*<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 447
(Table 1, continued)<br />
Differential genotype of Cucumis melo a /<br />
Reaction patterns of G. cichoracearum isolates<br />
IrH Véd Sol P45 W29 E47 PI41 P5 PI12 MR1 Nobl Race<br />
S S S S S R S R R R S K 2<br />
S S S S S R S S R R R J R 2<br />
S S S S S R S S R R S J 1<br />
S S S S S R S S S R S J S 1<br />
S S S S S R S S S S S a 2<br />
S S S S S S R R R R S L R 1<br />
S S S S S S R R R S S v 1<br />
S S S S S S R R S R S M 1<br />
S S S S S S R S R R S L 1<br />
S S S S S S R S S R R w 1<br />
S S S S S S S R R R R O R 1<br />
S S S S S S S R R R S N 4<br />
S S S S S S S R R S S x 1<br />
S S S S S S S R S R R c 1<br />
S S S S S S S R S R S N S 4<br />
S S S S S S S R S S R X 1<br />
S S S S S S S S R R R O 3<br />
S S S S S S S S R R S P 8<br />
S S S S S S S S R S S V 4<br />
S S S S S S S S S R R R 4<br />
S S S S S S S S S R S Y 14<br />
S S S S S S S S S S R R S 2<br />
S S S S S S S S S S S S 28<br />
*IS = isolates; R = resistant reaction; S = susceptible reaction.<br />
a Genotypes of Cucumis melo: IrH (Iran H), Véd (Védrantais), Sol (Solartur), P45<br />
(PMR 45), W29 (WMR 29), E47 (Edisto 47), PI41 (PI 414 723), P5 (PMR 5), PI12<br />
(PI 124 112), MR1 (MR-1), Nobl (Nantais oblong).<br />
No.<br />
IS*<br />
maxima. On these hosts both CPM species with the highest number of<br />
races were detected. Cucumis sativus was the species least frequently<br />
infected by CPMs (Lebeda and Sedláková, 2004; Lebeda et al., 2004,<br />
2006) (Table 4). Cucumis melo, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a foetidissima, and Lagenaria<br />
siceraria were very rare hosts of CPMs, and only one isolate of Px<br />
from each host was obtained (Table 4).<br />
448 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Races of Podosphaera xanthii identified in the Czech<br />
Republic in the years 2000–2004.<br />
Differential genotype of Cucumis melo a /<br />
Reaction patterns of P. xanthii isolates<br />
IrH Véd Sol P45 W29 E47 PI41 P5 PI12 MR1 Nobl Race<br />
R S S R R R R R R R S A 1<br />
R S S R R S R R R R S D R 1<br />
R S S R R S S R R R S D 1<br />
R S S S R R S R R S S CH 1<br />
R S S S R R S S R R S R1 1<br />
S R S R R R S R R R S I 1<br />
S S S R R R R R R R S 1 4<br />
S S S R R R R S R R S K 2<br />
S S S R R R S R R R S B 7<br />
S S S R R R S R S S S C 1<br />
S S S R R R S S R R S R2 1<br />
S S S R R S R S R R S R3 1<br />
S S S R R S R R R R S J 1<br />
S S S R R S S R R R S B R 4<br />
S S S R R S S S R R S L 1<br />
S S S R S S S R R R S M 1<br />
S S S S R R S S R R S 3 1<br />
S S S S R S R R R R S N 2<br />
S S S S R S R S R R S O 1<br />
S S S S R S S S R R S E 3<br />
S S S S R S S S S R S P 1<br />
S S S S R S S S R S S R4 1<br />
S S S S R S S S S S S H 1<br />
S S S S het S S R R R S 2US 2<br />
S S S S S S S S R R S G 4<br />
S S S S S S S S S S S F 1<br />
*IS = isolates; het = heterogenous reaction; R = resistant reaction; S = susceptible<br />
reaction.<br />
a Genotypes of Cucumis melo: IrH (Iran H), Véd (Védrantais), Sol (Solartur), P45<br />
(PMR 45), W29 (WMR 29), E47 (Edisto 47), PI41(PI 414 723), P5 (PMR 5), PI12<br />
( PI 124 112), MR1 (MR-1), Nobl (Nantais oblong).<br />
No.<br />
IS*<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 449
Table 3. Virulence of Golovinomyces cichoracearum and<br />
Podosphaera xanthii isolates in the years 2000–2004.<br />
Category of isolate*<br />
No. of<br />
isolates<br />
% of all<br />
isolates<br />
No. of<br />
races<br />
Golovinomyces cichoracearum<br />
Low virulence (1–4) 17 10 5<br />
Medium virulence (5–7) 55 32 31<br />
High virulence (8–11) 100 58 27<br />
Total<br />
Podosphaera xanthii<br />
172 100 63<br />
Low virulence (1–4) 7 15 4<br />
Medium virulence (5–7) 28 61 16<br />
High virulence (8–11) 11 24 6<br />
Total 46 100 26<br />
*1–11 = Number of infected differentials.<br />
Table 4. Frequency of Golovinomyces cichoracearum and<br />
Podosphaera xanthii races on different host species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae<br />
in the years 2000–2004.<br />
G. cichoracearum P. xanthii<br />
Host species<br />
No. of<br />
isolates<br />
No. of<br />
races<br />
No. of<br />
isolates<br />
No. of<br />
races<br />
Cucumis sativus 13 9 5 5<br />
Cucumis melo - - 1 1<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo 104 50 24 18<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
55 27 14 10<br />
foetidissima - - 1 1<br />
Lagenaria siceraria - - 1 1<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bardin, M., J. Carlier, and P. C. Nicot. 1999. Genetic differentiation in the French<br />
population of Erysiphe cichoracearum, a causal agent of powdery mildew of<br />
cucurbits. Plant Pathol. 48:531–540.<br />
Bertrand, F. 1991. Les oïdiums des <strong>Cucurbit</strong>acées: maintien en culture pure, étude de<br />
leur variabilité et de la sensibilité chez le melon. Thése, Université Paris-Sud-<br />
Orsay. Specialité «Phytopathologie».<br />
Bertrand, F., M. Pitrat, A. Glandard, and J. M. Lemaire. 1992. Diversité et variabilité<br />
des champignons responsables de ľ oïdium des cucurbitacées. Phytoma-La<br />
Défense des Végétaux. 438:46–49.<br />
450 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Braun, U., R. T. A. Cook, A. J. Inman, and H.-D. Shin. 2002. <strong>The</strong> taxonomy of the<br />
powdery mildew fungi, p. 13–55. In: R. R. Bélanger, W. R. Bushnell, A. J. Dik,<br />
and L. W. Carver (eds.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. a comprehensive treatise. APS<br />
Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
Cohen, R., Y. Burger, and N. Katzir. 2004. Monitoring physiological races of<br />
Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea), the causal agent of powdery<br />
mildew in cucurbits: factors affecting race identification and the importance for<br />
research and commerce. Phytoparasit. 32:174–183.<br />
Hosoya, K., M. Kuzuya, T. Murakami, K. Kato, K. Narisawa, and H. Ezura. 2000.<br />
Impact of resistant melon cultivars on Sphaerotheca fuliginea. Plant Breed.<br />
119:286–288.<br />
Jahn, M., H. M. Munger, and J. D. McCreight. 2002. <strong>Breeding</strong> cucurbit crops for<br />
powdery mildew resistance, p. 239–248. In: R. R. Bélanger, W. R. Bushnell, A.<br />
J. Dik, and L. W. Carver (eds.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. a comprehensive<br />
treatise. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
Křístková, E., A. Lebeda, and B. Sedláková. 2004. Virulence of Czech cucurbit<br />
powdery mildew isolates on Cucumis melo genotypes MR-1 and PI 124112. Sci.<br />
Hort. 99:257–265.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1983. <strong>The</strong> genera and species spectrum of cucumber powdery mildew in<br />
Czechoslovakia. Phytopath. Z. 108:71–79.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1984. Screening of wild Cucumis species for resistance to cucumber<br />
powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum and Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Sci.<br />
Hort. 24:241–249.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1986. Padlí okurkové. Erysiphe cichoracearum, Sphaerotheca fuliginea<br />
(Cucumber powdery mildew. Erysiphe cichoracearum, Sphaerotheca fuliginea),<br />
p. 87–91. In: A. Lebeda (ed.). Methods of testing vegetable crops for resistance<br />
to plant pathogens. VHJ Sempra, Research Institute of Vegetable Crops,<br />
Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Lebeda, A. and B. Sedláková. 2004. Disease impact and pathogenicity variation in<br />
Czech populations of cucurbit powdery mildews, p. 281–287. In: A. Lebeda and<br />
H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in cucurbit genetics and breeding research. Proc.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8th EUCARPIA Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and<br />
<strong>Breeding</strong>. Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Lebeda, A., B. Sedláková, and E. Křístková. 2004. Distribution, harmfulness and<br />
pathogenic variability of cucurbit powdery mildew in the Czech Republic. Acta<br />
fytotechnica et zootechnica. 7:174–176.<br />
Lebeda, A., B. Sedláková, and E. Křístková. 2006. Temporal changes in<br />
pathogenicity structure of cucurbit powdery mildews populations. Acta Hort. (In<br />
press.)<br />
McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />
melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
131:59–65.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2001. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences<br />
and challenges. Plant Dis. 85:236–245.<br />
Pitrat, M., C. Dogimont, and M. Bardin. 1998. Resistance to fungal diseases of<br />
foliage in melon, p. 167–173. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98,<br />
evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />
VA.<br />
Sedláková, B. and A. Lebeda. 2004a. Variation in sensitivity to fungicides in Czech<br />
populations of cucurbit powdery mildews, p. 289–294. In: A. Lebeda and H. S.<br />
Paris (eds.). Progress in <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong> Research. Proc.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8 th EUCARPIA Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and<br />
<strong>Breeding</strong>. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 451
Sedláková, B. and A. Lebeda. 2004b. Resistance to fungicides in cucurbit powdery<br />
mildew populations in the Czech Republic. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica.<br />
7:269–271.<br />
Sitterly, W. R. 1978. Powdery mildews on cucurbits, p. 359–379. In: D. M. Spencer<br />
(ed.). <strong>The</strong> powdery mildews. Academic Press, London, New York, San<br />
Francisco.<br />
Vakalounakis, D. J. and E. Klironomou. 1995. Race and mating type identification of<br />
powdery mildew on cucurbits in Greece. Plant Pathol. 44:1033–1038.<br />
Vakalounakis, D. J., E. Klironomou, and A. Papadakis. 1994. Species spectrum, host<br />
range and distribution of powdery mildews on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae in Crete. Plant<br />
Pathol. 43:813–818.<br />
452 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION ASPECTS OF<br />
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CUCURBITS AND<br />
PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS:<br />
PATHOTYPES AND RACES<br />
A. Lebeda 1, M.P. Widrlechner 2 , and J. Urban 1<br />
1 Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of<br />
Botany, Šlechtitelů 11, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic<br />
2 USDA-Agricultural Research Service, <strong>North</strong> Central Regional Plant<br />
Introduction Station, Iowa <strong>State</strong> University, Departments of Agronomy<br />
and Horticulture, Ames, Iowa 50011-1170<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, cucurbit downy mildew, hostpathogen<br />
specificity, race-specific resistance, pathogenicity, genetic structure<br />
ABSTRACT. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge regarding<br />
variation in interactions between <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis as a backdrop for the development and use of systems to characterize<br />
pathogenicity at the individual and population levels. Host-parasite specificity<br />
and interactions between <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and P. cubensis exhibit significant<br />
variation on both the individual and population level. However, our<br />
phytopathological and genetic knowledge of the interactions between individual<br />
P. cubensis isolates and a broad range of accessions of most important genera of<br />
cultivated cucurbits (e.g., Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Citrullus) remains limited.<br />
Recently, an improved differential set of cucurbit accessions was developed to<br />
characterize pathogenic variability (pathotypes) among P. cubensis isolates<br />
(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003). That set included 12 genotypes from six<br />
genera (Benincasa, Citrullus, Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Lagenaria, and Luffa) and is<br />
now being used for pathotype differenatiation. Nevertheless, we have reasons to<br />
believe that these differentials are in<strong>complete</strong>. Data on patterns of pathogenic<br />
variation are available only for certain countries (e.g., the Czech Republic,<br />
India, Israel, Japan, and the USA), but even those studies are typically based on<br />
individual isolates, not populations. Some highlights and future trends<br />
regarding the development of new differential sets are suggested. For example,<br />
recent research in the Czech Republic demonstrated how data at the population<br />
level can contribute to elucidating temporal and spatial pathogen distribution<br />
and dynamics, as well as to clarifying host-pathogen interactions. It is also<br />
important to consider the practical application of these data in resistance<br />
breeding and disease management. We conclude by proposing some ideas to<br />
promote research and collaboration on these topics.<br />
This research was supported by grants MSM 6198959215 and MSM 153100010, QD<br />
1357; and by the National Programme of Genepool Conservation of Microorganisms<br />
and Small Animals of Economic Importance of the Czech Republic. <strong>The</strong> assistance<br />
of Dr. Charles Block in locating references is much appreciated.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 453
P<br />
seudoperonospora cubensis (cucurbit downy mildew) is one of<br />
the most important foliar pathogens infecting cucurbits (Palti<br />
and Cohen, 1980; Thomas, 1996; Lebeda and Widrlechner,<br />
2003). It is widely distributed throughout the world and can inflict<br />
major production losses in both open-field and protected culture<br />
(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2004).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are about 60 cucurbit species known as hosts of P. cubensis<br />
(Palti and Cohen, 1980; Lebeda, 1990, 1992a, 1999; Lebeda and<br />
Widrlechner, 2003). However, most of the published information on<br />
its host range and specificity originates from Asia and the USA (Bains<br />
and Sharma, 1986; Cohen et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 1987), with<br />
relatively little information obtained from Europe (Lebeda, 1999;<br />
Lebeda and Gadasová, 2002; Lebeda and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006) or<br />
other parts of the world. Although our understanding of intraspecific<br />
variation and genetics in the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae -Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis pathosystem is rather limited, given the damage that this<br />
pathogen can cause, it is extremely important from both the theoretical<br />
and practical perspectives (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003, 2004). This<br />
information is crucial to the development of effective differential sets<br />
of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae for the characterization of P. cubensis variability<br />
(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis is characterized by large variation in<br />
pathogenicity, which was recently reviewed by Lebeda and<br />
Widrlechner (2003). Pathogenicity of P. cubensis, on the basis of<br />
individual isolates, has been characterized in India (Bains and Sharma,<br />
1986), Israel (Cohen et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 1987), Japan and the<br />
USA (Thomas et al., 1987), and recently in the Czech Republic<br />
(Lebeda, 1991, 1999; Lebeda and Gadasová, 2002; Lebeda and Urban,<br />
2004a,b, 2006), leaving much of its geographic range unstudied. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
studies solely defined pathotypes (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003), not<br />
races. <strong>The</strong> main reason for this situation is the lack of differentials to<br />
distinguish among races on the most important <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae host<br />
taxa (e.g., Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, Citrullus). Recently, the first detailed<br />
studies to focus on the variation and dynamics of pathogenicity of P.<br />
cubensis at the population level were conducted in the Czech Republic<br />
(Lebeda and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006). However, comparable studies are<br />
needed from other parts of Europe, the USA, and Asia.<br />
<strong>The</strong> aims of this paper are to review and critically consider the<br />
current state of knowledge on host-parasite (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae-P.<br />
cubensis) specificity and interactions and to suggest future directions<br />
for basic and applied research in this area. Our primary focus is on the<br />
characterization and differentiation of P. cubensis pathogenic<br />
variability, at both the pathotype and race level.<br />
454 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
General Aspects of Host-Pathogen Specificity and<br />
Variation from the Viewpoint of Characterization of<br />
P. cubensis Pathogenicity<br />
In host plant-downy mildew interactions, there is often a very clear<br />
expression of reaction, i.e., susceptibility (+) or resistance (-). This<br />
binary system can serve as a simple classification system for<br />
pathotypes or races, based on the reaction patterns of differential host<br />
genera, species, and/or genotypes (Lebeda and Jendrulek, 1987). Each<br />
differential-host genotype may differ by presence of resistance alleles,<br />
which interact with corresponding pathogen avirulence genes. In<br />
investigating downy mildew pathogenic variability, the following<br />
issues are of importance (Lebeda & Schwinn, 1994): (1) Pathogen and<br />
host phenotypes (host range, virulence, and specificity); (2) pathogen<br />
and host genetics; and (3) genetic models to explain host-pathogen<br />
interactions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most recent review of P. cubensis variation and its<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae host genera was presented by Lebeda and Widrlechner<br />
(2003). Data presented therein clearly demonstrated the existence of<br />
distinct physiological forms of P. cubensis, i.e., pathotypes and races<br />
(Table 1). On the basis of an initial set of differentials (Thomas et al.,<br />
1987; Table 2) and new experimental data, the authors develepod an<br />
improved set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae differentials for more detailed<br />
determination of pathotypes (Table 3), including the creation of a<br />
tetrade coding system for precise pathotype description (Table 4)<br />
(Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003). That review also outlined the most<br />
important reasons for a more detailed examination of host and<br />
pathogen variation from the viewpoint of development of specific<br />
differential sets for P. cubensis.<br />
Host-Plant Resistance Variation and Possibilities<br />
for the Development of Race Differential Sets for<br />
the Determination of P. cubensis<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are at least three candidate genera (Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, and<br />
Citrullus) for the development of differential sets for race<br />
differentiation of P. cubensis. All these genera are known as natural<br />
hosts of P. cubensis (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003; Palti and Cohen,<br />
1980).<br />
CUCUMIS. <strong>The</strong> genus Cucumis is rather diverse, encompassing 32<br />
species (Kirkbride, 1993). Of these, in addition to the two<br />
economically important species, cucumber (C. sativus L.) and melon<br />
(C. melo L.), two additional species, C. anguria L. (“West Indian<br />
gherkin”) and C. metuliferus E. Meyer ex Naudin (“African horned<br />
cucumber” or “jelly melon”), are also commercially exploited for fruit<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 455
production (Baird and Thieret, 1988; Morton, 1987). Other wild<br />
species originating mostly from arid and/or semi-arid regions of Africa<br />
are cultivated as ornamental plants, e.g., C. dipsaceus Ehrenberg ex<br />
Spach (“hedgehog gourd”) and C. myriocarpus Naudin (“gooseberry<br />
gourd”) (Kirkbride, 1993). A comprehensive review of recent<br />
knowledge about Cucumis germplasm and its genetic variation can be<br />
consulted for more information (Lebeda et al., 2006).<br />
Table 1. Survey of data on the occurrence of pathotype- and racespecificity<br />
in interactions between key <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae host genera and<br />
P. cubensis.<br />
Hostparasite<br />
specificity Pathotype Race<br />
Data<br />
Data<br />
Host taxon availability References availability References<br />
Cucumis<br />
3-6,8,9,12,<br />
1, 4-6,8,9,11sativus<br />
-? 13 -? 13,14<br />
Cucumis<br />
2,3,5,6,9,12,<br />
melo<br />
Cucumis<br />
+ 2,3,5,6,7,12,13 + 13<br />
spp.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
+ 3,5,9 -? 3,5,9<br />
pepo<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
+ 6,7,9,10,12,13 + 6,7,9,10,12,13<br />
maxima<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
+ 6,9,10,13 + 6,9,10,13<br />
foetidissima<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
+ 10 + 10<br />
spp.<br />
Citrullus<br />
+ 15 + 15<br />
lanatus + 6,9,12,13 + 6,9,12,13<br />
- = pathotype- or race-specificity absent; + = pathotype- or race-specificity present;<br />
? = data not available or confirmed.<br />
References (for full references see Literature Cited):<br />
(1) Horejsi et al. (2000); (2) Lebeda (1991); (3) Lebeda (1992a); (4) Lebeda (1992b);<br />
(5) Lebeda (1999); (6) Lebeda and Gadasová (2002); (7) Lebeda and Kristkova<br />
(1993, 2000); (8) Lebeda and Prasil (1994); (9) Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003); (10)<br />
Lebeda and Widrlechner (2004); (11) Shetty et al. (2002); (12) Thomas (1982); (13)<br />
Thomas et al. (1987); (14) Wehner and Shetty (1997); (15) Wessel-Beaver (1993).<br />
456 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Critical analysis of the scientific literature demonstrated (Lebeda<br />
and Widrlechner, 2003) that available C. sativus germplasm accessions<br />
and recent commercial cucumber cultivars do not possess effective<br />
sources of resistance, and experimentally verified, race-specific<br />
interactions are unknown. It was concluded that C. sativus genotypes<br />
could be used in differential sets only as a susceptible control (Tables<br />
1–3). Nevertheless, it was suggested to continue investigations of this<br />
host-parasite interaction because there may still be opportunities to<br />
discover race-specific resistance in this species (Lebeda and<br />
Widrlechner, 2003).<br />
<strong>The</strong> natural range of C. melo has yet to be determined conclusively<br />
(Lebeda et al., 2006). Prior to its domestication, it may have been<br />
limited to Africa or may have reached the Near East or perhaps farther<br />
east into Asia (Bates and Robinson, 1995). <strong>The</strong> center of diversity and<br />
perhaps of the origin of the principal melons of world commerce (i.e.,<br />
the C. melo Inodorus and Cantalupensis groups) is located in the Near<br />
East and adjacent central Asian regions (Jeffrey, 1980). In contrast to<br />
C. sativus, recent reports characterize C. melo as displaying<br />
considerable intraspecific variation at various levels, i.e.,<br />
morphological, resistance, genetic, and molecular (Pitrat et al., 2000;<br />
Stepansky et al., 1999). Cucumis melo is the only species in the genus<br />
where the phenomenon of pathotype- and race-specificity of P.<br />
cubensis is relatively well known (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />
Recent, more detailed research on about 100 accessions of C. melo<br />
maintained in the US National Plant Germplasm System’s collection<br />
held at the USDA-ARS <strong>North</strong> Central Regional Plant Introduction<br />
Station in Ames, Iowa, is yielding new information on host-pathogen<br />
interactions (i.e., identifying various and unknown pathotype-specific<br />
reaction patterns) (Lebeda and Widrlechner, unpublished data).<br />
Among the 100 accessions, susceptible responses were most<br />
common, but there were also very clear and diverse race-specific<br />
reaction patterns, giving an opportunity for the development of a<br />
differential set composed solely of C. melo accessions, resembling the<br />
system developed for race differentiation of cucurbit powdery mildew<br />
(Bardin et al., 1999; McCreight, 2006; Pitrat et al., 1998).<br />
Beyond the cultivated Cucumis species, there are about 30 wild<br />
Cucumis species, mostly native to Africa (Kirkbride, 1993). However,<br />
Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003) concluded that wild Cucumis species<br />
are unlikely to haveplayed an important role in the differentiation of P.<br />
cubensis pathotypes and races. More research is needed in this area.<br />
CUCURBITA. <strong>The</strong> genus <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a is native exclusively to the New<br />
World, but has been widely cultivated in the Old World since the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 457
1500s (Paris, 1989, 2001a,b). It is not closely related to other cucurbit<br />
genera (Merrick, 1995).<br />
<strong>The</strong> genus is now thought to consist of between 12 and 15 species,<br />
with 5 regularly cultivated (Lira-Saade, 1995; Sanjur et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong><br />
current state of knowledge about the origin, evolution, and genetic<br />
variation of domesticated <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species was recently reviewed<br />
(Lebeda et al., 2006).<br />
Host-parasite specificity among <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species and various P.<br />
cubensis isolates is a complex phenomenon deserving closer analysis<br />
(Lebeda and Křístková, 1993; Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003). To<br />
date, fairly limited evaluation of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species for resistance to P.<br />
cubensis has been conducted (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003, 2004).<br />
Only a few papers describing the variation of interactions between<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. and P. cubensis, and their specificity, are available. An<br />
evaluation of the responses of 60 cultivars of C. pepo to three<br />
pathotypes of P. cubensis suggested that host-parasite specificity was<br />
controlled by race-specific resistance factors (Lebeda and Křístková,<br />
1993).<br />
Table 2. Differential set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae and differentiation of P.<br />
cubensis pathotypes (adapted from Thomas et al., 1987).<br />
Groups of P. cubensis isolates (country)<br />
M1, M2<br />
(Japan)<br />
Host plant C1 C2 83, 85 C T<br />
differential taxon (Japan) (Japan) (Israel) (US) (US)<br />
Cucumis sativus<br />
C. melo var.<br />
+ + + + +<br />
reticulatus*<br />
C. melo var.<br />
+ + + + +<br />
conomon<br />
C. melo var.<br />
- + + + +<br />
acidulus - - + + +<br />
Citrullus lanatus - - - + +<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.<br />
Pathotype<br />
- - - - +<br />
designation 1 2 3 4 5<br />
* also known as C. melo var. cantalupensis Naudin.<br />
- = incompatible to slightly compatible response; + = highly compatible response.<br />
458 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Pathotype-specificity has also been described for C. maxima and<br />
C. moschata (Bains and Sharma, 1986; Thomas et al., 1987). More<br />
recently, a study was initiated to evaluate a set of wild and weedy<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a populations (97 accessions representing 10 species and 14<br />
taxa), representing a wide phylogenetic cross-section of the genus with<br />
relationships to all five domesticated species, for their responses to<br />
diverse P. cubensis pathotypes (altogether 11 isolates representing 9<br />
pathotypes) (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2004). That study reported<br />
extensive variation in the responses of these <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a accessions to<br />
11 isolates of P. cubensis. In total, 57 different reaction patterns were<br />
recorded with 13 accessions <strong>complete</strong>ly resistant, 12 accessions<br />
<strong>complete</strong>ly susceptible, and 32 accessions expressing pathotype/racespecific<br />
patterns. <strong>The</strong>se data demonstrated that most of the studied<br />
taxa displayed pathotype- and/or race-specificity. <strong>The</strong> most variable<br />
taxa included C. argyrosperma, C. foetidissima, C. okeechobensis, and<br />
C. pepo (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2004). <strong>The</strong> screening of about 50<br />
accessions of different C. pepo morphotypes for resistance to different<br />
P. cubensis pathotypes, as a basis for more detailed understanding of<br />
this host-pathogen interaction, is now underway (Lebeda and Paris,<br />
unpublished results). Collectively, these data can serve as a strong<br />
foundation for the future development of an improved differential set<br />
of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. for race determination of P. cubensis.<br />
CITRULLUS. Four species of Citrullus (C. lanatus [syn. C.<br />
vulgaris], C. colocynthis, C. ecirrhosus, and C. rehmii) have been<br />
generally recognized (Lebeda et al., 2006). Two species (C. lanatus<br />
and C. colocynthis) are widely distributed, and the others are restricted<br />
to the desert regions of Namibia (Jarret and Newman, 2000; Levi et<br />
al., 2000). Citrullus lanatus and C. colocynthis are natural hosts of P.<br />
cubensis (Palti and Cohen, 1980). <strong>The</strong> first clear pathotype/racespecific<br />
reaction pattern between Citrullus spp. and P. cubensis was<br />
identified in C. lanatus (Thomas et al., 1987). This initial report was<br />
verified by inoculation with some European isolates (Lebeda and<br />
Gadasová, 2002; Lebeda and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006). Reactionspecificity<br />
has not been identified in other Citrullus species. A broader<br />
screening of Citrullus species germplasm collections should be<br />
conducted to obtain information about patterns of variation for<br />
resistance (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />
As noted above, there are at least three candidate groups of<br />
cucurbitaceous host plants (Cucumis, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a, and Citrullus) that<br />
could be used for the development of race differential sets for P.<br />
cubensis. Of course, to accomplish this end we need more information<br />
about the phenotypic expression of host-pathogen variation,<br />
mechanisms responsible for resistance, and their genetic bases.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 459
Table 3. Differential set of cucurbit taxa for determination of P.<br />
cubensis pathotypes (adapted from Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae<br />
Accession<br />
number<br />
Cultivar<br />
name<br />
Dif. Differential<br />
No. Value Taxon<br />
Donor EVIGEZ<br />
H39- Marketer<br />
1 1 Cucumis sativus<br />
0121 430<br />
C. melo subsp. PI H40- Ananas<br />
2 2 melo<br />
292008 1117 Yoqne´am<br />
3 4<br />
4 8<br />
5 1<br />
6 2<br />
C. melo subsp.<br />
agrestis var.<br />
conomon<br />
C. melo subsp.<br />
agrestis var.<br />
acidulous<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
subsp. pepo *<br />
C. pepo subsp.<br />
ovifera var. texana<br />
CUM<br />
238/1974<br />
PI<br />
200819<br />
PI<br />
171622<br />
PI<br />
614687<br />
H40-<br />
0625<br />
H40-<br />
0611<br />
H42-<br />
0117<br />
H42-<br />
0130<br />
Baj-Gua<br />
Dolmalik<br />
C. pepo var. PI H42-<br />
7 4 fraterna ** 532355 0136<br />
H42-<br />
8 8 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima<br />
0137<br />
H37-<br />
Goliáš<br />
9 1 Citrullus lanatus<br />
0008<br />
H15-<br />
Malali<br />
10 2 Benincasa hispida BEN 485 0001<br />
H63-<br />
11 4 Luffa cylindrical<br />
0010<br />
Lagenaria<br />
H63-<br />
12 8 siceraria<br />
0009<br />
EVIGEZ - Czech genebank number.<br />
*taxonomy of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species follows recent correspondence with J.H. Wiersema<br />
(USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA).<br />
**originally described as <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fraterna (Lebeda and Gadasová, 2002).<br />
460 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Variation in the Pathogenicity of<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis<br />
INDIVIDUAL LEVEL (PATHOTYPE AND RACE DETERMINATION).<br />
Variability in pathogenicity (virulence) has been described in several<br />
downy mildew isolates at the level of pathotype or race (Table 5).<br />
When there is clear expression of susceptibility or resistance,<br />
classification of pathotypes and races can be based on the patterns of<br />
these reactions in differential hosts (for pathotypes, mostly at the<br />
generic level; for races, mostly at the specific level) (Lebeda and<br />
Schwinn, 1994). However, when relatively good information on host<br />
variation for specific resistance is available (i.e., a validated genetic<br />
model explaining host-pathogen interactions), then there is an<br />
opportunity to move from solely the taxonomic classification of<br />
pathogen races to the concept of virulence phenotypes, i.e., presence or<br />
absence of specific virulence/avirulence factors in individual pathogen<br />
isolates (Lebeda and Schwinn, 1994). For pathotypes, this translates<br />
into the presence or absence of specific disease phenotypes for each<br />
differential genotype (e.g., Table 3).<br />
We can now describe very precisely the pathogenicity of<br />
individual isolates as a pathotype (as a unique tetrade code [Lebeda<br />
and Widrlechner, 2003]) (Table 4) and characterize the structure of<br />
pathogen population at the individual level (Lebeda and Urban,<br />
2004a,b, 2006). This approach is more understandable and efficient<br />
than the previous system of pathotype description (Cohen et al., 2003;<br />
Thomas et al., 1987).<br />
<strong>The</strong> development of a comparable system for race differentiation is<br />
clearly needed, at least for Cucumis melo, the most economically<br />
important <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a species, and Citrullus lanatus. This system can<br />
serve as a foundation for future developments in resistance breeding<br />
and the effective deployment of various resistance alleles and loci for<br />
coordinated control of pathogen populations. Two control strategies<br />
that could function as models for P. cubensis management are the use<br />
of carefully selected multilines or cultivar mixtures (Mundt, 2002) and<br />
the development of cultivars with pyramided resistance alleles (Castro<br />
et al., 2003), which may be facilitated through advances in markerassisted<br />
selection (Servin et al., 2004).<br />
POPULATION STUDIES. <strong>The</strong> development of differentiation systems<br />
provides an opportunity for the more exact description of pathotypes<br />
or races of P. cubensis and is creating the basis for the application of<br />
population biology and genetic studies, and for comparative<br />
investigations of virulence variation in distinct pathogen populations<br />
(Lebeda, 1982). <strong>The</strong> recent system of description of P. cubensis<br />
pathotypes (Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003) is providing a good base<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 461
Table 4. Examples of different P. cubensis pathotypes (expressed in<br />
tetrade codes; see Lebeda and Widrlechner, 2003) collected in the<br />
Czech Republic in 2001–2004.<br />
Level of<br />
pathogenicity/<br />
Year/no. of isolates<br />
pathotype<br />
Low<br />
pathogenicity<br />
(PF = 1–4)<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
3.0.12. 1 0 0 0<br />
11.0.8.<br />
Medium<br />
pathogenicity<br />
(PF = 5–8)<br />
1 0 0 0<br />
15.2.10. 1 5 0 0<br />
15.10.10.<br />
High<br />
pathogenicity<br />
(PF = 9–12)<br />
1 10 0 0<br />
15.14.10. 1 8 4 2<br />
15.14.11. 1 0 11 4<br />
15.14.14. 4 6 6 3<br />
15.15.11. 0 0 2 10<br />
15.15.14. 2 1 6 1<br />
15.15.15. 1 0 6 2<br />
PF = pathogenicity factor (for explanation see Population Studies heading).<br />
for such studies on the level of frequencies of “pathogenicity factors”<br />
(each hypothetical pathogenicity factor [PF] is able to overcome<br />
resistance of one differential genotype [see Table 3]). PF frequencies<br />
(0–100%, or 0.0–1.0) can express very clearly the pathogen population<br />
structure (Figure 1), and their spatial and temporal changes (Lebeda<br />
and Urban, 2004a,b, 2006). Elaboration of this system on the level of<br />
races (i.e., specific virulences to specific genotypes of host species),<br />
could bring a new methodological approach for this plant pathosystem,<br />
i.e., investigations of the genetic structure of virulence of P. cubensis<br />
populations. This approach has been very beneficial for practical<br />
breeding and cultivar use in some other vegetable crops, such as lettuce<br />
(Lebeda, 1981; Lebeda and Zinkernagel, 2003).<br />
We are confident that similar benefits could be gained for cucurbit<br />
breeding and research. Detailed virulence surveys on the local,<br />
462 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
national, and international levels are very important for elucidating<br />
pathogen population structure and behaviour (Lebeda, 1982), including<br />
the understanding of pathogen virulence tactics, strategy, and evolution<br />
(McDonald and Linde, 2002).<br />
Frequency (%)<br />
Fig. 1. Frequency of pathogenicity factors (see Table 3) in P. cubensis popula-<br />
tions in the Czech Republic in the years 2001–2004.<br />
Table 5. Survey of recent data on the determination of P. cubensis<br />
pathotypes and races in various countries.<br />
Pathogenicity<br />
category<br />
Pathotype Race<br />
Data<br />
References<br />
Data<br />
References<br />
Country<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
Pathogenicity factor<br />
avail.<br />
avail.<br />
China ? +? 10<br />
Czech Republic + 5,6,7,8,9 + 5,6,7,8,9<br />
Bulgaria +? 1 +? 1<br />
India + 2 +? 2,10<br />
Israel + 3,11 + 3,11<br />
Japan + 11 +? 11<br />
Poland ? +? 10<br />
USA + 10 + 4,10,11<br />
Others (FR, NL, SP) * + 6 + 6,8<br />
- = pathotype or race absent; + = pathotype or race present; ? = data not available or<br />
not experimentally confirmed; * only one isolate determined.<br />
References (for full references see Literature Cited):<br />
(1) Angelov et al. (2000); (2) Bains and Sharma (1986); (3) Cohen et al. (2003); (4)<br />
Horejsi et al. (2000); (5) Lebeda (1999); (6) Lebeda and Gadasová (2002); (7)<br />
Lebeda and Urban (2004a,b, 2006); (8) Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003); (9) Lebeda<br />
and Widrlechner (2004); (10) Shetty et al. (2002); (11) Thomas et al. (1987).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 463<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004
Conclusions and Recommendations<br />
In conclusion, most of the summary comments and<br />
recommendations made by Lebeda and Widrlechner (2003) remain<br />
timely today:<br />
1. It is evident that P. cubensis is an extremely variable<br />
pathogen from the viewpoint of host specificity/pathogenicity<br />
and virulence.<br />
2. Pathogenicity must be clearly described, first at the<br />
pathotype and race levels, and then at the level of virulence<br />
phenotypes.<br />
3. To this end, internationally recognized and accepted<br />
differential host genotypes (at the level of genera and species<br />
for pathotype differentiation) and differential host lines (at the<br />
species level within a single genus for race differentiation)<br />
must be defined, conserved, and made widely available to the<br />
research and breeding community.<br />
4. <strong>The</strong>re must be a clear and standardized system for P.<br />
cubensis pathotype description (now available [Lebeda and<br />
Widrlechner, 2003]), and for race determination (under<br />
development for Cucumis melo and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp. [Lebeda et<br />
al., unpublished]).<br />
5. Differential host lines for race differentiation must be<br />
sufficiently genetically characterized (i.e., genetics of racespecific<br />
resistance [race-specific resistance genes and/or<br />
factors]).<br />
6. <strong>The</strong> above-mentioned systems should be incorporated into<br />
basic research (e.g., host-pathogen interactions, resistance<br />
mechanisms, population genetic studies, genetics of virulence,<br />
etc.), and also broadly applied in practical resistance breeding<br />
of the world’s most important cucurbit crops.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Angelov, D., P. Georgiev, and L. Krasteva. 2000. Two races of Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis on cucumbers in Bulgaria. Acta Hort. 510:81–83.<br />
Bains, S. S. and N. K. Sharma. 1986. Differential response of certain cucurbits to<br />
isolates of Pseudoperonospora cubensis and characteristics of identified races.<br />
Phytophylactica. 18:31–33.<br />
Baird, J. R. and J. W. Thieret. 1988. <strong>The</strong> bur gherkin (Cucumis anguria var. anguria,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 42:447–451.<br />
Bardin, M., J. Carlier, and P. C. Nicot. 1999. Genetic differentiation in the French<br />
population of Erysiphe cichoracearum, a causal agent of powdery mildew of<br />
cucurbits. Plant Pathol. 48:531–540.<br />
464 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Bates, D. M. and R. W. Robinson. 1995. Cucumbers, melons and water-melons, p.<br />
89–96. In: J. Smartt and N. W. Simmonds (eds.). Evolution of crop plants, 2 nd<br />
ed. Longman Scientific, Harlow, Essex, UK.<br />
Castro, A. J., X. Chen, P. M. Hayes, and M. Johnston. 2003. Pyramiding quantitative<br />
trait locus (QTL) alleles determining resistance to barley stripe rust: effects on<br />
resistance at the seedling stage. Crop. Sci. 43:651–659.<br />
Cohen, Y., I. Meron, N. Mor, and S. Zuriel. 2003. A new pathotype of<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis causing downy mildew in cucurbits in Israel.<br />
Phytoparasitica. 31:458–466.<br />
Horejsi, T., J. E. Staub, and C. Thomas. 2000. Linkage of random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA markers to downy mildew resistance in cucumber (Cucumis<br />
sativus L.). Euphytica. 115:105–113.<br />
Jarret, R. L. and M. Newman. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among species of<br />
Citrullus and the placement of C. rehmii De Winter as determined by Internal<br />
Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequence heterogeneity. Genet. Res. Crop Evol.<br />
47:215–222.<br />
Jeffrey, C. 1980. A review of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 81:233–247.<br />
Kirkbride, J. H., Jr.. 1993. Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumis<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Parkway Publishers, Boone, NC.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1981. Population genetics of lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae).<br />
Phytopath. Z. 101:228–239.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1982. Population genetics aspects in the study of phytopathogenic fungi.<br />
Acta Phytopath. Acad. Sci. Hung. 17:215–219.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1990. Biology and ecology of cucurbit downy mildew, p. 13–46. In: A.<br />
Lebeda (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> downy mildew. Czechoslovak Scientific Society for<br />
Mycology by Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1991. Resistance in muskmelons to Czechoslovak isolates of<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis from cucumbers. Sci. Hort. 45:255–260.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1992a. Screening of wild Cucumis species against downy mildew<br />
(Pseudoperonospora cubensis) isolates from cucumbers. Phytoparasitica.<br />
20:203–210.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1992b. Susceptibility of accessions of Cucumis sativus to<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Tests of Agrochem. and Cult. 13 (Ann. Appl.<br />
Biol., 120[Suppl.]):102–103.<br />
Lebeda, A. 1999. Pseudoperonospora cubensis on Cucumis spp. and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.–<br />
resistance breeding aspects. Acta Hort. 492:363–370.<br />
Lebeda, A. and V. Gadasová. 2002. Pathogenic variation of Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis in the Czech Republic and some other European countries. Acta Hort.<br />
588:137–141.<br />
Lebeda, A. and E. Křístková. 1993. Resistance in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata varieties to cucurbit downy mildew. Plant Var. Seeds. 6:109–114.<br />
Lebeda, A. and E. Křístková. 2000. Interactions between morphotypes <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
pepo and obligate biotrophs (Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Erysiphe<br />
cichoracearum and Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Acta Hort. 510:219–225.<br />
Lebeda, A. and F. J. Schwinn. 1994. <strong>The</strong> downy mildews–an overview of recent<br />
research progress. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 101:225–254.<br />
Lebeda, A. and J. Prášil. 1994. Susceptibility of Cucumis sativus cultivars to<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Acta Phytopath. Entom. Hung. 29:89–94.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 465
Lebeda, A. and J. Urban. 2004a. Disease impact and pathogenicity variation in<br />
Czech populations of Pseudoperonospora cubensis, p. 267–273. In: A. Lebeda<br />
and H. S. Paris (eds.). Progress in <strong>Cucurbit</strong> genetics and breeding research. Proc.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2004, 8 th EUCARPIA Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and<br />
<strong>Breeding</strong>. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Lebeda, A. and J. Urban. 2004b. Distribution, harmfulness and pathogenic variability<br />
of cucurbit downy mildew in the Czech Republic. Acta Fytotechnica et<br />
Zootechnica. 7:170–173.<br />
Lebeda, A. and J. Urban. 2006. Temporal changes in pathogenicity and fungicide<br />
resistance in Pseudoperonospora cubensis populations. Acta Hort. (In press.)<br />
Lebeda, A. and M. P. Widrlechner. 2003. A set of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae taxa for<br />
differentiation of Pseudoperonospora cubensis pathotypes. J. Plant Dis. Protect.<br />
110:337–349.<br />
Lebeda, A. and M. P. Widrlechner. 2004. Response of wild and weedy <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a L.<br />
to pathotypes of Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk. & Curt.) Rostov. (cucurbit<br />
downy mildew), p. 203–210. In: P. T. N. Spencer-Phillips and M. Jeger (eds.).<br />
Advances in downy mildew research, vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers,<br />
Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />
Lebeda, A., M. P. Widrlechner, J. Staub, H. Ezura, J. Zalapa, and E. Křístková. 2006.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>s (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae; Cucumis spp., <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp., Citrullus spp.), ch. 8.<br />
In: R. J. Singh (ed.). Genetic resources, chromosome engineering, and crop<br />
improvement series, vol. 3–vegetable crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. (In<br />
press.)<br />
Lebeda, A. and T. Jendrulek. 1987. Cluster analysis as a method for evaluation of<br />
genetic similarity in specific host-parasite interaction (Lactuca sativa-Bremia<br />
lactucae). <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 75: 194–199.<br />
Lebeda, A. and V. Zinkernagel. 2003. Evolution and distribution of virulence in the<br />
German population of Bremia lactucae. Plant Pathol. 52:41–51.<br />
Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, A. P. Keinath, and T. C. Wehner. 2000. Estimation of<br />
genetic diversity among Citrullus accessions using RAPD markers. Acta Hort.<br />
510:385–390.<br />
Lira-Saade, R. 1995. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a L. In: Estudios taxonómicos y ecogeográphicos de<br />
las <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae Latinoamericanas de importancia económica. Systematics and<br />
Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Genepools, No. 9. IPGRI, Rome.<br />
McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in<br />
melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
131:59–65.<br />
McDonald, B. A. and C. Linde. 2002. Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary<br />
potential, and durable resistance. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:349–379.<br />
Merrick, L. C. 1995. Squashes, pumpkins and gourds, p. 97–105. In: Smartt, J. and<br />
Simmonds, N. W. (eds.). Evolution of crop plants, 2 nd ed. Longman Scientific &<br />
Technical, London, UK.<br />
Morton, J. F. 1987. <strong>The</strong> horned cucumber, alias ‘Kiwano’ (Cucumis metuliferus,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 41:325–327.<br />
Mundt, C. C. 2002. Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease<br />
management. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:381–410.<br />
Palti, J. and Y. Cohen. 1980. Downy mildew of cucurbits (Pseudoperonospora<br />
cubensis): the fungus and its hosts, distribution, epidemiology and control.<br />
Phytoparasitica. 8:109–147.<br />
Paris, H. S. 1989. Historical records, origins, and development of the edible cultivar<br />
groups of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae). Econ. Bot. 43:13–43.<br />
466 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Paris, H. S. 2001a. Characterization of the <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo collection at the Newe<br />
Ya’ar Research Center, Israel. Plant Genet. Res. Newslet. 126:41–45.<br />
Paris, H. S. 2001b. History of the cultivar-groups of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo. Hort. Rev.<br />
25:71–170.<br />
Pitrat, M., C. Dogimont, and M. Bardin. 1998. Resistance to fungal diseases of<br />
foliage in melon, p. 167–173. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae ’98,<br />
Evaluation and Enhancement of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />
VA.<br />
Pitrat, M., P. Hanelt, and K. Hammer. 2000. Some comments on infraspecific<br />
classification of cultivars of melon. Acta Hort. 510:29–36.<br />
Sanjur, O. I., D. R. Piperno, T. C. Andres, and L. Wessel-Beaver. 2002. Phylogenetic<br />
relationships among domesticated and wild species of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: implications for crop plant<br />
evolution and areas of origin. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA). 99:535–540.<br />
Servin, B., O. C. Martin, M. Mezard, and F. Hospital. 2004. Toward a theory of<br />
marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Genetics. 168:513–523.<br />
Shetty, N. V., T. C. Wehner, C. E. Thomas, R. W. Doruchowski, and K. P. V. Shetty.<br />
2002. Evidence for downy mildew races in cucumber tested in Asia, Europe,<br />
and <strong>North</strong> America. Sci. Hort. 94:231–239.<br />
Stepansky, A., I. Kovalski, and R. Perl-Treves. 1999. Intraspecific classification of<br />
melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation.<br />
Plant Syst. Evol. 217: 313–332.<br />
Thomas, C. E. 1982. Resistance to downy mildew in Cucumis melo plant<br />
introductions and American cultivars. Plant Dis. 66:500–502.<br />
Thomas, C. E. 1996. Downy mildew, p. 25–27. In: T. A. Zitter, D. L. Hopkins, and<br />
C. E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of <strong>Cucurbit</strong> diseases. APS Press, St. Paul,<br />
MN.<br />
Thomas, C. E., T. Inaba, and Y. Cohen. 1987. Physiological specialization in<br />
Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Phytopathology. 77:1621–1624.<br />
Wehner, T. C. and N. V. Shetty. 1997. Downy mildew resistance of the cucumber<br />
germplasm collection in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> field tests. Crop Sci. 37:1331–1340.<br />
Wessel-Beaver, L. 1993. Powdery and downy mildew resistance in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
moschata accessions. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genet. Coop. Rep. 16:73–74.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 467
EVALUATING ZUCCHINI YELLOW MOSAIC<br />
VIRUS RESISTANCE IN WATERMELON<br />
Kai-Shu Ling and Amnon Levi<br />
USDA-ARS, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC 29414<br />
Nihat Guner and Todd C. Wehner<br />
Department of Horticultural Science, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
Raleigh, NC 27695<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus, inheritance, recessive gene, SRAP<br />
ABSTRACT. Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) resistance was previously<br />
identified in Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus U.S. Plant Introduction (PI) 595203,<br />
and inheritance studies indicated that the ZYMV resistance is conferred by a<br />
single recessive gene. In this study we examined the inheritance of resistance to<br />
the original ZYMV Florida strain (ZYMV-FL) using F1, F2, and reciprocal BC1<br />
populations derived from PI 595203 and the watermelon cultivar ‘New<br />
Hampshire Midget’ (NHM). <strong>The</strong> results confirmed that PI 595203 is resistant<br />
to ZYMV-FL and the resistance was conferred by a single recessive gene. A<br />
study was initiated to identify DNA markers closely linked to the gene<br />
conferring the ZYMV resistance. Genomic DNA was isolated from the parents<br />
(PI 595203 and NHM) as well as their F1, F2, and BC1 plants. Two hundred and<br />
seventy sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers were tested<br />
for polymorphism between the parents (PI 595203 and NHM). Of these, 135<br />
markers appeared to be polymorphic, and are being used (with the mapping<br />
BC1 and F2 populations) for constructing a genetic linkage map and locating the<br />
ZYMV-resistance gene locus.<br />
Z<br />
ucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), Watermelon mosaic virus<br />
(WMV), Papaya ringspot virus watermelon strain (PRSV-W),<br />
and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) are considered major<br />
viruses of cucurbits. Provvidenti et al. (1984) identified two major<br />
ZYMV strains in the United <strong>State</strong>s and showed that although ZYMV-<br />
CT incites more severe disease symptoms in watermelon, its<br />
distribution is limited to the <strong>North</strong>east. On the other hand, ZYMV-FL<br />
is the most prevalent strain in cucurbit crops in <strong>North</strong> America.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore it is important to first develop watermelon cultivars that are<br />
resistant to ZYMV-FL. Provvidenti (1991) identified four watermelon<br />
(C. lanatus) landraces (PI 482322, PI 482299, PI 482261, and PI<br />
482308) that are resistant to ZYMV-FL. Inheritance studies indicated<br />
that a single recessive gene (zym) is conferring ZYMV-FL resistance<br />
in PI 482261 (Provvidenti, 1991). Boyhan et al. (1992) was the first to<br />
identify cv. Egun (apparently PI 595203) with strong resistance to<br />
ZYMV-FL. Lecoq et al. (1998) also identified other PI accessions<br />
468 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
with resistance to ZYMV. Guner (2004) reevaluated a large PI<br />
collection of watermelon for ZYMV resistance and identified a few<br />
more PIs (including PI 595203). Xu et al. (2004) examined ZYMV-<br />
China Strain (ZYMV-CH) and WMV resistance in watermelon (PI<br />
595203) and determined that the resistance to ZYMV-CH is also<br />
conferred by a single recessive gene (zym-CH). <strong>The</strong> objective of this<br />
study is to evaluate the inheritance of resistance to ZYMV-FL in<br />
watermelon, and identify molecular markers closely linked to the<br />
resistance gene. <strong>The</strong>se markers will be useful in marker-assisted<br />
selection (MAS) to incorporate the resistance into watermelon<br />
cultivars.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
HOST PLANT AND GENETIC MATERIALS. F1, F2, and reciprocal<br />
BC1 populations, derived from a cross between PI 595203 (ZYMVresistant)<br />
and cv. New Hampshire Midget (NHM) (ZYMVsusceptible),<br />
were developed by Guner and Wehner at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong><br />
<strong>State</strong> University (Guner, 2004). Seeds were germinated in an insectfree<br />
greenhouse with temperature of 18–30C and 14–16 hours of<br />
natural lighting period at the U. S. Vegetable Laboratory in<br />
Charleston, SC. <strong>The</strong> two youngest leaves were collected from young<br />
seedlings (4–5 leaf stage) for DNA isolation. Plants were then<br />
mechanically inoculated with the ZYMV-FL culture.<br />
VIRUS ISOLATE AND INOCULATION. <strong>The</strong> ZYMV-FL culture is<br />
derived from the original ZYMV-FL strain isolated by Provvidenti<br />
(1984). <strong>The</strong> virus was propagated and maintained on Gray zucchini<br />
squash. Virus inoculum was prepared by macerating virus-infected<br />
leaves (1:5 w/v) in 0.01M phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, with<br />
mortar and pestle. Seedlings were inoculated by lightly dusting the<br />
leaves with carborundum then mechanical rubbing with acotton Q-tip<br />
soaked in the virus inoculum. Application involved several circular<br />
motions until the entire leaf was covered. Excess carborundum was<br />
rinsed with water and the inoculated seedlings were placed under the<br />
shade for a few hours to minimize direct sunlight damage to the newly<br />
inoculated leaves. Three weeks after inoculation, plants were<br />
evaluated for virus symptoms (Figure 1). Virus disease severity was<br />
rated as: 0 = no symptoms; 1= slight mosaic on leaves; 2 = mosaic<br />
patches and/or necrotic spots on leaves; 3 = leaves near apical<br />
meristem are slightly deformed, with yellow color and reduced leaf<br />
size; 4 = apical meristem has deformed shape and with mosaic<br />
appearance; 5 = extensive mosaic appearance and severe leaf<br />
deformation, or plant is dead (Xu et al., 2004).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 469
ELISA. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was<br />
performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioReba,<br />
Switzerland). Microtiter plates were first coated with 1μg/ml of<br />
ZYMV antibody, and virus particles were trapped after incubating the<br />
tissue extract on the coated plates. Leaf extract was prepared by<br />
processing the collected leaf tissue with a tissue homogenizer Homex-<br />
6 (BioReba) in tissue extraction buffer (1:20 w/v). <strong>The</strong> alkaline<br />
phosphatase conjugated antibody to ZYMV was then added to the<br />
plate. Finally, yellow color developed in positive samples due to<br />
enzyme-substrate hydrolysis was measured with an ELISA reader. A<br />
sample with absorbance value of at least twice the mean health<br />
controls (OD at 405nm) is regarded as positive.<br />
Fig. 1: Comparison of the resistant PI 595203 (left) and the susceptible cv. New<br />
Hampshire Midget (right) to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus infection.<br />
SEQUENCE-RELATED AMPLIFICATION POLYMORPHISM. Genomic<br />
DNA was isolated from the parent plants (PI 595203 and NHM), and<br />
from their F1, F2, and BC1 plants as described by Levi et al. (2004).<br />
Two hundred and seventy sequence-related amplified polymorphism<br />
(SRAP) markers were tested for polymorphism between the parents<br />
(PI 595203 and NHM) as described by Levi et al. (2006).<br />
470 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Results and Discussion<br />
All 19 F1 plants from the cross between NHM and PI 595203 were<br />
susceptible, indicating that the ZYMV-FL resistance in PI 595203 is<br />
controlled by a recessive gene. <strong>The</strong> F2, BC1R, and BC1S segregation<br />
data were tested against the expected ratio for a single recessive gene<br />
and to confirm the observations by Provvidenti (1991) and Xu et al.<br />
(2004). Interestingly, the F2 segregation data (71S:10R) did not<br />
support the expected 3:1 (susceptible: resistance) ratio (Table 1). <strong>The</strong><br />
cause for this skewed characterization toward susceptibility to ZYMV-<br />
FL in the F2 population was not determined. However, BC1S<br />
population was all susceptible and BC1R population was segregating<br />
in 1:1 (69S:61R) ratio supporting a single recessive gene.<br />
Of the 270 SRAP primer pairs tested, 135 produced polymorphism<br />
between the parents PI 595203 and NHM. <strong>The</strong>se polymorphic markers<br />
are being used with mapping BC1 and F2 populations for constructing<br />
a genetic linkage map and locating the ZYMV-resistance gene locus.<br />
Table 1. Single locus goodness-of-fit-test for ZYMV-FL resistance in<br />
watermelon (‘New Hampshire Midget’ x PI 595203).<br />
Generation Total Susceptible Resistance Expected ratio X 2 df P-value<br />
NHM 12 12 0<br />
PI 595203 11 0 11<br />
F1 19 19 0<br />
F2 81 71 10 3:1 7.78 1 0.005<br />
BC1R 130 69 61 1:1 0.49 1 0.5<br />
BC1S 20 20 0<br />
This study confirmed that a single recessive gene confers<br />
resistance to ZYMV-FL in PI 595203. <strong>The</strong> slight deviation from the<br />
expected 3:1 ratio in the F2 population may be a result of preferential<br />
segregation that may occur in wide crosses between Citrullus PIs and<br />
watermelon cultivars (Levi et al. 2006). <strong>The</strong> preliminary SRAP<br />
analysis revealed sufficient polymorphism between NHM and PI<br />
595203 that might be useful in identifying a DNA marker linked to the<br />
ZYMV-resistance gene locus. <strong>The</strong> marker will be useful in markerassisted<br />
selection (MAS) to incorporate the resistance into watermelon<br />
cultivars.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 471
Literature Cited<br />
Boyhan, G., J. D. Norton, B. J. Jacobsen, and B. R. Abrahams. 1992. Evaluation of<br />
watermelon and related germplasm for resistance to Zucchini yellow mosaic<br />
virus. Plant Dis. 76:251–252.<br />
Guner, N. 2004. Papaya ringspot virus watermelon strain and Zucchini yellow<br />
mosaic virus resistance in watermelon. PhD Diss., Department of Horticultural<br />
Sciences, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> Univ., Raleigh, NC.<br />
Lecoq, H., G. Wisler, and M. Pitrat. 1998. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> viruses: the classics and the<br />
emerging, p. 126–142. In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 1998:<br />
evaluation and enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria,<br />
VA.<br />
Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, M. Newman, O. U. K. Reddy, X. Zhang, and Y. Xu. 2004.<br />
ISSR and AFLP markers sufficiently differentiated among American<br />
watermelon cultivars with limited genetic diversity. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
129:553–558.<br />
Levi, A., C. E. Thomas, T. Trebitsh, A. Salman, J. King, J. Karalius, M. Newman, O.<br />
U. K. Reddy, Y. Xu, and X. Zhang. 2006. An extended linkage map for<br />
watermelon based on SRAP, AFLP, SSR, ISSR and RAPD markers. J. Amer.<br />
Soc. Hort. Sci. (In press.)<br />
Provvidenti, R. 1991. Inheritance of resistance to the Florida strain of Zucchini<br />
yellow mosaic virus in watermelon. HortSci. 26:407–408.<br />
Provvidenti, R., D. Gonsalves, and H. S. Humaydan. 1984. Occurrence of Zucchini<br />
yellow mosaic virus in cucurbits from Connecticut, New York, Florida, and<br />
California. Plant Dis. 68:443–446.<br />
Xu, Y., D. Kang, Z. Shi, H. Shen, and T. Wehner, T. 2004. Inheritance of resistance<br />
to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus and Watermelon mosaic virus in watermelon.<br />
J. Hered. 95:498–502.<br />
472 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
OCCURRENCE OF FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE<br />
IN PODOSPHAERA XANTHII AND IMPACT<br />
ON CONTROLLING CUCURBIT POWDERY<br />
MILDEW IN NEW YORK<br />
Margaret Tuttle McGrath<br />
Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University<br />
Long Island Horticultural Research and Extension Center<br />
3059 Sound Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901-1098<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. QoI fungicides, Strobilurin fungicides, DMI<br />
fungicides, pumpkin<br />
ABSTRACT. Frequency of QoI-resistant strains of Podosphaera xanthii<br />
(Castagne) U. Braun & N. Shishkoff was low in commercial production fields at<br />
the start of powdery mildew development in 2003 (detected in one of five fields),<br />
but increased greatly to 61–100% in all fields, and was associated with poor<br />
disease control. Resistant strains were found in nontreated fields at the end of<br />
the season. Frequency was high at the start of powdery mildew development in<br />
2004 (32–91%). Strains moderately insensitive to DMI fungicides were detected<br />
in all fields in 2003 (1–25%) and in 2004 (15–84%) before these fungicides were<br />
used but the DMIs Nova and Procure provided excellent control when<br />
evaluated in 2005 where DMI-insensitive strains were present, indicating that<br />
DMI resistance has not reached a degree that control is affected. Programs<br />
with QoI, DMI, and protectant fungicides were effective, but not as effective as<br />
the new fungicide Quintec applied alone.<br />
P<br />
owdery mildew is a common disease of cucurbits under field<br />
and greenhouse conditions in most areas of the world.<br />
Management is needed to avoid loss in fruit quantity and market<br />
quality. Mobile fungicides (those with systemic, translaminar, or<br />
volatile activity) are needed to control powdery mildew on the<br />
underside of leaves where this disease typically develops best.<br />
Unfortunately these fungicides tend to be at risk for resistance<br />
development due to their single-site mode of action. And the cucurbit<br />
powdery mildew fungus, Podosphaera (sect. Sphaerotheca) xanthii<br />
(Castagne) U. Braun & N. Shishkoff, has a history of developing<br />
resistance, beginning with benomyl in the late 1960s, which was one<br />
of the first cases of fungicide resistance (McGrath, 2001).<br />
Application of fungicides continues to be the principal practice for<br />
managing powdery mildew in cucurbit crops, but successful control is<br />
challenged by development of resistance to key fungicides (McGrath<br />
2001). While there are varieties with genetic resistance to this disease,<br />
an integrated program is recommended to reduce selection pressure for<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 473
pathogen strains able to overcome the genetic resistance in the plant as<br />
well as fungicide resistance. Powdery mildew is the most common<br />
disease occurring every year throughout the U.S. <strong>The</strong> pathogen<br />
develops best on the lower surface (underside) of leaves, thus a<br />
successful management program necessitates controlling the pathogen<br />
on the lower as well as the upper surface. It is difficult to deliver<br />
fungicide directly to the lower surface, even with new nozzle types and<br />
air-assist sprayers. Consequently, an important component of<br />
fungicide programs has been fungicides able to move to the lower leaf<br />
surface. Most of these fungicides are systemic (e.g., Topsin M,<br />
Nova) or have translaminar activity (e.g., Amistar, Cabrio,<br />
Flint, Quadris). Some, notably the new fungicide Quintec<br />
(Fungicide Resistance Action Committee [FRAC] Group 13), have<br />
high volatility, enabling redistribution from upper to lower leaf<br />
surfaces.<br />
Unfortunately, these fungicides effective on lower leaf surfaces<br />
have been prone to resistance development due to their single-site<br />
mode of action. Additionally, the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus has<br />
demonstrated ability to evolve new strains resistant to these fungicides.<br />
Presence of resistant strains has been associated with control failure.<br />
With some fungicides, including MBC (methyl benzimidazole<br />
carbamate) fungicides, aka benzimidazoles (e.g., Topsin M) (FRAC<br />
Group 1), and QoI (quinone outside inhibiting) fungicides, aka<br />
strobilurins (e.g., Amistar, Cabrio, Flint, Quadris) (FRAC Group 11),<br />
this change renders the pathogen strain <strong>complete</strong>ly resistant to the<br />
fungicide (qualitative resistance). With other fungicides, including the<br />
DMI (demethylation inhibiting) fungicides (Bayleton, Nova, and<br />
Procure) (FRAC Group 3), pathogen strains exhibit a range in<br />
fungicide sensitivity depending on the number of genetic changes they<br />
possess that affect the fungicide’s ability to function (quantitative<br />
resistance).<br />
During the 1990s, grower complaints of inadequate control of<br />
powdery mildew in New York, as well as elsewhere in the U.S., were<br />
found to be due to resistance to Bayleton (DMI) and Benlate (MBC),<br />
the only mobile fungicides registered at that time (McGrath et al.,<br />
1996). For a few years after detection of Bayleton resistance, initial<br />
resistance frequency was found to be sufficiently low that one<br />
application of this fungicide was effective; however, the proportion of<br />
the pathogen population that was resistant subsequently increased<br />
greatly, thus additional applications were ineffective (McGrath, 1996).<br />
This information combined with efficacy data from fungicide<br />
evaluation experiments provided the necessary support to obtain<br />
474 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
emergency registration of Quadris and Nova, a new DMI, in some<br />
states in 1998 and 1999, respectively. <strong>The</strong>se fungicides received full<br />
federal registration in the U.S. in 1999 and 2000, respectively. Nova<br />
was effective while Bayleton was not because resistance to the DMIs<br />
is quantitative and Nova is inherently more active. DMI resistance did<br />
have some impact on Nova efficacy: the lowest labeled rate was no<br />
longer as effective as higher rates. Growers were encouraged to use<br />
high rates to obtain good control as well as to manage further<br />
development of DMI resistance. Strains of P. xanthii fully resistant to<br />
Bayleton but controlled by high rates of Nova were called moderately<br />
insensitive to DMIs.<br />
<strong>The</strong> recommendation to growers was to apply Quadris in<br />
alternation with Nova plus a protectant fungicide on a seven-day<br />
schedule, beginning before powdery mildew started to develop or,<br />
preferably, after reaching the action threshold of 1 leaf with symptoms<br />
out of 50 older leaves examined. Initially QoIs were thought to have<br />
medium resistance risk and resistance would be quantitative. After<br />
reports of rapid development of qualitative resistance that rendered<br />
QoIs ineffective elsewhere in the world, the recommended fungicide<br />
program was modified to include a protectant with the QoI. Protectants<br />
are a valuable component of the program because they have low<br />
resistance risk and control strains resistant to the mobile fungicides.<br />
QoI resistance was detected in NY and elsewhere in the U.S. in<br />
2002 when QoIs failed in fungicide-efficacy experiments (McGrath<br />
and Shishkoff, 2003a). This was three years after federal registration<br />
and the fourth year that QoIs were used by growers in some states.<br />
Resistance was detected in the geographically separated east and west<br />
regions. In the eastern U.S., P. xanthii is thought to survive over<br />
winter in southern Florida and then move northward with the<br />
successive cropping seasons. Winds do not move in a southward<br />
direction often enough to provide the pathogen a means to move back<br />
down the coast in the fall. It could survive north of Florida as<br />
ascomata (cleistothecia), but these are not thought to play an important<br />
role considering cropping practices.<br />
In 2002 fungicide sensitivity was determined for isolates of P.<br />
xanthii collected at crop maturity from fungicide-efficacy experiments<br />
in Georgia (GA), <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> (NC) and NY. <strong>The</strong> maximum<br />
concentration tolerated by most of the 73 isolates (89%) was either 0.5<br />
or 100mg/ml of the QoI trifloxystrobin, indicating that resistance was<br />
qualitative. Four of 9 NY isolates, 19 of 21 GA isolates, and 13 of 15<br />
NC isolates from plants treated weekly with a QoI fungicide were able<br />
to grow well on leaf disks treated with 100mg/ml trifloxystrobin. In<br />
the NY fungicide-efficacy experiment, after two applications, Quadris<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 475
used alone was as effective as Quadris alternated with Nova plus<br />
sulfur; but at the assessment made eight days later following two more<br />
applications, powdery mildew was as severe on Quadris-treated leaves<br />
as on nontreated leaves (McGrath and Shishkoff, 2003a, 2003c).<br />
Surprisingly, many isolates resistant to QoIs were moderately<br />
insensitive to DMIs, an unrelated fungicide group: 56% of the NY<br />
isolates and 90% of the NC isolates. No isolate was found that was<br />
resistant to QoIs and sensitive to DMIs. This situation constrains<br />
managing QoI and DMI resistance (McGrath and Shishkoff, 2003b).<br />
Research was conducted in 2003 to 2005 in NY to (1) examine<br />
occurrence of fungicide-resistant strains in commercial production<br />
fields before mobile fungicides for powdery mildew were applied to<br />
these crops, and (2) examine the impact of fungicide use on resistance<br />
and of resistance on fungicide efficacy. <strong>The</strong>se goals were achieved by<br />
monitoring resistance in commercial fields using a seedling bioassay,<br />
examining powdery mildew control, and assessing fungicide efficacy<br />
and resistance occurrence in replicated experiments. Preliminary<br />
reports of the individual experiments have been published and contain<br />
additional detail on methods and results (McGrath, 2004a, 2004b,<br />
2005a, 2005b; McGrath and Davey, 2006).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
An in-field seedling bioassay was used in 2003 and 2004 to<br />
determine the fungicide sensitivity of the powdery mildew fungal<br />
pathogen population in cucurbit fields at commercial farms and at the<br />
Cornell University Long Island Horticultural Research and Extension<br />
Center (LIHREC) in Suffolk County, NY.<br />
<strong>The</strong> seedling bioassay entailed placing fungicide-treated seedlings<br />
in a field of cucurbits with powdery mildew. Summer squash<br />
seedlings were grown in a growth chamber. <strong>The</strong>ir growing point and<br />
unexpanded leaves were removed just before treatment. Seedlings<br />
varied in size from one to nine true leaves. Treatments were no<br />
fungicide, QoI fungicide (50mg/L trifloxystrobin formulated as Flint),<br />
DMI fungicide (20mg/L myclobutanil; Nova), and a combination of<br />
the QoI and DMI fungicides. Seedlings were dipped in the fungicide<br />
solutions, then allowed to dry overnight before setting in a cucurbit<br />
crop in groups of four plants with the four treatments. <strong>The</strong>re were two<br />
to seven groups per field. After being in fields for 4 to 22 hours,<br />
seedlings were kept in a greenhouse until symptoms of powdery<br />
mildew were visible, which took at least one week. <strong>The</strong>n severity<br />
(percent tissue with symptoms) was visually estimated for each leaf on<br />
a 0 to 100% continuous scale. Frequency of resistant pathogen strains<br />
476 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
in a field was estimated by calculating the ratio of severity on<br />
fungicide-treated plants relative to nontreated plants for each group,<br />
then determining the field average.<br />
In 2003, three early crops of zucchini and yellow summer squash<br />
that had not been sprayed with QoI or DMI fungicides were identified<br />
for the first bioassay. Two early plantings of pumpkin that had not<br />
been treated with fungicides were also selected for this bioassay<br />
because powdery mildew was observed in these plants in late July at<br />
the same time symptoms were first observed in the squash plants.<br />
Another bioassay was conducted about one month later on 31 August<br />
in six commercial pumpkin fields and a winter squash experiment at<br />
LIHREC after QoI and/or DMI fungicides were used in these fields.<br />
Powdery mildew severity was assessed in some of these fields before<br />
the bioassay was conducted and again at the time of the bioassay. A<br />
third assay conducted on 25 September included pumpkin fields where<br />
no QoI or DMI fungicides were used.<br />
In 2004, the seedling assay was conducted in seven fields at six<br />
farms on 29 July. Due to the high frequency of resistance the assay<br />
was not conducted again.<br />
Efficacy of fungicides used alone plus combined in fungicide<br />
programs and impact of fungicide use on fungicide resistance were<br />
assessed through three replicated experiments conducted with<br />
pumpkin at LIHREC in 2003 to 2005. Most treatments were initiated<br />
after the IPM threshold of one leaf with powdery mildew symptoms of<br />
50 old leaves examined was reached. Upper and lower surfaces of 5 to<br />
25 leaves in each plot were examined weekly for powdery mildew.<br />
Average severity for the entire canopy was calculated from the<br />
individual leaf assessments. Area under the disease progress curve<br />
(AUDPC) was calculated for severity over all assessment dates to<br />
obtain a summation value for the entire epidemic. Fungicides were<br />
applied weekly with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer equipped with<br />
D5-25 hollow cone nozzles spaced 17 inches apart that delivered 85–<br />
100gpa at 100–110psi. Fungicide sensitivity was determined for<br />
isolates collected from select plots using a leaf disk assay (McGrath,<br />
1996).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In 2003, QoI resistance was detected in one of four fields at the<br />
start of powdery mildew development before QoIs had been applied<br />
(Table 1). QoI resistance was not detected in a research field.<br />
Moderate resistance to DMIs was detected in all fields (at a frequency<br />
of 1–25%). One month later, QoI resistance was detected at a high<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 477
level (61–100%) in all six commercial fields examined, including a<br />
field where only DMI fungicides had been used, plus the research site.<br />
Moderately DMI-insensitive strains were also more common (13–<br />
56%). Control of powdery mildew in commercial pumpkin fields was<br />
poor. <strong>The</strong> lower surface of most leaves was at least 50% covered by<br />
powdery mildew and many leaves had died prematurely by 31 August.<br />
Control appeared to be only slightly better in plots in a fungicideefficacy<br />
experiment where a fungicide program recommended to<br />
growers (QoI plus sulfur alternated with DMI plus sulfur on a weekly<br />
schedule) was applied (Table 2). Another bioassay was conducted in<br />
2003 to determine how widespread QoI resistance had become. It was<br />
detected in three fields where neither QoI nor DMI fungicides had<br />
been used. Two were organic production fields. Typically in these<br />
bioassays powdery mildew severity on plants treated with a DMI was<br />
similar to severity on plants treated with both a DMI and a QoI,<br />
indicating that most strains moderately insensitive to DMIs were also<br />
resistant to QoIs.<br />
Several fungicide programs were evaluated in 2003 (Table 2). On<br />
8 September after five weekly applications to pumpkin (7 Aug to 6<br />
Sept), the QoI Flint applied in alternation with sulfur was providing<br />
poor control (37% on upper leaf surfaces and 0% on lower surfaces).<br />
Control was improved by applying sulfur every week and applying on<br />
alternate weeks a DMI fungicide; using Nova provided 84% and 48%<br />
control on upper and lower leaf surfaces, respectively; the DMI<br />
Procure provided a similar level of control (89% and 34%). Control<br />
was not improved significantly by applying Flint and Procure more<br />
than once in a fungicide program with weekly applications of sulfur,<br />
most likely due to high frequency of resistant strains. Flint plus sulfur<br />
applied Week 1 followed by Procure plus sulfur Week 2, then sulfur<br />
alone Weeks 3 to 5 provided 68% and 24% control. Sulfur applied<br />
alone Weeks 3 to 5 did contribute to control; where only Week 1 and 2<br />
applications of Flint, Procure, and sulfur were made, powdery mildew<br />
on 8 September, 25 days after the last application, was as severe as<br />
where no fungicides were applied. In comparison, 95% and 91%<br />
control was obtained with Quintec (quinoxyfen) applied on the same<br />
dates. Strains moderately insensitive to DMIs and resistant to QoIs<br />
were present.<br />
In 2004, QoI resistance was detected in all seven fields at the start<br />
of powdery mildew development (frequency of 32–91%) (Table 3).<br />
QoIs had been applied only in one field. Moderate insensitivity to<br />
DMIs was detected in all fields (15–84%). Although MBC fungicides<br />
are now very rarely used for cucurbit disease control, resistant strains<br />
of P. xanthii were common (31–91%). Fungicide programs with a QoI<br />
478 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Proportion of cucurbit powdery mildew fungal population<br />
estimated to be moderately insensitive to DMI fungicides and<br />
proportion resistant to QoI fungicides based on results from a<br />
fungicide-sensitivity seedling bioassay in 2003.<br />
DMI moderately<br />
insensitive isolates<br />
(%) z<br />
QoI-resistant<br />
isolates<br />
(%) z<br />
Site 7/27 8/31 9/25 7/27 8/31 9/25<br />
1<br />
33 61<br />
2 1 13 0 100<br />
Cornell LIHREC 16 56 0 100<br />
3 (no QoIs) 44 5 83 88<br />
4 6 56 61 91<br />
5 12 1 89 89<br />
6 25 0<br />
7 35 1 97 97<br />
8 (Organic) 1 2<br />
9 (Organic) 1 56<br />
10 (no QoIs or<br />
DMIs)<br />
17 1 0 38<br />
z<br />
blank indicates bioassay not conducted at that site on that date.<br />
(Flint or Pristine) and a DMI (Nova or Procure) were not as effective as<br />
applying Quintec weekly even when Quintec was in two of the six<br />
applications (Table 2). When efficacy of products as well as programs<br />
was examined in 2005, the DMIs were more effective than Pristine,<br />
which was equal in efficacy to Endura (FRAC Group 7), which<br />
contains the second active ingredient in Pristine. <strong>The</strong>refore, strains<br />
moderately insensitive to DMIs are controlled by Nova and Procure,<br />
and QoIs no longer appear to be effective due to resistance.<br />
As a result of QoI and DMI resistance, the cost of controlling<br />
powdery mildew plus other foliar diseases with fungicides has doubled<br />
due to the need to apply DMIs at a high rate, to include a protectant<br />
fungicide with each application, and to include additional fungicides in<br />
the control program. QoIs have broader spectrum activity than other<br />
mobile fungicides effective for powdery mildew.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 479
Table 2. Control of powdery mildew achieved on upper and lower leaf<br />
surfaces of pumpkin with fungicide programs evaluated in replicated<br />
experiments conducted in 2003 to 2005. Control based on AUDPC<br />
values relative to nontreated control.<br />
Powdery mildew control (%)<br />
Year Treatment (week of application) Upper Lower<br />
2003 Flint (1,3,5) alternated with sulfur (2,4) 63 c 25 b<br />
2003 Flint + sulfur (1,3,5), Nova + sulfur (2,4) 91 e 59 de<br />
2003 Flint + sulfur (1,3,5), Procure + sulfur (2,4) 93 e 56 de<br />
2003 Flint + S + Nova (1,3,5), Procure + S (2,4) 92 e 68 e<br />
2003 Flint + S (1), Procure + S (2), S (3–5) 85 de 44 cd<br />
2003 Flint + S (1), Procure + S (2) 33 b 37 bc<br />
2003 Quintec (1–5) 93 e 86 f<br />
2004 Pristine + sulfur (1,3,5), Nova + S (2,4), S (6) 95 cd 87 cd<br />
2004 Pristine + sulfur (1), Quintec + S (2), Nova +<br />
S (3), Quintec + S (4), Pristine + S (5), S (6)<br />
97 cd 92 d<br />
2004 Procure + sulfur (1,3,5), Flint + S (2,4), S (6) 92 c 83 c<br />
2004 Procure + sulfur (1), Quintec + S (2), Procure<br />
+ S (3), Quintec + S (4), Procure + S (5), S(6)<br />
97 cd 88 cd<br />
2004 Procure + sulfur (1), Quintec + S (2), Quintec<br />
+ S (3), Procure + S (4), Procure + S (5), S (6)<br />
95 cd 98 e<br />
2004 Quintec (1–6) 99 d 98 e<br />
2005 Bravo Ultrex(1–5) 91 bcde 44 b<br />
2005 Pristine (1–5) 94 cde 46 b<br />
2005 Endura (1–5) 87 bcd 56 bc<br />
2005 Nova (1–5) 91 bcde 82 ef<br />
2005 Procure 50WS (1–5) 98 e 93 f<br />
2005 Procure 480SC (1–5) 96 cde 76 def<br />
2005 Procure 480SC (1,3,5), Quintec (2,4) 91 bcde 88 ef<br />
2005 Procure 480SC (1,3,5), Pristine (2,4) 89 bcde 75 cdef<br />
2005 Nova (1,4,5), Pristine (2,4) 78 b 60 bcd<br />
2005 Pristine (1), Quintec (2), Nova (3),<br />
Pristine(4), Quintec (5), S (1–5)<br />
97 de 71 cde<br />
2005 Quintec (1), Pristine (2), Quintec (3), Nova<br />
(4), Pristine (5), S(1–5)<br />
96 cde 74 cdef<br />
2005 Quintec (1), Pristine (2), Quintec (3), Nova<br />
(4), Quintec (5), S (2X premildew,1–5)<br />
98 e 87 ef<br />
S = sulfur. Treatments in year with a letter in common are not significantly different.<br />
480 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 3. Proportion of cucurbit powdery mildew fungal population<br />
estimated to be moderately insensitive to DMI fungicides and<br />
proportion resistant to QoI or MBC fungicides based on results from a<br />
fungicide-sensitivity seedling bioassay in 2004.<br />
Resistant isolates (%) on July 29, 2004<br />
QoI +<br />
Site Crop QoI DMI DMI MBC<br />
1 Pumpkin<br />
Summer<br />
39 20 1 36<br />
2 squash<br />
91 57 59 91<br />
2 Pumpkin<br />
Summer<br />
56 26 34 84<br />
3 squash<br />
Summer<br />
88 78 64 75<br />
4 squash<br />
87 84 53 90<br />
5 Pumpkin 66 15 24 73<br />
6 Pumpkin 32 31 50 31<br />
Literature Cited<br />
McGrath, M. T. 1996. Increased resistance to triadimefon and to benomyl in<br />
Sphaerotheca fuliginea populations following fungicide usage over one season.<br />
Plant Dis. 80:633–639.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2001. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew:<br />
experiences and challenges. Plant Dis. 85(3):236–245.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2004a. Evaluation of fungicide programs for managing powdery<br />
mildew of pumpkin, 2003. Fungicide & Nematicide Tests. 59:V056.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2004b. Seasonal dynamics of resistance to QoI and DMI fungicides<br />
in Podosphaera xanthii and impact on control of cucurbit powdery mildew. Res.<br />
Pest Mgmt. 13(2).<br />
.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2005a. Evaluation of fungicide programs for managing pathogen<br />
resistance and powdery mildew of pumpkin, 2004. Fungicide & Nematicide<br />
Tests. 60:V049.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2005b. Occurrence of resistance to QoI, DMI, and MBC fungicides<br />
in Podosphaera xanthii in 2004 and implication for controlling cucurbit<br />
powdery mildew. Res. Pest Mgmt. 14(2).<br />
.<br />
McGrath, M. T. and Davey, J. F. 2006. Evaluation of fungicide programs for<br />
managing powdery mildew of pumpkin, 2005. Fungicide & Nematicide Tests.<br />
61:V038<br />
McGrath, M. T. and Shishkoff, N. 2003a. Evaluation of fungicide programs for<br />
managing powdery mildew of pumpkin, 2002. Fungicide & Nematicide Tests.<br />
58:V023.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 481
McGrath, M. T. and Shishkoff, N. 2003b. First report of the cucurbit powdery<br />
mildew fungus (Podosphaera xanthii) resistant to strobilurin fungicides in the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s. Plant Dis. 87:1007.<br />
McGrath, M. T. and Shishkoff, N. 2003c. Resistance to strobilurin fungicides in<br />
Podosphaera xanthii associated with reduced control of cucurbit powdery<br />
mildew in research fields in the Eastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Res. Pest Mgmt. 12(2).<br />
.<br />
McGrath, M. T, Staniszewska, H., Shishkoff, N., and Casella, G. 1996. Fungicide<br />
sensitivity of Sphaerotheca fuliginea populations in the United <strong>State</strong>s. Plant<br />
Dis. 80:697–703.<br />
482 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
FRUIT YIELD, QUALITY PARAMETERS, AND<br />
POWDERY MILDEW (SPHAEROTHECA<br />
FULIGINEA) SUSCEPTIBILITY OF<br />
SPECIALTY MELON (CUCUMIS MELO L.)<br />
CULTIVARS GROWN IN A PASSIVELY<br />
VENTILATED GREENHOUSE<br />
J. M. Mitchell, D. J. Cantliffe, and S. A. Sargent<br />
University of Florida, IFAS, Horticultural Sciences Dept., Gainesville,<br />
FL 32611<br />
L. E. Datnoff<br />
University of Florida, IFAS, Plant Pathology Dept., Gainesville, FL<br />
32611<br />
P. J. Stoffella<br />
University of Florida, IFAS, Horticultural Sciences Dept., Indian<br />
River Research and Education Center, Ft. Pierce, FL 34945<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Galia, muskmelon, protected agriculture, disease<br />
progress curves<br />
ABSTRACT. Like other cucurbits, many specialty melons (Cucumis melo L.) are<br />
susceptible to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Although greenhouse<br />
production decreases the risk for some diseases, greenhouses provide an optimal<br />
environment for the development of powdery mildew. Eighteen specialty melon<br />
cultivars were grown during fall 2005 in a passively ventilated greenhouse in<br />
Citra, FL, and rated for their fruit yield, fruit-quality characteristics, and<br />
susceptibility to powdery mildew. Disease-severity ratings (DSR) based on the<br />
percentage of leaf area infected were taken once per week from 47 days after<br />
transplanting (DAT) until the final harvest. Plants were sprayed with potassium<br />
bicarbonate (Milstop) once per week, beginning at first sign of disease (after the<br />
first rating), to suppress mildew infection. Area under disease progress curve<br />
(AUDPC) values were calculated from the weekly DSR ratings. Yield as number<br />
of fruit per plant was similar for all cultivars. Although three cultivars with<br />
100% DSR had among the lowest yields, powdery mildew severity could not be<br />
correlated with yield or fruit quality for any of the cultivars. <strong>The</strong> Charentaistype<br />
cultivars were the most susceptible to powdery mildew and had the lowest<br />
yields; two Galia-type cultivars had favorable yields and quality and were less<br />
susceptible to powdery mildew.<br />
S<br />
pecialty melons have been gaining in popularity throughout the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s (Jett, 2005a; Rangarajan and Ingall, 2003;<br />
Schultheis and Jester. 2004; Shaw et al., 2001; Simon et al.,<br />
1993; Smith and Bartolo, 2005). <strong>The</strong>se melons are extremely<br />
attractive and come with diverse tastes, colors and aromas (Simon et<br />
al., 1993). A few of these melons include the yellow-netted, green-<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 483
fleshed, highly aromatic and sweet ‘Galia’ (Cucumis melo L. var.<br />
reticulatus Ser.)—a favorite throughout the Mediterranean and Europe<br />
with prices averaging $2 to $4 each (Karchi, 2000; Rodriguez et al.,<br />
2002). A French favorite is the ‘Charentais’ (Cucumis melo L. var.<br />
cantalupenis Naud.), which has a smooth exterior with green sutures, a<br />
bright orange flesh, and a rich honey flavor and aroma (Goldman,<br />
2002; Rangarajan and Ingall, 2003). Another distinct type, named for<br />
both its bright yellow exterior and the island where it first became<br />
popular, Canary (Cucumis melo L. var. inodorus Naud.) has a smooth,<br />
and a sugary, white flesh (Goldman, 2002; Anon., 2004). <strong>The</strong>se<br />
melons are an ideal high-value crop for protected culture (Cantliffe et.<br />
al., 2003).<br />
Unfortunately, the high temperatures (25–35°C), high humidity<br />
(90%), and dense plant growth of a greenhouse melon crop provide the<br />
optimum conditions for powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea)<br />
disease development (Elad et. al., 1996; Jett, 2005b; Pottorff, 2005).<br />
Sphaerotheca fuliginea is the most common and aggressive powdery<br />
mildew fungus of cucurbits (McGrath, 1997). It is easily recognized<br />
by its white or gray talcum powder-like spots or patches (Pottorff,<br />
2005). Powdery mildew can be a devastating disease because a severe<br />
epidemic can reduce photosynthesis, increase respiration and<br />
transpiration, impair vegetative and fruit growth, and ultimately reduce<br />
yields (Agrios, 2005). Because of this potential for yield reduction,<br />
even in a protected environment, information on how powdery mildew<br />
affects specialty melons’ fruit yield and quality parameters in a<br />
greenhouse environment would be useful to growers and plant<br />
breeders. For this study, 18 different cultivars were grown in a<br />
passively ventilated greenhouse to ascertain any relationships between<br />
the incidence of powdery mildew and melon fruit yields and quality.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Seeds of 18 melon cultivars (Table 1) were sown in polystyrene<br />
trays (Model 128A, Speedling, Bushnell, FL) on 22 July 2005. <strong>The</strong><br />
growing medium used was a commercial fine-grade mixture (Premier<br />
ProMix FPX, Quakertown, PA). Seedlings were grown at the<br />
University of Florida, Gainesville campus in a growth chamber<br />
(Controlled Env. Ltd., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) at temperatures<br />
of 28 ° C (day) and 22 ° C (night) with 12-hour daily artificial lighting.<br />
When cotyledons were fully expanded, seedlings were fertilized once<br />
per week with a solution of 100ppm each of 20N: 20P: 20K (Peters<br />
Professional All Purpose Plant Food, Spectrum Group, St. Louis, MO).<br />
484 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Specialty melon (Cucumis melo) cultivars, fall 2005.<br />
Diseasetolerance<br />
Cultivar Type<br />
listing z Seed source y<br />
Kamila x<br />
Galia N.R. Outstanding Seed<br />
Co.<br />
Gallicum Galia PM1,2 Seigers Seed Co.<br />
(Seminis variety)<br />
Gala Galia PM2 D. Palmer Seed Co.<br />
GVS 125 Galia N.R. Golden Valley Seed<br />
GVS 205 Galia N.R. Golden Valley Seed<br />
GVS 206 Galia N.R. Golden Valley Seed<br />
Melon 96-Nestor Galia PM Hazera Genetics<br />
Melon 6003-<br />
Elario<br />
Galia PM Hazera Genetics<br />
Melon 6004 Galia N.R. Hazera Genetics<br />
Angel Mediterranean N.R. Known-You Seed<br />
Amy Canary/<br />
Mediterranean<br />
N.R. Known-You Seed<br />
Galia F1 (H) Galia N.T. Hazera Genetics<br />
Vedrantais Charantais N.R. Technisem<br />
Vicar Galia PM1 Rogers/Syngenta<br />
Galileo Galia PM1 Rogers/Syngenta<br />
z<br />
Disease tolerance to powdery mildew (S. fuliginea) as listed by suppliers: PM1,2 =<br />
tolerance to race 1 or 2; N.R.= not reported; N.T.= no tolerance.<br />
y<br />
Seeds were kindly donated by these suppliers.<br />
x<br />
‘Kamila’ was advertised as a ‘Galia-type’, but it was found to be a Japanese-type.<br />
Seedlings were transplanted on 18 August 2005 when they had<br />
three true leaves in a passively ventilated, high-roof, sawtooth<br />
greenhouse (TOP greenhouses, Ltd., Barkan, Israel) located at the UF<br />
Plant Science Research Education Unit, Citra, FL. Commercial<br />
greenhouse production techniques and nutrient requirements for<br />
producing ‘Galia’ melons hydroponically were used according to<br />
guidelines of Shaw et al. (2001). Plants were pollinated by bumble<br />
bees (Bombus impatiens, Natupol, Koppert Biological Systems, Inc.,<br />
Romulus, MI).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 485
Table 2. Final AUDPC and disease severity ratings for specialty<br />
melon (Cucumis melo) cultivars, fall 2005.<br />
Cultivar<br />
AUDPC z<br />
Disease-severity<br />
rating y (%)<br />
Vedrantais 3182 x 100<br />
Charantais 2910 100<br />
Gala 2262 100<br />
Kamila 1173 80<br />
Galia (T) 1143 83<br />
Amy 1116 78<br />
GVS 206 970 55<br />
GVS 125 794 48<br />
GVS 205 786 54<br />
Gallicum 594 50<br />
Galia (H) 534 49<br />
Angel 478 53<br />
Girlie 444 42<br />
Vicar 431 38<br />
Melon 6004 236 28<br />
Melon 6003-Elario 127 14<br />
Galileo 87 15<br />
Melon 96-Nestor 42 3<br />
LSD (0.05) 516* 9*<br />
z<br />
AUDPC = area under disease progress curve.<br />
y<br />
Disease severity ratings (0–100%) were the mean of three leaves per plant and<br />
recorded as percent leaf area infected.<br />
x<br />
Means separated using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (P
Systems, Inc., Romulus, MI) were released on 8 Sept. 2005.<br />
Neoseiulus californicus (Biotactics Inc., Perris, CA) predatory mites<br />
were used to control the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae).<br />
N. californicus (3000) were released on 8 Sept., 6,000 on 28 Sept., and<br />
10,000 on 5 Oct. 2005. Erotmocerus eremicus (ERCAL, Koppert<br />
Biological Systems, Inc., Romulus, MI) were released to control<br />
whitefly (Bemisia tabaci biotype B). E. eremicus (500) were released<br />
on 8 Sept. and 7,000 on 5 Oct. 2005. Orius insidiosus (THRIPOR-I,<br />
Koppert Biological Systems, Inc., Romulus, MI), a predatory bug for<br />
control of flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), were released on<br />
8 Sept. (500 O. insidiosus) and again on 5 Oct. 2005.<br />
Disease ratings were recorded at first sign of disease symptoms.<br />
Ratings were taken on each of the five plants per plot. Plants were<br />
divided into three sections—lower, middle and upper—and ratings<br />
were taken as a percentage of leaf area infected per one sample leaf<br />
per section once per week until the end of the crop production (seven<br />
ratings total). Mean of three sample leaves represents the disease<br />
severity rating (DSR). In order to keep the crop alive, plants were<br />
sprayed with potassium bicarbonate (Milstop, BioWorks Inc., Fairport,<br />
NY), a foliar fungicide that suppresses powdery mildew, once a week<br />
directly after the ratings. No other chemical fungicides were used.<br />
Final area under disease progress curves (AUDPC) were generated by<br />
the method of Shaner and Finney (1967) from the weekly DSR.<br />
AUDPC indicates the total amount of disease that occurred throughout<br />
the crop production period whereas DSR reflects the amount of disease<br />
present at a given time interval only.<br />
Fruits were harvested at full-slip stage. First harvest began on 17<br />
Oct. 2005 and ended on 21 Nov. 2005. Harvest data collected<br />
included mean number of fruit per plant, weight, flesh thickness,<br />
soluble solids content (SSC), and firmness. All postharvest parameters<br />
were measured on the day of harvest.<br />
After fruits were weighed, a 2.5-cm slice was taken from the<br />
equatorial region of each fruit and flesh thickness, firmness, and<br />
soluble solids content measured. A caliper (Digimatic Mycal,<br />
Mitutoyo, Japan) was used to measure flesh thickness from peel to<br />
cavity. A firmness reading was taken at two equidistant points on the<br />
equatorial region of each fruit slice using an Instron Universal Testing<br />
Instrument (Model 4411-C8009, Canton, MA). <strong>The</strong> Instron was fitted<br />
with a 50-kg load cell and an 11-mm convex probe with a crosshead<br />
speed of 50mm/min. Firmness data were expressed as the maximum<br />
force (Newton) attained during deformation. Soluble solids content<br />
(°Brix) (SSC) was measured with a temperature-compensating,<br />
handheld refractometer (Model 10430, Reichert Scientific Instrument,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 487
Buffalo, NY) from three samples taken from the equatorial slice. <strong>The</strong><br />
means from five plants in each plot were subjected to an analysis of<br />
variance (ANOVA) by the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute,<br />
Version 9, Cary, NC). Cultivar means were subjected to Fisher’s least<br />
significant difference (LSD 0.05).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Powdery mildew was first observed 47 days after transplanting.<br />
After seven weeks of ratings, cultivars ‘Vedrantais’, ‘Charentais’ and<br />
‘Gala’ had the highest final AUDPC and the final DSR for each was<br />
100% (Table 2). Final DSR was over 50% for ‘Angel,’ ‘GVS-205,’<br />
‘GVS-206,’ ‘Amy,’ ‘Kamila’, and ‘Galia (T)’; and from 25 to 50% for<br />
‘Melon 6004,’ ‘Vicar,’ ‘Girlie’ ‘GVS-125’, ‘Gallicum’, and ‘Galia<br />
(H).’ Cultivars ‘Galileo’ and ‘Elario’ had a final DSR of less than 20%<br />
and ‘Nestor’ was the lowest with 3%. Cultivars ‘Charentais’ and<br />
‘Vedrantais’ are Charentais-type melons, which are highly susceptible<br />
to powdery mildew (Jett, 2005a) and were at 100% DSR by Week 6.<br />
‘Gala’ is a Galia-type that is also highly susceptible to powdery<br />
mildew. Also interesting was the difference between the two true<br />
‘Galia’ cultivars, ‘Galia (Hazera)’ and ‘Galia (Technisem).’ ‘Galia<br />
(H)’ had a final DSR rating 49%, which was significantly lower than<br />
‘Galia (T)’—83%. Also, soluble solids content (°Brix) was higher for<br />
‘Galia (H)’ (11.5°Brix) than ‘Galia (T)’ (9.6°Brix); and ‘Galia (H)’<br />
was a firmer fruit (18N) than ‘Galia (T)’ (8N) (Table 3), yet yields<br />
were the same. Thus, although fruit quality was potentially reduced by<br />
powdery mildew in this case, yields were not. <strong>The</strong> AUDPC was lower<br />
for ‘Galia (H)’ than ‘Galia (T)’, which may have helped contribute to<br />
the better fruit quality of ‘Galia (H).’<br />
<strong>The</strong> number of marketable fruit per plant was similar among all<br />
cultivars. Each cultivar averaged only one to two fruit (data not<br />
shown). Fruit numbers per plant were low due to poor bumble bee<br />
activity. Previous greenhouse melon cultivar trials averaged 2.2 to 3.6<br />
fruits per plant (Shaw et. al., 2001). Mean fruit weight per plant was<br />
different among cultivars. Average individual fruit weight ranged<br />
from 0.7kg (‘Charentais’) to 1.9kg (‘Girlie’) (Table 3). Several<br />
cultivars, ‘Angel,’ ‘Vedrantais,’ ‘GVS 206,’ ‘Nestor,’ ‘Gala’, and<br />
‘Charantais’, had significantly lower yields (less than 40, 000kg · ha -1 )<br />
than ‘Galileo,’ ‘Elario,’ ‘Kamila’ and ‘Girlie’ (more than 70,000 kg ·<br />
ha -1 ); however, the final DSR varied from 100 to 3% on the lowest<br />
yielding cultivars. Soluble solids content also seemed to have no<br />
relationship to DSR or yield since ‘Gala’ had a final DSR of 100 and<br />
488 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 3. Marketable yields and fruit quality of screened specialty<br />
melons (Cucumis melo), fall 2005.<br />
Fruit Fruit<br />
weight number<br />
per per Fruit<br />
plant square yield<br />
Cultivar (kg) meter (kg · ha -1 Flesh Fruit Soluble<br />
thickness firmness solids<br />
) (mm) (N) (°Brix)<br />
Vedrantais 0.9 Z 4.1 34,063 27 2 8.5<br />
Charentais 0.7 5.6 39,644 24 12 11.0<br />
Gala 1.5 2.5 39,158 35 17 11.8<br />
Kamila 1.5 5.2 76,272 35 31 15.0<br />
Galia (T) 1.6 3.5 55,526 32 8 9.6<br />
Amy 1.1 4.1 45,646 28 12 14.3<br />
GVS 206 1.4 2.6 36,396 33 24 9.4<br />
GVS 125 1.1 4.0 45,139 31 22 10.3<br />
GVS 205 1.4 3.9 53,674 34 17 9.6<br />
Gallicum 1.3 5.2 65,163 33 13 10.1<br />
Galia (H) 1.3 3.8 50,456 33 18 11.7<br />
Angel 1.1 2.9 30,851 30 12 16.3<br />
Girlie 1.9 3.9 72,609 34 16 11.5<br />
Vicar<br />
Melon<br />
1.2 4.8 59,990 33 30 11.7<br />
6004<br />
Melon<br />
6003-<br />
1.7 3.7 64,576 38 20 8.9<br />
Elario 1.7 4.6 76,917 41 20 8.8<br />
Galileo<br />
Melon 96-<br />
1.5 5.5 81,499 36 32 12.4<br />
Nestor 1.1 3.6 38,940 32 23 10.3<br />
z<br />
LSD (0.05) 0.3* 2.0 28,615* 4* 7* 1.3*<br />
Z<br />
Means separated using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (P
SSC were ‘Angel’ (16.3°Brix) and ‘Kamila’ (15°Brix), which also had<br />
a DSR >50% but still maintained Brix. However, the lowest SSC was<br />
found for ‘Vedrantais’ (8.4°Brix, 100 DSR), ‘Elario’ (8.8°Brix, 14<br />
DSR), and ‘Melon 6004’ (8.9°Brix, 28 DSR). Charentais melons may<br />
reach 14 to 16°Brix (Rangarajan and Ingall, 2003), whereas in<br />
this study they were below this at 8.4°Brix (‘Vedrantais’) and<br />
11.0°Brix (‘Charentais’).<br />
<strong>The</strong> Charentais-type cultivars in this trial (‘Charentais’ and<br />
‘Vedrantais’) were the most susceptible to powdery mildew (final<br />
DSR=100%), had the lowest yields and smallest fruit size, and are not<br />
recommended for greenhouse production. <strong>The</strong> Canary and<br />
Mediterranean types had less flavor and quality than the Galia-type<br />
melons. <strong>The</strong> cultivar ‘Kamila’ also had a high SSC and was<br />
advertised as a Galia-type; however, it did not slip, netting and flesh<br />
were not similar to ‘Galia’, and it had little flavor. Of the Galia-type<br />
cultivars, ‘Galileo’ and ‘Vicar’ had high yields, SSC and fruit quality<br />
that were considered good, and were less susceptible to powdery<br />
mildew.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Agrios, G. 2005. Plant pathology. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA.<br />
Anon. 2004. Melon F1 ‘Amy’ vegetable award winner. Colorado <strong>State</strong> Cooperatve<br />
Extension. 20 April, 2006. .<br />
Cantliffe, D. J., N. Shaw, and E. Jovicich. 2003. New vegetable crops for<br />
greenhouses in the Southeastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Acta Hort. 626:483–485.<br />
Elad, Y., N. Malathrakis, and A. Dik. 1996. Biological control of Botrytis-incited<br />
diseases and powdery mildews in greenhouse crops. Crop Protection.<br />
15(3):229–240.<br />
Goldman, A. 2002. Melons for the passionate grower. Workman, New York.<br />
Jett, L. 2005a. High tunnel cantaloupe and specialty melon cultivar evaluation. 10<br />
April, 2006. .<br />
Jett, L. 2005b. High tunnel melon and watermelon production. 10 April, 2006.<br />
.<br />
Karchi, Z. 2000. Development of melon culture and breeding in Israel. Acta Hort<br />
510:13–17.<br />
McGrath, M. 1997. Powdery mildew of cucurbits. Fact Sheet Page: 732.30 Date: 2-<br />
1997. Cooperative Extension, New York <strong>State</strong>, Cornell Univ. 17 Nov., 2005.<br />
.<br />
Pottorff, L. 2005. Powdery mildews. Colorado <strong>State</strong> University Cooperative<br />
Extension, Jefferson County, no. 2.902. 16 Nov.,<br />
2005..<br />
Rangarajan, A. and B. Ingall. 2003. Charentais melons 2003. 11 April, 2006.<br />
.<br />
490 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Rodriguez, J., N. Shaw, and D. Cantliffe. 2002. Production of Galia-type muskmelon<br />
using a passive ventilated greenhouse and soilless culture, p. 365–372.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Schultheis, J. and B. Jester. 2004. Screening and advancing new specialty melons<br />
for market potential. 10 April, 2006.<br />
.<br />
Shaner, G. and R. Finney. 1967. <strong>The</strong> effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression<br />
of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology. 67:1051–1056.<br />
Shaw, N. and D.J. Cantliffe. 2003. Hydroponically produced mini-cucumber with<br />
improved powdery mildew resistance. Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 116:58–62.<br />
Shaw, N., D. J. Cantliffe, and B. S. Taylor. 2001. Hydroponically produced 'Galia’<br />
muskmelon—what’s the secret? Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 114:288–293.<br />
Simon, J. E., M. R. Morales, and D. J. Charles. 1993. Specialty melons for the fresh<br />
market, p. 547–553. In: J. Janick and J. E. Simon (eds.), New crops. Wiley, New<br />
York.<br />
Smith, G. and M. Bartolo. 2005. Exotic and specialty melons for the Rocky Ford<br />
area. 10 April, 2006. .<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 491
INTEGRATION OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL<br />
AND PLASTIC MULCHES TO MANAGE<br />
WATERMELON MOSAIC VIRUS IN SQUASH<br />
John F. Murphy and Micky D. Eubanks<br />
Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL<br />
36849<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Plant virus, WMV, vegetable, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo,<br />
PGPR<br />
ABSTRACT. A study was undertaken to evaluate the combined effects of<br />
reflective plastic mulch and a commercially available biological control<br />
treatment to reduce the incidence and resulting disease-related yield losses<br />
caused by an aphid-borne plant virus in squash. Squash plants grown on silveron-black<br />
mulch did not have reduced incidence of Watermelon mosaic virus<br />
(WMV) relative to plants grown on black mulch. In contrast, squash plants<br />
grown on a highly reflective silver mulch had significantly less WMV incidence<br />
relative to those grown on silver-on-black and black mulches. <strong>The</strong> silver-onblack<br />
mulch treatment led to greater squash fruit yields relative to the other<br />
mulch treatments. <strong>The</strong> biological control treatment, BioYield TM , did not reduce<br />
virus incidence or result in increased fruit yields relative to nontreated control<br />
plants.<br />
P<br />
lant viruses are difficult to manage when resistant varieties are<br />
not available. <strong>The</strong> application of management strategies<br />
becomes more complicated and typically less effective when the<br />
viruses of concern are transmitted by aphids in a nonpersistent manner.<br />
This manner of transmission leads to very rapid acquisition of virus<br />
from infected plants and transmission to healthy plants. This rapid<br />
transmission process essentially eliminates the effectiveness of<br />
insecticides as a means to manage virus by way of its vector.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> crops are vulnerable to infection by several viruses in the<br />
genus Potyvirus, the most frequent being: Papaya ringspot virus<br />
(PRSV), Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), and Zucchini yellow<br />
mosaic virus (ZYMV). Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV, genus<br />
Cucumovirus) also poses a serious threat to cucurbit crops since it too<br />
is transmitted by aphids in a nonpersistent manner (Zitter et al., 1996).<br />
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been used in<br />
previous studies to induce resistance in cucumber plants against CMV<br />
(Raupach et al., 1996) and in tomato plants against CMV and Tomato<br />
mottle virus (genus Begomovirus) (Murphy et al., 2003; Murphy et al.,<br />
2000). In cucumber and particularly in tomato, the PGPR treatment<br />
resulted in an enhancement of plant growth. Protection against CMV<br />
492 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
infection was observed in the form of a <strong>complete</strong> lack of symptoms or<br />
mild symptoms with reduced virus accumulation in systemically<br />
infected leaves, or interference in systemic infection.<br />
Although protection against virus infection occurred in response to<br />
treatment with PGPR, it varied in level of protection under greenhouse<br />
conditions and even more so in the field. In the project described in<br />
this report, efforts were made to integrate a commercially available<br />
PGPR product with different types of plastic mulch in an effort to<br />
reduce the incidence of aphid-borne plant viruses in squash.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Two field trials were performed in 2005 at the E.V. Smith<br />
Agricultural Research and Education Center, Shorter, AL.: one trial in<br />
the spring (referred to as Spring trial) and the second trial in the fall<br />
(referred to as Fall trial).<br />
<strong>The</strong> objective was to evaluate silver-based reflective versus<br />
nonreflective plastic mulch in conjunction with the biological control<br />
treatment BioYield TM . <strong>The</strong> field design was a split-plot with mulch as<br />
the whole-plot treatment and plant treatment (i.e., BioYield TM and<br />
nontreated control) as the subplot treatment. For the Spring trial, two<br />
mulch treatments were used: black, nonreflective mulch and silver-onblack<br />
reflective mulch. For the Fall trial, three mulch treatments were<br />
used: black, nonreflective mulch, silver-on-black reflective mulch,<br />
and a highly reflective silver mulch.<br />
Within each mulch treatment, a BioYield TM and a nontreated<br />
control treatment were arranged in a randomized <strong>complete</strong> block with<br />
four replications consisting of 12 plants in each. BioYield TM was a<br />
commercial product marketed by Gustafson, Inc. and consisted of two<br />
PGPR strains, GB03 and IN937a, Bacillis subtilis and B.<br />
amolyliquefaciens, respectively, and the carrier chitosan. Each PGPR<br />
strain was formulated as endospores at 4.0 x 10 10 colony-forming units<br />
(CFU)/liter. BioYield TM was mixed with soil-less growth medium<br />
(Speedling Inc., Busnell, FL) at a ratio of 1:40 (v/v) to achieve a<br />
bacterial density of 10 9 CFU/litre medium. <strong>The</strong> medium was placed<br />
into Styrofoam trays (Speedling Inc.,) containing 72 cavities per tray.<br />
To produce transplants, squash seeds (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L cv<br />
‘Dixie’) were individually placed into each cavity, and given 2–3<br />
weeks to germinate and grow in a temperature-controlled greenhouse<br />
at the Auburn University Plant Science Research Complex, Auburn,<br />
AL. At the time of transplant, seedlings were transported to the<br />
appropriate field location and planted 30cm apart on raised beds (20cm<br />
high by 84cm wide). Prior to bed preparation, P205 fertilizer was<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 493
applied as a broadcast at 2.5Kg per 30.5m of row. All beds were<br />
fumigated with methyl bromide (335Kg/ha of 67% methyl bromide +<br />
33% chloropicrin) before being covered with polyethylene plastic tarp<br />
(mulch). After bedding, 15-0-30 fertilizer was banded onto the bed<br />
shoulders at 9.5Kg per 30.5m of row.<br />
Disease evaluations included visual and serological assessments.<br />
Plants in each treatment were monitored routinely for virus symptoms<br />
such as mosaic patterns on leaves and leaf deformation. Foliar tissues<br />
were collected from each plant at the midway point to harvest (Spring<br />
trial) and once fruit harvest was underway (Spring and Fall trials).<br />
Each sample was wrapped in a dampened paper towel, placed in a ziplock<br />
bag and transported to Auburn University for analysis. Virus was<br />
detected using Agdia, Inc. (Elkhart, IN) enzyme-linked<br />
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits specific to CMV, PRSV, WMV, or<br />
ZYMV and performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.<br />
Squash fruit was harvested and graded as marketable and total<br />
(marketable and nonmarketable), and each grade measured by number<br />
and weight of fruit.<br />
<strong>The</strong> data were analyzed with analysis of variance (SAS, Cary, NC)<br />
and for significant ANOVA’s treatment means separated using LSD<br />
mean separation tests. Significant interactions were tested at P = 0.05.<br />
Results<br />
SPRING TRIAL. Two viruses were detected among infected squash<br />
plants in the Spring trial, CMV and WMV, with CMV incidence being<br />
very low (~2.5%) but with high incidence of WMV (~66%). <strong>The</strong> low<br />
incidence of CMV made analysis difficult and, therefore, data<br />
presentations will focus on WMV.<br />
For the Spring trial, there was no difference in the incidence of<br />
WMV infection among plants grown on black versus silver-on-black<br />
mulches (P < 0.05; although significantly less WMV occurred on<br />
silver-on-black mulch at P < 0.10). Similarly, no difference in WMV<br />
incidence occurred among squash plants treated with BioYield TM<br />
versus the nontreated control (P < 0.05) and no mulch x plant<br />
treatment interaction occurred.<br />
Squash marketable yields, both in number of fruit and weight, were<br />
significantly greater for plants grown on silver-on-black mulch than<br />
for plants grown on black mulch (P < 0.05). For both marketable fruit<br />
number and weight, there was no significant difference among plants<br />
treated with BioYield TM versus the nontreated controls. <strong>The</strong> same<br />
trend occurred for total fruit number, i.e., significantly more fruit for<br />
plants grown in silver-on-black mulch with no difference due to plant<br />
494 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
treatment; however, total fruit weight did not differ among mulch or<br />
plant treatments.<br />
FALL TRIAL. As observed in the Spring trial, CMV incidence was<br />
low with a high incidence of WMV. Significantly fewer squash plants<br />
grown on silver mulch were infected with WMV than on silver-onblack<br />
or black mulch (P < 0.05). No difference in WMV incidence<br />
was observed for plants treated with BioYield TM versus those in the<br />
nontreated control treatment.<br />
All parameters for squash yield, marketable number and weight,<br />
and total number and weight resulted in significantly greater yields for<br />
plants grown on silver-on-black mulch than the other mulches with no<br />
difference occurring for BioYield TM versus nontreated control plants.<br />
Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> goal of this research was to reduce aphid-borne plant virus<br />
incidence in squash and thereby reduce yield losses due to virus<br />
infection. <strong>The</strong> four viruses examined represent commonly occurring<br />
viruses that, due to their mode of transmission, are difficult to manage<br />
without availability of resistant varieties. WMV was the predominant<br />
virus in both trials with a low incidence of CMV and no PRSV or<br />
ZYMV detected.<br />
Two methods were used to reduce virus incidence: reflective<br />
plastic mulch and a commercially available PGPR treatment shown<br />
previously to enhance plant growth. <strong>The</strong> reflective mulch was<br />
intended to delay the introduction of virus into the crop by deterring<br />
aphids from flying onto the plants. <strong>The</strong> PGPR treatment was intended<br />
to induce systemic resistance to virus infection and enhance plant<br />
growth, the latter of which was expected to shorten the window of<br />
time when plants are small and more vulnerable to development of<br />
severe disease symptoms if infected by a plant virus during this early<br />
stage of growth.<br />
<strong>The</strong> use of silver-on-black plastic mulch did not reduce WMV<br />
incidence in either trial; however, silver mulch had significantly fewer<br />
WMV-infected plants than the two other mulch treatments in the Fall<br />
trial. Based on a simple visual assessment, the reflective properties of<br />
the silver mulch were far greater than those of the silver-on-black; the<br />
greater reflective property of the silver mulch may have deterred<br />
aphids from entering the crop, thereby leading to a reduction in WMV<br />
incidence. Yet there is a possibility that the effect on plant growth<br />
from silver-on-black is not only better than that of silver but that the<br />
highly reflective nature of the silver mulch has a negative effect. This<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 495
could be important since it might offset the positive effects of reduced<br />
virus incidence.<br />
Silver reflective mulch, also referred to as UV-reflective mulch,<br />
has been shown to reduce insect densities on plants and/or virus<br />
incidence relative to other mulches (Diaz-Perez et al., 2003;<br />
Loebenstein et al., 1975; Momol et al., 2004; Summers et al., 2004;<br />
Summers, et al., 1995; Wilson, 1999; Wyman et al., 1979). Silver<br />
mulches deterred aphids and delayed the introduction of aphid-borne<br />
viruses in spring- and fall-grown zucchini squash crops (Summers et<br />
al., 1995). <strong>The</strong>re was a corresponding effect on squash fruit yields<br />
with an approximately 70% greater yield for plants grown on silver<br />
mulch than those grown on nonmulched plots. Wyman et al. (1979)<br />
described a similar effect of reflective mulch on reducing aphid<br />
numbers on summer squash plants, with a corresponding reduction in<br />
the incidence of WMV.<br />
<strong>The</strong> BioYield TM treatment did not lead to any apparent increase in<br />
plant growth relative to plants in the nontreated control treatment, nor<br />
to any reduction in virus incidence. <strong>The</strong> lack of an increase in fruit<br />
yield for BioYield TM -treated squash plants further supports the<br />
observation that the PGPR treatment did not enhance plant growth and<br />
development. <strong>The</strong> treatment of tomato plants with BioYield TM led to<br />
significant enhancement of plant growth with significant reductions in<br />
CMV infection when tested in greenhouse conditions (Murphy et al.,<br />
2003). <strong>The</strong> tomato plants responded to inoculation with CMV in a<br />
similar manner to older, more mature plants, which suggested the<br />
protection afforded the BioYield TM -treated plants may have been a<br />
form of induced mature plant resistance rather than induced systemic<br />
resistance.<br />
Our hypothesis at the onset of this work was that the integration of<br />
the insect-deterring properties of the reflective mulch along with<br />
enhanced plant growth induced by the PGPR treatment would combine<br />
to have a highly significant effect on reduction of virus incidence and<br />
corresponding fruit yields. Silver-reflective mulch was effective at<br />
reducing WMV incidence; this was dependent on the reflective<br />
properties of the mulch, i.e., higher levels of reflectance are necessary<br />
for effective deterrence of aphid vectors.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was no evidence that the BioYield TM treatment resulted in<br />
enhanced plant growth, development, or yield increase relative to the<br />
nontreated control. Likewise, there was no evidence of protection<br />
against virus infection, whether from induced systemic resistance or<br />
induced mature plant resistance, for plants treated with BioYield TM .<br />
Previous studies using PGPR-based treatments suggested that the<br />
protection afforded plants against infection by CMV did not occur<br />
496 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
when a virus in the genus Potyvirus was used as inoculum (e.g., J. F.<br />
Murphy, unpublished data). This may explain, in part, the lack of<br />
protection observed for BioYield TM -treated plants against the<br />
potyvirus, WMV. <strong>The</strong> possibility that a PGPR-based treatment may<br />
protect plants against CMV but not a virus in the genus Potyvirus is<br />
intriguing and should be pursued in future studies.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Diaz-Perez, J. C., K. D. Batal, D. Granberry, D. Bertrand, D. Giddings, and<br />
H. Pappu. 2003. Growth and yield of tomato on plastic film mulches as<br />
affected by tomato spotted wilt virus. HortSci. 38:395–399.<br />
Loebenstein, G., M. Alper, S. Levy, D. Palevitch, and E. Menagem. 1975.<br />
Protecting peppers from aphid-borne viruses with aluminum foil and<br />
plastic mulch. Phytoparasitica. 3:43–53.<br />
Momol, M. T., S. M. Olson, J. E. Funderburk, J. Stavisky, and J. J. Marois.<br />
2004. Integrated management of tomato spotted wilt on field-grown<br />
tomatoes. Plant Dis. 88:882–890.<br />
Murphy, J. F., G. W. Zehnder, D. J. Schuster, E. J. Sikora, J. E. Polston, and<br />
J. W. Kloepper. 2000. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated<br />
protection in tomato against Tomato mottle virus. Plant Dis. 84:779–<br />
784.<br />
Murphy, J. F., M. S. Reddy, C. M. Ryu, J. W. Kloepper, and R. Li. 2003.<br />
Rhizobacteria-mediated growth promotion of tomato leads to protection<br />
against Cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopathology. 93:1301–1307.<br />
Raupach, G. S., L. Liu, J. F. Murphy, S. Tuzun, and J.W. Kloepper. 1996.<br />
Induced systemic resistance against cucumber mosaic cucumovirus using<br />
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Plant Dis. 80:891–894.<br />
Summers, C. G., J. J. Stapleton, A. S. Newton, R. A. Duncan, and D. Hart.<br />
1995. Comparison of sprayable and film mulches in delaying the onset of<br />
aphid-transmitted virus diseases in zucchini squash. Plant Dis. 79:1126–<br />
1131.<br />
Summers, C. G., J. P. Mitchell, and J. J. Stapleton. 2004. Management of<br />
aphid-borne viruses and Bemisia argentifolii (Homptera: Aleyrodidae) in<br />
zucchini squash by using UV reflective plastic and wheat straw mulches.<br />
Env. Entomol. 33:1447–1457.<br />
Wilson, C. R. 1999. <strong>The</strong> potential of reflective-mulching in combination with<br />
insecticide sprays for control of aphid-borne viruses of iris and tulip in<br />
Tasmania. Ann. Appl. Biol. 134:293–297.<br />
Wyman, J. A., N. C. Toscano, K. Kido, H. Johnson, and K. S. Mayberry.<br />
1979. Effects of mulching on spread of aphid-transmitted watermelon<br />
mosaic virus to summer squash. J. Econ. Entomol. 72:139–143.<br />
Zitter, T. A., D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Compendium of<br />
cucurbit diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 497
BACTERIAL LEAF SPOT (XANTHOMONAS<br />
CAMPESTRIS PV. CUCURBITAE) AS A<br />
FACTOR IN CUCURBIT PRODUCTION AND<br />
EVALUATION OF SEED TREATMENTS FOR<br />
CONTROL IN NATURALLY INFESTED SEEDS<br />
Zahide Özdemir<br />
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, 09100, Turkey<br />
Thomas A. Zitter<br />
Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo, pumpkin, kabutiá<br />
squash<br />
ABSTRACT. Pumpkin (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo cv. New Rocket) seeds naturally infested<br />
with Xanthomonas campestris pv. cucurbitae, the pathogen responsible for<br />
bacterial leaf spot disease of winter squash, pumpkin, gourd, and cucumbers,<br />
were treated with four different chemicals to determine the most effective<br />
treatment to eliminate bacteria from the infested seeds. <strong>The</strong> seed treatments<br />
included 3% hydrogen peroxide, 1% peroxyacetic acid, 1% sodium<br />
hypochlorite, copper hydroxide plus mancozeb (0.36g + 0.27 g/100ml of water,<br />
respectively), and sterile distilled water as control. Seeds were treated in<br />
aqueous solutions of chemicals for 15 min. Treated seeds were washed in sterile<br />
cold saline solution and dilution platings were made onto XCS agar.<br />
Treatments with copper plus mancozeb, 1% peroxyacetic acid, and 1% sodium<br />
hypochlorite were effective in eliminating the pathogen on seed. Hydrogen<br />
peroxide was less effective, resulting in a 90–92% reduction in bacteria<br />
recovered from seed in the first experiment. In a second experiment, no<br />
bacteria were recovered following treatment.<br />
B<br />
acterial leaf spot of cucurbits, caused by the bacterium<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. cucurbitae (Xcc), was first<br />
described in New York on Hubbard squash (Bryan, 1926).<br />
<strong>The</strong> disease was subsequently reported on other winter squash,<br />
pumpkins, summer squash, cucumber, and gourds. Foliar symptoms<br />
are common on pumpkin and winter squash, and lesions on fruit can<br />
be severe enough to result in a total loss. <strong>The</strong> disease occurs<br />
sporadically, and literature on its epidemiology is currently limited<br />
(Zitter et al., 1996). Recently, bacterial leaf spot has been observed on<br />
pumpkins (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo), causing reduced fruit quality in the U.S.<br />
(Latin, 1996; Zitter et al., 1996), and it continues to be an issue in crop<br />
production in several midwestern states. In Uruguay, the disease was<br />
observed in both 2005 and 2006 in kabutiá winter squash (C. moschata<br />
498 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
x C. maxima), and has spread into neighboring butternut squash (C.<br />
moschata) fields (T. A. Zitter, unpublished data). Since growers also<br />
use locally produced seed saved from two pollinator species (C.<br />
moschata and C. pepo), it is not known which seed may have<br />
introduced the pathogen and may be perpetuating the problem. <strong>The</strong><br />
pathogen appears to be short-lived in the soil (Bryan, 1930; Vincent-<br />
Sealy and Brathwaite, 1982) and infested seed is the primary source of<br />
inoculum (McLean, 1958; Moffett and Wood, 1979).<br />
Chemical seed treatments were evaluated by Moffett and Wood<br />
(1979) on winter squash (C. maxima cv. Queensland Blue) seeds<br />
collected from naturally Xcc-infected fruits. One percent sodium<br />
hypochlorite with 1% nonionic spreader sticker and hot-water<br />
treatment at 54˚C and 56˚C for 30 min reduced the incidence of the<br />
disease in the field, but the pathogen was not eliminated from the seed.<br />
Hydrochloric acid treatment (31.5% w/w) at 1:20 diluted concentration<br />
eradicated the pathogen from seed and no disease was observed in the<br />
field; however, seed germination was adversely affected. Treatment of<br />
cucumber seeds with 10% Clorox ® (sodium hypochlorite) for 1, 10, or<br />
15 min, with 1:1000 diluted mercuric chloride solution for 10 min, or<br />
with 400ppm streptomycin sulfate for 10 min, also reduced seed<br />
infection, but hot-water treatment at 55˚C for 25–30 min was not<br />
effective (Vincent-Sealy and Brathwaite, 1982).<br />
In this study, several chemical seed treatments were evaluated for<br />
the elimination of Xcc from naturally infested pumpkin seeds and their<br />
effects on seed germination were noted.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENTS. Chemical treatments tested were<br />
hydrogen peroxide (Fisher Scientific) at 3%; copper hydroxide<br />
(Kocide 101, Griffin LLC, Valdosta, GA) plus mancozeb (Dithane DF,<br />
Griffin LLC) at 0.36g + 0.27g, respectively, per 100ml of sterile<br />
distilled water; peroxyacetic acid at 1% (BioSide HS 5.2%, Enviro-<br />
Tech, Modesto, CA); and sodium hypochlorite at 1%. Sterile distilled<br />
water was used as control. <strong>The</strong> experiment was repeated twice.<br />
APPLICATION OF THE TREATMENTS. Approximately 500 seeds<br />
weighing 71.2g were used for each treatment. Seeds were added to<br />
500-ml sterile flasks with 200ml of the prepared chemical solutions.<br />
Seeds were shaken vigorously (250rpm) at room temperature (RT) for<br />
15 min. Treated seeds were drained and thoroughly rinsed with sterile<br />
distilled water. Seeds were placed in surface-sterilized plastic boxes<br />
containing sterile filter paper and incubated overnight at 4˚C.<br />
Incubated seeds were put in 200ml of 0.85% cold sterile saline<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 499
solution with one drop of Tween 20 in 500-ml sterile flasks for each<br />
treatment and were shaken vigorously (250rpm) for 3 hrs at RT.<br />
Dilutions of 10 -1 and 10 -2 of the slurry for each treatment were<br />
prepared in 0.85% sterile sodium chloride. From each sample, 50μl of<br />
the slurry was plated in duplicate for the undiluted solutions and<br />
dilutions onto Xanthomonas campestris semiselective medium (XCS)<br />
(Williford and Schaad, 1984). Plates were incubated at 27–29˚C and<br />
observed over 5–6 days for bacterial growth, and the number of<br />
colonies counted for each plate. Suspected colonies of Xcc were<br />
sampled for identification by plating onto yeast extract-dextrose-<br />
CaC03 medium (YDC), by Biolog carbohydrate utilization plates, and<br />
by pathogenicity testing. YDC (Wilson et al., 1967) is a nonselective<br />
medium for the genus Xanthomonas, and was used to identify<br />
suspected colonies from XCS medium.<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF SUSPECTED COLONIES ON YDC MEDIUM BY<br />
BIOLOG AND PATHOGENICITY TESTS. On XCS medium, suspected<br />
colonies of Xcc were distinguishable in 3–5 days. <strong>The</strong> colony<br />
morphology of Xcc was previously observed on XCS medium using<br />
Xcc LMG 690, type strain for this pathogen. All isolated colonies on<br />
YDC were additionally tested on Biolog GN2 carbohydrate utilization<br />
plates.<br />
Pathogenicity of the suspected Xcc colonies was confirmed on<br />
Blue Hubbard winter squash (C. maxima). Leaves of 5-week-old<br />
plants were infiltrated with bacteria using a sterile needleless syringe.<br />
Inoculum was prepared from 48-hr-old pure colonies grown on YDC<br />
medium. Inoculum was standardized at OD600=0.3<br />
spectrophotometrically. Xcc LMG 690 was used as the positive<br />
control, and both Pseudomonas fluorescens LMG 5849 and sterile<br />
water were used as negative controls. Two leaves were used for each<br />
isolate and controls. Inoculated plants were incubated for 24–48 hrs in<br />
a mist chamber for symptom development. Plants were later<br />
transferred to the greenhouse for disease development. Pathogenicity<br />
was determined by the expansion of necrotic lesions and appearance of<br />
greasy pinpoint spots as observed on the bottom surface of the leaves.<br />
EFFECTS OF SEED TREATMENTS ON GERMINATION. One hundred<br />
and ten seeds were counted out for each treatment and placed in 600ml<br />
sterile beakers. Seeds were covered with 50ml of the chemical<br />
solutions for each treatment and were soaked for 15 min at RT, with<br />
occasional mixing of the solutions. Soaked seeds were drained,<br />
thoroughly rinsed with sterile water, transferred to blotter papers, and<br />
covered with another layer of blotter paper. Germination was based on<br />
emergence of the radicle from the seed. Seeds were observed for 5–6<br />
500 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
days for maximal germination and the blotter paper was remoisturized<br />
as needed. <strong>The</strong> number of germinated seeds was counted for each<br />
treatment and the percentage of germination calculated. Germination<br />
assays were repeated three times.<br />
DATA ANALYSIS. Seed germination data were analyzed by twoway<br />
analysis of variance (ANOVA) model by using MINITAB (<strong>State</strong><br />
College, PA) statistical software.<br />
Results<br />
EVALUATION OF THE SEED TREATMENTS. Preliminary studies<br />
were performed for the detection of Xcc in order to confirm the<br />
presence of the bacteria on naturally infested seeds and to select the<br />
semiselective media for detection of the pathogen. <strong>The</strong> pathogen was<br />
detected only once out of five trials from the seed lot (ca. 10,000<br />
seeds) examined. <strong>The</strong> performance of YDC, semiselective media SX,<br />
and XCS, as recommended by STA Laboratories (personal<br />
communication, Longmont, CO), was evaluated. XCS medium<br />
provided a higher recovery rate of Xcc colonies than either YDC or SX<br />
media. When plating on XCS medium, a known strain of Xcc was<br />
used to facilitate the distinction of its colony morphology from that of<br />
saprophytes. On XCS, suspected colonies of Xcc were observed in 3–<br />
5 days. <strong>The</strong> suspected colonies were round, almost colorless, and<br />
translucent; they later became darker, shiny with smooth edges,<br />
domed, and yellow brown. Saprophytic bacterial growth was reduced<br />
on XCS medium as compared to growth on YDC medium. Detection<br />
of Xcc on SX medium was very difficult because many saprophytic<br />
bacteria covered the medium before the growth of the Xcc colonies<br />
began. Overall, recovery of the bacteria was low and it required 9<br />
days for growth of the suspected colonies.<br />
No bacteria were detected from the copper plus mancozeb,<br />
peroxyacetic acid, and sodium hypochlorite treatments in undiluted<br />
and diluted plates of XCS medium in either experiment (Table 1). In<br />
the first experiment, Xcc colonies were detected in the 3% hydrogen<br />
peroxide treatment. <strong>The</strong> number of colonies detected in this treatment<br />
was 8% of those found on the water control on 1:10 dilution colony<br />
counts (Table 1). Hydrogen peroxide reduced the number of bacteria<br />
by 90–92% of those found on the water control of undiluted and 1:10<br />
diluted colony counts, respectively. In the second experiment, the<br />
number of colonies detected in the water control was one-tenth of that<br />
found in the first experiment. No Xcc colonies were detected in seed<br />
that had been subjected to any of the chemical treatments. Saprophytic<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 501
colonies were not eliminated when the 3% hydrogen peroxide<br />
treatment was used.<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF SUSPECT COLONIES ON YDC BY BIOLOG AND<br />
PATHOGENICITY TESTS. In the first experiment, 15 suspect colonies<br />
plated on XCS medium were isolated to YDC medium. Six of these<br />
colonies were from hydrogen peroxide-treated seed and 9 were from<br />
water-control plates on XCS medium. In the second experiment, 16<br />
suspect colonies from water-control plates on XCS were transferred to<br />
YDC. All isolated colonies on YDC medium were identical in colony<br />
morphology to the positive control Xcc LMG 690. Colonies on YDC<br />
medium appeared within two days, were distinctive in colony<br />
morphology, and were shiny, yellow, and mucoid, with round, smooth<br />
edges. Biolog carbohydrate utilization profiles of the isolates<br />
were identified at the genus level as Xanthomonas, confirming the<br />
identity of the isolates identified on YDC.<br />
Pathogenicity of 21 isolated colonies from both experiments was<br />
tested on Blue Hubbard winter squash. All the isolates were<br />
pathogenic (data not shown). Xcc LMG 690 gave positive symptoms<br />
as described above.<br />
EFFECTS OF SEED TREATMENTS ON SEED GERMINATION. Data<br />
analysis showed no statistically significant differences among the<br />
treatments on seed germination as compared with the water control<br />
(data not shown). Germination rates were 92% to 98% for all<br />
treatments. Sodium hypochlorite-treated seeds tended to germinate<br />
more slowly than the others, but these differences were not apparent<br />
when the final readings were made. Peroxyacetic acid-treated seeds<br />
germinated faster than seeds from the other treatments; however, the<br />
treated seeds had a bleached appearance and weaker radicle<br />
development in two of the three assays. Copper hydroxide-plusmancozeb-treated<br />
seeds looked healthy, except for showing weak<br />
radicle growth in one of the assays. Hydrogen peroxide-treated seeds<br />
showed no adverse effects on germination.<br />
Discussion<br />
Elimination of Xcc from naturally infested pumpkin seeds by<br />
chemical seed treatments with copper hydroxide plus mancozeb,<br />
peroxyacetic acid, and sodium hypochlorite was successful as<br />
determined by dilution plating of seed washings. In this study,<br />
chemicals were applied in fixed concentrations and time. Pernezny et<br />
al. (2002) used different concentrations and application times of<br />
sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and copper hydroxide plus<br />
mancozeb, and included some other chemicals including the antibiotic<br />
502 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
streptomycin as chemical seed treatments on artificially inoculated<br />
lettuce seeds to control X. campestris pv. vitians, which causes<br />
bacterial leaf spot of lettuce. In their study, treatments with 3% and<br />
5% hydrogen peroxide for 5 and 15 min eliminated bacteria; however,<br />
the 5% hydrogen peroxide treatment also reduced seed germination<br />
significantly. Sodium hypochlorite treatment of seeds at 1%<br />
concentration for 15 min reduced bacterial infestation to as low as 2%.<br />
Copper hydroxide plus mancozeb treatment significantly reduced the<br />
seed infestation to 2% or less when applied for 5 and 15 min and at<br />
three different concentrations: 0.18g copper hydroxide plus 0.14<br />
mancozeb; 0.24g copper hydroxide plus 0.18g mancozeb; and 0.36g<br />
copper hydroxide plus 0.27g mancozeb /100 ml of water.<br />
Table 1. Evaluation of seed treatments for elimination of<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. cucurbitae (Xcc) from naturally infected<br />
pumpkin seeds.<br />
Experiment Treatment<br />
Conc. of Xcc<br />
(cfu/ml) a<br />
I. Water control 5000<br />
Hydrogen peroxide, 3%<br />
Copper hydroxide +<br />
mancozeb (0.36g + 0.27<br />
400<br />
g/100ml) 0<br />
Peroxyacetic acid, 1% 0<br />
Sodium hypochlorite, 1% 0<br />
II Water control 600<br />
Hydrogen peroxide, 3%<br />
Copper hydroxide +<br />
mancozeb (0.36g + 0.27<br />
0<br />
g/100ml) 0<br />
Peroxyacetic acid, 1% 0<br />
Sodium hypochlorite, 1% 0<br />
a<br />
Colony-forming units per ml (cfu/ml) was calculated by average colony number on<br />
duplicate 1:10 dilution plates x dilution factor x 20[1000µl (1ml)/50µl of (seed<br />
slurry)].<br />
In our study, seed treatments of sodium hypochlorite at 1%, copper<br />
hydroxide at 0.36g plus 0.27g mancozeb /100 ml of water, and<br />
peroxyacetic acid at 1% for 15 min eliminated Xcc on naturally<br />
infested pumpkin seeds. <strong>The</strong> 3% hydrogen peroxide treatment did not<br />
eliminate bacteria, but reduced the infestation by 90–92% as compared<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 503
to those on water-control plates in the first experiment (Table 1). In<br />
the second experiment, the 3% hydrogen peroxide treatment<br />
eliminated the pathogen, although recovery of the bacteria in watercontrol<br />
plates was only 10% of that recovered in the first experiment.<br />
<strong>The</strong> differences with recovery of bacteria observed could be due to the<br />
overgrowth of the plates by saprophytic bacteria or to the<br />
heterogeneous infestation of the seed lot tested. In preliminary<br />
experiments for detection of Xcc from this naturally infested seed lot,<br />
bacteria were detected in only one of five trials conducted. In the one<br />
successful trial, a high number of Xcc colonies were detected.<br />
Franken et al. (1991) evaluated agar plating assays for detection of<br />
X. campestris pv. campestris from naturally contaminated crucifer<br />
seeds. <strong>The</strong>y tested the efficacy of a centrifugation step prior to plating<br />
the seed washings, and concluded that this step should be omitted<br />
since no increase in recovery of the bacteria was obtained. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
suggested that, theoretically, the centrifugation step could be useful if<br />
bacterial counts on seeds are low, as low as 1cfu of X. campestris pv.<br />
campestris in the undiluted seed washing of 50μl plated onto a 9-cm<br />
Petri dish, and with less than 250cfu of saprophytes present in the<br />
same plate. However, they indicated that they had not found seed lots<br />
that met these requirements. <strong>The</strong>y also realized that seed lots could<br />
have varying levels of saprophytic bacteria depending on the growing<br />
area and season in which the seed was produced, and that the numbers<br />
of X. campestris pv. campestris would also vary.<br />
Roberts et al. (2002) tested several nondestructive methods of<br />
detection of bacteria for seeds stored in a germplasm collection. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
used artificially inoculated and naturally infected seeds of several<br />
crops. Naturally infested pea seeds were soaked in sterile tap water for<br />
three incubation periods for recovery of Pseudomonas syringae pv.<br />
pisi, but results were inconclusive due to high sample-to-sample<br />
variability in naturally infected seed lots.<br />
Peroxyacetic acid, a peroxygen compound and oxidizing agent, is<br />
used mainly in the food industry as a disinfectant (Block, 1991).<br />
Recently, Hopkins et al. (2001) evaluated this oxidizing agent for<br />
seed-borne eradication of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli, the causal<br />
agent of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Peroxyacetic acid at<br />
concentrations of 1600ppm and higher eliminated the seed<br />
transmission of bacteria to the seedlings in greenhouse grow-out tests,<br />
with no adverse effects on germination observed. In the current study,<br />
peroxyacetic acid at 1% concentration eliminated Xcc from infected<br />
seeds, also with no adverse effect on germination. However, slightly<br />
weaker root growth was observed in two of the three germination<br />
504 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
assays. This most probably occurred from residual chemical left on<br />
the seed coats due to inadequate rinsing. Seed coats also appeared<br />
bleached in all assays. None of the chemical treatments we tested<br />
adversely affected seed germination; however, seedling vigor was<br />
slightly reduced with peroxyacetic acid and for one assay with copper<br />
hydroxide plus mancozeb. Seeds treated with sodium hypochlorite<br />
tended to germinate more slowly than the others. In order to evaluate<br />
the effects of seed treatment on seedling vigor and stand appearance,<br />
grow-out tests using sterilized soils in a temperature-controlled<br />
greenhouse would be required. Fatmi et al. (1991) treated tomato<br />
seeds with acidified cupric acetate to control Clavibacter<br />
michiganensis subsp. michiganensis and found that the adverse effects<br />
of this chemical on seed germination were eliminated by sowing<br />
treated seeds in sterilized soil. Germination blotter tests, however,<br />
showed a significant reduction in germination. Fatmi et al. suggested<br />
that this reduction could be due to inadequate dispersal of acidic cupric<br />
acetate residues, whereas the binding of these residues to soil particles<br />
would enhance seed germination.<br />
<strong>The</strong> hydrogen peroxide treatment in our study did not affect<br />
seedling vigor and germination. This chemical has been used for<br />
promotion of seed germination for certain crops such as tomatoes and<br />
legumes. It may promote germination by providing the rapid release of<br />
oxygen as a respiration stimulant (Copeland and McDonald, 2001) or<br />
by oxidation of germination inhibitors as in treatment of Zinnia<br />
elegans seeds (Ogawa and Iwabuchi, 2001). Compared to peroxyacetic<br />
acid, hydrogen peroxide is relatively inefficient in eliminating bacteria,<br />
possibly because it has fewer bactericidal properties (Baldry, 1983).<br />
Baldry compared the bactericidal, fungicidal, and sporicidal properties<br />
of the two chemicals and found that peroxyacetic acid had strong<br />
bactericidal properties. Hydrogen peroxide had poorer bactericidal<br />
properties but was more effective as a sporocide. Hydrogen peroxide<br />
can easily be decomposed by enzymes such as catalase or peroxidase<br />
and by heat to harmless end products of oxygen and water, whereas<br />
peroxyacetic acid is not degraded by these enzymes (Block, 1991).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Baldry, M. G. C. 1983. Bactericidal, fungicidal and sporicidal properties of<br />
hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 54:417–423.<br />
Block, S. 1991. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation, 4 th ed. Lea and Febiger,<br />
Malvern, Pa.<br />
Bryan, M. K. 1926. Bacterial leaf spot on Hubbard squash. Science 63:165.<br />
Bryan, M. K. 1930. Bacterial leaf spot of squash. J. Agric. Res. 40:385–391.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 505
Copeland, O. L. and McDonald, M. B. 2001. Principles of seed science and<br />
technology, 4 th ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.<br />
Fatmi, M., N. W. Schaad, and H. A. Bolkan. 1991. Seed treatments for eradicating<br />
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis from naturally infected tomato<br />
seeds. Plant Dis. 75:383–385.<br />
Franken, A. A. J. M., C. Van Zeijl, J. G. P. M. Van Bilsen, A. Neuvel, R. De Vogel,<br />
Y. Van Wingerden, Y. E. Birnbaum, J. Van Hateren, and P. S. Van Der<br />
Zouwen.1991. Evaluation of a plating assay for Xanthomonas campestris pv.<br />
campestris. Seed Sci. Tech. 19:215–226.<br />
Hopkins, D., C. Thompson, J. Hilgren, and B. Lovic. 2001. Wet seed treatment with<br />
peroxyacetic acid for the control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon.<br />
Phytopathology. 91:S40 (Abstr.).<br />
Latin, R. 1996. Bacterial spot hits the pumpkin patch. Am. Veg. Grower. 44–46.<br />
McLean, D. M. 1958. A seed-borne bacterial cotyledon spot of squash. Plant Dis.<br />
Rep. 42:425–426.<br />
Moffett, M. L., and B. A. Wood. 1979. Seed treatment for bacterial spot of<br />
pumpkin. Plant Dis. Rep. 63:537–539.<br />
Ogawa, K., and M. Iwabuchi. 2001. A mechanism for promoting the germination of<br />
Zinnia elegans seeds by hydrogen peroxide. Plant Cell Physiol. 42:286–291.<br />
Pernezny, K., R. Nagata, R. N. Raid, J. Collins, and A. Carroll. 2002. Investigation<br />
of seed treatments for management of bacterial leaf spot of lettuce. Plant Dis.<br />
86:151–155.<br />
Roberts, S. J., J. Brough, and S. Chakrabarty. 2002. Non-destructive seed testing for<br />
bacterial pathogens in germplasm material. Seed Sci. Tech.. 30:69–85.<br />
Vincent-Sealy, L., and W. D. Brathwaite. 1982. Bacterial leaf spot of cucumber<br />
in Trinidad. Trop. Agricl. 59:287–288.<br />
Williford, R. E., and N. W. Schaad. 1984. Agar medium for selective isolation of<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. carotae from carrot seeds. Phytopathology.<br />
74:1142.<br />
Wilson, E. E., F. M. Zeitoun, and D. L. Frederickson. 1967. Bacterial phloem<br />
canker, a new disease of Persian walnut trees. Phytopathology. 57:618–621.<br />
Zitter, T. A., D. L. Hopkins, and C. E. Thomas. 1996. Compendium of cucurbit<br />
diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
506 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
DETERMINING DENSITY OF<br />
PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI OOSPORES IN<br />
SOIL<br />
C. Pavon and M. Babadoost<br />
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois,<br />
1102 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, USA, 61801<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. <strong>Cucurbit</strong>, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
ABSTRACT. A sucrose-centrifugation method was developed to extract oospores<br />
of Phytophthora capsici from soil. <strong>The</strong> relationship between the number of<br />
oospores recovered from soil and the number of oospores incorporated into the<br />
soil was Ŷ= -0.75 + 1.21X -0.02X 2 (R 2 =0.98), where Ŷ = log10 of the number of<br />
oospores recovered from soil and X = log10 of the number of oospores in soil.<br />
<strong>The</strong> oospores were germinated after treating with 0.1% KMnO4 solution for 10<br />
min. Using a sucrose-centrifugation method, oospores of P. capsici were<br />
successfully extracted from soil samples collected from commercial squash<br />
fields. A real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) protocol was<br />
developed to assay the density of P. capsici oospores in soil. PCR-inhibition was<br />
avoided by extracting oospores from soil using the sucrose-centrifugation<br />
method. <strong>The</strong> relationship between the amount of DNA measured and the<br />
number of oospores of P. capsici included in the test was Ŷ = - 3.57 - 0.54X +<br />
0.30X 2 (R 2 = 0.93), where Ŷ = log10 (ng of P. capsici DNA), X = log10 (number of<br />
oospores).<br />
P<br />
hytophthora blight of cucurbits, caused by Phytophthora capsici<br />
Leonian, is one of the most serious threats to production of<br />
cucurbits, pepper, and eggplant worldwide. P. capsici is a soilborne<br />
oomycete that infects more than 50 plant species in 15 families<br />
(Erwin and Ribeiro. 1996; Tian and Babadoost, 2004). It can infect<br />
plants at any stage of growth, causing seedling damping-off, crown<br />
rot, foliage blight, and fruit rot. Phytophthora blight can cause yield<br />
losses of up to 100% in cucurbits and pepper fields (Babadoost and<br />
Islam, 2003; Hausbeck and Lamour, 2004). At present, there is no<br />
long-term sustainable solution for disease management, however, a<br />
combination of cultural practices, fungicide application, and genetic<br />
resistance can be used to minimize the damages caused by P. capsici<br />
to vegetable crops (Babadoost and Islam, 2003; Hausbeck and<br />
Lamour, 2004).<br />
P. capsici is a heterothallic organism in which two compatible<br />
mating types, designated as A1 and A2, are needed for sexual<br />
reproduction. <strong>The</strong> sexual spore of P. capsici is the oospore, which is<br />
the primary source of inoculum and the overwintering propagule in the<br />
soil (Erwin and Ribeiro. 1996). A reliable method for quantifying P.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 507
capsici oospores in soil is needed to assess survival of the pathogen<br />
and the potential for disease development in the field. Methods used<br />
for assessing density of P. capsici in soil have been primarily dilution<br />
plating and baiting assays but, these methods are time-consuming and<br />
the accuracy of the assays is questionable (Erwin and Ribeiro, 1996;<br />
Silvar et al., 2005).<br />
Sucrose-centrifugation and sieving is basically a method t\hat<br />
separate particles based on their density and size. This method has<br />
been used to extract propagules of mycorrhizal fungi (Smith and<br />
Skipper, 1979), teliospores of Tilletia species (Babadoost and Mathre,<br />
1998), and nematodes (Jenkins, 1964) from soil.<br />
Silvar et al. (2005) used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based<br />
method to detect P. capsici in soil. <strong>The</strong> protocol they used was for<br />
detecting the pathogen only and the method cannot determine quantity<br />
of P. capsici oospores in soil. Also, they reported the presence of PCR<br />
inhibitory factors in the DNA extracts for molecular detection of plant<br />
pathogens in soil (Van de Graaf, 2003). Real-time quantitative<br />
polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) is a relatively new molecular<br />
technique that has been used to quantify nematodes (Cao et al., 2005),<br />
viruses (Delanoy et al., 2003), bacteria (Bach et al., 2003), and fungal<br />
plant pathogens (Hayden et al., 2004: Silvar et al., 2005).<br />
<strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to develop a reliable QPCR method<br />
to quantify P. capsici oospores in soil.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
IN VITRO OOSPORE PRODUCTION. For in vitro production of<br />
oospores of P. capsici, two plugs of opposite mating types (A1 and<br />
A2) of the pathogen were grown in 40-ml aliquots of V8-CaCO3<br />
medium in 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks at 24°C for 2 mo in darkness.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n, oospores were harvested, blending the culture at full speed for<br />
90s in a Hamilton Beach blender (model 52250, Southern Pines, NC).<br />
<strong>The</strong> suspension in the blender was passed through 68- and 38-µm<br />
metal sieves and the filtrate was collected. <strong>The</strong> filtrate then was passed<br />
through a 20-µm Spectra/Mesh nylon filter (Spectrum, Houston, TX).<br />
<strong>The</strong> oospores collected on the mesh were washed into a beaker and the<br />
number of oospores was determined using a spore-counting chamber<br />
(Hauser Scientific, Horsham, PA).<br />
OOSPORE EXTRACTION FROM SOIL. Five agricultural soils,<br />
including a sandy loam, a silt clay, and three silt loam, collected from<br />
various locations in Illinois, were used in this study to develop the<br />
procedure for extraction of oospores of P. capsici from soil. <strong>The</strong><br />
calculations were based on the air-dried weight for all of the soils.<br />
508 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Samples of the five soil types were air dried at room temperature<br />
on a laboratory bench for 14 days and passed through a 2-mm sieve.<br />
Predetermined quantities of oospores were added to soil samples and<br />
thoroughly mixed. <strong>The</strong> artificially infested soil samples were estimated<br />
to have10 1 , 10 2 , 10 3 , 10 4 , and 10 5 oospores of P. capsici per 10g of airdried<br />
soil.<br />
Each 10-g infested soil sample was suspended in 400ml tap water<br />
with two drops of Tween-20 and shaken for 15 min. <strong>The</strong> soil<br />
suspension was passed through nested 106-, 63-, and 38-µm metal<br />
sieves. <strong>The</strong> material caught on the 38-µm sieve was washed using a<br />
sprinkler with a gentle stream of water and the filtrate was collected.<br />
This suspension (approximately 2L) was then passed through a 20-µm<br />
mesh filter. <strong>The</strong> materials caught on the 20-µm mesh were washed into<br />
two 50-ml centrifuge tubes and spun for 4 min (900 x g) using a<br />
bench-top centrifuge. <strong>The</strong> supernatant was discarded and the pellet<br />
was suspended in 30ml of 1.6M sucrose solution. This suspension was<br />
centrifuged for 45s (190 x g) and the supernatant was passed through<br />
the 20-µm mesh. <strong>The</strong> pellet was resuspended in the sucrose solution<br />
and centrifuged again (45s, 190 x g). <strong>The</strong> procedure was repeated six<br />
times to maximize oospore recovery from soil. <strong>The</strong> materials caught<br />
on the 20-µm mesh were washed into a 50-ml centrifuge tube and spun<br />
for 4 min (900 x g). <strong>The</strong> pellet was resuspended in 0.5 to 1.5ml of<br />
distilled water, depending on the original number of oospores added to<br />
the soil, and the number of oospores was determined using a sporecounting<br />
chamber.<br />
<strong>The</strong> oospore recovery at each inoculum level for each of the five<br />
artificially infested soils was determined using four replicates of 10-g<br />
soil sample and with four oospore counts per replicate (a total of 16<br />
spore counts for each inoculum level for each soil type).<br />
EXTRACTION OF OOSPORES FROM FIELD SOIL. Eight commercial<br />
fields in three counties, with a history of Phytophthora blight, were<br />
sampled to test the soil for presence of P. capsici oospores. In each<br />
field, 20 subsamples of soil were taken from 0–20cm deep from<br />
approximately 0.4ha area using a soil probe. <strong>The</strong> subsamples from<br />
each field were mixed thoroughly and a 1-kg sample was taken. Four<br />
replicates of 10-g soil samples from each field were processed using<br />
the procedure described above, to extract and enumerate oospores of<br />
P. capsici.<br />
OOSPORE GERMINATION. Extracted oospores from soil were<br />
germinated to determine their viability. <strong>The</strong> oospores were plated onto<br />
the semiselective medium PARP in Petri plates (50 oospores per<br />
plate). <strong>The</strong> effect of potassium permanganate (KMnO4) treatment on<br />
oospore germination was evaluated by suspending oospores in 0.02,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 509
0.04, 0.1, and 0.2% of KMnO4 solution in water for 10 min. After the<br />
treatment, oospores were washed three times with sterile-distilled<br />
water and plated onto PARP medium. <strong>The</strong> plates were incubated at<br />
24°C under fluorescent light for 4 days and the percentage of<br />
germinated spores was determined. Four replica plates of oospore<br />
germination were included for each treatment. Single colonies of<br />
germinated oospores from commercial fields were transferred to lima<br />
bean agar in Petri plates and P. capsici colonies were identified from<br />
colonies of other Phytophthora and Pythium species based on<br />
sporangial morphology.<br />
REAL-TIME QPCR QUANTIFICATION OF OOSPORES. P. capsici<br />
DNA was extracted from the oospores using a protocol based on<br />
FastDNA kit (Qbiogene, Inc., Carlsbad, CA), which was modified for<br />
removal of PCR inhibitors by Malvick and Grunden (2005). <strong>The</strong><br />
QPCR assays were conducted in a 96-well plate format with the ABI<br />
PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System instrument and software (PE<br />
Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). P. capsici primers were:<br />
forward, 5’-GGA ACC GTA TCA ACC CTT TTA GTT G-3’; reverse,<br />
5’-CGC CCG GAC CGA AGT C-3’; and probe, 5’-6FAM-TCT TGT<br />
ACC CTA TCA TGG CG-MGBNFQ-3’. <strong>The</strong> manufacturer’s<br />
instructions were followed, except that 25-µl reaction mixtures were<br />
used instead of 50µl. <strong>The</strong>rmal cycling conditions consisted of 10 min<br />
at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C, in<br />
addition to a 2-min preincubation at 50°C.<br />
<strong>The</strong> modified QPCR procedure was used to detect P. capsici<br />
oospores in soil samples collected from the eight commercial fields.<br />
First, oospores were extracted using the sucrose-centrifugation<br />
method. <strong>The</strong>n the extracted oospores were tested to determine the<br />
quantity of P. capsici oospores.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
IN VITRO OOSPORE PRODUCTION. Both mating types of P. capsici<br />
(A1 and A2) were identified among the isolates tested. <strong>The</strong> three<br />
pairings used for oospore production yielded almost the same amount<br />
of oospores per plate. <strong>The</strong> number of oospores per plate after 2 mo<br />
ranged from 4.41 x 10 5 to 6.72 x 10 5 (mean 5.56 x 10 5 ) oospores per<br />
plate.<br />
OOSPORE EXTRACTION FROM SOIL. Oospores of P. capsici were<br />
successfully recovered from all five artificially infested soil types.<br />
Overall, 50.9% of oospores incorporated into the soil were recovered.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in oospore recovery among the soil<br />
types. <strong>The</strong> relationship between the number of oospores recovered<br />
510 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
from soil and the number of oospores incorporated into the soil was<br />
Ŷ= -0.75 + 1.21X -0.02X 2 (R 2 =0.98), where Ŷ = log10 of the number<br />
of oospores recovered from soil and X = log10 of the number of<br />
oospores in soil (Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> average recovery rates of P. capsici<br />
oospores from the soils were 25.5 (13.5-37.8), 43.7 (33.0-54.4), 53.6<br />
(42.9-64.4), 60.3 (49.5-71.0), and 72.1% (61.3-82.8%) from soil<br />
samples containing 10 1 , 10 2 , 10 3 , 10 4 , and 10 5 oospores per 10g,<br />
respectively. <strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in oospore recovery<br />
between soil samples containing 10 4 and 10 5 oospores per 10g.<br />
Percentage of oospores recovered from soil samples with 10 1 oospores<br />
per 10g was significantly lower than the percentage of oospores<br />
recovered from the samples with 10 2 , 10 3 , 10 4 , and 10 5 oospores per<br />
10g. Similarly, percentage of oospores recovered from soil<br />
_ = - 0.75 + 1.21X - 0.02X 2<br />
R 2 = 0.98<br />
Fig. 1. Relationship between number of oospores recovered from soil and<br />
number of oospores incorporated into soil.<br />
samples with 10 2 oospores per 10g soil was significantly lower than<br />
those of soil samples with 10 4 and 10 5 oospores per 10g soil. In<br />
addition, the percentage of oospores recovered from soil samples with<br />
10 3 oospores per 10g was not significantly different than the<br />
percentage of oospores recovered from samples with 10 2 , and 10 4<br />
oospores per 10g.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 511
OOSPORES IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS. We extracted oospores from<br />
soil samples collected from all eight commercial fields in Illinois. <strong>The</strong><br />
number of oospores recovered from commercial fields ranged from<br />
694 to 2,467 per 10g of soil. <strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in<br />
diameter of oospores recovered from different fields. Number of P.<br />
capsici oospores extracted from commercial fields ranged from 79 to<br />
529 per 10g soil. <strong>The</strong> rate of P. capsici oospores of the total number of<br />
oospores extracted from soil samples from commercial fields ranged<br />
from 9.2% to 18.5% (mean 14%).<br />
OOSPORE GERMINATION. Germination rates of oospores produced<br />
in vitro with the pretreatment with 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.1, and 0.2 solution<br />
of KMnO4 were 15.2, 29.8, 27.6, 44.5, and 40.7%, respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />
rates of oospore germination for 0.1 and 0.2% solution of KMnO4<br />
were not significantly different. But the rates of oospore germination<br />
after treating with either 0.1 or 0.2% solution of KMnO4 were<br />
significantly higher than those of treatments with 0.02 and 0.04%<br />
KMnO4 solutions. <strong>The</strong>refore, for germination of oospores extracted<br />
from soil samples from commercial fields, we used a 0.1% KMnO4<br />
solution and oospores were treated for 10 min. Germination rates of<br />
oospores extracted from commercial fields ranged from 18.8% to<br />
51.1% (mean 36.8%). In addition to P. capsici, P. sojae and Pythium<br />
spp. were identified in the culture plates.<br />
REAL-TIME PCR QUANTIFICATION OF OOSPORES. <strong>The</strong><br />
relationship between the number of oospores and P. capsici DNA<br />
quantity was Ŷ = -3.57 - 0.54X - 0.30X 2 (R 2 = 0.93), where Ŷ = log10<br />
(ng of P. capsici DNA), X = log10 (number of oospores) (Figure 2).<br />
According to this model, the DNA quantities corresponding to 10 1 ,<br />
10 1.5 , 10 2 , 10 2.5 , 10 3 , 10 3.5 , 10 4 , 10 4.5 and 10 5 oospores were 1.4 × 10 -4 ,<br />
1.9 × 10 -4 , 3.5 × 10 -4 , 9.0 × 10 -4 , 3.2 × 10 -3 , 1.6 × 10 -2 , 1.5 × 10 -1 , 1.2 ×<br />
10 0 , and 1.7 × 10 1 ng, respectively.<br />
Using the QPCR procedure, we detected P. capsici in all field soil<br />
samples tested. <strong>The</strong>re was no PCR-inhibition in the DNA extracts<br />
from oospores extracted from soil using the sieving-sucrosecentrifugation<br />
method, although some soil particles and organic matter<br />
were associated with the oospores. PCR inhibition, however, was<br />
found in the DNA extraction directly from soil.<br />
Using the sieving-centrifugation with sucrose solution method, we<br />
were able to recover oospores of P. capsici from soil with a spore<br />
density as low as 10 spores per g of soil. <strong>The</strong> results showed that the<br />
method can be used to determine density of P. capsici oospores in<br />
fields with different soil types. <strong>The</strong>re were, however, some difficulties<br />
in the identification of the oospores extracted from naturally infested<br />
commercial field soils, because oospores of other Phytophthora and<br />
512 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Pythium species were co-extracted by the procedure. <strong>The</strong>se difficulties<br />
were overcome by germinating and identifying oospores based on<br />
morphological characteristics of sporangia. Thus, the sieving-sucrosecentrifugation<br />
procedure can be used to estimate P. capsici oospores in<br />
soil in areas where Phytophthora blight of vegetables is a problem, or<br />
any other area suspected of having P. capsici.<br />
_ = -3.57 - 0.54X + 0.30X 2<br />
R 2 = 0.93<br />
Fig. 2. Relationship between quantity of DNA and number of oospores used in<br />
quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests.<br />
Difficulty in the in vitro germination of oospores of Phytophthora<br />
species has been reported. <strong>The</strong>se difficulties have been overcome by<br />
pretreatment of oospores with KMnO4 solution. For example,<br />
germination of oospores of P. parasitica was improved by a<br />
pretreatment with 0.25% solution of KMnO4 for 20 min. Similarly,<br />
germination of oospores of P. megasperma was enhanced by a<br />
pretreatment of 0.05% of KMnO4 for 10 min. Similarly, we increased<br />
percent of germination of P. capsici oospores from about 10% to 50%<br />
by pretreatment with 0.1% KMnO4 solution.<br />
QPCR is useful for detecting and quantifying nonculturable and<br />
slow-growing organisms. Some reports indicated that P. capsici can be<br />
outgrown by closely related and fast-growing Pythium spp. <strong>The</strong> QPCR<br />
procedure used in this study is a reliable method for quantifying P.<br />
capsici oospores in soil. <strong>The</strong> procedure detected P. capsici in all field<br />
soil samples tested. This QPCR protocol is a fast, accurate, and<br />
sensitive method for quantifying P. capsici oospores in soil. Also, the<br />
combination of sieving-centrifugation and QPCR is effective in<br />
eliminating PCR inhibitors that affect PCR tests in direct assays from<br />
soil samples.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 513
Literature Cited<br />
Babadoost, M. and D. E. Mathre. 1998. A method for extraction and enumeration<br />
of teliospores of Tilletia indica, T. controversa, and T. barclayana in soil. Plant<br />
Dis. 82:1357–1361.<br />
Babadoost, M. and S. Z. Islam. 2003. Fungicide seed treatment effects on seedling<br />
damping-off of pumpkin caused by Phytophthora capsici. Plant Dis. 87:63–68.<br />
Bach, H. J., I. Jessen, M. Schloter, and J. C. Munch. 2003. A TaqMan-PCR<br />
protocol for quantification and identification of the phytopathogenic<br />
Clavibacter michiganensis subspecies. J. Microbiol. Meth. 52:85–91.<br />
Cao, A. X., X. Z. Liu, S. F. Zhu, and B. S. Lu. 2005. Detection of pinewood<br />
nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, using a real-time polymerase chain<br />
reaction assay. Phytopathology 95:566–571.<br />
Delanoy, M., M. Salmon, and J. Kummert. 2003. Development of real-time PCR<br />
for rapid detection of episomal Banana streak virus (BSV). Plant Dis. 87:33–<br />
38.<br />
Erwin, D. C. and O. K. Ribeiro. 1996. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide.<br />
American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN.<br />
Hausbeck, M. K. and K. H. Lamour. 2004. Phytophthora capsici on vegetable<br />
crops: research progress and management challenges. Plant Dis. 88:1292–1303.<br />
Hayden, K. J., D. Rizzo, J. Tse, and M. Garbelotto. 2004. Detection and<br />
quantification of Phytophthora ramorum from California forest using a realtime<br />
polymerase chain reaction assay. Phytopathology 94:1075–1083.<br />
Jenkins, W. R. 1964. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating<br />
nematodes from soil. Plant Dis. Rep. 48:692.<br />
Malvick, D. K., and E. Grunden. 2005. Isolation of fungal DNA from plant tissues<br />
and removal of DNA amplification inhibitors. Molec. Ecol. 5: 958–960.<br />
Silvar, C., J. Diaz, and F. Merino. 2005. Real-time polymerase chain reaction<br />
quantification of Phytophthora capsici in different pepper genotypes.<br />
Phytopathology. 95:1423–1429.<br />
Smith, G. W. and H. D. Skipper. 1979. Comparison of methods to extract spores<br />
of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:722–725.<br />
Tian, D. and M. Babadoost. 2004. Host range of Phytophthora capsici from<br />
pumpkin and pathogenicity of isolates. Plant Dis. 88:485–489.<br />
Van de Graaf, P., A. K. Lees, D. W. Cullen, and J.M. Duncan. 2003. Detection and<br />
quantification of Spongospora subterranea in soil, water and plant tissue<br />
samples using real-time PCR. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109:589–597.<br />
514 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
CHARACTERISTICS OF DOUBLE-HAPLOID<br />
CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS SATIVUS L.) LINES<br />
RESISTANT TO DOWNY MILDEW<br />
(PSEUDOPERONOSPORA CUBENSIS [BERK.<br />
ET CURT.] ROSTOVZEV)<br />
J. Sztangret-Wiśniewska<br />
Plant <strong>Breeding</strong> and Acclimatization Institute, Mlochow Research Center,<br />
19 Platanowa Str., 05-831 Mlochow, Poland<br />
T. Gałecka, A. Korzeniewska, L. Marzec, G. Kołakowska, U.<br />
Piskurewicz, M. Śmiech, and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt<br />
Department of Plant Genetics, <strong>Breeding</strong>, and Biotechnology, Warsaw<br />
Agricultural University, Nowoursynowska St., 02-776 Warszawa, Poland<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. DH lines, diploidization, haploid embryo rescue,<br />
irradiated pollen<br />
ABSTRACT. Downy mildew caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk et Curt.)<br />
Rostovzev is one of the most important diseases of field-grown cucumbers. A<br />
study was designed to determine the feasibility of obtaining double-haploid (DH)<br />
lines from cucumber hybrids tolerant to Pseudoperonospora cubensis that would<br />
result in creation of diverse, genetically fixed lines that are homozygous for<br />
resistance to downy mildew. On average, 20% of embryos generated in two<br />
experiments were converted to haploid plants. Utilization of two diploidization<br />
methods, direct regeneration and colchicine treatment, resulted in the doubling of<br />
these haploids (53% and 33% conversion rate, respectively). This is the first report<br />
on DH cucumber lines tolerant to downy mildew.<br />
E<br />
fficient generation of haploid (H) and double-haploid (DH) lines<br />
in cultivated plants can significantly contribute to breeding<br />
efforts. DH cucumber lines characterized by useful agronomic<br />
characteristics could be used as inbred lines in hybrid production. This<br />
study was undertaken to test the feasibility of production of DH lines that<br />
are resistant to downy mildew, one of the most important diseases of<br />
cultivated cucumber.<br />
Two methods of cucumber haploid production are known. <strong>The</strong> first<br />
method utilizes an in vitro culture of either ovules or ovaries. <strong>The</strong> second<br />
method, called haploid parthenogenesis, consists of pollination with<br />
irradiated pollen followed by haploid embryo rescue and in vitro culture<br />
This research was partially supported by a grant from AWRSP – Poland. <strong>The</strong> authors<br />
thank E. Gniazdowska and J. Szewczyk for careful technical assistance.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 515
(Gemes-Juhasz et al., 2002; Truong-Andre, 1988; Niemirowicz-Szczytt<br />
and Dumas de Vaulx, 1989; Sauton, 1989; Przyborowski and<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994; Caglar and Abak, 1996).<br />
In 1990 the Dutch seed company Nunhems Zaden BV (Haelen, <strong>The</strong><br />
Netherlands) patented a method for the ovule-culture method (patent NP-<br />
374755); however, no data were provided on the efficacy and application<br />
of this invention. More recently, a similar approach was reported by<br />
Gemes-Juhasz et al. (2002). In the latter, longitudinally sliced<br />
unpollinated ovaries were harvested six hours before anthesis of the<br />
hermaphrodite flower and cultured in vitro on various media at 24°, 28°,<br />
and 35°C. <strong>The</strong> best result was regeneration of plants from 7.1% of<br />
approximately 150 ovaries, of which 87.7% were haploids. This result<br />
was obtained by culturing the ovaries at 35 o C after 2–4 days of treatment<br />
on induction medium containing thidiazuron (TDZ). No information was<br />
reported on morphology and number of DH plants obtained in that study.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second approach, the embryo-rescue method, has given in<br />
general better results than ovary culture (Truong-Andre, 1988;<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Dumas de Vaulx, 1989; Sauton, 1989;<br />
Przyborowski and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994; Caglar and Abak, 1996).<br />
In this method, pollination with an irradiated pollen resulted in direct<br />
formation of haploid embryos that developed into haploid plants. For<br />
instance, Przyborowski and Niemirowicz-Szczytt (1994) reported that an<br />
average of 1.2 to 3.1 embryos per fruit were obtained in six cucumber<br />
genotypes and approximately 50% of the excised haploid embryos<br />
developed into plants.<br />
Since cucumber haploid plants are sterile (Przyborowski and<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994), their use in plant breeding requires<br />
chromosome doubling. Two methods for chromosome doubling are in<br />
use. <strong>The</strong> first method involves colchicine treatment of the apical<br />
meristem (Nikolova and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1996), and the second<br />
method employs direct regeneration of plants from young haploid leaf<br />
tissue (Faris et al., 2000). <strong>The</strong> method of repeated treatment of the<br />
meristems with colchicine solution resulted in generation of 20.9%<br />
diploid plants. <strong>The</strong> method of direct regeneration of plants resulted in<br />
29.5% of diploid plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong> process of H and DH plant production is both time- and laborconsuming.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, it is important to estimate at a relatively early<br />
stage of employment of this technology the potential breeding value (i.e.,<br />
presence of valuable characteristics, such as resistance to downy mildew)<br />
of the obtained plants. Moreover, it is important to be able to recover DH<br />
plants from genetically diverse material. To evaluate the efficacy of DH<br />
production in different genotypes, a study was designed to determine<br />
516 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
whether DH cucumber plants could be obtained effectively from three<br />
cucumber hybrids resistant to Pseudoperonospora cubensis.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
HAPLOID PLANT PRODUCTION. <strong>The</strong> haploid embryo production<br />
utilized the process of haploid parthenogenesis (Przyborowski and<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994). Female flowers of three commercial<br />
hybrids resistant to Pseudoperonospora cubensis, ‘Krak’, ‘Frykas’, and<br />
‘Izyd’, and one susceptible hybrid, ‘Polan’, were pollinated with pollen<br />
irradiated at 0.3kGy gamma rays, cobalt source, 0.80Gy/min at the<br />
Department of Food Safety and Public Health, Warsaw Agricultural<br />
University. Flowers of 40 plants of each cultivar grown at a Warsaw<br />
Agricultural University greenhouse at the Wolica Experimental Station<br />
were used in the pollination. Three to five weeks after pollination,<br />
presence of individual haploid embryos was detected using a<br />
stereomicroscope. <strong>The</strong> embryos were removed aseptically from the<br />
ovaries and transferred to E20A medium (Sauton and Dumas de Vaulx,<br />
1987). Embryos that developed into plants were maintained on MS<br />
medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). <strong>The</strong> experiment was conducted<br />
during the months of May and June and then August and September,<br />
1999.<br />
DIPLOIDIZATION METHODS. Two methods of diploidization were<br />
used. One method consisted of direct regeneration of plants from young<br />
haploid leaf tissue and the second method was a colchicine treatment of<br />
apical meristems of H plants. Direct regeneration from leaf explants of<br />
haploid plants obtained in the spring of 1999 (May and June) was<br />
conducted in the autumn (September–November) of the same year,<br />
whereas the haploids obtained in the summer/autumn of 1999 (August–<br />
September) were used in regeneration during winter/spring of 2000<br />
(January–April).<br />
DIRECT-REGENERATION METHOD. In vitro-grown haploid plants<br />
that were about 10cm were used in the direct-regeneration method. <strong>The</strong><br />
first and second leaves, closest to the apical shoot meristem and between<br />
0.50 to 0.75cm 2 , were cut into 2- to 3-mm 2 squares (explants), placed on<br />
a modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Burza and Malepszy,<br />
1995), and incubated in the dark at 25±2 o C for 11 to 15 days. Next, the<br />
explants were transferred to a hormone-free medium (1/2 MS<br />
macroelements, <strong>complete</strong> MS microelements, <strong>complete</strong> MS vitamins),<br />
and cultured in a 16-h photoperiod (54μmol m -2 s -1 ) until shoots were<br />
formed on the cut edge of the explant. <strong>The</strong> explants and the shoots were<br />
transferred to a fresh medium every 15 days. To induce rooting, three to<br />
five shoots detached from the explant-tissue shoots were placed<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 517
aseptically in 0.33-dm -3 glass jars containing 1/2 MS medium containing<br />
1mg /dm -3 indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Rooted plants were grown in 0.6dm<br />
-3 pots filled with universal substrate for cucumber (Hollas, Pasłęk,<br />
Poland) under greenhouse conditions (23/25°C, 16/h day, 1000μmol m -2<br />
s -1 ).<br />
<strong>The</strong> ploidy level of actively growing young plants was estimated by<br />
flow-cytometry according to Galbraith et al. (1983). In brief, two weeks<br />
after transplanting to soil, two–three top leaves were collected, the nuclei<br />
were extracted and stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)<br />
for flow-cytometry measurements using a PARTEC model ANII<br />
cytometer (Partec GmbH, Münster, Germany).<br />
MERISTEM COLCHICINE TREATMENT. All regenerated H plants were<br />
subjected to colchicine treatment according to Nikolova and<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt (1996). In this method H plants were maintained<br />
aseptically in glass jars on 1/2 MS medium. Each plant was clonally<br />
propagated by cutting the stem into segments, each segment containing<br />
one leaf. After 10 to15 days each cutting produced four to five leaves<br />
and roots. Colchicine solution (0.1% in water) was applied to apical<br />
meristems of actively growing plants by placing a 50-μL drop on the<br />
meristem. At least 15 clones of each H plant were treated. <strong>The</strong>re were<br />
three successive applications with a 24-h interval between treatments.<br />
This method resulted in the death of approximately 50% of the treated<br />
plants. New shoots developed from the main and auxiliary meristems of<br />
the surviving plants after three to four weeks. <strong>The</strong>se shoots were<br />
removed and transferred to jars containing 1/2 MS medium and 1mg<br />
/dm -3 IAA for root induction. <strong>The</strong> ploidy level of these shoots was<br />
estimated by flow-cytometry as described above.<br />
PHENOTYPIC OBSERVATIONS OF DH LINES. Visual observations of<br />
DH lines were made on 20 plants per line grown at the Warsaw<br />
Agriculture University experimental field nursery. Four-week-old<br />
seedlings were transplanted to the field on May 25, 2001, with 50 x 120cm<br />
spacing between plants. Plants were grown in a randomized block<br />
design with four replicates of 5 plants each. <strong>The</strong>y were evaluated for the<br />
following traits: sex expression (female or monoecious), growth type<br />
(vine, intermediate, dwarf), leaf color (A = dark green, B = dark<br />
green/light green, C = light green [Green group 135, R.H.S Colour Chart,<br />
<strong>The</strong> Royal Horticultural Society London, Flower Council of Holland,<br />
Leiden, 1995]), and susceptibility to downy mildew. <strong>The</strong> evaluation of<br />
plant infection was made in the field on August 15–20, 2001. Symptoms<br />
were assessed using a scale from 0 to 9 (0 = no visible symptoms; 1 =<br />
several necrotic spots on leaves; 3 = 25% of infected leaves; 5 = 50%<br />
infected leaves; 7 = 75% infected leaves; and 9 = 100% infected leaves,<br />
leaf decay), according to Jenkins and Wehner (1983) and Doruchowski<br />
518 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
and Łąkowska-Ryk (1992). In each class, a disease index (DI) was<br />
calculated by averaging the scores for each DH line according to<br />
Happstadius et al. (2003). A one-way analysis of variance for DI was<br />
performed using the Statgraphics Plus 4.1 (Manugistics, Rockville, MD)<br />
statistical software package.<br />
Results<br />
CUCUMBER HAPLOID DEVELOPMENT. Fruit developed from about<br />
50% of pollinated flowers and numerous haploid embryos and plants<br />
were obtained in four hybrid varieties as a result of pollination with<br />
irradiated pollen (Table 1).<br />
Typically, 2–3 fruit per plant for a total of 119 fruit were obtained<br />
from pollination of 40 plants in each cultivar. <strong>The</strong> number of embryos<br />
that developed from seeds within five weeks after pollination ranged<br />
between 70 and 116 per cultivar. In total, the number of embryos<br />
developed from the four cultivars was similar in each season (356 in<br />
spring and 333 in summer/autumn). Average number of embryos that<br />
developed into plants varied from experiment to experiment and from<br />
cultivar to cultivar, ranging between 7.8 and 41.9%. Haploid plants were<br />
obtained in each genetic background; the results were consistent over the<br />
two years. Using cytometric evaluation, all plants were classified as<br />
monohaploids (n = 7). <strong>The</strong>se plants were maintained in vitro and<br />
vegetatively propagated to provide material for chromosome doubling.<br />
CHROMOSOME DOUBLING. Chromosome doubling was<br />
accomplished using two methods applied consecutively: (1) direct<br />
regeneration from young leaf explants (Tables 2 and 3), and (2)<br />
colchicine treatment of the apical meristem (Tables 4 and 5).<br />
Not all H plants developed juvenile leaves that were suitable for<br />
direct regeneration during the first six months when the juvenile leaves<br />
were collected (96.3% and 42.4% in the first and the second experiment,<br />
respectively).<br />
<strong>The</strong> results of plant regeneration in five genetically different haploid<br />
clones are shown in Table 3. <strong>The</strong> number of regenerated plants ranged<br />
between 2 and 45, while the cumulative percentage of diploids in these<br />
clones was 53.3%.<br />
A summary of results of six experiments with colchicine treatment is<br />
shown in Table 4. Out of a total of 245 plants, 132 plants (53.9%)<br />
developed new shoots after colchicine treatment. Ploidy estimation on<br />
rooted cuttings revealed that 32.6% were diploid, 57.6% were haploid,<br />
and 9.8% were either mixoploid and/or chimeras. Table 5 shows the<br />
results of colchicine treatment on five haploid clones, represented by 15–<br />
27 plants. <strong>The</strong> mean percentage of shoot recovery after colchicine<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 519
treatment for all five clones was 61.5%, while the diploid recovery was<br />
25.0%. Not all haploid clones could be “diploidized” (e.g., Clone no. 2).<br />
Table 1. Cucumber haploid embryo and plant development from four F1<br />
donor cultivars in two environments.<br />
a. Spring 1999<br />
Embryos<br />
regener-<br />
F1 donor cultivar<br />
Fruits<br />
(no.)<br />
Embryos<br />
(no.)<br />
Plants<br />
(no.)<br />
ated into<br />
plants (%)<br />
Polan<br />
132 116 9 7.8<br />
Krak<br />
102 76 16 21.1<br />
Frykas<br />
127 79 15 19.0<br />
Izyd<br />
120 85 14 16.5<br />
Total 481 356 54 15.2<br />
b. Summer/autumn 1999<br />
Polan<br />
123 92 20 21.7<br />
Krak<br />
100 74 31 41.9<br />
Frykas<br />
130 70 25 35.7<br />
Izyd<br />
117 97 9 9.3<br />
Total 470 333 85 25.5<br />
Table 2. Direct regeneration of plants from young leaf explants of<br />
cucumber haploid plants in two environments.<br />
a. 1999<br />
Total no. Explant Regenerating<br />
F1 donor haploid donor plants donor plants<br />
cultivar<br />
Polan<br />
Krak<br />
Frykas<br />
Izyd<br />
plants No. % No. %<br />
9<br />
16<br />
15<br />
14<br />
9<br />
15<br />
14<br />
14<br />
100.0<br />
93.7<br />
93.3<br />
100.0<br />
6<br />
4<br />
4<br />
6<br />
66.7<br />
25.0<br />
26.7<br />
42.9<br />
Total 54 52 96.3 20 37.0<br />
b. 1999/2000<br />
Polan<br />
Krak<br />
Frykas<br />
Izyd<br />
20<br />
31<br />
25<br />
9<br />
9<br />
9<br />
11<br />
7<br />
45.0<br />
29.0<br />
44.0<br />
77.8<br />
3<br />
3<br />
12<br />
5<br />
15.0<br />
9.7<br />
48.0<br />
55.5<br />
Total 85 36 42.4 23 27.1<br />
520 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 3. Ploidy level and number of plants regenerated from leaf<br />
explants of five haploid cucumber clones.<br />
Haploid plant<br />
No.<br />
regenerated<br />
Ploidy level of plants*<br />
plants 2n 1n<br />
Mixoploids<br />
and<br />
chimeras<br />
1 2 2 0 0<br />
2 45 16 17 12<br />
3 29 11 15 3<br />
4 13 11 2 0<br />
5 31 24 6 1<br />
Total 120 64 40 16<br />
(53.3%) (33.3%) (13.4%)<br />
*Ploidy determined using a flow-cytometric procedure as described by Galbraith et al.<br />
(1983).<br />
Table 4. <strong>The</strong> number and ploidy of plants recovered from colchicine<br />
treatment of the apical meristem.<br />
Exp.<br />
no.<br />
No.<br />
treated<br />
haploid<br />
plants<br />
Shoot<br />
Recovery<br />
No. %<br />
No. plants according to<br />
ploidy level*<br />
Mixoploids<br />
2n 1n and chimeras<br />
1 45 20 44.4 8 9 3<br />
2 30 12 40.0 6 3 3<br />
3 33 24 72.7 5 13 6<br />
4 42 36 85.7 11 25 0<br />
5 25 14 56.0 3 11 0<br />
6 70 26 37.1 10 15 1<br />
Total 245 132 53.9 43 76 13<br />
(32.6%) (57.6%) (9.8%)<br />
*Ploidy determined using a flow-cytometric procedure as described by Galbraith et al.<br />
(1983).<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF DH LINES. Table 6 presents data from DH<br />
lines derived from the three hybrid cultivars tolerant to downy mildew<br />
and the susceptible control hybrid ‘Polan’. In each line plants were<br />
morphologically homogenous.<br />
Most numerous fertile DH plants were obtained from the cultivar<br />
‘Izyd’. Because the group of 14 lines derived from the cultivar ‘Izyd’<br />
was the largest, it represents the majority of the morphological<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 521
Table 5. Number of cucumber plants obtained from colchicine treatment<br />
from five haploid clones.<br />
Shoot No. plants according<br />
Hap- No. treated recovery<br />
to ploidy level<br />
loid<br />
clone<br />
haploid<br />
plants No. % 2n 1n Mixoploids<br />
and chimeras<br />
1 21 15 71.4 7 6 2<br />
2 17 6 35.3 0 3 3<br />
3 24 18 75.0 3 12 3<br />
4 27 20 74.0 5 14 1<br />
5 15 5 33.3 1 2 2<br />
Total 104 64 61.5 16 37 11<br />
(25.0%) (57.8%) (17.2%)<br />
* Ploidy determined using a flow-cytometric procedure as described by Galbraith et al.<br />
(1983).<br />
Table 6. Phenotype characteristics of cucumber DH (10 plants per line),<br />
grown in the open field in 2001.<br />
Suscepti-<br />
DH line<br />
Growth Leaf bility to downy<br />
denomination Sex type color mildew DI<br />
F-1 100 F V C 5.90*<br />
F-2 310 F V C 4.25<br />
F-3 311 F V C 4.40<br />
I-1 18 M V C 8.50*<br />
I-2 89 F V B 8.80*<br />
I-3 114 M V B 8.75*<br />
I-4 150 M V B 8.75*<br />
I-5 228 F I A 8.75*<br />
I-6 243 F I B 3.85<br />
I-7 275 M V A 2.65*<br />
I-8 280 M V B 8.65*<br />
I-9 290 M V B 6.00*<br />
I-10 321 F V A 6.95*<br />
I-11 502 F I A 2.65*<br />
I-12 503 F I A 2.60*<br />
I-13 504 F I A 4.95*<br />
I-14 506 M V B 8.70*<br />
K-1 25 F V A 4.55<br />
K-2 228 F V A 4.55<br />
P-1 356 F V C 8.45*<br />
Izyd F1 (standard) F V B 4.15<br />
Sex expression: F = female, M = monoecious; Growth type: V = vine, I = intermediate,<br />
D = dwarf; Leaf color: A = dark green, B = dark green/light green, C = light green.<br />
522 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
observations that were made. <strong>The</strong> lines within this group differed in sex<br />
expression, growth type, leaf color, and susceptibility to downy mildew<br />
(disease ratings between 2.6 and 8.8). <strong>The</strong> cultivar ‘Izyd’ is gynoecious<br />
with indeterminate (vine) growth, has a leaf color rating of “B,” and is<br />
tolerant to downy mildew (Table 6). Out of the 14 DH lines derived from<br />
‘Izyd’, 3 lines were more tolerant to downy mildew than the original<br />
cultivar. Increased resistance was not observed among the DH lines<br />
developed from the other two resistant varieties.<br />
Discussion<br />
In this study we demonstrated a <strong>complete</strong> procedure for cucumber<br />
DH line production based on previous partial investigations<br />
(Przyborowski and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994; Nikolova and<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1996; Faris et al., 2000).<br />
<strong>The</strong> frequency of embryo development was comparable in the two<br />
experiments performed in this study (about 0.7 embryo per fruit). This<br />
efficiency is not considered high when compared to the efficiency of 1.2<br />
to 3.1 embryos per fruit published earlier (Przyborowski and<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1994). However, the results presented here are<br />
unique in the fact that embryos and haploid plants were obtained from<br />
each of the four tested varieties.<br />
As reported here, the frequency of plant regeneration, calculated by<br />
dividing the total number of plants by the number of ovaries that<br />
produced embryos, ranges from 0.07% to 0.31%. Frequency of 0.0 to<br />
7.1% was reported by Gemes-Juhasz et al. (2002); however, in that study<br />
the plantlets were obtained through ovary culture.<br />
<strong>The</strong> results presented here are similar to those observed in<br />
muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), which has been studied to a greater<br />
extent than cucumber (Sauton and Dumas de Vaulx, 1987; Cuny et al.,<br />
1993; Ficcadenti et al., 1995; Abak et al., 1996; Ficcadenti et al., 1999,<br />
Lotfi et al., 2003).<br />
It was reported that ovary culture results in fewer plants and in the<br />
increase in the percentage of mixoploids as compared to haploid embryo<br />
rescue (Ficcadenti et al., 1999; Lotfi et al., 2003). In contrast, pollination<br />
with irradiated pollen, embryo rescue, and subsequent in vitro culture<br />
was reported to produce stable muskmelon haploid plants (Sauton and<br />
Dumas de Vaulx, 1987; Cuny et al., 1993; Ficcadenti et al., 1995; Abak<br />
et al., 1996). <strong>The</strong> latter method clearly produces more desirable results.<br />
Haploid plant production is only the first step in DH production.<br />
Cucumber H embryos do not double spontaneously during in vitro<br />
culture, and efficient methods of chromosome doubling are needed.<br />
Colchicine treatment, the technique most frequently used for<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 523
chromosome doubling, has been applied to cucumber DH production<br />
previously (Nikolova and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, 1996). <strong>The</strong> most<br />
effective procedure (28% of diploids) proved to be colchicine treatment<br />
of young plants grown in vitro. <strong>The</strong> results of the current study are<br />
similar to the previously published data, but indicate that not every<br />
haploid clone is amenable to doubling.<br />
Another drawback of the colchicine treatment is the death of 38.5%<br />
to 46.1% of plants (Tables 4 and 5). A complementary haploid-doubling<br />
procedure of direct regeneration from haploid leaf explants was applied<br />
to augment the low recovery of diploids (25.0 to 32.6%) resulting from<br />
the application of colchicine (Tables 4 and 5).<br />
Direct regeneration from leaf tissue allows the production of both<br />
haploid and diploid plants (Faris et al., 2000), and has the additional<br />
benefit of multiplying the haploid plants, which in turn provides more<br />
plant material for colchicine treatment. However, only a portion of the<br />
haploid plants (27.1 to 37.0%) was amenable to in vitro regeneration<br />
(Table 2). Furthermore, only some (53.3%) of the regenerated plants<br />
were diploid. This result confirms a similar observation made earlier in<br />
our laboratory (Faris et al., 2000).<br />
<strong>The</strong> number of H plants obtained from H embryos in both<br />
experiments (Table 1) was relatively high, with 20.2% embryos<br />
developing into plants. However, the outcome of the two methods of<br />
chromosome doubling is not satisfactory. Only 20 DH plants (14.4 % of<br />
all haploid plants, Table 2) produced viable seeds. This frequency is low<br />
as compared to the frequency reported for Triticum aestivum (60–81%)<br />
(Lefebvre and Devaux, 1996) and Hordeum vulgare (64%) (Furusho et<br />
al., 1999).<br />
<strong>The</strong> reason for the low fertility and consequently low seed set is<br />
unclear. It is possible that the diploid plants are either partial chimeras or<br />
even low-level mixoploids. Fertility problems were also reported by<br />
Gemes-Juhasz et al. (2002).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is an additional difficulty in achieving self-pollination in DH<br />
plants, namely, there is a need for the induction of male flowers in<br />
otherwise female plants by the application of silver nitrate. In our<br />
experience induction of male flowers is especially difficult in plants<br />
derived from in vitro culture.<br />
It appears that the difficulty of diploidization of cucumber and melon<br />
plants is the main reason for insufficient production of DH lines. For<br />
example, the recent report by Lotfi et al. (2003) describes a spontaneous<br />
appearance of two DH and one mixoploid melon plant in an in vitro<br />
culture of a total of 175 haploid plants, whereas 10 diploid and 100<br />
mixoploid plants were obtained after treating 167 shoots with colchicine.<br />
524 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
In order to be useful in breeding, DH lines must be produced in large<br />
quantities. It appears that the most serious obstacle to cucumber DH line<br />
production occurs at the stage of haploid doubling (Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5).<br />
Such limitation was not reported in Triticum aestivum (Lefebvre and<br />
Devaux, 1996; Inagaki et al., 1998) or Hodeum vulgare (Furusho et al.,<br />
1999). In the studies cited above, the colchicine treatment gave better<br />
results than in cucumber.<br />
Relatively facile production of numerous DH lines (65 to 97), as<br />
described in wheat (Inagaki et al., 1998), allows evaluation of agronomic<br />
characteristics and comparisons with lines produced by conventional<br />
reproductive methods.<br />
Although the number of the DH lines obtained in our study is rather<br />
small, this is the first reported characterization of cucumber DH lines.<br />
Moreover, 3 DH lines showed significantly lower susceptibility to<br />
downy mildew than their donor variety. This characteristic, together with<br />
a high fruit yield of several other DH lines (data not published), as well<br />
as the possibility of early detection of downy mildew resistance using<br />
RAPD markers, may prove to be useful in cucumber breeding.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Abak, K., N. Sari, M. Paksoy, H. Yimaz, H. Aktas, and C. Tunali. 1996. Genotype<br />
response to haploid embryo induction with pollination by irradiated pollen in<br />
melon, production of dihaploid lines, and determination of haploid and diploid<br />
plants by different techniques. Turk. J. Agric. For. 20:425–430.<br />
Burza, W. and S. Malepszy. 1995. Direct regeneration from leaf explants in cucumber<br />
(Cucumis sativus L.) is free of stable genetic variation. Plant Breed. 114:341–345.<br />
Caglar, G. and K. Abak. 1996. <strong>The</strong> effect of season and irradiation doses on haploid<br />
embryo production in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), p. 25–30. In: Proc. 6 th<br />
Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Malaga, Spain.<br />
Cuny, F., M. Grotte, R. Dumas de Vaulx, and A. Rieu. 1993. Effect of gamma<br />
irradiation of pollen on parthenogenetic haploid production in muskmelon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 33:301–312.<br />
Doruchowski, R. and E. Łąkowska-Ryk. 1992. Inheritance of resistance to downy<br />
mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis Berk & Court) in Cucumis sativus, p. 66–69.<br />
In: Proc. 5 th Eucarpia <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae Symposium, Warsaw, Poland.<br />
Faris, N. M., M. Rakoczy-Trojanowska, S. Malepszy, and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt.<br />
2000. Diploidization of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) haploids by in vitro culture<br />
of leaf explant, p. 49–54. In: S. Bielecki, J. Tramper, and J. Polak (eds.). Food<br />
biotech. Elsevier Science,<br />
Ficcadenti, N., P. Veronese, S. Sestili, P. Crino, S. Lucretti, M. Schiavi, and F.<br />
Saccardo. 1995. Influence of genotype on the induction of haploids in Cucumis<br />
melo L. by using irradiated pollen. J. Genet. Breed. 49:359–364.<br />
Ficcadenti, N., S. Sestili, S. Annibali, M. Marco, and M. Schiavi. 1999. In vitro<br />
gynogenesis to induce haploid plants in melon Cucumis melo L. J. Genet. Breed.<br />
53:255–257.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 525
Furusho, M., T. Baba, O. Yamaguchi, T. Yoshida, Y. Hamachi, R. Yoshikawa, K.<br />
Mizuta, and M. Yoshino. 1999. <strong>Breeding</strong> of a new malting barley cultivar Houshun<br />
by the bulbosum method. Breed. Sci. 49:281–284.<br />
Galbraith, D. W., K. R. Harkins, J. M. Maddox, N. M. Ayres, D. P. Sharma, and E.<br />
Firoozabady. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle in intact plant<br />
tissues. Sci. 220:1049–1051.<br />
Gemes-Juhasz, A., P. Balogh, A. Ferenczy, and Z. Kristof. 2002. Effect of optimum<br />
stage of female gametophyte and heat treatment on in vitro gynogenesis induction<br />
in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell Rep. 21:105–111.<br />
Happstadius, I., A. Ljungberg, B. Kristansson, and C. Dixelius. 2003. Identification of<br />
Brassica oleracea germplasm with improved resistance to Verticillium wilt. Plant<br />
Breed. 122:30–34.<br />
Inagaki, M. N., G. Varughese, S. Rajaram, van M. Ginkel, and A. Mujeeb-Kazi. 1998.<br />
Comparison of bread wheat lines selected by doubled haploid, single-seed descent<br />
and pedigree selection methods. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Gen. 97:550–556.<br />
Jenkins, S. F. and T. C. Wehner. 1983. A system for the measurement of foliar diseases<br />
in cucumbers. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 6:10–12.<br />
Lefebvre, D. and P. Devaux. 1996. Doubled haploids of wheat from wheat X maize<br />
crosses: genotypic influence, fertility and inheritance of 1BL-1RS chromosome.<br />
<strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Gen. 93:1267–1273.<br />
Lotfi, M., A. R. Alan, M. J. Henning, M. M. Jahn, and E. D. Earle. 2003. Production of<br />
haploid and doubled haploid plants of melon (Cucumis melo L.) for use in breeding<br />
for multiple virus resistance. Plant Cell. Rep. 21:1121–1128.<br />
Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays<br />
with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497.<br />
Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. and R. Dumas de Vaulx. 1989. Preliminary data on haploid<br />
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) induction. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 12:24–25.<br />
Nikolova, V. and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt. 1996. Diploidization of cucumber (Cucumis<br />
sativus L.) haploids by colchicine treatment. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 65:311–317.<br />
Przyborowski, J. and K. Niemirowicz-Szczytt. 1994. Main factors affecting cucumber<br />
(Cucumis sativus L.) haploid embryo development and characteristics. Plant Breed.<br />
112:70–75.<br />
Sauton, A. 1989. Haploid gynogenesis in Cucumis sativus L. induced by irradiated<br />
pollen. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Gen. Coop. Rpt. 12:22–23.<br />
Sauton, A. and R. Dumas de Vaulx.1987. Obtention de plantes haploides chez le melon<br />
(Cucumis melo L.) par gynogenese induite par du pollen irradie. Agronomie.<br />
7:141–148.<br />
Truong-Andre, I. 1988. In vitro haploid plants derived from pollination by irradiated<br />
pollen of cucumber, p. 143–144. Proc. Eucarpia Meeting on <strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics<br />
and <strong>Breeding</strong>, Avignon-Montfavet, France<br />
526 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
NATURALLY OCCURRING STRAINS OF<br />
BIPARTITE BEGOMOVIRUSES AFFECT<br />
SOME MEMBERS OF CUCURBITACEAE<br />
FAMILY INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE COTTON<br />
ZONE IN PAKISTAN<br />
M. Tahir and M. S. Haider<br />
School of Biological Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore,<br />
Pakistan<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Luffa cylindrica, Momordica charantia, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a<br />
pepo, Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus, Pumpkin yellow mosaic Lucknow virus,<br />
Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)<br />
ABSTRACT. Young symptomatic leaves of Luffa cylindrica, Momordica charantia,<br />
and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo were collected from vegetable fields from both the cotton<br />
zone (Multan) and noncotton zone (Lahore) in Pakistan. Total DNA was<br />
extracted by the CTAB method. For each of the six samples, PCR products of<br />
expected size (i.e., 2.8kb for both full-length DNA A and DNA B) were amplified<br />
by using specific primers designed from published sequences of ToLCNDV. <strong>The</strong><br />
PCR-amplified products were cloned, sequenced, and analyzed. <strong>The</strong> partial<br />
DNA A sequences obtained from M. charantia (Lahore) and L. cylindrica<br />
(Lahore and Multan) showed the highest sequence homology (91% to 98% over<br />
a stretch of 486 to 728 nucleotides) to Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus<br />
(ToLCNDV). <strong>The</strong> partial DNA A sequence obtained from <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
(Lahore) showed the highest sequence homology (97% over a stretch of 503<br />
nucleotides) to Pumpkin yellow mosaic Lucknow virus (PYMLkV). <strong>The</strong> partial<br />
DNA B sequences obtained from M. charantia (Multan) and L. cylindrica<br />
(Lahore and Multan) had the highest level of sequence identity (88% to 94%<br />
over a stretch of 447 to 606 nucleotides) to ToLCNDV. However, the sequence<br />
for DNA A component of M. charantia (Multan) and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (Multan)<br />
and for DNA B component of M. charantia (Lahore) and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
(Lahore and Multan both) have yet to be determined.<br />
B<br />
egomoviruses (Family Geminiviridae) are single-stranded<br />
DNA viruses that infect dicotyledonous plants, are transmitted<br />
by a single species of whitefly [Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)],<br />
and typically have genomes consisting of two components (Rybicki et<br />
al., 2000), referred to as DNA A and DNA B, both of which are<br />
essential for virus proliferation. <strong>The</strong> components share a region of high<br />
sequence identity known as the “common region” that contains motifs<br />
required for the control of gene expression and replication, notably<br />
conserved reiterated motifs and a putative stem-loop structure<br />
containing the highly conserved nonanucleotide motif (TAATATTAC)<br />
that functions in the initiation of rolling circle replication.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 527
<strong>The</strong> genome component designated DNA A encodes all virus<br />
functions required for DNA replication (Stanley, 1983; Hanley-<br />
Bowdoin et al., 1999), as well as the coat protein, which plays an<br />
essential role in insect transmission (Briddon et al., 1998; Azzam et<br />
al., 1994).<br />
<strong>The</strong> DNA B component encodes two genes involved in virus<br />
movement within plants (Noueiry et al., 1994) and their products are<br />
symptoms determinants for the bipartite begomoviruses (Klinkenberg<br />
and Stanley, 1990; von Arnim and Stanley, 1992).<br />
However, a small number of monopartite begomoviruses, for<br />
instance Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), have been identified<br />
that lack the second component. For these viruses, all viral products<br />
required for replication, gene expression, whitefly transmission, and<br />
systemic infection are encoded on a single component (a homolog of<br />
the DNA A component of the bipartite begomoviruses; Navot et al.,<br />
1991; Rojas et al., 2001).<br />
Satellite molecules have been identified for several monopartite<br />
begomoviruses. <strong>The</strong>se molecules, called DNA β, are approximately<br />
1350nts in length (approximately half that of the genomes of their<br />
helper viruses) and are unrelated in sequence to their helper viruses;<br />
they require their helper viruses for replication, movement in plants,<br />
and insect transmission. DNA β satellites affect the replication of their<br />
helper begomoviruses and alter the symptoms induced in some host<br />
plants (Saunders et al., 2000; Briddon et al., 2001).<br />
A B<br />
Fig. 1. (A) L. cylindrica (mosaic); (B) Bitter gourd (yellow vein).<br />
528 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
<strong>The</strong> characteristic symptoms include leaf curling, vein thickening,<br />
yellow leaf curling, vein yellowing, mosaic, and, in some cases,<br />
yellow blotch and stunting (Briddon and Markham, 2001, Harrison, et<br />
al., 1997).<br />
Geminiviruses cause several of the world’s most serious viral<br />
diseases of crop plants in tropical and subtropical regions, e.g., cassava<br />
in Africa and India, tomato, legumes, and cucurbits worldwide, and<br />
cotton in Pakistan.<br />
Occurrence of whitefly-transmitted diseases in plants, particularly in<br />
vegetables, ornamental plants, and agricultural and economic crops,<br />
presents a challenge for plant scientists concerned with yield and<br />
quality in plant production. In recent years, the role of whitefly and<br />
begomoviruses both in yield and quality has been recognized. During<br />
the last decade the output of cotton from Pakistan has been seriously<br />
compromised due to an epidemic of Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD),<br />
with losses between 1992 and 1997 estimated at US$5 billion.<br />
Disease incidence on cucurbits is quite high; it ranges from 60–<br />
90% depending on disease severity. It is hard to find a field without<br />
begomovirus infection over a distance of hundreds of kilometres. <strong>The</strong><br />
present study aimed at the analysis of the genetic variability of<br />
cucurbit viruses within each location and for two distant locations in<br />
Pakistan: Multan (cotton zone) and Lahore (noncotton zone).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
SAMPLE COLLECTION. Young leaves of Luffa cylindrica,<br />
Momordica charantia, and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo showing typical<br />
begomovirus-like symptoms and symptomless leaves were collected<br />
from both cotton-growing (Multan) and non-cotton-growing (Lahore)<br />
regions separated by 350Km. Leaf samples were kept separately in<br />
plastic bags and stored at -80 о C in a freezer. Total DNA from both<br />
healthy and infected leaves was isolated by the cetyl trimethyl<br />
ammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987) by<br />
using 1g of leaf tissues.<br />
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION. To amplify full-length DNA A<br />
and B, specific primers were designed from published sequences of<br />
ToLCNDV. PCR was performed in volumes of 50μl containing<br />
1.5mM MgCl2, 200μM dNTPs, 2.5μM each of primers, 100ng of<br />
Total DNA, and 2.5U of Taq polymerase (Fermentas). Reactions were<br />
carried out in an Applied Biosystems 2720 thermal cycler programmed<br />
for 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 о C, 1 min at 55 о C, and 3 mins at 72 о C.<br />
Amplified PCR products were detected by 1% agarose gel<br />
electrophoresis using DNA ladder Mix (Fermentas) as marker.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 529
LIGATION AND TRANSFORMATION. Amplified products were<br />
ligated into pTZ57R/T (Fermentas) cloning vector according to the<br />
supplier’s instructions and transformed in DH5α strain of E. coli. Blue<br />
and white selection was made by spreading the transformed cells onto<br />
the surface of LB medium agar plates (0.5% NaCl, 0.5% yeast extract,<br />
1% trypton, and 1.5% agar) containing 130μg/ml of IPTG, 270μg/ml<br />
of X-gal, and 100μg/ml of ampicillin. Plates were incubated at 37 о C<br />
for 14–16 hours.<br />
<strong>The</strong> white colonies were selected and reinoculated in LB broth<br />
(0.5% NaCl, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% trypton) for small-scale<br />
preparation and restricted analysis was done by HindIII, EcoRI, and<br />
BamHI restriction endonucleases. Sequencing was performed by<br />
CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman and Coulter<br />
sequencer).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> objectives of this study were to confirm the relation between<br />
the observed diseases in local vegetable fields and the presence of<br />
begomoviruses, to have an idea about the distribution of the problem<br />
around the country, and to determine the genetic diversity of<br />
begomoviruses infecting cucurbits. This study also aimed to find out if<br />
cucurbits could function as reservoir hosts of the begomoviruses<br />
infecting other vegetables, or vice versa.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> vegetables showing begomovirus-like symptoms<br />
collected from two distant locations (the cotton-growing area of<br />
Multan and the non-cotton-growing area of Lahore) from Pakistan<br />
produced PCR products of expected size (i.e., 2.8kb each for DNA A<br />
and DNA B), and there was no amplification from any of the healthy<br />
plant samples. <strong>The</strong> PCR products were detected on 1% agarose gel<br />
using DNA ladder as marker (Figure 2).<br />
<strong>The</strong> partial sequences obtained from virus isolates were compared<br />
with sequences from other begomoviruses available in databases. <strong>The</strong><br />
presence of begomoviruses, in the symptomatic plant species<br />
evaluated was positive for nearly all the samples tested. <strong>The</strong>re is about<br />
the same level of variability when comparing sequence identities (%)<br />
between all begomovirus isolates from different cucurbit plant species<br />
as there is within a single plant species.<br />
<strong>The</strong> partial DNA A sequences obtained from M. charantia<br />
(Lahore) and L. cylindrica (Lahore and Multan) showed the highest<br />
sequence homology (91% to 97% over a stretch of 486 to 728<br />
nucleotides) to Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV). <strong>The</strong><br />
partial DNA A sequence obtained from <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (Lahore)<br />
530 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
1. M. charantia Lhr, A<br />
2. M. charantia, Lhr, B<br />
3. M. charantia Mn, A<br />
4. Luffa, Mn, A<br />
5. Luffa, Mn, B<br />
6. Luffa, Lhr, A<br />
7. DNA ladder<br />
8. C. pepo Lhr, A<br />
9. C. pepo Lhr, B<br />
Mn = Multan<br />
Lhr= Lahore<br />
A = DNA A<br />
B= DNA B<br />
Fig 2. Ethidium bromide stained 1% agarose gel. Samples from Lane 1–9 are<br />
described on the right-hand side of figure.<br />
showed the highest sequence homology (97% over a stretch of 503<br />
nucleotides) to Pumpkin yellow mosaic Lucknow virus (PYMLkV).<br />
<strong>The</strong> partial DNA B sequences obtained from M. charantia (Multan)<br />
and L. cylindrica (Lahore and Multan) had the highest level of<br />
sequence identity (88% to 94% over a stretch of 447 to 606<br />
nucleotides) to ToLCNDV (Table 1). However, the sequence for the<br />
DNA A component of M. charantia (Multan) and <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo<br />
(Multan) and the DNA B component of M. charantia (Lahore) and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo (Lahore and Multan both) have yet to be determined.<br />
<strong>The</strong> results of these studies on cucurbits showed that begomovirus<br />
diseases are widespread in Pakistan as in many countries of the world.<br />
Begomoviruses were detected in all six samples collected from two<br />
distant locations. According to the comparisons and their partial<br />
sequence analysis, they were arranged in two groups in relation to the<br />
previously described begomoviruses. <strong>The</strong>y were found to be widely<br />
distributed (present in almost every part of Asia, especially Pakistan)<br />
and belonged to at least two species, i.e., ToLCNDV and PYMLkV.<br />
ToLCNDV covers quite a broad host range from diverse plant families<br />
including Compositeae (Haider et al., 2005) and Solanaceae (Hussain<br />
et al., 2004). This indicates that ToLCNDV is a potential threat to<br />
vegetables and to the cotton industry in Pakistan. <strong>The</strong> results suggest<br />
the existence of ToLCNDV on Luffa cylindrica and M. charantia and<br />
of PYMLkV on <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo under natural conditions in two<br />
regions of Pakistan.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 531
Table 1. Percentage blast homology of the sequences from investigated<br />
sample.<br />
Blast<br />
Sample<br />
Size<br />
homology<br />
name Location Genome (kb) Virus (%)<br />
M. charantia Multan A 2.8 ToLCNDV 95<br />
M. charantia Lahore A 2.8 ToLCNDV 91<br />
L. cylindrica Lahore A 2.8 ToLCNDV 91<br />
L. cylindrica Lahore A 2.8 ToLCNDV 95<br />
C. pepo Lahore A 2.8 PYMLkV 97<br />
M. charantia Multan B 2.8 ToLCNDV 88<br />
L. cylindrica Lahore B 2.8 ToLCNDV 94<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Azzam, O., J. Frazer, D. de la Rose, J. S. Beaver, P. Ahiquist, and D. P. Maxwell.<br />
1994. Whitefly transmission and efficient ssDNA accumulation of bean golden<br />
mosaic geminivirus requires functional coat protein. Virol. 204:289–296.<br />
Briddon, R. W. and P. G. Markham. 2001. Cotton leaf curl disease. Virus Res.<br />
71:151–159.<br />
Briddon, R. W., S. Liu, M. S. Pinner, and P. G. Markham. 1998. Infectivity of<br />
African cassava mosaic virus clones to cassava by biolistic inoculation. Arch.<br />
Virol. 143:2487–2492.<br />
Doyle, J. J. and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small<br />
quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11–15.<br />
Haider M. S, M. Tahir, Latif, and R. W. Briddon. 2005. First report of Tomato leaf<br />
curl New Delhi virus infecting Eclipta prostrata in Pakistan.<br />
.<br />
Hanley-Bowdoin, L., S. B. Settlage, B. M. Orozco, S. Nagar, and D. Robertson.<br />
1999. Geminiviruses: models for plant DNA replication, transcription, and cell<br />
cycle regulation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18:71–106.<br />
Harrison, B. D., S. Khalid, S. Hameed, G. W. Otim-Nape, Y. L. Liu, and D. J.<br />
Robinson. 1997. Detection and relationships of cotton leaf curl virus and allied<br />
whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses occurring in Pakistan. Ann. Appl. Biol.<br />
130:61–75.<br />
Hussain, M., S. Mansoor, S. Iram, Y. Zafar, and R. W. Briddon. 2004. First report of<br />
Tomato leaf curl New Delhi Virus infecting Chilli pepper in Pakistan.<br />
.<br />
Klinkenberg, F. A. and J. Stanley. 1990. Encapsidation and spread of African<br />
cassaca mosaic virus DNA A in the absence of DNA B when agro-inoculated to<br />
Nicotiana benthaniana. J. Gen. Virol. 71:1409–1412.<br />
Navot, N., E. Pichersky, M. Zeidan, D. Zamir, and H. Czosnek. 1991. Tomato<br />
yellow leaf curl virus: a whitelfy transmitted geminivirus with a single genomic<br />
component. Virol. 185:151–161.<br />
Noueiry, A. O., W. J. Lucas, and R. L. Gilbertson. 1994. Two proteins of a plant<br />
DNA virus coordinate nuclear and plasmodesmal transport. Cell. 76:925–932.<br />
Rojas, M. R., H. Jiang, R. Salati, B. Xoconostle-Cazares, M. R. Sudarshana, W. J.<br />
Lucas, and R. L. Gilbertson. 2001. Functional analysis of proteins involved in<br />
532 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
movement of the monopartite begomovirus, tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Virol.<br />
291:110–125.<br />
Rybicki, E. P., R. W. Briddon, J. E. Brown, C. M. Fouquet, D. P. Maxwell, B. D.<br />
Harrison, P. G. Markhan, D. M. Bisaro, D. Robinson, and J. Stanley. 2000.<br />
Geminiviridae, p. 285–297. In: M. H. V. Van Regenmortel, C. M. Fauquet, D.<br />
H. L. Bishop, E. B. Carstens, M. K. Estes, S. M. Lemon, J. Maniloff, M. A.<br />
Mayo, D. J. McGeoch, C. R. Pringle, R. B. Wicker (eds.). Virus taxonomy:<br />
eighth report on the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Academic<br />
Press, San Diego, CA.<br />
Saunders, K., I. D. Bedford, R. W. Briddon, P. G. Markham, S. M. Wong, and J.<br />
Stanley. 2000. A novel virus complex causes Ageratum yellow vein disease.<br />
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:6890–6895.<br />
Stanley, J. 1983. Infectivity of the cloned geminivirus genome requires sequencers<br />
from both DNAs. Nature. 305:643–645.<br />
Von Arnim, A. and J. Stanley. 1992. Determinants of tomato golden mosaic virus<br />
symptom development located on DNA B. Virol. 186:286–293.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 533
EFFECT OF FUNGICIDE CHEMISTRY AND<br />
CULTIVAR ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF<br />
CUCURBIT POWDERY MILDEW ON PUMPKIN<br />
IN NEW JERSEY<br />
Christian A. Wyenandt<br />
Rutgers University, Rutgers Cooperative Research and Extension<br />
Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center<br />
121 <strong>North</strong>ville Road, Bridgeton, New Jersey 08302<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Podosphaera xanthii, fungicide resistance, FRAC<br />
groups<br />
ABSTRACt. A trial was conducted in 2005 at the Rutgers Agricultural Research<br />
and Extension Center in southern New Jersey to determine if resistance to<br />
commonly used fungicides would develop in cucurbit powdery mildew. Five<br />
fungicide application programs were applied to two pumpkin cultivars every 7<br />
to 10 days season-long: (1) mancozeb (Manzate) + sulfur alternated with<br />
Maneb + fixed copper (Champ) (protectant fungicides only); (2) chlorothalonil<br />
(Bravo) + myclobutanil (Nova) alternated with azoxystrobin (Amistar); (3)<br />
myclobutanil + Maneb alternated with famoxadone+cymoxanil (Tanos); (4)<br />
chlorothalonil + myclobutanil alternated with myclobutanil; and (5)<br />
chlorothanolil + azoxystrobin alternated with azoxystrobin. Area under the<br />
disease progress curve (AUDPC) values were significantly higher when<br />
azoxystrobin was applied weekly. AUDPC values were 1067.0 for ‘Howden’ and<br />
1245.0 for ‘Magic Lantern’ compared to 625.6 in ‘Howden’ and 489.2 in ‘Magic<br />
Lantern’ when azoxystrobin was alternated weekly with a myclobutanil.<br />
AUDPC was lowest when myclobutanil was applied weekly.<br />
O<br />
ver 2,400 hectares of cucurbit crops are grown annually for<br />
commercial wholesale or roadside markets in New Jersey.<br />
Powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne)<br />
U. Braun & N. Shishkoff (also known as Sphaerotheca fusca (Fr.) S.<br />
Blumer and S. fuliginea (Schlechtend.:Fr.) Pollacci) is one of the most<br />
destructive diseases of pumpkin and other cucurbit crops in the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s. Without proper fungicide applications, powdery mildew can<br />
cause 100% premature defoliation leading to sunscald injury to fruit<br />
and reduced yield. Fungicide applications are the principle practice in<br />
most cucurbit crops for managing powdery mildew (McGrath, 2001).<br />
In recent years new fungicide chemistries, such as the QoIs (Fungicide<br />
Resistance Action Committee [FRAC] Group 11) have been<br />
introduced to the market for the control of powdery mildew (Kuck and<br />
Mehl, 2003). <strong>The</strong>se new chemistries, although highly effective at<br />
controlling powdery mildew, have a high risk for the development of<br />
534 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
esistance by the pathogen (McGrath, 2001). Powdery mildew<br />
resistance to FRAC Group 11 (QoI) as well as to DMIs (FRAC Group<br />
3) fungicides has been reported in other states and other countries<br />
(McGrath, 2001). In recent years, cucurbit growers in northern New<br />
Jersey have stated that some of the fungicides (i.e., DMIs and QoIs)<br />
commonly used in recommended powdery mildew control programs<br />
have not been as effective as in previous years. This noticeable<br />
reduction in control may be the result of resistance development in<br />
commercial fields where QoI and DMI fungicides are being used<br />
extensively for cucurbit powdery mildew control in New Jersey.<br />
In 2005, a fungicide trial was conducted at Rutgers Agricultural<br />
Research and Extension Center (RAREC) in Bridgeton (Cumberland<br />
County), New Jersey, to determine if P. xanthii would develop<br />
resistance to either a DMI and/or QoI fungicide chemistry.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Five blocks, each consisting of 2 rows on 3.1m centers, of<br />
pumpkin cvs. Howden and Magic Lantern were established 22 June.<br />
Prior to pumpkin establishment, and on 20 April 2005, Sudangrass was<br />
seeded at 68 kg/ha between each block to provide a windbreak and<br />
prevent fungicide drift between blocks. Each block consisted of five<br />
replications each of sprayed (fungicide treatment) or unsprayed plots<br />
(7.6m long) with in-row breaks of 3.1m between plots. Five different<br />
fungicide programs consisting of (1) 2.24kg/ha Manzate + 2.24kg/ha<br />
sulfur alternated with 2.24kg/ha Maneb + 1.51L/ha Champ (protectant<br />
fungicides only); (2) 3.5L/ha Bravo + 0.34kg/ha Nova alternated with<br />
0.34kg/ha Amistar (standard program, FRAC Groups 3 and 11); (3)<br />
0.34kg/ha Nova + 2.24kg/ha Maneb alternated with 0.55kg/ha Tanos<br />
(FRAC Groups 11 + 27); (4) 3.5L/ha Bravo + 0.34kg/ha Nova<br />
alternated with 0.34kg/ha Nova (FRAC Group 3 weekly); and (5)<br />
3.5L/ha Bravo + 0.34kg/ha Amistar alternated with 0.34kg/ha Amistar<br />
(FRAC Group 11 weekly) were applied season-long starting on 27<br />
July and repeated every 7 to 10 days (10 total applications/block).<br />
Fungicide was applied using a tractor-mounted CO2-assisted 3.1m<br />
boom sprayer (R&D Sprayers, Opelousa, LA) with flat fan nozzles<br />
(TeeJet 8002VS) on 0.51m centers with a delivery rate of 412L/ha at<br />
58psi. All sprayed and unsprayed plots in each block were rated on a<br />
weekly basis on a scale of 0.0 to 1.0 (0.05 increments) for percentage<br />
of foliage with powdery mildew symptoms. At the end of the season<br />
arcsine transformed AUPDC values were calculated for all plots. On 3<br />
Oct five pumpkin leaves from each plot were visually rated for the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 535
percentage of leaf surface (top and bottom) with symptoms of powdery<br />
mildew. On 17 Oct all fruit were harvested and weighed.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> effects of fungicide chemistry and pumpkin cultivar on the<br />
development of cucurbit powdery mildew were studied in southern<br />
New Jersey in 2005. Powdery mildew was most severe when a Group<br />
11 fungicide was applied weekly to either a fully susceptible<br />
‘Howden’ or powdery mildew-tolerant ‘Magic Lantern’ (Figure 1).<br />
Powdery mildew severity was lower when a Group 11 fungicide was<br />
alternated with a Group 3 fungicide weekly, and lowest when a Group<br />
3 fungicide was applied weekly (Figure 1). At the end of the growing<br />
season, powdery mildew severity was visually<br />
Fig. 1. Effects of fungicide program and cultivar on the development of<br />
powdery mildew on pumpkin in southern New Jersey in 2005.<br />
rated on the top and bottom sides of leaves of the fully susceptible<br />
‘Howden’ or the powdery mildew-tolerant ‘Magic Lantern’. Powdery<br />
mildew was highest on the bottom side of leaves when a FRAC Group<br />
11 fungicide was applied weekly (71% in ‘Howden’ and 66% in<br />
‘Magic Lantern’) compared to the protectant fungicide program (48%<br />
in ‘Howden’; 38% in ‘Magic Lantern’) and standard program (Group<br />
536 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
3 alt. Group 11) (27% in ‘Howden’; 26% in ‘Magic Lantern’). When a<br />
Group 3 fungicide was applied weekly, powdery mildew was only 2%<br />
on the bottom side of leaves in both ‘Howden’ and ‘Magic Lantern’.<br />
AUDPC values were significantly higher in ‘Howden’ and ‘Magic<br />
Lantern’ when Group 11 fungicide was applied weekly. AUDPC<br />
values were 1067.0 for ‘Howden’ and 1245.0 for ‘Magic Lantern’<br />
compared to 625.6 in ‘Howden’ and 489.2 in ‘Magic Lantern’ when<br />
Group 11 fungicide was alternated weekly with a Group 3 fungicide.<br />
AUDPC was lowest when Group 3 fungicide was applied weekly,<br />
362.7 in ‘Howden’ and 321.6 in ‘Magic Lantern’ (Table 1). In general,<br />
pumpkin yield (tons/ha) was higher in the powdery mildew-tolerant<br />
‘Magic Lantern’ compared to the susceptible ‘Howden’. <strong>The</strong><br />
respective yields (tons/ha) for ‘Howden’ and ‘Magic Lantern’ were<br />
15.4 and 19.6 for the Group 11/weekly program; 12.5 and 20.7 for<br />
Group 3/weekly; 9.3 and 13.6 for Group 3 alternated with Group 11<br />
(standard); 9.8 and 15.0 in protectant fungicides only; and 9.3 and 13.6<br />
in Group 3 alternated with Groups 11 + 27.<br />
This research suggests that cucurbit powdery mildew developed<br />
resistance to the FRAC Group 11 fungicide azoxystrobin when applied<br />
on a weekly basis during the production season, and that a resistant<br />
powdery mildew population is most likely to develop on the bottom<br />
side of the leaf surface when protectant fungicides, such as<br />
chlorothalonil (FRAC Group M5), are included in fungicide program.<br />
Importantly, from a control standpoint, once QoI resistance develops<br />
to one strobilurin chemistry, the pathogen is expected to develop<br />
cross-resistance to other QoIs, even if those chemistries haven’t been<br />
applied. Powdery mildew severity was lower when a FRAC Group 11<br />
fungicide was alternated weekly with a FRAC Group 3 fungicide,<br />
suggesting that the alternation of these chemistries is effective in<br />
slowing the development of a resistant population. Powdery mildew<br />
severity was lowest when a FRAC Group 3 fungicide was applied<br />
weekly, suggesting that in the case of this study, the use of a Group 3<br />
fungicide was not selecting for a resistant population.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 537
Table 1. Fungicide program (rate per hectare), FRAC grouping(s), and<br />
AUDPC values for cucurbit mildew development in pumpkin cvs.<br />
Howden and Magic Lantern at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and<br />
Extension Center (RAREC) in southern New Jersey in 2005.<br />
Fungicide FRAC<br />
AUDPC value<br />
program<br />
3.5L/ha Bravo<br />
+ 0.34kg/ha<br />
Amistar alt.<br />
0.34kg/ha<br />
Amistar<br />
groups(s) Howden Magic Lantern<br />
Group 11<br />
weekly 1067.0 1245.0<br />
2.24kg/ha<br />
Manzate + 2.24<br />
kg/ha sulfur alt.<br />
2.24kg /ha<br />
Maneb + 1.51<br />
L/ha Champ Group M only 910.3 796.1<br />
0.34kg/ha Nova<br />
+ 2.24kg/ha<br />
Maneb alt.<br />
0.55kg/ha<br />
Tanos<br />
3.5L/ha Bravo<br />
+ 0.34kg/ha<br />
Nova alt<br />
0.34kg/ha<br />
Amistar<br />
Group 3 alt<br />
Group 11+27 858.3 912.2<br />
Group 3 alt<br />
Group 11 625.6 489.2<br />
3.5L/ha Bravo<br />
+ 0.34kg/ha<br />
Nova alt<br />
0.34kg/ha Nova Group 3 weekly 362.7 321.6<br />
LSD (p = 0.05) 162.9 215.4<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Kuck, K.-H. and A. Mehl. 2003. Trifloxystrobin: resistance risk and resistance<br />
management. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer. 56:313–325.<br />
McGrath, M. T. 2001. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences<br />
and challenges. Plant Dis. 85:236–245.<br />
538 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
SURVEY FOR CUCURBIT VIRUSES IN<br />
COMMERCIAL FIELDS AND EVALUATION OF<br />
VIRUS-RESISTANT SUMMER SQUASH<br />
BREEDING LINES IN NEW JERSEY<br />
Christian A. Wyenandt<br />
Rutgers University, Rutgers Cooperative Research and Extension<br />
Michelle Infante-Casella<br />
Gloucester County Agricultural Agent<br />
Melvin R. Henninger<br />
Specialist in Vegetable Crops<br />
Richard Buckley<br />
Coordinator, Plant Diagnostic and Nematode Detection Service<br />
Resource Center<br />
Sabrina Tirpak<br />
Principle Lab Technician, Plant Diagnostic and Nematode Detection<br />
Service Resource Center<br />
Kristian E. Holmstrom<br />
IPM Research Project Coordinator II<br />
Peter J. Nitzsche<br />
Morris County Agricultural Agent<br />
William H. Tietjen<br />
Warren County Agricultural Agent<br />
Raymond J. Samulis<br />
Burlington County Agricultural Agent<br />
Wesley L. Kline<br />
Cumberland County Agricultural Agent<br />
Win Cowgill<br />
Hunterdon County Agricultural Agent<br />
Joseph R. Heckman<br />
Extension Specialist in Soil Fertility, Rutgers Cooperative Research<br />
and Extension, Rutgers University, 88 Lipman Drive,<br />
New Brunswick, NJ 08901<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. ELISA, mosaic virus<br />
ABSTRACT. A survey of commercial fields was carried out to determine which<br />
viruses were most prevalent in cucurbit production areas of New Jersey in 2005.<br />
Concurrently, 22 summer squash breeding lines and named cultivars were<br />
sampled for virus infection. In total, 22 summer squash breeding lines and<br />
cultivars and 37 virus-infected cucurbits from commercial plantings from eight<br />
counties in New Jersey were tested for CMV (Cucumber mosaic virus), WMV-2<br />
(Watermelon mosaic virus 2), PRSV (Papaya ring spot virus), and ZYMV<br />
(Zucchini yellow mosaic virus). In total, 85% of the samples tested positive for<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 539
WMV, 33% tested positive for ZYMV, 12% tested positive for CMV, and 5%<br />
tested positive for PRSV. Thirty-five percent of the samples tested positive for<br />
two viruses and 2% tested positive for three viruses. Of the 22 squash breeding<br />
lines and cultivars, only 2, ‘Payroll’ and ‘Patriot II’, tested negative for all four<br />
viruses during this survey.<br />
O<br />
ver 2,400 hectares of cucurbit crops are grown annually for<br />
commercial wholesale and roadside markets in New Jersey.<br />
New summer squash cultivars are regularly released that<br />
contain resistance packages for important cucurbit viruses. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
resistance packages may include resistance and/or tolerance to one or<br />
more cucurbit viruses, such as Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV 2),<br />
Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Zucchini yellow mosaic virus<br />
(ZYMV), and/or Papaya ring spot virus (PRSV). <strong>Cucurbit</strong> growers in<br />
New Jersey rely on summer squash cultivars with virus-resistance<br />
packages along with resistance and/or tolerance to other important<br />
diseases, such as powdery or downy mildew, to reduce the chances for<br />
significant losses. <strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to survey<br />
commercial fields to determine which viruses were most prevalent in<br />
cucurbit production areas of New Jersey in 2005. Concurrently, 22<br />
summer squash breeding lines and named cultivars with and without<br />
resistance/tolerance packages were sampled for virus infection.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
During the summer of 2005, commercial cucurbit fields from eight<br />
counties in New Jersey were surveyed for symptoms of virus infection.<br />
Infected plant tissue was collected by county agricultural agents and<br />
sent to the Plant Diagnostic Laboratory in New Brunswick, New<br />
Jersey, for virus identification. At the Plant Diagnostic Laboratory,<br />
commercially available Agdia, DAS ELISA, alkaline phosphatase<br />
label, PathoScreen Test Kits for CMV, WMV, ZYMV, and PRSV<br />
detection were used for the testing protocol. Symptomatic plant<br />
material was selected from each sample. Most samples were leaf<br />
tissue, but some fruit and stems were tested. A 1:10 ratio (0.5g to 5ml)<br />
solution of tissue and extraction buffer was placed in Agdia sample<br />
extraction pouches and ground using Agdia’s tissue homogenizer<br />
attached to a 9-volt drill press. <strong>The</strong> buffer/tissue solution was<br />
subsequently loaded into sample wells alongside positive and negative<br />
controls supplied with the test kit. <strong>The</strong> test plates were incubated for<br />
two hours at room temperature. After incubation the plates were<br />
washed with PBST. An enzyme conjugate was added and the plates<br />
were incubated again at room temperature for two hours. After<br />
540 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
incubation, as before, the plates were washed with PBST. PNP buffer<br />
(100ul) was added to the plates and then incubated for another hour.<br />
Lastly, sodium hydroxide (50ul) was added to each well to stop the<br />
reaction. <strong>The</strong> wells were examined and color change was interpreted<br />
visually. Wells in which color developed indicated positive results.<br />
Individual wells in which there was no significant color development<br />
indicated negative results.<br />
Results<br />
In total, 22 summer squash breeding lines and cultivars and 37<br />
virus-infected cucurbit plantings from eight counties were tested for<br />
CMV, WMV-2, PRSV, and ZYMV in 2005 (Table 1). In the<br />
breeding-line and cultivar evaluation, symptoms of virus infection first<br />
appeared on 8 Sept. in ‘Sunray’, which tested positive for WMV-2. Of<br />
the 22 squash breeding lines and cultivars, only 2, ‘Payroll’ and<br />
‘Patriot II’, tested negative for all four viruses, although ‘Payroll’<br />
developed virus-like symptoms during this survey (Tables 2 and 3).<br />
Only ‘Patriot II’, ‘Liberator III’, ‘Seminis Exp.’, and ‘Conqueror III’<br />
showed no symptoms of virus infection on foliage or fruit. However,<br />
‘Liberator III’, ‘Conqueror III’, and ‘Seminis Exp.’ tested positive for<br />
CMV. Although ‘Payroll’ developed virus-like symptoms, it tested<br />
negative for all four viruses (Table 3). ‘Independence II’ showed<br />
symptoms of virus-like infection on developing fruit only. In total,<br />
85% of the samples collected from commercial fields and from a<br />
breeding-line and cultivar evaluation tested positive for WMV-2, 33%<br />
tested positive for ZYMV, 12% tested positive for CMV, and 5%<br />
tested positive for PRSV. Thirty-five percent of the samples tested<br />
positive for two viruses and 2% tested positive for three viruses.<br />
Watermelon mosaic virus was the most commonly identified virus in<br />
cucurbit crops in New Jersey in 2005. Overall, 35 % of the samples<br />
tested positive for two viruses. Because of this, cucurbit growers in<br />
New Jersey, as well as elsewhere, should continue to plant cultivars<br />
with resistance packages for one or more of the important viruses in<br />
cucurbits.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 541
Table 1. Host, county, and ELISA results for commercial cucurbit fields<br />
sampled for Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Watermelon mosaic virus<br />
(WMV), Papaya ring spot virus (PRSV), and Zucchini mosaic virus<br />
(ZYMV) in New Jersey in 2005.<br />
Host County CMV PRSV WMV2 ZYMV<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + +<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + +<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + +<br />
Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Warren - - + +<br />
Pumpkin Warren - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Warren - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Warren - - + +<br />
Pumpkin Warren - - + +<br />
Pumpkin Sussex - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Morris - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Middlesex - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Warren - - - +<br />
Pumpkin Hunterdon - - + +<br />
Zucchini Hunterdon - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + +<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - + + +W<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - + + +w<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - + + +w<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Gourd Burlington - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Squash Burlington - - + +w<br />
Yellow<br />
squash Burlington - - + +w<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Burlington - - + -<br />
Pumpkin Cumberland - - + -<br />
Zucchini Cumberland - - + -<br />
Yellow<br />
squash Cumberland - - + -<br />
(+) = positive for virus, (-) = negative for virus, (+w) = weak positive.<br />
542 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. ELISA test results for yellow summer squash breeding line(s)<br />
and cultivars evaluated at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and<br />
Extension Center, Bridgeton, New Jersey, in 2005.<br />
Company/<br />
Cultivar CMV PRSV WMV2 ZYMV<br />
Resistance<br />
package<br />
Seminis<br />
‘General Patton’<br />
- - + - CMV, WMV<br />
(PY)<br />
Seminis<br />
+ - - - CMV, WMVII,<br />
experimental<br />
ZYMV<br />
(trans)<br />
Seminis ‘Patriot<br />
II’<br />
Seminis<br />
‘Liberator III’<br />
Seminis<br />
Conquerer III’<br />
Seminis<br />
‘Sunray’<br />
Harris Moran<br />
‘Cougar’<br />
Harris Moran<br />
‘Lioness’<br />
- - - - WMII, ZYMV<br />
(trans)<br />
+W - - CMV,<br />
WMVII,<br />
ZYMV (trans)<br />
+ - - - CMV,<br />
WMVII,<br />
ZYMV<br />
(trans), PRSV<br />
(conv)<br />
- - + - CMV,<br />
WMVII, (PY)<br />
- - + - CMV,<br />
WMVII, (PY),<br />
PRSV, ZYMV<br />
(T)<br />
- - + - CMV,<br />
WMVII,<br />
PRSV (IR),<br />
ZYMV (T)<br />
(+) = positive for virus, (-) = negative for virus, (+w) = weak positive.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 543
Table 3. ELISA test results for zucchini breeding lines and cultivars<br />
evaluated at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center,<br />
Bridgeton, New Jersey, in 2005.<br />
Resistance<br />
Company/cultivar CMV PRSV WMV2 ZYMV<br />
Harris Moran/<br />
‘Tigress’<br />
Harris Moran/<br />
‘Leopard’<br />
package<br />
- - - + ZYMV,<br />
WMVII (T)<br />
+W - + - WMV,<br />
PRSV (IR)<br />
Harris Moran/‘Lynx’ - - + + WMVII,<br />
ZYMV,<br />
PRSV (T)<br />
Harris Moran/<br />
‘Wildcat’<br />
- - +W -<br />
Sieger/experimental - - + -<br />
Sieger/ experimental - - + -<br />
Sieger/ experimental - - + +W<br />
Sieger/ experimental - - + -<br />
Sieger/‘Payroll’ - - - - WMVII,<br />
ZYMV<br />
(T)(trans)<br />
Sieger/‘Revenue’ - - + - CMV,<br />
WMVII,<br />
ZYMV<br />
(T)(trans)<br />
Sieger/‘Independence<br />
II’<br />
- - +W - WMVII,<br />
ZYMV<br />
(R)(trans)<br />
Sieger/‘Justice III’ - - + + CMV,<br />
WMVII,<br />
ZYMV<br />
(R)(trans)<br />
Seminis/‘Senator’ - - + + none<br />
Seminis/<br />
experimental<br />
+ - - - CMV,<br />
WMVII,<br />
ZYMV<br />
(trans)<br />
(+) = positive for virus, (-) = negative for virus, (+w) = weak positive.<br />
544 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
A RAPID HEXANE-FREE METHOD FOR<br />
ANALYZING TOTAL CAROTENOID CONTENT<br />
IN CANARY YELLOW-FLESHED<br />
WATERMELON<br />
Angela R. Davis, Julie Collins, Wayne W. Fish,<br />
Charles Webber III, and Penelope Perkins-Veazie<br />
USDA, ARS, South Central Agriculture Research Laboratory,<br />
P.O. Box 159, Lane, OK 74555<br />
Y. Tadmor<br />
Newe Ya’ar Research Center, ARO, Israel<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, light-absorption method, puree<br />
absorbance method, carotenoid quantification<br />
ABSTRACT. Lycopene is the predominant carotenoid in red watermelon<br />
(Citrullus lanatus [Thunb. ] Matsum. and Nakai) and pro-lycopene is the<br />
predominant carotenoid in most orange watermelon. However, yellow<br />
watermelons contain many different carotenoids, all in low to trace amounts.<br />
Since carotenoids have antioxidant properties and potential health benefits,<br />
selecting varieties with high concentrations of these valuable pigments is<br />
important for breeding lines. Unfortunately, current methods to assay total<br />
carotenoid content are time consuming and require hazardous organic solvents.<br />
This report describes a rapid and reliable light-absorption method to assay total<br />
carotenoid content for yellow watermelon that does not require organic<br />
solvents. Light absorption of 67 watermelon flesh purees was measured with a<br />
diode array xenon flash spectrophotometer that can measure actual light<br />
absorption from opaque samples; results were compared with a hexane<br />
extraction method. <strong>The</strong> puree absorbance method gave a linear relationship<br />
(R 2 =0.85) to total carotenoid content and was independent of watermelon<br />
variety within the total carotenoid concentration range measured (0μg/g to<br />
7μg/g fresh weight).<br />
C<br />
arotenoids have been linked to lower risk of myocardial<br />
infarction (Kohlmeier et al., 1997), may possess anticancer<br />
properties (Gerster, 1997), and promote healthy eye function<br />
(Rodriguez-Carmona et al., 2006; Giovannucci, 1999; Simon, 1997;<br />
Stahl and Sies, 1996). <strong>The</strong>se attributes may be in part responsible for<br />
increased purchase of products containing these compounds (McBride,<br />
1999; National Watermelon Promotion Board, 1999). Red-fleshed<br />
watermelons contain high quantities of lycopene, a red-pigmented<br />
carotenoid with powerful antioxidant properties (Di Mascio et al.,<br />
1989, Tomes et al., 1963). Orange watermelons typically contain high<br />
amounts of pro-lycopene, similar to the tomato “tangerine” mutation<br />
(Isaacson et al., 2002), and, in some watermelon varieties, β-carotene<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 545
and ζ-carotene (Tadmor et al., 2004, 2005; Tomes and Johnson, 1965;<br />
Perkins-Veazie et al., unpublished data). Yellow watermelons are<br />
divided into two major types: canary yellow and salmon yellow<br />
(Henderson et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong> salmon yellow is a “tangerine type”<br />
watermelon that contains small amounts of pro-lycopene, whereas the<br />
canary yellow contains multiple carotenoids all in low or trace<br />
amounts (Tadmor et al., 2004, 2005; Perkins-Veazie and King,<br />
unpublished data).<br />
Carotenoid content varies greatly among watermelon cultivars and<br />
production environments (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2001), but yellow<br />
watermelon seems to be consistently low in all of these potent<br />
antioxidants. Total carotenoid content was tested for ‘Early<br />
Moonbeam’, a canary yellow watermelon (Henderson et al., 1998);<br />
only trace amounts of carotenoids were detected (Tadmor et al., 2004,<br />
2005). Tadmor and others suggest that this may be similar to tomatoes,<br />
where a nonfunctioning phytoene synthase gene results in the<br />
accumulation of very low levels of carotenoids in yellow-fleshed fruits<br />
(Camara, 1993). Because carotenoids are valued as phytonutrients, a<br />
quick, reliable screening method for carotenoid content is needed for<br />
germplasm evaluations. Conventional spectrophotometric or HPLC<br />
assays to quantify total carotenoids utilize organic solvents to extract<br />
and solubilize these compounds from tissue (Adsule and Dan, 1979;<br />
Beerh and Siddappa, 1959; Sadler et al., 1990). <strong>The</strong>se methods are<br />
time consuming, require the use and disposal of hazardous organic<br />
solvents, and do not work well for the more hydrophilic carotenoids. A<br />
simple, inexpensive, and reliable method to determine total carotenoid<br />
content without organic solvents is highly desirable for the watermelon<br />
industry. One such approach is a modified method from Davis et al.<br />
(2003), which utilizes a diode array xenon flash spectrophotometer to<br />
measure absorbed visible color and correlate these values to lycopene<br />
We would like to thank Amy Helms, Buddy Faulkenberry, Anthony Dillard, and<br />
Bryan Deak for providing valuable technical support, and Pat Bischof and Gordon<br />
Leggett of Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., for technical assistance. Mention of<br />
trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of<br />
providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement<br />
by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of the U.S.<br />
Department of Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to<br />
race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article<br />
cited was prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties. Copyright<br />
protection under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works. Accordingly,<br />
there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in which the<br />
article appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S.<br />
Government, which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />
546 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
content. In this report, we demonstrate that watermelon puree<br />
evaluated with a diode array xenon flash spectrophotometer is a novel<br />
and fast method for accurately quantifying total carotenoid content in<br />
yellow watermelon. This method overcomes detection problems with<br />
carotenoid levels and missing hydrophilic carotenoids.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
WATERMELON FRUIT. Watermelons ranging from yellow to offwhite<br />
were grown at Lane, OK, in 2005. Four open-pollinated varieties<br />
(‘Early Moonbeam’, ‘Yellow Baby’, ‘Yellow Doll’, and ‘Cream of<br />
Saskatchewan’), and five Plant Introduction (PI) lines (271773,<br />
271769, 299378, 314655, 494531) were evaluated. Uncut watermelons<br />
were stored at room temperature. Heart tissue was removed within<br />
one week of harvest.<br />
SAMPLE PREPARATION. All steps from the time watermelons were<br />
cut lengthwise were performed in subdued lighting at room<br />
temperature, unless otherwise stated. <strong>The</strong> heart tissue was collected cut<br />
into chunks approximately 3cm 3 or smaller. Samples were pureed<br />
immediately or after storage for several months at -80 o C. Tissue<br />
(~30g) was homogenized using a Brinkmann Polytron Homogenizer<br />
(Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, NY) with a 20mm O.D.<br />
blade to produce a uniform slurry with particles smaller then 3mm 3 .<br />
Samples were not allowed to heat or froth.<br />
LOW-VOLUME HEXANE EXTRACTION METHOD. <strong>The</strong> low-volume<br />
hexane extraction method, performed as described by Fish et al.<br />
(2002), was used to measure total carotenoid content of watermelon<br />
purees. Briefly, approximately 0.6g samples were weighed from each<br />
puree into two 40-mL amber screw-top vials containing 5mL of 0.05%<br />
(w/v) BHT in acetone, 5mL of 95% ethanol, and 10mL of hexane.<br />
Purees were stirred on a magnetic stirring plate during sampling.<br />
Samples were placed on ice on an orbital shaker at 180rpm for 15 min.<br />
After shaking, 3mL of deionized water were added and samples<br />
shaken for an additional 5 min on ice. <strong>The</strong> vials were left at room<br />
temperature for 5 min to allow for phase separation. <strong>The</strong> absorbance of<br />
the upper, hexane layer was measured at 450nm in a 1-cm path length<br />
quartz cuvette blanked with hexane. Total carotenoid content of<br />
watermelon was calculated based on sample weight using the<br />
absorbance at 450nm (Fish et al., 2002). A comparison was made<br />
between the hexane extraction, methanol extractions, and ethanol<br />
extractions for each variety and PI used to ensure the hexane method<br />
was adequately extracting all carotenoids. Additionally, the aqueous<br />
phase of the hexane extraction was scanned to ensure all carotenoids<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 547
were extracted into the hexane layer. This step was deemed necessary<br />
since the carotenoid profile of all yellow watermelons is not known<br />
and it was necessary to determine that water-soluble carotenoids were<br />
not missed.<br />
PUREE ABSORBANCE METHOD. <strong>The</strong> UltraScan XE (Hunter<br />
Associates Laboratory, Inc., Reston, VA) is a diode array xenon flash<br />
colorimeter/spectrophotometer with a wavelength range from 360 to<br />
750nm that reads both reflectance and transmittance. All tristimulus<br />
integrations are based on a triangular bandpass of 10nm and a<br />
wavelength interval of 10nm. <strong>The</strong> instrument sensor uses a specially<br />
coated plastic integrating sphere (6-in. diameter) that diffuses the light<br />
from the xenon light source. <strong>The</strong> light source illuminates and is<br />
transmitted through the sample. A lens located at an angle of 8 o<br />
perpendicular to the sample surface collects the transmitted light and<br />
directs it to a diffraction grating that separates the light into its<br />
component wavelengths. <strong>The</strong> intensities of these component<br />
wavelengths of transmitted light are then measured by two<br />
polychromators, each with 40-element diode array detectors.<br />
<strong>The</strong> instrument was standardized per company specifications and<br />
blanked on an empty cuvette. Watermelon puree was mixed well to<br />
keep separation to a minimum; about 20mL of the sample were<br />
immediately poured into a 1-cm, 20- mL SR101A cuvette (Spectrocell,<br />
Oreland, PA). <strong>The</strong> sample was scanned in the transmittance (TTRAN)<br />
mode under the following settings: the large reflectance port (1.00”),<br />
Illuminant at D65, MI Illuminant Fcw, and observer 10 o . Absorbance<br />
at 670nm was subtracted from absorbance at the maximum absorbance<br />
(430nm) to adjust for light scatter. <strong>The</strong> low-volume hexane analysis<br />
and the Hunter UltraScan XE readings were performed on the same<br />
day.<br />
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Linear least square regression analyses<br />
were performed using the statistical component of Microsoft ® Excel<br />
2002 SP-2 software (Redmond, WA).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
ABSORBANCE SPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS OF WATERMELON-<br />
TISSUE PUREE. Previous attempts at reliably correlating reflectance<br />
parameters to carotenoid content of watermelon with handheld<br />
colorimeters were unsuccessful (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2001). Use of<br />
tissue puree can overcome this limitation as well as provide access to<br />
light absorption to provide a reliable quantification method. <strong>The</strong><br />
Hunter UltraScan XE subjects samples to light intensities that are<br />
orders of magnitude greater than those of analytical<br />
548 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
spectrophotometers with quartz halogen lamps. <strong>The</strong> UltraScan XE also<br />
has sphere collectors that collect scattered as well as nonscattered<br />
light. This potentially allows reliable spectral measurements on<br />
translucent samples that scatter light. <strong>The</strong> spectra for yellow<br />
watermelon exhibit apparent absorption maxima of 410, 430, and<br />
480nm (data not shown).<br />
ABSORBANCE BEHAVIOR OF WATERMELON PUREE AS RELATED<br />
TO TOTAL CAROTENOID CONTENT. Based on the spectral results<br />
obtained from the UltraScan XE, we investigated the possibility of<br />
employing absorbance measurements of watermelon puree at 430nm<br />
as a means to estimate total carotenoid content of watermelon tissue.<br />
Since many purified carotenoids are not soluble in an aqueous phase,<br />
and because the carotenoid profile of yellow watermelon is not fully<br />
known, a standard curve with purified carotenoids could not be<br />
performed. <strong>The</strong>refore, visible absorbance of watermelon puree using<br />
the UltraScan XE was correlated with total carotenoid content<br />
determined by absorption measurement of organic solvent extraction.<br />
Flesh of tissue from 47 yellow to off-white watermelons from four<br />
varieties and four PIs were used in the study. <strong>The</strong> absorbance at<br />
430nm measured for each puree (adjusted for light scatter by<br />
subtracting the absorbance at 670nm) was plotted against its total<br />
carotenoid content as measured by hexane extraction (Figure 1).<br />
Hexane method total carotenoid estimate<br />
(ug/g fresh tissue)<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
y = 2.9993x - 0.5497<br />
R 2 = 0.8509<br />
0<br />
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5<br />
Puree absorbance (A430nm-A670nm)<br />
Fig. 1. Forty-seven yellow watermelon heart tissue purees (4 varieties and 4 PI<br />
lines) were analyzed with the UltraScan XE. Absorbance is plotted versus total<br />
carotenoid content as determined by hexane extraction. <strong>The</strong> absorbance at<br />
430nm is adjusted for scatter by subtracting the absorbance at 670nm. <strong>The</strong> R 2<br />
value and the linear least squares fit equation are given in the figure.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 549
<strong>The</strong> scatter-adjusted absorbance at 430nm appears to obey Beer’s<br />
law with respect to total carotenoid content. <strong>The</strong> absorbance reading is<br />
linearly correlated with total carotenoid content, and the linear least<br />
squares fit to the data yields the equation: y = 2.9993x - 0.5497 with<br />
an R 2 value of 0.85 (p< 0.05).<br />
USE OF WATERMELON-PUREE ABSORBANCE TO QUANTIFY TOTAL<br />
CAROTENOID CONTENT. To validate the equation obtained in Figure 1<br />
as a predictive equation for total carotenoid content in watermelon<br />
tissue, the scatter-adjusted absorbances (430nm - 670nm) of 20<br />
additional watermelon purees (two hybrid varieties and three PI lines)<br />
were measured. <strong>The</strong>n, each value was inserted into the linear equation<br />
generated by Figure 1 to estimate the total carotenoid content of the<br />
tissue. Predicted values were plotted against the total carotenoid values<br />
estimated by hexane extraction (Figure 2). A linear relationship was<br />
obtained between the estimates by the two methods with an R 2 of 0.85.<br />
<strong>The</strong> equation for the linear least squares fit to the data, y = 0.9875x -<br />
0.0337, differs only slightly from that expected for an ideal fit, y = x.<br />
Hexane method total carotenoid content<br />
(ug/g fresh tissue)<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
y = 0.9875x - 0.0337<br />
R 2 = 0.8476<br />
0<br />
-0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5<br />
-0.5<br />
Predicted lycopene content from puree absorbance method<br />
(ug/g fresh tissue)<br />
Fig. 2. Total carotenoid content determined for 20 individual yellow<br />
watermelons (3 varieties and 2 PI lines) by the puree absorbance method as<br />
compared with the determinations by the low-volume hexane assay. <strong>The</strong><br />
adjusted absorbance at 430nm (i.e., 430 nm - 670nm) for each watermelon<br />
puree was converted to a total carotenoid content with the use of the linear least<br />
squares equation of Fig. 1 (y = 2.9993x - 0.5497). <strong>The</strong> R 2 value and the linear<br />
least squares fit equation are given in the figure. <strong>The</strong> hatched line indicates a<br />
perfect predictive model, i.e., y = x.<br />
550 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
To achieve the desired level of reliability in the puree absorbance<br />
procedure, one must: (1) maintain subdued light, since light degrades<br />
carotenoids, (2) thoroughly homogenize the tissue, and (3) mix the<br />
puree before reading the samples.<br />
This paper details a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method to<br />
quantify total carotenoids in flesh of canary yellow watermelons. We<br />
evaluated 67 watermelon samples (four hybrid varieties and five PI<br />
lines) with total carotenoid contents ranging from 0μg/g to 7μg/g fresh<br />
weight. <strong>The</strong> puree absorbance method gave a linear relationship to<br />
carotenoid content and is independent of watermelon variety. This<br />
method offers an improvement to the conventional method by<br />
reducing sample-processing time by at least half and requires no<br />
hazardous reagents. It is important to note that this equation may have<br />
to be altered for yellow fruit that have a higher total carotenoid than<br />
tested here (> 7ug/g). Until this germplasm is found, if it indeed exists,<br />
this method is a good screening tool to search for high-carotenoidcontaining<br />
yellow-watermelon germplasm.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Adsule, P. G. and A. Dan. 1979. Simplified extraction procedure in the rapid<br />
spectrophotometric method for lycopene estimation in tomato. J. Food Sci. &<br />
Tech. 16:216.<br />
Beerh, O. P. and G. S. Siddappa. 1959. A rapid spectrophotometric method for the<br />
detection and estimation of adulterants in tomato ketchup. Food Tech. 13:414–<br />
418.<br />
Camara, B. 1993. Plant phytoene synthase complex: component enzymes,<br />
immunology, and biogenesis. Methods in Enzymol. 214:352–365.<br />
Davis, A. R., W. W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method<br />
for analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />
Di Mascio, P., S. P. Kaiser, and H. Sies. 1989. Lycopene as the most efficient<br />
biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.<br />
274:532–538.<br />
Fish, W. W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />
lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food Comp. &<br />
Anal. 15:309–317.<br />
Gerster, H. 1997. <strong>The</strong> potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Amer. Coll.<br />
Nutr. 16:109–126.<br />
Giovannucci, E. 1999. Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer:<br />
review of the epidemiological literature. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91:317–331.<br />
Henderson, W. R., G. H. Scott, and T. C. Wehner. 1998. Interaction of flesh color<br />
genes in watermelon. J. Hered. 89:50–53.<br />
Isaacson, T., G. Ronen, D. Zamir, and J. Hirschberg. 2002. Cloning of tangerine<br />
from tomato reveals a carotenoid isomerase essential for production of βcarotene<br />
and xanthophylls in plants. Plant Cell. 14:333–342.<br />
Kohlmeier, L., J. D. Kark, G. E. Gomez, B. C. Martin, S. E. Steck, A. F. M.<br />
Kardinaal, J. Ringstad, T. M. Thamm, V. Masaev, R. Riemersma, J. M. Moreno-<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 551
Martin, J. K. Huttunene, and F. J. Kok. 1997. Lycopene and myocardial<br />
infarction risk in the EURAMIC study. Amer. J. Epidemiol. 146:618–626.<br />
McBride, J. 1999. Phytonutrients take center stage. Agr. Res. 47:24–25.<br />
National Watermelon Promotion Board. 1999. Consumer research on watermelon<br />
purchase and promotion. National Watermelon Promotion Board, Orlando, FL.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene content<br />
differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food & Agr. 81:983–<br />
987.<br />
Rodriguez-Carmona, M., J. Kvansakul, J. Alister Harlow, W. Kopcke, W. Schalch,<br />
and J. L. Barbur. 2006. <strong>The</strong> effects of supplementation with lutein and/or<br />
zeaxanthin on human macular pigment density and colour vision. Ophthal. &<br />
Physiol. Optics. 26:137–147.<br />
Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and bcarotene<br />
from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />
Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />
Simon, P. 1997. Plant pigments for color and nutrition. HortSci. 32:12–13.<br />
Stahl, W. and H. Sies. 1996. Lycopene: a biologically important carotenoid for<br />
humans? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 336:1–9.<br />
Tadmor, Y., N. Katzir, S. King, A. Levi, A. Davis, and J. Hirschberg. 2004. Fruit<br />
coloration in watermelon: lessons from the tomato, p. 181–185. In: A. Lebeda<br />
and H. S. Paris (eds.). Eucarpia 2004, progress in cucurbit genetics and<br />
breeding. Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.<br />
Tadmor, Y., S. King, A. Levi, A. Davis, A. Meir, B. Wasserman, J. Hirschberg, and<br />
E. Lewinsohn. 2005. Comparative fruit colouration in watermelon and tomato.<br />
Food Res. Intl. 38:837–841.<br />
Tomes, M. L. and K. W. Johnson. 1965. Carotene pigments of an orange-fleshed<br />
watermelon. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 87: 438–442.<br />
Tomes, M. L., K. W. Johnson, and M. Hess. 1963. <strong>The</strong> carotene pigment content of<br />
certain red fleshed watermelons. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 82:460–464.<br />
552 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI ASSOCIATED<br />
WITH SUSCEPTIBILITY TO POSTHARVEST<br />
PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORDERS AND DECAY<br />
OF MELON FRUIT<br />
J. P. Fernández-Trujillo, J. A. Martínez, J. Obando, C. Miranda<br />
Technical University of Cartagena (ETSIA) and Institute of Plant<br />
Biotechnology, Cartagena, Spain<br />
A. J. Monforte, I. Eduardo, and P. Arús<br />
Laboratori de Genética Molecular Vegetal CSIC-IRTA, Cabrils, Spain<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Cucumis melo, fruit quality, near isogenic lines,<br />
chilling injury, overripening, water-soaking texture, necrosis of placental tissue<br />
ABSTRACT. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is a perishable fruit that requires<br />
refrigeration to extend its shelf life. A genomic library of near isogenic lines<br />
(NILs) derived from a cross between the Spanish cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS)<br />
and an exotic Korean accession (PI 161375), each of them with a single<br />
introgression from PI 161375 into the PS background, was used to detect<br />
quantitative trait loci (QTLs). <strong>The</strong> analyzed polygenes included those affecting<br />
the susceptibility of fruit to physiological disorders and associated decay after<br />
long-term storage (35d at 8 o C and 75%RH). One QTL improved overall fruit<br />
flavor after refrigeration while another reduced total losses compared with PS.<br />
However, most of the QTLs identified had a detrimental effect on melon fruit<br />
quality compared with PS because they increased flesh susceptibility to watersoaking<br />
texture, overripening, and flavor loss. Other QTLs were associated<br />
with decreased susceptibility to chilling injury or Fusarium sp. decay, or<br />
increased susceptibility to Stemphylium sp. decay. <strong>The</strong> association of two QTLs<br />
to necrosis of the placental tissue at harvest was confirmed after the postharvest<br />
phase. Hollow flesh disorder was associated with three QTLs.<br />
P<br />
hysiological disorders, including chilling injury (CI), are a<br />
serious problem for melon exporters, because most commercial<br />
melon varieties are sensitive to CI (Tatsumi and Murata, 1981).<br />
Other disorders such as water-soaking (du Chatenet et al., 2000) and<br />
overripening are also important problems for the melon-processing<br />
This work was funded by grants 00620/PI/04 (Fundación Séneca, Región de Murcia),<br />
AGL2003-09175-C02-01, and AGL2003-09175-C02-02 from the Spanish Ministry<br />
of Education and Science and FEDER (EU). JO is grateful to the Spanish Ministry of<br />
Foreign Affairs for an MAE-AECI fellowship, and IE to the Spanish Ministry of<br />
Education and Science for an FPI grant. <strong>The</strong> parental line of PS melon was provided<br />
by Semillas Fitó S. A. (Barcelona, Spain) and plastic liners by Plásticos del Segura S.<br />
L. (Murcia, Spain).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 553
industry, and for when attempts are made to promote whole or freshcut<br />
melon consumption in the marketplace, as in fast-food or<br />
conventional restaurants (Fernández-Trujllo, 2006). Typical CI<br />
symptoms in melon are pitting and scald, which are usually colonized<br />
in a few days by saprophytic or necrotrophic fungi (Miccolis and<br />
Saltveit, 1995; Xu et al., 1990). Sensitivity to some disorders is<br />
strongly dependent on cultivar, storage time, and temperature<br />
(Miccolis and Saltveit, 1995).<br />
Wild or exotic germplasm can be used to improve input or output<br />
traits (i.e., fruit yield and quality, respectively) if selected genomic<br />
regions are introgressed into elite genetic backgrounds (Bernacchi et<br />
al., 1998; Fernández-Trujillo et al., 2005; Schauer et al., 2006).<br />
Approaches to identify the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) responsible<br />
for low-temperature responses in the introgressed region of tomato<br />
have been conducted with near isogenic lines (NILs) by Oyanedel et al.<br />
(2001). A genomic library of NILs derived from a cross between the<br />
Spanish cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) and an exotic Korean accession<br />
(PI 161375) has been recently developed (Eduardo et al., 2005). NIL<br />
genomic libraries facilitate the genetic dissection of complex traits<br />
(Zamir 2001). <strong>The</strong> NIL melon genomic library has been used to<br />
identify QTLs affecting fruit-quality traits during refrigerated storage.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Twenty-seven NILs derived from a cross between the Spanish<br />
cultivar ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) and the exotic Korean accession<br />
‘Shongwan Charmi’ PI 161375 (SC) were used. Each of the NILs had<br />
a single introgression from SC into the PS background covering the<br />
whole genome of the SC (Eduardo et al., 2005). Ten plants for each<br />
NIL and SC and 50 plants for the PS were grown in a <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />
randomized design in Torre Pacheco (Murcia, Spain) using standard<br />
growing practices under Mediterranean summer conditions<br />
(Fernández-Trujillo et al., 2005). Every single plant of the NIL or<br />
parentals was considered a replication.<br />
Fruit from the previous experiment were used for the storage<br />
experiment. At least two fruit of 23 replications of PS and at least 5<br />
replications of eight NILs with introgression of SC located in six<br />
linkage groups (LG) (II, IV, V, VIII, IX, and X) were tested. At least<br />
two fruit from 3 to 5 replications of eight additional NILs with<br />
introgressions from SC located in seven LG (I, III, IV, V, VIII, IX, and<br />
XII) were also analyzed. Fruit were stored, distributed randomly in the<br />
cold chamber, for 35d at 8±0.5ºC and 75±3% relative humidity (RH),<br />
covered with plastic liners (Plásticos del Segura S.L., Murcia, Spain).<br />
554 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
<strong>The</strong> skin CI symptoms of PI161375 were also inspected after one, two,<br />
or three weeks at 8 o C. After this time, the stored fruits were examined<br />
for CI, decay, loss of whole-fruit finger texture, internal overripening,<br />
disorders, and flavor.<br />
Typical symptoms of CI were pitting, surface pitting, skin scald,<br />
and watery breakdown as a result of decay by secondary infection of<br />
microorganisms as reported by Tatsumi and Murata (1981). <strong>The</strong><br />
degree of rind CI was evaluated subjectively. Fruit were divided into<br />
five classes depending on the skin-surface area affected by CI: 0 =<br />
absent; 1 = very slight, 0–5%; 2 = slight, 5–10%; 3 = moderate, 10–<br />
25%; 4 = severe, 25–50% (Fernández-Trujillo and Artés, 1998;<br />
Miccolis and Saltveit, 1995). Moderately to severely injured fruit was<br />
considered unmarketable since these disorders affected more than 20%<br />
of the epidermis surface in a double cut parallel to the longitudinal<br />
diameter. In the case of water-soaking texture (glassy texture,<br />
vitrescence), moderate to severely injured fruit were not of commercial<br />
quality since these disorders affected more than 20% of the epidermis<br />
surface. A hedonic test after storage scored whole-fruit hardness<br />
(finger texture), flesh overripening, and loss of fruit flavor by using a<br />
five-degree scale as follows: 1 = poor, soft, <strong>complete</strong> loss of flavor; 2<br />
= insipid and nonsweet, or senescent aroma; 3 = fair texture, slightly<br />
sweet and aromatic flavor; 4 = good, firm, balance between sweetness<br />
and flavor; 5 = very firm, excellent.<br />
Decay caused by necrotrophic fungi and other rots was recorded<br />
and considered as losses according to Blancard et al. (1995). <strong>The</strong> fungi<br />
were recorded with digital pictures and later identified by light<br />
microscopy. When only sterile mycelium appeared, melon fruits were<br />
subjected to additional storage (around one week at 22±2ºC with<br />
>90%RH) in order to facilitate the emergence of the conidiophores and<br />
conidia. In cases of doubt (due, for example, to the absence of<br />
conidiophores and conidia), potato dextrose agar culture and other<br />
techniques for stimulating the reproductive hyphae, such as cutting the<br />
mycelium, were applied. Decay-causing fungi were identified up to<br />
genus level by using the <strong>complete</strong> manual of imperfect fungi of<br />
Barnett and Hunter (1999). No index of severity was applied and fruits<br />
were classified according to the absence or presence of decay.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect of the SC introgressions was studied by an analysis of<br />
variance (ANOVA) of the data untransformed or transformed into<br />
their respective arc sin or the arc sin of the square root of the data. <strong>The</strong><br />
data transformation was performed to follow a normal distribution<br />
according to a normal probability plot. Mean NIL values were<br />
compared with the control genotype PS using the Dunnet contrast with<br />
Type-I error α ≤ 0.05 calculated by JMP 5.1.2 (SAS Institute Inc.,<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 555
Cary, NC). <strong>The</strong> number of QTLs was estimated assuming that there<br />
was only one QTL per introgression. When two NILs with overlapping<br />
introgressions showed significant effects, the QTL was considered to<br />
be located in the overlapping region. <strong>The</strong> effects of the QTLs located<br />
in NILs with significant effects are reported as relative to the PS mean:<br />
QTL effect =<br />
( NILmean − PSmean)<br />
100 *<br />
PSmean<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
PI161375 showed slight CI symptoms after one week at 8 o C and<br />
moderate CI symptoms after two weeks at 8 o C, while PS showed no<br />
CI symptoms even after two–three weeks at 8 o C. CI developed mostly<br />
on fruit with netted skin, which was later colonized by Alternaria sp.<br />
and Cladosporium sp., generally growing together at 8 o C, as has been<br />
previously reported (Snowdon, 1991).<br />
One QTL located in LG VIII reduced total losses due to lower<br />
levels of CI and associated decay than observed in the PS control<br />
(Table 1). <strong>The</strong> main rots that developed after one month of storage at<br />
8 o C were Alternaria, Cladosporium, Stemphylium, and Fusarium sp.,<br />
and, to a lesser extent, Botrytis sp. <strong>The</strong>se necrotrophic fungi developed<br />
mainly on scald and pitting caused by CI. In some NILs the above<br />
fungi developed in cracks and CI associated to netting, and in the<br />
peduncle. No QTLs were found for susceptibility to Alternaria sp. or<br />
Cladosporium sp., or other occasional rots such as Aspergillus sp. or<br />
Botrytis sp. In agreement with Snowdon (1991), Fusarium sp. was<br />
found mainly in the peduncle. This rot was not specific to CI fruit<br />
because it also grew in fruit stored at 10 o C (data not shown). One QTL<br />
in LG VIII was responsible for a higher incidence of Stemphylium sp.<br />
in the NILs than in PS while another QTL in LG VIII showed the<br />
opposite trend for Fusarium sp. rot (Table 1). Other QTLs located in<br />
LGs IV, VIII, and IX may have reduced the sensitivity to CI (P
absent in PS. One QTL in LG X also had some influence in the<br />
development of the water-soaked texture associated with late ripening.<br />
In fact, harvesting fruits from every NIL with the QTL in LG X in the<br />
right state of maturity was difficult because the abscission layer beside<br />
the peduncle was not defined.<br />
Table 1. Analyzed disorders, decay, and flavor after storage for 35d at<br />
8 o C in the parent control ‘Piel de Sapo’ (PS) and quantitative trait loci<br />
(QTLs) detected with near isogenic line (NIL) genomic library. PS<br />
column indicates the mean for this genotype, the first number of the<br />
QTL indicates the linkage group number of the genetic map of melon<br />
where the QTL was mapped, the range of QTL effects and and P was<br />
the significance of the Dunnett test.<br />
PS<br />
Quality trait mean QTL Range of QTL effects relative to PS P<br />
Total losses 87% tl8.1 -86%
Four to 10% of fruits in NILs with introgressions in LGs III, VIII,<br />
and IX were affected by slight symptoms of hollow flesh disorder<br />
probably due to fruit senescence (Figure 1A). This disorder has not<br />
received attention in melons, but in cucumber or watermelon one that<br />
may be related (pillowy fruit disorder) has been associated with<br />
environmental and postharvest stress (Navazio and Staub, 1994). At<br />
least two QTLs (n2.3 and n9.2) located in LGs II and IX at harvest<br />
were responsible for necrosis of the placental tissue and surrounding<br />
flesh tissue (Figure 1B). <strong>The</strong> necrosis was also detected in another<br />
experiment analyzing fruit at harvest (data not shown), and was<br />
confirmed after the postharvest phase. <strong>The</strong> NILs with QTLs n2.3 and<br />
n9.2 had 100 and 60% of the fruit affected by the necrosis disorder,<br />
respectively.<br />
A B<br />
Fig. 1. Internal disorders in near isogenic lines (NILs) of melons after storage<br />
for 35d at 8 o C. (A) Necrosis of the placental tissue and adjacent areas in<br />
Linkage Group IX (QTL n9.2). (B) Hollow flesh disorder located in a NIL with<br />
a PI161375 introgression in LG IX.<br />
It is possible to identify the QTLs involved in the detrimental<br />
effects on melon fruit during refrigerated storage by using NILs, but to<br />
get good results a minimum number of replicates (five to eight) and<br />
fruit per replicate (to give at least thirty to forty fruit per NIL) are<br />
required to confirm these results. QTL identification can be<br />
implemented in breeding programs to develop new varieties suitable<br />
for long-term storage with improved flavor and reduced susceptibility<br />
to internal disorders and CI. <strong>The</strong> effect of these introgressions should<br />
be evaluated in a range of elite genetic backgrounds, to assess the<br />
558 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
suitability of using them as sources of new genetic variability in<br />
modern breeding programs.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Barnett, H. L. and B. B. Hunter. 1999. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. Burgess<br />
Pub. Co., Minneapolis, MN.<br />
Bernacchi, D., T. Beck-Bunn, D. Emmatty, Y. Eshed S. Inai, J. López, V. Petiard, H.<br />
Sayama, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir, and S. Tanksley. 1998. Advanced backcross QTL<br />
analysis of tomato. II. evaluation of near-isogenic lines carrying single-donor<br />
introgressions for desirable wild QTL-alleles derived from Lycopersicon<br />
hirsutum and L. pimpinellifolium. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 97:170–180.<br />
Blancard, D., H. Lecoq, and M. Pitrat. 1995. A colour atlas of cucurbit diseases.<br />
Manson Pub. Co., London.<br />
du Chatenet, C., A. Latche, E. Olmos, B. Ranty, M. Charpenteau, R. Ranjeva, J. C.<br />
Pech, and A. Graziana. 2000. Spatial-resolved analysis of histological and<br />
biochemical alterations induced by water-soaking in melon fruit. Physiol. Plant.<br />
110:248–255.<br />
Eduardo, I., P. Arús, and A. J. Monforte. 2005. Development of a genomic library of<br />
near isogenic lines (NILs) in melon (Cucumis melo L.) from the exotic accession<br />
PI161375. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 112:139–148.<br />
Fernández-Trujillo, J. P. 2006. Análisis del punto de venta de frutas y hortalizas y<br />
propuestas de mejora desde la poscosecha. Hort. XXIV:38–47.<br />
.<br />
Fernández-Trujillo, J. P. and F. Artés. 1998. Chilling injury in peaches during<br />
conventional and intermittent warming storage. Int. J. Refrig. 21:265–272.<br />
Fernández-Trujillo, J. P., J. Obando, J. A. Martínez, A. Alarcón, I. Eduardo, A. J.<br />
Monforte, and P. Arús. 2005. Statistical multivariate analysis of melon shape: a<br />
case study using near isogenic lines. Acta Hort. 674:537–544.<br />
Miccolis, V. and M. E. Saltveit. 1995. Influence of storage period and temperature<br />
on the postharvest characteristics of six melon (Cucumis melo L., Inodorus<br />
Group) cultivars. Postharvest Biol. Tech. 5:211–219.<br />
Navazio, J. P. and J. E. Staub. 1994. Effects of soil moisture, cultivar, and<br />
postharvest handling on pillowy fruit disorder in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc. Hort.<br />
Sci. 119:1234–1242.<br />
Oyanedel, E., D. W. Wolfe, A. J. Monforte, S. D. Tanksley, and T. G. Owens. 2001.<br />
Using Lysopcersicon hirsutum as a source of cold tolerance in processing<br />
tomato breeding. Acta Hort. 542:387–391.<br />
Schauer, N., Y. Semel, U. Roessner, A. Gur, I. Balbo, F. Carrari, T. Pleban, A.<br />
Pérez-Melis, C. Bruedigam, J. Kopka, L. Willmitzer, D. Zamir, and A. R. Fernie.<br />
2006. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific<br />
introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotech. 24:447–454.<br />
Snowdon, A. L. 1991. A colour atlas of postharvest diseases and disorders of fruits<br />
and vegetables. 2. vegetables. Wolfe Scientific, London, UK.<br />
Tatsumi, Y. and T. Murata. 1981. Relation between chilling sensitivity of<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae fruits and the membrane permeability. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
50:108–113.<br />
Xu, L., W. Y. Zhang, and Y.W. Tian. 1990. Effects of chilling injury on the<br />
morphology and cell structure of Hami melon fruits. Acta Bot. Sin. 32:772–776.<br />
Zamir, D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev.<br />
Genet. 2:983–989.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 559
POSTHARVEST CHARACTERIZATION OF A<br />
CUSHAW SQUASH BREEDING LINE<br />
L. Fernando Grajeda-García and Sergio Garza-Ortega<br />
Departamento de Agricultura y Ganadería, Universidad de Sonora,<br />
Rosales y Blvd. Encinas, Hermosillo, Sonora, México 83000<br />
Alberto Sánchez-Estrada and Rosalba Troncoso-Rojas<br />
Dirección de Tecnología de Alimentos de Origen Vegetal, Centro de<br />
Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Carr. a La Victoria km<br />
0.6. Hermosillo, Sonora, México 83000<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Winter squash, firmness, soluble solids content,<br />
respiratory rate, weight loss<br />
ABSTRACT. Work was conducted to study the postharvest characteristics of<br />
Cushaw squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma) mature fruit stored at 20ºC and 80%<br />
relative humidity for 98 days. Respiratory rate and ethylene production rate<br />
fluctuated from 32.28 to 79.19mg CO2.kg -1 hr -1 and from 0 to 3.09µL C2H4 .kg -<br />
1 hr -1 , respectively. <strong>The</strong> soluble solids content was 10% (highest value) after 56<br />
days of storage and the average fructose, glucose, and sucrose was 0.66, 2.02,<br />
and 2.16mg.mL -1 , respectively. <strong>The</strong> highest weight loss was obtained after 98<br />
days of storage and the fruit firmness changed from 155N to 55N after 77 days<br />
of storage. Fruit density decreased from 0.72 at the beginning of the experiment<br />
to 0.6 after 98 days. Titratable acidity ranged from 0.018 to 0.041% and pH<br />
values from 7.4 to 7.84. We conclude that cushaw squash fruit showed the<br />
typical physiological behavior of other mature winter squash, but weight losses<br />
in storage may be significant.<br />
C<br />
ushaw squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma Huber, has been<br />
cultivated in Mexico, its domestication site, for at least 7000<br />
years. Contrary to the more widely grown species of winter<br />
squash, C. pepo L., C. maxima Duchesne, and C. moschata Duchesne,<br />
the information related to C. argyrosperma culture and management is<br />
very limited, particularly concerning fruit quality and postharvest<br />
behavior. Landraces of Cushaw squash that are grown in northwest<br />
Mexico, usually under rain-fed conditions, are taxonomically<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma subsp. argyrosperma var. callicarpa. Fruits<br />
collected in the mountain region of this part of the country have a pale<br />
yellow to orange flesh color and an average weight of 2.5kg per fruit<br />
(Merrick, 1991).<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors are thankful to MSI F. Alfonso Aguilar-Valenzuela for his assistance in<br />
graph construction.<br />
560 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
In mature squash, high soluble solids content (SSC) is an indicator<br />
of good fruit quality. Nineteen days after harvest, fruits of cushaw<br />
squash breeding lines, hybrids, and landraces had SSCs ranging from 4<br />
to 7.5% for a spring crop and from 3.6 to 10.4% for a fall crop (Nuñez-<br />
Grajeda and Garza-Ortega, 2005). Using the same equipment for<br />
measuring SSC, Garza-Ortega et al. (2002) observed that fruits of<br />
‘Waltham Butternut’ (C. moschata), after one month of storage at 15<br />
to 22°C, had a higher SSC, 13.1%.<br />
<strong>The</strong> SSC of the kabocha (C. maxima) squash ‘Delica’ was 13.6%<br />
when measured 60 days after flowering plus 3 weeks of simulated<br />
refrigerated shipment at 12–14ºC (Harvey et al., 1997). In Australia,<br />
kabocha cultivars grown in different sites and seasons had SSCs that<br />
fluctuated from 5.7 to 13.3% at harvest time (Morgan and Midmore,<br />
2003). In butternut-type germplasm, the SSC increased from 2.6% at<br />
harvest to 9.4% after a period of storage of 60 days at 20ºC (Morales-<br />
Munguía et al., 2004).<br />
Winter squash fruits have a long postharvest life but weight losses<br />
in storage may be significant. <strong>The</strong> internal appearance of ‘Butternut’<br />
squash began to deteriorate when fruits reached a weight loss of 15%<br />
(Francis and Thomson, 1965). This cultivar showed weight losses of<br />
15.8, 17.4, and 15% when stored at room temperature after 63, 70, and<br />
84 days, respectively, in different years (Holmes, 1951). Weight loss<br />
of ‘Delica’ reached 11.3% when stored at 20ºC and 75%RH for 12<br />
weeks (Arvayo-Ortiz et al., 1994).<br />
Fruit firmness of ‘Delica’ at harvest time was 81N but increased to<br />
100N and then slightly decreased to 94N after two and three months of<br />
storage at 12ºC and 80–85%RH, respectively (Ratnayake et al., 1999).<br />
<strong>The</strong> firmness of butternut fruit increased after 15 days of storage at<br />
20ºC and 70%RH but decreased after 45 days of storage, reaching a<br />
value of 51N; in this work, the average density of fruits at harvest was<br />
1.13 but decreased to 1.06 after 60 days of storage (Morales-Munguía<br />
et al., 2004).<br />
<strong>The</strong> objective of the present work was to study quality attributes<br />
and the physiological behavior of mature fruit from a true-to-type<br />
cushaw squash breeding line after harvest.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
FRUIT MATERIAL. C. argyrosperma A-43, a breeding line that<br />
was selected for having uniform fruit size, shape, color, and tolerance<br />
to Squash leaf curl virus, was used in this experiment. In the fall<br />
season of 2002, A-43 had an average fruit weight of 2.1kg (0.8 to 4.6)<br />
and a seed weight per fruit of 84.2g. <strong>The</strong> soluble solids content and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 561
flesh color measured 19 days after harvest was 7.4% and 7.3Y<br />
respectively (results not published). Seeds were directly sown into<br />
moist soil on August 14, 2002, and on September 24 the first female<br />
flowers appeared. Young fruits were removed on October 5, the date<br />
on which all plants had female flowers and set fruits uniformly<br />
afterwards. Mature fruits were harvested on November 29, so that<br />
most fruits had been on the vines for 55 days. After harvesting, fruits<br />
were stored in a laboratory at room temperature (15–24°C) and<br />
40%RH for five days. Fruits were then sorted, selecting those of<br />
uniform size and free of physical damage, washed with chlorinated<br />
water (250μL/L), and air-dried at room temperature. A group of 168<br />
fruits was stored for 98 days at 20°C and 80%RH and evaluated every<br />
1, 2, or 3 weeks. Evaluations consisted of measuring respiration,<br />
ethylene production, SSC, sugar content, weight loss, firmness,<br />
density, pH, and titratable acidity.<br />
RESPIRATION AND ETHYLENE PRODUCTION. Respiratory rate (RR)<br />
and ethylene-production rate (EPR) were determined (Troncoso-Rojas<br />
et al., 2005) by using six fruits that were weighed and placed<br />
individually in 6-L glass containers and kept at 20°C. Every week, the<br />
containers were covered with a plastic cap fitted with a septum. After<br />
1 h, 1-mL samples from the headspace were withdrawn and injected<br />
into a Varian 3400 cx gas chromatograph. RR and EPR were reported<br />
as mg CO2kg -1 .hr -1 and µL C2H4kg -1 .hr -1 , respectively.<br />
WEIGHT LOSS. In order to estimate weight losses, 12 fruits were<br />
individually marked, weighed in a digital balance (Mettler Pe Mod.<br />
2000), and stored at 20°C and 80%RH. Each fruit was weighed every<br />
week for 12 weeks and weight loss was calculated as a percentage.<br />
DENSITY. <strong>The</strong> volume of fruit was measured by water<br />
displacement in a graduated cylinder and expressed as milliliters (mL),<br />
and weight was measured in grams (g). Fruit density was calculated by<br />
dividing weight by volume.<br />
FIRMNESS. Six fruits were longitudinally cut in two pieces, for<br />
testing each piece with a Chatillon penetrometer model DFG-50<br />
equipped with a 10-mm plunger (J. Chatillon and Sons, NY). Firmness<br />
was expressed as the force in Newtons (N) needed to penetrate the<br />
mesocarp tissue.<br />
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS (TSS) AND SUGARS. <strong>The</strong><br />
total soluble solids content was determined in fruit juice using an<br />
ABBE Leica Mark II refractometer model 10459 (American Optical<br />
Co.) expressing the TSS as a percentage. <strong>The</strong> sugar content was<br />
determined after every 2 or 3 weeks of storage at 20°C by a<br />
chromatographic method using an HPLC equipped with a refractive<br />
index detector (López-Hernández et al., 1994). Quantification was<br />
562 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
done with a standard curve of glucose with different concentrations.<br />
Sugar concentration is expressed as mg.mL -1 of tissue.<br />
TITRATABLE ACIDITY AND PH. An automatic Mettler DL21 tritator<br />
standardized at pH 4 was used to determine both parameters. <strong>The</strong><br />
TA% is reported using citric acid as standard.<br />
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. ANOVA were performed based in a<br />
<strong>complete</strong>ly randomized design. When significant differences were<br />
found, (P
EPR had values from 0 to 3.09µL kg -1 .hr -1 (Figure 1). During the first<br />
43 days of storage, EP was low (0 to 0.84µL C2H4kg -1 .hr -1 ) but a sharp<br />
increase was observed at day 59 (3.09µL C2H4kg -1 .hr -1 ). Other than<br />
this peak, the EPR was low. It is known that winter squash produce<br />
only trace amounts of ethylene, but wounding greatly increases the<br />
production (Brecht, 2004).<br />
SOLUBLE SOLIDS AND SUGAR CONTENT. <strong>The</strong> soluble solids content<br />
(SSC) reached a maximum value of 10% in fruits stored for 56 days<br />
and then decreased significantly at 98 days of storage (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong><br />
same pattern for SSC changes after harvest was reported for both<br />
kabocha and butternut squash (Harvey et al., 1997; Morales-Munguía<br />
et al., 2004). However, the SSC of cushaw squash was lower than the<br />
SSC of kabocha squash measured at harvest (Morgan and Midmore,<br />
2003) and that of ‘Waltham Butternut’ measured 4 weeks after harvest<br />
(Garza-Ortega et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> average fructose, glucose, and sucrose<br />
concentrations for the six sample dates were 0.66, 2.02, and<br />
2.16mg.mL -1 , respectively, increasing similarly to the SSC at 56 days<br />
of storage and decreasing afterwards (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> fructose plus<br />
glucose levels increased slightly after 35 and 56 days of storage and<br />
then decreased at 98 days. In kabocha squash, the fructose plus<br />
glucose levels decreased in fruit picked 60 days after flowering and<br />
stored for 3 weeks at 12ºC (Harvey et al., 1997).<br />
Fig. 2. Changes in soluble solids concentration (SSC%) and sugar content in<br />
Cushaw squash fruit during storage at 20°C. Each value is the mean of 24<br />
replicates ± standard deviation.<br />
564 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
WEIGHT LOSS. As expected, the weight loss increased as storage<br />
time increased, reaching a maximum of 18.2% after 98 days of<br />
storage. At this point fruits showed yellowing of the skin but had no<br />
signs of shrivelling. However, fruits that were stored at 4°C for 3<br />
weeks and then at 20°C for 6 weeks showed depressions of the skin,<br />
mold development, and dehydration of the seed cavity (results not<br />
shown). Cushaw squash fruits usually become mummified when<br />
stored for long periods of time, sometimes keeping their original<br />
shape. <strong>The</strong> weight loss in this study was higher than the loss reported<br />
for kabocha and butternut squash (Arvayo-Ortiz et al., 1994; Holmes,<br />
1951).<br />
FRUIT FIRMNESS AND DENSITY. Fruit firmness at the beginning of<br />
the experiment was 115N, decreased slightly after 35 and 56 days, but<br />
then markedly decreased to 55N after 77 days of storage (Figure 3).<br />
However, firmness increased again, reaching 138.6N, after 98 days of<br />
storage. Initial firmness in this experiment was higher than the one<br />
reported for butternut squash (Morales-Munguía et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />
firmness of cushaw squash measured through the skin was similar to<br />
that found for kabocha (Ratnayake et al., 1999) after 6 weeks of<br />
storage, but the cushaw squash fruits were firmer after 12 weeks of<br />
storage to that observed previously.<br />
Fig. 3. Changes in firmness and density in Cushaw fruit during storage<br />
at 20°C. Each value is the mean of 24 replicates for firmness and 6<br />
replicates for density ± standard deviation.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 565
Fruit density measured at the beginning of the storage period was<br />
0.72, but significantly decreased to 0.6 after 98 days of storage (Figure<br />
3). <strong>The</strong> density of butternut fruit changed from an initial value of 1.13<br />
to 1.06 after 60 days of storage (Morales-Munguía et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />
large seed cavity of these more rounded cushaw fruits is most likely<br />
the reason for the lower density.<br />
TITRATABLE ACIDITY AND PH. Titratable acidity (TA) ranged<br />
from 0.018 to 0.041%, being higher at the beginning of the experiment<br />
but significantly decreasing after 35 days of storage. <strong>The</strong> pH values of<br />
the cushaw squash fruit ranged from 7.40 to 7.84, with no changes<br />
during the storage period at 20°C. <strong>The</strong>se results agree with those<br />
reported by Alosi et al. (1988), who found pH values in phloem<br />
exudates of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata from 7.5 to 7.8.<br />
Under the conditions of this study, cushaw squash fruits showed<br />
the typical physiological behavior of a mature winter squash,<br />
characterized by low ethylene production and low respiratory rate. <strong>The</strong><br />
high weight loss indicates that further study is required, using lower<br />
storage temperatures and relative humidity combinations in order to<br />
prolong storage life. Cushaw squash fruits might have a favorable<br />
response to modified atmosphere storage. In regions where the fruit<br />
flesh is the main part of the fruit used for food, breeding programs<br />
should target higher soluble solids content and selection of fruits with<br />
smaller seed cavities and thus higher densities.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Alosi, M. C., D. L. Melroy, and R. B. Park. 1988. <strong>The</strong> regulation of gelation of<br />
phloem exudate from <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a fruit by dilution, glutathione, and glutathione<br />
reductase. Plant Physiol. 86:1089–1094.<br />
Arvayo-Ortiz, R. M., S. Garza-Ortega, and E. M. Yahia. 1994. Postharvest response<br />
of winter squash to hot-water treatment, temperature, and length of storage.<br />
HortTech. 4:253–255.<br />
Brecht, J. K. 2004. Pumpkins and winter squash. In: <strong>The</strong> commercial storage of<br />
fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. USDA Agriculture Hand<strong>book</strong><br />
66. .<br />
Francis, F. J. and C. L. Thomson. 1965. Optimum storage conditions for Butternut<br />
squash. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 86:441–456.<br />
Garza-Ortega, S., A. Serrano-Esquer, and J. K. Brown. 2002. Yield, quality, and<br />
SLCV and SSL reactions of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne lines and hybrids<br />
evaluated in Sonora, México, p. 109–115. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2002. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Harvey, W. J., D. G. Grant, and J. P. Lammerink. 1997. Physical and sensory<br />
changes during the development and storage of buttercup squash. New Zealand<br />
J. Crop & Hort. Sci. 25:341–351.<br />
Holmes, A. D. 1951. Factors that affect the storage life of butternut squashes. Food<br />
Tech. 5:372–373.<br />
566 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
López-Hernández, J., M. J. González-Castro, M. E. Vazquez-Blanco, M. L.<br />
Vazquez-Oderiz, and J. Simal-Lozano. 1994. HPLC determination of sugars and<br />
starch in green beans. J. Food Sci. 59:1048–1049.<br />
Merrick, L. C. 1991. Systematics, evolution, and ethnobotany of a domesticated<br />
squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma. PhD Diss., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.<br />
Morales-Munguía, J. C., S. Garza-Ortega, R. Báez-Sañudo, and B. Ramírez Wong.<br />
2004. Evaluación de la calidad de líneas e híbridos de calabaza tipo Butternut<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a moschata Duchesne). Biotecnia. 6:43–52.<br />
Morgan, W. and D. Midmore. 2003. Kabocha and Japanese pumpkin in Australia.<br />
Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation 02/167,<br />
Barton-Kingston Australia.<br />
Nuñez-Grajeda, H. C. and S. Garza-Ortega. 2005. Differential response of cushaw<br />
squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a argyrosperma Huber) lines, hybrids, and landraces in spring<br />
versus fall culture in Sonora, Mexico. HortSci. 40:1108(Abstr.).<br />
Ratnayake, R. M. S., P. L. Hurst, and L. D. Melton. 1999. Texture and the cell wall<br />
polysaccharides of buttercup squash ‘Delica’ (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima). New Zealand<br />
J. Crop & Hort. Sci. 27:133–143.<br />
Troncoso-Rojas, R., A. Sánchez-Estrada, C. Ruelas, H. S. García, and M. E.<br />
Tiznado-Hernández. 2005. Effect of benzyl isothiocyanate on tomato fruit<br />
infection development by Alternaria alternata. J. Sci. & Food Agric. 85:1427–<br />
1434.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 567
HARVEST PERIOD AND STORAGE AFFECT<br />
BIOMASS PARTITIONING AND ATTRIBUTES<br />
OF EATING QUALITY IN ACORN SQUASH<br />
(CUCURBITA PEPO)<br />
J. Brent Loy<br />
University of New Hampshire, Department of Plant Biology,<br />
Durham, NH<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS: Biomass allocation, Brix levels, embryo growth<br />
ABSTRACT. <strong>The</strong> effects of harvest date and storage on eating quality and<br />
biomass partitioning in acorn squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo) were evaluated in two<br />
years. In 2003, ‘Table Ace’ and NH1605 were harvested at 30–35, 40–45, or 50–<br />
55 days after pollination (DAP), with or without storage for 20 days at 14 o C. In<br />
2005, NH1634, NH1635, NH1636, and ‘Tip Top’ were evaluated 25, 35, and 45<br />
DAP, with or without 10-day storage at 21 o C. In 2003, peak mesocarp dry<br />
weight (DW) occurred at 30 DAP, but Brix levels for good eating quality were<br />
not attained until 50 DAP. In 2005, the NH hybrids attained peak DWs 25<br />
DAP; ‘Tip Top’ at 35 DAP. Brix levels were low (5.9 to 7.2) across all cultivars<br />
25 DAP; 8.1 –10.9 35 DAP; and 9.7–13.4 45 DAP. Following 10-day storage at<br />
21 o C, o Brix reached acceptable (11+) levels 35 and 45 DAP in all NH hybrids,<br />
and 45 DAP in ‘Tip Top’. Embryos were 8–19mg DW 25 DAP and grew linearly<br />
until 55 DAP (45 DAP + 10-d storage). Reallocation of assimilates from<br />
mesocarp to embryos during storage significantly increased the proportion of<br />
seed to total DW biomass in NH1636 and ‘Tip Top’ 25 35 DAP.<br />
A<br />
corn squash, <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L. subsp. texana (Scheele) Filov<br />
Acorn Group is one of the three most popular classes of<br />
squash consumed in <strong>North</strong> America. Based on evaluation of<br />
numerous samples of acorn squash from supermarkets and from<br />
cultivars grown at the University of New Hampshire research farms,<br />
eating quality appears to be inconsistent and generally poor. This is in<br />
contrast to buttercup/kabocha cultivars of C. maxima Duchesne, which<br />
generally exhibit uniformly good quality because of the high<br />
percentage of dry weight (DW) and sugar content. Kabocha squash<br />
are an important export crop in New Zealand, and this has led to<br />
extensive studies on culture (Buwalda and Freeman, 1986a, b), harvest<br />
time (Harvey and Grant, 1992; Harvey et al., 1997), and establishment<br />
of quality standards (Harvey et al., 1997). Such is not the case for<br />
acorn squash. Mesocarp DW in acorn squash is usually in the range of<br />
12 to 20% (Culpepper and Moon, 1945; J. B. Loy, unpublished data),<br />
considerably below that of kabocha squash (20 to 30%). An additional<br />
problem is that fruit of most modern acorn squash cultivars reach near<br />
568 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
full size and assume mature fruit pigmentation within two weeks from<br />
pollination, and may appear mature and thus be harvested well ahead<br />
of peak mesocarp DW (30 days), before acceptable Brix levels are<br />
attained, and considerably before seed maturation at 50 to 55 DAP<br />
(Loy, 2004). <strong>The</strong> objectives of the current studies were (1) to examine<br />
the relationship between harvest date and physiological factors<br />
affecting eating quality in acorn squash, and (2) to quantify the effect<br />
of harvest date and subsequent storage on allocation of biomass<br />
between mesocarp tissue and seeds.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Field studies in 2003 and 2005 were conducted at the Woodman<br />
Horticultural Research Farm in Durham, NH. <strong>The</strong> soil type was a<br />
Charlton fine sandy loam (Inceptisol). In 2003, the experimental<br />
design was a split plot with two black-green acorn cultivars, ‘Table<br />
Ace’ (semibush) and NH1605 (bush), as main plots and six treatments<br />
as subplots. <strong>The</strong> six treatments were stored or nonstored fruit<br />
harvested at 30 to 35, 40 to 45, and 50 to 55 days after pollination<br />
(DAP). Fruit were tagged within two days of anthesis, and treatments<br />
were assigned randomly to plants within plots. For the three storage<br />
treatments, fruit were stored for 20 days at 14 o C. Raised beds, covered<br />
with 1.5-mil black polyethylene mulch and provided with 8-mil drip<br />
tape (T-tape with 12-inch emitter spacing), were spaced 1.8m on<br />
center. Each plot was seeded on 10 June 2003, and consisted of 10<br />
plants spaced 0.6m apart. Fertilizer at 56kg.ha -1 N and K2O was<br />
broadcast preplant, prior to bed formation. Additional soluble<br />
fertilizer was applied weekly as a 20-2-20 formulation at 5.6kg.ha -1 N<br />
and K2O through fertigation, beginning at one week prior to flowering,<br />
and continuing for five weeks. One application of imidacloprid<br />
applied through drip irrigation shortly after seeding was the only insect<br />
control. <strong>The</strong> fungicides chlorothalonil, azoxystrobin, and mycobutanil<br />
were applied as recommended in the 2002–2003 New England<br />
Vegetable Management Guide to control foliar diseases.<br />
<strong>The</strong> 2005 study consisted of four PMT F1 hybrids: ‘Tip Top’<br />
(semibush; Johnny’s Selected Seeds, Albion, ME), NH1634 (bush), with<br />
black-green exterior pigmentation, and two semibush hybrids, NH1635<br />
and NH1636, with yellow and green striped exterior pigmentation<br />
similar to that of ‘Sweet Dumpling’. Plots were seeded on 03 June,<br />
2005. Each hybrid was grown as a separate experimental unit (row),<br />
with five replications and six treatments randomized within each plot of<br />
20 plants spaced 1.5m apart. <strong>The</strong> six treatments were harvests at 25, 35,<br />
or 45 DAP, with or without storage for 10 days at 21 o C. All fruits were<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 569
tagged at or near the pollination date, and treatments were assigned<br />
randomly to different fruits. Cultural conditions and pest control were<br />
the same as for the 2003 study.<br />
In 2003, data were taken on fruit number per plant, fruit fresh<br />
weight (FW), mesocarp FW, DW, and o Brix, and seed/placental FW<br />
and DW. DW of mesocarp tissue was determined by multiplying FW<br />
x % DW of two core samples taken from the middle of fruit. Samples<br />
were dried for 48h at 60 o C in a VWR Model 1350FM drying oven.<br />
Subjective ratings (1 to 5 scale) were made by the investigator and<br />
research technician on perceived dryness, sweetness, texture, and<br />
overall eating quality of all squash. In 2005, data were taken on fruit<br />
FW, mesocarp FW and DW, seed/placental FW and DW, and seed<br />
coat and embryo FW and DW (20-seed sample). <strong>The</strong>se data were used<br />
to generate data on biomass partitioning between seeds and mesocarp.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
FRUIT YIELD AND BIOMASS PARTITIONING IN 2003. ‘Table Ace’<br />
had significantly larger fruit than NH1605, but about the same number<br />
of fruit per plant, so produced higher FW yields than NH1605 (Table<br />
1). ‘Table Ace’ has a semibush growth habit, and leaf-canopy cover<br />
was nearly <strong>complete</strong> at time for fruit set, whereas NH1605 is a bush<br />
hybrid, and the leaf canopy did not <strong>complete</strong>ly fill in rows spaced 1.8m<br />
apart. In preliminary studies in 2003 on plant population density with<br />
NH1605, decreases in within-row spacing from 0.6 to 0.3m increased<br />
fruit yields by about 20% without affecting fruit size or quality (J. B.<br />
Loy, unpublished data).<br />
Table 1. Comparison of fresh weight (FW) yield components in ‘Table<br />
Ace’ and NH1605 acorn squash in 2003, across all treatments.<br />
Mean<br />
fruit<br />
Cultivar FW (kg) z<br />
Mesocarp<br />
FW per<br />
fruit z<br />
Mean<br />
fruit<br />
no. z<br />
Means fruit<br />
FW per<br />
plant (kg) z<br />
Table Ace 0.78 a 0.67 a 3.75 a 2.92 a<br />
NH1605 0.56 b 0.45 a 3.92 a 2.19 b<br />
z<br />
Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significant by analysis of<br />
variance, P = 0.05.<br />
Total fruit DW per plant, total mesocarp DW per fruit, total<br />
mesocarp DW per plant, and total seed DW per fruit were not<br />
significantly different between cultivars (Table 2). <strong>The</strong> lack of<br />
significant differences between cultivars for DW as compared to FW<br />
570 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 2. Comparison of dry weight (DW) yield components in ‘Table<br />
Ace’ and NH1605 acorn squash in 2003, across all treatments.<br />
Ratio seed<br />
Fruit Fruit DW Mesocarp DW total<br />
Cultivar DW (g) plant (g) DW fruit DW<br />
Table Ace 121.2 a 454.5 a 324.0 a 28.7 a<br />
NH1605 105.2 a 412.3 a 304.7 a 26.1 a<br />
z<br />
Means within rows followed by the same letter are not significantly different at<br />
P = 0.05 according to analysis of variance.<br />
y<br />
Seed DW includes placental mesocarp tissue surrounding seed.<br />
attributes of yield was due to the higher percentage of DW of<br />
mesocarp tissue in NH1605 (17.8%) as compared to ‘Table Ace’<br />
(13.6) across all treatment comparisons. <strong>The</strong> proportion of biomass<br />
allocated to seeds and placental tissue was similar for both hybrids,<br />
amounting to slightly more than one fourth of the total fruit biomass.<br />
As elucidated in detail by Harvey et al. (1997), in kabocha squash<br />
grown in New Zealand, sugar levels and dry-matter content of the<br />
mesocarp are the overriding factors in determining eating quality of<br />
squash. Sugar levels and perceived sweetness of squash were highly<br />
correlated with measurements of o Brix with a refractometer. Squash<br />
with high dry matter (% DW) have a high starch content, and much of<br />
the starch is converted to sugars during the maturation of squash or<br />
during storage following harvest (Phillips, 1946; Schales and Isenberg,<br />
1963). A smooth pasty texture produced by a high starch content<br />
together with high Brix levels following conversion of some of the<br />
starch to sugar contributes to high eating quality in squash. For<br />
kabocha squash, 20% DW and 11 o Brix have been suggested as the<br />
minimum standards for acceptable eating quality at point of<br />
consumption (Harvey et al., 1997). For shipping and long term<br />
storage, % DW should be higher than 20%, so as to account for<br />
biomass loss due to respiration.<br />
In the present study, time of harvest did not significantly affect<br />
mesocarp % DW prior to storage (Table 3). Previous studies showed<br />
that maximum DW occurs at about 30 DAP in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo squash<br />
(Culpepper and Moon, 1945), the time of first harvest in the present<br />
study. A significant reduction in mesocarp biomass during storage<br />
was expected, however, due to respiratory losses (Irving et al., 1997)<br />
and remobilization of assimilates to developing seeds (Loy, 2004).<br />
Storage did not have a consistent effect of % DW, possibly because of<br />
excessive error variance with only six replications, but also because<br />
moisture loss in storage increases % DW. However, using paired<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 571
comparisons of nonstored to stored fruit, significant decreases in %<br />
DW following storage were obtained for ‘Table Ace’ harvested at 30<br />
DAP, and NH1605 harvested at 40 DAP.<br />
Time of harvest had a strong impact on o Brix (Table 3). Brix<br />
levels increased linearly over time of harvest for both cultivars.<br />
However, because ‘Table Ace’ had low dry biomass, the increase in<br />
o Brix from 6.0 at 30 DAP to 8.4 at 50 DAP was not sufficient to<br />
provide acceptable eating quality. In NH1605, o Brix increased from<br />
6.6 at 30 DAP to 8.8 at 40 DAP and to 11.2 at 50 DAP, the latter level<br />
being sufficient for good eating quality. Brix levels increased<br />
significantly during all three storage periods for ‘Table Ace’.<br />
However, the highest Brix levels, 10 to 10.5 attained at 40 and 50 DAP<br />
in stored ‘Table Ace’, largely depleted starch reserves, resulting in<br />
squash with a fibrous, watery texture that did not have acceptable<br />
eating quality. On the other hand, acceptable Brix levels were attained<br />
during all three storage periods with NH1605, and sufficient starch<br />
remained following storage so that texture remained good.<br />
Table 3. Dry weight and o Brix in ‘Table Ace’ (TA) and NH1605<br />
acorn squash harvested at 30, 40 and 50 DAP, with or without storage<br />
for 20 days at 14 o C.<br />
Harvest periods z<br />
Cultivar/storage 30 DAP 40 DAP 50 DAP<br />
Mesocarp % DW<br />
TA nonstored 14.4 a 14.7 a 13.6 a<br />
TA stored 10.9 a 14.8 a 13.6 a<br />
NH1605 nonstored 17.3 a 19.5 a 17.8 a<br />
NH1605 stored 17.7 a 16.3 a 17.2 a<br />
Mesocarp o Brix<br />
TA nonstored 6.1 d 7.3 cd 8.7 b<br />
TA stored 7.6 bc 10.6 a 10.0 a<br />
NH1605 nonstored 6.9 c 8.9 b 11.3 a<br />
NH1605 stored 11.5 a 11.0 a 11.6 a<br />
z Harvest periods of 30 to 35, 40 to 45 and 50 to 55 days after pollination(DAP).<br />
y Means for the 6 treatments within each hybrid followed by same letter were not<br />
significantly different at P = 0.05 by Duncans’ New Multiple Range Test.<br />
Texture, along with overall eating quality of squash cooked in a<br />
microwave, was subjectively evaluated by the author and a technician<br />
on a scale of 1–5: 1 = watery/fibrous; 2 = moist/fibrous; 3 =<br />
grainy/moist; 4 = smooth/moist; 5 = smooth/dry. For Treatment 6 (50<br />
DAP harvest + 20-day storage), the average texture rating for 16<br />
572 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
samples of ‘Table Ace’ was 2.4, and for 24 samples of NH1605 was 3.9.<br />
Evaluation of eating quality on a 1 to 5 scale (1 = poor; 2 = fair; 3 =<br />
good; 4 = very good; 5 = excellent) was similar, with ‘Table Ace’<br />
averaging 1.9 for Treatment 6 and NH1605 averaging 4.3.<br />
2005 BIOMASS STUDY. Among the four hybrids, ‘Tip Top’ had the<br />
largest fruit (792g), followed by the ‘Sweet Dumpling’ type hybrids,<br />
NH1635 (638g) and NH1636 (604g), and the acorn hybrid NH1634 at<br />
559g (Table 4). Between 81 to 85% of fruit biomass was allocated to<br />
mesocarp tissue among the four hybrid cultivars.<br />
<strong>The</strong> primary aim of this study was to quantify the effect of<br />
remobilization of assimilates from mesocarp tissue to embryos (seed<br />
fill) on quality parameters (% DW and soluble solids) of the edible<br />
mesocarp. However, variation in fruit size and % DW of mesocarp<br />
tissue both within and among treatments precluded a precise<br />
determination of this relationship. Nonetheless, it is possible to show<br />
the magnitude o f the effect of remobilization by following increases<br />
in embryo DW biomass, and changes in the proportion of seed DW<br />
before and after storage of squash harvested at different time periods<br />
(Table 5).<br />
Table 4. Comparison of fruit biomass components among four C. pepo<br />
hybrids grown in 2005, and harvested at 25, 35, and 45 days after<br />
pollination (DAP).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo F1 hybrids<br />
Fruit biomass<br />
components NH1634 NH1635 NH1636 Tip Top<br />
Fruit FW 559 638 604 792<br />
Fruit DW 111 126 123 139<br />
Mesocarp DW 91 107 101 112<br />
% Meso. DW/Total DW 82 85 82 81<br />
Mean seed number 276 247 219 260<br />
Reallocation of assimilates from mesocarp tissue to seeds varied<br />
considerably among cultivars, primarily because of variation in seed<br />
fill (embryo DW), but also due to differences in seed numbers.<br />
Changes in biomass distribution during storage were most evident in<br />
‘Tip Top’ and NH1636 because these cultivars had the largest seeds.<br />
With both of these cultivars, fruit harvested at 25 and 35 DAP showed<br />
significant increases in the proportion of seed DW biomass to total<br />
biomass following 10 days of storage at 21 o C. <strong>The</strong> increases were<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 573
greatest, 52% in NH1636 and 67% in ‘Tip Top’, in fruit harvested at<br />
35 DAP.<br />
In nonstored fruit, increases in embryo biomass between 25 and 45<br />
DAP were nearly linear in ‘Tip Top’, but were more curvilinear in<br />
NH1634 and 1636 (Table 5). Seed fill was poor and reached a plateau<br />
at 35 DAP in NH1635. Increases in embryo biomass during 10-day<br />
intervals in stored fruit were comparable to those in fruit remaining on<br />
the plant. Moreover, fruit harvested at 45 DAP and stored continued<br />
to show large increases in embryo biomass, corroborating previous<br />
studies in C. pepo (Vining and Loy, 1998) showing that substantial<br />
seed fill may occur up to 55 DAP.<br />
Table 5. Changes in mesocarp % DW, o Brix, ratios of seed DW to<br />
total fruit DW, and increases in embryo biomass before and after 10<br />
days storage at 21 o C following harvest at 25, 35, or 45 days after<br />
pollination (DAP).<br />
25 DAP 35 DAP 45 DAP<br />
Treat-<br />
ments<br />
NS<br />
S<br />
Ratio seed/total DW<br />
NH1634 0.18a 0.23a 0.15a 0.20a 0.18a 0.23a<br />
NH1635 0.15a 0.21a 0.12a 0.16a 0.16a 0.19a<br />
NH1636 0.18a 0.23bc 0.21c 0.32a 0.29ab 0.24bc<br />
Tip Top 0.19ab 0.26a 0.15b 0.25a 0.19ab 0.25a<br />
20 Embryo DW (mg) y<br />
NH1634 8.6a 31.1b 31.3b 38.8b 36.2b 57.1c<br />
NH1635 11.3a 24.9a 28.4a 33.4a 25.5a 28.5a<br />
NH1636 19.1c 45.5b .42.0b 68.6a 48.5b 76.9a<br />
Tip Top 16.0d 54.9c 48.8c 74.3b 73.7b 87.5a<br />
20 Seed coat DW (mg) y<br />
NH1634 30.4a 22.7bc 26.3ab 23.2bc 22.8bc 22.5c<br />
NH1635 35.1a 23.5c 27.9b 23.8c 25.2bc 21.7c<br />
NH1636 39.7a 28.6b 29.2b 27.5b 27.9b 27.3b<br />
Tip Top 31.6a 28.0bc 29.6ab 26.6bc 27.3bc 25.4c<br />
Embryo DW per fruit (g) x<br />
NH1634 2.6 9.4 9.5 11.8 9.9 15.6<br />
NH1635 2.9 6.4 7.5 8.8 7.7 8.6<br />
NH1636 5.0 12.0 9.9 16.1 10.0 15.9<br />
Tip Top 4.6 15.6 15.6 23.8 16.7 19.8<br />
z Harvest and storage treatments within the same cultivar having the same letter are<br />
not significantly different at P = 0.05 by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test.<br />
y Biomass of 20 embryo or seed coat samples.<br />
x Embryo DW per fruit determined by embryo DW x seed number per fruit.<br />
NS<br />
574 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006<br />
S<br />
NS<br />
S
<strong>The</strong> largest increase in total embryo biomass per fruit during<br />
storage was 11g in fruit of ‘Tip Top’ harvested at 25 DAP. In ‘Tip<br />
Top’, the mesocarp DW averaged 80g for fruit harvested at 25 DAP<br />
and stored. <strong>The</strong> 11g of embryo growth represents a fairly large sink<br />
for remobilization of assimilates from the mesocarp because in terms<br />
of energy equivalents, embryos, composed chiefly of lipids and<br />
protein, contain about twice those of mesocarp tissue (Loy, 2004).<br />
In squash harvested after seed maturation is <strong>complete</strong> (50 to 55 DAP),<br />
there is a steady loss of moisture during storage (Hopp et al., 1960;<br />
Phillips, 1946; Schales and Isenberg, 1963), along with a steady<br />
decline in dry biomass due to respiration of sugars (Hopp et al., 1960;<br />
Phillips, 1946; Irving et al., 1997). In squash harvested prematurely,<br />
respiratory biomass losses are compounded by additional losses,<br />
primarily of starch reserves, because of remobilization of mesocarp<br />
assimilates to developing seed. <strong>The</strong> effect on eating quality may not<br />
be readily evident in squash with relatively high dry matter content,<br />
but can be quite substantial in cultivars having low starch levels at<br />
time of harvest.<br />
Changes in seed-coat biomass were also evident (Table 5). Seedcoat<br />
biomass was greatest at 25 DAP, and decreased about 25% to<br />
30% within 10 days to stationary levels throughout the rest of seed<br />
development. Previous studies in seed pumpkins (Stuart and Loy,<br />
1988; Vining and Loy, 1998) showed that seed-coat DW peaks at 20 to<br />
25 DAP and then decreases, indicating that the seed coat may function<br />
as a transient storage organ, capable of providing assimilates to the<br />
developing embryo.<br />
COMPONENTS OF EATING QUALITY. Compared to the 2003 study,<br />
mesocarp % DW was relatively high for all of the cultivars in the 2005<br />
study (Table 6). Harvest time and storage did not have a statistically<br />
significant effect on mesocarp DW, with the exception of a significant<br />
drop in % DW during storage of ‘Tip Top’ fruit harvested at 25 DAP.<br />
It also appeared that mesocarp DW may not have reached maximum<br />
levels in ‘Tip Top’ at 25 DAP as compared to the other cultivars.<br />
Soluble solids levels, on the other hand, were markedly affected by<br />
harvest date and subsequent storage (Table 6). Fruit harvested at 25<br />
DAP had low Brix levels. Storage for 10 days increased o Brix, but in<br />
most cases the levels were not sufficient (11 or greater) for good eating<br />
quality. Brix levels increased at 35 DAP, and approached reasonable<br />
levels for good eating quality in all of the NH experimental hybrids.<br />
Brix levels were further elevated during storage, but were still<br />
insufficient in ‘Tip Top’ for good eating quality. At 45 DAP all<br />
experimental hybrids exhibited high Brix levels with or without<br />
storage, and ‘Tip Top’ attained 12.1 o Brix after 10 days of storage.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 575
Table 6. Changes in mesocarp % DW and o Brix before and after 10<br />
days storage at 21 o C, following harvest at 25, 35 or 45 days after<br />
pollination (DAP).<br />
25 DAP z<br />
35 DAP z<br />
45 DAP z<br />
Treatments NS S NS S NS S<br />
Mesocarp %DW<br />
NH1634 20.3a 18.0a 20.7a 20.5a 21.3a 21.1a<br />
NH1635 19.2a 16.9a 22.6a 20.6a 20.3a. 20.1a<br />
NH1636 20.3a 19.0a 20.8a 16.4a 21.3a 19.3a<br />
Tip Top 16.9a 12.6b 19.3a 16.7ab 19.8a 17.5a<br />
Mesocarp o Brix<br />
NH1634 7.2c 10.3b 9.6b 13.8a 12.8a 13.0a<br />
NH1635 6.8d 8.4c 10.9b 13.3a 13.4a 14.4a<br />
NH16346 6.8c 10.6b 10.2b 10.9b 12.8ab 13.9a<br />
Tip Top 5.9d 7.1cd 8.1c 9.7b 9.7b 12.1a<br />
z Harvest and storage treatments within the same cultivar having the same letter are<br />
not significantly different at P = 0.05 by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test.<br />
Conclusions<br />
As noted in previous studies (Culpepper and Moon, 1945) and as<br />
illustrated in the present study, cultivars of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo squash<br />
may vary considerably in soluble solids content and mesocarp DW,<br />
primary parameters contributing to eating quality. Premature harvest<br />
can markedly affect eating quality because peak dry matter is not<br />
attained until 25 to 30 DAP, and even in cultivars having sufficient dry<br />
matter, adequate o Brix are often not attained until after the fruit are<br />
fully mature in terms of seed maturation (50 to 55 DAP). Cultivars<br />
with low mesocarp DW are impacted more adversely than those with<br />
high DW by early harvest because conversion of starch to sugar and<br />
remobilization of sugars to seeds depletes starch below a threshold<br />
level necessary for an acceptable smooth, pasty texture. Acorn<br />
cultivars of C. pepo are particularly prone to being harvested immature<br />
because the fruit of most cultivars attain near full size and mature fruit<br />
rind coloration within two weeks of fruit set. <strong>The</strong> popularity among<br />
growers of cultivars with poor eating quality, along with negligence in<br />
harvesting squash at the proper time, negatively impacts consumer<br />
demand for a potentially excellent vegetable crop. New cultivars with<br />
higher dry matter should help to alleviate this problem.<br />
576 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Literature Cited<br />
Buwalda, J. G. and R. E. Freeman. 1986a. Growth and development of hybrid squash<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima L.) in the field. Proc. Agron. Soc. New Zealand. 16:7–11.<br />
Buwalda, J. G. and R. E. Freeman. 1986b. Hybrid squash: responses to nitrogen,<br />
potassium, and phosphorus fertilizers on a soil of moderate fertility. New<br />
Zealand J. Exp. Agr. 14:339–345.<br />
Culpepper, C. W. and H. H. Moon. 1945. Differences in the composition of the fruits<br />
of <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a varieties at different ages in relation to culinary use. J. Agr. Res.<br />
71:111.136.<br />
Harvey, W. J. and D. G. Grant. 1992. Effect of maturity on the sensory quality of<br />
buttercup squash. Proc. Agron. Soc. New Zealand. 22:25–30.<br />
Harvey, W. J., D. G. Grant, and J. P. Lammerink. 1997. Effect of maturity on the<br />
sensory changes during development and storage of buttercup squash. New<br />
Zealand J. Crop & Hort. Sci. 25:341–351.<br />
Hopp, R. J., S. B. Merrow, and E. M. Elbert. 1960. Varietal differences and storage<br />
changes in β-carotene content of six varieties of squashes. Proc. Amer. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sci. 76:568–576.<br />
Irving, D. E., P. L. Hurst, and J. S. Ragg. 1997. Changes in carbohydrates and<br />
carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes during development, maturation, and<br />
ripening of buttercup squash (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a maxima D. ‘Delica’). J. Amer. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sci. 122:310–314.<br />
Loy, J. B. 2004. Morpho-physiological aspects of productivity and quality in squash<br />
and pumpkins (<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a spp.). Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23:337–363.<br />
Phillips, T. G. 1946. Changes in composition of squash during storage. Plant Physiol.<br />
21:533–541.<br />
Schales, F. D. and F. M. Isenberg. 1963. <strong>The</strong> effect of curing and storage on<br />
chemical composition and taste acceptability of winter squash. Proc. Amer. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sci. 83:667–674.<br />
Stuart, S. G. and J. B. Loy. 1988. Changes in testa composition during seed<br />
development in <strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L. Plant Physiol. (Life Sci. Adv.). 7:191–195.<br />
Vining, K. J. and J. B. Loy. 1998. Seed development and seed fill in hull-less seeded<br />
cultigens In: J. D. McCreight (ed.). <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 98: evaluation and<br />
enhancement of cucurbit germplasm. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.of pumpkin<br />
(<strong>Cucurbit</strong>a pepo L.), p. 64–69.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 577
RIPENING CHANGES IN MINIWATERMELON<br />
FRUIT<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie and Julie K. Collins<br />
South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory<br />
USDA-ARS, Lane, OK 74555<br />
Donald J. Huber<br />
Horticulture Department,<br />
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611<br />
Niels Maness<br />
Department of Horticulture, Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University<br />
Stillwater, OK 74074<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, lycopene, beta-carotene, pectin,<br />
cell wall<br />
ABSTRACT. In this study, seedless and seeded miniwatermelons (Citrullus<br />
lanatus) of ripe, underripe, and overripe stages were evaluated for quality<br />
characteristics and changes in carotenoids and pectins. Similar to seeded, large<br />
watermelon, minimelon weight, pH, and soluble solids content increased in fruit<br />
between underripe and ripe stages, while firmness decreased. Phytofluene,<br />
total, trans-, and cis- lycopene, and total carotenoid content increased as fruit<br />
changed from underripe to ripe stages. Beta-carotene content increased in<br />
overripe fruit compared to ripe fruit and may explain the orange tint that is<br />
seen in overripe watermelons. <strong>The</strong> proportion of large molecular weight pectins<br />
increased as minimelons became fully ripe, then overripe. Among cultivars,<br />
‘Xite’ had firmer flesh, thicker rind, and more lycopene than ‘Minipool’ or<br />
‘Valdoria’. ‘Minipool’ had fewer large molecular weight pectins while<br />
‘Valdoria’ had more beta-carotene and large molecular weight pectins<br />
compared to ‘Xite’.<br />
I<br />
n the U.S., the market has shifted from seeded to seedless<br />
watermelons, and from large (>10kg) to small fruit (4–10kg) fruit.<br />
A new introduction to the market is the miniwatermelon. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
fruit are round and weigh less than 4kg. In addition, several of these<br />
selections, especially the seedless types, feature extremely firm, almost<br />
crunchy flesh.<br />
Little is known about the ripening events in watermelon fruit.<br />
Corey and Schlimme (1988) found that seeded watermelons exhibited<br />
a slight loss in soluble solids content and an increase in pH as fruit<br />
progressed from under- to overripe stages. At about 10 days<br />
postanthesis, lycopene accumulation is initiated in the locular area of<br />
the fruit (P. Perkins-Veazie, unpublished), while sugar accumulation<br />
occurs well before full color formation (Elmstrom and Davis, 1981).<br />
578 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
As fruit become overripe, cell-wall and membrane breakdown occur,<br />
yielding a mealy or grainy texture as cell wall fragments aggregate.<br />
Elkashif and Huber (1988) found that cell-wall changes in seeded<br />
‘Charleston Gray’ fruit shifted from large molecular weight to small<br />
molecular weights as fruit went from ripe to overripe stages. Although<br />
several of the minimelon cultivars exhibit firm flesh and high soluble<br />
solids and lycopene content, the ripening characteristics of<br />
miniwatermelons is unknown.<br />
Table 1. Indicators of watermelon ripeness (subjective and objective).<br />
Indicator Description<br />
Color Underripe is pink in locule first, then pink all<br />
over; overripe has orange cast; color expands<br />
into rind (rind looks thinner).<br />
Lycopene Underripe has 20 to 50% less, depending on<br />
variety and days from full ripeness; overripe<br />
will have slightly more, the same, or 10% less.<br />
pH Increases slightly from under to overripe.<br />
Soluble solids content (SSC)<br />
Difficult to separate ripe from overripe; can<br />
sometimes see higher SSC in locule compared<br />
to heart in slightly underripe; locations are<br />
equal in ripe; heart slightly higher in overripe.<br />
Texture (finger/mouth feel) Mealy in overripe; slimy in very overripe.<br />
Ripe fruit may be crunchy (‘Xite’) or crisp<br />
Flavor (taste)<br />
(‘Minipool’).<br />
Underripe has a ‘green’ or cucumber like<br />
flavor; overripe has pumpkin flavor.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL. Miniwatermelons were planted in Bixby, OK,<br />
in 2005, following recommended cultural practices for Oklahoma<br />
(Bolin and Brandenberger, 1999). Three cultivars were used:<br />
‘Minipool’ (seeded, crisp texture), ‘Valdoria’ (seedless, crisp texture),<br />
and ‘Xite’ (Hazera 6007) (seedless, crunchy texture, high lycopene).<br />
Fruit were harvested at underripe (7 to 10 days before ripe), ripe, and<br />
overripe (2–7 days after ripeness) stages using planting date, ground<br />
spot, and tendril browning as ripeness guides. Fruit were transported<br />
to Lane, OK, washed, weighed, measured for diameter and length, and<br />
cut into halves from stem end to blossom end. Fruit were classified by<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 579
ipeness stage using subjective and objective measurements (Table 1).<br />
Rind thickness was measured at four points (stem and blossom ends<br />
and each side) with digital calipers. Firmness of flesh was measured at<br />
corresponding locations in the heart (center of watermelon) and in the<br />
interlocular tissues using a handheld Wagner gauge (2 to 25N) and flat<br />
(8mm) probe. Percent soluble solids content was measured on heart<br />
and locular samples using a digital refractometer. Ripeness of each<br />
fruit was determined using the indicators listed in Table 1. Three to<br />
four fruit per ripeness stage and cultivar were sampled. Samples of<br />
heart tissue were frozen at -80˚C for lycopene, carotenoid, and pectin<br />
analysis.<br />
FRUIT ANALYSIS. For sugar, carotenoid, and cell-wall analysis,<br />
three melons per ripeness stage were selected from each of the three<br />
cultivars. Lycopene and carotenoid content of frozen samples was<br />
determined within four months of harvest by spectrophotometry,<br />
scanning colorimetry, and HPLC using established methods (Fish et<br />
al., 2002; Davis et al., 2003; Craft, 2001). Ethanol insoluble powders<br />
were extracted from about 200g of fresh tissue per fruit using the<br />
methods of Karakurt and Huber (2002). Molecular size of chelatorsoluble<br />
polyuronides was determined using a Sepharose CL-2B-300<br />
gel column (Chun and Huber, 2000). <strong>The</strong> experiment was designed as<br />
a factorial arrangement and data were analyzed using ANOVA and<br />
general linear means model (SAS, v.9.0, Cary, NC). A significant<br />
interaction of cultivar and ripeness stage was seen only in β-carotene<br />
and in percent polyuronic acids. Main-effect means were separated by<br />
LSD, P
the minimelons, averaging 80mg/kg in ripe fruit. Phytofluene<br />
decreased in overripe fruit, while cis and trans lycopene were not<br />
significantly different in ripe and overripe fruit. Only beta-carotene<br />
increased significantly in overripe watermelon. As a percent of total<br />
carotenoids, beta-carotene increased from 2 to 4 to 6% in underripe,<br />
ripe, and overripe fruit, respectively. This increase may explain the<br />
distinct orange tint that appeared in overripe fruit.<br />
Among cultivars, ‘Xite’ had the thickest rind, firmest flesh, and<br />
highest lycopene content (Table 3). Beta-carotene was higher in<br />
‘Valdoria’, especially in overripe fruit (5.6 vs. 3.3 and 3.8mg/kg for<br />
‘Valdoria’, ‘Minipool’, and ‘Xite’, respectively; data not shown).<br />
mg/kg carotenoid<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
A<br />
b a a b a a b a a<br />
translycopene<br />
total lycopene total<br />
carotenoids<br />
Fig. 1. Changes in the carotenoids trans-lycoepne, total lycopene, and total<br />
carotenoids (A), and beta-carotene, phytofluene, and cis-lycopene (B) with<br />
ripening of minimelons.<br />
Pectins (measured as chelator-soluble uronic acids) from the<br />
minimelons underwent a distinct downshift in molecular size during<br />
ripening, largely evident as a disappearance of polymers excluded<br />
from the molecular sieve gel (Figure 2). With overripening,<br />
proportionally greater quantities of low-molecular size polymers were<br />
evident, as seen also in pectins from ‘Charleston Gray’, a large,<br />
seeded watermelon cultivar (Elkashif and Huber 1988). Mao et al.<br />
(2004) reported a loss of membrane integrity and subsequent increase<br />
in lipoxygenase activity in watermelon gassed with ethylene. Similar<br />
changes in lipoxygenase activity may occur in watermelon as they pass<br />
from ripe to overripe stages, leading to a loss of cell integrity and<br />
changes in carotenoid and polyuronic profiles.<br />
Among cultivars, ‘Valdoria’ had the largest percent and ‘Minipool’<br />
the smallest percent of large molecular weight uronic acids in ripe fruit<br />
(Figure 3). <strong>The</strong>se results fail to explain the crunchy eating texture of<br />
‘Xite’ compared the more crisp texture of the other cultivars. <strong>The</strong><br />
mg/kg carotenoid<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
B<br />
b a a<br />
b a a<br />
cis-lycopene phytofluene _-carotene<br />
underripe<br />
ripe<br />
c b a<br />
overripe<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 581
Table 2. Changes in ripening watermelons averaged over 3 minimelon<br />
cultivars.<br />
Averages of Xite, Valdoria, and Minipool<br />
Ripeness stage Underripe Ripe Overripe<br />
Weight (kg) 2.4b 3.4a 2.9ab<br />
Length (cm) 17.1a 19.2a 18.8a<br />
Diameter (cm) 16.2a 17.9a 17.4a<br />
Rind thickness (mm) 13.6a 12.4a 12.2a<br />
Firmness (N) 19.6a 14.6b 13.0b<br />
SSC (%) 8.1b 11.1a 11.2a<br />
pH 5.2b 5.8a 6.0a<br />
Total lycopene x mg/kg 30.6b 80.4a 70.7a<br />
Values represent means of 12–28 fruit; means separated by LSD, P
A<br />
C<br />
Fig. 2. Changes in pectin fragment size (% total uronic acids) in underripe (A),<br />
ripe (B), and overripe (C) miniwatermelons. Pectin fragment size decreases with<br />
volume.<br />
A Minipool<br />
B<br />
Xite<br />
C<br />
Fig. 3. Changes in pectin fragment size in ‘Minipool’ (seeded, crisp) (A), ‘Xite’<br />
(seedless, crunchy) (B), and ‘Valdoria’ (seedless, crisp) (C) miniwatermelons.<br />
Pectin fragment size decreases with volume.<br />
B<br />
Valdoria<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 583
Literature Cited<br />
Bolin, P. and Brandenberger, L. 1999. <strong>Cucurbit</strong> integrated crop management.<br />
Chun, J. P. and D. J. Huber. 2000. Firmness, ultrastructure, and polygalacturonase<br />
activity in tomato fruit expressing an antisense gene for the ß-subunit protein. J.<br />
Plant Physiol.121:1273–1279<br />
Corey, K. A. and D. V.Schlimme. 1988. Relationship of rind gloss and groundspot<br />
color to flesh quality of watermelon fruits during maturation. Sci. Hort. 34:211–<br />
218.<br />
Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />
Prot. Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15. Don’t understand coent about cited in<br />
text-Corey and Schlimme or Bolin and Brandenberger?<br />
Davis,A. R., W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method for<br />
analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />
Elkashif, M. E. and D. J. Huber. 1989. Enzymic hydrolysis of placental cell wall<br />
pectins and cell separation in watermleon (Citrullus lanatus) fruits exposed to<br />
ethylene. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:81–85.<br />
Elmstrom, G. W. and P. L. Davis. 1981. Sugars in developing and mature fruits of<br />
several watermelon cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:330–333.<br />
Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K.Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />
lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food<br />
Composition Anal. 15:309–317.<br />
Karakurt, Y. and D. J. Huber. 2002. Cell wall-degrading enzymes and pectin<br />
solubility and depolymerization in immature and ripe watermelon (Citrullus<br />
lanatus) fruit in response to exogenous ethylene. Physiol. Plant. 116:398–405.<br />
Mao, L-C., Y. Karakurt, and D. J. Huber. 2004. Incidence of water-soaking and<br />
phospholipid catabolism in ripe watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) fruit: induction<br />
by ethylene and prophylactic effects of 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol.<br />
Tech. 33:1–9.<br />
584 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
CHANGES IN CAROTENOID CONTENT<br />
DURING PROCESSING OF WATERMELON<br />
FOR JUICE CONCENTRATES<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie and J. K. Collins<br />
USDA-ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory<br />
Lane, OK 74555<br />
M. Siddiq and K. Dolan<br />
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition<br />
Michigan <strong>State</strong> University, East Lansing, MI 48824<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, processing, lycopene, betacarotene<br />
ABSTRACT. Watermelons (Citrullus lanatus) are used primarily as a fresh<br />
product in the U.S. <strong>The</strong>re is interest in developing value-added products for<br />
additional markets and for use of cosmetically damaged fruit. In this study,<br />
watermelons were processed into juice concentrates, using a series of heat and<br />
treatment applications. Application of heat (50ºC) and a pectinase slightly<br />
increased juice yield from fruit macerate. Pasteurization had little or no effect<br />
on carotenoid content of most juices. Application of heat up to 40 or 50ºC<br />
slightly increased lycopene content of juice concentrates, while concentrating<br />
the juice to 42ºBrix increased lycopene content fivefold but reduced betacarotene<br />
content by 40 to 50%. Results indicate that watermelon juice exhibits<br />
lycopene stability with application of short or longer durations of heat<br />
treatment.<br />
I<br />
n the U.S., watermelon is consumed mostly as a fresh fruit. Fresh<br />
watermelon juice is popular in summer months, but there is little<br />
commercialization of the processed product. Challenges in<br />
developing a shelf-stable watermelon juice product include stabilizing<br />
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Watermelon Promotion<br />
Board and the USDA Rural Development Value-Added Producer Grants Program.<br />
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the<br />
purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or<br />
endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of<br />
the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without<br />
regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap.<br />
<strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties.<br />
Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works.<br />
Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in<br />
which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S.<br />
Government, which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 585
color and flavor (J. K. Collins, unpublished data). Additionally, as<br />
fresh watermelon contains large amounts of lycopene, a juice naturally<br />
high in lycopene and other carotenoids is desirable.<br />
Generally, during tomato fruit processing, lycopene is stabilized<br />
with heat application, and beta-carotene is lost (Takeoka et al., 2001;<br />
Abushita et al., 2000). Changes in watermelon carotenoids during<br />
food processing and pasteurization steps are unknown. This project<br />
was undertaken to determine carotenoid content in processed<br />
watermelon.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PROCESSING STEPS. Seedless watermelons were obtained from<br />
local markets in East Lansing, MI. Fruit were sanitized using a 5-min<br />
dip in SCJ Fruit and Vegetable Wash (SC Johnson Professional,<br />
Sturtevant, WI.) (100µl/L available chlorine), peeled and cut by hand,<br />
and macerated with a propeller-type blender. Macerate was subjected<br />
to no heat, heat (50ºC in steam-jacketed kettle), or heat + enzyme<br />
treatments (50ºC plus pectinase [Crystalzyme]). Macerates were then<br />
filtered through a nylon cloth and stored at -20ºC (Figure 1). Batch<br />
pasteurization was done by placing 1-L juice samples into heated<br />
water in double-jacketed steam kettles, 15 sec at 85ºC. Juice was<br />
concentrated to 42ºBrix using a lab-scale vacuum evaporator at 40 or<br />
50ºC.<br />
POMACE<br />
MACERATE<br />
SIEVE<br />
JUICE<br />
+HEAT<br />
+ PASTUERIZATION<br />
+HEAT (40 or 50ºC)<br />
CONCENTRATE (42ºBrix)<br />
Fig. 1. Food-processing steps of watermelon to develop juices and juice<br />
concentrates.<br />
586 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
LYCOPENE AND CAROTENOID MEASUREMENT. Duplicate<br />
watermelon samples were pureed using a tissue homogenizer and a 0.2<br />
to 0.5g sample was extracted with hexane:ethanol:acetone (2:2:1 v/v),<br />
following the methods of Sadler et al. (1990) and a modified<br />
micromethod developed by Fish et al. (2002). Pomace samples were<br />
diluted 1:3 w/w with distilled deionized water prior to<br />
homogenization, and sonicated for 10 min to aid lycopene release from<br />
fibers. Concentrates were diluted 2:1 w/w with ddi water prior to<br />
homogenization. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)<br />
was used to determine carotenoid profiles of each sample in triplicate<br />
using a modified method of Craft (2001), as outlined in Perkins-<br />
Veazie et al. (2006). Tomato lycopene and carrot beta-carotene from<br />
Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and synthetic trans-lycopene from Lycovit<br />
(BASF) were used to verify spectra and calculate lycopene<br />
concentrations.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Juice yield from watermelon was 55–57% on a per melon basis,<br />
and 82–86% of the flesh, with 5 to 8% of the flesh left as pomace<br />
(Table 1). Addition of pectinase and heat increased juice yields by 4%<br />
and reduced amounts of pomace by 3%. Lycopene and total<br />
carotenoid recovery after juicing was 61 to 66% of the original<br />
lycopene content of the macerate (Table 2). Heating and adding a<br />
pectinase to the watermelon macerate prior to filtering the juice had<br />
little effect on the amount of lycopene or carotenoids recovered in the<br />
juice, but greatly increased the amount of lycopene, beta-carotene, and<br />
total carotenoids in the pomace (Table 2). Although percent yield of<br />
pomace was less than 10% of the beginning amount of flesh,<br />
significant amounts of carotenoids appeared to remain bound to the<br />
fibers in the pomace.<br />
In the second experiment, use of pasteurization had no effect on<br />
individual carotenoids or on total carotenoid content of the juice<br />
(Table 3). Use of heat and pectinase in initial juice extraction slightly<br />
reduced lycopene, beta-carotene, and total carotenoid contents. When<br />
juice was concentrated to 42ºBrix, using 40 or 50ºC heat, all<br />
carotenoids were concentrated (Table 4). However, about 50% of<br />
beta-carotene was lost during heating. Isomerization of trans-lycopene<br />
to cis-lycopene was not found during pasteurization or heating (about<br />
4mg/kg cis-lycopene in all treatments). In tomato, exposure to heat<br />
during processing stabilizes lycopene, but can also cause losses of 9–<br />
28% of total lycopene with losses from lycopene oxidation or<br />
isomerization (Re et al., 2002; Takeoka et al., 2001; Stahl and<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 587
Sies, 1992). Abushita et al. (2000) found that heating raw tomatoes<br />
followed by dehydration into paste stabilized lycopene but decreased<br />
beta-carotene by 30%, much of which was due to isomerization. With<br />
watermelon, an increase to 9mg/kg beta-carotene was expected due to<br />
concentration to 42ºBrix (Table 4). <strong>The</strong> 50% lower yield of betacarotene<br />
indicates a significant loss of this carotenoid during heating at<br />
40 or 50ºC.<br />
Table 1. Yield of juice and pomace.<br />
% Juice yield (per Juice yield Pomace yield<br />
Macerate melon basis) (%w/w, flesh (%w/w, flesh<br />
treatment<br />
basis)<br />
basis)<br />
Cold (no heat) 54.7 82.5 8.0<br />
Heat (50ºC)<br />
Heat (50ºC) +<br />
55.5 83.8 5.2<br />
enzyme 57.2 86.2 5.0<br />
Table 2. Changes in carotenoids after processing of watermelon flesh<br />
into juice and loss/gain in carotenoids from macerate to juice and<br />
pomace.<br />
Product<br />
Macerate Juice Pomace<br />
Heat<br />
(50ºC)<br />
+<br />
Enzyme<br />
Heat<br />
(50ºC)<br />
+<br />
Enzyme<br />
Heat<br />
(50ºC)<br />
+<br />
Enzyme<br />
Quality<br />
component<br />
Soluble<br />
Cold<br />
Cold<br />
Cold<br />
solids (%)<br />
8.3 8.7 8.5 8.9 8.5 8.9<br />
pH<br />
Total<br />
5.4 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.2 5.2<br />
lycopene<br />
Beta-<br />
36.4+1.3 36.0+1.9 24.1+0.6 21.6+1.1 122.8+3.5 176.1+3.2<br />
carotene<br />
Total<br />
1.4+0.7 1.2+0.1 0.9+0 0.8+0.8 4.2+0.2 5.3+0.02<br />
carotenoids 38.6+1.3 37.2+2.0 26.8+0.6 22.3+1.1 129.0+1.0 181.4+3.2<br />
% loss/gain<br />
Total<br />
Macerate to juice Macerate to pomace<br />
lycopene<br />
Beta-<br />
- - -33.8 -40.0 +237.4 +389.2<br />
carotene<br />
Total<br />
- - -35.7 -33.3 +200.0 +341.7<br />
carotenoids - - -30.6 -40.0 +234.2 +387.6<br />
Means of duplicate samples, +standard deviation. Gain/loss is calculated from juice<br />
minus macerate value/macerate value for cold and heat, respectively.<br />
588 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 3. Changes in carotenoids (mg/kg fresh wt) of watermelon juice<br />
subjected to pasteurization.<br />
Unpasteurized<br />
Pasteurized juice<br />
Macerate<br />
treatment<br />
None<br />
(cold)<br />
Total<br />
lycopene<br />
22.1+<br />
0.1<br />
Betacarotene<br />
1.8+<br />
0.1<br />
juice<br />
Total<br />
carotenoids<br />
26.5+<br />
0.1<br />
Heat<br />
(50ºC) + 20.8+ 1.5+ 24.0+<br />
enzyme 0.3 0.1 0.3<br />
Means of duplicate samples, +standard deviation.<br />
Total<br />
lycopene<br />
22.7+<br />
0.7<br />
20.3+<br />
0.1<br />
(85ºC, 15 sec)<br />
Beta- Total<br />
carotene carotenoids<br />
1.8+ 27.0+<br />
0.1 0.8<br />
1.4+<br />
0.01<br />
23.6+<br />
0.01<br />
In the second experiment, use of pasteurization had no effect on<br />
individual carotenoids or on total carotenoid content of the juice<br />
(Table 3). Use of heat and pectinase in initial juice extraction slightly<br />
reduced lycopene, beta-carotene, and total carotenoid contents. When<br />
juice was concentrated to 42ºBrix, using 40 or 50ºC heat, all<br />
carotenoids were concentrated (Table 4). However, about 50% of<br />
beta-carotene was lost during heating. Isomerization of trans-lycopene<br />
to cis-lycopene was not found during pasteurization or heating (about<br />
4mg/kg cis-lycopene in all treatments). In tomato, exposure to heat<br />
during processing stabilizes lycopene, but can also cause losses of 9–<br />
28% of total lycopene with losses from lycopene oxidation or<br />
isomerization (Re et al., 2002; Takeoka et al., 2001; Stahl and Sies,<br />
1992). Abushita et al. (2000) found that heating raw tomatoes<br />
followed by dehydration into paste stabilized lycopene but decreased<br />
beta-carotene by 30%, much of which was due to isomerization. With<br />
watermelon, an increase to 9mg/kg beta-carotene was expected due to<br />
concentration to 42ºBrix (Table 4). <strong>The</strong> 50% lower yield of beta-<br />
carotene indicates a significant loss of this carotenoid during heating at<br />
40 or 50ºC.<br />
Table 4. Effects of heating juice to 40 or 50ºC on carotenoid content<br />
(mg/kg) of 42ºBrix unpasteurized juice concentrate.<br />
Beta- Total<br />
Temperature Treatment Total lycopene carotene carotenoids<br />
40ºC<br />
Cold macerate<br />
Heat (50ºC) +<br />
91.9±2.1 3.6±0.1 95.5±2.2<br />
enzyme<br />
111.2±6.3 4.6±0.01 119.0±6.4<br />
50ºC<br />
Cold macerate<br />
Heat (50ºC) +<br />
109.5±3.0 4.8±0.1 117.6±3.2<br />
enzyme<br />
94.8±1.7 3.6±0.1 98.4±1.8<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 589
Conclusions<br />
Recovery of lycopene from a juice product was approximately<br />
60% of the original fruit. Methods using heat and pectinase enzymes<br />
slightly increased juice recovery but reduced recovery of lycopene and<br />
total carotenoids. Heat pasteurization had no effect on lycopene loss<br />
but may have helped stabilize the color of the juice during storage.<br />
Watermelon juice products as a source of lycopene and beta-carotene<br />
were successfully developed.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Abushita, A. A., H. G. Daood, and P. A. Biacs. 2000. Change in carotenoids and<br />
antioxidant vitamins in tomato as a function of varietal and technological<br />
factors. J. Agri. Food Chem. 48:2075–2081.<br />
Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />
Prot. Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15.<br />
Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K. Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />
lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food Comp.<br />
Anal. 15:309–317.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K.Collins, A. R. Davis, and W. Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />
content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Ag. Food Chem. 54:2593–2597.<br />
Re, R., P. M. Bramley, and C. Rice-Evans. 2002. Effects of food processing on<br />
flavonoids and lycopene status in a Mediterranean tomato variety. Free Radical<br />
Res. 36:803–810.<br />
Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and b-<br />
carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />
Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />
Stahl, W. and H. Sies. 1992. Uptake of lycopene and its geometrical isomers is<br />
greater from heat-processed than from unprocessed tomato juice in humans. J.<br />
Nutr. 122:2161–2166.<br />
Takeoka, G. R., L. Dao, S. Flessa, D. M. Gillespie, W. T. Jewell, B. Huebner,<br />
D. Bertow, and S. E. Ebeler. 2001. Processing effects on lycopene content and<br />
antioxidant activity of tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:3713–3717.<br />
590 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
VARIATION IN CAROTENOIDS AMONG<br />
MINIWATERMELONS PRODUCED IN FOUR<br />
LOCATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S.<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie and Julie K. Collins<br />
USDA-ARS, South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory,<br />
Hwy 3W, Lane, OK 74555<br />
Richard L. Hassell<br />
Clemson University, Coastal Research and Education Center,<br />
2700 Davannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414<br />
Donald N. Maynard<br />
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida,<br />
14625 CR 672, Wimanma, FL 33598<br />
Jonathan Schultheis<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Dept. Horticultural Science,<br />
Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609<br />
Bill Jester<br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> <strong>State</strong> University, Dept. Horticultural Science, Specialty<br />
Crops Program, Cunningham Research Station, 202 Cunningham Rd.,<br />
Kinston, NC 28501<br />
Steve Olson<br />
<strong>North</strong> Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida,<br />
155 Research Rd., Quincy, FL 32351<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, lycopene, beta-carotene,<br />
environmental effects<br />
ABSTRACT. Eighteen miniwatermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cultivars or lines<br />
(cultigens), all representing mini size (less than 4kg), were grown in South and<br />
<strong>North</strong> Florida, South <strong>Carolina</strong>, and <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>. <strong>The</strong> watermelon was<br />
produced at each location using plasticulture (black plastic mulch and drip<br />
irrigation) at an in-row spacing of 0.46m and row center spacing of 2.7m.<br />
Fertilization and pest-management practices were varied according to<br />
recommendations for each state. Germplasm had the greatest effect on total<br />
lycopene content. A strong geographical production effect on total lycopene was<br />
detected, with fruit from the two Florida locations having 10 to 15mg/kg more<br />
lycopene than fruit from the other two locations. Two minimelon cultigens had<br />
unusually high beta-carotene levels. On average, minimelons have high amounts<br />
of lycopene, over 100mg/kg in some cultigens, and production environment can<br />
significantly affect lycopene content.<br />
S<br />
eedless watermelons usually contain more lycopene than seeded<br />
cultivars, and irrigation and growing season (winter/summer) can<br />
slightly affect lycopene content (Leskovar et al., 2004; Perkins-<br />
Veazie et al., 2001; 2006). Miniwatermelons have been marketed in the<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 591
U.S. for less than five years. <strong>The</strong>se fruit are characterized by their<br />
rounded shape, size (less than 4kg), high soluble solids content (SSC);<br />
they are usually seedless. A number of minimelons are now available<br />
from seed producers. <strong>The</strong> purpose of this study was to determine the<br />
total lycopene content among minimelon cultivars, and to determine if<br />
production environment affected lycopene content.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL AND PRODUCTION PRACTICES. Eighteen<br />
miniwatermelon cultivars and cultigens were grown in three replicated<br />
blocks at four locations in the eastern U.S.: Bradenton, FL; Quincy, FL;<br />
Kinston, NC; and Charleston, SC. Standard field cultural practices for<br />
each state/location were used for the growing season. Ten plants were<br />
planted in one replication. Three replications were used per location.<br />
Plots with missing plants were replanted approximately seven days after<br />
planting to achieve 100% stand in most cases. Spacing between row<br />
middles was 2.7m while in-row spacing was 46cm. Pollenizer plants of<br />
SP-1 were interplanted in the plots at plants 1, 4, and 7. Field conditions<br />
at each location are given in Table 1.<br />
Fruits were harvested when ripe, with most subsequent harvests<br />
being made on a weekly basis. Fruits were graded for shape and disease<br />
defects according to USDA grading standards. Watermelons were cut<br />
from blossom to stem end and through the ground spot. Tissue from the<br />
center of the fruit (heart and locular area) was removed and placed in<br />
Ziploc bags held on ice. Samples were quickly frozen at -20°C,<br />
shipped to Lane, OK, and held at-80°C until analyzed. <strong>The</strong> total number<br />
of watermelons sampled per cultivar and location ranged from 6 to 12.<br />
Five miniwatermelon cultivars were selected for carotenoid-profile<br />
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Watermelon Promotion<br />
Board and the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology<br />
(AP02(2)-i05). We thank the companies listed in Table 1 for providing seed. We thank<br />
Shelia Magby, Sheli Magby, Toni Magby, and Melissa O’Hern for their technical<br />
assistance. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for<br />
the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or<br />
endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of the<br />
U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without<br />
regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong><br />
article cited was prepared by a USDA employee as part of his/her official duties.<br />
Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not available for such works.<br />
Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that the private publication in<br />
which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not affect the material of the U.S.<br />
Government, which can be freely reproduced by the public.<br />
592 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
Table 1. Field conditions at each location.<br />
NC<br />
(Kinston)<br />
SC<br />
(Charleston)<br />
N. FL<br />
(Quincy)<br />
S. FL<br />
(Bradenton)<br />
Latitude/longitude (º) 77.5/35 80/32.8 85/30.5 82.8/26.2<br />
Soil type Norfolk<br />
sandy<br />
loam<br />
Final fertility<br />
(NPK kg/ha)<br />
Temperature (ºC)<br />
(max/min) 30 days<br />
from 10% bloom<br />
Yauhannah<br />
loamy fine<br />
sand<br />
Dothan<br />
loamy fine<br />
sand<br />
Eau Gallie<br />
fine sand<br />
84-45-168 120-80-120 164-22-136 167-45-167<br />
30/21 32/22 32/17 29/16<br />
Harvest dates 7/12–8/26 6/20–7/6 5/20–7/20 5/30–6/3<br />
determination by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se cultivars were selected as representatives of each seed company<br />
used in the variety trial. For HPLC analysis, five replicates, consisting<br />
of one to three fruit, were used from each variety and location.<br />
LYCOPENE, SSC, AND PH MEASUREMENT. Frozen watermelon<br />
tissue (40g per melon) was pureed using a tissue homogenizer. <strong>The</strong> pH<br />
of purees was taken using an Orion 8950 electrode and Orion pH meter.<br />
SSC was measured by placing about 0.5ml of puree on a digital<br />
refractometer (Atago PR 100). A 0.2- to 0.5-g sample of puree was<br />
extracted with hexane:ethanol:acetone (2:2:1 v/v), following the<br />
methods of Sadler et al. (1990) and a modified micromethod developed<br />
by Fish et al., (2002). One extraction was sufficient to <strong>complete</strong>ly<br />
remove color. <strong>The</strong> maximum absorbance of lycopene in hexane is at<br />
471nm, with an additional absorption peak at 503nm. <strong>The</strong> 503-nm<br />
wavelength was used to prevent measuring beta-carotene absorption,<br />
which can occur at 471nm. HPLC was used to check lycopene<br />
concentrations of five samples from each study, using the method of<br />
Craft (2001). Tomato lycopene from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and<br />
synthetic trans lycopene from Lycovit (BASF) were used to verify<br />
spectra and calculate lycopene concentrations. Lycopene was also<br />
measured using a scanning colorimetric method with a Hunter XE xenon<br />
colorimeter (Hunter Associates, Reston,VA). In this method, watermelon<br />
puree was placed in a cuvette and absorbance was measured at<br />
560 and 700nm (Davis et al., 2003). Absorbance was plotted against<br />
lycopene values extracted with hexane to generate the slope, which is<br />
then used to calculate lycopene in the puree (total<br />
lycopene=39.5*[abs560-abs700].<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 593
Data from the <strong>complete</strong>ly randomized block design were subjected<br />
to analysis of variance (SAS v. 8.2, Cary, NC) using a general linear<br />
means model. When significant interactions were found between main<br />
effects, means were separated using REGWQ, P
with more vine resources enhancing carbohydrate allocation and<br />
carotenoid synthesis.<br />
Carotenoid profiles of the five minimelon varieties show strong<br />
similarities between ‘Xite’ and ‘Mohican’ (Table 3). <strong>The</strong>se fruit were<br />
high in lycopene and total carotenoids. ‘Precious Petite’ fruit, although<br />
visibly red without an orange tint, had unusually high amounts of betacarotene.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se levels of beta-carotene are higher than those found in<br />
orange-tinted overripe red-fleshed watermelon. It may be desirable to<br />
enhance beta-carotene without affecting visible color as beta-carotene is<br />
a vitamin A precursor, and is necessary for healthy eyesight.<br />
Watermelon currently have 10% vitamin A in a serving size (considered<br />
a ‘good’ source); increasing vitamin A to a consistent 20% per serving<br />
would improve the nutritional labeling to the “excellent” level.<br />
Phytofluene content was higher in the high lycopene cultivars ‘Xite’ and<br />
‘Mohican’, most likely an indicator of increased lycopene synthesis.<br />
Soluble solids content and pH are indicators of ripeness, and the high<br />
average for the four locations indicates full fruit ripeness (Table 3).<br />
Conclusions<br />
All seedless miniwatermelons tested exceeded 50 mg/kg lycopene,<br />
and would provide the suggested lycopene intake of 25 mg/day in a 2cup<br />
serving (~ 500g). Five of the miniwatermelons had enhanced<br />
lycopene content when produced in Florida compared to the <strong>Carolina</strong>s.<br />
This geographic difference was unexpected and indicates germplasm<br />
sensitivity to production environment.<br />
Table 3. Carotenoid profiles (mg/kg), SSC, and pH of puree from five<br />
minimelon cultivars averaged over the four geographic locations.<br />
Total CisBeta- Total<br />
lycolycocaroPhytocaro- SSC<br />
Cultivar penepenetenefluenetenoids (%) pH<br />
Xite 96.2a 8.1a 4.0b 7.4a 108.8a 12.6a 6.2<br />
Mohican 92.5a 12.0a 3.4b 6.3b 102.2a 11.7b 6.1<br />
Petite<br />
Treat<br />
62.8b 7.8a 4.4b 5.6b 68.2b 11.8b 6.2<br />
Precious<br />
Petite<br />
68.2b 9.7a 6.1a 5.9b 70.7b 12.3a 6.0<br />
Vanessa 71.5b 8.9a 3.2b 4.3c 79.6b 12.1ab 5.9<br />
Means separated within columns by REGWQ, P
Literature Cited<br />
Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />
Prot. in Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15.<br />
Davis, A. R., W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method for<br />
analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />
Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K.Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />
lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food<br />
Comp. Anal. 15:309–317.<br />
Leskovar, D., H. Bang, K. Crosby, N. Maness, A. Franco, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2004.<br />
Lycopene, carbohydrates, ascorbic acid and yield components of<br />
diploid and triploid watermelon cultivars are affected by limited irrigation. J.<br />
Hort. Sci. Biotech. 79:75–81.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene<br />
content differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agri.<br />
81:983–987.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, A. Davis, W. and Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />
content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:2593-2597.<br />
Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and b-<br />
carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />
Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />
596 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
WATERMELON CAROTENOID CONTENT IN<br />
RESPONSE TO GERMPLASM, MATURITY,<br />
AND STORAGE<br />
Penelope Perkins-Veazie, Julie K. Collins, and Angela Davis<br />
U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service<br />
South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory,<br />
Lane, OK 74555<br />
Niels Maness<br />
Department of Horticulture<br />
Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University, Stillwater, OK 74074<br />
Warren Roberts<br />
Oklahoma <strong>State</strong> University<br />
Wes Watkins Research and Extension Center,<br />
Lane, OK 74555<br />
ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Citrullus lanatus, carotenoids, shelf life, triploid<br />
melon, seedless, genotype<br />
ABSTRACT. Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) contain high amounts of lycopene,<br />
the pigment that imparts red color to some fruits. Lycopene is a highly efficient<br />
oxygen radical scavenger and has been implicated in human studies as<br />
providing protection against cardiovascular disease and some cancers,<br />
particularly that of the prostate. Over the last six years, we have evaluated<br />
4,000 fruit from 80 cultivars to determine the effects of germplasm, ripeness,<br />
and storage on lycopene content. Watermelon lycopene is most affected by fruit<br />
maturity and germplasm; fruit about 7 days from full ripeness had 10–20% less<br />
lycopene. Postharvest storage of whole watermelon at room temperature<br />
enhanced lycopene content while fresh-cut watermelon lost about 10%,<br />
probably from membrane breakdown and lycopene oxidation. <strong>The</strong> results from<br />
these studies indicate that watermelon lycopene is highly dependent on<br />
germplasm and ripeness stage. Lycopene content is relatively stable in fresh-cut<br />
fruit and can be influenced by storage temperature in intact watermelon.<br />
A<br />
diet rich in fruits and vegetables has been linked to reduced<br />
incidence of some chronic diseases such as atherosclerosis and<br />
cancers (Joshipura et al., 2001; Steinmetz and Potter, 1996).<br />
<strong>The</strong> reasons for this relationship appear to be multifaceted and may<br />
include natural plant phytochemicals that act as electron scavengers in<br />
photosynthesis, and/or detoxification agents.<br />
Lycopene, a red pigment of the carotenoid class found in only a<br />
few fruits and vegetables, is a powerful singlet oxygen scavenger and<br />
highly effective antioxidant (Gerster, 1997). A high dietary intake of<br />
tomatoes, rich in lycopene content, is associated with a lower risk of<br />
certain cancers, primarily of the prostate (Giovannucci, 2002).<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 597
Watermelon and tomatoes are the most familiar sources of lycopene in<br />
the Western diet, containing on average 46 and 31mg lycopene/kg<br />
fresh weight, respectively (USDA National Nutrient Database for<br />
Standard Reference, Release 18, 2005).<br />
Most watermelon sold in the U.S. is consumed fresh, with 50 to<br />
80% of this sold as seedless (National Watermelon Promotion Board,<br />
2005, personal communication). Much of the fresh market fruit is<br />
shipped around the U.S., and shelf life of intact fruit is expected to be<br />
7 to 21 days (Rushing et al., 2001). Minimally processed (cut or<br />
cubed) watermelon represents about 20–30% of watermelon sales in<br />
the U.S, but can be as high as 80% of watermelon sales in other<br />
countries. <strong>The</strong> objectives of our work over the last six years have been<br />
to determine the genotype, germplasm, and ripeness effects on<br />
lycopene, and to determine the stability of lycopene in stored and cut<br />
(minimally processed) watermelon.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
PLANT MATERIAL. Experiments were conducted at the South<br />
Central Agricultural Laboratory in Lane, OK. Types of melons<br />
sampled included seeded heirloom (such as ‘Black Diamond’); seeded<br />
hybrid (such as ‘Summer Flavor 800’); seedless (such as ‘Tri-X-313’);<br />
seeded pollinators (such as ‘Minipool’), and seedless miniwatermelons<br />
(such as ‘Extazy’). About 4,000 watermelons have been sampled from<br />
1999 to 2005. About 10 to 20 fruit per cultivar per year were sampled<br />
to determine the relative lycopene content. Fruit were cut transversely<br />
through the ground spot and watermelon center and 100–300g tissue<br />
was sampled from heart and locular areas and held at<br />
-80 o C until analyzed.<br />
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Watermelon Promotion<br />
Board, the Initiative for Future Agricultural Farming Systems (IFAFS Agreement<br />
No. 00-521021-9635), and the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science<br />
and Technology (AP02(2)-i05). Mention of trade names or commercial products in<br />
this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not<br />
imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All<br />
programs and services of the U.S. Department of Agriculture are offered on a<br />
nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex,<br />
age, marital status, or handicap. <strong>The</strong> article cited was prepared by a USDA employee<br />
as part of his/her official duties. Copyright protection under U.S. copyright law is not<br />
available for such works. Accordingly, there is no copyright to transfer. <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />
the private publication in which the article appears is itself copyrighted does not<br />
affect the material of the U.S. Government, which can be freely reproduced by the<br />
public.<br />
598 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006
GERMPLASM, GENOTYPE, AND RIPENESS STUDIES. Six cultivars<br />
were selected for ripeness studies, using 10 to 20 watermelons per<br />
underripe, ripe, and overripe stage. Underripe melons were about 7<br />
days from fully ripe and overripe about 7 days past ideal ripeness, as<br />
judged by flesh color (pale red in underripe to orange in overripe),<br />
texture (firm or mealy/slimy), odor/taste (green taste in underripe and<br />
pumpkinlike in overripe), and sweetness (at least 9% soluble solids<br />
content for fully ripe). More details on analysis of these melons can be<br />
found in Perkins-Veazie et al. (2001, 2006).<br />
STORAGE AND FRESH-CUT STUDIES. For storage studies, 10 uncut<br />
melons per cultivar and temperature treatment of ripe fruit of seedless<br />
and hybrid seeded cultivars (‘Sugar Shack’ and ‘Summer Flavor 800’)<br />
were placed at 5, 13, or 21°C for 0 or 14 days, tissue was sampled as<br />
described above, and lycopene and soluble solids analyzed as<br />
described below. To determine effects of minimal processing on<br />
lycopene stability, 20 melons each of the above were cut in half and<br />
cubes of 3cm 3 flesh placed in sealed plastic boxes held at 2°C for 10<br />
days in darkness. <strong>The</strong> same melon was used to fill one box replicate<br />
for 0 and 10 days (Perkins-Veazie and Collins, 2004).<br />
LYCOPENE AND SOLUBLE SOLIDS CONTENT MEASUREMENT.<br />
Frozen watermelon tissue (40g per melon) was pureed using a tissue<br />
homogenizer. Soluble solids content was determined by placing 0.5ml<br />
puree on a digital refractometer (Atago PR100).<br />
A 0.2- to 0.5-g sample was extracted with hexane:ethanol:acetone<br />
(2:2:1 v/v), following the methods of Sadler et al. (1990) and a<br />
modified micromethod developed by Fish et al., (2002). One<br />
extraction was sufficient to <strong>complete</strong>ly remove color. Absorbance of<br />
hexane extracts was measured at 503nm by spectrophotometer<br />
(Shimazdu UV160). Lycopene purees were placed in cuvettes and also<br />
measured using a scanning colorimetric method with a Hunter XE<br />
xenon colorimeter (Hunter Associates, Reston, VA) (Davis et al.,<br />
2003). Absorbance at 560nm was plotted against lycopene values<br />
extracted with hexane to generate the slope, which is then used to<br />
calculate lycopene in the puree (total lycopene=39.5*[abs560-abs750].<br />
High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to<br />
determine carotenoid profiles of cultivar subsets in triplicate using a<br />
modified method of Craft (2001), as outlined in Perkins-Veazie et al.<br />
(2006). Tomato lycopene and carrot beta-carotene from Sigma (St.<br />
Louis, MO) and synthetic trans-lycopene from Lycovit (BASF) were<br />
used to verify spectra and calculate lycopene concentrations.<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006 599
STATISTICS. All studies were designed as randomized <strong>complete</strong><br />
block or factorial experiments. Data were subjected to ANOVA and a<br />
general linear model was used (SAS, v. 9.0, Cary, NC). Means were<br />
separated by REGWQ, P12 32.5 to 69.2c 0.1 to 3.0<br />
Hybrid, seeded<br />
Minipollenizer,<br />
6 to 12 45.5 to 92.7ab 0.8 to 9.3<br />
seeded 4 45.5 to 100.5ab 0.8 to 7.4<br />
(minimelon)
Table 2. Range of total lycopene content among ripeness stages of<br />
watermelon; underripe is about 7 days from full ripeness and overripe<br />
is 7 days past ideal ripeness.<br />
Total lycopene content (mg/kg)<br />
Stage<br />
Genotype<br />
Heirloom seeded<br />
Underripe Ripe Overripe<br />
(Black Diamond)<br />
Hybrid seeded (Summer<br />
26.0b 35.7a 32.8a<br />
Flavor 800; Dumara) 49.2b 55.8a 57.3a<br />
Seedless (Tri-X-313)<br />
Pollenizer,<br />
51.2b 65.5a 60.4ab<br />
seeded (Minipool)<br />
Seedless minimelon<br />
48.0ab 63.8a 53.4ab<br />
(Xite; Valdoria) 72.5b 90.3a 94.6a<br />
Means separated within row and genotype by REGWQ, P
(64 to 60mg/kg) (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2004). This loss may have<br />
been from degradation of cut surfaces exposed to air during storage,<br />
with oxidation of lycopene, or from chilling injury. Soluble solids<br />
content slightly decreased (0.5 to 1%) for most samples after storage<br />
(data not shown).<br />
Conclusions<br />
Red-fleshed watermelon consistently has large amounts of<br />
lycopene per unit fresh weight, although amounts are dependent on the<br />
germplasm and ripeness of the fruit. Holding uncut fruit at room<br />
temperature increased lycopene and beta-carotene contents.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Craft, N. 2001. Chromatographic techniques for carotenoid separation. Curr.<br />
Prot. Food Anal. Chem. F2.3.1–F2.3.15.<br />
Davis, A. R., W. Fish, and P. Perkins-Veazie. 2003. A rapid hexane-free method<br />
for analyzing lycopene content in watermelon. J. Food Sci. 68:328–332.<br />
Fish, W., P. Perkins-Veazie, and J. K.Collins. 2002. A quantitative assay for<br />
lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food<br />
Comp. Anal. 15:309–317.<br />
Gerster, H. 1997. <strong>The</strong> potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Amer.<br />
Coll. Nutr. 16:109–126.<br />
Giovannucci, E. 2002. A review of epidemiologic studies of tomatoes, lycopene,<br />
and prostate cancer. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood). 227:852–859.<br />
Joshipura, K. J., F. B. Hu, and J. E. Manson. 2001. <strong>The</strong> effect of fruit and vegetable<br />
intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 134:1106–1114.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P. and J. K. Collins. 2004. Flesh quality and lycopene stability of<br />
fresh-cut watermelon. Postharv. Biol. Tech. 31:159–166.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, A. Davis, and W. Roberts. 2006. Carotenoid<br />
content of 50 watermelon cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:2593–2597.<br />
Perkins-Veazie, P., J. K. Collins, S. D. Pair, and W. Roberts. 2001. Lycopene<br />
content differs among red-fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric.<br />
81:983–987.<br />
Rushing, J. W., J. M. Fonseca, and A. P. Keinath. 2001. Harvesting and<br />
postharvest handling. In: D. N. Maynard (ed.). Watermelons: characteristics,<br />
production, and marketing. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.<br />
Sadler, G., J. Davis, and D. Dezman. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and b-<br />
carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J.<br />
Food Sci. 55:1460–1461.<br />
Showalter, R. K. 1960. Watermelon color as affected by maturity and storage.<br />
Proc. Fla. <strong>State</strong> Hort. Soc. 73:289–293.<br />
Showalter, R. K., S. A. Harmon, B. B. Brantely, D. W. Newson, and J. F. Pittman.<br />
1955.<br />
Changes in Congo watermelons after harvest. Proc. Assoc. South. Agric.<br />
Wrkrs. 52:136–137.<br />
Steinmetz, K. A., and J. D. Potter. 1996. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention:<br />
a review. J. Amer. Diet. Assoc. 96:1027–39.<br />
USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 18. 2005.<br />
.<br />
602 <strong>Cucurbit</strong>aceae 2006