21.07.2013 Views

the churches and southern africa - KORA

the churches and southern africa - KORA

the churches and southern africa - KORA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SACTU APPEALS FOR SOLIDARITY AT THE ILO<br />

MEETING<br />

At <strong>the</strong> June meeting of <strong>the</strong> International Labor<br />

Organization in Geneva, <strong>the</strong> South African Congress of<br />

Trade Unions appealed for solidarity with <strong>the</strong> struggle of<br />

black workers in South Africa. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong><br />

I LO's director-general called for a "fundamental<br />

transformation of South Africa into a society offering<br />

equal rights <strong>and</strong> opportunities, <strong>and</strong> a just share in its<br />

wealth, to all its citizens."<br />

Mr. Mark William Shope, Secretary General, <strong>and</strong> M s.<br />

Ray Alex<strong>and</strong>er executive committee member,<br />

represented SACTU at <strong>the</strong> I LO meeting, which was<br />

attended by delegates from governments, employers<br />

organizations, <strong>and</strong> labor unions from most countries. In a<br />

memor<strong>and</strong>um circulated to all delegates, SACTU asked<br />

for assistance in winning certain basic rights:<br />

1. Democratic rights-one man, one vote.<br />

2. Abolition of pass laws-<strong>the</strong> badge of slavery.<br />

3. The legal recognition of African trade unions. The<br />

right to collective bargaining <strong>and</strong> to strike.<br />

4. The abolition of industrial color bars.<br />

5. The obolition of migratory labor systems.<br />

6. The abolition of <strong>the</strong> compound (barracks) system.<br />

7. No sale of arms to South Africa.<br />

8. No trade with South Africa.<br />

9. No technicians or any skilled manpower to go to<br />

South Africa.<br />

(Sources: SACTU memor<strong>and</strong>um; excerpts have been<br />

published in U.N. Document 14/72, Unit on Apar<strong>the</strong>id,<br />

ILO Director General, U.N. Document 13/72, Unit on<br />

Apar<strong>the</strong>id.)<br />

BOO K REVIE W<br />

INSIPE NAMIBIA: a booklet published on US Business<br />

in I/mibia<br />

The Africa Fund (associated with <strong>the</strong> American<br />

Committee on Africa) has joined with <strong>the</strong> Program to<br />

Combat Racism of <strong>the</strong> World Council of Churches to<br />

publish a booklet entitled NAMIBIA: U.S. CORPORATE<br />

INVOLVEMENT. Beginning with a brief economic<br />

portrait of <strong>the</strong> territory, <strong>the</strong> publication presents a survey<br />

of American policy, investment, exploration, <strong>and</strong> trade.<br />

Detailed treatment is given to <strong>the</strong> Tsumeb Corporation<br />

owned by Newmont Mining Corporation <strong>and</strong> American<br />

Metals Climax.<br />

Authors Winifred Courtney .<strong>and</strong> Jennifer Davis<br />

conclude that a neutral role for U.S. Corporations is<br />

impossible. The basic conflict between African people <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> white minority government dictates that foreign<br />

business activity "plays an important role in bolstering<br />

<strong>the</strong> illegal South African regime. " by contributing taxes<br />

<strong>and</strong> foreign exchange. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, it legitimizes South<br />

Africa's political control <strong>and</strong> depletes non-renewable<br />

mineral resources.<br />

The 32-page pamphlet calls for <strong>the</strong> education <strong>and</strong><br />

mobilization of many thous<strong>and</strong>s of Americans "to end<br />

U.S. aid <strong>and</strong> comfort for South African racism." It can be<br />

ordered from The Africa Fund, 164 Madison Avenue,<br />

New York, N.Y. 10016 at a cost of $.50 each.<br />

INSIDE<br />

NAMIBIA<br />

NAMIBIA STIFFENS RESISTANCE TO SOUTH<br />

AFRICAN CONTROL<br />

In a joint statement released by <strong>the</strong> headmen <strong>and</strong> tribal<br />

executive, <strong>the</strong> Damara people of Namibia have refused to<br />

accept South Africa's proposal to grant "partial<br />

self-government" to <strong>the</strong>ir designated homel<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

territory's far northwest. Only about 10% of <strong>the</strong> 60,000<br />

Damaras live in <strong>the</strong> prescribed area.<br />

The proposal is part of a South African scheme to<br />

divide Namibia into 12 separate areas for <strong>the</strong> African<br />

population, <strong>the</strong>reby diffusing organized opposition to<br />

occupation by South Africa. In late June <strong>the</strong><br />

Government-appointed Chief Councilor of <strong>the</strong> Ovambos,<br />

whose people form <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> Namibian<br />

population, announced that Pretoria had fixed a timetable<br />

to grant a larger measure of autonomy to <strong>the</strong> Ovambo<br />

area.<br />

Damaras are <strong>the</strong> second largest ethnic group in <strong>the</strong><br />

territory, <strong>and</strong> up to now have been regarded by <strong>the</strong> South<br />

African Government as compliant. The Johannesburg Star<br />

sees <strong>the</strong> Damaras' rejection of <strong>the</strong> Bantustan plan as "an<br />

ultimatum which threatens to wreck its plans to apply its<br />

policy of multinational development to <strong>the</strong>ir people."<br />

(Aug. 7, 1972)<br />

The statement described <strong>the</strong> "so-called Damara<br />

homel<strong>and</strong>" as part of a policy under which "we are being<br />

systematically disinherited <strong>and</strong> made strangers in our<br />

l<strong>and</strong>." Characterizing <strong>the</strong>ir situation as "a form of<br />

slavery," <strong>the</strong>y maintained that <strong>the</strong> country belonged to all<br />

of its people, <strong>and</strong> could not be divided. "We are<br />

dissatisfied with South African administration <strong>and</strong> will<br />

never be satisfied with it," <strong>the</strong>y said.<br />

Like <strong>the</strong> Ovambos, Damaras had been taken for<br />

granted by <strong>the</strong> white Government, which appoints <strong>and</strong><br />

maintains tribal "chiefs" to echo official policy. The<br />

myth of Ovambo acquiescence was shattered last<br />

December when a strike by 15,000 contract laborers<br />

crippled Namibia's economy, halting work at mines <strong>and</strong><br />

factories for three months. In <strong>the</strong> aftermath of <strong>the</strong> strike,<br />

South Africa overhauled <strong>the</strong> system which guaranteed<br />

cheap labor to white-owned industries, <strong>and</strong> set up labor<br />

bureaus to replace <strong>the</strong> centralized South West African<br />

Native Labour Association.<br />

Changes were largely cosmetic, however, <strong>and</strong> it is <strong>the</strong><br />

regulations accompanying <strong>the</strong> restructuring which have<br />

provoked Damara leaders. Among <strong>the</strong> new requirements is<br />

compulsory registration of black women for work in <strong>the</strong><br />

white-controlled towns.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!