21.07.2013 Views

Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sanctification; for in both cases a believer testifies to a work consciously wrought in him by the<br />

power of the Holy Spirit. Fancy and fanaticism are deeply seated in human nature. Nevertheless,<br />

experience is experience. Unless Methodists have wholly misread the Bible, it teaches the working<br />

of the mighty power of God in human souls. If it is a reality, we cannot but know it. If it is a<br />

delusion, let us give up at once and forever the contention that religion is the life of God in the soul<br />

of man, and deny that men are partakers of the divine nature. When freed from self-deception and<br />

the possible admixtures of error imposed from without by traditional formulas, in the light of which<br />

another seeks to lead the subject of experience to explain it, experience stands in the soul itself for<br />

indisputable reality -- otherwise all the personal religious foundations are gone. If there are not<br />

verifiable certainties of Christian experience, Methodism has been from the beginning a stupendous<br />

blunder. The late Dr. R. W. Dale, in his "Living Christ and the Four Gospels," gives a vivid picture<br />

of the dissipation of a Christian scholar's doubts by a plain man's experience. The learned divine<br />

leaves his study and finds his way to a humble home where "he sits by the side of some poor, aged,<br />

and illiterate man, whose strength is slowly wasting, and the conditions of whose life are very<br />

cheerless; but the old man had traveled by the same path that all the saints have traveled. As the<br />

scholar listened, he could recall, at point after point, identical experiences of his own. It was as if the<br />

man were telling the story of years which he had spent in some foreign country which the scholar<br />

also had visited. They had seen the same cities and harbors and churches and palaces, the same ruins,<br />

the same mountains and rivers, the same crops, the same trees and flowers. The old man's account<br />

of them was very different from what his own account would have been, the old man's theories and<br />

explanations of them and his own were still more different, but it was certain that what he had seen<br />

the old man had seen."<br />

The doctrinal rather than the experimental presentation of Christian truth has characterized for<br />

the most part the method of theologians. To this rule, John Wesley, as in so many other particulars,<br />

was a noteworthy exception: in few other things have his wisdom and independence, his common<br />

sense and courage, been more conspicuously displayed. The Christian consciousness, with its<br />

well-defined peculiarities, of which many German theologians since Schleiermacher's day have made<br />

so much -- some of them seeking to draw the entire system of dogmatics from this source -- had in<br />

Wesley's time been ignored or underestimated. As in many questions of Biblical criticism, both as<br />

to method and results, the founder of Methodism anticipated some of the most recent advances of<br />

the highest scholarship -- compare his text emendations and translations in his "Notes on the New<br />

Testament" with the Revised Version of 1881 -- so he was one of the earliest theologians and<br />

religious teachers to draw attention to the doctrinal as well as the practical value of religious<br />

experience, and to insist on the evidential value of the Christian consciousness. Every thoughtful<br />

reader of that most marvelous record of apostolic activities outside the Holy Scriptures, Wesley's<br />

Journal, must have been struck with the confirmation of his own faith which John Wesley derived<br />

from the experiences of the people called Methodists whom God raised up under his ministry.<br />

Dr. Brooks seems to me to have kept in the main to the well-defined truths of Wesleyan<br />

orthodoxy on the subject of entire sanctification. He is not only Wesleyan, but, what is better, he is<br />

scriptural, devoting his first eleven chapters to "the removing of those things that are shaken, as of<br />

things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain." Whatever be the<br />

advance in modern forms of statement, it is necessary to allow that the essential, delivering truths<br />

of the gospel have been recognized in their true light, and realized in their appointed power, since

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!