21.07.2013 Views

ABSTRACT ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURES OPERATIONS AND ...

ABSTRACT ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURES OPERATIONS AND ...

ABSTRACT ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURES OPERATIONS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ationals from the integers. This make it possible to take the stand that you<br />

can define the rationals if only you take the integers for granted. This fits into<br />

a program where you want to have all concepts defined. This includes a way of<br />

constructing the integers from the natural numbers. And so on till you reach<br />

the foundations of mathematic based on set theory. But this is quite another<br />

story to be told in another afsnit.<br />

It is them important to say that the construction can be used in a lot of other<br />

cases, where we don’t have the result of the construction already.<br />

First we have to clarify the notions with the following<br />

145. Definition: Field of fractions<br />

Let R be a ring and let L be et field. Suppose there exists an injective homomorphism<br />

i : R → L where L is the underlying ring with the property that any<br />

x ∈ L may be written in the form i(p)/i(q) where p and q are in R. Now we<br />

use i to identify R with i(R), that is we consider p and i(p) to be the same.<br />

Then R is a subring of L and any element in L can be written in the form p/q,<br />

where p and q belongs to R. We shall say that L via i is a field of fractions for<br />

R. We shall call i the associated embedding of R into L<br />

Now follows the construction, which has the form of a<br />

146. Theorem: Existence of field of fractions<br />

There exists a field of fractions for the ring R if and only if R is an integral<br />

domain<br />

Proof : The necessity of the condition follows from the fact that L as a field<br />

is also an integral domain and so the i(R) as a substructure of an integral<br />

domain is itself an integral domain, and then of course this also holds for R by<br />

isomorphism.<br />

To prove the sufficiency assume that R is an integral domain.<br />

We define the set S = {(p, q) ∈ R × R : q ̸= 0}. On S we define an addition<br />

+ by the assignment (a, b) + (c, d) = (ad + bc, bd) and a multiplication by<br />

the assignment (a, b)(c, d) = (ac, bd). That this in fact defines operations rely<br />

heavily on R being an integral domain, since the non existence of zero divisors<br />

ensures that bd ̸= 0. We also define the opposite operation −(a, b) = (−a, b)<br />

and a reciprocal operation (a, b) −1 = (b, a). Finally we define a zero element<br />

(0, 1) and et unit-element (1, 1).<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!