THE BIJLMER CRASH - JOE VIALLS - CAUGHT IN A LIE.

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Bijlmer Crash - Joe Vialls - Caught In A Lie. map of Amsterdam. Advertisements Here is a link to further information on the Bijlmer crash, http://members.ams.chello.nl/j.wiersema2/bijlmer Low Cost Internet Services And if you have not read the following article, Get one you FREE should. month of Dialup Access! A Detailed Analysis of whether a Boeing Low 757 Cost hit the Web Pentagon. Hosting Accounts. Mention Nerdcities.com and get the Setup Fee waived! Click HERE! Pentagon Attack Plane Was An El Al Lookalike Page 6 sur 14 To advertise here or on a pop-under, please contact staff@nerdcities.com Flights 77 and 1862 more information. both had "vanishing" wings Joe Vialls, May 2002 El Al Flight 1862, Amsterdam American Airlines Flight 77, Pentagon El Al Flight 1862, Amsterdam Many weeks ago I wrote a report designed to rebut arcane French suggestions that American Airlines Flight 77 did not strike the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. According to the French, the building was allegedly hit either by a much smaller aircraft, or perhaps by a bomb planted inside the Pentagon by its own "evil" occupants, the United States Military. Though I was not surprised by such extraordinary suggestions from a bunch of wine swilling Parisians, I was certainly surprised by the immediate and rampant American response. Within days, hundreds of US bulletin boards and web sites were awash with similar claims. It was an incredibly successful "divide and rule" exercise that pitted American against American, and civilian against soldier. Needless to say, the French were delighted. Why were they delighted Joe? Do they plan to divide and RULE the US? The apparent problem was quite simple. American Airlines Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 twin-jet with a http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/Bijlmer/ 17/11/2002
The Bijlmer Crash - Joe Vialls - Caught In A Lie. Page 7 sur 14 wingspan of 124 feet, but the hole in the Pentagon was less than 124 feet across. Actually, since the aircraft hit the Pentagon at an angle of about 45 degrees, the hole should have been roughly 177 feet across. It was in fact about half this width. Conspiracy heaven! You bet! Obviously then, according to those determined to undermine American national security, the attack aircraft was a remotely-controlled F -16 fighter or Martell missile, almost certainly guided to its American military target by a crazed four-star American general buried deep inside Cheyenne Mountain at NORAD headquarters. So, uncle Joe, everyone who wants an answer to the questions that have been raised, are "obviously", out to undermine American national security. Uncle Joe is paranoid. My original report (Joe's disinformation) sought to stem this rising tide of disinformation by using the personal example of a British Mach 2 Lightning fighter with a wingspan of 35 feet, which vanished completely into a hole in the ground with a diameter of only 22 feet. Unfortunately I could not prove this with a photo because the 400 mph Lightning crash occurred at the height of the Cold War, and anyone [including me] caught taking happy snaps of the impact crater with a Brownie box camera, would probably still be locked up in the Tower of London today. This paragraph (as you may have already concluded for yourself) is just bullshit to cover the fact that Joe couldn't back up the claims that he had made earlier. What I should have done instead, was conduct a simple Internet search for photographs of civil equivalents of this exact phenomena where a big plane vanishes into a small hole. Joe thinks that finding a picture of an aircraft crash where the width of the impact hole is less than the wingspan, somehow implies that the wings of the plane ended up in the hole. An absolutely ridiculous assumption, but that's Joe for you. So should the French... Not far north of the wine-swilling Parisians lies the elegant Dutch city of Amsterdam, whose residents had a terrible shock at 6:35 PM on October 4, 1992. Henk Prijt in the suburb of Bijlmer put it this way: "We were in the living room, watching the sports program on television, like so many others in our neighborhood did that Sunday evening. It was a few minutes after sunset when I noticed an airplane flying low. Low-flying airliners are nothing special here since we live near Schiphol and the route over our heads is one of the busiest for Amsterdam airport." "But this particular plane did something strange: it flew in the wrong direction. I didn't pay much attention and it flew out of my sight. Shortly after, however, there it was again, coming right at us as we stared out of the window. My son yelled and dashed for the back of the house. As he looked out the door he saw something no one should ever have to see: the huge plane plunging into the next block, some 250 meters to the east of our building." What Henk Prijt Junior saw was Israeli El Al Flight 1862, a massive 747 Jumbo freighter with a wingspan of 212 feet, crashing horizontally into the apartment block. This outright lie has been dealt with above. At the point of impact in Bijlmer, El Al Flight 1862 weighed 680,000 pounds, roughly three times the gross weight of American Airlines Flight 77 when it crashed into the Pentagon Shortly after take-off from Amsterdam for Tel Aviv, the Israeli jumbo lost both starboard [right side] engine pods, and was attempting to return for an emergency landing on Schipol Airport's runway 27. We know from the official accident reports that although now fatally under powered, El Al Flight 1862 remained under control while descending into the building, and thus was horizontally orientated at the point of impact. The outright lie, again. "At 17.27:30, as the aircraft was climbing through 6500ft, the no.3 engine and pylon separated from the wing in an outward and rearward movement, colliding with the no.4 engine causing this engine and pylon to separate as well (incidently, this is physically impossible). An emergency was declared and the crew acknowledged their intention to return to Schiphol Airport and reported that they had a no.3 engine failure and a loss of engine thrust of both no.3 and 4 engine". "At 17.28.57 the Amsterdam Radar controller informed the crew that runway 06 was in use with a 040 deg / 21kts wind. The crew however requested runway 27 for landing. A straight in approach to runway 27 was not possible because of airplane altitude (5000ft) and distance to the runway (7mls). The Amsterdam Arrival controller then instructed the crew to turn right heading 360deg and descend to 2000ft. During this descending turn the El Al crew reported that the no.3 and 4 engine were out and that they were having flap problems". "Final clearance was given to turn right heading 270 to intercept the final approach course. When it became apparent that the aircraft was going to overshoot the localizer, the controller informed the crew accordingly and directed them to turn to heading 290 to try and intercept the final approach path again". "A further instruction was given a 310 heading and descent clearance for 1500ft. These instructions were acknowledged and the crew added that they were experiencing control problems now as well. While reducing speed for the final approach, control was lost and the aircraft crashed into an apartment building in the Bijlmer suburb of Amsterdam." Though the photos at the top of this page are good enough to illustrate the points I intend to make, larger ones would have been much better. The photos at the top of this article do not illustrate his points at all. Also, it is interesting to note that Joe had to reduce the size of all the photos he says illustrate his points. I had no trouble finding the same photos, and have reproduced them above at the same size that they appear on the various web-sites on which I found them. Unfortunately, someone seems to have done a good job of "scrubbing" the Internet of these images. Even the British BBC had managed to "accidentally" break the links to its better photographs of the crash site. Bearing in mind what was on board the El Al plane, and its final destination, this is hardly surprising. The Israelis and friends at work. Nestled amongst the mostly innocuous cargo on board the jumbo was 50 GALLONS of dimethyl methylphosphonate, intended for Sarin nerve gas production at the Jewish Chemical and Biological Weapons http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/Bijlmer/ 17/11/2002
Page 1 and 2: The Bijlmer Crash - Joe Vialls - Ca
Page 5: The Bijlmer Crash - Joe Vialls - Ca

THE BIJLMER CRASH - JOE VIALLS - CAUGHT IN A LIE.

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?