25.07.2013 Views

Measuring National Level Logistics Costs - International Transport ...

Measuring National Level Logistics Costs - International Transport ...

Measuring National Level Logistics Costs - International Transport ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ITF Summit 2012, Leipzig, May 2, 2012<br />

Side Event: <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Measurement<br />

<strong>Measuring</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Costs</strong><br />

Overview of Worldwide Empirical Evidence<br />

Presented by Prof. Lauri Ojala<br />

Turku School of Economics at the University of Turku, Finland<br />

Lauri.ojala@utu.fi


A comprehensive overview<br />

By Rantasila & Ojala<br />

Discussion Paper 2012 - 04<br />

Published at the<br />

ITF Summit 2012<br />

Leipzig, Germany<br />

Available also at:<br />

www.internationaltransportforum.org<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 2


<strong>Logistics</strong> costs: no statistical nor accounting units<br />

• Definitions vary from case to case<br />

– Large differences in awarness levels across countries<br />

• Firm and macro level data not compatible<br />

– Linkage to <strong>National</strong> Accounts data only implicit;<br />

• Some industry or transport statistics also rely on questionnaires<br />

– Self-reported data may be subjective or biased<br />

In short: severe knowledge gaps exist<br />

on the concept of logistics costs<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 3


The boundary of the firm affects the<br />

object and unit of analysis; but it is fuzzy<br />

The line between firm, supply chain or network?<br />

Upstream SC Focal firm Downstream SC<br />

Firm Strategic Business Unit Conglomerate<br />

”Arm’s length” transaction Long-term partnership<br />

Outsourcing In-house-operations<br />

Intra-firm trading Intra-industry trading<br />

Domestic operations <strong>International</strong> operations<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 4


Main types of logistics study/survey<br />

• Statistics-based studies applying models<br />

– Econometric<br />

– Other modelling approaches<br />

• Surveys using questionnaires<br />

– Comprehensive themes<br />

– Single-theme surveys<br />

• Case study-based approaches<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 5


ASLOG France<br />

Brazil: ILOS<br />

Existing studies e.g. by the following…<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Canada<br />

University of Lund, Sweden<br />

Technical University of Berlin<br />

Fraunhofer Institute, Germany<br />

Delcan Corp. for CSCMP , USA<br />

Thammasat University Thailand<br />

St. Gallen University Switzerland<br />

Type of study<br />

Statistics-based Survey-based<br />

Turku School of Economics, Finland<br />

Japan Institute of <strong>Logistics</strong> Systems<br />

South Africa: CSIR & Stellenbosch U.<br />

Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong>, New Zealand<br />

Latin America: Georgia Tech & LALC<br />

Institute of <strong>Transport</strong> Economics Norway<br />

US State of <strong>Logistics</strong><br />

South Africa<br />

Brazil<br />

Europe Top 100<br />

Norway<br />

<strong>Logistics</strong> providers <strong>Logistics</strong> users<br />

Source of data<br />

Finland<br />

Germany (BVL)<br />

Switzerland<br />

Thailand, Japan<br />

France<br />

Colombia<br />

Sweden<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 6


25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

A wide spread of methods, units and definitions on<br />

logistics cost; few longitudinal studies exist<br />

<strong>Logistics</strong> costs as % of: (i) GDP *; (ii) Sales **; (iii) Total costs ***<br />

1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Finland ** ELA/ AT. Kearney** U.S. State of <strong>Logistics</strong>* Sweden*<br />

State of logistics<br />

South Africa*<br />

BVL Germany;<br />

Manufacturing***<br />

Tajikistan 2005*<br />

Moldova 2005*<br />

Ukraine 2007*<br />

China; Choi & Lee (2009) *<br />

Brazil = ILOS (2010) *<br />

Russia 2011*<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 7


<strong>Level</strong>s of <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Costs</strong> in Statistics-based<br />

Studies; Percentage of GDP (* % of sales)<br />

Source: Rantasila & Ojala (2012) ITF Discussion Paper 2012-04<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 8


<strong>Level</strong>s of <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Costs</strong> in surveys;<br />

Percentage of GDP (* % of sales)<br />

Source: Rantasila & Ojala (2012) ITF Discussion Paper 2012-04<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 9


LPI 2007 indicated a strong correlation of<br />

national logistics performance and costs<br />

Source: Arvis et al. (2007) Connecting to Compete; <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index, World Bank<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 10


Knowledge gaps on national level<br />

logistics performance indicators & costs<br />

• Lack of comparable methods & terminology<br />

• Very few cross-country studies made even in HICs<br />

• Little comparative data across countries & industries<br />

Fact-based, comparative policy recommendations<br />

difficult to make without adequate indicators<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 11


<strong>Logistics</strong> Performance <strong>International</strong> Observatory<br />

LPIO initiative by The World Bank to improve<br />

<strong>Logistics</strong> Cost & Performance analysis<br />

• Collecting the existing knowledge LPIO<br />

– Starting mainly from High Income countries<br />

– Three workshops held in the US, Europe and Asia<br />

• Analytic tools esp. for Middle & Low Income countries<br />

• Questionnaire-based surveys<br />

• Statistics-based studies<br />

• Modelling approaches<br />

• Other approaches, e.g. <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index (LPI) surveys<br />

Aim to measure logistics costs & KPI’s in a more uniform way<br />

” F K o C ”<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 12


In conclusion, there is strong…<br />

• …interest for exchange of knowledge among<br />

researchers in the field;<br />

• …need for improved market information; and<br />

• …demand for better analysis to support policymaking<br />

especially in LICs and MICs.<br />

A need to create a joint knowledge platform to<br />

study national level logistics performance<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 13


Thank you for your attention!<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 14


Selected references:<br />

• ELA and AT Kearney (2004) Differentiation for Performance Excellence in <strong>Logistics</strong>, http://www.elalog.org/<br />

• ELA and AT Kearney (2007) Innovation Excellence in <strong>Logistics</strong> 2007, http://www.elalog.org/<br />

• Finland State of <strong>Logistics</strong> 2006; Naula, Ojala and Solakivi (2006) MoTC publications 45/2006 www.mintc.fi<br />

• Finland State of <strong>Logistics</strong> 2009; Solakivi, Ojala et al. (2009) MoTC publications 21/2009 www.mintc.fi<br />

• Finnish <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 1992. Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong> and Communications publications 6/1993<br />

• Finnish <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 1996-7. Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong> and Communications publications 33/1997<br />

• Finnish <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 2001. Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong> and Communications publications 52/2001<br />

• Ittmann, HW, King, DJ, Maspero, EL et al. (2008) Fourth annual state of logistics survey for South Africa 2007:<br />

logistics for regional growth and development<br />

• Langley, J. and Dort, E. and Ang, A. and Sykes, S.(2007) “2007 Third-Party <strong>Logistics</strong>, Results and Findings of the<br />

12th Annual Study”, http://www.us.capgemini.com/industries/ind_tl.asp?IndID=19.<br />

• Ojala, Solakivi, Hälinen, Lorentz and Hoffmann (2007) State of <strong>Logistics</strong> in the Baltic Sea Region, LogOn Baltic<br />

3:2007 www.logonbaltic.info<br />

• Rodrigues, A.M, Bowersox, D.J, Calantone, R.J, (2005) Estimation of Global and <strong>National</strong> <strong>Logistics</strong> Expenditures:<br />

2002 Data Update. Journal of Business <strong>Logistics</strong>, Vol.26, No. 2, 1-16<br />

• Supply Chain & <strong>Logistics</strong> Association Canada (2008) State of <strong>Logistics</strong>, The Canadian Report 2008<br />

• <strong>Transport</strong> Intelligence (2008) <strong>Logistics</strong> & transport Industry Environmental Survey<br />

• Töyli, Häkkinen, Ojala, Naula (2008) <strong>Logistics</strong> and financial performance - An analysis of Finnish small and<br />

medium-sized enterprises, Int. J. of Physical Distribution and <strong>Logistics</strong> Management, 38, 1, 57-80<br />

• Guasch J.L – Kogan J (2006) Inventories and Logistic <strong>Costs</strong> in Developing Countries: <strong>Level</strong>s and Determinants—A<br />

Red Flag for Competitiveness and Growth. Policy Research Working Paper 2552. Washington DC: World Bank<br />

• Guerrero P - Lucenti K – Galarza S (2010) Trade <strong>Logistics</strong> and Regional Integration in Latin America and the<br />

Caribbean, ADBI Working Paper Series No. 233<br />

• Barbero J A (2010) Freight <strong>Logistics</strong> in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Agenda to Improve Performance,<br />

Inter‐American Development Bank Infrastructure and Environment Department, TECHNICAL NOTES No.<br />

IDB‐TN‐103<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 15


Statistics-based logistics studies do exist:<br />

• Annual State of <strong>Logistics</strong> Report U.S 1989 <br />

• Bowersox, Rodrigues, Calantone & Closs, Stank 1999, -02,-05<br />

• South Africa State of <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 2003 <br />

• <strong>Logistics</strong> costs in Brazil 2005 <br />

• Top 100 in (European) <strong>Logistics</strong> 2007 <br />

• Norwegian logistics costs 2008 <br />

• Svensk Makrologistik (Sweden) 2008 <br />

• Radelet and Sachs 1998<br />

• Lee & Hausmann (World Bank background note) 2005<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 16


…as do surveys using questionnaires, such as:<br />

• ELA & A.T. Kearney 1987 <br />

• Finland State of <strong>Logistics</strong> 1991 <br />

• German <strong>Logistics</strong> Association BVL 1995 <br />

• State of <strong>Logistics</strong>: The Canadian Report 200X <br />

• Norwegian <strong>Logistics</strong> barometer 2003 <br />

• ASLOG L'Etat de l'art de la logistique française 2005/2006 <br />

• McKinsey Global Supply Chains 2006 & 2008<br />

• LogOn Baltic <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 2007<br />

• World Bank <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index 2007 <br />

• Colombian logistics survey 2008 <br />

• Swiss <strong>Logistics</strong> market, St. Gallen University 2009 <br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 17


World Bank case studies on national<br />

logistics costs in Low-Income countries<br />

• Arvis: Sub-Saharan and North Africa 2003<br />

• Ojala: Moldova, Albania, Ukraine, Central Asia 2003<br />

• Naula: Central Asia 2007<br />

ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!