Measuring National Level Logistics Costs - International Transport ...
Measuring National Level Logistics Costs - International Transport ...
Measuring National Level Logistics Costs - International Transport ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ITF Summit 2012, Leipzig, May 2, 2012<br />
Side Event: <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Measurement<br />
<strong>Measuring</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Costs</strong><br />
Overview of Worldwide Empirical Evidence<br />
Presented by Prof. Lauri Ojala<br />
Turku School of Economics at the University of Turku, Finland<br />
Lauri.ojala@utu.fi
A comprehensive overview<br />
By Rantasila & Ojala<br />
Discussion Paper 2012 - 04<br />
Published at the<br />
ITF Summit 2012<br />
Leipzig, Germany<br />
Available also at:<br />
www.internationaltransportforum.org<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 2
<strong>Logistics</strong> costs: no statistical nor accounting units<br />
• Definitions vary from case to case<br />
– Large differences in awarness levels across countries<br />
• Firm and macro level data not compatible<br />
– Linkage to <strong>National</strong> Accounts data only implicit;<br />
• Some industry or transport statistics also rely on questionnaires<br />
– Self-reported data may be subjective or biased<br />
In short: severe knowledge gaps exist<br />
on the concept of logistics costs<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 3
The boundary of the firm affects the<br />
object and unit of analysis; but it is fuzzy<br />
The line between firm, supply chain or network?<br />
Upstream SC Focal firm Downstream SC<br />
Firm Strategic Business Unit Conglomerate<br />
”Arm’s length” transaction Long-term partnership<br />
Outsourcing In-house-operations<br />
Intra-firm trading Intra-industry trading<br />
Domestic operations <strong>International</strong> operations<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 4
Main types of logistics study/survey<br />
• Statistics-based studies applying models<br />
– Econometric<br />
– Other modelling approaches<br />
• Surveys using questionnaires<br />
– Comprehensive themes<br />
– Single-theme surveys<br />
• Case study-based approaches<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 5
ASLOG France<br />
Brazil: ILOS<br />
Existing studies e.g. by the following…<br />
<strong>Transport</strong> Canada<br />
University of Lund, Sweden<br />
Technical University of Berlin<br />
Fraunhofer Institute, Germany<br />
Delcan Corp. for CSCMP , USA<br />
Thammasat University Thailand<br />
St. Gallen University Switzerland<br />
Type of study<br />
Statistics-based Survey-based<br />
Turku School of Economics, Finland<br />
Japan Institute of <strong>Logistics</strong> Systems<br />
South Africa: CSIR & Stellenbosch U.<br />
Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong>, New Zealand<br />
Latin America: Georgia Tech & LALC<br />
Institute of <strong>Transport</strong> Economics Norway<br />
US State of <strong>Logistics</strong><br />
South Africa<br />
Brazil<br />
Europe Top 100<br />
Norway<br />
<strong>Logistics</strong> providers <strong>Logistics</strong> users<br />
Source of data<br />
Finland<br />
Germany (BVL)<br />
Switzerland<br />
Thailand, Japan<br />
France<br />
Colombia<br />
Sweden<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 6
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
A wide spread of methods, units and definitions on<br />
logistics cost; few longitudinal studies exist<br />
<strong>Logistics</strong> costs as % of: (i) GDP *; (ii) Sales **; (iii) Total costs ***<br />
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
Finland ** ELA/ AT. Kearney** U.S. State of <strong>Logistics</strong>* Sweden*<br />
State of logistics<br />
South Africa*<br />
BVL Germany;<br />
Manufacturing***<br />
Tajikistan 2005*<br />
Moldova 2005*<br />
Ukraine 2007*<br />
China; Choi & Lee (2009) *<br />
Brazil = ILOS (2010) *<br />
Russia 2011*<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 7
<strong>Level</strong>s of <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Costs</strong> in Statistics-based<br />
Studies; Percentage of GDP (* % of sales)<br />
Source: Rantasila & Ojala (2012) ITF Discussion Paper 2012-04<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 8
<strong>Level</strong>s of <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Costs</strong> in surveys;<br />
Percentage of GDP (* % of sales)<br />
Source: Rantasila & Ojala (2012) ITF Discussion Paper 2012-04<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 9
LPI 2007 indicated a strong correlation of<br />
national logistics performance and costs<br />
Source: Arvis et al. (2007) Connecting to Compete; <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index, World Bank<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 10
Knowledge gaps on national level<br />
logistics performance indicators & costs<br />
• Lack of comparable methods & terminology<br />
• Very few cross-country studies made even in HICs<br />
• Little comparative data across countries & industries<br />
Fact-based, comparative policy recommendations<br />
difficult to make without adequate indicators<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 11
<strong>Logistics</strong> Performance <strong>International</strong> Observatory<br />
LPIO initiative by The World Bank to improve<br />
<strong>Logistics</strong> Cost & Performance analysis<br />
• Collecting the existing knowledge LPIO<br />
– Starting mainly from High Income countries<br />
– Three workshops held in the US, Europe and Asia<br />
• Analytic tools esp. for Middle & Low Income countries<br />
• Questionnaire-based surveys<br />
• Statistics-based studies<br />
• Modelling approaches<br />
• Other approaches, e.g. <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index (LPI) surveys<br />
Aim to measure logistics costs & KPI’s in a more uniform way<br />
” F K o C ”<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 12
In conclusion, there is strong…<br />
• …interest for exchange of knowledge among<br />
researchers in the field;<br />
• …need for improved market information; and<br />
• …demand for better analysis to support policymaking<br />
especially in LICs and MICs.<br />
A need to create a joint knowledge platform to<br />
study national level logistics performance<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 13
Thank you for your attention!<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 14
Selected references:<br />
• ELA and AT Kearney (2004) Differentiation for Performance Excellence in <strong>Logistics</strong>, http://www.elalog.org/<br />
• ELA and AT Kearney (2007) Innovation Excellence in <strong>Logistics</strong> 2007, http://www.elalog.org/<br />
• Finland State of <strong>Logistics</strong> 2006; Naula, Ojala and Solakivi (2006) MoTC publications 45/2006 www.mintc.fi<br />
• Finland State of <strong>Logistics</strong> 2009; Solakivi, Ojala et al. (2009) MoTC publications 21/2009 www.mintc.fi<br />
• Finnish <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 1992. Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong> and Communications publications 6/1993<br />
• Finnish <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 1996-7. Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong> and Communications publications 33/1997<br />
• Finnish <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 2001. Ministry of <strong>Transport</strong> and Communications publications 52/2001<br />
• Ittmann, HW, King, DJ, Maspero, EL et al. (2008) Fourth annual state of logistics survey for South Africa 2007:<br />
logistics for regional growth and development<br />
• Langley, J. and Dort, E. and Ang, A. and Sykes, S.(2007) “2007 Third-Party <strong>Logistics</strong>, Results and Findings of the<br />
12th Annual Study”, http://www.us.capgemini.com/industries/ind_tl.asp?IndID=19.<br />
• Ojala, Solakivi, Hälinen, Lorentz and Hoffmann (2007) State of <strong>Logistics</strong> in the Baltic Sea Region, LogOn Baltic<br />
3:2007 www.logonbaltic.info<br />
• Rodrigues, A.M, Bowersox, D.J, Calantone, R.J, (2005) Estimation of Global and <strong>National</strong> <strong>Logistics</strong> Expenditures:<br />
2002 Data Update. Journal of Business <strong>Logistics</strong>, Vol.26, No. 2, 1-16<br />
• Supply Chain & <strong>Logistics</strong> Association Canada (2008) State of <strong>Logistics</strong>, The Canadian Report 2008<br />
• <strong>Transport</strong> Intelligence (2008) <strong>Logistics</strong> & transport Industry Environmental Survey<br />
• Töyli, Häkkinen, Ojala, Naula (2008) <strong>Logistics</strong> and financial performance - An analysis of Finnish small and<br />
medium-sized enterprises, Int. J. of Physical Distribution and <strong>Logistics</strong> Management, 38, 1, 57-80<br />
• Guasch J.L – Kogan J (2006) Inventories and Logistic <strong>Costs</strong> in Developing Countries: <strong>Level</strong>s and Determinants—A<br />
Red Flag for Competitiveness and Growth. Policy Research Working Paper 2552. Washington DC: World Bank<br />
• Guerrero P - Lucenti K – Galarza S (2010) Trade <strong>Logistics</strong> and Regional Integration in Latin America and the<br />
Caribbean, ADBI Working Paper Series No. 233<br />
• Barbero J A (2010) Freight <strong>Logistics</strong> in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Agenda to Improve Performance,<br />
Inter‐American Development Bank Infrastructure and Environment Department, TECHNICAL NOTES No.<br />
IDB‐TN‐103<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 15
Statistics-based logistics studies do exist:<br />
• Annual State of <strong>Logistics</strong> Report U.S 1989 <br />
• Bowersox, Rodrigues, Calantone & Closs, Stank 1999, -02,-05<br />
• South Africa State of <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 2003 <br />
• <strong>Logistics</strong> costs in Brazil 2005 <br />
• Top 100 in (European) <strong>Logistics</strong> 2007 <br />
• Norwegian logistics costs 2008 <br />
• Svensk Makrologistik (Sweden) 2008 <br />
• Radelet and Sachs 1998<br />
• Lee & Hausmann (World Bank background note) 2005<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 16
…as do surveys using questionnaires, such as:<br />
• ELA & A.T. Kearney 1987 <br />
• Finland State of <strong>Logistics</strong> 1991 <br />
• German <strong>Logistics</strong> Association BVL 1995 <br />
• State of <strong>Logistics</strong>: The Canadian Report 200X <br />
• Norwegian <strong>Logistics</strong> barometer 2003 <br />
• ASLOG L'Etat de l'art de la logistique française 2005/2006 <br />
• McKinsey Global Supply Chains 2006 & 2008<br />
• LogOn Baltic <strong>Logistics</strong> Survey 2007<br />
• World Bank <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index 2007 <br />
• Colombian logistics survey 2008 <br />
• Swiss <strong>Logistics</strong> market, St. Gallen University 2009 <br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 17
World Bank case studies on national<br />
logistics costs in Low-Income countries<br />
• Arvis: Sub-Saharan and North Africa 2003<br />
• Ojala: Moldova, Albania, Ukraine, Central Asia 2003<br />
• Naula: Central Asia 2007<br />
ITF Summit, Leipzig, May 2, 2012, Rantasila & Ojala 18