25.07.2013 Views

THE LOEWEN GROUP, INC. and RAYMOND L. LOEWEN, v. THE ...

THE LOEWEN GROUP, INC. and RAYMOND L. LOEWEN, v. THE ...

THE LOEWEN GROUP, INC. and RAYMOND L. LOEWEN, v. THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Indeed, it was Loewen who had its witness (Peter Hyndman) explain to the jury, with<br />

regard to O'Keefe's advertisements, that "many Canadian lives were lost in the bloody <strong>and</strong> heroic<br />

defense of the British Crown Colony of Hong Kong by the Canadians against the Japanese." Tr.<br />

4486. It is thus nothing short of astonishing that claimants should now complain, for example,<br />

that Mr. O'Keefe, on cross-examination by Loewen about the advertising campaign, made<br />

references to Loewen's nationality. See Joint Reply at 13. 8<br />

2. The Jury Foreman Did Not "Hate" Canadians And, By Loewen's Own<br />

Account, Had A "Good Grasp Of The Entirety Of The Trial"<br />

One of the more alarming aspects of the Joint Reply is claimants' treatment of the fact<br />

that the foreman of the O'Keefe jury was himself Canadian by birth <strong>and</strong> a veteran of the Royal<br />

Canadian Air Force. Rather than accept the unavoidable conclusion that the jury's verdict could<br />

not have been motivated by an "anti-Canadian" bias, claimants now allege that the foreman<br />

actually "hated" Canadians <strong>and</strong> reached his verdict out of "contempt . . . for his ex-homel<strong>and</strong>."<br />

See Joint Reply at 9-10.<br />

Appended hereto at Tab D is a declaration from the jury foreman, Glenn Millen, which<br />

conclusively demonstrates that claimants' allegation is as wrong as it is, in Mr. Millen's words,<br />

8 Many of the other references of which claimants complain are likewise no different from<br />

Loewen's own statements to the jury. For example, Loewen complains that Mr. Gary mentioned<br />

Loewen's nationality during voir dire, but Loewen's own questionnaire (which was submitted to<br />

the jury pool long before Mr. Gary uttered his first words to the jury) asked such questions as<br />

"Do you believe that a foreign corporation with its corporation headquarters being located in<br />

Canada <strong>and</strong> Kentucky is entitled to a fair trial the same as an individual in our courts of law?"<br />

U.S. App. at 1015 (emphasis added). See also, e.g., U.S. App. at 1020. Similarly, claimants<br />

criticize Mr. Gary's description of lawsuits as "the American way" of resolving disputes, but<br />

Loewen's counsel (Edward Blackmon) also felt it important to tell the jury that "we [Americans]<br />

have one of the best systems in the world to settle disputes" <strong>and</strong> that, "under our way of justice<br />

<strong>and</strong> settling disputes in this country, . . . [w]e don't go fighting each other or start wars. [People]<br />

file lawsuits if there's a dispute." A404.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!