29.07.2013 Views

Thesis Book - MyWeb at WIT

Thesis Book - MyWeb at WIT

Thesis Book - MyWeb at WIT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a site for the “uncanny” to manifest. 15 Vidler st<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the uncanny “is not a property of space itself nor can it be provoked by<br />

any particular sp<strong>at</strong>ial conform<strong>at</strong>ion”, but th<strong>at</strong> it is an “aesthetic dimension” th<strong>at</strong> erases the boundaries between “the real and the<br />

unreal.” 16 Finally, all the sources can agree on the aspir<strong>at</strong>ions of the only architect to <strong>at</strong>tempt surrealist architecture: Frederick<br />

Kiesler.<br />

According to Bernard Tschumi, author of the article “Architecture and Its Double”, which appeared in the 1978 volume of<br />

Architectural Design, Kiesler’s first surrealist space was the “space-stage” in 1923 for the production of RUR in Berlin. 17 Kiesler<br />

designed a funnel shaped auditorium space where the walls and ceilings could open up during the show. Tschumi describes Kiesler’s<br />

second surrealist project, ‘The Endless The<strong>at</strong>er’ in Vienna, which had an unfolding double shell of cast-glass, as well as ramps,<br />

elev<strong>at</strong>ors, and pl<strong>at</strong>forms to cre<strong>at</strong>e a continuous space th<strong>at</strong> did not separ<strong>at</strong>e functions. 18 Tschumi comments th<strong>at</strong> Kiesler turned<br />

to unbuilt architectural research, dealing with how spaces were inherently connected to a person’s deep unconscious. 19 Tschumi<br />

argues th<strong>at</strong> Kiesler’s <strong>at</strong>tempt <strong>at</strong> surrealist architecture have been ignored by architectural historians in favor of the 1920s movement<br />

towards Modernism. 20 Dalibor Veseley acknowledges th<strong>at</strong> Kiesler worked on his ‘Endless House’ for 40 years, arguably the most well<br />

known surrealist architectural design, cre<strong>at</strong>ing “a continuous space very much like a cave in the shape of an egg, with gre<strong>at</strong> freedom<br />

of movement inside, gre<strong>at</strong> flexibility for dividing the space.” 21 However, Veseley points out the fact th<strong>at</strong> the Endless House was never<br />

actually built, challenging the limits of “genuine surrealist architecture.” 22 Anthony Vidler questions whether Kiesler’s egg-shaped<br />

design is surrealist; as Kiesler himself has said th<strong>at</strong> it is more “Correalist”, meaning it had a “continual interaction between man<br />

and his n<strong>at</strong>ural and technological environments.” 23 Stephen Philips, author of “Introjection and Projection: Frederick Kiesler and his<br />

15 Anthony Vidler. Fantasy, the Uncanny and Surrealist Theories of Architecture. Papers of Surrealism Winter, no. 1: 2 (2003), 3.<br />

16 Ibid.<br />

17 Surrealism and Architecture. Architectural Design 48, no. 2-3(1978),116.<br />

18 Surrealism and Architecture. Architectural Design 48, no. 2-3(1978), 116.<br />

19 Ibid, 116.<br />

20 Ibid.<br />

21 Surrealism and Architecture. Architectural Design 48, no. 2-3(1978), 93.<br />

22 Ibid, 94.<br />

23 Anthony Vidler. Fantasty, the Uncanny and Surrealist Theories of Architecture. Papers of Surrealism Winter, no. 1:2 (2003), 2.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!