01.08.2013 Views

Ketamine in Chronic Pain - McMaster University

Ketamine in Chronic Pain - McMaster University

Ketamine in Chronic Pain - McMaster University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TOPICAL STUDIES<br />

Author Design<br />

Barton<br />

(2011)<br />

Lynch<br />

(2003)<br />

Lynch<br />

(2005)<br />

Vranken<br />

(2005)<br />

DB RCT PLC<br />

DB RCT PLC;<br />

subsequent openlabel<br />

prospective<br />

<strong>in</strong> "ketam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

responders"<br />

subgroup<br />

DB RCT PLC<br />

DB RCT PLC<br />

Patient population and<br />

numbers<br />

N=208; Chemotherapy<br />

associated peripheral<br />

neuropathy for >1 month<br />

N=20; <strong>Chronic</strong> neuropathic<br />

pa<strong>in</strong><br />

N=92; Diabetic<br />

neuropathy, Post-Heraptic<br />

neuralgia or Posttraumatic<br />

neuralgia<br />

N=33 Central Neuropathic<br />

Pa<strong>in</strong><br />

Design/Methodology Outcomes<br />

Topical Gel of 10 mg<br />

baclofen, 40 mg amitryptyl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

and 20 ug ketam<strong>in</strong>e vs<br />

placebo 10ml applied daily x<br />

4 weeks<br />

Topical ketam<strong>in</strong>e cream<br />

(0.5%) vs topical<br />

amitryptyl<strong>in</strong>e cream (0.1%)<br />

vs comb<strong>in</strong>ation cream vs<br />

placebo 5 ml daily x 2 days;<br />

subsequent 7 day open label<br />

trial of comb<strong>in</strong>ation cream<br />

Topical ketam<strong>in</strong>e cream<br />

(0.1%) vs Topical<br />

amitryptyl<strong>in</strong>e cream (0.2%)<br />

vs comb<strong>in</strong>ation cream vs<br />

Placebo (emulsant only); all<br />

creams 4ml TID x 3 weeks<br />

Iontopatch adm<strong>in</strong>istered 50<br />

mg ketam<strong>in</strong>e vs 75 mg<br />

ketam<strong>in</strong>e vs placebo (NS)<br />

over 24hr x 5 days<br />

Statistically significant<br />

improvement <strong>in</strong> motor neuropathy<br />

symptoms on CIPN-20<br />

questionnaire; trend towards<br />

improvement <strong>in</strong> sensory<br />

neuropathy symptoms<br />

No difference on McGill Pa<strong>in</strong><br />

Questionnaire or VAS between<br />

treatment arms <strong>in</strong> 2 day trial; openlabel<br />

arm showed significant<br />

decrease <strong>in</strong> pa<strong>in</strong> by day 3-7<br />

No statistically significant<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> pa<strong>in</strong> reduction on<br />

NRS-PI scale between study arms;<br />

all arms generated 1-1.5 decrease<br />

<strong>in</strong> spontaneous pa<strong>in</strong><br />

No significant difference between<br />

any groups <strong>in</strong> change of VAS<br />

scores after 7 days; significant<br />

improvement <strong>in</strong> PDI, EQ-5D and<br />

SF-6 scores <strong>in</strong> the 75 mg ketam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

group<br />

Withdrawal/Side<br />

Effects<br />

No significant<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> adverse<br />

events between<br />

placebo and treatment<br />

2 patients experienced<br />

"m<strong>in</strong>or" side effects<br />

1 episode of local sk<strong>in</strong><br />

irritation; 1 swollen<br />

feet; 2 episodes of<br />

drows<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

3 patients <strong>in</strong> ketam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

arms reported<br />

sedation, 1 each of<br />

nausea/vomit<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

confusion, dizz<strong>in</strong>ess,<br />

vivid dreams,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!