DRAFT DETAILED CONCLUSIONS ON REPRESENTATION OF ...

CODE SPECIES CTRY SITES (SDF) 1
POPULATION (SDF) 1 COMMENTS (EBCC 2 , BiE 3 , IBA 4 ) PROPOSED
CONCLUSION
A002 Gavia arctica ME 8 sites (1?,0A,0B,1C,6D) Wintering: no counts. No reference information on wintering
population. Does the use of 'D' category
indicate that there are only few birds in
each site. Should species be in the
Reference List? Site ME000000C
probably needs correction as species is
listed as 'resident'.
CD ?
A002 Gavia arctica MK 5 sites (0?,2A,2B,1C,0D) Wintering/staging: No reference information on wintering SUF?
mostly few birds/site
with maximum 50.
population.
A002 Gavia arctica RS
A003 Gavia immer AL
A003 Gavia immer BA
A003 Gavia immer HR
A003 Gavia immer ME 4 sites (1?,0A,0B,1C,2D) Wintering: no counts. No reference information on wintering
population. Does the use of 'D' category
indicate that there are only few birds in
each site. Should species be in the
Reference List? Site ME000000C
probably needs correction as species is
A003 Gavia immer MK
A003 Gavia immer RS
A007 Podiceps auritus AL 6 sites (0?,1A,2B,2C,1D) Wintering: few
birds/site, maximum 12.
A007 Podiceps auritus BA 2 sites (0?,0A,0B,2C,0D) Probably wintering: no
information.
A007 Podiceps auritus HR
listed as 'resident'.
No reference information on wintering
population. Does the use of 'D' category
indicate that there are only few birds in
each site. Should species be in the
Reference List? Site ME000000C
probably needs correction as species is
listed as 'resident'.
No reference information on wintering
population. Should the species be
included in the Reference List?
ETC/BD October 2011 2
?
SUF?
?