DRAFT DETAILED CONCLUSIONS ON REPRESENTATION OF ...
DRAFT DETAILED CONCLUSIONS ON REPRESENTATION OF ...
DRAFT DETAILED CONCLUSIONS ON REPRESENTATION OF ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CODE SPECIES CTRY SITES (SDF) 1<br />
POPULATI<strong>ON</strong> (SDF) 1 COMMENTS (EBCC 2 , BiE 3 , IBA 4 ) PROPOSED<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>CLUSI<strong>ON</strong><br />
A320 Ficedula parva ME 11 sites (7?,0A,0B,1C,3D) Breeding: 4 sites RS+ME breed. pop. size 500-800. Do<br />
proposed sites reflect actual distribution:<br />
breeding in higher elevations and staging<br />
along the coast?<br />
?<br />
A320 Ficedula parva MK 2 sites (0?,0A,1B,1C,0D) Breeding: 1-5 pairs Marginal breeders (S margin of the<br />
distribution range). Probably sufficient<br />
SUF?<br />
A320 Ficedula parva RS 18 sites<br />
Breeding: no count RS+ME breed. pop. size 500-800. Absent ?<br />
(0?,0A,5B,11C,2D)<br />
from the northern part (exc. 1 site) or lack<br />
of sites here?<br />
A321 Ficedula albicollis AL 11 sites (0?,0A,0B,7C,4D) Breeding: 1 site, others<br />
- staging<br />
Breed. pop. size 10-100. Is the one<br />
breeding site AL0000013 Morava holds<br />
most of this population?<br />
A321 Ficedula albicollis BA 0 No site BiE: considered present as a breeder.<br />
EBCC atlas shows breeding, at least in<br />
A321 Ficedula albicollis HR 17 sites<br />
(17?,0A,0B,0C,0D)<br />
A321 Ficedula albicollis ME 33 sites<br />
(13?,0A,0B,1C,19D)<br />
Breeding: 45650-<br />
110500<br />
A321 Ficedula albicollis MK 5 sites (0?,0A,1B,1C,3D) Breeding: 11-50 pairs,<br />
others- staging<br />
A321 Ficedula albicollis RS 33 sites<br />
(0?,0A,0B,21C,12D)<br />
A338 Lanius collurio AL 23 sites<br />
(0?,0A,3B,8C,12D)<br />
the northern part.<br />
Breed. pop. size 10000-50000.<br />
Apparently sufficient, but please check<br />
population estimates in SDFs, e.g., one<br />
site max 25000 pairs. Aren't these<br />
assessments too optimistic?<br />
Breeding: no count RS+ME breed. pop. size 8000-12000.<br />
Geographical coverage seems fair,<br />
please check population assessments<br />
(i.e., only 1 C?).<br />
Breeding: no count at<br />
each site but can be up<br />
to 20 pairs/site<br />
Breed. pop. size 2000-8000. Low<br />
population coverage; also, can distribution<br />
of sites be improved?<br />
RS+ME breed. pop. size 8000-12000.<br />
ASCI distribution good but IBA Obedska<br />
bara significantly larger than the<br />
corresponding Emerald site. Is this<br />
difference significant for the species?<br />
Breeding: no count Breed. pop. size 5000-20000.<br />
Widespread in the region? ASCI<br />
distribution good.<br />
ETC/BD October 2011 46<br />
?<br />
IN MAJOR?<br />
SUF? CD<br />
SUF? CD<br />
IN MOD/ IN<br />
MIN?<br />
IN MOD?<br />
SUF?
Change language