02.08.2013 Views

Abraham Fleming: - Early Music Online - Royal Holloway, University ...

Abraham Fleming: - Early Music Online - Royal Holloway, University ...

Abraham Fleming: - Early Music Online - Royal Holloway, University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with his Georgiks”, which suggests that this was intended to be a single book containing<br />

both the Bucoliks and Georgiks. Both books were quarto in size and printed by Thomas<br />

Orwin to be sold by Woodcocke at his shop The Black Bear in Paul’s Churchyard.<br />

Consequently Bucoliks and Georgiks have been catalogued as one text with the two titles<br />

sharing the same STC number. However, the British Library’s copy (shelfmark C.122.c.13)<br />

reveals a different story. The first 32 pages comprise Bucoliks, well printed with a clear title<br />

page and embellished with woodcuts of a uniform style. Georgiks does not start at page 33 as<br />

one might expect had it followed straight on from Bucoliks, but starts with a new page one.<br />

Georgiks has its own title page and a separate dedication. This book looks as though it was<br />

printed quickly and costs were kept down, although both colophons say that the books were<br />

printed by Orwin. The woodcuts used to illustrate Georgiks are of a different style too and do<br />

not match those used in Bucoliks. This indicates that <strong>Fleming</strong>’s Georgiks was intended to be<br />

a separate text to Bucoliks and the evidence also suggests that Orwin printed Bucoliks<br />

himself and farmed Georgiks out to a colleague or even to an apprentice. In addition the<br />

Bodleian Library’s copy (shelfmark CC28(3)Jur) has different wording on the title page<br />

making it a variant edition, which led bibliophiles to conclude wrongly that there were two<br />

different editions of the Georgiks. One variant was supposed to have been bound with<br />

Bucoliks and the other variant was available separately. This theory was upheld in the<br />

Peterhouse Biographical Register, which went so far as to suggest that the 1589 Bucoliks,<br />

Georgiks and Bucoliks and Georgiks comprised three distinct texts, despite examples of such<br />

bound copies having separate title pages and being quite obviously different in style. 257 This<br />

thesis demonstrates that there were two books produced in 1589: these were the third<br />

translation of Bucoliks and a brand new translation of Georgiks. Woodcocke’s customers<br />

could purchase one of each title and ask to have them bound as one, in which case there was<br />

a supplementary title page available that could be inserted at the front. Alternatively<br />

customers could just purchase the book that they wanted. However, <strong>Fleming</strong>’s 1589<br />

Georgiks continues to share an STC number with the Bucoliks and is not counted as a<br />

257 Walker, Peterhouse Biographical Register (1927), p. 290.<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!