LOCUS OF CONTROL ORIENTATION AND LEVEL - Drake University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Period studied Day one Internal Chance Powerful others Total Group Day two Internal Chance Powerful Others Total Group First 48 hours Internal Chance Powerful Others Total Group Testine the Hvaothesis Table 3. Mean Pain Scores for Day I, Day 2, and First 48 Hours Mean ~ain score The hypothesis that was tested was: Health Locus of Control will account for differences in perceived pain relief in persons who have had abdominal surgery and received epidural analgesia for pain control. Table 4 depicts the comparison of mean pain scores on day one when the sample was categorized by health locus of control (HLC); i.e.. internal health locus of control (IHLC), chance health locus of control (CHLC), or powerful others locus of control (PHLC).
Table 4. ANOVA: DAY 1 Comparison of Mean PAn Score When Categorized by Health Locus of Control As table 4 indicates, there was no sign~ficant difference In pain perception when the sample was categorized by HLC E(2,37) = 0.167, E< .05. Table 5 depicts the comparison of mean pain scores on day two when the sample was categorized by HLC. Table 5. ANOVA: DAY 2 Comparison of Mean Pain Score When Categorized by Health Locus of Control DF S S MS F 2 0.2 16 0.108 0.059 35 63.476 1.814 37 63.692 As table 5 indicates, there was no s~gnificant difference in pain perception when the sample was categorized by HLC F(2,35) = 0.059, Q < a. Table 6 depicts the comparison <strong>OF</strong> mean pain scores for the first 48 hours when the sample is categorized by HLC.
Page 1 and 2: LOCUS OF CONTROL ORIENTATION AND LE
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT The pupse of this study wa
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page . . ABSTRACT
Page 7 and 8: CHAPTER I DIMENSIONS OF THE PROBLEM
Page 9 and 10: One factor that is often referred t
Page 11 and 12: ' a as their effects" (p. 52). Nurs
Page 13 and 14: nurses meet the goal of providing t
Page 15 and 16: ~rsonnel/nursing can use to increas
Page 17 and 18: Since the advent of Itotter's I-E L
Page 19 and 20: pain as it reaches the brain. This
Page 21 and 22: Epidurd analgesia involves placemen
Page 23: and severe tension headaches and 14
Page 26 and 27: from traditional interventions to t
Page 28 and 29: 3. experienced a recovery period wi
Page 30 and 31: than previous scaling techniques. M
Page 32 and 33: Low positive correlations with appr
Page 34 and 35: scores for postoperative day one an
Page 38 and 39: Table 6. ANOVA: FIRST 48 HOURS Comp
Page 40 and 41: the pain stimuli would be less susc
Page 42 and 43: Another explanation for why the hyp
Page 44 and 45: domain of the acute pain experience
Page 46 and 47: Orem cautioned nurses that this int
Page 48 and 49: REFERENCES Abramson, L-, Seligmm, M
Page 50 and 51: Melzack, R. & Wall, P. The challeng
Page 52 and 53: Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R., & Lus
Page 54 and 55: Nursing Epidural Flow Sheet Il CODt
Page 56 and 57: MAR KEY FRN MEDS: T - TIME ADMlNlST
Page 58 and 59: NURSING EPIDV%Ii LATHEIER PROTOC~ I
Page 60 and 61: Appendix C: Multidimensional HeaIth
Page 62: Appendix D: Demographic Data Collec
Page 65 and 66: June 25, 7992 Jul ianne Sarcone 481
Page 67 and 68: VANDERI3f L'I' UNIVERSITY NASIIVILL
Page 69 and 70: our work on using the Value Survey
Page 71 and 72: Appendix G: Consent Letter

LOCUS OF CONTROL ORIENTATION AND LEVEL - Drake University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?