05.08.2013 Views

1987 Fall - Mountain Lion Foundation

1987 Fall - Mountain Lion Foundation

1987 Fall - Mountain Lion Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Seplember<strong>1987</strong><br />

BOARD OF DIRECTORS<br />

MllTga;et Owings<br />

President<br />

Hon. William Newsom,<br />

Northern California<br />

Vice President<br />

Rabbi Ja;eph Hurwitz,<br />

Southern California<br />

Vice President<br />

Bill Yeates,<br />

Secretary<br />

Scott Hennessey,<br />

Treasurer<br />

lise Byrnes<br />

Hon. Frtd Farr<br />

Dr. Alan Rabinowitz<br />

Dr. George SclJaIler<br />

Susan de Treville<br />

Gretchen Wyler<br />

Dirt.CtoT,<br />

Sharon Negri<br />

Production: Manette Be1livttlu<br />

Illustration: MiJcL Kowalski<br />

Design/Production: o.itlin Rivers<br />

Editor: Sharon Negri<br />

MOUNTA1N l10N<br />

THE CALIFORNIA COUGAR NEWS<br />

The <strong>Foundation</strong> Continues<br />

Efforts to Protect <strong>Lion</strong>s<br />

The overwhelming pUblic support<br />

for protecting mountain lions<br />

provides the <strong>Foundation</strong> with<br />

the challenge and opportunity<br />

to influence future decisions<br />

that will lead to the long-term<br />

preservation of California's<br />

magnificent symbol of wilderness<br />

and natural heritage.<br />

The <strong>Foundation</strong> has already<br />

developed short and long-range<br />

plans for protecting mountain<br />

lions that entail: 1) stopping<br />

the hunting season before it<br />

begins, 2) developing new<br />

educational programs, and 3)<br />

developing a proposal to<br />

conduct a 5-year independent<br />

mountain lion study in<br />

California that will contribute<br />

to a better understanding of<br />

lions and their habitat needs.<br />

By filing a lawsuit to stop the<br />

hunting season, the <strong>Foundation</strong><br />

has already stepped in to halt<br />

conJinued onpage 6<br />

the senseless destruction of<br />

190 mountain lions. (see<br />

Lawsuit) Saving mountain lions<br />

for future generations to come,<br />

however, means more than merely<br />

stopping the hunting season for<br />

this year - it means getting to<br />

the real heart of the problem<br />

by addressing the myths,<br />

anecdotal stories, and traditional<br />

management practices<br />

that have plagued the mountain<br />

lion for decades.<br />

Right now the <strong>Foundation</strong> is<br />

creating new educational<br />

programs to eliminate those age<br />

old myths, such as mountain<br />

lion populations are increasing;<br />

mountain lions are a major<br />

cause of livestock loss and<br />

deer population declines; and<br />

mountain lions are a serious<br />

threat to pUblic safety. New<br />

slideshow/video presentations,<br />

brochures, and a children's<br />

program will seek to eliminate


<strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> Preservation <strong>Foundation</strong><br />

Celebrating Our One Year<br />

Anniversary<br />

The Year's Highlights and Accomplishments<br />

This month the <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong><br />

Preservation <strong>Foundation</strong><br />

celebrates its one-year<br />

anniversary. Aside from the<br />

disappointing Fish & Game<br />

Commission decision, the<br />

Four.dation successfully made<br />

the protection of California<br />

mountain lions one of the<br />

pUblic's top wildlife<br />

concerns.<br />

Reaching one million<br />

Californians through the<br />

media and testing whether the<br />

pUblic was supportive of a<br />

mountain lion trophy hunting<br />

season was the <strong>Foundation</strong>'s<br />

primary effort after its<br />

formation in September of<br />

1986. In order to accomplish<br />

this enormous task the<br />

<strong>Foundation</strong> embarked on a<br />

major Public Education and<br />

Media campaign and hired the<br />

expertise of McElroy<br />

communications.<br />

The tremendous success of the<br />

campaign brought widespread<br />

radio, newspaper, and<br />

television support from<br />

around the state. Over 29<br />

major newspaper editorials<br />

opposed the DFG's hunting<br />

season and heavily criticized<br />

its research. Virtually every<br />

radio station from Eureka to<br />

San Diego covered the issue.<br />

Television commentaries in<br />

every large urban center made<br />

reference to the lunacy of<br />

the DFG plan and urged them<br />

to "scrap the idea."<br />

with the help of the media,<br />

millions of Californians<br />

became aware that the trophy<br />

hunting of lions was neither<br />

justified by research or<br />

necessary to protect<br />

livestock or public safety.<br />

The Los Angeles Times<br />

summarized what thousands of<br />

Californians felt and<br />

pUblicly stated:<br />

"... DFG experts say: "Sport hunting of<br />

mountain lions cannot predictably reduce<br />

livestock and domestic animal depredation<br />

or predation on wildlife species such as<br />

deer. Nor can it guarantee public safety .<br />

.. The question, then boils down to this:<br />

Do we know enough about the lion<br />

population in California, and its ability to<br />

survive a variety ofenvironmental<br />

pressures, to permit 210 sportsmen to<br />

track the cats with dogs until the winded<br />

animals are cornered and shot? The<br />

answer is no."<br />

The <strong>Foundation</strong> also played a<br />

vital role in providing key<br />

testimony at the Commission<br />

hearings. In February, after<br />

the DFG recommended a<br />

hunting season, the<br />

<strong>Foundation</strong> called in mountain<br />

lion experts and biologist<br />

who spent countless hours<br />

reviewing the data. Staff<br />

and Board Members spent the<br />

next 3 months summarizing the<br />

problems, preparing<br />

testimony, holding press<br />

conferences, and traveling<br />

around the state speaking to<br />

groups, the media, and<br />

concerned individuals.<br />

Slideshows and brochures were<br />

developed and distributed<br />

statewide refuting the myths<br />

about lions, correcting the<br />

misconceptions about the<br />

benefits of hunting, and<br />

declaring the need to protect<br />

California's last symbol of<br />

wildness.<br />

After being disillusioned<br />

with the Department's<br />

research, we brought in the<br />

expertise of Dr. Hornocker to<br />

2<br />

develop a sound alternative<br />

to the hunting season that is<br />

still being pursued today.<br />

The overwhelming public<br />

opposition to the Fish & Game<br />

Commission's decision to reopen<br />

mountain lion trophy<br />

hunting coupled with the lack<br />

of sound data to warrant any<br />

hunting season convinced the<br />

<strong>Foundation</strong> to spearhead the<br />

current lawsuit. The<br />

<strong>Foundation</strong> is leading efforts<br />

to raise the funds necessary<br />

to carry out the suit. With<br />

the generous support of 24<br />

well known celebrities, an.ad<br />

was placed in newspapers<br />

around the state requesting<br />

pUblic support to defray<br />

costs of the lawsuit. AS'of<br />

this date we have nearly<br />

reached our goal.<br />

The <strong>Foundation</strong> staff and<br />

Board composed of nationally<br />

acclaimed scientists, leading<br />

state conservationists, and<br />

pUblic figures, are proud of<br />

the year's accomplishments to<br />

protect California's most<br />

majestic wildlife species.<br />

The <strong>Foundation</strong> staff has<br />

grown and now includes Sharon<br />

Negri, Director; Manette<br />

Belliveau, Office<br />

Administrator; Peter Edwards,<br />

part-time biologist, and<br />

various consultants that help<br />

carry out the public<br />

education and research<br />

programs.<br />

The <strong>Foundation</strong> Board and<br />

staff thank all of you who<br />

have contributed to this<br />

worthwhile effort and<br />

acknowledge that the<br />

<strong>Foundation</strong> would not be where<br />

it is today without the<br />

enormous support from our<br />

donors.


<strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> Preservation <strong>Foundation</strong><br />

Are <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong>s Really Varmits?<br />

Are mountain lions a significant<br />

threat to livestock and<br />

wildlife? For years livestock<br />

owners and hunters have<br />

justified mountain lion hunting<br />

as a way of controlling<br />

the number of predators and<br />

thereby reducing losses to<br />

livestock and to deer populations.<br />

But is this really<br />

necessary and are mountain<br />

lions really the problem?<br />

DEER POPULATIONS DECLINES<br />

The decline in deer populations<br />

in recent years has<br />

been of great concern to<br />

many. The mountain lion,<br />

however, is not the sole<br />

problem as many hunters would<br />

like us to believe, but<br />

rather, is the result of many<br />

factors.<br />

For example, Department of<br />

Fish and Game's deer studies<br />

in 1976 concluded that the<br />

loss of habitat and dwindling<br />

food supplies were the major<br />

reason for the drastic<br />

decline in California's deer<br />

popUlations. No study since<br />

1976 has shown that this<br />

situation has changed.<br />

Deer are the primary prey for<br />

mountain lions, and yet no<br />

evidence shows that mountain<br />

lions can suppress a healthy<br />

deer herd. A study in the<br />

North Kings Area in Fresno<br />

County tried to prove that<br />

mountain lions were supressing<br />

the deer herds but other<br />

experts from around the<br />

country heavily criticized<br />

the limited data base and<br />

conclusions reached.<br />

Interestingly, studies from<br />

other states actually find<br />

the opposite is true. A<br />

long-term study in New Mexico<br />

in which 575 does were radio<br />

collared gave a mortality<br />

rate of 19%, only three<br />

percent of which was due to<br />

IIAny glimpse into the life of an animal quickens our own and<br />

makes it so much the larger and better in every way."<br />

lions. Similarly, in 1949<br />

half of the mountain lions<br />

were removed from a test area<br />

in Utah with no effect on the<br />

deer popUlations. Finally,<br />

two long-term studies in<br />

Arizona concluded that deer<br />

popUlations fluctuate<br />

independent of the coexisting<br />

mountain lion population.<br />

Furthermore, the DFG claims<br />

that twice as many deer are<br />

killed illegally than legally<br />

in this state amounting to<br />

approximately 100,000<br />

illegally killed deer annually.<br />

It appears that human<br />

encroachment and exploitation,<br />

not the mountain lion,<br />

is the more serious threat to<br />

the declining deer<br />

popUlation.<br />

LIVESTOCK LOSSES<br />

<strong>Mountain</strong> lion depredation<br />

(lions killing livestock) is<br />

not a serious problem to the<br />

livestock industry, but can<br />

be costly to individual<br />

ranchers when it occurs.<br />

According to a survey by<br />

ranchers several years ago,<br />

domestic and feral dogs were<br />

identified as a greater<br />

threat to their livestock<br />

than mountain lions (65% as<br />

opposed to 8%).<br />

Many people are unaware that<br />

laws exist, even during the<br />

moratorium on mountain lion<br />

hunting, that allow ranchers<br />

to kill depredating mountain<br />

4<br />

John Muir<br />

lions. Even in areas where<br />

there are extensive problems,<br />

since 1983 the DFG has had<br />

the authority to develop<br />

management plans to reduce<br />

the number of lion attacks on<br />

livestock.<br />

One of the Department's<br />

justifications for a lion<br />

hunting season this year was<br />

the rise in livestock losses·<br />

due to lions. But is it as<br />

serious a problem as they<br />

claim?<br />

No. The Department alleges<br />

the 64 attacks in 1982 to 114<br />

in 1986 is a reflection of<br />

the rise in lion populations<br />

and attacks over the last 16<br />

years. What the DFG fails to<br />

tell the public is that prior<br />

to 1971 livestock owners had<br />

no incentive to report livestock<br />

loss due to mountain<br />

lions. In fact they kept no<br />

formal records prior to 1982.<br />

Since that time, ranchers<br />

have been encouraged to<br />

report livestock losses due<br />

to mountain lions and other<br />

predators.<br />

In addition, after the<br />

<strong>Foundation</strong> reviewed the DFG's<br />

depredation reports, these<br />

poorly kept, often conflicting<br />

records never supported<br />

their claim that mountain<br />

lion depredations are on an<br />

increase. According to the<br />

DFG's own reports, the number<br />

actually decreased!<br />

Before someone accuses the<br />

mountain lion of being a<br />

varmit, they need to take a<br />

closer look at the facts.


<strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> Preservation <strong>Foundation</strong><br />

U Few of us in this state have actually seen a mountain lion. But<br />

the knawledge they are there, spectral and feral, gives meaning to<br />

the remote land we must save. "<br />

San Francisco Chronicle<br />

5<br />

ilJuSl...si

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!