South Dakota Mountain Lion Public Opinion Poll
South Dakota Mountain Lion Public Opinion Poll
South Dakota Mountain Lion Public Opinion Poll
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
About this Document<br />
Larry M. Gigliotti<br />
The purpose of this report is to document the nature and extent of public opinion towards<br />
the <strong>South</strong> <strong>Dakota</strong> mountain lion plan. Almost all of the comments concerning the<br />
mountain lion plan centered on the proposed mountain lion season. A simplified model<br />
is proposed consisting of four general management actions. The diversified range of<br />
public comments can be classified under one of the four general management actions.<br />
Most of the <strong>South</strong> <strong>Dakota</strong> public can support a mountain lion season in general, however,<br />
most of the controversy is in the details/structure of a mountain lion hunting season.<br />
This report first provides some statistics summarizing citizens' attitudes attending the<br />
public meetings followed by a simplified framework for understanding the range of<br />
attitudes towards mountain lion management in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Dakota</strong>. The next section is my<br />
initial attempt to identify questions, concerns and issues raised by the public. The<br />
appendices contain the entire public comments received by GFP (to the best of my<br />
ability) regarding mountain lion management in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Dakota</strong>. Reading these comments<br />
will provide a detailed qualitative understanding of public opinion concerning mountain<br />
lion management in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Dakota</strong>.<br />
This document is a companion report to the <strong>South</strong> <strong>Dakota</strong> <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> Management<br />
Plan. Its main value will be in helping to address the education and public involvement<br />
objectives in the plan. GFP biologists and managers need to refine and expand the initial<br />
set of questions, concerns and issues I have identified in this report and to provide more<br />
in-depth and complete responses to these questions, concerns and issues. This is an ongoing<br />
aspect of this initial public involvement effort.