<strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Oral</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>via</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Computer</strong> Question # Points Possible Tell a little about yourself. (lowest difficulty level) Fluency Pronunciation Grammar Quality 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 Total: Relate several things you did this morning from <strong>the</strong> time you woke up until now. (medium difficulty level) Fluency Pronunciation Grammar Quality 3 2 5 4 2 1 4 3 1 0 3 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 Total: Explain how to ride a bicycle. (high difficulty level) Fluency Pronunciation Grammar Quality 5 3 7 8 4 2 6 7 3 1 5 6 2 0 4 5 1 3 4 0 2 3 1 2 0 1 0 GRAND TOTAL: Total: 64 CALICO Journal
CONCLUSION Jerry W. Larson The general consensus in foreign- and second-language education is that oral skill development is a high priority, indeed in many cases, <strong>the</strong> top priority. If, in fact, speaking is emphasized, it should also be tested periodically. However, assessing oral skills requires a significant commitment of time and energy on <strong>the</strong> part of language teachers. In an effort to mitigate this testing burden, testing software has been developed that allows teachers to construct computerized oral tests, to administer <strong>the</strong>m, and to assess students’ responses with relative ease. Using this kind of software in conjunction with an appropriate scoring technique, teachers can assess <strong>the</strong>ir students’ oral performance on a relatively frequent basis with a minimal loss of classroom time. REFERENCES Brown, J. W. (1985). RSVP: Classroom oral interview procedure. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals, 18 (6), 481-486. Frink, H. (1982). <strong>Oral</strong> testing for first-year language classes. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals, 14 (4), 281-287. Gonzalez Pino, B. (1989). Prochievement testing of speaking. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals, 22 (5), 487-496. Gutiérrez, J. (1987). <strong>Oral</strong> testing in <strong>the</strong> high school classroom: Some suggestions. Hispania, 70, 915-918. Harlow, L. L., & Caminero, R. (1990). <strong>Oral</strong> testing of beginning language students at large universities: Is it worth <strong>the</strong> trouble? Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals, 23 (6), 489-501. Hendrickson, J. M. (1992). Creating listening and speaking prochievement tests. Hispania, 75 (5), 1326-1331. Higgs, T. V., & Clifford, R. (1982). The push toward communication. In T. V. Higgs (Ed.), Curriculum, competence, and <strong>the</strong> foreign language teacher (pp. 57-79). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company. Larson, J. W. (1984). <strong>Testing</strong> speaking ability in <strong>the</strong> classroom: The semi-direct alternative. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals, 17 (5), 499-507. Manley, J.(1995). Assessing students’ oral language: One school district’s response. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals, 28 (1), 93-102. Meredith, R. A. (1990). The oral proficiency interview in real life: Sharpening <strong>the</strong> scale. Modern <strong>Language</strong> Journal, 74 (3), 288-296. Omaggio, A. C. (1986). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. Paulus, L. (1998). Watch <strong>the</strong>m SOAR: Students oral assessment redefined. Hispania, 81, 146-152. Volume 18 Number 1 65