08.08.2013 Views

4 Algebraic Cycles and Singularities of Normal Functions

4 Algebraic Cycles and Singularities of Normal Functions

4 Algebraic Cycles and Singularities of Normal Functions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 M. Green <strong>and</strong> Ph. Griffiths<br />

Then it may be shown that (this is essentially ρ(iii) = ρ(v) in section 4.2.4<br />

above)<br />

From (4.24) a consequence is that<br />

HC ⇒ α is injective on Hg n (X)prim . (4.26)<br />

a class ζ ∈ H n (Ω n X )prim is integral ⇔ the residues <strong>of</strong> ζ are integral (4.27)<br />

The spectral sequence argument also gives<br />

H 1 R 0 πI∆ ⊗ (KX ⊗ L n ⊗ H n ) =0 for L ≫ 0<br />

⇒ α is injective<br />

⇒ HC.<br />

(4.28)<br />

The statements (4.26) <strong>and</strong> (4.28) give precise meaning to the general principle:<br />

The HC may be reduced to (in fact, is equivalent to) a statement about the<br />

global geometry <strong>of</strong><br />

We thus have:<br />

∆ ⊂ X × S. (4.29)<br />

HC ⇔ geometric property <strong>of</strong> (4.29) when L ≫ 0.<br />

Above we have discussed the question: Can we a priori estimate how positive<br />

L must be? The condition L ≫ 0 in this section requires sufficient<br />

positivity to have vanishing <strong>of</strong> cohomology plus Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity.<br />

Above, we gave a heuristic argument to the effect that for each ζ<br />

the condition L ≫ 0 must also involve ζ 2 .<br />

Discussion: Denote by ˇ Xk the dual variety to the image <strong>of</strong><br />

One may ask the question<br />

X → P ˇ H 0 (OX(L k )) .<br />

What are the properties <strong>of</strong> the singular set ˇ Xk,sing <strong>of</strong> ˇ Xk for k ≫ 0?<br />

Although we shall not try to make it precise, one may imagine two types<br />

<strong>of</strong> singularities: (i) Ones that are present for a general X ⊂ P ˇ H 0 (OX(L))<br />

having the same numerical characters as X; in particular, they should be<br />

invariant as X varies in moduli. (In this regard, one may assume that L → X<br />

is already sufficiently ample so as to have those vanishing theorems that will<br />

ensure that dim ˇ Xk can be computed from the numerical characters <strong>of</strong> X1).<br />

(ii) Ones that are only present for special X. What our study shows is that:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!