08.08.2013 Views

McCartan, K. (2008) Current understandings of paedophilia and the ...

McCartan, K. (2008) Current understandings of paedophilia and the ...

McCartan, K. (2008) Current understandings of paedophilia and the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

explained because as children paedophiles had poor relationships with adults<br />

(Lowenstein, 1998; Wilson & Cox, 1983; Cassati, Mc Glurg & Browne, 2002).<br />

Which is best demonstrated in regard to both fixated (Groth et al, 1982) <strong>and</strong> elderly<br />

paedophiles (Whiskin, 1997), both <strong>of</strong> whom tend to have poorer relationships with<br />

adults than <strong>the</strong>y do with children, hence believing that children underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>m better<br />

than adults do, <strong>and</strong> that children are less dem<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> judgemental than adults<br />

(O‟Carroll, 1980).<br />

The social <strong>and</strong> psychology explanations <strong>of</strong> <strong>paedophilia</strong> are reinforced in research by<br />

Finklehor (1984). Finklehor believes that <strong>the</strong>re are four central explanations for why<br />

people sexually <strong>of</strong>fend against children; including that paedophiles feel an emotional<br />

congruence with children, that paedophiles have a sexual arousal to children that<br />

paedophiles are unable to have age appropriate relations <strong>and</strong> that paedophiles have<br />

lower levels <strong>of</strong> sexual inhibitions. Finklehors model attempts to give a more rounded<br />

<strong>and</strong> complete explanation <strong>of</strong> why adults sexually abuse children (Finklehor, 1984),<br />

which seems plausible as Finklehors research fits with alterative research findings<br />

(Howitt, 1995; Silverman & Wilson, 2002), including what paedophiles <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

state (O‟Carroll, 1980).<br />

Cycle <strong>of</strong> abuse<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r antecedent <strong>of</strong> child sexual abuse, with a long <strong>and</strong> rich research history, is <strong>the</strong><br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> abuse argument (Finklehor, 1984). The cycle <strong>of</strong> abuse explanation <strong>of</strong> child<br />

sexual abuse states that individuals who have been sexually abused in childhood will<br />

go on to reciprocate <strong>the</strong> abuse in later life (Howitt, 1995; Leberg, 1997; Silverman &<br />

Wilson, 2002). This explanation postulates numerous explanations for why a victim<br />

<strong>of</strong> child sexual abuse may become a perpetrator, including; (1) identification with <strong>the</strong><br />

aggressor (2) anger over <strong>the</strong> abuse that <strong>the</strong>y suffered acted out on o<strong>the</strong>r children (3)<br />

that <strong>the</strong> transition from victim to abuser is merely a career progression, or (4)<br />

psychological damage as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous abuse which has lead to a sexual<br />

fixation on children (Howitt, 1995).<br />

Research suggests that <strong>the</strong>re seems to be a relationship between being abused,<br />

becoming an abuser <strong>and</strong> links to mental disorders (Nurcombe, 2000); suggesting that<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!