08.08.2013 Views

in the court of appeals of the state - Mississippi Supreme Court

in the court of appeals of the state - Mississippi Supreme Court

in the court of appeals of the state - Mississippi Supreme Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>Court</strong> <strong>in</strong>structs <strong>the</strong> Jury that if you f<strong>in</strong>d from a preponderance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> evidence <strong>in</strong> this case that <strong>the</strong> defendant, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber<br />

Company, manufactured a defective tire and that such action, if any,<br />

proximately contributed to <strong>the</strong> happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accident <strong>in</strong> this case and to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>juries, if any, which <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs susta<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong>n you must, <strong>in</strong> arriv<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

your verdict, reduce pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs’ damages, if any, by that percentage which<br />

pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs’ own negligence, if any, proximately contributed to <strong>the</strong> happen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accident and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>juries, if any, susta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

51. The jury also received three additional <strong>in</strong>structions on apportionment <strong>of</strong> damages, one<br />

for each pla<strong>in</strong>tiff. Instruction No. 41 was for <strong>the</strong> heirs <strong>of</strong> Kirby and provides:<br />

On <strong>the</strong> claim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heirs <strong>of</strong> Travis C. Kirby aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> defendants,<br />

Big 10 Tire Company and Goodyear, if you f<strong>in</strong>d from a preponderance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

evidence <strong>in</strong> this case that:<br />

1. The defendants Big 10 Tire Company and Goodyear<br />

were negligent; and<br />

2. Travis C. Kirby was negligent; and<br />

3. The negligence <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> defendants and Travis C.<br />

Kirby were proximate contribut<strong>in</strong>g causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accident <strong>in</strong><br />

question; and<br />

4. The heirs <strong>of</strong> Travis C. Kirby, pla<strong>in</strong>tiff, susta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

damages caused by <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed negligence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> defendants<br />

and Travis C. Kirby;<br />

<strong>the</strong>n you will, <strong>in</strong> arriv<strong>in</strong>g at your verdict, first determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> money<br />

which will fairly and adequately compensate <strong>the</strong> heirs <strong>of</strong> Travis C. Kirby for<br />

said damages, and <strong>the</strong>n reduce this sum <strong>in</strong> proportion to <strong>the</strong> causal negligence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Travis C. Kirby, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g method:<br />

1. Determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> proportion that Travis C. Kirby’s<br />

causal negligence bears to <strong>the</strong> causal negligence as a whole, as<br />

a part or percentage <strong>of</strong> 100 percent = total causal negligence <strong>of</strong><br />

both <strong>the</strong> defendants and Travis C. Kirby;<br />

2. Multiply <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> money you determ<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!