09.08.2013 Views

Hepatitis C: New Treatments in the Pipeline - CD8 T cells - The Body

Hepatitis C: New Treatments in the Pipeline - CD8 T cells - The Body

Hepatitis C: New Treatments in the Pipeline - CD8 T cells - The Body

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20<br />

PROVE 3<br />

Figure 4 . PROVE 3 Study Design<br />

Arm A<br />

(N=110)<br />

Arm B<br />

(N=110)<br />

Arm C<br />

(N=110)<br />

Arm D<br />

(N=110)<br />

Week 12 Week 24 Week 36 Week 48 Week 72<br />

TVR+PEG+RBV PEG+RBV Follow Up<br />

TVR+PEG Follow Up<br />

TVR+PEG+RBV PEG+RBV Follow Up<br />

PEG+RBV Follow Up<br />

Re-treatment options for people who did not respond to pegylated <strong>in</strong>terferon and ribavir<strong>in</strong> are<br />

currently limited to torturous strategies, such as extend<strong>in</strong>g treatment with <strong>the</strong> current standard<br />

of care, and doubl<strong>in</strong>g doses (see Table 2. Re-treatment Trials <strong>in</strong> Non-Responders to PEG-IFN<br />

and Ribavir<strong>in</strong>: Strategies and SVR, page 11).<br />

Unfortunately, PROVE 3 will add a s<strong>in</strong>gle new drug to a previously unsuccessful regimen. At<br />

best, this strategy will yield a higher rate of SVR <strong>in</strong> people who did not respond to re-treatment<br />

with pegylated <strong>in</strong>terferon-based regimens. Hopefully, study participants will not be left with<br />

drug resistance that limits <strong>the</strong>ir future treatment options. If SVR from a telaprevir-based retreatment<br />

regimen surpasses 16% (<strong>the</strong> highest response to re-treatment of non-responders<br />

to pegylated <strong>in</strong>terferon and ribavir<strong>in</strong>; see Table 2. Re-treatment Trials <strong>in</strong> Non-Responders to<br />

at Least 12 Weeks of PEG-IFN and Ribavir<strong>in</strong>: Strategies and SVR, page 11), Vertex may seek<br />

an <strong>in</strong>dication for use <strong>in</strong> this population. Unless <strong>the</strong> results are truly impressive, treatmentexperienced<br />

people should consider wait<strong>in</strong>g—if possible—until telaprevir can be paired with<br />

at least one additional new drug to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> chance of SVR.<br />

Interim data from PROVE 3 are expected <strong>in</strong> May 2008; f<strong>in</strong>al data will follow a year later.<br />

Meanwhile, Tibotec, Vertex’s European development partner, is also conduct<strong>in</strong>g a portfolio<br />

of phase II studies of telaprevir <strong>in</strong> people with genotypes 2, 3, and 4, and different dos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

schedules of telaprevir (every 8 hours, versus every 12 hours) <strong>in</strong> treatment-naïve people with<br />

HCV genotype 1.<br />

In January of 2008, Vertex announced <strong>the</strong> phase III development plan for telaprevir. In <strong>the</strong><br />

first quarter of 2008, <strong>the</strong>y will beg<strong>in</strong> enroll<strong>in</strong>g 1,050 treatment-naïve people who have HCV<br />

genotype 1 <strong>in</strong> ADVANCE, an <strong>in</strong>ternational, three-arm trial (see Figure 5. Telaprevir Phase III<br />

Trial Design, page 21). An additional study will be look<strong>in</strong>g at SVR after 48 weeks of treatment<br />

<strong>in</strong> approximately 400 to 500 people. F<strong>in</strong>al data are expected <strong>in</strong> 2010, and <strong>the</strong> company is<br />

hop<strong>in</strong>g for FDA approval, for an <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>in</strong> treatment-naïve people, by 2011.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!