a randomised controlled trial (MATISSE). - ResearchGate
a randomised controlled trial (MATISSE). - ResearchGate
a randomised controlled trial (MATISSE). - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12 Methods<br />
therapists/facilitators working in a hospital or community setting. Indirect overhead costs<br />
included administrative and managerial support costs and capital overhead costs included the<br />
cost of office space. Total salary and overhead costs were then divided by the average number<br />
of working hours per year, taken from Curtis, 41 to calculate the cost per hour. As well as time in<br />
direct contact with groups, art therapists and activity group facilitators spent time preparing for<br />
the groups and in non-client-related activities, such as training and administration. We therefore<br />
asked each therapist and facilitator to complete a short survey asking how long they spent on<br />
these activities in a typical week. The ratio of direct to indirect client contact that resulted from<br />
this survey was used to calculate the cost per hour of direct client contact. Art therapists and<br />
group facilitators were assisted by co-therapists and facilitators, and their contribution was<br />
calculated by assuming that they were paid as unskilled health-care assistants. In many cases the<br />
assistants were volunteers or students; however, their contribution has been valued monetarily for<br />
the purpose of the economic evaluation as recommended by best practice guidelines 46 and varied<br />
to zero in a sensitivity analysis. The cost per participant was calculated as the sum of therapist/<br />
facilitator and co-therapist/facilitator time in direct client contact for the duration of the groups,<br />
divided by the number per group (eight). We assumed that groups ran for an average of 40 weeks.<br />
Costs were apportioned to each participant on the basis of their <strong>randomised</strong> status, regardless of<br />
attendance at group therapies. This approach is appropriate here because the groups had closed<br />
entry and because it acknowledges that the resources have effectively been consumed by an<br />
individual at the point of allocation to the group and thus cannot be used by anyone else. 47<br />
Calculation of quality-adjusted life-years<br />
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated on the basis of the EQ-5D health state<br />
classification instrument, which has five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/<br />
discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each domain the respondent chooses one of three<br />
levels of functioning – good to poor. The three levels for each of the five domains are used to<br />
define 243 health states. 48 The health states are then given a utility score using responses from a<br />
representative sample of adults in the UK. 49 The QALYs in the second year were discounted at a<br />
rate of 3.5%, as recommended by NICE. 50 The QALYs were calculated as the area under the curve<br />
as defined by the utility values at BSL and at 12 and 24 months’ follow-up, and it was assumed<br />
that changes in utility score over time followed a linear path. 51 The QALYs were adjusted for<br />
BSL covariates.<br />
Cost-effectiveness analysis<br />
Differences in the use of services between <strong>randomised</strong> groups at 12 and 24 months’ follow-up<br />
are reported descriptively and are not compared statistically to avoid problems associated<br />
with multiple testing, and because the focus of the economic evaluation was on cost and costeffectiveness.<br />
Costs and cost-effectiveness were compared in two sets of analyses: (1) art therapy<br />
versus standard care and (2) art therapy versus activity groups.<br />
Primary analysis used available case analysis, including those for whom full data at 12 and<br />
24 months were available; there was no imputation of missing service-use observations. Data<br />
on the use of hospital services were available for a larger sample and the impact on results of<br />
using these costs alone were explored in sensitivity analysis. Initially, standard statistical tests<br />
for differences in costs were used. Although costs were not normally distributed, analyses<br />
compared the mean costs between groups using the standard Student’s t-test. Ordinary least<br />
squares regression was used for the adjusted analyses and the validity of results was confirmed<br />
using bootstrapping. 52 This approach, rather than logarithmic transformation or the use of<br />
non-parametric tests, is used in the analysis of cost data because of the need to make inferences<br />
about the arithmetic mean. 53 The primary analysis was of total costs over 24 months. Multiple<br />
regression was used to adjust for the following prespecified BSL characteristics: site, age, sex and