10.08.2013 Views

Prophet Muhammad and the Black Arabs - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Prophet Muhammad and the Black Arabs - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Prophet Muhammad and the Black Arabs - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

648 <strong>and</strong> 653 are unrecorded, <strong>and</strong> it is precisely during this period (i.e. 650) that this embassy<br />

likely happened (see below), though obviously not on <strong>the</strong> instruction of <strong>Muhammad</strong> who had<br />

been dead for several years by <strong>the</strong>n [Pickens, 1942: 203].<br />

Nor is <strong>the</strong> chronological problem insurmountable. Errors, chronological <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rwise,<br />

as it relates to <strong>the</strong> rise of Islam are certainly found in <strong>the</strong> dynastic annals <strong>and</strong> should not<br />

surprise us [Wakeman, 1990: 409-411, n. 176]. In addition, <strong>the</strong> date most commonly offered in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hui sources for this embassy, 628, is likely wrong on <strong>the</strong> surface, but it also probably has an<br />

accurate date underneath it. Scholars now know that <strong>the</strong> conversion of Muslim lunar dates to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Chinese luni-solar calendar introduced a twenty-one/two year error into <strong>the</strong> Chinese<br />

retelling of Islamic history. When corrected for this error, <strong>the</strong> Chinese Muslim date of <strong>the</strong><br />

embassy, 628, becomes 649-650 <strong>and</strong> agrees precisely with <strong>the</strong> date we get from <strong>the</strong> official<br />

annals for such an embassy (Leslie, 1998: 11 <strong>and</strong> below). Hui tradition <strong>and</strong> Chinese official<br />

records thus agree, suggesting that <strong>the</strong>y “have a foundation in fact” [Pickens, 1942: 208; <strong>Dr</strong>ake,<br />

1943: 23; Hongxun, 1985]. Even though <strong>the</strong> Hui tradition undoubtedly has legendary accretions,<br />

<strong>the</strong> basic claim that Islam first came to China in <strong>the</strong> seventh century with an Arab embassy (that<br />

included Sa’d) has nothing militating against it [Lipman, 1997: 25; Leslie, 1998: 3].<br />

According to Hui tradition, Sa’d <strong>and</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r Arab ambassador, Thabit b. al-Qays, are<br />

among <strong>the</strong> forefa<strong>the</strong>rs of <strong>the</strong> Hui. Their alleged tombs in Guangzhou <strong>and</strong> Hami, Xinjiang are<br />

holy centers to which distressed Believers travel seeking blessings <strong>and</strong> praying for protection<br />

[Garnaut, 2006; Hongxun, 1985; Gladney, 1987: 497-500]. These saints of Chinese Islam are black<br />

<strong>Arabs</strong>. Sa’d b. Abī Waqqās, cousin of <strong>the</strong> prophet’s mo<strong>the</strong>r, Amīna bt. Wahb <strong>and</strong> uncle of<br />

<strong>Muhammad</strong>, was from <strong>the</strong> Banū Zuhra <strong>and</strong> was thus described as black-skinned (ādam), flatnosed<br />

<strong>and</strong> tall [al-Dhahabī, 1981, I:97; Berry, 2002:71-72]. Thabit b. al-Qays was chieftain of Banū<br />

Khazraj, a tribe notorious for having black skin [see <strong>Muhammad</strong>, 2011: 16-17; idem, 2009: 178-<br />

180; Berry, 2002: 68-69]. He was <strong>the</strong> first of Yathrib to swear allegiance to <strong>Muhammad</strong>. These<br />

two famous black-skinned <strong>Arabs</strong> are considered <strong>the</strong> forefa<strong>the</strong>rs of Islam in China <strong>and</strong> are<br />

among Chinese Islam’s most holy figures, Sa’d certainly <strong>the</strong> holiest, second only to <strong>Muhammad</strong>.<br />

4. The <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Arabs</strong> in Official Chinese Records<br />

China had contacts with Western Asia as early as <strong>the</strong> pre-Imperial Period, before <strong>the</strong><br />

second century B.C.E. Envoys of <strong>the</strong> Han dynasty (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) with caravan reached<br />

Arabia ca. 206 B.C.E. As late as <strong>the</strong> fifth century C.E. during <strong>the</strong> Liu-Sung dynasty (420-479 C.E.)<br />

Chinese trading ships had anchored in <strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>and</strong> traded with <strong>Arabs</strong>. Formal relations with<br />

Arabia, however, began only with <strong>the</strong> T’ang dynasty (618 -907 C.E.), which was contemporary<br />

with <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>and</strong> zenith of Arabian/Islamic power [Baojun, 2001: 80; Jun-yan, 1980: 91;<br />

Bretschneider, 1929; idem, 1871].<br />

In 638 Yazdigird III, gr<strong>and</strong>son of Chosroes <strong>and</strong> Sasānian ruler of Persia, sent an embassy<br />

to China appealing to <strong>the</strong> T’ang emperor, T’ai-tsung, for assistance against <strong>the</strong> <strong>Arabs</strong> who had<br />

invaded his realm. Yazdigird’s son <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> last Sasānian ruler, Fīrūz, made a similar appeal in<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!