10.08.2013 Views

Volume 31 – 1990 (PDF) - Searching The Scriptures

Volume 31 – 1990 (PDF) - Searching The Scriptures

Volume 31 – 1990 (PDF) - Searching The Scriptures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 6 ___________<br />

MARRIAGE OF THE SONS OF GOD TO THE<br />

DAUGHTERS OF MEN<br />

QUESTION: Who are the sons of God and who are<br />

the daughters of men in Genesis 6: 2, 4?<br />

ANSWER: <strong>The</strong> verses state, "That the sons of God<br />

saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they<br />

took them wives of all which they chose. <strong>The</strong>re were<br />

giants in the earth in those days; and also after that,<br />

when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of<br />

men, and they bare children to them, the same became<br />

mighty men which were of old, men of renown. "<br />

<strong>The</strong> sons of God were apparently the pious descendants<br />

of Seth who married the daughters of men, viz.,<br />

women of the world who lacked spiritual devotion and<br />

piety. Seth was regarded by his mother, Eve, as a son<br />

from God as she said, "For God... hath appointed me<br />

another seed instead of Abel whom Cain slew" (Gen.<br />

4: 25). After the birth of Seth's son, Enos, men (evidently,<br />

descendants of Seth), began "to call upon the<br />

name of the Lord" (Gen. 4: 26).<br />

While the family of Cainites was laying the foundation<br />

for a kingdom of worldly arts and business (Gen.<br />

4: 16-24), the family of Sethites began by united<br />

invocation of the name of God. Hence, the sons of God<br />

would, seemingly, be the Sethites and the daughters<br />

of men appear to be the Cainite women.<br />

A bizarre and fanciful theory is that the sons of God<br />

were angels who took on the form of men and married<br />

earthly women. But Jesus taught that angels do not<br />

marry (Matt. 20: 30; Lk. 20: 35-36). If angels could<br />

have come and married women of this earth, good<br />

angels would not have done so, and bad angels would<br />

not have been called, "the sons of God. " Though<br />

angels are designated "sons of God, " (Job 1: 6; 2: 1; 38:<br />

7), it does not follow that angels are meant in Gen. 6: 2,<br />

4. Adam was "the son of God" (Lk. 3: 38), the Israelites<br />

were "sons of God" (Deut. 14: 1, NASB) and<br />

Christians are "sons of God" (Rom. 8: 14; Gal. 3: 26,<br />

NASB). <strong>The</strong>refore, the descendants of Seth could well<br />

have been "the sons of God. "<br />

Several use Jude, vv. 6 & 7, as a proof-text that<br />

angels were "the sons of God" in Gen. 6: 2, 4. <strong>The</strong><br />

verses read, "And the angels which kept not their own<br />

principality, but left their proper habitation, he hath<br />

kept in everlasting bonds... Even as Sodom and<br />

Gomorrah, and the cities about them, having in like<br />

manner with these given themselves over to<br />

fornication and gone<br />

after strange flesh.... " (ASV).<br />

We are told that "these" in v. 7 modifies "angels" in v.<br />

6. <strong>The</strong> Expositor's Greek Testament states, "the fallen<br />

angels... In the case of the angels the forbidden flesh...<br />

refers to the intercourse with women" (Vol. 5, p. 260). It<br />

is alleged that the pronoun toutois (these) is masculine<br />

gender and Sodom and Gomorrah are neuter and do not<br />

agree in gender. Hence, "these" could not modify Sodom<br />

and Gomorrah, but must refer back to angels.<br />

However, toutois is dative plural of toutos and Moulton<br />

states this pronoun is "masculine and neuter"<br />

(Analytical Greek Lexicon, p. 407), having, therefore, the<br />

same form in both masculine and neuter. Hence, toutois<br />

(these) can modify Sodom and Gomorrah, and the meaning<br />

would be that "the cities about them, " Admah and<br />

Zeboim (Deut. 19: 23; Hosea 11: 8), were sexual<br />

deviants — homosexuals, just like Sodom and Gomorrah.<br />

(Zoar, a fifth city in the vicinity, was spared by the<br />

intercession of Lot (Gen. 19: 21, 22). Where two or<br />

more antecedents are grammatically possible, the<br />

nearer one is selected.<br />

Angels sinned by leaving their habitation. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

nothing in Jude, or any other place in the Bible about<br />

angels cohabiting with women. <strong>The</strong> offspring of the illassorted<br />

marriages of Gen. 6: 4 became giants, i. e.,<br />

gigantic human beings, men of great renown<br />

physically. <strong>The</strong> word "giants" (Nephilim, ASV) is<br />

obviously used for the offspring of men in Num. 13: 33.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Bible gives us a record of some men who were<br />

large in stature. Og, king of Bashan, is called a giant,<br />

whose bed was 9 cubits long and 4 cubits wide or 13 1/2<br />

ft. by 6 ft. (Deut. 3; 11). <strong>The</strong> Egyptian, whom Benaiah<br />

slew, was 5 cubits tall (7 1/2 ft. ), and Goliath, the<br />

Philistine, was 6 cubits and a span tall or about 9 3/4 feet.<br />

So, let us not imagine that the "giants" of Genesis 6: 4<br />

were the superhuman prodigy of wicked angels and<br />

ungodly women.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!