10.08.2013 Views

A Nuclear Cross Section Data Handbook

A Nuclear Cross Section Data Handbook

A Nuclear Cross Section Data Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

~Uij(E)<br />

j<br />

The “total” heating number includes the energies of all photons produ~, the<br />

“local” heating number has the photon energies removed. The distinction between<br />

j and jt is significant. The cross sections for the j~ photon production reactions<br />

are independent of the j neutron reactions. In calculating H~l(E) one takes the<br />

difference between two large numbers. Extreme care must be taken in the calculation<br />

of k~(l?) and k~,(E) but - more importantly - extreme care is needed<br />

in the preparation of the evaluated data to insure that proper energy balance is<br />

maintained. When energy balance is considered appropriately, the local heating<br />

numbers H~ti~(E) will be positive.<br />

An alternative and somewhat simpler depiction of the heating number is the<br />

difference calculation employed by Carter and Cashwell (Ref. 13). In this caae<br />

(8)<br />

H=lJ+~--Et-rt (9)<br />

where E is the incident neutron energy, ~ is the average Q-Value, E’ is the average<br />

energy of the secondary neutrons, and 17’ is the average energy of the outgoing<br />

photons.<br />

The difference (E+~)-(E’+1”) is the charged particle heating assumed to be<br />

deposited within a negligible distance from the reaction (hence the term local neutron<br />

heating). The assumption is that neutrons and photons escape the immediate<br />

volume and deposit their energy elsewhere.<br />

Equation (9) again reinforces the fact that the incorrect calculation of P will<br />

result in negative heating numbers. In the past this problem has been particularly<br />

troublesome as illustrated in the work of Soran and Seamen (Ref. 12) where 26 of<br />

the 68 evaluations on the RMCCS library at that time had negative local heating<br />

numbers. Compare that with the present MCNP library which has 28 of the 129<br />

evaluations with at least one negative local heating number; those evaluations are<br />

listed in Table V. Two factors essential in the improvement of the heating number<br />

calculation are a) better energy balance considerations and b) significantly improved<br />

evaluations and evaluational methods. Incidentally, the Monte Carlo code<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!