10.08.2013 Views

SHIRBURNS of Stoneyhurst.pdf - Ingilby History

SHIRBURNS of Stoneyhurst.pdf - Ingilby History

SHIRBURNS of Stoneyhurst.pdf - Ingilby History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> secular priests <strong>of</strong> the Ch[urch] <strong>of</strong> Rome” 22 . However, witnesses were never called and the case<br />

was unexpectedly dismissed, as Sir Nicholas presented a mass <strong>of</strong> documentation to prove that at that<br />

time the lands were simply not his to give. They had been, instead, part <strong>of</strong> the property <strong>of</strong> his elder<br />

brother, who was now safely dead and could not possibly be called to give an account <strong>of</strong> his gifting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the lands in question 23 . It may well have been this skilful defence, coupled with the ignominious<br />

collapse <strong>of</strong> the Manchester Treason Trials in the following year, which caused the authorities to<br />

subsequently relent in their pursuit <strong>of</strong> Sir Nicholas. Similar charges, regarding the settling <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chipping estate upon “Charles Panket, a Popish priest … [and] at his death in a succession for ever<br />

to Popish priests”, were, however, reactivated in December 1716, when the government sought once<br />

more to clamp down upon the twin threats posed by religious dissent and by Jacobite political<br />

activism. New depositions suggested that the original gift <strong>of</strong> the property had been made by Sir<br />

Nicholas’ mother, and not by his elder brother as had been previously alleged, and <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

compelling pro<strong>of</strong> that Father Panket had lived openly, and in some considerable, style at a house in<br />

Chipping Lane 24 . Perhaps, more worrying to Hanoverian and Anglican <strong>of</strong>ficials, was the contention<br />

<strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> Sir Nicholas’ tenants – when accused <strong>of</strong> ignoring his own “poor relations” and <strong>of</strong><br />

subdividing his land so that he might be better able to support the covert activities <strong>of</strong> the missionary<br />

priests – that his kinsmen “could not do him so great kindness as the Priests”, while affirming that<br />

“all that I ever have shall go for pious uses” 25 . However, just as before, the prosecutions <strong>of</strong> Sir<br />

Nicholas and his tenants were destined to stall and to fail, not as the result <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> compelling<br />

evidence or for the want <strong>of</strong> potential informers, but on account <strong>of</strong> the total absence – on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

the local authorities - <strong>of</strong> a sufficiently strong political will and sense <strong>of</strong> self-assurance with to pursue<br />

22 Beamont, op.cit. p.3.<br />

23 Beaumont, op.cit. p.7.<br />

24 J.O. Payne (ed), Records <strong>of</strong> the English Catholics <strong>of</strong> 1715 (London, 1889), p.95.<br />

25 Payne, op.cit. p.106.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!