18.10.2012 Views

Becoming a cHamPion BRanD: - APCO Worldwide

Becoming a cHamPion BRanD: - APCO Worldwide

Becoming a cHamPion BRanD: - APCO Worldwide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

RoBeRt ScHooling<br />

President, Americas<br />

<strong>APCO</strong> <strong>Worldwide</strong><br />

1<br />

JANUARY 2012<br />

The below is a speech presented on January 27, 2012, by Robert Schooling at<br />

the Conference Board’s Corporate Image and Branding Conference: Powerful<br />

Strategies that Build Loyalty and Value.<br />

Good morning. I’m Robert Schooling, president of <strong>APCO</strong> in the Americas. I<br />

appreciate the opportunity to speak with you today about the revolution that is<br />

underway in the expectations for corporate brands, and how smart companies can<br />

lead that revolution.<br />

I’m going to suggest a total re-evaluation of how we think about corporate<br />

brands and the demolition of the idea of reputation as a way of thinking about the<br />

corporate brand, but beyond that, nothing too ambitious.<br />

Before joining <strong>APCO</strong>, I was in politics, where the questions seemed more important.<br />

We weren’t just communicating—we were building relationships with constituencies<br />

and engaging in common purpose to elect the right candidate. The future of<br />

democracy hung in the balance every November.<br />

In fact, it wasn’t about the candidates at all; they were just individuals who were<br />

symbolic of something more meaningful. We were working for a cause, something<br />

bigger than ourselves.<br />

Over my years at <strong>APCO</strong>, I was still interested in working on “something bigger<br />

than ourselves.” My work turned to reputation as a way of helping clients—both<br />

companies and industries—define themselves in ways that would give them an<br />

advantage in dealing with a variety of stakeholders—from policymakers and NGOs<br />

to customers and investors.


<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

At the same time, something was changing. All the old castles crumbled. The walls<br />

came down. We’ve heard a lot during this conference about the transformation<br />

we are all going through. But I don’t think we can overstate the extent of<br />

this transformation or the extent to which its implications should be seen in<br />

fundamental—not just tactical—ways.<br />

I believe we are in the early stages of a reevaluation of the relationship between<br />

people and companies—and for companies, that reevaluation is going to create<br />

winners and losers.<br />

Muhammad Ali wasn’t just the greatest boxing champion of all time, he was also a<br />

social activist whose words still have the ring of truth today: “It isn’t the mountains<br />

ahead to climb that wear you out; it’s the pebble in your shoe.”<br />

Two different pebbles in our metaphorical shoes have transformed the way<br />

companies need to do business if they want to get to the top of the mountain:<br />

1. Technology has upended the relationship between individuals and companies<br />

by democratizing information. Corporate information is available anytime,<br />

anywhere—and because only a fraction of that information comes from the<br />

company itself, the result is blurred and limited message control. Information<br />

is no longer mediated by the media and other institutions. As a consequence,<br />

the ability of traditional communications to control corporate imagery has<br />

been radically diminished.<br />

2. The expectations for companies have changed. We are seeing governments’<br />

ability to meet needs weaken and the scale of corporations grow inexorably<br />

larger. The lines are blurring between the province of government and<br />

the province of corporations—and like government, the companies need<br />

the permission of the people to operate and succeed. As a consequence,<br />

stakeholders’ expectations of companies are not only increasing but<br />

increasingly important to the success of the company.<br />

The most successful companies, the Champion Brands, will need to keep pace with—or<br />

better yet, get ahead of—the revolution in communications wrought by technology at a<br />

time when expectations of companies have increased exponentially.<br />

As we think about these trends and the implications for creating greater corporate<br />

brand value, we first need to recognize that the people we are talking to have also<br />

changed.<br />

The NeW STAkehOlder hAS GreAT exPeCTATiONS<br />

Muhammad Ali famously said, “A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did<br />

at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.” If you still think about your stakeholders the<br />

way you did five years ago, The Champ would tell you you’ve wasted the last five years.<br />

2


<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

WhO Are The NeW STAkehOlderS, ANd WhAT dO They WANT?<br />

The new stakeholder is:<br />

1. Often self-appointed<br />

2. Feels invested in the success of your company<br />

3. Expects companies to be champions for their interests<br />

I like to think of this modern stakeholder as the new Renaissance person. This<br />

new Renaissance person is no longer defined by a single characteristic like their<br />

occupation or place of residence. They wear multiple hats—they are simultaneously<br />

an accountant, a mother, a community volunteer, an investor and an environmental<br />

activist. The traditional means of segmenting people or groups into discrete<br />

audiences is over.<br />

The old “Renaissance man” was someone of high culture who spoke five languages<br />

and read Plato in the original Greek—but this new incarnation is much more<br />

democratized, a function of ideas and engagement, not just knowledge alone. In the<br />

new world almost anyone can be a new Renaissance person.<br />

The new Renaissance stakeholder is invested in the success of your business. They are<br />

financially invested—witness the huge increase in the number of people who actually<br />

own shares in companies and actively manage these portfolios. But these people also<br />

are invested because you are:<br />

• Creating jobs<br />

• Influencing public policy<br />

• Determining whether communities thrive or die<br />

• Creating a cleaner, healthier environment<br />

• And on, and on<br />

Indeed, these people understand and recognize that a company’s influence often<br />

outpaces the influence that government can have on their lives.<br />

We need to undergo a mind-shift in the way we think about all these people—these<br />

stakeholders—who matter to us. Because they have real power and influence, they<br />

are no longer “audiences.” They are truly partners in the success of your enterprise<br />

who have very specific and informed opinions about your company. We can’t expect<br />

to only share information with them—we also have to share power with them.<br />

3


The NeW STAkehOlder NeedS TO be eNGAGed<br />

<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

These new stakeholders understand that something sits behind the product brands—<br />

that there is a corporate entity that can and should be engaged with them.<br />

• Corporate sloganeering is now dismissed as cynical. It isn’t enough to have<br />

clever advertising—stakeholders are looking for a relationship.<br />

• Having a Facebook page and Twitter handle are tactics, not strategies. Of<br />

course, we need to be digitally engaged—but we need to know where that<br />

engagement is taking us.<br />

• Corporate responsibility and philanthropy can be important tools, but they<br />

only address a certain group of stakeholders and don’t always speak to the<br />

core values of the company operating in society. They, too, need to be part of<br />

a singular integrated vision for how the company enters into a relationship with<br />

its stakeholders.<br />

There was an interesting study published recently by Harvard that looked at what they<br />

called “high-sustainability” companies—those that more fully embraced sustainable<br />

business practices, non-financial reporting and certain governance practices. The<br />

study found that those companies substantially outperformed other companies that<br />

did not adopt those same measures.<br />

My suspicion is that this study is a clue to something larger—that these companies<br />

are more likely to be better at building relationships and engaging sustainably with a<br />

variety of stakeholders—not just those traditionally defined by “sustainability.”<br />

Real engagement is the way Champion Brands will be built in this new environment.<br />

Creating enduring, non-transactional relationships between companies and their<br />

stakeholders is the way to get the pebbles out of our shoes and climb up the mountain.<br />

The relationships we help create open the door not only for creating stronger<br />

brands, but also for gaining better insights about the marketplace and identifying<br />

opportunities to create more innovative solutions that will pay off for both the<br />

corporation and its stakeholders.<br />

eNduriNG relATiONShiPS CreATe eNduriNG brANd VAlue<br />

Warren Buffett said, “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to<br />

ruin it.” In the current environment, I think that sentiment is truer than ever—and<br />

a reasonable conclusion for a CEO to draw is that we shouldn’t be investing in<br />

reputation if it is so easily destroyed. I agree.<br />

4


<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

We need to create a new way of thinking about corporate brands that is more<br />

enduring.<br />

We are now in an environment where the idea of reputation has limited utility and<br />

meaning. When stakeholders can mobilize opinion and allies in minutes, reputation<br />

as we know it is temporal. Companies that rely on the idea of reputation alone in<br />

building their corporate brand are going to lose ground.<br />

After all, we’ve all watched companies whose good reputations have come crashing<br />

down to earth when faced with bad facts. For many companies there appears to be<br />

cyclicality to their reputation, while other companies are more resistant to downturns.<br />

What is the difference between them?<br />

We’ve deduced some important trends when looking at our clients and over a<br />

decade of research. There are qualities that separate the merely good corporate<br />

brands from the Champion Brands—qualities that make them more resistant to bad<br />

news, better able to adapt to changing market conditions and better able to innovate<br />

and succeed.<br />

So the question we set out to answer was whether or not there was a methodology,<br />

both for research as well as for implementation, that could yield better results—<br />

an approach to creating Champion Brands that would be more meaningful, less<br />

mercurial and better suited to this new environment.<br />

buildiNG A ChAmPiON brANd: The FOur A’S<br />

We developed a new way to measure, understand and ultimately create corporate<br />

value by creating Champion Brands. Our model is based on what we call the “Four<br />

A’s.” Think of it as a credit rating for your brand—are you a single A-, double A-, triple<br />

A- or quadruple A-rated brand?<br />

1. The first A is Alignment: This is the extent to which you are aligned with the<br />

expectations of your stakeholders. We can identify the most persuasive ways<br />

to close the gap between current perceptions and stakeholder expectations.<br />

It’s the way almost all corporate and reputation research is done, and it is a<br />

critical first step—without it you can’t progress through the other stages. But it<br />

isn’t sufficient.<br />

2. The second A is Attachment: Most companies understand the need to<br />

create an emotional connection between their products or services and their<br />

customers. But few companies understand the need to create an emotional<br />

connection between stakeholders and the company itself. Companies are<br />

brands too, and stakeholders need to feel an attachment to, and have a<br />

relationship with, the company.<br />

5


<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

Pushing those disciplines together would be a good start—but still not enough.<br />

3. In the world we live in—of increasing transparency—there is a third A—<br />

Authenticity. Companies must say what they mean, mean what they say and do<br />

what they say. The degree to which their actions and words are truly reflective<br />

of their corporate character is critical. There has been a fair amount of good<br />

thinking and writing done about this from groups like the Page Society and<br />

others. They claim that the best companies find the sweet spot for their brand<br />

in the places where they are truly most able to make a difference in the lives of<br />

all of their stakeholders, and to do so sustainably within their business model.<br />

Building a positioning on a false premise is doomed to fail. I don’t think we need to<br />

name names, but we’ve all seen companies that have attempted to be something<br />

they are not. The results are a huge waste of resource and a cynicism about the brand<br />

that is hard to erase.<br />

When companies are aligned, create attachment and are authentic, they have a very,<br />

very strong brand. But there’s a fourth step to become a Champion Brand.<br />

The ChAmPiON brANd iS AN AdVOCATe FOr iTS STAkehOlderS<br />

There is an old saying in politics that “great campaigns are about the voter, and bad<br />

campaigns are about the candidate.” This is particularly apt as we think about the<br />

meaning of corporate brands in the current environment. In addition to Alignment,<br />

emotional Attachment, and Authenticity stands the fourth differentiating factor:<br />

Advocacy—standing for something bigger than yourself.<br />

Instead of thinking about how to turn our various stakeholders into “brand<br />

champions” for us, we should be asking how we can become champions for our<br />

mutual interests. To paraphrase John F. Kennedy, ask not what your stakeholders can<br />

do for you, ask what you can do for your stakeholders.<br />

Companies are now being asked to show how they add value to society. Don’t<br />

mistake advocacy for cause marketing, or corporate responsibility, or philanthropy—<br />

they are all potential subsets of the idea, but not the idea itself. Advocacy is about<br />

what you stand for—explaining why you’re in business in a way that works in common<br />

cause with your stakeholders. It means acting on your mutual values. It means<br />

building your business while improving society.<br />

The very best and most powerful brands in the world already do this. They stand for<br />

something bigger than themselves, and in the conduct of their business they are<br />

also advocates for their stakeholders. Their customers and their stakeholders believe<br />

that the company is actively working for their interests, and because of that, they are<br />

willing to give the company the benefit of the doubt when and if it slips.<br />

6


<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

We also found that this insight has tangible meaning in the execution of traditional<br />

programs. We were able to show quantitatively that the impact of communications<br />

was greatly enhanced when the nature of the communication was oriented toward<br />

engagement and advocating common cause rather than toward conveying information.<br />

Most importantly, Champion Brands generate outcomes that strengthen their<br />

business—they are better able to avoid the cyclical effects of a reputation based<br />

solely on dry and changing facts. Champion Brands talk differently, act differently<br />

and build more enduring relationships with their stakeholders than other brands that<br />

simply have good reputations.<br />

ChAmPiON brANdS PerFOrm beTTer<br />

We’ve seen in our research a clear correlation between perceptions of the corporate<br />

brand and business outcomes such as sales, employee loyalty, policy outcomes and<br />

shareholder value.<br />

Let me give you a few examples from two different industries:<br />

First, we recently conducted a study of the retail industry. Our research found that<br />

companies that create two-way dialogue—that truly engage—with the communities<br />

in which they operate are more likely to have favorable business outcomes. Our<br />

analysis revealed that improving perceptions of companies in the retail sector by only<br />

one point on our Index (from 0-100) leads to:<br />

• Greater spending by consumers—$133 more per year for the average<br />

consumer. If every retail company in the United States moved up the ladder one<br />

point toward being a Champion Brand, we could inject nearly $35 billion into<br />

the economy and the retail sector.<br />

• Enhanced employee engagement and retention—503,000 more retail<br />

employees would stay with their companies.<br />

• Stronger shareholder value to the tune of half a percentage point increase in<br />

market capitalization (that’s many billions of dollars for some of the largest retail<br />

companies).<br />

These tangible business results apply to not only those companies with<br />

prominent consumer-facing brands. We have also found that in industries like the<br />

pharmaceutical sector, where the corporate brand is several steps removed from<br />

the consumer, those companies that are seen as advocates for society and their<br />

stakeholders perform better. The research shows that standing for something bigger<br />

than producing safe and innovative products leads to stronger brands. Specifically,<br />

we discovered that being seen as a leader in addressing public health challenges,<br />

such as chronic disease, is a key opportunity to improving perceptions and business<br />

7


<strong>Becoming</strong> a <strong>cHamPion</strong> <strong>BRanD</strong>:<br />

Differentiating Yourself in the Marketplace<br />

outcomes. The data shows that companies that improve perceptions of their brand by<br />

only one point would see:<br />

• An average increase in annual sales of 3.33 percent.<br />

• An additional 83,000 activists actively and vocally speaking on behalf of the<br />

company.<br />

Investing in your corporate brand isn’t only about being trusted or admired—it’s about<br />

being more successful. These are tangible metrics executives and Boards of Directors<br />

will expect from us. Our model proves that it really pays to be a Champion Brand.<br />

ChAmPiON brANdS FulFill A NeW CONTrACT WiTh STAkehOlderS<br />

I’d like to conclude by discussing what I think this means in the big picture for all of<br />

us—both wearing our hats as stakeholders and as representatives of our companies.<br />

Building a Champion Brand is about embracing a new contract that reframes the<br />

relationships between companies and their stakeholders.<br />

Just as governments have always needed the permission of the people to operate<br />

and succeed, and companies then required a “license to operate” from governments,<br />

companies now need the direct permission of their stakeholders to grow.<br />

This new contract is based on working in common cause to add value to society while<br />

adding value to the company. It leads to more direct interactions, more successful<br />

negotiations and better results for both stakeholders and corporations.<br />

Advocacy is at the core of this new contract. The new stakeholder demands it. Growth<br />

requires it. Now there’s a methodology both for research and implementation that<br />

pinpoints a company’s need to advocate based on shared values, creates advocacy<br />

programs based on common cause, and pays back in predictable, tangible ways. We<br />

know it pays back, because we measure the outcomes.<br />

I think the good news for people in our business is that we have an opportunity to help<br />

shape reality, not just react to it. We are at a critical turning point—and all of us in this<br />

room are lucky to be at the right place at the right time to do something about it.<br />

Thank you for your time today. I’d be happy to answer any questions.<br />

For more information about the Champion Brand, please visit www.apcochampionbrand.com.<br />

© 2012 <strong>APCO</strong> <strong>Worldwide</strong> Inc. All rights reserved. Design: Studio<strong>APCO</strong> ®<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!