Introduction to Phytoremediation - CLU-IN
Introduction to Phytoremediation - CLU-IN
Introduction to Phytoremediation - CLU-IN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.1 Background<br />
Phy<strong>to</strong>remediation is the name given <strong>to</strong> a set of technologies<br />
that use plants <strong>to</strong> clean contaminated sites. Many techniques<br />
and applications have been called phy<strong>to</strong>remediation,<br />
possibly leading <strong>to</strong> confusion. This document uses the term<br />
phy<strong>to</strong>remediation <strong>to</strong> refer <strong>to</strong> a set of plant-contaminant interactions,<br />
and not <strong>to</strong> any specific application. Many of the<br />
phy<strong>to</strong>remediation techniques involve applying information that<br />
has been known for years in agriculture, silviculture, and<br />
horticulture <strong>to</strong> environmental problems.<br />
The term phy<strong>to</strong>remediation (phy<strong>to</strong> = plant and remediation<br />
= correct evil) is relatively new, coined in 1991. Basic information<br />
for what is now called phy<strong>to</strong>remediation comes from<br />
a variety of research areas including constructed wetlands,<br />
oil spills, and agricultural plant accumulation of heavy metals.<br />
The term has been used widely since its inception, with<br />
a variety of specific meanings. In this document<br />
phy<strong>to</strong>remediation is used <strong>to</strong> mean the overall idea of using<br />
plant-based environmental technologies, not any specific<br />
application.<br />
Research efforts in<strong>to</strong> remediation can be roughly categorized<br />
in<strong>to</strong> two sets: exploration of mechanisms and evaluation<br />
of claims. Mechanism work has centered on finding theoretical<br />
limits, and explanations for results observed in the field.<br />
Pilot-scale field work has both preceded and followed explana<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
labora<strong>to</strong>ry research, and early successes have piqued<br />
interest. Long-term, objective field evaluation is critical <strong>to</strong> understanding<br />
how well phy<strong>to</strong>remediation may work, what the<br />
real cost of application will be, and how <strong>to</strong> build models <strong>to</strong><br />
predict the interaction between plants and contaminants. Most<br />
of the projects are ongoing and thus provide only preliminary<br />
data.<br />
2.1.1 Applications<br />
Phy<strong>to</strong>remediation applications (as shown in Figure 2-1 and<br />
Table 2-1) can be classified based on the contaminant fate:<br />
degradation, extraction, containment, or a combination of these.<br />
Phy<strong>to</strong>remediation applications can also be classified based<br />
on the mechanisms involved. Such mechanisms include extraction<br />
of contaminants from soil or groundwater; concentration<br />
of contaminants in plant tissue; degradation of contaminants<br />
by various biotic or abiotic processes; volatilization or<br />
transpiration of volatile contaminants from plants <strong>to</strong> the air;<br />
immobilization of contaminants in the root zone; hydraulic<br />
control of contaminated groundwater (plume control); and<br />
Chapter 2<br />
Overview of Phy<strong>to</strong>remediation<br />
3<br />
control of runoff, erosion, and infiltration by vegetative covers.<br />
A brief explanation of these application categories follows,<br />
with more detailed explanations in following chapters.<br />
2.1.1.1 Degradation<br />
Plants may enhance degradation in the rhizosphere (root<br />
zone of influence). Microbial counts in rhizosphere soils can<br />
be 1 or 2 orders of magnitude greater than in nonrhizosphere<br />
soils. It is not known whether this is due <strong>to</strong> microbial or fungal<br />
symbiosis with the plant, plant exudates including enzymes,<br />
or other physical/chemical effects in the root zone. There are,<br />
however, measurable effects on certain contaminants in the<br />
root zone of planted areas. Several projects examine the interaction<br />
between plants and such contaminants as trinitro<strong>to</strong>luene<br />
(TNT), <strong>to</strong>tal petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), pentachlorophenol<br />
(PCP), and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).<br />
Another possible mechanism for contaminant degradation<br />
is metabolism within the plant. Some plants may be able <strong>to</strong><br />
take in <strong>to</strong>xic compounds and in the process of metabolizing<br />
the available nutrients, de<strong>to</strong>xify them. Trichloroethylene (TCE)<br />
is possibly degraded in poplar trees and the carbon used for<br />
tissue growth while the chloride is expelled through the roots.<br />
EPA has three projects underway in the field using populus<br />
species <strong>to</strong> remediate TCE. Tests at the University of Washing<strong>to</strong>n<br />
are being developed <strong>to</strong> verify this degradation mechanism<br />
under controlled conditions.<br />
2.1.1.2 Extraction<br />
Phy<strong>to</strong>extraction, or phy<strong>to</strong>mining, is the process of planting<br />
a crop of a species that is known <strong>to</strong> accumulate contaminants<br />
in the shoots and leaves of the plants, and then harvesting<br />
the crop and removing the contaminant from the site.<br />
Unlike the destructive degradation mechanisms, this technique<br />
yields a mass of plant and contaminant (typically metals)<br />
that must be transported for disposal or recycling. This is<br />
a concentration technology that leaves a much smaller mass<br />
<strong>to</strong> be disposed of when compared <strong>to</strong> excavation and landfilling.<br />
This technology is being evaluated in a Superfund Innovative<br />
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration, and may also<br />
be a technology amenable <strong>to</strong> contaminant recovery and recycling.<br />
Rhizofiltration is similar <strong>to</strong> phy<strong>to</strong>extraction in that it<br />
is also a concentration technology. It differs from phy<strong>to</strong>extraction