Global Value Chains: Impacts and Implications - Center on ...
Global Value Chains: Impacts and Implications - Center on ...
Global Value Chains: Impacts and Implications - Center on ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g>:<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Impacts</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Implicati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Aar<strong>on</strong> Sydor<br />
Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist<br />
Foreign Affairs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Trade Canada
Overview<br />
What is a global value chain (GVC)?<br />
How GVCs Fit In<br />
Drivers<br />
Measures<br />
High <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g>s Activities<br />
Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Outsourcing<br />
Wrap-up<br />
2
What Is A <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chain?<br />
3
Headquarters<br />
Corporate<br />
Services<br />
Finance<br />
HR/ Payroll<br />
IT<br />
Marketing<br />
Logistics<br />
R&D<br />
R&D<br />
A simplified value chain…<br />
Inputs Assembly Distributi<strong>on</strong> Sales Service<br />
Intermediate<br />
Input<br />
Services<br />
Intermediate<br />
Input<br />
Assembly<br />
Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />
Sales<br />
After Sales<br />
Service<br />
4
Headquarters<br />
Corporate<br />
Services<br />
Finance<br />
HR/ Payroll<br />
IT<br />
Marketing<br />
Logistics<br />
R&D<br />
R&D<br />
R&D<br />
R&D<br />
…individual functi<strong>on</strong>s become<br />
separable…<br />
Inputs<br />
Intermediate<br />
Inputs Input Assembly Distributi<strong>on</strong> Sales Service<br />
Intermediate<br />
Services Input<br />
Services<br />
Intermediate<br />
Input<br />
Intermediate<br />
Input<br />
Assembly<br />
Assembly<br />
Assembly<br />
Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />
Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />
Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />
Sales<br />
Sales<br />
Sales<br />
Service<br />
After Sales<br />
Service<br />
After Sales<br />
Service<br />
5
R&D<br />
…which can then be located anywhere<br />
in the world<br />
Company<br />
HQ<br />
Lawyers<br />
Call-Centre<br />
& IT<br />
Manufacturing<br />
Inputs<br />
6
How GVCs Fit In<br />
7
A comm<strong>on</strong> definiti<strong>on</strong> of GVCs<br />
A global value chain describes the full range of activities<br />
undertaken to bring a product or service from its<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> to its end use <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> how these activities are<br />
distributed over geographic space <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> across<br />
internati<strong>on</strong>al borders*<br />
* Adapted from the global value chains initiative at Duke University<br />
8
How GVCs fit into trade theory<br />
Why Firms Trade<br />
Classical<br />
Ricardo Differences in Technology<br />
H-O<br />
New Trade Theory<br />
Krugman<br />
Heterogeneous Firms<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Fenstra <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Hans<strong>on</strong><br />
Grossman <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Rossi-Hansberg<br />
Differences in Endowments<br />
Scale, Trade Costs<br />
Various IP, Management, Technology<br />
Activities<br />
Tasks<br />
Source of Advantage<br />
Locati<strong>on</strong> –<br />
Often Country<br />
Industry<br />
Firm<br />
Within Firm<br />
9
Classical<br />
Resource exports<br />
New Trade Theory<br />
Heterogeneous Firms<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
How GVCs explain trade<br />
Labour intensive exports from countries with cheap labour<br />
Industrial clustering<br />
Multinati<strong>on</strong>als<br />
Performance differences between firms<br />
Trade in intermediate inputs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services<br />
Move from horiz<strong>on</strong>tal to vertical FDI<br />
10
Why this matters<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> value chains do not make comparative advantage any less<br />
relevant (as some have claimed).<br />
– In fact, the opposite is more likely the case…GVCs give<br />
comparative advantage a finer edge.<br />
Same gains from trade!<br />
– Gains from trade may be even greater when trade takes place<br />
at a more granular level.<br />
Provides an important link between trade in goods, services,<br />
inward <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outward FDI, movement of ideas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> of people.<br />
Competiti<strong>on</strong> increases <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> becomes more refined.<br />
11
Drivers of GVCs<br />
12
1000<br />
900<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
Rising oil prices d<strong>on</strong>’t seem to be having<br />
a major impact <strong>on</strong> global trade<br />
Index<br />
1983 = 100<br />
Oil Prices <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> Trade<br />
1983 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009<br />
*U.S. dollars per barrel, near m<strong>on</strong>th Cushing future <strong>on</strong> NYMEX.<br />
Data: WTO <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S. Department of Energy<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
World<br />
Manufacturing<br />
Imports<br />
Oil Price*<br />
13
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
The growth of c<strong>on</strong>tainer shipping also<br />
seems to have had limited impact<br />
Milli<strong>on</strong>s of T<strong>on</strong>s Loaded<br />
Internati<strong>on</strong>al Seaborne Trade<br />
80 90 00 08 80 90 00 08 80 90 00 08<br />
80 90 00 08<br />
Oil Main Bulks C<strong>on</strong>tanier Other dry<br />
Data: UNCTAD, Review of Maritime Transport, 2010<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
14
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Percent<br />
Air transport appears to be an important<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributor to the rise of GVCs…<br />
Share of Canadian Exports by Air<br />
to N<strong>on</strong>-U.S. Destinati<strong>on</strong>s*, 2008<br />
Total Scientific<br />
Equipment<br />
* By <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Data: Statistics Canada <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Transport Canada<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
Electr<strong>on</strong>ics Aerospace Machinery<br />
15
15<br />
13<br />
11<br />
9<br />
7<br />
5<br />
Percentage<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> Average Applied Tariff Rates <strong>on</strong> All Products<br />
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />
Data: World Bank<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
…as does falling tariffs<br />
16
Measuring GVCs<br />
17
R&D<br />
CDIA<br />
Measurement can be very difficult<br />
Profits<br />
Company<br />
HQ<br />
C<strong>on</strong>tract<br />
CDIA<br />
Service<br />
Imports<br />
Lawyers<br />
Exports<br />
Call-Centre<br />
& IT<br />
Manufacturing<br />
18
Existing measures<br />
A Suite of Measurement Opti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
– Merch<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ise trade, services trade, FDI flows <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> stocks, royalty payments<br />
Classificati<strong>on</strong> of trade by use<br />
– Intermediate merch<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ise trade becomes proxy for GVCs<br />
Input/output tables<br />
– Shows links between industries<br />
– Internati<strong>on</strong>al linkages are not well measured, proporti<strong>on</strong>ality problem<br />
Custom surveys<br />
– Lack of comparability, limited time dimensi<strong>on</strong>, survey burden <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost<br />
– New survey in Canada, SIBS visit www.internati<strong>on</strong>al.gc.ca/ec<strong>on</strong>omist-ec<strong>on</strong>omiste<br />
19
Existing measures show a rising importance<br />
of trade, investment, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services<br />
X - Goods<br />
X - Comm. Services<br />
X - Royalties & Lic. Fees<br />
X - R&D Services<br />
Outward FDI<br />
FA Sales Abroad<br />
M - Goods<br />
M - Comm. Services<br />
M - Royalties & Lic. Fees<br />
Growth In <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g> in Canada<br />
Growth Relative to Canadian GDP, 1990-2008<br />
M - R&D Services<br />
Inward FDI<br />
FC Sales in Canada<br />
GDP<br />
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5<br />
Percent<br />
* For FA Sales <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> FC sales, period is 1999-2008.<br />
Data: Statistics Canada<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
15.5x<br />
20
Capital<br />
Intermediate<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong><br />
BEC data shows mixed results for trade<br />
in intermediate goods<br />
Growth<br />
(2000-2008)<br />
World<br />
Exports by Type<br />
Canada<br />
U.S.<br />
0 20 40 60<br />
Percent<br />
80 100 120 140<br />
Data: UN Comtrade<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
Capital<br />
Intermediate<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong><br />
Share<br />
(2008)<br />
Canada<br />
World<br />
U.S.<br />
0 20 40<br />
Percent<br />
60 80 10<br />
21
Percent<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
But, I/O data shows the growing<br />
importance of imported inputs…<br />
Share of Inputs that are Imported<br />
1961 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 '00 2006<br />
Data: Statistics Canada<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
Manufactured<br />
Total Ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />
22
Percent<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
…especially for key types of services<br />
Professi<strong>on</strong>al Service* Inputs<br />
Share that are Imported (LHS)<br />
Share of Total Inputs (RHS)<br />
Percent<br />
1961 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 '00 2006<br />
* Engineering, scientific, accounting, legal, advertising software development <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> misc.<br />
services to business.<br />
Data: Statistics Canada<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
23
High <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g>d Activities<br />
24
Headquarters (HQs)<br />
Case studies of some high-valued<br />
activities…HQs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> R&D<br />
– Employ relatively well paid, educated, skilled people<br />
– Provide services to rest of enterprise<br />
– Locally support other skilled professi<strong>on</strong>s such as legal, financial, etc…<br />
– Make decisi<strong>on</strong>s about locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sourcing of activities (matters if local<br />
bias)<br />
– Philanthropy?<br />
R&D<br />
– Employ relatively well paid, educated, skilled people<br />
– R&D activities ‘spill-over’ into local community<br />
25
Methodology<br />
How does Canada stack up as a locati<strong>on</strong> for these activities (HQs<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> R&D)?<br />
– Is Canada viewed as a desirable locati<strong>on</strong> from which to lead a<br />
global company? Difference between HQ activities <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> HQs.<br />
– Is Canada seen as a desirable locati<strong>on</strong> for global companies to<br />
locate their R&D activities? Is Canada viewed as a good<br />
locati<strong>on</strong> for sourcing R&D?<br />
What envir<strong>on</strong>ment / policy levers are most important for attracting<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> retaining these activities?<br />
26
Canada hosts the HQs of few global<br />
companies…<br />
Number of Companies <strong>on</strong> Fortune<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> 500 Scaled by Size of Ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />
Switzerl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Netherl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />
France<br />
Japan<br />
Britain<br />
Sweden<br />
South Korea<br />
Belgium<br />
Germany<br />
U.S.<br />
China<br />
Irel<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Australia<br />
Canada<br />
Austria<br />
Spain<br />
Denmark<br />
India<br />
Italy<br />
Brazil<br />
Finl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Norway<br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
Index<br />
Data: Fortune Magazine <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> World Development Indicators,<br />
2010 list of companies, 2008 GPDs<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
27
Company Revenues of Fortune <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
500 Scaled by Size of Ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />
Switzerl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Netherl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
France<br />
Britain<br />
Japan<br />
South<br />
Germany<br />
U.S.<br />
Belgium<br />
China<br />
Italy<br />
Sweden<br />
Spain<br />
Australia<br />
Denmark<br />
Finl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Irel<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Canada<br />
Norway<br />
Brazil<br />
India<br />
Austria<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
Index<br />
Data: Fortune Magazine <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> World Development Indicators,<br />
2010 list of companies, 2008 GDPs.<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
…<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> they tend to be small<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Operati<strong>on</strong>s of Canadian <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S.<br />
MNEs Outside of North America*<br />
US level as a multiple of Canadian level<br />
11 times<br />
21 times<br />
18 times<br />
GDP Sales Employment<br />
Data: Statistics Canada FATS <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S. BEA operati<strong>on</strong>s of majority<br />
owned n<strong>on</strong>-bank foreign affiliates, 2004.<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
28
Percent<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
R&D is globalizing extremely quickly…<br />
Share of R&D Budget Spent Outside<br />
of the Home Country*<br />
95 98 ‘01 ‘04 95 98 ‘01 ‘04 95 98 ‘01 ‘04<br />
Western Europe Japan North America<br />
* 209 MNEs, estimate for 2004<br />
Source: Reger (2002) as report in Hall (2011)<br />
29
Percent<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Data: OECD<br />
Source: Hall (2011)<br />
…Canada is more important as a<br />
destinati<strong>on</strong> than as a source<br />
Cross-Border R&D Shares<br />
As Source<br />
As Destinati<strong>on</strong><br />
Canada Europe U.S. Japan Other A/P Africa &<br />
ME<br />
Latin<br />
America<br />
30
Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Outsourcing in Canada<br />
31
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> Circulati<strong>on</strong> of Business Activities<br />
Canada<br />
Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> inshoring are circular<br />
flows…<br />
Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
Offshoring<br />
Percentage Of Firms<br />
All Industries:<br />
Manufacturing:<br />
1.9%<br />
5.2%<br />
Percentage Of Firms<br />
All Industries:<br />
Manufacturing:<br />
1.8%<br />
5.0%<br />
Inshoring<br />
World<br />
32
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
Inshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Offshoring of Business Activities<br />
In Manufacturing<br />
Inshored Activities<br />
2<br />
Percent of Firms<br />
…but with important differences<br />
between activities<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Producti<strong>on</strong> of goods<br />
Provisi<strong>on</strong> of services<br />
Distributi<strong>on</strong> & logistics<br />
Call centers<br />
Marketing & sales<br />
Software development<br />
Data processing<br />
ICT<br />
Legal Services<br />
Accounting<br />
HR mgnt<br />
Financial mgnt<br />
Engineering<br />
R&D<br />
Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
Offshored Activities<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
Percent of Firms<br />
33
Outsourcing is more prevelant<br />
Outsourcing of Business Activities<br />
In Manufacturing<br />
Producti<strong>on</strong> of goods<br />
Provisi<strong>on</strong> of services<br />
Distributi<strong>on</strong> & logistics<br />
Call centers<br />
Marketing & sales<br />
Software development<br />
Data processing<br />
ICT<br />
Legal Services<br />
Accounting<br />
HR mgnt<br />
Financial mgnt<br />
Engineering<br />
R&D<br />
0 2 4 6 8 10<br />
Percent of Firms<br />
Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
34
Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outsourcing is mostly<br />
driven by costs<br />
Top Motivati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
Offshoring or Outsourcing*<br />
- Manufacturers -<br />
Logistics<br />
Other<br />
Motivati<strong>on</strong><br />
N<strong>on</strong>-Labour Costs<br />
Labour Costs<br />
Access to New Markets<br />
Delivery Times<br />
Access to Knowledge<br />
Focus <strong>on</strong> Core Business<br />
New goods or services<br />
Following comp or clients<br />
Tax or Financial<br />
Lack of Labour<br />
* Those indicating medium or high motivati<strong>on</strong><br />
Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />
Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
% of<br />
Resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />
69.7<br />
63.7<br />
41.7<br />
34.5<br />
34.0<br />
29.6<br />
28.8<br />
28.6<br />
28.4<br />
20.3<br />
18.0<br />
2.9<br />
35
Those offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outsourcing face<br />
different obstacles than exporters<br />
Top Obstacles when<br />
Offshoring or Outsourcing*<br />
- Manufacturers -<br />
Tariffs<br />
Tax<br />
Internati<strong>on</strong>al st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ards<br />
IP<br />
Obstacle<br />
Distance to producers<br />
Identifying providers<br />
Language or cultural<br />
Foreign legal or admin<br />
Lack of mgmt expertise<br />
Cnd Legal or Admin.<br />
Distance to customers<br />
C<strong>on</strong>cerns of employees<br />
Lack of financing<br />
Social <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />
55.5<br />
54.9<br />
45.1<br />
43.9<br />
41.3<br />
37.4<br />
33.4<br />
32.7<br />
32.0<br />
30.5<br />
25.0<br />
24.5<br />
20.4<br />
8.3<br />
% of<br />
Firms<br />
Those indicating medium or high<br />
motivati<strong>on</strong><br />
Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS<br />
Survey<br />
Source: Office of the Chief<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />
36
Wrap-up<br />
GVCs is trade, but at a more granular level – producing similar<br />
gains.<br />
Competiti<strong>on</strong> becomes greater <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> more finely-tuned.<br />
Measures c<strong>on</strong>firm growing importance of GVCs.<br />
Some of the drivers, most notably tariffs, are c<strong>on</strong>trolled by policy.<br />
Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outsourcing are strategies used by business to be<br />
competitive globally – brings benefits to Canada.<br />
Its all about establishing an envir<strong>on</strong>ment that will create an<br />
attractive locati<strong>on</strong> for firms to undertake high-valued activities<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> from which to serve global markets.<br />
Little difference matter more than ever.<br />
37
Canada’s State of Trade:<br />
Trade <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Investment Update – 2011<br />
www.internati<strong>on</strong>al.gc.ca/ec<strong>on</strong>omist-ec<strong>on</strong>omiste<br />
Shameless Pitch<br />
Trade Policy Research, 2011<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g>: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impacts</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Implicati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Coming So<strong>on</strong><br />
38