13.08.2013 Views

Global Value Chains: Impacts and Implications - Center on ...

Global Value Chains: Impacts and Implications - Center on ...

Global Value Chains: Impacts and Implications - Center on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g>:<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Impacts</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Implicati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Aar<strong>on</strong> Sydor<br />

Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist<br />

Foreign Affairs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Trade Canada


Overview<br />

What is a global value chain (GVC)?<br />

How GVCs Fit In<br />

Drivers<br />

Measures<br />

High <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g>s Activities<br />

Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Outsourcing<br />

Wrap-up<br />

2


What Is A <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chain?<br />

3


Headquarters<br />

Corporate<br />

Services<br />

Finance<br />

HR/ Payroll<br />

IT<br />

Marketing<br />

Logistics<br />

R&D<br />

R&D<br />

A simplified value chain…<br />

Inputs Assembly Distributi<strong>on</strong> Sales Service<br />

Intermediate<br />

Input<br />

Services<br />

Intermediate<br />

Input<br />

Assembly<br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />

Sales<br />

After Sales<br />

Service<br />

4


Headquarters<br />

Corporate<br />

Services<br />

Finance<br />

HR/ Payroll<br />

IT<br />

Marketing<br />

Logistics<br />

R&D<br />

R&D<br />

R&D<br />

R&D<br />

…individual functi<strong>on</strong>s become<br />

separable…<br />

Inputs<br />

Intermediate<br />

Inputs Input Assembly Distributi<strong>on</strong> Sales Service<br />

Intermediate<br />

Services Input<br />

Services<br />

Intermediate<br />

Input<br />

Intermediate<br />

Input<br />

Assembly<br />

Assembly<br />

Assembly<br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong><br />

Sales<br />

Sales<br />

Sales<br />

Service<br />

After Sales<br />

Service<br />

After Sales<br />

Service<br />

5


R&D<br />

…which can then be located anywhere<br />

in the world<br />

Company<br />

HQ<br />

Lawyers<br />

Call-Centre<br />

& IT<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Inputs<br />

6


How GVCs Fit In<br />

7


A comm<strong>on</strong> definiti<strong>on</strong> of GVCs<br />

A global value chain describes the full range of activities<br />

undertaken to bring a product or service from its<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> to its end use <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> how these activities are<br />

distributed over geographic space <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> across<br />

internati<strong>on</strong>al borders*<br />

* Adapted from the global value chains initiative at Duke University<br />

8


How GVCs fit into trade theory<br />

Why Firms Trade<br />

Classical<br />

Ricardo Differences in Technology<br />

H-O<br />

New Trade Theory<br />

Krugman<br />

Heterogeneous Firms<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Fenstra <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Hans<strong>on</strong><br />

Grossman <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Rossi-Hansberg<br />

Differences in Endowments<br />

Scale, Trade Costs<br />

Various IP, Management, Technology<br />

Activities<br />

Tasks<br />

Source of Advantage<br />

Locati<strong>on</strong> –<br />

Often Country<br />

Industry<br />

Firm<br />

Within Firm<br />

9


Classical<br />

Resource exports<br />

New Trade Theory<br />

Heterogeneous Firms<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

How GVCs explain trade<br />

Labour intensive exports from countries with cheap labour<br />

Industrial clustering<br />

Multinati<strong>on</strong>als<br />

Performance differences between firms<br />

Trade in intermediate inputs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services<br />

Move from horiz<strong>on</strong>tal to vertical FDI<br />

10


Why this matters<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> value chains do not make comparative advantage any less<br />

relevant (as some have claimed).<br />

– In fact, the opposite is more likely the case…GVCs give<br />

comparative advantage a finer edge.<br />

Same gains from trade!<br />

– Gains from trade may be even greater when trade takes place<br />

at a more granular level.<br />

Provides an important link between trade in goods, services,<br />

inward <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outward FDI, movement of ideas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> of people.<br />

Competiti<strong>on</strong> increases <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> becomes more refined.<br />

11


Drivers of GVCs<br />

12


1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Rising oil prices d<strong>on</strong>’t seem to be having<br />

a major impact <strong>on</strong> global trade<br />

Index<br />

1983 = 100<br />

Oil Prices <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> Trade<br />

1983 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009<br />

*U.S. dollars per barrel, near m<strong>on</strong>th Cushing future <strong>on</strong> NYMEX.<br />

Data: WTO <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S. Department of Energy<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

World<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Imports<br />

Oil Price*<br />

13


3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

The growth of c<strong>on</strong>tainer shipping also<br />

seems to have had limited impact<br />

Milli<strong>on</strong>s of T<strong>on</strong>s Loaded<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Seaborne Trade<br />

80 90 00 08 80 90 00 08 80 90 00 08<br />

80 90 00 08<br />

Oil Main Bulks C<strong>on</strong>tanier Other dry<br />

Data: UNCTAD, Review of Maritime Transport, 2010<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

14


90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Percent<br />

Air transport appears to be an important<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributor to the rise of GVCs…<br />

Share of Canadian Exports by Air<br />

to N<strong>on</strong>-U.S. Destinati<strong>on</strong>s*, 2008<br />

Total Scientific<br />

Equipment<br />

* By <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Data: Statistics Canada <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Transport Canada<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

Electr<strong>on</strong>ics Aerospace Machinery<br />

15


15<br />

13<br />

11<br />

9<br />

7<br />

5<br />

Percentage<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> Average Applied Tariff Rates <strong>on</strong> All Products<br />

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />

Data: World Bank<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

…as does falling tariffs<br />

16


Measuring GVCs<br />

17


R&D<br />

CDIA<br />

Measurement can be very difficult<br />

Profits<br />

Company<br />

HQ<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tract<br />

CDIA<br />

Service<br />

Imports<br />

Lawyers<br />

Exports<br />

Call-Centre<br />

& IT<br />

Manufacturing<br />

18


Existing measures<br />

A Suite of Measurement Opti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– Merch<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ise trade, services trade, FDI flows <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> stocks, royalty payments<br />

Classificati<strong>on</strong> of trade by use<br />

– Intermediate merch<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ise trade becomes proxy for GVCs<br />

Input/output tables<br />

– Shows links between industries<br />

– Internati<strong>on</strong>al linkages are not well measured, proporti<strong>on</strong>ality problem<br />

Custom surveys<br />

– Lack of comparability, limited time dimensi<strong>on</strong>, survey burden <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost<br />

– New survey in Canada, SIBS visit www.internati<strong>on</strong>al.gc.ca/ec<strong>on</strong>omist-ec<strong>on</strong>omiste<br />

19


Existing measures show a rising importance<br />

of trade, investment, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services<br />

X - Goods<br />

X - Comm. Services<br />

X - Royalties & Lic. Fees<br />

X - R&D Services<br />

Outward FDI<br />

FA Sales Abroad<br />

M - Goods<br />

M - Comm. Services<br />

M - Royalties & Lic. Fees<br />

Growth In <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g> in Canada<br />

Growth Relative to Canadian GDP, 1990-2008<br />

M - R&D Services<br />

Inward FDI<br />

FC Sales in Canada<br />

GDP<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5<br />

Percent<br />

* For FA Sales <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> FC sales, period is 1999-2008.<br />

Data: Statistics Canada<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

15.5x<br />

20


Capital<br />

Intermediate<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

BEC data shows mixed results for trade<br />

in intermediate goods<br />

Growth<br />

(2000-2008)<br />

World<br />

Exports by Type<br />

Canada<br />

U.S.<br />

0 20 40 60<br />

Percent<br />

80 100 120 140<br />

Data: UN Comtrade<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

Capital<br />

Intermediate<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

Share<br />

(2008)<br />

Canada<br />

World<br />

U.S.<br />

0 20 40<br />

Percent<br />

60 80 10<br />

21


Percent<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

But, I/O data shows the growing<br />

importance of imported inputs…<br />

Share of Inputs that are Imported<br />

1961 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 '00 2006<br />

Data: Statistics Canada<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

Manufactured<br />

Total Ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />

22


Percent<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

…especially for key types of services<br />

Professi<strong>on</strong>al Service* Inputs<br />

Share that are Imported (LHS)<br />

Share of Total Inputs (RHS)<br />

Percent<br />

1961 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 '00 2006<br />

* Engineering, scientific, accounting, legal, advertising software development <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> misc.<br />

services to business.<br />

Data: Statistics Canada<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

23


High <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g>d Activities<br />

24


Headquarters (HQs)<br />

Case studies of some high-valued<br />

activities…HQs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> R&D<br />

– Employ relatively well paid, educated, skilled people<br />

– Provide services to rest of enterprise<br />

– Locally support other skilled professi<strong>on</strong>s such as legal, financial, etc…<br />

– Make decisi<strong>on</strong>s about locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sourcing of activities (matters if local<br />

bias)<br />

– Philanthropy?<br />

R&D<br />

– Employ relatively well paid, educated, skilled people<br />

– R&D activities ‘spill-over’ into local community<br />

25


Methodology<br />

How does Canada stack up as a locati<strong>on</strong> for these activities (HQs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> R&D)?<br />

– Is Canada viewed as a desirable locati<strong>on</strong> from which to lead a<br />

global company? Difference between HQ activities <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> HQs.<br />

– Is Canada seen as a desirable locati<strong>on</strong> for global companies to<br />

locate their R&D activities? Is Canada viewed as a good<br />

locati<strong>on</strong> for sourcing R&D?<br />

What envir<strong>on</strong>ment / policy levers are most important for attracting<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> retaining these activities?<br />

26


Canada hosts the HQs of few global<br />

companies…<br />

Number of Companies <strong>on</strong> Fortune<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> 500 Scaled by Size of Ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />

Switzerl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Netherl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

France<br />

Japan<br />

Britain<br />

Sweden<br />

South Korea<br />

Belgium<br />

Germany<br />

U.S.<br />

China<br />

Irel<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Australia<br />

Canada<br />

Austria<br />

Spain<br />

Denmark<br />

India<br />

Italy<br />

Brazil<br />

Finl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Norway<br />

0 1 2 3 4<br />

Index<br />

Data: Fortune Magazine <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> World Development Indicators,<br />

2010 list of companies, 2008 GPDs<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

27


Company Revenues of Fortune <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

500 Scaled by Size of Ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />

Switzerl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Netherl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

France<br />

Britain<br />

Japan<br />

South<br />

Germany<br />

U.S.<br />

Belgium<br />

China<br />

Italy<br />

Sweden<br />

Spain<br />

Australia<br />

Denmark<br />

Finl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Irel<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Canada<br />

Norway<br />

Brazil<br />

India<br />

Austria<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

Index<br />

Data: Fortune Magazine <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> World Development Indicators,<br />

2010 list of companies, 2008 GDPs.<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

…<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> they tend to be small<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Operati<strong>on</strong>s of Canadian <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S.<br />

MNEs Outside of North America*<br />

US level as a multiple of Canadian level<br />

11 times<br />

21 times<br />

18 times<br />

GDP Sales Employment<br />

Data: Statistics Canada FATS <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S. BEA operati<strong>on</strong>s of majority<br />

owned n<strong>on</strong>-bank foreign affiliates, 2004.<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

28


Percent<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

R&D is globalizing extremely quickly…<br />

Share of R&D Budget Spent Outside<br />

of the Home Country*<br />

95 98 ‘01 ‘04 95 98 ‘01 ‘04 95 98 ‘01 ‘04<br />

Western Europe Japan North America<br />

* 209 MNEs, estimate for 2004<br />

Source: Reger (2002) as report in Hall (2011)<br />

29


Percent<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Data: OECD<br />

Source: Hall (2011)<br />

…Canada is more important as a<br />

destinati<strong>on</strong> than as a source<br />

Cross-Border R&D Shares<br />

As Source<br />

As Destinati<strong>on</strong><br />

Canada Europe U.S. Japan Other A/P Africa &<br />

ME<br />

Latin<br />

America<br />

30


Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Outsourcing in Canada<br />

31


<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> Circulati<strong>on</strong> of Business Activities<br />

Canada<br />

Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> inshoring are circular<br />

flows…<br />

Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

Offshoring<br />

Percentage Of Firms<br />

All Industries:<br />

Manufacturing:<br />

1.9%<br />

5.2%<br />

Percentage Of Firms<br />

All Industries:<br />

Manufacturing:<br />

1.8%<br />

5.0%<br />

Inshoring<br />

World<br />

32


5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

Inshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Offshoring of Business Activities<br />

In Manufacturing<br />

Inshored Activities<br />

2<br />

Percent of Firms<br />

…but with important differences<br />

between activities<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Producti<strong>on</strong> of goods<br />

Provisi<strong>on</strong> of services<br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong> & logistics<br />

Call centers<br />

Marketing & sales<br />

Software development<br />

Data processing<br />

ICT<br />

Legal Services<br />

Accounting<br />

HR mgnt<br />

Financial mgnt<br />

Engineering<br />

R&D<br />

Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

Offshored Activities<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Percent of Firms<br />

33


Outsourcing is more prevelant<br />

Outsourcing of Business Activities<br />

In Manufacturing<br />

Producti<strong>on</strong> of goods<br />

Provisi<strong>on</strong> of services<br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong> & logistics<br />

Call centers<br />

Marketing & sales<br />

Software development<br />

Data processing<br />

ICT<br />

Legal Services<br />

Accounting<br />

HR mgnt<br />

Financial mgnt<br />

Engineering<br />

R&D<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Percent of Firms<br />

Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

34


Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outsourcing is mostly<br />

driven by costs<br />

Top Motivati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />

Offshoring or Outsourcing*<br />

- Manufacturers -<br />

Logistics<br />

Other<br />

Motivati<strong>on</strong><br />

N<strong>on</strong>-Labour Costs<br />

Labour Costs<br />

Access to New Markets<br />

Delivery Times<br />

Access to Knowledge<br />

Focus <strong>on</strong> Core Business<br />

New goods or services<br />

Following comp or clients<br />

Tax or Financial<br />

Lack of Labour<br />

* Those indicating medium or high motivati<strong>on</strong><br />

Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS Survey<br />

Source: Office of the Chief Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

% of<br />

Resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />

69.7<br />

63.7<br />

41.7<br />

34.5<br />

34.0<br />

29.6<br />

28.8<br />

28.6<br />

28.4<br />

20.3<br />

18.0<br />

2.9<br />

35


Those offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outsourcing face<br />

different obstacles than exporters<br />

Top Obstacles when<br />

Offshoring or Outsourcing*<br />

- Manufacturers -<br />

Tariffs<br />

Tax<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ards<br />

IP<br />

Obstacle<br />

Distance to producers<br />

Identifying providers<br />

Language or cultural<br />

Foreign legal or admin<br />

Lack of mgmt expertise<br />

Cnd Legal or Admin.<br />

Distance to customers<br />

C<strong>on</strong>cerns of employees<br />

Lack of financing<br />

Social <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

55.5<br />

54.9<br />

45.1<br />

43.9<br />

41.3<br />

37.4<br />

33.4<br />

32.7<br />

32.0<br />

30.5<br />

25.0<br />

24.5<br />

20.4<br />

8.3<br />

% of<br />

Firms<br />

Those indicating medium or high<br />

motivati<strong>on</strong><br />

Data: Statistics Canada – SIBS<br />

Survey<br />

Source: Office of the Chief<br />

Ec<strong>on</strong>omist, DFAIT<br />

36


Wrap-up<br />

GVCs is trade, but at a more granular level – producing similar<br />

gains.<br />

Competiti<strong>on</strong> becomes greater <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> more finely-tuned.<br />

Measures c<strong>on</strong>firm growing importance of GVCs.<br />

Some of the drivers, most notably tariffs, are c<strong>on</strong>trolled by policy.<br />

Offshoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> outsourcing are strategies used by business to be<br />

competitive globally – brings benefits to Canada.<br />

Its all about establishing an envir<strong>on</strong>ment that will create an<br />

attractive locati<strong>on</strong> for firms to undertake high-valued activities<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> from which to serve global markets.<br />

Little difference matter more than ever.<br />

37


Canada’s State of Trade:<br />

Trade <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Investment Update – 2011<br />

www.internati<strong>on</strong>al.gc.ca/ec<strong>on</strong>omist-ec<strong>on</strong>omiste<br />

Shameless Pitch<br />

Trade Policy Research, 2011<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Value</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Chains</str<strong>on</strong>g>: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impacts</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Implicati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Coming So<strong>on</strong><br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!