Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hector Martin (marcan42) on Twitter http://twitter.com/marcan42<br />
Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document4 Filed01/11/11 Page134 of 282<br />
296.<br />
297.<br />
298.<br />
299.<br />
300.<br />
301.<br />
302.<br />
303.<br />
304.<br />
305.<br />
306.<br />
307.<br />
308.<br />
309.<br />
310.<br />
Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:14:14 PM via Choqok in reply to<br />
donttrythis<br />
@TeToNN next release ;) Wednesday, October 13, 2010 10:35:19<br />
AM via Choqok in reply to TeToNN<br />
@madshaun1984 it matters if you care about the meaning of open<br />
source and care about legitimate use of the GPL Tuesday, October<br />
12, 2010 12:22:45 PM via Choqok in reply to madshaun1984<br />
@prototux no. AsbestOS isn't an app, it's an independently written<br />
payload and also comes with my own impl. of the USB exploit code.<br />
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:37:33 AM via Twitter for iPhone in<br />
reply to prototux<br />
@prototux the original version (in my git repo) has never used any<br />
psgroove code whatsoever. Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:33:04 AM<br />
via Twitter for iPhone in reply to prototux<br />
@Mathieulh Registration doesn't matter. Copyright is implicitly<br />
assigned at the time of creation. Someone (cont) http://tl.gd/6eqe23<br />
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:31:41 AM via Twitter for iPhone in<br />
reply to Mathieulh<br />
@prototux my version doesn't. There is a psgroove version, but<br />
that's fine. The psgroove USB code is fine. It's the payload that isn't.<br />
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:17:36 AM via Choqok in reply to<br />
prototux<br />
@prototux I did do it. AsbestOS contains no code from psjb and is<br />
fully GPLv2. Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:06:47 AM via Choqok in<br />
reply to prototux<br />
@Mathieulh you don't get it. It doesn't matter whether they come<br />
forth, the psgroove payload isn't legitimate GPLed code *today*.<br />
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:03:31 AM via Choqok in reply to<br />
Mathieulh<br />
@prototux that doesn't mean you can't still do it, but you shouldn't<br />
pretend it's legitimage Free Software. It isn't, don't bill it as such.<br />
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:02:41 AM via Choqok in reply to<br />
prototux<br />
@prototux the point is you can't use a free license, because your<br />
code isn't free. The project isn't legally legit. Tuesday, October 12,<br />
2010 7:02:09 AM via Choqok in reply to prototux<br />
@prototux What I'm saying: if you want to rip off psjb, then call<br />
your project a psjb hack/rip, but don't slap the GPL on it. Tuesday,<br />
October 12, 2010 6:58:33 AM via Choqok in reply to prototux<br />
@prototux Open projects cannot legitimately be based on ripped<br />
decompiled or disassembled code. You can call them something else.<br />
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 6:57:29 AM via Choqok in reply to<br />
prototux<br />
@prototux I said nothing about copying the concept of their exploit.<br />
All I'm saying is you shouldn't rip off their payload code. Tuesday,<br />
October 12, 2010 6:55:16 AM via Choqok in reply to prototux<br />
@prototux I prefer following licenses, because people ripping off<br />
commercial code usually also end up violating open source licenses<br />
too. Tuesday, October 12, 2010 6:50:15 AM via Choqok<br />
@Mathieulh basically, "I don't know who the copyright owner is and<br />
he won't sue me anyway" isn't an excuse to violate copyright.<br />
20 of 58 1/9/2011 12:16 PM
Change language