15.08.2013 Views

THE INTERNATIONAL SERIES OF MONOGRAPHS ON PHYSICS ...

THE INTERNATIONAL SERIES OF MONOGRAPHS ON PHYSICS ...

THE INTERNATIONAL SERIES OF MONOGRAPHS ON PHYSICS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 GRAVITY<br />

√ 1<br />

ρΛ −g ∼±<br />

c3¯h 3 E4 Planck = ± 1<br />

¯h 3<br />

√ 4<br />

−gEPlanck . (2.11)<br />

The sign of the vacuum energy is determined by the fermionic and bosonic content<br />

of the quantum field theory.<br />

The vacuum energy was calculated for flat spacetime with the Minkowski<br />

metric in the form gµν = diag(−1,c −2 ,c −2 ,c −2 ), so that √ −g = c −3 . The righthand<br />

side of eqn (2.11) does not depend on the ‘material parameter’ c, and thus<br />

(as we see later) is also applicable to quantum liquids.<br />

2.2.2 Cosmological constant problem<br />

The ‘cosmological constant problem’ refers to a huge disparity between the<br />

naively expected value in eqn (2.11) and the range of actual values. The experimental<br />

observations show that the energy density in our Universe is close to<br />

the critical density ρc, corresponding to a flat Universe. The energy content is<br />

composed of baryonic matter (very few percent), the so-called dark matter which<br />

does not emit or absorb light (about 30%) and vacuum energy (about 70%). Such<br />

a distribution of energy leads to an accelerated expansion of the Universe which<br />

is revealed by recent supernovae Ia observations (Perlmutter et al. 1999; Riess<br />

et al. 2000). The observed value of the vacuum energy ρΛ ∼ 0.7ρc is thus on<br />

the order of 10−123E4 Planck in contradiction with the theoretical estimate in eqn<br />

(2.11). This is probably the largest discrepancy between theory and experiment<br />

in physics.<br />

This huge discrepancy can be cured by supersymmetry, the symmetry between<br />

fermions and bosons. If there is a supersymmetry, the positive contribution<br />

of bosons and negative contribution of fermions exactly cancel each other. However,<br />

it is well known that there is no supersymmetry in our low-energy world.<br />

This means that there must by an energy scale ESuSy below which the supersymmetry<br />

is violated and thus there is no balance between bosons and fermions<br />

in the vacuum energy . This scale is providing the cut-off in eqn (2.9), and the<br />

theoretical estimate of the cosmological constant becomes ρΛ(theor) ∼ E4 SuSy .<br />

Though ESuSy can be much smaller than the Planck scale, the many orders of<br />

magnitude disagreement between theory and reality still persists, and we must<br />

accept the experimental fact that the vacuum energy in eqn (2.9) is not gravitating.<br />

This is the most severe problem in the marriage of gravity and quantum<br />

theory (Weinberg 1989), because it is in apparent contradiction with the general<br />

principle of equivalence, according to which the inertial and gravitating masses<br />

coincide.<br />

One possible way to solve this contradiction is to accept that the theoretical<br />

criteria for setting the absolute zero point of energy are unclear within the<br />

effective theory, i.e. the vacuum energy is by no means the energy of vacuum<br />

fluctuations of effective fields in eqn (2.9). Its estimation requires physics beyond<br />

the Planck scale and thus beyond general relativity. To clarify this issue<br />

we can consider such quantum systems where the elements of the gravitation<br />

are at least partially reproduced, but where the structure of the quantum vacuum<br />

beyond the ‘Planck scale’ is known. Quantum liquids are the right systems,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!