15.08.2013 Views

STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL - Law Commission

STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL - Law Commission

STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(l) the extraction of water from private lands by entering, surveying,<br />

cutting watercourses and constructing reservoirs, pumps and the like,<br />

for the purpose of supplying fresh water to the gaol “constantly and<br />

uninterruptedly”; 82<br />

(m) the fitting-out of the new gaol, and of the rebuilt prothonotary’s office,<br />

shire hall, exchequer court and record rooms, and other buildings, so<br />

that they would be available for operational use; 83<br />

(n) the provision of temporary accommodation within the city or the<br />

county for the gaol, and for other courts and offices, whilst demolition<br />

and rebuilding was in progress; 84<br />

(o) the designation of the new gaol as the common gaol for the county<br />

(and the replacement shire hall and exchequer court as facilities for<br />

the “county palatine of Chester”); 85<br />

(p) the raising of moneys by the commissioners for the building project<br />

both by precepting on the county rate (in accordance with 12 Geo.2<br />

c.29 (1738) relating to county rates) levied on towns, parishes and the<br />

82 The 1788 Act, s.25. The authority extended to the commissioners’ workmen entering lands<br />

subsequently, in order to clean and repair the installations (which, by then, would have vested in, and be<br />

held in trust by, the county’s custos rotulorum). Any unauthorised interference by others with the water<br />

installations was made an offence. The Act contained a specific proviso in section 25 that none of its<br />

provisions was to detract from any contractual liability on the part of the city of Chester waterworks<br />

company to supply water to the gaol (whether at the castle or at its new location) and to other publiclymaintained<br />

buildings, although the cost of all new piping would be borne by the inhabitants of the<br />

county.<br />

83 The 1788 Act, s.27. The commissioners were authorised to employ workmen and contractors for both<br />

this task and in order “to pull down the houses or buildings so to be purchased, taken down, or removed<br />

as aforesaid, and to sell or dispose of the materials thereof”: ibid. The commissioners were also<br />

authorised to include, in any contract, provision for forfeiture of penalties and payment of damages in<br />

the event of contractor-default: ibid., s.28.<br />

84 The 1788 Act, s.32. The temporary gaol facility would be deemed to be the common gaol for the<br />

county, pending relocation. The commissioners were empowered to fit-out for temporary use, at the<br />

expense of the county’s inhabitants, the various buildings occupied for county purposes.<br />

85 The 1788 Act, s.33. All existing national laws which related to gaols were to apply to the new gaol as<br />

if they had been applied specifically to it: ibid., s.51. Once the gaol was complete, prisoners were to be<br />

transferred there from their temporary accommodation “with all convenient speed”: ibid. The gaol,<br />

together with the other municipal buildings (prothonotary’s office, shire hall, exchequer court and record<br />

rooms, and ancillary offices) were all to be kept in repair, and insured, “at the publick expense of the<br />

inhabitants of the said county”, but the various buildings were to be exempt from house and window tax,<br />

and the local rates on the lands were to be capped to the level applying as at their date of acquisition by<br />

the commissioners: ibid., s.35. As an alternative to the year-on-year payment of rates, land tax and lamp<br />

duty, the commissioners were authorised to pay a single lump sum to the relevant churchwardens,<br />

overseers of the poor, constables and tax collectors, equivalent to a maximum of 35 years purchase,<br />

subject to the arrangement being sanctioned by general quarter sessions (which lump sum would then<br />

be utilised “for the greatest and most equal benefit of the inhabitants” and the land owners and<br />

occupiers within the relevant parish or township): ibid., s.36.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!