15.08.2013 Views

cp149 Consents to Prosecution consultation - Law Commission

cp149 Consents to Prosecution consultation - Law Commission

cp149 Consents to Prosecution consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

notice <strong>to</strong> the contrary. 102<br />

A notice of discontinuance does not preclude the<br />

institution of fresh proceedings on a later occasion. 103<br />

Take over and offer no evidence<br />

1.43 The power of the CPS <strong>to</strong> take over a case and offer no evidence is now beyond<br />

doubt. In Turner v DPP, 104<br />

the High Court held that the DPP had properly<br />

exercised his discretion in taking over a private prosecution brought by a convicted<br />

robber against his accomplice, when the accomplice had given evidence in the<br />

robber’s trial on the basis of an undertaking from the DPP that he would not be<br />

prosecuted for his part in the robbery. The DPP was held <strong>to</strong> have been acting in<br />

the public interest.<br />

1.44 The reasoning in Turner was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Raymond v<br />

At<strong>to</strong>rney-General: 105<br />

The Direc<strong>to</strong>r will … intervene in a private prosecution where the<br />

issues in the public interest are so grave that the expertise and the<br />

resources of the Direc<strong>to</strong>r’s office should be brought <strong>to</strong> bear in order <strong>to</strong><br />

ensure that the proceedings are properly conducted from the point of<br />

view of the prosecution.<br />

On the other hand there may be what appear <strong>to</strong> the Direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />

substantial reasons in the public interest for not pursuing a prosecution<br />

privately commenced. 106<br />

1.45 Nevertheless, it appears that the power <strong>to</strong> take over a private prosecution and offer<br />

no evidence will be exercised only rarely. The High Court in Turner considered<br />

that it would be an improper exercise of the power <strong>to</strong> take over a prosecution <strong>to</strong> do<br />

so with a view <strong>to</strong> offering no evidence unless the circumstances were exceptional,<br />

like those in Turner.<br />

Take over and withdraw<br />

1.46 In addition <strong>to</strong> discontinuance, the CPS has the power <strong>to</strong> take over and withdraw<br />

the proceedings. The existence of such a power was challenged in Cooke v DPP<br />

and Brent JJ, 107<br />

in which it was argued that the discontinuance power under section<br />

23 was the only way in which the CPS could terminate a case. The question for<br />

the court was whether the 1985 Act supplemented or replaced the pre-1985<br />

powers of a prosecu<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> terminate proceedings. The court held that the CPS’s<br />

common law and statu<strong>to</strong>ry powers existed side by side.<br />

102 POA 1985, s 23(7).<br />

103 POA 1985, s 23(9).<br />

104 (1979) 68 Cr App R 70.<br />

105 [1982] QB 839.<br />

106 Ibid, at p 847A-C, per Sir Sebag Shaw.<br />

107 (1992) 156 JP 497.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!