15.08.2013 Views

cp149 Consents to Prosecution consultation - Law Commission

cp149 Consents to Prosecution consultation - Law Commission

cp149 Consents to Prosecution consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART III<br />

THE AUTHORITIES WHOSE CONSENT IS<br />

REQUIRED, AND OTHER PROCEDURAL<br />

MATTERS<br />

1.1 In this Part we consider which officers have authority <strong>to</strong> grant or refuse consent <strong>to</strong><br />

prosecution, and we set out the constitutional functions of the <strong>Law</strong> Officers and<br />

the DPP. We describe the practical operation of consent provisions – the principles<br />

applied in exercising the power of consent, the form consent should take and the<br />

time when consent must be given. Finally, we examine whether the decision <strong>to</strong><br />

grant or refuse consent is amenable <strong>to</strong> judicial review.<br />

WHOSE CONSENT?<br />

1.2 A variety of offences require the consent of a designated officer or body 108<br />

before<br />

proceedings can be instituted. As we said in Part I, in many cases that officer is<br />

either one of the <strong>Law</strong> Officers (the At<strong>to</strong>rney-General or the Solici<strong>to</strong>r-General) or<br />

the DPP; in other cases, the officer may be the Secretary of State or, for example,<br />

the Industrial Assurance <strong>Commission</strong>er 109<br />

or the <strong>Commission</strong>ers of Cus<strong>to</strong>ms and<br />

Excise. 110<br />

In this paper we confine our examination <strong>to</strong> those consent provisions<br />

requiring the consent of either one or other of the <strong>Law</strong> Officers or the DPP.<br />

The <strong>Law</strong> Officers<br />

1.3 The <strong>Law</strong> Officers consist of the At<strong>to</strong>rney-General and the Solici<strong>to</strong>r-General.<br />

Unlike the office of the DPP, which was created by statute, 111<br />

the offices held by<br />

the <strong>Law</strong> Officers arose by royal decree. 112<br />

His<strong>to</strong>rical background<br />

1.4 The origin of the office of At<strong>to</strong>rney-General can be traced back <strong>to</strong> the thirteenth<br />

century when, as King’s At<strong>to</strong>rney or King’s Serjeant, the office holder was<br />

responsible for maintaining the interests of the sovereign in the royal courts. 113<br />

The<br />

modern office of Solici<strong>to</strong>r-General originated in 1461. 114<br />

Although since the early<br />

part of the seventeenth century both the At<strong>to</strong>rney-General and the Solici<strong>to</strong>r-<br />

General were entitled <strong>to</strong> sit in the House of Commons, “until well in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

nineteenth century the generally accepted interpretation of a <strong>Law</strong> Officer’s<br />

108 Eg Housing Associations Act 1985, s 27(4) and s 30(6), which specifies the consent of the<br />

Housing Corporation.<br />

109 Insurance Companies Act 1982, ss 93(a) and 94(2).<br />

110 Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990, s 21(2)(a).<br />

111 POA 1879.<br />

112 J Ll J Edwards, The <strong>Law</strong> Officers of the Crown (1964) p 2.<br />

113 Ibid, p 3.<br />

114 Sir John Sainty, A List of English <strong>Law</strong> Officers, King’s Counsel and Holders of Patents of<br />

Precedence (1987) p 59.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!