15.08.2013 Views

P3-Vol 2.No3 Dec 96 - International Journal of Wilderness

P3-Vol 2.No3 Dec 96 - International Journal of Wilderness

P3-Vol 2.No3 Dec 96 - International Journal of Wilderness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION<br />

WILDNESS AND WILDERNESS IN THE<br />

NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES—<br />

Challenge for the Coming Century<br />

BY LLOYD C. IRLAND<br />

[Editor’s Note: <strong>Wilderness</strong> policymakers and environmentalists have struggled over wilderness designation<br />

in the East for several decades. While lands in the East generally have been impacted by settlement and<br />

development, many are in advanced stages <strong>of</strong> recovery on a path toward naturalness. Whether such lands<br />

ultimately could fit in the wilderness system, or could be better protected under some other designation, will<br />

be an important issue for debate.<br />

In this article Lloyd Irland presents data on wilderness and natural area opportunities in the East with a<br />

proposal about how the protection <strong>of</strong> wilderness values might be extended. IJW looks forward to reader<br />

comments on his proposals about this timely issue. —John C. Hendee]<br />

Abstract: In the northeast part <strong>of</strong> the United States (New England plus New York,<br />

New Jersey, and Pennsylvania), centuries <strong>of</strong> cutting, farming, and development<br />

have virtually eliminated virgin landscapes from the region. Of the region’s 100<br />

million acres, 15% <strong>of</strong> the rural land is being farmed. Only 12% <strong>of</strong> the forest land is<br />

publicly owned, so wider efforts to retain wildness and protect biodiversity face<br />

severe challenges. While there is little true wilderness, about five million acres (5%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the land) would fit in a more loosely defined “wild forest.” I propose a long-term<br />

program <strong>of</strong> cooperative Landscape Management Areas (LMAs) that can retain<br />

important wildness and biodiversity values with lower cost and less political polarization<br />

than large acquisition programs. This program would augment a 50%<br />

increase in publicly owned wild forest, including some true wilderness. Managing<br />

motorized recreation poses a major social challenge to the region’s wilderness<br />

community, because motorized uses are well established in most existing and<br />

potential wild forest units.<br />

S<br />

INCE THE DAYS OF THOREAU, NORTHEAST-<br />

ERNERS have appreciated wild forest landscapes. They<br />

pushed for state forests and parks as early as the 1880s<br />

with the citizen-led effort to create the Adirondack Park<br />

(Nash 1982; Graham 1978). Local citizens pressed for federal<br />

acquisition <strong>of</strong> land in the White Mountain National<br />

Forest. Maine contains a splendid example <strong>of</strong> a privately<br />

created wilderness: Baxter State Park. The few remaining<br />

scraps <strong>of</strong> virgin forest are mostly outside the region’s large,<br />

formally designated wilderness areas (see Table 1). Supportive<br />

as they have been <strong>of</strong> public land systems, Northeasterners<br />

have not seen fit, outside <strong>of</strong> the Adirondacks, to allocate<br />

large areas <strong>of</strong> public land to wilderness preservation. This is<br />

partly because motorized river and trail uses are well established<br />

and vigorously defended almost everywhere. Today,<br />

about 12% <strong>of</strong> the region’s forest land is publicly owned.<br />

The forest has regrown so completely that few hikers<br />

realize that many a trail side vista was once farmed, abusively<br />

cut, or burned. Regionwide, 17 million acres <strong>of</strong> cleared<br />

land returned to forest from 1909 to 1992—an area equal to<br />

Maine’s present forest area. Spreading forests and successful<br />

public programs have led to rebounding populations <strong>of</strong> eagle,<br />

Article author Lloyd C. Irland.<br />

fish, bear, and other animals traditionally associated with wild<br />

country. Deer, once virtually eradicated in many parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Northeast, are now so abundant that they are suppressing<br />

natural regeneration and injuring habitat for other wildlife<br />

in some areas. The region currently rates low on lists <strong>of</strong> endangerment<br />

“hotspots” (Noss and Peters 1995).<br />

The Wild Five Percent<br />

The boundaries <strong>of</strong> the wild forest are difficult to define. The<br />

wild forest includes a range <strong>of</strong> forest lands in public and<br />

conservation ownership, whose primary objective is the<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> natural conditions. Defining the wild forest<br />

in strictly ecological terms as vestiges <strong>of</strong> truly undisturbed<br />

forest, important in its own right, does not define the wild<br />

forest (Crow 1990; Davis 19<strong>96</strong>). Large acreages <strong>of</strong> the wild<br />

forest are devoted to such uses as watershed protection. Perhaps<br />

a half-million acres <strong>of</strong> such lands are found in the region,<br />

and these lands may be available for limited timber<br />

cutting. But because they form large green blocks in the<br />

midst <strong>of</strong> cities and suburbs, they fill most <strong>of</strong> the functions <strong>of</strong><br />

the wild forest. Likewise, the tiny parcels owned as green<br />

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDERNESS/<strong>Vol</strong>ume 2, Number 3, <strong>Dec</strong>ember 19<strong>96</strong> 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!