16.08.2013 Views

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution ...

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution ...

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Policy contains four fundamental principles to ensure that CSO controls are cost-effective <strong>and</strong> meet<br />

local environmental objectives:<br />

(1) Clear levels <strong>of</strong> control to meet health <strong>and</strong> environmental objectives.<br />

(2) Flexibility to consider the site-specific nature <strong>of</strong> CSOs <strong>and</strong> find the most cost-effective<br />

way to control them.<br />

(3) Phased implementation <strong>of</strong> CSO controls to accommodate a community’s financial<br />

capability.<br />

(4) Review <strong>and</strong> revision <strong>of</strong> water quality st<strong>and</strong>ards during the development <strong>of</strong> CSO control<br />

plans to reflect the site-specific wet weather impacts <strong>of</strong> CSOs.<br />

CSO communities have made significant progress in reducing the frequency <strong>and</strong> size <strong>of</strong> overflows, but<br />

more work remains to be done. EPA estimates that the annual CSO volume is approximately 850 billion<br />

gallons, down from over 1 trillion gallons prior to issuance <strong>of</strong> the 1994 CSO Control Policy. EPA also<br />

estimates that approximately $51 billion is still needed over the next 20 years to meet the goals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

policy (NACWA, 2007).<br />

3.2.4 Capacity, Management, Operation, <strong>and</strong> Maintenance (CMOM) Program. The CMOM<br />

regulations are part <strong>of</strong> the SSO regulations affecting some 19,000 sanitary sewer collection systems<br />

throughout the country. Owners <strong>of</strong> all municipal wastewater collection systems are required to develop<br />

procedures to improve system capacity, perform long-term planning for investments in infrastructure,<br />

develop better documentation <strong>and</strong> asset management procedures, <strong>and</strong> share all <strong>of</strong> this information with<br />

stakeholders more effectively. The CMOM is derived from a need for reducing sewer overflows <strong>and</strong> the<br />

consequent health risks associated with these overflows. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the CMOM approach is to abate<br />

SSOs, reduce health risks, extend the life <strong>of</strong> sewer system assets, <strong>and</strong> improve utility customer<br />

satisfaction.<br />

3.2.5 Government Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34. The GASB, a nongovernment<br />

entity that defines the criteria that auditors use to judge the adequacy <strong>of</strong> local <strong>and</strong> state<br />

government financial statements, has changed long-st<strong>and</strong>ing practices by requiring that government<br />

entities include reporting <strong>of</strong> their capital assets in their annual balance sheet <strong>and</strong> income statement.<br />

GASB-34, adopted in June 1999, highlights the costs <strong>of</strong> acquiring, owning, operating, <strong>and</strong> maintaining<br />

public-works infrastructure for government-bond holders <strong>and</strong> the public at large. GASB-34 requires that<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> infrastructure assets be shown on the balance sheet, <strong>and</strong> gives governments a choice <strong>of</strong><br />

adopting either (a) traditional private-sector methods <strong>of</strong> calculating infrastructure depreciation expenses<br />

based on historical acquisition costs, or (b) an effective asset management system. These asset<br />

management systems must demonstrate either that maintenance spending is adequate to prevent<br />

infrastructure deterioration or that infrastructure condition is being maintained at or above explicitly<br />

stated minimum acceptable st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

3.2.6 <strong>Rehabilitation</strong> Funding. Federal funding under the Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act State Revolving Fund<br />

(SRF) program has remained flat for the past decade. Congress appropriated between $1.2 billion <strong>and</strong><br />

$1.35 billion annually from 1995 to 2004. However, in FY 2005, Congress cut wastewater SRF funding<br />

for the first time in eight years, reducing the total investment to $1.1 billion. The administration proposed<br />

further cuts for FY 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2007, with a budget submittal calling for an appropriation <strong>of</strong> only $688<br />

million in FY 2007, a reduction <strong>of</strong> 37 percent from the FY 2005-enacted level. In March 2007, the U.S.<br />

House <strong>of</strong> Representatives approved the <strong>Water</strong> Quality Financing Act, 2007, which reauthorized the Clean<br />

<strong>Water</strong> SRF at $14 billion over 4 years (FY 2008 to 2012).<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!