18.08.2013 Views

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sinorhizobium meliloti strain L33, on the establishment <strong>of</strong> rhizobial communities. In a<br />

subsequent study, however, Miethling et al. (2003) found that both soil type and plant<br />

species affected structural diversity in the rhizosphere communities <strong>of</strong> three legumes,<br />

namely; alfalfa (M. sativa); common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and clover (Trifolium<br />

pratense). In the same soil, significant differences were found in the composition <strong>of</strong><br />

leguminous rhizosphere communities and plant-specific organisms. Dominant alfalfa<br />

rhizosphere populations differed in two soils with distinct agricultural histories, and<br />

the three leguminous rhizosphere populations could be differentiated.<br />

Anthropogenic disturbance has drastically altered the composition and productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

plant communities in the arid land ecosystem <strong>of</strong> the Colorado (USA) plateau<br />

grasslands. Kuske et al. (2002) made comparisons at different depths <strong>of</strong> rhizosphere<br />

bacterial communities <strong>of</strong> the native bunchgrasses Stipa hymenoides and Hilaria<br />

jamesii, the invading annual grass Bromus tectorum and <strong>of</strong> interspaces colonised by<br />

cyanobacterial soil crusts. A significant difference was found in the total bacterial<br />

population structure and in the Acidobacterium division between the soil crust<br />

interspaces and the plant rhizospheres, with large differences also seen among the<br />

three rhizospheres, particularly in the Acidobacterium analysis. It was shown that soil<br />

depth in plant rhizospheres as well as in the interspaces affected both the total<br />

bacterial community and bacteria from the Acidobacterium division, with different<br />

members <strong>of</strong> this division occupying specific niches in the grassland soil.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> genetically engineered (GE) crops on agricultural practice, human<br />

health and the environment were studied by Schmalenberger and Tebbe (2003).<br />

Bacterial community diversity in the rhizosphere <strong>of</strong> a transgenic, herbicide<br />

(glufosinate)-resistant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) was compared with that <strong>of</strong> its non-<br />

engineered counterpart. Differences in community composition due to field and<br />

annual variability were evident but there was no detectable effect <strong>of</strong> transgenic<br />

herbicide resistance on the microbial community. In a similar study, Heuer et al.<br />

(2002) investigated the possibility that GE plants could change rhizosphere bacterial<br />

consortia through transgenic T4 lysozyme release or by a change in root exudate<br />

composition, and thereby change agroecosystems. Bacterial populations from<br />

transgenic potato rhizospheres were compared with those <strong>of</strong> wild-type plants and non-<br />

lysozyme producing transgenic controls. The authors found environmental factors<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!