- Page 1 and 2: Supersymmetry and the LHC ICTP Summ
- Page 3: Lecture 1: Motivation and Introduct
- Page 7 and 8: This “reason” for the positron
- Page 9 and 10: Contributions tom 2 H Dirac fermion
- Page 11 and 12: The Hierarchy Problem We already kn
- Page 13 and 14: Indirect couplings of the Higgs to
- Page 15 and 16: Supersymmetry A SUSY transformation
- Page 17 and 18: How do the Standard Model quarks an
- Page 19 and 20: Why do we need two Higgs supermulti
- Page 21 and 22: Recall that if supersymmetry were a
- Page 23 and 24: The effective Lagrangian has the fo
- Page 25 and 26: Is there any good reason why the su
- Page 27 and 28: Notations for two-component (Weyl)
- Page 29 and 30: Two LH Weyl spinors ξ,χ can form
- Page 31 and 32: To have any chance,δψ should be l
- Page 33 and 34: The auxiliary fieldF does not affec
- Page 35 and 36: Covered in Lecture 1: • The Hiera
- Page 37 and 38: Recall: the Wess-Zumino model Lagra
- Page 39 and 40: From the conserved supercurrents on
- Page 41 and 42: Masses and Interactions for Chiral
- Page 43 and 44: The superpotential W = 1 2 Mij φi
- Page 45 and 46: The auxiliary fieldD a is again nee
- Page 47 and 48: Soft SUSY-breaking Lagrangians It h
- Page 49 and 50: The Superpotential for the Minimal
- Page 51 and 52: Actually, the most general possible
- Page 53 and 54: Consequences if R-parity is conserv
- Page 55 and 56:
Is R-parity inevitable? No! MaybeB
- Page 57 and 58:
The soft SUSY-breaking Lagrangian o
- Page 59 and 60:
Define mass-eigenstate Higgs bosons
- Page 61 and 62:
Radiative corrections to the Higgs
- Page 63 and 64:
Neutralinos The neutral higgsinos (
- Page 65 and 66:
Charginos Similarly, the charged hi
- Page 67 and 68:
A typical mass hierarchy for the ne
- Page 69 and 70:
Squarks and Sleptons To treat these
- Page 71 and 72:
Diagonalizing the top squark mass 2
- Page 73 and 74:
Lecture 3: Experimental Signatures
- Page 75 and 76:
Hints of an Organizing Principle Fo
- Page 77 and 78:
Similarly: TheD 0 ,D 0 system const
- Page 79 and 80:
The Flavor-Preserving Minimal Super
- Page 81 and 82:
A reason to be optimistic that this
- Page 83 and 84:
In SUSY, the potential energy can b
- Page 85 and 86:
F -term breaking (continued) If you
- Page 87 and 88:
Spontaneous Breaking of SUSY requir
- Page 89 and 90:
The O’Raifeartaigh model has the
- Page 91 and 92:
Planck-scale Mediated SUSY Breaking
- Page 93 and 94:
Renormalization Group Running for a
- Page 95 and 96:
Impact of the discoveryMh = 125.5 G
- Page 97 and 98:
Computer programs can generate the
- Page 99 and 100:
Superpartner decays: 1) Neutralino
- Page 101 and 102:
2) Chargino Decays Charginos ˜Ci h
- Page 103 and 104:
An important feature of gluino deca
- Page 105 and 106:
5) Slepton Decays When Ñ1 is the L
- Page 107 and 108:
SUSY Limits from LEP2e + e − coll
- Page 109 and 110:
The LHC vs. Supersymmetric Models,
- Page 111 and 112:
LHC Signals for SUSY inpp collision
- Page 113 and 114:
Typical ATLAS cuts for a jets +E mi
- Page 115 and 116:
A better way of showing the same li
- Page 117 and 118:
For simplified model with ˜g, ˜ Q
- Page 119 and 120:
Kinematically allowed decays of lig
- Page 121 and 122:
Electroweak SUSY production at Hadr
- Page 123 and 124:
Why has SUSY not been discovered ye
- Page 125 and 126:
Natural SUSY (continued) This is ac
- Page 127 and 128:
LSP mass [GeV] 800 700 600 500 400
- Page 129 and 130:
However, a group of theorists (Kris
- Page 131 and 132:
Stoponium A spin-0˜t1 ˜t ∗ 1 bo
- Page 133 and 134:
Split SUSY Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos
- Page 135 and 136:
R-parity violating results from CMS
- Page 137 and 138:
Compressed SUSY: the limits from je
- Page 139 and 140:
The LHC will eventually reach √ s
- Page 141 and 142:
Direct top-squark pair production p
- Page 143 and 144:
Why I am still optimistic about the