20.08.2013 Views

Monteiro-Riviere ,NA. Indirect Immunohistochemistry

Monteiro-Riviere ,NA. Indirect Immunohistochemistry

Monteiro-Riviere ,NA. Indirect Immunohistochemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> ,<strong>NA</strong>. <strong>Indirect</strong> <strong>Immunohistochemistry</strong> and immunoelectron microscopy distribution<br />

of eight epidermal-dermal junction epitopes in the pig and in isolated perfused skin treated with bis<br />

(2-chloroethyl) sulfide. Toxicologic Pathology 23:313-325, 1995.


<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> <strong>NA</strong>: Integument. In Eurell J, Frappier B, eds. Dellman’s Textbook of<br />

Veterinary Histology, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, 6 th ed., pp.320-349, 2006.


Experimental Model Systems


• Practicality<br />

• Absorption<br />

Animal Models<br />

• Toxicology - Increased absorption compared to man to<br />

assess worse case scenario<br />

• Rats, Mice, Rabbits<br />

• Pharmacology - Similar absorption to man<br />

• Toxicity<br />

• Pigs, Primates, Hairless Rodents<br />

• Immunological considerations<br />

• Rabbits, Guinea Pigs, Rodents<br />

• Species differences for different mechanisms are<br />

independent ∴one species is not the best model for all<br />

endpoints in humans!


Species Differences<br />

• Anatomical factors such as thickness,<br />

adnexial structures, etc.<br />

• Biochemical differences in lipid<br />

composition, enzymes, etc.<br />

• Different receptors for immunological or<br />

pharmacological agents<br />

• Physiological differences including blood<br />

flow, etc.


Body Site Differences<br />

• The rate of penetration and absorption differs<br />

across various body sites<br />

• Scrotum > Forehead > Axilla > = Scalp > Back =<br />

Abdomen > Palm and Plantar surface<br />

• Seen in humans and animals making route to<br />

route extrapolations “interesting.”<br />

• The major reasons are due to:<br />

– Differences in anatomy:skin thickness<br />

– Differences in physiology: blood flow and distribution<br />

of blood vessels<br />

– Stratum corneocyte cell size ?


Pig Skin is Similar to Human Skin<br />

• Similar surface characteristics<br />

• Body masses and skin to body surface area ratio<br />

• Sparse hair coat<br />

• Thick epidermis<br />

• Hair follicle density<br />

• Epidermal turnover kinetics<br />

• Lipid composition<br />

• Biophysical properties of lipid<br />

I like pigs. Dogs look up to us.<br />

Cats look down on us.<br />

Pigs treat us as equals.<br />

Don’t use skin from an abattoir if hide is scalded!


Differences Between Pig and<br />

Human Skin<br />

• Pig skin has an additional interfollicular<br />

muscle<br />

• Young pigs have hair follicles that occur<br />

in a triad<br />

• Pigs have only apocrine sweat glands over<br />

most of the body<br />

• Immunological and drug metabolism<br />

differences not well characterized


<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong>, <strong>NA</strong>. Comparative Anatomy, Physiology, and Biochemistry<br />

of Mammalian Skin . In Hobson DW (ed) Dermal and Ocular Toxicology:<br />

Fundamentals and Methods, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, Chpt. 1, 3-71, 1991.


Porcine Skin<br />

Stromberg MW, Huang YC, <strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> <strong>NA</strong>. Interfollicular smooth muscle in the<br />

skin of the domesticated pig. The Anatomical Record 201:455-462, 1981.


Porcine Skin


Human Skin


Monkey Skin


Nude Guinea Pig Skin


Mouse Skin


Nude Mouse


Rat Skin


Rabbit Skin


Cow Skin


Cow Skin


Dog Skin<br />

<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> <strong>NA</strong>: Integument. In Eurell J, Frappier B, eds. Dellman’s Textbook of<br />

Veterinary Histology, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, 6 th ed., pp.320-349, 2006.


Dog Skin<br />

<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> <strong>NA</strong>: Integument. In Eurell J, Frappier B, eds. Dellman’s Textbook<br />

of Veterinary Histology, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, 6 th ed., pp.320-349, 2006.


Cat Skin


Cat Skin<br />

<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> <strong>NA</strong>: Integument. In Eurell J, Frappier B, eds. Dellman’s Textbook<br />

of Veterinary Histology, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, 6 th ed., pp.320-349, 2006.


Cat Foot Pad<br />

<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> <strong>NA</strong>: Integument. In Eurell J, Frappier B, eds. Dellman’s Textbook of<br />

Veterinary Histology, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, 6th ed., pp.320-349, 2006.


Comparative Epidermal Thickness and Number<br />

of Cell Layers From the Back of Nine Species<br />

Species Epidermis Stratum Corneum Number of Cell Layers<br />

(µm) (µm)<br />

Cat 12.97 + 0.93 5.84 + 1.02 1.28 + 0.13<br />

Cow 36.76 + 2.95 8.65 + 1.17 2.22 + 0.11<br />

Dog 21.16 + 2.55 5.56 + 0.85 1.89 + 0.16<br />

Horse 33.59 + 2.16 7.26 + 1.04 2.50 + 0.25<br />

Monkey 26.87 + 3.14 2.05 + 2.30 2.67 + 0.24<br />

Mouse 13.32 + 1.19 2.90 + 0.12 1.75 + 0.08<br />

Pig 51.89 + 1.49 12.28 + 0.72 3.94 + 0.13<br />

Rabbit 10.85 + 1.00 6.56 + 0.37 1.22 + 0.11<br />

Rat 21.66 + 2.23 5.00 + 0.85 1.83 + 0.17<br />

<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> et al. Interspecies and interegional analysis of the comparative<br />

histological thickness and laser Doppler blood flow measurements at five cutaneous<br />

sites in nine species. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 95:582-586, 1990.


Blood Flow Measurements of Nine Species at<br />

Five Cutaneous Sites<br />

Species BUT EAR HSJ TLJ VAB<br />

Cat 1.82 + 0.59 6.46 + 2.30 1.86 + 0.70 2.39 + 0.35 6.19 + 0.94<br />

Cow 6.03 + 1.84 6.98 + 2.19 5.51 + 2.32 5.49 + 1.49 10.49 + 2.13<br />

Dog 2.21 + 0.67 5.21 + 1.53 5.52 + 1.31 1.94 + 0.27 8.78 + 1.40<br />

Horse 3.16 + 1.22 ----- 6.76 + 1.49 2.99 + 0.86 8.90 + 1.46<br />

Monkey 3.12 + 0.58 20.93 + 5.37 8.49 + 3.28 2.40 + 0.82 3.58 + 0.41<br />

Mouse 3.88 + 0.92 1.41 + 0.48 10.10 + 3.51 20.56 + 4.69 36.85 + 8.14<br />

Pig 3.08 + 0.48 11.70 + 3.02 6.75 + 2.09 2.97 + 0.56 10.68 + 2.14<br />

Rabbit 3.55 + 0.93 8.38 + 1.53 5.38 + 1.06 5.46 + 0.94 17.34 + 6.31<br />

Rat 4.20 + 1.05 9.13 + 4.97 6.22 + 1.47 9.56 + 2.17 11.35 + 5.53<br />

Units=ml/min/100g (mean + SE)<br />

But = buttocks; Ear = pinnae; HSJ = humeroscapular joint; TLJ = thoracolumbar junction;<br />

VAB = ventral abdomen.<br />

<strong>Monteiro</strong>-<strong>Riviere</strong> et al. Interspecies and interegional analysis of the comparative histological<br />

thickness and laser Doppler blood flow measurements at five cutaneous sites in nine species.<br />

Journal of Investigative Dermatology 95:582-586, 1990.


Hair Follicle Density<br />

Species Area of Skin Number of Hair<br />

Follicles/cm 2<br />

Human Abdomen 11 + 1<br />

Pig Back 11 + 1<br />

Rat Back 289 + 21<br />

Mouse Back 658 + 38<br />

Hairless Mouse Back 75 + 6<br />

Bronaugh et al. Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies II. Animal<br />

models for human skin. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 62, 481-488, 1982.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!