22.08.2013 Views

On Pragmatic Functions and their Correlation with Syntactic - Atlantis

On Pragmatic Functions and their Correlation with Syntactic - Atlantis

On Pragmatic Functions and their Correlation with Syntactic - Atlantis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 A. Jesús Moya<br />

texts <strong>and</strong> the observed frequencies account for 58 <strong>and</strong> 6 respectively. Finally, <strong>with</strong><br />

regards to postmodifiers <strong>and</strong> predicator complements, the expected counts are 10.49<br />

<strong>and</strong> 6.46 respectively in the tourist brochures <strong>and</strong> 15.51 <strong>and</strong> 9.45 in the news items. The<br />

observed counts are 18 <strong>and</strong> 12 in the former, but only 8 <strong>and</strong> 4 appear in the latter. A<br />

similar pattern is found <strong>with</strong> subject complements. The expected counts are 2.02 in the<br />

tourist brochures <strong>and</strong> 2.98 in the news items <strong>and</strong> the observed frequencies account for 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2 respectively. <strong>On</strong>ly the frequency of agents follows a distribution similar to the<br />

rates of the subject function in both subgenres. In fact, the expected count is 2.98 in the<br />

news items <strong>and</strong> 2.02 in the tourist brochures <strong>and</strong> the observed frequencies account for 5<br />

<strong>and</strong> 0 respectively. Thus, the degree of deviation from the null hypothesis of no<br />

association between syntactic realizations <strong>and</strong> text type varies greatly from one syntactic<br />

function to another in the sample texts. 16<br />

16 Also notice that the category of Predicator Complement has been eliminated from the<br />

second revised edition of Downing <strong>and</strong> Locke (2006), the relational types being subsumed under<br />

non-prototypical direct objects, the others under types of complement. However, in order to<br />

maintain the maximum variety of syntactic functions <strong>with</strong>in the English clause (see note 7), for<br />

the purposes of this study I have adopted the previous version of the editions of 1992 <strong>and</strong> 2002 in<br />

which the authors draw a clear boundary between the functions of direct object <strong>and</strong> predicator<br />

complement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!