22.08.2013 Views

A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes - Carnegie Mellon University

A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes - Carnegie Mellon University

A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes - Carnegie Mellon University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I995] THE PREDICTION OF TASTES 93I<br />

on, first, <strong>the</strong> surpris<strong>in</strong>gly long time it has taken social scientists to discover <strong>the</strong><br />

effect, given its magnitude and robustness; second, <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> endowment<br />

effect disappears when people make valuation decisions on behalf <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

person, as if <strong>the</strong>y are not aware that o<strong>the</strong>rs will get attached to objects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

possession (Marshall et al. I987); and third, <strong>the</strong> fact that o<strong>the</strong>r studies have<br />

found that people tend to underestimate how quickly <strong>the</strong>y will adapt to<br />

changed circumstances such as w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g a lottery or becom<strong>in</strong>g paraplegic<br />

(Brickman et al. I978) - i.e. that <strong>the</strong>y underestimate <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> reference<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t shifts.<br />

I. EXPERIMENT I<br />

The first experiment was designed to test whe<strong>the</strong>r subjects without an object<br />

could predict how attached <strong>the</strong>y would become if <strong>the</strong>y were endowed with it.<br />

We first elicited hypo<strong>the</strong>tical sell<strong>in</strong>g prices for an object from unendowed<br />

subjects <strong>the</strong>n endowed <strong>the</strong>m with <strong>the</strong> object and elicited an actual sell<strong>in</strong>g price.<br />

Subjects were 27 undergraduates enrolled <strong>in</strong> a core humanities class at<br />

<strong>Carnegie</strong> <strong>Mellon</strong> <strong>University</strong> and 42 adults enrolled <strong>in</strong> two even<strong>in</strong>g classes <strong>in</strong><br />

f<strong>in</strong>ance at <strong>the</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh. In each class, <strong>the</strong> experimenter held up<br />

a mug engraved with <strong>the</strong> school logo for <strong>the</strong> students to see. A different style<br />

<strong>of</strong> mug was used at <strong>Carnegie</strong> <strong>Mellon</strong> and at <strong>the</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh. A<br />

form was <strong>the</strong>n randomly distributed to approximately half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> students <strong>in</strong><br />

each class. The form asked <strong>the</strong> students to imag<strong>in</strong>e that <strong>the</strong>y possessed <strong>the</strong> mug<br />

on display and to predict whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y would be will<strong>in</strong>g to exchange <strong>the</strong> mug<br />

for various amounts <strong>of</strong> money. It was worded as follows:<br />

We are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> your op<strong>in</strong>ion about <strong>the</strong> mug displayed at <strong>the</strong> front <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> room. Imag<strong>in</strong>e that we gave you a mug exactly like <strong>the</strong> one you can<br />

see, and that we gave you <strong>the</strong> opportunity to keep it or trade it for some<br />

money. Below are a series <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es marked 'Keep mug__ Trade it for<br />

$ amount .' On each l<strong>in</strong>e check whe<strong>the</strong>r you th<strong>in</strong>k that you would<br />

prefer to keep <strong>the</strong> mug or to trade it <strong>in</strong> for <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> money written<br />

on <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e. Check one or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r on every l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong>der <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> page consisted <strong>of</strong> 40 l<strong>in</strong>es each conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a choice<br />

between keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mug or trad<strong>in</strong>g it for an amount <strong>of</strong> money that ranged<br />

from 25 cents to io dollars <strong>in</strong> $0.25 <strong>in</strong>crements. The experimenter waited until<br />

all subjects with a form had completed it. Next, all subjects were presented with<br />

a mug and given a second form which actually provided <strong>the</strong> opportunity to<br />

exchange <strong>the</strong> mug for cash. The <strong>in</strong>structions for <strong>the</strong> second form were directly<br />

analogous to those used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prediction form, but made it clear that one <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir choices would count. Subjects were told that <strong>the</strong>y would receive <strong>the</strong><br />

option <strong>the</strong>y had circled on one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es - which l<strong>in</strong>e had been determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> advance by <strong>the</strong> experimenter.<br />

The experimental design creates two groups <strong>of</strong> subjects, one that completed<br />

<strong>the</strong> prediction form prior to receiv<strong>in</strong>g a mug, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r that did not. It<br />

allows us to conduct both a between- and with<strong>in</strong>-subject analysis <strong>of</strong> prediction<br />

accuracy. The with<strong>in</strong>-subject analysis compares <strong>the</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary valuation<br />

K Royal Economic Society I995

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!