25.08.2013 Views

second interim report - Eu-ARTECH

second interim report - Eu-ARTECH

second interim report - Eu-ARTECH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 nd Year Interim Report<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong><br />

Access, Research and Technology for the conservation<br />

of the <strong>Eu</strong>ropean Cultural Heritage<br />

Integrating Activity<br />

implemented as<br />

Integrated Infrastructure Initiative<br />

Contract number: RII3-CT-2004-506171<br />

Project Co-ordinator: Prof. Brunetto Giovanni Brunetti<br />

Reporting period: from June 1 st 2005 to November 30 th 2005<br />

Project funded by the <strong>Eu</strong>ropean Community<br />

under the “Structuring the <strong>Eu</strong>ropean Research Area”<br />

Specific ProgrammeResearch Infrastructures action<br />

1


1 ST YEAR INTERIM ACTIVITY REPORT<br />

1. PROGRESS REPORT<br />

1.1 Summary of activities ................................................................................................. 3<br />

1.2 Management Activity ............................................................................................... 3<br />

1.2.1 Management tasks .................................................................................................. 3<br />

1.2.2 General meetings .................................................................................................... 4<br />

1.3 Networking Activities ............................................................................................... 6<br />

1.3.1 N1-Sharing knowledge and resources ............................................................... 6<br />

1.3.1.1 Activity progress...................................................................................... 6<br />

1.3.1.2 Meetings and workshops......................................................................... 8<br />

1.3.2 N2- Materials and methods in conservation .................................................... 11<br />

........ 1.3.2.1 Activity progress.................................................................................... 11<br />

1.3.2.2 Meetings and workshops....................................................................... 12<br />

1.4 Transnational Access Activities.............................................................................. 13<br />

1.4.1 TA1: AGLAE ........................................................................................................ 13<br />

1.4.1.1 Description of the publicity concerning the new opportunities<br />

for access ............................................................................................. 13<br />

1.4.1.2 Description of the selection procedures and access activity ............. 13<br />

1.4.1.3 Meetings and workshops .................................................................... 15<br />

1.4.2 TA2: MOLAB ..................................................................................................….15<br />

1.4.2.1 Description of the publicity concerning the new opportunities<br />

for access ........................................................................................... ..15<br />

1.4.2.2 Description of the selection procedures and access activity............. .16<br />

1.4.2.3 Meetings and workshops…………………………………………..17<br />

1.5 Joint Research Activities.................................................................................... .. 18<br />

........ 1.5.1 JRA1: Development and evaluation of new treatments for the<br />

conservation-restoration of outdoor stone and bronze monuments............... 18<br />

1.5.1.1 Activity progress.................................................................................... 18<br />

1.5.1.2 Meetings and workshops....................................................................... 19<br />

........ 1.5.2 JRA2: New methods in diagnostics: Imaging and spectroscopy ………………....19<br />

1.5.2.1 Activity progress.................................................................................... 19<br />

1.5.2.2 Meetings and workshops....................................................................... 21<br />

…<br />

2. LIST OF DELIVERABLES……………………………………………………………… 22<br />

3. USE AND DISSEMINATION OF KNOWLEDGE……………………………………… 24<br />

ANNEXES<br />

.......Annex 1 – Summary Report of the Second Interim Meeting………………………………..26<br />

.......Annex 2 – Composition of the Users Selection Panel……………………..…..…………….30<br />

.......Annex 3 – List of AGLAE and MOLAB User-Projects …………………………………… 31<br />

.......Annex 4 – Standardised format for analytical procedures…………….………….……..…..33<br />

.......Annex 5 – Summary on the workshop on “Non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage…. ...36<br />

.......Annex 6 – Summary on GUPIX course…………………………………….………….…….40<br />

.......Annex 7 – Summary on AGLAE and MOLAB Users Meeting………………………..…....41<br />

.......Annex 8 – Summary Report on JRA1………………………………………………….…....46<br />

....... Annex 9 – Summary Report on JRA2………………………………………………………108


1. PROGRESS REPORT<br />

1.1 – Summary of activities<br />

The <strong>second</strong> year activities of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> started on June 1 st 2005. All the various tasks of the planned<br />

networking, access and joint research activities had their regular development, according to the<br />

implementation plan of the <strong>second</strong> period and, after 18 months from the start-up of the project, significant<br />

progresses have been done and all the planned milestones have been achieved.<br />

The present <strong>interim</strong> <strong>report</strong> describes the activities that have been developed during the first six month of<br />

the <strong>second</strong> year (June 1 st - November 30 th 2005), preparing the way towards the more articulated Second<br />

Annual Report to be delivered at the end of May 2006.<br />

1.2 – Management Activity<br />

The <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> management activity of the period consisted mainly of the preparation of the First Annual<br />

Report, of the dissemination of the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities with emphasis to Transnational Access, of the<br />

intensification and deepening of the relations with other I3 initiatives or other projects operating in the field<br />

of conservation of cultural heritage. During this period, one meeting of the Governing Board was held. All<br />

these activities are described in the following paragraphs.<br />

1.2.1 – Management tasks<br />

The main management task of the <strong>second</strong> year was the preparation of the First Annual Report. After the<br />

Ormylia Meeting, a fruitful intense work was carried out by the Coordinator and the Consortium partners in<br />

order to satisfy all the administrative requirements of the <strong>report</strong>ing. In particular, strong efforts were<br />

dedicated to the preparation of all the documentation necessary for the signature of the Audit Certificates. At<br />

the deadline (July 15 th ) all the partners were ready, apart one exception due to internal specific rules of the<br />

institution. This difficulty lead to some delay in the presentation of the Annual Report, that was finally<br />

delivered on September 2005. After the delivery, some integration of documents have been requested by EC.<br />

The last documents were delivered in December 2005, that is during the days of preparation of this <strong>report</strong>.<br />

Contacts were maintained with other organisations or infrastructures with the objective to promote crossfertilisations<br />

in order to establish a common area of encounter and interchange of knowledge. Other contacts<br />

were maintained with other I3 or other organisations or infrastructures in order to exchange administrative<br />

experience in the perspective of future both managerial and programme aspects of FP7. The activities of<br />

ESFRI to produce an infrastructure road map was also monitored. Specific contacts were maintained and<br />

deepened with:<br />

- I3 initiatives, such as LASERLAB, NMI3, and IA-SFS, developing work in the field of cultural<br />

heritage;<br />

- I3 Forum;<br />

- infrastructures operating in the field of study and conservation of cultural heritage, such as the ICTP,<br />

Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics of Trieste, or the LABEC – INFN of<br />

Florence;<br />

- EC projects, such as COST G8, COST G7, CEN/TC 346 dedicated to the “Conservation of Cultural<br />

Property, or with Marie-Curie actions such as ATHENA and EPISCON, dedicated to the formation<br />

of young conservation scientists.<br />

3


-During the period, the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website (www.eu-artech.org) was continuosly adjourned, introducing<br />

new pages and links in the effort to create an easily readable interface with users and institutions external to<br />

the Consortium. The specific restricted area of the website was reserved to the exchange and diffusion of<br />

working documents.<br />

The Governing Board met one time during the period June 1 st - November 30 th 2005, in Paris in occasion of<br />

the Second Interim meeting (November 21 st , 2005). A <strong>report</strong> on this meeting is in the following paragraph.<br />

1.2.2 General Meetings<br />

The Second Interim Meeting of Paris, held at C2RMF, Palais du Louvre, in November 2005, was the 4 th<br />

General Meeting of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>.<br />

In Paris, the 4 th Governing Board Meeting was held. According to the Consortium Agreement, this meeting<br />

was restricted to the Coordinator and one authorised representative for each participant infrastructure.<br />

The following GB members were present: Coordinator: B.Brunetti; UNIPG: A. Sgamellotti; CNRS-C2RMF:<br />

M.Menu; CNR-ICVBC: S.Bracci; NGL: A. Roy; OPD: D. Pinna; BLFD: M. Mach; OADC: S. Sotiropoulou;<br />

ICN: M. Bommel; LNEC: J. Delgado; IRPA: J. Wouters; RWTH: B. Bluemich; UNIBO: R. Mazzeo; INOA:<br />

L. Pezzati.<br />

1- Amendments to the contract<br />

The Coordinator announced that from June 1 st INOA formally merged into CNR, however it was authorised<br />

to maintain its administrative rules, being entered in a transitory phase. The GB decided to ask to the EC<br />

Research Infrastructure office if the change of model cost from AC (cost model of INOA in the contract) to<br />

FC (the cost model of CNR) is obligatory or can be postponed up to the end of the transitory phase. In case<br />

of obligation, the request of amendment of the contract is to be considered authorised by the GB.<br />

B. Brunetti illustrated the content of the clause 39 that could be introduced in the contract. It allows<br />

institutions having an annual budget lower than 150.000 euros to skip the audit.<br />

The Coordinator presented and discussed advantages and possible inconvenients of the introduction of clause<br />

39. After accurate evaluation by the Consortium representatives, it was decided to renounce to the clause 39<br />

and accept the rule of presenting every year the Audit Certificate for each institution.<br />

As a third point, the possible extension of the participation of RWTH to the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities was<br />

discussed. The original formulation of the contract includes the participation of RWTH limited to the first<br />

two years. However, RWTH is developing a relevant work on new NMR methodologies for the laboratory<br />

and in-situ studies of artworks; therefore, it would be important for <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> to extend its participation,<br />

at least, for another year. All the partners agreed on this point. In order to allow RWTH to continue its<br />

activity, the Coordinator proposed to shift part of the UNIPG budget (coordinator), corresponding to an<br />

amount of 25.000 euros, to RWTH. Unanimously, the GB accepted the proposal of the Coordinator inviting<br />

him to proceed to the request of amendment of the contract.<br />

The Coordinator communicated that the Bank of UNIPG changed its coordinates. The change was due to the<br />

merging of the Banca dell’Umbria into the largest UniCredit Banca. The new coordinates will be<br />

communicated to the EC asking for the relative amendment of the contract. All GB members agreed with the<br />

request of amendment. The new name of the Bank is: UniCredit Banca; the new IBAN:<br />

IT58G0200803016000029489728.<br />

2- Administrative notes<br />

The Coordinator informed the Consortium member representatives that the procedure to close the First<br />

Annual Report with the inclusion of the Audit Certificates of all the participating institutions was close to the<br />

end.<br />

Due to the strong foreseen delay in the pre-financing of the <strong>second</strong> year, the Coordinator announced to<br />

reserve to himself the use of the residue of the budget of the First Year not yet distributed to the partners, for<br />

4


a pre- prefinancing of those institutions (only) that spended all or almost all their first year budget. The<br />

assembly was favourable.<br />

3- Next Meetings<br />

At the end of the meeting the proposal of Munchen as location for the Third Year Annual Meeting was<br />

advanced by M. Mach of BLFD. The proposal was unanimously accepted.<br />

The National Gallery of London, as site for the Third Year Interim Meeting was also proposed and accepted.<br />

Therefore the locations of the next <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> meetings is the following:<br />

-Second Year Annual Meeting – Lisbon, LNEC, May 3-5 2006;<br />

-Third Year Interim Meeting – London, NGL, date to be established;<br />

-Third Year Annual Meeting, Munchen, BLFD, date to be established.<br />

4- General notes<br />

It has been proposed by LNEC and accepted by GB, to define and publish on the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website a list<br />

of trainees & training opportunities “stock exchange” among the participating institutions. Such a simple and<br />

flexible item will permit to increase and diversify the training possibilities in the areas of the project.<br />

With this last decision, the Governing Board meeting was closed.<br />

5


1.3 – Networking activity<br />

According to the contract, networking activity was continued, articulated in two lines, one regarding the<br />

analysis and diagnostics on artwork materials (N1), the <strong>second</strong> regarding the materials and methods used in<br />

conservation of cultural heritage (N2). Networking discussions on the rational use of analytical methods and<br />

resources (N1) is considered of outmost importance to optimise research; the definition of best methods and<br />

materials in conservation of artworks (N2) is recognised as the proper way to better guarantee the diffusion<br />

of best practices for their preservation.<br />

The two networking activities were accomplished through continuous interactions among the<br />

responsibles of the networking tasks and participants, who took care of the work. Natural coordination<br />

followed also from the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> periodical meetings (every six months).<br />

Participants are all the partners, apart INOA and RWTH.<br />

Responsible for networking is UNI-BO.<br />

1.3.1 – N1: Sharing knowledge and resources<br />

N1 networking specific activities of the first six months of the <strong>second</strong> year consisted mainly in:<br />

- continuation of Task 1 on Analytical resources, analytical procedures and investigation strategies,<br />

especially referred to organic substance investigations;<br />

- start of Task 2- Exchange knowledge and expertise.<br />

In particular, it was planned:<br />

-Task 1c (CNRS-C2RMF): Proposition of a standardised format for describing analytical procedures for<br />

natural organic substances investigations, to allow these procedures to be readily compared and reproduced.<br />

Continuation of interlaboratory comparison on dyestuffs investigation. with focus on complementary nondestructive<br />

techniques available via MOLAB and AGLAE.<br />

-Task 2 (ICN): Subtask 2a, Reference Materials Sharing, overview on possible sharing of reference materials<br />

among infrastructures.<br />

-Subtask 2b (C2RMF): Cooperation with CAMEO (MFA, Boston);<br />

-Subtask 2c (UNIPG), Workshop on Non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage comprising educational<br />

lectures and practical training exercises with mobile NMR equipment. Training course for PIXE users on<br />

GUPIX data processing software.<br />

Behind these tasks, other activities of dissemination were carried out.<br />

Responsible for N1 is CNRS-C2RMF.<br />

1.3.1.1 – Activity progress<br />

The effort on establishing fruitful interactions among <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> and relevant infrastructures in the field<br />

of cultural heritage had no stop. Information on <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities was currently distributed among<br />

interested institutions and researchers. At the end of November 2005, 127 institutions of 27 countries, plus 3<br />

international organisations, have manifested interest in the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> project and have been registered in<br />

the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> mailing list. In the next future, other efforts will be done particularly towards libraries,<br />

archives, historical buildings and archaeological institutions, restoration workshops, producers of cultural<br />

heritage materials (pigments, dyes, paper, textiles, wood, stone, ceramics…).<br />

Along this line, a list of conferences, seminars, training courses in the area of conservation of cultural<br />

heritage was regularly updated, distributed to the institutions and researchers of the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> mailing<br />

list, and made available on the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website. A list of relevant websites of interest in the<br />

conservation science and conservation/restoration of cultural heritage was also westablished and made<br />

accessible through the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website. The list was regularly updated and enriched.<br />

The database initiated during the previous <strong>Eu</strong>ropean project LabS TECH related to the institutions (public<br />

cultural heritage institutions, universities, research centres, museums, libraries, restoration workshops,<br />

foundations, industrial technology research centres...) active in characterisation & analysis of cultural<br />

heritage artefacts and their component materials has been continuously updated. New entries, via the interest<br />

6


manifested to <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> initiatives, have permitted the extension of the database from 106 to 126<br />

institutions belonging to 28 different countries and working with 114 different investigation techniques.<br />

It has been proposed and accepted to update regularly the database, and to link it to the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong><br />

website. Once this will be done, improvements (widening to new techniques and extension of the areas of<br />

cultural heritage activity) will be introduced.<br />

Task1 - Analytical resources, analytical procedures and investigation strategies (OADC, ICN, NGL, KIK-<br />

IRPA, UNIPG, C2RMF)<br />

Task 1c (CNRS-C2RMF): Proposition of a standardised format for describing analytical procedures for<br />

natural organic substances investigations, to allow these procedures to be readily compared and reproduced.<br />

A template format for documenting analytical protocols and data exchange has been set up (see Annex 4)<br />

and distributed among the partners to be assessed for its relevance, completeness and applicability to real<br />

cases. Discussion is in progress on the essential relevant analytical parameters to be adopted as common<br />

reference for exchange of results<br />

A future action in collaboration with MaSC users group is scheduled, focusing on the adaptation and<br />

assessment of the existing JCAMP format (for MS data) for UV-Vis spectra linked with chromatographic<br />

data.<br />

Task 2 (ICN): Subtask 2a, Reference Materials Sharing, overview on possible sharing of reference materials<br />

among infrastructures.<br />

Interlaboratory comparison<br />

In cooperation with the COST G8 action, “Non-destructive Analysis and Testing of Museum Objects”, and<br />

within the framework of Irina Petroviciu’s short time scientific mission (COST-STSM-G8-01461) at KIK-<br />

IRPA and NGL, well documented reference materials have been prepared to be shared for analysis and<br />

interlaboratory comparison of results among the partners.<br />

In continuation of the pilot study on Weld, five other well-characterised natural biological sources (plants<br />

and animals) of interest have been selected, for the distribution of 22 dyed wool and silk fibres and fabrics<br />

(prepared at KIK-IRPA) and 7 lake pigments (prepared at the NGL).<br />

The following plants and insects have been selected:<br />

-dyer’s broom (Genista tinctoria),<br />

-sappanwood (Caesalpinia sappan),<br />

-safflower (Carthamus tinctorius),<br />

-Mexican cochineal (Dactylopius coccus) and<br />

-indigo (Indigofera sp.).<br />

Additionally, madder (Rubia sp.) and madder dyed wool provided by MODHT - Monitoring of Damage in<br />

Historic Textiles - EU 5th FP (C. No EVK4-2001-00020) ended on June 2005 (from which several reference<br />

materials are available to be shared) have been also used for the standards of madder lake pigments.<br />

Laboratory recipes have been adopted, based on historic literature citations but adapted and established to be<br />

controllable and reproducible. All procedures for the preparation of pigments and dying textiles are <strong>report</strong>ed<br />

in detail and documented with pictures to be distributed to all the partners who will participate to the<br />

interlaboratory activities.<br />

Well prepared and documented samples of reference materials are presently shared for interlaboratory<br />

comparison among all the laboratories involved in the present task (NGL, KIK-IRPA, ICN, OADC, UNI-<br />

PG) and some cooperating institutions external to the project (such as GCI, NMS/UoE). In occasion of the<br />

ICOM-CC conference a proposal for the initiative NOPART was advanced, in the perspective of possible<br />

future interaction with ICOM-CC (see Annex 4).<br />

Results will be evaluated and discussed:<br />

-first, during the 2nd <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> annual meeting in May 2006 in Lisbon,<br />

-extensively, at the one day <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> Working meeting attached to the DHA25 in Romania, 21-23<br />

September 2006.<br />

Task 2b - Cooperation between <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> and MFA, Boston, for the improvement of CAMEO<br />

7


A plan for a possible co-operation between EU-<strong>ARTECH</strong> and MFA Boston, related to CAMEO, has been<br />

adopted, setting a reasonable and workable contribution of the Consortium’s members.<br />

A Memorandum of Agreement has been written, in order to propose to MFA Boston the conditions of the<br />

contribution of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>, the information on the CAMEO website and on the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website, the<br />

intellectual property conditions and the interface with the “Conservation dictionary”.<br />

A dedicated working group has discussed these aspects during the <strong>second</strong> intermediate meeting in Paris. It<br />

has been proposed to organise a meeting with MFA, to finalise this co-operation, in Amsterdam or London,<br />

in March or April 2006.<br />

Subtask 2c (UNIPG), Dissemination: Workshop on Non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage comprising<br />

educational lectures and practical training exercises with mobile NMR equipment. Training course for PIXE<br />

users on GUPIX data processing software.<br />

A double initiative has been developed at the University of Perugia in September 19-23 2005: a “Workshop<br />

on non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage” and the “5th Colloquium in Mobile NMR”, organised by<br />

RWTH Aachen (B. Blümich), SMAArt UNIPG (A. Sgamellotti) and CNR-IMC (A. Segre). The workshop<br />

and the Colloquium had a large participation( 42 researchers at the workshop; 72 researchers at the<br />

Colloquium). During both meetings, but in particular during the “Workshop on non-invasive NMR and<br />

Cultural Heritage”, the general bases of the NMR technique and the design of the portable NMR-MOUSE<br />

(Nuclear Magnetic Resonance – MObile Universal Surface Explorer) were fully described, both from the<br />

theoretical and experimental point of view. In many presentations, attention was dedicated not only to the<br />

applications already carried out, but also to the developments of the NMR-MOUSE and to the “depthprofile”<br />

version of this instrument. A short <strong>report</strong>, including the agenda and list of participants to the<br />

workshop, is <strong>report</strong>ed in Annex 5.<br />

The “Training course for PIXE users on GUPIX data processing software”, organised by C2RMF with the<br />

co-operation of the University of Guelph (Canada), was held in the rooms of C2RMF – Paris, on october 5 th<br />

–7 th 2005. The course included theoretical lectures and practical exercise in the AGLAE-PIXE laboratory<br />

and was attended by AGLAE TA users.<br />

A summary <strong>report</strong> of the training course, is <strong>report</strong>ed in Annex 6.<br />

1.3.1.2. Meetings and workshops<br />

The following meetings and workshops were organised:<br />

- “Workshop on Non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage”, 19th - 290th September 200 – Perugia,<br />

comprising educational lectures and practical training exercises with mobile NMR equipment<br />

(RWTH, UNIPG). (Annex 5).<br />

- “Training course for PIXE users on GUPIX data processing software”, with the co-operation of the<br />

University of Guelph (Canada), C2RMF – Paris, 5-7 October 2005. the workshop was held in Paris<br />

at C2RMF and included practical exercise in the AGLAE-PIXE laboratory. (Annex 6).<br />

In addition, <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> participated, with the active presence of several Consortium members, to relevant<br />

conferences or workshops, such as:<br />

- “COST and Cultural Heritage: crossing borders” – Florence – October 20-22 2005<br />

(http://www.echn.net/cost-hig/florence2005) a <strong>Eu</strong>ropean meeting where the COST activities of the<br />

field have been discussed in the perspective of future developments. During this meeting, <strong>Eu</strong>-<br />

<strong>ARTECH</strong> had a relevant evidence.<br />

Information on <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities were largely diffused at:<br />

- “3rd International conference on the application of Raman spectroscopy in art & archaeology”–<br />

Paris - 31 August - 3 September 2005 (participation of C2RMF and UNIPG);<br />

- “14th ICOM-CC Triennial Meeting” - The Hague - 12-16 September 2005. ICOM-CC is the largest<br />

association of conservators of the world having more than 1400 members. It aims to promote the<br />

conservation, investigation and analysis of culturally and historically significant works and to further<br />

the goals of the conservation professions. At this conference <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> was present with a stand,<br />

where brochures and other documentations on the Consortium activities (with emphasis to AGLAE<br />

and MOLAB Transnational Access) were distributed to the interested conservators. In addition to a<br />

general poster on <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> networking, another poster presented the concepts and content of the<br />

interlaboratory comparison experiment on dyes’ analysis (illustrating the weld pilot study). On the<br />

8


day of 16th September, during the ICOM-CC conference, a short target meeting was held, presenting<br />

the outline of the NOPART initiative and discussing possible future interaction with ICOM-CC, as<br />

well as aims and topics of a future joint meeting which could be scheduled jointly as an ICOM-CC<br />

working group meeting. (In Annex 4, an introduction sent to the Coordinators of the ICOM-CC<br />

working groups, before the target meeting as well as a short <strong>report</strong> on the meeting itself are<br />

included). A relevant detail is that, at the closure conference, Tim Whalen, the General Director of<br />

the Getty Conservation Institute of Los Angeles, mentioned <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> as the most relevant<br />

project in the field of conservation of cultural heritage in <strong>Eu</strong>rope. Also relevant, for the strengthening<br />

of the relationships between <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> and ICOM-CC, was the election, as President of the<br />

ICOM-CC for the next Triennium, of Jan Wouters, representative of IRPA within <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>’s approach and activity on organic substances’ analytical strategies have been diffused by<br />

the partners participating in relevant <strong>Eu</strong>ropean conferences or meetings, attracting the interest of<br />

interdisciplinary researchers in the field. They are:<br />

-“MODHT end-of-project meeting” on 20th-21st June. (Monitoring of Damage in Historic Textiles).<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> partners present: Jan Wouters (KIK-IRPA), Ina Vanden Berghe (KIK-IRPA), Jo Kirby<br />

(NGL). Possible ways of cooperation were discussed (e.g. sharing of reference materials, benefit<br />

from the experiences of the MODHT project).<br />

- “29 th International Symposium on High Performance Liquid Phase Separations and Related<br />

Techniques”, 26-30 June 2005, Stockholm, Sweden. <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> partner present: Yannis<br />

Karapanagiotis (OADC). Topics of the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> networking initiatives related to Studies on<br />

organic materials in artworks have been promoted.<br />

-“MaSC Users Group”, 7-10 September 2005, Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam. <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong><br />

partners present: Catherine Higgitt (NGL), Maarten van Bommel(ICN). Presentation of the N1<br />

networking activity and of planned collaboration with MaSC.<br />

- “14th ICOM-CC triennial meeting”, in The Hague, 12-16 September 2005. <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> partners<br />

who are leading the Organic Analyses topic in attendance: Jan Wouters (KIK-IRPA), Ina Vanden<br />

Berghe (KIK-IRPA), Jo Kirby (NGL), Maarten van Bommel (ICN), Costanza Miliani (UNI-PG),<br />

Sophia Sotiropoulou (OADC). This meeting has been already mentioned.<br />

- “Dyes in History and Archaeology annual meeting, DHA 24”, in Liverpool, 3-5 November 2005.<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> partners present: Jan Wouters (KIK-IRPA), Ina Vanden Berghe (KIK-IRPA), Jo Kirby<br />

(NGL), Catherine Higgitt(NGL), Maarten van Bommel (ICN), Sophia Sotiropoulou (OADC), Catia<br />

Clementi (UNI-PG). Dissemination of the concept, scope and results of the weld pilot study. Key<br />

findings and perspectives, presented by M. van Bommel [.ppt on the website]. A Working Meeting<br />

of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> partners of OADC , ICN , IRPA , NGL and UNI-PG present at DHA 24 took place<br />

in Liverpool on November 4th 2005, where the progress of the work on both topics of dyes and<br />

natural polymers have been discussed.<br />

Other N1 working meetings were held during the last semester:<br />

-“Bilateral OADC-C2RMF meeting” held at C2RMF, 11-12 July 2005, Paris, France<br />

Participants: Yannis Karapanagiotis (OADC), Martine Regert and Thibaut Devièse (C2RMF),<br />

Key points regarding sample preparation procedures and analytical protocols with respect to the<br />

utilization of chromatographic methods were discussed in detail. Major attention was focused on the<br />

assessment of different analytical methodologies and complementary techniques to build a more<br />

complete picture in the analysis of natural dyes. Utilization of HPLC-PDA and LC-MS techniques in<br />

dyestuff analysis and evaluation of the various analytical protocols was a priority of the meeting.<br />

C2RMF has recently acquired a new HPLC-PDA instrument and therefore has the intention to be<br />

actively involved in the intercomparison experiments and networking actions on Organic substances<br />

analyses issues, which are planned in the next period.<br />

Similar issues, related to binding media identification were also discussed, to be developed under the<br />

extension of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> N1 activity on natural polymers analytical strategies. OADC and C2RMF<br />

had the opportunity to share knowledge on these issues, based on the recent conclusions and<br />

concerns of Networking activity N1.<br />

-“Bilateral Meeting OADC-UNIPG” held in Ormylia, on 4-9 august, 2005. Participants:<br />

S.Sotiropoulou and G.Karagiannis (OADC), B.G.Brunetti, A. Sgamellotti (UNIPG). During the<br />

meeting, problens regarding intellectual property rights were clarified, as well as publications on<br />

9


joint research. Advances in JRA2 were also discussed and a plan for the activities at the <strong>Eu</strong>-<br />

<strong>ARTECH</strong> stand at the ICOM was established (posters, ICOM-CC publication, flyers, ecc.). For the<br />

documents produced see the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website.<br />

-“Bilateral meeting ICN-NGL” held in London at the NGL (August 2005)<br />

Participants: Maarten van Bommel (ICN), Jo Kirby and Catherine Higgitt (NGL). The progress on<br />

the weld project and the content for the dissemination of first results of the presentation to be given<br />

at DHA were discussed.<br />

- A separate “NOPART discussion”, took place during the Paris <strong>interim</strong> meeting (November 22 nd<br />

2005). Participants: Sophia Sotiropoulou (OADC), Costanza Miliani, (UNI-PG), Laura Cartechini<br />

(UNI-PG), Jan Wouters (KIK-IRPA), Ina Vanden Berghe (KIK-IRPA), Maarten van Bommel (ICN).<br />

To those who were not present during the discussion held at then ICOM-CC conference on 16<br />

September 2005, a brief overview was prepared (see Appendix 4). The best strategy is to focus on a<br />

single material. At this meeting it was decided that the focus should be on proteins. Contact will be<br />

sought with both the Getty Conservation Institute and the coordinators of the working groups of<br />

ICOM-CC which are related to proteins (a possible common area of interest could be defined, in<br />

relation with GCI running project “The Organic Materials in Wall Paintings (OMWP)”,<br />

http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications/newsletters/19_2/gcinews1.html . The OMWP<br />

project brings together an international group of conservation science laboratories — including the<br />

GCI — with expertise in the study of wall paintings and in the use and evaluation of analytical<br />

techniques. The workings groups which will be contacted are Scientific Research, Textiles,<br />

Paintings, Leather and related materials, wet organic and archaeological materials. etc.<br />

The aim is to organise a meeting, possibly prior to or directly after the annual <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> meeting<br />

in May 2007, which will be held in Munich.<br />

It is already established that for the next six months of the <strong>second</strong> year, the following meetings will be<br />

organised by <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>:<br />

– Workshop on Seventeenth Century Northern <strong>Eu</strong>ropean paintings, National Gallery London – 12 December<br />

2005. This workshop will be held within the task on “Examination of paintings” coordinated by NG. A<br />

maximum number of 40 participants is planned. This number is kept deliberately relatively low, so that the<br />

workshop will have a seminar-type format, and active discussions will be promoted. Participants include<br />

conservation scientists, art historians, curators, and conservators, mainly from <strong>Eu</strong>rope (especially Britain, the<br />

Netherlands and Belgium, as might be expected given the subject of the workshop), as well as from the<br />

United States.<br />

– International conference on “The painting technique of Matthias Grünewald and his contemporaries” –<br />

Colmar, Musée d’Unterlinden in co-operation with C2RMF – January 24-26 2006 The first day will be<br />

dedicated to the technique of Matthias Grünewald strictly speaking, the <strong>second</strong> day to the corpus of<br />

Grünewald production and the third day to the painting technique of contemporary artists. Publication of the<br />

proceedings is foreseen in Techné.<br />

- Together with the <strong>second</strong> <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> annual meeting: International seminar on the theme “Theory and<br />

practice in conservation – A tribute to Cesare Brandi” (May 4-5 2006 Lisbon - LNEC). The meeting will<br />

coincide with the 100 th anniversary of Cesare Brandi’s birthday.<br />

A suggestion has been made to invitate Christiane Maierhofer (BAM – Berlin, and also a member of the<br />

ECTP-FACH) to make a presentation on the <strong>Eu</strong>ropean Project “Onsiteformasonry”.<br />

In the next six months, to disseminate <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities and establish fruitful contacts with other<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>ropean initiatives, <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> consortium members will also participate to meetings such as:<br />

- “RICH (Research Infrastructures for Cultural Heritage) workshop” - Trieste - December 12-13 2005<br />

(http://neutron.neutron-eu.net/n_nmi3/n_networking_activities/rich); in particular, it is planned that<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> will contribute to the organisation of the workshop;<br />

- “MIP 2006 (Metals in paper) final conference” - Newcastle upon Tyne – January 24-27 2006<br />

(http://www.miponline.org/final.htm).<br />

- “Synchrotron Radiation in Art and Archaeology, SR2A” – Berlin, end 2006<br />

A special attention will be given to get in touch with the participants in the recently launched <strong>Eu</strong>ropean<br />

programme ECTP (<strong>Eu</strong>ropean Construction Technology Platform) and especially its dedicated Focus Area<br />

Cultural Heritage (FACH) (http://www.ectp.org/fa_cultural_heritage.asp). Potential interferences and/or cooperations<br />

will be examined.<br />

10


1.3.2 – N2: Materials and methods in conservation<br />

The N2 networking planned work was concerned with the continuation of Task 1- Cleaning and<br />

consolidation methods and materials already developed during the first year (resp. CNR-ICVBC). In<br />

particular, during the period of this <strong>report</strong>, the development of Task 1d was foreseen: Survey on cleaning and<br />

consolidation.<br />

After the approval of the final revised version of the survey forms of the first year, a translation into Italian,<br />

French, German, Dutch and Portuguese was planned. The formation of a list of curators and conservators<br />

operating in different fields and different members’ countries was also planned (in cooperation with N1)<br />

together with the preparation of database-forms for the storage and analysis of the collected survey data. A<br />

relevant dissemination of the N2 activity was foreseen for the 14 th Triennial Meeting of ICOM-CC in The<br />

Hague, on September 2005. All these tasks have been accomplished and their development is described in<br />

the following.<br />

1.3.2.1 – Activity progress<br />

Multi language Forms<br />

Following the decision during the first <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> Annual Meeting in Ormylia, the 9 FORMS in their<br />

English version have been re-structured and compressed; at the end of the process, 4 survey “question<br />

packages” have been prepared, according to the different materials: Stones, Metals, Paintings, Mural<br />

Paintings.<br />

- Package Stone: Cleaning, Consolidation, Treatment of biodeteriogens;<br />

- Package Metals: Cleaning<br />

- Package Painting: Cleaning, Treatment of biodeteriogens;<br />

- Package Mural Paintings: Consolidation, Treatment of biodeteriogens;<br />

Each package contains a special page for the identification of the Compiler and the grant to use personal<br />

data.<br />

With the help of the partners the English version of the packages are translated into other language for a<br />

better diffusion: Italian, French, German, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish, Rumanian.<br />

Italian, French and Portuguese versions have been already completed, while the other versions are still in<br />

progress.<br />

The fact that not all the translations are completed is due to the long revision of the forms after the first<br />

application among partners and their quality evaluation; the future application will imply probably a small<br />

delay of the distribution of the forms to the compilers. Revised final version of the Forms are available in the<br />

reserved area of the website.<br />

Database for the analysis of results of the survey action<br />

The structure of the database has been revised according to the completion of the packages. The database has<br />

been set-up with the Microsoft Access software. The main file to be filled in, is: <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>_N2<br />

survey.mdb It contains 5 pages: Stone, Metals, Paintings, Mural paintings, plus the Compiler page. Once<br />

filled in, the database is blocked and can’t be modified. The data will be transferred from the compiled forms<br />

by a single person authorised by the responsible of the Survey Action. A scheme of the database is delivered<br />

through the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website (reserved area).<br />

Report on the Survey action at ICOM-CC Meeting<br />

The activity has been focused on the first appointment with the restorers and conservators, that is the launch<br />

of the “exploring” survey action at 14 th Triennal Meeting ICOM-CC, 12-16 September, The Hague,<br />

Netherlands.<br />

There is a growing understanding that in order to preserve our Cultural Heritage successfully, it is necessary<br />

to actively involve the public. If the public feels a sense of responsibility and understands the decision<br />

processes involved, we can achieve a stronger basis for the conservation of Cultural Heritage. To promote<br />

this dialogue, the theme for the ICOM-CC 2005 Congress has been: Our Cultural Past – Your Future! The<br />

11


main task of N2 activity is completely in agreement with this idea and therefore the ICOM – CC Conference<br />

has been chosen as the ideal first launch of the Survey Action in the framework of EU-Artech. To reach this<br />

goal two different actions have been carried out:<br />

• a mini-stand was reserved nad managed at the trade fair of the congress; the stand was completely<br />

devoted to promote <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities; some posters have been exposed regarding the<br />

Transanational Access (MOLAB and AGLAE) and regarding the Joint Research Activity (JRA1<br />

and JRA2); a depliant regarding the Project and particularly the Networking N2 activity has been<br />

distributed to the public (file <strong>Eu</strong>artech_depliant 2005.pdf, see <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website);<br />

• at the mini-stand two young researcher of ICVBC have explained the general aims of the N2 Survey<br />

action, collecting the opinion of international conservators about the Forms; at the mini-stand they<br />

also established around 100 contacts with different professionals, that have been registered in the<br />

List of Conservators. Many observations on the forms, their content, their feasibility and clarity<br />

were collected and thereafter discussed.<br />

• an editorial space was prepared and printed on the newspaper of the ICOM-CC Meeting (ICOM-<br />

CC2005-Congress-Newspaper.pdf - pag.12/20); the space consisted of one page advertisement<br />

explaining the three different activities of the Project (Networking, Access, Research); attention was<br />

particularly dedicated to Transantional Access and N2 activity and tSurvey on “Cleaning and<br />

consolidation methods and materials” (see the file ICOM-CC2005-Congress-Newspaper.pdf -<br />

pag.12/20 and file <strong>Eu</strong>artech_advert _ICOM CC.pdf on the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website).<br />

• Set up of a List of conservators<br />

This task was particularly onerous: all the partners contributed to send a list of conservators. The list is long<br />

and consists of about 700 names, however, the list must not be considered as closed. A Microsoft Access<br />

specific file has been set-up to collect the survey-data: <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>_N2 survey_Compiler.mdb.<br />

Many countries revealed to have a poor organisation of the professionals of restoration of cultural heritage;<br />

in addition, the survey proposal met some resistance among some associations of restorers. In any case, at<br />

the end of the 18 th month, about 700 compilers’ data were collected, even if the distribution of contacts<br />

among the <strong>Eu</strong>ropean countries will be improved during the next months.<br />

Inorder to have a very large basis of Compilers (better statistics) the launch of the survey action probably<br />

will be delayed because, according to the partners’ opinion, great care and attention should be devoted to<br />

prepare the action: it is critically important to try to assure the maximum participation.<br />

1.3.2.2 – Meetings and workshops<br />

The Networking activity has been promoted during other Conferences by presentation and participation of<br />

the partners:<br />

- “Scienza e Beni Culturali” XXI International Congress in Brixen (I), 12-15 Jul 2005;<br />

- the 3 rd Congress of the Italian Group IIC “Lo Stato dell’Arte” Palermo, 22-24 Sept 2005;<br />

- 9th Congress on Environment and Cultural Heritage Chemistry, Bologna-Rimini, Italy, 8-9 Sept<br />

2005<br />

- 14 th Triennial ICOM-CC Meeting, The Hague, NL, September 2005.<br />

12


1.4 Transnational Access<br />

Access was offered by AGLAE and MOLAB. In AGLAE non-destructive elemental composition studies<br />

were carried out, in the unique environment of the laboratories operating in the basement of the Louvre<br />

Museum; in MOLAB access was offered to the unique collection of portable instrumentations, that allowed<br />

users to carry out in-situ non-destructive measurements.<br />

The milestones of both AGLAE and MOLAB for the first six months of the <strong>second</strong> year were to ensure<br />

continuity in offering access, according to the schedules indicated in previous <strong>report</strong>s and to the<br />

implementation plan of the period.<br />

During the first six months of the <strong>second</strong> year, both accesses have been operative and successful<br />

measurements have been carried out.<br />

1.4.1 AGLAE<br />

1.4.1.1 Description of the publicity concerning the new opportunities for access.<br />

The possibility for users to access the AGLAE facility was spread by poster contributions at the ICOM-CC at<br />

The Hague, Nederland (12-16 September 2005) and the IBA 2005 in Seville, Spain (26 th June - 2 nd July<br />

2005). For this occasion A0 Posters were made and printed at the C2RFM.<br />

Furthermore, as a reminder, an informative email announcing the deadline for proposals was spread to all<br />

people who have shown interest in this project.<br />

The AGLAE Access program was publicised through presentations at various international meetings:<br />

• On the ICOM-CC conference at The Hague, Nederlands (12th - 16thSeptember 2005) the program<br />

was presented by Michel Menu (C2RMF).<br />

• At a one day workshop held at the BAM (Federal Institute of Materials Research and Testing) on the<br />

17th October 2005 in Berlin, Germany, the work of AGLAE and the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> AGLAE Access<br />

program were presented in an oral presentation by Stefan Röhrs (C2RMF). This workshop was<br />

addressing the German ion beam analysis community to reflect about current and future fields of<br />

application of this analytical method.<br />

• On an international symposium in Gubbio, Italy (9th – 11th November) with the title “Mastro<br />

Giorgio da Gubbio: Art, Science & Technology of Lustred Majolicas” results of the project from G.<br />

Padeletti (ISMN) were orally presented by Marc Aucoutouier (C2RMF), who mentioned and<br />

acknowledged the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> AGLAE Access program.<br />

• A international workshop took place in Lecce, Italy organized by the University of Lecce with the<br />

tile: “Non Destructive Nuclear Techniques for Dating and Analysis” (16th-17th December 2005).<br />

Joseph Salomon (C2RMF) was invited to give a talk about “AGLAE: past, present, future” in which<br />

AGLAE and the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> AGLAE Access program were presented.<br />

1.4.1.2 Description of the selection procedures and access activities<br />

Proposals and their selection. For the <strong>second</strong> semester of the <strong>second</strong> year (December 2005 to May 2006), 11<br />

proposals were received, from 10 research teams, among which 4 teams come from Italy and each one team<br />

from Austria, Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Romania and Spain.<br />

These projects were evaluated by the AGLAE Peer Review International Committee, namely: Pr. Annemie<br />

Adriaens, Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Ghent, Belgium; Pr. Aurelio Climent-Font,<br />

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; Dr. Patrick Trocellier, Research Center of Atomic Energy Commission<br />

(CEA), Saclay, France. The project evaluation was carried out on December 8 th . 3 proposals were turned<br />

down due to the lack of time available at AGLAE. The other 8 were positively evaluated. For the period<br />

from December 2005 to May 2006 the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> users will receive 25% of the beam time available.<br />

Table 1 at the end of this document gives a summary of the received and accepted proposals.<br />

Among these accepted users for the first half of 2006 are some who have already participated to the AGLAE<br />

Access program and continue their work or have submitted a different project for this semester:<br />

13


R. Bertoncello (December 2005) aimed to analyse glass samples coated with a sol-gel silica film after<br />

artificial weathering in a climatic chamber. These samples were previously analyzed before weathering in the<br />

first run performed in March 2005.<br />

A. von Bohlen will come a <strong>second</strong> time. During the last project an idea was developed to try an internal<br />

standard calibration for PIXE to overcome problems which occur by in air analysis of thick samples with<br />

material that have a dark matrix (i.e. wood, parchment). The problem stems from the lack of a sufficient<br />

charge measurement by in air IBA with isolating samples.<br />

B. Constantinescu is continuing his work on the Visigothic ‘Pietroasa’ gold hoard , based on µ-PIXE<br />

analysis.<br />

B. Colston continues her work on the hazardous organic and inorganic residues applied to dried botanical<br />

collections, indeed the large number of samples involved in this study (over 300) necessitates a <strong>second</strong> run.<br />

R. Golser will come a <strong>second</strong> time for further tests and damage evaluation on sensible parchment samples.<br />

A. Polvorinos del Rio is coming a third time analysing lustred ceramic. He will analyse a new set of<br />

archaeological objects from another region.<br />

Access activity results - In the <strong>second</strong> period of 2005 (June to November) 9 research teams came to AGLAE<br />

via the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> program. The names of the group leaders, their institutes and the subjects can be found<br />

in Table 2 at the end of this document.<br />

The first project in June was concerned with the analysis of gold foils and objects coming from the tomb of<br />

Akrotiki in Greece. 18 objects were analyzed by PIXE and PIGE, further more 6 objects were analyzed by<br />

PIXE-XRF method to obtain a better limit of detection for Pt.<br />

The <strong>second</strong> project in June dealt with the study of glass chandeliers from the Nostetangen Glassworks<br />

factory in Norway by PIXE and PIGE. A. Björke has brought the objects to AGLAE, 110 Spectra were<br />

acquired in this run.<br />

Another project used the PIXE and RBS techniques to analyse the lustred ceramics from Triana/Seville,<br />

Spain. In this project specific techniques of the ceramic workshops of Triana were identified through the<br />

study of archaeological objects. Since the luster layer was inhomogeneous beside punctual analysis also<br />

mappings were made. Results of this and earlier runs were submitted and excepted for the proceedings of the<br />

IBA 2005 Conference, Seville :<br />

A. Polvorinos, J. Castaing, M. Aucouturier, Metallic nano-particles distribution in lustre glazed ceramic<br />

from the 15 th century in Seville. Submitted to NIM-B.<br />

A project concerning violin varnishes was carried out with A. von Bohlen. On small wood/varnish samples<br />

µPIXE mappings were done to find different elemental contributions for the various varnish layers. PIXE<br />

mappings were made. Publication of this results is in preparation.<br />

To insure the security of curators dealing with dried botanical collections the contend of hazardous inorganic<br />

elements of an herbarium was analyzed. V. Purewal and B. Colston have brought herbarium samples from<br />

the National Museum of Wales which were analyzed by PIXE (points and mapping). The aim of this study is<br />

to find a easy and for every museum accessible way to estimate the hazardous potential of this collections<br />

e.g. utilizing UV-light.<br />

Continuing the work on the ceramic workshop of Mastro Giorgio G. Padeletti has analysed two objects from<br />

the Town Museum from Gubbio, Italy and two objects from the Louvre. PIXE and RBS was used to enrich<br />

the data concerning the Gubbio lustred ceramics production. The results of this run and the previous one lead<br />

to the following publication:<br />

G. Padeletti, G.M. Ingo, A. Bouquillon, S. Pages-Camagna, M. Aucouturier, S. Roehrs, P. Fermo, First-time<br />

observation of Mastro Giorgio masterpieces by means of non-destructive techniques. Submitted and<br />

accepted by Applied Physics A.<br />

Another project dealt with the analyses of excavated glasses from the site of San Martino di Ovaro (northeastern<br />

Italy). The samples belong to different periods of this site, a paleo-christian church (5 th – 10 th<br />

centuries) and a market place (12 th - 16 th centuries), were brought by A. Zucchiatti. 142 points were<br />

measured by PIXE to attribute this glass to different production periods.<br />

In a study on corrosion of historical glasses a feasibility test was made with altered glass samples. Nonvacuum<br />

ERDA was used to estimate the thickness of the hydrated layer on the surface of a standard glass.<br />

The samples were provided by M. Maeder and were also analysed by other methods like 15 N-NRA in another<br />

laboratory.<br />

The last experiment carried out in this period concerns ion beam induced luminescence and its application in<br />

the field of cultural heritage. A wide range of pigments and varnish materials were analyzed by A. Quaranta<br />

14


to gain a better understanding of the processes and to find the best experimental parameter for ion beam<br />

induced luminescence spectroscopy.<br />

1.4.1.3 Meetings and workshops<br />

In November 2005 a meeting of the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> AGLAE users took place at the C2RMF in Paris. On this<br />

occasion, M. Menu and J. Salomon presented respectively an overview of the C2RMF activities and of the<br />

AGLAE facility. Five oral presentations were given by AGLAE users illustrating the work carried out in the<br />

last six month. The given talks and authors were the following:<br />

• Polvorinos Del Rio (University of Seville, Spain) “Analysis of lustred ceramics from the Triana<br />

workshop in Seville”<br />

• G. Padeletti (ISMN-CNR, Roma, Italy) “First-time observation of Mastro Giorgio masterpieces by<br />

means of non-destructive techniques.”<br />

• A. Von Bohlen (Institute for Analytical Sciences, Dortmund, Germany) “Violin varnishes – material<br />

analysis using µPIXE”<br />

• R. Bertoncello (University Padova, Italy) “Lead silicate glasses protected by silica coatings”<br />

• M. F. Guerra (C2RMF, Paris, France) “Etruscan gold work from the Campana’s collection (Louvre<br />

Museum): manufacture techniques and identification of 19 th century restorations and pastiches”<br />

74 People from 11 <strong>Eu</strong>ropean countries have registered to this user meeting, the participants were coming<br />

from Italy, France, UK, Portugal, Netherlands, Czech Republic, Germany, Belgium, Spain, Greece, and<br />

Malta. A more detailed <strong>report</strong> on the Users’ Meeting is <strong>report</strong>ed in Annex 7.<br />

1.4.2 MOLAB<br />

1.4.2.1 Description of the publicity concerning the MOLAB access.<br />

The diffusion of information regarding MOLAB access continued regularly through the website fo <strong>Eu</strong>-<br />

<strong>ARTECH</strong> (www.eu-artech.org) where a prominent relevance was given to the Transnational Acces activities.<br />

In particular, through the list of institutions and researchers collected by the networking activity N1 (see this<br />

Report) information on MOLAB work and accessibility was capillarly diffused. The website was<br />

continuously updated and explanations on eligibility and information on compilation of proposal forms were<br />

improved. The website was enriched with the list of projects, carried out from the beginning of the project,<br />

with pictures and Users Reports.<br />

A particular advertisement on MOLAB was carried out at the ICOM-CC Triennial Meeting in The Hague<br />

(September 2005). At the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> stand, MOLAB (as well as AGLAE) had a large prominence. A<br />

poster and a brochure were prepared and rendered avilable to potential users. The proposal preparation forms<br />

were also available and presentation procedures were explained to interested people. Apart this diffusion, at<br />

the end of the meeting, during the closure plenary lecture, the Director of the GCI (USA), Tim Whalen,<br />

mentioned AGLAE and MOLAB as the most relevant opportunity offered to <strong>Eu</strong>ropean conservators in the<br />

last years. More specifically, the results obtained by MOLAB on the Vergin of the Rocks by Leonardo, at the<br />

National Gallery of London, and on the Lamentation on the Dead Christ by Bronzino, at the Museum of Fine<br />

Arts and Archaeology in Besancon, were described as exemplary cases of non-invasive in-situ measurements<br />

(see ICOM-CC newspaper in the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website).<br />

Diffusion of information on MOLAB activity was carried out also at other relevant conferences of the field.<br />

For example, at the conference “COST and cultural heritage: crossing borders”, held in Florence on october<br />

20 th -21 st 2005 (http://www.echn.net/cost-hig/florence2005/) , the Coordinator B.Brunetti (UNIPG) was<br />

invited to talk on “Transnational Access in cultural heritage: the case of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>”, where the focus was<br />

centred on AGLAE and MOLAB activities. The talk was certainly successful and attracted the attention of<br />

researchers and public.<br />

The positive impact of MOLAB in the field is also well witnessed by the invited lecture to the LACONA VI<br />

Meeting (6 th International Congress on Lasers in the Conservation of Artworks, Wien<br />

http://www.lacona6.at”) that was held in Vienna on the 21 st - 25 th september 2005. The invited lecture was<br />

entitled “MOLAB: a mobile laboratory for in-situ non-invasive studies in arts and archaeology” and was<br />

presented by L.Pezzati (INOA).<br />

15


1.4.2.2 Description of the selection procedures and access activities<br />

As <strong>report</strong>ed in the First Annual Report, at the Ormylia meeting of the Peer Review Committee, held in May<br />

2005, 8 new proposals were received by researchers from Germany (1 proposal), Romania ( 1 proposal), UK<br />

(3 proposals), Macedonia (1 proposal), Poland (1 proposal), and Spain (1 proposal). Six were approved<br />

while two applicants were invited to present again the proposals after modifications.<br />

At the beginning of the <strong>second</strong> year activities the list of proposals approved by the PR Committee and still to<br />

be worked out was the following:<br />

1- Study of the painting technique of Johann Baptist Lampi, father and son, at the Moravian Gallery in<br />

Brno (CZ). Acronym: LAMPI. Project leader: D. Hradil.<br />

2- Romanian illuminated medieval manuscripts in Putna: materials and techniques<br />

Acronym: PUTNA. Project leader: M. Lupu<br />

3- Non-invasive analysis of materials from paintings by Paul Cezanne in the Courtauld Institute<br />

Gallery, London. Acronym: CEZANNE. Project leader: Aviva Burnstock.<br />

4- Study of gemstones in historical jewellery at the Victoria and Albert Museum, by non-destructive<br />

techniques. Acronym: GEM. Project leader: Lucia Burgio.<br />

5- The Macclesfield Psalter & Metz Pontifical at the Fitzwilliam in Cambridge. Acronym: M&M.<br />

Project leader: Spike Bucklow.<br />

6- Analysis of polychromies and of the effects of consolidation in the stones of the façades of the<br />

Cathedral and Provincial Museum of Huesca (Spain). Acronym: SPASTONE. Project leader: Rosa<br />

Maria Esbert.<br />

7- Paint on Early Meissen Stoneware in Dresden Museum. Acronym: POEM. Project leader: Anette<br />

Loesch.<br />

During the first six months of the <strong>second</strong> year two of these projects were carried out: the study of the<br />

painting technique of Lampi, father and son, in Brno (Czek Republic), and the study of materials of the<br />

Romanian illuminated medieval manuscripts in Putna (Romania). The works were carried out in june and<br />

september 2005. Of these two works is <strong>report</strong>ed in the website of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>. In both cases the results<br />

permitted to achieve significant conclusions on the execution techniques of the examined artworks. The work<br />

on the painters Lampi (father and son) was presented by D. Hradil at the First MOLAB Users Meeting in<br />

Paris at C2RMF the 23 rd november 2005. For a <strong>report</strong> on the meeting see Annex 7.<br />

At the moment of writing the present <strong>report</strong> (december 2005) another of the planned MOLAB intervention<br />

was carried out: the project CEZANNE at the Courtauld Institute of Art Gallery in London.<br />

Further interventions will be carried out in january 2006 in London, at the V&A Museum (GEM) and at the<br />

Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge, UK (M&M). Other interventions have been planned during the spring<br />

2006 in Huesca, E (SPASTONE), and possibly Dresden, D (POEM).<br />

The deadline for new proposals, relative to the <strong>second</strong> semester of the <strong>second</strong> year (december 2005-may<br />

2006), was november 1 st . Nine new proposals were received. Their evaluation was carried out during the<br />

Second Interim Meeting in Paris on november 23 rd , 2005. At the PR meeting six of the presented proposals<br />

were approved. One was not recognised as eligible for MOLAB because the movement of the laboratory was<br />

not justified; the <strong>second</strong> was recognised as interesting but the planned measurements could be not adequate<br />

to solve the specific conservation problems; the third proposal was extremely interesting and very well<br />

presented but the location of the work (a site in China) requires a specific preparation and difficulties in<br />

logistics, therefore the proposers were invited to present again the proposals at the next deadline, leaving<br />

time to the PR committee and MOLAB office to evaluate the feasibility of the intervention.<br />

At the Interim Meeting in Paris, the Steering Committee evaluated as positive the activities developed.<br />

Milestones were all respected.<br />

Table: A2 - Summary of selection Panel activities during the <strong>report</strong>ing period (MOLAB PRC)<br />

Date<br />

Selection<br />

meetings<br />

Location<br />

Projects<br />

N° & Countries<br />

Submitted Selected<br />

Nov 2005<br />

4 rth MOLAB-PRC<br />

Meeting<br />

Paris 9<br />

Germany[1], United Kingdom<br />

[2], Bulgaria [1], Portugal [2],<br />

Greece [1], Turkey [1], Italy [1]<br />

6<br />

16


1.4.2.3 Meetings and workshops<br />

A joint meeting INOA-UNIPG-OPD and CNR-ICVBC was held in Florence during the “COST and Cultural<br />

Heritage” meeting (october 2005). The logistic organisation of the planned MOLAB interventions was<br />

discussed among partners and a defined calendar was established, according to the decisions of the MOLAB<br />

PR Committee.<br />

At the Florence COST meeting, B.Brunetti presented as invited speaker the talk “Transnational Access in<br />

Cultural Heritage: the case of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>”, where both MOLAB and AGLAE TA activities were<br />

presented.<br />

L. Pezzati (INOA) participated, as invited speaker, to the conference LACONA VI in Vienna, presenting the<br />

talk “MOLAB: a mobile laboratory for in-situ non-invasive studies in arts and archaeology”.<br />

The First AGLAE and MOLAB Users Meeting was organised by <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> in May 2005 and held in<br />

Paris, at the Louvre Pavilion (C2RMF). The morning was dedicated to the presentations of the work<br />

developed by AGLAE users, while the afternoon was dedicated to the MOLAB Users. The meeting had a<br />

large participation, including potential users (see Annex 7 ). After a general presentation of C. Miliani on the<br />

more recent acquisitions and improvement of performances of MOLAB, Luke Syson (National Gallery,<br />

London), Bruno Mottin (C2RMF, Paris), Lucia Burgio (V&A Museum, London), D. Hradil (Academy of<br />

Science, Prague – Moravian Gallery, Brno), and Sophia Sotiropoulou (as substitute of Demetra Papanikola-<br />

Bakirtzis) presented the work developed through the MOLAB facility. The meeting was also the occasion for<br />

the users to meet each other and to discuss not only the scientific aspects of the work, but also to evaluate the<br />

MOLAB intervention together with the users.<br />

Suggestions about the improvement of the website were done, especially regarding the communication of the<br />

evaluations of the PR Committee. All the users declared their satisfaction for the opportunities offered by<br />

MOLAB, expressing the intention to present further proposals in the future.<br />

17


1.5 Joint research activities<br />

The continuation of both the two <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> JR activities was foreseen. As explained in the previous<br />

<strong>report</strong>s, JRA1-Development and evaluation of new treatments for the conservation-restoration of outdoor<br />

stone and bronze monuments has the objective to clarify and define advantages and limits of new<br />

conservative treatments on outdoor monuments, comparing new and traditional methods. The <strong>second</strong> joint<br />

research activity, JRA2-New methods in diagnostics: Imaging and spectroscopy is dedicated to the<br />

development of new methodologies in diagnostics and monitoring, setting-up innovative instrumentation for<br />

in-situ non-invasive and non-contact measurements.<br />

1.5.1 JRA1- Development and evaluation of new treatments for the conservation-restoration<br />

of outdoor stone and bronze monuments<br />

The planned work for the first six month of the <strong>second</strong> year was concerned with the partial development of<br />

Task2-Development of new treatments and procedures-chemical process and application prococols (resp.<br />

UNIPG) and Task3-Accelerated ageing of samples-stone and bronzes (resp. LNEC). The work was developed<br />

according to the planned schedule and milestones were all achieved. A Report on the developed activities is<br />

in Annex 8.<br />

Participants are CNR-ICVBC, UNI-PG, UNI-BO, BLFD, LNEC and OPD.<br />

1.5.1.1 Activity progress<br />

The definition of the drilling parameters for testing Ançã and Lecce stones was set within the scope of Task<br />

1, finished in the middle of the 1st year. However, during the <strong>report</strong>ing period, some complementary work<br />

was carried aiming at improving the drilling conditions, taking advantage of new innovative developments<br />

introduced in this testing tool. The conditions addressed were: drying of specimens; drilling speed; use of a<br />

pilot-hole and dust extraction. The new results pointed out the importance of using dried specimens and the<br />

benefit of using the pilot hole drilling technique with dust suction. Although the hole-over-hole drilling<br />

technique significantly lowered the range of forces in Ançã and Lecce stones, the discrimination of any<br />

subtle differences (such as a consolidation action) is assured by the increased reliability and precision of the<br />

data obtained with the new technique. The new drilling conditions adopted on the basis of the results are<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed in the Summary <strong>report</strong> of Annex 8.<br />

Task 2- For the study of the chemical processes and identification of the critical parameters of the treatment,<br />

a study was carried out by UNI-PG on the kinectic aspects of artificial oxalate formation on carbonatic<br />

stones and sandstones, compared to ethylsilicate in two treatments (TEOS and TEOS + coupling). For the<br />

applied conditions, the kinetic study indicated that a plateau in quantity of oxalate is obtained after 48 hours.<br />

Among the various stones, marble is producing the highest quantity, followed by limestones and sandstones.<br />

The same comparisons of oxalate treatments with TEOS and TEOS+coupling treatments were carried out on<br />

limestones by LNEC. Two different types of treatments (immersion and poulticing) with ammonium oxalate<br />

were tested, monitoring relevant parameters such as colour variation, water absorption, and drilling<br />

resistance.<br />

ICVBC, studied treatments by Ba(OH)2 in different conditions, monitoring performances, in terms of colour,<br />

quantity of product, water absorption, etc. Finally, OPD carried out a study on the influence of salt<br />

contamination in the treatments.<br />

Task 3- Tests on ageing procedures of marble by thermal shock (ICVBC) and of sandstone either with<br />

thermal shock and salt contamintaion ( LNEC) were also carried out.<br />

The results of all these studies are <strong>report</strong>ed in Annex 8.<br />

Analogous advances of the work were carried out on T2 and T3 for bronzes by UNIBO, BLFD, and LNEC.<br />

Details on this activity are again in Annex 8.<br />

18


1.5.1.2 Meetings and workshops<br />

A general working meeting has been held, with all the participating researchers (representatives from CNR-<br />

ICVBC, LNEC, UNIPG, OPD, BLFD, UNIBO), during the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> meeting in Paris, November 22 nd<br />

2005. During the meeting the developed activities have ben discussed and coordination plans on future<br />

activities established.<br />

The developed work has been presented at the following conferences:<br />

- “Scienza e Beni Culturali” XXI International Congress in Brixen (I), 12-15 Jul 2005;<br />

- 14 th Triennial ICOM-CC Meeting, The Hague, NL, September 2005.<br />

- 9th Congress on Environment and Cultural Heritage Chemistry, Bologna-Rimini, Italy, 8-9 Sept<br />

2005<br />

- the 3 rd Congress of the Italian Group IIC “Lo Stato dell’Arte” Palermo, 22-24 Sept 2005;<br />

1.5.2 JRA2- New methods in diagnostics: Imaging and spectroscopy<br />

By this activity, four different new analytical methodologies for artwork studies are developed, assembling<br />

in parallel four new portable equipments for in-situ non destructive measurements.<br />

In Task1, new applications of NMR techniques to artwork studies are foreseen, included the application of<br />

the portable NMR-MOUSE; in Task2, two different and complementary methods for imaging spectroscopy<br />

in the near IR are set-up: high resolution imaging at various fixed wavelengths, with low wavelength<br />

resolution, and low resolution imaging at continuous wavelengths, with high wavelength resolution; in<br />

Task3, a new method is developed and experimented for in-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray<br />

fluorescence measurements (XRF); in Task4, an existing portable micro-Raman technique is joint with the<br />

VIS micro-fluorescence technique for the identification of organic colorants.<br />

1.5.2.1 Activity progress<br />

Task 1 -Application and development of laboratory analytical NMR methods and of protable NMR-MOUSE.<br />

Subtask 1.1 (UNIPG, RWTH) The study of the behaviour of clay as a function of temperature continued<br />

with the writing of a paper that has been published on Journal of Physical Chemistry. Further measurements<br />

have been carried out on new clay samples. Measurements are in progress.<br />

Subtask 1.2 (UNIPG, RWTH) A study has been started on the NMR determination of water content in stones<br />

measuring spin-lattice (T1) and spin-spin (T2) relaxation times with the objective to establish correlations of<br />

T1 and T2 with stone porosity, pore size distribution, permeability, etc. Three Umbrian stones have been<br />

chosen for the first approach: San Presto, Pianello, and Palombina Turri. Through Hahn Echo experiments<br />

the moisture content of these stones, in equilibrium with the environment, have been determined. It was<br />

found that the highest water content in normal conditions is in San Presto stone. Regarding the T1<br />

measurements, it was found that San Presto stones show the shortest T1 values. For T2 the values are<br />

comparables. Subsequent measurements were carried out on San Presto stones wetted by water capillary<br />

absorption. A clear increase in the Hahn Echo was found. In addition, an increase of T2 spin-spin relaxation<br />

time have been observed due to the increased water in the pores. (See Annex 9)<br />

Subtask 1.3 (RWTH, UNIPG) Towards the perspective of realisation of a device for the 3 D non-invasive<br />

study of painting layers an NMR sensor has been developed placed on a table that can be micrometrically<br />

moved to probe layers with a depth resolution of about 20 micrometers. No contact is necessary with the<br />

painting: once the panting and probe are aligned, the sensor is able to “explore” the material in depth.<br />

Through this new device it has been possible to carry out measurements where the thickness of paint layers,<br />

preparation, and canvas have been measured in several historical panel paintings at The National Gallery of<br />

Umbria. Among the studied painters are Gentile da Fabriano, Pietro Perugino, and Piero della Francesca.<br />

Data are in Annex 9.<br />

19


Task2-New devices for multispectral imaging of painted surfaces in the near infrared.<br />

Subtask 2.1. and 2.2 (OPD, OADC) The reference panel (standards) prepared during the first year have been<br />

characterised microscopically, through SEM picture recordings and EDS, Energy Dispersive X-ray<br />

Spectroscopy. Samples were taken out from the standards and cross sections were appropriately prepared for<br />

the study.For each examined sample, a BSE image of the cross section and EDS spectra of the various paint<br />

layers have been recorded.<br />

Other special reference samples have been prepared and spectroscopically characterised in the IR range.<br />

They have been prepared with gradually higher paint layer thickness in order to study the transmission and<br />

reflection of the IR radiation through them. These samples are painted on a common white ground and with<br />

the same binding medium in order to minimise the uncertainty of the applied algorithm during the tests.<br />

Examples of cross section images, EDS spectra at differenth depth, and IR analyses are given in Annex 9.<br />

Subtask 2.3 (OADC, INOA) Advances in the assembling of the two nIR imaging equipments have been<br />

done. In particular, in OADC a golden integration sphere has been assembled in order to permit the study of<br />

reflection and integration of the IR radiation from 800 nm up to 4500 nm. Details of the design of the<br />

integration sphere are in the Annex 9.<br />

On the other side, INOA provided to better establish a new set of cost-effective IR detectors, to design and<br />

realise the filter holders, the sub-rack unit, and the first proptotype of 16 fiber bundle. In this case, 14 Vis-<br />

NIR and 2 UV-Vis multi-mode optical fibers were used, with a cladding diameter of 230 microns. In order to<br />

properly align the 16 fibers in a square-shaped bundle, a 1 mm grove was dig.<br />

Task 3. A new device for in-situ XRD and XRF measurements.<br />

Continuing the task for the determination of the optimal conditions for XRF and XRD in-situ measurements,<br />

the Energy Dispersive X-ray Diffraction (ED-XRD) was already ruled out based on literature survey.<br />

However, during this period diffraction experiments were carreied ou to verify performances of ED-XRD<br />

with the traditional angular detection. Few different specimen were analysed: polycristalline silicon, quartz,<br />

calcite, and calcite covered by a thin layer of goethite. The measurements were carried out at 2 or 3 different<br />

2-Theta angles for each sample (this resulted in a shift of the energy peak positions). A significant case was<br />

that of polycristalline Si, because its fluorescence peaks are in the low energy range, in this way the<br />

diffraction peaks interfer only with the Cu signal due to the anode of the X-ray tube. For the other samples,<br />

the overlapping of fuorescence and diffraction can represent a strong difficulty in the spectra interpretation.<br />

Due to this overlap, the technique was confirmed not suitable for mineral identification with a portable<br />

instrument. Moreover fluorescence peaks are usually much more intense than diffraction ones. Another<br />

problem is that the diffraction peak intensity is not only weak, but also is quite large, due to the detector<br />

energy resolution and to the superposition of different diffractions. In principle these problems could be<br />

overcome by systematically doing measurements at several different angles. This could be done in a<br />

relatively quick measurement time by using a multi-element detector or some single detectors located at<br />

different 2θ angles. Indeed this solution could be appropriate, but it requires a complex and heavy equipment<br />

(not easily portable!) and also a non-trivial data analysis.<br />

In conclusion, the initial idea, based on the literature, to rule out the ED-XRD for the planned portable<br />

system was widely confirmed.<br />

In a <strong>second</strong> phase, X-ray diffraction using an “imaging plate” detection was experimented. Test<br />

measurements have been performed at the Laboratoire de Cristallographie (CNRS UPR 5031) in Grenoble.<br />

The source used was a Philips C-Tech type x-ray tube, with Cu anode and a maximum power of 2200 W (60<br />

kV). The x-ray beam was monochromatic by means of two mirrors: only Kα1, Kα2 and Kβ appear in the<br />

spectrum (with approximately the following ratio between intensities Kα/Kβ≈10 -3 ÷10 -4 ). The divergence of<br />

the beam was approximately 0.05° and its dimension was around 1.5mm x 1mm in the centre of the<br />

goniometer, with a flux of around 10 7 ph/s. The tube was biased at 50 kV and 40 mA.<br />

For each investigated sample two XRD detector systems have been used:<br />

- a conventional scintillator detector, with a monochromator in front of it, in a θ-2θ configuration<br />

- an Imaging Plate (IP) perpendicular to the incident X-ray beam at distance of around 20 cm from<br />

sample.<br />

The Imaging Plate detector proved to be a valid alternative to the one-dimensional scintillator detector: the<br />

measurement times are comparable (around 20÷30 minutes for both), even if Imaging Plate seems to be more<br />

efficient. Imaging Plates have the big advantage of being a two-dimensional low-noise system, with a<br />

flexible and wireless mounting, and they allow to collect data in a parallel detection configuration. On the<br />

20


other hand the scanner system requires around 3 minutes to read the recorded image (it is not an online<br />

measurement; the result is visible only at the end of the process) and Imaging Plates are light sensitive<br />

(Annex 9).<br />

Task 4 – A joint micro-Raman and micro-fluorimeter new portable apparatus.<br />

The vibrational and electronic characterisation of dyestuffs and lakes was continued largely increasing the<br />

microRaman and UV-VIS fluorescence database of solid powder standard dyes and lakes.<br />

Standard materials have been examined employing micro-Raman in the lab set-up using two excitation<br />

wavelength 532 nm and 785 nm. The portable set-up has been experience as micro-Raman using the 532nm<br />

excitation and as fluorimeter using again the 532nm excitation, but conveniently moving the polychromator.<br />

MicroRaman and fluorescence spectra are <strong>report</strong>ed in the database format in Annex 9. Interestingly, the<br />

portable equipment has been proven to be well set-up for the study of red anthraquinone dyes, in fact in this<br />

case using the 532 nm excitation it is observed a resonance enhancement and a relatively low fluorescence<br />

background thanks to a large Stoke shift.<br />

1.5.2.2 Meetings and workshops<br />

A general working meeting has been held with all the participating researchers (representatives of UNIPG,<br />

RWTH, INOA, OADC, and C2RMF) during the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> meeting in Paris, november 2005.<br />

A bilateral meting RWTH and UNIPG was held in Perugia, from July 17 th to 22 nd (J.Perlo, RWTH;<br />

F.Presciutti, B.Brunetti, A.Sgamellotti, UNIPG). The meeting was dedicated to discuss details of the portable<br />

NMR depth-profile device. Improvements were introduced and measurements were carried out at the<br />

National Gallery of Umbria. A <strong>report</strong> on these measurements is in the Annex 9.<br />

Another working meeting on the NMR depth-profile was held in Perugia, in the evening of july 20 th , at the<br />

end of the NMR School on portable NMR in Cultural Heritage. Participants were: B. Bluemich, F.Casanova,<br />

and J.Perlo, RWTH, and F.Presciutti, B.Brunetti , and A.Sgamellotti, UNIPG. During these meeting the<br />

results obtained in the lab-study on water content in Umbrian stones were examined and discussed. A plan of<br />

new measurements was also done.<br />

21


2. LIST OF DELIVERABLES<br />

Activity<br />

N1<br />

Deliv<br />

No<br />

Deliverable Name Task No Delivered by<br />

Contractor<br />

1 REPORT ON THE STANDARDISED FORMAT<br />

FOR DESCRIBING ANALYTICAL<br />

PROCEDURES.<br />

2 REPORT ON INTERLABORATORY<br />

COMPARISON<br />

3 REPORT ON OVERVIEW ON POSSIBLE<br />

SHARING OF REFERENCE MATERIALS<br />

4 REPORT ON THE NMR WORKSHOP (CD<br />

ON PRESENTATIONS)<br />

Task 1c<br />

Task 1b<br />

OADC, ICN, NGL,<br />

IRPA,OPD,ICVBC,<br />

UNIPG,UNIBO,<br />

C2RMF, LNEC,<br />

BLFD<br />

OADC, ICN, NGL,<br />

IRPA,OPD,ICVBC,<br />

UNIPG, C2RMF,<br />

LNEC, BLFD,<br />

UNIBO<br />

Task 2a ICN, NGL, IRPA,<br />

OADC, UNIPG,<br />

Task 2c UNIPG, RWRTH,<br />

NGL, OPD<br />

OADC<br />

Plan<br />

ned<br />

(imon<br />

ths)<br />

Achieved<br />

(months)<br />

18 18<br />

[Annex 4 ]<br />

18 18<br />

[this <strong>report</strong><br />

and Annex 4]<br />

18 18<br />

[this <strong>report</strong>,<br />

pages 7-8]<br />

18 18<br />

[Annex 5 ]<br />

5 REPORT ON THE GUPIX COURSE Task 2c C2RMF 18 18<br />

[Annex 6 ]<br />

N2 6 MULTI LANGUAGE FORMS<br />

Task 1d CNR-ICVBC, OPD,<br />

IRPA,ICN,LNEC,<br />

UNIPG, C2RMF,<br />

BLFD,NGL, UNIBO,<br />

OADC<br />

18 18<br />

[see website;<br />

res.area]<br />

7 DATABASE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF<br />

RESULTS OF THE SURVEY ACTION<br />

Task 1d CNR-ICVBC, OPD 18 18<br />

[see website;<br />

res.area]<br />

8 REPORT ON THE SURVEY ACTION AT<br />

ICOM-CC<br />

Task 1d CNR-ICVBC, ICN,<br />

UNIPG, C2RMF<br />

IRPA, OPD, OADC<br />

18 18<br />

[this <strong>report</strong><br />

and website]<br />

9 SET UP OF A LIST OF CONSERVATORS Task 1d CNR-ICVBC, OPD, 18 18<br />

IRPA,ICN,LNEC,<br />

UNIPG, C2RMF,<br />

BLFD,NGL, UNIBO,<br />

[for the list,<br />

see website;<br />

res.area]<br />

TA1 10 SUMMARY REPORT ON AGLAE<br />

11 1 ST<br />

USERS’ MEETING REPORT C2RMF,<br />

UNIPG,INOA,CNR-<br />

TA2 12 SUMMARY REPORT ON MOLAB<br />

C2RMF 18 18<br />

[this <strong>report</strong>,<br />

ICVBC,OPD<br />

UNI-PG, INOA,<br />

CNR-ICVBC, OPD<br />

13 1 ST<br />

USERS’ MEETING REPORT C2RMF,<br />

UNIPG,INOA,CNR-<br />

JRA1 14 PROGRESS REPORT ON THE<br />

PROCEDURES TO BE ADOPTED FOR EACH<br />

TREATMENT UNDER STUDY<br />

15 PROGRESS REPORT ON THE<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLES<br />

JRA2 16<br />

(STONE AND BRONZE) DURING AGEING<br />

PROCEDURES<br />

PROGRESS REPORT ON LAB NMR AND<br />

METHODOLOGY FOR IN-SITU STUDY OF<br />

WATER-RELATED PROPERTIES OF STONE<br />

Task 2<br />

ICVBC,OPD<br />

CNR-ICVBC,UNIPG,<br />

BLFD,OPD, and<br />

participating partners<br />

pages 13-15]<br />

18 18<br />

[Annex 7 ]<br />

18 18<br />

[this <strong>report</strong>,<br />

pages 15-17]<br />

18 18<br />

[Annex 7]<br />

18 18<br />

[Annex 8]<br />

Task 3 UNIBO, BLFD,LNEC 18 18<br />

[Annex 8]<br />

Task1-<br />

Subtask<br />

1.1<br />

UNI-PG,RWTH 18 18<br />

[Annex 9]<br />

22


17 PROGRESS REPORT ON NMR MOUSE<br />

3D<br />

18 PROGRESS REPORT ON MICRO- AND<br />

SPECTROSCOPIC CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

STANDARDS.<br />

19 REPORT ON OPTIMAL CONDITIONS FOR<br />

ARTWORK XRD STUDIES AND ON<br />

XRD&XRF SYSTEM DESIGN AND<br />

ASSEMBLING.<br />

20 REPORT ON THE SPECTROSCOPIC<br />

CHARACTERISATION OF THE PREPARED<br />

SAMPLES.<br />

Task 1-<br />

Subtask<br />

1.3<br />

RWTH , UNIPG 18 18<br />

[Annex 9]<br />

Task2- INOA, OADC 18 18<br />

[Annex 9]<br />

Task3-<br />

Subtask<br />

1<br />

Task4-<br />

Subtask<br />

1<br />

CNRS-C2RMF 18 18<br />

[Annex 9]<br />

UNIPG 18 18<br />

[Annex 9]<br />

23


3. USE AND DISSEMINATION OF KNOWLEDGE<br />

Dissemination has been carried out through all the media that are commonly available to contact potential<br />

users (that are identified as conservation scientists, conservator, restorers, libraries, museums, schools on<br />

conservation, cultural institutions, etc.) but also public. Indeed, conservation of cultural heritage has strong<br />

societal implications and it is of general interest for the public and policy makers. Used media have been:<br />

internet, e-mail, conferences, contacts with other organisations, and, in some cases, press.<br />

The <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website (www.eu-artech.org) was continuosly adjourned, introducing new pages and links<br />

in the effort to create an easily readable interface with institutions internal and external to the Consortium,<br />

potential users, and public. A specific restricted area, accessible only by password, was reserved to the<br />

exchange and diffusion of working documents.<br />

A list of relevant websites of interest in the conservation science and conservation/restoration of cultural<br />

heritage was also established and made accessible in the website.<br />

A specific relevance was given to the AGLAE and MOLAB Transational Access starting from the home<br />

page. Information is also available on the projects already developed, through the Users Report on-line e<br />

picture documentation.<br />

Relevance is also given to the events, open to potential users and public, organised or promoted by <strong>Eu</strong>-<br />

<strong>ARTECH</strong> such as workshops, schools, conferences and meetings.<br />

The website has been built as the more friendly interface between the Consortium and the community of<br />

conservation scientists, conservators, restorers, scholars, as well as funding agencies and policy makers.<br />

The effort on establishing fruitful interactions among <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> and relevant infrastructures in the field<br />

of cultural heritage had no stop. On this type of dissemination of knowledge has been given large space ib<br />

the networking N1 section of this <strong>report</strong>.<br />

Other diffusion or dissemination of knowledge was carried out through plenary lectures, invited conferences,<br />

seminars, or presentations of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> programs and initiatives in relevant international and national<br />

congresses and meetings, such as:<br />

- “COST and Cultural Heritage: crossing borders” – Florence – October 20-22 2005<br />

(http://www.echn.net/cost-hig/florence2005) a <strong>Eu</strong>ropean meeting where the COST activities of the field have<br />

been discussed in the perspective of future developments. During this meeting, <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> had a large<br />

evidence. The Coordinator gave the lecture: “Transnational Access in Cultural heritage: the case of <strong>Eu</strong>-<br />

<strong>ARTECH</strong>”.<br />

- “3rd International conference on the application of Raman spectroscopy in art & archaeology”– Paris - 31<br />

August - 3 September 2005<br />

-“MODHT end-of-project meeting” on 20th-21st June. (Monitoring of Damage in Historic Textiles).<br />

- “29 th International Symposium on High Performance Liquid Phase Separations and Related Techniques”,<br />

26-30 June 2005, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

-“MaSC Users Group”, 7-10 September 2005, Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam.<br />

-“Dyes in History and Archaeology annual meeting, DHA 24”, in Liverpool, 3-5 November 2005.<br />

- “14th ICOM-CC Triennial Meeting” - The Hague - 12-16 September 2005.<br />

Contacts have been consolidated with organisations developing activities in the same field or of interest in<br />

the field, such as:<br />

- I3 initiatives, such as LASERLAB (http://www.laserlab-europe.net/index.html) , NMI3<br />

(http://neutron.neutron-eu.net/n_nmi3), and IA-SFS (http://www.elettra.trieste.it/i3/), also working in the<br />

field of cultural heritage;<br />

- infrastructures operating in the field, such as the ICTP (Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical<br />

Physics of Trieste, http://www.ictp.it/ ) or the LABEC – INFN of Florence (http://labec.fi.infn.it/index.html);<br />

- EC projects, such as COST G8 (http://srs.dl.ac.uk/arch/cost-g8/index.htm), COST G7<br />

(http://alpha1.infim.ro/cost/pagini/home.html), CEN/TC 346 (http://www.cenorm.be/CENORM/index.htm)<br />

dedicated to the “Conservation of Cultural Property;<br />

24


- ICOM-CC (http://icom-cc.icom.museum/) or IIC (http://www.iiconservation.org/index.php);<br />

- Marie-Curie actions, such as ATHENA and EPISCON<br />

(http://www.scienze.unibo.it/Scienze+Matematiche/Post+Laurea/Altri+corsi+post+laurea/episcon.htm), a<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>ropean PhD in Science for Conservation.<br />

Regarding the press, <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities were disseminated in occasion of the press release, organised by<br />

the National Gallery of London on the work developed, through MOLAB, on the “Vergin of the Rocks” of<br />

Leonardo. The new had a <strong>Eu</strong>ropean relevance.<br />

25


Annex 1<br />

ANNEXES<br />

Summary Report of the Second Interim Meeting<br />

Paris, november 21 st -22 nd 2005 – Pavilion du Louvre- C2RMF<br />

The meeting was helsd in the rooms of the C2RMF with participants from all the Consortium institutions.<br />

The following people was present:<br />

Nathalie Balcar C2RMF, Bernhard Blümich RWTH, Eliane Bohnert C2RMF, David Bourgarit C2RMF, Jean<br />

Louis Boutaine C2RMF, Susanna Bracci CNR-ICVBC, Brunetto Giovanni Brunetti UNIPG, Laura<br />

Cartechini UNIPG, Jacques Castaing C2RMF, Nathalie Collain CNRS, José Delgado Rodrigues LNEC,<br />

Maria Douka CEE, Ana Paula Ferreira Pinto Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Alessandra Gianoncelli<br />

C2RMF, Ineke Joosten ICN, Mathias Kocher BLFD, Christian Lahanier C2RMF, Anne-Solenn Le Hô<br />

C2RMF, Martin Mach BLFD, Francine Mariani-Ducray Direction des Musées de France, Vincent Mazel<br />

C2RMF, Rocco Mazzeo UNIBO, Michel Menu C2RMF, Costanza Miliani UNIPG, João Mimoso LNEC,<br />

Christiane Naffah C2RMF, Cristiana Nunes LNEC, Sandrine Pagès C2RMF, Juan Perlo RWTH, Luca<br />

Pezzati INOA, Daniela Pinna OPD, Martine Regert C2RMF, Pascale Richardin C2RMF, Dominique Robcis<br />

C2RMF, Stefan Röhrs C2RMF, Ashok Roy NGL, Barbara Sacchi CNR – ICVBC, Barbara Salvadori OPD,<br />

Manfred Schreiner Academy of Fine Arts Wien, Antonio Sgamellotti UNIPG, Sophia Sotiropoulou OADC,<br />

Marika Spring NGL, Olivier Tavoso C2RMF, Lucia Toniolo CNR – ICVBC, Stéphane Vaiedelich Musée de<br />

la musique de Paris, Maarten Van Bommel ICN, Elsa Van Elslande C2RMF, Ina Vanden Berghe KIK –<br />

IRPA, Jan Wouters KIK – IRPA.<br />

The meeting started with the introductory notes of the new Director of C2RMF, Dr. Christiane Naffah, who<br />

presented herself to the Consortium and welcomed all participants.<br />

After a general review by M. Menu (C2RMF) of the planned two days work, the Coordinator B.G. Brunetti<br />

opened the formal meeting presenting the main line of the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> dissemination of knowledge during<br />

the period June-November 2005. He mentioned the Schools and Meetings sponsored or directly organized by<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong>, such as<br />

-the “3 rd International Conference on the application of Raman spectroscopy in Art and Archaeology” (Paris<br />

F, Aug 31-Sept 3,2005);<br />

-the Workshop on Non-invasive NMR in Cultural Heritage and NMR Colloqium (Perugia, I, Sept 19-23,<br />

2005);<br />

-the GUPIX School (Paris, Oct 6-7, 2005).<br />

B.Brunetti dedicated particular attention to the description of the presence of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> at the Triennial<br />

Meeting of ICOM-CC (The Hague, NL, September 2005).<br />

Dr. Maria Douka of the R.I. Office of the EC, presented the perspectives of evolution of Research<br />

Infrastructures towards the 7 th Framework Programme. Great attention of the odeon was achieved during the<br />

discussion of the activities of ESFRI and the perspectives of creation of the ERA in the field.<br />

I - Consortium Governing Board n. 4<br />

After a short break, the fourth <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> Consortium Governing Board was held. According to the<br />

Consortium Agreement, this meeting was restricted to the Coordinator and one authorised representative for<br />

each participant infrastructure.<br />

The following representatives were present: Coordinator: B.Brunetti; UNIPG: A. Sgamellotti; CNRS-<br />

C2RMF: M.Menu; CNR-ICVBC: S.Bracci; NGL: A. Roy; OPD: D. Pinna; BLFD: M. Mach; OADC: S.<br />

26


Sotiropoulou; ICN: M. Bommel; LNEC: J. Delgado; IRPA: J. Wouters; RWTH: B. Bluemich; UNIBO: R.<br />

Mazzeo; INOA: L. Pezzati.<br />

1- Amendments to the contract<br />

The Coordinator announced that from June 1 st INOA formally merged into CNR, however it was authorised<br />

to maintain its administrative rules, being entered in a transitory phase. The GB decided to ask to the EC R.I.<br />

office if the change of model cost from AC (cost model of INOA in the contract) to FC (the cost model of<br />

CNR) is obligatory or can be postponed up to the end of the transitory phase. In case of obligation, the<br />

request of amendment of the contract is to be considered authorised by the GB.<br />

B. Brunetti illustrated the content of the clause 39 that could be introduced in the contract. It allows<br />

institutions having an annual budget lower than 150.000 euros to skip the audit. Specifically, clause 39 says:<br />

“Nothwithstanding the provision of article 7.2 of this contract, contracors requesting a EC financial<br />

contribution for one or more <strong>report</strong>ing periods of less than 150.000 euros, need not to submit an audit<br />

certificate, until the comulative request for EC financialcontribution is equal or exceeds 150.000 euros for<br />

the <strong>report</strong>ingperiods for which an audit certificate has not yet been submitted.In all cases an audit certificate<br />

shall be submitted at the latest 45days after the final <strong>report</strong>ing period. This final audit will cover all the<br />

periods for which an audit certificate has not been previously submitted.”<br />

The Coordinator presented and discussed advantages and possible inconvenients of the introduction of clause<br />

39. After accurate evaluation by the Consortium representatives, it was decided to renounce to clause 39 and<br />

accept the rule of presenting every year the Audit Certificate for each institution.<br />

As a third point, the possible extension of RWTH participation to <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> was discussed. The original<br />

formulation of the contract includes a participation of RWTH limited to the first two years. However, RWTH<br />

is developing a relevant work on new NMR methodologies for the laboratory and in-situ studies of artworks;<br />

therefore, it would be important for <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> to extend its participation, at least, for another year. All the<br />

partners agreed on this point. In order to allow RWTH to continue its activity, the Coordinator proposed to<br />

shift part of the UNIPG budget (corresponding to an amount of 25.000 euros) to RWTH. Unanimously, the<br />

GB accepted the proposal of the Coordinator inviting him to proceed to the request of amendment of the<br />

contract.<br />

The Coordinator communicated that the Bank of UNIPG changed its coordinates. The change was due to the<br />

merging of the Banca dell’Umbria into the largest UniCredit Banca. The new coordinates will be<br />

communicated to the EC asking for the relative amendment of the contract. All GB members agreed with the<br />

request of amendment. The new name of the Bank is: UniCredit Banca; the new IBAN:<br />

IT58G0200803016000029489728.<br />

2- Administrative notes<br />

The Coordinator informed the Consortium member representatives that the procedure to close the First<br />

Annual Report with the inclusion of the Audit Certificates of all the participating institutions was not yet<br />

ended. However, all the documentation should be ready in few days.<br />

In any case, due to the strong foreseen delay in the pre-financing of the <strong>second</strong> year, the Coordinator<br />

announced to reserve to himself the use of the residue of the budget of the First Year, not yet distributed to<br />

the partners, for a pre- prefinancing of those institutions (only) that spended all (or almost all) their first year<br />

budget.<br />

The assembly was favourable.<br />

3- Next Annual Meetings<br />

At the end of the GB meeting the proposal of Munchen as location for the Third Year Annual Meeting was<br />

advanced by M. Mach of BLFD. The proposal was unanimously accepted.<br />

The National Gallery of London, as possible site for the Third Year Interim Meeting was also proposed and<br />

accepted.<br />

Therefore the locations of the next <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> meetings is the following:<br />

-Second Year Annual Meeting – Lisbon, LNEC, May 3-5 2006;<br />

-Third Year Interim Meeting – London, NGL, date to be established;<br />

-Third Year Annual Meeting, Munchen, BLFD, date to be established.<br />

27


4- Note<br />

It has been proposed by LNEC and accepted by GB, to define and publish on the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> website a list<br />

of trainees & training opportunities “stock exchange” among the participating institutions. Such a simple and<br />

flexible item will permit to increase and diversify the training possibilities in the areas of the project. No <strong>Eu</strong>-<br />

<strong>ARTECH</strong> funding will be involved. Institutions and/or trainees will manage by themselves to find the<br />

necessary financing.<br />

With this last decision, the Governing Board meeting was closed.<br />

II- Networking N1 and N2 Joint Activities.<br />

After the lunch break, the meeting continued with the discussion of the networking activities N1 and N2.<br />

Rocco Mazzeo (UNIBO) briefly presented the project EPISCON (<strong>Eu</strong>ropean PhD in Science for<br />

Conservation), a Marie Curie Early Stage Training fellowships of the 6th Framework Programme, recently<br />

approved.<br />

J.L.Boutaine, the Convenor of N1 introduced the discussion of N1 activities.<br />

N1 networking specific activities of the first six months of the <strong>second</strong> year consisted mainly in the<br />

continuation of Task 1 on Analytical resources, analytical procedures and investigation strategies,<br />

especially referred to organic substance investigations and the start of Task 2- Exchange knowledge and<br />

expertise. Within Task 1 the continuation of dissemination of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> activities on analytical<br />

investigations of artwork materials was also planned (with particular reference to examination of paintings).<br />

Discussions followed where all the activities developed in the various tasks and subtasks were presented.<br />

Lucia Toniolo introduced then the discussion on N2. The problems related to the translation of the survey<br />

forms were discussed and the data base structure for the analysis of results of the survey was presented. It<br />

was also presented the diffusion of the survey action at the ICOM-CC meeting (a specific association of<br />

conservators and conservation scientists), where it was started the set-up of a list of conservators interested to<br />

participate to the survey.<br />

III- Transnational Access Activities<br />

M.Menu, C2RMF, shortly presented the AGLAE access activity of the first six months of the <strong>second</strong> year.<br />

Immediately after, C.Miliani, , UNIPG, did the same for the MOLAB activities. The presentation was limited<br />

to few information on the proposals received (10 for AGLAE and 9 for MOLAB) because a wider<br />

discussion on Transantional Access is forseen for the day of November 23 rd , where the First Users Meeting<br />

of AGLAE and MOLAB will be held.<br />

At the end of the first day, a social dinner was held at the Restaurat “Gran Louvre” inside the Museum.<br />

According to the Agenda, the morning of tuesday 22 nd , the meeting started with the presentation of the Joint<br />

Research activities.<br />

IV – Joint Research Activities.<br />

Regarding JRA1, under the coordination of S. Bracci, ICVBC, kinectic aspects of artificial oxalate formation<br />

on carbonatic stones and sandstones compared to ethylsilicate in two treatments (TEOS and TEOS +<br />

coupling) were presented by C. Miliani, UNIPG. The same comparisons of oxalate treatments with TEOS<br />

and TEOS+coupling was carried out on limestones by LNEC (J. Delgado). S. Bracci, ICVBC, described<br />

results obtained in treatments by Ba(OH)2 in different conditions (verification of performances, in terms of<br />

colour, quantity of product, water absorption, etc).<br />

Tests on ageing procedures of marble by thermal shock and of sandstone either with thermal shock and salt<br />

contamintaion were also presented. Finally, OPD (D.Pinna) presented results on treatments by oxalate and<br />

procedures for contamination by salts.<br />

28


Analogous advances of the work were discussed for bronzes by R.Mazzeo, UNIBO, M. Mach, BLFD, and<br />

J.Mimoso, LNEC.<br />

In the afternoon, after the lunch break, first the results obtained on JRA2 laboratory NMR studies were<br />

presented by UNIPG. These studies led to a publication that will appear on Journal of Physical Chemistry A.<br />

The paper will concern with the structural aluminosilicate modifications during the firing of clays. The more<br />

recent results on portable NMR were also presented, regarding the performances of the NMR profilometer<br />

developed under the coordination of RWTH. Then the recent advances on the systems for IR imaging were<br />

presented by L.Pezzati, INOA, and S.Sotiropoulou, OADC. A. Gianoncelli presented the advancement in the<br />

work carried out by C2RMF in setting a new XRF and XRD equipment and, finally, A.Sgamellotti presented<br />

the more recent results for the system to carry out micro-Raman and micro-fluorescence measurements.<br />

At the end of all the presentations, the Coordinator and the Steering Committee verified that in all cases, the<br />

work had a regular development and milestones were achieved, according to the contract.<br />

Before the closure, the Coordinator briefly synthetised the work carried out during the two days of the<br />

meeting and traced the general lines of development of the work to be carried out during the following six<br />

months. Final thanks were addressed to C. Naffah, M.Menu and all C2RMF members, who took care of the<br />

excellent organisation.<br />

29


Annex 2<br />

Components of the Peer Review International Committees<br />

AGLAE<br />

MOLAB<br />

Components of the Peer Review Committee<br />

Annemie Adriaens Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Ghent,<br />

Belgium<br />

Aurelio Climent-Font Departmento de Física Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de<br />

Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain<br />

Patrick Trocellier Research Centre of Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Saclay<br />

France<br />

Jean Claude Dran AGLAE representative<br />

Manfred Schreiner Institute of Chemistry, Academy Fine Arts, Vienna , Austria<br />

Modesto Montoto Dept. of Geology, Group of Petrophysics, University of<br />

Oviedo, Spain<br />

Marisa Tabasso Former Director of Laboratories of Istituto Centrale del<br />

Restauro and ICCROM, Rome, Italy<br />

Brunetto Giovanni MOLAB representative<br />

Brunetti<br />

30


Annex 3<br />

List of new AGLAE and MOLAB User-Projects presented and evaluated<br />

during the first six-months of the <strong>second</strong> year.<br />

AGLAE<br />

Applicant Institution Project title/number Time<br />

requested<br />

(days)<br />

R. Bertoncello University of<br />

Padova (I)<br />

A. Von Bohlen<br />

C. Luglie<br />

Study of protective sol-gel layers for<br />

ancient glass<br />

ISAS<br />

Internal standard method µPIXE to<br />

Dortmund/Germa<br />

analyze paper, parchment and wood<br />

ny<br />

University<br />

Cagliati/Italy<br />

IFIN-HH<br />

B. Constantinescu Bucarest/Romani<br />

B. Colston<br />

a<br />

Lincoln<br />

University<br />

Lincoln/UK<br />

A. Zucchiatti INFN Genoa/Italy<br />

R. Golser<br />

R. Bertoncello<br />

A. Polvorinos del<br />

Rio<br />

D. Strivay<br />

University<br />

Vienna/Austria<br />

University<br />

Padova/Italy<br />

University<br />

Sevilla/Spain<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>ropean Centre<br />

of Archaeometry<br />

Liège/Belgium<br />

Neolithisation and obsidian circulation in<br />

western Mediteranean Sea<br />

early periode of Sardinian neolithic<br />

Micro-PIXE studies on Visigothic<br />

“Pietroasa”gold hoard objects<br />

Analysis of hazardous organic and<br />

inorganic residues applied to dried<br />

botanical collections<br />

PIXE study of Morocco zelliges and<br />

mortars from the XIVth to XVIIIth<br />

centuries<br />

Damage evaluation for Micro-PIXE used<br />

for the analysis of metal point drawings<br />

Study of sol-gel protectives for ancient<br />

glass<br />

Analyses of lustered ceramics from<br />

Andalusia<br />

9<br />

Time<br />

allocated<br />

(days)<br />

Planned<br />

month<br />

5 December<br />

5 5 March<br />

4 5 February<br />

3 3 January<br />

2 2 March<br />

3 0<br />

2 2 March<br />

6 0<br />

4 4 April<br />

Study of patinas of antique bronzes 6 5 May<br />

Sum of days 47 31<br />

% total time available 38% 25%<br />

Total days available 125<br />

31


MOLAB<br />

Applicant Institution Project title/Acronym Techniques Approval<br />

Kitan<br />

Kitanov<br />

Ines Abreu<br />

Correia<br />

Bulgarian<br />

Ministry of<br />

Culture<br />

National<br />

Archives<br />

Institute- Torre<br />

do Tombo, P<br />

Isabel Ribeiro Portuguese<br />

Institute for<br />

Conservation<br />

and Restoration<br />

Nicola<br />

Spinosa<br />

Noni<br />

Maravelaki<br />

Soprintendenza<br />

Speciale per il<br />

Polo Museale di<br />

Napoli<br />

25th Ephorate of<br />

Prehistoric and<br />

Classical<br />

Antiquities,<br />

Ministry of<br />

In-situ analysis of the early<br />

Hellenistic wall painting in<br />

the Thracian tomb near the<br />

village of Alexandrovo,<br />

Bulgaria (HELLEN)<br />

Comparative<br />

characterization of two<br />

illuminated medieval codex<br />

of the 12 th century and<br />

damage assessment of the<br />

parchment support.<br />

(MEDI-COD)<br />

Casas Pintadas de Évora.<br />

(EVORACAP)<br />

Drawing and colour in<br />

designing a painting:<br />

Polidoro artwork in<br />

Capodimonte.<br />

(CAPODIMONTE)<br />

In-situ identification of the<br />

penetration depth of<br />

consolidants on bioclastic<br />

limestones through microdrilling<br />

measurements<br />

XRF, FT-IR, Vis-NIR,<br />

micro-Raman, UV-Vis<br />

fluorescence,<br />

fluorescence imaging,<br />

micro-drilling<br />

XRF, FTIR, micro-<br />

Raman, UV-Vis<br />

fluorescence,<br />

fluorescence imaging,<br />

NMR-MOUSE<br />

FT-IR, Vis-NIR, micro-<br />

Raman, IR-colour<br />

scanner, laser microprofilometry,UV-Vis<br />

fluorescence,<br />

fluorescence imaging<br />

XRF, IR-colour<br />

scanner, fluorescence<br />

imaging<br />

Notes<br />

-- Measurements<br />

could be not<br />

adequate to<br />

solve the<br />

specific<br />

conservation<br />

problems<br />

yes<br />

yes<br />

yes<br />

Micro-drilling yes<br />

Culture (KRETE)<br />

Fusun Okyar Tubitak Study of archaeological XRF, Vis-NIR, micro- -- Project not<br />

Marmara materials from Iznik: Glazes Raman<br />

Research center and colour of original Iznik<br />

materials ware. (IZNIK)<br />

institute<br />

pertinent for<br />

in-situ studies<br />

David English Heritage Investigation of Silver XRF, FTIR, Vis-NIR yes<br />

Thickett<br />

Tarnish Risk and Remaining<br />

Protection Afforded by<br />

Lacquers.(SILVER)<br />

Sharon Courtauld Non-Invasive Analysis of XRF, FT-IR, Vis-NIR, -- To be<br />

Cather Institute of Art,<br />

University of<br />

London<br />

Mural Paintings.<br />

(NIAM)<br />

micro-Raman, IRcolour<br />

scanner, UV-Vis<br />

fluorescence,<br />

fluorescence imaging,<br />

NMR-MOUSE<br />

presented at<br />

the next<br />

deadline<br />

Roberto Gemäldegalerie - A Technical Study of the XRF, FTIR, Vis-NIR, yes<br />

Contini Staatliche Paintings: Amor Vincit IR-Colour scanner,<br />

Museen zu Omnia by Caravaggio, laser microprofilometry,<br />

Berlin Portrait of a Lady (Dorotea) NMR-MOUSE<br />

and Reclining nude of a<br />

woman in a landscape<br />

(Cerere) by Sebastiano del<br />

Piombo (CARAVAGGIO)<br />

32


Annex 4<br />

I-Report on the standardised format for describing analytical procedures<br />

DELIVERABLE N.1<br />

Proposed format analytical protocol<br />

- Aim of the protocol, short description<br />

- Name of the Author<br />

- Date of latest version<br />

- Chemicals<br />

o Reagent, grade, concentration, supplier, product number<br />

- Materials (below some examples when dealing with HPLC protocols)<br />

o Column<br />

Dimension column<br />

Nature of particle<br />

Monomeric or polymeric column<br />

Particle size<br />

Particle distribution and deviation<br />

Pore diameter<br />

Surface area<br />

Total carbon %<br />

Surface coverage<br />

End capped<br />

Supplier, product number<br />

Add reference if available: What did we want with this?<br />

o Guard column → type, dimension, supplier, product number<br />

o Filters→ type, dimension, supplier, product number<br />

Reagent preparation<br />

Equipment (below some examples when dealing with HPLC protocols)<br />

o Pump<br />

o Degasser<br />

o Autosampler / injector<br />

o Column oven<br />

o Post column derivatisation system<br />

o Detector<br />

Pre-examination<br />

Sample pre-treatment<br />

Analysis<br />

- Blank analysis, what serves as a blank and how often is it done<br />

- Standards, what is used as a standard, with which purpose and how often<br />

- Detection parameters<br />

- Data evaluation<br />

- Additional field for specific comments<br />

- Show example of analysis of a standard<br />

- Add relevant literature about the analysis (if available)<br />

33


II- Interlaboratory Comparison<br />

Analytical investigation strategies on organic materials<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 3<br />

NOPART meeting, 16 September 2005, Brainstorm about Networking on Natural Organic Polymer:<br />

Identification and Alteration<br />

Present:<br />

Jo Kirby National Gallery London, UK<br />

David Saunders British Museum, UK dsaunders@thebritishmuseum.ac.uk<br />

Chris Maines National Gallery, Washington,<br />

USA<br />

c-maines@nga.gov<br />

Patrick Dieterman Bayerisches Landesamt für<br />

Denkmalpflege, Germany<br />

Patrick.dietemann@blfd.bayern.de<br />

Marianne Odlyha Birkbeck College, UK m.odlyha@bbk.ac.uk<br />

Rene Larssen School of Conservation,<br />

Denmark<br />

rl@kons.dk<br />

Anne-Laurance Dupont CRCDG, France<br />

aldupont@mnhn.fr<br />

Sophia Sotiropoulou OADC, Greece<br />

Ina Vanden Berghe KIK/IRPA, Belgium<br />

Maarten van Bommel ICN, The Netherlands<br />

Introduction by Jan Wouters:<br />

Natural organic polymers are among the main constituents of materials such as textiles, leather,<br />

parchment, paper, photographs, bone, horn, antlers, natural adhesives and binding media of paint. They are<br />

composed of cellulose and protein mainly. Their presence in cultural heritage artefacts of such diversity has<br />

resulted in the existence of object-specific research lines, as clearly expressed in a series of past and present<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>ropean research projects (Leather Project CT90-0105; Leather Project EV5V-CT94-0514; ENVIART on<br />

artificial marble; MAP and IDAP on parchment; InkCor, Papylum, ServeNIR, PaperTreat and MIP on paper;<br />

MODHT on textiles), many of them based on national research efforts. It is the main objective of this<br />

initiative to provide appropriate bridging of these.<br />

Joint meetings of researchers will focus on sample preparation, analysis procedures and parameters<br />

to calculate, in order to contribute to the material’s and the object’s damage assessment. Balances of<br />

invasiveness/destruction on the one hand and detail and wealth of analytical information on the other will be<br />

critically evaluated. Investigating how the properties of a natural organic polymer change as a function of<br />

materials added may help formulating jeopardizing conservation or treatment conditions. For example may<br />

be compared the way cellulose degrades, in paper written with corrosive iron-gall ink or in a cotton fabric<br />

mordanted with an iron mordant and dyed with a natural organic dye. The changes brought about in collagen<br />

may be compared, in parchment where stability is provided by drying animal hide under tension or in leather<br />

where hide collagen is chemically reacted with tannins for it’s stabilisation.<br />

The ways by which a critical selection of parameters which indicate early changes in the polymer’s<br />

composition may lead to the description of early warning systems, will be investigated. On their turn may<br />

such investigations contribute to the development of models for improving ageing studies of such polymers<br />

(cf. COST G7) and of organic polymer degradation dedicated sensors (cf. MIMIC, MASTER, LIDO).<br />

The formulation of suitable analytical pathways must look for universality with respect to damage<br />

assessment and archaeometry.<br />

34


Summary of the meeting<br />

Further networking will be sought with <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> (networking activities, MOLAB Access) and the<br />

MaSC group (on mass spectrometry and chromatography) and through international and multidisciplinary<br />

platforms such as the conservation committee of ICOM (ICOM-CC) and the International Institute for<br />

Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (IIC).The participants showed many different interests with<br />

quite some overlap. One can describe this in a matrix such as:<br />

Application Material Problems<br />

Paper Polysaccharides identification,<br />

mechanism of ink corrosion<br />

Textiles Proteins monitoring degradation<br />

Polysaccharides identification: monitoring degradation<br />

Leather Resins effects on physical, mechanical properties<br />

Proteins monitoring degradation<br />

Parchment Oils ink corrosion<br />

Proteins monitoring degradation<br />

Binding media lipids etc<br />

Etc etc<br />

The list above is not complete of course. Usually, the described problems are object-related and<br />

discussed in separate workgroups of ICOM-CC. Between the different disciplines; there is not so much<br />

exchange of information. However, there is a general feeling among the participants that such an exchange<br />

can be of benefit for us all. The consortium of <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> can organise a joint meeting, together with<br />

ICOM-CC (or at least some of the related working groups from ICOM-CC) on one of the topics mentioned<br />

above.<br />

So far we are considering a meeting about polysaccharides only, or polysaccharides and proteins, for<br />

all applications mentioned above. There is some discussion if we want to focus on one specific problem or if<br />

we want to leave that open. At present, no specific problem has been chosen. An option is to organise the<br />

meeting with different themes which can have the focus of interdisciplinary discussion. We have to think<br />

about and define more clearly the different topics of interest and their possible inter-relationships. In<br />

addition, we need to identify those who can actively contribute to these topics.<br />

All participants feel that the meeting should be mainly a discussion meeting, rather then a series of<br />

presentations. So short presentations will be requested (5 – 10 min) followed by brainstorming sessions.<br />

Although, this could in itself be a single fruitful event, it may be that from this first meeting a core<br />

group can take over and organise more of these interdisciplinary meetings.<br />

35


Annex 5<br />

Report on the “Workshop on non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage” (19 th -<br />

20 th ) and on the “5th Colloquium in Mobile NMR” (21 st -23 rd ) – Perugia,<br />

September 2005.<br />

(UNIPG-RWTH)<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 4<br />

Within the <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> project, two initiatives have been developed out at the University of Perugia in the<br />

period, September 19-23, 2005: the “Workshop on non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage” and the “5th<br />

Colloquium in Mobile NMR”, organized by RWTH Aachen (B. Blümich), SMAArt Perugia (A. Sgamellotti)<br />

and CNR-IMC (A. Segre).<br />

During both meetings, but in particular during the “Workshop on non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage”,<br />

the general bases of the NMR technique and the design of the portable NMR-MOUSE (Nuclear Magnetic<br />

Resonance – MObile Universal Surface Explorer) were fully described, both from the theoretical and<br />

experimental point of view. In many presentations, attention was dedicated not only to the applications<br />

already carried out, but also to the developments of the NMR-MOUSE and to the “depth-profile” version of<br />

this instrument (see JRA2, Task1 – this <strong>report</strong>).<br />

The main features of the portable NMR device are the following:<br />

-two permanent magnets, are mounted on an iron yoke with anti-parallel polarization to form the classical<br />

horseshoe geometry;<br />

-the main direction of the polarisation field B0 is across the gap;<br />

-the rf field B1 is generated by a surface coil which is mounted in the gap;<br />

-by the use of “NMR echoes” relaxation rates 1/T2 are accessible which are characteristic of material<br />

hardness.<br />

Almost all studies are performed using 1 H-NMR, due to high sensitivity and the natural abundance of<br />

protons. Nevertheless, during the meeting some communications <strong>report</strong>ed some preliminary results to extend<br />

the investigations to nuclei other than 1 H.<br />

Several applications in the field of cultural heritage were discussed and presented. Among them, two relevant<br />

applications regarded: the study of presence of humidity in frescoes of the Vasari’s house in Florence and the<br />

study of the humidity on an ancient Roman fresco, as well as the bricks, of the walls at the Colle Oppio<br />

Cryptoporticus in Rome. In these works, the signal of the water in the pores was measured approaching the<br />

fresco up to one millimetre distance, without touching it. The echo envelope was then analyzed by inverse<br />

Laplace transformation for a distribution of relaxation times. Although some signal loss has to be accounted<br />

for by translational self diffusion in the highly inhomogeneous magnetic field of the NMR-MOUSE the<br />

signal amplitude at short T2 can nevertheless be attributed to water in small pores, and the signal at large T2<br />

to water in large pores. The wet fresco showed signal at both small and large T2. So small and large pores<br />

were filled with water. The brick wall supporting the fresco gave similar results, in particular when<br />

considering that the bricks have a pore size distribution different from the fresco material.<br />

On the other hand the bricks, in another dryer part of a different wall of the Cryptoporticus, showed low<br />

signal at high T2. This is in line with laboratory drying studies, which show that during drying the NMR<br />

signal vanishes first from the large pores and only later from the small pores. By calibration with laboratory<br />

samples, including established mercury porosimetry studies on test samples, the non-destructive<br />

measurements by the NMR-MOUSE can be used to quantify the pore-size distribution and the water<br />

distribution within the pores. This technology can also be used for inspection of stone conservation<br />

procedures, which reduce the pore sizes in the outer stone layers by impregnation with polymers.<br />

In the field of nuclear magnetic resonance, a new portable device has been recently developed, presented and<br />

tested at the Workshop: the “profile NMR-MOUSE”, which aims to obtain microscopic resolution depthprofiles<br />

in paintings or other artworks, with a single-sided sensor.<br />

The common single-sided NMR sensors combine open magnets and surface rf coils to generate a sensitive<br />

volume external to the sensor and inside the object. The shape of the sensitive volume, which is fully<br />

determined by the geometry of the magnet system, defines the best spatial resolution attainable with the<br />

36


sensor. A novel magnet was developed by the Aachen group, the main characteristic is that the resolution is<br />

improved by almost three orders of magnitude. The depth-profiling procedure requires repositioning of the<br />

sensor with respect to the sample. For this purpose a high-precision lift was illustrated in one of the<br />

communications. It has an acrylic plate, where to place the sample and a movable plate to control the<br />

position of the sensor. To quantify the improvement in the spatial resolution, an experiment was <strong>report</strong>ed<br />

where the point spread functions for the new sensor was measured to be 2.3 µm, instead of 1 mm, typical<br />

value for a common sensor.<br />

An application of the profile NMR-MOUSE to the field of cultural heritage was presented, with special<br />

reference to the study of panel paintings.<br />

In laboratory experiments, different models of a paintings, with progressive degrees of complexity, were<br />

investigated: containing different binders (egg. tempera, linseed oil and casein), varnishes (amber, chios and<br />

dammar), organic colorants (lakes) and pigments. The preliminary results were analyzed in order to have<br />

reliable information on the painting technique and on the stratigraphy.<br />

Furthermore, in-situ measurements, performed at the National Gallery of Umbria on the Renaissance<br />

paintings on the “Adorazione dei Magi” of Perugino and on the “Triptych of Sant’Antonio” of Piero della<br />

Francesca were presented. For the first time, it has been possible to measure, by a non-invasive technique,<br />

the thickness of the painting layers, including the painting, the preparation, and the “incamottatura”.<br />

New results were also <strong>report</strong>ed on the use of the spin-lattice decay, as screening indicator, to obtain<br />

information on the painting technique.<br />

During the workshop, practical sessions were held, during which the participants had the possibility to carry<br />

on measurements on paintings, on stone materials, and on paper artworks: the results were then analyzed and<br />

discussed in full detail.<br />

The workshop was followed by the “5th Colloquium on Mobile NMR”. The colloquium had a large<br />

participation and several topics regarding theory and applications of mobile NMR were presented and<br />

discussed. Among these topics a relevant role had the applications to the study of cultural heritage that<br />

attracted the attention and the interest of several scientists.<br />

The participants to the workshop and to the Colloquium were, respectively, 42 and 70, coming mainly from<br />

<strong>Eu</strong>ropean countries, but also from Canada, United States, Japan and New Zeland.<br />

NOTE: Due to the necessity to preserve intellectual property rights, it has been not possible to produce the<br />

planned CD with the various presentations to the “Workshop on non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage”.<br />

In substitution, however, the Book of Abstracts of the “5th Colloquium in Mobile NMR” is available and<br />

will be published in the website.<br />

The Agenda of both meetings is available at: http://www.nmr-mouse.de/5mnmr/<br />

____________________________________<br />

List of participants to the “Workshop on non-invasive NMR and Cultural Heritage”:<br />

Participant Institution e-mail address<br />

1<br />

Adams Buda, Alina<br />

ITMC, RWTH<br />

Aachen<br />

abuda@mc.rwth-aachen.de<br />

2<br />

Adams, Michael<br />

ITMC, RWTH<br />

Aachen<br />

madams@mc.rwth-aachen.de<br />

3<br />

Bluemich, Bernhard<br />

ITMC, RWTH<br />

Aachen<br />

bbluemich@mc.rwth-aachen.de<br />

4<br />

Blumler, Peter<br />

Institut ICG-III,<br />

Julich<br />

p.bluenler@fz-juelich.de<br />

5<br />

Bortolotti, Villiam<br />

University of Bologna,<br />

Bologna<br />

villiam.bortolotti@unibo.it<br />

6 Brunetti, Brunetto<br />

Giovanni<br />

Centre SMAArt, University<br />

of Perugia, Perugia<br />

bruno@dyn.unipg.it<br />

7<br />

Cagnini, Andrea<br />

Opificio delle Pietre Dure,<br />

Firenze<br />

micindri@supereva.it<br />

8<br />

Camaiti, Mara<br />

CNR-ICVBC,<br />

Firenze<br />

m.camaiti@icvbc.cnr.it<br />

9 Capitani, Donatella Istituto di Metodologie donatella.capitani@imc.cnr.it<br />

37


10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

Cartechini, Laura<br />

Chimiche, CNR, Roma<br />

ISTM, CNR, Dep. of<br />

Chemistry, Perugia<br />

laura@thch.unipg.it<br />

Casanova, Federico ITMC, RWTH Aachen fcasanova@mc.rwth-aachen.de<br />

Cozzolino, Sara<br />

Del Federico, Eleonora<br />

Galeotti, Monica<br />

Gehlen, Christa<br />

16 Herrmann, Volker<br />

Centre S.M.A.Art,<br />

University of Perugia,<br />

Perugia<br />

Pratt Institute, Science and<br />

Mathemathics, USA<br />

Opificio delle Pietre Dure,<br />

Firenze<br />

ITMC, RWTH<br />

Aachen<br />

sara.cozzolino@imc.cnr.it<br />

edelfede@pratt.edu<br />

cgehlen@mc.rwth-aachen.de<br />

Degussa AG, Koln, Germany volker.herrmann@degussa.com<br />

17<br />

Higgit, Catherine<br />

The National Gallery,<br />

London<br />

Cathrine.higgit@ng-london.org.uk<br />

18 Kolz, Jurgen ITMC, RWTH<br />

Aachen<br />

jkolz@mc.rwth.aachen.de<br />

19 Kremer, Kai ACT GmbH,<br />

Roetgen, D<br />

kai.kremer@sct-aachen.com<br />

20 Maddinelli, Giuseppe CHIF – Physical Chemistry<br />

Dept, Milano<br />

gmaddinelli@enitecnologie.eni.it<br />

21 Marble, Andrew MRI Research Centre,<br />

University of New<br />

Brunswick, Canada<br />

andrew.marble@unb.ca<br />

22 Masic Admir<br />

University of Torino, Torino admir.masic@unito.it<br />

23 Megens, Luc Netherland Institut of<br />

Cultural Heritage,<br />

Amsterdam<br />

luc.megens@icn.nl<br />

24 Miliani, Costanza ISTM, CNR, Dep. of<br />

Chemistry, Perugia<br />

miliani@tchch.unipg.it<br />

25 Nestle, Nikolau<br />

nikolaus.nestle@physik.tudarmstadt.de<br />

26 Neevel, Han Netherlands Institute for<br />

Cultural Heritage<br />

han.neevel@icn.nl<br />

27 Perlo, Juan<br />

ITMC, RWTH Aachen jperlo@mc.rwth.aachen.de<br />

28 Pirazzoli, Ilaria University of Rome“La<br />

Sapienza”<br />

29 Presciutti, Federica University of Perugia,<br />

Perugia<br />

30 Rossi, Enrico<br />

31 Roy, Ashok<br />

32 Ruffolo, Silvestro Antonio<br />

ilaria.pirazzoli@roma1.infn.it<br />

federica@thch.unipg.it<br />

enrico.rossi@imc.cnr.it<br />

National Gallery, London Ashok.roy@ng-london.org.uk<br />

University of Calabria Silvio.ruffolo@libero.it<br />

33 Segre, Annalaura Institute of Chemical<br />

Methodologies of CNR,<br />

Rome<br />

segre@imc.cnr.it<br />

34 Sgamellotti, Antonio University of Perugia,<br />

Perugia<br />

sgam@thch.unipg.it<br />

35 Spring, Marika<br />

National Gallery, London Marika.spring@ng-london.org.uk<br />

36 Stork, Holger<br />

Holger.stork@physik.tu-darmstadt.de<br />

37 Tabasso, Marisa m.tabasso@agora.it<br />

38


38 Tedoldi, Fabio<br />

39 Utsuzawa, Shin<br />

Bruker, Italy fabio.tedoldi@bruker.it<br />

University of Tsukuba utsuzawa@mrlab.bk.tsukuba.ac.jp<br />

40 Voda, Alexandra Freudenberg<br />

Forschungsdienste KG,<br />

Weinheim<br />

alexandra.voda@freudenberg.de<br />

41 Weglarz, Wladyslaw Unilever Wladyslaw.Werglarz@unilever.com<br />

42 Yiming, Zhang Chinese Academy of<br />

Science, Beijing, China<br />

ymzhang@mail.iee.ac.cn<br />

39


Annex 6<br />

Summary Report on GUPIX Course<br />

C2RMF<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 5<br />

The first edition of the “GUPIX School” was organised at the C2RMF from the 6 th to 7 th October 2005.<br />

The aim of this small workshop was to improve user's expertise in running GUPIX, the most popular<br />

program used to process PIXE spectra, which is also used at AGLAE.<br />

The school was given by Prof. J.L. Campbell, professor at the Guelph University, Canada, one of the most<br />

renowned expert in PIXE and co-designer of the GUPIX program. The 6 th and 7 th October were dedicated to<br />

the presentation of the new GUPIXWIN windows version (release 1.1)<br />

On October 5 th , one day before the school, the operation of AGLAE was dedicated to participants wishing to<br />

collect fresh PIXE spectra of their own samples in order to use them as sample spectra during the workshop.<br />

24 users and owners of the GUPIX program from seven western <strong>Eu</strong>ropean countries were gathered. Five<br />

participants were directly connected with the AGLAE transnational access program (names underlined in the<br />

list of participants, below).<br />

The first day of the school Prof. J.L. Campbell presented a detailed review of the capabilities of this new<br />

version of GUPIX, which has a completely redesigned interface running under windows. The <strong>second</strong> day<br />

was dedicated to practising GUPIX on various sample spectra with increasing complexity (hidden elements,<br />

layers, etc.). Finally, in the last afternoon the participants had the occasion to submit remarks and<br />

suggestions to J.L. Campbell, to help the improvement of the next version of GUPIXWin.<br />

List of Participants<br />

Nr Name Surname E-mail Institute Town<br />

1 Dr Janusz LEKKI Janusz.Lekki@ifj.edu.pl INP Cracow Po<br />

2 Dr Wojciech KWIATEK Wojciech.Kwiatek@ifj.edu.pl INP Cracow Po<br />

3 Prf Iain CAMPBELL Guelph<br />

University<br />

CAN<br />

4 Dr Richard THOMPSON r.l.thompson@durham.ac.uk University of<br />

Durham<br />

UK<br />

5 Dr Christian NEELMEIJER c.neelmeijer@fz-rossendorf.de FZW Rossend D<br />

6 Dr Thomas CALLIGARO Thomas.Calligaro@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

7 Dr Jacques CASTAING Jacques.castaing@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

8 Mr David BOURGARIT David.Bourgarit@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

9 Dr Stefan ROEHRS Stefan.Roehrs@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

10 Mr Laurent PICHON Laurent.Pichon@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

11 Dr Isabelle BIRON Isabelle.Biron@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

12 Dr Joseph SALOMON Joseph.Salomon@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

13 Dr Lucile BECK Lucile.beck@culture.fr C2RMF Paris F<br />

14 Dr Inés ORTEGA iofeliu@us.es CNA Seville E<br />

15 Dr Petra KROEPFL Petra.Kroepfl@ap.univie.ac.at VERA Vienna A<br />

16 Dr Barbara WUNSCHEK Barbara.Wunschek@ap.univie.ac.at VERA Vienna A<br />

19 Dr Stéphane LUCAS Stephane.Lucas@fundp.ac.be LARN - Namur B<br />

20 Dr Claire RAMBOZ cramboz@cnrs-orleans.fr ISTO Orleans F<br />

21 Dr Olivier ROUER orouer@ cnrs-orleans.fr ISTO Orleans F<br />

22 Dr Caroline RAEPSAET caroline.raepsaet@cea.fr CEA<br />

DRECAM<br />

Saclay F<br />

23 Dr Hélène BUREAU hbureau@drecam.cea.fr CEA<br />

DRECAM<br />

Saclay F<br />

24 Dr Mohammad ROUMIÉ mroumie@cnrs.edu.lb CNRS LEB<br />

orf<br />

40


Annex 7<br />

Report on the First AGLAE and MOLAB Users Meeting - (Paris, 23 rd November 2005)<br />

C2RMF, Palais du Louvre, Porte des Lions, 14 - quai François Mitterrand.<br />

C2RMF, UNIPG, INOA, CNR-ICVBC, OPD<br />

DELIVERABLES N.11, 13<br />

The meeting was opened by M. Menu, as <strong>Eu</strong>-<strong>ARTECH</strong> responsible for T.A. activities. He briefly described<br />

the Access activities developed during the first 18 months of the project by both AGLAE and MOLAB<br />

infrastructures.<br />

J.Salomon presented a lecture on the general characteristics of AGLAE, introducing the main new technical<br />

AGLAE solutions for obtaining the highest performances in PIXE, PIGE, RBS, ERDA measurements.<br />

A.Polvorinos Del Rio and G.Padeletti presented the results obtained in the study of “lustre” ceramics of the<br />

“Hispano-Islamic” and “Italian Renaissance” periods. In particular, while Polvorinos presented results<br />

obtained on several shards from the excavation of the Triana (Sevilla) workshop, Padeletti presented an<br />

extended study carried out on several plates by Mastro Giorgio da Gubbio. Both studies were carried out in<br />

AGLAE, through PIXE and RBS measurements.<br />

In the case of the lustre shards from Triana (Sevilla), small amounts of Cu and Ag, the species known to be<br />

at the origin of the lustre effects, were detected by PIXE. It was found that Cu concentration increases with<br />

the Pb content of the glaze. Ag was not always present. RBS analyses led to the detailed characterisation of<br />

the distribution of elements in the surface layers of the decorations. It was confirmed the occurrence of thin<br />

layers (less than 300 nm) containing metallic silver and/or copper, very likely as nanoparticles, embedded in<br />

the glassy matrix of the glaze. A correlation was attempted between the copper and/silver content of the<br />

upper layers and the surface colour aspect.<br />

In the case of the Renaissance lustre, two campaigns of measurements were carried out. In each case, the<br />

available beamtime has been used for PIXE analyses under 3 MeV protons, and to RBS acquisitions under a<br />

3 MeV beam. The examined objects included several original Renaissance plates such as “Caduta di<br />

Fetonte”, “Pico, Circe e Canente” "Dedalus", "The cup of riders and infantrymen", "The birth of Adonis",<br />

and others, from the Museo Comunale di Gubbio and Museums of Sevres and Ecouen. In the majority of<br />

cases, the glazes have been precisely characterised and the nature of different pigments, blue, green, black,<br />

yellow, etc. have been identified. RBS analyses gave information on the metal content of the lustered layers,<br />

as well as on their in-depth distribution. Results indicated that the layers containing copper and/or silver are<br />

of the order of a few hundred nanometres thick and contain a relatively low amount of metals (few percent<br />

weight). The comparison of the data obtained on the different objects provided parameters useful to identify<br />

markers of the technological evolution of the workshops all along the considered period, such as, for<br />

example, the use of a cobalt mineral containing a relatively high impurity of arsenic.<br />

A. Von Bohlen, from the Institute for Analytical Sciences, in Dortmund, Germany, presented relevant results<br />

in the study of varnishes in ancient musical instruments, such as violins. The study was carried out through<br />

micro-PIXE an lead to interesting results part of which are under processing.<br />

R. Bertoncello, from the University of Padova, Italy, presented the results he obtained in a study of sol-gel<br />

silica coatings, deposited on different kinds of glass substrate, in order to test their activity in glass<br />

protection. An interesting aspect of this study was the analysis of ion-interdiffusion between glass and<br />

coating.<br />

Different types of glass samples, coming from the Corning Museum, have been used in order to test the<br />

mobility of lead. The results showed that the protective coatings experience a low lead migration when they<br />

are in contact with G glass (content of lead in the protective coating: 0.030 atom %) and in C glass (content<br />

of lead in the protective coating: 0.006 atom %). In particular, lead catalysed coatings showed an<br />

homogeneous amount of lead in the sol-gel silica layer (owing to the homogeneous migration of Pb 2+ from<br />

the glass substrate) while the non-catalysed layers showed an in-homogeneous composition, with at least two<br />

indexes of ion migration (on glass C): a first layer with a lower amount of lead (0.010 atom %) and a <strong>second</strong><br />

layer with a larger amount of lead (0.019 atom %). This behaviour could be related to the fact that, in the<br />

non-catalysed coating, lead diffusing from the substrate, acts by itself as a non-homogeneously dispersed<br />

polymerising catalyst, causing a non-homogeneous growing of the silica coating, while in the case of lead<br />

catalysed coatings the migration reaches its equilibrium and does not evolve any more. This consideration<br />

41


would be coherent with a better protective action of lead catalysed sol-gel silica with respect to the noncatalysed<br />

one.<br />

In conclusion of the session dedicated to the AGLAE users, M.Guerra presented relevant results in a study of<br />

Etruscan gold work from the Campana’s collection (Louvre Museum). The study was able to put well in<br />

evidence many details of the manufacture techniques and allowed for the identification of 19 th century<br />

restorations and pastiches.<br />

In the afternoon, C. Miliani, from the University of Perugia, introduced the session dedicated to MOLAB<br />

presenting several unpublished results obtained through MOLAB national access. The presentation had the<br />

objective to show new case studies of MOLAB to the public of actual and potential users.<br />

After this introduction, B. Mottin (C2RMF) presented the work developed in-situ on the Lamentation on the<br />

dead Christ altarpiece, located in the Museum of Fine Arts and Archaeology of Besançon. The painting was<br />

executed for the Chapel of Eleonora of Toledo, the wife of Cosimo I de' Medici and daughter of the Viceroy<br />

of Naples, in Palazzo Vecchio in Florence. It was finished in 1545 and, in the same year, it was sent to<br />

Besançon to the private secretary of the Emperor Charles V with whom Cosimo had important negotiations.<br />

The Lamentation on the dead Christ in Besançon was studied, through the following techniques: fiber-optic<br />

FT-IR; fiber-optic Vis-NIR; fiber-optic fluorescence; fluorescence imaging; IR-colour scanner<br />

reflectography; laser micro-prophilometry. XRF measurements and X-ray radiographies were carried out<br />

separately by C2RMF. The IR-colour reflectogram put in light several pentimenti of Bronzino with<br />

modification of the position of the various figures or even their substitutions. The false-coulour image gave a<br />

clear idea of the distribution of different materials allover the painted surface. The almost complete set of<br />

used pigments was identified by the combination of XRF and mid-FTIR. Repaintings by cobalt-blue were<br />

also evidenced. Two different types of lakes were identified by wavelength resolved Vis-fluorescence.<br />

Within the mixtures of lakes and oil (as binder) the presence of glass powder was found. The study shed light<br />

on the general painting techniques of Florentine painters of the period.<br />

D. Hradil, from the Academy of Science of the Czek Republic, presented his work on the painting techniques<br />

of J. B. Lampi, father and son, from the 19 th century collection of the Moravian Gallery in Brno. Within this<br />

project, five paintings of two authors, Johann Baptist Lampi elder and Johann Baptist Lampi younger were<br />

studied. In some of their paintings the authorship was uncertain, because the son adapted the style of his<br />

father very markedly. For this reason, the finding of material features distinguishing between the two authors<br />

seemed to be extremely difficult, although not impossible. As a reference, a painting of a different author,<br />

probably Friedrich Amerling, was used. The results were positive. Although the mobile instrumental<br />

techniques did not provide a definite answer to the question of the authorship, it yielded very quick and<br />

objective confirmation of the originally proposed assignment. Several measurement were carried out that led<br />

to a wide characterisation of the materials used by the painters. The most important distinguishing feature<br />

seemed to be the presence of really uncommon lead-tin-antimony yellow, which could indicate some<br />

preferences in the pigment selection. In particular, the results showed that this pigment was preferred by the<br />

younger authors – J.B. Lampi junior and F. Amerling.<br />

The results of non-destructive IR spectroscopy and XRF focused the attention to the need of more detailed<br />

analysis of yellows and greens (mixed from yellows and blues in all paintings). This conclusion is vital to<br />

guide microsampling of painting layers for further developments of the study through stratigraphic analyses.<br />

L. Syson, from the National Gallery of London, presented his technical study of Leonardo’s Vergin of the<br />

Rocks and associated Leonardesque paintings by the IR-colour scanner of INOA. Two distinct compositional<br />

underdrawings were seen under the surface of the Virgin of the Rocks. The first of these, drawn directly on<br />

the gesso ground using a fluid medium, does not correspond at all to the image that we know so well today.<br />

The <strong>second</strong> underdrawing, drawn over a priming layer, is for the Virgin of the Rocks as it was finally<br />

executed, but here too there is evidence of several substantial changes of mind and of a complicated working<br />

procedure.<br />

The study have radically altered the understanding of Leonardo’s working methods, particularly with regard<br />

to his use of cartoons, and allowed L.Syson to distinguish between his underdrawing style and method and<br />

those of his collaborators.<br />

L.Burgio from the Victoria and Albert Museum of London presented her study of 11 majolicas by Mastro<br />

Giorgio Andreoli, conserved in the V&A .Three techniques were used in the study: energy dispersive X-ray<br />

fluorescence (EDXRF), Raman spectroscopy and visible and near-infrared spectroscopy (Vis-NIR). The use<br />

of a portable EDXRF spectrometer allowed for the detection of copper and silver, which can be related to the<br />

colour of the decoration. Portable fibre-optic Vis-NIR spectroscopy allowed the quantification of colours<br />

42


and, at the same time, the qualitative detection of copper and silver nanoparticles. The identification was<br />

carried out by measuring the surface plasmon resonances, specific absorption peaks typical of nanoparticles<br />

dispersed in a transparent medium. The resonances appear at different wavelength, according to the nature,<br />

dimension and concentration of the nanoparticles and on the refractive index of the hosting medium. Finally,<br />

the glassy network of the glaze was studied by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Raman spectra from many<br />

different areas of the lustre decoration were recorded, making it possible to compare spectra taken from<br />

different decorations of the same plate or analogous decorations in different plates. In particular, a specific<br />

yellow-orange decoratioon showed the typical spectrum of lead antimonate with some specific features to be<br />

attributed to the presence of zinc (also detected by XRF).<br />

As a final presentation, S.Sotiropoulou from Ormylia, presented the main features of the study carried out by<br />

MOLAB on the St. <strong>Eu</strong>thimios Chapel wall paintings (XIV century) at St. Demetrios in Thessaloniki.<br />

Information was collected on the use of various pigments, combining XRF with mid- and near-FTIR<br />

spectroscopic results. The information strongly contributed to shed light on the Byzanthine painting<br />

technique of the time. The results are currently compared with those obtained in a previous study of<br />

Panselinos mural paintings in the Protaton church in Mount Athos.<br />

At the end of the day, M.Menu and B.Brunetti together underlined the relevance and the high interest of the<br />

study presented. The positive results confirmed the constructive role of transantional access to promote the<br />

highest level of research, to strenghten the international cooperation among scientist, conservators and<br />

scholars on cultural heritage, and, therefore, to contribute to the creation of <strong>Eu</strong>ropean area of research in the<br />

field of artwork studies and conservation.<br />

The Agenda of the Meeting is available on the website.<br />

Being open to the community of researchers external to the Consortium, the meeting was publicised and<br />

more than 70 participants were present.<br />

List of participants:<br />

First Name Family name Institution Country Email Telephone<br />

1 Marc Aucouturier C2RMF F marc.aucourturier@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 57 49<br />

2 Nathalie Balcar C2RMF F nathalie.balcar@culture.fr 01 40 20 56 79<br />

3 Gilles Bastian C2RMF F gilles.bastian@culture.fr<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Lucile Beck C2RMF F lucile.beck@culture.fr 01 40 20 24 82<br />

Ludovic Bellot-Gurlet<br />

6 Renzo Bertoncello<br />

CNRS -<br />

Université P.<br />

F<br />

et M. Curie,<br />

Paris IV<br />

bellot-gurlet@glvt-cnrs.fr 01 49 78 11 14<br />

University of<br />

I renzo.beroncello@unipd.it 3904 98 27 52 04<br />

Padova<br />

7 Anne Bouquillon C2RMF F anne.bouquillon@culture.fr 01 40 20 68 58<br />

8 David Bourgarit C2RMF F david.bourgarit@culture.fr 01 40 20 56 39<br />

9 Jean-Louis Boutaine C2RMF F jean-louis.boutaine@wanadoo.fr<br />

10 Susanna Bracci ICVBC-CNR I s.bracci@icvbc.cnr.it 39-055-5225413<br />

11 Brunetto<br />

Giovanni<br />

Brunetti<br />

Universita’ di<br />

I bruno@impact.dyn.unipg.it<br />

Perugia<br />

12 Emilien Burger C2RMF F emilien.burger@culture.gouv.fr 06 16 08 29 38<br />

13 Lucia Burgio V&A Museum UK l.burgio@vam.ac.uk<br />

14 Laura Cartechini<br />

Universita’ di<br />

I laura@thch.unipg.it 390 755 855 526<br />

Perugia<br />

15 Jacques Castaing C2RMF F jacques.castaing@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 56 69<br />

16 Christian Degrigny<br />

Heritage<br />

Malta<br />

Malta cdegrigny@mcr.edu.mt<br />

43


17 José<br />

18<br />

Delgado<br />

Rodrigues<br />

Françoise Douau<br />

LNEC P delgado@lnec.pt 351 218 443 699<br />

Musée<br />

d'Archélogie<br />

Nationale<br />

F francoise.douau@culture.gouv.fr 01 39 01 12 13<br />

19 Marie-Pierre Etcheverry LRMH F marie-pierre.etcheverry@culture.fr 01 60 37 77 86<br />

20 Paola Fermo<br />

21<br />

Ana Paula Ferreira Pinto<br />

University of<br />

I paola.fermo@unimi.it 0039-02 50314425<br />

Milan<br />

Instituto<br />

Superior<br />

Técnico (IST)<br />

P anapinto@civil.ist.utl.pt 351 218 418 363<br />

22 Eva Goetz ICN NL eva.goetz@icn.nl 0031 20 3054 733<br />

23 Maria Filomena Guerra C2RMF F maria.guerra@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 24 58<br />

24 Rosemarie Heulin<br />

25<br />

26<br />

David Hradil<br />

Janka Hradilova<br />

Musée du<br />

F rosemarie.heulin@quaibranly.fr<br />

Quai Branly<br />

Academy of<br />

Sciences of<br />

the CZ Rep.<br />

Academy of<br />

Fine Arts in<br />

Prague<br />

06 16 74 65 21 /<br />

01 56 61 71 59<br />

CZ hradil@iic.cas.cz 420-266172187<br />

CZ hradilovaj@volny.cz 420-233015334<br />

27 Ineke Joosten ICN NL ineke.joosten@icn.n 31(0)20 3054728<br />

28 Ildiko Katona C2RMF F ildiko.katona@culture.fr<br />

29 Mathias Kocher BLFD D mathias.kocher@blfd.bayern.de 00 49 89 21 14 323<br />

30<br />

Christian Lahanier C2RMF F christian.lahannier@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 58 71<br />

31 Anne-Solenn Le Hô C2RMF F anne-solenn.leho@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 54 78<br />

32 Marie-Anne Loeper-Attia Restorer F philattia@wanadoo.fr 01 46 07 87 97<br />

33 Claudine Loisel LRMH F claudine.loisel@culture.fr 01 60 37 77 80<br />

34 Martin Mach BLFD D martin.mach@blfd.bayern.de 0049 089/2114-323<br />

35<br />

François Mathis<br />

Université de<br />

Liège<br />

B francois.mathis@ulg.ac.be<br />

36 Vincent Mazel C2RMF F vincent.mazel@culture.gouv.fr<br />

37 Anna Maria Mecchi CNR ICVBC I a.mecchi@icvbc.cnr.it 39 3485221116<br />

38 Michel Menu C2RMF F michel.menu@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 56 59<br />

39 Costanza Miliani<br />

Universita’ di<br />

Perugia<br />

I miliani@thch.unipg.it<br />

40 João Mimoso LNEC P lmimoso@lnec.pt 351,218,443,553<br />

41 Jean-Pierre Mohen<br />

Musée du<br />

Quai Branly<br />

F jmo@quaibranly.fr 01 56 61 53 09<br />

42 Bruno Mottin C2RMF F bruno.mottin@culture.fr 01 40 20 56 61<br />

43 Christiane Naffah C2RMF F christiane.naffah@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 56 50<br />

44 Cristiana Nunes LNEC P clpn@lnec.pt 351,218,443,979<br />

45 Giuseppina Padeletti CNR - ISMN I pad@mlib.cnr.it 39-06-90672346<br />

46 Sandrine Pagès C2RMF F sandrine.pages@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 54 78<br />

47<br />

Silvia Païn<br />

Service<br />

archéologique<br />

départemental<br />

des Yvelines<br />

F spain@cg78.fr 01 61 37 36 90<br />

44


48 Juan Perlo<br />

RWTH-<br />

Aachen<br />

D jperlo@mc.rwth-aachen.de 49 241/8026-430<br />

49<br />

Luca Pezzati INOA I luca@ino.it<br />

39 055 23 08 221<br />

50<br />

Laurent Pichon C2RMF F laurent.pichon@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 24 62<br />

51 Daniela Pinna<br />

52 Angel Polvorinos<br />

53 Stéphanie<br />

Rabourdin-<br />

Auffret<br />

Opificio delle<br />

Pietre Dure<br />

Seville<br />

University<br />

Université<br />

Paris I<br />

I daniela.pinna@unibo.it 051.4209428<br />

E polvorin@us.es 95 455 71 40<br />

F srabourdin.auffret@free.fr 01 53 19 97 37<br />

54 Elisabeth Ravaud C2RMF F elisabeth.ravaud@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 56 57<br />

55 Martine Regert C2RMF F martine.regert@culture.fr<br />

56 Pascale Richardin C2RMF F pascale.richardin@culture.fr<br />

57 Ashok Roy NGL UK ashok.roy@ng-london.org.uk 44 (0) 207 747 2823<br />

58 Barbara Sacchi ICVBC-CNR I b.sacchi@icvbc.cnr.it 39-055-5225413<br />

59 Joseph Salomon C2RMF F joseph.salomon@culture.gouv.fr<br />

60<br />

Barbara Salvadori<br />

61 Antonio Sgamellotti<br />

62<br />

63<br />

Jacek Sobczyk<br />

Joanna Sobczyk<br />

Opificio delle<br />

Pietre Dure<br />

Universita’ di<br />

Perugia<br />

Polish<br />

Academy of<br />

Sciences<br />

National<br />

Museum in<br />

Krakow<br />

I salvadori@csgo.unifi.it 055-4625488<br />

I sgam@thch.unipg.it 390,755,855,516<br />

Pol sobczyk@img-pan.krakow.pl 48 12 637 62 00<br />

Pol<br />

jsobczyk@muz-nar.krakow.pl,<br />

lanboz@op.pl<br />

48 12422 26 35<br />

64 Sophia Sotiropoulou OADC Gr s.sotiropoulou@artdiagnosis.gr 302,371,098,400<br />

65<br />

Marika Spring NGL UK marika.spring@ng-london.org.uk 44 20 7747 2827<br />

66 Luke Syson NGL UK<br />

67 Olivier Tavoso C2RMF F<br />

68 Annick Texier LRMH F annick.texier@culture.fr 01.60.37.77.80<br />

69 Lucia Toniolo CNR - ICVBC I lucia.toniolo@polimi.it 39 02 2399 3935<br />

70 Maarten Van Bommel ICN NL maarten.ven.bommel@icn.nl 31-(0)20-3054780<br />

71 Elsa Van Elslande C2RMF F elsa.van-elslande@culture.fr<br />

72<br />

Ina<br />

Van den<br />

Berghe<br />

KIK - IRPA B ina.vendenberghe@kikirpa.be 0032 2 7396846<br />

73<br />

Philippe Walter C2RMF F philippe.walter@culture.gouv.fr<br />

74 Eléonore Welcomme C2RMF F eleonore.welcomme@culture.gouv.fr 01 40 20 68 54<br />

45


Annex 8<br />

Progress <strong>report</strong> on JRA1- DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF TREATMENTS<br />

FOR THE CONSERVATION-RESTORATION OF OUTDOOR STONE AND BRONZE MONUMENTS<br />

(ICVBC-CNR, LNEC, UNI-PG, OPD)<br />

(DELIVERABLE N.14) Progress <strong>report</strong> on the procedures to be adopted for each treatment under study<br />

(DELIVERABLE N.15) Progress <strong>report</strong> on the characteristics of the samples during ageing procedures<br />

Prepared by:<br />

ICVBC-CNR – S. Bracci, B. Sacchi;<br />

LNEC - J. Delgado Rodrigues, A. Ferreira Pinto, C. Paulos Nunes;<br />

OPD - D. Pinna, S. Porcinai, B. Salvadori;<br />

UNI-PG – C. Miliani, B. Doherty<br />

Summary<br />

1. TASK 1 - REPORT ON IDENTIFICATION, SELECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION<br />

OF STONE SPECIMENS FOR TESTING<br />

1.1 NEW DRILLING CONDITIONS<br />

2. TASK 2 - PROGRESS REPORT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TREATMENTS<br />

AND PROCEDURES (Chemical processes and application protocols)<br />

2.1 CHEMICAL PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUATION OF CRITICAL PARAMETERS<br />

FOR TREATMENTS<br />

2.1.1 Kinetic study of Calcium oxalate<br />

2.1.2 Experimental<br />

2.1.3 Results<br />

2.2 TREATMENTS UNDER EVALUATION<br />

2.2.1 Tests of consolidation treatments on Gioia Marble, Firenzuola and Santafiora<br />

stones<br />

2.2.2 Tests of drilling on Gioia Marble<br />

2.2.3 Tests of consolidation treatments on Ançã and Lecce stones<br />

2.2.3.1 Treatment T2<br />

2.2.3.2 Treatment T3 and T4<br />

2.2.4. Tests of protective treatments<br />

2.2.4.1 Definition of further steps<br />

3. TASK 3 - PROGRESS REPORT ON ACCELERATED AGEING TESTS<br />

3.1 ACCELERATED AGEING TESTS UNDER EVALUATION<br />

3.2 THERMAL SHOCK<br />

3.3 SALT CRYSTALLISATION<br />

46


1. TASK 1 - REPORT ON THE IDENTIFICATION, SELECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF<br />

STONE SPECIMENS FOR TESTING<br />

1.1 New drilling conditions<br />

(LNEC)<br />

The definition of the drilling parameters for testing Ançã and Lecce stones was set within the scope of<br />

Task 1 finished in the middle of the 1 st year. However, during the <strong>report</strong>ing period, complementary work was<br />

carried aiming at improving the drilling conditions, taking advantage of new innovative developments<br />

introduced in this testing tool. The conditions addressed were:<br />

• drying of specimens;<br />

• drilling speed;<br />

• introduction of a pilot-hole and dust extraction.<br />

• Drying of specimens<br />

In order to investigate the influence of the humidity content in the stone specimens conditioned at the<br />

laboratory (20-25ºC, 45-65%), the specimens were drilled after being dried at 60ºC during 24h. The results<br />

obtained are shown in Fig. 1. These results illustrate the need of drying the specimens before testing to<br />

avoid the occurrence of abnormal results.<br />

Force [N<br />

12<br />

10<br />

• New drilling conditions<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

400rpm 15mm/min<br />

After drying(5holes)<br />

Before drying (2holes)<br />

Ançã<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Fisher drill bit<br />

5 10 15<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

20 25 30<br />

Fig. 1 - Graphic showing the drilling resistance of Ançã stone<br />

before and after drying<br />

The drilling conditions set in the first <strong>report</strong> were 400r.p.m. of rotation speed and 15mm/min of<br />

penetration rate. Both Ançã and Lecce stones were characterised by a low force range with these testing<br />

parameters (Fig. 2). In order to increase it some tests were carried out with different drilling parameters,<br />

namely 100 and 200r.p.m. of rotation speed and 20mm/min of penetration rate (Fig. 3).<br />

The range of forces obtained with 100r.p.m and 20mm/min for both limestones were considered the<br />

ones which better fit for comparison testing.<br />

47


Force [N<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Force [N<br />

0 10 20<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Ançã<br />

Lecce<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Depth [mm] Diamond Drill Bit<br />

Fig. 2 - Drilling resistance profiles for Ançã and Lecce stones<br />

with the first testing parameters<br />

20mm/min Ançã<br />

100 r.p.m. (3holes)<br />

200 r.p.m.(3holes)<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Diamond drill bit<br />

30<br />

Force [N<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

20mm/min<br />

100 r.p.m.(7holes)<br />

200 r.p.m.(3holes)<br />

Lecce<br />

Diamond drill bit<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Fig. 3 - Drilling resistance profiles for Ançã and Lecce stones using 100 and 200 r.p.m. at 20mm/min<br />

• Use of a pilot hole and dust suction<br />

A new drilling technique proposed by Mimoso and Costa 1 was tested in order to avoid the<br />

occurrence of dust packing. This is a highly important aspect when analysing the drilling resistance of<br />

stones in depth, since packing occurs predominantly in soft stones at low rotational speeds and when a<br />

consolidating treatment aggregates the stone cuttings.<br />

The technique consists of drilling holes in stone over previously made pilot holes (hole-overhole<br />

method). In the present case a 5mm diameter diamond drill bit was used to drill over a pilot hole of<br />

3mm diameter.<br />

The use of a pilot hole practically avoids packing phenomenon. However packing situations may<br />

still occur. In the case of Ançã and Lecce stones this aspect proved to be important. Slight packing<br />

occurred when drilling the stones at 100r.p.m. and 20mm/min. over a pilot hole of 3mm diameter. The<br />

phenomenon proved to be effectively controlled by means of dust suction during the drilling run (Figs.<br />

1 Mimoso, J. M. and Costa, D. – “A new DRMS drilling technique with pilot holes”. (communication to be presented to<br />

the Conference Heritage, weathering & Conservation, Madrid, 2006)<br />

48


Force [N<br />

4, 5 and 6). Since the specimens selected for this research are slabs with 3cm thick, this technique is easy<br />

to implement since the drill bit is able to cross completely the slab thickness.<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

without guide-hole(3holes)<br />

with guide-hole(3holes)<br />

Diamond drill bit<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Force [N<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Dust suction<br />

Fig. 4 - Scheme of the hole-over-hole drilling technique applied with a<br />

3mm pilot hole and a 5mm drill bit (Mimoso and Costa)<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Ançã<br />

100rpm 20mm/min<br />

without guide-hole(7holes)<br />

with guide-hole(4holes)<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Lecce<br />

Diamond drill bit<br />

100rpm 20mm/min<br />

Fig. 5 - Drilling resistance profiles for Ançã and Lecce stones with and without the hole-over-hole drilling technique<br />

applied with a 5mm drill bit over a 3mm pilot hole<br />

Force [N<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

without dust suction<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

with dust suction<br />

Ançã<br />

Force [N<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

without dust suction<br />

with dust suction<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Lecce<br />

Fig. 6 - Drilling resistance profiles for Ançã and Lecce stones obtained with the hole-over-hole drilling technique<br />

(100r.p.m. and 20mm/min.) with and without dust suction<br />

49


• Final remarks<br />

These new results point out the importance of using dried specimens and the benefit of using the<br />

pilot hole drilling technique with dust suction, namely in the case of Ançã and Lecce stones.<br />

Although the hole-over-hole drilling technique significantly lowered the range of forces in Ançã and<br />

Lecce stones, the discrimination of any subtle differences (such as a consolidation action) is assured by the<br />

increased reliability and precision of the results obtained with this technique.<br />

1.<br />

The new drilling conditions adopted on the basis of the results here <strong>report</strong>ed are summarised in Table<br />

Stone specimen Drill bit<br />

Dried for at least<br />

24h at 60ºC<br />

Table 1 : New drilling conditions defined for Ançã and Lecce stones<br />

Diamond - φ5mm<br />

with dust suction<br />

Pilot hole<br />

Rotational speed<br />

[r.p.m.]<br />

Penetration rate<br />

[mm/min]<br />

φ3mm 100 20<br />

50


2. TASK 2 – PROGRESS REPORT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TREATMENTS AND<br />

PROCEDURES (Chemical processes and application protocols)<br />

2.1 CHEMICAL PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUATION OF CRITICAL PARAMETERS FOR<br />

TRATMENTS<br />

(UNI-PG)<br />

2.1.1 Kinetic study of calcium oxalate artificial deposition<br />

This <strong>report</strong> outlines the results of the laboratory study, carried out in the first semester of the<br />

<strong>second</strong> year, of artificial treatment on powdered substrates in an attempt to understand the kinetics and<br />

mechanisms involved in the method.<br />

2.1.2 Experimental<br />

Separate kinetic reactions were controlled for differing contact times (hours) between reagents<br />

namely: 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 18, 24, 48, 72, 120, and 168 hours, that were conducted in sealed 50ml flasks<br />

placed on a magnetic stirrer, which allowed the constant agitation of the solution, at room<br />

temperature (20-27°C). In order to block the reactions at the different times, filtration of the<br />

solution is followed by passing through deionized water (200 ml). The product was then dried in an<br />

oven at 40°C - 60°C for two to tree days and then quantitatively weighed and measured by means of<br />

a Jasco FT/IR-400Plus Fourier Transform Infrared laboratory Spectrometer. All spectra<br />

measurements have been gathered in absorption mode with a measurement range of 4000 cm -1 to<br />

400 cm -1 , a resolution of 2cm -1 and 100 scans using a pressed potassium bromide pellet as<br />

background. All powdered samples were weighed (1.4 x 10 -3 g) and prepared using KBr (0.4g) in<br />

the die method with a manual hydraulic press.<br />

2.1.3 Results<br />

Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopy is used for a quantitative evaluation of the kinetic reaction<br />

of calcium oxalate in the different work conditions. Spectra were analyzed in terms of the<br />

absorbance of the calcium oxalate product which was previously compared to each stone under<br />

study (figure 7). The 3 main characteristic oxalate frequencies are observed at 1622cm -1 relative to<br />

the ν (C=O), at 1320cm -1 assigned as the νs (C-O) + δ (O-C=O) and 782 cm -1 given by the δ (O-<br />

C=O) + ν (M-O). In comparison to the calcium carbonate reagents, the frequency at 1320cm -1 may<br />

be influenced by the broad band at 1424cm -1 , the ν3 fundamental stretching vibration of the CO3 2-<br />

ion. Similarly the characteristic bending of water ≈1620cm -1 may disturb the signal at 1618cm -1 .<br />

Hence the band at 782cm -1 has been chosen as representative of the presence of the calcium oxalate<br />

product. Each spectrum was subjected to an identical baseline treatment to render the results<br />

coherent and comparable.<br />

Absorbance<br />

3,0<br />

2,5<br />

2,0<br />

1,5<br />

1,0<br />

0,5<br />

0,0<br />

1624<br />

1318<br />

1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600<br />

Wavenumber (cm -1 )<br />

Ança limestone<br />

Gioia marble<br />

Santafiora sandstone<br />

Firenzuola sandstone<br />

Lecce marble<br />

CALCIUM OXALATE STD<br />

Fig. 7 - FTIR spectra of the five stone matrices with the oxalate product<br />

782<br />

51


The absorbance of δ (O-C=O) + ν (M-O) given by the band at 782cm -1 in function with the number<br />

of contact hours was used to convert the chosen relative absorbance characteristic frequency into relative<br />

concentration/weight percentage using the representative linear fit equation (y = 0.037+0.019x) that was<br />

previously calculated from a series of standard spectra based on known quantities of calcium oxalate<br />

dispersed in a matrix of calcium carbonate substrate. Kinetic curves have been plotted for each of the five<br />

different stone matrices (figure 8),<br />

% Oxalate product formed<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Gioia marble<br />

Firenzuola sandstone<br />

Santafiora sandstone<br />

Lecce limestone<br />

Ança limestone<br />

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180<br />

Time (hours)<br />

Fig. 8 - Scatter plots of relative absorbance with converted oxalate concentration versus time for<br />

each stone matrix, Gioia marble, Lecce limestone, Ança limestone, Santafiora sandstone<br />

and Firenzuola sandstone .<br />

Analytical interpretation of the kinetic curves graphics has been carried out for all the reactions<br />

utilizing the plateau value absorbance at 48 hours used to calculate the percentage oxalate formed giving the<br />

characteristic features expressed in Table 2.<br />

Table 2 : Characteristic features of reactions conducted with 2.5% (NH4)2C2O4.<br />

Substrate<br />

Time<br />

(h)<br />

Plateau value<br />

(Abs)<br />

CaC2O4<br />

formed<br />

(weight %)<br />

Gioia marble 48 0.490 23.85 0.052 2.212<br />

Lecce limestone 48 0.402 19.19 0.136 1.765<br />

Ança limestone 48 0.430 20.69 0.110 2.287<br />

Santafiora sandstone 48 0.370 17.54 0.066 0.219<br />

Firenzuola sandstone 48 0.219 9.60 0.265 0.195<br />

It may be noted that all of the stone types were subjected to the artificial protective, even though<br />

research has suggested that this treatment is normally most adapt to limestone and marble as they are mostly<br />

constituted by calcium carbonate, the main reagent in the oxalate protective method. However, as the<br />

sandstones contain a non negligible quantity of carbonate, the ammonium oxalate was also applied in order<br />

to understand any eventual response.<br />

The kinetic curves resulting, indicates that maximum quantity of oxalate product is generated given<br />

by the trends reaching a plateau after a an approximate 48 hours reaction. The behaviour of the stone groups<br />

marble, limestone and sandstone, each observing the same granulometry (160microns), may be an indicator<br />

as to the response of each lithotype to the artificial oxalate treatment. On the whole, the trend of the kinetic<br />

curves indicates three groups given by the quantity of oxalate formed, marble produces the most, followed<br />

by limestone and lastly sandstone. The available surface area of reaction of each stone is the same, yet the<br />

chemical composition and petrophysical properties of the carbonate stones seem to have an important role on<br />

k1<br />

k2<br />

52


the rate of reaction between Ca 2+ and C2O4 2- , as it may be seen through the division in time of reaction<br />

required by each stone to achieve plateau.<br />

2.2 TREATMENTS UNDER EVALUATION<br />

2.2.1 Tests of consolidation treatments on Gioia Marble, Firenzuola and Santafiora stones<br />

(ICVBC)<br />

In the first year of the project, ICVBC-CNR started the study in the framework of Task 2 with a first<br />

series of samples as planned on not aged samples. In the first semester of the <strong>second</strong> year, ICVBC continued<br />

the study, varying some of the parameters in the procedures.<br />

The measurements done up to now on the treated stones are the following:<br />

amount of products applied;<br />

colour determination;<br />

absorption by sponge method.<br />

- T1 treatment [Ba(OH)2, immersion, on Marble]<br />

The procedure followed was exactly the same used in the first experiment (see Report @ 12 months)<br />

for immersion application, except for the time of immersion, which was changed after the first experiment.<br />

The samples dimensions were 10x5x3 cm.<br />

For the treatment carried out in the first experiments, time of immersion was 30 days.<br />

For the new treatments:<br />

a) time immersion = 3 hours;<br />

b) time immersion = 5 days;<br />

c) time immersion = 15 days.<br />

The differences in weight (g), colour changes and water absorption for T1 treatment are <strong>report</strong>ed in<br />

Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.<br />

Amount of product<br />

(g)<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

0,800<br />

0,600<br />

0,400<br />

0,200<br />

0,000<br />

T1 - Barium Hydroxide<br />

3 hours 5 days 15 days 30 days<br />

Fig. 9 - Amount of product applied for T1 treatment<br />

Marble<br />

53


Amount of water<br />

absorbed (g/(cm 2 *min)<br />

)<br />

∆E<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

8,0<br />

6,0<br />

4,0<br />

2,0<br />

0,0<br />

T1 - Barium Hydroxide<br />

Marble<br />

3 hours 5 days 15 days 30 days<br />

Fig. 10 - Colour changes for T1 treatment<br />

Untreated Ba(OH)2<br />

hours<br />

Marble - T1<br />

Water absorption by sponge method<br />

Ba(OH)2<br />

days<br />

Ba(OH)2<br />

days<br />

Ba(OH)2<br />

days<br />

Ba(OH)2<br />

Immersion - 3 Immersion - 5 Immersion - 15 Immersion - 30 Poultice - 3<br />

hours<br />

1 minute<br />

2 minutes<br />

5 minutes<br />

Fig. 11 - Water absorption by sponge method before and after T1 treatment<br />

- T3 and T4 treatment [TEOS+APS and TEOS]<br />

The procedure followed was exactly the same used in the first test T3 and T4 (see Report @ 12<br />

months). The only difference was that TEOS and modified TEOS were diluted in acetone (50:50 w/w). The<br />

samples dimensions were 10x5x3 cm.<br />

The volumes are <strong>report</strong>ed in Table 3: Vmax was the maximum volume applied in the first tests, VDmax<br />

is the maximum (diluted) volume applied in the tests of this <strong>second</strong> year.<br />

54


Table 3 : Determination of maximum volume on different stones<br />

volume/sample (ml)<br />

surface 10x 5 cm 2<br />

Vmax<br />

VDmax<br />

Gioia Marble 0.70 1.45<br />

Firenzuola<br />

Sandstone<br />

Santafiora<br />

Sandstone<br />

0.80 1.50<br />

1.65 2.50<br />

Measurements done up to now on the treated stones are the following:<br />

amount of products applied;<br />

colour determination;<br />

absorption by sponge method.<br />

The differences in weight (g), colour changes and water absorption for T3 and T4 treatment are <strong>report</strong>ed<br />

in Table 4 and Table 5 and Figures 12 - 15.<br />

Table 4 : Weight increase and colour changes after T3 and T4 treatments<br />

Gioia Marble<br />

Firenzuola Sandstone<br />

Santafiora Sandstone<br />

Vmax<br />

Weight increase (g)<br />

Vmax/2<br />

Vmax/2+<br />

Vmax/2<br />

T4 0.270 0.074 0.208<br />

T3 0.195 0.060 0.165<br />

T4 0.254 0.130 0.262<br />

T3 0.212 0.103 0.254<br />

T4 0.556 0.291 0.531<br />

T3 0.425 0.292 0.508<br />

55


Table 5 : Weight increase and colour changes after T3 and T4 treatments (diluted 50% w/w with acetone)<br />

Gioia Marble<br />

Firenzuola Sandstone<br />

Santafiora Sandstone<br />

∆E<br />

∆E<br />

8,0<br />

6,0<br />

4,0<br />

2,0<br />

0,0<br />

8,0<br />

6,0<br />

4,0<br />

2,0<br />

0,0<br />

Weight increase (g)<br />

VDmax VDmax/2 VDmax/2+<br />

VDmax/2<br />

T4 n.d. n.d. n.d.<br />

T3 0.147 0.100 0.134<br />

T4 0.153 0.063 0.127<br />

T3 0.156 0.089 0.225<br />

T4 0.297 0.153 0.260<br />

T3 0.239 0.206 0.308<br />

T4 - TEOS<br />

T4 - Vmax<br />

T4 - Vmax/2<br />

T4 - Vmax/2+Vmax/2<br />

M F S<br />

T4 - TEOS Diluted Solution<br />

T4 dil. - VDmax<br />

T4 dil. - VDmax/2<br />

T4 dil. - VDmax/2 + VDmax/2<br />

M F S<br />

Fig. 12 - Colour changes for T4 and diluted T4 treatments<br />

56


∆E<br />

∆E<br />

8,0<br />

6,0<br />

4,0<br />

2,0<br />

0,0<br />

8,0<br />

6,0<br />

4,0<br />

2,0<br />

0,0<br />

T3 - TEOS + APS<br />

T3 - Vmax<br />

T3 - Vmax/2<br />

T3 - Vmax/2+Vmax/2<br />

M F S<br />

T3 - (TEOS + APS) Diluted Solution<br />

T3 dil. - VDmax<br />

T3 dil. - VDmax/2<br />

T3 dil. - VDmax/2 + VDmax/2<br />

M F S<br />

Fig. 13 - Colour changes for T3 and diluted T3 treatments<br />

57


1,50<br />

1,00<br />

0,50<br />

0,00<br />

Gioia Marble - T4<br />

Water absorption by sponge method - Time of contact<br />

2,00<br />

1,00<br />

0,00<br />

TEOS Vmax TEOS Vmax/2 +<br />

2 minutes TEOS<br />

Vmax/2<br />

Santafiora Sandstone - T4<br />

TEOS Vmax TEOS Vmax/2 +<br />

Vmax/2<br />

TEOS Vmax/2<br />

Water absorption by sponge method - Time of contact<br />

3,00<br />

2,00<br />

1,00<br />

0,00<br />

2 minutes<br />

Firenzuola Sandstone - T4<br />

TEOS Vmax/2<br />

Water absorption by sponge method - Time of contact<br />

TEOS Vmax TEOS Vmax/2 +<br />

Vmax/2<br />

TEOS Vmax/2<br />

Dil. Sol.<br />

TEOS<br />

Dil. Sol.<br />

2 minutes TEOS<br />

Fig. 14 - Water absorption by sponge method for T4 and diluted T4 treatments (time of contact = 2 minutes)<br />

Dil. Sol.<br />

58


1,50<br />

1,00<br />

0,50<br />

0,00<br />

Gioia Marble - T3<br />

Water absorption by sponge method - Time of contact<br />

1,50<br />

1,00<br />

0,50<br />

0,00<br />

2 minutes<br />

TEOS + APS Vmax TEOS + APS<br />

Vmax/2 + Vmax/2<br />

Santafiora Sandstone - T3<br />

TEOS + APS Vmax TEOS + APS<br />

Vmax/2 + Vmax/2<br />

TEOS + APS<br />

Vmax/2<br />

TEOS + APS<br />

Vmax/2<br />

Mod. TEOS<br />

Dil. Sol.<br />

Water absorption by sponge method - Time of contact<br />

3,00<br />

2,00<br />

1,00<br />

0,00<br />

2 minutes<br />

Firenzuola Sandstone - T3<br />

Water absorption - Time of contact 2 minutes<br />

TEOS + APS Vmax TEOS + APS<br />

Vmax/2 + Vmax/2<br />

TEOS + APS<br />

Vmax/2<br />

Mod. TEOS<br />

Dil. Sol.<br />

Mod. TEOS<br />

Fig. 15 - Water absorption by sponge method for T3 and diluted T3 treatments (time of contact = 2 minutes)<br />

Dil. Sol.<br />

59


2.2.2 Tests of drilling on Gioia Marble<br />

First tests with Drilling Force Measurement Treatments were made on Gioia Marble. Drilling tests on<br />

the Sandstones will be carried out in the next months, with a new method which should make up to the<br />

problem of the abrasion of the drill bits with this kind of materials.<br />

The drilling conditions were 600 rpm rotation speed and 10 mm/min of the penetration rate. The drill bit<br />

used was a diamond drill bit Diaber.<br />

Drilling Force profiles are <strong>report</strong>ed in Figures 16- 21<br />

F (N)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Gioia Marble - T1 - Immersion<br />

Untreated<br />

Immersion - 3 hours<br />

Immersion - 5 days<br />

Immersion - 15 days<br />

Immersion - 30 days<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Penetration depth (mm)<br />

Fig. 16 - Drilling resistance graphs of Gioia Marble stone treated with Barium hydroxide (T1) by immersion<br />

F (N)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Gioia Marble - T2<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Penetration depth (mm)<br />

Untreated<br />

Immersion<br />

Poultice<br />

Fig. 17 - Drilling resistance graphs of Gioia Marble stone treated with Ammonium Oxalate (T2) by immersion and<br />

poultice.<br />

60


F (N)<br />

Gioia Marble - T4 (TEOS)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Untreated<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Penetration depth (mm)<br />

Vmax/2 + Vmax/2<br />

Fig. 18 - Drilling resistance graphs of Gioia Marble stone treated with TEOS (T4) by brush<br />

F (N)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Gioia Marble - T4 (TEOS - Dil. sol.)<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Penetration depth (mm)<br />

Untreated<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2<br />

Vmax/2 +<br />

Fig. 19 - Drilling resistance graphs of Gioia Marble stone treated with TEOS (T4 - Diluted Solution) by brush<br />

61


F (N)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Gioia Marble - T3 (TEOS + APS)<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Penetration depth (mm)<br />

Untreated<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2<br />

Vmax/2 + Vmax/2<br />

Fig. 20 - Drilling resistance graphs of Gioia Marble stone treated with modified TEOS (T3) by brush<br />

F (N)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Gioia Marble - T3 (TEOS + APS Dil. sol.)<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Penetration depth (mm)<br />

Untreated<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2<br />

Vmax/2 + Vmax/2<br />

Fig. 21 - Drilling resistance graphs of Gioia Marble stone treated with modified TEOS (T3 - Diluted Solution) by brush<br />

2.2.3 Tests of consolidation treatments on Ançã and Lecce stones<br />

(LNEC)<br />

Consolidating treatments tested by LNEC on limestones:<br />

• T2) Ammonium Oxalate [(NH4)2C2O4];<br />

• T3) Modified Ethylsilicate (TEOS + APS);<br />

• T4) Ethylsilicate (TEOS).<br />

The ammonium oxalate treatment as consolidant (T2-C) was tested on Ançã and Lecce stones with two<br />

different procedures:<br />

i) by immersion of the stone specimens in the ammonium oxalate solution;<br />

ii) by application of poultices with the ammonium oxalate solution on the stone surface.<br />

The specimen’s dimensions for both treatment procedures were 10×5×3cm.<br />

62


The T3 (BSOH100+APS) and T4 (BSOH100) treatments were applied by brushing on Ançã and<br />

Lecce stones without any previous ageing.<br />

2.3.1.1 Treatment T2) Ammonium Oxalate [(NH4)2C2O4]<br />

Description of the immersion treatment procedure<br />

Specimens were placed in a desiccator with CaCl2 for a 24h period and then weighted. Specimens<br />

were then inserted in a desiccator by placing them on glass rods or glass spheres in order to have a high<br />

portion of the lower surface in contact with the solution and the desiccator is evacuated applying a vacuum<br />

pump for 1h. After that time a solution of Ammonium oxalate (2.5% w/w in water) was added in order to<br />

completely fill the vessel.<br />

The specimens were maintained immersed in the solution for 2 days (@ room temperature).<br />

Afterwards the specimens were removed from the solution, immersed in water for surface cleaning and<br />

gently dabbed with a soft cloth, weighted and left to dry by positioning them on glass rods or spheres in the<br />

laboratory until constant weight.<br />

Description of the poulticing treatment procedure<br />

Specimens were sealed (with epoxy resin 2 ) on the lateral surfaces, leaving both the wider surfaces<br />

free. After the resin was set, the specimens were placed in a desiccator with CaCl2 for 24h and weighted.<br />

The Ammonium oxalate solution (2.5% w/w in water) was mixed to a cellulose powder (Arbocel) in<br />

order to produce a poultice able to be applied on one of the two free surfaces without causing any leaching<br />

problems.<br />

The poultices were prepared by mixing 12% (w/w) of cellulose with 88% demineralised water, and a<br />

portion of approximately 70g of this mixture, with a thickness of approximately 1cm, was applied over the<br />

surface of each specimen. Between the poultice and the stone surface a foil of Japanese paper was interposed<br />

in order to enable to weight the materials in separate.<br />

The contact time was 5h for all the lithotypes, taking care to maintain humid the poultice by<br />

supplying additional solution of ammonium oxalate. After the removal of the poultice the surfaces were<br />

sprayed with water, cleaned and weighed.<br />

Aluminium foil was applied over the exposed area of the poultice to prevent excessive evaporation.<br />

The specimens were positioned with the treated surface on the top on glass rods and left to dry in the<br />

laboratory environment until constant weight.<br />

In the case of the treatment procedure by poulticing, the mass evolution during treatment was also<br />

monitored. The procedure followed for the mass evolution monitoring was the same as described in 2.2.1.1.<br />

Monitoring of colour variation<br />

The Ammonium Oxalate treatments were responsible for some colour variation on Ançã and Lecce stone<br />

(Figs. 22 and 23):<br />

• For the treatment by poulticing:<br />

• Ançã stones show a high colour variation after 15 days and important differences among the<br />

treated specimen occurred. Lecce stone presents only slight yellowing that, as in Ançã stone, is<br />

stronger near the edges.<br />

• For the treatment by immersion:<br />

• the top and lateral surfaces, i.e. those more exposed to drying, showed colour changes;<br />

2 Sikadur 32N<br />

63


• Ançã stone shows a very strong colour variation – the surface shows orange stains mainly<br />

near the edges which possibly is linked with a stronger evaporation process in these areas.<br />

Lecce stone only presents a slight yellow increment.<br />

Fig. 22 - Colour variation on Ançã (P) and Lecce (L) treated with ammonium oxalate by poulticing (NT –<br />

non treated)<br />

Top face<br />

Top face<br />

Lateral face<br />

Lateral face<br />

Fig. 23 - Colour variation on Ançã (P) and Lecce (L) treated by immersion with ammonium oxalate (NT –<br />

non treated)<br />

Monitoring of water absorption by the contact sponge method<br />

The results obtained by the contact sponge method on Ançã and Lecce stones are presented on Fig.<br />

24. A very high reduction of water absorption can be noticed in both lithotypes, but clearly higher in the<br />

Ançã stone. When comparing the two treatment procedures on Ançã stone, the differences are very low.<br />

Lecce stone shows small differences, with a slightly higher decrease produced by the immersion procedure.<br />

64


Absorption [g. cm -2 . min -1 ]<br />

0,25<br />

0,2<br />

0,15<br />

0,1<br />

0,05<br />

0<br />

Immersion<br />

Poultice<br />

Immersion<br />

Poultice<br />

Ançã Ançã Ançã Lecce Lecce Lecce<br />

Absorption [g. cm<br />

-2 . min -1 ]<br />

0,05<br />

0,04<br />

0,03<br />

0,02<br />

0,01<br />

0<br />

Immersion Poultice Immersion Poultice<br />

Ançã Ançã Lecce Lecce<br />

Fig. 24 - Water absorption by the contact sponge method on Ançã and Lecce stone treated with ammonium oxalate by<br />

immersion and by poulticing<br />

Monitoring with drilling resistance<br />

The effect of the ammonium oxalate treatment by immersion and poulticing on Ançã and Lecce<br />

stones is shown in Fig. 25.<br />

The results obtained on Ançã and Lecce stones are different. The drilling resistance increment of<br />

Ançã stone is very low. Lecce stone shows a higher mechanical strength increment near the surface for both<br />

poulticing and immersion procedures.<br />

Depth [mm<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

NT<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Force [N]<br />

Ammonium Oxalate<br />

Ançã<br />

Immersion<br />

Poultice<br />

Depth [mm<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

NT<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Force [N]<br />

Ammonium Oxalate<br />

Lecce<br />

Fig. 25 - Drilling resistance of Lecce treated with ammonium oxalate by immersion and poulticing<br />

Immersion<br />

Poultice<br />

Inside each stone type, the way how the ammonium oxalate is applied does not induce significant<br />

differences in the mechanical strength properties.<br />

65


2.2.3.2 Treatments T3) Modified Ethylsilicate (TEOS + APS) and T4) Ethylsilicate (TEOS)<br />

Description of the immersion treatment procedure<br />

The T3 (BSOH100+APS) and T4 (BSOH100) were applied by brushing on Ançã and Lecce stones<br />

as without any previous ageing. The following tentative procedures were tested:<br />

• Specimens were weighted before treatment;<br />

• Consolidants were applied wet on wet by brush with three different procedures:<br />

1) Until apparent refusal (refusal was considered to be reached when the treated surface remains<br />

wet for at least 60 <strong>second</strong>s) in order to individuate for each lithotype the volume which will<br />

be considered a reference “maximum” absorbed volume (Vmax);<br />

2) Application of half of the maximum absorbed volume (Vmax); and<br />

3) Application of half of the maximum absorbed volume in two steps with a time interval of<br />

two weeks (Vmax/2+ Vmax/2).<br />

Specimens were then positioned on glass rods or spheres and left to evaporate the solvent and to<br />

complete reaction in the laboratory conditions until constant weight is reached.<br />

Ançã stone was also subject to treatment with another type of ethyl silicate – Tegovakon, referred as<br />

TG – as supplied by the manufacturer and also mixed with APS.<br />

Amount of product absorbed<br />

Tables 6, 7 and 8 present the first results of the amount of consolidant absorbed ( M / S) by Ançã<br />

and Lecce stones.<br />

Table 6 : Test trials with Tegovakon+APS and Tegovakon treatments on Ançã stone<br />

Lithotype Treatment Procedure ∆t / S<br />

(brush) [×10 -2 min⋅cm -2 ∆M / S<br />

] [kg⋅m -2 ]<br />

Ançã TG+APS Vmax 27 2.54<br />

TG<br />

Vmax 27 2.70<br />

Table 7 : Test trials with T3 (BSOH100) treatments on limestones<br />

Lithotype Procedure ∆t / S<br />

(brush) [×10 -2 min⋅cm -2 ∆M / S<br />

] [kg⋅m -2 Fringe<br />

] [mm]<br />

Ançã Vmax 63.6 3.51 19<br />

Vmax/2 33.4 1.90 9<br />

Vmax/2<br />

+<br />

32.6 1.78<br />

9<br />

Vmax/2<br />

155.6 1.71<br />

(Σ=3.49)<br />

9<br />

Lecce Vmax 42.9 2.02 9-10<br />

Vmax/2 16.3 1.10 6<br />

Vmax/2<br />

+<br />

6 1.11<br />

5-6<br />

Vmax/2<br />

15 1.01<br />

(Σ=2.12)<br />

5<br />

66


Table 8 : Test trials with T4 (BSOH100+APS) treatments on limestones<br />

Lithotype Procedure<br />

∆t / S<br />

(brush) [×10 -2 min⋅cm -2 ∆M / S<br />

] [kg⋅m -2 Fringe<br />

] [mm]<br />

Ançã Vmax 80.7 3.51 15<br />

Vmax/2 35.0 2.4 8-9<br />

Vmax/2<br />

+<br />

34.2<br />

1.77<br />

8-9<br />

Vmax/2<br />

68.5<br />

0.18<br />

(Σ=1.97)<br />

2<br />

Lecce Vmax<br />

64.4 1.99 6<br />

Vmax/2 18.1 1.10 5-6<br />

Vmax/2<br />

+<br />

22.5<br />

1.02<br />

5-6<br />

Vmax/2<br />

49.1<br />

0.53<br />

(Σ=1.55)<br />

5<br />

The BSOH100 consolidant (as received from the manufacturer) seems to “cure” so rapidly after the<br />

addition of APS that curing on the surface inhibits penetration. This happened after about half an hour of the<br />

products mixture. Fig. 26 shows the aspect of Ançã and Lecce treated surfaces with BS+APS after 7hours;<br />

the part of the product applied that was not absorbed formed a film at the specimens surface that<br />

subsequently cracked. To avoid this problem it was necessary to prepare the solution of BSOH100 and APS<br />

and to apply it immediately after.<br />

Fig. 26 - Aspect of the Ançã (left) and Lecce (right) treated surfaces with BS+APS after 7<br />

hours (7×)<br />

Monitoring with colour variation<br />

The treatments T3) Modified Ethylsilicate (TEOS + APS) and T4) Ethylsilicate (TEOS) did not<br />

induce relevant colour variations on Ançã and Lecce stones.<br />

67


Monitoring with water absorption by the contact sponge method<br />

The results obtained by the contact sponge method on Ançã and Lecce stones are presented on Fig.<br />

27. It can be noticed that water reduction was sensitive to the treatment procedure and to the amount of<br />

product applied.<br />

Water absorption [10-3 g.cm-2 .min-1 Water absorption [10 ]<br />

-3 g.cm-2 .min-1 ]<br />

Water absorptio<br />

[10 -3 g.cm - [10 2.min-1<br />

-3 g.cm - 2.min-1<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

TG+APS<br />

TG<br />

V/2 V V/2 + V/2<br />

Treatment<br />

Ançã<br />

BS+APS<br />

BS<br />

Water absorption [10-3 g.cm-2 .min-1 Water absorption [10 ]<br />

-3 g.cm-2 .min-1 ]<br />

Water absorption [ 10 -3 g. cm-2.<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

V/2 V V/2 + V/2<br />

Treatment<br />

Lecce<br />

BS+APS<br />

Fig. 27 - Water absorption by the contact sponge method on Ançã and Lecce stone treated with T3) Modified<br />

Ethylsilicate (BS + APS) and T4) Ethylsilicate alone (BS). The ethylsilicate TG is added for comparison<br />

Monitoring with drilling resistance<br />

The drilling resistance evaluated on the stone specimens treated with T3) Modified Ethylsilicate (TEOS<br />

+ APS) and T4) Ethylsilicate (TEOS) treatments show:<br />

• visible differences between the two ethylsilicate products,<br />

• scarce influence of the lithotype,<br />

• identifiable APS action,<br />

• influence of the amount of product in the depth of penetration,<br />

• influence of the treatment procedure in the consolidation action.<br />

-differences between the two ethylsilicate products<br />

Tegovakon and BSOH100 consolidants show a high penetration capacity. However, TG seems to be more<br />

homogeneously dispersed in the stone matrix since the drilling resistance is practically constant in depth.<br />

BS<br />

68


14<br />

12<br />

De 10<br />

pt<br />

h 8<br />

[m<br />

m] 6<br />

Scarce influence of the lithotype<br />

4<br />

2<br />

TG (2,7kg.m -2 )<br />

Ançã - NT<br />

BS (3,5 kg.m -2 )<br />

Vmax<br />

0<br />

0 5<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

10<br />

Force [N]<br />

15 20<br />

Fig. 28 - Drilling resistance of Ançã stone treated with two<br />

ethylsilicate products (TG- Tegovakon; BS – BSOH100)<br />

The drilling resistance in depth revealed a scarce influence of the lithotype on the consolidation action<br />

obtained with BSOH100 (BS) and BSOH100 + APS (BS+APS), Fig.29.<br />

Force [N]<br />

Force [N]<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

BSOH100 (BS)<br />

(2,0 kg.m -2 )<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm] Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

-2<br />

(1,9 kg.m )<br />

Ançã - NT<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

BSOH100 (BS)<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide<br />

h l<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

Force [N]<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

(2,0 kg.m -2 )<br />

BSOH100 (BS) +<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide ho<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Fig. 29 - Drilling resistance of Ançã and Lecce stone treated with BSOH100 (BS) and BSOH100 + APS<br />

(BS+APS)<br />

Force [N]<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Depth[mm]<br />

(2,0kg.m -2 )<br />

Ançã - NT<br />

BSOH100 (BS) + APS<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

69


APS action<br />

The results point out that APS may be responsible for:<br />

• a resistance increase near the treated surface, Fig.30;<br />

• reducing the capability of ethylsilicate to penetrate inside the stone, Fig.31.<br />

This behaviour may be assigned to the rapid gelification of the consolidant when mixed with APS as<br />

mentioned above. In Fig. 32 the differences between the BSOH 100 with and without APS after 20h of<br />

gelification can be observed.<br />

Force e [N<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

Ançã - NT<br />

BS + APS<br />

BS<br />

Vmax<br />

2<br />

(3,5 kg.m<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Depth[mm] Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

-2 )<br />

Force [N<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

BS + APS<br />

BS<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

Vmax<br />

0<br />

(2,0 kg.m<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Depth [N] Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

-2 )<br />

Fig. 30 - APS action evaluated by the drilling resistance of Ançã and Lecce stone treated with BSOH100 (BS) and<br />

BSOH100 + APS (BS+APS)<br />

Force [N<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

15mm<br />

BSOH100 (BS)<br />

BSOH100 (BS) + APS<br />

(1,1 kg.m -2 )<br />

(1,1 kg.m -2 )<br />

19mm<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm] Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

Fig. 31 - APS may be responsible for reducing the capability of ethylsilicate<br />

to penetrate inside the stone<br />

BSOH<br />

BSOH+APS<br />

Fig. 32 : BSOH and<br />

BSOH+APS after 20h of<br />

gelification<br />

BSOH100<br />

70


the amount of product influences the depth of penetration<br />

The comparison between the consolidation action obtained with the same procedure treatment but<br />

with different amounts of consolidant on Ançã and Lecce stones show that the amount of product influences<br />

the consolidated thickness, Fig.33.<br />

Force [N<br />

Fig. 33 - Influence of the amount of consolidant applied on the consolidation action<br />

the treatment procedure influences the consolidation action<br />

The comparison between the action of the treatments applied by the different procedures above mentioned<br />

on Ançã and Lecce stones is shown in Fig.34. The results show the influence of the treatment procedure on<br />

the consolidation action.<br />

Force[N<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

(2,1 kg.m -2 )<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

2.2.4 Tests of protective treatments<br />

(OPD)<br />

BSOH100 (BS)<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2<br />

(2,0 kg.m -2 )<br />

(1,1 kg.m -2 )<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

BSOH100 (BS)<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2+Vmax/2<br />

(2,0 kg.m -2 )<br />

Fig. 34 - Influence of the treatment procedure on the consolidation action<br />

(2,0 kg.m -2 )<br />

(2,0 kg.m -2 )<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide hole<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

The application of protective treatments on stone specimens contaminated by the planned tentative<br />

procedure had produced some undesirable superficial effects: formation of a shiny, plastic layer on samples<br />

treated with DMPS (Fig. 35) and strong re-crystallisation of NaCl on samples treated with ammonium<br />

Force [N<br />

Force [N<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

(1,8 kg.m -2 )<br />

Lecce - NT<br />

BSOH100 (BS) + APS<br />

(1,1 kg.m -2 )<br />

BSOH100 (BS) + APS<br />

Vmax<br />

Vmax/2+Vmax/2<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide hole Depth [mm]<br />

100rpm; 20mm/min<br />

20 25<br />

71


oxalate poultice. (Fig. 36) This effects meant that the strong conditions (10% w/w solution, long times of<br />

imbibition) adopted for contamination had to be adjusted in order to both reduce the amount of salt and avoid<br />

the formation of an impenetrable barrier of NaCl crystals.<br />

Fig. 35 - Stereomicroscope image of the shiny coating of<br />

protective on Lecce stone: the presence of a strong layer of<br />

NaCl under the surface prevents the penetration of DMPS<br />

treatment.<br />

Fig. 36 - SEM image of NaCl efflorescence after treatment<br />

of Ança stone with ammonium oxalate poultice.<br />

Therefore, a different protocol of contamination was set up. The most important parameters to be<br />

adjusted were:<br />

• the concentration of salt<br />

• the contact time with the solution<br />

• the temperature of the oven<br />

Satisfactory results were thus achieved by drastically reducing the soaking time of the specimens in the<br />

saline bath and then immediately allowing them to dry in oven at 70°C.<br />

By adopting this procedure, no covering effect of NaCl crystals was observed, and subsequent stages of<br />

treatment could be undertaken.<br />

2.2.4.1 Definition of further steps<br />

In order to evaluate the performance of treatments at best, a procedure was established, based on the<br />

comparison of color, contact angle and capillary rise measurements before and after the application of<br />

protective. Also, some reference sets of samples (both contaminated but untreated and treated without any<br />

previous contamination) were prepared in order to assess whether the presence of salt had any influence on<br />

the capillary absorption measurements. A scheme of the different sets of samples is <strong>report</strong>ed in Fig. 37.<br />

72


The procedure was established as follows:<br />

Fig. 37 - Scheme of the different sets of samples.<br />

• Contamination of specimens of each lithotype, to be executed according to the new experimental<br />

parameters;<br />

• Introduction into oven at 70 °C until constant weight is reached;<br />

• Color and contact angle tests on contaminated specimens, to be treated with protective;<br />

• Capillary measurements on contaminated reference set;<br />

• Application of protective on all the other samples according to the planned procedure (see §2.4 and first<br />

application);<br />

• Wait period until treatments have stabilized;<br />

• Color and contact angle measurement on treated specimens;<br />

• Capillary rise test on treated specimens.<br />

The samples have been contaminated and treated, and the planned tests have been carried out before<br />

treatments. After stabilization of the protective treatments, the measurements will be repeated; the data<br />

collected before and after the treatments will be thus compared in order to evaluate the performance of each<br />

protective product. Moreover, the amount of protective product applied will be evaluated.<br />

73


3. TASK 3 - PROGRESS REPORT ON ACCELERATED AGEING TESTS AND RESULTS<br />

3.1 ACCELERATED AGEING TESTS UNDER EVALUATION<br />

(LNEC, ICVBC)<br />

The accelerated ageing tests under evaluation by LNEC and ICVBC in the <strong>report</strong>ing period are:<br />

• Thermal shock on Gioia marble, Firenzuola and Santafiora stones;<br />

• Salt crystallisation on limestones and sandstones.<br />

3.2 THERMAL SHOCK<br />

(LNEC)<br />

Thermal shock description<br />

The 1 st annual activity <strong>report</strong> presented the tests carried out to define the experimental conditions to<br />

induce degradation by temperature changes on some spare specimens of marbles and to select the experimental<br />

protocol.<br />

During the <strong>report</strong>ing period degradation on Gioia marble was induced by thermal shock by using the<br />

selected experimental protocol. This condition was achieved by placing the specimens in contact with a heated<br />

plate, at ~300ºC, for 5 minutes and, after that, allowed to cool at room temperature. Table 9 summarizes the<br />

work conditions applied in the Gioia marble tests.<br />

Table 9 : Thermal shock work conditions on Gioia marble<br />

Specimen<br />

Thickness<br />

(mm)<br />

Heated<br />

plate<br />

Temperature (ºC)<br />

Face in contacted<br />

with the heated plated<br />

Opposite face<br />

Number of<br />

cycles<br />

tested<br />

G9 30 300 200-240 90-110 5<br />

G12 30 300 200-220 90-100 3<br />

G10 30 300 200 100 1<br />

Ageing by thermal shock was monitored by the detection of eventual changes in water absorption<br />

characteristics (microdrops absorption time, water absorption by sponge and water absorption by capillarity).<br />

In order to minimize the variants of the measurement of the ageing action by the contact sponge<br />

method and the microdrops absorption time the specimens were always manipulated with care in order to<br />

avoid contamination with the grease from the hands. The water absorption by the contact sponge method was<br />

performed as follows:<br />

• the same sponge was always used for each specimen;<br />

• at least three measurements were taken for each specimen;<br />

• the sponges were always dried at room temperature for at least one day;<br />

Results<br />

The results of microdrops absorption time and water absorption by contact sponge are presented in<br />

Tables 10 and 11. The microdrops absorption and water absorption (by sponge) tests revealed didn’t detect any<br />

alteration due to ageing as can be observed in Fig. 38 for two different specimens, G9 and G12.<br />

74


Table 10 : Water absorption by the contact sponge evaluated on the specimens heated faces<br />

Specimen<br />

Microdrops absorption time [%]<br />

before ageing t1 t2 t3 t4 t5<br />

G9 7 3 17 17 13 12<br />

G12 9 5 3 6<br />

G10 8 10<br />

Table 11 : Water absorption by the contact sponge evaluated on the specimens heated faces<br />

Microdrop Absorption [%] [%] [%]<br />

Specimen<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

Water absorption by the contact sponge<br />

[×10 -4 g⋅cm -2 ⋅min -1 ]<br />

before ageing t1 t2 t3 t4<br />

G9 112 132 47 37 38<br />

G12 154 147 139 131<br />

G10 122 112<br />

Cycle number<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

0<br />

180<br />

150<br />

120<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

0<br />

Absorption Absorption by sponge by [10 Spon<br />

[g.cm-2.min-1]<br />

-4 .g.cm-2 .min-1 Absorption Absorption by sponge by [10 Spon<br />

]<br />

[g.cm-2.min-1]<br />

-4 .g.cm-2 .min-1 ]<br />

Fig. 38 - Thermal shock test on two Gioia specimens (G9 and G12).<br />

Microdrops absorption time and water absorption with sponge<br />

Experiments were taken in order to investigate the possible influence of the excessive dryness of the<br />

specimens on the results of microdrops absorption time and water absorption by contact sponge. The<br />

experiments consisted in humidifying the specimens before the water absorption evaluation and monitoring<br />

before and after the wetting procedure by the microdrops absorption time and the contact sponge method.<br />

The following procedures were adopted to wet the specimens:<br />

1. Surface wetting with an humid sponge, Fig.39;<br />

2. Specimens conditioning in an humid atmosphere (95-100% RH) at room temperature (20-25ºC)<br />

during 4 days, Fig.40;<br />

75


Microdrop absorption time<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Before surface wetting After surface wetting<br />

Wa [g/cm^2.m<br />

0,005<br />

0,004<br />

0,003<br />

0,002<br />

0,001<br />

0<br />

Before surface wetting After surface wetting<br />

Fig. 39 - Microdrops absorption time and water absorption by the contact sponge method before and after the<br />

surface humidification with a humid sponge<br />

Microdrops absorption time<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Before surface wetting After surface wetting<br />

Wa [g/cm^2.min^<br />

0,015<br />

0,01<br />

0,005<br />

0<br />

Before surface wetting After surface wetting<br />

Fig. 40 - Microdrops absorption time and water absorption by the contact sponge method before and after<br />

specimens conditioning in humid atmosphere<br />

The results point out that the state of dryness of the specimens is not a relevant factor. In fact, the<br />

results show very low variations between each measurement that seem to reveal that the process of drying<br />

doesn’t influence the results.<br />

Since no improvement can be introduced in the measuring process, we may conclude that<br />

microdrops absorption time and contact sponge methods are not adequate to monitor the ageing action on<br />

Gioia marble.<br />

Water absorption by capillarity was then tested to monitor the thermal shock on Gioia marble. This<br />

method has shown to be sensitive.<br />

When analysing each curve plotted in Fig. 41 it can be noticed that the first thermal shock is the<br />

main responsible for the damaged produced and that the further cycles do not increase significantly the decay<br />

intensity.<br />

The results point out that the method is suitable to control the ageing action on Gioia marble and that<br />

a unique thermal shock seems to be sufficient to produce damage.<br />

76


-4 -2<br />

g.mm-2 g.mm ]<br />

∆M ∆M/S / S [x [10 10<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Final remarks<br />

G11<br />

Cycle 0<br />

Cycle 1<br />

Cycle 2<br />

Cycle 3<br />

0 60 120 180<br />

Tempo [s 1/2 ]<br />

Water aborption -4 by capillarity -2<br />

∆M/S [10 g.mm ] [10-4 g<br />

Fig. 41 - Water absorption by capillarity evolution<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

G13<br />

Cycle 0<br />

Cycle1<br />

Cycle 2<br />

Cycle 3<br />

0 60 120 180<br />

Tempo [s 1/2 ]<br />

The test results pointed out that the methods initially used to monitor the ageing action on Gioia marble<br />

namely microdrops absorption time and water absorption by the contact sponge methods are not adequate.<br />

The possible influence of the state of dryness of the specimens on the results obtained with these<br />

methods was investigated and it was proved that the state of dryness is not the cause of it.<br />

The water absorption by capillarity seems to be an adequate method to monitor the damage induced<br />

by the thermal shock.<br />

Table 12 summarises the final proposal for the ageing of Gioia marble.<br />

Temperature of the<br />

heated plate<br />

[ºC]<br />

Table 12 : Summary of the proposal conditions for the Gioia marble ageing<br />

Contact Time<br />

[min]<br />

Cooling temperature<br />

[ºC]<br />

Ageing monitoring<br />

~300 5 20-25 Water absorption by<br />

capillarity<br />

3.2 THERMAL SHOCK<br />

(ICVBC)<br />

The specimens were placed in contact with a heated plate, at ~200ºC, for 3 minutes and, after that, let to<br />

cool at room temperature. The monitoring of the induced decay was carried out by measures of capillary water<br />

absorption at short time and by sponge method. The parameters were measured after 5, 10 and 20 cycles.<br />

Capillary water absorption at long times was measured at 0 and 20 cycles.<br />

Experimental data are <strong>report</strong>ed in Figures 42 - 47.<br />

77


Amount of water absorbed<br />

(g)<br />

Amount of water absorbed (s)<br />

0,200<br />

0,150<br />

0,100<br />

0,050<br />

0,000<br />

Amount of water<br />

absorbed (g)<br />

0,9<br />

0,9<br />

0,8<br />

0,8<br />

0,7<br />

0,7<br />

0,200<br />

0,150<br />

0,100<br />

0,050<br />

0,000<br />

Gioia Marble<br />

M-A1 M-A2 M-A3 (control)<br />

S-1 S-2<br />

0 cycles<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

Sievec Marble 0 cycles<br />

Carrara Marble<br />

X 104 X105<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

0 cycles<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

Fig. 42 - Capillary water absorption at short time of Marble specimens treated with thermal shock<br />

78


Amount of water<br />

absorbed<br />

(g)<br />

0,7<br />

0,6<br />

0,5<br />

0,4<br />

0,3<br />

0,2<br />

0,1<br />

0,0<br />

Amount of<br />

water<br />

absorbed (g)<br />

Firenzuola Sandstone<br />

0,6<br />

0,4<br />

0,2<br />

0,0<br />

F-A1 F-A2 F-A3 (control)<br />

Santafiora Sandstone<br />

S-A1 S-A2 S-A3<br />

(control)<br />

Fig. 43 - Capillary water absorption at short time of Sandstone specimens treated with thermal shock<br />

79


Water absorbed<br />

(mg/(cm 2 *min))<br />

Sievec Marble<br />

2,00<br />

1,50<br />

1,00<br />

0,50<br />

0,00<br />

Water absorbed<br />

(mg/(cm 2 *min))<br />

Gioia Marble<br />

10,00<br />

8,00<br />

6,00<br />

4,00<br />

2,00<br />

0,00<br />

0 cycles<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

M-A1 M-A2 M-A3<br />

Water absorbed<br />

(mg/(cm 2 *min))<br />

2,00<br />

1,50<br />

1,00<br />

0,50<br />

0,00<br />

0 cycles<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

Carrara Marble<br />

S-1 S-2 X 104 X 105<br />

0 cycles<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

Fig. 44 - Capillary water absorption by sponge method (time of contact = 2 minutes) of Marble specimens treated with<br />

thermal shock<br />

Water absorbed<br />

Firenzuola Sandstone<br />

(mg/(cm 2 /min))<br />

3,50<br />

3,00<br />

2,50<br />

2,00<br />

0 cycles<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

Santafiora Sandstone<br />

Water absorbed<br />

(mg/(cm2/min))<br />

3,00<br />

2,50<br />

2,00<br />

F-A1 F-A2 F-A3 S-A1 S-A2 S-A3<br />

0 cycles<br />

5 cycles<br />

10 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

Fig. 45 - Capillary water absorption by sponge method (time of contact = 2 minutes) of Sandstone specimens treated<br />

with thermal shock<br />

80


4,000<br />

3,500<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

0,500<br />

0,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0,000<br />

F-A1<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

S-A1<br />

4,500<br />

4,000<br />

3,500<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

0,500<br />

0,000<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

4,500<br />

4,000<br />

3,500<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

0,500<br />

0,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0,000<br />

F-A3 (control)<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

S-A3 (control)<br />

4,500<br />

3,500<br />

2,500<br />

1,500<br />

0,500<br />

F-A2<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

(not aged)<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

S-A2<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

-0,500<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles (not aged)<br />

Fig. 46 - Amount of water absorbed (g) by the samples treated with thermal shock<br />

81


1,000<br />

0,900<br />

0,800<br />

0,700<br />

0,600<br />

0,500<br />

0,400<br />

0,300<br />

0,200<br />

0,100<br />

0,000<br />

M-A1<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

1,000<br />

0,900<br />

0,800<br />

0,700<br />

0,600<br />

0,500<br />

0,400<br />

0,300<br />

0,200<br />

0,100<br />

0,000<br />

1,000<br />

0,900<br />

0,800<br />

0,700<br />

0,600<br />

0,500<br />

0,400<br />

0,300<br />

0,200<br />

0,100<br />

0,000<br />

M-A3 (control)<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

M-A2<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

0 cycles<br />

20 cycles<br />

(not aged)<br />

Fig. 47 - Amount of water absorbed (g) by the Gioia Marble samples treated with thermal shock<br />

3.3 SALT CRYSTALLISATION<br />

(LNEC)<br />

Salt crystallisation tests<br />

LNEC took the responsibility of carrying out the tests on ageing with salt crystallisation aiming at<br />

finding a suitable and quick way of producing artificially decayed surfaces in the selected stone types: limestones<br />

(Ançã and Lecce stones) and sandstones (Santafiora and Firenzuola). The results of the first experiments carried<br />

out on Ançã stone were presented in the 1 st annual activity <strong>report</strong>.<br />

The preliminary tests on Ançã stone were further developed and extended to the other lithotypes in order to<br />

obtain two distinct degradation patterns:<br />

1. superficial degradation;<br />

2. gradual degradation in depth.<br />

In all the ageing procedures the study was focused on the crystallisation of mirabilite from a high<br />

concentrated sulphate solution by means of a rapid temperature decrease. This sudden temperature change is<br />

able to promote a fast precipitation of the heptahydrate and decahydrate forms of sodium sulphate without<br />

water evaporation. The distinct patterns degradation abovementioned were tested in different conditions for<br />

all stones.<br />

Monitoring of the ageing tests was carried out by visual inspection and with a binocular microscope for all<br />

the stone specimens. Drilling profiles were executed for the limestones aiming to provide information on salt<br />

distribution within the stone and on the induced mechanical damage. The sandstone’s ageing was monitored<br />

with water absorption by the contact sponge method.<br />

During the <strong>report</strong>ing period the desalination procedure by immersion and with poultices was also studied.<br />

Experimental protocol<br />

82


Each specimen was initially dried at 40ºC and impregnated by capillarity in its individual glass Petri<br />

dish with sodium sulphate solutions at 40ºC. After the impregnation, each specimen was immediately placed<br />

in a climatic chamber between 5º and 10ºC during thirty minutes to promote mirabilite crystallization and<br />

then oven dried at 40ºC for 24h, before starting a new salt impregnation.<br />

Each specimen was individually tested and different procedures were adopted. The testing conditions<br />

to carry out the degradation were different in what concerns:<br />

• number of cycles,<br />

• lateral surfaces: sealed and not sealed,<br />

• concentration of the salt solution: 14% and 20%,<br />

• desalination: immersion and poulticing,<br />

• impregnation layer – achieved by controlling the time interval of salt solution absorption:<br />

• to promote superficial degradation up to 2-3mm;<br />

• to promote gradual degradation in depth in the range of 2-10mm.<br />

After each test, specimens were desalinated by immersion in distilled water or with wet poultices. The<br />

salt extraction was monitored by measuring the water conductivity.<br />

Desalination<br />

The desalination procedure is a very time consuming task. Trying to accelerate the desalination process,<br />

experiments were made with wet poultices in order to compare its efficiency with the immersion procedure. In<br />

both methods the desalination was tested at 40ºC and at room temperature.<br />

Ançã stone specimens (5×5×3cm) with the lateral surfaces sealed and with approximately the same salt<br />

content were used for the comparison.<br />

In the case of the desalination performed at 40ºC, the specimens were salinated by the gradual procedure<br />

(3 steps salination) with a salt solution of 20%-w sodium sulphate. In the case of the desalination at room<br />

temperature, the specimens were also salinated by the gradual procedure with a salt solution of 20%-w sodium<br />

sulphate but twice, i.e., 6 salt impregnations at different depths (10mm, 5mm, 2mm).<br />

- Experimental protocols<br />

Immersion procedure<br />

-<br />

1. The specimen is immersed in 1000ml demineralised water. The base of the specimen is put over<br />

glass rods. The container is closed (Fig. 48).<br />

2. The salt extraction is monitored by measuring the water electrical conductivity. The water is changed<br />

periodically being the first time intervals smaller (1, 3, 5 days – continued at time intervals of 5<br />

days) until the electrical conductivity falls bellow 100µS⋅cm -1 ) – and it generally lasts for 20 days.<br />

Closed<br />

1000 ml water<br />

Sample<br />

Glass rods<br />

Fig. 48 - Scheme of desalination procedure by immersion<br />

83


-Wet poultice procedure<br />

1. A mixture of 20% cellulose (ARBOCEL BC 1000) and 40% demineralised water (w/w) is prepared<br />

and applied over the top surface (the top surface of the specimen is the one that has been subjected to<br />

salt impregnation. The thickness of the poultice is of approximately 1cm;<br />

2. The specimen is immersed in water (a volume 500ml or less, depending on the container<br />

dimensions) leaving approximately 5mm height of the specimen out of the water; the base of the<br />

specimen is put over glass rods (Fig. 49);<br />

3. Both poultice and desalination water is periodically changed being the first time intervals smaller.<br />

The electrical conductivity of the poultice is measured by diluting it in 400ml water that is then<br />

filtrated and washed with 100ml water obtaining 500ml of extraction water – the electrical<br />

conductivity of the resulting solution is measured. The water extracted from the poultice and the<br />

water of immersion are measured separately. The volume of the immersion water is quantified and,<br />

if lower than 500ml, more demineralised water is added until 500ml volume is reached. Finally, the<br />

water extracted from the poultice and the immersion water are mixed, resulting in a solution volume<br />

of 1000ml and the electrical conductivity of the final solution is measured.<br />

- Results<br />

Opened<br />

container<br />

Cellulose poultice<br />

10mm<br />

5mm<br />

Sample<br />

Water<br />

Glass rods<br />

Fig. 49 - Scheme of desalination procedure with wet poultices<br />

Fig. 50 shows the results obtained with the two desalination methods. It can be considered that the<br />

desalination using poultices does not promote a relevant increase in the desalination efficiency. Regarding the<br />

higher amount of experimental work involved in the desalination procedure by poulticing and the difficulties to<br />

keep temperature at 40ºC, it is considered that the desalination process shall be carried out by immersion at room<br />

temperature.<br />

Conductivity [uS/c<br />

3000<br />

2400<br />

1800<br />

1200<br />

600<br />

Immersion - Troom<br />

Poultice - Troom<br />

Immersion - 40ºC<br />

Poultice - 40ºC<br />

0<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

Desalinisation Period [days]<br />

Fig. 50 - Graphic showing the measured conductivity over time<br />

by the immersion and wet poultice procedure<br />

84


Superficial degradation<br />

Table 13 summarizes the work in progress with the superficial ageing procedure.<br />

Table 13 : Summary of the work in progress with the superficial ageing procedure<br />

Lithotype Lateral [Na2SO4] Contact Impregnation Desalination<br />

surfaces %, w/w time depth [mm] procedure<br />

Ançã<br />

Not sealed<br />

14<br />

20 ~2-5sec.<br />

Immersion at 40ºC<br />

Sealed 20 2-3 Poulticing at 40ºC<br />

Lecce Sealed 20<br />

Poulticing at 40ºC<br />

Santafiora<br />

Firenzuola<br />

Sealed<br />

Sealed<br />

20<br />

20<br />

5min.<br />

Poulticing at 40ºC<br />

Poulticing at 40ºC<br />

The contact time set for the limestones was of approximately 2-5 <strong>second</strong>s. A larger period of time<br />

was set for the sandstones because of its lower capillarity absorption coefficient. In order to reach 2-3mm<br />

depth, the specimens were left in contact with the salt solution during 5minutes.<br />

The results obtained with Ançã stone not sealed are shown in the present <strong>report</strong>. The experiments<br />

with the other lithotypes are still in progress and will be presented in the next <strong>report</strong>.<br />

Ançã results - Superficial degradation<br />

The results here <strong>report</strong>ed concern the Ançã stone tested on specimens with the lateral faces not sealed<br />

and using salt solutions with 14% and 20% concentration.<br />

The Ançã specimen tested with the salt solutions with 14% concentration was submitted to the following steps:<br />

• 1º cycle<br />

• four salt solution impregnation during 2-5 <strong>second</strong>s . After each impregnation the<br />

specimen was immediately placed in a climatic chamber at 5º or 10ºC during thirty minutes to<br />

promote mirabilite crystallization and then oven dried at 40ºC before starting a new salt<br />

impregnation,<br />

• desalination by immersion at 40ºC.<br />

• 2º cycle<br />

• seven salt solution impregnations during 2-5 <strong>second</strong>s. After each impregnation the<br />

specimen was immediately placed in a climatic chamber at 5º or 10ºC during thirty minutes and<br />

then oven dried at 40ºC before starting a new salt impregnation,<br />

• desalination by immersion at 40ºC.<br />

The results obtained with the drilling profiles taken after each cycle (Fig. 51) indicate that salt<br />

concentrates near the surface.<br />

Regarding the tests carried out with a 14% salt solution concentration, slight loss of material could<br />

be observed at the top and at the sides (1mm height). However, the surfaces were pretty stable and only a<br />

slight surface roughness increase could be noticed, Fig.52.<br />

85


Force [N<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

before desalination<br />

0 5 10 15<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Fig. 51 - Drilling resistance of Ançã stone after the 7 salt<br />

impregnations of the 2 nd cycle with a 14% salt solution<br />

Fig. 52 - Salt degradation promoted on the Ançã<br />

specimen tested with the salt solutions with 14%<br />

concentration. Top face (photo above) and lateral<br />

face<br />

The Ançã specimen tested with the salt solutions with 20% concentration was submitted to the following steps:<br />

• 1º cycle<br />

• one salt solution impregnation during 2-5 <strong>second</strong>s. After the impregnation the specimen<br />

was immediately placed in a climatic chamber at 5º or 10ºC during thirty minutes to and then oven<br />

dried at 40ºC,<br />

• desalination by immersion at 40ºC;<br />

• 2º cycle<br />

• four salt solution impregnation during 2-5 <strong>second</strong>s. After each impregnation the<br />

specimen was immediately placed in a climatic chamber at 5º or 10ºC during thirty minutes and<br />

then oven dried at 40ºC before starting a new salt impregnation,<br />

• desalination by immersion at 40ºC<br />

The experiments carried out with a 20% salt solution concentration promoted powdering and surface<br />

delamination as presented in Fig. 53.<br />

Fig. 53 - Aspect of the top surface of the specimen showing delamination and<br />

powdering after 2 cycles with a 20%-w sodium sulphate solution<br />

The results obtained showed that the salt is mainly concentrated at the surface submitted to salt<br />

impregnation. The use of a 14% salt solution concentration resulted in surface powdering whereas the 20%<br />

salt solution promoted powdering and delamination more rapidly.<br />

86


Gradual<br />

degradation in depth<br />

The procedure carried out to promote the gradual degradation procedure was defined in order to avoid<br />

plaque formation and to achieve a moderate and gradual degradation pattern in depth. The risks of this procedure<br />

are the possibility of specimen destruction and to achieve a not-controlled degradation, Fig.54.<br />

The adopted ageing method comprises 3 salt impregnation tests at different penetration depths (3-steps<br />

salination), controlled with the contact time of each lithotype. Three different procedures were set<br />

and applied in<br />

all lithotypes. Table 14 presents the conditions defined for each test.<br />

• avoid plaque formation<br />

• achieve moderate and<br />

gradual degradation<br />

• non control gradual<br />

degradation<br />

• Sample destruction<br />

Fig. 54 - Objectives and risks associated to the salt gradual degradation<br />

procedure<br />

Table 14 : Summary of the tests carried out to promote a gradual degradation<br />

pattern<br />

Test Lateral [Na2SO4] Impregnation Desalination procedure<br />

surfaces<br />

%, w/w depth<br />

[mm]<br />

A Not sealed<br />

B Sealed<br />

14<br />

14<br />

14<br />

C Sealed 20<br />

14<br />

Water<br />

Immersion<br />

10<br />

5<br />

2 Poulticing<br />

Two consecutive salt solution<br />

impregnations followed by<br />

desalination<br />

2<br />

Poulticing<br />

5<br />

10<br />

Each cycle in Test A and B correspond to one salt solution impregnation (3-steps salination)<br />

followed<br />

by desalination.<br />

Table 15 presents the adopted contact time necessary to reach the impregnation depth specified in Table 14.<br />

87


Test [Na2SO4]<br />

%, w/w<br />

A and B<br />

C<br />

Table 15 : Adopted contact time with salt solution for each lithotype<br />

14<br />

14<br />

14<br />

20<br />

14<br />

Water<br />

Impregnation depth<br />

[mm]<br />

10<br />

5<br />

2<br />

2<br />

5<br />

10<br />

Contact time<br />

Limestones<br />

[min]<br />

5<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

5<br />

Contact time<br />

Sandstones<br />

5 h<br />

1 h<br />

15 min<br />

15 min<br />

1 h<br />

5 h<br />

Results obtained with Test A are shown in the present <strong>report</strong>. Tests B and C are still in progress and<br />

will be presented in the next <strong>report</strong>.<br />

In order to obtain information about the salt distribution inside the specimens the stone cuttings<br />

obtained during drilling were collected at each 5mm depth drilling run (in the same drilling hole) before its<br />

desalination. The collected powder was dried until constant weight at 70ºC. Afterwards 0.15g of each<br />

specimen were stirred in 50ml of demineralised water and filtrated. Finally, the electrical conductivity of the<br />

resulting solution was measured.<br />

The results of the drilling profiles taken on Ançã stone aged with Test A are presented in Fig. 31. It can<br />

be noticed that salt concentrates not only close to the surface but also at 10-15mm depth. During desalination,<br />

after 3 cycles the specimen split in two parts. Results point out that 3 cycles are excessive for ageing this<br />

lithotype.<br />

The results of the drilling profiles taken on Lecce stone aged with Test A are presented in Fig. 32. It can<br />

be noticed that salt concentrates mainly near the surface and that a gradual degradation pattern in depth could be<br />

achieved – the mechanical strength lowered more near the surface and reached approximately 1cm depth. During<br />

the ageing procedure, the specimen lost material by powdering and scaling mainly at the top surface as shown in<br />

Fig. 57.<br />

This procedure seems to be adequate for Lecce stone since it shows a gradual degradation pattern in<br />

depth, being more severe on the top face where salt concentrates. The decay intensity achieved with 3 ageing<br />

cycles also seems to be adequate but further cycles will be carried out in order to achieve higher decay levels.<br />

Force [N<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Diamond drill bit; no guide-hole<br />

50<br />

0<br />

400rpm/15mm.min -1<br />

Fig. 55 - Drilling resistance on Ançã stone after 3 cycles before desalination<br />

Conductivity [uS/c<br />

88


Force [N<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Force [N<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Diamond drill bit; no guide-hole<br />

Depth [mm] 400rpm/15mm.min-1<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Lecce<br />

Lecce aged<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Depth [mm]<br />

Diamond drill bit; guide-hole<br />

100rpm/20mm.min-1<br />

Fig. 56 - Drilling resistance of Lecce stone after 3 cycles<br />

before (above) and after desalination<br />

0<br />

Conductivity [uS/c<br />

Fig. 57 - Aspect of Lecce stone after 3<br />

cycles. Top face showing superficial<br />

scaling and powdering (above). Lateral<br />

surface showing a gradual loss of<br />

material in depth<br />

The results of the ageing monitoring after 3 cycles by the water absorption with the contact sponge<br />

method carried out on Santafiora stone aged with Test A are presented in Fig. 34. It can be noticed that there is<br />

a slight gradual increase in the water absorption meaning that this testing procedure is promoting decay.<br />

However, no significant loss of material was observed. The decay intensity achieved with three ageing cycles<br />

does not seem to be sufficient for ageing the Santafiora sandstone since the surfaces resulted pretty stable (Fig.<br />

59).<br />

The contact sponge seems to be a suitable method to monitor the ageing action. A drilling profile will be<br />

taken after achieving decay intensity detectable by visual inspection.<br />

The results of the ageing monitoring with the water absorption by the contact sponge method carried out<br />

on Firenzuola sandstone aged with Test A are presented in Fig. 60. As in the case of Santafiora sandstone, it can<br />

be noticed that there is a slight gradual increase in the water absorption meaning that this testing procedure is<br />

promoting decay. However, no loss of material was observed.<br />

The decay intensity achieved with three ageing cycles does not seem to be sufficient for ageing the<br />

Firenzuola sandstone since the surfaces resulted even more stable than those of Santafiora sandstone (Fig. 61).<br />

At the binocular microscope a slight corrosion of the biotites could be noticed.<br />

89


-2 -1<br />

.min ]<br />

-3<br />

Wa Wa [x10 [x10 -3 g.cm g. cm -2.mi<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3<br />

Cycle<br />

Fig. 58 - Water absorption by the contact sponge method after each<br />

ageing cycle of Test A on Santafiora sandstone<br />

Fig. 59 - Aspect of Santafiora<br />

sandstone after 3 cycles: Lateral<br />

surface (above) and top surface<br />

90


-2 -1<br />

.min ]<br />

-3<br />

Wa [x10 Wa [g/cm^2/m g. cm<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 1 Cycle 2 3<br />

Fig. 60 - Water absorption by the contact sponge method after each<br />

ageing cycle of Test A on Firenzuola sandstone<br />

Fig. 61 - Aspect of Firenzuola sandstone<br />

after 3 cycles: Lateral surface (above)<br />

and top surface<br />

Final remarks<br />

The higher amount of experimental work involved in the desalination procedure by poulticing and<br />

the difficulties associated with the temperature maintenance at 40ºC it is considered that the desalination<br />

process shall be carried out by immersion at room temperature.<br />

Salt crystallisation procedures adopted to promote a surface degradation pattern on Ançã stone<br />

indicate that this degradation pattern can be achieved more rapidly with the use of 20% sodium sulphate<br />

solution. These testing conditions for Ançã stone should be confirmed during the next period. The procedure<br />

for superficial degradation of the other stones is not yet defined. The tests continue.<br />

Decay obtained with the gradual degradation procedure of Test A in limestones and sandstones differ<br />

in a clear way. The results pointed out that three cycles are excessive for ageing the Ançã stone. With this<br />

testing procedure Ançã stone must be only submitted to two cycles. These testing condition and degradation<br />

pattern will be confirmed in the next period on Ançã stone.<br />

In the case of Lecce stone the method abovementioned seems to be adequate since it shows a gradual<br />

degradation pattern in depth. The decay intensity achieved with three ageing cycles also seems to be adequate<br />

but further cycles will be carried out in order to achieve higher decay levels.<br />

The decay intensity achieved with three ageing cycles of Test A does not seem to be sufficient for<br />

ageing the Santafiora and Firenzuola sandstones since the surfaces resulted stable. The contact sponge<br />

method seems suitable for monitoring the ageing procedure. These tests will be continued during the next<br />

period.<br />

This task will be finely tuned when the degradation morphology and decay intensity exhibited by the<br />

aged stones fulfil the requirements for the further consolidation study.<br />

91


JRA1 - DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF NEW TREATMENTS FOR THE<br />

CONSERVATION-RESTORATION OF OUTDOOR STONE AND BRONZE MONUMENTS<br />

(LNEC, BLfD, UNI-BO)<br />

Prepared by:<br />

LNEC - J. Delgado Rodrigues, A. Ferreira Pinto, C. Paulos Nunes;<br />

BLfD - M. Mach;<br />

UNI-BO – R. Mazzeo, E. Joseph<br />

BRONZE<br />

1 TASK 2. ......................................................................................................................................................<br />

A PROGRESS REPORT ON THE LABORATORY STUDIES ON NEW TREATMENTS ...........................<br />

1.1 .......BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TREATMENTS UNDER EVALUATION (UNI-BO, BLfD)<br />

.............................................................................................................................................................................<br />

1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF TREATMENTS AND FIRST RESULTS.....................................................<br />

1.2.1.a Silanes, waxes, incralac treatments<br />

1.2.1.b Chemical formation of artificial copper oxalate<br />

1.2.1.c Formation of artificial copper oxalate by fungi<br />

1.2.1.d Formation of thicker cuprite layer<br />

B PROGRESS REPORT ON ACCELERATED TESTS AGEING AND FIRST RESULTS............................<br />

1.3 AGEING PROCEDURES FOR ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL URBAN PATINA<br />

FORMATION (BLFD,UNI-BO,LNEC).........................................................................................................<br />

1.4 AGEING PROCEDURES FOR ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL MARINE PATINA<br />

FORMATION (BLFD,UNI-BO,LNEC).........................................................................................................<br />

1.4.1 accelerated ageing in laboratory chambers to simulate natural marine patinas formation<br />

(MA)<br />

1.4.2 Ageing of the bronze specimens for the formation of a natural marine patina (MN)<br />

Tables index<br />

Table 1 – treatments used for preliminary tests<br />

Table 4 – SEM-EDX results on fungi growth and copper oxalates formation<br />

Figure index<br />

Figure 1 - Enhancement of the Cuprite layer<br />

Figure 2 - a) copper roof sheets fixed on exposure support, b) schema indicating the different areas of<br />

treatments<br />

Figure 3 - a) sceptre of Colleoni treated with selected materials, b) schematic view (black arrow indicates the<br />

application of wax R21 over tested material)<br />

Figure 4 – Results of EIS measurements of different treatments on sceptre and copper roof sheets<br />

Figure 5 – scanner (600 dpi) of various treatments after 8 months exposure where (a) no visual alterations are<br />

visible and (b) chromatic alterations are visible<br />

Figure 6 – SEM microphotogram showing Aspergillus niger covering on roof sheet<br />

Figure 7 – SEM microphotogram of copper oxalate crystalline form<br />

Figure 8 – Scanner 600dpi of roof sheet before and after fungi invasion<br />

Figure 9 - Precipitation of Cuprite within the Cuprite layer<br />

Figure 10 - Controlled precipitation of Cuprite on a microscope slide<br />

Figure 11 - Cuprite crystals on a microscope slide<br />

Figure 12 - Cuprite formation on a one Cent coin<br />

Figure 13 - Artificial urban patina<br />

Figure 14 - Natural urban patina<br />

Figure 15 - Schematic layer sequence of bronze<br />

Figure 16 - Layer sequence of Pichler’s sample<br />

Figure 17 - Chemical composition of Pichler’s patina<br />

Figure 18 - Microstructure of Pichler’s<br />

Figure 19 - Microstructure of natural patina (SEM)<br />

92


1. TASK 2 - A PROGRESS REPORT ON THE LABORATORY STUDIES ON NEW<br />

TREATMENTS<br />

• brief description of the treatments under evaluation<br />

• Development of treatments and first results<br />

1.1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TREATMENTS UNDER EVALUATION<br />

(UNI-BO, BLfD)<br />

Four approaches were selected: 1) silane materials, 2) formation of artificial copper oxalate patinas, 3) formation<br />

of artificial copper oxalate by fungi, 4) formation of a thicker cuprite layer.<br />

1) New generation of silanes, which are commonly applied to protect stone monument, were chosen for<br />

their ability to produce, after hydrolysis, chemical bonds with copper hydroxysulphates and/or<br />

hydroxychlorides. They have been applied by a metal restorer following the procedures suggested by<br />

the manufacturers.<br />

2) As the copper oxalate patinas are known to be very protective (insoluble) an attempt is made to<br />

transform existing copper hydroxysulphates and copper hydroxychlorides into copper oxalate by<br />

chemical reaction with saturated solution of oxalate salts (sodium oxalate, Na2C2O4).<br />

3) For the same reasons mentioned above in 2), fungi which produce oxalic acid have been used to<br />

transform existing copper hydroxysulphates and copper hydroxychlorides into copper oxalate. Some<br />

fungi species resistant to copper have been grown and applied to bronze samples in a microbiology<br />

laboratory (Prof. Daniel Job and Gilles Farron, botany institute, university of Neuchâtel,<br />

Switzerland).<br />

4) The intention is to strengthen the Cuprite layer, as the best-preserved bronze memorials tend to have<br />

a thick and dense Cuprite layer which is considered to be highly protective and markedly more<br />

corrosion resistant than the bare metal (figure 1).<br />

Layer with new Cuprite (Cu2O)<br />

Cuprite layer<br />

Bronze with inclusions<br />

Fig. 1 - Enhancement of the Cuprite layer.<br />

All treatments will be photographically documented and analysed with the use of colorimetry,<br />

thickness measurements, corrosion tests (EIS, Rp), FTIR microscopy and cross-sections analysis with optical<br />

microscopy and SEM-EDX.<br />

93


1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF TREATMENTS AND FIRST RESULTS<br />

1.2.1 Silanes, waxes, incralac treatments<br />

Since copper roof samples (R) were already available, some of them were used for a preliminary<br />

evaluation of the performances of the selected treatments. The same selected treatments were applied to s real<br />

case: the sceptre of the equestrian bronze monument of Bartolomeo Colleoni located in Venice. The<br />

monument is under restoration carried out by G. Morigi.<br />

The different treatments (table 1) were applied on both the roof sheets (figure 2a) and on the Colleoni’s<br />

sceptre (figure 3a). Each copper roof sample was divided in three areas: 1st) tested material + wax, 2 )<br />

rd<br />

tested material, 3 ) reference area without any treatment (see figure 2b and 3b). After application, the sheets<br />

were fixed with a bolt on a wood support inclined 45 °C and exposed the 11th February together with the<br />

sceptre outside in the restoration construction site, located in Venice (I).<br />

Table 1 : treatments used for preliminary tests.<br />

treatment product sheet sceptre<br />

T1 Dynasylan F8263<br />

R1 x<br />

T2 SIVO clear R4 x<br />

T3a Protectosil SC<br />

R3 -<br />

(1:1 in H20) T3b (1:2 in H20) Protectosil SC R8 x<br />

T3c (1:8 in H20) Protectosil SC<br />

R9 x<br />

T3d (1:14 in H20) Protectosil SC<br />

R10 -<br />

T4 Dynasylan BSM 40 R2<br />

x<br />

T5 VP 5035 R5 x<br />

T6 Incralac R6 x<br />

T7 Microcrystalline wax R21 Applied on T1-T6<br />

T9 Wax TeCe 3534F R15 x<br />

a<br />

R2<br />

1 2 3<br />

b<br />

Fig. 2 - a) copper roof sheets fixed on exposure support, b) schema indicating the different areas of treatments<br />

nd<br />

94


a<br />

b<br />

Fig. 3 - a) sceptre of Colleoni treated with selected materials, b) schematic view (black arrow indicates the application<br />

of wax R21 over tested material)<br />

Both the sceptre and partially the copper roof sheets have been submitted to EIS measurement after 8<br />

months exposure by the subcontractor ISMAR institute. The preliminary EIS results (table 2) showed how<br />

the untreated brochantite patina on the sceptre have similar protective features in respect to the one present<br />

on the copper roof plates. EIS measurements on treatments are summarized in figure 4. T1, T2 and T4 have<br />

similar protective features as the reference treatments T6. T5 shows poor results and T3b seems to be less<br />

protective the untreated patina. T9 shows the highest values which correspond to very protective feature.<br />

Table 2 : Results of EIS measurements on sceptre and copper roof sheet patinas<br />

sceptre<br />

Copper roof<br />

T1 T2 T3b T4 T5 T3c T6 T9<br />

Sample |Z|10mHz Ω KΩ MΩ<br />

TP1NC16<br />

TP1NC21<br />

TP2NC21<br />

R6NC17<br />

R6NC22<br />

R10NC22<br />

259477<br />

203885<br />

57410<br />

155000<br />

144000<br />

493800<br />

65095<br />

60058<br />

106000<br />

251700<br />

219400<br />

221700<br />

247300<br />

232 ± 39<br />

106 ± 69<br />

63 ± 4<br />

192 ± 77<br />

235 ± 18<br />

R15NC22 237800 238<br />

R5NC22 71260 71<br />

.<br />

319 ± 247<br />

Media sceptre<br />

0,2 ± 0,2<br />

Media sceptre<br />

0,19 ± 0,05<br />

Media copper roof<br />

0,16 ± 0,09<br />

Media copper roof<br />

0,21 ± 0,05<br />

95


Fig. 4 - Results of EIS measurements of different treatments on sceptre and copper roof sheets.<br />

At the same time colorimetric measurements and microFTIR analyses have been performed in order<br />

to make a first selection of those treatments to be further investigated. The evaluation of possible chromatic<br />

alterations due to the application of treatments without the addition of R21 wax (3) and exposition has been<br />

performed with colorimetric measurements. The results are expressed in term of euclidean distance. With the<br />

visual appearance of samples it was possible to distinguish two groups (figure 5) which have been confirmed<br />

with the colorimetry (table 3).<br />

96


T1 T4<br />

T2<br />

T5<br />

T3a T3b<br />

T3d<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Fig. 5 - Scanner (600 dpi) of various treatments after 8 months exposure where (a) no visual alterations are visible and<br />

(b) chromatic alterations are visible.<br />

T3c<br />

T6 T9<br />

3<br />

97


Table 3 : Colorimetric results on silanes at interval of 8 months.<br />

treatment <strong>Eu</strong>clidean distance DE*<br />

2 2 2<br />

[√(DL*) +(Da*) + Db*) ]<br />

February 2005<br />

With the microFTIR spectroscopy it has been possible to chemically characterise the treatments on<br />

the copper sheet samples. For technical reasons, it was not possible to perform the same analysis on sceptre<br />

since it’s too large to be placed on the FTIR microscope stage. So far, it has been not possible to evaluate the<br />

formation of the chemical bond which was supposed to be formed between the silanes and the copper<br />

hydroxysulphates or hydroxychlorides . This issue will be further investigated during the next six months<br />

research.<br />

1.2.1.1 Chemical formation of artificial copper oxalate<br />

A copper roof sheet with an existing copper hydroxysulphate surface was treated by immersion in a<br />

saturated solution of sodium oxalate for different period of time (2 min, 10 min, 1 hour and 2 hours). The results<br />

have been checked with the microFTIR combined with ATR and it seems that copper oxalate’s patina is still not<br />

formed. Nevertheless alternative procedures will be performed by modifying the saturated sodium oxalate<br />

solution pH.<br />

1.2.1.2 Formation of artificial copper oxalate by fungi<br />

DE*<br />

October<br />

2005<br />

Two copper roof sheets with copper hydroxysulphate (brochantite) patina and one with a artificial<br />

copper hydroxychloride patina were given to the microbiology laboratory to carry out tests with different fungi<br />

species. Tests started on sheets with brochantite patina with Penicillium sp. (strain F75), Gloeophilum trabeum<br />

and Aspergillus niger, strain 14 and strain 6 isolated from the grapevine. SEM-EDX morphological<br />

investigations have been carry out to evaluate whether the copper oxalate is produced (table 4) and Aspergillus<br />

niger seems to give the best results (figure 6 and 7). No colour modification were observed by visual<br />

examination of the treated with Aspergillus niger and untreated samples as shown in figure 8.<br />

Table 4 : SEM-EDX results on fungi growth and copper oxalates formation.<br />

Colour difference<br />

DE* ≤ 1 : unperceivable<br />

DE* ≥ 2 : just perceivable<br />

DE* ≥ 5 : clearly perceivable<br />

T1 Dynasylan F8263 2 2-3 just perceivable<br />

T2 SIVO clear 3.31


Fig. 6 - SEM microphotogram showing Aspergillus<br />

niger covering on roof sheet.<br />

original<br />

Fig. 7 - SEM microphotogram of copper oxalate<br />

crystalline form.<br />

Fig. 8 - Scanner 600dpi of roof sheet before and after fungi invasion.<br />

Since the first result seems to be very promising, further investigations will be carried out in order to<br />

optimized the activity of the fungi on the brochantite patina. It has been decided to concentrate the research on<br />

Aspergillus niger and tested it also on the copper sheet with a artificial copper hydroxychloride patina. A<br />

subcontract will be established with the microbiology laboratory (Prof. Daniel Job and Gilles Farron, Magali<br />

Kocher, botany institute, university of Neuchâtel, Switzerland) since this laboratory has longstanding<br />

experience in the research on oxalates formation by fungi.<br />

1.2.1.3 Formation of a more dense cuprite layer<br />

treated<br />

One experimental line was to test oxidants in aqueous solution. Those oxidants were thought to<br />

penetrate into the Cuprite layer, in particular into the Cuprite layer defects. At the borderline between bronze<br />

and Cuprite oxidants should react with the metallic bronze, forming new Cuprite and by this would heal the<br />

Cuprite layer defects specifically in the faulty areas (figure 9).<br />

99


Fig. 9 - Precipitation of Cuprite within the Cuprite layer.<br />

For experimental purposes the Brochantite layer of the urban type substrates (see task 3) was<br />

selectively removed. As has been shown by Mauro Matteini’s work on the Florence Baptistery Doors,<br />

Rochelle salt can be used in order to selectively remove the sulphate layer. After treatment with Rochelle salt<br />

a pure bronze/Cuprite system is left behind which can be inspected and controlled much easier than the full<br />

patina layer system with Brochantite on top.<br />

It was possible to create new Cuprite crystals on the bronze surface in experiments by means of 30%<br />

aqueous hydrogen peroxide (H O ). But when going back to the complete patina systems it turned out that<br />

2<br />

hydrogen peroxide immediately reacted with the Brochantite, destroying the Brochantite, presumably by<br />

forming CuO (Tenorite). First it was thought that this destructive reaction might have been caused by an<br />

acid-base reaction, so carbonate buffered hydrogen peroxide was used instead in order to maintain neutral<br />

pH values in the chemical reagents’ system. But when the buffered solutions showed the same destructive<br />

reaction it was decided that the oxidation pathway with hydrogen peroxide had to be skipped.<br />

The <strong>second</strong> experimental approach was to rinse the patina with a solution containing complexed<br />

copper ions and then let the copper ions precipitate within the Cuprite layer defects as solid Cuprite. A series<br />

of tentative experiments revealed that a reactive solution can be prepared easily, just by mixing the following<br />

solutions:<br />

Solution F1: 0.7 g CuSO * 5 H O in 10 ml H O<br />

4 2 2<br />

Solution F2: 3.5 g sodium potassium tartrate and 1 g NaOH in 10 mlH O<br />

2<br />

Solution G: 2 g glucose in 10 ml H20<br />

2<br />

Cuprite layer<br />

Bronze<br />

Equal volume parts of the solutions F1 and F2 are mixed, after some stirring a further volume part of<br />

solution G is added, after stirring again the mixture is clear and ready for use. It is a pale-blue liquid, similar<br />

in viscosity to pure water. The Cuprite precipitation can be triggered and speed-controlled by mild heating,<br />

allowing a wide range of temperature-time variations, with a typical triggering temperature of around 40°C.<br />

The reaction time can be in the range 60 of <strong>second</strong>s or lower, a time period which minimises the risk<br />

of unwanted <strong>second</strong>ary chemical reactions. In any case the remaining solution which is depleted of copper<br />

due to the precipitation will have to be removed by thorough rinsing the patina. First experiments showed<br />

that also a full patina system with Brochantite on top was not markedly affected by the precipitation solution<br />

treatment.<br />

When tested in vitro the precipitation can be studied on a microscope slide (figure 10). The Cuprite<br />

particles appear as tiny globular, brown particles with typical sizes of about 1 micrometer down to 100 nm<br />

(figure 11). Similar size particles can be formed on a Copper coin (figure 12). The Cuprite formed has an<br />

enormous adherence towards any substrate, a fact which can easily be demonstrated by performing the<br />

reaction on a microscope slide and then washing vividly under tap water: most of the precipitated Cuprite<br />

will remain on the slide.<br />

100


Fig. 10 - Controlled precipitation of Cuprite on a microscope slide.<br />

Fig. 11 - Cuprite crystals on a REM carbon support slide.<br />

101


Fig. 12 – Experimental Cuprite formation on a one Cent coin.<br />

Planned steps: The precipitation behaviour of the Cuprite (grain size, particle density, effectiveness<br />

of protection) will be evaluated by light microscope, scanning electron microscope and electrochemical<br />

impedance spectroscopy (EIS). For this reason preliminary measurements of the Copper<br />

Alloy/Cuprite/Brochantite system have been made. In the next six months further EIS measurements of<br />

treated samples will be performed in order to evaluate the protective character of the treated Cuprite.<br />

Furthermore, a new generation of copper complexing agents, the so-called TOMATS (i.e.<br />

Trioctylmethylammoniumthiosalicylate) will be taken into account as reagents and will be checked for the<br />

given application. Those modern complexing agents can be used in organic, e.g. alcoholic solution and<br />

therefore might be an interesting alternative to water-based systems. There are fair chances that they will<br />

react to a lesser extent with the patina than water based systems.<br />

If necessary, the treatment might be enhanced by additional ingredients or a <strong>second</strong> step procedure, e.g. with<br />

a polysiloxane based medium.<br />

102


TASK 3 - B PROGRESS REPORT ON ACCELERATED TESTS AGEING AND FIRST RESULTS<br />

1.3 AGEING PROCEDURES FOR ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL URBAN PATINA FORMATION<br />

(BLFD,UNI-BO,LNEC)<br />

All urban type substrates, i.e. "urban type, artificial patina" and "urban type, natural patina (copper<br />

roof)" are ready for treatment.<br />

Bronze samples were sent to Prof. Pichler, Hochschule für Angewandte Kunst, Vienna, in order to<br />

produce the set of “urban artificial” (UA) with his patented cuprite / brochantite surface layer. The urban<br />

type artificial patina samples have been prepared by the so-called Pichler process. The Pichler type substrates<br />

(figure 13) mimic the natural bronze patina perfectly as far as layer sequence (figures 15 and 16) and<br />

chemical composition (figure 17) are concerned: Cross sections through the artificial Pichler patina revealed<br />

a red Cuprite layer (ca. 10 - 15 µm) and above a green Brochantite layer (ca. 50 µm). The respective XRD<br />

findings are Cuprite and Brochantite, nothing else. Nevertheless the visual appearance of the urban artificial<br />

substrates is markedly different from the natural ones (figure 14). The artificial substrates show a darker,<br />

more saturated green whereas the natural substrates have the colour of powdered synthetic Brochantite, i.e. a<br />

light green. SEM investigations led to the conclusion that the colour difference has to be attributed to<br />

different micro-crystallinity (figures 18 and 19). At magnifications of 100x and more Pichler type samples<br />

show Brochantite crystals whereas it was not possible to detect a single Brochantite crystal on natural<br />

substrates, even at the highest SEM resolutions available.<br />

Fig. 13 - Artificial urban patina<br />

(Pichler typ).<br />

Fig. 14 - Natural urban patina<br />

of a copper roof sheet.<br />

103


Brochantite or<br />

Atacamite layer<br />

Cuprite layer<br />

Bronze with inclusions<br />

Fig. 15 - Schematic layer sequence of bronze.<br />

Substrate: Urban Artificial<br />

"Pichler type"<br />

Top view of Brochantite layer<br />

Fig. 18 - Microstructure of Pichler’s patina (SEM).<br />

Fig. 17 - Chemical composition of Pichler’s patina.<br />

Urban Artificial<br />

cross section<br />

Green: Brochantite layer,<br />

ca. 50 µm<br />

Red: Cuprite layer,<br />

ca. 10-15 µm<br />

Fig. 16 - Layer sequence of Pichler’s sample.<br />

Substrate: Urban Natural<br />

"Copper roof"<br />

Top view of Brochantite layer<br />

Fig. 19 - Microstructure of natural patina (SEM).


1.4 AGEING PROCEDURES FOR ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL MARINE PATINA<br />

FORMATION<br />

(BLFD,UNI-BO,LNEC).<br />

1.4.1 Accelerated ageing in laboratory chambers to simulate natural marine patinas formation<br />

(MA)<br />

On July was initiated the accelerated exposure of bronze specimens for the formation of a<br />

patina in marine simulated conditions in lab. The accelerated exposure includes two phases. First<br />

phase: 3 months in a climatic chamber (T= 50ºC and RH> 95%) and the Second phase: 6 months in<br />

salt spray chamber ( 5% NaCl, T= 38ºC). At the initiation of the first phase the formation of powered<br />

white corrosion products was observed. The white powder can be easily removed from the bronze<br />

surface cleaning with a cloth. XRD identify the presence of cerussite. Later at the end of the first<br />

phase, black and brown products begin to be formed under the cerussite powder. As was indicated by<br />

XRD these corrosion products are a mix of cuprite and tenorite, Figure 20. After the first month of<br />

exposure in the salt chamber ( Second Phase) green patina formation begin to be formed in some spots<br />

of the surface. The <strong>second</strong> phase will be finished before 24 months of the project as planned.<br />

H - Hidrocerussite Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2<br />

C – Cuprite Cu2O<br />

T – Tenorite CuO<br />

Q – Quartzo SiO2<br />

Fig. 20 - Aspect of the bronze surface after the first phase of accelerated exposure conditions and XRD analysis<br />

of corrosion products<br />

105


1.4.2 Ageing of the bronze specimens for the formation of a natural marine patina (MN)<br />

The ageing of the bronze specimens in marine exposure at Cabo Raso station go on .The green<br />

patina formed during the first six months of exposure , Figure 21, show a very powered aspect and a<br />

very low adherence to the bronze surface, probably due to the polished initial state of bronze surface .<br />

The XRD analysis of the patina products indicated that products are mainly amorphous and the<br />

crystalline products are atacamite. After the first 6 months patina seems turn to more compact and<br />

with a better adherence. Thickness is around 10 µm. Localized corrosion at the alloy Pb inclusions<br />

was observed on SEM/BSE, Figure 22. The measurement of the environmental parameters at the<br />

exposure site also goes on, since the beginning of the exposure. It is expected that marine exposure<br />

can be finished also until the 24 months of the project.<br />

Cl – Atacamite Cu2Cl(OH)3<br />

Fig. 21 - Natural marine patina after six of exposure . XRD spectrum<br />

106


SEM/BSE<br />

SEM/BSE<br />

a) b)<br />

Fig. 22 - Natural marine patina at SEM/BSE. Corrosion of the bronze specimens at the Pb inclusions a). patina<br />

with 10 µm of thickness b)<br />

107


Annex 9<br />

Progress <strong>report</strong> on JRA2<br />

I- JRA2 Task 1- Progress <strong>report</strong> on Lab-NMR and methodology for in-situ study of<br />

stones<br />

Resp. UNIPG, RWTH<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 16<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Three stones, from Umbria, (Italy), have been characterized by Unilateral NMR.<br />

They are:<br />

1. San Presto (n° 20)<br />

2. Pianello (n° 134)<br />

3. Palombina Turri (n° 39)<br />

All measurements have been carried out on dry stones, i.e., on stones in equilibrium with their<br />

environment. The NMR signal is due to the moisture in the stone, exchanging with the environment.<br />

The San Presto stone has also been studied after capillary water absorption for 24 hours.<br />

All NMR measurements were performed with a commercial unilateral NMR “ProFiler” from Bruker<br />

Biospin, Italy, with a probehead operating at 18.153 MHz with a penetration depth of about 1 mm.<br />

Spin-lattice relaxation times T were measured with the a periodic saturation recovery pulse<br />

sequence.<br />

1<br />

Spin-spin relaxation times T 2 were measured with the CPMG pulse sequence; the echo time 2τ<br />

was 50 µs; 2048 echoes were collected in all cases.<br />

Results<br />

1) NMR Characterisation of dry stones<br />

Hahn Echo Experiment<br />

A single Hahn Echo has been collected for the three stones and the results are <strong>report</strong>ed in Figure 1. A<br />

major moisture content in San Presto stone on respect to Pianello and Palombina Turri stones has<br />

been found.<br />

I (%)<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0,00 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,04 0,05<br />

Figure 1<br />

t (ms)<br />

San Presto I(%) = 31<br />

Pianello I (%) = 13<br />

Palombina Turri I(%) = 9<br />

108


T1 Experiment<br />

In table 1, T1 spin-lattice relaxation<br />

values of the three stones are <strong>report</strong>ed. A<br />

bi-exponential behavior has been found<br />

for all stones.<br />

In figure 2 T1 trends are shown. San<br />

Presto stone shows the shortest T1 values<br />

on respect to Pianello and Palombina<br />

Turri stones.<br />

T2 Experiment<br />

Normalized Intensity<br />

Table 1<br />

1,2<br />

1,0<br />

0,8<br />

0,6<br />

0,4<br />

0,2<br />

0,0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

t (ms)<br />

Figure 2<br />

San Presto<br />

Pianella<br />

Palombina Turri<br />

best fit<br />

San Presto Pianello Palombina Turri<br />

Wa (%) 46 29 29<br />

T1a (ms) 1.53±0.15 12.1±1.7 24±6<br />

Wb (%) 54 71 71<br />

T1b (ms) 188±9 279±16 329±37<br />

In table 2, T2 spin-spin relaxation<br />

values of the three stones are<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed. Three T2 values have been<br />

found for San Presto and Pianello<br />

stones whereas two values has been<br />

obtained for Palombina Turri stone.<br />

In figure 3 T2 trends are shown.<br />

Normalized Intensity<br />

1,0<br />

0,8<br />

0,6<br />

0,4<br />

0,2<br />

0,0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

t (ms)<br />

San Presto<br />

Pianello<br />

Palombina Turri<br />

best fit<br />

6<br />

109


Table 2<br />

Figure 3<br />

San Presto Pianello Palombina Turri<br />

Wa (%) 55 57<br />

T2a (ms) 0.121±0.004 0.122±0.006<br />

Wb (%) 40 37 85<br />

T2b (ms) 0.539±0.015 0.471±0.015 0.379±0.007<br />

Wc (%) 5 6 15<br />

T2a (ms) 4.35±0.16 7.29±0.26 3.31±0.13<br />

2) NMR characterisation of San Presto stone wetted by water capillary absorption<br />

Hahn Echo Experiment<br />

In Figure 4 the single Hahn Echo for the dry and wet San Presto stone are shown. A clear increase of<br />

intensity has been found for the wetted one.<br />

Normalized Intensity<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0, 00 0, 01 0, 02 0,03 0,04 0,05 0,06<br />

t (ms)<br />

Figure 4<br />

dry I(%) = 31<br />

wet I(%)= 60<br />

110


T2 Experiment<br />

In table 3, T2 spin-spin relaxation<br />

values of dry and wet stones are<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed. In figure 5 T2 trends are<br />

shown.<br />

An increase of all T2 values are<br />

observed due to water into the pores.<br />

In particular a considerable increase<br />

of the longest T2 component has been<br />

found.<br />

Table 3<br />

Normalized Intensity<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

-0.2<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

t (ms)<br />

Figure 5<br />

San Presto dry San Presto wet<br />

Wa (%) 55 39<br />

T2a (ms) 0.121±0.004 0.477±0.032<br />

Wb (%) 40 34<br />

T2b (ms) 0.539±0.015 1.72±0.18<br />

Wc (%) 5 27<br />

T2a (ms) 4.35±0.16 8.0±0.6<br />

dry<br />

wet<br />

best fit<br />

111


II- JRA2 Task 1- Progress <strong>report</strong> on NMR-MOUSE, towards the 3D.<br />

Resp. RWTH<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 17<br />

During the first year of the project the NMR-MOUSE as well as the methods (pulses sequences) were<br />

improved based on the results obtained from reference samples. In July 2005 the first measurement on<br />

ancient paintings were carried out at the Galleria Nazionale dell’Umbria in Perugia. It is important to<br />

stress that the complete NMR instrumentation, including computer, spectrometer, NMR-MOUSE, and<br />

the lift, can be packed in a suitcase and can be carried by one person (Portable NMR).<br />

Several paintings have been studied, such as a panel by Maestro del Farneto, a Virgin with<br />

Child by Gentile da Fabriano, the Adorazione dei Magi by Perugino, and the Tryptic of Sant’Antonio<br />

by Piero della Francesca.<br />

Figure 4a describes the typical configuration of the sensor required to perform the experiment.<br />

The sensor is placed on a table that can be moved up and down on order to control the vertical<br />

position, while the lateral position is controlled simply by displacing the sensor. Since the lateral<br />

resolution is of about 1 cm in both direction (up-down and left-right) the mechanism results of good<br />

precision. The direction that results more critical is along the depth where the space resolution goes<br />

down to 20 micrometers. The proper alignment can be done by taking as reference the acrylic plate<br />

and setting it parallel to the painting surface. The ratio between the sizes of the acrylic plate and the<br />

sensitive region (30cm/1cm) is a demultiplication factor that allows one to precisely align the sensitive<br />

volume. For example, an error of 0.5 mm at the border of the plate represents a deviation of only 16<br />

µm across the sensitive volume.<br />

Notice that there is no need to have any contact with the painting. Once the plate is aligned,<br />

the sensor is moved respect to the plate by a high-precision lift. Figure. 4b shows two depth profiles<br />

measured at two different positions on the Virgin with Child by Gentile da Fabriano. The NMR signal<br />

amplitude is plotted as a function of the depth. The first peak (depth~0 mm) corresponds to the paint<br />

layer which has a thickness of about 130 µm, this is followed by a flat region of about 800 µm that<br />

corresponds to the preparation. The <strong>second</strong> peak at about 1 mm depth is assigned to canvas that is<br />

glued at the interface between the preparation and the wood support.<br />

1<br />

130 µm<br />

800 µm<br />

300 µm<br />

Fig 4. a) The NMR-MOUSE set up to measure depth profiles of the Virgin with Child by Gentile da Fabriano.<br />

The acrylic plate is aligned parallel to the painting surface but does not touch the paint; a distance of about 1 mm<br />

is left between them. b) NMR signal amplitude plotted as a function of the depth into the painting. The<br />

multilayer structure of the painting can be observed, from left to right: paint, preparation, canvas, and wood.<br />

112


The same structure, paint-preparation-canvas-wood, was observed in the panel by the Maestro del<br />

Farneto, the Adorazione dei Magi from Perugino, and the Tryptic of Sant’Antonio by Piero della<br />

Francesca, but the thickness of those layers were different from painting to painting. Interestingly, in<br />

the case of the Adorazione dei Magi by Perugino (figure 5a), a region where the canvas layer is much<br />

broader than normal was found. In region 1, the profile shows the preparation layer became thin while<br />

the canvas reaches a thickness of about 1 mm. A possible explanation could be that the wood support<br />

is composed by pieces that are joined together, and in the join line several canvas layers are used for<br />

reinforcing. Close to the measured spot one of this joins can be seen.<br />

2 1<br />

Fig 5. a) Adorazione dei Magi from Perugino. b) NMR signal amplitude profiles.<br />

113


III- JRA2- Task 2: Progress <strong>report</strong> on micro- and spectroscopic characterisation of<br />

standards and technical advances<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 18<br />

JRA2 Task2, Ia- Characterisation of standards<br />

Resp. OPD<br />

Within the Joint Research Activity 2, Opificio delle Pietre Dure contributed to this activity by<br />

providing multilayer painted standards for both Task1 (NMR methods) and Task2 (Multispectral<br />

imaging). During the first year activity, some pictorial standards were prepared and a preliminary<br />

characterisation had been carried out on microsample cross sections by means of optical microscopy<br />

under both visible and UV light.<br />

In order to have a complete stratigraphical characterisation of the standard samples in terms of<br />

thickness and composition of the paint layers, the samples have been analysed by Scanning Electron<br />

Microscopy – Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), which measures the energy and intensity<br />

distribution of X-ray signals generated by the electron beam striking the surface of the specimen.<br />

Due to some troubles occurred to the EDS device, that is currently under repair, it was possible to<br />

examine only samples A-D; the results so far achieved are <strong>report</strong>ed in the following sections.<br />

Preparation of samples to be investigated<br />

SEM samples were prepared by mounting the cross sections on aluminium stubs (0.5” aluminium<br />

stubs, purchased by AGAR Scientific LTD, Stansted, UK), by means of a double-stick carbon<br />

tape (AGAR). An optimal contact between the sample and the metallic support was provided<br />

by subsequently using a quick drying silver paint (AGAR). Embedded cross sections are nonconductors<br />

of electricity, therefore when placed in the path of the electron beam the samples<br />

would charge causing deviation of the beam, as well as discharging. The sample were thus<br />

coated by a conductive material: carbon was the choice because of its low Z, minimal effect<br />

on the X-Ray spectrum either in terms of producing X-ray lines or absorbing X-rays. The<br />

carbon coat was applied using a vacuum evaporator at pressure of less than 10 -4 torr (AGAR<br />

SEM Carbon Coater, Mod. 108C). The film thickness was around 100-150 nm.<br />

Experimental Conditions<br />

The samples were examined by a Cambridge Stereoscan 440i, coupled with an Oxford 5431<br />

microprobe (Software LINK ISIS) which provided the microanalyses. The accelerating voltage was 20<br />

kV, the beam current 120 pA. In order to better distinguish the different constituent phases and<br />

elements in the various areas, a back-scattered electrons detector was used (BSE)<br />

SEM-EDS examination<br />

For each examined sample, a BSE image of the cross-section and EDS spectra of the various paint<br />

layers were collected. The results are <strong>report</strong>ed in the following figures.<br />

Ground: EDS spectra were collected on the ground of the standards, which was the same for all<br />

the samples and consisted of a mixture of gypsum and rabbit glue; as expected, calcium and<br />

sulphur were found. A representative spectrum is shown in Figure 1. In the following<br />

micrographs, the ground is always labelled as “1”.<br />

114


Figure 1. EDS Spectrum of the ground of the standards (mixture of gypsum and rabbit glue).<br />

Standard A (Figure 2): the sample consisted of indian yellow (3, outer layer) laid on lead and tin<br />

yellow (2, intermediate layer). Due to the organic composition of indian yellow, no relevant peak was<br />

detected on layer 3 (spectrum not <strong>report</strong>ed).<br />

a<br />

cps<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O<br />

Ca<br />

S<br />

Ca<br />

Ca<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

b<br />

Figure 2. (a) Standard A, containing indian yellow (3, outer layer) and lead and tin yellow (2, inner layer);<br />

(b) SEM-EDS of layer 2 (lead and tin yellow).<br />

cps<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O<br />

Pb<br />

Sn<br />

Sn<br />

Sn Sn<br />

Pb<br />

Pb<br />

115


Standard B (Figure 3): the sample consisted of spincervino yellow (3, outer layer) laid on lead and<br />

tin yellow (2, intermediate layer). The EDS spectrum of spincervino revealed presence of aluminium,<br />

potassium and sulphur, possibly related to the use of alum as a supporting material for the organic<br />

colorant.<br />

cps<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O<br />

Na<br />

Al<br />

S<br />

K<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

b<br />

a<br />

Figure 3. (a) Standard B, containing spincervino yellow (3, outer layer) and lead and tin yellow (2, inner<br />

layer); (b) SEM-EDS of layer 3 (spincervino yellow); (c) SEM-EDS of layer 2 (lead and tin yellow).<br />

cps<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O<br />

Si<br />

Pb<br />

Sn<br />

Sn<br />

Sn<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

c<br />

Pb<br />

Pb<br />

116


Standard C (Figure 4): the sample consisted of saffron yellow (3, outer layer) laid on lead and tin<br />

yellow (2, intermediate layer). Due to the organic composition of saffron yellow, no relevant peak was<br />

detected on layer 3 (spectrum not <strong>report</strong>ed).<br />

a<br />

Figure 4. (a) Standard C, containing saffron yellow (3, outer layer) and lead and tin yellow (2, inner layer);<br />

(b) SEM-EDS of layer 2 (lead and tin yellow).<br />

cps<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O<br />

Si<br />

Pb<br />

Sn<br />

Sn<br />

Sn<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

b<br />

Pb<br />

Pb<br />

117


Standard D (Figure 5): the sample consisted of rubia lake (3, outer layer) laid on a mixture of<br />

cinnabar and lead white (2, intermediate layer). The EDS spectrum of rubia lake revealed the presence<br />

of aluminium, probably related to the use of alumina in the lake. In layer 2, the larger grains resulted<br />

to be composed of cinnabar, whereas smaller grains consisted of lead white.<br />

cps<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O Al<br />

Hg<br />

a<br />

Hg<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

Hg<br />

c<br />

d<br />

Figure 5. (a) Standard D, containing rubia lake (3, outer layer) and cinnabar + lead white (2, inner layer) (b)<br />

SEM-EDS of layer 3 (rubia lake); (c) SEM-EDS of layer 2 (cinnabar); (d) SEM-EDS of layer 2 (lead white).<br />

JRA2 Task2, I b- Technical advances in design of INOA scanning systems<br />

(Subtask 2.3).<br />

Resp. INOA<br />

cps<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

Pb<br />

b<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Energy (keV)<br />

During the first semester of the <strong>second</strong> year of the project the following activities have been carried<br />

out:<br />

1. Further study and definition of a new set of cost-effective IR detectors<br />

2. Design and realization of the filter holders<br />

3. Design and realization of the sub-rack unit<br />

cps<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

C<br />

O<br />

Al<br />

Pb<br />

Pb<br />

118


4. Realization of the first bundle prototype<br />

1. IR detectors<br />

The detection system will be made of 14 photodiodes to cover the spectral region from 800 nm to<br />

2400 nm. Each sensor is equipped with an interferential filter (see 12-monthly <strong>report</strong>). The first 3<br />

channels will be equipped with Si photodiodes; from 4 to 11 channel InGaAs photodiodes will be used<br />

and, finally for channels 12 to 14 pre-amplified thermoelettrically cooled photodiodes will be used.<br />

The 14 identified photodiodes are resumed in Table 1, together with the central wavelength and<br />

bandwidth of the corresponding filter.<br />

Table 1. Sensors identified for the detection system.<br />

CHANNEL PHOTOTDIODE λfilter [nm] ∆λfilter [nm]<br />

1 Hamamatsu S2386 5K 800 10<br />

2 Hamamatsu S2386 5K 850 67<br />

3 Hamamatsu S2386 5K 952 67<br />

4 Hamamatsu G8370-01 1030 55<br />

5 Hamamatsu G8370-01 1112 66<br />

6 Hamamatsu G8370-01 1200 66<br />

7 Hamamatsu G8370-01 1300 90<br />

8 Hamamatsu G8370-01 1400 90<br />

9 Hamamatsu G8370-01 1500 90<br />

10 Hamamatsu G8370-01 1600 90<br />

11 Hamamatsu G8371-01 1700 90<br />

12 Hamamatsu G6122 1820 100<br />

13 Hamamatsu G6122 1930 112<br />

14 Hamamatsu G6122-03 2265 590<br />

119


2. Filter holders<br />

A set of filter holders were designed to host the 14 filters and the photodiodes. Depending on filter<br />

dimensions and detector shape, they were studied to have the best match between the fiber output and<br />

the detector sensitive area. Three different types of holders were then designed, and they are shown in<br />

figure 1.<br />

3. Sub-rack unit<br />

(a) (b) (c)<br />

Figure 1. Filter holders for channels (a) I-III; (b) IV-XI and (c) XII-XIV<br />

As the instrument is supposed to be used for in situ measurement campaigns, compactness is an<br />

important requirement. A purpose-build sub-rack unit was then designed to keep all the detectors<br />

together. It also comprehends a power supply unit and an interface whose output goes directly to ADC<br />

by means of a flat cable. Figure 2 shows a sketch of the sub-rack unit, together with the Printed Circuit<br />

Board of the interface.<br />

P<br />

o<br />

w<br />

e<br />

r<br />

S<br />

u<br />

p<br />

p<br />

l<br />

y<br />

(a) (b)<br />

Figure 2. (a) Sub-rack unit; (b) PCB interface between the set of 14 sensors and the ADC.<br />

120


4. Bundle<br />

A first prototype of 16 fiber bundle was realized. 14 VIS-NIR and 2 UV-VIS multi-mode optical<br />

fibers were used, with a cladding diameter of 230 micron. In order to properly align in a square-shaped<br />

bundle the 16 fibers, a 1 mm groove was dig. The 16 fibers were then stick all together with a twocomponent<br />

glue. The microscope image of the bundle section is shown in figure 3. The 16-fiber array<br />

is not perfectly regular, as one of the lines is shifted with respect to the others. We are planning a new<br />

technique for the bundle realization that makes use of a different glue, in order to stick separately the<br />

four 4-fiber layers.<br />

Figure 3. Microscope image of the bundle section.<br />

121


JRA2 Task2, I c – Advances in preparation and characterisation of standards of layered<br />

painting materials (Subtask 2.1) and in transmission and reflection of IR radiation on layered<br />

standards (Subtask 2.2)<br />

Resp. OADC<br />

1.1.1 - Preparation of the reference samples in order to study the parameters of the models that will be<br />

used for the identification/investigation of the stratigraphy (Reference panels with eight levels of<br />

gradually higher thicknesses of the different 19 basic pigments).<br />

Within the period between the 12 th and the 18 th month special reference samples were<br />

developed on wooden panels of gradually higher paint layer thickness in order to study the<br />

transmission and reflection of the IR radiation through them. The way that these reference<br />

samples are created is displayed in figure 1.1a. Multi-spectral spectra of these samples will be<br />

acquired in the visible, near infrared (nIR) and mid infrared (mIR) area of the spectrum (up to<br />

4500nm).<br />

Figure 1.1a: Reference sample (way of fabrication of gradually higher thickness )<br />

The reference samples are painted on a common white ground and with the same binding<br />

medium in order to minimize the uncertainty to our applied algorithms during the tests.<br />

Ground : CaCO3 + animal glue<br />

Binding Medium : Egg yolk<br />

In appendix 1 all the first testing measurements on the panels are provided. For the time being<br />

the Perkin ELMER Lambda 900 spectrophotometer was used in the wavelength range of<br />

200nm-2400nm. These measurements will serve as a reference for the testing of the device<br />

under development. Within the next months and after the first assembly of the device, the<br />

measurements will be performed using the new device and the new developed method will be<br />

tested in the extensive wavelength range between 800nm and 4500nm.<br />

122


1.1.2. Materials and methodology of creation of the reference panels (standards)<br />

(Samples of 17 pigments in paint layers of gradually higher thickness).<br />

The panels with samples of different (gradually higher) thickness were prepared in successive steps, as<br />

follows: first, all eight parts of one pigment sample were painted at once in 2 or 3 layers of paint, then<br />

one part was masked out and the remaining seven layers were painted again in 2 or 3 layers. Then two<br />

parts were masked and the remaining six were painted, and so forth. Between each step, the paint was<br />

allowed to dry satisfactorily. The panels were set-aside for a month to dry well before the first<br />

measurements are taken.<br />

The panels for the samples of different thickness were prepared by lightly scoring rectangles,<br />

separated in 8 parts each of 2x5cm. These were then split in two lengthwise, one half painted in 3<br />

layers of carbon black with egg as a binding medium and the other scored in pencil with diagonal<br />

lines, again on half of its area.<br />

Figure 1.1.2a: Samples of 10 pigments in paint layers of gradually higher thickness.<br />

123


Subtask 2.3: Assembling of nIR imaging equipments<br />

(Integration sphere design and assembly).<br />

A golden integration sphere is assembled in order to permit the reflection and integration of<br />

the IR radiation from 800nm up to 4500nm. The design of the integration sphere is displayed<br />

in Fig 1.2.1a.<br />

Figure 1.2.1a: Integration sphere that will be used for diffused reflectance measurements from<br />

800nm up to 4500nm the dimensions are in INCHES.<br />

The description of the all the other parts of the equipment is in the 1 st year <strong>report</strong> of OADC<br />

(JRA2).<br />

124


APPENDIX 1<br />

Vertical axis (Reflectivity R%) - Horizontal axis Wavelengths 200-2400nm)<br />

Lead White<br />

(over Black)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Yellow Ochre<br />

(over Black)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Warm Ochre<br />

(over Black)<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

(over White)<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500


Red Ochre<br />

(over Black)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Sienna Burnt<br />

(over Black)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Hematite<br />

(over Black)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

(over White)<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

126


40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Caput Mortuum<br />

(over Black)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Umber Raw(over Black)<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Cinnabar<br />

(over Black)<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

127


70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Minium<br />

(over Black)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Green Earth<br />

(over Black)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Malachite<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

-0.05<br />

-0.1<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

(over White)<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 250<br />

(over White)<br />

-0.15<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

128


(over Black)<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Azurite<br />

(over Black)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Ultramarine<br />

(over Black)<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

Indigo<br />

(over Black)<br />

-10<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

(over White)<br />

-20<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

(over White)<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

129


25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Cobalt Blue(over Black)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

(over White)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

130


JRA2 Task 3 - Report on optimal conditions for artwork XRD studies and XRD and<br />

XRF assembling<br />

Resp. C2RMF – A.Gianoncelli, J.Castaing)<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 19<br />

Introduction<br />

The complete knowledge of materials characteristics requires the determination of the different<br />

phases (chemical composition, crystal structure) that are present in an object and the description of<br />

the microstructure (grain size, texture, lattice imperfections, etc.). The target of the project is to<br />

obtain this information thanks to a new tool for in situ studies of the constitutive materials of<br />

artworks by means of X ray fluorescence (XRF) and X ray diffraction (XRD). In the first twelve<br />

months, an assessment of the possible geometries has been made and general specifications have<br />

been established. We ruled out the energy dispersive X ray diffraction (ED-XRD) option based on<br />

a literature survey. However, we performed diffraction experiments to compare the performance of<br />

ED-XRD with traditional angular detection; we present the first results that confirm our initial<br />

choice.<br />

Another choice has been made concerning the detection of diffracted beams; we purchased an<br />

imaging plate system and have started to test it for XRD recording.<br />

Energy dispersive X-ray diffraction experiments<br />

Energy Dispersive X-ray diffraction (ED-XRD) experiments have been carried out at the<br />

Laboratoire de Cristallographie (CNRS UPR 5031) in Grenoble in order to test the performance of<br />

this method for a portable XRD instrument.<br />

X-ray diffraction occurs when there is constructive interference between incident and diffracted<br />

waves; this means that the path difference between the two waves must be an integer number of<br />

wavelengths.<br />

This leads to the Bragg’s law:<br />

2 d sinϑ<br />

= nλ<br />

= n (1.24 / E)<br />

where d is the spacing between the planes in the atomic lattice<br />

λ is the wavelength of the incoming x-ray of energy E (in keV for λ in nm)<br />

n is an integer<br />

θ is the angle between the incident beam and the scattering planes.<br />

Angle dispersive methods rely on the identification of the angles θ corresponding to constructive<br />

interference, once λ has been fixed.<br />

Energy dispersive methods allow to recognise the crystal structure of the sample (d-spacing) by<br />

analysing the energy of the peaks present in the spectra, acquired at a fixed angle θ.<br />

The following instrumentation was used during the test:<br />

- Cu anode X-ray tube biased at 40 kV and 40 mA;<br />

- Si(Li) detector, 8 µs peaking time, nominal energy resolution of 180 eV @ Mn Kα line (5.898<br />

eV).<br />

- Goniometre to rotate detector and sample independently<br />

A few different specimens have been analysed: polycrystalline silicon, quartz, calcite and calcite<br />

covered by a thin layer of goethite.<br />

The measurement have been taken at two or three different 2θ angles for each sample; this results<br />

in a shift of the peak position (energy) by changing the angle.<br />

131


We show the results obtained for polycrystalline silicon (figures 1 and 2). The position of the<br />

peaks for Polycristalline Si is indicated in table 1, according to the crystalline plane and to the<br />

angle between X-ray beam and detector axis (2θ).<br />

Due to difficulties in the alignment of the system, the geometry of the experiment is not well<br />

known, in fact the detected peaks correspond to the angles indicated 2θ=31° and 2θ=36°.<br />

hkl<br />

d-spacing<br />

[Å]<br />

Table 1.<br />

position [keV]<br />

@ 31°<br />

position [keV]<br />

@ 36°<br />

111 3.1355 7,398 6,398<br />

220 1.9201 12,081 10,448<br />

311 1.6374 14,167 12,252<br />

400 1.3567 17,098 14,787<br />

331 1.2459 18,619 16,102<br />

422 1.1085 20,927 18,097<br />

This kind of sample is an ideal one because its fluorescence peaks are in the low energy range (Si<br />

Kα is at 1.740 keV); in this way the diffraction peaks can only interfer with the Cu peaks due to the<br />

anode of the X-ray tube. The Si peaks are not visible in the spectrum because of the absorption of<br />

the air (the distance between sample and detector is around 15 cm).<br />

For most complicate or multi-elemental samples, the overlapping of fluorescence and diffraction<br />

peaks can make the peak identification more difficult.<br />

Figures 1 and 2 show the spectra acquired at two different angles. Peaks have been identified as<br />

diffraction peaks: the corresponding crystalline plane is indicated in the spectra.<br />

- Figure 1. Spectrum of a polycristalline Si, acquired with the Si(Li) detector and 2θ1=30°;<br />

measurement time (real time): 150 sec<br />

132


- Figure 2. Spectrum of a polycristalline Si, acquired with the Si(Li) detector and 2θ1=35°;<br />

measurement time (real time): 150 sec<br />

As expected, by changing the 2θ angle, the diffraction peak energy changes. For instance, the<br />

(111) peak is included in the fluorescence Cu-Kα in figure 1 and it is visible in figure 2, but it<br />

coincides with the escape peak.<br />

Similar observations were made on the other compounds. In these cases, the fluoresecnce of Ca<br />

and Fe from the specimens add up to the fluorescence of copper that originates from the X ray<br />

source.<br />

Although the measurements showed that it is possible to identify the diffraction peaks by using<br />

energy dispersive methods, this technique does not seem suitable for mineral identification with a<br />

portable instrument. The diffraction peak intensity is quite weak and the peak width is quite large,<br />

due to the detector energy resolution and to the superposition of different diffraction peaks.<br />

Fluorescence peaks can strongly interfere with diffraction peaks making their identification more<br />

difficult. Moreover fluorescence peaks are usually much more intense than diffraction ones.<br />

In principle these problems could be overcome by systematically doing measurements at several<br />

different angles. This could be done in a relatively quick measurement time by using a multielement<br />

detector or some single detectors located at different 2θ angles. This solution would allow<br />

to evaluate the geometry and to separate diffraction and fluorescence peaks. On the other hand this<br />

requires a complex and heavy equipment, and also a non-trivial data analysis.<br />

This supports our initial conclusion, based on the literature, to rule out the ED-XRD for the<br />

planned portable system.<br />

X-ray Diffraction experiments with Imaging Plate<br />

The experiments have been performed at the Laboratoire de Cristallographie (CNRS UPR 5031) in<br />

Grenoble. The source used is a Philips C-Tech type x-ray tube, with Cu anode and a maximum<br />

power of 2200 W (60 kV). The x-ray beam is monochromatic by means of two mirrors: only Kα1,<br />

Kα2 and Kβ appear in the spectrum (with approximately the following ratio between intensities<br />

Kα/Kβ≈10 -3 ÷10 -4 ).<br />

The divergence of the beam is approximately 0.05° and its dimension is around 1.5mm x 1mm in<br />

the centre of the goniometer, with a flux of around 10 7 ph/s.<br />

The tube is biased at 50 kV and 40 mA.<br />

133


Different kinds of samples and different times of measurement have been taken into account in<br />

order to test the system.<br />

For each sample two XRD detector systems have been used:<br />

- a conventional scintillator detector, with a monochromator in front of it, in a θ-2θ<br />

configuration<br />

- an Imaging Plate (IP) perpendicular to the incident X-ray beam at distance of around 20<br />

cm from sample, with ω being the angle between x-ray beam and sample surface.<br />

Here, we present the results obtained for quartz. For a measurement time less than 5 min the IP<br />

scanner did not read anything.<br />

Since the first image with the fixed sample showed some preferential orientation (punctuation on<br />

the rings) of the crystals in the quartz, further measurements were taken with the sample turning<br />

on itself in order to obtain a more uniform diagram (figure 3).<br />

Figure 4 and 5 show a comparison between the diagram recorded by the scintillator detector (1h<br />

and 6 minute measurement) and the diagram obtained from the fitting (Fit2D) of the image<br />

recorded with the Image Plate (10 minutes), respectively. Considering the measurement times and<br />

the intensity shown in the diagram, the efficiency of the imaging plate appears quite high.<br />

Figure 3. Diagram recorded on the imaging place for a turning quartz sample irradiated for 10 min<br />

with a monochromatic radiation (Cu Kα) and ω=15°, read at 16 bit.<br />

Figure 4. θ-2θ XRD diagram for quartz, recorded with a scintillator detector over a 2θ range from<br />

20° to 60° (0,05°/step with 5s/point) for a total measurement time of around 1h and 6 minutes.<br />

134


Figure 5. Result of the fitting of an XRD diagram recorded with an imaging plate, for a quartz<br />

sample irradiated for 10 min and ω =15° (16 reading bits).<br />

The imaging plate detector proved to be a valid alternative to the one-dimensional scintillator<br />

detector: the measurement times are comparable (around 20÷30 minutes for both), even if imaging<br />

plate seems to be more efficient. Imaging plates have the big advantage of being a twodimensional<br />

low-noise system, with a flexible mounting and wireless, and they allow to collect<br />

data in a parallel detection configuration. On the other hand the scanner system requires around 3<br />

minutes to read the recorded image (it is not an online measurement; the result is visible only at<br />

the end of the process) and imaging plates are light sensitive.<br />

Further tests are in progress in order to determine the needs for an analyzer for the diffracted<br />

beams and the types of slits/diaphragms necessary for optimal XRD. This is will allow to choose<br />

the optimal X ray source compatible for XRF and XRD.<br />

135


JRA2 Task 4 - Report on the spectroscopic characterisation of the prepared<br />

samples<br />

Resp. UNIPG<br />

DELIVERABLE N. 20<br />

The JRA2 research activity of task 4 during the first semester of the <strong>second</strong> year has been focused<br />

on the enlargement of the microRaman and UV-VIS fluorescence database of solid powder<br />

standard dyes and lakes. Standard materials <strong>report</strong>ed on table 1 have been examined employing<br />

MicroRaman in the lab set-up using two excitation wavelength 532 nm and 785 nm. The portable<br />

set-up has been experience as MicroRaman using the 532nm excitation and as fluorimeter using<br />

again the 532nm excitation but conveniently moving the polychromator. MicroRaman and<br />

fluorescence spectra are here <strong>report</strong>ed in the database format, maxima of vibrational scatterings<br />

and electronic emissions are labeled. Interestingly, the portable equipment resulted to be properly<br />

set-up for the study of red anthraquinone dyes, in fact in this case using the 532 nm excitation we<br />

can observe an resonance enhancement and a relatively low fluorescence background thanks to<br />

their large Stock-Shift.<br />

Table 1: Standard colorant and dye descriptions<br />

Name and molecular formula<br />

Natural red dyestuff<br />

Origin<br />

Anthraquinone<br />

Source<br />

Madder lake-(Alizarin & Purporin) Vegetable origin National Gallery<br />

Alizarin<br />

Purporin<br />

Gum lake<br />

Carminic acid<br />

Carmine<br />

Kermes lake<br />

Lac lake<br />

Dragon’s blood<br />

dracorhodin<br />

dracorubin<br />

Brasilwood<br />

brasilin<br />

brasilein<br />

Quercitin<br />

Vegetable origin Aldrich<br />

Vegetable origin Aldrich<br />

Insect origin Zecchi<br />

Insect origin Aldrich<br />

Insect origin Aldrich<br />

Insect origin National Gallery<br />

Insect origin National Gallery<br />

Natural resin Zecchi<br />

Vegetable origin National Gallery<br />

Natural yellow, yellow brown dyestuffs<br />

Flavononid<br />

Vegetable origin Riedel-de Haen AG<br />

Fustic -(Morin & Fisetin) Vegetable origin Zecchi<br />

Morin<br />

Vegetable origin Aldrich<br />

Fisetin Vegetable origin Fluka<br />

136


Curcumin<br />

Arzica<br />

Luteolin<br />

Stil De Grain<br />

Saffron/crocetin<br />

Apigenin<br />

Natural blue dyestuff<br />

indigo<br />

Campeggio (logwood)<br />

Orcein<br />

Orcinol<br />

Vegetable origin Zecchi<br />

Vegetable origin Zecchi<br />

Vegetable origin Zecchi<br />

Vegetable origin Zecchi<br />

Vegetable origin Zecchi<br />

Natural violet dyestuff<br />

Vegetable origin Zecchi<br />

Vegetable origin Aldrich<br />

Synthetic violet dyestuff<br />

Man-made Aldrich<br />

137


MicroRaman Spectroscopy: Laboratory instrument JASCO Ventuno.<br />

1. Pure standard colorants and dyes<br />

1.a Analyses carried out using 532nm excitation (no baseline effected)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

11<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

15<br />

12<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

0<br />

1480<br />

1420<br />

1328<br />

1276<br />

Madder lake<br />

1239<br />

511<br />

1079<br />

1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600<br />

989<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Porporin<br />

915<br />

839<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Carminic acid<br />

5000 4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

659<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

15<br />

1570<br />

1590<br />

1480<br />

1458<br />

1402<br />

1332<br />

Alizarin<br />

1216<br />

1192<br />

1600 1400 1200 800 600 400<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

831<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Lacca di gomma<br />

5000 4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

5<br />

0<br />

819<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Carmine<br />

680<br />

627<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

473<br />

424<br />

138


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Brazilwood<br />

5000 4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

12<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Dragon's blood<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Fustetto<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Verzino<br />

4000 2000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Quercetin<br />

1622<br />

1563<br />

1334<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

Morin<br />

857<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

607<br />

529<br />

139


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Fisetin<br />

1634<br />

1570<br />

5000 4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Arzica<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Zafferano<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

1559<br />

1185<br />

1023<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Curcumina<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Stil De Grain<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

Tioindaco<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

1648<br />

1573<br />

1350<br />

1191<br />

809<br />

629<br />

397<br />

140


1.b Analyses carried out using 785nm excitation (no baseline effected)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

1.2<br />

Madder lake<br />

1430<br />

1496<br />

1468<br />

1339<br />

1600 1200 800<br />

Carminic acid<br />

1465<br />

1244<br />

1180<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

Purpurin<br />

654<br />

448<br />

509<br />

1500 1000 500<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

1300<br />

1600 1400 1200 1000<br />

1224<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

910<br />

1098<br />

1076<br />

1007<br />

552<br />

585<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

785nm<br />

Alizarin<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Gum lake<br />

Carminio<br />

Raman shift (cm -1 )<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

60 977<br />

1319<br />

1263<br />

1400 1200 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

141


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Dragon's blood<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

2.1<br />

1.4<br />

0.7<br />

Kermes lake<br />

Brazilwood<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

1442<br />

1324<br />

1267<br />

1127<br />

1065<br />

1016<br />

904<br />

1526<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Lac lake<br />

Verzino<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Fustic<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

142


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

14<br />

4<br />

2<br />

7<br />

Morin<br />

Curcumin<br />

1.8 Stil de Grain<br />

0.9<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

4<br />

2<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Fisetin<br />

4000 3000 2000 1000<br />

6 Arzica<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Saffron<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

1541<br />

1166<br />

1216<br />

1282<br />

2000 1500 1000 500<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

143


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

0.9 Tioindigo<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Orceine<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Campeggio<br />

Orcinol<br />

3000 2000 1000<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

1615<br />

1335<br />

1384<br />

1158<br />

1004<br />

975<br />

595<br />

518<br />

556<br />

2000 1500 1000 500<br />

Raman Shift (cm -1 )<br />

407<br />

330<br />

144


2. MicroRaman Spectroscopy: Portable spectrophotometer of UNIPG<br />

Pure standard colorants and dyes<br />

Analyses carried out using 532nm excitation (no baseline effected), monochromator :876nm<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

1.5x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

5.0x10 4<br />

5x10 4<br />

4x10 4<br />

3x10 4<br />

1.2x10 5<br />

8.0x10 4<br />

4.0x10 4<br />

417<br />

452<br />

Madder lake<br />

1327<br />

1572<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Purpurin<br />

1048<br />

956<br />

Carmine<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

1329<br />

1243<br />

1466<br />

900 1800 2700<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

1094<br />

1308<br />

1487<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

1.2x10 5<br />

8.0x10 4<br />

4.0x10 4<br />

1.2x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

8.0x10 4<br />

6.0x10 4<br />

4.0x10 4<br />

2.0x10 4<br />

6x10 5<br />

5x10 5<br />

4x10 5<br />

3x10 5<br />

2x10 5<br />

Alizarin<br />

1185<br />

1477<br />

1325<br />

1593<br />

900 1800 2700<br />

Carminic acid<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

1229<br />

1466<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Quercetin<br />

486<br />

521<br />

594<br />

1097<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

1318<br />

1363<br />

1397<br />

1437<br />

1550<br />

1612<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

145


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

7x10 4<br />

6x10 4<br />

5x10 4<br />

4x10 4<br />

3x10 4<br />

1.4x10 5<br />

1.2x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

8.0x10 4<br />

6.0x10 4<br />

1.2x10 5<br />

9.0x10 4<br />

6.0x10 4<br />

3.0x10 4<br />

Fustic<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

562<br />

512<br />

Fisetin<br />

778<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

1636<br />

1575<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Stil de Grain<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

1000 2000<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

2.0x10 5<br />

1.5x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

2.0x10 5<br />

1.5x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

5.0x10 4<br />

2.0x10 5<br />

1.5x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

5.0x10 4<br />

Morin<br />

800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800<br />

Arzica<br />

Saffron<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

900 1800 2700<br />

1160<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

1537<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

146


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity<br />

(a.u)<br />

2.4x10 5<br />

1.6x10 5<br />

8.0x10 4<br />

3.6x10 5<br />

2.7x10 5<br />

1.8x10 5<br />

Tioindigo<br />

3. Microfluorimeter<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

Pure standard colorants and dyes<br />

569<br />

Arzica<br />

595<br />

540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

Intensity<br />

(a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

1.4x10 5<br />

1.2x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

8.0x10 4<br />

Analyses carried out using 532nm excitation (no baseline effected)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

3x10 5<br />

2x10 5<br />

1x10 5<br />

579<br />

Tioindigo<br />

550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

6.0x10 4<br />

3.0x10 4<br />

515<br />

634<br />

989<br />

1337<br />

1428<br />

1502<br />

1581<br />

500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Raman shift (cm-1)<br />

9.0x10 4 570<br />

594<br />

9.0x10 4<br />

Stil de Grain<br />

Orcinol<br />

540 560 580 600 620<br />

548<br />

1.2x10 5 578<br />

1873<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

Orcinol<br />

540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

147


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

240000<br />

210000<br />

180000<br />

60000<br />

55000<br />

50000<br />

45000<br />

390000<br />

360000<br />

330000<br />

595<br />

Curcumina<br />

580 600 620<br />

624<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

Madder lake<br />

600 650 700 750 800<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

619<br />

Morin<br />

590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

490000<br />

420000<br />

350000<br />

547<br />

Zafferano<br />

540 630 720<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

148


Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

96000<br />

90000<br />

84000<br />

150000<br />

120000<br />

90000<br />

666<br />

Campeggio<br />

650 700<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

620 640 660 680 700 720<br />

240000 652<br />

200000<br />

160000<br />

664<br />

Gum lake<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

Carminic acid<br />

640 680 720<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

Intensity (a.u)<br />

180000<br />

150000<br />

12000<br />

9000<br />

6000<br />

658<br />

Dragon's blood<br />

640 680 720<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

667<br />

Carmine<br />

620 640 660 680 700 720<br />

Wavenumber (nm)<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!