Individual

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Intragroup and Temporal Comparison Perception of (un)stability and low discrimination activate intragroup and temporal comparison strategy – this strategy predicts immigrants personal well-being (SWL and PWB) Perceived illegitimacy and permeability lead to higher SWL, and illegitimacy to higher PWB Perceived discrimination has a negative indirect effect on SWL and PWB through intragroup temporal comparison National identification augments the tendency to make intragroup and temporal comparisons as a form to cope with the stigma
Attributions to Prejudice Perception of impermeability of group boundaries and personal discrimination predict making attributions to prejudice Attributions to prejudice have an indirect effect on collective self-esteem (CSE) - ethnic identification serves a a self-esteem protector; however, this strategy does not reinforce social well-being (SWB) National desidentification’s role is less significant for both CSE and SWB Perception of (un)stability and illegitimacy of group status differences contributes to higher CSE, while permeability is crucial for SWB Perceived discrimination has stronger consequences for SWB than for CSE - protective role of attributions to prejudice and ethnic identity only for CSE
Page 2 and 3:
Coping with immigrant’s stigma: p
Page 4 and 5:
Immigration in Spain Top 10 migran
Page 6 and 7: The “perpetrator’s perspective
Page 8 and 9: Perceived Discrimination: awareness
Page 10 and 11: Perceived Discrimination: awareness
Page 12 and 13: Devalued Social Identity Social Ide
Page 14 and 15: Situational Cues: Perceived Group S
Page 16 and 17: Building up: SIT & Relative Depriva
Page 18 and 19: Building up: classic coping RE-EVAL
Page 20 and 21: RE-EVAL UATION OF COMPARISON DIMENT
Page 22 and 23: RE-EVAL UATION OF COMPARISON DIMENT
Page 24 and 25: Objectives of the Study To explore
Page 26 and 27: Method: Participants & Participant
Page 28 and 29: Group Status Permeability (1 items
Page 30 and 31: Adaptation Variables: Personal Adap
Page 32 and 33: Individual Coping Strategies Disen
Page 34 and 35: Results
Page 36 and 37: Group status related variables: Nat
Page 38 and 39: Collective Coping Strategies .78 8
Page 40 and 41: Collective Coping Strategies 5. The
Page 42 and 43: Individual Coping Strategies .18 .9
Page 44 and 45: Individual Coping Strategies .74 .5
Page 46 and 47: Individual Coping Strategies 4. I f
Page 48 and 49: .55 .34 -.50 -.38 -.14 .08 PERMEABI
Page 50 and 51: .34 Intragroup Temporal Comparison
Page 52 and 53: .57 .08 -.50 .34 -.14 -.38 Attribut
Page 54 and 55: Taxonomy Four-factor structure of
Page 58 and 59: General Conclusions Perceived grou
show all

Individual

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?