<strong>in</strong>stantiate the numbers <strong>encode</strong>d. Between Möller and the <strong>in</strong>-text examples of numbers given <strong>in</strong> Gard<strong>in</strong>er, 96.6% of the number-forms (the 10s, 100s, 1000s, and 10,000s) are attested <strong>in</strong> a way which can be sourced by page number <strong>in</strong> the source database. There are 87 such numbers, and only three of them have no page-reference sources <strong>in</strong> Gard<strong>in</strong>er or Möller: „ D070-A ‘4 heqat measures’, ‰ D075 ‘9 heqat measures’, and  V042-A ‘400’ <strong>in</strong> one of its configurations. And D070-A is referenced <strong>in</strong> Allen 1999:102. Different configurations are considered unique text-elements and are <strong>encode</strong>d as characters, because it is these elements which are used for hieratic transcription and manipulated by (for <strong>in</strong>stance) the MdC. Thus Ê Z020, ä Z020-A, ã Z020-B, and å Z020-C, are all <strong>encode</strong>d though thay all mean ‘9’, the last two of these are are used <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g dates; Allen 1999 gives another form ç Z020-D. Higherlevel pro<strong>to</strong>cols could, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, be used <strong>to</strong> generate <strong>Egyptian</strong> numbers out of their constituent parts, but there would seem <strong>to</strong> be little advantage <strong>to</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g this. In such a case, a number like ÿŸ⁄€‹99,999 would have <strong>to</strong> be decomposed <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> 45 constituent parts along with 44 elements of markup, e.g., ›*›*›:›*›*›:›*›*›-fi*fi*fi:fi*fi*fi:fi*fi*fi-fl*fl*fl:fl*fl*fl:fl*fl*fl-‡*‡*‡:‡*‡*‡:‡*‡*‡-·*·*·:·*·*·:·*·*·. <strong>Egyptian</strong> numbers are thus <strong>encode</strong>d here along the same pr<strong>in</strong>ciples which were used <strong>in</strong> the encod<strong>in</strong>g of Aegean and Cuneiform numbers. 9. Enclosures. The two pr<strong>in</strong>cipal names of the k<strong>in</strong>g, the nomen and praenomen, were normally written <strong>in</strong>side a car<strong>to</strong>uche: a figure represent<strong>in</strong>g a coil of rope, for <strong>in</strong>stance “ ≠¨pp ‘Apophis’. Gard<strong>in</strong>er 1957:71–76 describes the royal titulary, giv<strong>in</strong>g beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g and end shapes œ and — signs <strong>in</strong> the Catalogue. The bracket-like convention of writ<strong>in</strong>g œ–— is used <strong>in</strong> the hieratic (cf. Möller 1936:51) and some modern publications. Pla<strong>in</strong> text and general purpose software should likewise treat these signs as characters and not render the fully enclosed form. For some additional enclosure characters which could be added <strong>to</strong> the reper<strong>to</strong>ire, see “Issues: Enclosures” below. 10. Unicode Character Properties The Unicode Consortium ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a set of character properties. The follow<strong>in</strong>g excerpt from the proposed additions <strong>to</strong> the file UnicodeData.txt <strong>in</strong>dicates that hieoglyphs are classified as Letter_Other (L0), that they are not comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g characters, that they are Left-<strong>to</strong>-Right (L) and that they do not have decompositions or case mapp<strong>in</strong>gs. For the purposes of l<strong>in</strong>e and word break<strong>in</strong>g as well as identifiers they would be treated like alphabetics. 13000;EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH A001;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; 13001;EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH A002;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; 13002;EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH A003;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; ... 1341F;EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH AA030;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; 13420;EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH AA031;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; 13421;EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH AA032;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; 11. Order<strong>in</strong>g. Determ<strong>in</strong>istic order<strong>in</strong>g of actual hieroglyphs is someth<strong>in</strong>g that is probably unknown <strong>to</strong> the Egyp<strong>to</strong>logical tradition, s<strong>in</strong>ce Egyp<strong>to</strong>logists have tended <strong>to</strong> sort the transliterations. However, an alphabetic order does exist (¨, ñ, y, Æ, w, b, p, f, m, n, r, h, h. , h, h, s, sˇ, k. , k, g, t, t, d, d as given above), and ˘ ¯ ¯ ¯ this should be the basis for order<strong>in</strong>g those characters with a phonetic read<strong>in</strong>g. Determ<strong>in</strong>atives without phonetic read<strong>in</strong>gs should probably be left <strong>in</strong> code-po<strong>in</strong>t order. Some experimentation and <strong>in</strong>vestigation of current practice will have <strong>to</strong> be undertaken before recommendations can be made, and this will be the subject of a further proposal as <strong>in</strong>put <strong>to</strong> ISO/IEC 14651 and the Unicode Collation Algorithm. As an example, however, we have taken a set of words beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> g- from Gard<strong>in</strong>er’s grammar and ordered the list of words there as it might be ordered accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples outl<strong>in</strong>ed above. 4
Figure 1. The words <strong>in</strong> Gard<strong>in</strong>er’s grammar beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with ƒ g-. There are 66 different <strong>Egyptian</strong> characters on this page. Some of them have a s<strong>in</strong>gle phonetic value, some have more than one value, and some have no value but are just determ<strong>in</strong>atives. Assign<strong>in</strong>g a numeric value <strong>to</strong> each of the 24 letters of the alphabet (so ƒ g = 20), and expand<strong>in</strong>g biliteral and triliterals <strong>to</strong> the same values (so ≠ gb = 20-06 and æ grg = 20-11-20), and leav<strong>in</strong>g determ<strong>in</strong>atives values 25 <strong>to</strong> 52 (for this data set) so that they sort <strong>in</strong> cod<strong>in</strong>g order (so ° E029 = 35 and ≥ N002 = 39), the follow<strong>in</strong>g results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed: 5