27.08.2013 Views

St. Charles County Transportation Plan 2030 - East-West Gateway ...

St. Charles County Transportation Plan 2030 - East-West Gateway ...

St. Charles County Transportation Plan 2030 - East-West Gateway ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ST. CHARLES COUNTY<br />

TRANSPORTATION PLAN <strong>2030</strong><br />

February 2007<br />

The preparation of this document was financed in part by the United <strong>St</strong>ates Department of<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> through the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration,<br />

and the Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong>. The contents of this report reflect the opinions,<br />

findings and conclusions of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of the data herein. The<br />

contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the funding agencies. This report does<br />

not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.<br />

<strong>East</strong>-<strong>West</strong> <strong>Gateway</strong> Council of Governments<br />

One Memorial Drive<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis, Missouri 63102<br />

314-421-4220 618-274-2750 Fax: 314-231-6120<br />

Internet: sysop@ewgateway.org


<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>2030</strong><br />

Table of Contents<br />

Chapter Page<br />

I. Introduction 1<br />

A. Background 1<br />

B. The <strong>2030</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 1<br />

C. The <strong>St</strong>udy Methodology 1<br />

II. Demographics 3<br />

A. Population and Households 3<br />

B. Employment 4<br />

C. Present Land Use 6<br />

C-1. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sections 6<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 10<br />

III. The Existing <strong>Transportation</strong> System 13<br />

A. Background 13<br />

B. The Existing Major Road Network 13<br />

B-1. Highway Functional Classifications 13<br />

B-2. MoDOT Roads 17<br />

B-3. <strong>County</strong> and City Roads 17<br />

B-4. Traffic Volumes 18<br />

B-4.1. MoDOT Roads 18<br />

B-4.2. Missouri River Bridges Traffic 27<br />

B-4.3. Major <strong>County</strong> and City Roads 28<br />

B-4.4. Vehicle Miles of Travel 31<br />

B-4.5. Vehicles and Households 32<br />

B-5. Operational Conditions on Major Roads 33<br />

B-5.1. Interstates and Freeways 33<br />

B-5.2. Expressways 40<br />

B-5.3. Principal Arterials 42<br />

B-5.4. Minor Arterials 45<br />

B-5.5. Major Collectors 46<br />

B-6. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy 47<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong> 52<br />

C-1. Fixed Route Bus Service 52<br />

C-2. Paratransit Service 53<br />

C-3. Light Rail Transit 55<br />

i


Table of Contents<br />

(Continued)<br />

Chapter Page<br />

III. The Existing <strong>Transportation</strong> System (continued)<br />

D. Railroads 55<br />

E. Pipeline 55<br />

F. Aviation 56<br />

G. Barge 56<br />

IV. <strong>Transportation</strong> Safety 57<br />

A. Overview 57<br />

B. Major Road System Safety 57<br />

B-1. Number of Crashes, Severity Ratings and Crash Rates 57<br />

B-1.1. MoDOT Roads 58<br />

B-1.2. Comparison of MoDOT Roads to Region and <strong>St</strong>ate 66<br />

B-1.3. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and City Roads 66<br />

B-1.4. MoDOT and <strong>County</strong> Crash Rate Comparison 72<br />

B-2. Summary of Road Crash Data 74<br />

B-3. Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Crashes 74<br />

B-4. Deficiencies in the Crash Data Analyses 74<br />

C. Railroad Safety 75<br />

D. Airport Safety 76<br />

V. Present <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>s and <strong>St</strong>udies 77<br />

A. Background 77<br />

B. The Long Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 77<br />

B-1. Developing Future Highway Improvements 77<br />

B-2. Investment Priorities 77<br />

B-3. Illustrative Projects 78<br />

B-4. Corridor <strong>St</strong>udies 78<br />

B-5. Interstate 70 Corridor, Kansas City to <strong>St</strong>. Louis, Missouri 78<br />

C. The Short Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 79<br />

C-1. Funding Categories 79<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> TIP Projects 80<br />

. D. <strong>St</strong>ate of the <strong>Transportation</strong> System 82<br />

D-1. Mode of Travel to Work 83<br />

D-2. Crash Rating 83<br />

D-3. Other <strong>St</strong>udies 83<br />

iii


Table of Contents<br />

(Continued)<br />

Chapter Page<br />

VI. Future <strong>Transportation</strong> Conditions 85<br />

A. Background 85<br />

B. Demographics 85<br />

B-1. Population and Household Forecasts 85<br />

B-2. Employment Forecasts 86<br />

B-3. Vehicle and Household Forecasts 88<br />

C. Highway Travel 89<br />

C-1. Traffic Forecasting Methodology 89<br />

C-2. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions<br />

On MoDOT Roads 90<br />

C-2.1. Interstate and Freeways 90<br />

C-2.2. Expressways 103<br />

C-2.3. Principal Arterials 103<br />

C-2.4. Minor Arterials 106<br />

C-2.5. Major Collectors 107<br />

C-3. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions<br />

On <strong>County</strong> Roads 108<br />

C-3.1. Principal Arterials 108<br />

C-3.2. Minor Arterials 111<br />

C-4. Safety Concerns 113<br />

C-4.1. The <strong>St</strong>reet and Highway System 113<br />

C-4.2. Railroad Safety 114<br />

C-4.3. Airport Safety 114<br />

VII. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Needs and Funding 115<br />

A. Background 115<br />

B. The Major Highway System 115<br />

B-1. MoDOT Roads 118<br />

B-1.1. Interstates and Freeways 118<br />

B-1.2. Expressways 119<br />

B-1.3. Principal Arterials 119<br />

B-1.4. Minor Arterials 120<br />

B-1.5. Major Collectors 120<br />

B-1.6. Future MoDOT Funding 120<br />

B-2. <strong>County</strong> Roads 121<br />

B-2.1. Principal Arterials 121<br />

iv


Table of Contents<br />

(Continued)<br />

Chapter Page<br />

VII. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Needs and Funding (Continued)<br />

B-2.2. Minor Arterials 121<br />

B-2.3. Major Collectors 121<br />

B-2.4. <strong>County</strong> Road Summary 121<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong> 122<br />

D. Railroads Projects 122<br />

E.. Aviation Projects 123<br />

F. Pipeline and Barge Projects 123<br />

v


List of Tables<br />

Table Page<br />

1. Population and Households 3<br />

2. Employment Data 4<br />

3. Work Trip Destinations 5<br />

4. MoDOT Average Daily Traffic Volumes 19<br />

5. Historical Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Missouri River Bridges 28<br />

6. Missouri River Bridges Traffic Volume Changes<br />

Before and After Opening of Rt. 364 29<br />

7. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Average Daily Traffic Volumes 30<br />

8. Vehicle Miles of Travel, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> 31<br />

9. Vehicles and Households 32<br />

10. Level of Service Criteria for Freeway Segments 34<br />

11. Level of Service Criteria for Expressway Segments 41<br />

12. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy, Roads Surveyed 47<br />

13. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy, Summary of Travel Times 49<br />

14. Travel Time and Delay Data, Ranked by Delays 50<br />

15. MoDOT Highway Crash Data by Type 2002, 2003, 2004 59<br />

16. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Crashes per Mile 60<br />

17. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Severity 61<br />

18. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Crash Rates 63<br />

19. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Crash Rates 64<br />

20. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Severity Crash Rates 65<br />

21. MoDOT <strong>County</strong>, Region, <strong>St</strong>ate, Crash Rate Comparison 66<br />

22. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data by Type, 2002, 2003, 2004 68<br />

23. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data, Ranked by Crashes per Mile 69<br />

24. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data, Ranked by Severity 70<br />

25. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data, Ranked by Crash Rates 71<br />

26. Composite Crash Data, Ranked by Crash Rates 73<br />

27. 2002, 2003, 2004 Motorcycle - Bicycle - Pedestrian Crashes 74<br />

28. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, MoDOT Projects 81<br />

29. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, Local Projects 81<br />

30. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, Transit Projects 82<br />

31. Population and Household Forecasts, <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region 87<br />

32. Employment Forecasts, <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region 88<br />

33. Vehicles and Households, <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region 89<br />

vi


List of Figures<br />

Figure Page<br />

1. <strong>County</strong> Sections 7<br />

2. Roadway Functional Classification 15<br />

3. Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 21<br />

4. Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes - <strong>East</strong> Inset 23<br />

5. Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes - <strong>West</strong> Inset 25<br />

6. Year 2004 Levels of Service E and F 35<br />

7. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Traffic Volumes 91<br />

8. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Traffic Volumes - <strong>East</strong> Inset 93<br />

9. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Traffic Volumes - <strong>West</strong> Inset 95<br />

10. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Levels of Service E and F 117<br />

vii


Appendices<br />

Appendix A. Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways, November 2004,<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Appendix B. Forecasted ADTs for MoDOT Roads<br />

viii


List of Acronyms/Terms<br />

AASHTO American Association of <strong>St</strong>ate Highway <strong>Transportation</strong> Officials<br />

ADA Americans with Disabilities Act<br />

ADT Average Daily Traffic<br />

CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement program<br />

DEIS A Draft Environmental Impact <strong>St</strong>atement. <strong>St</strong>udies conducted for major<br />

transportation improvement projects to identify all environmental concerns<br />

associated with the project and to provide solutions to these problems.<br />

EPA Environmental Protection Agency<br />

FAA Federal Aviation Administration<br />

FHWA Federal Highway Administration<br />

FTA The Federal Transit Administration<br />

GPS Global Positioning System<br />

HBRR Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation<br />

HCM <strong>Transportation</strong> Research Boards’ Highway Capacity Manual<br />

ISTEA The Intermodal Surface <strong>Transportation</strong> Efficiency Act of 1991. The ISTEA<br />

authorizes legislation for federal transportation planning mandates and<br />

investment programs.<br />

ITS Intelligent <strong>Transportation</strong> Systems<br />

LOS Levels of Service<br />

MoDOT Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

NHS National Highway System program<br />

SAFETEA-LU Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Equity Act: A Legacy for Users<br />

STP Surface <strong>Transportation</strong> Program<br />

TEA-21 <strong>Transportation</strong> Equity Act for the 21 st Century<br />

TIP <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel<br />

ix


A. Background<br />

I. Introduction<br />

In February 1987 the <strong>East</strong>-<strong>West</strong> <strong>Gateway</strong> Coordinating Council completed a report for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> entitled “<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>St</strong>udy.” The report discussed population and<br />

employment in the <strong>County</strong> and traffic operations on the major street and highway system. It noted<br />

the degree of congestion experienced on the road system at that time and developed forecasts for<br />

year 2000 traffic volumes for the roadway system expected to be in place. Analyses were performed<br />

for a variety of road improvements and recommendations provided. Most of the recommended<br />

improvements were followed and are currently in place.<br />

In 1996, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> officials requested that the Council update the 1987 <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>St</strong>udy. Thus, in June 1997, an update to this study entitled “The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

Count <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2015 ” was completed. That report was more comprehensive than the<br />

1987 plan and addressed all areas of transportation in the <strong>County</strong>. It included an examination of<br />

safety issues, pedestrian and bicycle activity, public transportation including transit and paratransit<br />

service, railroad, aviation, pipeline, and barge movements. Forecasts of year 2015 travel on the<br />

street and highway system were developed. Deficient roadway sections were identified and<br />

transportation improvements for all modes of transportation were presented. In addition, an analysis<br />

was made of the financial capacity of the funding mechanisms available to pay for the<br />

recommended improvements. Suggestions were made for providing additional funds for these<br />

improvements.<br />

B. The <strong>2030</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Growth in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has continued at a fast pace for the last 30 years. However, since the<br />

release of the “1997 <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>,” new major commercial, industrial, and<br />

residential development has occurred rapidly. Many roadway improvements have been made with<br />

more expected in the near future. These existing and planned improvements play a major role in<br />

determining the safety and efficiency of future travel in the <strong>County</strong>. A new Missouri River bridge,<br />

Rt. 364 (the Page Ave. Extension), has been opened providing considerable relief to congestion on<br />

both I-70 and I-64, and other major and minor road improvements have been made. However,<br />

development has followed these improvements, as well as areas proposed for improvements. Many<br />

are in undeveloped areas or farmland. As a result, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> officials once again felt that<br />

an update of the earlier transportation plan was needed. This report is in response to that request.<br />

C. The <strong>St</strong>udy Methodology<br />

The methodology used in conducting this study was similar to that of previous transportation studies<br />

for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. However, because of advances in computer technology during the past ten<br />

years, the Council has made major improvements to the tools used for collecting and processing<br />

data. An improved travel demand forecasting model - TransEval - was purchased by the Council<br />

to better predict and evaluate future transportation demands under various system, policy, and<br />

1


investment scenarios. Also, more accurate data about traffic flow and safety (volume counts and<br />

accidents) were available from the Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> (MoDOT) and the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Department of <strong>Transportation</strong>. Council staff collected travel time (speed and delay)<br />

data using new Global Positioning System (GPS) recorders. The Council’s demographers used<br />

newer computers and software programs and were able to more accurately estimate the region’s<br />

future population, employment, and land use.<br />

The latest demographics from the Census and forecasts developed by the Council were assembled.<br />

They consisted of population, number of households, number of employed persons, and amount of<br />

employment in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. The type, amount, and location of<br />

existing land use were assembled from many sources including the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Department<br />

of Community Development. Estimates of future land use for 2015 and <strong>2030</strong> were made based on<br />

these data and forecasts of future population and employment for these years were then developed.<br />

Of considerable value was the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>, Target 2015: Prosperity Through<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning report published on December 15, 2003. These data were then used in the Council’s new<br />

travel demand model which was used to assist in forecasting traffic volumes for 2015 and <strong>2030</strong>.<br />

Data regarding the existing transportation system was acquired. Emphasis was placed on the major<br />

road network and assessing the efficiency and safety of travel on the system. Other modes of<br />

transportation, railroad, aviation, pipeline, and barge were also reviewed. For the major roadway<br />

system, road classifications (Interstates, Principal Arterials, etc.) and road characteristics (number<br />

of lanes, traffic controls, and geometry) were identified. In addition, special attention was paid to<br />

safety by acquiring the accident ratings of all major roads from MoDOT. Data regarding travel were<br />

assembled including, traffic volumes, number of accidents, and travel times. Measures of<br />

performance were developed for congestion and safety. They included volume to capacity ratios<br />

(v/c), accident ratios (accidents per vehicle miles of travel), and average speeds and delays. Levels<br />

of service (LOS) were developed from the v/c ratios and safety ratings from the accident ratios.<br />

Road speeds and average travel times were compared to the roads efficiency of travel (LOS) and<br />

their safety ratings, and were used for estimating future conditions from the forecasts.<br />

The roadway system expected to be in place by <strong>2030</strong> was developed from the Council’s long range<br />

transportation plan, Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, MoDOT’s <strong>St</strong>ate Implementation <strong>Plan</strong> (STIP), and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>’s Proposed Ten Year <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, dated December 30, 2003.<br />

Forecasted traffic volumes were developed, along with anticipated roadway characteristics, to<br />

determine volume to capacity ratios and safety issues. Travel times on the major roads, based on<br />

forecasted traffic and planned roadway improvements, were estimated to aid in the determination<br />

of future congestion. Deficient locations were identified and suggestions made for improvements.<br />

Future travels on other transportation modes including transit, rail, pipeline, air, and barge were<br />

estimated from earlier reports and information gathered from various sources including some of<br />

these agencies. The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> was used as a reference document. Based on<br />

these data, estimates were made of future needs and recommendations provided for improvements.<br />

2


II. Demographics<br />

Present demographics of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, which include <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, provide the means<br />

for developing forecasts of future demographics and thus forecasts of future travel. They consist<br />

of population, number of households, household size (number of persons per household), and<br />

amount of employment, integrated with a large amount of travel related data. These data are<br />

routinely collected by the Council from a variety of sources including the U.S. Census Bureau.<br />

A. Population and Households<br />

Population in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, showing moderate growth from 1990 to 2000, indicates some<br />

acceleration from 2000 to 2005, according to the Council’s estimates. The <strong>St</strong>. Louis region is<br />

defined as five counties in Missouri, Franklin, Jefferson, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, <strong>St</strong>. Louis, and the City of <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Louis and three counties in Illinois, Madison, Monroe, and <strong>St</strong>. Clair. Table 1 shows the population,<br />

the number of households, and the number of persons per household or household size, from the<br />

Census for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> for the years 1980, 1990, and 2000.<br />

Estimates by the Council for 2005 are cited.<br />

Table 1<br />

Population and Household Data<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Years Rates of Change<br />

1980 1990 2000 2005* 1980 -<br />

1990<br />

3<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

1990 -<br />

2000<br />

2000 -<br />

2005<br />

Population 2,323,800 2,389,600 2,482,900 2,522,700 2.8% 3.9% 1.6%<br />

Households 824,600 905,800 969,200 1,002,600 9.8% 7.0% 3.4`%<br />

HH Size 2.82 2.64 2.56 2.48 -6.4% -3.0% -3.1%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Population 144,100 212,900 283,900 314,400 47.7% 33.3% 10.7%<br />

Households 46,354 74,402 101,794 117,400 60.5% 36.8% 15.3%<br />

HH Size 3.11 2.86 2.79 2.73 -8.0% -2.4% -2.2%<br />

Pop./Region 6.2% 8.9% 11.4% 12.5% N/A N/A N/A<br />

HH/Region 5.6% 8.2% 10.5% 11.4% N/A N/A N/A<br />

* Estimates by the Council<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s population has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. From 1980 to 2000 it<br />

doubled, going from 144,100 to 283,900. The Council’s estimate for 2005 is 314,400, an increase<br />

of 30,500 from 2000 or 10.7 percent. The number of households from 1980 to 2000 more than


doubled, going from 46,354 to 101,794. This growth, compared to population, results in a decline<br />

of average household size. The estimate for 2005 is 117,400 households, an increase of 15,606 or<br />

15.3 percent. The estimate assumes a continued household size decline. The average person’s age<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2000 was 34.3 compared to 30.7 in 1990. For the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region it was<br />

36.0 in 2000 and 33.3 in 1990 showing the region as a whole, as well as <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, is<br />

growing older. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has the youngest population of all counties in the region except<br />

the City of <strong>St</strong>. Louis. Its population has now grown to be the third largest in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region.<br />

B. Employment<br />

Employment in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis area has a great impact on all modes of travel in the region. The<br />

primary mode of travel for employment is the automobile, with bus, truck, and other vehicles<br />

playing a lesser role in adding to the amount of traffic on the region’s highways. The amount of<br />

employment also effects railroad, aviation, pipeline, and barge movements but not to the extent that<br />

it effects travel on the highways. As a result, present and future highway travel can be directly<br />

linked to employment and has been used in this and previous reports for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> to<br />

forecast traffic volumes. Employment data for the years 1980, 1990, 2000, and estimates for 2005<br />

were obtained from the Census and the Council. These data are shown in Table 2 and 3 and<br />

discussed below.<br />

Table 2<br />

Employment Data<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Years Rates of Change<br />

1980 1990 2000 2005* 1980 -<br />

1990<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

4<br />

1990 -<br />

2000<br />

2000 -<br />

2005<br />

Employment 1,142,100 1,221,400 1,303,800 1,350,700 6.9% 6.7% 3.6%<br />

Households 824,600 905,800 969,200 1,002,600 9.8% 7.0% 3.4%<br />

Jobs/household 1.39 1.35 1.35 1.35 -2.9% 0.0% 0.0%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Employment 39,300 76,700 105,700 124,700 95.2% 37.8% 18.0%<br />

Households 46,354 74,402 101,794 117,400 61.0% 36.6% 15.3%<br />

Jobs/household 0.85 1.03 1.04 1.06 21.2% 1.0% 1.9%<br />

Employment/<br />

Percent region<br />

* Estimates by the Council<br />

3.4% 6.3% 8.1% 9.2% 85.3% 28.6% 13.6%<br />

Table 2 shows that employment in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region experienced a steady growth of about 6.8<br />

percent from 1980 to 2000. The number of jobs per household has also remained about the same<br />

at 1.35. Employment in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, however, like its population, has grown dramatically


climbing from 39,300 in 1980 to 76,700 in 1990 and to 105,700 in 2000. These are increases of 95<br />

percent and 38 percent respectively over the two ten-year periods. During the five years from 2000<br />

to 2005, estimates of the Council indicate an increase to 124,700 or about 18 percent. Using the<br />

2005 estimate and assuming growth similar to the population increase, it is expected growth in<br />

employment in the <strong>County</strong> will continue well into the future. Since 1980 the amount of employment<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> as a percent of the region’s total has increased going from 3.4 percent in 1980<br />

to an estimated 9.2 percent in 2005. It is also expected this percent will continue to increase.<br />

Table 3 below shows the total number of employed persons living in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and their<br />

work trip destinations as determined by the Census Bureau for the years 1980, 1990 and 2000. It<br />

shows the number of trips made within the <strong>County</strong> and to the other seven counties in the region.<br />

The number of employed persons living in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> increased from 64,920 in 1980 to<br />

149,111 in 2000, or about 130 percent. It can be seen that although more work trips are being<br />

generated from <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and a considerable amount stay within the <strong>County</strong>, much of the<br />

travel is being made to adjacent <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City. In 1980, 45 percent of the <strong>County</strong>’s<br />

employed persons worked in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> while 52 percent worked in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and<br />

City. A small percent worked in Illinois and outside the region. In 1990, still only 45 percent<br />

worked in the <strong>County</strong> while 52 percent commuted to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City. By 2000 it<br />

increased only slightly to 47 percent but 49 percent still commuted to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City.<br />

The number traveling to Illinois or out of the <strong>County</strong> stayed about the same and was insignificant.<br />

Estimates by the Council indicate that in 2005 this relationship of commuter travel from <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City had remained the same. In effect, the amount of travel from<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> across the Missouri River for work purposes has continued to increase and is<br />

expected to continue as the population grows. One interesting item regarding the amount of<br />

commuters is the flow into <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> from nearby Warren and Lincoln Counties as their<br />

populations rise dramatically.<br />

Table 3<br />

Work Trip Destinations<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Employed Persons<br />

Year <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

<strong>County</strong><br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

City<br />

Jefferson Franklin Illinois Out of<br />

Region<br />

5<br />

Total<br />

1980 28,939 25,159 8,415 55 223 540 1,589 64,920<br />

1990 49,700 46,321 11,119 285 292 995 2,339 111,051<br />

2000 70,058 62,353 10,930 380 555 1,640 3,195 149,111<br />

Percent in Each <strong>County</strong><br />

1980 44.6% 38.8% 13.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.8% 2.4% 100.0%<br />

1990 44.7% 41.7% 10.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.9% 2.1% 100.0%<br />

2000 47.0% 41.8% 7.3% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 2.1% 100.0%<br />

Note: Data obtained from the 2000 Census


C. Present Land Use<br />

Basic inputs into the Council's ongoing travel demand modeling process require some specific<br />

knowledge of occurring major developments as they alter land use from its present patterns. Such<br />

developments are continually monitored by the Council through general and business media, which<br />

may be supplemented with information from county and city governments and other local entities<br />

such as sewer and fire districts. Although somewhat broad-brush, not micro level, the monitored<br />

data sufficiently enables differentiations between generalized housing types/densities and between<br />

generalized land use types, such as commercial or industrial, as required by the travel demand<br />

modeling network. Land use is discussed in detail in the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>. It lists<br />

the following land use categories; residential, commercial, combined community districts, high-tech,<br />

industrial, recreation/wildlife/open space, transitional, and agricultural. These categories are shown<br />

on the Land Use Map for 2015 in that report. The map is quite harmonious with the Council’s<br />

estimates of future development and with data on population and employment. Since the Council<br />

develops demographics for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region on a more macro scale, the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> plan<br />

has been referenced as representing anticipated land use for 2015. Land use for <strong>2030</strong> becomes less<br />

clear but is estimated by the Council for purposes of developing <strong>2030</strong> population and employment.<br />

C- 1. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sections<br />

For purposes of discussing land use, the Council divided <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> into five geographic<br />

Sections. Each has similar features and many similar land uses. These Sections have been<br />

numbered and named according to the approximate areas they represent and are shown on Figure<br />

1. A general summary of the existing land use and new or proposed development in each Section<br />

follows.<br />

Section 1 - <strong>West</strong> Alton is in the northeast corner of the <strong>County</strong> and is sparsely populated due to the<br />

fact that it is mostly in a flood plain. Two cities exist with small populations, <strong>West</strong> Alton which<br />

centers around the junction of U.S. 67 and Rt. 94, and Portage Des Sioux which lies just north of<br />

Rt. 94 at Rts. J and H. Each city has experienced some additional residential development during<br />

the past 10 years but both have populations less than 500. Minor residential development has<br />

occurred along Rt. 94 between <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and <strong>West</strong> Alton and except for the Ameren electric<br />

generating plant near Portage Des Sioux, there is little commercial or industrial development.<br />

Section 2 - <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> encompasses an area from Section 1 on the north (approximately Rt. B),<br />

along Huster Rd., Truman Rd., and Muegge Rd., on the west and southwest, and east to the Missouri<br />

River along new Rt. 364 and the bridge across the Missouri River. It contains all of the City of <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> and a part of <strong>St</strong>. Peters. This is the oldest and most densely developed residential part of<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> with the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> containing the old urban core. Some new residential<br />

development has occurred along Rt. 94 north of Rt. 370 and at Elm <strong>St</strong>., Zumbehl Rd., and Truman<br />

Rd., around and south of Rt. 370. In addition, there has been quite a bit of new residential in-fill<br />

from Rt. 94 east to the Missouri River north of Rt. 364. New commercial and industrial<br />

development has occurred in the north part on Rt. 370 around the Elm <strong>St</strong>. interchange and east on<br />

6


Figure 1<br />

<strong>County</strong> Sections<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

7


Mueller Rd., Elm Point Rd., and Little Hills Expressway to Rt. 94. Old industrial development has<br />

declined along Rt. 94 in the north part of the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>. South of I-70 along Rt. 94, some<br />

additional commercial development has occurred south to Rt. 364.<br />

Section 3 - <strong>St</strong>. Peters runs from Section 2 on the east to Rt. 79 and its southern extension, Salt<br />

Lick/Birdie Hills Rd. on the west. It runs west along Rt. N and then south along Rt. K and southeast<br />

along I-64 to the Missouri River. It is mostly flood plain north of I-70 and east of Rt. 79. From I-70<br />

south past Mexico Rd. there is a large amount of old residential development with newer<br />

development occurring in the west end of the Section along Salt Lick/Birdie Hills Rd. Further south<br />

there is newer residential development. New development has also occurred in pockets along Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr., Spencer Rd., Willott Rd., and Jungermann Rd. Approaching Rt. 94 there are<br />

considerable undeveloped areas which are fast turning into new subdivisions. Southeast of Rt. 94<br />

to the Missouri River there are considerable farms and undeveloped land that are being turned into<br />

residential development. The most intense use is south of Rt. 364 all the way to I-64 between<br />

county roads such as Jungs <strong>St</strong>ation, Caulks Hill, Pitman Hill, Wolfrum, and Independence. This area<br />

has seen a very dramatic increase in residential development over the last ten years.<br />

Commercial development has continued, adjacent to all major roads in Section 3, with rapid<br />

development along Salt Lick Rd. around I-70 and south to Mexico Rd. The southern part of Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. from Willott Rd. to Rt. 94 has seen a substantial increase in commercial<br />

development with the most notable being from north of Central School Rd. to Rt. 94. Commercial<br />

development has grown along the southern part on Rt. 94 all the way from Harvester Rd. to I-64.<br />

A considerable amount of undeveloped land has been converted to commercial use along many parts<br />

of this road and it is anticipated, because land is so abundant, that the remaining undeveloped areas<br />

adjacent to the road will also be turned into commercial development of some type. Substantial<br />

commercial development has occurred just north of I-64 between Rt. K and Rt. 94 and continues<br />

north along Rt. K. Industrial development in Section 3 has been confined to the area in the northeast<br />

quadrant of I-70 and Rt. 79 and to the north of I-70 at Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

Section 4 - Wentzville-O’Fallon runs from Section 3 on the east, along I-64/U.S. 40/61 on the south,<br />

along with Rt. N, west to the Warren <strong>County</strong> line. The north boundary is Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It<br />

contains a considerable amount of old residential development especially along I-70 around old<br />

O’Fallon and in the Lake Saint Louis area. <strong>East</strong> of Rt. M in old O’Fallon, and north of I-70 to Rt.<br />

79, considerable new residential development has occurred fed by the new T.R. Hughes Blvd.<br />

interchange on I-70. New development has occurred to the north along Rt. P from Rt. M west to <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Paul, Josephville, and Flint Hill. On the south side of I-70, new residential development has been<br />

prolific to the east and west of Rt. K all the way south to I-64 and westward toward Lake Saint Louis<br />

filling in much of the undeveloped area. Development has grown dramatically south along Bryan<br />

Rd. from its interchange at I-70 south to Winghaven Blvd. at Rt. N. A very large amount of<br />

undeveloped land still exists in this area, especially south of the corridor for proposed Rt. 364 and<br />

it is expected that it all will be converted into residential development as time goes on. The area<br />

9


from Bryan Rd. west to Lake Saint Louis Blvd. has continued to be developed and farmland is fast<br />

turning into residential subdivisions. Around the old part of Wentzville, residential development<br />

has also increased substantially. To the south new large scale subdivisions are being established<br />

south of I-70, west of U.S. 40/61, north of Rt. N, and east of Rt. Z. Also, development is taking<br />

place on the south side of Rt. N west between U.S. 40/61 and Rt. Z. A very substantial amount of<br />

what is presently farmland is available in this area to accommodate new residential development.<br />

The potential for huge increases in population in this part of Section 4 is enormous. To the north,<br />

of old Wentzville, lies an area that also is open to considerable residential development. At this time<br />

a fair amount of new homes has been built and more subdivisions are planned. This development<br />

has spread all the way north along U.S. 61 to Flint Hill at Rt. P. Some development is occurring to<br />

the northwest toward Rt. W.<br />

Section 5 - Augusta-New Melle has experienced some new residential development along the south<br />

of Rt. N most notably from U.S. 40/61 west to Rt. Z. Some development has occurred in the New<br />

Melle area and it is expected this area will continue to grow. The rest of the area remains primarily<br />

rural farmland with some new homes on large tracts and small subdivisions sprinkled along parts<br />

of Rt. 94, N, Z, DD, T, and F. A number of large tracts in the vicinity of New Melle and scattered<br />

throughout the southern part of this Section have become locations for equestrian activity.<br />

Commercial development in this Section is quite small with some occurring along Rt. 94 and the<br />

Katy Trail and in and around the wineries that have grown in this area over the years. Industrial<br />

development in this Section has been practically nonexistent.<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong><br />

The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> report contained a chapter describing the work of the Housing<br />

and Land Use Task Force. In it they issued a “Mission <strong>St</strong>atement” on land use, which “promoted<br />

responsible growth and development,” and on housing whose premise was “to ensure housing<br />

opportunities for all county residents.” They discussed the need for a balanced development of<br />

housing, economic development, infrastructure, parks, and open space.<br />

Two land use maps were developed, one showing the entire county and the other showing the urban<br />

area, similar to that in this report. Their two land use maps were used by the Council, along with<br />

other data, to describe the land use described in the five Sections noted above. From field<br />

observations, it is obvious that development, to-date, is occurring quite close to what the <strong>County</strong>’s<br />

Master <strong>Plan</strong> report has prescribed. Most cities have contributed to this success and their land use<br />

plans followed, in most part, that of the <strong>County</strong>’s.<br />

One area that is growing fast and has a specific designation as the “High-Tech” corridor is along<br />

I-64/U.S. 40/61, soon to be I-64, from the Missouri River to Wentzville. Between the Missouri<br />

River and Rt. 94, the Missouri Research Park on the south west side of the road was developed some<br />

time ago with many high-tech companies. Since its beginning additional firms have located in the<br />

park and more are developing there. On the northeast side, a number of major companies have<br />

located adjacent to the frontage road including MCI Verizon and Enterprise Leasing. Considerable<br />

10


land is available for additional development and for sale signs are posted on vacant property. On<br />

the north side between Rt. 94 and Rt. K, CitiCorp has developed a substantial facility that now<br />

houses their headquarters and adjacent to it Barnes-Jewish Hospital is building a new facility.<br />

Considerable land is still available in this area and a new Mercedes Benz dealership is currently<br />

being constructed. Other commercial and retail development has continued to develop in this area.<br />

To the west of Rt. K at the Winghaven Blvd. interchange, MasterCard has built a very large office<br />

building and all around it smaller office and retail development has occurred. At Rt. N, and what<br />

will be the new Rt. 364 interchange, a mix of high-tech companies and commercial and retail<br />

development has taken place and the area continues to grow. The interchange at Lake Saint Louis<br />

Blvd. has experienced commercial and retail development and will likely continue to grow in the<br />

future.<br />

Another area designated by the <strong>County</strong>’s <strong>Plan</strong> is the industrial area along and mostly to the north<br />

of I-70 on its eastern end of the <strong>County</strong>. This industrial development has been accompanied by a<br />

substantial amount of commercial establishments, many new car dealerships, and other supporting<br />

commercial establishments. It is expected to continue to grow in line with the <strong>County</strong>’s Master<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Development along Rt. 94, especially from Harvester Rd. south and west to I-64, is expected to<br />

continue. Residential development is continuing and most likely will conform closely to what is<br />

envisioned on the <strong>County</strong>’s Master <strong>Plan</strong>. This area from Rt. 94 to the Missouri River bluffs has<br />

considerable vacant and farmland that will most likely be converted to residential development in<br />

the future.<br />

11


A. Background<br />

III. The Existing <strong>Transportation</strong> System<br />

The existing transportation system in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> consists of streets and highways, railroad,<br />

aviation, pipeline, and barge. Utilities could also be considered part of this system as they deliver<br />

commodities such as water, gas, electric, sewers, etc. All these modes provide the means for moving<br />

people, goods, services, and bulk commodities.<br />

<strong>St</strong>reets and highways provide for the travel needs of all the people in the <strong>County</strong> and those passing<br />

through the <strong>County</strong>. They allow for the movement of all vehicles and most pedestrians and bicycles.<br />

They handle all public transportation which is provided by some cities and also private, or semiprivate<br />

paratransit services. They handle the movement of people for all types of activities, which<br />

include, work, business, medical, school, social, and recreational. They handle the movement of<br />

large numbers of trucks, intra-county, regionally, statewide, and interstate.<br />

Some travel is provided by aviation at Smartt Airport and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport and they<br />

serve some business aircraft that travel outside the <strong>St</strong>. Louis area. The <strong>County</strong> has been considering<br />

plans to enhance Smartt airport and make it more inviting to more businesses in the <strong>County</strong>. (The<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 2015). No railroad passenger service exists as Amtrak does not run<br />

through <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. However, a substantial amount of rail service is provided to<br />

commercial and industrial facilities in the <strong>County</strong>. As an example, the Wentzville General Motors<br />

assembly plant has a rail yard that provides transferring vehicles from the assembly plant onto rail<br />

cars for shipment across the United <strong>St</strong>ates. They also load vehicles onto trucks for delivery to auto<br />

dealers locally and throughout the Midwest. Pipelines move a large amount of bulk material, all<br />

related to petroleum and natural gas products, but simply pass through the <strong>County</strong>. One exception<br />

is a facility in the city of <strong>St</strong>. Peters that transfers petroleum from a Conoco pipeline to trucks.<br />

Barges are similar in that they also carry a large amount of bulk material and travel both the<br />

Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. However, there are no transfer stations in the <strong>County</strong> that allow<br />

for moving their cargo from one mode to another.<br />

B. The Existing Major Road Network<br />

The major road network in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> consists of those roads shown on the Council’s<br />

functional classification map and are shown on Figure 2. The classifications follow the criteria<br />

established by MoDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). They include all major<br />

roads through the Major Collector level but not Minor Collectors or local streets. Many roads in<br />

these last two categories are maintained by the <strong>County</strong> but have not been addressed in this report.<br />

B-1. Highway Functional Classifications<br />

According to the criteria of MoDOT and FHWA, highways are classified according to the function<br />

that they serve, that is, how well they serve traffic and how much access they provide to adjacent<br />

land. The functional classifications are Interstates, Freeways/Expressways, Principal Arterials,<br />

Minor Arterials, Major Collectors, Minor Collectors, and local roads.<br />

13


Interstate highways serve traffic with no interruption, normally at higher speeds than other<br />

classifications since they are accessed only at interchanges and do not serve adjacent property. They<br />

travel through numerous states and provide continuity across the United <strong>St</strong>ates. Their design<br />

standards are the highest of all road classifications providing multi-lane divided facilities, normally<br />

four or more lanes, with thicker pavement, and gentle horizontal and vertical curves. They have<br />

paved outer and inner shoulders, high standards of sign and pavement marking, greater bridge<br />

clearances, and more safety features. They serve through traffic that may have destinations far<br />

beyond the city, county, or state and they serve a large amount of local traffic in urban areas for<br />

short and long trips. They serve a substantial amount of commercial vehicles that are traveling<br />

short and long distances, and can experience a considerable degree of congestion in urban and rural<br />

areas. Interstate highways handle the highest volume of traffic of all roads, with a few exceptions.<br />

Freeways and Expressways are in the same functional classification, based on FHWA criteria,<br />

however, they are considerably different.<br />

Freeways have design standards quite similar to Interstates. They are four or more lanes, have<br />

access only at interchanges, and do not serve adjacent property. Some features such as road<br />

curvature, pavement thickness, shoulders, and bridge clearances, could be somewhat less, but signs,<br />

markings, and safety features are often quite the same. Speed limits on Freeways are sometimes less<br />

than on an Interstate but that depends on the locations of the facilities. They can serve a sizeable<br />

amount of commercial vehicles, depending on their location and a large amount of local traffic in<br />

urban areas. Like Interstates, they can experience a considerable amount of congestion.<br />

Expressways have lesser design features than Interstates or Freeways but that is primarily because<br />

they have at-grade intersections at many locations and provide some access to adjacent property.<br />

The design standards of Expressways are considerably less than Interstates or Freeways as they are<br />

multi-lane, divided roadways with paved shoulders. Road curvature can be much less and quite<br />

often they have only a limited number of bridges. Safety features on Expressways are also less and<br />

intersections, both signalized and un signalized, can be a source of congestion. Speed limits on<br />

Expressways are always less than on Interstates or Freeways and the number of crashes can be more.<br />

Principal Arterials are normally multi-lane (four, five, or six lanes) major roads that travel<br />

considerable distances and connect other major roads. Their primary function is to serve through<br />

traffic with little delay at speeds of normally 35 to 50 miles per hour. They serve adjacent land but<br />

with limitations to the amount and location of access points. They can have medians or barriers to<br />

separate opposing traffic flow. In urban areas adjacent land use is mostly commercial. Major<br />

intersections are signalized and often systems of signal interconnection are provided to enhance<br />

travel times and improve safety. Principal Arterial roads in urban areas normally carry substantial<br />

volumes of traffic. In rural areas they can be two lanes and carry lesser volumes of traffic.<br />

Minor Arterials may be three, four, or five lanes, undivided roads that serve traffic for shorter<br />

distances and provide considerable access to adjacent land. The lands’ use adjacent to a Minor<br />

Arterial may be mostly residential but could also contain commercial, industrial, recreational, and<br />

14


Figure 2<br />

Roadway Functional Classifications<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

15


other uses as well. They generally connect traffic from Collector roads and local streets and<br />

distribute them to Principal Arterials, Expressways, Freeways, and some Interstate roads. They<br />

normally carry lower volumes of traffic than Principal Arterial roads.<br />

Major Collector roads can be two or three lanes that collect traffic from local streets and distributes<br />

them to Minor or Principal Arterials. They serve mostly residential land use but could also serve<br />

commercial, industrial, and other land uses. They normally carry lower traffic volumes than Minor<br />

Arterial roads. Major Collectors most often are found in more urban densely developed areas.<br />

Minor Collectors are two lanes that carry traffic from side roads and adjacent land use to higher<br />

classified roads. They normally are found in rural areas that have limited land use activity.<br />

B-2. MoDOT Roads<br />

The Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> maintains the most major roads in the <strong>County</strong> and those<br />

with the highest functional classifications. These roads include Interstates like I-70 and I-64 and<br />

Freeways, Expressways, and Principal Arterials such as U.S. 40/61, U.S. 61, U.S. 67, Rt. 79,<br />

Rt. 94, Rt. 364, and Rt. 370. All lettered roads are either Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials, or<br />

Major Collectors, and are maintained by the state with only few exceptions. Rt. 94 in the City of<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> is carried over city streets from Kingshighway to south of Rt. 370 and Rt. M north of I-<br />

70 is carried on Main <strong>St</strong>. through old O’Fallon to Rt. P. Some lettered roads like Rt. K are Principal<br />

Arterials that pass through highly developed commercial and residential areas. Others include Rts.<br />

A, B, C, D, F, H, J, N, P, T, V, W, Y, Z, and DD. These roads carry higher amounts of traffic than<br />

other county roads and serve all parts and land uses in the <strong>County</strong>.<br />

B-3. <strong>County</strong> and City Roads<br />

All roads that are not state highways are maintained by the <strong>County</strong> or cities. According to the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>, the <strong>County</strong> Highway Department maintains 640 miles of roads. They handle<br />

a few for smaller communities, under contract, with funds from the <strong>County</strong> Road and Bridge Fund.<br />

Most cities maintain their own roads using various funding sources. New projects are funded using<br />

local funds, funds from the ½ cent transportation sales tax, and federal funds. The goals and of the<br />

<strong>County</strong> for maintaining and improving roads are contained in the <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

In addition to the <strong>County</strong>’s Master <strong>Plan</strong>, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has a Proposed Ten Year <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Improvement Program. The present document was adopted by the <strong>County</strong> in December 2003 and<br />

is for FY 2003 to FY 2013. It contains a list of planned road improvements by the major<br />

municipalities and by the <strong>County</strong>. Although all the projects may not presently have funding, it is<br />

a list by which the <strong>County</strong> can plan road improvements for future years. From this document, the<br />

<strong>County</strong> develops a three-year <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program (TIP) that consists of funded<br />

improvements planned for the next three fiscal years, starting January 1, of each year. Funding for<br />

these projects comes mostly from the transportation sales tax revenue. Some may be included in the<br />

Council’s TIP and receive a percentage of federal dollars from various funding categories. The<br />

<strong>County</strong>’s present TIP is for FY 2007 through 2009 .<br />

17


B-4. Traffic Volumes<br />

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume data were compiled from MoDOT, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, and<br />

some cities for many of the major roads in the <strong>County</strong>. They consisted of ADTs for 1990, 2000, and<br />

2004. Since many MoDOT roads carry higher volumes, they are discussed first. A description of<br />

each road and its traffic volumes are described below in functional classification order. A tabulation<br />

of the traffic volumes is on Table 4. Figure 3 shows ADTs for the entire county, Figure 4 shows<br />

ADTs for the eastern part of the county, and Figure 5 shows ADTs for the western part of the<br />

county.<br />

ADT’s are developed by MoDOT and most other state Department’s of <strong>Transportation</strong> (DOT’s) by<br />

collecting 24 hour traffic counts at various times during the year. The numbers are then factored to<br />

account for seasonal, monthly, and daily fluctuations. They are for a seven day period. Many<br />

DOT’s also develop a weekday, Monday through Friday, traffic count termed, an AWDT. The<br />

weekday count is always higher than the ADT since in most cases, weekend traffic counts are lower<br />

than the weekday counts. This fact has been kept in mind throughout this report.<br />

B-4.1. MoDOT Roads<br />

Interstate 70 is the most traveled road in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. It has ten lanes across the Missouri<br />

River and carried about 165,000 vehicles a day in 2004. From the Missouri River west it loses a<br />

lane in each direction at Fifth <strong>St</strong>. and another in each direction at Rt. 94 dropping it to six lanes. An<br />

auxiliary lane exists between Rt. 94 and Zumbehl Rd. From there west to U.S. 40/61 it has six lanes<br />

with some auxiliary lanes between Rt. 370 and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and Rt. 79. Daily traffic<br />

volumes drop from the 165,000 at the Missouri River as one moves westward to about 66,000 east<br />

of U.S. 40/61. At the Warren <strong>County</strong> line (26.75 miles from the Missouri River) it is four lanes and<br />

handled about 56,400 vehicles per day. For its overall length, with some segments higher and lower,<br />

it averaged an increase of about 35 percent from 1990 to 2000 and 9 percent from 2000 to 2004.<br />

I-64 and U.S. 40/61 carried the second highest traffic volumes across the Missouri River, about<br />

77,500 vehicles a day in 2004. It is a seven-lane road, three lanes westbound and four lanes<br />

eastbound, from the Missouri River to Rt. 94 and then a six-lane road from there to the end of I-64<br />

just west of Rt. K. It then becomes U.S. 40/61 and traffic drops to about 46,100 due to the high<br />

volumes to and from Rt. 94 and Rt. K. Segments of U.S. 40/61 at the interchanges of Winghaven<br />

Blvd. and Lake Saint Louis Blvd. have been upgraded to Interstate standards. However, parts of the<br />

old road remain, and full continuity of I-64 from the Missouri River to I-70 is not complete at this<br />

time. These segments are in the Council’s TIP and it is expected that construction will be completed<br />

within the next three years bringing it up to Interstate standards. Traffic volumes west of Rt. N are<br />

around 35,300 and 35,700 just east of I-70. The average increase on the 13.2 miles from the<br />

Missouri River to I-70 was about 48 percent from 1990 to 2000 and 26 percent from 2000 to 2005.<br />

U.S. 61 is a four-lane expressway from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>, a distance of about 7.3 miles. It has<br />

an interchange north of I-70 with Rt. A and numerous at-grade intersections. It handles about<br />

33,000 vehicles a day north of I-70 which stays the same to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. The ADT on U.S. 61<br />

increased dramatically as population in Lincoln <strong>County</strong> grew. Since 2000 it has grown about 9<br />

percent.<br />

18


Table 4<br />

Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Fourteen Year Growth 1990 - 2004<br />

MoDOT Maintained Routes<br />

10 Year<br />

4 Year<br />

Route/Location 1990 2000* Change Percent 2004** Change Percent<br />

I-70 at Missouri River 154200 190800 36600 23.7% 165100 -25700 -13.5%<br />

I-70 e/o* Rt. 94 132700 168400 35700 26.9% 147300 -21100 -12.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Cave Sprgs. Rd. 104300 128200 23900 22.9% 125000 -3200 -2.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 98100 132400 34300 35.0% 134000 1600 1.2%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. 79 92000 119100 27100 29.5% 134000 14900 12.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. K & M 73100 98000 24900 34.1% 112000 14000 14.3%<br />

I-70 e/o Bryan Rd. 57000 80500 23500 41.2% 95600 15100 18.8%<br />

I-70 e/o Lake Saint Louis B. 53600 75400 21800 40.7% 82000 6600 8.8%<br />

I-70 e/o U.S. Rt. 40/61 41300 59500 18200 44.1% 66400 6900 11.6%<br />

I-70 e/o Pearce Blvd. 40900 59200 18300 44.7% 72200 13000 22.0%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. T 33800 48900 15100 44.7% 56400 7500 15.3%<br />

# Average change = 25400 35.2% 2691 6.9%<br />

I-64 at Missouri River 44300 69100 24800 56.0% 77500 8400 12.2%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. K 22550 30200 7650 33.9% 38200 8000 26.5%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. DD 21400 29300 7900 36.9% 34500 5200 17.7%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. N 19200 28400 9200 47.9% 32200 3800 13.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Lake STL 20100 31300 11200 55.7% 31100 -200 -0.6%<br />

# Average change = 12150 11.2% 5040 2.4%<br />

U.S. 61 s/o Lincoln Co. 13900 30000 16100 115.8% 32800 2800 4.7%<br />

U.S. 61 n/o I-70 13400 30000 16600 123.9% 33100 3100 10.3%<br />

# Average change = 16350 119.9% 2950 7.5%<br />

U.S. 67 s/o Mississippi R. 20900 28300 7400 35.4% 25800 -2500 -8.8%<br />

# Average change = 7400 35.4% -2500 -8.8%<br />

Rt. 79 s/o Lincoln Co. 10650 11900 1250 11.7% 13300 1400 11.8%<br />

Rt. 79 n/o I-70 18000 20000 2000 11.1% 22700 2700 6.8%<br />

# Average change = 1625 11.4% 4100 9.3%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. J 1450 2900 1450 100.0% 2700 -200 -6.9%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. 370 12000 14000 2000 16.7% 15000 1000 7.1%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-70 48450 56600 8150 16.8% 56900 300 0.5%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Harvester 38950 50000 11050 28.4% 53000 3000 6.0%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Mid-Rivers M. Dr. 27350 37400 10050 36.7% 35000 -2400 -6.4%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o I-64 18000 30000 12000 66.7% 40000 10000 33.3%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-64 9300 11500 2200 23.7% 10700 -800 -7.0%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. DD 2000 3000 1000 50.0% 3000 0 0.0%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. T 1650 2900 1250 75.8% 2900 0 0.0%<br />

# Average change = 5461 46.1% 1211 3.0%<br />

19


Table 4<br />

Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Fourteen Year Growth 1990 - 2004<br />

MoDOT Maintained Routes<br />

10 Year<br />

4 Year<br />

Route/Location 1990 2000* Change Percent 2004** Change Percent<br />

Rt. 364 at Missouri River - - - - 50000 N/A N/A<br />

# Average change = - - N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 370 at Missouri River - 48000 N/A - 56800 8800 18.3%<br />

Rt. 370 w/o Elm <strong>St</strong>. - 57100 N/A - 59300 2200 3.9%<br />

Rt. 370 n/o I-70 - 50000 N/A - 51900 1900 3.8%<br />

# Average change = N/A - 4300 8.7%<br />

Rt. K s/o I-70 15600 35000 19400 124.4% 45000 10000 28.6%<br />

Rt. K n/o Rt. N 10200 20000 9800 96.1% 30000 10000 50.0%<br />

Rt. K s/o Rt. N 7500 15000 7500 100.0% 25000 10000 66.7%<br />

Rt. K n/o U.S. 40/61 6450 11400 4950 76.7% 20000 8600 75.4%<br />

# Average change = 10412 99.3% 9650 55.2%<br />

Rt. N e/o Rt. K 3700 11700 8000 216.2% 13600 1900 16.2%<br />

Rt. N w/o U.S. 40/61 2750 4500 1750 63.6% 7500 3000 66.7%<br />

Rt. N w/o Rt. Z 1400 3200 1800 128.6% 6200 3000 93.8%<br />

# 3850 136.1% 2633 58.9%<br />

* From MoDOT's District 6,<br />

Total all 55.0% 15.9%<br />

** From MoDOT's September 12, 2005<br />

AADT data sheets<br />

# Does not reflect road lengths and is an<br />

20


U.S. 67 is a four-lane expressway that connects Alton, Illinois, through <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> across<br />

the Missouri River, into northern <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>, a distance of about 4.1 miles. It carries about<br />

28,300 vehicles each day and has experienced a slight decline of about 9 percent since 2000.<br />

Rt. 79 is a four-lane divide road for 1.5 miles from I-70 north through an industrial area past the Salt<br />

River Rd./Pearl Dr. diamond interchange. From there it becomes a two-lane principal arterial road<br />

for 10.4 miles to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It handles about 22,700 north of I-70 and 13,300 at Lincoln<br />

<strong>County</strong>. It experienced an increase from 1990 to 2000 of about 11 percent and 9 percent since 2000.<br />

Rt. 94 is the longest road in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> running from U.S. 67 at <strong>West</strong> Alton to Warren<br />

<strong>County</strong>, approximately 58 miles. Along this length it changes from a two-lane rural road to city<br />

streets, to a four-lane expressway, and back to a two-lane rural road. In the north part of the <strong>County</strong><br />

it handled about 2,700 vehicles a day. It experienced a dramatic increase between 1990 and 2000<br />

of 100 percent and now has leveled off. Through the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> it handled about 8,100 on<br />

Second <strong>St</strong>. near the <strong>County</strong> Government Center and about 23,500 on First Capitol Dr. west of<br />

Fifth <strong>St</strong>. South of I-70 it becomes a six-lane expressway to the north junction of Rt. 364 at Muegge<br />

Rd. From just north of Harvester Rd. it continues south to I-64. South of Harvester Rd. it handled<br />

about 39,000 in 1990 and 40,000 in 2000. It now carries about the same at 42,700. From<br />

Jungermann Rd. south to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. traffic has increased sizeably with continued growth<br />

of new homes and commercial development both east and west of the road. From Mid Rivers Mall<br />

Dr. south to I-64 new development has grown even at a faster rate and traffic volumes have jumped<br />

from 18,000 in 1990 to 30,000 in 2000, an increase of 67 percent. This central part of Rt. 94 from<br />

Harvester Rd. to I-64 has experienced the highest increase with an average of about 50 percent from<br />

1990 to 2000 and more than 30 percent since then. The rural part of Rt. 94 from I-64 west toward<br />

Warren <strong>County</strong> handled about 10,500 just south of I-64 and 2,900 near Augusta. This was a<br />

substantial increase since 1990 and just a slight increase since then.<br />

Rt. 364 was opened to traffic in December 2003 from Bennington Ln. in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Rt. 94,<br />

a distance of about 7.5 miles. It has ten lanes across the Missouri River and presently carries about<br />

50,000 vehicles a day. In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> it drops a lane in each direction at Rt. 94, becoming<br />

eight lanes from Muegge Rd. to just north of Harvester Rd. where it presently ends.<br />

Rt. 370 has six lanes from I-270 in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to I-70 near Mid Rivers Mall Dr., a distance<br />

of 14.0 miles. It handled about 57,000 vehicles per day with the highest volumes around the Elm<br />

<strong>St</strong>. interchange. Traffic has increased on this road about 4 percent since 2000.<br />

Rt. K is a five-lane principal arterial road that runs from I-70 to I-64, about 6.4 miles. It handled<br />

about 15,600 in 1990 just south of I-70 but jumped to 20,000 in 2000. By 2004 volumes had grown<br />

rapidly and it now carries about 51,000 vehicles a day as commercial and residential development<br />

in this corridor grew rapidly. Around Rt. N traffic grew from 10,000 in 1990 to 17,500 in 2000 and<br />

it now carries better than 30,000. Just north of I-64 traffic volumes more than doubled from 1990<br />

to 2004 going from about 6,500 to almost 20,000. Growth all along this road and especially in the<br />

southern part is quite substantial and traffic volumes continue to climb rapidly.<br />

21


Figure 3<br />

Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

23


Figure 4<br />

Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

<strong>East</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

25


Figure 5<br />

Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

<strong>West</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

27


Rt. N has two major parts which are both two lane roads. The eastern part runs from Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. to U.S. 40/61, a distance of 8.4 miles. The western part runs from U.S. 40/61 all the way<br />

to Rt. T at the Warren <strong>County</strong> line, a distance of 11.3 miles. The eastern part handles about 13,600<br />

vehicles per day with higher amounts around Rt. K. In general, these volumes have increased about<br />

16 percent since 2000. On the western part, traffic volumes have been about 7,500 vehicles per day<br />

west of U.S. 40/61 to Rt. Z and are growing rapidly as development in this area has been quite<br />

substantial. <strong>West</strong> of Rt. Z to Rt. T, traffic volumes have only grown slightly.<br />

Other lettered roads in the <strong>County</strong> are rural in nature with low traffic volumes. Two exceptions<br />

which are experiencing considerable residential development are Rt. Z from I-70 to Rt. N and Rt.<br />

P from Rt. M west to U.S. 61. Traffic volumes on these two roads are about 7,000 and 7,500, south<br />

of I-70 and west of Rt. M respectively, and have been growing since 2000.<br />

Summation<br />

Table 4 shows the average changes in ADTs for MoDOT roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. For the tenyear<br />

period 1990 to 2000 there was an overall increase of about 66 percent. For the four-year<br />

period, 2000 to 2004, it was about 27 percent. These figures are only approximations since they do<br />

not take into account the length of each road segment. However, the numbers do provide a “figure<br />

of magnitude” of the differences in each road during these time periods and how great the increase<br />

is county wide.<br />

B-4.2. Missouri River Bridges Traffic<br />

Five bridges cross the Missouri River connecting <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. All are<br />

maintained by MoDOT. They are U.S. 67 in the northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> which travels from<br />

Illinois into <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. It serves traffic in the northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> and those traveling<br />

to and from Illinois. A high percentage of the Illinois traffic travels to and from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>.<br />

The other four bridges serve traffic in the central and western part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and include<br />

Rt. 370, I-70, Rt. 364 and I-64. Table 5 shows ADT volumes on these bridges since 1990.<br />

With the population and employment in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> growing rapidly, travel across the<br />

Missouri River has increased substantially since 1990. Traffic volumes increased from 237,500 in<br />

1990 to 379,400 in 2004, an increase of 141,900 or 60 percent. Fortunately, new bridges have been<br />

built to alleviate highly congested conditions on I-70 which carried the largest part of this traffic.<br />

Rt. 370, a new six lane bridge just north of I-70, was opened in 1992 to replace the old Rt. 115<br />

bridge and was extended to I-70 in O’Fallon and opened to traffic in 1996. In 2003, the ten lane Rt.<br />

364 bridge south of I-70 was opened, which further relieved traffic on I-70.<br />

29


Table 5<br />

Historical Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Missouri River Bridges<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Route 1990 2000 Change % 2004 Change %<br />

U.S. 67 20,900 28,300 7,400 35.4 25,800 (2,500) -8.8<br />

Rt. 370* - 48,000 48,000 - 56,800 8,800 18.3<br />

Rt. 115* 18,200 Closed* (18,200) - - - -<br />

I-70 154,100 190,800 36,700 23.8 165,100 (25,700) -13.5<br />

Rt. 364** - - - - 50,000 50,000 -<br />

U.S. 40/61 44,300 69,100 24,800 56.0 77,500 8,400 12.2<br />

Totals 237,500 336,200 98,700 41.6 375,200 39,000 11.6<br />

* Opened in 1992 replacing the Rt. 115 bridge.<br />

** Opened in December 2003<br />

To show the relief that this new bridge provided to congestion on I-70, MoDOT conducted traffic<br />

counts before and after its opening. Table 6, provided by MoDOT, shows traffic volumes on all<br />

bridges before and after the opening of Rt. 364 in December 2003. One count was taken in October<br />

of 2003 and the other in October of 2004, allowing sufficient time for traffic to adjust to new travel<br />

patterns. These counts were taken for one day and were factored for day of the week and month of<br />

the year to get yearly adjusted ADTs.<br />

The total volume on all four bridges in 2003 was 331,900 and by 2004 it had grown to 349,400.<br />

Rt. 364 carried about 50,000 vehicles a day and its opening reduced traffic and thus the congestion<br />

on all the other bridges. I-70 had the highest drop going from 186,800 to 165,100 vehicles a day or<br />

11.6 percent. I-64 went from 85,200 to 77,500 or a drop of 9.0 percent. It is interesting to note that<br />

overall, the four bridges traffic volumes increased by about 17,500 vehicles a day or about 5.3<br />

percent between the time of these counts.<br />

30


Table 6<br />

Missouri River Crossings<br />

Changes in ADTs with opening of Rt. 364 Bridge*<br />

Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Change % Change<br />

Route Dir. ADT AM ** PM ** ADT AM ** PM ** ADT AM ** PM ** ADT AM ** PM **<br />

MO 370 WB 31,381 3,678 8,762 28,262 3,582 6,725 -3,119 96 2,037 -9.9% 2.6% 23.2%<br />

MO 370 EB 28,526 8,203 3,711 28,520 7,019 3,802 -6 1,184 -91 0.0% 14.4% -2.5%<br />

Total 59,907 11,881 12,473 56,782 10,601 10,527 -3,125 1,280 1,946 -5.2% 10.8% 15.6%<br />

I-70 WB 87,944 10,857 13,123 81,582 9,674 14,298 -6,362 -1,183 1,175 -7.2% -10.9% 9.0%<br />

I-70 EB 98,829 17,762 13,727 83,497 13,116 11,963 -15,332 -4,646 -1,764 -15.5% -26.2% -12.9%<br />

Total 186,773 28,619 26,850 165,079 22,790 26,261 -21,694 -5,829 -589 -11.6% -20.4% -2.2%<br />

MO 364 WB 0 0 0 24,778 1,536 8,175 24,778 1,536 8,175 N/A N/A N/A<br />

MO 364 EB 0 0 0 25,191 8,368 2,360 25,191 8,368 2,360 N/A N/A N/A<br />

Total 0 0 0 49,969 9,904 10,535 49,969 9,904 10,535 N/A N/A N/A<br />

I-64 WB 43,268 4,961 8,767 40,170 5,306 9,377 -3,098 345 610 -7.2% 7.0% 7.0%<br />

I-64 EB 41,915 8,613 6,261 37,353 9,302 6,300 -4,562 689 39 -10.9% 8.0% 0.6%<br />

Total 85,183 13,574 15,028 77,523 14,608 15,677 -7,660 1,034 649 -9.0% 7.6% 4.3%<br />

Total WB = 162,593 19,496 30,652 174,792 20,098 38,575 12,199 794 11,997 7.5% 4.1% 39.1%<br />

Total EB = 169,270 34,578 23,699 174,561 37,805 24,425 5,291 5,595 544 3.1% 16.2% 2.3%<br />

Total Crossing 331,863 54,074 54,351 349,353 57,903 63,000 17,490 6,389 12,541 5.3% 11.8% 23.1%<br />

* Data provided by MoDOT was factored to represent AADT<br />

** AM = 6:00 - 8:00<br />

** PM = 4:00 - 6:00<br />

Rt. 364 Bridge opened in December 2003


B-4.3. Major <strong>County</strong> and City Roads<br />

Many major roads maintained by either the <strong>County</strong> or cities have experienced dramatic growth in<br />

traffic volumes during the past ten years due to the large increase in residential and commercial<br />

development. A list of 37 major county and city roads with sizeable traffic volumes is contained<br />

in Table 7. A discussion of the traffic volume increases over the ten-year period, 1994 to 2004<br />

follows.<br />

Roads north of I-70 in the east part of the <strong>County</strong> which show modest increases include <strong>West</strong> Clay<br />

<strong>St</strong>., Elm <strong>St</strong>., and Truman Rd. Between I-70 and Rt. 94, substantial increases were noted on Zumbehl<br />

Rd., Muegge Rd., Mexico Rd., Mid Rivers Mall Dr., and Jungermann, Rd. To the south and east<br />

of Rt. 94, Friedens Rd., Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd., Caulks Hill Rd., Pitman Hill Rd., and Wolfrum Rd., have<br />

all seen substantial increases in traffic due to the large amount of new residential development in<br />

these areas. To the north of I-70 and west of Rt. M, traffic volumes have increased sizeably on Rt.<br />

M, Rt. P, Hoff Rd., and others. On the south of I-70, west of Rt. K, substantial increases were<br />

experienced on Bryan Rd. which connects I-70 to I-64, by its continuation on Winghaven Blvd.<br />

Other roads with considerable increases include, Mexico Rd. and Feise Rd. Many other minor<br />

arterials and collectors in the middle part of the <strong>County</strong> have experienced substantial increases<br />

due to increased residential and commercial development. Some roads around the Wentzville area<br />

are now experiencing more traffic, especially to the south along Rt. Z. An average of increases on<br />

the county roads listed on Table 7 is 39.0 percent. This figure does not take into account the<br />

distances of the roads and many other roads in the <strong>County</strong> and is only used for illustrative purposes.<br />

32


Table 7<br />

Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Ten Year Growth 1994 - 2004<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Major Roads<br />

Road Location 1994 2004 Diff. % Chg.<br />

Birdie Hills Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 10500 12800 2300 21.9%<br />

Bryan Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 12700 25400 12700 100.0%<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. S/O Harvester Rd. 16800 17200 400 2.4%<br />

Central School Rd W/O <strong>St</strong> Peters-Howell Rd. 10500 10800 300 2.9%<br />

Duello Rd. S/O U.S. 40/61 1500 3300 1800 120.0%<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. S/O Rt. 370 13200 14800 1600 12.1%<br />

Elm Point Rd. E/O Zumbehl Rd. 3000 4300 1300 43.3%<br />

Feise Rd. W/O Rt. K 11100 12500 1400 12.6%<br />

Friedens Rd. E/O Rt. 94 8000 11300 3300 41.2%<br />

Harvester Rd. S/O Rt. 94 16000 23000 7000 43.8%<br />

Jungermann Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 25500 30600 5100 20.0%<br />

Jungermann Rd. N/O McClay Rd. 18300 20200 1900 10.4%<br />

Jungs <strong>St</strong>ation Rd. S/O Rt. 364 17000 15000 -2000 -11.8%<br />

Kingshighway N/O Rt. 94 6000 8000 2000 33.3%<br />

Kisker Rd. S/O Old Farmhouse Rd. 14200 15500 1300 9.2%<br />

Knaust Rd. S/O Laura Hills Rd. 5500 8200 2700 49.1%<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. Bluecove Dr. 6500 8000 1500 23.1%<br />

Laura Hill Rd. E/O Rt. K 6000 9300 3300 55.0%<br />

McClay Rd. E/O Jungermann Rd. 14600 10300 -4300 -29.5%<br />

McClay Rd. E/O <strong>St</strong>. Perers-Howell Rd. 5000 5600 600 12.0%<br />

Mexico Rd. W/O Cave Sprgs. Rd. 32500 34500 2000 6.2%<br />

Mexico Rd. E/O Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 20800 21100 300 1.4%<br />

Mexico Rd. E/O Rt. K 12800 29900 17100 133.6%<br />

Mexico Rd. E/O Bryan Rd. 6600 11600 5000 75.8%<br />

Meyer Rd. E/O Point Praire Rd. 1800 2100 300 16.7%<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. S/O Suemandy Dr. 23000 36000 13000 56.5%<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. N/O <strong>St</strong>. Peters/Howell Rd. 15200 30000 14800 97.4%<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. N/O Rt. 94 16300 20000 3700 22.7%<br />

Muegge Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 9600 16000 6400 66.7%<br />

O'Fallon Rd. W/O Rt. 94 6500 10300 3800 58.5%<br />

Pitman Hill Rd. S/O Rt. 94 4600 7100 2500 54.3%<br />

Pralle Ln. S/O Rt. 94. 6000 5500 -500 -8.3%<br />

Salt Lick Rd. S/O Vet. Mem. Pkwy. 14200 19700 5500 38.7%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Peters-Howell Rd. E/O Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 2700 3300 600 22.2%<br />

Spencer Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 16800 25200 8400 50.0%<br />

Tom Ginnever Rd. E/O Rt. M 10000 10200 200 2.0%<br />

Truman Rd. S/O Ehlmann Rd. 4200 7400 3200 76.2%<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. S/O Rt. 364 3000 14300 11300 376.7%<br />

W. Clay E/O Zumbehl Rd. 10200 13500 3300 32.4%<br />

Wentzville Pkwy E/O Meyer Rd. 4600 12000 7400 160.9%<br />

Willott Rd. E/O Universal Dr. 6000 10000 4000 66.7%<br />

Winghaven B S/O Phoenix Dr. - 14800 14800 -<br />

Zumbehl Rd. S/O Vet. Mem. Pkwy. 35600 35700 100 0.3%<br />

Zumbehl Rd. N/O Rt. 94 18000 24300 6300 35.0%<br />

Average<br />

percent<br />

change = 46.8%


The <strong>County</strong> and all of the cities have had active road improvement programs. Each agency has its<br />

own source of funds. Much of the funding for these improvements has come from the <strong>County</strong>’s<br />

½ Cent <strong>Transportation</strong> Sales Tax. This tax was strongly endorsed by the citizens of the <strong>County</strong><br />

in 2004 by approving its extension to 2016. In addition, MoDOT has committed to many<br />

improvements to state highways since the passage of Amendment 3 in November 2004 and the new<br />

Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient <strong>Transportation</strong> Equity Act:<br />

A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), in August 2005. Funding for road improvements from these<br />

sources, along with other public and private funding, will help pay for many needed road<br />

improvements in the near future. However, as the case in many other growing suburban areas in the<br />

country, traffic congestion has grown faster than construction of new roads and improvements to<br />

existing facilities. It is expected that this trend will continue in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> for some time<br />

in the future.<br />

B-4.4. Vehicle Miles of Travel<br />

The Council maintains records of the amount of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) on the region’s<br />

highways to determine adherence to the Clean Air <strong>St</strong>andards of the Environmental Protection Agency<br />

(EPA). VMT is calculated by multiplying the total road miles by their ADTs. For <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

they were compiled for all road classifications except local streets. The miles of road and total VMT<br />

for the years 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2004 are shown below in Table 8.<br />

It can be seen that the number of miles of roads had just a small increase from 1990 to 1995, 18 miles<br />

or 3.5 per cent, seven miles from 1995 to 2000 or 1.3 percent, and just six miles or 1.1 percent from<br />

2000 to 2004. But during the ten years from 1990 to 2000, VMT changed dramatically growing by<br />

64 percent. During the four years from 2000 to 2004 it continued to increase growing by 17 percent.<br />

This illustrates the tremendous growth of travel in the <strong>County</strong> during this time reflecting the growth<br />

in population, employment, and overall personal travel.<br />

Table 8<br />

Vehicle Miles of Travel<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Year Road Miles VMT Change Percent VMT/Road<br />

1990 515 2,973,489 - - 5,774<br />

1995 533 4,203,478 1,229,989 41.4 7,886<br />

2000 540 4,876,750 673,272 16 9,031<br />

2004 546 5,708,387 831,637 17.1 10,455<br />

B-4.5. Vehicles and Households<br />

The number of vehicles, which are registered in each household, play a major role in determining<br />

the amount of vehicular travel. The more vehicles per household, the more travel will result. This<br />

34


adds to the amount of VMT that is found in each county and in the region. For this reason the<br />

number of registered vehicles in each county of the region and their number of households for the<br />

last 25 years was determined and compared. These data are shown in Table 9 below.<br />

It can be seen that the number of vehicles per household for the region was 1.15. For <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> it was 1.64. By 1990 vehicles per household in the region had increased to 1.21. However,<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> had increased to 1.77. By 2000 the region had reached 1.74, a dramatic increase<br />

during the ten-year period. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> stayed about the same at 1.73. By 2004, the region<br />

had once again increased, going to 1.78 but <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> again jumped, going to 1.97 or<br />

almost two vehicles per household. This explains why the <strong>County</strong> has had such an increase in traffic<br />

and traffic volumes on all of its streets and highways. It also explains why the <strong>County</strong> has had a<br />

large increase in VMT. Overall, this poses a serious challenge to the region as VMT is the major<br />

measure used in assessing the region’s adherence to the Clean Air <strong>St</strong>andards.<br />

Table 9<br />

Vehicles and Households<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Year 1980 1990 2000* 2004 Change & %<br />

1980 - 1990<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

947,700 1,097,400 1,689,400 1,769,100 149,700<br />

15.8%<br />

Household 824,600 905,800 969,200 995,900 81,200<br />

9.8%<br />

35<br />

Change & %<br />

2000 - 2004<br />

79,700<br />

4.7%<br />

26,700<br />

2.8%<br />

Autos/HH 1.15 1.21 1.74 1.78 5.2% 2.3%<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

76,200 120,500 176,000 225,300 44,300<br />

58.1%<br />

Households 46,400 74,400 101,800 117,400 28,000<br />

60.5%<br />

49,300<br />

28.0%<br />

15,600<br />

15.3%<br />

Autos/HH 1.64 1.77 1.73 1.97 7.9% 13.9%<br />

* Data from the Missouri Department of Revenue and the Illinois Department of Revenue for 2000 through 2005. Earlier data<br />

was not comparable to these data.


B-5. Operational Conditions on Major Roads<br />

Operational conditions on the major roads were determined by using the methods prescribed in the<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Research Boards’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000. This latest update of<br />

the HCM provides state-of-the-art techniques for estimating the capacity and measuring the level<br />

of service (LOS) of travel on these roads. The material in HCM 2000 has been used from a planning<br />

perspective to assess existing operational conditions based on traffic volumes, speeds and delays,<br />

and field observations. The HCM has also been used to assess future travel conditions using<br />

forecasted traffic volumes. They are discussed later in this report.<br />

The capacity of a road is the maximum number of vehicles that can pass a point in a given time<br />

under prevailing road, traffic, and traffic control conditions. It is expressed in number of passenger<br />

cars, per hour, per lane, (pcphpl) for each road classification. The number of trucks of various sizes,<br />

buses, and other slower moving vehicles are converted into passenger car equivalents. Other factors<br />

such as a road’s geometrics, adjacent land use, number of intersections, traffic control devices, and<br />

pedestrian activity play a major role in determining a road’s capacity.<br />

The LOS on a road segment are a measure of how well traffic is operating for a specified period of<br />

time, usually one hour. LOS takes into account the road’s functional classification, speed, density<br />

(freedom to maneuver), and traffic interruptions and delays. It compares a road segment’s capacity<br />

to the volume of traffic that desires to use it. This is referred to as the volume to capacity (v/c) ratio.<br />

Six LOS are defined for each road segment using letters A to F. LOS A represents the best<br />

operating condition and LOS F the worst. The maximum capacity of a road segment is LOS E and<br />

a complete breakdown in traffic flow is LOS F.<br />

LOS were developed for all major roads based on their ADTs and speeds and delays, if available.<br />

They were then factored to determine the morning and afternoon peak hour volumes using values<br />

applicable for each road. Traffic volumes, speeds, and delays, and the characteristics of various road<br />

segments were reviewed to determine the LOS. Field observations were made by Council staff to<br />

verify these designations. Roads with LOS E and F are shown in Figure 6.<br />

B-5.1. Interstates and Freeways<br />

Operating conditions on Interstates and Freeways are considerably different from other roads. The<br />

interaction is only among those vehicles traveling in the same direction since the road is divided by<br />

some type of barrier. The density of vehicles, their speed, and the volume of traffic are the major<br />

factors in determining the road segment’s LOS since access is only provided at on and off ramps.<br />

Speed can remain the same as volumes increase until they reach the road’s capacity. However, as<br />

volumes and density increase the LOS of vehicles decline. When capacity (LOS E) is reached,<br />

speeds decline noticeably and delays begin to occur. Lighting, weather conditions, and traffic<br />

incidents, also cause lower speeds and increase delays.<br />

LOS values of density, speed, v/c, and maximum hourly volumes are shown in Table 10 which was<br />

developed from the HCM 2000 Exhibit 23-2. Speeds of 70, 65, and 60 mph were used since they<br />

VPare the speed limits of Interstates and Freeways in the <strong>County</strong>. Morning and afternoon peak hour<br />

36


Criteria<br />

Table 10<br />

Level of Service Criteria<br />

For Freeway Segments<br />

37<br />

LOS<br />

A B C D E<br />

Free Flow Speed = 70 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 70 70 70 70 70<br />

Maximum v/c 0.32 0.53 0.74 0.9 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

770 1260 1770 2150 2400<br />

Free Flow Speed = 65 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 65 65 64.8 59.7 52.2<br />

Maximum v/c 0.3 0.5 0.71 0.89 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

710 1170 1680 2090 2350<br />

Free Flow Speed = 60 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 60 60 60 57.6 51.1<br />

Maximum v/c 0.29 0.47 0.68 0.88 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

660 1080 1560 2020 2300<br />

NOTE:<br />

The exact mathematical relationship between density and v/c has not always been maintained at<br />

LOS boundaries because of the use of rounded values. Density is the primary determinant of LOS.<br />

The speed criterion is the speed at maximum density for a given LOS.<br />

volumes were determined by applying a factor to the ADTs on Table 4 and by reviewing some of<br />

the volume count data from MoDOT. Conversion factors were applied to these numbers to take into<br />

account road widths, truck percent, terrain, and traffic fluctuations during the peak hours to get<br />

pcphpl as prescribed in the HCM 2000. From these adjusted peak hour volumes, the LOS for each<br />

direction of travel were calculated.


Figure 6<br />

Year 2004 Levels of Service E and F<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

38


I-64<br />

From the Missouri River to west of Rt. K, I-64 has a 60 mph speed limit and carries about 77,500<br />

vehicles a day. During the morning peak hour it carried about 7,800 vehicles, with eastbound the<br />

predominant flow, carrying about 4,700 vehicles. <strong>West</strong>bound carried about 3,100 vehicles.<br />

<strong>East</strong>bound traffic has three through lanes and an auxiliary lane. Each lane carried about 1,300<br />

vehicles and the auxiliary lane carried about 800. After applying appropriate factors (6.9 percent<br />

trucks) volumes reached about 1,400 pcphpl. Using Table 10, this indicates traffic is operating at<br />

LOS C. During the afternoon, peak hours, westbound traffic is the highest with 4,700 vehicles. It<br />

has only three lanes, therefore, each lane carried about 1,600. However, the Missouri River bridge<br />

has substandard lane widths (11 feet), no lateral clearance, an upgrade of about 5 percent, and a<br />

length close to one half mile. Applying adjustment factors brings the pcphpl to 1,900. This results<br />

in LOS E. This is confirmed by field observations that show traffic slows to cross the bridge with<br />

minor backups extending to the east.<br />

I-70<br />

I-70 is the primary road in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and handles the highest volume of traffic with a speed<br />

limit of 60 mph from the Missouri River to west of Wentzville. Across the Missouri River it carried<br />

165,000 vehicles a day in 2004. The eastbound bridge has five lanes, all standard widths, and<br />

shoulders. The westbound bridge, however, has substandard lane widths and no shoulders. It also<br />

has an upgrade of about 3 percent for part of its length. Commercial vehicles are quite high, about<br />

11 percent. The morning peak hour handled about 15,000 vehicles with eastbound having the<br />

highest, about 9,000. Each lane carried more than 1,800 vehicles, and when factored, this reaches<br />

more than 2,000 pcphpl. This places it at LOS E, the road’s capacity. These calculations meet with<br />

field observations which show that traffic flows at slow speeds but not in a start-stop mode.<br />

During the afternoon peak hour, traffic volumes are higher reaching about 16,500. <strong>West</strong>bound is<br />

the peak direction and has 9,500 vehicles or 1,900 per lane. With substandard lane widths, no<br />

shoulders, an upgrade of 3 percent, and 11 percent trucks, the pcphpl is estimated to be more than<br />

2,300. This places operating conditions at LOS F. There is a break down in traffic flow with<br />

vehicles in a start-stop mode and density at its highest. This is in agreement with field observations<br />

that show traffic backing through the Earth City interchange and onto the I-270 interchange ramps.<br />

From Fifth <strong>St</strong>. to Rt. 94 volumes drop to 147,000 and operate on four through lanes and an auxiliary<br />

lane in each direction. During the morning peak hours eastbound is the high direction of travel and<br />

handles about 7,300 vehicles. That would be 1,460 per lane but the auxiliary lane only carries 75<br />

percent. Therefore, it handles 1,100 and the rest is on the through lanes. That puts them at about<br />

1,600. Factoring gives close to 1,800 pcphpl which is LOS D. However, traffic up and downstream<br />

is operating at capacity, LOS E, so this section is also at LOS E<br />

<strong>West</strong> of Rt. 94 to Zumbehl Rd. I-70 has six lanes and auxiliary lanes and carried about 129,500. The<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours carried the same, around 12,000. The high direction of travel<br />

carried about 6,600 vehicles. The auxiliary lanes carried 75 percent of the through lanes or 1,200<br />

39


vehicles and the rest were on the through lanes. This caused them to carry around 1,800 vehicles.<br />

Factoring for pcphpl, the through lanes reached 2,000 which is LOS E or capacity. This agrees with<br />

field observations which show traffic moving slowly but without stop-start conditions.<br />

From Zumbehl Rd. to Cave Springs Rd., I-70 has six lanes. It handled about 125,000 vehicles a day.<br />

Morning and afternoon peak hours carry the same amount of traffic, about 11,500 vehicles. In the<br />

peak direction of traffic it carried 6,400 or 2,100 vehicles per lane. Factoring gives 2,300 pcphpl.<br />

Density is high and speeds low with the v/c ratio at 1.00. Traffic is operating at LOS E. This is in<br />

agreement with field observations.<br />

From Cave Springs Rd. to Rt. 370, volumes drop to about 106,000 on six lanes. The morning and<br />

afternoon peak hours carry about the same with 9,500 vehicles. The high direction of travel is about<br />

5,200 or 1,750 vehicles. When factored it is close to 2,000 pcphpl. This equals LOS E with slow<br />

traffic, high density, and v/c at 1.00. This agrees with field observations.<br />

Traffic, between Rt. 370 and Mid Rivers Mall Dr., jumps up to 134,000 due to the volume that is<br />

added by Rt. 370. It is handled on six traffic lanes in each direction when counting the auxiliary<br />

lanes. They are needed to handle the high volume of weaving traffic between the two roads. In the<br />

morning peak hours eastbound traffic, from the Mid Rivers Mall Dr. on-ramp, desiring to travel east<br />

on I-70 must weave through traffic wanting to get onto Rt. 370. In the afternoon, traffic exiting Rt.<br />

370 and desiring to travel west on I-70 must weave through the I-70 traffic wanting to exit the off<br />

ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Adding to the problem is the fact that westbound traffic on the off<br />

ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. often backs onto the auxiliary lanes and conflicts with through traffic.<br />

These weaving problems cause this section of I-70 to operate at capacity, LOS E.<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. 79, I-70 carries about 130,000 vehicles a day on six through lanes<br />

and an auxiliary lane in each direction. The morning and evening peak hours carry about the same,<br />

12,000 vehicles. The high direction of travel carries about 6,600 or 1,650 per lane, however, the<br />

auxiliary lanes only carry 75 percent and the rest are on the through lanes, which raises the volume<br />

close to 1,800 vehicles. Factoring gives 2,000 pcphpl, and this equals LOS E.<br />

Although these calculations seem correct, other traffic flow facts come in to play. Considerable<br />

eastbound traffic during the morning peak hours comes from the north on Rt. 79 and the south on<br />

Salt Lick Rd. They try to merge with eastbound I-70 traffic which causes considerable weaving<br />

between the two interchanges. The through lanes are unable to accept the additional volume and<br />

speeds drop causing substantial backups to the west through the T.R. Hughes and Rts. K/M<br />

interchanges. At times this backup extends west to Bryan Rd. and traffic quite often stops causing<br />

a very serious safety issue. During the afternoon peak hours, weaving occurs from the ramp of Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. wanting to go west and merge with through traffic wanting to exit Rt. 79. This<br />

results in start-stop traffic that backs through Mid Rivers Mall Dr. The road is operating at LOS F.<br />

From Bryan Rd. to U.S. 40/61, I-70 has six lanes and carries an average of about 78,000 vehicles.<br />

Morning and afternoon volumes are the same, 7,800. For the peak direction, this amounts to 4,300<br />

or more than 1,400 vehicles per lane. Factoring brings the pcphpl to almost 1,600 or LOS at D.<br />

40


I-70 west of U.S. 40/61 to Pearce Blvd. has four lanes and handles about 72,000 vehicles and 7,200<br />

during the peak hours. Traffic volumes are about 1,900 vehicles per lane in the peak direction of<br />

travel, eastbound in the morning and westbound in the afternoon. Factoring gives 2,100 pcphpl.<br />

With only four lanes, traffic is dense, speeds lower, and the v/c ratio near 1.00 or LOS E.<br />

From Pearce Blvd. to Warren <strong>County</strong>, the speed limit rises to 65 mph on four lanes. Traffic volumes<br />

are around 56,000 a day. The peak hour volumes are about the same at 2,900 and the directional<br />

split is 55/45. This results in 1,450 vehicles per lane. Factoring gives a pcphpl of 1,600 which is<br />

equal to LOS C.<br />

I-70 Summary<br />

Most of I-70 across <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> operates at or near capacity during the morning and<br />

afternoon peak hours. This is aggravated by the high percent of commercial vehicles. A number<br />

of sections, most notably from Earth City Dr. across the Missouri River to Rt. 94, are operating with<br />

volumes in excess of capacity, LOS F, with serious congestion occurring eastbound in the morning<br />

and westbound in the afternoon. Even though traffic volumes drop at Rt. 94, so do traffic lanes,<br />

resulting in operating conditions of LOS E west past the Cave Springs Rd. interchange. The section<br />

between Rt. 370 and Rt. 79 has serious operating deficiencies, especially during the morning peak<br />

hour, with severe weaving problems that causes operating conditions of LOS F for eastbound traffic<br />

as far west as Bryan Rd. It is only west of there that conditions improve to LOS D. New<br />

construction through the U.S. 40/61 interchange provides six lanes all the way to Rt. Z. To the west,<br />

it remains four lanes with traffic reaching the roads capacity to Pearce Blvd. <strong>West</strong> to Warren<br />

<strong>County</strong> volumes drop and operating conditions improve to LOS D.<br />

A major operating problem on I-70 has been traffic flow at many of the interchanges. From the Fifth<br />

<strong>St</strong>. interchange west through the Rt. 79 interchange, traffic is operating at LOS E and F during the<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours. At many locations, traffic backs up on the off ramps and extends<br />

into the through traffic lanes. This creates a very serious safety problems. With increased activity<br />

expected at all of the interchanges, and increases in traffic volumes, this situation will only get<br />

worse. This is discussed later in the chapter on forecasted traffic.<br />

Rt. 364<br />

Rt. 364 is a Freeway with a speed limit of 60 mph. It is ten lanes across the Missouri River and<br />

eight lanes from Rt. 94 at Muegge Rd. to Rt. 94 just north of Harvester Rd. It handles about 50,000<br />

vehicles a day and 6,000 in the peak hours. During the morning eastbound traffic across the<br />

Missouri River is about 3,600 vehicles. On five lanes this amounts to only 720 vehicles per lane.<br />

Truck percent on this road are low and conditions are ideal. As a result, pcphpl are still well below<br />

1,000 and the road operates at LOS B. Along the section with Rt. 94, it has about the same volume<br />

with traffic per lane at around 800 providing LOS B.<br />

41


Rt. 370<br />

Rt. 370 is a six-lane Freeway with a 60-mph speed limit. It carries about 57,000 vehicles a day with<br />

5,700 during the morning and afternoon peak hours. During the morning, eastbound traffic reaches<br />

3,400 vehicles or about 1,150 vehicles per lane. During the afternoon, traffic is about the same.<br />

Truck traffic on this route is around 7.5 percent coming from I-270 and the Earth City Industrial<br />

complex in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,450 or LOS C.<br />

B-5.2. Expressways<br />

Operating conditions and the quality of service provided on Expressways are less than Interstates<br />

and Freeways even though they are normally four-lane divided highways. They have at-grade<br />

intersections, often signalized, and provide access to adjacent land use at specific locations. Their<br />

speed limits are lower and their design characteristics are less with sharper turns and steeper grades.<br />

As a result vehicle conflicts occur more often and interrupt the flow of traffic.<br />

The HCM 2000 designates LOS for Expressways in a similar way as for Interstates and Freeways.<br />

However, speed categories, v/c ratios, and traffic volumes are all less. Table 11, developed from<br />

HCM 2000 Exhibit 21-2, shows the criteria for determining LOS for Expressways. Morning and<br />

afternoon peak hour volumes were determined by applying a peak hour factor to the ADTs shown<br />

on Table 4. Various conversion factors were applied to these numbers to take into account the<br />

percent of trucks, intersections and interchanges, fluctuations in traffic, and other factors to get<br />

pcphpl. LOS for each direction of travel were calculated for each Expressway. Field observations<br />

were used to verify the LOS ratings that were calculated.<br />

U.S. 61<br />

U.S. 61 from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>, 7.3 miles, is four lanes divided with 55 and 65 mph speed<br />

limits. It has one interchange at Rt. A and a number of at-grade intersections. Traffic volumes<br />

remain the same at about 33,000 vehicles a day. The morning and afternoon peak hours are handling<br />

about 3,350 vehicles. The peak direction is southbound in the morning and northbound in the<br />

afternoon. There are about 1,000 per lane in the peak direction. Adjusting for trucks (15 percent)<br />

and other factors bring this figure to more than 1,100 pcphpl. From Table 10, this gives LOS C for<br />

the peak directions. The other direction has about 800 pcphpl or LOS B.<br />

U.S. 67<br />

U.S. 67 from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Alton, Illinois is four lanes divided, 4.1 miles long, and has a 55<br />

mph speed limit. It has a number of intersections including one at Rt. 94 that is signalized. It carries<br />

31,000 vehicles a day. It handles the same amount of traffic during the morning and afternoon peak<br />

hours. During the morning, southbound traffic is highest with about 2,000, or 1,000 per lane.<br />

Northbound has about 1,400 or 700 per lane. In the afternoon the reverse is true. Adjusting for<br />

trucks (6 percent) and other factors, brings the peak direction to about 1,100 pcphpl and the other<br />

to 8,000. From Table 11, this gives LOS C and B respectively. The traffic signal at Rt. 94 does<br />

periodically interrupt traffic, however, field observations indicate this is just temporary and traffic<br />

speed, density, and the v/c, return to normal and the LOS designations are appropriate.<br />

42


Criteria<br />

Table 11<br />

Level of Service Criteria<br />

For Expressway Segments<br />

43<br />

LOS<br />

A B C D E<br />

Free Flow Speed = 60 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 40<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 60 60 59.4 56.7 55<br />

Maximum v/c 0.3 0.49 0.7 0.9 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

660 1080 1550 1980 2200<br />

Free Flow Speed = 55 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 41<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 55 55 54.9 52.9 51.2<br />

Maximum v/c 0.29 0.47 0.68 0.88 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

600 990 1430 1850 2100<br />

Free Flow Speed = 50 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 43<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 50 50 50 48.9 47.5<br />

Maximum v/c 0.28 0.45 0.65 0.86 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

550 900 1300 1710 2000<br />

Free Flow Speed = 45 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 45 45 45 44.4 42.2<br />

Maximum v/c 0.26 0.43 0.62 0.82 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

NOTE:<br />

490 810 1170 1550 1900<br />

The exact mathematical relationship between density and v/c has not always been maintained at<br />

LOS boundaries because of the use of rounded values. Density is the primary determinant of LOS.<br />

LOS F is characterized by highly unstable and variable traffic flow. Prediction of accurate flow rate,<br />

density, and speed at Los F is difficult.


U.S. 40/61<br />

U.S. 40/61 from west of Rt. K to Rt. N handles about 50,000 vehicles per day. It has a speed limit<br />

of 55 mph and a limited number of intersections until the signal at Rt. N. A section about a mile and<br />

a half long is up to Interstate standards through the Winghaven Blvd. interchange. During the<br />

morning peak hour it handles about 5,000 vehicles with 3,000 eastbound and 2,000 westbound.<br />

Adjusting for trucks (6.8 percent), rolling terrain, and other factors gives a passenger equivalent for<br />

eastbound of 3,300 or 1,650 vehicles per lane. This equates to LOS D. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic is around<br />

2,200 or 1,100 per lane and LOS C. From Rt. N to I-70, has volumes’ area about 35,000 per day<br />

with a speed limit of 55 mph. Two signals exist. One at Callahan Rd. and one at Prospect Rd. and<br />

other intersections also exists. A section about a mile and a half long, is Interstate through the Lake<br />

Saint Louis Blvd. interchange. During the morning peak hour there are 3,500 vehicles with about<br />

2,100 eastbound and 1,400 westbound. Adjusting for trucks, rolling terrain and traffic signals brings<br />

the pcphpl to about 2,300 and 1,600 or about 1,200 per lane in the peak direction and 800 in the<br />

other. This is equal to LOS of C and B respectively. During the afternoon, traffic volumes are the<br />

same as the morning and the volumes and LOS are the same, C for westbound and B for eastbound.<br />

B-5.3. Principal Arterials<br />

Operating conditions on Principal Arterial roads are poorer than on Interstates, Freeways, or<br />

Expressways. In urban and suburban areas they can be four, five, or six lanes, divided or undivided<br />

roads. In rural areas they can be two, three, or four lane roads. Traffic flow and LOS are controlled<br />

by their traffic volumes and number of signalized intersections, side streets, and entrances, and the<br />

number of vehicles turning to and from them.<br />

The HCM 2000 provides guides for estimating LOS for planning purposes on Principal Arterial roads.<br />

The data required are average travel speeds, the number of signals per mile, and the LOS of<br />

signalized intersections. Average travel speeds came from the Council’s GPS travel time runs. The<br />

number of signals came from the road inventories. The LOS of signalized intersections came from<br />

field observation’s following the criteria described in Chapter 16 - Signalized Intersections, of the<br />

HCM 2000. The LOS for most of the Principal Arterials fall into this category and are discussed<br />

below.<br />

Rt. 79<br />

Rt. 79 from I-70 north past the Salt River Rd./Pearl Dr. carried about 22,000 vehicles and operated<br />

at LOS C during the peak hours. Backups occur for northbound traffic during parts of the afternoon<br />

peak hour where it necks down from four to two thus reducing the LOS to F for a short section.<br />

North of there it has some left turn lanes for a signalized intersection at T.R. Hughes Blvd. and a few<br />

at non-signalized intersections. Volumes drop northward until it reaches Lincoln <strong>County</strong> where it<br />

carried about 13,000 vehicles. Average speeds were about 47 mph for northbound and southbound<br />

traffic during the morning peak hours. This placed it at LOS C. During the afternoon peak hour,<br />

northbound traffic averaged 43 mph placing it at LOS D and southbound traffic had an average<br />

44


speed of 50 placing it at LOS C. The signals operated at LOS C during the peak hours, therefore,<br />

these LOS designations are appropriate.<br />

Rt. 94 - Rt. 370 to I-70<br />

This part of Rt. 94 runs from Rt. 370 south on Second <strong>St</strong>. to Clark <strong>St</strong>. on two lanes. There it travels<br />

west to Fifth <strong>St</strong>. and then south to First Capitol Dr. It then travels west becoming four lanes at<br />

Kingshighway and runs south to I-70, a distance of 3.4 miles. It has six traffic signals, a number of<br />

four way stops, and parking on both sides along most of its length. It travels through the City of <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> Central Business District. Average travel speeds in both directions are 23 mph in the<br />

morning peak hour providing LOS C. The signals at this time are also operating at LOS C.<br />

Therefore, LOS C during the morning peak hour is appropriate. During the afternoon peak hour,<br />

average travel speeds in both directions are about 20 mph providing LOS D. The signals handle<br />

more traffic and also operate at LOS D confirming this designation.<br />

Rt. 94 - I-70 to I-64<br />

This segment is six and four lanes divided from I-70 to I-64. It has been divided into three segments<br />

for analysis; I-70 to N. Rt. 364 (old Hemsath Rd.), S. Rt. 364 (north of Harvester Rd.) to Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr., and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64. The first section is 2.4 miles long and has five<br />

traffic signals. During the morning peak hours it had an average travel speed in both directions of<br />

27 mph which places it at LOS at D. Field observations indicate the signals are operating at LOS<br />

D. During the afternoon peak hour the same conditions exist with speeds of 26 mph both ways.<br />

Field observations show the signals are operating at LOS E which is the controlling factor and<br />

determines a LOS E designation.<br />

The segment of Rt. 94 from S. Rt. 364 to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. is 3.4 miles long and has five traffic<br />

signals. During the morning peak hours speeds are about 25 mph placing it at LOS D. However,<br />

the signals are operating at capacity with backups from almost one intersection to another. This<br />

results in LOS F. During the afternoon peak hour the same condition exists with traffic backup from<br />

one intersection to another. This produces extreme congestion. This segment is operating at LOS<br />

E and F during both the morning and afternoon peak hours.<br />

Rt. 94 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64 is 3.7 miles long and has five traffic signals. During the<br />

morning peak hour average travel speeds are 36 mph both ways placing it at LOS C. However, the<br />

signals are operating at LOS D, therefore, the segment is operating at LOS D. During the afternoon<br />

peak hours, average travel speeds are slightly higher placing it at LOS C. One major problem exists<br />

on this segment. It is the congestion for northbound traffic at Siedentop Rd., the first signal north<br />

of I-64. This signal operates at LOS F with long backups extending south almost daily to I-64.<br />

Traffic stacks onto the off ramp and often into the through westbound lanes of I-64. This creates<br />

a very hazardous, accident prone situation on I-64.<br />

45


Rt. K<br />

This road is a five-lane suburban arterial with extra lanes at signalized intersections. It is divided<br />

into two segments, one on the north from I-70 to Rt. N and the other from Rt. N to I-64 on the south.<br />

The north segment has 13 traffic signals and numerous entrances for commercial development along<br />

its 3.1 mile length. Speeds during the morning peak hour are 30 mph southbound and 36 mph<br />

northbound. This places it at LOS C which seems to be in line with the signal operations. During<br />

the afternoon speeds are 25 mph southbound and 23 mph northbound. This places the LOS at D<br />

which also is in line with the signal operations. Unfortunately, the signalized intersection of Rt. K<br />

and Rt. N operates at LOS F during the afternoon peak hours. Traffic is stacked up on all<br />

approaches and at times it takes more than one turn of the signal to negotiate the intersection. The<br />

intersection is operating at LOS F or with volumes in excess of its capacity.<br />

On the south segment there are seven signals along its 3.1 mile length. Speeds during the morning<br />

peak hour are 42 mph northbound and 33 mph southbound. This places the northbound at LOS B<br />

and southbound at LOS C. This seems appropriate for signal operations. In the afternoon peak<br />

hour, speeds are 27 mph northbound and 37 mph southbound placing the LOS at D for northbound<br />

and B for southbound. This seems appropriate for the signal operations. Although this road carries<br />

substantial volumes (40,000 in the north and 25,000 in the south) and they have been increasing, the<br />

wide road and good signal spacing have allowed traffic to move well. As volumes continue to grow,<br />

maintaining the good LOS may be a challenge.<br />

Rt. M (Main <strong>St</strong>.)<br />

This road runs 2.5 miles from I-70 to Rt. 79 through old town O’Fallon on four lanes with parts on<br />

the north and south widened to five lanes. It has six signals that operate at LOS D during both the<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours. Speeds during the morning are 28 mph northbound and 24 mph<br />

southbound. This places it at LOS D. In the afternoon, they are 23 northbound and 17 southbound.<br />

Northbound is at LOS D and southbound has some congestion around I-70 placing it at LOS E.<br />

Congestion through the old part of O’Fallon can be serious and occasionally aggravated by trains<br />

crossing just north of downtown. At these times all traffic for some distance comes to a complete<br />

stop. During the peak hour periods the road is operating at LOS E to F.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to Rt. 94, 4.5 miles and has 14 signals. Average speeds during<br />

the morning peak hours were 26 mph northbound and 31 mph southbound. The signals operated at<br />

LOS D, and E. During the afternoon peak hours speeds were 28 northbound and 30 southbound.<br />

The signals operated at LOS D, and E. From I-70 to Mexico Rd. during the peak hours it is<br />

operating with serious congestion. Volumes are quite high (36,000) due to all the commercial<br />

development at and around the Mid Rivers Mall. All of the signals are operating at LOS E during<br />

the morning peak hours and LOS F during the afternoon peak hours.<br />

46


Jungermann Rd.<br />

This road runs from Veterans Memorial Pkwy. to Rt. 94, 3.5 miles and has 10 signals. Speed runs<br />

were not conducted on this road by the Council, but observations reveal that it is operating without<br />

excessive congestion. Traffic volumes are around 30,000 south of Mexico Rd. and decline<br />

southward to about 20,000 north of McClay Rd. The signals are operating at LOS D during the peak<br />

hour periods except for the one at Mexico Rd. which is operating at capacity, LOS E. Travel on this<br />

road is estimated to be LOS D.<br />

Muegge Rd.<br />

This road has four lanes from Mexico Rd. south to Old Hwy. 94 and the ramp connections to Rt.<br />

364. It handles about 16,000 vehicles per day. Speed runs were not conducted on this road. It has<br />

seven signals not counting Mexico Rd. Observations indicate they all operate at or below LOS C<br />

during both the am and pm peak hours and the road operates at LOS C.<br />

Bryan Rd.<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to Rt. N where it becomes Winghaven Blvd., a four-lane parkway<br />

to U.S. 40/61. No speed runs were conducted on this road, however, it has six signals that all<br />

operate at LOS C during the peak hour periods. It carries about 25,000 vehicles per day and<br />

observations indicate it is has no serious congestion and operates at LOS C.<br />

Truman Rd.<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to Rt. 370, has three signals, and handles about 14,000 vehicles<br />

a day. It is two miles long to the I-70/Cave Spring Rd. interchange. No speed runs were made on<br />

this road but observations indicate it is operating at LOS C during the peak hours except for traffic<br />

at the north service road of I-70 that operates at LOS E.<br />

Mexico Rd.<br />

This five-lane road runs from Veterans Memorial Pkwy. just east of Muegge Rd. to Bryan Rd., a<br />

distance of 10 miles. It handles about 35,000 at Jungermann Rd., 30,000 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

to Rt. K, and 12,000 east of Bryan Rd. It has about 18 signals, some at school entrances. No speed<br />

runs were made on this road but observations suggest it could be divided into three different<br />

segments. The east segment would be from Muegge Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr., the central from<br />

there to Rt. K, and the west segment from Rt. K to Bryan Rd. The east segment operates at LOS D<br />

during the peak hours due to close signals and their operations. The central part operates at LOS<br />

C with the signal at Mexico Rd. providing LOS D during the peak hours. The west segment’s most<br />

critical issue is the signal at Rt. K but it operates at LOS D even during the peak hours. Traffic flow<br />

between signals is good at LOS C and as noted above dictates the roads LOS at these points.<br />

B-5.4. Minor Arterials<br />

Minor arterial roads can be two, three or four lanes and serve traffic for shorter distances. They<br />

connect traffic from collector roads and local streets to Principal Arterial roads. They serve adjacent<br />

47


land use, especially residential development, to a greater degree than roads of a higher classification.<br />

They normally carry less traffic than roads of a higher classification but more than collectors and<br />

local streets. The LOS on Minor Arterial roads vary depending on the land use they serve, their<br />

traffic volumes, number of traffic signals, stop controls, and side streets. A list of the more highly<br />

traveled ones in the <strong>County</strong> along with an estimate of their peak hour LOS is shown below.<br />

MoDOT Roads LOS<br />

Rt. 79 (Rt. M to Lincoln Co) C<br />

Rt. 94 (Rt. 370 to Rt. B) C<br />

Rt. 94 (I-64 to Warren Co.) C<br />

Rt. A (I-70 to U.S. 61) C<br />

Rt. N (Mid R. M. Dr. to U.S. 40/61) D<br />

Rt. N (U.S. 40/61 to Rt. Z) D<br />

Rt. Z (I-70 to Rt. N) C<br />

<strong>County</strong> Roads LOS<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. C<br />

Central School Rd. C<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. C<br />

Feise Rd. C<br />

Fifth <strong>St</strong>. D<br />

Friedens Rd. D<br />

Harvester Rd. D<br />

Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. D<br />

Knaust Rd. C<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. C<br />

McClay Rd. D<br />

O’Fallon Rd. C<br />

South River Rd. C<br />

Spencer Rd. D<br />

<strong>West</strong> Clay <strong>St</strong>. D<br />

Willott Rd. C<br />

Zumbehl Rd. D<br />

48


B-5.5. Major Collectors<br />

Major Collector roads serve a substantial part of the <strong>County</strong>. They collect traffic from local streets<br />

and roads and distribute them to Minor Arterials or Principal Arterial roads. They can be two or<br />

three lanes and occasionally four lanes. They may have traffic signals, especially for special<br />

generators such as schools, churches, public buildings, and large commercial developments. Their<br />

LOS can vary depending on land use, intersecting streets, and special generators. No attempt was<br />

made to determine LOS at the Major Collector road level.<br />

B-6. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy<br />

In order to develop forecasts of traffic in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, the Council collects travel time data<br />

on a large number of major roads. Recently the procedure for collecting this data was updated by<br />

using Global Positioning System (GPS) recorders. This procedure was used in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

on many major roads for use in this study..<br />

Roads<br />

Table 12<br />

Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy<br />

Roads Surveyed<br />

From To Miles<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Rt. K 3.22<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Warren <strong>County</strong> 26.75<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 9.96<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln <strong>County</strong> 7.31<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Illinois <strong>St</strong>ate Line 4.13<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Lincoln <strong>County</strong> 10.41<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 I-70 25.85<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Warren <strong>County</strong> 21.85<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Rt. 94 3.23<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> I-70 8.49<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 6.38<br />

Rt. M I-70 Rt. 79 3.1<br />

Rt. N Mid Rivers M. Dr. U.S. 40.61 7.95<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.39<br />

Rt. Z Rt. N I-70 2.52<br />

Mid Rivers M. Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 4.53<br />

Total miles = 151.07<br />

In the fall of 2004 the Council developed a methodology for collecting travel time data. It consisted<br />

of selecting roads in the <strong>County</strong> where data was needed, developing a collection procedure, and<br />

determining the times and days of collection. The roads selected for inclusion in this study are listed<br />

49


on Table 12. They total 135 miles. All major state highways were selected including the Interstates,<br />

Freeways, Expressways, Major Arterials and some Minor Arterials. In addition, Mid Rivers Mall<br />

Dr. was included as it is a Major Arterial. A test vehicle was supplied with the GPS unit and driven<br />

during the morning, midday, and afternoon peak hours. These times were 6:30am to 9:00am,<br />

11:00am to 2:00pm, and 3:30pm to 6:00pm. The GPS unit recorded the exact position and time of<br />

the vehicle which then could be converted into speeds and delays that were encountered during the<br />

run The test vehicle traveled each road a number of times during each time period so that data for<br />

multiple days could be averaged. If weather conditions, crashes, other incidents, or unusual delays,<br />

were encountered the run was aborted and reran on another day. The data was downloaded from<br />

the GPS unit into the Council’s computer and analyzed. A report entitled <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Travel<br />

Time and Speed <strong>St</strong>udy August 2005, was prepared describing the results of the study. All of the<br />

travel times during the peak hour periods for these roads were taken from this report.<br />

A tabulation of the findings for these roads is shown in Table 13. It contains the direction, speed,<br />

travel time, delay, and percent of delay during the morning and afternoon peak hours. Table 14<br />

ranks the roads according to their percent delay for the a.m. and p.m. periods. These values are the<br />

average of a number of runs. A discussion of the travel time, delay, and percent of delay follows.<br />

I-64 eastbound traffic during the morning peak hour had the highest volume but traveled at the speed<br />

limit without any congestion. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic during the afternoon peak hour traveled at 56 mph<br />

and delay was about 10 percent of travel time. This was due to the congestion on the Missouri River<br />

bridge caused by the narrow lanes.<br />

I-70 eastbound traffic during the morning peak hour between Warren <strong>County</strong> and Rt. 79 ran at 44<br />

mph, 16 mph below the speed limit. The section between Bryan Rd. and Rt. 79 has serious<br />

congestion problems that reduce speeds to about 10 mph with stop-start traffic. Delays were 35<br />

percent of travel time. From Rt. 79 to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> speed was 54 mph. Sections between Rt.<br />

79 and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and to the Missouri River bridge had speeds of about 30 mph and delays<br />

of up to three minutes. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic during the morning peak hour had some delays but they<br />

were not serious. During the afternoon peak hour westbound traffic experienced serious congestion<br />

from the east of the Missouri River bridge to Rt. 79. Traffic traveled at only 50 mph and delays<br />

made up 10 percent of travel time. <strong>East</strong>bound traffic did not have any serious congestion or delays.<br />

U. S. 40/61 traffic eastbound during the morning from I-70 to Rt. K had speeds of 49 mph. Delays<br />

were more than 15 percent due to the signalized intersections of Callahan Rd., Prospect Rd., and Rt.<br />

N. From Rt. N east, speeds rose to 55 mph. <strong>West</strong>bound speeds were slightly less, about 54 mph and<br />

delays of up to one minute. This was mainly due to less traffic. During the afternoon peak hour,<br />

westbound speeds were about 44 mph due to the signals and delays were as high as 27 percent of<br />

travel time. <strong>East</strong>bound had higher speeds at 54 mph and delays were only 5 percent of travel time.<br />

U.S. 61 experienced no delays and traffic traveled at the speed limit at all times in both directions<br />

of travel from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>.<br />

50


U.S. 67 experienced no delays and traffic traveled at the speed limit at all times in both directions<br />

of travel from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Alton, Illinois.<br />

Rt. 79 had no delay problems from Rt. M to Lincoln <strong>County</strong> during all times of the day. Some<br />

delays were experienced during the peak hours at the signal of T.R. Hughes north of I-70.<br />

51


Table 13<br />

Travel Time and Delay Data<br />

Summary of Major Roads<br />

MoDOT and <strong>County</strong> Roads<br />

Road Beginning End Peak Dir. Miles Speed Speed Travel Delay Percent<br />

Hour Limit (mph) Time<br />

(Min.)<br />

(Min.) Delay<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K A.M. W.B. 3.22 60 61 3.25 0.30 9.2%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.22 60 62 3.23 0.15 4.6%<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K P.M. W.B. 3.22 60 56 3.61 0.37 10.2%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.22 60 65 3.05 0.10 3.3%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 A.M. W.B. 9.71 60 62 10.34 0.50 4.8%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 9.71 60 54 12.50 0.93 7.5%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 P.M. W.B. 9.71 60 50 13.20 1.28 9.7%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 9.71 60 63 10.44 0.17 1.6%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. A.M. W.B. 17.00 60 66 14.92 0.05 0.3%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 A.M. E.B. 17.00 60 44 24.74 8.60 34.8%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. P.M. W.B. 17.00 60 60 16.43 0.55 3.3%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 P.M. E.B. 17.00 60 67 14.69 0.13 0.9%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 A.M. W.B. 9.96 55 54 11.45 0.85 7.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K A.M. E.B. 9.96 55 49 12.80 1.97 15.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 P.M. W.B. 9.96 55 44 14.58 4.00 27.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K P.M. E.B. 9.96 55 54 11.73 0.58 5.0%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 A.M W.B. 10.40 55 35 19.03 5.27 27.7%<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 A.M. E.B. 10.40 55 29 22.98 9.15 39.8%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 P.M. W.B. 10.40 55 29 23.45 8.60 36.7%<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 P.M. E.B. 10.40 55 32 20.88 6.55 31.4%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. A.M. W.B. 3.23 60 60 6.10 0.18 3.0%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.23 60 59 6.25 0.17 2.7%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. P.M. W.B. 3.23 60 48 7.62 1.62 21.2%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.23 60 61 5.96 0.05 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 A.M. W.B. 8.49 60 68 7.90 0.00 0.0%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 8.49 60 65 8.16 0.07 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 P.M. W.B. 8.49 60 65 8.08 0.07 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 8.49 60 66 7.92 0.05 0.6%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 A.M. S.B. 6.38 45 31 12.20 3.08 25.3%<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 A.M. N.B. 6.38 45 38 9.85 1.30 13.2%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 P.M. S.B. 6.38 45 29 12.96 3.67 28.3%<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 P.M. N.B. 6.38 45 24 16.15 6.68 41.4%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 A.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.75 3.80 35.3%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 A.M. N.B. 4.32 35 26 10.90 4.17 38.2%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 P.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.50 3.25 31.0%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 P.M. N.B. 4.32 35 28 9.88 2.68 27.2%<br />

52


Road Beginning End<br />

Table 14<br />

Travel Time and Delay Data<br />

Roads Ranked by Percent Delay<br />

A.M Peak Hours<br />

Peak<br />

Hour Dir. Miles<br />

53<br />

Speed<br />

Limit<br />

Speed<br />

(mph)<br />

Travel<br />

Time<br />

(min)<br />

Delay<br />

(min)<br />

Percent<br />

Delay<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 A.M. E.B. 10.40 55 29 22.98 9.15 39.8%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 A.M. N.B. 4.32 35 26 10.90 4.17 38.2%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 A.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.75 3.80 35.3%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 A.M. E.B. 17.00 60 44 24.74 8.60 34.8%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 A.M W.B. 10.40 55 35 19.03 5.27 27.7%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 A.M. S.B. 6.38 45 31 12.20 3.08 25.3%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K A.M. E.B. 9.96 55 49 12.80 1.97 15.4%<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 A.M. N.B. 6.38 45 38 9.85 1.30 13.2%<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K A.M. W.B. 3.22 60 61 3.25 0.30 9.2%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 9.71 60 54 12.50 0.93 7.5%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 A.M. W.B. 9.96 55 54 11.45 0.85 7.4%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 A.M. W.B. 9.71 60 62 10.34 0.50 4.8%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.22 60 62 3.23 0.15 4.6%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. A.M. W.B. 3.23 60 60 6.10 0.18 3.0%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.23 60 59 6.25 0.17 2.7%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 8.49 60 65 8.16 0.07 0.8%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. A.M. W.B. 17.00 60 66 14.92 0.05 0.3%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 A.M. W.B. 8.49 60 68 7.90 0.00 0.0%<br />

P.M. Peak Hours<br />

Road Beginning End<br />

Peak<br />

Hour Dir. Miles<br />

Speed<br />

Limit<br />

Speed<br />

(mph)<br />

Travel<br />

Time<br />

(min)<br />

Delay<br />

(min)<br />

Percent<br />

Delay<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 P.M. N.B. 6.38 45 24 16.15 6.68 41.4%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 P.M. W.B. 10.40 55 29 23.45 8.60 36.7%<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 P.M. E.B. 10.40 55 32 20.88 6.55 31.4%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 P.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.50 3.25 31.0%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 P.M. S.B. 6.38 45 29 12.96 3.67 28.3%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 P.M. W.B. 9.96 55 44 14.58 4.00 27.4%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 P.M. N.B. 4.32 35 28 9.88 2.68 27.2%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. P.M. W.B. 3.23 60 48 7.62 1.62 21.2%<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K P.M. W.B. 3.22 60 56 3.61 0.37 10.2%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 P.M. W.B. 9.71 60 50 13.20 1.28 9.7%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K P.M. E.B. 9.96 55 54 11.73 0.58 5.0%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. P.M. W.B. 17.00 60 60 16.43 0.55 3.3%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.22 60 65 3.05 0.10 3.3%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 9.71 60 63 10.44 0.17 1.6%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 P.M. E.B. 17.00 60 67 14.69 0.13 0.9%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.23 60 61 5.96 0.05 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 P.M. W.B. 8.49 60 65 8.08 0.07 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 8.49 60 66 7.92 0.05 0.6%


Rt. 94 from I-70 to I-64 was the section with the most serious speed and delay problems of all<br />

routes surveyed. During the morning peak hour, eastbound traffic moved at only 29 mph with the<br />

highest delay of all roads, 40 percent of the travel time. This was caused by the numerous signalized<br />

intersections and the high volume of traffic. On some segments, such as Kisker Rd. to Harvester<br />

Rd. and Pralle Ln. to I-70, speeds were even lower and delays longer. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic did not fare<br />

much better having speeds of 35 mph and delays making up 28 percent of travel time. The worst<br />

segments were Harvester Rd. to Kisker Rd. and some between O’Fallon Rd. and I-64.<br />

During the afternoon peak hour conditions were just as bad with delays ranking second and third at<br />

37 and 31 percent of travel time. <strong>West</strong>bound speeds averaged 29 mph and eastbound were 32 mph.<br />

Delays caused serious congestion with vehicles operating in a start-stop mode. As mentioned<br />

earlier, eastbound traffic at Siedentop Rd. had delays which caused traffic exiting I-64 to back into<br />

the off ramp creating a serious safety issue. Reductions in speed and increased delays also were<br />

experienced from Kisker Rd. to Harvester Rd. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic was slightly better although<br />

reduced speeds and long delays also occurred at these locations.<br />

Rt. 364 had almost no delays and traveled at the speed limit during all hours of the day for both<br />

eastbound and westbound traffic.<br />

Rt. 370 ranked best for delays and travel was at the speed limit at all times of the day in both<br />

directions of travel.<br />

Rt. K has considerable delays and low speeds due to its many intersections and entrances. During<br />

the morning peak hours southbound speeds are only 31 mph and delays make up 25 percent of travel<br />

time. Northbound travel has speed of 38 mph and delays of 13 percent. During the afternoon peak<br />

hours northbound traffic ranks the list with speeds of 24 mph and delays of 41 percent of travel time.<br />

Southbound traffic is not much better with speeds of 29 mph and delays of 28 percent. Traffic<br />

volumes have continued to increase with growth in residential development.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr., is an arterial road with numerous signalized intersection and many entrances.<br />

It has a 35 mph speed limit. During the morning peak hours it had speeds of 26 mph both<br />

northbound and southbound and the second and third highest delay with 38 and 35 percent of travel<br />

time. During the afternoon peak hours it also had low speeds of 26 and 28 mph and delays of 31 and<br />

27 percent of travel time. Although congestion can be severe in some locations such as the Mid<br />

River Mall area, it handles traffic without severe congestion or safety problems.<br />

Summary<br />

Table 14 shows that the roads with the highest percent of delays during the morning peak hours were<br />

eastbound Rt. 94 between I-70 and I-64 with 39.8%, north and southbound Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

between Rt. 94 and I-70 with 38.2% and 35.3%, and I-70 from Warren <strong>County</strong> to Rt. 79 with 34.8%.<br />

Actually, the delays on I-70 start around Bryan Rd. and continue east through Rt. K and Rt. 79<br />

through Mid Rivers Mall Dr. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic on Rt. 94 from I-70 to I-64 had the next highest<br />

delay with 27.7 percent followed by southbound Rt. K from I-70 to I-64 with 25.3 percent.<br />

During the afternoon peak hours the greatest delays occurred on northbound Rt. K from I-64 to I-70<br />

with 41.4 percent, the highest percent for all roads surveyed. Rt. 94 west and eastbound from I-70<br />

to I-64 had the next highest delays with 36.7 percent and 31.4 percent. Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

54


southbound from I-70 to Rt. 94 was next with 31.0 percent followed by Rt. K southbound from I-70<br />

to I-64 with 28.3 percent. Roads with the least amount of delays were Rt. 370 both during the<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours, Rt. 364, parts of I-70 from Rt. 79 to Warren <strong>County</strong>, and U.S.<br />

61 from Lincoln <strong>County</strong> to I-70.<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Public transportation consists of any mode of ground travel that is available to the public besides a<br />

private vehicle. It generally consists of transportation services offered by any public or private<br />

agency for the purpose of moving people from one place to another. Public transportation in the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Louis region consists of fixed route bus transit, light rail transit, and paratransit services. Metro<br />

(formerly the Bi-<strong>St</strong>ate Development Agency) provides fixed route bus services in <strong>St</strong>. Louis City and<br />

<strong>County</strong> and operates MetroLink, the light rail transit system. They also provide paratransit services<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. Louis City and <strong>County</strong>. The <strong>St</strong>. Clair <strong>County</strong> and Madison <strong>County</strong> Transit Districts in Illinois<br />

also provide fixed route bus service for their counties. Numerous public and private agencies<br />

provide paratransit service throughout the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region.<br />

C-1. Fixed Route Bus Service<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has been quite active in planning and providing public transportation. In 1992<br />

the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit Authority was established by action of the Missouri General<br />

Assembly. It consists of a five-member board who meets periodically to discuss plans for future<br />

public transportation in the <strong>County</strong>. The agency is eligible to receive and dispense funds for public<br />

transportation but to-date no funding source has been provided.<br />

In 1997 the Council was asked to conduct a feasibility study of providing fixed route bus service in<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. A report entitled “A Technical Memorandum for a <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>” was completed in January 1998. It identified a number of bus routes that could serve<br />

residential and commercial property throughout the most densely developed part of the <strong>County</strong>. The<br />

report was used by the Transit Authority to consider ways of instituting bus service in the <strong>County</strong>.<br />

In early 2001 the <strong>County</strong> requested the Council update the 1998 plan to take advantage of the 2000<br />

Census and other new data. A report entitled “A <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit <strong>Plan</strong> for Intra-<strong>County</strong><br />

and Inter-<strong>County</strong> Bus Service” was completed in August 2001. The report contained updated census<br />

and demographic data and identified three corridors that should have bus service. They were I-70<br />

from the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to Wentzville, Rt. 94 from the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to Mid Rivers Mall<br />

Dr., and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. from I-70 to Rt. 94. It also recommended commuter bus service on<br />

I-70 to and from park and ride lots to the N. Hanley Rd. MetroLink station. Details of the<br />

recommended bus system can be found in the report. The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> suggests<br />

the Transit Authority pursue instituting bus service as described in the report. However, the lack<br />

of a steady and reliable funding source has hampered their ability to institute such service.<br />

Only one fixed route bus system is in operation in the <strong>County</strong> and it is the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Area Transit<br />

(SCAT) system provided by the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>. It consists of four bus routes that cover all parts<br />

of the city and operates once each hour, Monday through Friday, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.. They<br />

also operate a peak hour commuter bus service from park and ride lots on I-70 to the MetroLink<br />

station in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> at N. Hanley Rd. These services allow persons without any other means<br />

of transportation, in and around the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and some commuters on I-70, to travel within<br />

55


the city and also connect to the transit service in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City.<br />

The cities of <strong>St</strong>. Peters and O’Fallon do not presently provide any fixed route bus service but have<br />

been considering future possibilities. The city of Wentzville completed a transit study in 2003 and<br />

is using it as a guide for future bus service.<br />

C-2. Paratransit Service<br />

Paratransit service is quite different from fixed route transit. Its primary purpose is to provide<br />

transportation services to persons, who are transit dependant and elderly, have developmental and/or<br />

mental disabilities, and poor or homeless persons who are disabled. It is mostly demand responsive,<br />

that is, persons call a paratransit provider and arrange for transportation on specific days from their<br />

place of residence to their destination and back. <strong>Transportation</strong> is provided using vans or minibuses<br />

and the drivers and vehicles must meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act<br />

(ADA) of 1990. Some paratransit trips are made on a fixed route for group travel to a nutrition site<br />

or sheltered workshop. Also, some paratransit trips are made on the SCAT system as its service can<br />

deviate (within given distances) from its fixed route for persons with special needs. Paratransit<br />

services are normally operated by social service or specialized private organizations receiving both<br />

public and private funding. Because of ADA requirements, they have specific service mandates,<br />

operating conditions, and operating constraints.<br />

Funding for paratransit service comes from a number of sources. They are as follows;<br />

1. Federal Title III-B (Older Americans Act).<br />

2. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants administered by MoDOT. There are four FTA<br />

funding categories that are explained in the discussion of the TIP in the next chapter.<br />

3. Missouri Elderly and Handicapped <strong>Transportation</strong> Assistance Program (MEHTAP) funds<br />

administered through MoDOT.<br />

4. Missouri Department of Health funds.<br />

5. Medicaid funds.<br />

6. Other private funding.<br />

In 2000 the Council retained a consultant to study paratransit service in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> to<br />

determine ways of coordinating services between providers to reduce costs and improve service.<br />

A report entitled “<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit/Paratransit Coordination <strong>St</strong>udy” was completed in<br />

October 2000. It contained data from almost all paratransit providers in the <strong>County</strong> including the<br />

area they covered, the number and type of vehicles they operated, their hours in service, and the<br />

number of one-way trips they provided. It includes a list of existing conditions and paratransit<br />

providers and the number of vehicles they operated, the number of yearly passengers they served,<br />

and the yearly cost they incurred to provide these services. This report has not been updated since<br />

then but the data serves as a baseline for this study. Complete details of all paratransit providers can<br />

be found in the report along with recommendations for future services. A summary of some of the<br />

major items in the report is as follows.<br />

56


• The consultant sent out questionnaires to 17 paratransit providers and interviewed each one<br />

to determine details of the services they provided. The interviews revealed that about<br />

492,000 one-way passenger trips costing about $1.1 million were made in 2000 by these 17<br />

paratransit providers. These numbers are low since a number of agencies surveyed did not<br />

have or would not provide some of the information. Since it has been five years since this<br />

survey, it is likely that the number of trips and their costs are now higher.<br />

• A substantial amount of paratransit service is purchased from private for-profit and nonprofit<br />

providers by many state agencies including the Missouri Department of Mental Health,<br />

Division of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, the Mid-<strong>East</strong> Area Agency<br />

on Aging, and the Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Medical Services.<br />

• Paratransit service is also provided by a large number of agencies that use their own staff to<br />

transport clients so they can participate in other programs. Many organizations such as the<br />

Emmaus Homes, the Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services,<br />

reimburse clients for their own travel including the purchases of taxi and bus tickets.<br />

• Future demand for paratransit service in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will grow as the population<br />

continues to increase and the average age grows older.<br />

Since the 2000 Paratransit Report was published, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has continued to grow and<br />

more areas are becoming urbanized with residential and commercial development growing at a fast<br />

pace. Much of the developing area will increase the demand for future paratransit service. In<br />

addition, many areas of the <strong>County</strong> are rural and have limited or no paratransit service. Increased<br />

demand for these services can be expected in the future. Resources for this report did not allow for<br />

a detailed study of paratransit like the one provided by the consultant in 2000. However, data from<br />

MoDOT and the census helped to estimate what can be expected in the future.<br />

A list of agencies that recently received paratransit funds through MoDOT is listed below.<br />

• Community Living Inc., <strong>St</strong>. Peters, MO<br />

• Crider Center for Mental Health, Inc. Wentzville, MO<br />

• Emmaus Homes - <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, MO<br />

• Delta Center for Independent Living, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, MO<br />

• <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Association for Retarded Citizens <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, MO<br />

C-3. Light Rail Transit<br />

As part of its work in identifying corridors for possible light rail transit (MetroLink) extensions, the<br />

Council published a report in June 1991entitled “<strong>St</strong>. Louis System Analysis for Major Transit<br />

Capital Investment.” High on the list was an extension from the MetroLink station at Lambert<br />

International Airport west along the I-70 corridor into <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. A Major Investment<br />

<strong>St</strong>udy (MIS) and Draft Environmental Impact <strong>St</strong>atement (DEIS) for the corridor was initiated by the<br />

Council in 1993. These documents were approved by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in<br />

57


June 1996. In order to move forward with the extension, the <strong>County</strong> needed the 20 percent match<br />

required for funding the project. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> placed a one-half cent sales tax proposal before<br />

the voters in August and again in November of 1996. Both times the proposal failed. Since then<br />

other corridors in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region have been funded and improvements to the initial 18-mile<br />

system from downtown <strong>St</strong>. Louis to the airport has been constructed. The possibility of restoring<br />

the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> corridor to the MetroLink system now seems remote.<br />

D. Railroads<br />

Two railroads operate in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe and the Norfolk<br />

and Southern. The Burlington Northern travels from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> north along U.S. 67 to <strong>West</strong><br />

Alton and from there west in the northern part of the <strong>County</strong> close to the Mississippi River into<br />

Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It has no stops except for a spur to the Ameren Power <strong>Plan</strong>t at Portage Des Sioux.<br />

The Norfolk and Southern enter from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> along side Rt. 370 and travels west in the<br />

I-70 corridor into Warren <strong>County</strong> with a spur to the General Motors plant at Wentzville. These two<br />

railroads have no current plans for changes to their rail lines. No other railroad companies have<br />

expressed an interest in providing service in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> at this time.<br />

E. Pipeline<br />

According to the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 2015 there are 11 pipelines operating in the<br />

<strong>County</strong>. They include the following companies and move the noted products:<br />

• Amoco Gasoline, Petroleum<br />

• Arco Diesel Fuel #2, Kerosene, Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline<br />

• Conoco Fuel Oils, Liquid Petroleum Gas, Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline<br />

• Explorer Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline, Aviation Fuel (JP - 4)<br />

• Williams Diesel Fuel #2, Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline<br />

• Kochs Liquid Anhydrous Ammonia<br />

• Kochs Crude Oil<br />

• Missouri Natural Gas<br />

• Platte Crude Oil<br />

• Shell Crude Oil<br />

• Southern <strong>St</strong>ar Central Natural Gas<br />

These companies traverse all parts of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> entering from the west. Some cross the<br />

Missouri River and others enter from Warren and Lincoln Counties, They all converge in the<br />

northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> between the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers and cross into Illinois just<br />

north of the confluence of the rivers. This is the area in the Illinois part of the Region that has a<br />

large amount of petroleum and natural gas facilities that process and distribute products from the<br />

pipelines. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> plays no role in handling material from the pipelines with the<br />

exception of one facility, Williams Petroleum in <strong>St</strong>. Peters. The company transfers a small amount<br />

of petroleum from a Conoco pipeline to trucks. As a result, these modes of transportation have no<br />

impact, including employment opportunities, and place no demands on the <strong>County</strong>.<br />

58


F. Aviation<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has two general aviation airports. One is Smartt Airport and the other is <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport. Smartt Airport is located in the northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> adjacent<br />

to Grafton Ferry Rd. north of Rt. 94. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport is also in the northeast part of<br />

the <strong>County</strong> just south of Rt. B west of Rt. 94. Smartt Airport has an instrument runway that allows<br />

aircraft to land when the weather is below Visual Flight Rule (VFR) minimums of 1,000 feet. The<br />

FAA has designated Smartt Airport as a reliever airport for Lambert International for general<br />

aviation aircraft. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal has no instrument capabilities.<br />

The <strong>County</strong> had an airport study conducted by a consultant in 2002 entitled <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>-<br />

Smartt Airport Master <strong>Plan</strong>. Although some of the recommendations in the report do not have the<br />

approval of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) yet, extending the main runway by 600 ft.<br />

to 4,400 ft., which has been considered of real value by the <strong>County</strong>. Mention is made of the airport<br />

in the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 2015, as an opportunity to better meet the aviation needs of<br />

the <strong>County</strong>, expand the general aviation infrastructure, and increase the <strong>County</strong>’s aviation activity.<br />

The <strong>County</strong> has been discussing various possibilities for improving general aviation activity<br />

including expanding Smartt Airport.<br />

Highway traffic presently generated by the two airports is quite small and does not impose any<br />

traffic problems on the supporting highway system. Even an expanded facility, such as the one<br />

proposed for Smartt Airport, would not cause any future traffic problems regardless of its size as it<br />

only serves general aviation activity.<br />

G. Barge<br />

Since the 1997 <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> transportation study, no change has occurred in barge operations<br />

on the Missouri or Mississippi Rivers that would affect the <strong>County</strong>’s transportation system.<br />

Operations consist of travel up and down the rivers past the <strong>County</strong>. No new facilities have been<br />

built and there is no exchange of material to another mode of travel such as truck or railroad. There<br />

is no travel to such a facility by persons in the <strong>County</strong> generating additional traffic on county roads.<br />

59


A. Overview<br />

IV. <strong>Transportation</strong> Safety<br />

The safety of travel on the road system of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and other transportation modes, such<br />

as railroad and aviation, was considered a very important topic in this report. This chapter goes into<br />

detail regarding their safety by examining available historical data. These data provided<br />

information on the number of crashes on the road system, the number of crashes at railroad<br />

crossings, and safety measures at the <strong>County</strong>’s airports. For the road system a substantial amount<br />

of data was acquired from MoDOT. An analysis of these data is contained in the following parts<br />

of this chapter.<br />

B. Major Road System Safety<br />

The safety of travel on the major road system includes travel by automobiles, trucks, motorcycles,<br />

bicycles, and pedestrians. The major road system consists of most of MoDOT’s roads and many<br />

<strong>County</strong> and city roads. Lists of these roads are contained in the tables that follow. The degree of<br />

safety afforded traffic on the major roads was measured by the number of crashes (commonly know<br />

as accidents) that occur on a given road segment. Crash data was supplied by MoDOT for all the<br />

roads including those maintained by the <strong>County</strong> and cities.<br />

In 2003 MoDOT organized a group of public and private partners to study safety issues and develop<br />

methods for improving safety in the state. A document entitled “Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer<br />

Roadways” was published in November 2004. More than 150 partners provided input for the report<br />

and some of the data was used in this study. Appendix A contains the Executive Summary of that<br />

report. The report contains a wealth of information regarding travel in Missouri and road and driver<br />

conditions. It is considered an important adjunct to this report and is discussed later.<br />

B-1. Number of Crashes, Severity Ratings, and Crash Rates<br />

This section discusses measures of safety afforded traffic on the <strong>County</strong>’s road system. They<br />

include the number of crashes on a road segment, the severity of the crashes, and the crash rates.<br />

MoDOT roads are discussed first followed by the <strong>County</strong> and cities roads. In some cases parts of<br />

roads carrying MoDOT route markings are maintained by the <strong>County</strong> or a city.<br />

Three measures are used to assess the degree of safety afforded traffic on specific road segments.<br />

The first is the number of crashes that occur on the segment, the second is the severity rating of the<br />

crashes, and the third is the crash rate. Traffic engineers use the number of crashes during the most<br />

recent three years to calculate these safety measures. For this study, crash data for the years 2002,<br />

2003, and 2004 were used. Data for 2005 is still being processed. The severity rating measure was<br />

developed using MoDOT’s methodology which assigns a value of nine for each fatal crash and six<br />

for each disabling injury crash. These values are then added to give the route a severity rating. The<br />

crash rate is the measure used by traffic engineers as it provides a relationship between the number<br />

of crashes on a road segment, the length of the segment, and the volume of traffic on the road.<br />

60


B-1.1 MoDOT Roads<br />

Number of Crashes<br />

The number of crashes that were reported on MoDOT’s roads for 2002, 2003, and 2004, are shown<br />

in Table 15. A total of 44 road segments was listed. The roads are arranged by functional<br />

classification showing their number of fatality, disabling injury, minor injury and property damage<br />

crashes for each year. The number of fatality crashes was the lowest type. Most involved only one |<br />

fatality and constitute less than 1 percent of each year’s total. Disabling Injury crashes were also<br />

low, around 3 percent. Personal Injury and Property Damage crashes were the highest with more<br />

than 96 percent of all crashes.<br />

Table 16 shows the road segments ranked by number of crashes per mile. Although it does not<br />

include volumes or severity data, it does show where most of the crashes have occurred. Almost all<br />

segments of I-70 are in the top part of the list. They carry the highest traffic volumes in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> ranging from 190,000 to 175,000 vehicles per day. The segment from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to<br />

Rt. 94 is first. It includes the highly traveled Rt. 94 and Fifth <strong>St</strong> interchanges. Second was Rt. K<br />

from I-70 to Rt. N. It has high volumes and numerous intersections that create conflict points that<br />

are potential locations for crashes. The third highest segment was I-70 from Rt. 370 to Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. This short section contains two major interchanges that carry substantial traffic volumes<br />

which are negotiating weaving movements that create the potential for crashes. In addition, long<br />

backups are experienced in the afternoon for the westbound off ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

creating the potential for collisions.<br />

The mean number of crashes per mile of the 44 segments is 131. There are 17 segments at or above<br />

this number and some of them, especially I-70 and Rt. K, have quite high numbers. There are 27<br />

segments below the mean and many of them (11) have very low numbers, between 30 down to 2.<br />

Severity Rating<br />

Table 17 lists the road segments ranked by their severity ratings. Although it does not take into<br />

account the road’s traffic volume, its length, and the total number of crashes, it does provide an<br />

insight of roads with a high number of severe crashes, those with fatality or disabling injury crashes.<br />

At the top was Rt. 94 from Rt. 370 through the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to I-70. The second highest<br />

was I-70 from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Rt. 94. Four other segments of Rt. 94 also were high. The mean<br />

number of severity rating crashes of the 44 segments is 76. This places 22 segments above and 22<br />

below it. This means the severity ratings are fairly uniform for the 44 roads. I-70 which carries the<br />

highest traffic volumes in the <strong>County</strong> only had 3 of it 12 segments above the mean.<br />

61


Table 15<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data by Type<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Segment Crashes by Type<br />

Fatalities Disabling Injury<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 Totals<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 0 0 0 2 2 1 200 163 71 439<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 0 0 0 12 9 9 254 283 231 798<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 0 0 0 5 4 0 119 127 125 380<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 0 1 0 6 9 3 137 169 161 486<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 1 0 1 2 5 2 103 104 123 341<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 1 0 0 4 2 6 171 124 141 449<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 0 0 1 2 2 3 184 150 176 518<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 0 0 1 2 9 3 201 195 212 623<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 0 1 0 2 6 1 137 121 131 399<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>L 2.0 0 1 1 6 5 2 95 106 100 316<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>L U.S. 40/61 3.6 1 0 0 2 3 2 83 132 106 329<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 0 1 0 5 5 3 182 165 145 506<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 0 0 0 5 1 2 130 90 147 375<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 23 26<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 0 0 1 0 0 1 55 53 76 186<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 0 0 0 2 0 0 21 17 22 62<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 0 0 1 1 4 1 38 58 45 148<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 0 0 0 2 3 2 69 82 80 238<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 0 0 1 1 5 7 128 175 134 451<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 1 1 0 5 6 9 108 142 173 445<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 5 0 0 7 4 5 98 71 97 287<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 0 1 2 6 5 5 56 38 46 159<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 0 0 0 1 3 2 46 58 58 168<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 2 0 0 3 2 6 33 51 38 135<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 0 2 2 5 10 5 84 66 73 247<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 1 0 0 11 8 12 344 329 367 1072<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 0 0 0 10 6 10 310 281 302 919<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 1 0 1 2 5 4 237 226 295 771<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 1 0 0 3 12 1 197 217 177 608<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 0 0 0 1 0 1 54 33 27 116<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 1 2 0 5 3 5 29 28 25 98<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 1 0 1 6 2 10 32 39 54 145<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 0 1 0 0 1 1 58 63 46 170<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 0 0 0 3 0 1 5 3 2 14<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 3 1 9<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 0 1 0 1 2 4 25 30 26 89<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 0 0 0 4 7 4 472 425 381 1293<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 0 0 0 2 4 2 124 139 142 413<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 0 0 1 4 3 5 157 178 153 501<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 0 0 0 6 4 4 162 172 165 513<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 1 0 0 0 2 3 40 60 47 153<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 1 1 0 3 1 2 51 47 55 161<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 0 0 1 2 4 2 41 41 34 125<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 0 0 2 2 3 8 45 25 66 151<br />

Totals = 188.0 18 13 17 154 171 161 5118 5081 5099 15832<br />

63<br />

Personal Injury/<br />

Property Damage


Table 16<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crashes per Mile<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 3 Yr Total 2004 ADTs<br />

3 Year<br />

Crashes<br />

per Mile<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 441<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 409<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 365<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 302<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 301<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 299<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 299<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 275<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 272<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 239<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 237<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 224<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 215<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 192<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 162<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 156<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 136<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 131<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 128<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 124<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 115<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 103<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 97<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 93<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 91<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 88<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 77<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 53<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 52<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 50<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 46<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 42<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 39<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 62 44 53 159 25800 38<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 28<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 25<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 21<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 16<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 16<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 16<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 15<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 11<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 10<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 3<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 2<br />

Totals and Averages = 189.3 5344 5260 5349 15953 128<br />

64


Table 17<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Severity Rating<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

3 Yr 2004 Severity<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Ratg<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 195<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 180<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 156<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 156<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 141<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 138<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 126<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 62 44 53 159 25800 123<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 117<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 105<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 105<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 96<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 96<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 93<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 90<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 87<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 87<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 84<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 84<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 84<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 81<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 81<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 72<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 63<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 57<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 54<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 54<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 51<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 51<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 51<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 48<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 48<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 45<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 42<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 39<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 36<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 30<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 24<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 21<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 15<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 12<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 12<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 12<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 6<br />

Totals and Averages = 188.0 5290 5265 5277 15832 76<br />

65


Crash Rates<br />

The crash rate is the best measure of safety on a given road segment and is calculated as follows.<br />

R = (A x 100 x 1,000,000)<br />

(365 days x T x V x L)<br />

where:<br />

R = crash rate in crashes per 100 million vehicle-miles (100MVM).<br />

A = number of crashes reported during the analysis period.<br />

T = time of the analysis period in years.<br />

V = annual average daily traffic on the road segment.<br />

L = length of the road segment in miles.<br />

Table 18 lists the roads by functional class with their crash rate. It relates the number of crashes to<br />

the length of the road and traffic volume. Table 19 ranks them by their crash rates. The road with<br />

the highest was Rt. 94 from Rt. 370 through the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to I-70. It travels through the<br />

urban core of the city and has many signals, driveways, and curb parking that create conflict points.<br />

Other road segments at the top of the list include a few that have short lengths with relatively low<br />

traffic volumes. However, they have many crashes because of numerous intersections and entrances.<br />

The road segments with the lowest crash rates, those that are the safest, are I-70 and I-64 and all the<br />

other freeways and expressways. Although they carry high volumes and have the most crashes per<br />

mile, they are the safest for the amount of vehicles they handle due to their high design standards.<br />

Severity Crash Rates<br />

In order to further assess the safety of travel on the road segments, a severity crash rate was<br />

developed. The crash rate formula described above was used but instead of using total crashes, the<br />

number of fatal and disabling injury crashes were used. This allowed for examining the severity of<br />

crashes on a road while taking into account its length and traffic volume. Table 20 shows the listing<br />

of the roads and their ranking.<br />

It was determined that the roads with the highest severity crash rates were those on two lane roads<br />

mainly in rural parts of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. First was Rt. 94 from Rt. D to Rt. DD, a two-lane road<br />

with severe horizontal and vertical curves, and second was Rt. DD from U.S. 40/61 to Rt. D, which<br />

also has severe curvatures. Roads with low severity crash rates, those that were safest, were the high<br />

design facilities such as the interstates, freeways, and expressways.<br />

66


Table 18<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

3 Yr 2004 Crash<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Rate<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 161<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 244<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 162<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 175<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 141<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 248<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 199<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 187<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 228<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 187<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 126<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 302<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 124<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 29<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 210<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 166<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 82<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 82<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 237<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 173<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 109<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 62 44 53 159 25800 136<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 145<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 201<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 375<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 1724<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 480<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 461<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 370<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 825<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 501<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 320<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 397<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 206<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 202<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 188<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 733<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 666<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 225<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 501<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 560<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 191<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 647<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 770<br />

Totals and Averages = 188.0 5290 5265 5277 15832 327<br />

67


Table 19<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

3 Yr 2004 Crash<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Rate<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 825<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 770<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 733<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 666<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 647<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 560<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 501<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 501<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 480<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 461<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 397<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 375<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 370<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 320<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 302<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 248<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 244<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 237<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 228<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 225<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 210<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 206<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 202<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 201<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 199<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 191<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 188<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 187<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 187<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 175<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 173<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 166<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 162<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 161<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 145<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 141<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1<br />

62 44 53 159 25800 136<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 126<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 124<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 109<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 82<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 82<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 29<br />

Totals and Averages = 184.4 6936 6931 6902 14763 288<br />

68


Table 20<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Severity Crash Rates<br />

Segment Fatality and Disabling Injury Crashes<br />

Severe<br />

3 Yr 2004 Crash<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Rate<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 2 3 10 15 3000 76<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 3 0 1 4 1500 59<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 12 8 12 32 16000 51<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 2 4 3 9 7000 47<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 1 0 1 2 800 45<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 7 2 11 20 2900 44<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 5 12 7 24 2700 36<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 1 3 4 8 7400 17<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL<br />

4.1<br />

6 6 7 19<br />

25800<br />

16<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 6 4 4 14 21400 15<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 1 0 1 2 10700 14<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 5 2 6 13 13300 14<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 10 6 10 26 56900 14<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 4 3 6 13 22600 13<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 2 4 2 8 17600 13<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 6 7 9 22 35700 12<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 4 12 1 17 40000 10<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 4 2 2 8 7500 10<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 12 9 9 30 165100 9<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 6 6 3 15 75900 9<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 1 2 3 6 11500 9<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 4 7 4 15 51000 9<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 5 6 3 14 72200 8<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 12 4 5 21 33000 8<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 3 5 5 13 42700 8<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 5 2 6 13 134300 7<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 1 3 2 6 19000 7<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 0 2 1 3 12000 7<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 6 10 3 19 141700 7<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 2 7 1 10 89800 6<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 1 5 8 14 46100 5<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 2 0 0 2 56800 5<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 3 5 3 11 124400 5<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 2 9 4 15 115600 5<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 1 4 2 7 59300 4<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 5 4 0 9 155000 4<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 2 2 4 8 138500 3<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 3 3 2 8 66400 3<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 5 1 2 8 56400 3<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 2 3 2 7 51900 2<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 0 0 2 2 50000 2<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 2 2 1 5 77500 2<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 0 1 1 50000 1<br />

Totals and Averages = 182.0 2168 2182 2177 521 16<br />

69


B-1.2. Comparison of MoDOT Roads to Region and <strong>St</strong>ate<br />

To completely assess the safety of travel on MoDOT roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, their crash rates<br />

were compared to the values for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and state of Missouri. Table 21 shows these<br />

values for Interstate routes, U.S. routes, numbered routes, and lettered routes.<br />

Table 21<br />

2004 3-Year Average Crash Rate Comparison<br />

<strong>County</strong> - Region - <strong>St</strong>ate<br />

Road Type <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region <strong>St</strong>ate of Missouri<br />

Interstates 191.05 137.32 111.36<br />

U.S. Routes 163.77 252.62 166.04<br />

Numbered Routes 398.00 360.66 273.22<br />

Lettered Routes 440.49 415.33 272.28<br />

I-70 had a three-year average that was higher than the entire <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and the state average.<br />

Many items related to travel on I-70 could explain why these numbers are so high. There are many<br />

interchanges with high volumes of entering and exiting traffic which may be higher than in other<br />

parts of the region and the state. Truck traffic is also higher than on other Interstates in the region.<br />

On U.S. routes the three-year crash rate was lower than the region and the state. They include a<br />

number of roads that carry substantial volumes of traffic yet have low numbers of crashes. This<br />

probably will decline further once U.S. 40/61 is converted to I-64 and only U.S. Rt. 61 and U.S. Rt<br />

67 travel through the <strong>County</strong>. Both these roads presently have low numbers and severity of crashes.<br />

Numbered routes had a slightly higher crash rate than the region and state. These roads are heavily<br />

traveled and serve a large amount of land use that creates considerable conflicts. Some of these road<br />

segments, especially Rt. 94, in the rural part of the <strong>County</strong>, travel through very rough terrain. Many<br />

date back 50 to 75 years and have poor alignment, bad sight distances, and no shoulders.<br />

Lettered routes were also above the average for the region and the state, however, some of these<br />

routes were not included on the list and would have less traffic and lower crash rates. Including<br />

them would make the overall rate for the <strong>County</strong> lower than what is indicated.<br />

B-1.3. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and City Roads<br />

The same methodology used for analyzing MoDOT roads was used to evaluate the safety on <strong>County</strong><br />

and city roads. Twenty-four road segments were selected after consulting with <strong>County</strong> officials.<br />

They were the most highly traveled 1 (those carrying over 2,000 vehicles per day) and served the<br />

most developed land use areas. The measures of number of crashes, crashes per mile, severity<br />

ratings, and crash rates were derived from the crash data.<br />

1<br />

There are many other <strong>County</strong> roads but they do not carry high traffic volumes and have few crashes. Analysis of safety on<br />

these roads was considered beyond the scope of this study.<br />

70


Number of Crashes<br />

The number and severity of crashes that occurred on each road segment for the three years are<br />

shown on Table 22. Their number of fatality, disabling injury, minor injury and property damage<br />

crashes are shown for each year for each of the 24 road segments. There were a total of 1,901 |<br />

crashes reported for the three years. Of these, only three (3) were fatalities and they made up less<br />

than two tenths of one percent (0.2) of the total. Disabling injury crashes totaled 43 and made up<br />

two (2) percent of the total. Personal injury and property damage crashes totaled 1,855 making up<br />

97.5 percent of the total. It is obvious that the severity of crashes on the <strong>County</strong>’s roads is quite low<br />

and travel on these roads appears quite safe. These roads are mostly in urban and suburban areas<br />

where speed limits are low (35 to 50 mph). This lessens the chance for higher severity type crashes.<br />

Table 22 shows that two Mexico Rd. segments, Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K and Cave Springs Rd.<br />

to Mid Rivers Mall Dr., had the highest number of crashes, 120 and 99 respectively, followed by<br />

Zumbehl Rd. (98), from I-70 to Rt. 94, and Muegge Rd. (52) from Mexico Rd. to McClay Rd. A<br />

third segment of Mexico Rd. From Rt. K to Bryan Rd. was next followed by Bryan Rd., Jungermann<br />

Rd., and Elm <strong>St</strong>. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. from I-70 to Rt. 94 was also high on the list.<br />

Crashes per Mile<br />

A ranking of the road segments by the number of crashes per mile is shown in Table 23. The first<br />

three road segments are the same as the first three shown on Table 22. They are two segments<br />

Mexico Rd., and Zumbehl Rd. Harvester Rd. comes next followed by the third segment of Mexico<br />

Rd., Salt Lick Rd., and Muegge Rd. The average number of crashes per mile for the 24 road<br />

segments for the three year period 31.4.<br />

Severity Rating<br />

Table 24 ranks the road segments by crash severity. The number of fatal and disabling injury<br />

crashes were low. Again, all three segments of Mexico Rd. were at the top of the list, followed by<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. In the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, Bryan Rd., and Jungermann Rd. The mean severity rating was<br />

quite low indicating the <strong>County</strong> and city roads did not have a high number of fatal or severe injury<br />

crashes.<br />

Crash Rates<br />

Table 25 indicates the ranking of road segments based on their crash rate. Mexico Rd. from Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K had the highest followed by Zumbehl Rd. from I-70 to Rt. 94. The other<br />

two segments of Mexico Rd. Were third and fourth. The roads with low numbers of crashes and<br />

traffic volumes also had low crash rates.<br />

71


Road<br />

Table 22<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Segment Crashes by Type<br />

From To Miles<br />

Fatalities/Disabling Injury<br />

Property Damage<br />

2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004<br />

72<br />

Personal Injury/<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 0 0 0 3 4 1 202 143 140 493<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 0 0 0 2 4 1 136 104 111 358<br />

Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 33 49 117<br />

Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 0 0 0 0 1 1 50 20 23 95<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 0 0 1 1 0 1 32 29 29 93<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 0 1 0 1 1 1 17 25 37 83<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 0 0 0 0 2 2 22 31 23 80<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 0 0 0 3 1 1 25 16 30 76<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 0 0 0 0 3 0 20 22 14 59<br />

Friedens Rd Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 19 22 58<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 18 54<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 13 23 53<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 19 17 47<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 15 5 41<br />

Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5 24 37<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 10 12 36<br />

Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill Rd. 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 20 31<br />

Birdie Hills Rd. Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 6 9 30<br />

Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 10 25<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 5 14<br />

Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 10<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5<br />

Arena Pkwy Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 4<br />

South River Rd. Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 0 1 2 12 21 10 671 555 629 1901<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.<br />

Totals


Road<br />

Table 23<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crashes per Mile<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

73<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs *<br />

3 Year<br />

Crashes<br />

per Mile<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 120<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 99<br />

Zumbehl I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 98<br />

Harvester Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 52<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 44<br />

Salt Lick I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 44<br />

Muegge Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 35<br />

Friedens Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 34<br />

Belleau I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 33<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 31<br />

Jungerman Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 22 33 25 80 22000 22<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 21<br />

Caulks Hill Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 19<br />

Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 18<br />

Wentzville U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 17<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 16<br />

Mid Rivers I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 20 25 14 59 30000 13<br />

Lake Saint I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 13<br />

Harry Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 11<br />

Upper Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 6 3 5 14 12000 7<br />

Winghaven Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 9 1 10 15000 7<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 1 4 5 8000 6<br />

Arena Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 1 3 4 12000 2<br />

South Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 2 0 2 12000 2<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 683 577 641 1901 Avg. = 32<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.


Table 24<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Severity Rating<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

Road<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs * Rating<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 48<br />

74<br />

3 Yr<br />

2004<br />

Severity<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 42<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 33<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 30<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 27<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 22 33 25 80 22000 24<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 20 25 14 59 30000 18<br />

Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 12<br />

Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 12<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 9<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 6<br />

South River Rd. Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 2 0 2 12000 6<br />

Friedens Rd. Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 6<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 6<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 6<br />

Arena Pkwy Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 1 3 4 12000 6<br />

Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 6<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 1 4 5 8000 0<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 6 3 5 14 12000 0<br />

Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 0<br />

Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 0<br />

Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 9 1 10 15000 0<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 0<br />

Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 0<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 683 577 641 1901 Avg. = 12<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.


Road<br />

Table 25<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

75<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs *<br />

Crash<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 477<br />

Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 356<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 289<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 284<br />

Friedens Rd. Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 283<br />

Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 256<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 249<br />

Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 247<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 229<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 207<br />

Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 205<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 188<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 187<br />

Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 161<br />

Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 130<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 112<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 101<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 22 33 25 80 22000 92<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 1 4 5 8000 63<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 6 3 5 14 12000 53<br />

Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 9 1 10 15000 41<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 20 25 14 59 30000 40<br />

Arena Pkwy Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 1 3 4 12000 16<br />

South River Rd. Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 2 0 2 12000 14<br />

Rate<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 683 577 641 1901 Avg. = 178<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.


B-1.4 MoDOT and <strong>County</strong> Crash Rate Comparison<br />

For a better review of safety on the major roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, the three crash indicators<br />

discussed above for MoDOT roads and <strong>County</strong> roads were compared. For crashes per mile,<br />

MoDOT averaged 131 crashes per mile for their 44 road segments while the <strong>County</strong> averaged 32<br />

for their 24 road segments. For the severity rating, MoDOT had an average value of 76 while the<br />

<strong>County</strong> had 12. For the crash rate, MoDOT had an average of 327 while the <strong>County</strong> had 178.<br />

It can be seen that in all three categories the ratings on MoDOT roads are much higher. This tends<br />

to indicate that travel on MoDOT roads is not as safe as travel on <strong>County</strong> roads. However, the best<br />

measure or safety on a road segment is the crash rate as it uses the number of crashes along with the<br />

traffic volumes and the length of the segment. In order to best assess how MoDOT roads and major<br />

<strong>County</strong> roads compared, a composite crash table using crash rates was developed and is shown on<br />

Table 26. It ranked 58 road segments leaving out roads that had a crash rate under 100. It shows<br />

the distribution of the major roads regardless of whether they were MoDOT roads or <strong>County</strong> roads.<br />

MoDOT had the higher number of road segments because they carry the highest traffic and have the<br />

most crashes. They contained 178 miles and the <strong>County</strong> had 40 miles resulting in 82% for MoDOT<br />

and 18% for the <strong>County</strong>. The composite list shows MoDOT had the most crashes with 15,420 while<br />

the <strong>County</strong> had 1,727, totaling 17,147. This is 90 percent and 10 percent respectively. Multiplying<br />

the miles by the ADTs, reveals that MoDOT roads handled 5.3 million vehicle miles of travel<br />

(VMT) a day while the <strong>County</strong> roads only handle 0.6 million. This places MoDOT’s VMT at 90<br />

percent and the <strong>County</strong>’s at 10 percent. This reflects the number of crashes on each road system.<br />

Examination of Table 26 reveals that the first 10 roads listed are MoDOT roads. At the top of the<br />

list was Rt. 94 from Rt. 370 to I-70. The next highest include other segments of Rt. 94, the two<br />

segments of Rt. K from I-70 to I-64, and segments of Rt. N and Rt. Z. Mexico Rd. from Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. to Rt. K was number 11. It was followed by four more MoDOT roads including three more<br />

segments of Rt. 94. The next <strong>County</strong> road was Zumbehl Rd. from I-70 to Rt. 94 which ranked<br />

number 16. Five <strong>County</strong> roads, including the other three segments of Mexico Rd., were in the<br />

middle ranking 19 through 23. The remaining <strong>County</strong> roads were scattered throughout the list. In<br />

all, the MoDOT road segments had the highest crash rates.<br />

Although MoDOT roads have the highest crash rates, it must be noted that I-70 ranked low on the<br />

list. Their was only one segment, U.S. 40/61 to Pearce Blvd. that was above the middle of the list<br />

(number 18) and it was below two <strong>County</strong> roads, Mexico Rd. from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K,<br />

(number 11) and Zumbehl Rd. from I-70 to Rt. 94 (number 16). Eleven segments of I-70, that<br />

included those with the highest traffic volumes in the <strong>County</strong>, ranked low on the list.<br />

The road with the worst crash rating overall in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> was Rt. 94. Many segments,<br />

especially those between I-70 and I-64, had very high crash rates. This road has been undergoing<br />

upgrading with the construction of the Rt. 364 freeway from approximately Hemsath Rd. west to<br />

Harvester Rd. and other sections to the west of it are scheduled for construction . This will greatly<br />

alleviate some of the safety problems presently being experienced.<br />

76


No. Road<br />

Table 26<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Composite Crash Data, 2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked By Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

77<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs<br />

Crash<br />

Rate<br />

1Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 1724<br />

2Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 825<br />

3Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 770<br />

4Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 733<br />

5Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 666<br />

6Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 647<br />

7Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 560<br />

8Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 501<br />

9Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 501<br />

10Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 480<br />

11Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 477<br />

12Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 461<br />

13Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 397<br />

14Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 375<br />

15Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 370<br />

16Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 356<br />

17Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 320<br />

18I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 302<br />

19Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 289<br />

20Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 284<br />

21Friedens Rd. Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 283<br />

22Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 256<br />

23Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 249<br />

24I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 248<br />

25Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 247<br />

26I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 244<br />

27U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 237<br />

28Lake Saint Louis B. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 229<br />

29I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 228<br />

30Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 225<br />

31Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 210<br />

32Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 207<br />

33Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 206<br />

34Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 205<br />

35Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 202<br />

36Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 201<br />

37I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 199<br />

38Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 191<br />

(Continued on next page)


No. Road<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

78<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs<br />

Crash<br />

Rate<br />

39Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 188<br />

40Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 188<br />

41I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 187<br />

42Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 187<br />

43I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 187<br />

44I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 175<br />

45U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 173<br />

46Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 166<br />

47I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 162<br />

48Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 161<br />

49I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 161<br />

50Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 145<br />

51I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 141<br />

52U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1<br />

62 44 53 159 25800<br />

136<br />

53Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 130<br />

54I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 126<br />

55I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 124<br />

56Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 112<br />

57U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 109<br />

58Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 101<br />

Totals = 218.6 5815 5619 5713 17147 Average = 313<br />

B-2. Summary of Road Crash Data<br />

The composite crash data for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> shows the major role that MoDOT roads play in<br />

providing safety. They make up the most mileage and carry the highest traffic volumes. They<br />

provide the most important and greatest means of travel for all trip purposes including travel into,<br />

out of, and through the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region. They also serve a large amount of commercial vehicles<br />

into, through and out of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the region. Although all the roads carry a large<br />

amount of traffic, the roads with the highest functional classification, Interstates, Freeways, and<br />

Expressway, provide a very high degree of safety. As an example, I-70 carries the highest traffic<br />

volumes, but has fewer crashes per mile, than many other roads. It does not have high crash rates,<br />

therefore, even with very high traffic volumes, it still is considered quite safe for the amount of<br />

traffic it handles.<br />

Their has always been a correlation between traffic volumes and numbers of crashes. This is<br />

especially true in urban and suburban areas. As traffic volumes continue to increase in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>, as described in later chapters, the potential for more crashes increases. This is true on all<br />

streets and highways. MoDOT in particular and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and its cities will have to<br />

continue planning improvements that will reduce the potential for these crashes. MoDOT’s<br />

Blueprint for Safer Roads, discussed earlier, provides a good foundation for addressing this issue.


B-3. Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Crashes<br />

A safety item of interest in this study was the number of motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian crashes<br />

that occurred in the <strong>County</strong>. Motorcycles had the highest number, pedestrians had the second<br />

highest, and bicycles had the third. These data were compared to the region and the state. These<br />

values are shown in Table 27.<br />

Table 27<br />

2002, 2003, 2004, Motorcycle - Bicycle - Pedestrian Crashes<br />

<strong>County</strong> - Region - <strong>St</strong>ate<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Region Percent of<br />

Region<br />

79<br />

<strong>St</strong>ate Percent of<br />

<strong>St</strong>ate<br />

Motorcycle 296 1,496 19.8% 5,331 5.6%<br />

Bicycle 94 966 9.7% 2,315 4.1%<br />

Pedestrian 128 2,196 5.8% 4,441 2.9%<br />

B-4. Deficiencies in the Crash Data Analyses<br />

The above analysis of crash data provided good information about the number of crashes that<br />

occurred; the road segments where they happened; the number of crashes per mile; their severity,<br />

and their crash rates. While this allowed for identification of where, how many, and how bad, it<br />

didn’t discuss other very important factors such as the how and why these crashes occur.<br />

There are many factors that contribute to why crashes happen. They include road conditions, sight<br />

distances, traffic control devices, traffic volumes, possible distractions, weather conditions, time of<br />

day, other drivers, and other factors. None of these items have been examined in this study.<br />

The most important item that must be considered and also is not addressed is the driver and his/her<br />

situation. Is the driver preoccupied instead of paying full attention to driving, such as talking to<br />

passengers, listening to the radio or CD, or talking on a cell phone. Is the driver sick or having some<br />

kind of mental or a physical problem that reduces their ability to drive the vehicle properly or simply<br />

falling asleep or not paying close attention. Is he or she intoxicated or affected by some type of<br />

drug. To properly address these important items a full and more comprehensive report on safety for<br />

the <strong>County</strong> is required. Such a report is beyond the scope of this study.<br />

Traffic engineers have been performing these investigations for years. MoDOT has experienced<br />

engineers who apply the best techniques to analyzing crash data on roads having poor crash<br />

statistics. Some counties and cities also have personnel with this experience or they hire traffic<br />

consultants who have competent staff that can perform such analyses. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and many<br />

of the cities have used their staff and employed consultants to investigate various problem areas and<br />

projects.


The Council’s long range plan discusses safety of travel in the region and shows tables that allow<br />

for comparisons of the eight counties. Problems associated with roads and drivers are fully<br />

discussed and suggestions are made for improvements. In MoDOT’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways,<br />

a very comprehensive examination of roads and drivers is made. This document covers much of the<br />

items noted above. Both these reports make suggestion for reducing crashes and their severity<br />

including the four “E’s,” Enforcement, Engineering, Education, and Emergency Deployment. All<br />

these items and the referenced material noted is considered an important part of this chapter and this<br />

report.<br />

In summary, it appears the number of crashes, their severity, and crash rates on roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> is slightly higher than in other parts of the region and the state. The roads that handle the<br />

highest volumes and have the most crashes are maintained by MoDOT. Yet, many such as I-70, do<br />

not have high crash rates and are considered quite safe for the volume of traffic that they carry. It<br />

may be that the <strong>County</strong> ranks higher than the region or state as a result of its increased population<br />

and fast growth. Road and street improvements, except for some major high cost MoDOT projects,<br />

seem to have kept up with this growth, although the <strong>County</strong>’s Ten year <strong>Plan</strong> contains a large number<br />

of yet to be completed projects. It would seem that some combinations of the above factors are the<br />

reason for the higher crash rates.<br />

C. Railroad Safety<br />

Railroad safety has been considered for two categories of railroad traffic in the <strong>County</strong>. The first<br />

is the safety of railroad crossings with roads and the second is safety on the railroad lines<br />

themselves. For road crossings, they involve at-grade crossings of roads maintained by MoDOT,<br />

the <strong>County</strong>, and some cities. A number of crossings are grade separated by bridges (such as the<br />

recently completed T.R. Hughes bridge over the Norfolk Southern) and with rare exception, have<br />

no crash related experiences. MoDOT’s Multi modal Division gathers crash data for all railroad<br />

crossings and all injuries and deaths on railroad lines and has provided the data for this section. In<br />

addition, they monitor and approve requests for state funding for railroad crossing improvements.<br />

On the railroad lines there are incidents that involve trains and railroad employees or trains with<br />

pedestrians. Train and pedestrian incidents, in addition to crossing incidents, are reported by the<br />

railroads to MoDOT and are included in MoDOT’s data.<br />

In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> there are two railroads with current traffic over railroad lines, the BNSF and<br />

the Norfolk Southern. The BNSF runs from <strong>West</strong> Alton west along the northern part of the <strong>County</strong><br />

close to the Mississippi River and then north into Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It has 26 public crossings with<br />

state and county roads and 34 private crossings in close proximity to the river. There are also three<br />

grade separations. It has experienced no crashes in the last four years at these crossings. The<br />

Norfolk Southern runs just north of I-70, from the Missouri River west to Wentzville, where it<br />

crosses over I-70 and runs into Warren <strong>County</strong>. It has 34 public at-grade crossings and 21 private<br />

crossings and has experienced three crashes during the last four years, no fatalities but two injuries.<br />

There are also 14 grade separations.<br />

80


Overall the number of safety incidents in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> was quite low. In comparison to other<br />

counties, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has proportionally more signalized crossings than most other counties<br />

because of its increasing population. When safety improvements are needed, MoDOT evaluates all<br />

crossings in the state using a formula that takes into account the number and speed of trains that pass<br />

an at-grade crossing, the time of the crossings, any applicable sight distance problems, and the<br />

amount and speed of traffic on the road. It then determines which crossings in the state should<br />

receive the limited amount of federal and state funding which is available each year. In some cases,<br />

the state, in conjunction with cities and counties and other public and private entities, will contribute<br />

to the costs of building bridges over railroads to completely eliminate an at-grade crossing, thereby<br />

permanently eliminating the potential for future crashes.<br />

D. Airport Safety<br />

The two airports in the <strong>County</strong>, Smartt Airport and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport, routinely provide<br />

improvements for safety. They take the form of maintaining the existing facility and keeping all<br />

systems operating properly. Additionally, improvements to the runways, striping, and taxiway<br />

markings, are made. Airfield lighting improvements, and other similar upgrades also improve<br />

airport safety. The airports may also make major improvements that are safety related that would<br />

also enhance operational safety, such as runway extensions and additional or improved instrument<br />

approaches. Funding is provided by applying for Federal and <strong>St</strong>ate grants for such improvements.<br />

Improvements to Smartt Airport generally are considered of a higher priority since it is the<br />

designated reliever airport and is equipped for instrument landing. Safety at both airports has not<br />

been an issue and aircraft incidents are quite infrequent if not absent.<br />

81


A. Background<br />

V. Present <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>s and <strong>St</strong>udies<br />

The 1997 transportation plan for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> mentioned short and long range plans and other<br />

studies by the Council that would affect future transportation in the county. This update is no<br />

exception. Since 1997 the Council has completed many plans and studies in keeping with the<br />

requirements of the U.S. Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> for the expenditure of federal funds. First<br />

and most important is the region’s long range transportation plan which requires updating every four<br />

years. The second is the short range transportation plan which is represented by the TIP and consists<br />

of projects planned by various agencies for the next four years. These projects reflect what is<br />

contained in the long range transportation plan. Other studies have been conducted by the Council<br />

relating to transportation in the county. A review of these plans and studies follows.<br />

B. The Long Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

In March 2005 the Council published its long range transportation plan “Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, The<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> for the <strong>Gateway</strong> Region.” It provides a long range view of how the region’s<br />

surface transportation system will develop over the next 25 years and follows earlier practices of<br />

emphasizing the relationship of transportation, community vitality, environmental quality, economic<br />

growth, and social equity. It is the foundation of the transportation planning process and details the<br />

region’s transportation priorities by creating a guide for future transportation investments. As<br />

explained in the document, “The plan’s fundamental purpose is to ensure that public resources are<br />

used in ways that best meet the economic, community, and environmental needs of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

region.” The <strong>Plan</strong> and the TIP, described below, were developed according to the rules of the new<br />

Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, SAFETEA-LU, which was passed in August 2005. The Council is<br />

presently developing an update that is scheduled for release by July 1, 2007.<br />

B-1. Developing Future Highway Improvements<br />

Legacy <strong>2030</strong> discussed the need for establishing policies and principals for how to decide the best<br />

use of federal funds for highway improvements. In addition, the <strong>Plan</strong> established an investment<br />

strategy that sets priorities for committing these funds. Since all projects must first be identified in<br />

the <strong>Plan</strong> to be eligible for federal funds, a list of MoDOT projects through the horizon year <strong>2030</strong> was<br />

developed. This could not be a simple “wish list” of projects but a list that MoDOT has reasonable<br />

expectations of funding within the <strong>2030</strong> Long Range <strong>Plan</strong> time frame. Three categories of projects<br />

are listed below in chronological order.<br />

B-2. Investment Priorities<br />

A number of other major highway improvements are planned by MoDOT in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

They are listed in Table 6.7 of Legacy <strong>2030</strong> as “Investment Priorities,” which means they can be<br />

funded within the region’s financial constraint. They are listed below by specific time periods.<br />

82


Period 2011-2020<br />

I-64 - Construct new bridge over Missouri River for westbound traffic<br />

Period 2021 - <strong>2030</strong><br />

I-70 - Revise interchanges from Zumbehl Rd. to Rt. 79<br />

I-70 - Revise interchange at Rt. K<br />

I-70 - Add lanes from Rt. Z to Pearce Blvd.<br />

B-3. Illustrative Projects<br />

Other projects proposed by MoDOT are on the <strong>Plan</strong>’s “Illustrative Projects” list. These are projects<br />

they plan to build if funds become available. They are shown in Table 6.8 of the <strong>Plan</strong> and below.<br />

I-70 - Add lanes from Pearce Blvd. to Rt. T at Foristell<br />

I-70 - Construct new interchange at Rt. T at Foristell<br />

U.S. 61 - Upgrade to Interstate standards from Rt. A to Lincoln <strong>County</strong><br />

Rt. 94 - Construct additional lanes from Rt. 370 to Rt. B<br />

Rt. N - Widen to three lanes from west of U.S. 40/61 to Rt. Z<br />

Rt. Z - Widen to three lanes from I-70 to Rt. N<br />

B-4. Corridor <strong>St</strong>udies<br />

A number of major corridors in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> have been identified by MoDOT as warranting<br />

a corridor study in the future. Although funding is not available at this time for any improvements,<br />

corridor studies can be performed at any time in order to determine what type of improvement would<br />

be required, where it should be, how soon it would be needed, and how it would be funded. Five<br />

corridors have been identified by MoDOT as warranting study. They are as follows.<br />

• Rt. 79 from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong><br />

• Rt. K from I-64 to I-70<br />

• Rt. M from I-70 to Rt. 79<br />

• Rt. P from Rt. M to U.S. 61<br />

• Rt. Z from I-70 to Rt. N<br />

B-5. Interstate 70 Corridor, Kansas City to <strong>St</strong>. Louis, Missouri<br />

One corridor project of particular significance is I-70 from Kansas City to <strong>St</strong>. Louis. Because of its<br />

magnitude, MoDOT first conducted a Feasibility <strong>St</strong>udy in 1999. The study provided an estimation<br />

of the future needs of the corridor, feasible solutions, and recommendations for future action. In<br />

order to meet federal requirements, MoDOT initiated the “First Tier”of a Draft Environmental<br />

Impact <strong>St</strong>atement (DEIS). This first phase of the DEIS, completed in 2001, considered a number<br />

of approaches to improving the safety and efficiency of travel in the corridor from Kansas City to<br />

83


<strong>St</strong>. Louis. The next or “Second Tier” of the DEIS consisted of a group of seven independent, but<br />

yet coordinated, corridor studies across the state that would take into account engineering,<br />

environmental, and community issues. The eastern most segment was the section from just west of<br />

Rt. 19 in Montgomery <strong>County</strong> through Warren <strong>County</strong> into <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> to the Lake Saint<br />

Louis Blvd. interchange. This segment of the Second Tier of the DEIS was completed in December<br />

2004. It provided a “preferred alternative” recommendation which consisted of widening I-70 to<br />

eight lanes with many ancillary improvements from Warren <strong>County</strong> to the Lake Saint Louis Blvd.<br />

interchange. Since this DEIS it is subject to further review it is considered preliminary. The final<br />

evaluation and selection of the preferred alternative will be based on a project public hearing, public<br />

and agency comments on the DEIS, and other relevant information that may become available. The<br />

FHWA will then have to issue a Record of Decision (ROD) for approval of the project. It is<br />

anticipated that the project will not move forward at this time since funding for the improvement has<br />

not been identified.<br />

C. The Short Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

The short range transportation plan is the TIP. Each year the Council updates the last one based on<br />

what various agencies in the region have accomplished to-date and what is approved for the next TIP<br />

period. The current TIP was approved in July 2006 for the four year period 2007 through 2010<br />

The Council holds a meeting for informational purposes to assist all counties, cities, transit agencies,<br />

and others who plan to submit projects for inclusion in the TIP. A deadline for submitting projects<br />

is set. Agencies are asked to prepare supporting information for each project. All projects must<br />

have a committed source of revenue to match federal funds. The projects are reviewed by the<br />

Council to insure that they conform to the goals and objectives of the long range transportation plan.<br />

Projects are then prioritized and ranked according to established criteria. The projects selected for<br />

inclusion in the TIP come from a list of ranked projects until available federal funds are completely<br />

used. Normally, the funding requested far exceeds the available federal funds.<br />

Because the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has found the <strong>St</strong>. Louis metropolitan<br />

area to be a non attainment area for air quality, all projects selected for inclusion in the TIP are<br />

examined to insure that they do not contribute to the air quality problems of the region. Federally<br />

funded projects as well as non federally funded projects are subject to this rule.<br />

C-1. Funding Categories<br />

Federal funding categories in the TIP from the FHWA include the following;<br />

• Surface <strong>Transportation</strong> Program (STP) which provides funding for states and localities for<br />

public roads, bridges, transit capital projects, and transit terminals.<br />

• Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) which provides funds specifically for safetyrelated<br />

projects.<br />

• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program which provides<br />

funds for transportation projects which improve air quality.<br />

84


• National Highway System (NHS) program, which provides funds to improve roads that are<br />

part of the National Highway System, normally Interstates and some designated connections,<br />

and many Principal Arterials routes.<br />

• Interstate Maintenance (I-M) program, which provides funds for rehabilitation and<br />

reconstruction to the Interstate system, but does not include road widening but could include<br />

projects that improve safety.<br />

• Highway Bridge Progam (HBP) provides funds for replacing or rehabilitating deficient<br />

bridges.<br />

• High Priority Projects (HPP) which provides funds for specific designated SAFETY-LU<br />

earmarked projects.<br />

Federal funding categories in the TIP from the FTA include the following;<br />

• Section 5309 Capital Assistance Program which provides funding (in a discretionary basis)<br />

for capital construction and equipment purchases.<br />

• Section 5307 Operating Assistance and Capital Program which provides funding for capital<br />

construction and operating assistance for urban public transit service.<br />

• Section 5310 Program which provides capital assistance to nonprofit social service agencies<br />

to provide paratransit services.<br />

• Section 5311 Program which provides capital and operating assistance for rural transit.<br />

In addition to the federal funding categories listed above, some projects in the TIP may be<br />

implemented without federal funds. While inclusion is not specifically required of such projects,<br />

any project that could affect the amount of traffic that is carried (VMT) or capacity and air quality<br />

is subject to inclusion for examination by the Council to insure that the region continues to adhere<br />

to the air quality standards. Agencies throughout the region are informed of the need to submit such<br />

projects to the Council when submitting requests for federal-funded projects.<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> TIP Projects<br />

The current TIP contains 24 MoDOT projects (including four CMAQ projects) in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

totaling about $100 million ($89 MoDOT and $11CMAQ). There are 33 county and city projects<br />

totaling about $46 million, and three a transit projects totaling $336,000. All totaled, there are 60<br />

projects costing about $146.6 million. A tabulation of MoDOT projects by type of improvement in<br />

the region’s five counties is shown in Table 28 with <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> highlighted. The number<br />

and cost of <strong>County</strong> and city projects are shown in Table 29 and transit projects shown in Table 30.<br />

It can be seen that <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will receive $88,935,000 or 7.9 percent of MoDOT’s funds<br />

for the period 2007 through 2010. In addition, because MoDOT sets aside monies for multi-county<br />

projects, projects that cross county lines, and regional projects, various projects throughout the<br />

region, such as pavement overlays, signals, signs, Intelligent <strong>Transportation</strong> System (ITS)<br />

improvements, and safety projects, MoDOT will spend additional monies in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

In effect, the total dollar expenditure will be more than the $189 million.<br />

85


<strong>County</strong> Preservation<br />

Table 28<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

FY 2007 - 2010<br />

MoDOT Projects<br />

Capacity<br />

Adding<br />

Operational<br />

& Safety<br />

86<br />

Other Total<br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

Franklin $21,656,000 $59,663,000 $1,274,000 $0 $82,593,000 7.3%<br />

Jefferson $25,189,000 $0 $45,073,000 $0 $70,262,000 6.2%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> $8,699,000 $77,709,000 $2,223,000 $304,000 $88,935,000 7.9%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis $526,142,000 $34,636,000 $11,917,000 $11,217,000 $583,912,000 51.6%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis City $126,724,000 $0 $727,000 $70,000 $127,521,000 11.3%<br />

Multi-<strong>County</strong> $18,369,000 $0 $7,345,000 $0 $25,714,000 2.3%<br />

Regional $93,768,000 $0 $57,377,000 $2,231,000 $153,376,000 13.5%<br />

Multi-<strong>St</strong>ate $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 0.0%<br />

Total $820,627,000 $172,008,000 $125,936,000 $13,822,000 $1,132,393,00<br />

0<br />

% 72.5% 15.2% 11.1% 1.2% 100.0%<br />

Note: The four CMAQ projects total $11 million bringing the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> MoDOT totals to $100 million<br />

<strong>County</strong> Preservatn<br />

Table 29<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

FY 2007 - 2010<br />

Local Projects<br />

Capacity<br />

Adding<br />

Operationl<br />

& Safety<br />

System<br />

Enhncmnts<br />

Other Total<br />

100.0%<br />

Franklin $12,486,195 $2,361,000 $2,852,000 $2,145,499 $0 $19,844,694 6.9<br />

Jefferson $10,038,820 $5,625,000 $6,909,600 $110,000 $219,500 $22,902,920 8.1<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> $26,990,390 $617,855 $26,877,388 $2,873,000 $0 $57,358,633 20.2<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis $39,574,300 $11,100,000 $30,211,099 $11,819,369 $324,000 $93,028,768 32.8<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

City<br />

Multi-<br />

<strong>County</strong><br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

$50,640,424 $0 $23,793,300 $10,591,701 $0 $85,025,425 30.0<br />

$0 $0 $2,410,500 $1,550,000 $1,850,991 $5,811,491 2.0<br />

Total $139,730,129 $19,703,855 $93,053,887 $29,089,569 $2,394,491 $283,971,931 100.0<br />

% 49.2 6.9 32.8 10.3 0.8 100.0<br />

Note: Transit Vehicle Service under Multi-county of $22,436,869 has been omitted


<strong>County</strong><br />

Bus/Van<br />

Acquisitions<br />

Table 30<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

FY 2007 - 2010<br />

Transit Projects<br />

MetroLink<br />

Improvmts<br />

MetroLink<br />

Expansion<br />

87<br />

Equip./Facilities<br />

& Maintenance<br />

Total<br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

Franklin $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0<br />

Jefferson $42,000 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $0<br />

<strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong><br />

$336,000 $0 $0 $0 $336,000 $0<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis $45,500 $487,000 $0 $516,775 $1,049,275 $1<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

City<br />

Multi-<br />

<strong>County</strong><br />

$2,463,040 $2,931,832 $0 $4,100,209 $9,495,081 $6<br />

$8,426,041 $7,316,862 $109,789,995 $16,805,809 $142,338,707 $93<br />

Total $11,312,581 $10,735,694 $109,789,995 $21,422,793 $153,261,063 $100<br />

Percent 7.6 7.0 71.4 14.0 100.0<br />

Some of the more major <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> projects included in the TIP include the following;<br />

• I-70, eastbound auxiliary lane from Rt. 79 to Mid Rivers Mall Dr., $7.0 million.<br />

(Construction expected in 2006 and 2007)<br />

• I-70 reconstruct roadway and add lanes from Pearce Blvd., to east of Rt. Z, $8.8 million<br />

• Rt. 364 from east of Harvester Rd. to I-64 at Rt. N, new freeway, $36.1 million (construction<br />

expected in 2006 and 2007)<br />

• U.S. 40/61 from I-70 to Lake Saint Louis Blvd., upgrade to interstate standards $28.2<br />

million, and Winghaven Blvd. to west of Rt. K, $16 million.<br />

The number of projects and total dollars for each county differs in each year’s TIP as projects are<br />

completed and new projects are added. Major projects, especially those by MoDOT, can cause<br />

substantial changes in the dollars and percent for each county. A detailed listing of the projects<br />

presently programed in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> can be found in the 2007 - 2010 TIP.<br />

D. <strong>St</strong>ate of the <strong>Transportation</strong> System<br />

In April 2005 the Council published a study entitled “<strong>St</strong>ate of the <strong>Transportation</strong> System.” This<br />

report reviewed travel in <strong>St</strong>. Louis from many aspects. It used the Council’s Travel Survey<br />

conducted in 2001 to provide considerable information. It compared various measures of travel in<br />

the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region to other major cities in the United <strong>St</strong>ates. It reviewed travel from the<br />

perspective of the six major emphasis areas. Although it reviewed the region as a whole, some<br />

topics relating to <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> were identified and are discussed below.


D-1. Mode of Travel to Work<br />

For 2000 in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> had the highest percent of drivers that drove<br />

alone to work, 87.1%. The next highest was <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> with 84.9%. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> had<br />

the lowest number of car poolers with 8.1%. <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> was the next with 8.4%. Of those<br />

using public transit, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> was second lowest with 0.3%. Jefferson <strong>County</strong> was the<br />

lowest with 0.2%. <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> had 1.7 percent.<br />

D-2. Crash Rating<br />

The average annual crash rate, as a percent of population, was lower in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> than the<br />

City of <strong>St</strong>. Louis or <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. However, the crash rate, the measure of crashes to number<br />

of vehicle miles of travel, was higher on the Interstate system in the <strong>County</strong> than the other counties<br />

in region. Specific crash data for the roads in the <strong>County</strong> has been discussed earlier.<br />

D-3. Other <strong>St</strong>udies<br />

Since 1997 when the previous transportation plan was prepared, MoDOT, the <strong>County</strong>, and many<br />

cities have conducted numerous studies. They cover a wide variety of topics including major<br />

highway improvements, land use, environmental issues, economic development, waste water and<br />

water treatment facilities, residential development, and commercial development. Many of these<br />

studies have been previously mentioned in this report and the topics discussed have influenced the<br />

outcome of conclusions of this study. In some instances the data collected in those studies may have<br />

been used or referenced in this report. In other cases they were not. The purpose of this section is<br />

to indicate that the Council recognizes that these reports exist and that difference in the data from<br />

that of the Council does not mean they are wrong. The Council does, however, use its data,<br />

including that which may have been obtained from various sources in the county, to develop<br />

forecasts, conclusions, and recommendations for this report.<br />

88


A. Background<br />

VI. Future <strong>Transportation</strong> Conditions<br />

Future transportation conditions in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will depend on many factors. The first and<br />

most important is how land use in the county and rest of the region will change over the next 25<br />

years. This will effect the region’s demographics and greatly influence the amount and pattern of<br />

travel on all transportation modes, especially streets and highways. Of particular importance is the<br />

growth of population and employment. The second most important factor is the changes that can<br />

be expected in all modes of transportation in the region. Of primary concern are changes to the<br />

street and highway system since they will influence the movement of people, goods, services and<br />

commodities. A third factor that will influence travel is the overall economic conditions in the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Louis region, Missouri, and the United <strong>St</strong>ates as it will effect the demands that will be placed on all<br />

modes of transportation. Lastly, the amount of travel that can be expected by persons living in the<br />

region and those traveling through it is apt to change as societal and technical changes take place<br />

and economic conditions of the country change. These changes will also influence the movement<br />

of people, goods, services, and commodities. Assumptions have been made regarding these factors<br />

and how they will influence travel on all modes of transportation in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

B. Demographics<br />

The demographic makeup of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region that may exist in the year <strong>2030</strong> is quite important<br />

in estimating the amount of travel that can be expected in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Data in Chapter II<br />

provided information on historical demographics. These data were used as a baseline for developing<br />

future estimates. Trends in population including age and gender, number of households and persons<br />

per household, and employment, were important items used in making these estimates.<br />

Future land use forecasts provided the basis for determining the county’s demographics which were<br />

essential in developing forecasts of travel. The Council developed much of these data, especially<br />

forecasts of population, number of households, persons per household and the amount and<br />

distribution of employment, by closely tracking land development in the county. The county’s<br />

planning staff played an important role in assisting Council staff in developing these data as did<br />

many of the cities.<br />

B-1. Population and Household Forecasts<br />

Since land in the county is abundant and residential development continues, it is expected that this<br />

trend will continue well into the future. New residential development has followed or is ahead of<br />

current and planned highway improvements and is expected to continue. This is especially true<br />

along major corridors presently being updated and those planned for new construction in the near<br />

future. Such roads include the conversion of U.S. 40/61 to I-64 from Rt. K to I-70, the proposed<br />

Rt. 364 corridor west along Rt. 94 from Harvester Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and west to I-64 at<br />

Rt. N. Other corridors that have attracted new development include Mid Rivers Mall Dr. from<br />

Willott Rd. south to Rt. 94, Rt. 94 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. west to I-64, Rt. K from Rt. N south<br />

89


to I-64, and Winghaven Blvd./Bryan Rd. from I-70 to I-64. Considerable in-fill is taking place north<br />

of I-64/U.S. 40/61 from the Missouri River west to Lake Saint Louis Blvd. in the cities of Weldon<br />

Spring, O’Fallon, Dardenne Prairie, Lake Saint Louis, and parts of unincorporated <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>. New residential development is occurring in the northern part of the county also on<br />

available land in many older and well-established communities. They include areas north and south<br />

of Mexico Rd., especially west of Mid Rivers Mall Dr., and north of I-70 from the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

west through old O’Fallon to Wentzville, especially north and south of Rt. P. In the Wentzville area<br />

development continues all around the older parts of town and south of I-70 along Rt. Z and both<br />

sides of Rt. N to I-64. New development has accelerated north of Wentzville from U.S. 61 west to<br />

Warren <strong>County</strong>.<br />

Using Census Bureau data as a benchmark and a considerable amount of other data, the Council<br />

developed forecasts of population for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region. The latest forecasts are contained in the<br />

Council’s report, “Long-Range Population and Employment Projections” prepared in June 2004.<br />

It consisted of reviewing historical data from the census for 1980, 1990, and 2000, and then<br />

producing a series of projections based on births, deaths, and in and out migration from the <strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

region. Comparisons were made of these forecasts to the history of the region’s population.<br />

Change in population depends on many factors as previously described. Table 1 in Chapter 1<br />

showed <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s population grew at 48 and 33 percent from 1980 to 1990 and 1990 to<br />

2000, respectively. During that time the region only grew by about 3 percent. Table 31 below<br />

shows the forecasts of population for the region to year <strong>2030</strong>. It shows the region’s population will<br />

slowly increase at about 10 percent to about 2,700,500 while the county will grow by almost 30<br />

percent to 408,000. This will make it the second largest next to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>.<br />

The number of households will also grow but at a faster rate than the population because the size<br />

of households is decreasing. For the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region households are expected to grow around 18<br />

percent but <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will grow by 43 percent. The average household size will decline<br />

throughout the entire region.<br />

B-2. Employment Forecasts<br />

Employment growth or decline and its distribution throughout the region has a major effect on all<br />

modes of transportation, especially traffic on the region’s highway system. Travel for work has<br />

always been a major item used in developing highway traffic forecasts. As a result, estimates of<br />

future employment in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and for the region were developed for this study.<br />

Employment projections, unlike population projections, do not use a baseline of census data.<br />

Instead, data is acquired from a number of agencies that provide employment information on persons<br />

in the United <strong>St</strong>ates and the state of Missouri. In addition, data were collected from various agencies<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Forecasts were then developed using an evaluation process which considered<br />

the development outlook and potential for each county in the region. Employment forecasts were<br />

developed by the Council for Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, and details can be found in the Council’s June 2004<br />

report cited above.<br />

90


Category 2000<br />

Table 31<br />

Population and Households Forecasts<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

2005<br />

Estimated<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

91<br />

<strong>2030</strong><br />

Projected<br />

Percent Change<br />

2000-2005 2005-<strong>2030</strong><br />

Population 2,482,900 2,522,700 2,770,500 1.6% 9.8%<br />

Households 969,200 1,002,600 1,188,600 3.4% 18.6%<br />

Avg. HH Size 2.56 2.52 2.33 -3.0% -7.5%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Population 283,900 314,400 408,000 10.7% 29.8%<br />

Households 101,800 117,400 167,800 15.3% 42.9%<br />

Avg. HH Size 2.79 2.68 2.43 -2.8% -9.3%<br />

Pop % of Region 11.4% 12.5% 14.7% 9.6% 17.6%<br />

For <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, many factors have contributed to a sizeable increase in employment. They<br />

include the amount of available land, the growth in residential development and population, and the<br />

expansion and improvement to the major highway network. New employment has followed<br />

improvements that are taking place along existing and new highway corridors. Examples are the<br />

Rt. 370 freeway from the Missouri River to I-70, improvements to I-70 especially at many of the<br />

interchanges, the new Rt. 364 freeway from the Missouri River to Rt. 94, and the upgrading of U.S.<br />

40/61 to I-64 from the Missouri River to I-70 at Wentzville. These and other road improvements<br />

allow faster travel on the region’s major highway system and thus attract commercial, industrial, and<br />

other development.<br />

The most dramatic change has been in the new I-64 corridor from the Missouri River to Wentzville.<br />

It has become the “high tech” corridor with many new major employers. <strong>East</strong> of Rt. 94, additional<br />

companies have built in the Missouri Research Park which is on the south side and others including<br />

Verizon and Enterprise Leasing have built on the north side. All around the Rt. 94/Rt. K interchange<br />

a very large amount of commercial development has sprung up including hotels, restaurants, car<br />

dealerships, and other strip commercial, all anchored by CitiGroup and BJC Hospital. At the<br />

Winghaven Blvd. interchange considerable development has occurred, similar to that at Rt. 94/Rt.<br />

K, anchored by MasterCard. New commercial establishments have developed all around the Rt. N<br />

interchange anchored by Wal-Mart, Lowes, Target, and JC Penny to name a few. New commercial<br />

development has sprung up around the Lake Saint Louis Blvd. interchange with more coming.


When a new interchange is built east of Callahan Rd., replacing the two signalized intersections, it<br />

also is very likely to attract new commercial development.<br />

Forecasts of employment are shown in Table 32 below. They include the number of jobs in the<br />

county, the number of persons who live in the county and are employed, and the number of<br />

employed persons who live in the county and work in the county. It confirms what is described in<br />

Chapter II, that employment in the county has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. It also notes that<br />

many employed persons living in the county now work in the county and the number has been<br />

growing. However, because the amount of jobs has not grown as fast as the number of employed<br />

persons there is still a need for many persons to commute across the Missouri River. It is expected<br />

that this trend will continue for some time with a slight decline in the future (See Table 3, Page 5).<br />

Category<br />

Table 32<br />

Employment Forecasts<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

2000 2005*<br />

Years Rate of Change<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

92<br />

<strong>2030</strong><br />

Projected<br />

2000-2005 2005-<strong>2030</strong><br />

Employment 1,303,800 1,350,700 1,481,100 3.6% 9.7%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Employment 105,700 124,700 173,500 18.0% 39.1%<br />

Percent Working<br />

in <strong>County</strong><br />

Employment as a<br />

Percent of Region<br />

* Estimated<br />

B-3. Vehicle and Household Forecasts<br />

47.0% 50.5% 60.0%* 7.4% 18.8%<br />

8.1% 9.2% 11.7% 13.6% 27.2%<br />

An important item used in forecasting travel is the number of vehicles expected in each household.<br />

Estimates of households as well as vehicle ownership was developed using historical data and future<br />

population. Households were estimated with population and were used to obtain the number of<br />

vehicles that would exist. Historical data regarding vehicle registrations for 2000 and 2004 were<br />

obtained from the states of Missouri and Illinois but older data (1990) was not comparable or used.<br />

Table 33 below shows the number of households and registered autos in 2000 and 2004. It also<br />

contains an estimate of households and autos for the year <strong>2030</strong>. The data shows that the number of<br />

autos in the region increased by 79,700, far exceeding the 33,400 increases in households. In <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> the difference between the growth in vehicles and households was more dramatic.<br />

Vehicles increased by 49,300 or 28.0 percent while households grew by 15,700 or 15.4 percent. By


Table 33<br />

Vehicles and Households<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Year 2000* 2004* <strong>2030</strong>**<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

93<br />

Change & %<br />

2000 - 2004<br />

1,689,400 1,769,100 2,200,000 79,700<br />

4.7%<br />

Households 969,200 1,002,600 1,188,600 33,400<br />

3.4%<br />

Change & %<br />

2004 - <strong>2030</strong>**<br />

430,900<br />

24.4%<br />

186,000<br />

18.6%<br />

Autos/HH 1.74 1.76 1.85 1.1% 5.1%<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

176,000 225,300 380,000 49,300<br />

28.0%<br />

Households 101,700 117,400 167,800 15,700<br />

15.4%<br />

154,700<br />

68.7%<br />

50,400<br />

42.9%<br />

Autos/HH 1.73 1.97 2.26 13.9% 14.7%<br />

* Data obtained from the Missouri Department of Revenue and the Illinois Secretary of <strong>St</strong>ate, Department of Revenue for 2000<br />

through 2004. Earlier data was not comparable to these data.<br />

** Estimated based on historical values and judgement using the population and employment forecasts.<br />

<strong>2030</strong> it is estimated that the region will grow to 1,188,600 households and registered vehicles will<br />

reach 2,200,000. This is an 18.6 percent increase in households while vehicle ownership will rise<br />

by 24.4 percent. In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> the change will be even more dramatic with households<br />

rising by 42.9 percent and vehicles by 68.7 percent. This shows how travel in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

can be expected to be much higher than that of the rest of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region.<br />

C. Highway Travel<br />

Future travel on the major highways in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the region will depend on the system<br />

in place by <strong>2030</strong>. To best estimate what it will look like, Legacy <strong>2030</strong> and the Council’s TIP were<br />

used as they list projects that are expected to have adequate funding. For the county’s roads, their<br />

TIP and Master <strong>Plan</strong> were used. Their TIP also listed projects that have dedicated funding. Their<br />

Master <strong>Plan</strong> suggests future improvements. However, some do not presently have dedicated funding.<br />

C-1. Traffic Forecasting Methodology<br />

The methodology used for developing forecasts of traffic volumes on major MoDOT’s roads and<br />

county roads employed a number of steps. First, historical ADTs were obtained from MoDOT and<br />

city and county data. Growth factors were developed from these ADTs and applied to each road


taking into account future improvements outlined in the present TIP and Legacy <strong>2030</strong>. Second, the<br />

percent change in population, households, and employment, forecasted by the Council in the five<br />

sections of the county as shown in Figure 1, was related to the growth factors developed for each<br />

road. Third, road characteristics including their functional classifications, lengths, type of areas they<br />

traversed, and number of lanes, were reviewed. Forecasts were then developed for each road in 10<br />

year increments from 2010 to <strong>2030</strong> to allow for close comparison to population, households, and<br />

employment forecasts, and land use changes that are expected.<br />

The forecasts developed by the Council were reviewed with MoDOT staff to insure that they were<br />

in line with their forecasts and any major reports prepared for them. Two such reports were recently<br />

prepared. The first entitled “Interstate 70 Corridor, Second Tier Draft Environmental Impact<br />

<strong>St</strong>atement,” addressed state-wide improvements to I-70 and included the section dealing with<br />

Montgomery, Warren, and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Counties. Forecasts of I-70 traffic for <strong>2030</strong> were included<br />

in that study and were reviewed in this report. The second report, entitled “Final Environmental<br />

Impact <strong>St</strong>atement, U.S. Route 40/61 Bridge Location <strong>St</strong>udy over the Missouri River,” contained<br />

<strong>2030</strong> traffic forecasts on I-64 at the bridge. They also were reviewed. No other studies of<br />

MoDOT’s major roads were prepared that would produce future traffic counts.<br />

C-2. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions on MoDOT Roads<br />

Traffic volume forecasts for <strong>2030</strong> were developed for all roads in functional classification order.<br />

From these forecasts travel conditions or the degree of congestion that can be expected was<br />

determined. MoDOT roads were examined first as they carry the highest volumes of traffic. The<br />

degree of congestion was expressed in Level of Service (LOS) as explained in Chapter III.<br />

Interstates and Freeways are addressed first followed by Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials, and<br />

Major Collectors. The <strong>2030</strong> ADTs are shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9. A complete tabulation of the<br />

traffic volume forecasts for MoDOT’s roads are contained in Appendix B. Using these forecasts,<br />

the number of lanes for each road, and the road improvements shown in the TIP and Legacy <strong>2030</strong>,<br />

the LOS for each road were determined. They were developed by following the procedures in the<br />

2000 HCM described in Chapter III. The result for each road segment is discussed below.<br />

C-2.1. Interstate and Freeways<br />

Interstates and freeways are considered primary roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the region. They<br />

handle the highest volumes with no interruption and ingress and egress allowed only at interchanges.<br />

Their design features are almost identical and therefore, they are discussed first.<br />

I-64<br />

ADTs From the Missouri River west to I-70, traffic volumes have continued to increase as new<br />

sections of this road were completed. From 1990 to 2000, before parts of it were upgraded to<br />

Interstate standards, traffic across the Missouri River grew by 56 percent from 44,300 to 69,100.<br />

By 2004, it had climbed to 77,500, and that was with a new bridge across the river on Rt. 364 which<br />

diverted some traffic. By 2010 it is expected that volumes will reach 90,000 and by <strong>2030</strong> are<br />

forecast to rise to 120,000. The Rt. 94/Rt. K interchange will serve considerable traffic and volumes<br />

94


Figure 7<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Forcasted Travel Volumes<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

95


Figure 8<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Forcasted Travel Volumes<br />

<strong>East</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

97


Figure 9<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Forcasted Travel Volumes<br />

<strong>West</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

99


100


will drop west of there to 80,000. <strong>East</strong> of Rt. N, forecasts place volumes at 75,000 and west of it<br />

at 65,000 and it will remain the same through Lake Saint Louis Blvd. to I-70 at Wentzville.<br />

Although the traffic increases along I-64 are high, they reflect a major change in this facility. A new<br />

Interstate with high design standards will replace old U.S. 40/61. A new eastbound bridge will be<br />

built across the Missouri River increasing river crossing capacity, if funding becomes available.<br />

This will provide uninterrupted traffic flow between I-70 and <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and through the<br />

region. It is expected that some traffic from I-70 and U.S. 61 will be diverted to this new road.<br />

LOS I-64 will have four lanes, two in each direction, from I-70 to Rt. K. From there through Rt.<br />

94 to the Missouri River it widens to six lanes with an auxiliary lane in each direction. From I-70<br />

to Rt. N, forecasted volumes will be about 65,000. Using 9 percent of the ADT to determine peak<br />

hour volumes result in 5,900 vehicles. Traffic volumes will have a 55/45 split in direction resulting<br />

in 3,200 in the high direction or 1,600 vehicles per lane. Using planning default factors to determine<br />

the equivalent passenger cars per lane per hour (pcphpl) brings this number to about 1,700. Based<br />

on Table 10 in Chapter III which explains LOS criteria for Freeways, and using a 60-mph speed<br />

limit, the road will operate at LOS D with some congestion but below the roads capacity. Traffic<br />

in the opposite direction will be lower and provide LOS C.<br />

<strong>East</strong> of Rt. N volumes will rise to around 75,000 to Winghaven Blvd. and then 80,000 to Rt. K.<br />

Applying the 9 percent factor to the highest volume results in 7,200 vehicles during the peak hours<br />

and applying a 55/45 directional split gives about 4,000 or 2,000 per lane. Using planning default<br />

factors, this equals about 2,100 pcphpl. Table 10 and a 60-mph speed limit shows this volume will<br />

reach the capacity of the road and it will operate at LOS E with serious congestion. Traffic will<br />

move at slower speeds from the Rt. N interchange through Winghaven to the six lane section at Rt.<br />

K. Traffic in the opposite direction will operate at LOS D with minor congestion based on the same<br />

factors except for the directional split.<br />

It should be noted that the Rt. 364 freeway extension from Rt. 94 at Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to the<br />

I-64/Rt. N interchange has not been included in this report. In Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, this section of Rt. 364<br />

is listed as an “Illustrative” project, meaning that it is desired but funds have not yet been provided.<br />

If funds become available and this road is completed by <strong>2030</strong>, a fair amount of traffic on I-64 will<br />

be diverted to it and traffic volumes will drop east of there. It is estimated that as much as 10,000<br />

to 15,000 vehicles will be diverted. This could drop volumes to about 60,000 east of the Rt. N<br />

interchange and improve the LOS on I-64 to D.<br />

From Rt. 94 to the Missouri River bridge volumes will increase again to 120,000 and it will operate<br />

on six lanes with two auxiliary lanes. Applying the same daily peak hour and directional values<br />

gives volumes at around 6,000 or 1,500 per lane. Applying planning factors results in about 1,600<br />

pcphpl. Although there are four lanes in each direction, one of them acts as an auxiliary lane<br />

between the ramps of Rt. 94 to Chesterfield Airport Rd. in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. The distance between<br />

the ramps is more than three miles, therefore, it is expected that they will carry substantial volumes.<br />

However, they will be less than that of the through lanes. A factor of 75 percent has been used for<br />

these lanes and the remaining volume (400) were distributed to the other three lanes. This brings<br />

volumes on the three through lanes to about 1,750. From Table 10 at a 60 mph speed limit, this<br />

shows that the road will provide LOS D with only minor congestion during the peak hour periods.<br />

101


I-64 Summary<br />

Traffic volumes on I-64 from I-70 to the Missouri River bridge will increase substantially by <strong>2030</strong>.<br />

Unfortunately, a five-mile section from Rt. N to Rt. K, with only two lanes in each direction, will<br />

operate with volumes at capacity (LOS E) in both directions of travel during the peak hours. If Rt.<br />

364 is built from Rt. 94 at Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to the I-64/Rt. N interchange, then volumes will<br />

decline east of there and the road will operate at LOS D with only moderate congestion. This points<br />

out the importance of completing this project.<br />

I-70<br />

ADTs Traffic volumes on I-70 have been increasing for some time. Chapter III noted that the<br />

average increase from 1990 to 2000 was 35 percent. Since 1990, two new Missouri River bridges<br />

have been built. Rt. 370, a freeway, crosses the river north of the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and junctions<br />

with I-70 east of Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. 364, also a freeway, crosses the river south of I-70 and<br />

intersects with Rt. 94 near Muegge Rd. Both had an effect of reducing traffic on I-70 east of Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. Forecasts indicates that volumes across the Missouri River will still increase but<br />

at a slower pace with these bridges to assist crossings. By <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to climb back<br />

up to 210,000. Between Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and Rt. 79 they will increase to 175,000. <strong>East</strong> of<br />

Bryan Rd. volumes will rise to 125,000 and at Pearce Blvd. in Wentzville, they will reach 100,000.<br />

Although these are substantial increases, they reflect the growth in the western part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>, the growth in adjoining Lincoln and Warren Counties, and an overall increases in traffic<br />

on I-70 across the state of Missouri. Fortunately, in the west part of the county, with I-64 becoming<br />

a major Interstate route, a considerable amount of increased traffic will use it instead of I-70. On<br />

the east end, traffic across the Missouri River will be shared with two other bridges.<br />

LOS In <strong>2030</strong> I-70 will be a four-lane facility, two lanes in each direction, from Warren <strong>County</strong><br />

through Pearce Blvd. and will handle about 90,000 vehicles. Nine percent of the daily traffic can<br />

be expected during the peak hours with a 55/44 directional split. This gives about 4,500 or 2,250<br />

vehicles per lane in the high direction of travel. Applying planning factors converts this to about<br />

2,350 pcphpl. With a 65 mph speed limit, Table 10 indicates it is right at LOS F, meaning the<br />

forecasted volumes will be in excess of the road’s capacity. It will operate with severe congestion<br />

in a start-stop mode. Traffic in the opposite direction will also be high and operate at LOS D with<br />

moderate congestion. Widening of this section of I-70 by one lane in each direction is listed in<br />

Legacy <strong>2030</strong> as an “Illustrative” project. If funds become available by <strong>2030</strong>, this improvement will<br />

allow the road to operate at LOS of D in the high direction with only moderate congestion.<br />

From Pearce Blvd. through Rt. Z to I-64/U.S. 61, it will be widened to six lanes and carry 110,000<br />

vehicles. Growth in this part of the county both north and south of I-70, will be the cause of this<br />

high increase. Applying the 9 percent daily and 55/44 percent directional split factors for the peak<br />

hours result in about 5,500 vehicles in the high direction or 1,800 vehicles per lane. Factoring gives<br />

1,900 pcphpl which from Table 10 and a 60 mph speed limit indicates LOS D. The road will handle<br />

these volumes with moderate congestion.<br />

Although the I-70/I-64 (presently U.S. 40/61) interchange is being rebuilt, it will experience serious<br />

congestion by <strong>2030</strong>. <strong>West</strong> of the interchange peak hour volumes are expected to be around 1,900<br />

pcphpl. <strong>East</strong> of the interchange they will be 1,800 (see below). I-64 will have peak hour volumes<br />

102


around 2,000 pcphpl. U.S. 61 to the north will have lesser volumes but will still contribute to the<br />

amount of traffic that will flow through the interchange. The volumes on I-70 and I-64 alone will<br />

be operating at LOS D to E. It is anticipated that merging and diverging movements to and from<br />

the ramps will cause frictional effects on the through lanes and worsen their LOS to E or capacity.<br />

From I-64 to Lake Saint Louis Blvd. volumes will drop to 100,000 in six lanes as I-64 will drain off<br />

some traffic. Applying the above daily and directional factors results in 5,000 vehicles during the<br />

peak hours in the high direction of travel which gives 1,700 vehicles per lane. Factoring for pcphpl<br />

gives about 1,800. From Table 10 and a 60 mph speed limit, this results in LOS D with some<br />

congestion. From Lake Saint Louis Blvd. to Bryan Rd., volumes will be slightly higher but<br />

congestion will be about the same.<br />

From Bryan Rd. to Rt. 79, traffic builds up substantially, because of the sizeable amount of<br />

development that is expected to occur in this part of the county. <strong>East</strong> of Bryan Rd. to Rt. K volumes<br />

will increase to 125,000 on three lanes in each direction. Applying the daily and directional factors<br />

results in 2,050 vehicles per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 2,200. From Table 10 and a 60 mph<br />

speed limit, it will operate at LOS E with considerable congestion. The opposite direction will have<br />

about 1,700 vehicles and planning factors indicate 1,800 pcphpl. Table 10 indicates LOS D with<br />

moderate congestion.<br />

Traffic volumes east of Rt. K will also rise and reach 145,000 vehicles. However, an additional<br />

through lane, in each direction, will be added making it four lanes. Applying the daily and<br />

directional factors gives 1,800 vehicles per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,900 vehicles or the<br />

high end of LOS D. This section will operate with considerable congestion. Traffic in the opposite<br />

direction will operate at the low end of LOS D with only minor congestion.<br />

T.R. Hughes will add a small amount of traffic and have four lanes in each direction to Rt. 79. The<br />

LOS will be slightly worse with the high direction of travel reaching capacity (LOS E) with severe<br />

congestion. The opposite direction will be LOS D with moderate congestion.<br />

<strong>East</strong> of Rt. 79 volumes will rise substantially to about 175,000 to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. It will have<br />

four lanes in each direction, however, an auxiliary lane will be added for eastbound traffic. This will<br />

aid travel between the two interchanges especially during the morning peak hours. Applying daily<br />

and directional factors and adjusting for the auxiliary lane gives 1,850 vehicles in the through lane.<br />

Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,950 vehicles. From Table 10 and a 60 mph speed limit this equates to<br />

the high end of LOS D. Considerable congestion can be expected for eastbound traffic between<br />

these interchanges as it does today. In the opposite direction there will be no auxiliary lane, only<br />

four through lanes. During the afternoon peak hours volumes will reach 2,200 vehicles per lane or<br />

the capacity of the road at LOS E. It will operate with severe congestion similar to what is occurring<br />

today with backups extending from Rt. 79 through Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. 370, I-70 widens to six lanes in each direction for the multiple on<br />

and off ramps to Rt. 370. The ADT in this section will be about the same with 175,000 vehicles.<br />

After applying all the adjustment factors it was determined that the pcphpl volumes from Table 10<br />

would operate at LOS D due to the additional lanes. However, these numbers do not take into<br />

account congestion from two other sources; that described above from the adjacent section to the<br />

west and the other from weaving traffic to and from the Mid Rivers Mall Dr. interchange.<br />

103


With an additional lane eastbound (four lanes), more traffic will be delivered to the Rt. 370<br />

interchange and the lanes of the on ramp. During the morning peak hour, this traffic will be merging<br />

with traffic coming from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. In addition, the four lanes on I-70 will have to neck<br />

down to three lanes east of the interchange. Therefore, it is expected that congestion on this segment<br />

of I-70 will increase substantially. This may cause backups on I-70 and on to Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

The LOS at this location is expected to reach F in a start-stop mode.<br />

A sizeable amount of westbound I-70 traffic desires to exit at this interchange, especially during the<br />

afternoon peak hours. They must weave across traffic that is coming from Rt. 370. At the same<br />

time considerable westbound Rt. 370 traffic desires to merge into the through lanes of westbound<br />

I-70. This causes a very serious weaving problem that creates severe congestion. Adding to this<br />

problem is the fact that westbound traffic on the off-ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. presently backs<br />

up into the westbound through lanes. It is expected that this situation will worsen by the forecast<br />

year as volumes increase. For eastbound traffic a similar situation exists with considerable traffic<br />

from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. wanting to proceed east on I-70. They must weave through traffic<br />

coming from I -70 heading for Rt. 370. This situation is not as bad as the westbound flow, even in<br />

the morning peak hours, but with additional traffic expected by the forecast year the situation is<br />

bound to worsen. Traffic can be expected to operate with severe congestion in a start-stop mode<br />

through this entire section and affect congestion to the east and west. It is expected that the peak<br />

hours will be extended and that congestion will exist during most of the day.<br />

<strong>East</strong> of Rt. 370 to Cave Springs Rd. volumes drop to 150,000 as traffic is diverted to and from Rt.<br />

370. Traffic must be carried on six lanes and there will be no auxiliary lanes. Factoring for peak<br />

hour and high direction gives 7,400 or 2,500 vehicles per hour. Factoring for pcphpl gives 2,600.<br />

Table 10 indicates LOS F which means the road will have volumes that exceed its capacity. It will,<br />

therefore, experience severe congestion. For the opposite direction volumes will reach 2,000<br />

vehicles. After factoring for pcphpl, this rises to 2,100 and from Table 10 shows it will reach<br />

capacity, LOS E. Because the road will be at and over the capacity, peak hours will spread more<br />

than what they already are presently, speeds will decrease, and travel time and delays will increase.<br />

Congestion will be severe and be extended to most of the daytime hours.<br />

From Cave Spring Rd. to Zumbehl Rd. the situation will worsen as more volume is added rising to<br />

160,000 and there are no additional lanes. The situation described above, LOS F, will also exist.<br />

From Zumbehl Rd. to Rt. 94 volumes again rise and reach 170,000. However, an auxiliary lane<br />

exists in this section helping to some degree the added volumes. Again, the auxiliary lane can only<br />

be expected to carry a portion of through lane volumes although the percent most likely will<br />

increase. Regardless, through volumes will be about 2,200 pcphpl at the roads capacity LOS E.<br />

Severe congestion can be expected as on the previous section.<br />

At Rt. 94, the new interchange will allow for considerable traffic to get on and off I-70 and the<br />

volumes will rise substantially, reaching 195,000 vehicles a day. An additional through lane will<br />

be added and also an auxiliary lane. This will help handle the forecasted volumes. Using a 9<br />

percent daily factor and a 55/44 split, peak hour volumes in the high direction will reach 9,700<br />

vehicles. Dividing this by five equals about 2,000 and factoring for pcphpl gives 2,100. This is<br />

assuming the auxiliary lane will handle the same volumes as the through lanes. From Table 10 this<br />

104


shows the road will be operating at capacity, LOS E. Congestion will be severe in a start-stop mode.<br />

This situation can be expected in both directions of travel and the peak hours will be extended.<br />

From Fifth <strong>St</strong>reet across the Missouri River bridge it is expected that volumes will reach 210,000.<br />

This is more than it has been in the past when it reached 190,000 in 2000. The five lanes will have<br />

volumes over their capacity (LOS F) and the bridge will operate in a start-stop mode with congestion<br />

and backups severe on both approaches.<br />

I-70 Summary<br />

From Warren <strong>County</strong> to the Missouri River traffic volumes on I-70 by the year <strong>2030</strong> are forecasted<br />

to range from 100,000 to 210,000. The number of lanes available to handle these volumes will range<br />

from four in the west to six, eight, and ten across the Missouri River. Auxiliary lanes between many<br />

of the interchanges will help and interchange improvements will also be made. Nonetheless, most<br />

sections of I-70 will have volumes and number of lanes that cause it to operate at LOS E and F.<br />

With these LOS, congestion will be severe between many of the interchanges and will affect traffic<br />

flow upstream during both the morning and afternoon peak hours.<br />

The traffic flow situation forecasted for I-70 will be similar to but worse than what presently exists.<br />

During the morning peak hours from Bryan Rd. through Mid Rivers Mall Dr. traffic now moves in<br />

a start-stop mode. In the afternoon peak hours, from the Earth City Expressway in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong><br />

past Rt. 79, congestion is also severe and often in a start-stop mode. One congested section simply<br />

worsens the congestion behind it and in some case on the next section. The result is congestion<br />

throughout the entire length of the road. It is anticipated that what is occurring today will be worse<br />

by <strong>2030</strong> even with the improvements planned. Congestion will start west of Wentzville and<br />

extending across the entire county to the Missouri River both during the morning and afternoon peak<br />

hours and these hours will be extended. Unfortunately, traffic in the opposite direction will also be<br />

rising and they too will reach LOS E and F. In effect, congestion can be expected in both directions<br />

(in a start-stop mode) and the hours of the congestion will be expanded to a longer part of the day.<br />

A major operational problem mentioned earlier in Chapter III was the severe congestion that is<br />

presently experienced at many of the interchanges. Vehicles back up on the off ramps and extend<br />

into the through traffic lanes. This not only causes serious congestion on I-70, but they also create<br />

a very serious safety problems. With increased activity expected at all of the interchanges, this<br />

situation will only get worse. The interchanges that presently are most effected, with the exception<br />

of new Rt. 94, Rt. 370, and new T.R Hughes, are from Fifth <strong>St</strong>. through Rt. K/M. No doubt, Bryan<br />

Rd. will experience this kind of congestion in the near future. MoDOT’s plan’s for improvements<br />

to these interchanges should be accelerated due to the severity of the situation.<br />

Rt. 364<br />

This freeway opened in the spring of 2004 and carried 50,000 vehicles. Volumes are expected to<br />

increase as traffic adjusts and additional sections are completed. By 2010 it will be extended from<br />

north of Harvester Rd. to north of Jungermann Rd. By 2020 it will be extended south to Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. Improvements are also planned in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> in the form of additional ramps and<br />

the ramp configuration. This will allow traffic to flow more smoothly between Rt. 364 and I-270<br />

making it more attractive and thus add traffic volumes onto Rt. 364.<br />

105


By <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to reach 80,000 across the Missouri River. Peak hour volumes, as<br />

a percent of daily traffic, will be higher than those on I-70 and I-64 and are estimated at 12 percent.<br />

The high direction of travel will also be more at 65 percent. This will cause peak hour volumes in<br />

the high direction of travel to be about 6,200. With five lanes in both directions across the river,<br />

peak hour volumes for each lane will be about 1,250 vehicles. Even with converting to pcphpl, this<br />

provides LOS C and no congestion. From the bridge to Rt. 94 volumes will drop slightly to 75,000<br />

and it will lose a lane in each direction. Using 12 percent for peak hour volumes and 65 percent for<br />

the high direction gives 5,900 or about 1,500 vehicles per lane. Converting to pcphpl gives 1,600.<br />

From Table 10 and 60 mph speed limit, this equates to a low LOS D with some congestion.<br />

From its north junction with Rt. 94 through Harvester Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. 364 will take<br />

the place of Rt. 94. It will carry between 70,000 and 60,000 vehicles a day. Peak hour volumes will<br />

be less of the daily totals in the old Rt. 94 corridor or about 10 percent. The directional split in<br />

traffic will be more equal at about 55/45 percent. With four lanes in each direction this equates to<br />

a high of about 1,000 vehicles per lane or LOS C with no congestion.<br />

When Rt. 364 is completed from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. west to the I-64/Rt. N interchange, volumes<br />

will increase due to growth in the corridor and its connection to I-64. Since this part of the<br />

improvement is not included in Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, forecasts with this addition have not been made. It<br />

is expected that the increase will not cause the road to reach its capacity, therefore, it will function<br />

without any serious congestion problems. However, its completion will greatly aid traffic<br />

congestion on both I-64 and on I-70.<br />

Rt. 370<br />

Traffic across the Missouri River has grown steadily. Year 2004 volumes indicate 61,000 at the<br />

river dropping to 58,000 near the Elm Ave. interchange. <strong>West</strong> of Truman Rd. it was 51,000. By<br />

<strong>2030</strong> it is expected that volumes will reach 85,000 at the Missouri River, 65,000 west of Elm Ave.<br />

and 60,000 west of Truman Rd.<br />

At the Missouri River during the peak hours in <strong>2030</strong> it will have 10 percent of the daily traffic and<br />

a 60/40 directional split. For a six-lane road, the peak direction will have 5,100 vehicles or 1,700<br />

vehicles per lane. Converting to pcphpl gives 1,800. Table 10 and a 60-mph speed limit indicates<br />

LOS D with moderate congestion. From Rt. 94 through the Elm Ave. and west to I-70 it remains<br />

a six-lane freeway and volumes drop resulting in a better LOS C with no congestion.<br />

One item of note is the fact that some traffic from I-70 finds Rt. 370 a useful bypass eliminating the<br />

need for travel on highly congestion I-70. This is especially true for vehicles traveling to and from<br />

the north part of <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> or through the region and wanting to avoid traveling through<br />

downtown <strong>St</strong>. Louis. It also is greatly used if there is an incident on I-70 that causes any disturbance<br />

in traffic flow. At these times volumes can be much higher and the congestion can be quite acute.<br />

C-2.2. Expressways<br />

As noted previously, traffic flow on an expressway differs considerably from that of a freeway since<br />

it has at-grade intersections and many of them may be signalized depending on the road’s location.<br />

The HCM recognizes this difference and the analysis of the following expressways follows that of<br />

the HCM. Table 11 in Chapter III provides the LOS values for these expressways.<br />

106


U.S. 61<br />

Volumes on this four-lane road have been increasing steadily with the growth in Lincoln <strong>County</strong>.<br />

This will continue well into the future and by <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to reach 50,000 per day<br />

at the county line. During the peak hours it will carry 10 percent of these volumes and a 60/40<br />

directional split. This equates to 3,000 vehicles on the two lanes in the high direction of travel or<br />

1,500 per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,600 vehicles. Using Table 11 from Chapter III and a<br />

60 mph speed limit, this equates to LOS D. The road will operate with minor congestion during the<br />

peak hours. Close to I-70 daily volumes will rise to about 60,000 on the four lanes and congestion<br />

will increase with LOS approaching E. The ramps to and from I-70 will also add to this congestion.<br />

U.S. 67<br />

Volumes on this road have remained level over the last few years and are not expected to increase<br />

substantially in the future. The <strong>2030</strong> forecast indicates volumes will reach 34.000. The peak hours<br />

will be about 12 percent of the daily volume and have a 65/35 directional split. This equals 2,700<br />

vehicles on the two lanes or 1,350 per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,450 and from Table 11<br />

indicates the road will operate with no congestion at LOS C.<br />

C-2.3. Principal Arterials<br />

This classification includes a large number of the major roads in the county including both MoDOT<br />

and county roads. As explained in Chapter III, the present LOS on these roads was determined by<br />

reviewing their peak hour traffic volumes, operating conditions, including their physical<br />

characteristics, average speeds, number of signalized intersections and their LOS. These data were<br />

used as reference for making estimates of future LOS based on forecasted traffic volumes,<br />

committed roadway improvements, estimates of future speeds, and other relevant data. Each of<br />

these roads is discussed below.<br />

Rt. 79<br />

The section of Rt. 79 from Lincoln <strong>County</strong> south to Rt. M is classified as a Minor Arterial road.<br />

However, it is discussed here for continuity. From Rt. M to I-70 it is a Principal Arterial road.<br />

Traffic on this route has continued to rise as population in the northern part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

and in adjoining Lincoln <strong>County</strong> has grown. This trend will continue in the future according to<br />

population and employment projections. By the year <strong>2030</strong> the road is expected to carry about<br />

18,000 vehicles just south of Lincoln <strong>County</strong>, up from 13,000 in 2004. Average peak hour travel<br />

speeds will drop from the mid 40's to below 30 mph. Present day peak hour traffic is operating at<br />

LOS C to D at the two signalized intersections. It is expected that more intersections will be<br />

signalized and these side roads will carry higher volumes. This will lower their LOS to E.<br />

Congestion will be serious during the peak hours for both directions of traffic on the two lane<br />

section.<br />

On the four lane section north of I-70 volumes are expected to rise to 27,000, a substantial increase<br />

over the 20,000 experienced today. Long backups and delays can be expected during all the peak<br />

hours for northbound traffic where it necks down to two lanes. The back ups will be much more<br />

serious than what is experienced today and the LOS will drop to F or over the capacity of the road.<br />

Congestion will also increase for southbound traffic especially in the morning peak hour as traffic<br />

107


passes through the signal of the north ramps of I-70 and negotiates the eastbound on ramp. The<br />

interchange will operate at capacity or LOS E. A corridor study is included in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> for this<br />

road which may lead to improvements that will relieve these serious congestion problems.<br />

Rt. 94<br />

Parts of Rt. 94 are Minor Arterial and Major Collector roads. They are discussed in their appropriate<br />

sections later.<br />

The Rt. 94 sections that are designated as Principal Arterials have been divided into a number of<br />

segments as each one is quite different from the other. The section from Rt. 370 through the city<br />

of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to Kingshighway is basically a two-lane street and will have only minor increases in<br />

traffic by <strong>2030</strong> as this area is not growing. It will average between 8,000 and 10,000 vehicles per<br />

day. The characteristics of the streets are not expected to change much and since it is presently<br />

operating at LOS D it is expected to remain that way.<br />

From Kingshighway to I-70 it becomes a five-lane road with a number of signalized intersections<br />

and traffic is expected to increase slightly to 28,000 by <strong>2030</strong> due to additional development in the<br />

area. At the <strong>West</strong> Clay <strong>St</strong>. intersection it may reach LOS E during the peak hours as this intersection<br />

is presently operating near capacity. The operation of the new I-70 interchange will help increase<br />

traffic flow on this segment.<br />

From I-70 south to Rt. 364, Rt. 94 is a four-lane divided road with auxiliary lanes between signals<br />

and has high volumes of traffic. By <strong>2030</strong> these volumes are expected to increase to 66,000. The<br />

new I-70/Rt. 94 interchange will greatly contribute to this additional traffic. Five signalized<br />

intersections exist in this segment and volumes on the side streets will be increasing. The LOS of<br />

the signals will be the controlling factor and it is expected that they will all be operating at capacity<br />

during the peak hours. Backups will extend for some distance from each intersection, possibly from<br />

one intersection into the next, and the peak hours will be extended. As a result, the road will operate<br />

at LOS F with demand in excess of its capacity.<br />

The section of Rt. 94 from Rt. 364 west to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. will have been converted to Rt. 364<br />

by <strong>2030</strong> and has been discussed above under freeways.<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64, Rt. 94 will be a four-lane divided road with many traffic signals.<br />

Volumes are expected to rise to 55,000 west of Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and increase to 60,000 east of<br />

I-64. Most of the signals will be operating at capacity during the peak hours with backups extending<br />

for some distance. The peak hour periods will increase. The road will be operating at LOS F with<br />

demand greater than its capacity.<br />

Rt. K<br />

The analysis of forecasted traffic on this road has been divided into two sections. The northern<br />

section from I-70 to Rt. N has the most commercial development and signalized intersections.<br />

Volumes are expected to increase to 68,000 between I-70 and Mexico Rd. and to 55,000 between<br />

Mexico Rd. and Rt. N by <strong>2030</strong>. The road is presently operating at capacity south of I-70, at Mexico<br />

Rd., and at Rt. N during the peak hours. With higher volumes forecasted, it can be expected that<br />

congestion will worsen and traffic demand will be in excess of the intersection’s capacity at LOS<br />

F. Demand at the major intersections will cause serious backups that will affect all the other<br />

108


signalized intersections along the road. This will cause all of them to operate at capacity, LOS E.<br />

The peak hours will be extended and exist for most of the day. This section of Rt. K will have some<br />

of the worst congestion that can be expected in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

From Rt. N to I-64 commercial development will increase and a considerable amount of residential<br />

development will continue to the east and west. Volumes will increase from 35,000 to close to<br />

50,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. More intersections will be signalized and congestion will increase substantially.<br />

Since some of the intersections are now operating at LOS D, it can be expected that they will all<br />

operate upwards of their capacity LOS E, and some beyond, LOS F, by that time. Serious<br />

congestion can be expected at many intersections during the peak hours and these hours will be<br />

expanded.<br />

It has been recommended in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> that a corridor study be conducted by MoDOT to evaluate<br />

possible ways of alleviating future traffic congestion on Rt. K. With severe congestion forecasted<br />

for the northern section and serious congestion expected on the southern part, it is only appropriate<br />

that this study is conducted for its entire length from I-70 to I-64.<br />

Rt. M<br />

This road runs through the middle of old downtown O’Fallon as Main <strong>St</strong>. from I-70 north to Rt. P.<br />

It carries about 6,000 vehicles in downtown and these volumes are not expected to increase much.<br />

On the north end between Rt. P and Rt. 79 volumes are around 4,000 and will increase to 7,000 as<br />

the area develops. Both sections will operate at LOS D with some congestion.<br />

C-2.4. Minor Arterials<br />

This classification includes a number of MoDOT roads and many major county roads. In some parts<br />

of the county traffic on these roads has already increased substantially as they are in areas that are<br />

growing rapidly. Some are starting to reach a level where congestion is becoming a problem.<br />

Rt. 94<br />

From Rt. B to Rt. 370 commercial and residential development is expected to increase along the<br />

corridor. By <strong>2030</strong> traffic volumes are expected to reach more than 22,000. The two lane road will<br />

be widened at new signalized intersections to better handle turning movements. However, overall<br />

speed on this two-mile section will decrease and the intersections will operate close to capacity.<br />

Congestion will be serious during the peak hours and the road is designated at LOS E. Although<br />

improvements are noted in the Illustrative Projects listing in Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, they do not mention<br />

widening. This road will need widening to three or four lanes based on expected growth in the area.<br />

From this segment to I-64, Rt. 94 is a Principal Arterial and has been discussed above. From I-64<br />

west to Rt. D, it is two lanes and traffic volumes will grow to about 16,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. This section<br />

only has two traffic signals, one at Rt. D and the other at the south frontage Rd. of I-64. They are<br />

expected to operate at LOS D as is the road.<br />

South of Rt. D, Rt. 94 remains a two-lane road and volumes only increase slightly. Although minor<br />

growth is expected in this area, the terrain is such that a substantial increase is not expected. By<br />

<strong>2030</strong> volumes will rise from 3,000 to 4,000 near Rt. F. The LOS will remain the same at C.<br />

109


Rt. A<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to U.S. 61 and serves the General Motors plant and other<br />

industrial development. Growth in residential and commercial development in the corridor has been<br />

slow and is not expected to increase substantially by <strong>2030</strong>. Some residential development may<br />

occur to the north and this traffic may find its way to Rt. A. Also, some traffic from U.S. 61 and the<br />

northwest part of Wentzville may find it convenient to access I-70. By <strong>2030</strong> traffic volumes are<br />

expected to grow to around 18,000. Some signals exist at entrances to the GM plant and some<br />

others may be installed but they and the road will operate at LOS C.<br />

Rt. N<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K this two-lane road is forecasted to handle around 15,000 per day.<br />

Some intersection improvements are planned and traffic will continue to operate at LOS D. The<br />

forecasted volumes could drop slightly if the planned Rt. 364 freeway is built.<br />

From Rt. K to I-64 volumes are forecasted at around 30,000. However, should Rt. 364 be<br />

completed, this traffic will move to the new road. If not, traffic from Rt. K to Bates Rd. will be split<br />

between the old Rt. N and the new south outer road of Rt. 364. These roads will both operate at<br />

LOS D during the peak hours with congestion at major intersections. <strong>West</strong> of Bryan Rd., Rt. N will<br />

be three lanes and additional volumes will be handled at LOS D.<br />

Additional improvements are planned for Rt. N through the proposed I-64/Rt. 364 interchange.<br />

Some have been completed at this time and others may come later if Rt. 364 is built. The area<br />

around the interchange has grown with major commercial development that is expected to continue<br />

in the future. The new and proposed road improvements serving the area should be able to handle<br />

traffic generated by this development at LOS D.<br />

<strong>West</strong> of I-64 to Rt. Z, Rt. N is forecasted to have 22,000 vehicles by <strong>2030</strong>. Many of the major<br />

intersections will be signalized. This section may be widened to three lanes as it is on the<br />

“illustrative” list in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> since the area is growing so rapidly. With growth expected in this<br />

area of the <strong>County</strong>, three lanes may not be sufficient. Should four or five lane widening be<br />

completed, the road will be able to handle the volumes at LOS D. If not, serious congestion can be<br />

expected. New signalized intersections will have to be designed to handle the additional volumes.<br />

Even with widening, the road will operate at LOS D with congestion at the major intersections.<br />

Rt. Z<br />

From I-70 to Rt. N, traffic on this road has been increasing with all the residential development in<br />

the area. It is expected to continue in the future. By <strong>2030</strong> volumes will increase from 11,000 to<br />

20,000. Widening of the road to three lanes is listed in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> as an “Illustrative” project.<br />

Should it be built, it will be able to handle forecasted volumes at LOS D. Some intersections will<br />

be signalized and they also will operate at LOS D. Congestion can be expected all along this road.<br />

C-2.5. Major Collectors<br />

These roads mainly serve adjacent areas and include some MoDOT roads and many county roads.<br />

Congestion generally is not a problem. Major roads with higher forecasted volumes are discussed<br />

below and others with lower volumes have been grouped together.<br />

110


Rt. 94<br />

The section of Rt. 94 from U.S. 67 at <strong>West</strong> Alton to Rt. B at Boschertown is a two-lane road with<br />

low volumes, averaging around 3,500, and it is not expected to increase much by <strong>2030</strong>. It’s LOS<br />

will remain the same at B.<br />

Rt. N<br />

From Rt. Z to Rt. T this road serves mainly a rural area. Some residential development is occurring,<br />

from Rt. Z to the west, and is expected to continue in the future. By <strong>2030</strong> it is expected that traffic<br />

volumes will increase from an average of 4,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day. The road should operate<br />

at LOS C and only a few local road intersections will become a concern.<br />

Rt. P<br />

Traffic on this road has been growing considerably with residential development occurring all along<br />

its length from Rt. M to U.S. 61. By <strong>2030</strong> it is expected to carry 16,000 vehicles, up from about<br />

8,000 at this time. Some signals may be installed at major intersection, however, they should be<br />

designed with these forecasts in mind and have adequate lanes. They may operate at LOS D during<br />

the peak hours and so will parts of the road. The most serious parts will be close to Rt. M on the east<br />

and U.S. 61 on the west.<br />

Rts. B, C, D, F, H, J, T, W, Y, and DD<br />

These roads are all in rural parts of the county and will not be affected much by the growth of the<br />

county and in traffic volumes. One exception could be the section of Rt. DD from I-64 southwest.<br />

This section of the road is adjacent to the I-64/Winghaven Blvd. interchange and the development<br />

that is occurring in this area. It is quite possible that growth may spread southwest along the road<br />

as demand for other types of commercial and residential development grows in close proximity to<br />

I-64. In addition, more residential development could occur in the New Melle area which is at the<br />

junction of Rt. D and Rt. Z. This could cause increased traffic on the roads in these areas.<br />

C-3. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions on <strong>County</strong> Roads<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> traffic volume forecasts for major county roads are also shown on Figures 7, 8, and 9.<br />

The forecasts were developed from traffic counts acquired from a number of sources including the<br />

county, many of the cities, and counts made by consultants. These data were used with some<br />

discretion as they were not factored to represent Average Daily Traffic counts like those produced<br />

by MoDOT. The growth rates of forecasted traffic were based on the population and employment<br />

forecasts in each road’s area. Particular attention was paid to Principal Arterial roads and some<br />

Minor Arterials. Forecasts were not made for roads with lower functional classifications due to a<br />

lack of data. The county’s transportation department is presently developing a system for collecting<br />

traffic counts on all county roads so they can develop their own forecasts. The roads are discussed<br />

below from east to west with only an indication of the degree of congestion that can be anticipated<br />

rather than assigning a specific LOS. Roads with lower traffic volumes that are not expected to have<br />

congestion problems in the future were not discussed.<br />

C-3.1. Principal Arterials<br />

Principal Arterial county roads are mainly multi-lane roads that were upgraded for some time and<br />

serve areas that are mostly developed. The following discussion of each road describes expectations<br />

111


of future travel conditions. Some minor arterial roads are included in the discussion of Principal<br />

Arterials as they provide continuity to the major road system.<br />

Truman Rd. I-70 to Rt. 370<br />

This road carried 7,500 vehicles north of Ehlmann Rd. in 2005. It is expected that growth in this<br />

corridor will continue because of its close proximity to I-70 and Rt. 370. By <strong>2030</strong> it is expected that<br />

volumes will increase to about 12,000. The road has five lanes and a number of signals that are<br />

operating below their capacity. A number of signals may be added by the forecast date as the area<br />

grows. However, the road should be able to handle forecasted volumes with only minor congestion<br />

during the peak hours.<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. to Rt. 94.<br />

Jungermann Rd. has higher volumes on the north end near Mexico Rd. that decrease southward until<br />

it gets close to Rt. 94. This is a very stable area that is not expected to grow very much. Forecasts<br />

indicate a modest increase by <strong>2030</strong> to 34,000 south of Mexico Rd. and 26,000 north of what will be<br />

Rt. 364. This five-lane road will handle these volumes with congestion reasonably close to what is<br />

being experienced today. Some signalized intersections may be operating close to capacity during<br />

the peak hours with substantial congestion.<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. to Jungermann Rd.<br />

This section of Mexico Rd. has the highest volumes, around 32,000 in 2005. The area is reasonably<br />

stable except for the possibility of additional commercial development on both sides just west of<br />

Jungermann Rd. It is a five-lane road with numerous signals which are all working at capacity<br />

during the peak hours. Forecasts indicate the volumes will rise slightly over the coming years and<br />

reach 35,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. It is expected the congestion will increase slightly but will only result in a<br />

slight spreading of the peak hours.<br />

Mexico Rd. Jungermann Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

Mexico Rd. remains five-lanes through this section. It carried about 21,000 in 2005 and the area is<br />

reasonably stable. Forecasted volumes are only expected to rise slightly with the normal growth of<br />

traffic volumes and reach about 24,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. The road will be able to handle these volumes<br />

without any additional traffic congestion.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 to Mexico Rd.<br />

This five-lane section, of Mid Rivers Mall Dr., passes through a very high area of commercial<br />

development that generated high traffic volumes, around 35,000 in 2005. The major generator is<br />

Mid Rivers Mall and other development in the area and through traffic account for the high volumes.<br />

There are five signalized intersections and they all are operating at capacity during the peak hours.<br />

It is expected that by <strong>2030</strong> volumes will rise slightly to around 38,000 from a general increase in<br />

traffic volumes. However, the area is fairly well developed. It is expected that the future increases<br />

will cause severe congestion with backups extending from one signal into another. Traffic on the<br />

side streets may increase also which will add to the congestion. It does not appear possible to build<br />

any capacity adding features, therefore, the county should undertake a study to insure that all signal<br />

coordination and optimization measures are implemented to insure the best flow of future traffic<br />

through the area.<br />

112


Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Mexico Rd. to Willott Rd.<br />

This section of the road will have a minor increase in traffic by <strong>2030</strong> as this part of the county<br />

experiences additional residential development. Volumes are expected to rise from 28,000 in 2005<br />

to 32,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. Congestion will increase but the five-lane road should be able to handle the<br />

volumes and operate close to capacity with some congestion occurring during the peak hours.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Willott Rd. to Central School Rd.<br />

This five-lane section will have an increase in traffic from 18,000 in 2005 to about 32,000 in <strong>2030</strong>.<br />

Growth will continue along this corridor and contribute to this increase. There are a number of<br />

signals now and additional ones may be built. They presently handle traffic without serious<br />

congestion and it is expected that the road will operate with minor congestion during the peak hours<br />

in the future.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr Central School Rd. to Rt. 94.<br />

Traffic volume on this section of five-lane road has increased substantially in the past few years as<br />

adjacent commercial development has grown. Also, residential development in the area has grown<br />

dramatically adding to these traffic volumes. It is expected that volumes will rise from the current<br />

20,000 to close to 30,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. The traffic signals and the road will be operating close to<br />

capacity with serious congestion.<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Salt Lick Rd.<br />

This section of Mexico Rd. is five lanes and had about 23,000 vehicles per day in 2005. Volumes<br />

are expected to rise over the coming years to 26,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. A number of signals along its length<br />

are presently operating with minor congestion during the peak hours and this trend will continue.<br />

By <strong>2030</strong> congestion will increase slightly but the road will still operate below its capacity.<br />

Mexico Rd. Salt Lick Rd. to Rt. K.<br />

Mexico Rd. in this segment is four and five lanes and has less volume than other sections but they<br />

are increasing. Year 2005 had 18,000 and this number will rise to about 26,000 in <strong>2030</strong>. There is<br />

very little congestion now but by <strong>2030</strong> there will be some minor congestion at major intersections.<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K to Bryan Rd. (A Minor Arterial)<br />

This section is four and five lanes and presently carries about 16,000. By <strong>2030</strong> these volumes will<br />

rise to 22,000. The major intersections are not presently congested and it is expected that by the<br />

forecast year they will have some minor congestion.<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 to Rt. N. (A minor Arterial)<br />

Bryan Rd. has been rebuilt and upgraded since 2000. It is now a five-lane major road from a full<br />

diamond interchange at I-70 and has turning lanes at all major signalized intersections. In 2005 it<br />

carried 28,000 vehicles with minor congestion during some of the peak hours. It is anticipated that<br />

by <strong>2030</strong> volumes will increase to 36,000. It will have serious congestion at the major intersections<br />

during the peak hours and they will be operating at capacity.<br />

113


Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N to I-64.<br />

Winghaven Blvd. is an extension of Bryan Rd. south to I-64. However, it was built as a parkway<br />

with a grassed center median and left turn lanes at major intersections. Commercial development<br />

has been built around the Rt. N intersection and along part of its length. At I-64, MasterCard<br />

anchors the interchange with considerable other development including a hospital and a number of<br />

strip commercial developments on both sides of the road. In 2005 traffic volumes were around<br />

15,000. It is expected that by <strong>2030</strong> volumes will reach about 26,000. The intersections are presently<br />

operating with only minor congestion during the peak hours but this congestion will increase over<br />

the years. However, future volumes will stay within the roads capacity and it should operate with<br />

modest congestion during the peak hours.<br />

Wentzville Pkwy. I-70 to U.S. 61. (A Minor Arterial)<br />

This five-lane road is currently operating without any congestion except for the area just north of<br />

I-70 past Pearce Blvd. Through this area to north of Meyer Rd. considerable commercial<br />

development has grown on both sides of the road and a number of new traffic signals have been<br />

installed. The I-70 interchange has been upgraded with additional traffic lanes and an improved<br />

traffic signal system. The road carried close to 18,000 vehicles in 2005 and it is expected that this<br />

number will increase to 25,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. Congestion will start to be a problem along the section<br />

from I-70 through Pearce Blvd. north toward Meyers Rd. The intersection of Pearce Blvd. is<br />

expected to operate at capacity.<br />

On the section from Meyers Rd., which is in the northwest corner of the Parkway, east to U.S. 61,<br />

it remains a five-lane road but volumes, which are presently around 7,000, will be about 15,000 in<br />

<strong>2030</strong>. Some intersections may be signalized and they will operate without any congestion problems.<br />

C-3.2. Minor Arterial Roads<br />

Most of the county’s Minor Arterial roads are presently operating without any severe congestion.<br />

Many of them have been improved from old two lane roads with poor grades into three, four, or five<br />

lane roads with improved alignment. This provides more capacity and safer roads. Many old roads<br />

are scheduled for similar improvements. Over the years traffic volumes on many of these roads will<br />

increase, especially in the parts that will continue to experience significant growth. However, the<br />

increases will be small and not dramatically change their traffic operations, especially those that<br />

have been improved. The ones where traffic increases may be a problem are discussed below.<br />

Elm Ave. From Rt. 370 through Elm Point Rd. has been widened to five lanes and is carrying<br />

about 18,000 vehicles. The Rt. 370 interchange is responsible for generating these volumes.<br />

Commercial development lines the corridor and the road feeds traffic to and from Elm Point Rd.<br />

which has considerable development, and into the old part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>. It is expected that<br />

volumes will increase by <strong>2030</strong> to around 25,000. This will cause some congestion problems at the<br />

signals but volumes will be below their capacity.<br />

Zumbehl Rd. From I-70 to Rt. 94 is expected to have an increase in traffic due to growth in the<br />

corridor. Volumes are presently around 25,000 and congestion is experienced at some of the major<br />

intersections. This congestion will grow worse in the future and by <strong>2030</strong> some intersections may<br />

have volumes close to their capacity as they rise to 33,000. This will cause congestion problems<br />

during the peak hour periods.<br />

114


Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. to Old Highway 94.<br />

This four and five-lane road handled 14,000 in 2005. This area is reasonably stable and not much<br />

additional growth is expected. Some traffic has been added due to the ramp connections of Muegge<br />

Rd. to Rt. 364 and the new bridge across the Missouri River. This traffic is generally coming from<br />

I-70 and Mexico Rd. Additional traffic can be expected in the future as congestion on I-70 increases<br />

and traffic seeks an alternative route across the Missouri River. It is forecasted that by <strong>2030</strong><br />

volumes on Muegge Rd. will reach 20,000. With four lanes it is expected that the road will operate<br />

below its capacity with only minor congestion during the peak hours.<br />

Harvester Rd. From Rt. 94 to Caulks Hill Rd. is a five-lane road and presently handles about<br />

23,000 vehicles per day. By <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to reach 28,000. It has a number of signals<br />

that operate with serious congestion during the peak hours. This will only get worse, especially with<br />

more development in the area and traffic wanting to use the new Rt. 364 freeway. It is expected that<br />

demand will exceed the road’s capacity and severe congestion will result.<br />

McClay Rd. From Jungermann Rd. to Thoele Rd. is a two-lane road and may have volumes<br />

upwards of 18,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. This could cause some capacity problems. Although development in<br />

this area is stable, it is expected that the opening of the Rt. 364 freeway could divert some traffic<br />

from the area to the north and cause some congestion problems.<br />

Spencer Rd. South of Mexico Rd. is expected to have an increase by <strong>2030</strong> that could cause some<br />

serious congestion problems. Although the road has been improved, it is expected that demand will<br />

reach close to 20,000. The signals will have volumes approaching capacity at some locations.<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 to Mexico Rd.<br />

This five-lane road has undergone substantial growth in recent years. First the road was widened<br />

and then commercial development sprang up all along its length. Today it is close to being fully<br />

developed and new residential development in the corridor has added to the traffic. Volumes are<br />

presently at 20,000 and are expected to increase to 25,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. A number of new signals have<br />

been installed and they are operating well below capacity. By <strong>2030</strong> congestion will increase but the<br />

road should operate with only minor congestion during the peak hour periods.<br />

Summary<br />

With the increase in population and employment in the county the Principal and Minor Arterial<br />

roads are going to experience an increase in traffic volumes over the next 20 years. Some of them<br />

will have a substantial increase, especially in the fast-growing parts of the county. Most of them<br />

will be able to handle the volumes without serious congestion but some will have volumes that reach<br />

the roads capacity, especially when taking into consideration signalized intersections and their<br />

capacity. The <strong>County</strong> and many of the cities will be required to continually observe their operations.<br />

All traffic operational improvements including signal optimization plans, minor capacity<br />

improvements at selected locations, and other traffic control techniques, will have to be employed<br />

to minimize anticipated congestion and insure continued smooth operation.<br />

C-4. Safety Concerns<br />

Chapter IV discussed the degree of safety provided on all transportation modes. Data for 2002,<br />

2003, and 2004 were acquired and analyzed. Measures of safety appropriate to each mode were<br />

used and safety records were described. For the major highway system, number of crashes, their<br />

115


severity, and the crash rate (crashes per vehicle miles of travel), for each road segment, were used<br />

to assess their level of safety. These assessments were straight forward and the degree of safety on<br />

all major roads was described.<br />

Attempting to forecast safety, however, becomes much more difficult. First, no data is available<br />

except that which is historical. Second, no accepted crash forecasting model has been developed<br />

that has any degree of accuracy. Third, future modes of travel, especially on the road system, has<br />

many unknowns such as the ease or difficulty of driving, safety features of the road, safety features<br />

of vehicles, and technological changes for both highway and vehicle operations. In the next twenty<br />

years these changes may have a dramatic effect on safety.<br />

Instead of attempting to forecast if their will be more or less crashes and accidents, and whether they<br />

will be more or less severe, this report discusses conditions that are expected to exist on all<br />

transportation modes and how they could affect their safety.<br />

C-4.1. The <strong>St</strong>reet and Highway System<br />

For the road and highway system some facts are known. On the positive side, many changes have<br />

been made that will tend to decrease the number of crashes and their severity. Improvements have<br />

been made to the highway system bringing old roads up to today’s design standard. They include<br />

safety features that did not previously exist. Improvements have also been made to newer roads that<br />

include specific safety features. New traffic control devices have been installed that more safely<br />

handle, advise, and direct traffic. These include improved traffic signals and traffic signal systems,<br />

better signing and pavement markings, and information message boards that alert drivers of<br />

advanced road conditions. Other technological changes that will improve traffic flow are constantly<br />

being evaluated and in the near future may be employed.<br />

On the negative side, many factors are making driving more dangerous and increase the possibility<br />

of more crashes and their severity. The number of vehicles on the roads and drivers available to use<br />

them has continued to rise and thus the amount of vehicular travel has increased every year. This<br />

is expected to continue although it will most likely taper off in the future. This causes more<br />

congestion, which in turn creates the possibility of vehicles colliding. On many roads, volumes<br />

during the peak hours have reached the road’s capacity and traffic moves in a start-stop mode. This<br />

creates conditions that tend to increase the number crashes. Drivers are not only dealing with more<br />

vehicles around them, but with other distractions. All types of technical devices have been placed<br />

in vehicles that take away the driver’s attention. These include cell phones, radios/CDs, navigation<br />

systems, and even television. Eating in vehicles has become commonplace. Other passengers can<br />

cause distractions. Along the road advertisements take the attention of drivers. Other vehicle<br />

incidents can result in distractions and at times can cause additional crashes. Drivers’ attitudes have<br />

changed due to all the demands that are placed on them and in some cases reaches what is described<br />

as driver rage. Lifestyle changes also contribute to driver behavior that in many cases can add to<br />

the potential for more crashes. All these factors add to the possibility of more crashes occurring in<br />

the future and in many cases, could increase the severity of these crashes.<br />

There are other unknowns that could either increase or decrease the degree of safety afforded travel<br />

on the highway system. Funds for improvements play a major role and its future is cloudy. Many<br />

116


states are looking at other means of funding improvements besides raising existing taxes. A<br />

public/private sector partnership is being pursued in many states. In some, the use of toll roads is<br />

increasing. The vehicle mix, or size and type of vehicles that will be on the roads, is also another<br />

unknown. All these factors play a very important role in the degree of safety that can be expected.<br />

In Chapter II of Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, safety is fully discussed including measures and initiatives that are<br />

currently being pursued. <strong>St</strong>rategies have been proposed to address and reduce future crash related<br />

problems. MODOT’s Blueprint For Safer Roadways, discusses safety in great detail and provides<br />

many strategies for improving the roadway system and the ability of persons to drive safely. The<br />

Executive Summary of this report contained in Appendix A contains a full summary of methods of<br />

improving safety on <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> roads. These two documents are used as a guide in this<br />

report for future road safety in the county.<br />

C-4.2. Railroad Safety<br />

Safety of railroads was divided into two categories in Chapter IV, the first dealing with railroad<br />

crossings and the second with the railroad lines themselves. The future of safety in the first<br />

category can be related to road and highway safety. The number of vehicles using these crossings,<br />

the number of crossing, and the number of train movements are bound to increase and with it the<br />

possibility of mishaps. Fortunately, the number of vehicles using the crossings are quite low and<br />

the incidents very small. With the continued emphasis on road and railroad safety, all measures of<br />

insuring the safety of these crossings will be implemented. Therefore, it is expected that their will<br />

be no major increase in incidents and a good chance for a decrease. Crossings that handle higher<br />

volumes of traffic have continued to be monitored and considered for grade separation by both<br />

highway departments and the railroads. This should also help to decrease future crossing crashes.<br />

For railroad operations safety, the same logic applies. Railroads have had increased activity and one<br />

could expect more safety problems. However, they too have placed high emphasis on safety and<br />

have taken measures to insure that their workers adhere to all safety regulations and instructions.<br />

It is expected that safety on railroad operations will be improved and incidents will not increase.<br />

C-4.3. Airport Safety<br />

Although activity at the two airports may increase in the future, they are expected to continue<br />

making safety improvements. Runways may be improved including better striping and taxiway<br />

markings. More and better lighting may be provided where required. Technological advances in<br />

the field of aviation may further enhance the ability of airport operators and aircraft pilots to insure<br />

the continued safety of their operations.<br />

117


118


A. Background<br />

VII. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Needs and Funding<br />

This study resulted in forecasts of future travel conditions for the year <strong>2030</strong> on all modes of<br />

transportation in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. It noted deficiencies that are expected including safety issues.<br />

This chapter describes various types of improvements that can be used to alleviate these deficiencies.<br />

Although possible improvements can easily be mentioned, funding these improvements has always<br />

been a major obstacle. As a result, not only are the improvements described, but an estimate of how<br />

costly they will be is also discussed. In most cases, the responsible agencies have many other<br />

demands for available funds and have established their own priorities. This has been recognized in<br />

this report.<br />

B. The Major Highway System<br />

For some time it has been recognized that building enough roads to handle future traffic was not going<br />

to be possible. As a result, operating and managing the road system most efficiently came to the<br />

forefront. The use of advanced technologies termed Intelligent <strong>Transportation</strong> Systems (ITS) was<br />

developed in the early 1990's by many transportation agencies throughout the United <strong>St</strong>ates. Its<br />

purpose was to enhance traffic flow and safety on the major highway networks through the use of<br />

advanced technologies and improved management. They included the use of computerized traffic<br />

signals and signal systems (the interconnection of signals), advanced message boards on roadsides<br />

to advise drivers of road conditions, motorists assist programs, including roadside call boxes and<br />

emergency assist vehicles, and coordination between emergency response agencies such as police,<br />

fire, ambulance, and towing services. The ITS program adopted by the DOTs has continued today<br />

and is recognized as the most efficient and effective means of handling future congestion problems.<br />

MoDOT has expanded its ITS program by building and staffing a traffic communications center at<br />

its <strong>St</strong>. Louis office. It is operated continuously with data supplied by optical monitors and other traffic<br />

monitoring devices on all their interstate roads in the region. They are able to monitor the flow of<br />

traffic and communicate with law enforcement officials and emergency response agencies throughout<br />

the region. They have a number of permanent variable message boards that are placed at strategic<br />

locations on the highways that change messages on road conditions continuously as needed. They<br />

are constantly adding new technological improvements to detect and monitoring road conditions and<br />

enhance the operation of the system.<br />

With the above in mind, conditions described in Chapter VI were reviewed and possible<br />

improvements were considered for those roads having the worst congestion and potential safety<br />

problems. Figure 10 shows the roads that are expected to operate at LOS of E and F by <strong>2030</strong>. The<br />

improvements that could be implemented and estimates of their costs are described below. The<br />

discussion follows the functional classification of the roads. Roads that are not discussed are<br />

considered not to need any improvements, such as those with no congestion or safety problems. This<br />

excludes routine maintenance that is continuously performed.<br />

119


B-1. MoDOT Roads<br />

The following parts of this chapter describe various types of improvements that can be made to<br />

MoDOT roads. It also discusses present funding for MoDOT and the outlook for additional funds in<br />

the future.<br />

B-1.1. Interstate and Freeways<br />

I-64 will have serious congestion between Rt. N and Rt. K. It will only have two lanes in each<br />

direction and traffic forecasts indicate volumes at capacity. These forecasts are based on Rt. 364 not<br />

being completed by <strong>2030</strong>. Should that occur volumes will probably drop such that it will operate<br />

below capacity. It seems, regardless of the ultimate timing of Rt. 364, I-64 will have congestion<br />

problems. Although ITS implementation will be helpful, adding a lane in each direction is the only<br />

true way to provide for the additional volumes. This should not be a costly improvement since the<br />

road is already in place and can accommodate the widening. It will also improve the road’s safety<br />

and travel on other roads that feed traffic to it. This improvement is recommended in view of the<br />

importance of the safety and efficiency of travel on this Interstate route.<br />

I-70 presents a very serious problem due to the extent of the forecasted deficiencies. Traffic volumes<br />

are expected to be well in excess of the road’s capacity. Unfortunately, widening presents high costs,<br />

environmental and social concerns, and serious traffic problems during construction. Some minor<br />

widening could be accomplished with auxiliary lanes between interchanges. This should be<br />

considered from I-64/U.S. 61 to Bryan Rd., and from Rt. 370 to Zumbehl Rd. In addition, some<br />

interchanges could be upgraded to better handle traffic. These improvements would not only help<br />

congestion, but they would improve the roads’ safety and air quality in the region.<br />

Over the years there have been numerous discussions between MoDOT, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, and other<br />

agencies, about remedies for the congestion on I-70. Early in the planning stage of Rt. 370, a<br />

connection between it and Rt. 79 along a corridor north of old town <strong>St</strong>. Peters from about Spencer Rd.<br />

west to Rt. 79 was discussed. This concept was never pursued for many reasons. First, there was no<br />

study to support that sufficient traffic would use it to greatly relieve I-70. Second, funding for its<br />

construction and adding it to the state system was an issue. Third, there were numerous<br />

environmental concerns about building a road in this location. Although this improvement was never<br />

pursued by MoDOT, the <strong>County</strong> still is of the opinion that it would be of value.<br />

This report has discussed the severity of congestion on I-70 and how it is only going to get worse.<br />

It suggests that MoDOT consider all improvement alternatives to alleviate future congestion. The<br />

above roadway plan could possibly reduce some future traffic on I-70 between Rt. 79 and Rt. 370.<br />

Therefore, for that reason, this report recommends that a study be conducted to determine how much<br />

traffic would be diverted, any environmental concerns and other issues, and the cost-benefit of such<br />

an improvement.<br />

A new wider westbound bridge over the Missouri River presents a real challenge for MoDOT. Such<br />

an improvement would present extremely difficult construction problems and would be quite costly.<br />

120


Figure 10<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Levels of Service E and F<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

121


122


There would be very serious problems in handling traffic during construction. A study of possible<br />

improvements to this bridge would be of value. Such a study should be added to MoDOT’s list in<br />

the Council’s update of the Long Range <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

I-70 across <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> should be a high priority for MoDOT to update and improve it’s ITS<br />

process. This would include the use of additional technologies from their traffic control center<br />

including optical and other traffic monitoring mechanisms, variable message sign boards, roadside<br />

call boxes, lane control signs, motorist assist vehicles, and communications with all emergency<br />

response agencies.<br />

Rt. 364 does not present any congestion problems and could easily handle additional traffic.<br />

Completing the section from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to the I-64/Rt. N interchange should be completed<br />

as soon as possible. This will greatly help travel on I-64 and could decrease some travel on I-70 and<br />

allow other roads to operate more safely and with less congestion. Its completion would also help<br />

improve air quality in the region.<br />

Rt. 370 does not present any serious congestion problems. However, because it is a major freeway<br />

connecting two interstate routes, additional ITS improvements should be made to the road to insure<br />

that it continues to operate with the greatest efficiency. In the future a number of such ITS<br />

improvements like those described above should be implemented.<br />

B-1.2. Expressways<br />

U.S. 61 MoDOT plans improvements to this route that should adequately handle future volumes.<br />

They are included in the Legacy <strong>2030</strong> Illustrative list for improving the road to freeway standards.<br />

B-1.3. Principal Arterials<br />

Rt. 79 will need attention in the section from Rt. M to north of I-70. Widening to four lanes divided<br />

is suggested and would not be an expensive improvement or create any negative environmental<br />

problems. This will greatly improve traffic operations and its safety. The road is listed for a<br />

corridor study in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> north to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>.<br />

Rt. 94<br />

From I-70 to N. Rt. 364, this road will require ITS improvements. Some intersection improvements<br />

may be possible with additional turn lanes, but the only other practical improvements would be to<br />

optimize the signal operations. MoDOT should undertake such a study to determine hardware that<br />

may be available in the future to assist in this area.<br />

The section of Rt. 94 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64 will require capacity expansion. An<br />

additional lane in each direction should handle future traffic and improve the roads’ safety. Such<br />

an improvement should not be very expensive or create any severe inconvenience to traffic since<br />

the median has the room for this type improvement. There would be no negative environmental<br />

effects and it would enhance air quality in the region.<br />

Rt. K will require the special corridor study defined in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> to determine adjustments to<br />

traffic operations and other improvements that would better handle future traffic. The cost of this<br />

123


study should be low, however, improvements could get expensive and complicated if they require<br />

assistance or approval from adjacent property owners.<br />

B-1.4. Minor Arterials<br />

Rt. 94 from Rt. B to Rt. 370 is on the Illustrative list for improvement. Consideration should be<br />

given to widening the road from two to four or five lanes instead of just a three-lane road.<br />

Rt. N from I-64 to Rt. Z should be closely monitored to determine if the planned widening to three<br />

lanes will be sufficient. This area is experiencing substantial growth and it is expected to continue<br />

into the future. Although the forecasts do not indicate volumes in excess of capacity, they are quite<br />

marginal. Depending on how fast growth continues, the three lane road proposed may not be<br />

sufficient and a four or five lane facility may be needed.<br />

Rt. Z from I-70 to Rt. N is another road that should be monitored closely by MoDOT. Growth in<br />

this part of the county has been very high and could easily exceed forecasts. Should volumes<br />

increase over the ones predicted, the road will exceed its capacity and need to be widened to four<br />

or five lanes instead of just three.<br />

B-1.5. Major Collectors<br />

Rt. P is a road whose growth is unpredictable. Should development continue beyond expectations<br />

the road will need widening over what is presently considered by MoDOT. Traffic volumes should<br />

be closely monitored in future years.<br />

A number of rural MoDOT roads have poor safety records. Although specific ones have not been<br />

identified, the chapter on safety clearly pointed out that the severity rates on rural roads are normally<br />

higher than on suburban and urban ones. Traffic volumes should be carefully monitored as well as<br />

crash prone locations, those with poor horizontal and vertical alignment and limited sight distances.<br />

Proposed new entrances or side roads should be carefully checked to insure that they are not placed<br />

in locations that present additional hazards.<br />

B-1.6. Future MoDOT Funding<br />

Many of MoDOT’s projects described in this report can be expected to have reasonably high cost<br />

and probably will be beyond their present funding capability. This is based on state-wide and<br />

regional demands and priorities. Funds for new projects are quickly declining as a percent of total<br />

funds compared to funds that are needed to simply maintain the existing system. MoDOT has been<br />

examining ways of increasing present funding, but like many other DOTs and transportation<br />

authorities, they have found new sources hard to acquire. Future funds will not be able to keep up<br />

with future needs. Other means of funding transportation improvements may have to be considered<br />

in order to meet the ever increasing demand for road and street travel.<br />

B-2. <strong>County</strong> Roads<br />

B-2.1. Principal Arterials<br />

Most of the county’s principal arterial roads have been widened to four and five lanes. New traffic<br />

signals and other equipment have been installed to upgrade existing facilities. However, in many<br />

124


cases traffic is continuing to increase and current controls are becoming inadequate. The county,<br />

with the help of the many municipalities, should continue to improve on its data collecting<br />

procedures. Current traffic volumes and crash data are needed to continually monitor the<br />

effectiveness of the system and assess future needs. This includes communication with and the<br />

efficiency uses of emergency vehicles. <strong>County</strong> roads that interface with MoDOT roads should be<br />

fully coordinated and integrated with theirs to reduce side effects from adjacent traffic problems.<br />

One major road that is going to need continued monitoring is Mid Rivers Mall Dr. between I-70 and<br />

Mexico Rd. This section of the road is presently operating with serious congestion during the peak<br />

hours and there is no room for expanding capacity. ITS type improvements are the only means of<br />

influencing and assisting traffic in this area. Because it is directly connected to I-70 and a potential<br />

growth area to the north, it will require special attention by county and municipal authorities.<br />

A major road that has ranked the top of the crash rating numbers is Mexico Rd. from Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. to Rt. K. Because this road ranks every crash rating list, it deserves special attention.<br />

B-2.2. Minor Arterials<br />

As noted in chapter VI, most county minor arterials are operating with no serious problems. This<br />

could be an over simplification as so many parts of the county are growing and volumes are rising<br />

quite quickly. Close monitoring of future congestion and safety problems will have to be pursued<br />

by county and municipal authorities to insure that the roads continue to operate safely and<br />

efficiently.<br />

B-2.3. Major Collectors<br />

The county’s major collector roads are closely monitored by the <strong>County</strong>’s <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Department. They make decisions on how best to spend available funds for needed improvements.<br />

B-2.4. <strong>County</strong> Road Summary<br />

The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> Department and the public works department’s of all the<br />

municipalities are effectively using available funds designated for road and street improvements.<br />

Each agency has its own source of funding and additional funds are provided by the ½ cent<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Sales Tax, through a project selection process based on recommendations of the<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Board and approval of the <strong>County</strong> Executive and <strong>County</strong> Council. More<br />

major funding for road improvements come from federal funds. Projects are submitted to the<br />

Council for inclusion in the Council’s TIP and funds are provided from various federal funding<br />

categories through the current Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, SAFETEA-LU. This practice is expected<br />

to continue into the future. However, due to the fast pace of growth in the <strong>County</strong>, additional funds<br />

at all levels may be required to keep pace with the growing road improvement needs.<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Public transportation services that presently exist in the county are limited. As previously noted in<br />

Chapter III, future funds for fixed route transit or light rail transit are presently nonexistent due to<br />

the lack of a funding source in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. This could change in future years depending on<br />

125


public decisions, and does not mean that there is not a need. On the contrary, as the county’s<br />

population grows and matures, the need for public transportation continues to increase, especially<br />

with a growing and aging population.<br />

The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit Authority had a report prepared by the Council in the mid 1990's that<br />

was updated in 2001 (see Chapter III) dealing with the needs and possibility of providing fixed route<br />

transit. An update of that report has been requested by the <strong>County</strong> and the Council intends to<br />

undertake this update in 2007. It will once again review the needs and possibility of the county<br />

providing fixed route transit and what it may cost. Funding will once again be the major issue as<br />

it will require a vote of the county’s residents to provide specific funding for that purpose.<br />

Paratransit service has always been mainly a privately funded form of transportation for the elderly,<br />

poor, and disabled part of the community. MoDOT, through their public transportation department,<br />

and federal funds, provided from various programs handled by the Council, provided some<br />

additional funds. The number of people requiring such services has continued to grow while the<br />

amount of private and public funding has continued to shrink. The demand for these services has<br />

always been in excess of existing funds. It is expected that the future will not be too bright in<br />

supplying additional funds either from private sources, the state of Missouri, or the federal<br />

government. This will result in simply more persons going without transportation service to<br />

medical, shopping, or other types of needed activities. It will be left to others, relatives, friends, etc.,<br />

to provide these transportation services to this segment of the population. The completion of the<br />

updated report in 2007 by the Council may be helpful in more clearly defining these issues.<br />

D. Railroad Projects<br />

The need for funding future railroad improvements almost lies solely with the railroads. Some road<br />

improvements involving railroad crossings or grade separations, are funded, at least partially, by the<br />

<strong>County</strong>, MoDOT, or the private sector. Using safety data for the roads appears to be the best<br />

barometer of where additional railroad crossing improvements should be made. These are discussed<br />

in Chapter IV. However, there are a number of at-grade crossings that are in close proximity to<br />

major roads. These include the crossing on Guthrie Rd. just north of the I-70/Lake Saint Louis Blvd.<br />

interchange, Mid Rivers Rivers Mall Dr. just north of the I-70 interchange, and Rt. M (Main <strong>St</strong>.) in<br />

O’Fallon. Back-ups in traffic caused by slow and long trains at these locations extend at times well<br />

back into the high volume interchanges causing serious congestion and can extend further into traffic<br />

flow on I-70. This introduces a very high crash prone situation. These locations should be<br />

continually monitored by MoDOT, the <strong>County</strong>, and the railroads, and when deemed appropriate,<br />

grade separations should be constructed.<br />

The railroads have constantly been improving their facilities as this most competitive means of<br />

transportation continues strongly in the United <strong>St</strong>ates. In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, incentives can be used<br />

by the county when it involves furthering gains in the private sector. <strong>County</strong> administrators will<br />

continue this practice which will further enhance railroad investments.<br />

126


E. Aviation Projects<br />

Aviation expenditures in the future are rather limited. Some studies have been performed for the<br />

operation of the two existing airports. The county has also considered building a new airport in the<br />

far west part but to-date has not pursued this possibility. It seems that very little large expenditures<br />

on aviation can be expected in the future.<br />

F. Pipeline and Barge<br />

These two means of transportation in the county are hardly affected by any of the governing of the<br />

county. It is unlikely that little will change in these two modes in the future.<br />

127


APPENDICES


APPENDIX A<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

MISSOURI BLUEPRINT FOR SAFER ROADWAYS<br />

Missouri has lost more than 2,400 people in traffic crashes over the past two years. In addition,<br />

thousands were disabled in these tragic events during that same time period.<br />

To address this problem, the <strong>St</strong>ate is participating with the American Association of <strong>St</strong>ate Highway<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Officials (AASHTO) in a national effort to reduce these preventable tragedies.<br />

"Missouri's Blueprint for Safer Roadways" is a focused document developed by utilizing a<br />

partnership approach that outlines strong opportunities to reduce fatal and serious injuries on<br />

Missouri roadways.<br />

The Blueprint will serve as an umbrella guide to increase coordination, communication, and<br />

cooperation among state and local agencies, law enforcement, planning organizations, non-profit<br />

organizations, and other safety advocates throughout the <strong>St</strong>ate. The Missouri Coalition for Roadway<br />

Safety is charged with leading the statewide implementation effort to effectively deploy strategies<br />

outlined in the Blueprint. In addition, regional plans will be developed to address targeted crash<br />

problems in their respective areas.<br />

Prior to the development of the document, more than 150 Missouri safety partners were contacted<br />

to seek ideas and input concerning a statewide reduction goal, the document content, and successful<br />

deployment strategies. The draft document was distributed to hundreds of safety partners throughout<br />

the <strong>St</strong>ate for comment and review. As a result of these meetings and the review process, the final<br />

Blueprint was compiled and Missouri's fatality reduction goal was set at "1,000 or fewer fatalities<br />

by 2008." This is an 18.8 percent reduction from 2003.<br />

To attain this goal, the diverse safety community representing the engineering, enforcement,<br />

education, and emergency medical services areas must target their efforts and, in some cases,<br />

redirect their resources. We must invest in strategies that hold great promise for reducing both fatal<br />

and disabling injury crashes.<br />

The "Essential Eight" are strategies Missouri must implement to make significant progress in<br />

reaching the projected goal. These were identified through extensive data analysis, current research<br />

findings, and best practices.<br />

Essential Eight<br />

• Pass a Primary Safety Belt Law and Maintain and Enhance Existing Safety Laws<br />

• Increase Enforcement on Targeted Crash Corridors<br />

• Increase Public Education and Information on Traffic Safety Issues<br />

• Expand the Installation of Shoulder, Edgeline, and Centerline Rumble <strong>St</strong>rips<br />

• Expand, Improve, and Maintain Roadway Visibility Features (i.e. markings, signs, lighting)<br />

• Expand Installation of Median Three <strong>St</strong>rand Cable or Equivalent Barrier<br />

• Effectively Deter, Identify, Arrest, and Adjudicate Alcohol and Other Drug Impaired Drivers<br />

and Pedestrians<br />

• Expand Installation and Maintenance of Roadway Shoulders and Clear Zones


APPENDIX B<br />

<strong>2030</strong> TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS<br />

MoDOT ROADS ST. CHARLES COUNTY


Appendix B<br />

<strong>2030</strong> Traffic Volume Forecasts<br />

MoDOT Roads <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Route/ Existing Forecasts 2000 to 2004 2000 to 2010 2010 to 2020 2020 to <strong>2030</strong><br />

Location 2000 2004 2010 2020 <strong>2030</strong> Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent<br />

I-70 at Missouri River 190,800 165,100 180,000 200,000 210,000 -25,700 -13.5% -10,800 -5.7% 20,000 11.1% 10,000 5.0%<br />

I-70 e/o* Rt. 94 168,400 147,300 165,000 180,000 195,000 -21,100 -12.5% -3,400 -2.0% 15,000 9.1% 15,000 8.3%<br />

I-70 e/o Zumbehl Rd. 148,400 129,500 140,000 155,000 165,000 -18,900 -12.7% -8,400 -5.7% 15,000 10.7% 10,000 6.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Cave Sprgs. Rd. 128,200 125,000 130,000 145,000 155,000 -3,200 -2.5% 1,800 1.4% 15,000 11.5% 10,000 6.9%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. 370 105,000 106,200 110,000 130,000 140,000 1,200 1.1% 5,000 4.8% 20,000 18.2% 10,000 7.7%<br />

I-70 e/o Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 132,400 134,000 150,000 165,000 175,000 1,600 1.2% 17,600 13.3% 15,000 10.0% 10,000 6.1%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. 79 119,100 134,000 150,000 165,000 175,000 14,900 12.5% 30,900 25.9% 15,000 10.0% 10,000 6.1%<br />

I-70 e/o TR Hughes Dr. 98,000 114,600 125,000 145,000 155,000 16,600 16.9% 27,000 27.6% 20,000 16.0% 10,000 6.9%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. K & M 98,000 112,000 115,000 135,000 145,000 14,000 14.3% 17,000 17.3% 20,000 17.4% 10,000 7.4%<br />

I-70 e/o Bryan Rd. 80,500 95,600 95,000 115,000 125,000 15,100 18.8% 14,500 18.0% 20,000 21.1% 10,000 8.7%<br />

I-70 e/o Lake Saint Louis B. 75,400 82,000 85,000 95,000 105,000 6,600 8.8% 9,600 12.7% 10,000 11.8% 10,000 10.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. A 68,000 75,000 80,000 90,000 95,000 7,000 10.3% 12,000 17.6% 10,000 12.5% 5,000 5.6%<br />

I-70 e/o U.S. 40/61 59,500 66,400 70,000 85,000 95,000 6,900 11.6% 10,500 17.6% 15,000 21.4% 10,000 11.8%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. Z 64,000 71,400 80,000 100,000 110,000 7,400 11.6% 16,000 25.0% 20,000 25.0% 10,000 10.0%<br />

I-70 e/o Pearce Blvd. 59,200 72,200 75,000 90,000 100,000 13,000 22.0% 15,800 26.7% 15,000 20.0% 10,000 11.1%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. T 48,900 56,400 60,000 75,000 90,000 7,500 15.3% 11,100 22.7% 15,000 25.0% 15,000 20.0%<br />

I-64 at Missouri River 69,100 77,500 90,000 110,000 120,000 8,400 12.2% 20,900 30.2% 20,000 22.2% 10,000 9.1%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. K 30,200 38,200 50,000 70,000 80,000 8,000 26.5% 19,800 65.6% 20,000 40.0% 10,000 14.3%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt.DD 29,300 34,500 45,000 65,000 75,000 5,200 17.7% 15,700 53.6% 20,000 44.4% 10,000 15.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. N 28,400 31,100 42,000 55,000 65,000 2,700 9.5% 13,600 47.9% 13,000 31.0% 10,000 18.2%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Lake STL 28,400 31,100 40,000 55,000 65,000 2,700 9.5% 11,600 40.8% 15,000 37.5% 10,000 18.2%<br />

U.S. 61 s/o Lincoln Co. 30,000 32,800 37,000 45,000 50,000 2,800 9.3% 7,000 23.3% 8,000 21.6% 5,000 11.1%<br />

U.S. 61 n/o I-70 29,300 33,100 32,000 40,000 50,000 3,800 13.0% 2,700 9.2% 8,000 25.0% 10,000 25.0%<br />

U.S. 67 s/o Mississippi R. 28,300 25,800 30,000 32,000 34,000 -2,500 -8.8% 1,700 6.0% 2,000 6.7% 2,000 6.3%<br />

Rt. 79 s/o Lincoln Co. 11,900 13,300 15,000 17,000 18,000 1,400 11.8% 3,100 26.1% 2,000 13.3% 1,000 5.9%<br />

Rt. 79 n/o I-70 15,700 18,900 22,000 25,000 27,000 3,200 20.4% 6,300 40.1% 3,000 13.6% 2,000 8.0%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. J 2,900 2,700 3,000 3,200 3,400 -200 -6.9% 100 3.4% 200 6.7% 200 6.3%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. 370 12,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 4,000 33.3% 6,000 50.0% 2,000 11.1% 2,000 10.0%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o I-70 22,800 25,100 28,000 28,000 28,000 2,300 10.1% 5,200 22.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-70 50,400 56,900 60,000 64,000 66,000 6,500 12.9% 9,600 19.0% 4,000 6.7% 2,000 3.1%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. 364 45,000 47,000 50,000 56,000 64,000 2,000 4.4% 5,000 11.1% 6,000 12.0% 8,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Harvester 38,400 42,700 60,000 N/A N/A 4,300 11.2% 21,600 56.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Kisker 45,200 48,000 52,000 N/A N/A 2,800 6.2% 6,800 15.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Mid-Rivers M. Dr. 37,400 40,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 2,600 7.0% 7,600 20.3% 5,000 11.1% 5,000 10.0%


Appendix B<br />

(Continued)<br />

Route/ Existing Forecasts 2000 to 2004 2000 to 2010 2010 to 2020 2020 to <strong>2030</strong><br />

Location 2000 2004 2010 2020 <strong>2030</strong> Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent<br />

Rt. 94 n/o I-64 35,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 10,000 28.6% 15,000 42.9% 5,000 10.0% 5,000 9.1%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-64 11,500 12,500 13,500 15,000 16,000 1,000 8.7% 2,000 17.4% 1,500 11.1% 1,000 6.7%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. DD 3,000 3,000 3,200 3,400 4,000 0 0.0% 200 6.7% 200 6.3% 600 17.6%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. T 2,900 2,900 3,000 3,200 3,500 0 0.0% 100 3.4% 200 6.7% 300 9.4%<br />

Rt. 364 at Missouri R. N/A 50,000 60,000 75,000 80,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 15,000 25.0% 5,000 6.7%<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Upper Bottom N/A 45,000 54,000 67,000 70,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13,000 24.1% 3,000 4.5%<br />

Rt. 364 n/o Harvester Rd. N/A 55,000 54,000 80,000 85,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 26,000 48.1% 5,000 6.3%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Harvester Rd. N/A N/A N/A 65,000 70,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,000 7.7%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Jungermann Rd. N/A N/A N/A 60,000 65,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,000 8.3%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Central School N/A N/A N/A 55,000 60,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,000 9.1%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Kisker Rd. N/A N/A N/A 50,000 60,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 20.0%<br />

Rt. 364 n/o Mid R. Mall Dr. N/A N/A N/A 50,000 60,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 20.0%<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Mid R. Mall Dr. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Rt. K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Bryan Rd. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 370 at Missouri R. 58,000 61,000 70,000 80,000 85,000 3,000 5.2% 12,000 20.7% 10,000 14.3% 5,000 6.3%<br />

Rt. 370 e/o Elm <strong>St</strong>. 57,500 60,000 66,000 75,000 75,000 2,500 4.3% 8,500 14.8% 9,000 13.6% 0 0.0%<br />

Rt. 370 w/o Elm <strong>St</strong>. 57,100 58,800 59,000 68,000 65,000 1,700 3.0% 1,900 3.3% 9,000 15.3% -3,000 -4.4%<br />

Rt. 370 n/o I-70 50,000 51,500 56,000 63,000 60,000 1,500 3.0% 6,000 12.0% 7,000 12.5% -3,000 -4.8%<br />

Rt. K s/o I-70 35,000 45,000 60,000 65,000 68,000 10,000 28.6% 25,000 71.4% 5,000 8.3% 3,000 4.6%<br />

Rt. K n/o Rt. N 20,000 30,000 43,000 48,000 55,000 10,000 50.0% 23,000 115.0% 5,000 11.6% 7,000 14.6%<br />

Rt. K s/o Rt. N 15,000 25,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 10,000 66.7% 20,000 133.3% 5,000 14.3% 5,000 12.5%<br />

Rt. K n/o U.S. 40/61 11,400 20,000 28,000 35,000 40,000 8,600 75.4% 16,600 145.6% 7,000 25.0% 5,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. N w/o Mid R. Mall Dr. * 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 13,000 2,000 33.3% 4,000 66.7% 2,000 20.0% 1,000 8.3%<br />

Rt. N e/o Rt. K 11,700 13,600 16,000 18,000 17,000 1,900 16.2% 4,300 36.8% 2,000 12.5% -1,000 -5.6%<br />

Rt. N w/o Rt. K 10,400 21,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 10,600 101.9% 14,600 140.4% 5,000 20.0% 5,000 16.7%<br />

Rt. N w/o Bryan Rd. 5,000 8,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 3,000 60.0% 10,000 200.0% 5,000 33.3% 5,000 25.0%<br />

Rt. N w/o U.S. 40/61 4,500 6,600 10,000 15,000 22,000 2,100 46.7% 5,500 122.2% 5,000 50.0% 7,000 46.7%<br />

Rt. N w/o Rt. Z 3,200 3,800 5,000 8,000 12,000 600 18.8% 1,800 56.3% 3,000 60.0% 4,000 50.0%<br />

Rt. A n/o I-70 4,900 12,100 14,000 16,000 18,000 7,200 146.9% 9,100 185.7% 2,000 14.3% 2,000 12.5%<br />

Rt. A e/o U.S. 61 4,200 10,600 12,000 14,000 16,000 6,400 152.4% 7,800 185.7% 2,000 16.7% 2,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. P w/o Rt. M 7,400 9,100 12,000 14,000 16,000 1,700 23.0% 4,600 62.2% 2,000 16.7% 2,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. P e/o U.S. 61 2,500 3,300 6,000 8,000 10,000 800 32.0% 3,500 140.0% 2,000 33.3% 2,000 25.0%<br />

Rt. Z I-70 to Rt. N 7,100 11,000 17,000 18,000 20,000 3,900 54.9% 9,900 139.4% 1,000 5.9% 2,000 11.1%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!