27.08.2013 Views

St. Charles County Transportation Plan 2030 - East-West Gateway ...

St. Charles County Transportation Plan 2030 - East-West Gateway ...

St. Charles County Transportation Plan 2030 - East-West Gateway ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ST. CHARLES COUNTY<br />

TRANSPORTATION PLAN <strong>2030</strong><br />

February 2007<br />

The preparation of this document was financed in part by the United <strong>St</strong>ates Department of<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> through the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration,<br />

and the Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong>. The contents of this report reflect the opinions,<br />

findings and conclusions of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of the data herein. The<br />

contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the funding agencies. This report does<br />

not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.<br />

<strong>East</strong>-<strong>West</strong> <strong>Gateway</strong> Council of Governments<br />

One Memorial Drive<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis, Missouri 63102<br />

314-421-4220 618-274-2750 Fax: 314-231-6120<br />

Internet: sysop@ewgateway.org


<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>2030</strong><br />

Table of Contents<br />

Chapter Page<br />

I. Introduction 1<br />

A. Background 1<br />

B. The <strong>2030</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 1<br />

C. The <strong>St</strong>udy Methodology 1<br />

II. Demographics 3<br />

A. Population and Households 3<br />

B. Employment 4<br />

C. Present Land Use 6<br />

C-1. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sections 6<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 10<br />

III. The Existing <strong>Transportation</strong> System 13<br />

A. Background 13<br />

B. The Existing Major Road Network 13<br />

B-1. Highway Functional Classifications 13<br />

B-2. MoDOT Roads 17<br />

B-3. <strong>County</strong> and City Roads 17<br />

B-4. Traffic Volumes 18<br />

B-4.1. MoDOT Roads 18<br />

B-4.2. Missouri River Bridges Traffic 27<br />

B-4.3. Major <strong>County</strong> and City Roads 28<br />

B-4.4. Vehicle Miles of Travel 31<br />

B-4.5. Vehicles and Households 32<br />

B-5. Operational Conditions on Major Roads 33<br />

B-5.1. Interstates and Freeways 33<br />

B-5.2. Expressways 40<br />

B-5.3. Principal Arterials 42<br />

B-5.4. Minor Arterials 45<br />

B-5.5. Major Collectors 46<br />

B-6. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy 47<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong> 52<br />

C-1. Fixed Route Bus Service 52<br />

C-2. Paratransit Service 53<br />

C-3. Light Rail Transit 55<br />

i


Table of Contents<br />

(Continued)<br />

Chapter Page<br />

III. The Existing <strong>Transportation</strong> System (continued)<br />

D. Railroads 55<br />

E. Pipeline 55<br />

F. Aviation 56<br />

G. Barge 56<br />

IV. <strong>Transportation</strong> Safety 57<br />

A. Overview 57<br />

B. Major Road System Safety 57<br />

B-1. Number of Crashes, Severity Ratings and Crash Rates 57<br />

B-1.1. MoDOT Roads 58<br />

B-1.2. Comparison of MoDOT Roads to Region and <strong>St</strong>ate 66<br />

B-1.3. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and City Roads 66<br />

B-1.4. MoDOT and <strong>County</strong> Crash Rate Comparison 72<br />

B-2. Summary of Road Crash Data 74<br />

B-3. Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Crashes 74<br />

B-4. Deficiencies in the Crash Data Analyses 74<br />

C. Railroad Safety 75<br />

D. Airport Safety 76<br />

V. Present <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>s and <strong>St</strong>udies 77<br />

A. Background 77<br />

B. The Long Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 77<br />

B-1. Developing Future Highway Improvements 77<br />

B-2. Investment Priorities 77<br />

B-3. Illustrative Projects 78<br />

B-4. Corridor <strong>St</strong>udies 78<br />

B-5. Interstate 70 Corridor, Kansas City to <strong>St</strong>. Louis, Missouri 78<br />

C. The Short Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 79<br />

C-1. Funding Categories 79<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> TIP Projects 80<br />

. D. <strong>St</strong>ate of the <strong>Transportation</strong> System 82<br />

D-1. Mode of Travel to Work 83<br />

D-2. Crash Rating 83<br />

D-3. Other <strong>St</strong>udies 83<br />

iii


Table of Contents<br />

(Continued)<br />

Chapter Page<br />

VI. Future <strong>Transportation</strong> Conditions 85<br />

A. Background 85<br />

B. Demographics 85<br />

B-1. Population and Household Forecasts 85<br />

B-2. Employment Forecasts 86<br />

B-3. Vehicle and Household Forecasts 88<br />

C. Highway Travel 89<br />

C-1. Traffic Forecasting Methodology 89<br />

C-2. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions<br />

On MoDOT Roads 90<br />

C-2.1. Interstate and Freeways 90<br />

C-2.2. Expressways 103<br />

C-2.3. Principal Arterials 103<br />

C-2.4. Minor Arterials 106<br />

C-2.5. Major Collectors 107<br />

C-3. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions<br />

On <strong>County</strong> Roads 108<br />

C-3.1. Principal Arterials 108<br />

C-3.2. Minor Arterials 111<br />

C-4. Safety Concerns 113<br />

C-4.1. The <strong>St</strong>reet and Highway System 113<br />

C-4.2. Railroad Safety 114<br />

C-4.3. Airport Safety 114<br />

VII. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Needs and Funding 115<br />

A. Background 115<br />

B. The Major Highway System 115<br />

B-1. MoDOT Roads 118<br />

B-1.1. Interstates and Freeways 118<br />

B-1.2. Expressways 119<br />

B-1.3. Principal Arterials 119<br />

B-1.4. Minor Arterials 120<br />

B-1.5. Major Collectors 120<br />

B-1.6. Future MoDOT Funding 120<br />

B-2. <strong>County</strong> Roads 121<br />

B-2.1. Principal Arterials 121<br />

iv


Table of Contents<br />

(Continued)<br />

Chapter Page<br />

VII. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Needs and Funding (Continued)<br />

B-2.2. Minor Arterials 121<br />

B-2.3. Major Collectors 121<br />

B-2.4. <strong>County</strong> Road Summary 121<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong> 122<br />

D. Railroads Projects 122<br />

E.. Aviation Projects 123<br />

F. Pipeline and Barge Projects 123<br />

v


List of Tables<br />

Table Page<br />

1. Population and Households 3<br />

2. Employment Data 4<br />

3. Work Trip Destinations 5<br />

4. MoDOT Average Daily Traffic Volumes 19<br />

5. Historical Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Missouri River Bridges 28<br />

6. Missouri River Bridges Traffic Volume Changes<br />

Before and After Opening of Rt. 364 29<br />

7. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Average Daily Traffic Volumes 30<br />

8. Vehicle Miles of Travel, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> 31<br />

9. Vehicles and Households 32<br />

10. Level of Service Criteria for Freeway Segments 34<br />

11. Level of Service Criteria for Expressway Segments 41<br />

12. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy, Roads Surveyed 47<br />

13. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy, Summary of Travel Times 49<br />

14. Travel Time and Delay Data, Ranked by Delays 50<br />

15. MoDOT Highway Crash Data by Type 2002, 2003, 2004 59<br />

16. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Crashes per Mile 60<br />

17. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Severity 61<br />

18. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Crash Rates 63<br />

19. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Crash Rates 64<br />

20. MoDOT Highway Crash Data, Ranked by Severity Crash Rates 65<br />

21. MoDOT <strong>County</strong>, Region, <strong>St</strong>ate, Crash Rate Comparison 66<br />

22. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data by Type, 2002, 2003, 2004 68<br />

23. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data, Ranked by Crashes per Mile 69<br />

24. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data, Ranked by Severity 70<br />

25. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Crash Data, Ranked by Crash Rates 71<br />

26. Composite Crash Data, Ranked by Crash Rates 73<br />

27. 2002, 2003, 2004 Motorcycle - Bicycle - Pedestrian Crashes 74<br />

28. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, MoDOT Projects 81<br />

29. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, Local Projects 81<br />

30. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, Transit Projects 82<br />

31. Population and Household Forecasts, <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region 87<br />

32. Employment Forecasts, <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region 88<br />

33. Vehicles and Households, <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region 89<br />

vi


List of Figures<br />

Figure Page<br />

1. <strong>County</strong> Sections 7<br />

2. Roadway Functional Classification 15<br />

3. Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 21<br />

4. Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes - <strong>East</strong> Inset 23<br />

5. Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes - <strong>West</strong> Inset 25<br />

6. Year 2004 Levels of Service E and F 35<br />

7. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Traffic Volumes 91<br />

8. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Traffic Volumes - <strong>East</strong> Inset 93<br />

9. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Traffic Volumes - <strong>West</strong> Inset 95<br />

10. Year <strong>2030</strong> Forecasted Levels of Service E and F 117<br />

vii


Appendices<br />

Appendix A. Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways, November 2004,<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Appendix B. Forecasted ADTs for MoDOT Roads<br />

viii


List of Acronyms/Terms<br />

AASHTO American Association of <strong>St</strong>ate Highway <strong>Transportation</strong> Officials<br />

ADA Americans with Disabilities Act<br />

ADT Average Daily Traffic<br />

CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement program<br />

DEIS A Draft Environmental Impact <strong>St</strong>atement. <strong>St</strong>udies conducted for major<br />

transportation improvement projects to identify all environmental concerns<br />

associated with the project and to provide solutions to these problems.<br />

EPA Environmental Protection Agency<br />

FAA Federal Aviation Administration<br />

FHWA Federal Highway Administration<br />

FTA The Federal Transit Administration<br />

GPS Global Positioning System<br />

HBRR Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation<br />

HCM <strong>Transportation</strong> Research Boards’ Highway Capacity Manual<br />

ISTEA The Intermodal Surface <strong>Transportation</strong> Efficiency Act of 1991. The ISTEA<br />

authorizes legislation for federal transportation planning mandates and<br />

investment programs.<br />

ITS Intelligent <strong>Transportation</strong> Systems<br />

LOS Levels of Service<br />

MoDOT Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

NHS National Highway System program<br />

SAFETEA-LU Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Equity Act: A Legacy for Users<br />

STP Surface <strong>Transportation</strong> Program<br />

TEA-21 <strong>Transportation</strong> Equity Act for the 21 st Century<br />

TIP <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel<br />

ix


A. Background<br />

I. Introduction<br />

In February 1987 the <strong>East</strong>-<strong>West</strong> <strong>Gateway</strong> Coordinating Council completed a report for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> entitled “<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>St</strong>udy.” The report discussed population and<br />

employment in the <strong>County</strong> and traffic operations on the major street and highway system. It noted<br />

the degree of congestion experienced on the road system at that time and developed forecasts for<br />

year 2000 traffic volumes for the roadway system expected to be in place. Analyses were performed<br />

for a variety of road improvements and recommendations provided. Most of the recommended<br />

improvements were followed and are currently in place.<br />

In 1996, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> officials requested that the Council update the 1987 <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>St</strong>udy. Thus, in June 1997, an update to this study entitled “The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

Count <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2015 ” was completed. That report was more comprehensive than the<br />

1987 plan and addressed all areas of transportation in the <strong>County</strong>. It included an examination of<br />

safety issues, pedestrian and bicycle activity, public transportation including transit and paratransit<br />

service, railroad, aviation, pipeline, and barge movements. Forecasts of year 2015 travel on the<br />

street and highway system were developed. Deficient roadway sections were identified and<br />

transportation improvements for all modes of transportation were presented. In addition, an analysis<br />

was made of the financial capacity of the funding mechanisms available to pay for the<br />

recommended improvements. Suggestions were made for providing additional funds for these<br />

improvements.<br />

B. The <strong>2030</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Growth in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has continued at a fast pace for the last 30 years. However, since the<br />

release of the “1997 <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>,” new major commercial, industrial, and<br />

residential development has occurred rapidly. Many roadway improvements have been made with<br />

more expected in the near future. These existing and planned improvements play a major role in<br />

determining the safety and efficiency of future travel in the <strong>County</strong>. A new Missouri River bridge,<br />

Rt. 364 (the Page Ave. Extension), has been opened providing considerable relief to congestion on<br />

both I-70 and I-64, and other major and minor road improvements have been made. However,<br />

development has followed these improvements, as well as areas proposed for improvements. Many<br />

are in undeveloped areas or farmland. As a result, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> officials once again felt that<br />

an update of the earlier transportation plan was needed. This report is in response to that request.<br />

C. The <strong>St</strong>udy Methodology<br />

The methodology used in conducting this study was similar to that of previous transportation studies<br />

for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. However, because of advances in computer technology during the past ten<br />

years, the Council has made major improvements to the tools used for collecting and processing<br />

data. An improved travel demand forecasting model - TransEval - was purchased by the Council<br />

to better predict and evaluate future transportation demands under various system, policy, and<br />

1


investment scenarios. Also, more accurate data about traffic flow and safety (volume counts and<br />

accidents) were available from the Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> (MoDOT) and the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Department of <strong>Transportation</strong>. Council staff collected travel time (speed and delay)<br />

data using new Global Positioning System (GPS) recorders. The Council’s demographers used<br />

newer computers and software programs and were able to more accurately estimate the region’s<br />

future population, employment, and land use.<br />

The latest demographics from the Census and forecasts developed by the Council were assembled.<br />

They consisted of population, number of households, number of employed persons, and amount of<br />

employment in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. The type, amount, and location of<br />

existing land use were assembled from many sources including the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Department<br />

of Community Development. Estimates of future land use for 2015 and <strong>2030</strong> were made based on<br />

these data and forecasts of future population and employment for these years were then developed.<br />

Of considerable value was the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>, Target 2015: Prosperity Through<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning report published on December 15, 2003. These data were then used in the Council’s new<br />

travel demand model which was used to assist in forecasting traffic volumes for 2015 and <strong>2030</strong>.<br />

Data regarding the existing transportation system was acquired. Emphasis was placed on the major<br />

road network and assessing the efficiency and safety of travel on the system. Other modes of<br />

transportation, railroad, aviation, pipeline, and barge were also reviewed. For the major roadway<br />

system, road classifications (Interstates, Principal Arterials, etc.) and road characteristics (number<br />

of lanes, traffic controls, and geometry) were identified. In addition, special attention was paid to<br />

safety by acquiring the accident ratings of all major roads from MoDOT. Data regarding travel were<br />

assembled including, traffic volumes, number of accidents, and travel times. Measures of<br />

performance were developed for congestion and safety. They included volume to capacity ratios<br />

(v/c), accident ratios (accidents per vehicle miles of travel), and average speeds and delays. Levels<br />

of service (LOS) were developed from the v/c ratios and safety ratings from the accident ratios.<br />

Road speeds and average travel times were compared to the roads efficiency of travel (LOS) and<br />

their safety ratings, and were used for estimating future conditions from the forecasts.<br />

The roadway system expected to be in place by <strong>2030</strong> was developed from the Council’s long range<br />

transportation plan, Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, MoDOT’s <strong>St</strong>ate Implementation <strong>Plan</strong> (STIP), and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>’s Proposed Ten Year <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program, dated December 30, 2003.<br />

Forecasted traffic volumes were developed, along with anticipated roadway characteristics, to<br />

determine volume to capacity ratios and safety issues. Travel times on the major roads, based on<br />

forecasted traffic and planned roadway improvements, were estimated to aid in the determination<br />

of future congestion. Deficient locations were identified and suggestions made for improvements.<br />

Future travels on other transportation modes including transit, rail, pipeline, air, and barge were<br />

estimated from earlier reports and information gathered from various sources including some of<br />

these agencies. The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> was used as a reference document. Based on<br />

these data, estimates were made of future needs and recommendations provided for improvements.<br />

2


II. Demographics<br />

Present demographics of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, which include <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, provide the means<br />

for developing forecasts of future demographics and thus forecasts of future travel. They consist<br />

of population, number of households, household size (number of persons per household), and<br />

amount of employment, integrated with a large amount of travel related data. These data are<br />

routinely collected by the Council from a variety of sources including the U.S. Census Bureau.<br />

A. Population and Households<br />

Population in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, showing moderate growth from 1990 to 2000, indicates some<br />

acceleration from 2000 to 2005, according to the Council’s estimates. The <strong>St</strong>. Louis region is<br />

defined as five counties in Missouri, Franklin, Jefferson, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, <strong>St</strong>. Louis, and the City of <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Louis and three counties in Illinois, Madison, Monroe, and <strong>St</strong>. Clair. Table 1 shows the population,<br />

the number of households, and the number of persons per household or household size, from the<br />

Census for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> for the years 1980, 1990, and 2000.<br />

Estimates by the Council for 2005 are cited.<br />

Table 1<br />

Population and Household Data<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Years Rates of Change<br />

1980 1990 2000 2005* 1980 -<br />

1990<br />

3<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

1990 -<br />

2000<br />

2000 -<br />

2005<br />

Population 2,323,800 2,389,600 2,482,900 2,522,700 2.8% 3.9% 1.6%<br />

Households 824,600 905,800 969,200 1,002,600 9.8% 7.0% 3.4`%<br />

HH Size 2.82 2.64 2.56 2.48 -6.4% -3.0% -3.1%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Population 144,100 212,900 283,900 314,400 47.7% 33.3% 10.7%<br />

Households 46,354 74,402 101,794 117,400 60.5% 36.8% 15.3%<br />

HH Size 3.11 2.86 2.79 2.73 -8.0% -2.4% -2.2%<br />

Pop./Region 6.2% 8.9% 11.4% 12.5% N/A N/A N/A<br />

HH/Region 5.6% 8.2% 10.5% 11.4% N/A N/A N/A<br />

* Estimates by the Council<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s population has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. From 1980 to 2000 it<br />

doubled, going from 144,100 to 283,900. The Council’s estimate for 2005 is 314,400, an increase<br />

of 30,500 from 2000 or 10.7 percent. The number of households from 1980 to 2000 more than


doubled, going from 46,354 to 101,794. This growth, compared to population, results in a decline<br />

of average household size. The estimate for 2005 is 117,400 households, an increase of 15,606 or<br />

15.3 percent. The estimate assumes a continued household size decline. The average person’s age<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2000 was 34.3 compared to 30.7 in 1990. For the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region it was<br />

36.0 in 2000 and 33.3 in 1990 showing the region as a whole, as well as <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, is<br />

growing older. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has the youngest population of all counties in the region except<br />

the City of <strong>St</strong>. Louis. Its population has now grown to be the third largest in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region.<br />

B. Employment<br />

Employment in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis area has a great impact on all modes of travel in the region. The<br />

primary mode of travel for employment is the automobile, with bus, truck, and other vehicles<br />

playing a lesser role in adding to the amount of traffic on the region’s highways. The amount of<br />

employment also effects railroad, aviation, pipeline, and barge movements but not to the extent that<br />

it effects travel on the highways. As a result, present and future highway travel can be directly<br />

linked to employment and has been used in this and previous reports for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> to<br />

forecast traffic volumes. Employment data for the years 1980, 1990, 2000, and estimates for 2005<br />

were obtained from the Census and the Council. These data are shown in Table 2 and 3 and<br />

discussed below.<br />

Table 2<br />

Employment Data<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Years Rates of Change<br />

1980 1990 2000 2005* 1980 -<br />

1990<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

4<br />

1990 -<br />

2000<br />

2000 -<br />

2005<br />

Employment 1,142,100 1,221,400 1,303,800 1,350,700 6.9% 6.7% 3.6%<br />

Households 824,600 905,800 969,200 1,002,600 9.8% 7.0% 3.4%<br />

Jobs/household 1.39 1.35 1.35 1.35 -2.9% 0.0% 0.0%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Employment 39,300 76,700 105,700 124,700 95.2% 37.8% 18.0%<br />

Households 46,354 74,402 101,794 117,400 61.0% 36.6% 15.3%<br />

Jobs/household 0.85 1.03 1.04 1.06 21.2% 1.0% 1.9%<br />

Employment/<br />

Percent region<br />

* Estimates by the Council<br />

3.4% 6.3% 8.1% 9.2% 85.3% 28.6% 13.6%<br />

Table 2 shows that employment in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region experienced a steady growth of about 6.8<br />

percent from 1980 to 2000. The number of jobs per household has also remained about the same<br />

at 1.35. Employment in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, however, like its population, has grown dramatically


climbing from 39,300 in 1980 to 76,700 in 1990 and to 105,700 in 2000. These are increases of 95<br />

percent and 38 percent respectively over the two ten-year periods. During the five years from 2000<br />

to 2005, estimates of the Council indicate an increase to 124,700 or about 18 percent. Using the<br />

2005 estimate and assuming growth similar to the population increase, it is expected growth in<br />

employment in the <strong>County</strong> will continue well into the future. Since 1980 the amount of employment<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> as a percent of the region’s total has increased going from 3.4 percent in 1980<br />

to an estimated 9.2 percent in 2005. It is also expected this percent will continue to increase.<br />

Table 3 below shows the total number of employed persons living in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and their<br />

work trip destinations as determined by the Census Bureau for the years 1980, 1990 and 2000. It<br />

shows the number of trips made within the <strong>County</strong> and to the other seven counties in the region.<br />

The number of employed persons living in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> increased from 64,920 in 1980 to<br />

149,111 in 2000, or about 130 percent. It can be seen that although more work trips are being<br />

generated from <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and a considerable amount stay within the <strong>County</strong>, much of the<br />

travel is being made to adjacent <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City. In 1980, 45 percent of the <strong>County</strong>’s<br />

employed persons worked in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> while 52 percent worked in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and<br />

City. A small percent worked in Illinois and outside the region. In 1990, still only 45 percent<br />

worked in the <strong>County</strong> while 52 percent commuted to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City. By 2000 it<br />

increased only slightly to 47 percent but 49 percent still commuted to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City.<br />

The number traveling to Illinois or out of the <strong>County</strong> stayed about the same and was insignificant.<br />

Estimates by the Council indicate that in 2005 this relationship of commuter travel from <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City had remained the same. In effect, the amount of travel from<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> across the Missouri River for work purposes has continued to increase and is<br />

expected to continue as the population grows. One interesting item regarding the amount of<br />

commuters is the flow into <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> from nearby Warren and Lincoln Counties as their<br />

populations rise dramatically.<br />

Table 3<br />

Work Trip Destinations<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Employed Persons<br />

Year <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

<strong>County</strong><br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

City<br />

Jefferson Franklin Illinois Out of<br />

Region<br />

5<br />

Total<br />

1980 28,939 25,159 8,415 55 223 540 1,589 64,920<br />

1990 49,700 46,321 11,119 285 292 995 2,339 111,051<br />

2000 70,058 62,353 10,930 380 555 1,640 3,195 149,111<br />

Percent in Each <strong>County</strong><br />

1980 44.6% 38.8% 13.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.8% 2.4% 100.0%<br />

1990 44.7% 41.7% 10.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.9% 2.1% 100.0%<br />

2000 47.0% 41.8% 7.3% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 2.1% 100.0%<br />

Note: Data obtained from the 2000 Census


C. Present Land Use<br />

Basic inputs into the Council's ongoing travel demand modeling process require some specific<br />

knowledge of occurring major developments as they alter land use from its present patterns. Such<br />

developments are continually monitored by the Council through general and business media, which<br />

may be supplemented with information from county and city governments and other local entities<br />

such as sewer and fire districts. Although somewhat broad-brush, not micro level, the monitored<br />

data sufficiently enables differentiations between generalized housing types/densities and between<br />

generalized land use types, such as commercial or industrial, as required by the travel demand<br />

modeling network. Land use is discussed in detail in the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>. It lists<br />

the following land use categories; residential, commercial, combined community districts, high-tech,<br />

industrial, recreation/wildlife/open space, transitional, and agricultural. These categories are shown<br />

on the Land Use Map for 2015 in that report. The map is quite harmonious with the Council’s<br />

estimates of future development and with data on population and employment. Since the Council<br />

develops demographics for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region on a more macro scale, the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> plan<br />

has been referenced as representing anticipated land use for 2015. Land use for <strong>2030</strong> becomes less<br />

clear but is estimated by the Council for purposes of developing <strong>2030</strong> population and employment.<br />

C- 1. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sections<br />

For purposes of discussing land use, the Council divided <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> into five geographic<br />

Sections. Each has similar features and many similar land uses. These Sections have been<br />

numbered and named according to the approximate areas they represent and are shown on Figure<br />

1. A general summary of the existing land use and new or proposed development in each Section<br />

follows.<br />

Section 1 - <strong>West</strong> Alton is in the northeast corner of the <strong>County</strong> and is sparsely populated due to the<br />

fact that it is mostly in a flood plain. Two cities exist with small populations, <strong>West</strong> Alton which<br />

centers around the junction of U.S. 67 and Rt. 94, and Portage Des Sioux which lies just north of<br />

Rt. 94 at Rts. J and H. Each city has experienced some additional residential development during<br />

the past 10 years but both have populations less than 500. Minor residential development has<br />

occurred along Rt. 94 between <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and <strong>West</strong> Alton and except for the Ameren electric<br />

generating plant near Portage Des Sioux, there is little commercial or industrial development.<br />

Section 2 - <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> encompasses an area from Section 1 on the north (approximately Rt. B),<br />

along Huster Rd., Truman Rd., and Muegge Rd., on the west and southwest, and east to the Missouri<br />

River along new Rt. 364 and the bridge across the Missouri River. It contains all of the City of <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> and a part of <strong>St</strong>. Peters. This is the oldest and most densely developed residential part of<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> with the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> containing the old urban core. Some new residential<br />

development has occurred along Rt. 94 north of Rt. 370 and at Elm <strong>St</strong>., Zumbehl Rd., and Truman<br />

Rd., around and south of Rt. 370. In addition, there has been quite a bit of new residential in-fill<br />

from Rt. 94 east to the Missouri River north of Rt. 364. New commercial and industrial<br />

development has occurred in the north part on Rt. 370 around the Elm <strong>St</strong>. interchange and east on<br />

6


Figure 1<br />

<strong>County</strong> Sections<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

7


Mueller Rd., Elm Point Rd., and Little Hills Expressway to Rt. 94. Old industrial development has<br />

declined along Rt. 94 in the north part of the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>. South of I-70 along Rt. 94, some<br />

additional commercial development has occurred south to Rt. 364.<br />

Section 3 - <strong>St</strong>. Peters runs from Section 2 on the east to Rt. 79 and its southern extension, Salt<br />

Lick/Birdie Hills Rd. on the west. It runs west along Rt. N and then south along Rt. K and southeast<br />

along I-64 to the Missouri River. It is mostly flood plain north of I-70 and east of Rt. 79. From I-70<br />

south past Mexico Rd. there is a large amount of old residential development with newer<br />

development occurring in the west end of the Section along Salt Lick/Birdie Hills Rd. Further south<br />

there is newer residential development. New development has also occurred in pockets along Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr., Spencer Rd., Willott Rd., and Jungermann Rd. Approaching Rt. 94 there are<br />

considerable undeveloped areas which are fast turning into new subdivisions. Southeast of Rt. 94<br />

to the Missouri River there are considerable farms and undeveloped land that are being turned into<br />

residential development. The most intense use is south of Rt. 364 all the way to I-64 between<br />

county roads such as Jungs <strong>St</strong>ation, Caulks Hill, Pitman Hill, Wolfrum, and Independence. This area<br />

has seen a very dramatic increase in residential development over the last ten years.<br />

Commercial development has continued, adjacent to all major roads in Section 3, with rapid<br />

development along Salt Lick Rd. around I-70 and south to Mexico Rd. The southern part of Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. from Willott Rd. to Rt. 94 has seen a substantial increase in commercial<br />

development with the most notable being from north of Central School Rd. to Rt. 94. Commercial<br />

development has grown along the southern part on Rt. 94 all the way from Harvester Rd. to I-64.<br />

A considerable amount of undeveloped land has been converted to commercial use along many parts<br />

of this road and it is anticipated, because land is so abundant, that the remaining undeveloped areas<br />

adjacent to the road will also be turned into commercial development of some type. Substantial<br />

commercial development has occurred just north of I-64 between Rt. K and Rt. 94 and continues<br />

north along Rt. K. Industrial development in Section 3 has been confined to the area in the northeast<br />

quadrant of I-70 and Rt. 79 and to the north of I-70 at Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

Section 4 - Wentzville-O’Fallon runs from Section 3 on the east, along I-64/U.S. 40/61 on the south,<br />

along with Rt. N, west to the Warren <strong>County</strong> line. The north boundary is Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It<br />

contains a considerable amount of old residential development especially along I-70 around old<br />

O’Fallon and in the Lake Saint Louis area. <strong>East</strong> of Rt. M in old O’Fallon, and north of I-70 to Rt.<br />

79, considerable new residential development has occurred fed by the new T.R. Hughes Blvd.<br />

interchange on I-70. New development has occurred to the north along Rt. P from Rt. M west to <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Paul, Josephville, and Flint Hill. On the south side of I-70, new residential development has been<br />

prolific to the east and west of Rt. K all the way south to I-64 and westward toward Lake Saint Louis<br />

filling in much of the undeveloped area. Development has grown dramatically south along Bryan<br />

Rd. from its interchange at I-70 south to Winghaven Blvd. at Rt. N. A very large amount of<br />

undeveloped land still exists in this area, especially south of the corridor for proposed Rt. 364 and<br />

it is expected that it all will be converted into residential development as time goes on. The area<br />

9


from Bryan Rd. west to Lake Saint Louis Blvd. has continued to be developed and farmland is fast<br />

turning into residential subdivisions. Around the old part of Wentzville, residential development<br />

has also increased substantially. To the south new large scale subdivisions are being established<br />

south of I-70, west of U.S. 40/61, north of Rt. N, and east of Rt. Z. Also, development is taking<br />

place on the south side of Rt. N west between U.S. 40/61 and Rt. Z. A very substantial amount of<br />

what is presently farmland is available in this area to accommodate new residential development.<br />

The potential for huge increases in population in this part of Section 4 is enormous. To the north,<br />

of old Wentzville, lies an area that also is open to considerable residential development. At this time<br />

a fair amount of new homes has been built and more subdivisions are planned. This development<br />

has spread all the way north along U.S. 61 to Flint Hill at Rt. P. Some development is occurring to<br />

the northwest toward Rt. W.<br />

Section 5 - Augusta-New Melle has experienced some new residential development along the south<br />

of Rt. N most notably from U.S. 40/61 west to Rt. Z. Some development has occurred in the New<br />

Melle area and it is expected this area will continue to grow. The rest of the area remains primarily<br />

rural farmland with some new homes on large tracts and small subdivisions sprinkled along parts<br />

of Rt. 94, N, Z, DD, T, and F. A number of large tracts in the vicinity of New Melle and scattered<br />

throughout the southern part of this Section have become locations for equestrian activity.<br />

Commercial development in this Section is quite small with some occurring along Rt. 94 and the<br />

Katy Trail and in and around the wineries that have grown in this area over the years. Industrial<br />

development in this Section has been practically nonexistent.<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong><br />

The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> report contained a chapter describing the work of the Housing<br />

and Land Use Task Force. In it they issued a “Mission <strong>St</strong>atement” on land use, which “promoted<br />

responsible growth and development,” and on housing whose premise was “to ensure housing<br />

opportunities for all county residents.” They discussed the need for a balanced development of<br />

housing, economic development, infrastructure, parks, and open space.<br />

Two land use maps were developed, one showing the entire county and the other showing the urban<br />

area, similar to that in this report. Their two land use maps were used by the Council, along with<br />

other data, to describe the land use described in the five Sections noted above. From field<br />

observations, it is obvious that development, to-date, is occurring quite close to what the <strong>County</strong>’s<br />

Master <strong>Plan</strong> report has prescribed. Most cities have contributed to this success and their land use<br />

plans followed, in most part, that of the <strong>County</strong>’s.<br />

One area that is growing fast and has a specific designation as the “High-Tech” corridor is along<br />

I-64/U.S. 40/61, soon to be I-64, from the Missouri River to Wentzville. Between the Missouri<br />

River and Rt. 94, the Missouri Research Park on the south west side of the road was developed some<br />

time ago with many high-tech companies. Since its beginning additional firms have located in the<br />

park and more are developing there. On the northeast side, a number of major companies have<br />

located adjacent to the frontage road including MCI Verizon and Enterprise Leasing. Considerable<br />

10


land is available for additional development and for sale signs are posted on vacant property. On<br />

the north side between Rt. 94 and Rt. K, CitiCorp has developed a substantial facility that now<br />

houses their headquarters and adjacent to it Barnes-Jewish Hospital is building a new facility.<br />

Considerable land is still available in this area and a new Mercedes Benz dealership is currently<br />

being constructed. Other commercial and retail development has continued to develop in this area.<br />

To the west of Rt. K at the Winghaven Blvd. interchange, MasterCard has built a very large office<br />

building and all around it smaller office and retail development has occurred. At Rt. N, and what<br />

will be the new Rt. 364 interchange, a mix of high-tech companies and commercial and retail<br />

development has taken place and the area continues to grow. The interchange at Lake Saint Louis<br />

Blvd. has experienced commercial and retail development and will likely continue to grow in the<br />

future.<br />

Another area designated by the <strong>County</strong>’s <strong>Plan</strong> is the industrial area along and mostly to the north<br />

of I-70 on its eastern end of the <strong>County</strong>. This industrial development has been accompanied by a<br />

substantial amount of commercial establishments, many new car dealerships, and other supporting<br />

commercial establishments. It is expected to continue to grow in line with the <strong>County</strong>’s Master<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Development along Rt. 94, especially from Harvester Rd. south and west to I-64, is expected to<br />

continue. Residential development is continuing and most likely will conform closely to what is<br />

envisioned on the <strong>County</strong>’s Master <strong>Plan</strong>. This area from Rt. 94 to the Missouri River bluffs has<br />

considerable vacant and farmland that will most likely be converted to residential development in<br />

the future.<br />

11


A. Background<br />

III. The Existing <strong>Transportation</strong> System<br />

The existing transportation system in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> consists of streets and highways, railroad,<br />

aviation, pipeline, and barge. Utilities could also be considered part of this system as they deliver<br />

commodities such as water, gas, electric, sewers, etc. All these modes provide the means for moving<br />

people, goods, services, and bulk commodities.<br />

<strong>St</strong>reets and highways provide for the travel needs of all the people in the <strong>County</strong> and those passing<br />

through the <strong>County</strong>. They allow for the movement of all vehicles and most pedestrians and bicycles.<br />

They handle all public transportation which is provided by some cities and also private, or semiprivate<br />

paratransit services. They handle the movement of people for all types of activities, which<br />

include, work, business, medical, school, social, and recreational. They handle the movement of<br />

large numbers of trucks, intra-county, regionally, statewide, and interstate.<br />

Some travel is provided by aviation at Smartt Airport and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport and they<br />

serve some business aircraft that travel outside the <strong>St</strong>. Louis area. The <strong>County</strong> has been considering<br />

plans to enhance Smartt airport and make it more inviting to more businesses in the <strong>County</strong>. (The<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 2015). No railroad passenger service exists as Amtrak does not run<br />

through <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. However, a substantial amount of rail service is provided to<br />

commercial and industrial facilities in the <strong>County</strong>. As an example, the Wentzville General Motors<br />

assembly plant has a rail yard that provides transferring vehicles from the assembly plant onto rail<br />

cars for shipment across the United <strong>St</strong>ates. They also load vehicles onto trucks for delivery to auto<br />

dealers locally and throughout the Midwest. Pipelines move a large amount of bulk material, all<br />

related to petroleum and natural gas products, but simply pass through the <strong>County</strong>. One exception<br />

is a facility in the city of <strong>St</strong>. Peters that transfers petroleum from a Conoco pipeline to trucks.<br />

Barges are similar in that they also carry a large amount of bulk material and travel both the<br />

Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. However, there are no transfer stations in the <strong>County</strong> that allow<br />

for moving their cargo from one mode to another.<br />

B. The Existing Major Road Network<br />

The major road network in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> consists of those roads shown on the Council’s<br />

functional classification map and are shown on Figure 2. The classifications follow the criteria<br />

established by MoDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). They include all major<br />

roads through the Major Collector level but not Minor Collectors or local streets. Many roads in<br />

these last two categories are maintained by the <strong>County</strong> but have not been addressed in this report.<br />

B-1. Highway Functional Classifications<br />

According to the criteria of MoDOT and FHWA, highways are classified according to the function<br />

that they serve, that is, how well they serve traffic and how much access they provide to adjacent<br />

land. The functional classifications are Interstates, Freeways/Expressways, Principal Arterials,<br />

Minor Arterials, Major Collectors, Minor Collectors, and local roads.<br />

13


Interstate highways serve traffic with no interruption, normally at higher speeds than other<br />

classifications since they are accessed only at interchanges and do not serve adjacent property. They<br />

travel through numerous states and provide continuity across the United <strong>St</strong>ates. Their design<br />

standards are the highest of all road classifications providing multi-lane divided facilities, normally<br />

four or more lanes, with thicker pavement, and gentle horizontal and vertical curves. They have<br />

paved outer and inner shoulders, high standards of sign and pavement marking, greater bridge<br />

clearances, and more safety features. They serve through traffic that may have destinations far<br />

beyond the city, county, or state and they serve a large amount of local traffic in urban areas for<br />

short and long trips. They serve a substantial amount of commercial vehicles that are traveling<br />

short and long distances, and can experience a considerable degree of congestion in urban and rural<br />

areas. Interstate highways handle the highest volume of traffic of all roads, with a few exceptions.<br />

Freeways and Expressways are in the same functional classification, based on FHWA criteria,<br />

however, they are considerably different.<br />

Freeways have design standards quite similar to Interstates. They are four or more lanes, have<br />

access only at interchanges, and do not serve adjacent property. Some features such as road<br />

curvature, pavement thickness, shoulders, and bridge clearances, could be somewhat less, but signs,<br />

markings, and safety features are often quite the same. Speed limits on Freeways are sometimes less<br />

than on an Interstate but that depends on the locations of the facilities. They can serve a sizeable<br />

amount of commercial vehicles, depending on their location and a large amount of local traffic in<br />

urban areas. Like Interstates, they can experience a considerable amount of congestion.<br />

Expressways have lesser design features than Interstates or Freeways but that is primarily because<br />

they have at-grade intersections at many locations and provide some access to adjacent property.<br />

The design standards of Expressways are considerably less than Interstates or Freeways as they are<br />

multi-lane, divided roadways with paved shoulders. Road curvature can be much less and quite<br />

often they have only a limited number of bridges. Safety features on Expressways are also less and<br />

intersections, both signalized and un signalized, can be a source of congestion. Speed limits on<br />

Expressways are always less than on Interstates or Freeways and the number of crashes can be more.<br />

Principal Arterials are normally multi-lane (four, five, or six lanes) major roads that travel<br />

considerable distances and connect other major roads. Their primary function is to serve through<br />

traffic with little delay at speeds of normally 35 to 50 miles per hour. They serve adjacent land but<br />

with limitations to the amount and location of access points. They can have medians or barriers to<br />

separate opposing traffic flow. In urban areas adjacent land use is mostly commercial. Major<br />

intersections are signalized and often systems of signal interconnection are provided to enhance<br />

travel times and improve safety. Principal Arterial roads in urban areas normally carry substantial<br />

volumes of traffic. In rural areas they can be two lanes and carry lesser volumes of traffic.<br />

Minor Arterials may be three, four, or five lanes, undivided roads that serve traffic for shorter<br />

distances and provide considerable access to adjacent land. The lands’ use adjacent to a Minor<br />

Arterial may be mostly residential but could also contain commercial, industrial, recreational, and<br />

14


Figure 2<br />

Roadway Functional Classifications<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

15


other uses as well. They generally connect traffic from Collector roads and local streets and<br />

distribute them to Principal Arterials, Expressways, Freeways, and some Interstate roads. They<br />

normally carry lower volumes of traffic than Principal Arterial roads.<br />

Major Collector roads can be two or three lanes that collect traffic from local streets and distributes<br />

them to Minor or Principal Arterials. They serve mostly residential land use but could also serve<br />

commercial, industrial, and other land uses. They normally carry lower traffic volumes than Minor<br />

Arterial roads. Major Collectors most often are found in more urban densely developed areas.<br />

Minor Collectors are two lanes that carry traffic from side roads and adjacent land use to higher<br />

classified roads. They normally are found in rural areas that have limited land use activity.<br />

B-2. MoDOT Roads<br />

The Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> maintains the most major roads in the <strong>County</strong> and those<br />

with the highest functional classifications. These roads include Interstates like I-70 and I-64 and<br />

Freeways, Expressways, and Principal Arterials such as U.S. 40/61, U.S. 61, U.S. 67, Rt. 79,<br />

Rt. 94, Rt. 364, and Rt. 370. All lettered roads are either Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials, or<br />

Major Collectors, and are maintained by the state with only few exceptions. Rt. 94 in the City of<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> is carried over city streets from Kingshighway to south of Rt. 370 and Rt. M north of I-<br />

70 is carried on Main <strong>St</strong>. through old O’Fallon to Rt. P. Some lettered roads like Rt. K are Principal<br />

Arterials that pass through highly developed commercial and residential areas. Others include Rts.<br />

A, B, C, D, F, H, J, N, P, T, V, W, Y, Z, and DD. These roads carry higher amounts of traffic than<br />

other county roads and serve all parts and land uses in the <strong>County</strong>.<br />

B-3. <strong>County</strong> and City Roads<br />

All roads that are not state highways are maintained by the <strong>County</strong> or cities. According to the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>, the <strong>County</strong> Highway Department maintains 640 miles of roads. They handle<br />

a few for smaller communities, under contract, with funds from the <strong>County</strong> Road and Bridge Fund.<br />

Most cities maintain their own roads using various funding sources. New projects are funded using<br />

local funds, funds from the ½ cent transportation sales tax, and federal funds. The goals and of the<br />

<strong>County</strong> for maintaining and improving roads are contained in the <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

In addition to the <strong>County</strong>’s Master <strong>Plan</strong>, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has a Proposed Ten Year <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Improvement Program. The present document was adopted by the <strong>County</strong> in December 2003 and<br />

is for FY 2003 to FY 2013. It contains a list of planned road improvements by the major<br />

municipalities and by the <strong>County</strong>. Although all the projects may not presently have funding, it is<br />

a list by which the <strong>County</strong> can plan road improvements for future years. From this document, the<br />

<strong>County</strong> develops a three-year <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program (TIP) that consists of funded<br />

improvements planned for the next three fiscal years, starting January 1, of each year. Funding for<br />

these projects comes mostly from the transportation sales tax revenue. Some may be included in the<br />

Council’s TIP and receive a percentage of federal dollars from various funding categories. The<br />

<strong>County</strong>’s present TIP is for FY 2007 through 2009 .<br />

17


B-4. Traffic Volumes<br />

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume data were compiled from MoDOT, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, and<br />

some cities for many of the major roads in the <strong>County</strong>. They consisted of ADTs for 1990, 2000, and<br />

2004. Since many MoDOT roads carry higher volumes, they are discussed first. A description of<br />

each road and its traffic volumes are described below in functional classification order. A tabulation<br />

of the traffic volumes is on Table 4. Figure 3 shows ADTs for the entire county, Figure 4 shows<br />

ADTs for the eastern part of the county, and Figure 5 shows ADTs for the western part of the<br />

county.<br />

ADT’s are developed by MoDOT and most other state Department’s of <strong>Transportation</strong> (DOT’s) by<br />

collecting 24 hour traffic counts at various times during the year. The numbers are then factored to<br />

account for seasonal, monthly, and daily fluctuations. They are for a seven day period. Many<br />

DOT’s also develop a weekday, Monday through Friday, traffic count termed, an AWDT. The<br />

weekday count is always higher than the ADT since in most cases, weekend traffic counts are lower<br />

than the weekday counts. This fact has been kept in mind throughout this report.<br />

B-4.1. MoDOT Roads<br />

Interstate 70 is the most traveled road in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. It has ten lanes across the Missouri<br />

River and carried about 165,000 vehicles a day in 2004. From the Missouri River west it loses a<br />

lane in each direction at Fifth <strong>St</strong>. and another in each direction at Rt. 94 dropping it to six lanes. An<br />

auxiliary lane exists between Rt. 94 and Zumbehl Rd. From there west to U.S. 40/61 it has six lanes<br />

with some auxiliary lanes between Rt. 370 and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and Rt. 79. Daily traffic<br />

volumes drop from the 165,000 at the Missouri River as one moves westward to about 66,000 east<br />

of U.S. 40/61. At the Warren <strong>County</strong> line (26.75 miles from the Missouri River) it is four lanes and<br />

handled about 56,400 vehicles per day. For its overall length, with some segments higher and lower,<br />

it averaged an increase of about 35 percent from 1990 to 2000 and 9 percent from 2000 to 2004.<br />

I-64 and U.S. 40/61 carried the second highest traffic volumes across the Missouri River, about<br />

77,500 vehicles a day in 2004. It is a seven-lane road, three lanes westbound and four lanes<br />

eastbound, from the Missouri River to Rt. 94 and then a six-lane road from there to the end of I-64<br />

just west of Rt. K. It then becomes U.S. 40/61 and traffic drops to about 46,100 due to the high<br />

volumes to and from Rt. 94 and Rt. K. Segments of U.S. 40/61 at the interchanges of Winghaven<br />

Blvd. and Lake Saint Louis Blvd. have been upgraded to Interstate standards. However, parts of the<br />

old road remain, and full continuity of I-64 from the Missouri River to I-70 is not complete at this<br />

time. These segments are in the Council’s TIP and it is expected that construction will be completed<br />

within the next three years bringing it up to Interstate standards. Traffic volumes west of Rt. N are<br />

around 35,300 and 35,700 just east of I-70. The average increase on the 13.2 miles from the<br />

Missouri River to I-70 was about 48 percent from 1990 to 2000 and 26 percent from 2000 to 2005.<br />

U.S. 61 is a four-lane expressway from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>, a distance of about 7.3 miles. It has<br />

an interchange north of I-70 with Rt. A and numerous at-grade intersections. It handles about<br />

33,000 vehicles a day north of I-70 which stays the same to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. The ADT on U.S. 61<br />

increased dramatically as population in Lincoln <strong>County</strong> grew. Since 2000 it has grown about 9<br />

percent.<br />

18


Table 4<br />

Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Fourteen Year Growth 1990 - 2004<br />

MoDOT Maintained Routes<br />

10 Year<br />

4 Year<br />

Route/Location 1990 2000* Change Percent 2004** Change Percent<br />

I-70 at Missouri River 154200 190800 36600 23.7% 165100 -25700 -13.5%<br />

I-70 e/o* Rt. 94 132700 168400 35700 26.9% 147300 -21100 -12.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Cave Sprgs. Rd. 104300 128200 23900 22.9% 125000 -3200 -2.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 98100 132400 34300 35.0% 134000 1600 1.2%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. 79 92000 119100 27100 29.5% 134000 14900 12.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. K & M 73100 98000 24900 34.1% 112000 14000 14.3%<br />

I-70 e/o Bryan Rd. 57000 80500 23500 41.2% 95600 15100 18.8%<br />

I-70 e/o Lake Saint Louis B. 53600 75400 21800 40.7% 82000 6600 8.8%<br />

I-70 e/o U.S. Rt. 40/61 41300 59500 18200 44.1% 66400 6900 11.6%<br />

I-70 e/o Pearce Blvd. 40900 59200 18300 44.7% 72200 13000 22.0%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. T 33800 48900 15100 44.7% 56400 7500 15.3%<br />

# Average change = 25400 35.2% 2691 6.9%<br />

I-64 at Missouri River 44300 69100 24800 56.0% 77500 8400 12.2%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. K 22550 30200 7650 33.9% 38200 8000 26.5%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. DD 21400 29300 7900 36.9% 34500 5200 17.7%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. N 19200 28400 9200 47.9% 32200 3800 13.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Lake STL 20100 31300 11200 55.7% 31100 -200 -0.6%<br />

# Average change = 12150 11.2% 5040 2.4%<br />

U.S. 61 s/o Lincoln Co. 13900 30000 16100 115.8% 32800 2800 4.7%<br />

U.S. 61 n/o I-70 13400 30000 16600 123.9% 33100 3100 10.3%<br />

# Average change = 16350 119.9% 2950 7.5%<br />

U.S. 67 s/o Mississippi R. 20900 28300 7400 35.4% 25800 -2500 -8.8%<br />

# Average change = 7400 35.4% -2500 -8.8%<br />

Rt. 79 s/o Lincoln Co. 10650 11900 1250 11.7% 13300 1400 11.8%<br />

Rt. 79 n/o I-70 18000 20000 2000 11.1% 22700 2700 6.8%<br />

# Average change = 1625 11.4% 4100 9.3%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. J 1450 2900 1450 100.0% 2700 -200 -6.9%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. 370 12000 14000 2000 16.7% 15000 1000 7.1%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-70 48450 56600 8150 16.8% 56900 300 0.5%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Harvester 38950 50000 11050 28.4% 53000 3000 6.0%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Mid-Rivers M. Dr. 27350 37400 10050 36.7% 35000 -2400 -6.4%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o I-64 18000 30000 12000 66.7% 40000 10000 33.3%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-64 9300 11500 2200 23.7% 10700 -800 -7.0%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. DD 2000 3000 1000 50.0% 3000 0 0.0%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. T 1650 2900 1250 75.8% 2900 0 0.0%<br />

# Average change = 5461 46.1% 1211 3.0%<br />

19


Table 4<br />

Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Fourteen Year Growth 1990 - 2004<br />

MoDOT Maintained Routes<br />

10 Year<br />

4 Year<br />

Route/Location 1990 2000* Change Percent 2004** Change Percent<br />

Rt. 364 at Missouri River - - - - 50000 N/A N/A<br />

# Average change = - - N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 370 at Missouri River - 48000 N/A - 56800 8800 18.3%<br />

Rt. 370 w/o Elm <strong>St</strong>. - 57100 N/A - 59300 2200 3.9%<br />

Rt. 370 n/o I-70 - 50000 N/A - 51900 1900 3.8%<br />

# Average change = N/A - 4300 8.7%<br />

Rt. K s/o I-70 15600 35000 19400 124.4% 45000 10000 28.6%<br />

Rt. K n/o Rt. N 10200 20000 9800 96.1% 30000 10000 50.0%<br />

Rt. K s/o Rt. N 7500 15000 7500 100.0% 25000 10000 66.7%<br />

Rt. K n/o U.S. 40/61 6450 11400 4950 76.7% 20000 8600 75.4%<br />

# Average change = 10412 99.3% 9650 55.2%<br />

Rt. N e/o Rt. K 3700 11700 8000 216.2% 13600 1900 16.2%<br />

Rt. N w/o U.S. 40/61 2750 4500 1750 63.6% 7500 3000 66.7%<br />

Rt. N w/o Rt. Z 1400 3200 1800 128.6% 6200 3000 93.8%<br />

# 3850 136.1% 2633 58.9%<br />

* From MoDOT's District 6,<br />

Total all 55.0% 15.9%<br />

** From MoDOT's September 12, 2005<br />

AADT data sheets<br />

# Does not reflect road lengths and is an<br />

20


U.S. 67 is a four-lane expressway that connects Alton, Illinois, through <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> across<br />

the Missouri River, into northern <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>, a distance of about 4.1 miles. It carries about<br />

28,300 vehicles each day and has experienced a slight decline of about 9 percent since 2000.<br />

Rt. 79 is a four-lane divide road for 1.5 miles from I-70 north through an industrial area past the Salt<br />

River Rd./Pearl Dr. diamond interchange. From there it becomes a two-lane principal arterial road<br />

for 10.4 miles to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It handles about 22,700 north of I-70 and 13,300 at Lincoln<br />

<strong>County</strong>. It experienced an increase from 1990 to 2000 of about 11 percent and 9 percent since 2000.<br />

Rt. 94 is the longest road in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> running from U.S. 67 at <strong>West</strong> Alton to Warren<br />

<strong>County</strong>, approximately 58 miles. Along this length it changes from a two-lane rural road to city<br />

streets, to a four-lane expressway, and back to a two-lane rural road. In the north part of the <strong>County</strong><br />

it handled about 2,700 vehicles a day. It experienced a dramatic increase between 1990 and 2000<br />

of 100 percent and now has leveled off. Through the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> it handled about 8,100 on<br />

Second <strong>St</strong>. near the <strong>County</strong> Government Center and about 23,500 on First Capitol Dr. west of<br />

Fifth <strong>St</strong>. South of I-70 it becomes a six-lane expressway to the north junction of Rt. 364 at Muegge<br />

Rd. From just north of Harvester Rd. it continues south to I-64. South of Harvester Rd. it handled<br />

about 39,000 in 1990 and 40,000 in 2000. It now carries about the same at 42,700. From<br />

Jungermann Rd. south to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. traffic has increased sizeably with continued growth<br />

of new homes and commercial development both east and west of the road. From Mid Rivers Mall<br />

Dr. south to I-64 new development has grown even at a faster rate and traffic volumes have jumped<br />

from 18,000 in 1990 to 30,000 in 2000, an increase of 67 percent. This central part of Rt. 94 from<br />

Harvester Rd. to I-64 has experienced the highest increase with an average of about 50 percent from<br />

1990 to 2000 and more than 30 percent since then. The rural part of Rt. 94 from I-64 west toward<br />

Warren <strong>County</strong> handled about 10,500 just south of I-64 and 2,900 near Augusta. This was a<br />

substantial increase since 1990 and just a slight increase since then.<br />

Rt. 364 was opened to traffic in December 2003 from Bennington Ln. in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Rt. 94,<br />

a distance of about 7.5 miles. It has ten lanes across the Missouri River and presently carries about<br />

50,000 vehicles a day. In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> it drops a lane in each direction at Rt. 94, becoming<br />

eight lanes from Muegge Rd. to just north of Harvester Rd. where it presently ends.<br />

Rt. 370 has six lanes from I-270 in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to I-70 near Mid Rivers Mall Dr., a distance<br />

of 14.0 miles. It handled about 57,000 vehicles per day with the highest volumes around the Elm<br />

<strong>St</strong>. interchange. Traffic has increased on this road about 4 percent since 2000.<br />

Rt. K is a five-lane principal arterial road that runs from I-70 to I-64, about 6.4 miles. It handled<br />

about 15,600 in 1990 just south of I-70 but jumped to 20,000 in 2000. By 2004 volumes had grown<br />

rapidly and it now carries about 51,000 vehicles a day as commercial and residential development<br />

in this corridor grew rapidly. Around Rt. N traffic grew from 10,000 in 1990 to 17,500 in 2000 and<br />

it now carries better than 30,000. Just north of I-64 traffic volumes more than doubled from 1990<br />

to 2004 going from about 6,500 to almost 20,000. Growth all along this road and especially in the<br />

southern part is quite substantial and traffic volumes continue to climb rapidly.<br />

21


Figure 3<br />

Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

23


Figure 4<br />

Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

<strong>East</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

25


Figure 5<br />

Year 2004 Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

<strong>West</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

27


Rt. N has two major parts which are both two lane roads. The eastern part runs from Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. to U.S. 40/61, a distance of 8.4 miles. The western part runs from U.S. 40/61 all the way<br />

to Rt. T at the Warren <strong>County</strong> line, a distance of 11.3 miles. The eastern part handles about 13,600<br />

vehicles per day with higher amounts around Rt. K. In general, these volumes have increased about<br />

16 percent since 2000. On the western part, traffic volumes have been about 7,500 vehicles per day<br />

west of U.S. 40/61 to Rt. Z and are growing rapidly as development in this area has been quite<br />

substantial. <strong>West</strong> of Rt. Z to Rt. T, traffic volumes have only grown slightly.<br />

Other lettered roads in the <strong>County</strong> are rural in nature with low traffic volumes. Two exceptions<br />

which are experiencing considerable residential development are Rt. Z from I-70 to Rt. N and Rt.<br />

P from Rt. M west to U.S. 61. Traffic volumes on these two roads are about 7,000 and 7,500, south<br />

of I-70 and west of Rt. M respectively, and have been growing since 2000.<br />

Summation<br />

Table 4 shows the average changes in ADTs for MoDOT roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. For the tenyear<br />

period 1990 to 2000 there was an overall increase of about 66 percent. For the four-year<br />

period, 2000 to 2004, it was about 27 percent. These figures are only approximations since they do<br />

not take into account the length of each road segment. However, the numbers do provide a “figure<br />

of magnitude” of the differences in each road during these time periods and how great the increase<br />

is county wide.<br />

B-4.2. Missouri River Bridges Traffic<br />

Five bridges cross the Missouri River connecting <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. All are<br />

maintained by MoDOT. They are U.S. 67 in the northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> which travels from<br />

Illinois into <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. It serves traffic in the northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> and those traveling<br />

to and from Illinois. A high percentage of the Illinois traffic travels to and from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>.<br />

The other four bridges serve traffic in the central and western part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and include<br />

Rt. 370, I-70, Rt. 364 and I-64. Table 5 shows ADT volumes on these bridges since 1990.<br />

With the population and employment in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> growing rapidly, travel across the<br />

Missouri River has increased substantially since 1990. Traffic volumes increased from 237,500 in<br />

1990 to 379,400 in 2004, an increase of 141,900 or 60 percent. Fortunately, new bridges have been<br />

built to alleviate highly congested conditions on I-70 which carried the largest part of this traffic.<br />

Rt. 370, a new six lane bridge just north of I-70, was opened in 1992 to replace the old Rt. 115<br />

bridge and was extended to I-70 in O’Fallon and opened to traffic in 1996. In 2003, the ten lane Rt.<br />

364 bridge south of I-70 was opened, which further relieved traffic on I-70.<br />

29


Table 5<br />

Historical Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Missouri River Bridges<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Route 1990 2000 Change % 2004 Change %<br />

U.S. 67 20,900 28,300 7,400 35.4 25,800 (2,500) -8.8<br />

Rt. 370* - 48,000 48,000 - 56,800 8,800 18.3<br />

Rt. 115* 18,200 Closed* (18,200) - - - -<br />

I-70 154,100 190,800 36,700 23.8 165,100 (25,700) -13.5<br />

Rt. 364** - - - - 50,000 50,000 -<br />

U.S. 40/61 44,300 69,100 24,800 56.0 77,500 8,400 12.2<br />

Totals 237,500 336,200 98,700 41.6 375,200 39,000 11.6<br />

* Opened in 1992 replacing the Rt. 115 bridge.<br />

** Opened in December 2003<br />

To show the relief that this new bridge provided to congestion on I-70, MoDOT conducted traffic<br />

counts before and after its opening. Table 6, provided by MoDOT, shows traffic volumes on all<br />

bridges before and after the opening of Rt. 364 in December 2003. One count was taken in October<br />

of 2003 and the other in October of 2004, allowing sufficient time for traffic to adjust to new travel<br />

patterns. These counts were taken for one day and were factored for day of the week and month of<br />

the year to get yearly adjusted ADTs.<br />

The total volume on all four bridges in 2003 was 331,900 and by 2004 it had grown to 349,400.<br />

Rt. 364 carried about 50,000 vehicles a day and its opening reduced traffic and thus the congestion<br />

on all the other bridges. I-70 had the highest drop going from 186,800 to 165,100 vehicles a day or<br />

11.6 percent. I-64 went from 85,200 to 77,500 or a drop of 9.0 percent. It is interesting to note that<br />

overall, the four bridges traffic volumes increased by about 17,500 vehicles a day or about 5.3<br />

percent between the time of these counts.<br />

30


Table 6<br />

Missouri River Crossings<br />

Changes in ADTs with opening of Rt. 364 Bridge*<br />

Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Change % Change<br />

Route Dir. ADT AM ** PM ** ADT AM ** PM ** ADT AM ** PM ** ADT AM ** PM **<br />

MO 370 WB 31,381 3,678 8,762 28,262 3,582 6,725 -3,119 96 2,037 -9.9% 2.6% 23.2%<br />

MO 370 EB 28,526 8,203 3,711 28,520 7,019 3,802 -6 1,184 -91 0.0% 14.4% -2.5%<br />

Total 59,907 11,881 12,473 56,782 10,601 10,527 -3,125 1,280 1,946 -5.2% 10.8% 15.6%<br />

I-70 WB 87,944 10,857 13,123 81,582 9,674 14,298 -6,362 -1,183 1,175 -7.2% -10.9% 9.0%<br />

I-70 EB 98,829 17,762 13,727 83,497 13,116 11,963 -15,332 -4,646 -1,764 -15.5% -26.2% -12.9%<br />

Total 186,773 28,619 26,850 165,079 22,790 26,261 -21,694 -5,829 -589 -11.6% -20.4% -2.2%<br />

MO 364 WB 0 0 0 24,778 1,536 8,175 24,778 1,536 8,175 N/A N/A N/A<br />

MO 364 EB 0 0 0 25,191 8,368 2,360 25,191 8,368 2,360 N/A N/A N/A<br />

Total 0 0 0 49,969 9,904 10,535 49,969 9,904 10,535 N/A N/A N/A<br />

I-64 WB 43,268 4,961 8,767 40,170 5,306 9,377 -3,098 345 610 -7.2% 7.0% 7.0%<br />

I-64 EB 41,915 8,613 6,261 37,353 9,302 6,300 -4,562 689 39 -10.9% 8.0% 0.6%<br />

Total 85,183 13,574 15,028 77,523 14,608 15,677 -7,660 1,034 649 -9.0% 7.6% 4.3%<br />

Total WB = 162,593 19,496 30,652 174,792 20,098 38,575 12,199 794 11,997 7.5% 4.1% 39.1%<br />

Total EB = 169,270 34,578 23,699 174,561 37,805 24,425 5,291 5,595 544 3.1% 16.2% 2.3%<br />

Total Crossing 331,863 54,074 54,351 349,353 57,903 63,000 17,490 6,389 12,541 5.3% 11.8% 23.1%<br />

* Data provided by MoDOT was factored to represent AADT<br />

** AM = 6:00 - 8:00<br />

** PM = 4:00 - 6:00<br />

Rt. 364 Bridge opened in December 2003


B-4.3. Major <strong>County</strong> and City Roads<br />

Many major roads maintained by either the <strong>County</strong> or cities have experienced dramatic growth in<br />

traffic volumes during the past ten years due to the large increase in residential and commercial<br />

development. A list of 37 major county and city roads with sizeable traffic volumes is contained<br />

in Table 7. A discussion of the traffic volume increases over the ten-year period, 1994 to 2004<br />

follows.<br />

Roads north of I-70 in the east part of the <strong>County</strong> which show modest increases include <strong>West</strong> Clay<br />

<strong>St</strong>., Elm <strong>St</strong>., and Truman Rd. Between I-70 and Rt. 94, substantial increases were noted on Zumbehl<br />

Rd., Muegge Rd., Mexico Rd., Mid Rivers Mall Dr., and Jungermann, Rd. To the south and east<br />

of Rt. 94, Friedens Rd., Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd., Caulks Hill Rd., Pitman Hill Rd., and Wolfrum Rd., have<br />

all seen substantial increases in traffic due to the large amount of new residential development in<br />

these areas. To the north of I-70 and west of Rt. M, traffic volumes have increased sizeably on Rt.<br />

M, Rt. P, Hoff Rd., and others. On the south of I-70, west of Rt. K, substantial increases were<br />

experienced on Bryan Rd. which connects I-70 to I-64, by its continuation on Winghaven Blvd.<br />

Other roads with considerable increases include, Mexico Rd. and Feise Rd. Many other minor<br />

arterials and collectors in the middle part of the <strong>County</strong> have experienced substantial increases<br />

due to increased residential and commercial development. Some roads around the Wentzville area<br />

are now experiencing more traffic, especially to the south along Rt. Z. An average of increases on<br />

the county roads listed on Table 7 is 39.0 percent. This figure does not take into account the<br />

distances of the roads and many other roads in the <strong>County</strong> and is only used for illustrative purposes.<br />

32


Table 7<br />

Average Daily Traffic Volumes<br />

Ten Year Growth 1994 - 2004<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Major Roads<br />

Road Location 1994 2004 Diff. % Chg.<br />

Birdie Hills Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 10500 12800 2300 21.9%<br />

Bryan Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 12700 25400 12700 100.0%<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. S/O Harvester Rd. 16800 17200 400 2.4%<br />

Central School Rd W/O <strong>St</strong> Peters-Howell Rd. 10500 10800 300 2.9%<br />

Duello Rd. S/O U.S. 40/61 1500 3300 1800 120.0%<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. S/O Rt. 370 13200 14800 1600 12.1%<br />

Elm Point Rd. E/O Zumbehl Rd. 3000 4300 1300 43.3%<br />

Feise Rd. W/O Rt. K 11100 12500 1400 12.6%<br />

Friedens Rd. E/O Rt. 94 8000 11300 3300 41.2%<br />

Harvester Rd. S/O Rt. 94 16000 23000 7000 43.8%<br />

Jungermann Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 25500 30600 5100 20.0%<br />

Jungermann Rd. N/O McClay Rd. 18300 20200 1900 10.4%<br />

Jungs <strong>St</strong>ation Rd. S/O Rt. 364 17000 15000 -2000 -11.8%<br />

Kingshighway N/O Rt. 94 6000 8000 2000 33.3%<br />

Kisker Rd. S/O Old Farmhouse Rd. 14200 15500 1300 9.2%<br />

Knaust Rd. S/O Laura Hills Rd. 5500 8200 2700 49.1%<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. Bluecove Dr. 6500 8000 1500 23.1%<br />

Laura Hill Rd. E/O Rt. K 6000 9300 3300 55.0%<br />

McClay Rd. E/O Jungermann Rd. 14600 10300 -4300 -29.5%<br />

McClay Rd. E/O <strong>St</strong>. Perers-Howell Rd. 5000 5600 600 12.0%<br />

Mexico Rd. W/O Cave Sprgs. Rd. 32500 34500 2000 6.2%<br />

Mexico Rd. E/O Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 20800 21100 300 1.4%<br />

Mexico Rd. E/O Rt. K 12800 29900 17100 133.6%<br />

Mexico Rd. E/O Bryan Rd. 6600 11600 5000 75.8%<br />

Meyer Rd. E/O Point Praire Rd. 1800 2100 300 16.7%<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. S/O Suemandy Dr. 23000 36000 13000 56.5%<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. N/O <strong>St</strong>. Peters/Howell Rd. 15200 30000 14800 97.4%<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. N/O Rt. 94 16300 20000 3700 22.7%<br />

Muegge Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 9600 16000 6400 66.7%<br />

O'Fallon Rd. W/O Rt. 94 6500 10300 3800 58.5%<br />

Pitman Hill Rd. S/O Rt. 94 4600 7100 2500 54.3%<br />

Pralle Ln. S/O Rt. 94. 6000 5500 -500 -8.3%<br />

Salt Lick Rd. S/O Vet. Mem. Pkwy. 14200 19700 5500 38.7%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Peters-Howell Rd. E/O Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 2700 3300 600 22.2%<br />

Spencer Rd. S/O Mexico Rd. 16800 25200 8400 50.0%<br />

Tom Ginnever Rd. E/O Rt. M 10000 10200 200 2.0%<br />

Truman Rd. S/O Ehlmann Rd. 4200 7400 3200 76.2%<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. S/O Rt. 364 3000 14300 11300 376.7%<br />

W. Clay E/O Zumbehl Rd. 10200 13500 3300 32.4%<br />

Wentzville Pkwy E/O Meyer Rd. 4600 12000 7400 160.9%<br />

Willott Rd. E/O Universal Dr. 6000 10000 4000 66.7%<br />

Winghaven B S/O Phoenix Dr. - 14800 14800 -<br />

Zumbehl Rd. S/O Vet. Mem. Pkwy. 35600 35700 100 0.3%<br />

Zumbehl Rd. N/O Rt. 94 18000 24300 6300 35.0%<br />

Average<br />

percent<br />

change = 46.8%


The <strong>County</strong> and all of the cities have had active road improvement programs. Each agency has its<br />

own source of funds. Much of the funding for these improvements has come from the <strong>County</strong>’s<br />

½ Cent <strong>Transportation</strong> Sales Tax. This tax was strongly endorsed by the citizens of the <strong>County</strong><br />

in 2004 by approving its extension to 2016. In addition, MoDOT has committed to many<br />

improvements to state highways since the passage of Amendment 3 in November 2004 and the new<br />

Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient <strong>Transportation</strong> Equity Act:<br />

A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), in August 2005. Funding for road improvements from these<br />

sources, along with other public and private funding, will help pay for many needed road<br />

improvements in the near future. However, as the case in many other growing suburban areas in the<br />

country, traffic congestion has grown faster than construction of new roads and improvements to<br />

existing facilities. It is expected that this trend will continue in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> for some time<br />

in the future.<br />

B-4.4. Vehicle Miles of Travel<br />

The Council maintains records of the amount of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) on the region’s<br />

highways to determine adherence to the Clean Air <strong>St</strong>andards of the Environmental Protection Agency<br />

(EPA). VMT is calculated by multiplying the total road miles by their ADTs. For <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

they were compiled for all road classifications except local streets. The miles of road and total VMT<br />

for the years 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2004 are shown below in Table 8.<br />

It can be seen that the number of miles of roads had just a small increase from 1990 to 1995, 18 miles<br />

or 3.5 per cent, seven miles from 1995 to 2000 or 1.3 percent, and just six miles or 1.1 percent from<br />

2000 to 2004. But during the ten years from 1990 to 2000, VMT changed dramatically growing by<br />

64 percent. During the four years from 2000 to 2004 it continued to increase growing by 17 percent.<br />

This illustrates the tremendous growth of travel in the <strong>County</strong> during this time reflecting the growth<br />

in population, employment, and overall personal travel.<br />

Table 8<br />

Vehicle Miles of Travel<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Year Road Miles VMT Change Percent VMT/Road<br />

1990 515 2,973,489 - - 5,774<br />

1995 533 4,203,478 1,229,989 41.4 7,886<br />

2000 540 4,876,750 673,272 16 9,031<br />

2004 546 5,708,387 831,637 17.1 10,455<br />

B-4.5. Vehicles and Households<br />

The number of vehicles, which are registered in each household, play a major role in determining<br />

the amount of vehicular travel. The more vehicles per household, the more travel will result. This<br />

34


adds to the amount of VMT that is found in each county and in the region. For this reason the<br />

number of registered vehicles in each county of the region and their number of households for the<br />

last 25 years was determined and compared. These data are shown in Table 9 below.<br />

It can be seen that the number of vehicles per household for the region was 1.15. For <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> it was 1.64. By 1990 vehicles per household in the region had increased to 1.21. However,<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> had increased to 1.77. By 2000 the region had reached 1.74, a dramatic increase<br />

during the ten-year period. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> stayed about the same at 1.73. By 2004, the region<br />

had once again increased, going to 1.78 but <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> again jumped, going to 1.97 or<br />

almost two vehicles per household. This explains why the <strong>County</strong> has had such an increase in traffic<br />

and traffic volumes on all of its streets and highways. It also explains why the <strong>County</strong> has had a<br />

large increase in VMT. Overall, this poses a serious challenge to the region as VMT is the major<br />

measure used in assessing the region’s adherence to the Clean Air <strong>St</strong>andards.<br />

Table 9<br />

Vehicles and Households<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Year 1980 1990 2000* 2004 Change & %<br />

1980 - 1990<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

947,700 1,097,400 1,689,400 1,769,100 149,700<br />

15.8%<br />

Household 824,600 905,800 969,200 995,900 81,200<br />

9.8%<br />

35<br />

Change & %<br />

2000 - 2004<br />

79,700<br />

4.7%<br />

26,700<br />

2.8%<br />

Autos/HH 1.15 1.21 1.74 1.78 5.2% 2.3%<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

76,200 120,500 176,000 225,300 44,300<br />

58.1%<br />

Households 46,400 74,400 101,800 117,400 28,000<br />

60.5%<br />

49,300<br />

28.0%<br />

15,600<br />

15.3%<br />

Autos/HH 1.64 1.77 1.73 1.97 7.9% 13.9%<br />

* Data from the Missouri Department of Revenue and the Illinois Department of Revenue for 2000 through 2005. Earlier data<br />

was not comparable to these data.


B-5. Operational Conditions on Major Roads<br />

Operational conditions on the major roads were determined by using the methods prescribed in the<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Research Boards’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000. This latest update of<br />

the HCM provides state-of-the-art techniques for estimating the capacity and measuring the level<br />

of service (LOS) of travel on these roads. The material in HCM 2000 has been used from a planning<br />

perspective to assess existing operational conditions based on traffic volumes, speeds and delays,<br />

and field observations. The HCM has also been used to assess future travel conditions using<br />

forecasted traffic volumes. They are discussed later in this report.<br />

The capacity of a road is the maximum number of vehicles that can pass a point in a given time<br />

under prevailing road, traffic, and traffic control conditions. It is expressed in number of passenger<br />

cars, per hour, per lane, (pcphpl) for each road classification. The number of trucks of various sizes,<br />

buses, and other slower moving vehicles are converted into passenger car equivalents. Other factors<br />

such as a road’s geometrics, adjacent land use, number of intersections, traffic control devices, and<br />

pedestrian activity play a major role in determining a road’s capacity.<br />

The LOS on a road segment are a measure of how well traffic is operating for a specified period of<br />

time, usually one hour. LOS takes into account the road’s functional classification, speed, density<br />

(freedom to maneuver), and traffic interruptions and delays. It compares a road segment’s capacity<br />

to the volume of traffic that desires to use it. This is referred to as the volume to capacity (v/c) ratio.<br />

Six LOS are defined for each road segment using letters A to F. LOS A represents the best<br />

operating condition and LOS F the worst. The maximum capacity of a road segment is LOS E and<br />

a complete breakdown in traffic flow is LOS F.<br />

LOS were developed for all major roads based on their ADTs and speeds and delays, if available.<br />

They were then factored to determine the morning and afternoon peak hour volumes using values<br />

applicable for each road. Traffic volumes, speeds, and delays, and the characteristics of various road<br />

segments were reviewed to determine the LOS. Field observations were made by Council staff to<br />

verify these designations. Roads with LOS E and F are shown in Figure 6.<br />

B-5.1. Interstates and Freeways<br />

Operating conditions on Interstates and Freeways are considerably different from other roads. The<br />

interaction is only among those vehicles traveling in the same direction since the road is divided by<br />

some type of barrier. The density of vehicles, their speed, and the volume of traffic are the major<br />

factors in determining the road segment’s LOS since access is only provided at on and off ramps.<br />

Speed can remain the same as volumes increase until they reach the road’s capacity. However, as<br />

volumes and density increase the LOS of vehicles decline. When capacity (LOS E) is reached,<br />

speeds decline noticeably and delays begin to occur. Lighting, weather conditions, and traffic<br />

incidents, also cause lower speeds and increase delays.<br />

LOS values of density, speed, v/c, and maximum hourly volumes are shown in Table 10 which was<br />

developed from the HCM 2000 Exhibit 23-2. Speeds of 70, 65, and 60 mph were used since they<br />

VPare the speed limits of Interstates and Freeways in the <strong>County</strong>. Morning and afternoon peak hour<br />

36


Criteria<br />

Table 10<br />

Level of Service Criteria<br />

For Freeway Segments<br />

37<br />

LOS<br />

A B C D E<br />

Free Flow Speed = 70 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 70 70 70 70 70<br />

Maximum v/c 0.32 0.53 0.74 0.9 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

770 1260 1770 2150 2400<br />

Free Flow Speed = 65 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 65 65 64.8 59.7 52.2<br />

Maximum v/c 0.3 0.5 0.71 0.89 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

710 1170 1680 2090 2350<br />

Free Flow Speed = 60 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 60 60 60 57.6 51.1<br />

Maximum v/c 0.29 0.47 0.68 0.88 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

660 1080 1560 2020 2300<br />

NOTE:<br />

The exact mathematical relationship between density and v/c has not always been maintained at<br />

LOS boundaries because of the use of rounded values. Density is the primary determinant of LOS.<br />

The speed criterion is the speed at maximum density for a given LOS.<br />

volumes were determined by applying a factor to the ADTs on Table 4 and by reviewing some of<br />

the volume count data from MoDOT. Conversion factors were applied to these numbers to take into<br />

account road widths, truck percent, terrain, and traffic fluctuations during the peak hours to get<br />

pcphpl as prescribed in the HCM 2000. From these adjusted peak hour volumes, the LOS for each<br />

direction of travel were calculated.


Figure 6<br />

Year 2004 Levels of Service E and F<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

38


I-64<br />

From the Missouri River to west of Rt. K, I-64 has a 60 mph speed limit and carries about 77,500<br />

vehicles a day. During the morning peak hour it carried about 7,800 vehicles, with eastbound the<br />

predominant flow, carrying about 4,700 vehicles. <strong>West</strong>bound carried about 3,100 vehicles.<br />

<strong>East</strong>bound traffic has three through lanes and an auxiliary lane. Each lane carried about 1,300<br />

vehicles and the auxiliary lane carried about 800. After applying appropriate factors (6.9 percent<br />

trucks) volumes reached about 1,400 pcphpl. Using Table 10, this indicates traffic is operating at<br />

LOS C. During the afternoon, peak hours, westbound traffic is the highest with 4,700 vehicles. It<br />

has only three lanes, therefore, each lane carried about 1,600. However, the Missouri River bridge<br />

has substandard lane widths (11 feet), no lateral clearance, an upgrade of about 5 percent, and a<br />

length close to one half mile. Applying adjustment factors brings the pcphpl to 1,900. This results<br />

in LOS E. This is confirmed by field observations that show traffic slows to cross the bridge with<br />

minor backups extending to the east.<br />

I-70<br />

I-70 is the primary road in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and handles the highest volume of traffic with a speed<br />

limit of 60 mph from the Missouri River to west of Wentzville. Across the Missouri River it carried<br />

165,000 vehicles a day in 2004. The eastbound bridge has five lanes, all standard widths, and<br />

shoulders. The westbound bridge, however, has substandard lane widths and no shoulders. It also<br />

has an upgrade of about 3 percent for part of its length. Commercial vehicles are quite high, about<br />

11 percent. The morning peak hour handled about 15,000 vehicles with eastbound having the<br />

highest, about 9,000. Each lane carried more than 1,800 vehicles, and when factored, this reaches<br />

more than 2,000 pcphpl. This places it at LOS E, the road’s capacity. These calculations meet with<br />

field observations which show that traffic flows at slow speeds but not in a start-stop mode.<br />

During the afternoon peak hour, traffic volumes are higher reaching about 16,500. <strong>West</strong>bound is<br />

the peak direction and has 9,500 vehicles or 1,900 per lane. With substandard lane widths, no<br />

shoulders, an upgrade of 3 percent, and 11 percent trucks, the pcphpl is estimated to be more than<br />

2,300. This places operating conditions at LOS F. There is a break down in traffic flow with<br />

vehicles in a start-stop mode and density at its highest. This is in agreement with field observations<br />

that show traffic backing through the Earth City interchange and onto the I-270 interchange ramps.<br />

From Fifth <strong>St</strong>. to Rt. 94 volumes drop to 147,000 and operate on four through lanes and an auxiliary<br />

lane in each direction. During the morning peak hours eastbound is the high direction of travel and<br />

handles about 7,300 vehicles. That would be 1,460 per lane but the auxiliary lane only carries 75<br />

percent. Therefore, it handles 1,100 and the rest is on the through lanes. That puts them at about<br />

1,600. Factoring gives close to 1,800 pcphpl which is LOS D. However, traffic up and downstream<br />

is operating at capacity, LOS E, so this section is also at LOS E<br />

<strong>West</strong> of Rt. 94 to Zumbehl Rd. I-70 has six lanes and auxiliary lanes and carried about 129,500. The<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours carried the same, around 12,000. The high direction of travel<br />

carried about 6,600 vehicles. The auxiliary lanes carried 75 percent of the through lanes or 1,200<br />

39


vehicles and the rest were on the through lanes. This caused them to carry around 1,800 vehicles.<br />

Factoring for pcphpl, the through lanes reached 2,000 which is LOS E or capacity. This agrees with<br />

field observations which show traffic moving slowly but without stop-start conditions.<br />

From Zumbehl Rd. to Cave Springs Rd., I-70 has six lanes. It handled about 125,000 vehicles a day.<br />

Morning and afternoon peak hours carry the same amount of traffic, about 11,500 vehicles. In the<br />

peak direction of traffic it carried 6,400 or 2,100 vehicles per lane. Factoring gives 2,300 pcphpl.<br />

Density is high and speeds low with the v/c ratio at 1.00. Traffic is operating at LOS E. This is in<br />

agreement with field observations.<br />

From Cave Springs Rd. to Rt. 370, volumes drop to about 106,000 on six lanes. The morning and<br />

afternoon peak hours carry about the same with 9,500 vehicles. The high direction of travel is about<br />

5,200 or 1,750 vehicles. When factored it is close to 2,000 pcphpl. This equals LOS E with slow<br />

traffic, high density, and v/c at 1.00. This agrees with field observations.<br />

Traffic, between Rt. 370 and Mid Rivers Mall Dr., jumps up to 134,000 due to the volume that is<br />

added by Rt. 370. It is handled on six traffic lanes in each direction when counting the auxiliary<br />

lanes. They are needed to handle the high volume of weaving traffic between the two roads. In the<br />

morning peak hours eastbound traffic, from the Mid Rivers Mall Dr. on-ramp, desiring to travel east<br />

on I-70 must weave through traffic wanting to get onto Rt. 370. In the afternoon, traffic exiting Rt.<br />

370 and desiring to travel west on I-70 must weave through the I-70 traffic wanting to exit the off<br />

ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Adding to the problem is the fact that westbound traffic on the off<br />

ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. often backs onto the auxiliary lanes and conflicts with through traffic.<br />

These weaving problems cause this section of I-70 to operate at capacity, LOS E.<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. 79, I-70 carries about 130,000 vehicles a day on six through lanes<br />

and an auxiliary lane in each direction. The morning and evening peak hours carry about the same,<br />

12,000 vehicles. The high direction of travel carries about 6,600 or 1,650 per lane, however, the<br />

auxiliary lanes only carry 75 percent and the rest are on the through lanes, which raises the volume<br />

close to 1,800 vehicles. Factoring gives 2,000 pcphpl, and this equals LOS E.<br />

Although these calculations seem correct, other traffic flow facts come in to play. Considerable<br />

eastbound traffic during the morning peak hours comes from the north on Rt. 79 and the south on<br />

Salt Lick Rd. They try to merge with eastbound I-70 traffic which causes considerable weaving<br />

between the two interchanges. The through lanes are unable to accept the additional volume and<br />

speeds drop causing substantial backups to the west through the T.R. Hughes and Rts. K/M<br />

interchanges. At times this backup extends west to Bryan Rd. and traffic quite often stops causing<br />

a very serious safety issue. During the afternoon peak hours, weaving occurs from the ramp of Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. wanting to go west and merge with through traffic wanting to exit Rt. 79. This<br />

results in start-stop traffic that backs through Mid Rivers Mall Dr. The road is operating at LOS F.<br />

From Bryan Rd. to U.S. 40/61, I-70 has six lanes and carries an average of about 78,000 vehicles.<br />

Morning and afternoon volumes are the same, 7,800. For the peak direction, this amounts to 4,300<br />

or more than 1,400 vehicles per lane. Factoring brings the pcphpl to almost 1,600 or LOS at D.<br />

40


I-70 west of U.S. 40/61 to Pearce Blvd. has four lanes and handles about 72,000 vehicles and 7,200<br />

during the peak hours. Traffic volumes are about 1,900 vehicles per lane in the peak direction of<br />

travel, eastbound in the morning and westbound in the afternoon. Factoring gives 2,100 pcphpl.<br />

With only four lanes, traffic is dense, speeds lower, and the v/c ratio near 1.00 or LOS E.<br />

From Pearce Blvd. to Warren <strong>County</strong>, the speed limit rises to 65 mph on four lanes. Traffic volumes<br />

are around 56,000 a day. The peak hour volumes are about the same at 2,900 and the directional<br />

split is 55/45. This results in 1,450 vehicles per lane. Factoring gives a pcphpl of 1,600 which is<br />

equal to LOS C.<br />

I-70 Summary<br />

Most of I-70 across <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> operates at or near capacity during the morning and<br />

afternoon peak hours. This is aggravated by the high percent of commercial vehicles. A number<br />

of sections, most notably from Earth City Dr. across the Missouri River to Rt. 94, are operating with<br />

volumes in excess of capacity, LOS F, with serious congestion occurring eastbound in the morning<br />

and westbound in the afternoon. Even though traffic volumes drop at Rt. 94, so do traffic lanes,<br />

resulting in operating conditions of LOS E west past the Cave Springs Rd. interchange. The section<br />

between Rt. 370 and Rt. 79 has serious operating deficiencies, especially during the morning peak<br />

hour, with severe weaving problems that causes operating conditions of LOS F for eastbound traffic<br />

as far west as Bryan Rd. It is only west of there that conditions improve to LOS D. New<br />

construction through the U.S. 40/61 interchange provides six lanes all the way to Rt. Z. To the west,<br />

it remains four lanes with traffic reaching the roads capacity to Pearce Blvd. <strong>West</strong> to Warren<br />

<strong>County</strong> volumes drop and operating conditions improve to LOS D.<br />

A major operating problem on I-70 has been traffic flow at many of the interchanges. From the Fifth<br />

<strong>St</strong>. interchange west through the Rt. 79 interchange, traffic is operating at LOS E and F during the<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours. At many locations, traffic backs up on the off ramps and extends<br />

into the through traffic lanes. This creates a very serious safety problems. With increased activity<br />

expected at all of the interchanges, and increases in traffic volumes, this situation will only get<br />

worse. This is discussed later in the chapter on forecasted traffic.<br />

Rt. 364<br />

Rt. 364 is a Freeway with a speed limit of 60 mph. It is ten lanes across the Missouri River and<br />

eight lanes from Rt. 94 at Muegge Rd. to Rt. 94 just north of Harvester Rd. It handles about 50,000<br />

vehicles a day and 6,000 in the peak hours. During the morning eastbound traffic across the<br />

Missouri River is about 3,600 vehicles. On five lanes this amounts to only 720 vehicles per lane.<br />

Truck percent on this road are low and conditions are ideal. As a result, pcphpl are still well below<br />

1,000 and the road operates at LOS B. Along the section with Rt. 94, it has about the same volume<br />

with traffic per lane at around 800 providing LOS B.<br />

41


Rt. 370<br />

Rt. 370 is a six-lane Freeway with a 60-mph speed limit. It carries about 57,000 vehicles a day with<br />

5,700 during the morning and afternoon peak hours. During the morning, eastbound traffic reaches<br />

3,400 vehicles or about 1,150 vehicles per lane. During the afternoon, traffic is about the same.<br />

Truck traffic on this route is around 7.5 percent coming from I-270 and the Earth City Industrial<br />

complex in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,450 or LOS C.<br />

B-5.2. Expressways<br />

Operating conditions and the quality of service provided on Expressways are less than Interstates<br />

and Freeways even though they are normally four-lane divided highways. They have at-grade<br />

intersections, often signalized, and provide access to adjacent land use at specific locations. Their<br />

speed limits are lower and their design characteristics are less with sharper turns and steeper grades.<br />

As a result vehicle conflicts occur more often and interrupt the flow of traffic.<br />

The HCM 2000 designates LOS for Expressways in a similar way as for Interstates and Freeways.<br />

However, speed categories, v/c ratios, and traffic volumes are all less. Table 11, developed from<br />

HCM 2000 Exhibit 21-2, shows the criteria for determining LOS for Expressways. Morning and<br />

afternoon peak hour volumes were determined by applying a peak hour factor to the ADTs shown<br />

on Table 4. Various conversion factors were applied to these numbers to take into account the<br />

percent of trucks, intersections and interchanges, fluctuations in traffic, and other factors to get<br />

pcphpl. LOS for each direction of travel were calculated for each Expressway. Field observations<br />

were used to verify the LOS ratings that were calculated.<br />

U.S. 61<br />

U.S. 61 from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>, 7.3 miles, is four lanes divided with 55 and 65 mph speed<br />

limits. It has one interchange at Rt. A and a number of at-grade intersections. Traffic volumes<br />

remain the same at about 33,000 vehicles a day. The morning and afternoon peak hours are handling<br />

about 3,350 vehicles. The peak direction is southbound in the morning and northbound in the<br />

afternoon. There are about 1,000 per lane in the peak direction. Adjusting for trucks (15 percent)<br />

and other factors bring this figure to more than 1,100 pcphpl. From Table 10, this gives LOS C for<br />

the peak directions. The other direction has about 800 pcphpl or LOS B.<br />

U.S. 67<br />

U.S. 67 from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Alton, Illinois is four lanes divided, 4.1 miles long, and has a 55<br />

mph speed limit. It has a number of intersections including one at Rt. 94 that is signalized. It carries<br />

31,000 vehicles a day. It handles the same amount of traffic during the morning and afternoon peak<br />

hours. During the morning, southbound traffic is highest with about 2,000, or 1,000 per lane.<br />

Northbound has about 1,400 or 700 per lane. In the afternoon the reverse is true. Adjusting for<br />

trucks (6 percent) and other factors, brings the peak direction to about 1,100 pcphpl and the other<br />

to 8,000. From Table 11, this gives LOS C and B respectively. The traffic signal at Rt. 94 does<br />

periodically interrupt traffic, however, field observations indicate this is just temporary and traffic<br />

speed, density, and the v/c, return to normal and the LOS designations are appropriate.<br />

42


Criteria<br />

Table 11<br />

Level of Service Criteria<br />

For Expressway Segments<br />

43<br />

LOS<br />

A B C D E<br />

Free Flow Speed = 60 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 40<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 60 60 59.4 56.7 55<br />

Maximum v/c 0.3 0.49 0.7 0.9 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

660 1080 1550 1980 2200<br />

Free Flow Speed = 55 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 41<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 55 55 54.9 52.9 51.2<br />

Maximum v/c 0.29 0.47 0.68 0.88 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

600 990 1430 1850 2100<br />

Free Flow Speed = 50 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 43<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 50 50 50 48.9 47.5<br />

Maximum v/c 0.28 0.45 0.65 0.86 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

550 900 1300 1710 2000<br />

Free Flow Speed = 45 miles per hour<br />

Maximum density (pc/mi/ln) 11 18 26 35 45<br />

Minimum speed (mi/h) 45 45 45 44.4 42.2<br />

Maximum v/c 0.26 0.43 0.62 0.82 1<br />

Maximum hourly volume<br />

(pcphpl)<br />

NOTE:<br />

490 810 1170 1550 1900<br />

The exact mathematical relationship between density and v/c has not always been maintained at<br />

LOS boundaries because of the use of rounded values. Density is the primary determinant of LOS.<br />

LOS F is characterized by highly unstable and variable traffic flow. Prediction of accurate flow rate,<br />

density, and speed at Los F is difficult.


U.S. 40/61<br />

U.S. 40/61 from west of Rt. K to Rt. N handles about 50,000 vehicles per day. It has a speed limit<br />

of 55 mph and a limited number of intersections until the signal at Rt. N. A section about a mile and<br />

a half long is up to Interstate standards through the Winghaven Blvd. interchange. During the<br />

morning peak hour it handles about 5,000 vehicles with 3,000 eastbound and 2,000 westbound.<br />

Adjusting for trucks (6.8 percent), rolling terrain, and other factors gives a passenger equivalent for<br />

eastbound of 3,300 or 1,650 vehicles per lane. This equates to LOS D. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic is around<br />

2,200 or 1,100 per lane and LOS C. From Rt. N to I-70, has volumes’ area about 35,000 per day<br />

with a speed limit of 55 mph. Two signals exist. One at Callahan Rd. and one at Prospect Rd. and<br />

other intersections also exists. A section about a mile and a half long, is Interstate through the Lake<br />

Saint Louis Blvd. interchange. During the morning peak hour there are 3,500 vehicles with about<br />

2,100 eastbound and 1,400 westbound. Adjusting for trucks, rolling terrain and traffic signals brings<br />

the pcphpl to about 2,300 and 1,600 or about 1,200 per lane in the peak direction and 800 in the<br />

other. This is equal to LOS of C and B respectively. During the afternoon, traffic volumes are the<br />

same as the morning and the volumes and LOS are the same, C for westbound and B for eastbound.<br />

B-5.3. Principal Arterials<br />

Operating conditions on Principal Arterial roads are poorer than on Interstates, Freeways, or<br />

Expressways. In urban and suburban areas they can be four, five, or six lanes, divided or undivided<br />

roads. In rural areas they can be two, three, or four lane roads. Traffic flow and LOS are controlled<br />

by their traffic volumes and number of signalized intersections, side streets, and entrances, and the<br />

number of vehicles turning to and from them.<br />

The HCM 2000 provides guides for estimating LOS for planning purposes on Principal Arterial roads.<br />

The data required are average travel speeds, the number of signals per mile, and the LOS of<br />

signalized intersections. Average travel speeds came from the Council’s GPS travel time runs. The<br />

number of signals came from the road inventories. The LOS of signalized intersections came from<br />

field observation’s following the criteria described in Chapter 16 - Signalized Intersections, of the<br />

HCM 2000. The LOS for most of the Principal Arterials fall into this category and are discussed<br />

below.<br />

Rt. 79<br />

Rt. 79 from I-70 north past the Salt River Rd./Pearl Dr. carried about 22,000 vehicles and operated<br />

at LOS C during the peak hours. Backups occur for northbound traffic during parts of the afternoon<br />

peak hour where it necks down from four to two thus reducing the LOS to F for a short section.<br />

North of there it has some left turn lanes for a signalized intersection at T.R. Hughes Blvd. and a few<br />

at non-signalized intersections. Volumes drop northward until it reaches Lincoln <strong>County</strong> where it<br />

carried about 13,000 vehicles. Average speeds were about 47 mph for northbound and southbound<br />

traffic during the morning peak hours. This placed it at LOS C. During the afternoon peak hour,<br />

northbound traffic averaged 43 mph placing it at LOS D and southbound traffic had an average<br />

44


speed of 50 placing it at LOS C. The signals operated at LOS C during the peak hours, therefore,<br />

these LOS designations are appropriate.<br />

Rt. 94 - Rt. 370 to I-70<br />

This part of Rt. 94 runs from Rt. 370 south on Second <strong>St</strong>. to Clark <strong>St</strong>. on two lanes. There it travels<br />

west to Fifth <strong>St</strong>. and then south to First Capitol Dr. It then travels west becoming four lanes at<br />

Kingshighway and runs south to I-70, a distance of 3.4 miles. It has six traffic signals, a number of<br />

four way stops, and parking on both sides along most of its length. It travels through the City of <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> Central Business District. Average travel speeds in both directions are 23 mph in the<br />

morning peak hour providing LOS C. The signals at this time are also operating at LOS C.<br />

Therefore, LOS C during the morning peak hour is appropriate. During the afternoon peak hour,<br />

average travel speeds in both directions are about 20 mph providing LOS D. The signals handle<br />

more traffic and also operate at LOS D confirming this designation.<br />

Rt. 94 - I-70 to I-64<br />

This segment is six and four lanes divided from I-70 to I-64. It has been divided into three segments<br />

for analysis; I-70 to N. Rt. 364 (old Hemsath Rd.), S. Rt. 364 (north of Harvester Rd.) to Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr., and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64. The first section is 2.4 miles long and has five<br />

traffic signals. During the morning peak hours it had an average travel speed in both directions of<br />

27 mph which places it at LOS at D. Field observations indicate the signals are operating at LOS<br />

D. During the afternoon peak hour the same conditions exist with speeds of 26 mph both ways.<br />

Field observations show the signals are operating at LOS E which is the controlling factor and<br />

determines a LOS E designation.<br />

The segment of Rt. 94 from S. Rt. 364 to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. is 3.4 miles long and has five traffic<br />

signals. During the morning peak hours speeds are about 25 mph placing it at LOS D. However,<br />

the signals are operating at capacity with backups from almost one intersection to another. This<br />

results in LOS F. During the afternoon peak hour the same condition exists with traffic backup from<br />

one intersection to another. This produces extreme congestion. This segment is operating at LOS<br />

E and F during both the morning and afternoon peak hours.<br />

Rt. 94 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64 is 3.7 miles long and has five traffic signals. During the<br />

morning peak hour average travel speeds are 36 mph both ways placing it at LOS C. However, the<br />

signals are operating at LOS D, therefore, the segment is operating at LOS D. During the afternoon<br />

peak hours, average travel speeds are slightly higher placing it at LOS C. One major problem exists<br />

on this segment. It is the congestion for northbound traffic at Siedentop Rd., the first signal north<br />

of I-64. This signal operates at LOS F with long backups extending south almost daily to I-64.<br />

Traffic stacks onto the off ramp and often into the through westbound lanes of I-64. This creates<br />

a very hazardous, accident prone situation on I-64.<br />

45


Rt. K<br />

This road is a five-lane suburban arterial with extra lanes at signalized intersections. It is divided<br />

into two segments, one on the north from I-70 to Rt. N and the other from Rt. N to I-64 on the south.<br />

The north segment has 13 traffic signals and numerous entrances for commercial development along<br />

its 3.1 mile length. Speeds during the morning peak hour are 30 mph southbound and 36 mph<br />

northbound. This places it at LOS C which seems to be in line with the signal operations. During<br />

the afternoon speeds are 25 mph southbound and 23 mph northbound. This places the LOS at D<br />

which also is in line with the signal operations. Unfortunately, the signalized intersection of Rt. K<br />

and Rt. N operates at LOS F during the afternoon peak hours. Traffic is stacked up on all<br />

approaches and at times it takes more than one turn of the signal to negotiate the intersection. The<br />

intersection is operating at LOS F or with volumes in excess of its capacity.<br />

On the south segment there are seven signals along its 3.1 mile length. Speeds during the morning<br />

peak hour are 42 mph northbound and 33 mph southbound. This places the northbound at LOS B<br />

and southbound at LOS C. This seems appropriate for signal operations. In the afternoon peak<br />

hour, speeds are 27 mph northbound and 37 mph southbound placing the LOS at D for northbound<br />

and B for southbound. This seems appropriate for the signal operations. Although this road carries<br />

substantial volumes (40,000 in the north and 25,000 in the south) and they have been increasing, the<br />

wide road and good signal spacing have allowed traffic to move well. As volumes continue to grow,<br />

maintaining the good LOS may be a challenge.<br />

Rt. M (Main <strong>St</strong>.)<br />

This road runs 2.5 miles from I-70 to Rt. 79 through old town O’Fallon on four lanes with parts on<br />

the north and south widened to five lanes. It has six signals that operate at LOS D during both the<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours. Speeds during the morning are 28 mph northbound and 24 mph<br />

southbound. This places it at LOS D. In the afternoon, they are 23 northbound and 17 southbound.<br />

Northbound is at LOS D and southbound has some congestion around I-70 placing it at LOS E.<br />

Congestion through the old part of O’Fallon can be serious and occasionally aggravated by trains<br />

crossing just north of downtown. At these times all traffic for some distance comes to a complete<br />

stop. During the peak hour periods the road is operating at LOS E to F.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to Rt. 94, 4.5 miles and has 14 signals. Average speeds during<br />

the morning peak hours were 26 mph northbound and 31 mph southbound. The signals operated at<br />

LOS D, and E. During the afternoon peak hours speeds were 28 northbound and 30 southbound.<br />

The signals operated at LOS D, and E. From I-70 to Mexico Rd. during the peak hours it is<br />

operating with serious congestion. Volumes are quite high (36,000) due to all the commercial<br />

development at and around the Mid Rivers Mall. All of the signals are operating at LOS E during<br />

the morning peak hours and LOS F during the afternoon peak hours.<br />

46


Jungermann Rd.<br />

This road runs from Veterans Memorial Pkwy. to Rt. 94, 3.5 miles and has 10 signals. Speed runs<br />

were not conducted on this road by the Council, but observations reveal that it is operating without<br />

excessive congestion. Traffic volumes are around 30,000 south of Mexico Rd. and decline<br />

southward to about 20,000 north of McClay Rd. The signals are operating at LOS D during the peak<br />

hour periods except for the one at Mexico Rd. which is operating at capacity, LOS E. Travel on this<br />

road is estimated to be LOS D.<br />

Muegge Rd.<br />

This road has four lanes from Mexico Rd. south to Old Hwy. 94 and the ramp connections to Rt.<br />

364. It handles about 16,000 vehicles per day. Speed runs were not conducted on this road. It has<br />

seven signals not counting Mexico Rd. Observations indicate they all operate at or below LOS C<br />

during both the am and pm peak hours and the road operates at LOS C.<br />

Bryan Rd.<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to Rt. N where it becomes Winghaven Blvd., a four-lane parkway<br />

to U.S. 40/61. No speed runs were conducted on this road, however, it has six signals that all<br />

operate at LOS C during the peak hour periods. It carries about 25,000 vehicles per day and<br />

observations indicate it is has no serious congestion and operates at LOS C.<br />

Truman Rd.<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to Rt. 370, has three signals, and handles about 14,000 vehicles<br />

a day. It is two miles long to the I-70/Cave Spring Rd. interchange. No speed runs were made on<br />

this road but observations indicate it is operating at LOS C during the peak hours except for traffic<br />

at the north service road of I-70 that operates at LOS E.<br />

Mexico Rd.<br />

This five-lane road runs from Veterans Memorial Pkwy. just east of Muegge Rd. to Bryan Rd., a<br />

distance of 10 miles. It handles about 35,000 at Jungermann Rd., 30,000 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

to Rt. K, and 12,000 east of Bryan Rd. It has about 18 signals, some at school entrances. No speed<br />

runs were made on this road but observations suggest it could be divided into three different<br />

segments. The east segment would be from Muegge Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr., the central from<br />

there to Rt. K, and the west segment from Rt. K to Bryan Rd. The east segment operates at LOS D<br />

during the peak hours due to close signals and their operations. The central part operates at LOS<br />

C with the signal at Mexico Rd. providing LOS D during the peak hours. The west segment’s most<br />

critical issue is the signal at Rt. K but it operates at LOS D even during the peak hours. Traffic flow<br />

between signals is good at LOS C and as noted above dictates the roads LOS at these points.<br />

B-5.4. Minor Arterials<br />

Minor arterial roads can be two, three or four lanes and serve traffic for shorter distances. They<br />

connect traffic from collector roads and local streets to Principal Arterial roads. They serve adjacent<br />

47


land use, especially residential development, to a greater degree than roads of a higher classification.<br />

They normally carry less traffic than roads of a higher classification but more than collectors and<br />

local streets. The LOS on Minor Arterial roads vary depending on the land use they serve, their<br />

traffic volumes, number of traffic signals, stop controls, and side streets. A list of the more highly<br />

traveled ones in the <strong>County</strong> along with an estimate of their peak hour LOS is shown below.<br />

MoDOT Roads LOS<br />

Rt. 79 (Rt. M to Lincoln Co) C<br />

Rt. 94 (Rt. 370 to Rt. B) C<br />

Rt. 94 (I-64 to Warren Co.) C<br />

Rt. A (I-70 to U.S. 61) C<br />

Rt. N (Mid R. M. Dr. to U.S. 40/61) D<br />

Rt. N (U.S. 40/61 to Rt. Z) D<br />

Rt. Z (I-70 to Rt. N) C<br />

<strong>County</strong> Roads LOS<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. C<br />

Central School Rd. C<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. C<br />

Feise Rd. C<br />

Fifth <strong>St</strong>. D<br />

Friedens Rd. D<br />

Harvester Rd. D<br />

Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. D<br />

Knaust Rd. C<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. C<br />

McClay Rd. D<br />

O’Fallon Rd. C<br />

South River Rd. C<br />

Spencer Rd. D<br />

<strong>West</strong> Clay <strong>St</strong>. D<br />

Willott Rd. C<br />

Zumbehl Rd. D<br />

48


B-5.5. Major Collectors<br />

Major Collector roads serve a substantial part of the <strong>County</strong>. They collect traffic from local streets<br />

and roads and distribute them to Minor Arterials or Principal Arterial roads. They can be two or<br />

three lanes and occasionally four lanes. They may have traffic signals, especially for special<br />

generators such as schools, churches, public buildings, and large commercial developments. Their<br />

LOS can vary depending on land use, intersecting streets, and special generators. No attempt was<br />

made to determine LOS at the Major Collector road level.<br />

B-6. Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy<br />

In order to develop forecasts of traffic in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, the Council collects travel time data<br />

on a large number of major roads. Recently the procedure for collecting this data was updated by<br />

using Global Positioning System (GPS) recorders. This procedure was used in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

on many major roads for use in this study..<br />

Roads<br />

Table 12<br />

Travel Time <strong>St</strong>udy<br />

Roads Surveyed<br />

From To Miles<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Rt. K 3.22<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Warren <strong>County</strong> 26.75<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 9.96<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln <strong>County</strong> 7.31<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Illinois <strong>St</strong>ate Line 4.13<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Lincoln <strong>County</strong> 10.41<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 I-70 25.85<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Warren <strong>County</strong> 21.85<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> Rt. 94 3.23<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> I-70 8.49<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 6.38<br />

Rt. M I-70 Rt. 79 3.1<br />

Rt. N Mid Rivers M. Dr. U.S. 40.61 7.95<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.39<br />

Rt. Z Rt. N I-70 2.52<br />

Mid Rivers M. Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 4.53<br />

Total miles = 151.07<br />

In the fall of 2004 the Council developed a methodology for collecting travel time data. It consisted<br />

of selecting roads in the <strong>County</strong> where data was needed, developing a collection procedure, and<br />

determining the times and days of collection. The roads selected for inclusion in this study are listed<br />

49


on Table 12. They total 135 miles. All major state highways were selected including the Interstates,<br />

Freeways, Expressways, Major Arterials and some Minor Arterials. In addition, Mid Rivers Mall<br />

Dr. was included as it is a Major Arterial. A test vehicle was supplied with the GPS unit and driven<br />

during the morning, midday, and afternoon peak hours. These times were 6:30am to 9:00am,<br />

11:00am to 2:00pm, and 3:30pm to 6:00pm. The GPS unit recorded the exact position and time of<br />

the vehicle which then could be converted into speeds and delays that were encountered during the<br />

run The test vehicle traveled each road a number of times during each time period so that data for<br />

multiple days could be averaged. If weather conditions, crashes, other incidents, or unusual delays,<br />

were encountered the run was aborted and reran on another day. The data was downloaded from<br />

the GPS unit into the Council’s computer and analyzed. A report entitled <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Travel<br />

Time and Speed <strong>St</strong>udy August 2005, was prepared describing the results of the study. All of the<br />

travel times during the peak hour periods for these roads were taken from this report.<br />

A tabulation of the findings for these roads is shown in Table 13. It contains the direction, speed,<br />

travel time, delay, and percent of delay during the morning and afternoon peak hours. Table 14<br />

ranks the roads according to their percent delay for the a.m. and p.m. periods. These values are the<br />

average of a number of runs. A discussion of the travel time, delay, and percent of delay follows.<br />

I-64 eastbound traffic during the morning peak hour had the highest volume but traveled at the speed<br />

limit without any congestion. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic during the afternoon peak hour traveled at 56 mph<br />

and delay was about 10 percent of travel time. This was due to the congestion on the Missouri River<br />

bridge caused by the narrow lanes.<br />

I-70 eastbound traffic during the morning peak hour between Warren <strong>County</strong> and Rt. 79 ran at 44<br />

mph, 16 mph below the speed limit. The section between Bryan Rd. and Rt. 79 has serious<br />

congestion problems that reduce speeds to about 10 mph with stop-start traffic. Delays were 35<br />

percent of travel time. From Rt. 79 to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> speed was 54 mph. Sections between Rt.<br />

79 and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and to the Missouri River bridge had speeds of about 30 mph and delays<br />

of up to three minutes. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic during the morning peak hour had some delays but they<br />

were not serious. During the afternoon peak hour westbound traffic experienced serious congestion<br />

from the east of the Missouri River bridge to Rt. 79. Traffic traveled at only 50 mph and delays<br />

made up 10 percent of travel time. <strong>East</strong>bound traffic did not have any serious congestion or delays.<br />

U. S. 40/61 traffic eastbound during the morning from I-70 to Rt. K had speeds of 49 mph. Delays<br />

were more than 15 percent due to the signalized intersections of Callahan Rd., Prospect Rd., and Rt.<br />

N. From Rt. N east, speeds rose to 55 mph. <strong>West</strong>bound speeds were slightly less, about 54 mph and<br />

delays of up to one minute. This was mainly due to less traffic. During the afternoon peak hour,<br />

westbound speeds were about 44 mph due to the signals and delays were as high as 27 percent of<br />

travel time. <strong>East</strong>bound had higher speeds at 54 mph and delays were only 5 percent of travel time.<br />

U.S. 61 experienced no delays and traffic traveled at the speed limit at all times in both directions<br />

of travel from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>.<br />

50


U.S. 67 experienced no delays and traffic traveled at the speed limit at all times in both directions<br />

of travel from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Alton, Illinois.<br />

Rt. 79 had no delay problems from Rt. M to Lincoln <strong>County</strong> during all times of the day. Some<br />

delays were experienced during the peak hours at the signal of T.R. Hughes north of I-70.<br />

51


Table 13<br />

Travel Time and Delay Data<br />

Summary of Major Roads<br />

MoDOT and <strong>County</strong> Roads<br />

Road Beginning End Peak Dir. Miles Speed Speed Travel Delay Percent<br />

Hour Limit (mph) Time<br />

(Min.)<br />

(Min.) Delay<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K A.M. W.B. 3.22 60 61 3.25 0.30 9.2%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.22 60 62 3.23 0.15 4.6%<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K P.M. W.B. 3.22 60 56 3.61 0.37 10.2%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.22 60 65 3.05 0.10 3.3%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 A.M. W.B. 9.71 60 62 10.34 0.50 4.8%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 9.71 60 54 12.50 0.93 7.5%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 P.M. W.B. 9.71 60 50 13.20 1.28 9.7%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 9.71 60 63 10.44 0.17 1.6%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. A.M. W.B. 17.00 60 66 14.92 0.05 0.3%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 A.M. E.B. 17.00 60 44 24.74 8.60 34.8%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. P.M. W.B. 17.00 60 60 16.43 0.55 3.3%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 P.M. E.B. 17.00 60 67 14.69 0.13 0.9%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 A.M. W.B. 9.96 55 54 11.45 0.85 7.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K A.M. E.B. 9.96 55 49 12.80 1.97 15.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 P.M. W.B. 9.96 55 44 14.58 4.00 27.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K P.M. E.B. 9.96 55 54 11.73 0.58 5.0%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 A.M W.B. 10.40 55 35 19.03 5.27 27.7%<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 A.M. E.B. 10.40 55 29 22.98 9.15 39.8%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 P.M. W.B. 10.40 55 29 23.45 8.60 36.7%<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 P.M. E.B. 10.40 55 32 20.88 6.55 31.4%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. A.M. W.B. 3.23 60 60 6.10 0.18 3.0%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.23 60 59 6.25 0.17 2.7%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. P.M. W.B. 3.23 60 48 7.62 1.62 21.2%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.23 60 61 5.96 0.05 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 A.M. W.B. 8.49 60 68 7.90 0.00 0.0%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 8.49 60 65 8.16 0.07 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 P.M. W.B. 8.49 60 65 8.08 0.07 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 8.49 60 66 7.92 0.05 0.6%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 A.M. S.B. 6.38 45 31 12.20 3.08 25.3%<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 A.M. N.B. 6.38 45 38 9.85 1.30 13.2%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 P.M. S.B. 6.38 45 29 12.96 3.67 28.3%<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 P.M. N.B. 6.38 45 24 16.15 6.68 41.4%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 A.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.75 3.80 35.3%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 A.M. N.B. 4.32 35 26 10.90 4.17 38.2%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 P.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.50 3.25 31.0%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 P.M. N.B. 4.32 35 28 9.88 2.68 27.2%<br />

52


Road Beginning End<br />

Table 14<br />

Travel Time and Delay Data<br />

Roads Ranked by Percent Delay<br />

A.M Peak Hours<br />

Peak<br />

Hour Dir. Miles<br />

53<br />

Speed<br />

Limit<br />

Speed<br />

(mph)<br />

Travel<br />

Time<br />

(min)<br />

Delay<br />

(min)<br />

Percent<br />

Delay<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 A.M. E.B. 10.40 55 29 22.98 9.15 39.8%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 A.M. N.B. 4.32 35 26 10.90 4.17 38.2%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 A.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.75 3.80 35.3%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 A.M. E.B. 17.00 60 44 24.74 8.60 34.8%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 A.M W.B. 10.40 55 35 19.03 5.27 27.7%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 A.M. S.B. 6.38 45 31 12.20 3.08 25.3%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K A.M. E.B. 9.96 55 49 12.80 1.97 15.4%<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 A.M. N.B. 6.38 45 38 9.85 1.30 13.2%<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K A.M. W.B. 3.22 60 61 3.25 0.30 9.2%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 9.71 60 54 12.50 0.93 7.5%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 A.M. W.B. 9.96 55 54 11.45 0.85 7.4%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 A.M. W.B. 9.71 60 62 10.34 0.50 4.8%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.22 60 62 3.23 0.15 4.6%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. A.M. W.B. 3.23 60 60 6.10 0.18 3.0%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 3.23 60 59 6.25 0.17 2.7%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. A.M. E.B. 8.49 60 65 8.16 0.07 0.8%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. A.M. W.B. 17.00 60 66 14.92 0.05 0.3%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 A.M. W.B. 8.49 60 68 7.90 0.00 0.0%<br />

P.M. Peak Hours<br />

Road Beginning End<br />

Peak<br />

Hour Dir. Miles<br />

Speed<br />

Limit<br />

Speed<br />

(mph)<br />

Travel<br />

Time<br />

(min)<br />

Delay<br />

(min)<br />

Percent<br />

Delay<br />

Rt. K I-64 I-70 P.M. N.B. 6.38 45 24 16.15 6.68 41.4%<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 I-64 P.M. W.B. 10.40 55 29 23.45 8.60 36.7%<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 I-70 P.M. E.B. 10.40 55 32 20.88 6.55 31.4%<br />

Mid R M Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 P.M. S.B. 4.32 35 26 10.50 3.25 31.0%<br />

Rt. K I-70 I-64 P.M. S.B. 6.38 45 29 12.96 3.67 28.3%<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K I-70 P.M. W.B. 9.96 55 44 14.58 4.00 27.4%<br />

Mid R M Dr. Rt. 94 I-70 P.M. N.B. 4.32 35 28 9.88 2.68 27.2%<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 94 W. P.M. W.B. 3.23 60 48 7.62 1.62 21.2%<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. K P.M. W.B. 3.22 60 56 3.61 0.37 10.2%<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. Rt. 79 P.M. W.B. 9.71 60 50 13.20 1.28 9.7%<br />

U.S. 40/61 I-70 Rt. K P.M. E.B. 9.96 55 54 11.73 0.58 5.0%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Warren Co. P.M. W.B. 17.00 60 60 16.43 0.55 3.3%<br />

I-64 Rt. K <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.22 60 65 3.05 0.10 3.3%<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 9.71 60 63 10.44 0.17 1.6%<br />

I-70 Warren Co. Rt. 79 P.M. E.B. 17.00 60 67 14.69 0.13 0.9%<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 W. <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 3.23 60 61 5.96 0.05 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. I-70 P.M. W.B. 8.49 60 65 8.08 0.07 0.8%<br />

Rt. 370 I-70 <strong>St</strong>. Louis Co. P.M. E.B. 8.49 60 66 7.92 0.05 0.6%


Rt. 94 from I-70 to I-64 was the section with the most serious speed and delay problems of all<br />

routes surveyed. During the morning peak hour, eastbound traffic moved at only 29 mph with the<br />

highest delay of all roads, 40 percent of the travel time. This was caused by the numerous signalized<br />

intersections and the high volume of traffic. On some segments, such as Kisker Rd. to Harvester<br />

Rd. and Pralle Ln. to I-70, speeds were even lower and delays longer. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic did not fare<br />

much better having speeds of 35 mph and delays making up 28 percent of travel time. The worst<br />

segments were Harvester Rd. to Kisker Rd. and some between O’Fallon Rd. and I-64.<br />

During the afternoon peak hour conditions were just as bad with delays ranking second and third at<br />

37 and 31 percent of travel time. <strong>West</strong>bound speeds averaged 29 mph and eastbound were 32 mph.<br />

Delays caused serious congestion with vehicles operating in a start-stop mode. As mentioned<br />

earlier, eastbound traffic at Siedentop Rd. had delays which caused traffic exiting I-64 to back into<br />

the off ramp creating a serious safety issue. Reductions in speed and increased delays also were<br />

experienced from Kisker Rd. to Harvester Rd. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic was slightly better although<br />

reduced speeds and long delays also occurred at these locations.<br />

Rt. 364 had almost no delays and traveled at the speed limit during all hours of the day for both<br />

eastbound and westbound traffic.<br />

Rt. 370 ranked best for delays and travel was at the speed limit at all times of the day in both<br />

directions of travel.<br />

Rt. K has considerable delays and low speeds due to its many intersections and entrances. During<br />

the morning peak hours southbound speeds are only 31 mph and delays make up 25 percent of travel<br />

time. Northbound travel has speed of 38 mph and delays of 13 percent. During the afternoon peak<br />

hours northbound traffic ranks the list with speeds of 24 mph and delays of 41 percent of travel time.<br />

Southbound traffic is not much better with speeds of 29 mph and delays of 28 percent. Traffic<br />

volumes have continued to increase with growth in residential development.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr., is an arterial road with numerous signalized intersection and many entrances.<br />

It has a 35 mph speed limit. During the morning peak hours it had speeds of 26 mph both<br />

northbound and southbound and the second and third highest delay with 38 and 35 percent of travel<br />

time. During the afternoon peak hours it also had low speeds of 26 and 28 mph and delays of 31 and<br />

27 percent of travel time. Although congestion can be severe in some locations such as the Mid<br />

River Mall area, it handles traffic without severe congestion or safety problems.<br />

Summary<br />

Table 14 shows that the roads with the highest percent of delays during the morning peak hours were<br />

eastbound Rt. 94 between I-70 and I-64 with 39.8%, north and southbound Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

between Rt. 94 and I-70 with 38.2% and 35.3%, and I-70 from Warren <strong>County</strong> to Rt. 79 with 34.8%.<br />

Actually, the delays on I-70 start around Bryan Rd. and continue east through Rt. K and Rt. 79<br />

through Mid Rivers Mall Dr. <strong>West</strong>bound traffic on Rt. 94 from I-70 to I-64 had the next highest<br />

delay with 27.7 percent followed by southbound Rt. K from I-70 to I-64 with 25.3 percent.<br />

During the afternoon peak hours the greatest delays occurred on northbound Rt. K from I-64 to I-70<br />

with 41.4 percent, the highest percent for all roads surveyed. Rt. 94 west and eastbound from I-70<br />

to I-64 had the next highest delays with 36.7 percent and 31.4 percent. Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

54


southbound from I-70 to Rt. 94 was next with 31.0 percent followed by Rt. K southbound from I-70<br />

to I-64 with 28.3 percent. Roads with the least amount of delays were Rt. 370 both during the<br />

morning and afternoon peak hours, Rt. 364, parts of I-70 from Rt. 79 to Warren <strong>County</strong>, and U.S.<br />

61 from Lincoln <strong>County</strong> to I-70.<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Public transportation consists of any mode of ground travel that is available to the public besides a<br />

private vehicle. It generally consists of transportation services offered by any public or private<br />

agency for the purpose of moving people from one place to another. Public transportation in the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Louis region consists of fixed route bus transit, light rail transit, and paratransit services. Metro<br />

(formerly the Bi-<strong>St</strong>ate Development Agency) provides fixed route bus services in <strong>St</strong>. Louis City and<br />

<strong>County</strong> and operates MetroLink, the light rail transit system. They also provide paratransit services<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. Louis City and <strong>County</strong>. The <strong>St</strong>. Clair <strong>County</strong> and Madison <strong>County</strong> Transit Districts in Illinois<br />

also provide fixed route bus service for their counties. Numerous public and private agencies<br />

provide paratransit service throughout the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region.<br />

C-1. Fixed Route Bus Service<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has been quite active in planning and providing public transportation. In 1992<br />

the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit Authority was established by action of the Missouri General<br />

Assembly. It consists of a five-member board who meets periodically to discuss plans for future<br />

public transportation in the <strong>County</strong>. The agency is eligible to receive and dispense funds for public<br />

transportation but to-date no funding source has been provided.<br />

In 1997 the Council was asked to conduct a feasibility study of providing fixed route bus service in<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. A report entitled “A Technical Memorandum for a <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>” was completed in January 1998. It identified a number of bus routes that could serve<br />

residential and commercial property throughout the most densely developed part of the <strong>County</strong>. The<br />

report was used by the Transit Authority to consider ways of instituting bus service in the <strong>County</strong>.<br />

In early 2001 the <strong>County</strong> requested the Council update the 1998 plan to take advantage of the 2000<br />

Census and other new data. A report entitled “A <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit <strong>Plan</strong> for Intra-<strong>County</strong><br />

and Inter-<strong>County</strong> Bus Service” was completed in August 2001. The report contained updated census<br />

and demographic data and identified three corridors that should have bus service. They were I-70<br />

from the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to Wentzville, Rt. 94 from the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to Mid Rivers Mall<br />

Dr., and Mid Rivers Mall Dr. from I-70 to Rt. 94. It also recommended commuter bus service on<br />

I-70 to and from park and ride lots to the N. Hanley Rd. MetroLink station. Details of the<br />

recommended bus system can be found in the report. The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> suggests<br />

the Transit Authority pursue instituting bus service as described in the report. However, the lack<br />

of a steady and reliable funding source has hampered their ability to institute such service.<br />

Only one fixed route bus system is in operation in the <strong>County</strong> and it is the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Area Transit<br />

(SCAT) system provided by the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>. It consists of four bus routes that cover all parts<br />

of the city and operates once each hour, Monday through Friday, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.. They<br />

also operate a peak hour commuter bus service from park and ride lots on I-70 to the MetroLink<br />

station in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> at N. Hanley Rd. These services allow persons without any other means<br />

of transportation, in and around the City of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and some commuters on I-70, to travel within<br />

55


the city and also connect to the transit service in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and City.<br />

The cities of <strong>St</strong>. Peters and O’Fallon do not presently provide any fixed route bus service but have<br />

been considering future possibilities. The city of Wentzville completed a transit study in 2003 and<br />

is using it as a guide for future bus service.<br />

C-2. Paratransit Service<br />

Paratransit service is quite different from fixed route transit. Its primary purpose is to provide<br />

transportation services to persons, who are transit dependant and elderly, have developmental and/or<br />

mental disabilities, and poor or homeless persons who are disabled. It is mostly demand responsive,<br />

that is, persons call a paratransit provider and arrange for transportation on specific days from their<br />

place of residence to their destination and back. <strong>Transportation</strong> is provided using vans or minibuses<br />

and the drivers and vehicles must meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act<br />

(ADA) of 1990. Some paratransit trips are made on a fixed route for group travel to a nutrition site<br />

or sheltered workshop. Also, some paratransit trips are made on the SCAT system as its service can<br />

deviate (within given distances) from its fixed route for persons with special needs. Paratransit<br />

services are normally operated by social service or specialized private organizations receiving both<br />

public and private funding. Because of ADA requirements, they have specific service mandates,<br />

operating conditions, and operating constraints.<br />

Funding for paratransit service comes from a number of sources. They are as follows;<br />

1. Federal Title III-B (Older Americans Act).<br />

2. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants administered by MoDOT. There are four FTA<br />

funding categories that are explained in the discussion of the TIP in the next chapter.<br />

3. Missouri Elderly and Handicapped <strong>Transportation</strong> Assistance Program (MEHTAP) funds<br />

administered through MoDOT.<br />

4. Missouri Department of Health funds.<br />

5. Medicaid funds.<br />

6. Other private funding.<br />

In 2000 the Council retained a consultant to study paratransit service in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> to<br />

determine ways of coordinating services between providers to reduce costs and improve service.<br />

A report entitled “<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit/Paratransit Coordination <strong>St</strong>udy” was completed in<br />

October 2000. It contained data from almost all paratransit providers in the <strong>County</strong> including the<br />

area they covered, the number and type of vehicles they operated, their hours in service, and the<br />

number of one-way trips they provided. It includes a list of existing conditions and paratransit<br />

providers and the number of vehicles they operated, the number of yearly passengers they served,<br />

and the yearly cost they incurred to provide these services. This report has not been updated since<br />

then but the data serves as a baseline for this study. Complete details of all paratransit providers can<br />

be found in the report along with recommendations for future services. A summary of some of the<br />

major items in the report is as follows.<br />

56


• The consultant sent out questionnaires to 17 paratransit providers and interviewed each one<br />

to determine details of the services they provided. The interviews revealed that about<br />

492,000 one-way passenger trips costing about $1.1 million were made in 2000 by these 17<br />

paratransit providers. These numbers are low since a number of agencies surveyed did not<br />

have or would not provide some of the information. Since it has been five years since this<br />

survey, it is likely that the number of trips and their costs are now higher.<br />

• A substantial amount of paratransit service is purchased from private for-profit and nonprofit<br />

providers by many state agencies including the Missouri Department of Mental Health,<br />

Division of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, the Mid-<strong>East</strong> Area Agency<br />

on Aging, and the Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Medical Services.<br />

• Paratransit service is also provided by a large number of agencies that use their own staff to<br />

transport clients so they can participate in other programs. Many organizations such as the<br />

Emmaus Homes, the Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services,<br />

reimburse clients for their own travel including the purchases of taxi and bus tickets.<br />

• Future demand for paratransit service in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will grow as the population<br />

continues to increase and the average age grows older.<br />

Since the 2000 Paratransit Report was published, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has continued to grow and<br />

more areas are becoming urbanized with residential and commercial development growing at a fast<br />

pace. Much of the developing area will increase the demand for future paratransit service. In<br />

addition, many areas of the <strong>County</strong> are rural and have limited or no paratransit service. Increased<br />

demand for these services can be expected in the future. Resources for this report did not allow for<br />

a detailed study of paratransit like the one provided by the consultant in 2000. However, data from<br />

MoDOT and the census helped to estimate what can be expected in the future.<br />

A list of agencies that recently received paratransit funds through MoDOT is listed below.<br />

• Community Living Inc., <strong>St</strong>. Peters, MO<br />

• Crider Center for Mental Health, Inc. Wentzville, MO<br />

• Emmaus Homes - <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, MO<br />

• Delta Center for Independent Living, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, MO<br />

• <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Association for Retarded Citizens <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, MO<br />

C-3. Light Rail Transit<br />

As part of its work in identifying corridors for possible light rail transit (MetroLink) extensions, the<br />

Council published a report in June 1991entitled “<strong>St</strong>. Louis System Analysis for Major Transit<br />

Capital Investment.” High on the list was an extension from the MetroLink station at Lambert<br />

International Airport west along the I-70 corridor into <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. A Major Investment<br />

<strong>St</strong>udy (MIS) and Draft Environmental Impact <strong>St</strong>atement (DEIS) for the corridor was initiated by the<br />

Council in 1993. These documents were approved by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in<br />

57


June 1996. In order to move forward with the extension, the <strong>County</strong> needed the 20 percent match<br />

required for funding the project. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> placed a one-half cent sales tax proposal before<br />

the voters in August and again in November of 1996. Both times the proposal failed. Since then<br />

other corridors in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region have been funded and improvements to the initial 18-mile<br />

system from downtown <strong>St</strong>. Louis to the airport has been constructed. The possibility of restoring<br />

the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> corridor to the MetroLink system now seems remote.<br />

D. Railroads<br />

Two railroads operate in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe and the Norfolk<br />

and Southern. The Burlington Northern travels from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> north along U.S. 67 to <strong>West</strong><br />

Alton and from there west in the northern part of the <strong>County</strong> close to the Mississippi River into<br />

Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It has no stops except for a spur to the Ameren Power <strong>Plan</strong>t at Portage Des Sioux.<br />

The Norfolk and Southern enter from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> along side Rt. 370 and travels west in the<br />

I-70 corridor into Warren <strong>County</strong> with a spur to the General Motors plant at Wentzville. These two<br />

railroads have no current plans for changes to their rail lines. No other railroad companies have<br />

expressed an interest in providing service in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> at this time.<br />

E. Pipeline<br />

According to the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 2015 there are 11 pipelines operating in the<br />

<strong>County</strong>. They include the following companies and move the noted products:<br />

• Amoco Gasoline, Petroleum<br />

• Arco Diesel Fuel #2, Kerosene, Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline<br />

• Conoco Fuel Oils, Liquid Petroleum Gas, Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline<br />

• Explorer Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline, Aviation Fuel (JP - 4)<br />

• Williams Diesel Fuel #2, Leaded and Unleaded Gasoline<br />

• Kochs Liquid Anhydrous Ammonia<br />

• Kochs Crude Oil<br />

• Missouri Natural Gas<br />

• Platte Crude Oil<br />

• Shell Crude Oil<br />

• Southern <strong>St</strong>ar Central Natural Gas<br />

These companies traverse all parts of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> entering from the west. Some cross the<br />

Missouri River and others enter from Warren and Lincoln Counties, They all converge in the<br />

northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> between the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers and cross into Illinois just<br />

north of the confluence of the rivers. This is the area in the Illinois part of the Region that has a<br />

large amount of petroleum and natural gas facilities that process and distribute products from the<br />

pipelines. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> plays no role in handling material from the pipelines with the<br />

exception of one facility, Williams Petroleum in <strong>St</strong>. Peters. The company transfers a small amount<br />

of petroleum from a Conoco pipeline to trucks. As a result, these modes of transportation have no<br />

impact, including employment opportunities, and place no demands on the <strong>County</strong>.<br />

58


F. Aviation<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has two general aviation airports. One is Smartt Airport and the other is <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport. Smartt Airport is located in the northeast part of the <strong>County</strong> adjacent<br />

to Grafton Ferry Rd. north of Rt. 94. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport is also in the northeast part of<br />

the <strong>County</strong> just south of Rt. B west of Rt. 94. Smartt Airport has an instrument runway that allows<br />

aircraft to land when the weather is below Visual Flight Rule (VFR) minimums of 1,000 feet. The<br />

FAA has designated Smartt Airport as a reliever airport for Lambert International for general<br />

aviation aircraft. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal has no instrument capabilities.<br />

The <strong>County</strong> had an airport study conducted by a consultant in 2002 entitled <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>-<br />

Smartt Airport Master <strong>Plan</strong>. Although some of the recommendations in the report do not have the<br />

approval of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) yet, extending the main runway by 600 ft.<br />

to 4,400 ft., which has been considered of real value by the <strong>County</strong>. Mention is made of the airport<br />

in the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> 2015, as an opportunity to better meet the aviation needs of<br />

the <strong>County</strong>, expand the general aviation infrastructure, and increase the <strong>County</strong>’s aviation activity.<br />

The <strong>County</strong> has been discussing various possibilities for improving general aviation activity<br />

including expanding Smartt Airport.<br />

Highway traffic presently generated by the two airports is quite small and does not impose any<br />

traffic problems on the supporting highway system. Even an expanded facility, such as the one<br />

proposed for Smartt Airport, would not cause any future traffic problems regardless of its size as it<br />

only serves general aviation activity.<br />

G. Barge<br />

Since the 1997 <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> transportation study, no change has occurred in barge operations<br />

on the Missouri or Mississippi Rivers that would affect the <strong>County</strong>’s transportation system.<br />

Operations consist of travel up and down the rivers past the <strong>County</strong>. No new facilities have been<br />

built and there is no exchange of material to another mode of travel such as truck or railroad. There<br />

is no travel to such a facility by persons in the <strong>County</strong> generating additional traffic on county roads.<br />

59


A. Overview<br />

IV. <strong>Transportation</strong> Safety<br />

The safety of travel on the road system of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and other transportation modes, such<br />

as railroad and aviation, was considered a very important topic in this report. This chapter goes into<br />

detail regarding their safety by examining available historical data. These data provided<br />

information on the number of crashes on the road system, the number of crashes at railroad<br />

crossings, and safety measures at the <strong>County</strong>’s airports. For the road system a substantial amount<br />

of data was acquired from MoDOT. An analysis of these data is contained in the following parts<br />

of this chapter.<br />

B. Major Road System Safety<br />

The safety of travel on the major road system includes travel by automobiles, trucks, motorcycles,<br />

bicycles, and pedestrians. The major road system consists of most of MoDOT’s roads and many<br />

<strong>County</strong> and city roads. Lists of these roads are contained in the tables that follow. The degree of<br />

safety afforded traffic on the major roads was measured by the number of crashes (commonly know<br />

as accidents) that occur on a given road segment. Crash data was supplied by MoDOT for all the<br />

roads including those maintained by the <strong>County</strong> and cities.<br />

In 2003 MoDOT organized a group of public and private partners to study safety issues and develop<br />

methods for improving safety in the state. A document entitled “Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer<br />

Roadways” was published in November 2004. More than 150 partners provided input for the report<br />

and some of the data was used in this study. Appendix A contains the Executive Summary of that<br />

report. The report contains a wealth of information regarding travel in Missouri and road and driver<br />

conditions. It is considered an important adjunct to this report and is discussed later.<br />

B-1. Number of Crashes, Severity Ratings, and Crash Rates<br />

This section discusses measures of safety afforded traffic on the <strong>County</strong>’s road system. They<br />

include the number of crashes on a road segment, the severity of the crashes, and the crash rates.<br />

MoDOT roads are discussed first followed by the <strong>County</strong> and cities roads. In some cases parts of<br />

roads carrying MoDOT route markings are maintained by the <strong>County</strong> or a city.<br />

Three measures are used to assess the degree of safety afforded traffic on specific road segments.<br />

The first is the number of crashes that occur on the segment, the second is the severity rating of the<br />

crashes, and the third is the crash rate. Traffic engineers use the number of crashes during the most<br />

recent three years to calculate these safety measures. For this study, crash data for the years 2002,<br />

2003, and 2004 were used. Data for 2005 is still being processed. The severity rating measure was<br />

developed using MoDOT’s methodology which assigns a value of nine for each fatal crash and six<br />

for each disabling injury crash. These values are then added to give the route a severity rating. The<br />

crash rate is the measure used by traffic engineers as it provides a relationship between the number<br />

of crashes on a road segment, the length of the segment, and the volume of traffic on the road.<br />

60


B-1.1 MoDOT Roads<br />

Number of Crashes<br />

The number of crashes that were reported on MoDOT’s roads for 2002, 2003, and 2004, are shown<br />

in Table 15. A total of 44 road segments was listed. The roads are arranged by functional<br />

classification showing their number of fatality, disabling injury, minor injury and property damage<br />

crashes for each year. The number of fatality crashes was the lowest type. Most involved only one |<br />

fatality and constitute less than 1 percent of each year’s total. Disabling Injury crashes were also<br />

low, around 3 percent. Personal Injury and Property Damage crashes were the highest with more<br />

than 96 percent of all crashes.<br />

Table 16 shows the road segments ranked by number of crashes per mile. Although it does not<br />

include volumes or severity data, it does show where most of the crashes have occurred. Almost all<br />

segments of I-70 are in the top part of the list. They carry the highest traffic volumes in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> ranging from 190,000 to 175,000 vehicles per day. The segment from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to<br />

Rt. 94 is first. It includes the highly traveled Rt. 94 and Fifth <strong>St</strong> interchanges. Second was Rt. K<br />

from I-70 to Rt. N. It has high volumes and numerous intersections that create conflict points that<br />

are potential locations for crashes. The third highest segment was I-70 from Rt. 370 to Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. This short section contains two major interchanges that carry substantial traffic volumes<br />

which are negotiating weaving movements that create the potential for crashes. In addition, long<br />

backups are experienced in the afternoon for the westbound off ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

creating the potential for collisions.<br />

The mean number of crashes per mile of the 44 segments is 131. There are 17 segments at or above<br />

this number and some of them, especially I-70 and Rt. K, have quite high numbers. There are 27<br />

segments below the mean and many of them (11) have very low numbers, between 30 down to 2.<br />

Severity Rating<br />

Table 17 lists the road segments ranked by their severity ratings. Although it does not take into<br />

account the road’s traffic volume, its length, and the total number of crashes, it does provide an<br />

insight of roads with a high number of severe crashes, those with fatality or disabling injury crashes.<br />

At the top was Rt. 94 from Rt. 370 through the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to I-70. The second highest<br />

was I-70 from <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> to Rt. 94. Four other segments of Rt. 94 also were high. The mean<br />

number of severity rating crashes of the 44 segments is 76. This places 22 segments above and 22<br />

below it. This means the severity ratings are fairly uniform for the 44 roads. I-70 which carries the<br />

highest traffic volumes in the <strong>County</strong> only had 3 of it 12 segments above the mean.<br />

61


Table 15<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data by Type<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Segment Crashes by Type<br />

Fatalities Disabling Injury<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 Totals<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 0 0 0 2 2 1 200 163 71 439<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 0 0 0 12 9 9 254 283 231 798<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 0 0 0 5 4 0 119 127 125 380<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 0 1 0 6 9 3 137 169 161 486<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 1 0 1 2 5 2 103 104 123 341<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 1 0 0 4 2 6 171 124 141 449<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 0 0 1 2 2 3 184 150 176 518<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 0 0 1 2 9 3 201 195 212 623<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 0 1 0 2 6 1 137 121 131 399<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>L 2.0 0 1 1 6 5 2 95 106 100 316<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>L U.S. 40/61 3.6 1 0 0 2 3 2 83 132 106 329<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 0 1 0 5 5 3 182 165 145 506<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 0 0 0 5 1 2 130 90 147 375<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 23 26<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 0 0 1 0 0 1 55 53 76 186<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 0 0 0 2 0 0 21 17 22 62<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 0 0 1 1 4 1 38 58 45 148<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 0 0 0 2 3 2 69 82 80 238<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 0 0 1 1 5 7 128 175 134 451<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 1 1 0 5 6 9 108 142 173 445<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 5 0 0 7 4 5 98 71 97 287<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 0 1 2 6 5 5 56 38 46 159<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 0 0 0 1 3 2 46 58 58 168<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 2 0 0 3 2 6 33 51 38 135<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 0 2 2 5 10 5 84 66 73 247<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 1 0 0 11 8 12 344 329 367 1072<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 0 0 0 10 6 10 310 281 302 919<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 1 0 1 2 5 4 237 226 295 771<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 1 0 0 3 12 1 197 217 177 608<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 0 0 0 1 0 1 54 33 27 116<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 1 2 0 5 3 5 29 28 25 98<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 1 0 1 6 2 10 32 39 54 145<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 0 1 0 0 1 1 58 63 46 170<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 0 0 0 3 0 1 5 3 2 14<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 3 1 9<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 0 1 0 1 2 4 25 30 26 89<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 0 0 0 4 7 4 472 425 381 1293<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 0 0 0 2 4 2 124 139 142 413<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 0 0 1 4 3 5 157 178 153 501<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 0 0 0 6 4 4 162 172 165 513<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 1 0 0 0 2 3 40 60 47 153<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 1 1 0 3 1 2 51 47 55 161<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 0 0 1 2 4 2 41 41 34 125<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 0 0 2 2 3 8 45 25 66 151<br />

Totals = 188.0 18 13 17 154 171 161 5118 5081 5099 15832<br />

63<br />

Personal Injury/<br />

Property Damage


Table 16<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crashes per Mile<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 3 Yr Total 2004 ADTs<br />

3 Year<br />

Crashes<br />

per Mile<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 441<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 409<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 365<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 302<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 301<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 299<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 299<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 275<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 272<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 239<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 237<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 224<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 215<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 192<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 162<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 156<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 136<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 131<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 128<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 124<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 115<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 103<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 97<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 93<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 91<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 88<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 77<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 53<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 52<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 50<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 46<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 42<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 39<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 62 44 53 159 25800 38<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 28<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 25<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 21<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 16<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 16<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 16<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 15<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 11<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 10<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 3<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 2<br />

Totals and Averages = 189.3 5344 5260 5349 15953 128<br />

64


Table 17<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Severity Rating<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

3 Yr 2004 Severity<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Ratg<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 195<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 180<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 156<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 156<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 141<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 138<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 126<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 62 44 53 159 25800 123<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 117<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 105<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 105<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 96<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 96<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 93<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 90<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 87<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 87<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 84<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 84<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 84<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 81<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 81<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 72<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 63<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 57<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 54<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 54<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 51<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 51<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 51<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 48<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 48<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 45<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 42<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 39<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 36<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 30<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 24<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 21<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 15<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 12<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 12<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 12<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 6<br />

Totals and Averages = 188.0 5290 5265 5277 15832 76<br />

65


Crash Rates<br />

The crash rate is the best measure of safety on a given road segment and is calculated as follows.<br />

R = (A x 100 x 1,000,000)<br />

(365 days x T x V x L)<br />

where:<br />

R = crash rate in crashes per 100 million vehicle-miles (100MVM).<br />

A = number of crashes reported during the analysis period.<br />

T = time of the analysis period in years.<br />

V = annual average daily traffic on the road segment.<br />

L = length of the road segment in miles.<br />

Table 18 lists the roads by functional class with their crash rate. It relates the number of crashes to<br />

the length of the road and traffic volume. Table 19 ranks them by their crash rates. The road with<br />

the highest was Rt. 94 from Rt. 370 through the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to I-70. It travels through the<br />

urban core of the city and has many signals, driveways, and curb parking that create conflict points.<br />

Other road segments at the top of the list include a few that have short lengths with relatively low<br />

traffic volumes. However, they have many crashes because of numerous intersections and entrances.<br />

The road segments with the lowest crash rates, those that are the safest, are I-70 and I-64 and all the<br />

other freeways and expressways. Although they carry high volumes and have the most crashes per<br />

mile, they are the safest for the amount of vehicles they handle due to their high design standards.<br />

Severity Crash Rates<br />

In order to further assess the safety of travel on the road segments, a severity crash rate was<br />

developed. The crash rate formula described above was used but instead of using total crashes, the<br />

number of fatal and disabling injury crashes were used. This allowed for examining the severity of<br />

crashes on a road while taking into account its length and traffic volume. Table 20 shows the listing<br />

of the roads and their ranking.<br />

It was determined that the roads with the highest severity crash rates were those on two lane roads<br />

mainly in rural parts of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. First was Rt. 94 from Rt. D to Rt. DD, a two-lane road<br />

with severe horizontal and vertical curves, and second was Rt. DD from U.S. 40/61 to Rt. D, which<br />

also has severe curvatures. Roads with low severity crash rates, those that were safest, were the high<br />

design facilities such as the interstates, freeways, and expressways.<br />

66


Table 18<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

3 Yr 2004 Crash<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Rate<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 161<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 244<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 162<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 175<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 141<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 248<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 199<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 187<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 228<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 187<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 126<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 302<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 124<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 29<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 210<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 166<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 82<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 82<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 237<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 173<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 109<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1 62 44 53 159 25800 136<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 145<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 201<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 375<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 1724<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 480<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 461<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 370<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 825<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 501<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 320<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 397<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 206<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 202<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 188<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 733<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 666<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 225<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 501<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 560<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 191<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 647<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 770<br />

Totals and Averages = 188.0 5290 5265 5277 15832 327<br />

67


Table 19<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

3 Yr 2004 Crash<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Rate<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 825<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 770<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 733<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 666<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 647<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 560<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 501<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 501<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 480<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 461<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 397<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 375<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 370<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 320<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 302<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 248<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 244<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 237<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 228<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 225<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 210<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 206<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 202<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 201<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 199<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 191<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 188<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 187<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 187<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 175<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 173<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 166<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 162<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 161<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 145<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 141<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1<br />

62 44 53 159 25800 136<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 126<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 124<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 109<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 39 62 47 148 59300 82<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 71 85 82 238 51900 82<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 2 24 26 50000 29<br />

Totals and Averages = 184.4 6936 6931 6902 14763 288<br />

68


Table 20<br />

Missouri Department of <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Severity Crash Rates<br />

Segment Fatality and Disabling Injury Crashes<br />

Severe<br />

3 Yr 2004 Crash<br />

Road From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs Rate<br />

Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 2 3 10 15 3000 76<br />

Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 3 0 1 4 1500 59<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 12 8 12 32 16000 51<br />

Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 2 4 3 9 7000 47<br />

Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 1 0 1 2 800 45<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 7 2 11 20 2900 44<br />

Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 5 12 7 24 2700 36<br />

Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 1 3 4 8 7400 17<br />

U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL<br />

4.1<br />

6 6 7 19<br />

25800<br />

16<br />

Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 6 4 4 14 21400 15<br />

Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 1 0 1 2 10700 14<br />

Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 5 2 6 13 13300 14<br />

Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 10 6 10 26 56900 14<br />

Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 4 3 6 13 22600 13<br />

Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 2 4 2 8 17600 13<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 6 7 9 22 35700 12<br />

Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 4 12 1 17 40000 10<br />

Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 4 2 2 8 7500 10<br />

I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 12 9 9 30 165100 9<br />

I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 6 6 3 15 75900 9<br />

Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 1 2 3 6 11500 9<br />

Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 4 7 4 15 51000 9<br />

I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 5 6 3 14 72200 8<br />

U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 12 4 5 21 33000 8<br />

Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 3 5 5 13 42700 8<br />

I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 5 2 6 13 134300 7<br />

Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 1 3 2 6 19000 7<br />

Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 0 2 1 3 12000 7<br />

I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 6 10 3 19 141700 7<br />

I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 2 7 1 10 89800 6<br />

U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 1 5 8 14 46100 5<br />

Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 2 0 0 2 56800 5<br />

I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 3 5 3 11 124400 5<br />

I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 2 9 4 15 115600 5<br />

Rt. 370 Rt. 94 Elm <strong>St</strong>. 2.8 1 4 2 7 59300 4<br />

I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 5 4 0 9 155000 4<br />

I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 2 2 4 8 138500 3<br />

I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 3 3 2 8 66400 3<br />

I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 5 1 2 8 56400 3<br />

Rt. 370 Elm <strong>St</strong>. I-70 5.1 2 3 2 7 51900 2<br />

Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 0 0 2 2 50000 2<br />

I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 2 2 1 5 77500 2<br />

Rt. 364 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 E. 1.6 0 0 1 1 50000 1<br />

Totals and Averages = 182.0 2168 2182 2177 521 16<br />

69


B-1.2. Comparison of MoDOT Roads to Region and <strong>St</strong>ate<br />

To completely assess the safety of travel on MoDOT roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, their crash rates<br />

were compared to the values for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and state of Missouri. Table 21 shows these<br />

values for Interstate routes, U.S. routes, numbered routes, and lettered routes.<br />

Table 21<br />

2004 3-Year Average Crash Rate Comparison<br />

<strong>County</strong> - Region - <strong>St</strong>ate<br />

Road Type <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region <strong>St</strong>ate of Missouri<br />

Interstates 191.05 137.32 111.36<br />

U.S. Routes 163.77 252.62 166.04<br />

Numbered Routes 398.00 360.66 273.22<br />

Lettered Routes 440.49 415.33 272.28<br />

I-70 had a three-year average that was higher than the entire <strong>St</strong>. Louis region and the state average.<br />

Many items related to travel on I-70 could explain why these numbers are so high. There are many<br />

interchanges with high volumes of entering and exiting traffic which may be higher than in other<br />

parts of the region and the state. Truck traffic is also higher than on other Interstates in the region.<br />

On U.S. routes the three-year crash rate was lower than the region and the state. They include a<br />

number of roads that carry substantial volumes of traffic yet have low numbers of crashes. This<br />

probably will decline further once U.S. 40/61 is converted to I-64 and only U.S. Rt. 61 and U.S. Rt<br />

67 travel through the <strong>County</strong>. Both these roads presently have low numbers and severity of crashes.<br />

Numbered routes had a slightly higher crash rate than the region and state. These roads are heavily<br />

traveled and serve a large amount of land use that creates considerable conflicts. Some of these road<br />

segments, especially Rt. 94, in the rural part of the <strong>County</strong>, travel through very rough terrain. Many<br />

date back 50 to 75 years and have poor alignment, bad sight distances, and no shoulders.<br />

Lettered routes were also above the average for the region and the state, however, some of these<br />

routes were not included on the list and would have less traffic and lower crash rates. Including<br />

them would make the overall rate for the <strong>County</strong> lower than what is indicated.<br />

B-1.3. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and City Roads<br />

The same methodology used for analyzing MoDOT roads was used to evaluate the safety on <strong>County</strong><br />

and city roads. Twenty-four road segments were selected after consulting with <strong>County</strong> officials.<br />

They were the most highly traveled 1 (those carrying over 2,000 vehicles per day) and served the<br />

most developed land use areas. The measures of number of crashes, crashes per mile, severity<br />

ratings, and crash rates were derived from the crash data.<br />

1<br />

There are many other <strong>County</strong> roads but they do not carry high traffic volumes and have few crashes. Analysis of safety on<br />

these roads was considered beyond the scope of this study.<br />

70


Number of Crashes<br />

The number and severity of crashes that occurred on each road segment for the three years are<br />

shown on Table 22. Their number of fatality, disabling injury, minor injury and property damage<br />

crashes are shown for each year for each of the 24 road segments. There were a total of 1,901 |<br />

crashes reported for the three years. Of these, only three (3) were fatalities and they made up less<br />

than two tenths of one percent (0.2) of the total. Disabling injury crashes totaled 43 and made up<br />

two (2) percent of the total. Personal injury and property damage crashes totaled 1,855 making up<br />

97.5 percent of the total. It is obvious that the severity of crashes on the <strong>County</strong>’s roads is quite low<br />

and travel on these roads appears quite safe. These roads are mostly in urban and suburban areas<br />

where speed limits are low (35 to 50 mph). This lessens the chance for higher severity type crashes.<br />

Table 22 shows that two Mexico Rd. segments, Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K and Cave Springs Rd.<br />

to Mid Rivers Mall Dr., had the highest number of crashes, 120 and 99 respectively, followed by<br />

Zumbehl Rd. (98), from I-70 to Rt. 94, and Muegge Rd. (52) from Mexico Rd. to McClay Rd. A<br />

third segment of Mexico Rd. From Rt. K to Bryan Rd. was next followed by Bryan Rd., Jungermann<br />

Rd., and Elm <strong>St</strong>. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. from I-70 to Rt. 94 was also high on the list.<br />

Crashes per Mile<br />

A ranking of the road segments by the number of crashes per mile is shown in Table 23. The first<br />

three road segments are the same as the first three shown on Table 22. They are two segments<br />

Mexico Rd., and Zumbehl Rd. Harvester Rd. comes next followed by the third segment of Mexico<br />

Rd., Salt Lick Rd., and Muegge Rd. The average number of crashes per mile for the 24 road<br />

segments for the three year period 31.4.<br />

Severity Rating<br />

Table 24 ranks the road segments by crash severity. The number of fatal and disabling injury<br />

crashes were low. Again, all three segments of Mexico Rd. were at the top of the list, followed by<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. In the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>, Bryan Rd., and Jungermann Rd. The mean severity rating was<br />

quite low indicating the <strong>County</strong> and city roads did not have a high number of fatal or severe injury<br />

crashes.<br />

Crash Rates<br />

Table 25 indicates the ranking of road segments based on their crash rate. Mexico Rd. from Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K had the highest followed by Zumbehl Rd. from I-70 to Rt. 94. The other<br />

two segments of Mexico Rd. Were third and fourth. The roads with low numbers of crashes and<br />

traffic volumes also had low crash rates.<br />

71


Road<br />

Table 22<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Segment Crashes by Type<br />

From To Miles<br />

Fatalities/Disabling Injury<br />

Property Damage<br />

2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004<br />

72<br />

Personal Injury/<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 0 0 0 3 4 1 202 143 140 493<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 0 0 0 2 4 1 136 104 111 358<br />

Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 33 49 117<br />

Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 0 0 0 0 1 1 50 20 23 95<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 0 0 1 1 0 1 32 29 29 93<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 0 1 0 1 1 1 17 25 37 83<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 0 0 0 0 2 2 22 31 23 80<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 0 0 0 3 1 1 25 16 30 76<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 0 0 0 0 3 0 20 22 14 59<br />

Friedens Rd Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 19 22 58<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 18 54<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 13 23 53<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 19 17 47<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 15 5 41<br />

Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5 24 37<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 10 12 36<br />

Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill Rd. 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 20 31<br />

Birdie Hills Rd. Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 6 9 30<br />

Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 10 25<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 5 14<br />

Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 10<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5<br />

Arena Pkwy Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 4<br />

South River Rd. Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 0 1 2 12 21 10 671 555 629 1901<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.<br />

Totals


Road<br />

Table 23<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crashes per Mile<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

73<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs *<br />

3 Year<br />

Crashes<br />

per Mile<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 120<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 99<br />

Zumbehl I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 98<br />

Harvester Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 52<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 44<br />

Salt Lick I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 44<br />

Muegge Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 35<br />

Friedens Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 34<br />

Belleau I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 33<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 31<br />

Jungerman Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 22 33 25 80 22000 22<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 21<br />

Caulks Hill Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 19<br />

Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 18<br />

Wentzville U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 17<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 16<br />

Mid Rivers I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 20 25 14 59 30000 13<br />

Lake Saint I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 13<br />

Harry Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 11<br />

Upper Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 6 3 5 14 12000 7<br />

Winghaven Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 9 1 10 15000 7<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 1 4 5 8000 6<br />

Arena Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 1 3 4 12000 2<br />

South Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 2 0 2 12000 2<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 683 577 641 1901 Avg. = 32<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.


Table 24<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Severity Rating<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

Road<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004 Total ADTs * Rating<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 48<br />

74<br />

3 Yr<br />

2004<br />

Severity<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 42<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 33<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 30<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 27<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 22 33 25 80 22000 24<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 20 25 14 59 30000 18<br />

Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 12<br />

Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 12<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 9<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 6<br />

South River Rd. Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 2 0 2 12000 6<br />

Friedens Rd. Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 6<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 6<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 6<br />

Arena Pkwy Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 1 3 4 12000 6<br />

Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 6<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 1 4 5 8000 0<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 6 3 5 14 12000 0<br />

Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 0<br />

Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 0<br />

Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 9 1 10 15000 0<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 0<br />

Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 0<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 683 577 641 1901 Avg. = 12<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.


Road<br />

Table 25<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Highway Crash Data<br />

2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked by Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

75<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs *<br />

Crash<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 477<br />

Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 356<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 289<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 284<br />

Friedens Rd. Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 283<br />

Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 256<br />

Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 249<br />

Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 247<br />

Lake Saint Louis Blvd. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 229<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 207<br />

Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 205<br />

Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 188<br />

Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 187<br />

Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 161<br />

Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 130<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 112<br />

Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 101<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. Rt. 94 3.6 22 33 25 80 22000 92<br />

Weiss Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. Rt. N 0.9 0 1 4 5 8000 63<br />

Upper Bottom Rd. Rt. 364 Jungs <strong>St</strong>a. Rd. 2.0 6 3 5 14 12000 53<br />

Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N U.S. 40/61 1.5 0 9 1 10 15000 41<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 Rt. 94 4.5 20 25 14 59 30000 40<br />

Arena Pkwy Friedens Rd. Rt. 364 1.9 0 1 3 4 12000 16<br />

South River Rd. Fifth <strong>St</strong>. Friedens Rd. 1.1 0 2 0 2 12000 14<br />

Rate<br />

Totals and Averages = 55.6 683 577 641 1901 Avg. = 178<br />

* NOTE: Some of the ADTs have been adjusted due to limited count data.


B-1.4 MoDOT and <strong>County</strong> Crash Rate Comparison<br />

For a better review of safety on the major roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, the three crash indicators<br />

discussed above for MoDOT roads and <strong>County</strong> roads were compared. For crashes per mile,<br />

MoDOT averaged 131 crashes per mile for their 44 road segments while the <strong>County</strong> averaged 32<br />

for their 24 road segments. For the severity rating, MoDOT had an average value of 76 while the<br />

<strong>County</strong> had 12. For the crash rate, MoDOT had an average of 327 while the <strong>County</strong> had 178.<br />

It can be seen that in all three categories the ratings on MoDOT roads are much higher. This tends<br />

to indicate that travel on MoDOT roads is not as safe as travel on <strong>County</strong> roads. However, the best<br />

measure or safety on a road segment is the crash rate as it uses the number of crashes along with the<br />

traffic volumes and the length of the segment. In order to best assess how MoDOT roads and major<br />

<strong>County</strong> roads compared, a composite crash table using crash rates was developed and is shown on<br />

Table 26. It ranked 58 road segments leaving out roads that had a crash rate under 100. It shows<br />

the distribution of the major roads regardless of whether they were MoDOT roads or <strong>County</strong> roads.<br />

MoDOT had the higher number of road segments because they carry the highest traffic and have the<br />

most crashes. They contained 178 miles and the <strong>County</strong> had 40 miles resulting in 82% for MoDOT<br />

and 18% for the <strong>County</strong>. The composite list shows MoDOT had the most crashes with 15,420 while<br />

the <strong>County</strong> had 1,727, totaling 17,147. This is 90 percent and 10 percent respectively. Multiplying<br />

the miles by the ADTs, reveals that MoDOT roads handled 5.3 million vehicle miles of travel<br />

(VMT) a day while the <strong>County</strong> roads only handle 0.6 million. This places MoDOT’s VMT at 90<br />

percent and the <strong>County</strong>’s at 10 percent. This reflects the number of crashes on each road system.<br />

Examination of Table 26 reveals that the first 10 roads listed are MoDOT roads. At the top of the<br />

list was Rt. 94 from Rt. 370 to I-70. The next highest include other segments of Rt. 94, the two<br />

segments of Rt. K from I-70 to I-64, and segments of Rt. N and Rt. Z. Mexico Rd. from Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. to Rt. K was number 11. It was followed by four more MoDOT roads including three more<br />

segments of Rt. 94. The next <strong>County</strong> road was Zumbehl Rd. from I-70 to Rt. 94 which ranked<br />

number 16. Five <strong>County</strong> roads, including the other three segments of Mexico Rd., were in the<br />

middle ranking 19 through 23. The remaining <strong>County</strong> roads were scattered throughout the list. In<br />

all, the MoDOT road segments had the highest crash rates.<br />

Although MoDOT roads have the highest crash rates, it must be noted that I-70 ranked low on the<br />

list. Their was only one segment, U.S. 40/61 to Pearce Blvd. that was above the middle of the list<br />

(number 18) and it was below two <strong>County</strong> roads, Mexico Rd. from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K,<br />

(number 11) and Zumbehl Rd. from I-70 to Rt. 94 (number 16). Eleven segments of I-70, that<br />

included those with the highest traffic volumes in the <strong>County</strong>, ranked low on the list.<br />

The road with the worst crash rating overall in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> was Rt. 94. Many segments,<br />

especially those between I-70 and I-64, had very high crash rates. This road has been undergoing<br />

upgrading with the construction of the Rt. 364 freeway from approximately Hemsath Rd. west to<br />

Harvester Rd. and other sections to the west of it are scheduled for construction . This will greatly<br />

alleviate some of the safety problems presently being experienced.<br />

76


No. Road<br />

Table 26<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Major Roads<br />

Composite Crash Data, 2002, 2003, and 2004<br />

Ranked By Crash Rates<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

77<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs<br />

Crash<br />

Rate<br />

1Rt. 94 Rt. 370 I-70 3.6 356 337 379 1072 16000 1724<br />

2Rt. 94 I-64 Rt. D 1.2 55 33 28 116 10700 825<br />

3Rt. DD U.S. 40/61 Rt. D 6.0 47 28 76 151 3000 770<br />

4Rt. K I-70 Rt. N 3.2 476 432 385 1293 51000 733<br />

5Rt. K Rt. N I-64 3.2 126 143 144 413 17600 666<br />

6Rt. Z I-70 Rt. N 2.5 43 45 37 125 7000 647<br />

7Rt. N Rt. K U.S. 40/61 3.9 168 176 169 513 21400 560<br />

8Rt. N Mid R. M. Dr. Rt. K 4.0 161 181 159 501 22600 501<br />

9Rt. 94 Rt. D Rt. DD 6.0 35 33 30 98 3000 501<br />

10Rt. 94 I-70 Rt. 364 E. 3.1 320 287 312 919 56900 480<br />

11Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. K 4.1 205 147 141 493 23000 477<br />

12Rt. 94 Rt. 364 W. Mid R. M. Dr. 3.6 240 231 300 771 42700 461<br />

13Rt. A I-70 U.S. 61 3.3 58 65 47 170 12000 397<br />

14Rt. 94 U.S. 67 Rt. 370 22.3 89 78 80 247 2700 375<br />

15Rt. 94 Mid R. M. Dr. I-64 3.8 201 229 178 608 40000 370<br />

16Zumbehl Rd. I-70 Rt. 94 1.2 34 34 49 117 25000 356<br />

17Rt. 94 Rt. DD Warren Co. 14.3 39 41 65 145 2900 320<br />

18I-70 U.S. 40/61 Pearce Blvd. 2.1 187 171 148 506 72200 302<br />

19Mexico Rd. Rt. K Bryan Rd. 2.1 33 29 31 93 14000 289<br />

20Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 3.6 138 108 112 358 32000 284<br />

21Friedens Rd. Rt. 94 Arena Pkwy 1.7 16 19 23 58 11000 283<br />

22Wentzville Pkwy U.S. 61 I-70 2.2 8 5 24 37 6000 256<br />

23Belleau Ck. Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.1 14 10 12 36 12000 249<br />

24I-70 Rt. 370 Mid R M 1.2 176 126 147 449 134300 248<br />

25Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. McClay Rd. 2.7 50 21 24 95 13000 247<br />

26I-70 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 1.8 266 292 240 798 165100 244<br />

27U.S. 40/61 Rt. N I-70 4.8 114 149 182 445 35700 237<br />

28Lake Saint Louis B. I-70 U.S. 40/61 4.3 18 18 18 54 5000 229<br />

29I-70 Rt. K/M Bryan Rd. 1.8 139 128 132 399 89800 228<br />

30Rt. N U.S. 40/61 Rt. Z 5.4 41 62 50 153 11500 225<br />

31Rt. 364 Rt. 94 E. Rt. 94 W. 1.6 55 53 78 186 50000 210<br />

32Salt Lick Rd. I-70 Mexico Rd. 1.2 16 14 23 53 19500 207<br />

33Rt. B Rt. 94 Huster 4.1 8 3 3 14 1500 206<br />

34Harvester Rd. Rt. 94 Caulks Hill 0.6 7 4 20 31 23000 205<br />

35Rt. B Huster Rt. C 5.1 4 3 2 9 800 202<br />

36Rt. 79 I-70 Rt. M 4.0 47 61 60 168 19000 201<br />

37I-70 Mid R M Rt. 79 1.7 186 152 180 518 138500 199<br />

38Rt. P Rt. M U.S. 61 10.2 55 49 57 161 7500 191<br />

(Continued on next page)


No. Road<br />

Segment Crashes<br />

From To Miles 2002 2003 2004<br />

78<br />

3 Yr<br />

Total<br />

2004<br />

ADTs<br />

Crash<br />

Rate<br />

39Rt. D Rt. 94 Rt. DD 5.9 26 33 30 89 7400 188<br />

40Elm <strong>St</strong>. Rt. 370 Kingshighway 3.7 28 17 31 76 10000 188<br />

41I-70 Bryan Rd. Lake <strong>St</strong>. L 2.0 101 112 103 316 75900 187<br />

42Knaust Rd. Mexico Rd. Birdie Hills Rd. 2.5 21 15 5 41 8000 187<br />

43I-70 Rt. 79 Rt. K/M 2.6 203 204 216 623 115600 187<br />

44I-70 Zumbehl Cave Spgs 1.8 143 179 164 486 141700 175<br />

45U.S. 40/61 Rt. K Rt. N 5.2 129 180 142 451 46100 173<br />

46Rt. 370 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. 94 0.6 23 17 22 62 56800 166<br />

47I-70 Rt. 94 Zumbehl 1.4 124 131 125 380 155000 162<br />

48Birdie Hills Mexico Rd. Weiss Rd. 1.7 13 7 10 30 10000 161<br />

49I-64 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Rt. K 3.2 202 165 72 439 77500 161<br />

50Rt. 79 Rt. M Lincoln Co. 6.4 38 53 44 135 13300 145<br />

51I-70 Cave Spgs Rt. 370 1.8 106 109 126 341 124400 141<br />

52U.S. 67 <strong>St</strong>. L. Co. Alton, IL 4.1<br />

62 44 53 159 25800<br />

136<br />

53Harry Truman Blvd. Rt. 370 I-70 2.2 6 9 10 25 8000 130<br />

54I-70 Lake <strong>St</strong>. L U.S. 40/61 3.6 86 135 108 329 66400 126<br />

55I-70 Pearce Blvd. Warren Co. 4.9 135 91 149 375 56400 124<br />

56Bryan Rd. I-70 Rt. N 2.7 18 27 38 83 25000 112<br />

57U.S. 61 I-70 Lincoln Co. 7.3 110 75 102 287 33000 109<br />

58Caulks Hill Rd. Harvester Rd. Greens Bottom Rd. 2.5 10 19 18 47 17000 101<br />

Totals = 218.6 5815 5619 5713 17147 Average = 313<br />

B-2. Summary of Road Crash Data<br />

The composite crash data for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> shows the major role that MoDOT roads play in<br />

providing safety. They make up the most mileage and carry the highest traffic volumes. They<br />

provide the most important and greatest means of travel for all trip purposes including travel into,<br />

out of, and through the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region. They also serve a large amount of commercial vehicles<br />

into, through and out of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the region. Although all the roads carry a large<br />

amount of traffic, the roads with the highest functional classification, Interstates, Freeways, and<br />

Expressway, provide a very high degree of safety. As an example, I-70 carries the highest traffic<br />

volumes, but has fewer crashes per mile, than many other roads. It does not have high crash rates,<br />

therefore, even with very high traffic volumes, it still is considered quite safe for the amount of<br />

traffic it handles.<br />

Their has always been a correlation between traffic volumes and numbers of crashes. This is<br />

especially true in urban and suburban areas. As traffic volumes continue to increase in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>, as described in later chapters, the potential for more crashes increases. This is true on all<br />

streets and highways. MoDOT in particular and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and its cities will have to<br />

continue planning improvements that will reduce the potential for these crashes. MoDOT’s<br />

Blueprint for Safer Roads, discussed earlier, provides a good foundation for addressing this issue.


B-3. Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Crashes<br />

A safety item of interest in this study was the number of motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian crashes<br />

that occurred in the <strong>County</strong>. Motorcycles had the highest number, pedestrians had the second<br />

highest, and bicycles had the third. These data were compared to the region and the state. These<br />

values are shown in Table 27.<br />

Table 27<br />

2002, 2003, 2004, Motorcycle - Bicycle - Pedestrian Crashes<br />

<strong>County</strong> - Region - <strong>St</strong>ate<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Region Percent of<br />

Region<br />

79<br />

<strong>St</strong>ate Percent of<br />

<strong>St</strong>ate<br />

Motorcycle 296 1,496 19.8% 5,331 5.6%<br />

Bicycle 94 966 9.7% 2,315 4.1%<br />

Pedestrian 128 2,196 5.8% 4,441 2.9%<br />

B-4. Deficiencies in the Crash Data Analyses<br />

The above analysis of crash data provided good information about the number of crashes that<br />

occurred; the road segments where they happened; the number of crashes per mile; their severity,<br />

and their crash rates. While this allowed for identification of where, how many, and how bad, it<br />

didn’t discuss other very important factors such as the how and why these crashes occur.<br />

There are many factors that contribute to why crashes happen. They include road conditions, sight<br />

distances, traffic control devices, traffic volumes, possible distractions, weather conditions, time of<br />

day, other drivers, and other factors. None of these items have been examined in this study.<br />

The most important item that must be considered and also is not addressed is the driver and his/her<br />

situation. Is the driver preoccupied instead of paying full attention to driving, such as talking to<br />

passengers, listening to the radio or CD, or talking on a cell phone. Is the driver sick or having some<br />

kind of mental or a physical problem that reduces their ability to drive the vehicle properly or simply<br />

falling asleep or not paying close attention. Is he or she intoxicated or affected by some type of<br />

drug. To properly address these important items a full and more comprehensive report on safety for<br />

the <strong>County</strong> is required. Such a report is beyond the scope of this study.<br />

Traffic engineers have been performing these investigations for years. MoDOT has experienced<br />

engineers who apply the best techniques to analyzing crash data on roads having poor crash<br />

statistics. Some counties and cities also have personnel with this experience or they hire traffic<br />

consultants who have competent staff that can perform such analyses. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and many<br />

of the cities have used their staff and employed consultants to investigate various problem areas and<br />

projects.


The Council’s long range plan discusses safety of travel in the region and shows tables that allow<br />

for comparisons of the eight counties. Problems associated with roads and drivers are fully<br />

discussed and suggestions are made for improvements. In MoDOT’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways,<br />

a very comprehensive examination of roads and drivers is made. This document covers much of the<br />

items noted above. Both these reports make suggestion for reducing crashes and their severity<br />

including the four “E’s,” Enforcement, Engineering, Education, and Emergency Deployment. All<br />

these items and the referenced material noted is considered an important part of this chapter and this<br />

report.<br />

In summary, it appears the number of crashes, their severity, and crash rates on roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> is slightly higher than in other parts of the region and the state. The roads that handle the<br />

highest volumes and have the most crashes are maintained by MoDOT. Yet, many such as I-70, do<br />

not have high crash rates and are considered quite safe for the volume of traffic that they carry. It<br />

may be that the <strong>County</strong> ranks higher than the region or state as a result of its increased population<br />

and fast growth. Road and street improvements, except for some major high cost MoDOT projects,<br />

seem to have kept up with this growth, although the <strong>County</strong>’s Ten year <strong>Plan</strong> contains a large number<br />

of yet to be completed projects. It would seem that some combinations of the above factors are the<br />

reason for the higher crash rates.<br />

C. Railroad Safety<br />

Railroad safety has been considered for two categories of railroad traffic in the <strong>County</strong>. The first<br />

is the safety of railroad crossings with roads and the second is safety on the railroad lines<br />

themselves. For road crossings, they involve at-grade crossings of roads maintained by MoDOT,<br />

the <strong>County</strong>, and some cities. A number of crossings are grade separated by bridges (such as the<br />

recently completed T.R. Hughes bridge over the Norfolk Southern) and with rare exception, have<br />

no crash related experiences. MoDOT’s Multi modal Division gathers crash data for all railroad<br />

crossings and all injuries and deaths on railroad lines and has provided the data for this section. In<br />

addition, they monitor and approve requests for state funding for railroad crossing improvements.<br />

On the railroad lines there are incidents that involve trains and railroad employees or trains with<br />

pedestrians. Train and pedestrian incidents, in addition to crossing incidents, are reported by the<br />

railroads to MoDOT and are included in MoDOT’s data.<br />

In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> there are two railroads with current traffic over railroad lines, the BNSF and<br />

the Norfolk Southern. The BNSF runs from <strong>West</strong> Alton west along the northern part of the <strong>County</strong><br />

close to the Mississippi River and then north into Lincoln <strong>County</strong>. It has 26 public crossings with<br />

state and county roads and 34 private crossings in close proximity to the river. There are also three<br />

grade separations. It has experienced no crashes in the last four years at these crossings. The<br />

Norfolk Southern runs just north of I-70, from the Missouri River west to Wentzville, where it<br />

crosses over I-70 and runs into Warren <strong>County</strong>. It has 34 public at-grade crossings and 21 private<br />

crossings and has experienced three crashes during the last four years, no fatalities but two injuries.<br />

There are also 14 grade separations.<br />

80


Overall the number of safety incidents in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> was quite low. In comparison to other<br />

counties, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> has proportionally more signalized crossings than most other counties<br />

because of its increasing population. When safety improvements are needed, MoDOT evaluates all<br />

crossings in the state using a formula that takes into account the number and speed of trains that pass<br />

an at-grade crossing, the time of the crossings, any applicable sight distance problems, and the<br />

amount and speed of traffic on the road. It then determines which crossings in the state should<br />

receive the limited amount of federal and state funding which is available each year. In some cases,<br />

the state, in conjunction with cities and counties and other public and private entities, will contribute<br />

to the costs of building bridges over railroads to completely eliminate an at-grade crossing, thereby<br />

permanently eliminating the potential for future crashes.<br />

D. Airport Safety<br />

The two airports in the <strong>County</strong>, Smartt Airport and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Municipal Airport, routinely provide<br />

improvements for safety. They take the form of maintaining the existing facility and keeping all<br />

systems operating properly. Additionally, improvements to the runways, striping, and taxiway<br />

markings, are made. Airfield lighting improvements, and other similar upgrades also improve<br />

airport safety. The airports may also make major improvements that are safety related that would<br />

also enhance operational safety, such as runway extensions and additional or improved instrument<br />

approaches. Funding is provided by applying for Federal and <strong>St</strong>ate grants for such improvements.<br />

Improvements to Smartt Airport generally are considered of a higher priority since it is the<br />

designated reliever airport and is equipped for instrument landing. Safety at both airports has not<br />

been an issue and aircraft incidents are quite infrequent if not absent.<br />

81


A. Background<br />

V. Present <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>s and <strong>St</strong>udies<br />

The 1997 transportation plan for <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> mentioned short and long range plans and other<br />

studies by the Council that would affect future transportation in the county. This update is no<br />

exception. Since 1997 the Council has completed many plans and studies in keeping with the<br />

requirements of the U.S. Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> for the expenditure of federal funds. First<br />

and most important is the region’s long range transportation plan which requires updating every four<br />

years. The second is the short range transportation plan which is represented by the TIP and consists<br />

of projects planned by various agencies for the next four years. These projects reflect what is<br />

contained in the long range transportation plan. Other studies have been conducted by the Council<br />

relating to transportation in the county. A review of these plans and studies follows.<br />

B. The Long Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

In March 2005 the Council published its long range transportation plan “Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, The<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> for the <strong>Gateway</strong> Region.” It provides a long range view of how the region’s<br />

surface transportation system will develop over the next 25 years and follows earlier practices of<br />

emphasizing the relationship of transportation, community vitality, environmental quality, economic<br />

growth, and social equity. It is the foundation of the transportation planning process and details the<br />

region’s transportation priorities by creating a guide for future transportation investments. As<br />

explained in the document, “The plan’s fundamental purpose is to ensure that public resources are<br />

used in ways that best meet the economic, community, and environmental needs of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

region.” The <strong>Plan</strong> and the TIP, described below, were developed according to the rules of the new<br />

Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, SAFETEA-LU, which was passed in August 2005. The Council is<br />

presently developing an update that is scheduled for release by July 1, 2007.<br />

B-1. Developing Future Highway Improvements<br />

Legacy <strong>2030</strong> discussed the need for establishing policies and principals for how to decide the best<br />

use of federal funds for highway improvements. In addition, the <strong>Plan</strong> established an investment<br />

strategy that sets priorities for committing these funds. Since all projects must first be identified in<br />

the <strong>Plan</strong> to be eligible for federal funds, a list of MoDOT projects through the horizon year <strong>2030</strong> was<br />

developed. This could not be a simple “wish list” of projects but a list that MoDOT has reasonable<br />

expectations of funding within the <strong>2030</strong> Long Range <strong>Plan</strong> time frame. Three categories of projects<br />

are listed below in chronological order.<br />

B-2. Investment Priorities<br />

A number of other major highway improvements are planned by MoDOT in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

They are listed in Table 6.7 of Legacy <strong>2030</strong> as “Investment Priorities,” which means they can be<br />

funded within the region’s financial constraint. They are listed below by specific time periods.<br />

82


Period 2011-2020<br />

I-64 - Construct new bridge over Missouri River for westbound traffic<br />

Period 2021 - <strong>2030</strong><br />

I-70 - Revise interchanges from Zumbehl Rd. to Rt. 79<br />

I-70 - Revise interchange at Rt. K<br />

I-70 - Add lanes from Rt. Z to Pearce Blvd.<br />

B-3. Illustrative Projects<br />

Other projects proposed by MoDOT are on the <strong>Plan</strong>’s “Illustrative Projects” list. These are projects<br />

they plan to build if funds become available. They are shown in Table 6.8 of the <strong>Plan</strong> and below.<br />

I-70 - Add lanes from Pearce Blvd. to Rt. T at Foristell<br />

I-70 - Construct new interchange at Rt. T at Foristell<br />

U.S. 61 - Upgrade to Interstate standards from Rt. A to Lincoln <strong>County</strong><br />

Rt. 94 - Construct additional lanes from Rt. 370 to Rt. B<br />

Rt. N - Widen to three lanes from west of U.S. 40/61 to Rt. Z<br />

Rt. Z - Widen to three lanes from I-70 to Rt. N<br />

B-4. Corridor <strong>St</strong>udies<br />

A number of major corridors in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> have been identified by MoDOT as warranting<br />

a corridor study in the future. Although funding is not available at this time for any improvements,<br />

corridor studies can be performed at any time in order to determine what type of improvement would<br />

be required, where it should be, how soon it would be needed, and how it would be funded. Five<br />

corridors have been identified by MoDOT as warranting study. They are as follows.<br />

• Rt. 79 from I-70 to Lincoln <strong>County</strong><br />

• Rt. K from I-64 to I-70<br />

• Rt. M from I-70 to Rt. 79<br />

• Rt. P from Rt. M to U.S. 61<br />

• Rt. Z from I-70 to Rt. N<br />

B-5. Interstate 70 Corridor, Kansas City to <strong>St</strong>. Louis, Missouri<br />

One corridor project of particular significance is I-70 from Kansas City to <strong>St</strong>. Louis. Because of its<br />

magnitude, MoDOT first conducted a Feasibility <strong>St</strong>udy in 1999. The study provided an estimation<br />

of the future needs of the corridor, feasible solutions, and recommendations for future action. In<br />

order to meet federal requirements, MoDOT initiated the “First Tier”of a Draft Environmental<br />

Impact <strong>St</strong>atement (DEIS). This first phase of the DEIS, completed in 2001, considered a number<br />

of approaches to improving the safety and efficiency of travel in the corridor from Kansas City to<br />

83


<strong>St</strong>. Louis. The next or “Second Tier” of the DEIS consisted of a group of seven independent, but<br />

yet coordinated, corridor studies across the state that would take into account engineering,<br />

environmental, and community issues. The eastern most segment was the section from just west of<br />

Rt. 19 in Montgomery <strong>County</strong> through Warren <strong>County</strong> into <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> to the Lake Saint<br />

Louis Blvd. interchange. This segment of the Second Tier of the DEIS was completed in December<br />

2004. It provided a “preferred alternative” recommendation which consisted of widening I-70 to<br />

eight lanes with many ancillary improvements from Warren <strong>County</strong> to the Lake Saint Louis Blvd.<br />

interchange. Since this DEIS it is subject to further review it is considered preliminary. The final<br />

evaluation and selection of the preferred alternative will be based on a project public hearing, public<br />

and agency comments on the DEIS, and other relevant information that may become available. The<br />

FHWA will then have to issue a Record of Decision (ROD) for approval of the project. It is<br />

anticipated that the project will not move forward at this time since funding for the improvement has<br />

not been identified.<br />

C. The Short Range <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

The short range transportation plan is the TIP. Each year the Council updates the last one based on<br />

what various agencies in the region have accomplished to-date and what is approved for the next TIP<br />

period. The current TIP was approved in July 2006 for the four year period 2007 through 2010<br />

The Council holds a meeting for informational purposes to assist all counties, cities, transit agencies,<br />

and others who plan to submit projects for inclusion in the TIP. A deadline for submitting projects<br />

is set. Agencies are asked to prepare supporting information for each project. All projects must<br />

have a committed source of revenue to match federal funds. The projects are reviewed by the<br />

Council to insure that they conform to the goals and objectives of the long range transportation plan.<br />

Projects are then prioritized and ranked according to established criteria. The projects selected for<br />

inclusion in the TIP come from a list of ranked projects until available federal funds are completely<br />

used. Normally, the funding requested far exceeds the available federal funds.<br />

Because the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has found the <strong>St</strong>. Louis metropolitan<br />

area to be a non attainment area for air quality, all projects selected for inclusion in the TIP are<br />

examined to insure that they do not contribute to the air quality problems of the region. Federally<br />

funded projects as well as non federally funded projects are subject to this rule.<br />

C-1. Funding Categories<br />

Federal funding categories in the TIP from the FHWA include the following;<br />

• Surface <strong>Transportation</strong> Program (STP) which provides funding for states and localities for<br />

public roads, bridges, transit capital projects, and transit terminals.<br />

• Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) which provides funds specifically for safetyrelated<br />

projects.<br />

• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program which provides<br />

funds for transportation projects which improve air quality.<br />

84


• National Highway System (NHS) program, which provides funds to improve roads that are<br />

part of the National Highway System, normally Interstates and some designated connections,<br />

and many Principal Arterials routes.<br />

• Interstate Maintenance (I-M) program, which provides funds for rehabilitation and<br />

reconstruction to the Interstate system, but does not include road widening but could include<br />

projects that improve safety.<br />

• Highway Bridge Progam (HBP) provides funds for replacing or rehabilitating deficient<br />

bridges.<br />

• High Priority Projects (HPP) which provides funds for specific designated SAFETY-LU<br />

earmarked projects.<br />

Federal funding categories in the TIP from the FTA include the following;<br />

• Section 5309 Capital Assistance Program which provides funding (in a discretionary basis)<br />

for capital construction and equipment purchases.<br />

• Section 5307 Operating Assistance and Capital Program which provides funding for capital<br />

construction and operating assistance for urban public transit service.<br />

• Section 5310 Program which provides capital assistance to nonprofit social service agencies<br />

to provide paratransit services.<br />

• Section 5311 Program which provides capital and operating assistance for rural transit.<br />

In addition to the federal funding categories listed above, some projects in the TIP may be<br />

implemented without federal funds. While inclusion is not specifically required of such projects,<br />

any project that could affect the amount of traffic that is carried (VMT) or capacity and air quality<br />

is subject to inclusion for examination by the Council to insure that the region continues to adhere<br />

to the air quality standards. Agencies throughout the region are informed of the need to submit such<br />

projects to the Council when submitting requests for federal-funded projects.<br />

C-2. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> TIP Projects<br />

The current TIP contains 24 MoDOT projects (including four CMAQ projects) in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

totaling about $100 million ($89 MoDOT and $11CMAQ). There are 33 county and city projects<br />

totaling about $46 million, and three a transit projects totaling $336,000. All totaled, there are 60<br />

projects costing about $146.6 million. A tabulation of MoDOT projects by type of improvement in<br />

the region’s five counties is shown in Table 28 with <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> highlighted. The number<br />

and cost of <strong>County</strong> and city projects are shown in Table 29 and transit projects shown in Table 30.<br />

It can be seen that <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will receive $88,935,000 or 7.9 percent of MoDOT’s funds<br />

for the period 2007 through 2010. In addition, because MoDOT sets aside monies for multi-county<br />

projects, projects that cross county lines, and regional projects, various projects throughout the<br />

region, such as pavement overlays, signals, signs, Intelligent <strong>Transportation</strong> System (ITS)<br />

improvements, and safety projects, MoDOT will spend additional monies in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

In effect, the total dollar expenditure will be more than the $189 million.<br />

85


<strong>County</strong> Preservation<br />

Table 28<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

FY 2007 - 2010<br />

MoDOT Projects<br />

Capacity<br />

Adding<br />

Operational<br />

& Safety<br />

86<br />

Other Total<br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

Franklin $21,656,000 $59,663,000 $1,274,000 $0 $82,593,000 7.3%<br />

Jefferson $25,189,000 $0 $45,073,000 $0 $70,262,000 6.2%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> $8,699,000 $77,709,000 $2,223,000 $304,000 $88,935,000 7.9%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis $526,142,000 $34,636,000 $11,917,000 $11,217,000 $583,912,000 51.6%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis City $126,724,000 $0 $727,000 $70,000 $127,521,000 11.3%<br />

Multi-<strong>County</strong> $18,369,000 $0 $7,345,000 $0 $25,714,000 2.3%<br />

Regional $93,768,000 $0 $57,377,000 $2,231,000 $153,376,000 13.5%<br />

Multi-<strong>St</strong>ate $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 0.0%<br />

Total $820,627,000 $172,008,000 $125,936,000 $13,822,000 $1,132,393,00<br />

0<br />

% 72.5% 15.2% 11.1% 1.2% 100.0%<br />

Note: The four CMAQ projects total $11 million bringing the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> MoDOT totals to $100 million<br />

<strong>County</strong> Preservatn<br />

Table 29<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

FY 2007 - 2010<br />

Local Projects<br />

Capacity<br />

Adding<br />

Operationl<br />

& Safety<br />

System<br />

Enhncmnts<br />

Other Total<br />

100.0%<br />

Franklin $12,486,195 $2,361,000 $2,852,000 $2,145,499 $0 $19,844,694 6.9<br />

Jefferson $10,038,820 $5,625,000 $6,909,600 $110,000 $219,500 $22,902,920 8.1<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> $26,990,390 $617,855 $26,877,388 $2,873,000 $0 $57,358,633 20.2<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis $39,574,300 $11,100,000 $30,211,099 $11,819,369 $324,000 $93,028,768 32.8<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

City<br />

Multi-<br />

<strong>County</strong><br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

$50,640,424 $0 $23,793,300 $10,591,701 $0 $85,025,425 30.0<br />

$0 $0 $2,410,500 $1,550,000 $1,850,991 $5,811,491 2.0<br />

Total $139,730,129 $19,703,855 $93,053,887 $29,089,569 $2,394,491 $283,971,931 100.0<br />

% 49.2 6.9 32.8 10.3 0.8 100.0<br />

Note: Transit Vehicle Service under Multi-county of $22,436,869 has been omitted


<strong>County</strong><br />

Bus/Van<br />

Acquisitions<br />

Table 30<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program<br />

FY 2007 - 2010<br />

Transit Projects<br />

MetroLink<br />

Improvmts<br />

MetroLink<br />

Expansion<br />

87<br />

Equip./Facilities<br />

& Maintenance<br />

Total<br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

Franklin $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0<br />

Jefferson $42,000 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $0<br />

<strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong><br />

$336,000 $0 $0 $0 $336,000 $0<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis $45,500 $487,000 $0 $516,775 $1,049,275 $1<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

City<br />

Multi-<br />

<strong>County</strong><br />

$2,463,040 $2,931,832 $0 $4,100,209 $9,495,081 $6<br />

$8,426,041 $7,316,862 $109,789,995 $16,805,809 $142,338,707 $93<br />

Total $11,312,581 $10,735,694 $109,789,995 $21,422,793 $153,261,063 $100<br />

Percent 7.6 7.0 71.4 14.0 100.0<br />

Some of the more major <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> projects included in the TIP include the following;<br />

• I-70, eastbound auxiliary lane from Rt. 79 to Mid Rivers Mall Dr., $7.0 million.<br />

(Construction expected in 2006 and 2007)<br />

• I-70 reconstruct roadway and add lanes from Pearce Blvd., to east of Rt. Z, $8.8 million<br />

• Rt. 364 from east of Harvester Rd. to I-64 at Rt. N, new freeway, $36.1 million (construction<br />

expected in 2006 and 2007)<br />

• U.S. 40/61 from I-70 to Lake Saint Louis Blvd., upgrade to interstate standards $28.2<br />

million, and Winghaven Blvd. to west of Rt. K, $16 million.<br />

The number of projects and total dollars for each county differs in each year’s TIP as projects are<br />

completed and new projects are added. Major projects, especially those by MoDOT, can cause<br />

substantial changes in the dollars and percent for each county. A detailed listing of the projects<br />

presently programed in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> can be found in the 2007 - 2010 TIP.<br />

D. <strong>St</strong>ate of the <strong>Transportation</strong> System<br />

In April 2005 the Council published a study entitled “<strong>St</strong>ate of the <strong>Transportation</strong> System.” This<br />

report reviewed travel in <strong>St</strong>. Louis from many aspects. It used the Council’s Travel Survey<br />

conducted in 2001 to provide considerable information. It compared various measures of travel in<br />

the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region to other major cities in the United <strong>St</strong>ates. It reviewed travel from the<br />

perspective of the six major emphasis areas. Although it reviewed the region as a whole, some<br />

topics relating to <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> were identified and are discussed below.


D-1. Mode of Travel to Work<br />

For 2000 in the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> had the highest percent of drivers that drove<br />

alone to work, 87.1%. The next highest was <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> with 84.9%. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> had<br />

the lowest number of car poolers with 8.1%. <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> was the next with 8.4%. Of those<br />

using public transit, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> was second lowest with 0.3%. Jefferson <strong>County</strong> was the<br />

lowest with 0.2%. <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> had 1.7 percent.<br />

D-2. Crash Rating<br />

The average annual crash rate, as a percent of population, was lower in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> than the<br />

City of <strong>St</strong>. Louis or <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. However, the crash rate, the measure of crashes to number<br />

of vehicle miles of travel, was higher on the Interstate system in the <strong>County</strong> than the other counties<br />

in region. Specific crash data for the roads in the <strong>County</strong> has been discussed earlier.<br />

D-3. Other <strong>St</strong>udies<br />

Since 1997 when the previous transportation plan was prepared, MoDOT, the <strong>County</strong>, and many<br />

cities have conducted numerous studies. They cover a wide variety of topics including major<br />

highway improvements, land use, environmental issues, economic development, waste water and<br />

water treatment facilities, residential development, and commercial development. Many of these<br />

studies have been previously mentioned in this report and the topics discussed have influenced the<br />

outcome of conclusions of this study. In some instances the data collected in those studies may have<br />

been used or referenced in this report. In other cases they were not. The purpose of this section is<br />

to indicate that the Council recognizes that these reports exist and that difference in the data from<br />

that of the Council does not mean they are wrong. The Council does, however, use its data,<br />

including that which may have been obtained from various sources in the county, to develop<br />

forecasts, conclusions, and recommendations for this report.<br />

88


A. Background<br />

VI. Future <strong>Transportation</strong> Conditions<br />

Future transportation conditions in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will depend on many factors. The first and<br />

most important is how land use in the county and rest of the region will change over the next 25<br />

years. This will effect the region’s demographics and greatly influence the amount and pattern of<br />

travel on all transportation modes, especially streets and highways. Of particular importance is the<br />

growth of population and employment. The second most important factor is the changes that can<br />

be expected in all modes of transportation in the region. Of primary concern are changes to the<br />

street and highway system since they will influence the movement of people, goods, services and<br />

commodities. A third factor that will influence travel is the overall economic conditions in the <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Louis region, Missouri, and the United <strong>St</strong>ates as it will effect the demands that will be placed on all<br />

modes of transportation. Lastly, the amount of travel that can be expected by persons living in the<br />

region and those traveling through it is apt to change as societal and technical changes take place<br />

and economic conditions of the country change. These changes will also influence the movement<br />

of people, goods, services, and commodities. Assumptions have been made regarding these factors<br />

and how they will influence travel on all modes of transportation in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

B. Demographics<br />

The demographic makeup of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region that may exist in the year <strong>2030</strong> is quite important<br />

in estimating the amount of travel that can be expected in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Data in Chapter II<br />

provided information on historical demographics. These data were used as a baseline for developing<br />

future estimates. Trends in population including age and gender, number of households and persons<br />

per household, and employment, were important items used in making these estimates.<br />

Future land use forecasts provided the basis for determining the county’s demographics which were<br />

essential in developing forecasts of travel. The Council developed much of these data, especially<br />

forecasts of population, number of households, persons per household and the amount and<br />

distribution of employment, by closely tracking land development in the county. The county’s<br />

planning staff played an important role in assisting Council staff in developing these data as did<br />

many of the cities.<br />

B-1. Population and Household Forecasts<br />

Since land in the county is abundant and residential development continues, it is expected that this<br />

trend will continue well into the future. New residential development has followed or is ahead of<br />

current and planned highway improvements and is expected to continue. This is especially true<br />

along major corridors presently being updated and those planned for new construction in the near<br />

future. Such roads include the conversion of U.S. 40/61 to I-64 from Rt. K to I-70, the proposed<br />

Rt. 364 corridor west along Rt. 94 from Harvester Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and west to I-64 at<br />

Rt. N. Other corridors that have attracted new development include Mid Rivers Mall Dr. from<br />

Willott Rd. south to Rt. 94, Rt. 94 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. west to I-64, Rt. K from Rt. N south<br />

89


to I-64, and Winghaven Blvd./Bryan Rd. from I-70 to I-64. Considerable in-fill is taking place north<br />

of I-64/U.S. 40/61 from the Missouri River west to Lake Saint Louis Blvd. in the cities of Weldon<br />

Spring, O’Fallon, Dardenne Prairie, Lake Saint Louis, and parts of unincorporated <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>. New residential development is occurring in the northern part of the county also on<br />

available land in many older and well-established communities. They include areas north and south<br />

of Mexico Rd., especially west of Mid Rivers Mall Dr., and north of I-70 from the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

west through old O’Fallon to Wentzville, especially north and south of Rt. P. In the Wentzville area<br />

development continues all around the older parts of town and south of I-70 along Rt. Z and both<br />

sides of Rt. N to I-64. New development has accelerated north of Wentzville from U.S. 61 west to<br />

Warren <strong>County</strong>.<br />

Using Census Bureau data as a benchmark and a considerable amount of other data, the Council<br />

developed forecasts of population for the <strong>St</strong>. Louis Region. The latest forecasts are contained in the<br />

Council’s report, “Long-Range Population and Employment Projections” prepared in June 2004.<br />

It consisted of reviewing historical data from the census for 1980, 1990, and 2000, and then<br />

producing a series of projections based on births, deaths, and in and out migration from the <strong>St</strong>. Louis<br />

region. Comparisons were made of these forecasts to the history of the region’s population.<br />

Change in population depends on many factors as previously described. Table 1 in Chapter 1<br />

showed <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s population grew at 48 and 33 percent from 1980 to 1990 and 1990 to<br />

2000, respectively. During that time the region only grew by about 3 percent. Table 31 below<br />

shows the forecasts of population for the region to year <strong>2030</strong>. It shows the region’s population will<br />

slowly increase at about 10 percent to about 2,700,500 while the county will grow by almost 30<br />

percent to 408,000. This will make it the second largest next to <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>.<br />

The number of households will also grow but at a faster rate than the population because the size<br />

of households is decreasing. For the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region households are expected to grow around 18<br />

percent but <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> will grow by 43 percent. The average household size will decline<br />

throughout the entire region.<br />

B-2. Employment Forecasts<br />

Employment growth or decline and its distribution throughout the region has a major effect on all<br />

modes of transportation, especially traffic on the region’s highway system. Travel for work has<br />

always been a major item used in developing highway traffic forecasts. As a result, estimates of<br />

future employment in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and for the region were developed for this study.<br />

Employment projections, unlike population projections, do not use a baseline of census data.<br />

Instead, data is acquired from a number of agencies that provide employment information on persons<br />

in the United <strong>St</strong>ates and the state of Missouri. In addition, data were collected from various agencies<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Forecasts were then developed using an evaluation process which considered<br />

the development outlook and potential for each county in the region. Employment forecasts were<br />

developed by the Council for Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, and details can be found in the Council’s June 2004<br />

report cited above.<br />

90


Category 2000<br />

Table 31<br />

Population and Households Forecasts<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

2005<br />

Estimated<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

91<br />

<strong>2030</strong><br />

Projected<br />

Percent Change<br />

2000-2005 2005-<strong>2030</strong><br />

Population 2,482,900 2,522,700 2,770,500 1.6% 9.8%<br />

Households 969,200 1,002,600 1,188,600 3.4% 18.6%<br />

Avg. HH Size 2.56 2.52 2.33 -3.0% -7.5%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Population 283,900 314,400 408,000 10.7% 29.8%<br />

Households 101,800 117,400 167,800 15.3% 42.9%<br />

Avg. HH Size 2.79 2.68 2.43 -2.8% -9.3%<br />

Pop % of Region 11.4% 12.5% 14.7% 9.6% 17.6%<br />

For <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, many factors have contributed to a sizeable increase in employment. They<br />

include the amount of available land, the growth in residential development and population, and the<br />

expansion and improvement to the major highway network. New employment has followed<br />

improvements that are taking place along existing and new highway corridors. Examples are the<br />

Rt. 370 freeway from the Missouri River to I-70, improvements to I-70 especially at many of the<br />

interchanges, the new Rt. 364 freeway from the Missouri River to Rt. 94, and the upgrading of U.S.<br />

40/61 to I-64 from the Missouri River to I-70 at Wentzville. These and other road improvements<br />

allow faster travel on the region’s major highway system and thus attract commercial, industrial, and<br />

other development.<br />

The most dramatic change has been in the new I-64 corridor from the Missouri River to Wentzville.<br />

It has become the “high tech” corridor with many new major employers. <strong>East</strong> of Rt. 94, additional<br />

companies have built in the Missouri Research Park which is on the south side and others including<br />

Verizon and Enterprise Leasing have built on the north side. All around the Rt. 94/Rt. K interchange<br />

a very large amount of commercial development has sprung up including hotels, restaurants, car<br />

dealerships, and other strip commercial, all anchored by CitiGroup and BJC Hospital. At the<br />

Winghaven Blvd. interchange considerable development has occurred, similar to that at Rt. 94/Rt.<br />

K, anchored by MasterCard. New commercial establishments have developed all around the Rt. N<br />

interchange anchored by Wal-Mart, Lowes, Target, and JC Penny to name a few. New commercial<br />

development has sprung up around the Lake Saint Louis Blvd. interchange with more coming.


When a new interchange is built east of Callahan Rd., replacing the two signalized intersections, it<br />

also is very likely to attract new commercial development.<br />

Forecasts of employment are shown in Table 32 below. They include the number of jobs in the<br />

county, the number of persons who live in the county and are employed, and the number of<br />

employed persons who live in the county and work in the county. It confirms what is described in<br />

Chapter II, that employment in the county has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. It also notes that<br />

many employed persons living in the county now work in the county and the number has been<br />

growing. However, because the amount of jobs has not grown as fast as the number of employed<br />

persons there is still a need for many persons to commute across the Missouri River. It is expected<br />

that this trend will continue for some time with a slight decline in the future (See Table 3, Page 5).<br />

Category<br />

Table 32<br />

Employment Forecasts<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

2000 2005*<br />

Years Rate of Change<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

92<br />

<strong>2030</strong><br />

Projected<br />

2000-2005 2005-<strong>2030</strong><br />

Employment 1,303,800 1,350,700 1,481,100 3.6% 9.7%<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Employment 105,700 124,700 173,500 18.0% 39.1%<br />

Percent Working<br />

in <strong>County</strong><br />

Employment as a<br />

Percent of Region<br />

* Estimated<br />

B-3. Vehicle and Household Forecasts<br />

47.0% 50.5% 60.0%* 7.4% 18.8%<br />

8.1% 9.2% 11.7% 13.6% 27.2%<br />

An important item used in forecasting travel is the number of vehicles expected in each household.<br />

Estimates of households as well as vehicle ownership was developed using historical data and future<br />

population. Households were estimated with population and were used to obtain the number of<br />

vehicles that would exist. Historical data regarding vehicle registrations for 2000 and 2004 were<br />

obtained from the states of Missouri and Illinois but older data (1990) was not comparable or used.<br />

Table 33 below shows the number of households and registered autos in 2000 and 2004. It also<br />

contains an estimate of households and autos for the year <strong>2030</strong>. The data shows that the number of<br />

autos in the region increased by 79,700, far exceeding the 33,400 increases in households. In <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> the difference between the growth in vehicles and households was more dramatic.<br />

Vehicles increased by 49,300 or 28.0 percent while households grew by 15,700 or 15.4 percent. By


Table 33<br />

Vehicles and Households<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

Year 2000* 2004* <strong>2030</strong>**<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. Louis Region<br />

93<br />

Change & %<br />

2000 - 2004<br />

1,689,400 1,769,100 2,200,000 79,700<br />

4.7%<br />

Households 969,200 1,002,600 1,188,600 33,400<br />

3.4%<br />

Change & %<br />

2004 - <strong>2030</strong>**<br />

430,900<br />

24.4%<br />

186,000<br />

18.6%<br />

Autos/HH 1.74 1.76 1.85 1.1% 5.1%<br />

Registered<br />

Autos<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

176,000 225,300 380,000 49,300<br />

28.0%<br />

Households 101,700 117,400 167,800 15,700<br />

15.4%<br />

154,700<br />

68.7%<br />

50,400<br />

42.9%<br />

Autos/HH 1.73 1.97 2.26 13.9% 14.7%<br />

* Data obtained from the Missouri Department of Revenue and the Illinois Secretary of <strong>St</strong>ate, Department of Revenue for 2000<br />

through 2004. Earlier data was not comparable to these data.<br />

** Estimated based on historical values and judgement using the population and employment forecasts.<br />

<strong>2030</strong> it is estimated that the region will grow to 1,188,600 households and registered vehicles will<br />

reach 2,200,000. This is an 18.6 percent increase in households while vehicle ownership will rise<br />

by 24.4 percent. In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> the change will be even more dramatic with households<br />

rising by 42.9 percent and vehicles by 68.7 percent. This shows how travel in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

can be expected to be much higher than that of the rest of the <strong>St</strong>. Louis region.<br />

C. Highway Travel<br />

Future travel on the major highways in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the region will depend on the system<br />

in place by <strong>2030</strong>. To best estimate what it will look like, Legacy <strong>2030</strong> and the Council’s TIP were<br />

used as they list projects that are expected to have adequate funding. For the county’s roads, their<br />

TIP and Master <strong>Plan</strong> were used. Their TIP also listed projects that have dedicated funding. Their<br />

Master <strong>Plan</strong> suggests future improvements. However, some do not presently have dedicated funding.<br />

C-1. Traffic Forecasting Methodology<br />

The methodology used for developing forecasts of traffic volumes on major MoDOT’s roads and<br />

county roads employed a number of steps. First, historical ADTs were obtained from MoDOT and<br />

city and county data. Growth factors were developed from these ADTs and applied to each road


taking into account future improvements outlined in the present TIP and Legacy <strong>2030</strong>. Second, the<br />

percent change in population, households, and employment, forecasted by the Council in the five<br />

sections of the county as shown in Figure 1, was related to the growth factors developed for each<br />

road. Third, road characteristics including their functional classifications, lengths, type of areas they<br />

traversed, and number of lanes, were reviewed. Forecasts were then developed for each road in 10<br />

year increments from 2010 to <strong>2030</strong> to allow for close comparison to population, households, and<br />

employment forecasts, and land use changes that are expected.<br />

The forecasts developed by the Council were reviewed with MoDOT staff to insure that they were<br />

in line with their forecasts and any major reports prepared for them. Two such reports were recently<br />

prepared. The first entitled “Interstate 70 Corridor, Second Tier Draft Environmental Impact<br />

<strong>St</strong>atement,” addressed state-wide improvements to I-70 and included the section dealing with<br />

Montgomery, Warren, and <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> Counties. Forecasts of I-70 traffic for <strong>2030</strong> were included<br />

in that study and were reviewed in this report. The second report, entitled “Final Environmental<br />

Impact <strong>St</strong>atement, U.S. Route 40/61 Bridge Location <strong>St</strong>udy over the Missouri River,” contained<br />

<strong>2030</strong> traffic forecasts on I-64 at the bridge. They also were reviewed. No other studies of<br />

MoDOT’s major roads were prepared that would produce future traffic counts.<br />

C-2. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions on MoDOT Roads<br />

Traffic volume forecasts for <strong>2030</strong> were developed for all roads in functional classification order.<br />

From these forecasts travel conditions or the degree of congestion that can be expected was<br />

determined. MoDOT roads were examined first as they carry the highest volumes of traffic. The<br />

degree of congestion was expressed in Level of Service (LOS) as explained in Chapter III.<br />

Interstates and Freeways are addressed first followed by Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials, and<br />

Major Collectors. The <strong>2030</strong> ADTs are shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9. A complete tabulation of the<br />

traffic volume forecasts for MoDOT’s roads are contained in Appendix B. Using these forecasts,<br />

the number of lanes for each road, and the road improvements shown in the TIP and Legacy <strong>2030</strong>,<br />

the LOS for each road were determined. They were developed by following the procedures in the<br />

2000 HCM described in Chapter III. The result for each road segment is discussed below.<br />

C-2.1. Interstate and Freeways<br />

Interstates and freeways are considered primary roads in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the region. They<br />

handle the highest volumes with no interruption and ingress and egress allowed only at interchanges.<br />

Their design features are almost identical and therefore, they are discussed first.<br />

I-64<br />

ADTs From the Missouri River west to I-70, traffic volumes have continued to increase as new<br />

sections of this road were completed. From 1990 to 2000, before parts of it were upgraded to<br />

Interstate standards, traffic across the Missouri River grew by 56 percent from 44,300 to 69,100.<br />

By 2004, it had climbed to 77,500, and that was with a new bridge across the river on Rt. 364 which<br />

diverted some traffic. By 2010 it is expected that volumes will reach 90,000 and by <strong>2030</strong> are<br />

forecast to rise to 120,000. The Rt. 94/Rt. K interchange will serve considerable traffic and volumes<br />

94


Figure 7<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Forcasted Travel Volumes<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

95


Figure 8<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Forcasted Travel Volumes<br />

<strong>East</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

97


Figure 9<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Forcasted Travel Volumes<br />

<strong>West</strong> Inset<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

99


100


will drop west of there to 80,000. <strong>East</strong> of Rt. N, forecasts place volumes at 75,000 and west of it<br />

at 65,000 and it will remain the same through Lake Saint Louis Blvd. to I-70 at Wentzville.<br />

Although the traffic increases along I-64 are high, they reflect a major change in this facility. A new<br />

Interstate with high design standards will replace old U.S. 40/61. A new eastbound bridge will be<br />

built across the Missouri River increasing river crossing capacity, if funding becomes available.<br />

This will provide uninterrupted traffic flow between I-70 and <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> and through the<br />

region. It is expected that some traffic from I-70 and U.S. 61 will be diverted to this new road.<br />

LOS I-64 will have four lanes, two in each direction, from I-70 to Rt. K. From there through Rt.<br />

94 to the Missouri River it widens to six lanes with an auxiliary lane in each direction. From I-70<br />

to Rt. N, forecasted volumes will be about 65,000. Using 9 percent of the ADT to determine peak<br />

hour volumes result in 5,900 vehicles. Traffic volumes will have a 55/45 split in direction resulting<br />

in 3,200 in the high direction or 1,600 vehicles per lane. Using planning default factors to determine<br />

the equivalent passenger cars per lane per hour (pcphpl) brings this number to about 1,700. Based<br />

on Table 10 in Chapter III which explains LOS criteria for Freeways, and using a 60-mph speed<br />

limit, the road will operate at LOS D with some congestion but below the roads capacity. Traffic<br />

in the opposite direction will be lower and provide LOS C.<br />

<strong>East</strong> of Rt. N volumes will rise to around 75,000 to Winghaven Blvd. and then 80,000 to Rt. K.<br />

Applying the 9 percent factor to the highest volume results in 7,200 vehicles during the peak hours<br />

and applying a 55/45 directional split gives about 4,000 or 2,000 per lane. Using planning default<br />

factors, this equals about 2,100 pcphpl. Table 10 and a 60-mph speed limit shows this volume will<br />

reach the capacity of the road and it will operate at LOS E with serious congestion. Traffic will<br />

move at slower speeds from the Rt. N interchange through Winghaven to the six lane section at Rt.<br />

K. Traffic in the opposite direction will operate at LOS D with minor congestion based on the same<br />

factors except for the directional split.<br />

It should be noted that the Rt. 364 freeway extension from Rt. 94 at Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to the<br />

I-64/Rt. N interchange has not been included in this report. In Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, this section of Rt. 364<br />

is listed as an “Illustrative” project, meaning that it is desired but funds have not yet been provided.<br />

If funds become available and this road is completed by <strong>2030</strong>, a fair amount of traffic on I-64 will<br />

be diverted to it and traffic volumes will drop east of there. It is estimated that as much as 10,000<br />

to 15,000 vehicles will be diverted. This could drop volumes to about 60,000 east of the Rt. N<br />

interchange and improve the LOS on I-64 to D.<br />

From Rt. 94 to the Missouri River bridge volumes will increase again to 120,000 and it will operate<br />

on six lanes with two auxiliary lanes. Applying the same daily peak hour and directional values<br />

gives volumes at around 6,000 or 1,500 per lane. Applying planning factors results in about 1,600<br />

pcphpl. Although there are four lanes in each direction, one of them acts as an auxiliary lane<br />

between the ramps of Rt. 94 to Chesterfield Airport Rd. in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong>. The distance between<br />

the ramps is more than three miles, therefore, it is expected that they will carry substantial volumes.<br />

However, they will be less than that of the through lanes. A factor of 75 percent has been used for<br />

these lanes and the remaining volume (400) were distributed to the other three lanes. This brings<br />

volumes on the three through lanes to about 1,750. From Table 10 at a 60 mph speed limit, this<br />

shows that the road will provide LOS D with only minor congestion during the peak hour periods.<br />

101


I-64 Summary<br />

Traffic volumes on I-64 from I-70 to the Missouri River bridge will increase substantially by <strong>2030</strong>.<br />

Unfortunately, a five-mile section from Rt. N to Rt. K, with only two lanes in each direction, will<br />

operate with volumes at capacity (LOS E) in both directions of travel during the peak hours. If Rt.<br />

364 is built from Rt. 94 at Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to the I-64/Rt. N interchange, then volumes will<br />

decline east of there and the road will operate at LOS D with only moderate congestion. This points<br />

out the importance of completing this project.<br />

I-70<br />

ADTs Traffic volumes on I-70 have been increasing for some time. Chapter III noted that the<br />

average increase from 1990 to 2000 was 35 percent. Since 1990, two new Missouri River bridges<br />

have been built. Rt. 370, a freeway, crosses the river north of the city of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> and junctions<br />

with I-70 east of Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. 364, also a freeway, crosses the river south of I-70 and<br />

intersects with Rt. 94 near Muegge Rd. Both had an effect of reducing traffic on I-70 east of Mid<br />

Rivers Mall Dr. Forecasts indicates that volumes across the Missouri River will still increase but<br />

at a slower pace with these bridges to assist crossings. By <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to climb back<br />

up to 210,000. Between Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and Rt. 79 they will increase to 175,000. <strong>East</strong> of<br />

Bryan Rd. volumes will rise to 125,000 and at Pearce Blvd. in Wentzville, they will reach 100,000.<br />

Although these are substantial increases, they reflect the growth in the western part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>, the growth in adjoining Lincoln and Warren Counties, and an overall increases in traffic<br />

on I-70 across the state of Missouri. Fortunately, in the west part of the county, with I-64 becoming<br />

a major Interstate route, a considerable amount of increased traffic will use it instead of I-70. On<br />

the east end, traffic across the Missouri River will be shared with two other bridges.<br />

LOS In <strong>2030</strong> I-70 will be a four-lane facility, two lanes in each direction, from Warren <strong>County</strong><br />

through Pearce Blvd. and will handle about 90,000 vehicles. Nine percent of the daily traffic can<br />

be expected during the peak hours with a 55/44 directional split. This gives about 4,500 or 2,250<br />

vehicles per lane in the high direction of travel. Applying planning factors converts this to about<br />

2,350 pcphpl. With a 65 mph speed limit, Table 10 indicates it is right at LOS F, meaning the<br />

forecasted volumes will be in excess of the road’s capacity. It will operate with severe congestion<br />

in a start-stop mode. Traffic in the opposite direction will also be high and operate at LOS D with<br />

moderate congestion. Widening of this section of I-70 by one lane in each direction is listed in<br />

Legacy <strong>2030</strong> as an “Illustrative” project. If funds become available by <strong>2030</strong>, this improvement will<br />

allow the road to operate at LOS of D in the high direction with only moderate congestion.<br />

From Pearce Blvd. through Rt. Z to I-64/U.S. 61, it will be widened to six lanes and carry 110,000<br />

vehicles. Growth in this part of the county both north and south of I-70, will be the cause of this<br />

high increase. Applying the 9 percent daily and 55/44 percent directional split factors for the peak<br />

hours result in about 5,500 vehicles in the high direction or 1,800 vehicles per lane. Factoring gives<br />

1,900 pcphpl which from Table 10 and a 60 mph speed limit indicates LOS D. The road will handle<br />

these volumes with moderate congestion.<br />

Although the I-70/I-64 (presently U.S. 40/61) interchange is being rebuilt, it will experience serious<br />

congestion by <strong>2030</strong>. <strong>West</strong> of the interchange peak hour volumes are expected to be around 1,900<br />

pcphpl. <strong>East</strong> of the interchange they will be 1,800 (see below). I-64 will have peak hour volumes<br />

102


around 2,000 pcphpl. U.S. 61 to the north will have lesser volumes but will still contribute to the<br />

amount of traffic that will flow through the interchange. The volumes on I-70 and I-64 alone will<br />

be operating at LOS D to E. It is anticipated that merging and diverging movements to and from<br />

the ramps will cause frictional effects on the through lanes and worsen their LOS to E or capacity.<br />

From I-64 to Lake Saint Louis Blvd. volumes will drop to 100,000 in six lanes as I-64 will drain off<br />

some traffic. Applying the above daily and directional factors results in 5,000 vehicles during the<br />

peak hours in the high direction of travel which gives 1,700 vehicles per lane. Factoring for pcphpl<br />

gives about 1,800. From Table 10 and a 60 mph speed limit, this results in LOS D with some<br />

congestion. From Lake Saint Louis Blvd. to Bryan Rd., volumes will be slightly higher but<br />

congestion will be about the same.<br />

From Bryan Rd. to Rt. 79, traffic builds up substantially, because of the sizeable amount of<br />

development that is expected to occur in this part of the county. <strong>East</strong> of Bryan Rd. to Rt. K volumes<br />

will increase to 125,000 on three lanes in each direction. Applying the daily and directional factors<br />

results in 2,050 vehicles per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 2,200. From Table 10 and a 60 mph<br />

speed limit, it will operate at LOS E with considerable congestion. The opposite direction will have<br />

about 1,700 vehicles and planning factors indicate 1,800 pcphpl. Table 10 indicates LOS D with<br />

moderate congestion.<br />

Traffic volumes east of Rt. K will also rise and reach 145,000 vehicles. However, an additional<br />

through lane, in each direction, will be added making it four lanes. Applying the daily and<br />

directional factors gives 1,800 vehicles per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,900 vehicles or the<br />

high end of LOS D. This section will operate with considerable congestion. Traffic in the opposite<br />

direction will operate at the low end of LOS D with only minor congestion.<br />

T.R. Hughes will add a small amount of traffic and have four lanes in each direction to Rt. 79. The<br />

LOS will be slightly worse with the high direction of travel reaching capacity (LOS E) with severe<br />

congestion. The opposite direction will be LOS D with moderate congestion.<br />

<strong>East</strong> of Rt. 79 volumes will rise substantially to about 175,000 to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. It will have<br />

four lanes in each direction, however, an auxiliary lane will be added for eastbound traffic. This will<br />

aid travel between the two interchanges especially during the morning peak hours. Applying daily<br />

and directional factors and adjusting for the auxiliary lane gives 1,850 vehicles in the through lane.<br />

Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,950 vehicles. From Table 10 and a 60 mph speed limit this equates to<br />

the high end of LOS D. Considerable congestion can be expected for eastbound traffic between<br />

these interchanges as it does today. In the opposite direction there will be no auxiliary lane, only<br />

four through lanes. During the afternoon peak hours volumes will reach 2,200 vehicles per lane or<br />

the capacity of the road at LOS E. It will operate with severe congestion similar to what is occurring<br />

today with backups extending from Rt. 79 through Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. 370, I-70 widens to six lanes in each direction for the multiple on<br />

and off ramps to Rt. 370. The ADT in this section will be about the same with 175,000 vehicles.<br />

After applying all the adjustment factors it was determined that the pcphpl volumes from Table 10<br />

would operate at LOS D due to the additional lanes. However, these numbers do not take into<br />

account congestion from two other sources; that described above from the adjacent section to the<br />

west and the other from weaving traffic to and from the Mid Rivers Mall Dr. interchange.<br />

103


With an additional lane eastbound (four lanes), more traffic will be delivered to the Rt. 370<br />

interchange and the lanes of the on ramp. During the morning peak hour, this traffic will be merging<br />

with traffic coming from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. In addition, the four lanes on I-70 will have to neck<br />

down to three lanes east of the interchange. Therefore, it is expected that congestion on this segment<br />

of I-70 will increase substantially. This may cause backups on I-70 and on to Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

The LOS at this location is expected to reach F in a start-stop mode.<br />

A sizeable amount of westbound I-70 traffic desires to exit at this interchange, especially during the<br />

afternoon peak hours. They must weave across traffic that is coming from Rt. 370. At the same<br />

time considerable westbound Rt. 370 traffic desires to merge into the through lanes of westbound<br />

I-70. This causes a very serious weaving problem that creates severe congestion. Adding to this<br />

problem is the fact that westbound traffic on the off-ramp to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. presently backs<br />

up into the westbound through lanes. It is expected that this situation will worsen by the forecast<br />

year as volumes increase. For eastbound traffic a similar situation exists with considerable traffic<br />

from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. wanting to proceed east on I-70. They must weave through traffic<br />

coming from I -70 heading for Rt. 370. This situation is not as bad as the westbound flow, even in<br />

the morning peak hours, but with additional traffic expected by the forecast year the situation is<br />

bound to worsen. Traffic can be expected to operate with severe congestion in a start-stop mode<br />

through this entire section and affect congestion to the east and west. It is expected that the peak<br />

hours will be extended and that congestion will exist during most of the day.<br />

<strong>East</strong> of Rt. 370 to Cave Springs Rd. volumes drop to 150,000 as traffic is diverted to and from Rt.<br />

370. Traffic must be carried on six lanes and there will be no auxiliary lanes. Factoring for peak<br />

hour and high direction gives 7,400 or 2,500 vehicles per hour. Factoring for pcphpl gives 2,600.<br />

Table 10 indicates LOS F which means the road will have volumes that exceed its capacity. It will,<br />

therefore, experience severe congestion. For the opposite direction volumes will reach 2,000<br />

vehicles. After factoring for pcphpl, this rises to 2,100 and from Table 10 shows it will reach<br />

capacity, LOS E. Because the road will be at and over the capacity, peak hours will spread more<br />

than what they already are presently, speeds will decrease, and travel time and delays will increase.<br />

Congestion will be severe and be extended to most of the daytime hours.<br />

From Cave Spring Rd. to Zumbehl Rd. the situation will worsen as more volume is added rising to<br />

160,000 and there are no additional lanes. The situation described above, LOS F, will also exist.<br />

From Zumbehl Rd. to Rt. 94 volumes again rise and reach 170,000. However, an auxiliary lane<br />

exists in this section helping to some degree the added volumes. Again, the auxiliary lane can only<br />

be expected to carry a portion of through lane volumes although the percent most likely will<br />

increase. Regardless, through volumes will be about 2,200 pcphpl at the roads capacity LOS E.<br />

Severe congestion can be expected as on the previous section.<br />

At Rt. 94, the new interchange will allow for considerable traffic to get on and off I-70 and the<br />

volumes will rise substantially, reaching 195,000 vehicles a day. An additional through lane will<br />

be added and also an auxiliary lane. This will help handle the forecasted volumes. Using a 9<br />

percent daily factor and a 55/44 split, peak hour volumes in the high direction will reach 9,700<br />

vehicles. Dividing this by five equals about 2,000 and factoring for pcphpl gives 2,100. This is<br />

assuming the auxiliary lane will handle the same volumes as the through lanes. From Table 10 this<br />

104


shows the road will be operating at capacity, LOS E. Congestion will be severe in a start-stop mode.<br />

This situation can be expected in both directions of travel and the peak hours will be extended.<br />

From Fifth <strong>St</strong>reet across the Missouri River bridge it is expected that volumes will reach 210,000.<br />

This is more than it has been in the past when it reached 190,000 in 2000. The five lanes will have<br />

volumes over their capacity (LOS F) and the bridge will operate in a start-stop mode with congestion<br />

and backups severe on both approaches.<br />

I-70 Summary<br />

From Warren <strong>County</strong> to the Missouri River traffic volumes on I-70 by the year <strong>2030</strong> are forecasted<br />

to range from 100,000 to 210,000. The number of lanes available to handle these volumes will range<br />

from four in the west to six, eight, and ten across the Missouri River. Auxiliary lanes between many<br />

of the interchanges will help and interchange improvements will also be made. Nonetheless, most<br />

sections of I-70 will have volumes and number of lanes that cause it to operate at LOS E and F.<br />

With these LOS, congestion will be severe between many of the interchanges and will affect traffic<br />

flow upstream during both the morning and afternoon peak hours.<br />

The traffic flow situation forecasted for I-70 will be similar to but worse than what presently exists.<br />

During the morning peak hours from Bryan Rd. through Mid Rivers Mall Dr. traffic now moves in<br />

a start-stop mode. In the afternoon peak hours, from the Earth City Expressway in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong><br />

past Rt. 79, congestion is also severe and often in a start-stop mode. One congested section simply<br />

worsens the congestion behind it and in some case on the next section. The result is congestion<br />

throughout the entire length of the road. It is anticipated that what is occurring today will be worse<br />

by <strong>2030</strong> even with the improvements planned. Congestion will start west of Wentzville and<br />

extending across the entire county to the Missouri River both during the morning and afternoon peak<br />

hours and these hours will be extended. Unfortunately, traffic in the opposite direction will also be<br />

rising and they too will reach LOS E and F. In effect, congestion can be expected in both directions<br />

(in a start-stop mode) and the hours of the congestion will be expanded to a longer part of the day.<br />

A major operational problem mentioned earlier in Chapter III was the severe congestion that is<br />

presently experienced at many of the interchanges. Vehicles back up on the off ramps and extend<br />

into the through traffic lanes. This not only causes serious congestion on I-70, but they also create<br />

a very serious safety problems. With increased activity expected at all of the interchanges, this<br />

situation will only get worse. The interchanges that presently are most effected, with the exception<br />

of new Rt. 94, Rt. 370, and new T.R Hughes, are from Fifth <strong>St</strong>. through Rt. K/M. No doubt, Bryan<br />

Rd. will experience this kind of congestion in the near future. MoDOT’s plan’s for improvements<br />

to these interchanges should be accelerated due to the severity of the situation.<br />

Rt. 364<br />

This freeway opened in the spring of 2004 and carried 50,000 vehicles. Volumes are expected to<br />

increase as traffic adjusts and additional sections are completed. By 2010 it will be extended from<br />

north of Harvester Rd. to north of Jungermann Rd. By 2020 it will be extended south to Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. Improvements are also planned in <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> in the form of additional ramps and<br />

the ramp configuration. This will allow traffic to flow more smoothly between Rt. 364 and I-270<br />

making it more attractive and thus add traffic volumes onto Rt. 364.<br />

105


By <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to reach 80,000 across the Missouri River. Peak hour volumes, as<br />

a percent of daily traffic, will be higher than those on I-70 and I-64 and are estimated at 12 percent.<br />

The high direction of travel will also be more at 65 percent. This will cause peak hour volumes in<br />

the high direction of travel to be about 6,200. With five lanes in both directions across the river,<br />

peak hour volumes for each lane will be about 1,250 vehicles. Even with converting to pcphpl, this<br />

provides LOS C and no congestion. From the bridge to Rt. 94 volumes will drop slightly to 75,000<br />

and it will lose a lane in each direction. Using 12 percent for peak hour volumes and 65 percent for<br />

the high direction gives 5,900 or about 1,500 vehicles per lane. Converting to pcphpl gives 1,600.<br />

From Table 10 and 60 mph speed limit, this equates to a low LOS D with some congestion.<br />

From its north junction with Rt. 94 through Harvester Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Rt. 364 will take<br />

the place of Rt. 94. It will carry between 70,000 and 60,000 vehicles a day. Peak hour volumes will<br />

be less of the daily totals in the old Rt. 94 corridor or about 10 percent. The directional split in<br />

traffic will be more equal at about 55/45 percent. With four lanes in each direction this equates to<br />

a high of about 1,000 vehicles per lane or LOS C with no congestion.<br />

When Rt. 364 is completed from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. west to the I-64/Rt. N interchange, volumes<br />

will increase due to growth in the corridor and its connection to I-64. Since this part of the<br />

improvement is not included in Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, forecasts with this addition have not been made. It<br />

is expected that the increase will not cause the road to reach its capacity, therefore, it will function<br />

without any serious congestion problems. However, its completion will greatly aid traffic<br />

congestion on both I-64 and on I-70.<br />

Rt. 370<br />

Traffic across the Missouri River has grown steadily. Year 2004 volumes indicate 61,000 at the<br />

river dropping to 58,000 near the Elm Ave. interchange. <strong>West</strong> of Truman Rd. it was 51,000. By<br />

<strong>2030</strong> it is expected that volumes will reach 85,000 at the Missouri River, 65,000 west of Elm Ave.<br />

and 60,000 west of Truman Rd.<br />

At the Missouri River during the peak hours in <strong>2030</strong> it will have 10 percent of the daily traffic and<br />

a 60/40 directional split. For a six-lane road, the peak direction will have 5,100 vehicles or 1,700<br />

vehicles per lane. Converting to pcphpl gives 1,800. Table 10 and a 60-mph speed limit indicates<br />

LOS D with moderate congestion. From Rt. 94 through the Elm Ave. and west to I-70 it remains<br />

a six-lane freeway and volumes drop resulting in a better LOS C with no congestion.<br />

One item of note is the fact that some traffic from I-70 finds Rt. 370 a useful bypass eliminating the<br />

need for travel on highly congestion I-70. This is especially true for vehicles traveling to and from<br />

the north part of <strong>St</strong>. Louis <strong>County</strong> or through the region and wanting to avoid traveling through<br />

downtown <strong>St</strong>. Louis. It also is greatly used if there is an incident on I-70 that causes any disturbance<br />

in traffic flow. At these times volumes can be much higher and the congestion can be quite acute.<br />

C-2.2. Expressways<br />

As noted previously, traffic flow on an expressway differs considerably from that of a freeway since<br />

it has at-grade intersections and many of them may be signalized depending on the road’s location.<br />

The HCM recognizes this difference and the analysis of the following expressways follows that of<br />

the HCM. Table 11 in Chapter III provides the LOS values for these expressways.<br />

106


U.S. 61<br />

Volumes on this four-lane road have been increasing steadily with the growth in Lincoln <strong>County</strong>.<br />

This will continue well into the future and by <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to reach 50,000 per day<br />

at the county line. During the peak hours it will carry 10 percent of these volumes and a 60/40<br />

directional split. This equates to 3,000 vehicles on the two lanes in the high direction of travel or<br />

1,500 per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,600 vehicles. Using Table 11 from Chapter III and a<br />

60 mph speed limit, this equates to LOS D. The road will operate with minor congestion during the<br />

peak hours. Close to I-70 daily volumes will rise to about 60,000 on the four lanes and congestion<br />

will increase with LOS approaching E. The ramps to and from I-70 will also add to this congestion.<br />

U.S. 67<br />

Volumes on this road have remained level over the last few years and are not expected to increase<br />

substantially in the future. The <strong>2030</strong> forecast indicates volumes will reach 34.000. The peak hours<br />

will be about 12 percent of the daily volume and have a 65/35 directional split. This equals 2,700<br />

vehicles on the two lanes or 1,350 per lane. Factoring for pcphpl gives 1,450 and from Table 11<br />

indicates the road will operate with no congestion at LOS C.<br />

C-2.3. Principal Arterials<br />

This classification includes a large number of the major roads in the county including both MoDOT<br />

and county roads. As explained in Chapter III, the present LOS on these roads was determined by<br />

reviewing their peak hour traffic volumes, operating conditions, including their physical<br />

characteristics, average speeds, number of signalized intersections and their LOS. These data were<br />

used as reference for making estimates of future LOS based on forecasted traffic volumes,<br />

committed roadway improvements, estimates of future speeds, and other relevant data. Each of<br />

these roads is discussed below.<br />

Rt. 79<br />

The section of Rt. 79 from Lincoln <strong>County</strong> south to Rt. M is classified as a Minor Arterial road.<br />

However, it is discussed here for continuity. From Rt. M to I-70 it is a Principal Arterial road.<br />

Traffic on this route has continued to rise as population in the northern part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

and in adjoining Lincoln <strong>County</strong> has grown. This trend will continue in the future according to<br />

population and employment projections. By the year <strong>2030</strong> the road is expected to carry about<br />

18,000 vehicles just south of Lincoln <strong>County</strong>, up from 13,000 in 2004. Average peak hour travel<br />

speeds will drop from the mid 40's to below 30 mph. Present day peak hour traffic is operating at<br />

LOS C to D at the two signalized intersections. It is expected that more intersections will be<br />

signalized and these side roads will carry higher volumes. This will lower their LOS to E.<br />

Congestion will be serious during the peak hours for both directions of traffic on the two lane<br />

section.<br />

On the four lane section north of I-70 volumes are expected to rise to 27,000, a substantial increase<br />

over the 20,000 experienced today. Long backups and delays can be expected during all the peak<br />

hours for northbound traffic where it necks down to two lanes. The back ups will be much more<br />

serious than what is experienced today and the LOS will drop to F or over the capacity of the road.<br />

Congestion will also increase for southbound traffic especially in the morning peak hour as traffic<br />

107


passes through the signal of the north ramps of I-70 and negotiates the eastbound on ramp. The<br />

interchange will operate at capacity or LOS E. A corridor study is included in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> for this<br />

road which may lead to improvements that will relieve these serious congestion problems.<br />

Rt. 94<br />

Parts of Rt. 94 are Minor Arterial and Major Collector roads. They are discussed in their appropriate<br />

sections later.<br />

The Rt. 94 sections that are designated as Principal Arterials have been divided into a number of<br />

segments as each one is quite different from the other. The section from Rt. 370 through the city<br />

of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> to Kingshighway is basically a two-lane street and will have only minor increases in<br />

traffic by <strong>2030</strong> as this area is not growing. It will average between 8,000 and 10,000 vehicles per<br />

day. The characteristics of the streets are not expected to change much and since it is presently<br />

operating at LOS D it is expected to remain that way.<br />

From Kingshighway to I-70 it becomes a five-lane road with a number of signalized intersections<br />

and traffic is expected to increase slightly to 28,000 by <strong>2030</strong> due to additional development in the<br />

area. At the <strong>West</strong> Clay <strong>St</strong>. intersection it may reach LOS E during the peak hours as this intersection<br />

is presently operating near capacity. The operation of the new I-70 interchange will help increase<br />

traffic flow on this segment.<br />

From I-70 south to Rt. 364, Rt. 94 is a four-lane divided road with auxiliary lanes between signals<br />

and has high volumes of traffic. By <strong>2030</strong> these volumes are expected to increase to 66,000. The<br />

new I-70/Rt. 94 interchange will greatly contribute to this additional traffic. Five signalized<br />

intersections exist in this segment and volumes on the side streets will be increasing. The LOS of<br />

the signals will be the controlling factor and it is expected that they will all be operating at capacity<br />

during the peak hours. Backups will extend for some distance from each intersection, possibly from<br />

one intersection into the next, and the peak hours will be extended. As a result, the road will operate<br />

at LOS F with demand in excess of its capacity.<br />

The section of Rt. 94 from Rt. 364 west to Mid Rivers Mall Dr. will have been converted to Rt. 364<br />

by <strong>2030</strong> and has been discussed above under freeways.<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64, Rt. 94 will be a four-lane divided road with many traffic signals.<br />

Volumes are expected to rise to 55,000 west of Mid Rivers Mall Dr. and increase to 60,000 east of<br />

I-64. Most of the signals will be operating at capacity during the peak hours with backups extending<br />

for some distance. The peak hour periods will increase. The road will be operating at LOS F with<br />

demand greater than its capacity.<br />

Rt. K<br />

The analysis of forecasted traffic on this road has been divided into two sections. The northern<br />

section from I-70 to Rt. N has the most commercial development and signalized intersections.<br />

Volumes are expected to increase to 68,000 between I-70 and Mexico Rd. and to 55,000 between<br />

Mexico Rd. and Rt. N by <strong>2030</strong>. The road is presently operating at capacity south of I-70, at Mexico<br />

Rd., and at Rt. N during the peak hours. With higher volumes forecasted, it can be expected that<br />

congestion will worsen and traffic demand will be in excess of the intersection’s capacity at LOS<br />

F. Demand at the major intersections will cause serious backups that will affect all the other<br />

108


signalized intersections along the road. This will cause all of them to operate at capacity, LOS E.<br />

The peak hours will be extended and exist for most of the day. This section of Rt. K will have some<br />

of the worst congestion that can be expected in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

From Rt. N to I-64 commercial development will increase and a considerable amount of residential<br />

development will continue to the east and west. Volumes will increase from 35,000 to close to<br />

50,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. More intersections will be signalized and congestion will increase substantially.<br />

Since some of the intersections are now operating at LOS D, it can be expected that they will all<br />

operate upwards of their capacity LOS E, and some beyond, LOS F, by that time. Serious<br />

congestion can be expected at many intersections during the peak hours and these hours will be<br />

expanded.<br />

It has been recommended in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> that a corridor study be conducted by MoDOT to evaluate<br />

possible ways of alleviating future traffic congestion on Rt. K. With severe congestion forecasted<br />

for the northern section and serious congestion expected on the southern part, it is only appropriate<br />

that this study is conducted for its entire length from I-70 to I-64.<br />

Rt. M<br />

This road runs through the middle of old downtown O’Fallon as Main <strong>St</strong>. from I-70 north to Rt. P.<br />

It carries about 6,000 vehicles in downtown and these volumes are not expected to increase much.<br />

On the north end between Rt. P and Rt. 79 volumes are around 4,000 and will increase to 7,000 as<br />

the area develops. Both sections will operate at LOS D with some congestion.<br />

C-2.4. Minor Arterials<br />

This classification includes a number of MoDOT roads and many major county roads. In some parts<br />

of the county traffic on these roads has already increased substantially as they are in areas that are<br />

growing rapidly. Some are starting to reach a level where congestion is becoming a problem.<br />

Rt. 94<br />

From Rt. B to Rt. 370 commercial and residential development is expected to increase along the<br />

corridor. By <strong>2030</strong> traffic volumes are expected to reach more than 22,000. The two lane road will<br />

be widened at new signalized intersections to better handle turning movements. However, overall<br />

speed on this two-mile section will decrease and the intersections will operate close to capacity.<br />

Congestion will be serious during the peak hours and the road is designated at LOS E. Although<br />

improvements are noted in the Illustrative Projects listing in Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, they do not mention<br />

widening. This road will need widening to three or four lanes based on expected growth in the area.<br />

From this segment to I-64, Rt. 94 is a Principal Arterial and has been discussed above. From I-64<br />

west to Rt. D, it is two lanes and traffic volumes will grow to about 16,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. This section<br />

only has two traffic signals, one at Rt. D and the other at the south frontage Rd. of I-64. They are<br />

expected to operate at LOS D as is the road.<br />

South of Rt. D, Rt. 94 remains a two-lane road and volumes only increase slightly. Although minor<br />

growth is expected in this area, the terrain is such that a substantial increase is not expected. By<br />

<strong>2030</strong> volumes will rise from 3,000 to 4,000 near Rt. F. The LOS will remain the same at C.<br />

109


Rt. A<br />

This five-lane road runs from I-70 to U.S. 61 and serves the General Motors plant and other<br />

industrial development. Growth in residential and commercial development in the corridor has been<br />

slow and is not expected to increase substantially by <strong>2030</strong>. Some residential development may<br />

occur to the north and this traffic may find its way to Rt. A. Also, some traffic from U.S. 61 and the<br />

northwest part of Wentzville may find it convenient to access I-70. By <strong>2030</strong> traffic volumes are<br />

expected to grow to around 18,000. Some signals exist at entrances to the GM plant and some<br />

others may be installed but they and the road will operate at LOS C.<br />

Rt. N<br />

From Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Rt. K this two-lane road is forecasted to handle around 15,000 per day.<br />

Some intersection improvements are planned and traffic will continue to operate at LOS D. The<br />

forecasted volumes could drop slightly if the planned Rt. 364 freeway is built.<br />

From Rt. K to I-64 volumes are forecasted at around 30,000. However, should Rt. 364 be<br />

completed, this traffic will move to the new road. If not, traffic from Rt. K to Bates Rd. will be split<br />

between the old Rt. N and the new south outer road of Rt. 364. These roads will both operate at<br />

LOS D during the peak hours with congestion at major intersections. <strong>West</strong> of Bryan Rd., Rt. N will<br />

be three lanes and additional volumes will be handled at LOS D.<br />

Additional improvements are planned for Rt. N through the proposed I-64/Rt. 364 interchange.<br />

Some have been completed at this time and others may come later if Rt. 364 is built. The area<br />

around the interchange has grown with major commercial development that is expected to continue<br />

in the future. The new and proposed road improvements serving the area should be able to handle<br />

traffic generated by this development at LOS D.<br />

<strong>West</strong> of I-64 to Rt. Z, Rt. N is forecasted to have 22,000 vehicles by <strong>2030</strong>. Many of the major<br />

intersections will be signalized. This section may be widened to three lanes as it is on the<br />

“illustrative” list in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> since the area is growing so rapidly. With growth expected in this<br />

area of the <strong>County</strong>, three lanes may not be sufficient. Should four or five lane widening be<br />

completed, the road will be able to handle the volumes at LOS D. If not, serious congestion can be<br />

expected. New signalized intersections will have to be designed to handle the additional volumes.<br />

Even with widening, the road will operate at LOS D with congestion at the major intersections.<br />

Rt. Z<br />

From I-70 to Rt. N, traffic on this road has been increasing with all the residential development in<br />

the area. It is expected to continue in the future. By <strong>2030</strong> volumes will increase from 11,000 to<br />

20,000. Widening of the road to three lanes is listed in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> as an “Illustrative” project.<br />

Should it be built, it will be able to handle forecasted volumes at LOS D. Some intersections will<br />

be signalized and they also will operate at LOS D. Congestion can be expected all along this road.<br />

C-2.5. Major Collectors<br />

These roads mainly serve adjacent areas and include some MoDOT roads and many county roads.<br />

Congestion generally is not a problem. Major roads with higher forecasted volumes are discussed<br />

below and others with lower volumes have been grouped together.<br />

110


Rt. 94<br />

The section of Rt. 94 from U.S. 67 at <strong>West</strong> Alton to Rt. B at Boschertown is a two-lane road with<br />

low volumes, averaging around 3,500, and it is not expected to increase much by <strong>2030</strong>. It’s LOS<br />

will remain the same at B.<br />

Rt. N<br />

From Rt. Z to Rt. T this road serves mainly a rural area. Some residential development is occurring,<br />

from Rt. Z to the west, and is expected to continue in the future. By <strong>2030</strong> it is expected that traffic<br />

volumes will increase from an average of 4,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day. The road should operate<br />

at LOS C and only a few local road intersections will become a concern.<br />

Rt. P<br />

Traffic on this road has been growing considerably with residential development occurring all along<br />

its length from Rt. M to U.S. 61. By <strong>2030</strong> it is expected to carry 16,000 vehicles, up from about<br />

8,000 at this time. Some signals may be installed at major intersection, however, they should be<br />

designed with these forecasts in mind and have adequate lanes. They may operate at LOS D during<br />

the peak hours and so will parts of the road. The most serious parts will be close to Rt. M on the east<br />

and U.S. 61 on the west.<br />

Rts. B, C, D, F, H, J, T, W, Y, and DD<br />

These roads are all in rural parts of the county and will not be affected much by the growth of the<br />

county and in traffic volumes. One exception could be the section of Rt. DD from I-64 southwest.<br />

This section of the road is adjacent to the I-64/Winghaven Blvd. interchange and the development<br />

that is occurring in this area. It is quite possible that growth may spread southwest along the road<br />

as demand for other types of commercial and residential development grows in close proximity to<br />

I-64. In addition, more residential development could occur in the New Melle area which is at the<br />

junction of Rt. D and Rt. Z. This could cause increased traffic on the roads in these areas.<br />

C-3. Future Traffic Volumes and Travel Conditions on <strong>County</strong> Roads<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> traffic volume forecasts for major county roads are also shown on Figures 7, 8, and 9.<br />

The forecasts were developed from traffic counts acquired from a number of sources including the<br />

county, many of the cities, and counts made by consultants. These data were used with some<br />

discretion as they were not factored to represent Average Daily Traffic counts like those produced<br />

by MoDOT. The growth rates of forecasted traffic were based on the population and employment<br />

forecasts in each road’s area. Particular attention was paid to Principal Arterial roads and some<br />

Minor Arterials. Forecasts were not made for roads with lower functional classifications due to a<br />

lack of data. The county’s transportation department is presently developing a system for collecting<br />

traffic counts on all county roads so they can develop their own forecasts. The roads are discussed<br />

below from east to west with only an indication of the degree of congestion that can be anticipated<br />

rather than assigning a specific LOS. Roads with lower traffic volumes that are not expected to have<br />

congestion problems in the future were not discussed.<br />

C-3.1. Principal Arterials<br />

Principal Arterial county roads are mainly multi-lane roads that were upgraded for some time and<br />

serve areas that are mostly developed. The following discussion of each road describes expectations<br />

111


of future travel conditions. Some minor arterial roads are included in the discussion of Principal<br />

Arterials as they provide continuity to the major road system.<br />

Truman Rd. I-70 to Rt. 370<br />

This road carried 7,500 vehicles north of Ehlmann Rd. in 2005. It is expected that growth in this<br />

corridor will continue because of its close proximity to I-70 and Rt. 370. By <strong>2030</strong> it is expected that<br />

volumes will increase to about 12,000. The road has five lanes and a number of signals that are<br />

operating below their capacity. A number of signals may be added by the forecast date as the area<br />

grows. However, the road should be able to handle forecasted volumes with only minor congestion<br />

during the peak hours.<br />

Jungermann Rd. Mexico Rd. to Rt. 94.<br />

Jungermann Rd. has higher volumes on the north end near Mexico Rd. that decrease southward until<br />

it gets close to Rt. 94. This is a very stable area that is not expected to grow very much. Forecasts<br />

indicate a modest increase by <strong>2030</strong> to 34,000 south of Mexico Rd. and 26,000 north of what will be<br />

Rt. 364. This five-lane road will handle these volumes with congestion reasonably close to what is<br />

being experienced today. Some signalized intersections may be operating close to capacity during<br />

the peak hours with substantial congestion.<br />

Mexico Rd. Cave Springs Rd. to Jungermann Rd.<br />

This section of Mexico Rd. has the highest volumes, around 32,000 in 2005. The area is reasonably<br />

stable except for the possibility of additional commercial development on both sides just west of<br />

Jungermann Rd. It is a five-lane road with numerous signals which are all working at capacity<br />

during the peak hours. Forecasts indicate the volumes will rise slightly over the coming years and<br />

reach 35,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. It is expected the congestion will increase slightly but will only result in a<br />

slight spreading of the peak hours.<br />

Mexico Rd. Jungermann Rd. to Mid Rivers Mall Dr.<br />

Mexico Rd. remains five-lanes through this section. It carried about 21,000 in 2005 and the area is<br />

reasonably stable. Forecasted volumes are only expected to rise slightly with the normal growth of<br />

traffic volumes and reach about 24,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. The road will be able to handle these volumes<br />

without any additional traffic congestion.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. I-70 to Mexico Rd.<br />

This five-lane section, of Mid Rivers Mall Dr., passes through a very high area of commercial<br />

development that generated high traffic volumes, around 35,000 in 2005. The major generator is<br />

Mid Rivers Mall and other development in the area and through traffic account for the high volumes.<br />

There are five signalized intersections and they all are operating at capacity during the peak hours.<br />

It is expected that by <strong>2030</strong> volumes will rise slightly to around 38,000 from a general increase in<br />

traffic volumes. However, the area is fairly well developed. It is expected that the future increases<br />

will cause severe congestion with backups extending from one signal into another. Traffic on the<br />

side streets may increase also which will add to the congestion. It does not appear possible to build<br />

any capacity adding features, therefore, the county should undertake a study to insure that all signal<br />

coordination and optimization measures are implemented to insure the best flow of future traffic<br />

through the area.<br />

112


Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Mexico Rd. to Willott Rd.<br />

This section of the road will have a minor increase in traffic by <strong>2030</strong> as this part of the county<br />

experiences additional residential development. Volumes are expected to rise from 28,000 in 2005<br />

to 32,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. Congestion will increase but the five-lane road should be able to handle the<br />

volumes and operate close to capacity with some congestion occurring during the peak hours.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr. Willott Rd. to Central School Rd.<br />

This five-lane section will have an increase in traffic from 18,000 in 2005 to about 32,000 in <strong>2030</strong>.<br />

Growth will continue along this corridor and contribute to this increase. There are a number of<br />

signals now and additional ones may be built. They presently handle traffic without serious<br />

congestion and it is expected that the road will operate with minor congestion during the peak hours<br />

in the future.<br />

Mid Rivers Mall Dr Central School Rd. to Rt. 94.<br />

Traffic volume on this section of five-lane road has increased substantially in the past few years as<br />

adjacent commercial development has grown. Also, residential development in the area has grown<br />

dramatically adding to these traffic volumes. It is expected that volumes will rise from the current<br />

20,000 to close to 30,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. The traffic signals and the road will be operating close to<br />

capacity with serious congestion.<br />

Mexico Rd. Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to Salt Lick Rd.<br />

This section of Mexico Rd. is five lanes and had about 23,000 vehicles per day in 2005. Volumes<br />

are expected to rise over the coming years to 26,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. A number of signals along its length<br />

are presently operating with minor congestion during the peak hours and this trend will continue.<br />

By <strong>2030</strong> congestion will increase slightly but the road will still operate below its capacity.<br />

Mexico Rd. Salt Lick Rd. to Rt. K.<br />

Mexico Rd. in this segment is four and five lanes and has less volume than other sections but they<br />

are increasing. Year 2005 had 18,000 and this number will rise to about 26,000 in <strong>2030</strong>. There is<br />

very little congestion now but by <strong>2030</strong> there will be some minor congestion at major intersections.<br />

Mexico Rd. Rt. K to Bryan Rd. (A Minor Arterial)<br />

This section is four and five lanes and presently carries about 16,000. By <strong>2030</strong> these volumes will<br />

rise to 22,000. The major intersections are not presently congested and it is expected that by the<br />

forecast year they will have some minor congestion.<br />

Bryan Rd. I-70 to Rt. N. (A minor Arterial)<br />

Bryan Rd. has been rebuilt and upgraded since 2000. It is now a five-lane major road from a full<br />

diamond interchange at I-70 and has turning lanes at all major signalized intersections. In 2005 it<br />

carried 28,000 vehicles with minor congestion during some of the peak hours. It is anticipated that<br />

by <strong>2030</strong> volumes will increase to 36,000. It will have serious congestion at the major intersections<br />

during the peak hours and they will be operating at capacity.<br />

113


Winghaven Blvd. Rt. N to I-64.<br />

Winghaven Blvd. is an extension of Bryan Rd. south to I-64. However, it was built as a parkway<br />

with a grassed center median and left turn lanes at major intersections. Commercial development<br />

has been built around the Rt. N intersection and along part of its length. At I-64, MasterCard<br />

anchors the interchange with considerable other development including a hospital and a number of<br />

strip commercial developments on both sides of the road. In 2005 traffic volumes were around<br />

15,000. It is expected that by <strong>2030</strong> volumes will reach about 26,000. The intersections are presently<br />

operating with only minor congestion during the peak hours but this congestion will increase over<br />

the years. However, future volumes will stay within the roads capacity and it should operate with<br />

modest congestion during the peak hours.<br />

Wentzville Pkwy. I-70 to U.S. 61. (A Minor Arterial)<br />

This five-lane road is currently operating without any congestion except for the area just north of<br />

I-70 past Pearce Blvd. Through this area to north of Meyer Rd. considerable commercial<br />

development has grown on both sides of the road and a number of new traffic signals have been<br />

installed. The I-70 interchange has been upgraded with additional traffic lanes and an improved<br />

traffic signal system. The road carried close to 18,000 vehicles in 2005 and it is expected that this<br />

number will increase to 25,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. Congestion will start to be a problem along the section<br />

from I-70 through Pearce Blvd. north toward Meyers Rd. The intersection of Pearce Blvd. is<br />

expected to operate at capacity.<br />

On the section from Meyers Rd., which is in the northwest corner of the Parkway, east to U.S. 61,<br />

it remains a five-lane road but volumes, which are presently around 7,000, will be about 15,000 in<br />

<strong>2030</strong>. Some intersections may be signalized and they will operate without any congestion problems.<br />

C-3.2. Minor Arterial Roads<br />

Most of the county’s Minor Arterial roads are presently operating without any severe congestion.<br />

Many of them have been improved from old two lane roads with poor grades into three, four, or five<br />

lane roads with improved alignment. This provides more capacity and safer roads. Many old roads<br />

are scheduled for similar improvements. Over the years traffic volumes on many of these roads will<br />

increase, especially in the parts that will continue to experience significant growth. However, the<br />

increases will be small and not dramatically change their traffic operations, especially those that<br />

have been improved. The ones where traffic increases may be a problem are discussed below.<br />

Elm Ave. From Rt. 370 through Elm Point Rd. has been widened to five lanes and is carrying<br />

about 18,000 vehicles. The Rt. 370 interchange is responsible for generating these volumes.<br />

Commercial development lines the corridor and the road feeds traffic to and from Elm Point Rd.<br />

which has considerable development, and into the old part of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong>. It is expected that<br />

volumes will increase by <strong>2030</strong> to around 25,000. This will cause some congestion problems at the<br />

signals but volumes will be below their capacity.<br />

Zumbehl Rd. From I-70 to Rt. 94 is expected to have an increase in traffic due to growth in the<br />

corridor. Volumes are presently around 25,000 and congestion is experienced at some of the major<br />

intersections. This congestion will grow worse in the future and by <strong>2030</strong> some intersections may<br />

have volumes close to their capacity as they rise to 33,000. This will cause congestion problems<br />

during the peak hour periods.<br />

114


Muegge Rd. Mexico Rd. to Old Highway 94.<br />

This four and five-lane road handled 14,000 in 2005. This area is reasonably stable and not much<br />

additional growth is expected. Some traffic has been added due to the ramp connections of Muegge<br />

Rd. to Rt. 364 and the new bridge across the Missouri River. This traffic is generally coming from<br />

I-70 and Mexico Rd. Additional traffic can be expected in the future as congestion on I-70 increases<br />

and traffic seeks an alternative route across the Missouri River. It is forecasted that by <strong>2030</strong><br />

volumes on Muegge Rd. will reach 20,000. With four lanes it is expected that the road will operate<br />

below its capacity with only minor congestion during the peak hours.<br />

Harvester Rd. From Rt. 94 to Caulks Hill Rd. is a five-lane road and presently handles about<br />

23,000 vehicles per day. By <strong>2030</strong> volumes are expected to reach 28,000. It has a number of signals<br />

that operate with serious congestion during the peak hours. This will only get worse, especially with<br />

more development in the area and traffic wanting to use the new Rt. 364 freeway. It is expected that<br />

demand will exceed the road’s capacity and severe congestion will result.<br />

McClay Rd. From Jungermann Rd. to Thoele Rd. is a two-lane road and may have volumes<br />

upwards of 18,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. This could cause some capacity problems. Although development in<br />

this area is stable, it is expected that the opening of the Rt. 364 freeway could divert some traffic<br />

from the area to the north and cause some congestion problems.<br />

Spencer Rd. South of Mexico Rd. is expected to have an increase by <strong>2030</strong> that could cause some<br />

serious congestion problems. Although the road has been improved, it is expected that demand will<br />

reach close to 20,000. The signals will have volumes approaching capacity at some locations.<br />

Salt Lick Rd. I-70 to Mexico Rd.<br />

This five-lane road has undergone substantial growth in recent years. First the road was widened<br />

and then commercial development sprang up all along its length. Today it is close to being fully<br />

developed and new residential development in the corridor has added to the traffic. Volumes are<br />

presently at 20,000 and are expected to increase to 25,000 by <strong>2030</strong>. A number of new signals have<br />

been installed and they are operating well below capacity. By <strong>2030</strong> congestion will increase but the<br />

road should operate with only minor congestion during the peak hour periods.<br />

Summary<br />

With the increase in population and employment in the county the Principal and Minor Arterial<br />

roads are going to experience an increase in traffic volumes over the next 20 years. Some of them<br />

will have a substantial increase, especially in the fast-growing parts of the county. Most of them<br />

will be able to handle the volumes without serious congestion but some will have volumes that reach<br />

the roads capacity, especially when taking into consideration signalized intersections and their<br />

capacity. The <strong>County</strong> and many of the cities will be required to continually observe their operations.<br />

All traffic operational improvements including signal optimization plans, minor capacity<br />

improvements at selected locations, and other traffic control techniques, will have to be employed<br />

to minimize anticipated congestion and insure continued smooth operation.<br />

C-4. Safety Concerns<br />

Chapter IV discussed the degree of safety provided on all transportation modes. Data for 2002,<br />

2003, and 2004 were acquired and analyzed. Measures of safety appropriate to each mode were<br />

used and safety records were described. For the major highway system, number of crashes, their<br />

115


severity, and the crash rate (crashes per vehicle miles of travel), for each road segment, were used<br />

to assess their level of safety. These assessments were straight forward and the degree of safety on<br />

all major roads was described.<br />

Attempting to forecast safety, however, becomes much more difficult. First, no data is available<br />

except that which is historical. Second, no accepted crash forecasting model has been developed<br />

that has any degree of accuracy. Third, future modes of travel, especially on the road system, has<br />

many unknowns such as the ease or difficulty of driving, safety features of the road, safety features<br />

of vehicles, and technological changes for both highway and vehicle operations. In the next twenty<br />

years these changes may have a dramatic effect on safety.<br />

Instead of attempting to forecast if their will be more or less crashes and accidents, and whether they<br />

will be more or less severe, this report discusses conditions that are expected to exist on all<br />

transportation modes and how they could affect their safety.<br />

C-4.1. The <strong>St</strong>reet and Highway System<br />

For the road and highway system some facts are known. On the positive side, many changes have<br />

been made that will tend to decrease the number of crashes and their severity. Improvements have<br />

been made to the highway system bringing old roads up to today’s design standard. They include<br />

safety features that did not previously exist. Improvements have also been made to newer roads that<br />

include specific safety features. New traffic control devices have been installed that more safely<br />

handle, advise, and direct traffic. These include improved traffic signals and traffic signal systems,<br />

better signing and pavement markings, and information message boards that alert drivers of<br />

advanced road conditions. Other technological changes that will improve traffic flow are constantly<br />

being evaluated and in the near future may be employed.<br />

On the negative side, many factors are making driving more dangerous and increase the possibility<br />

of more crashes and their severity. The number of vehicles on the roads and drivers available to use<br />

them has continued to rise and thus the amount of vehicular travel has increased every year. This<br />

is expected to continue although it will most likely taper off in the future. This causes more<br />

congestion, which in turn creates the possibility of vehicles colliding. On many roads, volumes<br />

during the peak hours have reached the road’s capacity and traffic moves in a start-stop mode. This<br />

creates conditions that tend to increase the number crashes. Drivers are not only dealing with more<br />

vehicles around them, but with other distractions. All types of technical devices have been placed<br />

in vehicles that take away the driver’s attention. These include cell phones, radios/CDs, navigation<br />

systems, and even television. Eating in vehicles has become commonplace. Other passengers can<br />

cause distractions. Along the road advertisements take the attention of drivers. Other vehicle<br />

incidents can result in distractions and at times can cause additional crashes. Drivers’ attitudes have<br />

changed due to all the demands that are placed on them and in some cases reaches what is described<br />

as driver rage. Lifestyle changes also contribute to driver behavior that in many cases can add to<br />

the potential for more crashes. All these factors add to the possibility of more crashes occurring in<br />

the future and in many cases, could increase the severity of these crashes.<br />

There are other unknowns that could either increase or decrease the degree of safety afforded travel<br />

on the highway system. Funds for improvements play a major role and its future is cloudy. Many<br />

116


states are looking at other means of funding improvements besides raising existing taxes. A<br />

public/private sector partnership is being pursued in many states. In some, the use of toll roads is<br />

increasing. The vehicle mix, or size and type of vehicles that will be on the roads, is also another<br />

unknown. All these factors play a very important role in the degree of safety that can be expected.<br />

In Chapter II of Legacy <strong>2030</strong>, safety is fully discussed including measures and initiatives that are<br />

currently being pursued. <strong>St</strong>rategies have been proposed to address and reduce future crash related<br />

problems. MODOT’s Blueprint For Safer Roadways, discusses safety in great detail and provides<br />

many strategies for improving the roadway system and the ability of persons to drive safely. The<br />

Executive Summary of this report contained in Appendix A contains a full summary of methods of<br />

improving safety on <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> roads. These two documents are used as a guide in this<br />

report for future road safety in the county.<br />

C-4.2. Railroad Safety<br />

Safety of railroads was divided into two categories in Chapter IV, the first dealing with railroad<br />

crossings and the second with the railroad lines themselves. The future of safety in the first<br />

category can be related to road and highway safety. The number of vehicles using these crossings,<br />

the number of crossing, and the number of train movements are bound to increase and with it the<br />

possibility of mishaps. Fortunately, the number of vehicles using the crossings are quite low and<br />

the incidents very small. With the continued emphasis on road and railroad safety, all measures of<br />

insuring the safety of these crossings will be implemented. Therefore, it is expected that their will<br />

be no major increase in incidents and a good chance for a decrease. Crossings that handle higher<br />

volumes of traffic have continued to be monitored and considered for grade separation by both<br />

highway departments and the railroads. This should also help to decrease future crossing crashes.<br />

For railroad operations safety, the same logic applies. Railroads have had increased activity and one<br />

could expect more safety problems. However, they too have placed high emphasis on safety and<br />

have taken measures to insure that their workers adhere to all safety regulations and instructions.<br />

It is expected that safety on railroad operations will be improved and incidents will not increase.<br />

C-4.3. Airport Safety<br />

Although activity at the two airports may increase in the future, they are expected to continue<br />

making safety improvements. Runways may be improved including better striping and taxiway<br />

markings. More and better lighting may be provided where required. Technological advances in<br />

the field of aviation may further enhance the ability of airport operators and aircraft pilots to insure<br />

the continued safety of their operations.<br />

117


118


A. Background<br />

VII. <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Needs and Funding<br />

This study resulted in forecasts of future travel conditions for the year <strong>2030</strong> on all modes of<br />

transportation in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. It noted deficiencies that are expected including safety issues.<br />

This chapter describes various types of improvements that can be used to alleviate these deficiencies.<br />

Although possible improvements can easily be mentioned, funding these improvements has always<br />

been a major obstacle. As a result, not only are the improvements described, but an estimate of how<br />

costly they will be is also discussed. In most cases, the responsible agencies have many other<br />

demands for available funds and have established their own priorities. This has been recognized in<br />

this report.<br />

B. The Major Highway System<br />

For some time it has been recognized that building enough roads to handle future traffic was not going<br />

to be possible. As a result, operating and managing the road system most efficiently came to the<br />

forefront. The use of advanced technologies termed Intelligent <strong>Transportation</strong> Systems (ITS) was<br />

developed in the early 1990's by many transportation agencies throughout the United <strong>St</strong>ates. Its<br />

purpose was to enhance traffic flow and safety on the major highway networks through the use of<br />

advanced technologies and improved management. They included the use of computerized traffic<br />

signals and signal systems (the interconnection of signals), advanced message boards on roadsides<br />

to advise drivers of road conditions, motorists assist programs, including roadside call boxes and<br />

emergency assist vehicles, and coordination between emergency response agencies such as police,<br />

fire, ambulance, and towing services. The ITS program adopted by the DOTs has continued today<br />

and is recognized as the most efficient and effective means of handling future congestion problems.<br />

MoDOT has expanded its ITS program by building and staffing a traffic communications center at<br />

its <strong>St</strong>. Louis office. It is operated continuously with data supplied by optical monitors and other traffic<br />

monitoring devices on all their interstate roads in the region. They are able to monitor the flow of<br />

traffic and communicate with law enforcement officials and emergency response agencies throughout<br />

the region. They have a number of permanent variable message boards that are placed at strategic<br />

locations on the highways that change messages on road conditions continuously as needed. They<br />

are constantly adding new technological improvements to detect and monitoring road conditions and<br />

enhance the operation of the system.<br />

With the above in mind, conditions described in Chapter VI were reviewed and possible<br />

improvements were considered for those roads having the worst congestion and potential safety<br />

problems. Figure 10 shows the roads that are expected to operate at LOS of E and F by <strong>2030</strong>. The<br />

improvements that could be implemented and estimates of their costs are described below. The<br />

discussion follows the functional classification of the roads. Roads that are not discussed are<br />

considered not to need any improvements, such as those with no congestion or safety problems. This<br />

excludes routine maintenance that is continuously performed.<br />

119


B-1. MoDOT Roads<br />

The following parts of this chapter describe various types of improvements that can be made to<br />

MoDOT roads. It also discusses present funding for MoDOT and the outlook for additional funds in<br />

the future.<br />

B-1.1. Interstate and Freeways<br />

I-64 will have serious congestion between Rt. N and Rt. K. It will only have two lanes in each<br />

direction and traffic forecasts indicate volumes at capacity. These forecasts are based on Rt. 364 not<br />

being completed by <strong>2030</strong>. Should that occur volumes will probably drop such that it will operate<br />

below capacity. It seems, regardless of the ultimate timing of Rt. 364, I-64 will have congestion<br />

problems. Although ITS implementation will be helpful, adding a lane in each direction is the only<br />

true way to provide for the additional volumes. This should not be a costly improvement since the<br />

road is already in place and can accommodate the widening. It will also improve the road’s safety<br />

and travel on other roads that feed traffic to it. This improvement is recommended in view of the<br />

importance of the safety and efficiency of travel on this Interstate route.<br />

I-70 presents a very serious problem due to the extent of the forecasted deficiencies. Traffic volumes<br />

are expected to be well in excess of the road’s capacity. Unfortunately, widening presents high costs,<br />

environmental and social concerns, and serious traffic problems during construction. Some minor<br />

widening could be accomplished with auxiliary lanes between interchanges. This should be<br />

considered from I-64/U.S. 61 to Bryan Rd., and from Rt. 370 to Zumbehl Rd. In addition, some<br />

interchanges could be upgraded to better handle traffic. These improvements would not only help<br />

congestion, but they would improve the roads’ safety and air quality in the region.<br />

Over the years there have been numerous discussions between MoDOT, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, and other<br />

agencies, about remedies for the congestion on I-70. Early in the planning stage of Rt. 370, a<br />

connection between it and Rt. 79 along a corridor north of old town <strong>St</strong>. Peters from about Spencer Rd.<br />

west to Rt. 79 was discussed. This concept was never pursued for many reasons. First, there was no<br />

study to support that sufficient traffic would use it to greatly relieve I-70. Second, funding for its<br />

construction and adding it to the state system was an issue. Third, there were numerous<br />

environmental concerns about building a road in this location. Although this improvement was never<br />

pursued by MoDOT, the <strong>County</strong> still is of the opinion that it would be of value.<br />

This report has discussed the severity of congestion on I-70 and how it is only going to get worse.<br />

It suggests that MoDOT consider all improvement alternatives to alleviate future congestion. The<br />

above roadway plan could possibly reduce some future traffic on I-70 between Rt. 79 and Rt. 370.<br />

Therefore, for that reason, this report recommends that a study be conducted to determine how much<br />

traffic would be diverted, any environmental concerns and other issues, and the cost-benefit of such<br />

an improvement.<br />

A new wider westbound bridge over the Missouri River presents a real challenge for MoDOT. Such<br />

an improvement would present extremely difficult construction problems and would be quite costly.<br />

120


Figure 10<br />

Year <strong>2030</strong> Levels of Service E and F<br />

Click on the map below to view a larger version<br />

121


122


There would be very serious problems in handling traffic during construction. A study of possible<br />

improvements to this bridge would be of value. Such a study should be added to MoDOT’s list in<br />

the Council’s update of the Long Range <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

I-70 across <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> should be a high priority for MoDOT to update and improve it’s ITS<br />

process. This would include the use of additional technologies from their traffic control center<br />

including optical and other traffic monitoring mechanisms, variable message sign boards, roadside<br />

call boxes, lane control signs, motorist assist vehicles, and communications with all emergency<br />

response agencies.<br />

Rt. 364 does not present any congestion problems and could easily handle additional traffic.<br />

Completing the section from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to the I-64/Rt. N interchange should be completed<br />

as soon as possible. This will greatly help travel on I-64 and could decrease some travel on I-70 and<br />

allow other roads to operate more safely and with less congestion. Its completion would also help<br />

improve air quality in the region.<br />

Rt. 370 does not present any serious congestion problems. However, because it is a major freeway<br />

connecting two interstate routes, additional ITS improvements should be made to the road to insure<br />

that it continues to operate with the greatest efficiency. In the future a number of such ITS<br />

improvements like those described above should be implemented.<br />

B-1.2. Expressways<br />

U.S. 61 MoDOT plans improvements to this route that should adequately handle future volumes.<br />

They are included in the Legacy <strong>2030</strong> Illustrative list for improving the road to freeway standards.<br />

B-1.3. Principal Arterials<br />

Rt. 79 will need attention in the section from Rt. M to north of I-70. Widening to four lanes divided<br />

is suggested and would not be an expensive improvement or create any negative environmental<br />

problems. This will greatly improve traffic operations and its safety. The road is listed for a<br />

corridor study in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> north to Lincoln <strong>County</strong>.<br />

Rt. 94<br />

From I-70 to N. Rt. 364, this road will require ITS improvements. Some intersection improvements<br />

may be possible with additional turn lanes, but the only other practical improvements would be to<br />

optimize the signal operations. MoDOT should undertake such a study to determine hardware that<br />

may be available in the future to assist in this area.<br />

The section of Rt. 94 from Mid Rivers Mall Dr. to I-64 will require capacity expansion. An<br />

additional lane in each direction should handle future traffic and improve the roads’ safety. Such<br />

an improvement should not be very expensive or create any severe inconvenience to traffic since<br />

the median has the room for this type improvement. There would be no negative environmental<br />

effects and it would enhance air quality in the region.<br />

Rt. K will require the special corridor study defined in Legacy <strong>2030</strong> to determine adjustments to<br />

traffic operations and other improvements that would better handle future traffic. The cost of this<br />

123


study should be low, however, improvements could get expensive and complicated if they require<br />

assistance or approval from adjacent property owners.<br />

B-1.4. Minor Arterials<br />

Rt. 94 from Rt. B to Rt. 370 is on the Illustrative list for improvement. Consideration should be<br />

given to widening the road from two to four or five lanes instead of just a three-lane road.<br />

Rt. N from I-64 to Rt. Z should be closely monitored to determine if the planned widening to three<br />

lanes will be sufficient. This area is experiencing substantial growth and it is expected to continue<br />

into the future. Although the forecasts do not indicate volumes in excess of capacity, they are quite<br />

marginal. Depending on how fast growth continues, the three lane road proposed may not be<br />

sufficient and a four or five lane facility may be needed.<br />

Rt. Z from I-70 to Rt. N is another road that should be monitored closely by MoDOT. Growth in<br />

this part of the county has been very high and could easily exceed forecasts. Should volumes<br />

increase over the ones predicted, the road will exceed its capacity and need to be widened to four<br />

or five lanes instead of just three.<br />

B-1.5. Major Collectors<br />

Rt. P is a road whose growth is unpredictable. Should development continue beyond expectations<br />

the road will need widening over what is presently considered by MoDOT. Traffic volumes should<br />

be closely monitored in future years.<br />

A number of rural MoDOT roads have poor safety records. Although specific ones have not been<br />

identified, the chapter on safety clearly pointed out that the severity rates on rural roads are normally<br />

higher than on suburban and urban ones. Traffic volumes should be carefully monitored as well as<br />

crash prone locations, those with poor horizontal and vertical alignment and limited sight distances.<br />

Proposed new entrances or side roads should be carefully checked to insure that they are not placed<br />

in locations that present additional hazards.<br />

B-1.6. Future MoDOT Funding<br />

Many of MoDOT’s projects described in this report can be expected to have reasonably high cost<br />

and probably will be beyond their present funding capability. This is based on state-wide and<br />

regional demands and priorities. Funds for new projects are quickly declining as a percent of total<br />

funds compared to funds that are needed to simply maintain the existing system. MoDOT has been<br />

examining ways of increasing present funding, but like many other DOTs and transportation<br />

authorities, they have found new sources hard to acquire. Future funds will not be able to keep up<br />

with future needs. Other means of funding transportation improvements may have to be considered<br />

in order to meet the ever increasing demand for road and street travel.<br />

B-2. <strong>County</strong> Roads<br />

B-2.1. Principal Arterials<br />

Most of the county’s principal arterial roads have been widened to four and five lanes. New traffic<br />

signals and other equipment have been installed to upgrade existing facilities. However, in many<br />

124


cases traffic is continuing to increase and current controls are becoming inadequate. The county,<br />

with the help of the many municipalities, should continue to improve on its data collecting<br />

procedures. Current traffic volumes and crash data are needed to continually monitor the<br />

effectiveness of the system and assess future needs. This includes communication with and the<br />

efficiency uses of emergency vehicles. <strong>County</strong> roads that interface with MoDOT roads should be<br />

fully coordinated and integrated with theirs to reduce side effects from adjacent traffic problems.<br />

One major road that is going to need continued monitoring is Mid Rivers Mall Dr. between I-70 and<br />

Mexico Rd. This section of the road is presently operating with serious congestion during the peak<br />

hours and there is no room for expanding capacity. ITS type improvements are the only means of<br />

influencing and assisting traffic in this area. Because it is directly connected to I-70 and a potential<br />

growth area to the north, it will require special attention by county and municipal authorities.<br />

A major road that has ranked the top of the crash rating numbers is Mexico Rd. from Mid Rivers<br />

Mall Dr. to Rt. K. Because this road ranks every crash rating list, it deserves special attention.<br />

B-2.2. Minor Arterials<br />

As noted in chapter VI, most county minor arterials are operating with no serious problems. This<br />

could be an over simplification as so many parts of the county are growing and volumes are rising<br />

quite quickly. Close monitoring of future congestion and safety problems will have to be pursued<br />

by county and municipal authorities to insure that the roads continue to operate safely and<br />

efficiently.<br />

B-2.3. Major Collectors<br />

The county’s major collector roads are closely monitored by the <strong>County</strong>’s <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Department. They make decisions on how best to spend available funds for needed improvements.<br />

B-2.4. <strong>County</strong> Road Summary<br />

The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> Department and the public works department’s of all the<br />

municipalities are effectively using available funds designated for road and street improvements.<br />

Each agency has its own source of funding and additional funds are provided by the ½ cent<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Sales Tax, through a project selection process based on recommendations of the<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Road Board and approval of the <strong>County</strong> Executive and <strong>County</strong> Council. More<br />

major funding for road improvements come from federal funds. Projects are submitted to the<br />

Council for inclusion in the Council’s TIP and funds are provided from various federal funding<br />

categories through the current Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Bill, SAFETEA-LU. This practice is expected<br />

to continue into the future. However, due to the fast pace of growth in the <strong>County</strong>, additional funds<br />

at all levels may be required to keep pace with the growing road improvement needs.<br />

C. Public <strong>Transportation</strong><br />

Public transportation services that presently exist in the county are limited. As previously noted in<br />

Chapter III, future funds for fixed route transit or light rail transit are presently nonexistent due to<br />

the lack of a funding source in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>. This could change in future years depending on<br />

125


public decisions, and does not mean that there is not a need. On the contrary, as the county’s<br />

population grows and matures, the need for public transportation continues to increase, especially<br />

with a growing and aging population.<br />

The <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit Authority had a report prepared by the Council in the mid 1990's that<br />

was updated in 2001 (see Chapter III) dealing with the needs and possibility of providing fixed route<br />

transit. An update of that report has been requested by the <strong>County</strong> and the Council intends to<br />

undertake this update in 2007. It will once again review the needs and possibility of the county<br />

providing fixed route transit and what it may cost. Funding will once again be the major issue as<br />

it will require a vote of the county’s residents to provide specific funding for that purpose.<br />

Paratransit service has always been mainly a privately funded form of transportation for the elderly,<br />

poor, and disabled part of the community. MoDOT, through their public transportation department,<br />

and federal funds, provided from various programs handled by the Council, provided some<br />

additional funds. The number of people requiring such services has continued to grow while the<br />

amount of private and public funding has continued to shrink. The demand for these services has<br />

always been in excess of existing funds. It is expected that the future will not be too bright in<br />

supplying additional funds either from private sources, the state of Missouri, or the federal<br />

government. This will result in simply more persons going without transportation service to<br />

medical, shopping, or other types of needed activities. It will be left to others, relatives, friends, etc.,<br />

to provide these transportation services to this segment of the population. The completion of the<br />

updated report in 2007 by the Council may be helpful in more clearly defining these issues.<br />

D. Railroad Projects<br />

The need for funding future railroad improvements almost lies solely with the railroads. Some road<br />

improvements involving railroad crossings or grade separations, are funded, at least partially, by the<br />

<strong>County</strong>, MoDOT, or the private sector. Using safety data for the roads appears to be the best<br />

barometer of where additional railroad crossing improvements should be made. These are discussed<br />

in Chapter IV. However, there are a number of at-grade crossings that are in close proximity to<br />

major roads. These include the crossing on Guthrie Rd. just north of the I-70/Lake Saint Louis Blvd.<br />

interchange, Mid Rivers Rivers Mall Dr. just north of the I-70 interchange, and Rt. M (Main <strong>St</strong>.) in<br />

O’Fallon. Back-ups in traffic caused by slow and long trains at these locations extend at times well<br />

back into the high volume interchanges causing serious congestion and can extend further into traffic<br />

flow on I-70. This introduces a very high crash prone situation. These locations should be<br />

continually monitored by MoDOT, the <strong>County</strong>, and the railroads, and when deemed appropriate,<br />

grade separations should be constructed.<br />

The railroads have constantly been improving their facilities as this most competitive means of<br />

transportation continues strongly in the United <strong>St</strong>ates. In <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong>, incentives can be used<br />

by the county when it involves furthering gains in the private sector. <strong>County</strong> administrators will<br />

continue this practice which will further enhance railroad investments.<br />

126


E. Aviation Projects<br />

Aviation expenditures in the future are rather limited. Some studies have been performed for the<br />

operation of the two existing airports. The county has also considered building a new airport in the<br />

far west part but to-date has not pursued this possibility. It seems that very little large expenditures<br />

on aviation can be expected in the future.<br />

F. Pipeline and Barge<br />

These two means of transportation in the county are hardly affected by any of the governing of the<br />

county. It is unlikely that little will change in these two modes in the future.<br />

127


APPENDICES


APPENDIX A<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

MISSOURI BLUEPRINT FOR SAFER ROADWAYS<br />

Missouri has lost more than 2,400 people in traffic crashes over the past two years. In addition,<br />

thousands were disabled in these tragic events during that same time period.<br />

To address this problem, the <strong>St</strong>ate is participating with the American Association of <strong>St</strong>ate Highway<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Officials (AASHTO) in a national effort to reduce these preventable tragedies.<br />

"Missouri's Blueprint for Safer Roadways" is a focused document developed by utilizing a<br />

partnership approach that outlines strong opportunities to reduce fatal and serious injuries on<br />

Missouri roadways.<br />

The Blueprint will serve as an umbrella guide to increase coordination, communication, and<br />

cooperation among state and local agencies, law enforcement, planning organizations, non-profit<br />

organizations, and other safety advocates throughout the <strong>St</strong>ate. The Missouri Coalition for Roadway<br />

Safety is charged with leading the statewide implementation effort to effectively deploy strategies<br />

outlined in the Blueprint. In addition, regional plans will be developed to address targeted crash<br />

problems in their respective areas.<br />

Prior to the development of the document, more than 150 Missouri safety partners were contacted<br />

to seek ideas and input concerning a statewide reduction goal, the document content, and successful<br />

deployment strategies. The draft document was distributed to hundreds of safety partners throughout<br />

the <strong>St</strong>ate for comment and review. As a result of these meetings and the review process, the final<br />

Blueprint was compiled and Missouri's fatality reduction goal was set at "1,000 or fewer fatalities<br />

by 2008." This is an 18.8 percent reduction from 2003.<br />

To attain this goal, the diverse safety community representing the engineering, enforcement,<br />

education, and emergency medical services areas must target their efforts and, in some cases,<br />

redirect their resources. We must invest in strategies that hold great promise for reducing both fatal<br />

and disabling injury crashes.<br />

The "Essential Eight" are strategies Missouri must implement to make significant progress in<br />

reaching the projected goal. These were identified through extensive data analysis, current research<br />

findings, and best practices.<br />

Essential Eight<br />

• Pass a Primary Safety Belt Law and Maintain and Enhance Existing Safety Laws<br />

• Increase Enforcement on Targeted Crash Corridors<br />

• Increase Public Education and Information on Traffic Safety Issues<br />

• Expand the Installation of Shoulder, Edgeline, and Centerline Rumble <strong>St</strong>rips<br />

• Expand, Improve, and Maintain Roadway Visibility Features (i.e. markings, signs, lighting)<br />

• Expand Installation of Median Three <strong>St</strong>rand Cable or Equivalent Barrier<br />

• Effectively Deter, Identify, Arrest, and Adjudicate Alcohol and Other Drug Impaired Drivers<br />

and Pedestrians<br />

• Expand Installation and Maintenance of Roadway Shoulders and Clear Zones


APPENDIX B<br />

<strong>2030</strong> TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS<br />

MoDOT ROADS ST. CHARLES COUNTY


Appendix B<br />

<strong>2030</strong> Traffic Volume Forecasts<br />

MoDOT Roads <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Route/ Existing Forecasts 2000 to 2004 2000 to 2010 2010 to 2020 2020 to <strong>2030</strong><br />

Location 2000 2004 2010 2020 <strong>2030</strong> Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent<br />

I-70 at Missouri River 190,800 165,100 180,000 200,000 210,000 -25,700 -13.5% -10,800 -5.7% 20,000 11.1% 10,000 5.0%<br />

I-70 e/o* Rt. 94 168,400 147,300 165,000 180,000 195,000 -21,100 -12.5% -3,400 -2.0% 15,000 9.1% 15,000 8.3%<br />

I-70 e/o Zumbehl Rd. 148,400 129,500 140,000 155,000 165,000 -18,900 -12.7% -8,400 -5.7% 15,000 10.7% 10,000 6.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Cave Sprgs. Rd. 128,200 125,000 130,000 145,000 155,000 -3,200 -2.5% 1,800 1.4% 15,000 11.5% 10,000 6.9%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. 370 105,000 106,200 110,000 130,000 140,000 1,200 1.1% 5,000 4.8% 20,000 18.2% 10,000 7.7%<br />

I-70 e/o Mid Rivers Mall Dr. 132,400 134,000 150,000 165,000 175,000 1,600 1.2% 17,600 13.3% 15,000 10.0% 10,000 6.1%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. 79 119,100 134,000 150,000 165,000 175,000 14,900 12.5% 30,900 25.9% 15,000 10.0% 10,000 6.1%<br />

I-70 e/o TR Hughes Dr. 98,000 114,600 125,000 145,000 155,000 16,600 16.9% 27,000 27.6% 20,000 16.0% 10,000 6.9%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. K & M 98,000 112,000 115,000 135,000 145,000 14,000 14.3% 17,000 17.3% 20,000 17.4% 10,000 7.4%<br />

I-70 e/o Bryan Rd. 80,500 95,600 95,000 115,000 125,000 15,100 18.8% 14,500 18.0% 20,000 21.1% 10,000 8.7%<br />

I-70 e/o Lake Saint Louis B. 75,400 82,000 85,000 95,000 105,000 6,600 8.8% 9,600 12.7% 10,000 11.8% 10,000 10.5%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. A 68,000 75,000 80,000 90,000 95,000 7,000 10.3% 12,000 17.6% 10,000 12.5% 5,000 5.6%<br />

I-70 e/o U.S. 40/61 59,500 66,400 70,000 85,000 95,000 6,900 11.6% 10,500 17.6% 15,000 21.4% 10,000 11.8%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. Z 64,000 71,400 80,000 100,000 110,000 7,400 11.6% 16,000 25.0% 20,000 25.0% 10,000 10.0%<br />

I-70 e/o Pearce Blvd. 59,200 72,200 75,000 90,000 100,000 13,000 22.0% 15,800 26.7% 15,000 20.0% 10,000 11.1%<br />

I-70 e/o Rt. T 48,900 56,400 60,000 75,000 90,000 7,500 15.3% 11,100 22.7% 15,000 25.0% 15,000 20.0%<br />

I-64 at Missouri River 69,100 77,500 90,000 110,000 120,000 8,400 12.2% 20,900 30.2% 20,000 22.2% 10,000 9.1%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. K 30,200 38,200 50,000 70,000 80,000 8,000 26.5% 19,800 65.6% 20,000 40.0% 10,000 14.3%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt.DD 29,300 34,500 45,000 65,000 75,000 5,200 17.7% 15,700 53.6% 20,000 44.4% 10,000 15.4%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Rt. N 28,400 31,100 42,000 55,000 65,000 2,700 9.5% 13,600 47.9% 13,000 31.0% 10,000 18.2%<br />

U.S. 40/61 w/o Lake STL 28,400 31,100 40,000 55,000 65,000 2,700 9.5% 11,600 40.8% 15,000 37.5% 10,000 18.2%<br />

U.S. 61 s/o Lincoln Co. 30,000 32,800 37,000 45,000 50,000 2,800 9.3% 7,000 23.3% 8,000 21.6% 5,000 11.1%<br />

U.S. 61 n/o I-70 29,300 33,100 32,000 40,000 50,000 3,800 13.0% 2,700 9.2% 8,000 25.0% 10,000 25.0%<br />

U.S. 67 s/o Mississippi R. 28,300 25,800 30,000 32,000 34,000 -2,500 -8.8% 1,700 6.0% 2,000 6.7% 2,000 6.3%<br />

Rt. 79 s/o Lincoln Co. 11,900 13,300 15,000 17,000 18,000 1,400 11.8% 3,100 26.1% 2,000 13.3% 1,000 5.9%<br />

Rt. 79 n/o I-70 15,700 18,900 22,000 25,000 27,000 3,200 20.4% 6,300 40.1% 3,000 13.6% 2,000 8.0%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. J 2,900 2,700 3,000 3,200 3,400 -200 -6.9% 100 3.4% 200 6.7% 200 6.3%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. 370 12,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 4,000 33.3% 6,000 50.0% 2,000 11.1% 2,000 10.0%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o I-70 22,800 25,100 28,000 28,000 28,000 2,300 10.1% 5,200 22.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-70 50,400 56,900 60,000 64,000 66,000 6,500 12.9% 9,600 19.0% 4,000 6.7% 2,000 3.1%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. 364 45,000 47,000 50,000 56,000 64,000 2,000 4.4% 5,000 11.1% 6,000 12.0% 8,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Harvester 38,400 42,700 60,000 N/A N/A 4,300 11.2% 21,600 56.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Kisker 45,200 48,000 52,000 N/A N/A 2,800 6.2% 6,800 15.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 94 s/o Mid-Rivers M. Dr. 37,400 40,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 2,600 7.0% 7,600 20.3% 5,000 11.1% 5,000 10.0%


Appendix B<br />

(Continued)<br />

Route/ Existing Forecasts 2000 to 2004 2000 to 2010 2010 to 2020 2020 to <strong>2030</strong><br />

Location 2000 2004 2010 2020 <strong>2030</strong> Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent<br />

Rt. 94 n/o I-64 35,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 10,000 28.6% 15,000 42.9% 5,000 10.0% 5,000 9.1%<br />

Rt. 94 s/o I-64 11,500 12,500 13,500 15,000 16,000 1,000 8.7% 2,000 17.4% 1,500 11.1% 1,000 6.7%<br />

Rt. 94 n/o Rt. DD 3,000 3,000 3,200 3,400 4,000 0 0.0% 200 6.7% 200 6.3% 600 17.6%<br />

Rt. 94 e/o Rt. T 2,900 2,900 3,000 3,200 3,500 0 0.0% 100 3.4% 200 6.7% 300 9.4%<br />

Rt. 364 at Missouri R. N/A 50,000 60,000 75,000 80,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 15,000 25.0% 5,000 6.7%<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Upper Bottom N/A 45,000 54,000 67,000 70,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13,000 24.1% 3,000 4.5%<br />

Rt. 364 n/o Harvester Rd. N/A 55,000 54,000 80,000 85,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 26,000 48.1% 5,000 6.3%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Harvester Rd. N/A N/A N/A 65,000 70,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,000 7.7%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Jungermann Rd. N/A N/A N/A 60,000 65,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,000 8.3%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Central School N/A N/A N/A 55,000 60,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,000 9.1%<br />

Rt. 364 s/o Kisker Rd. N/A N/A N/A 50,000 60,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 20.0%<br />

Rt. 364 n/o Mid R. Mall Dr. N/A N/A N/A 50,000 60,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 20.0%<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Mid R. Mall Dr. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Rt. K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 364 w/o Bryan Rd. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Rt. 370 at Missouri R. 58,000 61,000 70,000 80,000 85,000 3,000 5.2% 12,000 20.7% 10,000 14.3% 5,000 6.3%<br />

Rt. 370 e/o Elm <strong>St</strong>. 57,500 60,000 66,000 75,000 75,000 2,500 4.3% 8,500 14.8% 9,000 13.6% 0 0.0%<br />

Rt. 370 w/o Elm <strong>St</strong>. 57,100 58,800 59,000 68,000 65,000 1,700 3.0% 1,900 3.3% 9,000 15.3% -3,000 -4.4%<br />

Rt. 370 n/o I-70 50,000 51,500 56,000 63,000 60,000 1,500 3.0% 6,000 12.0% 7,000 12.5% -3,000 -4.8%<br />

Rt. K s/o I-70 35,000 45,000 60,000 65,000 68,000 10,000 28.6% 25,000 71.4% 5,000 8.3% 3,000 4.6%<br />

Rt. K n/o Rt. N 20,000 30,000 43,000 48,000 55,000 10,000 50.0% 23,000 115.0% 5,000 11.6% 7,000 14.6%<br />

Rt. K s/o Rt. N 15,000 25,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 10,000 66.7% 20,000 133.3% 5,000 14.3% 5,000 12.5%<br />

Rt. K n/o U.S. 40/61 11,400 20,000 28,000 35,000 40,000 8,600 75.4% 16,600 145.6% 7,000 25.0% 5,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. N w/o Mid R. Mall Dr. * 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 13,000 2,000 33.3% 4,000 66.7% 2,000 20.0% 1,000 8.3%<br />

Rt. N e/o Rt. K 11,700 13,600 16,000 18,000 17,000 1,900 16.2% 4,300 36.8% 2,000 12.5% -1,000 -5.6%<br />

Rt. N w/o Rt. K 10,400 21,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 10,600 101.9% 14,600 140.4% 5,000 20.0% 5,000 16.7%<br />

Rt. N w/o Bryan Rd. 5,000 8,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 3,000 60.0% 10,000 200.0% 5,000 33.3% 5,000 25.0%<br />

Rt. N w/o U.S. 40/61 4,500 6,600 10,000 15,000 22,000 2,100 46.7% 5,500 122.2% 5,000 50.0% 7,000 46.7%<br />

Rt. N w/o Rt. Z 3,200 3,800 5,000 8,000 12,000 600 18.8% 1,800 56.3% 3,000 60.0% 4,000 50.0%<br />

Rt. A n/o I-70 4,900 12,100 14,000 16,000 18,000 7,200 146.9% 9,100 185.7% 2,000 14.3% 2,000 12.5%<br />

Rt. A e/o U.S. 61 4,200 10,600 12,000 14,000 16,000 6,400 152.4% 7,800 185.7% 2,000 16.7% 2,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. P w/o Rt. M 7,400 9,100 12,000 14,000 16,000 1,700 23.0% 4,600 62.2% 2,000 16.7% 2,000 14.3%<br />

Rt. P e/o U.S. 61 2,500 3,300 6,000 8,000 10,000 800 32.0% 3,500 140.0% 2,000 33.3% 2,000 25.0%<br />

Rt. Z I-70 to Rt. N 7,100 11,000 17,000 18,000 20,000 3,900 54.9% 9,900 139.4% 1,000 5.9% 2,000 11.1%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!