29.08.2013 Views

Attach 4 (PDF) - Greater Wellington Regional Council

Attach 4 (PDF) - Greater Wellington Regional Council

Attach 4 (PDF) - Greater Wellington Regional Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

,<br />

24 November 2000<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> Secretariat<br />

PO Box 11 646<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong><br />

To Whom It May Concern<br />

Windsurfing : Compulsory Lifejackets<br />

197 Darlington Road<br />

Miramar<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong><br />

I understand that a proposal is being submitted by the <strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

that compulsory wearing of lifejackets is to be imposed on recreational activities that<br />

include windsurfing.<br />

I wish to bring to your attention that while the intent is to increase safety on the water,<br />

this proposal my deliver increased risk to safety. Particularly, in instances of high<br />

winds and participating in wave sailing.<br />

These activities include “getting airborne” and it is useful to have the option to jump<br />

from the equipment and get “under” the sea surface to protect yourself from the<br />

falling equipment. In addition, wave sailing at times entails diving into the wave to<br />

protect yourself from the crushing force of a breaking wave. These options for<br />

protection would be limited in their usefulness if wearing a buoyancy aid.<br />

I am an experienced sailor who has been recently diagnosed with epilepsy. This<br />

diagnosis has encouraged me to attempt wearing boyancy aids. However, two<br />

potentially serious difficulties arose:<br />

1. The speeds that can be achieved (50kph to 80kph). Falling or diving off at<br />

these speeds resulted in the life jacket pushing aggressively upwards toward<br />

my neck (due to force of hitting the water);<br />

2. The greatest risk to safety is being separated from your equipment (which has<br />

buoyancy). Attempting to swim at speed (in rough waters) to recollect your<br />

gear is extremely difficult and tiring with a buoyancy aid (as harness are also<br />

worn).<br />

As a result, I now consider wearing a buoyancy aid presents a greater risk to my<br />

safety than the condition itself.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!