18.09.2013 Views

Economic Production of Tannase by Aspergillus niger ... - Rombio.eu

Economic Production of Tannase by Aspergillus niger ... - Rombio.eu

Economic Production of Tannase by Aspergillus niger ... - Rombio.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Romanian Biotechnological Letters Vol.17, No.4, 2012<br />

Copyright © 2012 University <strong>of</strong> Bucharest Printed in Romania. All rights reserved<br />

ORIGINAL PAPER<br />

<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh Adopting<br />

Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

Abstract<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012<br />

Received for publication, February 7, 2011<br />

Accepted, October 31, 2011<br />

H. S. HAMDY 1 AND E. M. FAWZY 2<br />

Biological Sciences & Geology Department, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Education, Ain Shams<br />

University, Roxy, Heliopolis, Cairo, 11757, Egypt<br />

1 hosamhamdy@yahoo.com 2 emanfawzy@hotmail.com<br />

Here, we demonstrated the ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> to utilize Ficus nitida' leaves and crude<br />

tannic acid extract to produce tannase. The kinetics <strong>of</strong> tannase synthesis using free and immobilised<br />

cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> were studied <strong>by</strong> adopting submerged (LSF), solid-state (SSF) and slurry-state (SlSF)<br />

cultures. The optimum parameters for maximum production were recorded at 30°C, initial pH <strong>of</strong> 5<br />

after 120 hours <strong>of</strong> shaking incubation at 175 rpm for SSF and SlSF and 200 for LSF. The maximum<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> tannase was produced in the following descending order: SSF (457.2 U 50ml -1 ) > LSF (451 U<br />

50ml -1 ) > SlSF (324.3 U 50ml -1 ). The concentration and balance <strong>of</strong> trace elements had a critical role<br />

on tannase synthesis where a dramatic beneficial effect was observed when a mixture <strong>of</strong> Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ ,<br />

Mn 2+ and Zn 2+ was added to the fermentation media. Applicability <strong>of</strong> the research findings was<br />

illustrated through suggesting the possibility <strong>of</strong> using the fermentation residue <strong>of</strong> F. nitida obtained<br />

from SSF in animal feed. Moreover, the ability <strong>of</strong> the produced tannase to remove up to 55% and 45%<br />

<strong>of</strong> tannin after 120 minute from tea extract and pomegranate juice respectively was confirmed.<br />

Keywords: <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong>, Ficus nitida, tannase, LSF, SSF, SlSF, detannification,<br />

partial purification.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Tannase</strong> (tannin acylhydrolase, E.C 3.1.1.20) is an important inducible enzyme<br />

responsible for the breakdown <strong>of</strong> ester linakages in tannins and gallic acid esters to produce<br />

glucose and gallic acid [31]. <strong>Tannase</strong> has a wide range <strong>of</strong> application in industrial,<br />

biotechnological, environmental, pharmac<strong>eu</strong>tical and other important fields, such as instant<br />

tea production, clarifying c<strong>of</strong>fee-flavoured s<strong>of</strong>t drinks, removing haze, bitterness, astringency<br />

and improving the colour <strong>of</strong> fruit juices, stabilising wine color, [7, 8, 35], enzymatic treatment<br />

for nutritive use <strong>of</strong> protein and carbohydrates from peas [64], enhancing the antioxidant<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> green tea [37], and improving the quality <strong>of</strong> forage used in animal and bird feeds<br />

[50]. It is also applied in the synthesis <strong>of</strong> pharmac<strong>eu</strong>tically important drugs, i.e.,<br />

trimethoprim, gallic acid, propyl gallate, antifolic agents, antioxidants, antibacterial and<br />

antiviral agents, analgaesics, anti-inflammatories, and active anticancer agents that do not<br />

harm normal cells [11, 20, 26, 69]. <strong>Tannase</strong> is also used in the production <strong>of</strong> semiconductors,<br />

ink, dye, photo developers, [27], manufacture <strong>of</strong> sensitive analytical probes to determine<br />

gallic acid esters [24], high grade leather [6], plant cell wall degradation [49] and cleaning<br />

hard acidic industrial effluent containing tannin materials [4].<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> the varied fields for tannase applications, the large-scale use <strong>of</strong> tannase is<br />

still limited at present, partly due to the shortage and high cost <strong>of</strong> the enzyme production [65].<br />

This could partly be due to the high price <strong>of</strong> the enzymes produced <strong>by</strong> submerged<br />

fermentation and the relatively high cost <strong>of</strong> tannic acid used as the substrate. On the other<br />

hand, there is <strong>of</strong>ten a serious problem in disposing agricultural residues and wastes, which<br />

7441


H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

may cause serious environmental contamination and propagation <strong>of</strong> flies and rats if not<br />

correctly dealt with. Meanwhile, agricultural wastes can represent large renewable resources<br />

for enzyme production <strong>by</strong> filamentous fungi and has been practiced worldwide as waste-based<br />

cultures adopting solid state fermentation [67]. To bridge this gap, alternative techniques<br />

such as solid/slurry state fermentations, use <strong>of</strong> whole-cell-immobilization, and/or use <strong>of</strong> less<br />

expensive substrates such as agricultural residues may be used in obtaining relevant costeffective<br />

products such as enzymes and forage among others. In Egypt, Ficus nitida L.<br />

(Moraceae) is a widely cultivated ornamental plant that annually yields a vast amount <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

in the form <strong>of</strong> leaves. Although Ficus wastes are highly nutritious for microorganisms [29],<br />

there is still no study that examines its potential use as a bioresource for tannase production.<br />

Solid state fermentation (SSF) is a batch process used for its many advantages such as<br />

the low cost <strong>of</strong> raw materials, simple equipments and facilities, labour and technology.<br />

Moreover, the secreted enzymes in the culture filtrate are more concentrated and <strong>of</strong> higher<br />

quality, with a less effluent generated and lower a lower cost <strong>of</strong> recovery than in the liquid<br />

state cultures [43]. It is also a natural environment that provides easy aeration, high surface<br />

exchange and serves as a support for the cells [44]. Along with the SSF, there is a growing<br />

interest in the whole-immobilized cells to produce enzymes as a promising technique<br />

proposed for improving the fermentation process where it <strong>of</strong>fers several advantages, i.e., easy<br />

to handle, r<strong>eu</strong>sable, continuous operation over a prolonged period with operational stability,<br />

reducing the overall cost and delays associated with the time needed for sterilisation,<br />

inoculation and mycelium growth, lower susceptibility to microbial contamination, lower<br />

vulnerability to inhibitory compounds and nutrient depletion, and increased rates <strong>of</strong><br />

generating <strong>of</strong> microbial products [17, 51]. Meanwhile, very little information can be found in<br />

the literature about slurry state fermentation and their applications are mostly restricted to<br />

anaerobic fermentations [18].<br />

Many fungal species have been reported to produce tannase, including <strong>Aspergillus</strong><br />

aculeatus, A. aur<strong>eu</strong>s, A. flavus, A. foetidus, A. japonicas, A. <strong>niger</strong>, A. oryzae Aureobasidium<br />

pullulans, Fusarium solani F. subglutinans, Paecilomyces variotii, Penicillium<br />

atramentosum; P.chrysogenum, P. variable, and R. oryzae as reviewed <strong>by</strong> Belur and<br />

Mugeraya [10] and Chavez-Gonzalez [16]. The vast majority produce in submerged cultures,<br />

while <strong>Aspergillus</strong> and Penicillium are the most active microorganisms capable <strong>of</strong> producing<br />

tannase through both submerged and solid state fermentations [45, 46]. Different agricultural<br />

residues such as cassava, carob bean, wine-grape, tea and c<strong>of</strong>fee wastes, [65]; Acacia nilotica,<br />

A. auriculiformis, Casuarina equisetifolia, Cassia fistula, Ficus benghalensis, [39] and<br />

gobernadora [62], have been associated with microbial production <strong>of</strong> tannase on SSF, while<br />

many studies have investigated tannase production with pure tannic acid as the soul carbon<br />

source [39].<br />

Thus, the aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate, compare and optimise production <strong>of</strong><br />

tannase utilising crude tannic acid extract and leaves <strong>of</strong> F. nitida adopting LSF, SSF and SlSF<br />

protocols inoculated with free and immobilised cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong>. Possible applications <strong>of</strong> the<br />

produced tannase as well as the fermentation residue are also suggested.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> materials and equipments<br />

Plant leaves were collected in May from mature trees <strong>of</strong> Ficus nitida, cultivated in<br />

different Egyptian localities, cut into small pieces, and then oven-dried at 55°C for 24 h until<br />

they reached a constant weight. The material was then finely ground to pass through a 50μm<br />

sieve. The powder was stored in dry flasks under dark conditions at room temperature.<br />

7442 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

Crude tannin extract was prepared according to the method <strong>of</strong> Schanderi [55] where<br />

50 g <strong>of</strong> dry plant materials were mixed with 200 ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water and kept at room<br />

temperature overnight. After soaking, the mixture was boiled for 10 min and filtered. The<br />

filtrate served as a crude tannin extract from which different dilutions were prepared using<br />

distilled water.<br />

Cleaning <strong>of</strong> equipments used in studying the requirements <strong>of</strong> metallic nutrition was<br />

performed <strong>by</strong> washing in hot detergent solution, rinsing in tap water, drying and submerging<br />

in a bath <strong>of</strong> hot, concentrated nitric-sulphuric acid (2:1) for 15 minutes. The glassware was<br />

removed from this bath and rinsed 5 times with distilled water and finally 2 times with glassdistilled<br />

water.<br />

Microorganism<br />

<strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh CBC 122722 used throughout this work was previously<br />

isolated from an Egyptian soil sample, identified <strong>by</strong> the CBS-KNAW (Fungal Biodiversity<br />

Centre, Uppsalalaan, Netherlands) and kept on malt extract agar at 4 °C and routinely<br />

cultured.<br />

Spore suspension (containing about 2 x 10 6 spores ml -1 ) was freshly prepared from 7day-old<br />

cultures <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> grown on malt extract agar slants at 30°C using deionised double<br />

distilled water.<br />

Entrapped spores <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was prepared according to the method described <strong>by</strong><br />

Yalcinkaya [71] where 10 ml <strong>of</strong> 5% Na-alginate was mixed with 1 ml <strong>of</strong> the fungal spore<br />

suspension. The mixture was introduced into a solution containing 0.1 M CaCl2 with a<br />

syringe with a constant stirring to prevent aggregation <strong>of</strong> the beads. The fungal sporeentrapped<br />

beads (about 2.5 mm in diameter to overcome the anaerobic conditions inside the<br />

large beads [60]) were cured in this solution for 1 h and then washed twice with 200 ml <strong>of</strong><br />

sterile distilled water. The beads with immobilised spores (about 20 ml volume) were then<br />

transferred to the fermentation medium.<br />

Screening<br />

The potential <strong>of</strong> different fungal strains for tannase production was screened in tannic<br />

acid medium composed <strong>of</strong> (g/l): freshly prepared filter-sterilised tannic acid (30g), (NH4)2SO4<br />

(2g), KH2PO4 (0.5g), MgSO4 (2g), and agar agar (30g) [4]. The tannase-producing organisms<br />

were grown according to one <strong>of</strong> the following fermentation protocols.<br />

Enzyme production and fermentation media<br />

(A) Batch cultures<br />

Flasks containing one <strong>of</strong> the following fermentation media were prepared in<br />

triplicates, the initial pH value adjusted to 5.5, and incubated for 96 h at 30°C under static and<br />

shaking conditions (GFL shaking incubator, 150 rpm).<br />

Liquid state fermentation (LSF) medium<br />

Liquid state fermentation (LSF) medium was composed <strong>of</strong> (g/l): freshly prepared<br />

filter-sterilised crude tannin extract (30g), (NH4)2SO4 (2.0g), K2HPO4 (0.5g) and<br />

MgSO4.7H2O (1.0g) in a final volume <strong>of</strong> 50 ml per flask [4]. Medium was inoculated with 1<br />

ml <strong>of</strong> free A. <strong>niger</strong> spore suspension, or with about 20 ml <strong>of</strong> immobilised cells.<br />

Solid state fermentation (SSF)<br />

Five ml <strong>of</strong> LSF medium without any <strong>of</strong> the carbon (crude tannin extract) and nitrogen<br />

((NH4)2SO4) sources were added to 10 g <strong>of</strong> powdered Ficus nitida leaves and inoculated with<br />

1 ml <strong>of</strong> free spore suspension.<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7443


H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

Slurry state fermentation (SlSF)<br />

Similar sets <strong>of</strong> flasks used in SSF were prepared, while an extra amount <strong>of</strong> 45 ml <strong>of</strong><br />

distilled water was added to the medium to set the slurry state condition (SlSF) and then were<br />

inoculated with 1 ml <strong>of</strong> free spore suspension.<br />

(B) Repeated batch cultures<br />

Flasks (LSF) inoculated with immobilised spores were incubated for 120 hours at the<br />

first cycle to allow the mycelium to develop and then the duration <strong>of</strong> each cycle was 48 hour.<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> each run the beads were aseptically filtered, washed thoroughly with 25 ml<br />

saline, acetate buffer (0.2 M, pH 5) and distilled water and then recultivated into 50 ml<br />

aliquots <strong>of</strong> fresh medium.<br />

Enzyme extraction<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> incubation, the cell-free filtrate in LSF was obtained <strong>by</strong> filtering through<br />

Whatman No. 1 filter paper in a Buchner funnel. In SSF and SlSF, a suitable amount <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fermented matter was thoroughly mixed with 10 ml <strong>of</strong> cold distilled water <strong>by</strong> keeping the<br />

flasks on a rotary shaker for 1 h at 200 rpm. The mixture was filtered through muslin cloth<br />

and the filtrate was centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C and served as crude enzyme<br />

preparation. The volume <strong>of</strong> all the enzyme extracts obtained from the different protocols was<br />

restored to 50 ml <strong>by</strong> cold distilled water and served as the crude enzyme preparation.<br />

<strong>Tannase</strong> and protein assays<br />

The activity <strong>of</strong> tannase was estimated according to the method <strong>of</strong> Mondal [41] where<br />

0.5 ml <strong>of</strong> enzyme solution was incubated with 3 ml <strong>of</strong> 1.0% (w/v) tannic acid, in 0.2 M acetate<br />

buffer (pH 5.0) at 40 °C for 30 min. The reaction was terminated <strong>by</strong> transferring the tubes<br />

containing the reaction mixture to an ice bath followed <strong>by</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> 2.0 ml (1%, w/v) <strong>of</strong><br />

bovine serum albumin to precipitate the remaining tannic acid. The precipitate was collected <strong>by</strong><br />

centrifugation (12 x 10 3 g for 15 min) and dissolved in 2 ml sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)triethanolamine<br />

(1.0%, w/v, SDS in 5% v/v, triethanolamine) solution. Absorbency was<br />

measured at 550 nm 15 min after the addition <strong>of</strong> 1.0 ml <strong>of</strong> FeCl3 (0.13 M dissolved in 0.01 N<br />

HCl). Control treatments were performed using heat-killed enzyme. One unit <strong>of</strong> tannase is the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> enzyme capable <strong>of</strong> hydrolysing 1.0 mM min -1 <strong>of</strong> tannic acid under the assay<br />

conditions <strong>by</strong> reference to a standard curve constructed with pure tannic acid [41].<br />

Protein content was determined using bovine serum albumin dissolved in 0.17 M<br />

NaCl as a standard [14].<br />

Chemical analyses<br />

Cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin contents <strong>of</strong> F. nitida' leaves were analysed as<br />

described <strong>by</strong> Jermyn [25] and the total nitrogen was estimated <strong>by</strong> the conventional micro-<br />

Kjeldahl method [33, 48].<br />

Tannin was extracted as described <strong>by</strong> Schanderi [55] and estimated as described <strong>by</strong><br />

Lokeswari [35] adopting the Folin–Denis method where a 50 ml aliquot <strong>of</strong> tannin-containing<br />

solution was mixed with 5 ml <strong>of</strong> Folin–Denis reagent, and then 10 ml <strong>of</strong> 15% (w/v) Na2CO3<br />

solution was added and then diluted to the 100 ml mark with distilled water. After thorough<br />

mixing, the flasks were kept in the dark for 30 minutes at 25°C. The absorbency <strong>of</strong> tannin was<br />

measured spectrophotometrically at 700 nm and its concentration calculated using pure tannic<br />

acid as a standard. Distilled water was used as blank regarding the calibration curve. From<br />

this curve, the concentrations for each sample was obtained and used for the tannin content<br />

calculation.<br />

7444 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

Optimising process parameters for tannase production<br />

Optimising tannase biosynthesis was performed <strong>by</strong> optimizing various physicochemical<br />

process parameters where the optimum condition found for each parameter was<br />

settled for the subsequent experiments. The effect <strong>of</strong> incubation temperature (25 to 45°C) for<br />

different incubation periods (96 to 168 h) at different agitation speeds (125 to 225 rpm) was<br />

explored. Initial pH value <strong>of</strong> the fermentation medium (4 to 7) was adjusted <strong>by</strong> 0.1 M HCl or<br />

NaOH. The effect <strong>of</strong> various initial tannic acid concentrations (2 to 9 g %, w/v) and the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> various mineral salts i.e. Mg, Ba, Ca, Co, Fe, K, Mn, Na and Zn (added as<br />

chlorides), were also optimised.<br />

Partial purification <strong>of</strong> tannase<br />

Partially purified tannase was prepared as previously described <strong>by</strong> Hamdy [23] where<br />

protein content <strong>of</strong> 500 ml <strong>of</strong> crude tannase <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was precipitated overnight with 65%<br />

ammonium sulphate, collected <strong>by</strong> centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 15 min, desalted <strong>by</strong> passing<br />

through a column <strong>of</strong> Sephadex G-25 and then fractionated <strong>by</strong> applying 2 ml to a column<br />

(2.5×82 cm) <strong>of</strong> diethylaminoethyl cellulose (DEAE cellulose, fast flow, fibrous form, Sigma<br />

Chemicals, Germany) for ion-exchange chromatography. 5 ml fractions were eluted with a<br />

linearly increasing molarity <strong>of</strong> NaCl solution (0.0 to 0.5 M) prepared in 0.2-M acetate buffer,<br />

pH 5.0. <strong>Tannase</strong> activity and the protein content <strong>of</strong> each fraction were determined and used to<br />

calculate the corresponding specific activities. Fractions possessing the highest specific<br />

activities were pooled, desalted, lyophilised and used as partially purified tannase in the<br />

experiments <strong>of</strong> reducing tannin.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> tannase in reducing tannin from tea extract and pomegranate juice<br />

50 g <strong>of</strong> fresh pomegranate seeds were washed with distilled water and extracted in 100<br />

ml distilled water using an electric blender. The extract was filtered through muslin cloth and<br />

kept cooled at 4°C.<br />

Tea extract was prepared <strong>by</strong> adding 2 g <strong>of</strong> locally purchased black tea leaves to 100 ml<br />

<strong>of</strong> boiled distilled water, left to stand for 20 minutes and then kept cold at 4°C.<br />

15 ml <strong>of</strong> the tea or pomegranate juice was incubated with 1 ml <strong>of</strong> partially purified<br />

tannase containing 17.32 U/ mg protein at 30°C for different incubation periods (30 to 150<br />

min) under shaking conditions (150 rpm). Tannin content was determined pre and post<br />

incubation with the enzyme.<br />

Statistical validation <strong>of</strong> treatment effects<br />

The mean, standard deviation, Tukey's test “T” and probability "P" values <strong>of</strong> three<br />

replicates <strong>of</strong> the investigated parameters and the control were calculated according to the<br />

mathematical principles described <strong>by</strong> Glantz [21]. Results were considered highly significant,<br />

significant or non-significant where P < 0.01, > 0.01 and < 0.05, and > 0.05, respectively.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, pectin, tannin, nitrogen and protein contents <strong>of</strong> Ficus<br />

nitida’ leaves used in the fermentation medium were determined and the results are given in<br />

Table 1. It is known that the detected amounts are subject to dramatic changes according to<br />

genotype, age <strong>of</strong> plant and leaves, soil fertility and acidity, growing season and methods <strong>of</strong><br />

extraction, drying and assay [3].<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7445


H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

Table 1: Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> Ficus nitida’ leaves.<br />

Chemical composition (%)<br />

Cellulose 1<br />

Hemicellulose 1<br />

Lignin 1<br />

Pectin 1<br />

Tannin 2<br />

Ash<br />

Nitrogen (N) and protein content 3<br />

32.7 21.93 0.71 11.03 15.01 7.5 0.19 0.83 1.02 6.37<br />

Analyses carried out adopting the methods <strong>of</strong> 1 Jermyn, [25] 2 Lokeswari [35], 3 Pirie, [48] and Lexander [33].<br />

<strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> was selected in this study for being classified as GRAS (generally<br />

regarded as safe) and is <strong>of</strong>ficially approved in France for enzyme production for the food<br />

industry [6] where some applications <strong>of</strong> tannase, especially in detanification processes, are<br />

accepted <strong>by</strong> partially purified enzymes [12], which requires a safe source <strong>of</strong> enzyme.<br />

Entrapment in alginate was selected in this study for its highest effectiveness factor (i.e. 1.12<br />

= amounts <strong>of</strong> tannase produced <strong>by</strong> immobilized cells / corresponding amounts produced <strong>by</strong><br />

free cells under the same conditions) versus the other investigated methods, i.e., adsorption to<br />

kieselguhr (0.68), covalent bonding to silica gel beads (0.53) and cross-linking with<br />

glutaraldehyde (0.43). Moreover, alginate gel is characterised <strong>by</strong> its high biodegradability,<br />

hydrophilicity, mechanical stability, rigidity, chemical inertness, ability to bind cells firmly<br />

and high loading capacity [71].<br />

<strong>Tannase</strong> production <strong>by</strong> free or immobilized cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> under static or shaking<br />

conditions, adopting LSF, SSF or SlSF was monitored at different temperatures (25 to 45°C)<br />

for different incubation periods (96 to 168 h) in a bifacatorial design. It was found that 30°C<br />

enabled maximum tannase biosynthesis in all cases and the results <strong>of</strong> the time course<br />

production at 30°C are graphically represented in Fig. 1. The optimum temperature for<br />

tannase production <strong>by</strong> most fungal species is around 30°C [10], while tannase production <strong>by</strong><br />

Trichoderma viride [35] has been maximally recorded at 45°C. Decrease in tannase<br />

biosynthesis <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> above 30°C is in agreement with other findings, such as the sharp<br />

decrease in tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. oryzae and almost no tannase production was detected at<br />

40°C [32].<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> time course <strong>of</strong> tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> in LSF (Fig. 1 a), SSF or<br />

SlSF (Fig. 1 b) at 30°C showed that the maximum biosynthesis achieved after 120 h <strong>of</strong><br />

shaking incubation, and 144 h <strong>of</strong> static incubation. <strong>Production</strong> under shaking conditions was<br />

significantly higher than the static one within the same fermentation protocol. The increased<br />

order <strong>of</strong> enzyme production in relation to different fermentation protocols is as per the<br />

following sequence: SSF (81.5 U 50 ml<br />

7446 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012<br />

-1 ) > Immobilised LSF (77.5 U 50 ml -1 ) > SlF (75.5 U<br />

50 ml -1 ) > Free LSF (69.5 U 50 ml -1 ) (Fig. 1). Therefore, the next stage <strong>of</strong> experiments<br />

focused on the first three for their significant level <strong>of</strong> production as well as representing the<br />

various fermentation protocols. It has been previously found that tannase production <strong>by</strong> A.<br />

<strong>niger</strong> on solid substrates is higher than in LSF (2), where tannase in LSF is partially<br />

intracellular and subsequently secreted into the medium during fermentation, while the<br />

enzyme in SSF is completely secreted out <strong>of</strong> the cells [31]. On the other hand, Srivastava and<br />

Kar [59] stated that extracellular tannase <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was optimally produced in submerged<br />

cultures. Our results (Fig. 1 a) also showed that tannase biosynthesis <strong>by</strong> immobilized cells <strong>of</strong><br />

A. <strong>niger</strong> in either shaking (77.5 U 50ml -1 ) or static (66 U 50 ml -1 ) conditions was significantly<br />

Soluble N<br />

Insoluble N<br />

Total N<br />

Total protein


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

higher (P < 0.01) than that <strong>by</strong> free cells (69.5 & 52.5 U 50 ml -1 , in order). Higher amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

tannase production <strong>by</strong> immobilised cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> and Bacillus licheniformis KBR6<br />

compared to free cells have also been reported [17, 40].<br />

a- LSF<br />

b- SSF and SlSF<br />

Fig. 1. Time course <strong>of</strong> tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> at different incubation periods adopting (a) liquid state<br />

(LSF), (b) solid state (SSF) and slurry state (SlSF) fermentation protocols using crude tannic acid extract and F.<br />

nitida leaves, respectively.<br />

Cultures were incubated for the indicated incubation periods while pH was initially<br />

Adjusted to 5.5 and the velocity <strong>of</strong> shaking, if applied, was 150 rpm.<br />

The data represent the mean <strong>of</strong> 3 different readings and the error bars represent the standard deviation <strong>of</strong> means.<br />

<strong>Tannase</strong> biosynthesis in LSF <strong>by</strong> A. flavus has been maximally recorded after 96 h<br />

[45]; while in SSF P. atramentosum has been maximally recorded after 96 h [56]; A. <strong>niger</strong><br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7447


H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

after 96 h [32], A. <strong>niger</strong> [19], and Paecilomyces variotii, [7] after 120 h; and after 144 h for A.<br />

<strong>niger</strong> ATCC 16620, [54]. Comparison <strong>of</strong> the incubation periods should be undertaken<br />

cautiously even for the same fungal species due to the variation in state <strong>of</strong> the fermentation<br />

and substrate utilised. The recorded decreases in tannase biosynthesis with prolonged<br />

incubation (Fig 1 a & b) could be explained <strong>by</strong> substrate scarcity in the medium, a shift in the<br />

reaction equilibrium due to accumulation <strong>of</strong> gallic acid [27] or an accumulation <strong>of</strong> toxic<br />

metabolities in the fermentation medium.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> shaking velocity on tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was evaluated and<br />

the maximum yield was obtained at 175 rpm for SSF (89.93 U / 50 ml) and SlSF (88.76 U /<br />

50 ml), while 200 rpm was the optimum (86.76 U/50 ml) for LSF inoculated with<br />

immobilized cells (Fig. 2). A concurrent increase in tannase biosynthesis with an increase in<br />

shaking velocity could be due to the enhancement effect <strong>of</strong> shaking on heat, mass and oxygen<br />

transfer capabilities in the fermentation media that minimizes moisture loss and drying in SSF<br />

[27] and overcomes a serious constraint to high enzyme productivity <strong>by</strong> immobilized aerobic<br />

cells where most <strong>of</strong> the interiors <strong>of</strong> large beads may be anaerobic [60]. On the other hand, a<br />

decline in tannase biosynthesis as the velocity <strong>of</strong> shaking increases above the optimum level<br />

could be ascribed to increasing the frequency <strong>of</strong> particle tumbling that disrupts the mycelium<br />

in the early growth stages [36], thus increasing vaculoation <strong>of</strong> older hyphal compartments and<br />

leading to autolysis or weakened hyphae [47] and/or making the mycelium easier to peel <strong>of</strong>f<br />

from the substrate surface [61]. A decrease in enzyme biosynthesis at higher rotation speeds<br />

was more pronounced in SSF and SlSF than in LSF using immobilised cells where the curve<br />

was broader (Fig. 2), most probably, due to the known protective effect <strong>of</strong> the immobilisation<br />

on cells.<br />

Fig. 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> shaking velocity on tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> after 120 h <strong>of</strong> incubation at 30°C, in the<br />

different fermentation protocols (LSF __ ♦ __ , inoculated with immobilized cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong>; SSF __ ■ __ and<br />

SlSF __ ▲ __ inoculated with free cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> and grown on leaves <strong>of</strong> F. nitida) at the indicated velocity <strong>of</strong><br />

shaking. Initial pH <strong>of</strong> the medium was adjusted to 5.5.<br />

7448 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

Maximum tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> (96.11, 114.76, 106.8 U 50 ml -1 for LSF,<br />

SSF, SlSF in order) was optimally recorded at an initial pH <strong>of</strong> 5.0 <strong>of</strong> the fermentation medium<br />

(Fig. 3). Applying different fermentation protocols have so far not been found to shift the<br />

optimum pH value, where a range <strong>of</strong> 4.5 to 6.5 enabled maximum tannase production <strong>by</strong> A.<br />

flavus, A. foetidus, A. japonicus, A. <strong>niger</strong>, A. oryzae, Paecilomyces variotti, Penicillium<br />

atramentosum, P. chrysogenum, grown on tannery solid substrates or in submerged media [1,<br />

6, 7, 27, 50, 56]. It is known that biological surfaces consist <strong>of</strong> different functional groups<br />

that become dissociated if the pH is above a certain value [71]. As shown in Fig. 3, the curve<br />

<strong>of</strong> tannase synthesis in LSF is broader, where a decline in tannase synthesis is lower and the<br />

active pH range is wider than that in SSF and SlSF.<br />

Fig. 3. pH-dependency <strong>of</strong> tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> after 120 h <strong>of</strong> shaking incubation at 30°C in different<br />

fermentation protocols (LSF __ ♦ __ , 200 rpm, inoculated with immobilised cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong>;SSF __ ■ __ , and<br />

SlSF __ ▲ __ , 175 rpm, inoculated with free cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> and grown on leaves <strong>of</strong> F. nitida). Initial pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />

medium was adjusted using 0.1 M HCl or NaOH.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> initial tannin concentration on production <strong>of</strong> tannase <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was<br />

studied and the results showed that maximum productivity was attained at 7% (w/v) in both<br />

LSF (146.10 U 50 ml -1 ) and SSF (190.50 U 50 ml -1 ) and at 6% in SlSF (153.72 U 50 ml -1 ),<br />

representing an increase in production <strong>of</strong> 1.88, 2.34 and 2.04-fold, respectively (Table 2).<br />

Tannin concentration is an important detrimental factor in microbial production <strong>of</strong> tannase<br />

and its optimum concentration for A. <strong>niger</strong> has been recorded at 4%, 5% and 10% <strong>by</strong> Lekha<br />

and Lonsane [31, 32], Aguilar [2] and Sharma [58], respectively, while various concentrations<br />

ranging from 0.5 to 10% have been recorded for other fungal species [10]. A reduction in the<br />

tannase yield at higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> tannin could be due to its toxic effect where it forms<br />

non-reversible bonds with surface proteins <strong>of</strong> the organism [5], deposition <strong>of</strong> gallic acid on<br />

cell surfaces [57], as well as depriving metal ions and substrates on membranes [13, 52] that<br />

impair metabolism, inhibit the organism and decrease tannase production. The ability <strong>of</strong><br />

several fungi to grow and tolerate relatively high tannin concentrations <strong>of</strong> up to 20%, as in A.<br />

<strong>niger</strong> [22], is an advantage for fungi as tannase producers.<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7449


H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

Table 2: The effect <strong>of</strong> varying initial crude tannin concentration on tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> in different<br />

fermentation protocols.<br />

Crude<br />

<strong>Tannase</strong> productivity<br />

tannin<br />

conc. (%)<br />

*<br />

LSF 1 SSF 2 SlSF 3<br />

U 50 ml -1<br />

% U 50 ml -1<br />

% U 50 ml -1 %<br />

3 (control) 96.11 ± 2.21 100 114.76 * ± 4.36 100 109.80 ± 2.74 100<br />

4 123.00 * ± 3.93 128 161.81 * ± 5.17 141 132.86 * ± 4.51 121<br />

5 131.67 * ± 5.13 137 174.43 * ± 6.27 152 133.95 * ± 4.28 122<br />

6 138.39 * ± 2.90 144 182.47 * ± 4.01 159 153.72 * ± 4.45 140<br />

7 146.10 * ± 6.28 152 190.50 * ± 5.90 166 142.74 * ± 5.42 130<br />

8 143.20 * ± 2.72 149 183.62 * ± 7.52 160 131.76 * ± 5.13 120<br />

9 131.67 * ± 3.42 137 161.81 * ± 4.20 141 117.49 * ± 2.70 107<br />

Initial pH <strong>of</strong> the fermentation medium was adjusted to 5.0, and incubated at 30ºC for 120 h with shacking<br />

incubation at: 200 rpm for LSF and 175 rpm for SSF and SlSF.<br />

1 Liquid state fermentation using crude tannic acid extract and inoculated with immobilised A. <strong>niger</strong> cell.<br />

2 , 3 Solid-state and slurry-state fermentations using F. nitida and inoculated with free cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong>. 10 g <strong>of</strong><br />

dried F. nitida’ leaves (15% tannin on dry weight base –Table 1- that equals 3% w/v in the fermentation<br />

medium) were used and higher tannin concentrations were applied to the liquid part <strong>of</strong> the medium.<br />

Significance <strong>of</strong> results was statistically validated compared to the control (3% crude tannin concentration)<br />

where * indicates highly significant difference.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> adding different metal ions at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 g % (w/v)<br />

to the fermentation media was investigated and the results showed that tannase production<br />

was stimulated in the following descending order: Ca<br />

7450 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012<br />

2+ , Mg 2+ , Mn 2+ , Zn 2+ in LSF and SSF,<br />

and Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , Mg 2+ , Zn 2+ in SlSF (Table 3). It has been established that metal ions<br />

significantly affect the progress and efficiency <strong>of</strong> fermentation, secretion <strong>of</strong> active enzymes<br />

and synthesis <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites <strong>by</strong> microorganisms and their ability to attach to their<br />

various substrates [38] <strong>by</strong> affecting the dynamics <strong>of</strong> cell membranes, cell viability,<br />

permeability, membrane fluidity, stability and signalling systems [30]. <strong>Tannase</strong> synthesis <strong>by</strong><br />

A. foetidus, A. japonicas A. <strong>niger</strong> A. oryzae, A. pullulans and R. oryzae are also stimulated <strong>by</strong><br />

Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Mn 2+ and Zn 2+ [1, 4, 8, 28, 62], while tannase synthesis <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> [6] and P.<br />

chrysogenum [50] is inhibited <strong>by</strong> Zn +2 . On the other hand, in the present investigation,<br />

tannase synthesis <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was inhibited in the following descending order: Ba 2+ , Co 2+ ,<br />

Fe 2+ in LSF and Co 2+ , Ba 2+ and Fe 2+ in SSF and SlSF. Ba 2+ and Co 2+ also inhibit tannase<br />

synthesis <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> and A. pullulans [4]. Inhibition mediated <strong>by</strong> Fe 2+ is in agreement with<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> Rajakumar and Nandy [50] and Barthom<strong>eu</strong>f [6] on tannase synthesis <strong>by</strong> A.<br />

<strong>niger</strong>, A. pullulans and P. chrysogenum but disagree with those <strong>of</strong> Banerjee [4] and Trevino-<br />

Cueto [62] on tannase synthesised <strong>by</strong> A. aculeatus and A. <strong>niger</strong>, respectively. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />

some metal ions in the fermentation medium may inhibit tannase synthesis due to their<br />

binding with tannic acid to form insoluble complexes, hence, limiting its bioavailability as a<br />

carbon source and inducer for enzyme synthesis [22]. This assumption was excluded in the<br />

present study where raising the level <strong>of</strong> tannin concentration in the fermentation medium<br />

containing the inhibitory metal salts (i.e. Ba 2+ , Co 2+ , or Fe 2+ ) did not show a significant<br />

enhancement effect on tannase synthesis (P > 0.05, data not shown). On the other hand,<br />

possible inhibition due to the binding <strong>of</strong> tannic acid to metal ions affecting the metal<br />

bioavailability, which in turn affects efficiencies <strong>of</strong> metabolic processes, secretion <strong>of</strong> active<br />

enzymes and the ability <strong>of</strong> the microorganisms to attach to their various substrates [38], was<br />

also ruled out since inhibition <strong>of</strong> tannase synthesis <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was more pronounced at higher<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> Ba 2+ , Co 2+ or Fe 2+ (Table 3). The previous discussion suggests that the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> metals is, most probably, on the activity <strong>of</strong> the secreted tannase rather than on<br />

tannase synthesis itself, consequently affecting the ability <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> to utilize the available<br />

tannin in the medium. Moreover, reduction in tannase productivity at higher concentrations


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

<strong>of</strong> metal ions could be due to the partial denaturation <strong>of</strong> some other important enzymes<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> excessive free ions in the media [63], nonspecific binding or<br />

aggregation <strong>of</strong> the enzyme [28] or possible osmotic stress on the cells.<br />

Table 3: Effect <strong>of</strong> different metal salts at different concentrations on tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> in different<br />

fermentation protocols.<br />

Metal<br />

salt<br />

BaCl2<br />

CaCl2<br />

CoCl2<br />

FeCl2<br />

KCl<br />

MnCl<br />

MgCl2<br />

NaCl<br />

ZnCl2<br />

2<br />

Conc.<br />

(g %,<br />

w/v)<br />

<strong>Tannase</strong> productivity (U 50 ml -1 )<br />

LSF 1 SSF 2 SlSF 3<br />

0.1 60.8 ± 2.37 * 167.64 ± 5.69 * 107.60 ± 4.41 *<br />

0.2 53.2 ± 1.17 * 146.68 ± 3.81 * 83.00 ± 2.15 *<br />

0.3 41.04 ± 0.98 * 131.44 ± 4.86 * 56.87 ± 1.42 *<br />

0.1 296.4 ± 9.18 * 321.94 ± 13.19 * 265.93 ± 9.04 *<br />

0.2 278.16 ± 5.28 * 280.03 ± 8.68 * 232.11 ± 7.42 *<br />

0.3 264.48 ± 11.37 * 253.36 ± 7.34 * 222.89 ± 6.46 *<br />

0.1 136.8 ± 3.83 * 62.865 ± 2.01 * 75.32 ± 2.86 *<br />

0.2 63.84 ± 2.17 * 59.05 ± 2.24 * 58.41 ± 2.27 *<br />

0.3 57.76 ± 2.02 * 36.19 ± 0.83 * 39.96 ± 0.91 *<br />

0.1 141.36 ± 4.09 * 173.35 ± 5.37 * 115.29 ± 3.22 *<br />

0.2 133.76 ± 4.14 * 152.4 ± 5.18 * 107.60 ± 4.19 *<br />

0.3 110.96 ± 4.32 * 133.35 ± 4.26 * 93.77 ± 3.46 *<br />

0.1 151.24 ± 5.44 n 190.5 ± 5.52 n 152.18 ± 5.02 n<br />

0.2 152 ± 4.25 n 192.40 ± 7.50 n 158.33 ± 3.64 n<br />

0.3 155.04 ± 3.25 n 203.84 ± 7.94 156.79 ± 3.29 n<br />

0.1 121.6 ± 4.37 * 169.54 ± 6.61 * 138.35 ± 4.98 *<br />

0.2• 152 ± 5.77 190.5 ± 4.95 153.72 ± 3.38<br />

0.3 232.56 ± 6.27 * 276.23 ± 9.11 * 182.93 ± 5.67 *<br />

0.1 200.64 ± 7.42 * 234.31 ± 5.38 * 201.37 ± 6.24 *<br />

0.2 205.2 ± 3.89 * 262.89 ± 8.41 * 204.45 ± 4.49 *<br />

0.3 212.8 ± 5.32 * 266.7 ± 10.40 * 216.74 ± 9.31 *<br />

0.1 152 ± 4.86 n 190.5 ± 4.00 n 146.03 ± 4.23 **<br />

0.2 165.68 ± 6.79 * 190.5 ± 8.19 n 139.88 ± 4.89 *<br />

0.3 167.2 ± 6.35 * 190.5 ± 3.61 n 138.35 ± 4.70 *<br />

0.1 183.92 ± 5.70 * 211.45 ± 5.49 * 178.32 ± 4.27 *<br />

0.2 196.08 ± 4.50 * 190.5 ± 7.23 n 184.46 ± 7.93 *<br />

0.3 183.92 ± 5.88 * 188.95 ± 6.04 n 179.85 ± 3.95 *<br />

* = highly significant (P < 0.01), ** = significant (P > 0.01 and < 0.05) and n = non significant (P > 0.05) in<br />

comparison to • Control (i.e., the original fermentation medium).<br />

1 Liquid-state fermentation inoculated with immobilised cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> and grown on 7 % crude tannic acid<br />

extract at 30°C, 200 rpm, and 2 , 3 Solid-state and slurry-state fermentations using F. nitida and inoculated with<br />

free cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong>.<br />

The investigated metal salts were separately added at the indicated concentrations to the fermentation media. No<br />

growth was determined in the presence <strong>of</strong> HgCl2 or PbCl2. Initial pH was adjusted to 5 with ammonium<br />

hydroxide instead <strong>of</strong> NaOH to prevent the interference from sodium ions.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> adding all the possible combinations <strong>of</strong> Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ and Zn 2+ ,<br />

considered as stimulators <strong>of</strong> tannase biosynthesis <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong>, to the fermentation media was<br />

investigated and the results showed that any such combination enhanced the levels <strong>of</strong> tannase<br />

synthesis at variable significant levels (Table 4). The maximum stimulatory effect was<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7451


H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

attained in the presence <strong>of</strong> Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ and Zn 2+ with a 2.9 (451 U 50 ml -1 ), 2.4 (457.2<br />

U 50 ml -1 ) and 2.1 (324.3 U 50 ml -1 ) fold increment in tannase synthesis in LSF, SSF and<br />

SlSF, respectively. Optimising the mineral nutrition requirements in the fermentation media<br />

for tannase synthesis <strong>by</strong> different microorganisms enhanced the yield at different levels, i.e.,<br />

<strong>by</strong> 2.8 (A. aculeatus), and 1.9 (A. pullulans) fold [4] and 4 fold in the case <strong>of</strong> B. licheniformis<br />

[39]. The exerted stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> the combinations <strong>of</strong> metallic salts on tannase synthesis<br />

<strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> is the net result <strong>of</strong> the interactions between the available metals either in a<br />

synergetic or antagonistic manner. For example, a balanced mixture <strong>of</strong> K 2+ and Mg 2+ salts<br />

enhances tannase synthesis <strong>by</strong> B. licheniformis [39] while the stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> Ca 2+ on<br />

tannase production <strong>by</strong> yeasts declines at higher concentrations due to the known antagonistic<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> calcium on magnesium uptake and its consequent effect on some essential magnesiumdependent<br />

metabolic processes [66]. Moreover, the known depressive effect <strong>of</strong> Mn 2+ on<br />

respiration, nucleic acid synthesis and proteins synthesis can be antagonised <strong>by</strong> Ca 2+ [70].<br />

Repeated batch culture<br />

The efficiency <strong>of</strong> the immobilised A. <strong>niger</strong> for tannase production in a repeated batch<br />

process was evaluated in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks and the productivity over 7 cycles is given<br />

in Fig. 4. Significant amounts <strong>of</strong> tannase were produced up to the 5 th cycle (266.54 U 50 ml -1 ,<br />

representing 59% <strong>of</strong> the production at the 1 st cycle), while almost stable amounts were<br />

produced during the first 3 cycles. In this respect, immobilised cultures <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> have<br />

exhibited significant tannase production stability <strong>of</strong> two repeated runs [17], while tannase<br />

production <strong>by</strong> immobilised cells <strong>of</strong> B. licheniformis have been demonstrated to be successful<br />

for up to 13 cycles, with its maximum level being reached at the 3 rd cycle [40].<br />

Table 4: The effect <strong>of</strong> adding different mixtures <strong>of</strong> metal salts on tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> in different<br />

fermentation protocols<br />

Minerals 1<br />

<strong>Tannase</strong> productivity (U 50 ml -1 LSF<br />

)<br />

SSF SlSF<br />

(Original Medium) Control 152 190.5 153.7 (100)<br />

Ca 2+ 296.4 ± 8.00 * 321.95 ± 12.55 * 265.90 ± 5.84 *<br />

Mg 2+ 232.56 ± 6.97 * 276.23 ± 9.94 * 182.90 ± 6.95 *<br />

Mn 2+ 212.8 ± 5.10 * 266.7 ± 8.26 * 216.72 ± 4.11 *<br />

Zn 2+ 196.1 ± 8.43 * 211.46 ± 5.92 * 184.44 ± 6.27 *<br />

Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ 375.44 ± 13.14 * 329.56 ± 9.55 * 276.66 ± 8.57 *<br />

Ca 2+ + Mn 2+ 320.72 ± 8.02 * 346.71 ± 11.09 * 290.49 ± 11.91 *<br />

Ca 2+ + Zn 2+ 314.64 ± 11.95 * 323.85 ± 10.03 * 272.05 ± 6.25 *<br />

Mg 2+ + Mn 2+ 264.48 ± 10.31 * 304.8 ± 10.97 * 233.62 ± 6.54 *<br />

Mg 2+ + Zn 2+ 255.36 ± 5.36 * 297.18 ± 10.99 * 210.57 ± 4.00 *<br />

Mn 2+ + Zn 2+ 258.4 ± 9.30 * 291.47 ± 11.07 * 230.55 ± 6.22 *<br />

Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ + Mn 2+ 351.12 ± 13.69 * 379.10 ± 8.34 * 282.81 ± 6.78 *<br />

Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ + Zn 2+ 319.2 ± 9.89 * 342.9 ± 6.51 * 276.66 ± 11.89 *<br />

Ca 2+ + Mn 2+ + Zn 2+ 349.6 ± 10.13 * 375.29 ± 11.63 * 305.86 ± 11.92 *<br />

Mg 2+ + Mn 2+ + Zn 2+ 270.56 ± 7.57 * 302.90 ± 10.29 * 233.62 ± 8.17 *<br />

Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ + Mn 2+ + Zn 2+ 451.44 ± 16.25 * 457.2 ± 12.80 * 324.31 ± 10.54 *<br />

1<br />

Added at the optimum concentration enabled maximum tannase synthesis shown in Table 3<br />

*<br />

highly significant (P < 0.01) in comparison to control<br />

Significant production over repeated cycles could be due to long term cell viability,<br />

reducing the damage <strong>of</strong> fungal mycelia and continuous metabolic activities that are known to<br />

be advantages for immobilised cells [17]. The observed decrease in enzyme productivity after<br />

several cycles could be attributable to the high growth <strong>of</strong> biomass, increasing cell density<br />

7452 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

and/or the presence <strong>of</strong> dead cells that cause diffusional limitation <strong>of</strong> oxygen, substrate and<br />

product inside and out <strong>of</strong> the beads, in addition to the mass transfer limitation that is still the<br />

major drawback in the application <strong>of</strong> an entrapment technique [68].<br />

Total activity (U / 50 ml)<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> cycle<br />

Fig. 4. Repeated batch culture for tannase production using immobilised cells <strong>of</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong><br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> tannins in human food and animal forages reduces<br />

the nutritive value [22] and has serious health implications [15]. Biological processes reduce<br />

the antinutritional effects <strong>of</strong> tannin and improve digestibility <strong>by</strong> adopting tannase preparations<br />

or various tannase-producing fungal strains [42]. Meanwhile, the fermentation residue<br />

resulting from SSF for tannase production is an agricultural waste that has already been<br />

detannified and may represent an extra added value if used in animal feed. To this end, tannin<br />

and protein contents <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>of</strong> F. nitida were monitored throughout fermentation and<br />

the results are given in Fig. 5 which show that tannin levels reduced <strong>by</strong> 27.33 % after 120 h <strong>of</strong><br />

fermentation. A reduction in tannin content due to fermentation <strong>by</strong> A. oryzae and B.<br />

licheniforms utilising different substrates range from 0.1 %, (Psidium guazava), 20 to 35%<br />

(Acacia auriculiformis, Casuarina equisetifolia and Delonix regia); and up to 53 to 75%<br />

(Anacardium occidentale, Cassia fistula, Eucalyptus tereticornis, and Ficus benghalensis)<br />

[34, 39]. Meanwhile, 90% <strong>of</strong> the tannin content <strong>of</strong> creosote bush plant materials is degraded<br />

<strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> [9]. Such variations in tannin biodegradation and digestibility depend on the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> leaves, fungi and fermentation times. The residual amount <strong>of</strong> tannin in the<br />

fermentation residue <strong>of</strong> F. nitida (10.90 %) might benefit ruminants <strong>by</strong> protecting proteins<br />

from microbial deamination and preventing bloats [22]. Meanwhile, in the present study, the<br />

protein content <strong>of</strong> F. nitida leaves increased <strong>by</strong> 24.33 % after 120 h <strong>of</strong> incubation before<br />

decreasing (Fig 5). This decrease in tannase biosynthesis could be because <strong>of</strong> changes in the<br />

prevailing conditions and physiology <strong>of</strong> the fungus where protein serves as a substrate. The<br />

protein content <strong>of</strong> creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) and tar bush (Flourensia cernua) used in<br />

SSF for tannase production <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> PSH and GH1 has been shown to increase <strong>by</strong> 30% and<br />

11 %, and 0.62%, 0.76%, respectively [9].<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7453


Total protein (%)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

Total tannin (%)<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

Total Protein (%) Tannin (%)<br />

0 24 48 72 96 120 144<br />

Incubation time (h)<br />

Fig. 5: Changes in tannin and protein contents <strong>of</strong> the fermented F. nitida' leaves used for the production <strong>of</strong><br />

tannase <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong>.<br />

Possible applications <strong>of</strong> the partially purified tannase produced <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong> was<br />

investigated <strong>by</strong> reducing tannin levels in tea extract and pomegranate juice. 55% <strong>of</strong> tannin<br />

was hydrolysed after 30 minutes <strong>of</strong> treating tea extract with A. <strong>niger</strong> tannase, while 45 % was<br />

removed from pomegranate juice after 120 minutes (Table 5). <strong>Tannase</strong> from P.<br />

atramentosum has been shown to reduce 38% <strong>of</strong> jamum wine; 43.5% <strong>of</strong> grape wine and 74%<br />

<strong>of</strong> tea extract after 3 h at 35° C [56] while 25% <strong>of</strong> tannin content <strong>of</strong> pomegranate juice has<br />

been reported to be reduced [53].<br />

Table (5): Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> tannin content <strong>of</strong> tea extract and pomegranate juice with treatment <strong>of</strong> partially purified<br />

tannase from A. <strong>niger</strong><br />

Incubation time<br />

(Minutes)<br />

7454 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

% Tannin hydrolysis<br />

Tea extract Pomegranate<br />

0 100 % (175.12 µg ml -1 ) 100 % (975 µg ml -1 )<br />

30 22 17<br />

60 29 21<br />

90 38 32<br />

120 55 45<br />

150 55 44<br />

1 ml <strong>of</strong> the partially purified tannase containing 17.32 U/ mg protein was incubated at 30° C in a rotary<br />

shaker (150 rpm) with 15 ml <strong>of</strong> tea extract or pome granate juice at pH 5 for the indicated time periods.<br />

Concluding remarks<br />

In the present work, we report for the first time the production <strong>of</strong> tannase <strong>by</strong> A. <strong>niger</strong><br />

using F. nitida leaves and crude tannic acid extract as a cost-effective alternative to largescale<br />

production where pure tannic acid is a very costly substrate. The optimum temperature<br />

for tannase production was recorded at 30°C, indicating A. <strong>niger</strong> as a suitable candidate for<br />

5<br />

0


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

tannase production at room temperature using F. nitida leaves in tropical countries such as<br />

Egypt with minor control processes where much <strong>of</strong> the necessary energy cost can be reduced.<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> tannase production (incubation period, incubation temperature, shaking<br />

velocity, initial pH, initial tannic acid concentration and mineral nutritional requirements)<br />

were optimised and increased production <strong>by</strong> 5.82, 5.61, and 4.29 fold in LSF, SSF, SlSF,<br />

respectively. Moreover, suitability <strong>of</strong> the SSF residue as a candidate for animal feed is<br />

suggested for further research. We also demonstrated the potentiality <strong>of</strong> the partially purified<br />

tannase for application in the removal <strong>of</strong> tannin from tea extract and pomegranate juice.<br />

References<br />

1. M. A. ABDEL-NABEY, A. A. SHERIEF, A. B. EL-TANASH, Tannin biodegradation and some<br />

factors affecting <strong>Tannase</strong> production <strong>by</strong> two <strong>Aspergillus</strong> sp. Biotechnology. 10(2): 149-158 (2011).<br />

2. C. N.AGUILAR, C. AUGUR, E. FAVELA, Z. VINIEGRA-GONZALEZ, <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> tannase <strong>by</strong><br />

<strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> Aa-20 in submerged and solid-state fermentation: influence <strong>of</strong> glucose and tannic<br />

acid. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 296-302 (2001).<br />

3. I. T. BALDWIN, J. C. SCHULTZ, D. WARD, Patterns and sources <strong>of</strong> leaf tannin variation in yellow<br />

birch (Betula allegheniensis) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum). J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1069-1078 (1987).<br />

4. S. D. BANERJEE, Microbial production <strong>of</strong> tannase and gallic acid. Ph. D. Thesis, Vidyasagar<br />

University, India. (2005).<br />

5. D. Banerjee, K.C. Mondal, B.R. Pati <strong>Tannase</strong> production <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> aculeatus DBF9 through solidstate<br />

fermentation. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 54(2):159-66 (2007).<br />

6. C. BARTHOMEUF, F. Regerat, H. Pourrat, <strong>Production</strong>, purification and characterization <strong>of</strong> a tannase<br />

from A. <strong>niger</strong> LCF8. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 77(3): 320-323 (1994).<br />

7. V. BATTESTIN, G.A. MACEDO, Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature, pH and additives on the activity <strong>of</strong> tannase<br />

produced <strong>by</strong> Paecilomyces variotii. Elec. J. Biotechnol. Vol. 10(2): 191 -199 (2007).<br />

8. R. BELMARES, J.C. CONTRERAS-ESQUIVEL, R. RODRÍGUEZ- HERRERA, A. RAMÍREZ-<br />

CORONEL, C.N. AGUILAR, Microbial production <strong>of</strong> tannase: an enzyme with potential use in food<br />

industry. Lebensm. Wiss. U.- Technol. 37: pp. 857 – 864 (2004).<br />

9. R. BELMARES, Y. GARZA, R. RODRÍGUEZ, J. CONTRERAS-ESQUIVEL, C. Aguilar,<br />

Composition and fungal degradation <strong>of</strong> tannins present in semiarid plants. Electronic J. Environ. Agric.<br />

Food Chem. 8(7), 512-518 (2009).<br />

10. P. D. BELUR, G. MUGERAYA, Microbial production <strong>of</strong> tannase: State <strong>of</strong> the art. Res. J. Microbiol. 6,<br />

25-40 (2011).<br />

11. V. BENIWAL, V. CHHOKAR, Statistical optimization <strong>of</strong> culture conditions for <strong>Tannase</strong> production <strong>by</strong><br />

<strong>Aspergillus</strong> awamori MTCC 9299 under submerged fermentation. Asian J. Biotechnol. 2(1), 46-52<br />

(2010).<br />

12. R. BHARDWAJ, B. SINGH, T.K. BHAT, Purification and characterization <strong>of</strong> tannin acyl hydrolase<br />

from <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> MTCC 2425. J. Basic Microbiol. 43, 449-461 (2003).<br />

13. T.K. BHAT, H.P. MAKKAR, B. SINGH, Preliminary studies on tannin degradation <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong><br />

<strong>niger</strong> van Tieghem MTCC 2425. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 22-23 (1997).<br />

14. M. M. BRADFORD, A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation <strong>of</strong> Microgram Quantities <strong>of</strong><br />

Protein Utilizing the Principle <strong>of</strong> Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 72. pp. 248 – 254 (1976).<br />

15. K.T. CHANG, T.Y. WONG, C.I. WEI, Y.W. HUANG, Y. LIN, Tannins and human health: a review.<br />

Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 38(6), 421-464 (1998).<br />

16. M. CHAVEZ-GONZALEZ, L.V. RODRIGUEZ-DURAN, N. BALAGURUSAMY, A. PRADO-<br />

BARRAGAN, R. RODRIGUEZ, J. CONTRERAS, C.N. AGUILAR, Biotechnological advances and<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> tannase: An overview. Food Bioprocess Technol. Published online first. DOI<br />

1001007/s11947-011-0608-5 (2011).<br />

17. I. DARAH, G. SUMATHI, K. JAIN, S.H. LIM, <strong>Tannase</strong> enzyme production <strong>by</strong> entrapped cells <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> FELT FT3 in submerged culture system. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 19(13), 1-7 (2011).<br />

18. A. DE-GREGORIO, G. MANDALARI, N. ARENA, F. NUCITA, M.M. TRIPODO, R.B. Lo CURTO,<br />

SCP and crude pectinase production <strong>by</strong> slurry-state fermentation <strong>of</strong> lemon pulps. Biores. Technol. 83,<br />

89-94 (2002).<br />

19. M.Z. EL-FOULY, Z. EL-AWAMRY, A.M. SHAHIN, H. EL-BIALY, E. NAEEM, G. EL-SAEED,<br />

Biosynthesis and characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> AUMC 4301 tannase. J. American Sci., 6(12), 709-<br />

721 (2010).<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7455


H. S. HAMDY AND E. M. FAWZY<br />

20. A. GATHON, Z. GROSS, M. ROZHANSKI, Propyl gallate: enzymatic synthesis in a reverse micelle<br />

system. Enzyme Microb Technol. 11, 604-9 (1989).<br />

21. AS. Glantz, Primer <strong>of</strong> biostatistics. McGraw Hill, Inc., USA. pp. 2-18 (1992).<br />

22. G. Goel, A. Puniya, C. Aguilar, K. Singh, Interaction <strong>of</strong> gut micr<strong>of</strong>lora with tannins in feeds.<br />

Naturwissenschaften, 92(11), 497-503 (2005).<br />

23. H. S. Hamdy, Purification and characterization <strong>of</strong> a newly isolated stable long-life tannase produced <strong>by</strong> F.<br />

subglutinans (Wollenweber and Reinking) Nelson et al. J. Pharm. Innov. 3(3), 142-151 (2008).<br />

24. E. Haslam, J.N. Tanner, Spectrophotometric assay <strong>of</strong> tannase. Phytochem; 90, 2305-2309 (1970).<br />

25. M. A. Jermyn, Cellulose and hemicellulose. In: Peach K., Tracey M. V., Eds., Modern Methods <strong>of</strong> Plant<br />

Analysis. 2, 197-224 (1955).<br />

26. C.S. Jun, M.J. Yoo, W.Y. Lee, K.C. Kwak, M.S. Bae, W.T. Hwang, D. H. SON, K.Y. Chai, Ester derivatives from<br />

tannase-treated prunioside A and their anti-inflammatory activities. Bull Korean Chem. Soc. 28, 73-76 (2007).<br />

27. B. Kar, R. Banerjee, B.C. Bhattacharya, Microbial production <strong>of</strong> gallic acid <strong>by</strong> modified solid state<br />

fermentation., J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 23,173-7. (1999).<br />

28. B. Kar, R. Banerjee, BC. Bhattacharyya, Effect <strong>of</strong> additives on the behavioural properties <strong>of</strong> tannin acyl<br />

hydrolase. Process Biochem. 38,1285-93 (2003).<br />

29. J. Kitajima, K. Kimizuka, Constituents <strong>of</strong> Ficus pumila leaves. Chem. Pharm. Bull. Tokyo, 46(10), 1647-<br />

1649 (1998).<br />

30. R.P. Learmonth, E. Gratton, Assessment <strong>of</strong> membrane fluidity in individual yeast cells <strong>by</strong> Laurdan<br />

Generalised polarization and multi-photon scanning fluorescence microscopy, In: Fluorescence<br />

Spectroscopy, Imaging and probes- New tools in Chemical, Physical and life science, Springer Series on<br />

Fluorescence: Methods and Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, 2, 241-252. (2002).<br />

31. P.K. Lekha, B.K. Lonsane, Comparative titers, location and properties <strong>of</strong> tannin acyl hydrolase produced <strong>by</strong><br />

<strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> PKL 104 in solid state, liquid surface and submerged fermentation. Process Biochem. 29,<br />

497-503. (1994).<br />

32. P.K. LEKHA, B.K. LONSANE, <strong>Production</strong> and application <strong>of</strong> tannin acyl hydrolase. State <strong>of</strong> the art. Adv.<br />

Appl. Microbiol. 44, 215-260 (1997).<br />

33. K. LEXANDER, E. CARLSSON, V. SCHALEN, A. SINONSSON, T. LUNDBORG, Quantities and<br />

qulaities <strong>of</strong> leaf protein concentrates from wild species and crop species grown under controlled conditions.<br />

Ann. App. Biol. 66(2), 193-216 (1970).<br />

34. N. LOKESWARI, <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> tannase through submerged fermentation <strong>of</strong> tannin-containing cashew husk<br />

<strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> oryzae. Rasayan J. Chem. 3(1), 32-37 (2010).<br />

35. N. LOKESWARI, K. JAYA-RAJU, S. POLA, V. BOBBARALA, Tannin acyl hydrolase from<br />

Trichoderma viride. Int. J. Chemical and Analytical Science. 1(5), 106-109 (2010).<br />

36. B. K. LONSANE, N.P. GHILDYAL, S. BUDIATMAN, S.V. RAMAKRISHNA, Engineering aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

solid-state fermentation. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 7, 258-265 (1985).<br />

37. M.J. LU, C. CHEN, Enzymatic modification <strong>by</strong> tannase increases the antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> green tea. Food<br />

Res. Int. 41, 130-137 (2008).<br />

38. M. MCDONALD, I. MILA, A. SCALBERT, Precipitation <strong>of</strong> metal ions <strong>by</strong> plant polyphenols: optimal<br />

conditions and origin <strong>of</strong> precipitation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44, 599-606 (1996).<br />

39. P.K. MOHAPATRA, K.C. MONDAL, B.K. PATI, <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> tannase through submerged fermentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> tannin-containing plant extracts <strong>by</strong> Bacillus lichiniformis KBR6. Polish J. Microbiol. 55(4), 297-<br />

301(2006).<br />

40. P.K.D. MOHAPATRA, K.C. MONDAL, B.R. PATI, <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> tannase <strong>by</strong> the immobilized cells <strong>of</strong><br />

Bacillus licheniformis KBR6 in Ca-alginate beads. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102(6), 1462-1467 (2007).<br />

41. K.C. MONDAL, D. BANERJEE, R. BANERJEE, B.R. Pati, <strong>Production</strong> and characterization <strong>of</strong> tannase<br />

from Bacillus cer<strong>eu</strong>s KBR9. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 47, pp. 263 – 267 (2001).<br />

42. O.M. NUERO, F. REYES, Enzymes for animal feeding from Penicillium chrysogenum mycelial wastes<br />

from penicillin manufacture. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 34(6), 413-416 (2002).<br />

43. A. PANDEY, Solid state fermentation: An overview. In: Solid-state fermentation, A. Pandey (Ed.), Wiley<br />

Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, India, PP, 3-10(1994).<br />

44. A. PANDEY, P. SELVAKUMAR, C.R. SOCCOL, P. NIGAM, Solid-state fermentation for the production<br />

<strong>of</strong> industrial enzymes. Curr. Sci. 77: 146-162 (1999).<br />

45. R. PARANTHAMAN, R.R. VIDYALAKSHMI, S. MURUGESH, K. SINGARAVADIV, Optimization <strong>of</strong><br />

fermentation conditions for production <strong>of</strong> tannase enzyme <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> oryzae using sugarcane bagasse<br />

and rice straw. Global J. Biotechnol. Biochemist., 3, 105-110 (2008).<br />

46. R. PARANTHAMAN, R. VIDYALAKSHMI, S. MURUGESH, K. SINGARAVADIVE, Effects <strong>of</strong> fungal<br />

co-culture for the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> tannase and gallic acid from grape wastes under solid state fermentation.<br />

Glob. J Biotechnol. Biochem. 4(1), 29-36 (2009).<br />

7456 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> van Tiegh<br />

Adopting Different Fermentation Protocols and Possible Applications<br />

47. G.C. PAUL, C.A. KENT, C.R. THOMAS, Hyphal vaculoation and fragmentation in Penicillium<br />

chrysogenum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44 655-660 (1994).<br />

48. N.W. PIRIE, Proteins in modern methods <strong>of</strong> plant analysis. FIZCL. Biokhim. Kul't Rast., 8(6) 619-625. [C.<br />

F. Chemical Abstract., 86(9), 52761 (1955).<br />

49. J.S. PUROHIT, J.R. DUTTA, R.K. NANDA, R. BANERJEE, Strain improvement for tannase production<br />

from co-culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> foetidus and Rhizopus oryzae. Biores Technol; 97,795-801 (2006).<br />

50. G.S. RAJAKUMAR, S.C. NANDY, Isolation, purification, and some properties <strong>of</strong> Penicillium chrysogenum<br />

tannase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46, 525-527 (1983).<br />

51. S.V. RAMAKRISHNA, R.S. PRAKASHAM, Microbial fermentatioins with immobilized cells. Curr. Sci.<br />

77, 87-100 (1999).<br />

52. J.D. REED, Nutritional toxicology <strong>of</strong> tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes. J. Animal Sci.<br />

73(5), 1516-28 (1995).<br />

53. S. ROUT, R. BANERJEE, <strong>Production</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> under mSSF and its application in fruit juice debittering.<br />

Ind. J. Biotechnol. 5, 346-350 (2006).<br />

54. A. SABU, A. PANDEY, M. JAAFAR-DAUD, G. SZAKACS, Tamarind seed powder and palm kernel<br />

cake: two novel agro residues for the production <strong>of</strong> tannase under solid state fermentation <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong><br />

<strong>niger</strong> ATCC 16620. Bioresource Technology. 96, 1223–1228 (2005).<br />

55. S.H. SCHANDERI, Methods in Food Analysis. Academic Press. New York. P, 709 (1970).<br />

56. M. SELWAL, A. YADAV, K. SELWAL, N.K. AGGARWAL, K. GUPTA, S.K. GAUTAM, <strong>Tannase</strong><br />

production <strong>by</strong> Penicillium atramentosum KM under SSF and its applications in wine clarification and tea<br />

cream solubilization. Braz. J. Microbiol. 42, 374-387 (2011).<br />

57. M. SETH, S. CHAND, Biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tannase</strong> and hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> tannins to gallic acid <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong><br />

awamori- optimization <strong>of</strong> process parameters. Proc. Biochem. 36, 39-44 (2000).<br />

58. S. SHARMA, L. AGARWAL, R.K. SAXENA, Statistical optimization for tannase production from<br />

<strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong> under submerged fermentation. Indian J. Microbiol. 47, pp. 132 – 138 (2007).<br />

59. A. SRIVASTAVA, R. KAR, Characterization and application <strong>of</strong> tannase produced <strong>by</strong> <strong>Aspergillus</strong> <strong>niger</strong><br />

ITCC 6514.07 on pomegranate rind. Braz. J. Microbiol. 40, 782-789 (2009)<br />

60. K. STORMO, R. CRAWFORD, Preparation <strong>of</strong> encapsulated microbial cells for environmental applications.<br />

App. Environ. Microbiol. 58 (2), 727-730 (1992).<br />

61. D.M. STUART, D.A. MITCHELL, J.D. JOHNS, LITSTER, Solid-state fermentation in rotating drum<br />

bioreactors: operating variables affect performance through their effects on transport phenomena.<br />

Biotechnol. Bioeng. 63, 383-391 (1999).<br />

62. B. TREVINO-CUETO, M. LUIS, J.C. CONTRERAS-ESQUIVEL, R. RODRIGUEZ, A. AGUILERA,<br />

C.N. AGUILAR, Gallic acid and tannase accumulation during fungal solid state culture <strong>of</strong> a tannin-rich<br />

desert plant (Larrea tridentata Cov.). Biores. Technol. 98, 721-724 (2007).<br />

63. R. TUNGA, R. BANERJEE, B.C. BHATTACHARYYA, Optimization <strong>of</strong> n variable biological experiments<br />

<strong>by</strong> evolutionary operation-factorial design technique. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 87(2), 125-131. (1999).<br />

64. G. URBANO, M. LOPEZ-JURADO, J.M. PORRES, S. FREJNAGEL, E. GOMEZ-VILLALVA, J. FRIAS,<br />

C. VIDALVALVERDE, P.ARANDA, Effect <strong>of</strong> treatment with α-galactosidase, <strong>Tannase</strong> or a cell-walldegrading<br />

enzyme complex on the nutritive utilization <strong>of</strong> protein and carbohydrates from pea (Pisum sativum<br />

L.) flour. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87, 1356-1363. (2007).<br />

65. J. VAN DE LAGEMAAT, D.L. PYLE, Solid state fermentation and bioremediation: development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

continuous process for the production <strong>of</strong> fungal tannase. Chem. Engin. J. 84, 115-123. (2001).<br />

66. G. WALKER, R. DE NICOLA, S. ANTHONY, R. Learmonth, Yeast-metal interactions: impact on brewing<br />

and distilling Asia Pacific Section. 19-24 March, Hobart, Tasmania. (2006)<br />

67. H.H. WANG, A review: Development and/or reclamation <strong>of</strong> bioresources with solid state fermentation.<br />

Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. Roc (B). 23(2), 45-61. (1999).<br />

68. X. WANG, Z GAI, B. YU, J. FENG, C. XU, Y. YUAN, Z. LIN, P. XU, Degradation <strong>of</strong> carbazole <strong>by</strong><br />

microbial cells immobilized in magnetic gellan gum gel beads. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73(20), 6421-6428<br />

(2007).<br />

69. H.H. WEETAL, Enzymatic gallic acid esterification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 27, 124-127 (1985).<br />

70. E.D. WEINBERG, Roles <strong>of</strong> metallic ions in host-parasite interactions. Bacteriol. Reviews. 30(1), 136-151<br />

(1966).<br />

71. Y. YALCINKAYA, M.Y. ARICA, L. SOYSAL, A. DENIZLI, O. GENC, S. BEKTAS, Cadmium and<br />

mercury uptake <strong>by</strong> immobilized Pl<strong>eu</strong>rotus sapidus. Turk J. Chem. 26, 441-452 (2002).<br />

Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012 7457

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!