Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum
Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum
Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
_____________________________________________________________<br />
interested in paying the costs for saving the financial system as such. The banking sector<br />
would not endogenize those costs without state intervention.<br />
3. OLD EXPROPRIATION DOCTRINES AND THE NEW NARROW EXPRO-<br />
PRIATION CONCEPT<br />
3.1 The role of the German judicial system<br />
The public-private law divide that characterises the German legal order has had an<br />
impact on the evolution of the case law and the conceptual framework in the realm of prop-<br />
erty law. The judicial review of administrative regulatory measures and actions pertaining<br />
to expropriation fall within the jurisdiction of administrative courts. In case of dispute re-<br />
specting the amount of compensation for expropriation, however, recourse is had to the<br />
civil courts (Article 14.3 sentence 3 of the Basic Law). Both courts have to deal with prop-<br />
erty law and to consider when a legal violates the fundamental right to property and when<br />
compensation must be paid. Additionally, as the Federal Constitutional Court has jurisdic-<br />
tion on questions about whether statutes, court decisions and administrative measures are<br />
consistent and in conformity with the Basic Law, the Federal Constitutional Court has to<br />
deal in particular with the constitutional concept of property and the function of private<br />
property as an indispensable legal institution. The obligation incumbent on the Federal<br />
Constitutional Court to act as a guardian over the Basic Law exists vis-à-vis all measures of<br />
German public authority, in principle also to those which give rise to the domestic applica-<br />
tion of Community and Union law 79 transpose 80 or perform Community and Union law.<br />
Therefore, all three jurisdictions have had to develop their own interpretation of the consti-<br />
79 See BVerfGE 89, 155 ; 123, 267 ),<br />
80 See BVerfGE 113, 273 ; 118, 79 ; BVerfG, judgment of the First Senate of 2 March 2010 - 1 BvR<br />
256/08, 1 BvR 263/08, 1 BvR 586/08 -, NJW 2010, p. 833 .<br />
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
Copyleft – Ius Publicum<br />
42