30.09.2013 Views

Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum

Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum

Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

_____________________________________________________________<br />

interested in paying the costs for saving the financial system as such. The banking sector<br />

would not endogenize those costs without state intervention.<br />

3. OLD EXPROPRIATION DOCTRINES AND THE NEW NARROW EXPRO-<br />

PRIATION CONCEPT<br />

3.1 The role of the German judicial system<br />

The public-private law divide that characterises the German legal order has had an<br />

impact on the evolution of the case law and the conceptual framework in the realm of prop-<br />

erty law. The judicial review of administrative regulatory measures and actions pertaining<br />

to expropriation fall within the jurisdiction of administrative courts. In case of dispute re-<br />

specting the amount of compensation for expropriation, however, recourse is had to the<br />

civil courts (Article 14.3 sentence 3 of the Basic Law). Both courts have to deal with prop-<br />

erty law and to consider when a legal violates the fundamental right to property and when<br />

compensation must be paid. Additionally, as the Federal Constitutional Court has jurisdic-<br />

tion on questions about whether statutes, court decisions and administrative measures are<br />

consistent and in conformity with the Basic Law, the Federal Constitutional Court has to<br />

deal in particular with the constitutional concept of property and the function of private<br />

property as an indispensable legal institution. The obligation incumbent on the Federal<br />

Constitutional Court to act as a guardian over the Basic Law exists vis-à-vis all measures of<br />

German public authority, in principle also to those which give rise to the domestic applica-<br />

tion of Community and Union law 79 transpose 80 or perform Community and Union law.<br />

Therefore, all three jurisdictions have had to develop their own interpretation of the consti-<br />

79 See BVerfGE 89, 155 ; 123, 267 ),<br />

80 See BVerfGE 113, 273 ; 118, 79 ; BVerfG, judgment of the First Senate of 2 March 2010 - 1 BvR<br />

256/08, 1 BvR 263/08, 1 BvR 586/08 -, NJW 2010, p. 833 .<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Copyleft – Ius Publicum<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!